Significant Accounting Policies | 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation— The accompanying financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, for reporting on Form 10-K. In April 2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, was enacted. Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. The Company has irrevocably elected not to avail itself of this extended transition period, and, as a result, the Company will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies. Use of Estimates —The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in the financial statements include, but are not limited to stock-based compensation, fair value of common stock, fair value of the derivative liabilities, operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities, the recoverability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance, and accrued liabilities related to expenses incurred for research and development from external vendors. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, known trends and other market-specific or other relevant factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Company tracks the progress of its various research and development studies and manufacturing projects to ensure related prepaid expenses and accrued expenses are in line with progress of each. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, as there are changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Actual results may differ materially from those estimates or assumptions. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash —The Company’s cash and cash equivalents include short-term highly liquid investments which are readily convertible into cash. These investments include money market securities and commercial paper with maturities of three months or less when acquired. The Company’s institutional money market accounts permit daily redemption and the fair values of these investments are based upon the quoted prices in active markets provided by the holding financial institutions, which are considered Level 1 inputs in the fair value hierarchy, as described below. The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $168.1 million as of December 31, 2019. Restricted cash represents cash on deposit with a financial institution as collateral in support of a letter of credit outstanding in favor of the Company’s landlord for office space. The restricted cash balance has been excluded from the cash balance and is classified as non-current restricted cash on the balance sheets as the lease expires after December 31, 2020. Concentration of Credit Risk —The Company maintains cash deposits in excess of government-provided insurance limits. The Company maintains its cash balances with one high quality, accredited financial institution, and accordingly, such funds are not exposed to significant credit risk. Leases —The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use, or ROU, assets, operating lease liabilities, and long-term operating lease liabilities in the Company’s balance sheets. ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate, the Company’s uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease prepayments, offset by lease incentives. The Company’s facilities operating leases have lease and non-lease components for which the Company has elected to apply the practical expedient and account for each lease component and related non-lease component as one single component. Operating lease cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Property and Equipment, Net —Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, ranging from 3-7 years as follows: Fixed Asset Type Estimated useful life Laboratory equipment 7 years Leasehold improvements Lesser of useful life or remaining lease term Computer equipment 3 years Furniture and fixtures 7 years Expenditures for repairs and maintenance of assets are charged to expense as incurred, while major betterments are capitalized. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets disposed of are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statements of operations. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets —Long-lived assets, comprised of property and equipment, to be held and used and the right-of-use asset associated with the Company’s leased office space are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Factors that the Company considers in deciding when to perform an impairment review include significant underperformance of the business in relation to expectations, significant negative industry or economic trends and significant changes or planned changes in the use of the assets. If an impairment review is performed to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability, the Company compares forecasts of undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the long-lived asset to its carrying value. An impairment loss would be recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset are less than its carrying amount. The impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying value of the impaired asset over its current fair value. To date, the Company has not recorded any impairment losses on long-lived assets. Comprehensive Loss —The Company does not have items of other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and therefore does not present a statement of comprehensive loss. The Company’s comprehensive loss equals its net loss Fair Value Measurements —Certain assets and liabilities are carried at fair value under U.S. GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. A framework is used for measuring fair value utilizing a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable: • Level 1 —Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 —Observable inputs (other than Level 1 quoted prices), such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. • Level 3 —Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to determining the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques. The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019 (and does not include cash of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2019): December 31, 2019 Active Markets (Level 1) Observable Inputs (Level 2) Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) (in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents: Money market funds 167,805 — — Restricted cash: Money market funds 91 — — Total $ 167,896 $ — $ — The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2018 (and does not include cash of less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2018): December 31, 2018 Active Markets (Level 1) Observable Inputs (Level 2) Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) (in thousands) Cash and cash equivalents: Money market funds 63,007 — — Restricted cash: Money market funds 91 — — Total $ 63,098 $ — $ — There have been no changes to the valuation methods utilized by the Company, nor were there transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 investments during the year ended December 31, 2019. there were no financial instruments classified as Level 3 investments. Derivative Liabilities —From time to time, the Company may issue certain financial instruments with embedded features which, dependent on their specific contractual terms or other conditions, may be required to be accounted for as separate derivative assets or liabilities. These instruments are required to be measured at fair value. