Investments and fair value measurements | Investments and fair value measurements Held-to-maturity debt securities The cost basis, fair values and gross unrealized gains and losses of our held-to-maturity debt securities are as follows: March 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Amortized Cost Unrealized Gains Unrealized Losses Fair Value Corporate debt securities (1) $ 55,727 $ 42 $ (906) $ 54,863 $ 62,078 $ 459 $ (207) $ 62,330 U.S. Treasury securities 6,834 — (98) 6,736 4,849 — (16) 4,833 Certificates of deposit 237 — — 237 237 — — 237 Total $ 62,798 $ 42 $ (1,004) $ 61,836 $ 67,164 $ 459 $ (223) $ 67,400 _______________ (1) Includes both U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities. The cost basis of held-to-maturity debt securities includes an adjustment for the amortization of premium or discount since the date of purchase. Held-to-maturity debt securities valued at approximately $4.5 million and $4.2 million were on deposit with various governmental authorities at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, as required by law. The change in net unrealized gains and losses on held-to-maturity debt securities for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 was $(1.2) million and $(0.1) million, respectively. Net realized gains of held-to-maturity debt securities are computed using the specific identification method and are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents certain information regarding contractual maturities of our held-to-maturity debt securities: Maturity March 31, 2022 Amortized Cost % of Total Fair Value % of Total One year or less $ 30,051 48 % $ 29,973 48 % After one year through five years $ 32,747 52 % $ 31,863 52 % Total $ 62,798 100 % $ 61,836 100 % There were no held-to-maturity debt securities with contractual maturities after five years. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Net unrealized losses on held-to-maturity debt securities and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position are as follows: March 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Corporate debt securities U.S. Treasury securities Certificate of deposits Total Corporate debt securities U.S. Treasury securities Certificate of deposits Total Less than 12 months Fair value $ 40,973 $ 6,571 $ — $ 47,544 $ 18,309 $ 4,667 $ — $ 22,976 Unrealized losses $ (836) $ (98) $ — $ (934) $ (192) $ (16) $ — $ (208) Greater than 12 months Fair value $ 1,085 $ — $ — $ 1,085 $ 605 $ — $ — $ 605 Unrealized losses $ (70) $ — $ — $ (70) $ (15) $ — $ — $ (15) Total Fair value $ 42,058 $ 6,571 $ — $ 48,629 $ 18,914 $ 4,667 $ — $ 23,581 Unrealized losses $ (906) $ (98) $ — $ (1,004) $ (207) $ (16) $ — $ (223) We believe that any unrealized losses on our held-to-maturity debt securities at March 31, 2022 are temporary based upon our current analysis of the issuers of the securities that we hold and current market conditions. We have no intent to sell, and it is more likely than not that we will not be required to sell, these securities until the fair value recovers to at least equal our cost basis or the securities mature. Under the new CECL model, the Company recognizes credit losses for its held-to-maturity debt securities by setting up an allowance which is remeasured each reporting period, with changes in the allowance recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company establishes an allowance for credit losses based on a number of factors including the current economic conditions, management's expectations of future economic conditions and performance indicators, such as credit agency ratings and payment and default history. As of March 31, 2022, credit agency ratings on our U.S. Treasury and corporate debt securities ranged from AAA through B1. For our held-to-maturity debt securities, the Company's model estimates expected credit loss by multiplying the exposure at default by both the probability of default and loss given default (“LGD”). The probability of default and LGD percentages are estimated after considering historical experience with global default rates and unsecured bond recovery rates for horizons aligning to the Company’s held-to-maturity debt security portfolio. The calculated allowance is recorded as an offset to held-to-maturity debt securities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and in the investment, dividend and other income line on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Rollforward of Credit Loss Allowance for Held-to-Maturity Debt Securities Beginning balance, January 1, 2022 $ 399 Current-period provision (reduction) for expected credit losses (17) Write-off charged against the allowance, if any — Recoveries of amounts previously written off, if any — Ending balance of the allowance for credit losses, March 31, 2022 $ 382 The current-period provision for expected credit losses is due to changes in portfolio composition and the maturity of certain securities. Available-for-sale debt securities The change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale debt securities for the three months ended 2021 wa s $(0.9) million . The Company disposed all available-for-sale debt securities in the three months ended March 31, 2021 and therefore had no unrealized gain or loss as of March 31, 2022 and no change in net unrealized gains on available-for-sale debt securities for the three months ended March 31, 2022. The following table reflects the composition of net realized gains or losses for the sales of the available-for-sale securities: Three months ended March 31, 2022 2021 Realized gains (losses): Available-for-sale debt securities: Gains $ — $ 768 Losses — (90) Net $ — $ 678 Net realized gains on disposition of available-for-sale debt securities are computed using the specific identification method and are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Equity securities The Company disposed of all equity securities in the three months ended March 31, 2021. Mortgage loans The mortgage loan portfolio as of March 31, 2022 is comprised entirely of single-family residential mortgage loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company did not purchase any new mortgage loans. Mortgage loans, which include contractual terms to