Item 1.01. | Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. |
Equity Purchase Agreement
On February 6, 2022, Resideo Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Newell Brands Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Newell”), entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement” or the “EPA”) providing for the Company to purchase from Newell and an affiliate thereof one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding capital stock of First Alert, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“First Alert”). First Alert and its subsidiaries offer a comprehensive portfolio of detection and suppression devices, including smoke alarms, carbon monoxide alarms, combination alarms, connected fire and carbon monoxide devices, and fire extinguishers and other suppression solutions, including through the First Alert®, BRK® and Onelink® brands.
Purchase Price
The base purchase price payable by the Company upon the closing of the transactions contemplated by the EPA (the “Closing” and the “Transactions,” respectively) is $593,000,000, which is subject to adjustment based on the amount of working capital and net indebtedness of the Business (as defined in the EPA) as of immediately prior to the Closing, as well as any unpaid transaction expenses that reduce the purchase price in accordance with the terms of the EPA. The purchase price will be paid in cash. Pursuant to the EPA and subject to the terms and limitations set forth therein, the parties have agreed to make an election under Section 338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which will treat the majority of the Transactions as an asset purchase for tax purposes. The Company expects to realize approximately $46 million in net present value of tax benefits as a result of making the above-referenced election.
Conditions to the Closing of the Transactions
The closing of the Transactions is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions for both parties, including (i) the expiration or termination of the waiting period, including any extension thereof, under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the receipt or continued effectiveness of certain third party consents, and (ii) no law being enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any governmental authority of competent jurisdiction that prevents or makes illegal the consummation of the Transactions (a “Closing Legal Impediment”). In addition, the obligation of each of the Company and Newell to consummate the Transactions is conditioned on the accuracy of the representations and warranties made by the other party on the Closing Date (as defined in the EPA) or, if applicable, an earlier date (subject to certain “materiality” and “material adverse effect” qualifications set forth in the EPA with respect to such representations and warranties), the performance by the other party in all material respects of its covenants and agreements set forth in the EPA, and (in the case of the obligation of the Company to consummate the Transactions) there not having occurred any change, development, circumstance, fact, effect or event following the execution of the EPA and on or prior to the Closing Date that has had, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect (as defined in the EPA).
Certain Other Terms of the EPA
The EPA provides for certain termination rights for both the Company and Newell, including, among other things, (i) by mutual consent of the parties, (ii) by either party if the Closing has not occurred on or before June 6, 2022, which date is subject to extension by 90 days under the circumstances described in the EPA, (iii) by either party in the event that a Closing Legal Impediment shall be in effect and shall have become final and nonappealable, and (iv) by either party in the case of certain breaches of the other party’s representations, warranties or covenants that would result in the failure of a closing condition and such breach is not cured within a specified period set forth in the EPA or is not capable of cure (so long as the termination party is not also in breach as set forth in the EPA).
The EPA contains customary representations and warranties made by each of the Company and Newell, and also contains customary pre-closing covenants applicable to the conduct of Business (as defined in the EPA), including to operate the Business (as defined in the EPA) in the ordinary course and to refrain from taking certain actions without
- 2 -