Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheet. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents represent cash held in banks, cash on hand, and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company may have bank balances in excess of federally insured amounts; however, the Company deposits its cash and cash equivalents with high credit-quality institutions to minimize credit risk exposure. The Company did not hold cash equivalents as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. Restricted Cash As of December 31, 2018, restricted cash consists of $0.9 million of cash received for subscriptions prior to the date in which the subscriptions are effective. The Company’s restricted cash is primarily held in a bank account controlled by the Company’s transfer agent but in the name of the Company. Organization and Offering Expenses Subsequent to the release of offering proceeds from escrow, organization costs are expensed as incurred and recorded as a component of General and Administrative Expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and offering costs are charged to equity as such amounts are The Advisor has agreed to advance organization and offering expenses on behalf of the Company (including legal, accounting, and other expenses attributable to the organization, but excluding upfront selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees) through the first anniversary of the date on which escrow was released. The Advisor has also agreed to advance all of the Company’s operating expenses incurred from July 13, 2017 (date of initial capitalization) through December 31, 2018. The Company will reimburse the Advisor for all such advanced expenses ratably over a 60 month period following December 21, 2019, which is the first anniversary of the date escrow was released. As of December 31, 2018, the Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organization and offering costs on the Company’s behalf of $5.8 million, consisting of offering costs of $4.4 million and organization costs of $1.4 million. Such costs became the Company’s liability on December 21, 2018, the date the proceeds from the Offering were released from escrow. These organization and offering costs are recorded as a component of Due to Affiliates on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, The following table details the selling commissions, dealer manager fees, and stockholder servicing fees for each applicable share class as of December 31, Common Stock Class T Common Stock Class S Common Stock Class D Common Stock Class I Selling commissions and dealer manager fees (% of transaction price) up to 3.5% up to 3.5% — — Stockholder servicing fee (% of NAV) 0.85% 0.85% 0.25% — For Class S shares sold in the primary offering, investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 3.5% of the transaction price. For Class T shares sold in the primary offering, investors will pay upfront selling commissions of up to 3.0% of the transaction price and upfront dealer manager fees of 0.5% of the transaction price, however such amounts may vary at certain participating broker-dealers, provided that the sum will not exceed 3.5% of the transaction The Dealer Manager is entitled to receive stockholder servicing fees of 0.85% per annum of the aggregate NAV for Class S shares and Class T shares. For Class T shares such stockholder servicing fee includes, an advisor stockholder servicing fee of 0.65% per annum, and a dealer stockholder servicing fee of 0.20% per annum, of the aggregate NAV for the Class T shares, however, with respect to Class T shares sold through certain participating broker-dealers, the advisor stockholder servicing fee and the dealer stockholder servicing fee may be other amounts, provided that the sum of such fees will always equal 0.85% per annum of the NAV of such shares. The Class D shares will incur a stockholder servicing fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the aggregate NAV for the Class D The Dealer Manager has entered into agreements with the selected dealers distributing the Company’s shares in the Offering, which provide, among other things, for the re-allowance of the full amount of the selling commissions and dealer manager fees and all or a portion of the stockholder servicing fees received by the Dealer Manager to such selected dealers. Through December 31, 2018, the Dealer Manager had not retained any upfront selling commissions, dealer manager, or stockholder servicing fees. The Company will cease paying the stockholder servicing fee with respect to any Class T share, Class S share or Class D share held in a stockholder’s account at the end of the month in which the total selling commissions, dealer manager fees and stockholder servicing fees paid with respect to the shares held by such stockholder within such account would exceed, in the aggregate, 8.75% (or, in the case of Class Income Taxes The Company intends to make an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ending December 31, 2019. If the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax on taxable income that it distributes to its stockholders. REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. The Company may elect to treat certain of its corporate subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). There were no active TRSs during the period for July 13, 2017 (date of initial capitalization) through December 31, 2017, or for the year ended December 31, 2018. In general, a TRS may perform additional services for the Company’s tenants and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate-related business other than management or operation of a lodging facility or a health care facility. A domestic TRS is subject to corporate federal income tax. The Company is a taxable corporation for its initial tax year ending December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company generated a net operating loss and as such no income tax provision was required. Net Loss per Share Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding (unless their effect is antidilutive) for the period. There are no common share equivalents outstanding that would have a dilutive effect as a result of the net loss, and accordingly, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding is identical for July 13, 2017 (date of initial capitalization) through December 31, 2017, and for the year ended December 31, 2018 for both basic and diluted shares. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09) “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” ASU 2014-09 broadly amends the accounting guidance for revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2017, and is to be applied retrospectively. The Company has adopted this pronouncement as of January 1, 2018 and will apply this guidance to its consolidated financial statements once significant operations commence. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” This new guidance, along with subsequent ASUs, was effective January 1, 2019 and requires lessees to record a lease liability and a right-of-use (ROU) asset. A lessee may make an accounting policy election for leases with a term 12 months or less to not recognize a lease liability and corresponding ROU asset. Lessor accounting remains predominately unchanged. The Company has adopted this pronouncement as of January 1, 2019 and will apply this guidance to its consolidated financial statements once significant operations commence. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2016-15 (“ASU 2016-15”) which provides guidance where there is diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows, on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements or notes to our consolidated financial statements. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842) - Targeted Improvements,” which provides "practical expedient" options (a) to implement ASU 2016-02 prospectively by only applying the new rules to leases that are in place as of the effective date on a go-forward basis, and (b) for lessors to combine revenues from lease and non-lease components. The Company anticipates On August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Disclosure Framework,” which adds new disclosure requirements and modifies or eliminates existing disclosure requirements of ASC 820. This ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted. The Company does not expect the application of this ASU to materially impact the Company. |