maturity of thirty years, are not categorized by contractual maturity as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with, or without, call or prepayment penalties. The cost and estimated fair value of mortgage loans are as follows: March 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Cost Estimated Fair Value Cost Estimated Fair Value Mortgage loans $ 1,141 $ 1,141 $ 2,022 $ 2,022 Total $ 1,141 $ 1,141 $ 2,022 $ 2,022 Investment income Investment income from securities consists of the following: Three months ended March 31, 2022 2021 Available-for-sale debt securities $ — $ 773 Held-to-maturity debt securities 389 394 Equity investments — (89) Mortgage loans 22 46 Other 44 60 Total $ 455 $ 1,184 Accrued interest receivable Accrued interest receivable from investments is included in receivables, net in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table reflects the composition of accrued interest receivable for investments: March 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Corporate debt securities $ 409 $ 874 U.S. Treasury securities 20 12 Accrued interest receivable on investment securities $ 429 $ 886 Mortgage loans 8 13 Accrued interest receivable on investments $ 437 $ 899 The Company does not recognize an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivable, which is recorded in the receivables line in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, because the Company writes off accrued investment timely. The Company writes off accrued interest receivables after three months by reversing interest income. Fair value measurement ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes and ranks the level of observability of inputs used to measure financial assets or liabilities at fair value. The observability of inputs is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of asset or liability, characteristics specific to the asset or liability, market conditions and other factors. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are as follows: Level 1 Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical asset or liability at the measurement date are used. Level 2 Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 pricing inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. Level 3 Pricing inputs are unobservable and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. The inputs used in determination of fair value require significant judgment and estimation. When fair value inputs fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the asset or liability is categorized in its entirety is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the asset or liability. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the valuation of an asset or liability in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The categorization of an asset or liability within the hierarchy is based upon the pricing transparency of the asset or liability and does not necessarily correspond to the perceived risk of that asset or liability. The following table summarizes the Company’s investments measured at fair value: Assets Corporate debt securities U.S. Treasury securities Mortgage loans Certificate of deposits Total March 31, 2022 Level 1 $ — $ 6,736 $ — $ — $ 6,736 Level 2 54,863 — — 237 55,100 Level 3 — — 1,141 — 1,141 Total $ 54,863 $ 6,736 $ 1,141 $ 237 $ 62,977 December 31, 2021 Level 1 $ — $ 4,833 $ — $ — $ 4,833 Level 2 62,330 — — 237 62,567 Level 3 — — 2,022 — 2,022 Total $ 62,330 $ 4,833 $ 2,022 $ 237 $ 69,422 The Company classifies U.S. Treasury bonds within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets. Corporate debt securities and certificates of deposit are classified within Level 2 because they are valued using inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable in the market, including readily available pricing sources for the identical underlying security which may not be actively traded. The Company classifies mortgage loans as Level 3 due to the reliance on significant unobservable valuation inputs. The Company’s liabilities in the following table are recorded at fair value on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table summarizes the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value: Liabilities Public Warrants Private Placement Warrants Sponsor Covered Shares Total March 31, 2022 Level 1 $ 4,025 $ — $ — $ 4,025 Level 2 — 2,042 — 2,042 Level 3 — — 1,916 1,916 Total $ 4,025 $ 2,042 $ 1,916 $ 7,983 December 31, 2021 Level 1 $ 10,925 $ — $ — $ 10,925 Level 2 — 5,542 — 5,542 Level 3 — — 5,415 5,415 Total $ 10,925 $ 5,542 $ 5,415 $ 21,882 The Company considers the Public Warrants to be Level 1 liabilities due to the use of an observable market quote in an active market under the ticker DOMA.WS. For the Private Placement Warrants, the Company considers the fair value of each Private Placement Warrant to be equivalent to that of each Public Warrant, with an immaterial adjustment for short-term marketability restrictions. As such, the Private Placement Warrants are classified as Level 2. The fair value of the Sponsor Covered Shares was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model using a distribution of potential stock price outcomes on a daily basis over the 10-year vesting period. The unobservable significant inputs to the valuation model were as follows: March 31, Current stock price $ 2.17 Expected volatility 60.0 % Risk-free interest rate 2.32 % Expected term 9.3 years Expected dividend yield — % Annual change in control probability 2.0 % The changes for Level 3 items measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs are as follows: Sponsor Covered Shares Fair value as of December 31, 2021 $ 5,415 Change in fair value of Sponsor Covered Shares (3,499) Fair value as of March 31, 2022 $ 1,916 There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021. There were no transfers involving Level 3 assets or liabilities during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and the year ended December 31, 2021. Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate fair value and are therefore excluded from the leveling table above. The cost basis is determined to approximate fair value due to the short term duration of these financial instruments. |