Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements: Certain of the Company’s significant accounting policies are described below. All of the Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 included in the Company’s Prospectus. Since the date of such financial statements, there have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies. Consolidation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Meira Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries: MeiraGTx Limited, a limited company under the laws of England and Wales (“Meira Limited); MeiraGTx, LLC, a Delaware corporation (“Meira LLC”); BRI-Alzan, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“BRI-Alzan”); MeiraGTx B.V., a Netherlands corporation (“Meira BV”); MeiraGTx UK II Limited, (“Meira UK II”), a limited company under the laws of England and Wales; MeiraGTx UK Limited (“Meira UK”), a limited company under the laws of England and Wales. All intercompany balances and transactions between the consolidated companies have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates Management considers many factors in selecting appropriate financial accounting policies and controls, and in developing the estimates and assumptions that are used in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements. Management must apply significant judgment in this process. In addition, other factors may affect estimates, including expected business and operational changes, sensitivity and volatility associated with the assumptions used in developing estimates, and whether historical trends are expected to be representative of future trends. The estimation process often may yield a range of potentially reasonable estimates of the ultimate future outcomes and management must select an amount that falls within that range of reasonable estimates. This process may result in actual results differing materially from those estimated amounts used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements if these results differ from historical experience, or other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate, even if such assumptions are reasonable when made. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management used significant estimates in the following areas, among others: valuation of A ordinary shares (“Ordinary Shares”) issued prior to the Company’s initial public offering, for the acquisition of assets, the accounting for research and development costs, warrants, share based compensation, asset retirement obligations and accrued expenses. Fair Value Measurements Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance The Company follows ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures • Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets the reporting entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date; • Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and • Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. The table below represents the values of the Compnay’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis: Fair Value Measurement Using: Description June 30, Significant Significant Other Significant Restricted cash $ 123,376 $ 123,376 $ — $ — Fair Value Measurement Using: Description December 31, Significant Significant Other Significant Restricted cash $ 123,376 $ 123,376 $ — $ — Warrants $ 2,679,633 $ — $ — $ 2,679,633 The table below represents a rollforward of the assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis from December 31, 2017 to June 30, 2018: Significant Balance as of December 31, 2017 $ 2,679,633 Change in fair value of warrants 1,514,775 Exercise of warrants (4,194,408 ) Balance as of June 30, 2018 $ — The warrants were classified as liabilities because the underlying Preferred Shares had a redemption feature in the event of a change of control of the Company. On June 5, 2018, the warrants were exercised at which time the warrant liability was determined to be $4,194,408, which represented the difference in the market value of the Preferred Shares and the exercise price of the warrants. This resulted in an increase of the warrant liability in the amount of $2,184,183 and $1,514,775 for the three-month and six-month The fair values of the warrants at December 31, 2017, March 31, 2018 and June 4, 2018 were estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model with the following assumptions: December 31, 2017 March 31, 2018 June 4, 2018 Risk-free interest rate 1.72 % 1.86 % 1.77 % Expected volatility 80 % 80 % 80 % Expected dividend yield 0 0 0 Expected life 9 months 5.5 months 1 day For the unobservable inputs for the warrants, the expected volatility was determined at each measurement date by taking an average of the volatility of other publicly-traded peer biotechnology companies. The expected life was determined at each measurement date based upon the Company’s estimate of the time until the Company has a conversion event. The fair value of the Preferred Shares was based upon recent issuances of the Company’s Preferred Shares on or about December 31, 2017, March 31, 2018 and June 5, 2018. The estimated fair values of the Company’s warrants are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a current market exchange. The determination of the fair value of the warrants are sensitive to changes in in the assumptions used and a change in those inputs could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. If the volatility were to increase or the expected life were to increase, the fair value of the warrant would increase. Conversely, if the volatility were to decrease or the expected life were to decrease, the fair value of the warrant would decrease. Net Loss per Ordinary Share Basic net loss per Ordinary Share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to the Company’s shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s Ordinary Shares assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted net loss per ordinary share is computed similar to basic net loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional Ordinary Shares that would have been outstanding if the potential ordinary shares had been issued at the beginning of the year and if the additional ordinary shares were dilutive (treasury stock method) or the two-class Asset Retirement Obligation Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at fair value when incurred and capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset. In the absence of quoted market prices, we estimate the fair value of our asset retirement obligations using Level 3 present value techniques, in which estimates of future cash flows associated with retirement activities are discounted using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Asset retirement obligations currently reported as other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet were measured during a period of historically low interest rates. The impact on measurements of new asset retirement obligations using different rates in the future may be significant. The Company uses estimates to determine the amount of the asset retirement obligations at the end of the lease term and discounts such asset retirement obligations using an estimated discount rate. Interest on the discounted asset retirement obligation is amortized over the term of the lease using the effective interest method and is recorded as interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The change in asset retirement obligations is as follows: For the six month period For the year ended Balance at beginning of period $ 178,419 $ 221,254 Amortization of interest 7,322 19,313 Change in estimate — (75,011 ) Effects of exchange rate (5,391 ) 12,863 Balance at end of period $ 180,350 $ 178,419 Research and Development Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. These costs include, but are not limited to, employee-related expenses, including salaries, benefits and travel of the Company’s research and development personnel; expenses incurred under agreements with contract research organizations and investigative sites that conduct clinical and preclinical studies and manufacture the drug product for the clinical studies and preclinical activities; acquisition of in-process Costs for certain development activities, such as Company funded outside research programs, are recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks with respect to their actual costs incurred. Payments for these activities are based on the terms of the individual arrangements, which may differ from the pattern of costs incurred, and are reflected in the financial statements as prepaid or accrued research and development expense, as the case may be. Segment Information Management has concluded it has a single reporting segment for purposes of reporting financial condition and results of operations. The following table summarizes non-current June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 United States $ 413,481 $ 436,463 United Kingdom 13,277,701 13,942,642 $ 13,691,182 $ 14,379,105 Recent Accounting Pronouncements In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, 505-50 all 2018-07 In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business, ASU 2017-01 , ASU 2017-01 ASU 2017-01 also ASU 2017-01 should 2017-01 In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASU 2016-20, that allows met. ASU 2016-20 also requires ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09. ASU 2016-20 In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Restricted Cash ASU 2016-18, which the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts ASU 2016-18 also ASU 2016-18 will ASU 2016-18 In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory ASU 2016-16 which ASU 2016-16 to In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12 , Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients ASU 2016-12, which ASU No. 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) ASU 2014-09, on ASU 2016-12 are ASU 2014-09, as ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date ASU 2015-14 . ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing ASU 2016-10 , ASU 2016-10 requires 2016-10 categorizes ASU 2016-10 has ASU 2014-09, as ASU 2015-14. In ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) ASU 2016-08, which ASU 2014-09 ASU 2016-08 has ASU 2014-09, as ASU 2015-14. The In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers 2014-09, 2014-09 2014-09 2014-09 non-public 2014-09 2014-09 2014-09 |