Investments | Investments Cigna’s investment portfolio consists of a broad range of investments including debt securities, equity securities, commercial mortgage loans, policy loans, other long-term investments, short-term investments and derivative financial instruments. The sections below provide more detail regarding our investment balances and realized investment gains and losses. See Note 12 for information about the valuation of the Company’s investment portfolio. The following table summarizes the Company's investments by category and current or long-term classification. September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (In millions) Current Long-term Total Current Long-term Total Debt securities $ 1,113 $ 23,560 $ 24,673 $ 928 $ 22,827 $ 23,755 Equity securities — 379 379 — 303 303 Commercial mortgage loans 13 1,966 1,979 — 1,947 1,947 Policy loans — 1,347 1,347 — 1,357 1,357 Other long-term investments — 2,698 2,698 — 2,403 2,403 Short-term investments 458 — 458 423 — 423 Total $ 1,584 $ 29,950 $ 31,534 $ 1,351 $ 28,837 $ 30,188 Investments classified as assets of business held for sale (1) (260) (7,998) (8,258) (414) (7,295) (7,709) Investments per Consolidated Balance Sheets $ 1,324 $ 21,952 $ 23,276 $ 937 $ 21,542 $ 22,479 (1) The table above includes $8.3 billion as of September 30, 2020 and $7.7 billion as of December 31, 2019 of investments associated with the U.S. Group Disability and Life business that are held for sale to New York Life. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, some of the assets currently associated with the Group Disability and Life business can be substituted for other assets. The assets that will transfer to New York Life will be primarily debt securities and to a lesser extent commercial mortgage loans and short-term investments. A. Investment Portfolio Debt Securities Accounting policy. Debt securities (including bonds, mortgage and other asset-backed securities and preferred stocks redeemable by the investor) are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded either in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within Shareholders’ equity or in credit loss expense based on fluctuations in the allowance for credit losses, as further discussed below. Net unrealized appreciation on debt securities supporting the Company’s run-off settlement annuity business is reported in Non-current insurance and contractholder liabilities rather than Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). When the Company intends to sell or determines that it is more likely than not to be required to sell an impaired debt security, the excess of amortized cost over fair value is directly written down with a charge to Realized investment gains and losses. As of January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASU 2016-13 that included certain targeted improvements to the accounting for available-for-sale debt securities. The new guidance resulted in certain policy changes related to the process used by the Company to review declines in fair value from a security’s amortized cost basis to determine whether a credit loss exists. For example, the length of time that a debt security has been impaired is no longer a criterion for this review. In addition, under this new guidance, the Company recognizes an allowance for credit loss with a corresponding charge to credit loss expense, presented in Realized investment gains and losses in the Company’s income statement. Prior to this new guidance, the Company recorded a direct write-down of the instrument’s amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit loss represents the excess of amortized cost over the greater of its fair value or the net present value of the debt security's projected future cash flows (based on qualitative and quantitative factors, including the probability of default, and the estimated timing and amount of recovery). Each period, the allowance for credit loss is adjusted through credit loss expense. The Company elected the expedient to not measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivables. Consistent with prior practice, when interest payments are delinquent based on contractual terms or when certain terms (interest rate or maturity date) of the investment have been restructured, accrued interest, reported in Other current assets, is written off through a charge to Net investment income, and interest income is recognized on a cash basis. Debt securities are classified as either Current or Long-term investments based on their contractual maturities. The amortized cost and fair value by contractual maturity periods for debt securities were as follows at September 30, 2020: (In millions) Amortized Fair Due in one year or less $ 1,133 $ 1,143 Due after one year through five years 7,403 7,789 Due after five years through ten years 9,011 10,015 Due after ten years 4,212 5,211 Mortgage and other asset-backed securities 514 515 Total $ 22,273 $ 24,673 Actual maturities of these securities could differ from their contractual maturities used in the table above because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without penalties. Gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on debt securities by type of issuer is shown below. (In millions) Amortized Allowance for Credit Loss Unrealized Unrealized Fair September 30, 2020 Federal government and agency $ 411 $ — $ 223 $ — $ 634 State and local government 628 — 85 — 713 Foreign government 2,091 — 317 (6) 2,402 Corporate 18,629 (31) 1,890 (79) 20,409 Mortgage and other asset-backed 514 (9) 32 (22) 515 Total $ 22,273 $ (40) $ 2,547 $ (107) $ 24,673 Investments supporting liabilities of the Company’s run-off settlement annuity business (included in total above) (1) $ 2,147 $ (9) $ 828 $ (13) $ 2,953 December 31, 2019 Federal government and agency $ 498 $ — $ 235 $ — $ 733 State and local government 729 — 81 — 810 Foreign government 2,027 — 230 (1) 2,256 Corporate 18,149 — 1,299 (28) 19,420 Mortgage and other asset-backed 506 — 31 (1) 536 Total $ 21,909 $ — $ 1,876 $ (30) $ 23,755 Investments supporting liabilities of the Company’s run-off settlement annuity business (included in total above) (1) $ 2,229 $ — $ 740 $ (4) $ 2,965 (1) Net unrealized appreciation for these investments is excluded from accumulated other comprehensive income. Review