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company’s uses a discounted cash flow analysis because these instruments are not quoted on an active market. These instruments are then adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end. Any increase or decrease in the fair value is recorded in the statement of operations as change in fair value of derivative liabilities. Research and Development Costs —Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist principally of personnel costs, including salaries, stock-based compensation, and benefits for research and development employees, costs related to third-party contract research, contract development and manufacturing organizations, other third-party research service providers, third-party license fees, other direct and indirect operational costs related to the Company’s research and development activities, including facility-related expenses. Non-refundable research and development advance payments are capitalized and expensed as the related goods are delivered or services are performed. Stock-Based Compensation —The Company measures all stock options and other stock-based awards granted to employees, directors, consultants and other nonemployees based on the fair value on the date of the grant and recognizes compensation expense of those awards over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. The Company recognizes forfeitures at the time forfeitures occur. The Company classifies stock-based compensation expense in its statement of operations in the same way the payroll costs or service payments are classified for the related stock-based award recipient. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company lacks company specific historical and implied volatility information. Therefore, it estimates its expected stock volatility based on the historical volatility of a publicly-traded set of peer companies and expects to continue to do so until it has adequate historical data regarding the volatility of its own traded stock price. Debt Issuance Costs— The Company incurred third-party costs in connection with the Company’s convertible note as described in Note 7. The Company amortizes these costs over the term of its agreement as interest expense in the statement of operations. Income Taxes —The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or the Company’s tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of the assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes. The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that the Company believes that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, management considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. Valuation allowances are provided, if based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. If management determines that the Company would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, management would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes. The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) management determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, management recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The Company provides reserves for potential payments of tax to various tax authorities related to uncertain tax positions. These reserves are based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized following resolution of any potential contingencies related to the tax benefit. Potential interest related to the underpayment of income taxes will be classified as a component of interest expense and any related penalties will be classified in operating expenses in the statement of operations. Net Loss per Common Share— Basic net loss per share is computed using the “two-class” method which includes the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and other securities that participate in dividends (a participating security). As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s convertible preferred stock were participating securities as defined by ASC 260-10, Earnings per Share. This stock converted into common stock upon the completion of the IPO in June 2019. During the periods where the Company incurs net losses, the Company allocates no loss to participating securities because these securities have no contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company. Under the two-class method, basic net loss per share applicable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed similar to basic net loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares for the potential dilutive effects of convertible debt, convertible preferred stock and stock options outstanding during the period calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method, or the two-class method, whichever is more dilutive. The Company allocates net earnings on a pari passu (equal) basis to both common and preferred stockholders. Net losses are not allocated to preferred stockholders as they do not have an obligation to share in the Company’s net losses. For all periods presented, basic and diluted net loss per share are the same, as any additional share equivalents would be anti-dilutive (Note 14). Segment Reporting— Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. To date, the Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as one operating segment. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Adopted) —In November 2018, the SEC’s release, Disclosure Update and Simplification, became effective. The Company adopted this amendment on January 1, 2019. The included amendments are intended to simplify and update the SEC’s disclosure requirements and eliminate duplicative disclosures between the SEC rules and U.S. GAAP. The amendments included new interim financial statement disclosures to reconcile the beginning balance to the ending balance in stockholders’ equity for each period for which an income statement is required to be filed. The Company adopted the rule on January 1, 2019 and included its first presentation of changes in stockholders’ equity in its Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09, Codification Improvements, Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements (Not Yet Adopted) —In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement – Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirement for Fair Value Measurement, or ASU 2018-13. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the FASB Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments under ASU 2018-13 are effective for interim and annual fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-13 to have a material impact on its financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangible-Goodwill and Other Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) |