This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (together with any amendments and supplements thereto, the “Schedule TO”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 12, 2021 by (i) Teiripic Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Purchaser”) and a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”) and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Horizon Therapeutics plc, a public limited company organized under the laws of Ireland (“Ultimate Parent”), (ii) Parent and (iii) Ultimate Parent. The Schedule TO relates to the offer by Purchaser to purchase all of the outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), of Viela Bio, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), at a purchase price of $53.00 per Share net to the holder thereof, in cash, without interest, subject to any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase, dated February 12, 2021 (together with any amendments or supplements thereto, the “Offer to Purchase”) and in the related letter of transmittal (as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time, the “Letter of Transmittal”), copies of which are attached to the Schedule TO as Exhibits (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii), respectively.
Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, the information set forth in the Schedule TO remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference to the extent relevant to the items in this Amendment. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Offer to Purchase.
Item 11. | Additional Information. |
The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under Section 15—“Conditions of the Offer” and Item 11 of the Schedule TO, to the extent such Item incorporates by reference the information contained in the Offer to Purchase, is hereby amended and supplemented by inserting the following paragraph at the end of such Section 15:
“At 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 23, 2021 the waiting period applicable to the Offer under the HSR Act expired in the ordinary course, and accordingly, the portion of the conditions to the Offer relating to the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act has been satisfied. The Offer continues to be subject to the remaining conditions set forth in this Section 15 — “Conditions of the Offer” of this Offer to Purchase.”
The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under Section 16—“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals” and Item 11 of the Schedule TO, to the extent such Item incorporates by reference the information contained in the Offer to Purchase, is hereby amended and supplemented by inserting the following sentences at the end of the second paragraph of the section captioned “Antitrust Compliance”:
“At 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on February 23, 2021 the waiting period applicable to the Offer under the HSR Act expired in the ordinary course. Accordingly, the portion of the conditions to the Offer relating to the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act has been satisfied. The Offer continues to be subject to the remaining conditions set forth in Section 15 — “Conditions of the Offer” of this Offer to Purchase.”
The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase under Section 16—“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals” and Item 11 of the Schedule TO, to the extent such Item incorporates by reference the information contained in the Offer to Purchase, is hereby amended and supplemented by adding at the end of the section captioned Section 16—“Certain Legal Matters; Regulatory Approvals” a subsection titled “Litigation” and the following paragraphs:
“Litigation
On February 18, 2021 and February 19, 2021, two purported stockholders of Viela filed separate lawsuits against Viela and its directors in the federal district court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Sciannella v. Viela Bio Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01481 (the “Sciannella Complaint”) and Carlisle v. Viela Bio Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01536 (the “Carlisle Compliant”), respectively. Each complaint alleges violations of Sections 14(d) and 14(e) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14d-9 promulgated thereunder and, in the case of the Carlisle Complaint, Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Both lawsuits allege that the Schedule 14D-9 is materially incomplete and misleading and seek to enjoin the tender offer until the purported deficiencies in the Schedule 14D-9 are corrected, or alternatively, monetary damages if the tender offer is consummated. Ultimate Parent, Parent and Purchaser believe the claims asserted in the complaints are without merit.
Additional lawsuits arising out of or relating to the tender offer may be filed in the future. If additional similar complaints are filed, absent new or different allegations that are material, Viela, Ultimate Parent, Parent and/or Purchaser will not necessarily announce such additional filings.”