of declines in fair value. Management reviews impaired debt securities to determine whether a credit loss allowance is needed based on criteria that include: • severity of decline; • financial health and specific prospects of the issuer; and • changes in the regulatory, economic or general market environment of the issuer’s industry or geographic region. The table below summarizes debt securities with a decline in fair value from amortized cost by investment grade and the length of time these securities have been in an unrealized loss position. These debt securities are primarily corporate securities with a decline in fair value that reflects an increase in market yields since purchase. See discussion of Realized Investment Gains and Losses below for further information on the credit loss expense recorded for the Company's investments. September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (Dollars in millions) Fair Amortized Unrealized Number Fair Amortized Unrealized Number One year or less Investment grade $ 1,193 $ 1,224 $ (31) 356 $ 723 $ 729 $ (6) 267 Below investment grade $ 713 $ 774 $ (61) 536 $ 340 $ 348 $ (8) 355 More than one year Investment grade $ 107 $ 111 $ (4) 19 $ 366 $ 378 $ (12) 118 Below investment grade $ 76 $ 87 $ (11) 36 $ 84 $ 88 $ (4) 93 Total $ 2,089 $ 2,196 $ (107) 947 $ 1,513 $ 1,543 $ (30) 833 The table below presents a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses on debt securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020. Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended (Dollars in millions) 2020 2020 Balance at beginning of period $ 48 $ 0 Additions for debt securities where no credit loss has previously been recognized 2 82 Reductions for securities sold during the period (6) (15) Decrease for debt securities where credit losses have previously been recorded (4) (27) Balance September 30, $ 40 $ 40 Equity Securities Equity securities with a readily determinable fair value consist primarily of mutual funds that invest in fixed income debt securities. Equity securities without a readily determinable fair value consist of private equity investments and are carried at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes. The amount of impairments or value changes resulting from observable price changes was not material as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Hybrid equity securities consist of preferred stock investments that have call features. The following table provides the values of the Company's equity security investments as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 (Dollars in millions) Amortized Cost Carrying Value Amortized Cost Carrying Value Equity securities with readily determinable fair values $ 126 $ 124 $ 61 $ 64 Equity securities with no readily determinable fair value $ 203 $ 212 $ 183 $ 192 Hybrid equity securities $ 57 $ 43 $ 58 $ 47 Total $ 386 $ 379 $ 302 $ 303 Commercial Mortgage Loans Accounting policy. Commercial mortgage loans are carried at unpaid principal balances. Beginning January 1, 2020 with the adoption of ASU 2016-13, unpaid principal balances are presented net of an allowance for expected credit losses. Changes in the allowance for expected credit losses are recognized as credit loss expense and presented in Realized investment gains and losses in the Company’s income statement. Each period, the Company establishes (or adjusts) its allowance for expected credit losses for commercial mortgage loans. The allowance for expected credit losses is based on a credit risk category that is assigned to each loan at origination using key credit quality indicators, including debt service coverage and loan-to-value ratios. Credit risk categories are updated as key credit quality indicators change. An expected loss rate, assigned based on the credit risk category, is applied to each loan's unpaid principal balance to develop an aggregate allowance for expected credit losses. Prior to adoption, impaired commercial mortgage loans were written down to the lower of unpaid principal or fair value of the underlying collateral when it became probable that the Company would not collect all amounts due under its promissory note. The Company recorded an allowance of $7 million through a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings to reflect expected credit losses at adoption. The credit loss allowance for the Company’s commercial mortgage loan investments was $9 million as of September 30, 2020. Commercial mortgage loans are considered impaired and written off against the allowance when it is probable that the Company will not collect all amounts due per the terms of the promissory note. The Company elected the expedient to not measure an allowance for credit losses for accrued interest receivables. Consistent with our prior practice, accrued interest, reported in other current assets, is written off through a charge to net investment income; interest income on impaired loans is only recognized when a payment is received. In the event of a foreclosure, the allowance for credit losses is based on the excess of the carrying value of the mortgage loan over the fair value of its underlying collateral. Mortgage loans held by the Company are made exclusively to commercial borrowers and are diversified by property type, location and borrower. Loans are generally issued at fixed rates of interest and are secured by high quality, primarily completed and substantially leased operating properties. Commercial mortgage loans are classified as either current or long-term investments based on their contractual maturities. Credit quality . The Company regularly evaluates and monitors credit risk, beginning with the initial underwriting of a mortgage loan and continuing throughout the investment holding period. Mortgage origination professionals employ an internal credit quality rating system designed to evaluate the relative risk of the transaction at origination that is then updated each year as part of the annual portfolio loan review. The Company evaluates and monitors credit quality on a consistent and ongoing basis. Quality ratings are based on our evaluation of a number of key inputs related to the loan, including real estate market-related factors such as rental rates and vacancies, and property-specific inputs such as growth rate assumptions and lease rollover statistics. However, the two most significant contributors to the credit quality rating are the debt service coverage and loan-to-value ratios. The debt service coverage ratio measures the amount of property cash flow available to meet annual interest and principal payments on debt, with a ratio below 1.0 indicating that there is not enough cash flow to cover the required loan payments. The loan-to-value ratio, commonly expressed as a percentage, compares the amount of the loan to the fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan. The following table summarizes the credit risk profile of the Company’s commercial mortgage loan portfolio based on loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019: (Dollars in millions) September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Loan-to-Value Ratio Carrying Value Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio Average Loan-to-Value Ratio Carrying Value Average Debt Service Coverage Ratio Average Loan-to-Value Ratio Below 60% $ 861 2.20 $ 1,136 2.19 60% to 79% 985 1.93 723 1.98 80% to 100% 142 1.33 88 1.62 Allowance for credit losses (9) Total $ 1,979 2.01 60 % $ 1,947 2.09 58 % The Company’s annual in-depth review of its commercial mortgage loan investments is the primary mechanism for identifying emerging risks in the portfolio. The Company’s investment professionals completed the annual in-depth review in the second quarter of 2020 that included an analysis of each underlying property’s most recent annual financial statements, rent rolls, operating plans, budgets, a physical inspection of the property and other pertinent factors. Based on historical results, current leases, lease expirations and rental conditions in each market, the Company estimated the current year and future stabilized property income and fair value for each loan. The average loan to value increased slightly from last year and remains strong. The portfolio's average debt service coverage ratio decreased slightly at September 30, 2020 compared with December 31, 2019 but remains at a high level. The Company re-evaluates a loan’s credit quality between annual reviews if new property information is received or an event such as delinquency or a borrower’s request for restructure causes management to believe that the Company’s estimate of financial performance, fair value or the risk profile of the underlying property has been impacted. All commercial mortgage loans in the Company's portfolio are current as of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. Other Long-Term Investments Other long-term investments include investments in unconsolidated entities, including certain limited partnerships and limited liability companies holding real estate, securities or loans. These investments are carried at cost plus the Company's ownership percentage of reporting income or loss, based on the financial statements of the underlying investments that are generally reported at fair value. Income or loss from these investments is reported on a one quarter lag due to the timing of when financial information is received from the general partner or manager of the investments. Other long-term investments also include investment real estate, foreign currency swaps, and statutory and other deposits. The following table provides carrying value information for these investments. Carrying value as of (In millions) September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Real estate investments $ 888 $ 788 Securities partnerships 1,591 1,409 Other 219 206 Total $ 2,698 $ 2,403 Short-Term Investments and Cash Equivalents Short-term investments and cash equivalents included the following types of issuers: (In millions) September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Corporate securities $ 2,729 $ 1,985 Federal government securities $ 1,139 $ 472 Foreign government securities $ 89 $ 65 Money market funds $ 313 $ 631 B. Realized Investment Gains and Losses Accounting policy. Realized investment gains and losses are based on specifically identified assets and result from sales, investment asset write-downs, change in the fair value of certain derivatives and equity securities, and changes in valuation reserves on commercial mortgage loans. Commencing January 1, 2020, realized gains and losses also include credit loss expense resulting from the impact of changes in the allowances for credit losses on debt securities and commercial mortgage loan investments under ASU 2016-13. The following realized gains and losses on investments exclude amounts required to adjust future policy benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business (consistent with accounting for a premium deficiency), as well as realized gains and losses attributed to the Company’s separate accounts because those gains and losses generally accrue directly to separate account policyholders. Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In millions) 2020 2019 2020 2019 Net realized investment gains, excluding credit loss expense and asset write-downs $ 24 $ 60 $ 33 $ 96 Credit loss (expense) recoveries on invested assets 8 — (41) — Other investment asset write-downs — (9) (10) (12) Net realized investment gains (losses), before income taxes $ 32 $ 51 $ (18) $ 84 Net realized investment gains, excluding credit loss expense and asset write-downs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 primarily represent gains on the sales of debt securities, partially offset by mark-to-market losses on equity securities and foreign exchange derivatives. Net realized investment gains, excluding credit loss expense and asset write-downs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 represent gains on the sales of real estate partnerships and debt securities. Credit loss (expense) recoveries on invested assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 reflects credit losses incurred primarily on debt securities due to uncertainty around issuers in certain industries that are particularly impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic. Realized gains and losses on equity securities still held at September 30, 2020 and 2019 were not material. The following table presents sales information for available-for-sale debt securities. Gross gains on sales and gross losses on sales exclude amounts required to adjust future policy benefits for the run-off settlement annuity business. Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, (In millions) 2020 2019 2020 2019 Proceeds from sales $ 380 $ 591 $ 2,003 $ 2,242 Gross gains on sales $ 15 $ 18 $ 81 $ 41 Gross losses on sales $ — $ (5) $ (21) $ (17) C. Derivative Financial Instruments The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage the characteristics of investment assets (such as duration, yield, currency and liquidity) to meet the varying demands of the related insurance and contract holder liabilities. The Company also uses derivative financial instruments to hedge the risk of changes in the net assets of certain of its foreign subsidiaries due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company has written and purchased GMIB reinsurance contracts in its run-off reinsurance business that are accounted for as freestanding derivatives as discussed in Note 10. Derivatives in the Company’s separate accounts are excluded from the following discussion because associated gains and losses generally accrue directly to separate account policyholders. Derivative instruments used by the Company typically include foreign currency swap contracts and foreign currency forward contracts. Foreign currency swap contracts periodically exchange cash flows between two currencies for principal and interest. Foreign currency forward contracts require the Company to purchase a foreign currency in exchange for the functional currency of its operating unit at a future date. The Company manages the credit risk of these derivative instruments by diversifying its portfolio among approved dealers of high credit quality and through routine monitoring of credit risk exposures. Certain of the Company’s over-the-counter derivative instruments require either the Company or the counterparty to post collateral or demand immediate payment depending on the amount of the net liability position of the derivative instrument and predefined financial strength or credit rating thresholds. These collateral posting requirements vary by counterparty. The Company would incur a loss if dealers completely failed to perform under derivative contracts, however collateral has been posted by dealers to cover substantially all of the fair values owed by dealers at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. The fair value of collateral posted by the Company was not significant as of September 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019. The gross fair values of our derivative financial instruments are presented in Note 12. The following table summarizes the types and notional quantity of derivative instruments held by the Company. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the effects of these individual hedging strategies were not material to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including gains or losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into shareholders' net income, as well as amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. (In millions) Notional Value as of September 30, 2020 December 31, 2019 Purpose Type of Instrument Fair value hedge: To hedge the foreign exchange-related changes in fair values of certain foreign-denominated bonds. The notional value of these derivatives matches the amortized cost of the hedged bonds. Foreign currency swap contracts $ 853 $ 817 Net investment hedge : To reduce the risk of changes in net assets due to changes in foreign currency spot exchange rates for certain foreign subsidiaries that conduct their business principally in Euros, Korean Won, and Taiwan Dollar. The notional value of hedging instruments matches the hedged amount of subsidiary net assets. Foreign currency swap contracts $ 526 $ 438 Foreign currency forward contracts $ 636 $ 406 Economic hedge: To hedge the foreign exchange-related changes in fair value of U.S. dollar-denominated investment assets to reflect the local currency for the Company’s foreign subsidiary in South Korea. The notional value of hedging instruments generally aligns with the fair value of the hedged investments. Foreign currency forward contracts $ 495 $ 410 The Company’s derivative financial instruments are presented as follows: • Fair value hedges of the foreign exchange-related changes in fair values of certain foreign-denominated bonds : Swap fair values are reported in Long-term investments or Other non-current liabilities. Changes in fair values attributable to foreign exchange risk of the swap contracts and the hedged bonds are reported in Realized investment gains and losses. The portion of the swap contracts’ changes in fair value excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness is recorded in Other comprehensive income and recognized in Net investment income as swap coupon payments are accrued, offsetting the foreign-denominated coupons received on the designated bonds. Net cash flows are reported in Operating activities, while exchanges of notional principal amounts are reported in Investing activities. • Net investment hedges of certain foreign subsidiaries that conduct their business principally in currencies other than the U.S. dollar : The fair values of the foreign currency swap and forward contracts are reported in Other assets or Other liabilities. The changes in fair values of these instruments are reported in Other comprehensive income, specifically in translation of foreign currencies. The portion of the change in fair values relating to foreign exchange spot rates will be recognized in earnings upon deconsolidation of the hedged foreign subsidiaries. The remaining changes in fair value of these instruments are excluded from our effectiveness assessment and recognized in interest expense when coupon payments are accrued or ratably over the term of the instrument. The notional value of hedging instruments matches the hedged amount of subsidiary net assets. Cash flows relating to these contracts are reported in Investing activities. • Economic hedges for derivatives not designated as accounting hedges : Fair values of forward contracts are reported in current Investments or Accrued expenses and other liabilities. The changes in fair values are reported in Realized investment gains and losses. Cash flows relating to these contracts are reported in Investing activities. |