Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2—Summary of significant accounting policies [A] Basis of presentation: The Company’s fiscal year ends on March 31. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2019, the condensed consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and the condensed consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity (deficit) for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 are unaudited. The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they as certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by U.S. GAAP can be condensed or omitted . The condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. In the opinion of management, the interim consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position and its results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results for the three months ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending March 31, 2020 or for any future period. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of USL and UHL, USG, USI, UTH and UST, USL’s wholly owned subsidiaries. USL has no unconsolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. T here have been no significant changes in the Company's accounting policies from those disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 filed with the SEC on June 14, 2019 other than the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU No. 2016-02”). [B] Use of estimates: The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to assets, liabilities, costs, expenses and compensation expense allocated to the Company under its services agreements with RSI and RSG, as well as share-based compensation, research and development costs and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. [C] Financial instruments: The Company applies a fair value framework in order to measure and disclose its financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs, where available, and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: • Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Fair values are determined by utilizing quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or other market observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves. • Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, cash equivalents consisting of money market accounts, restricted cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, amounts due to and from RSL and long-term debt. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates fair value based on current interest rates for similar types of borrowings and is included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The remaining financial instruments are stated at their respective historical carrying amounts, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. [D] : Cash and cash equivalents include cash deposits in banks and all highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash without penalty. The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash deposits and cash equivalents in highly-rated, federally-insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. The Company has established guidelines relative to diversification and maturities to maintain liquidity and preservation of capital. The Company has not experienced any credit losses related to these financial instruments and does not believe that it is exposed to any significant credit risk related to these instruments. Restricted cash consists of legally restricted non-interest-bearing deposit accounts held as compensating balances against the Company’s corporate credit card program and irrevocable standby letters of credit connected to its office leases (see Note 10) Restricted cash classified as a current asset consists of the restricted deposit account relating to the Company’s corporate credit card agreement. Restricted cash classified as a long-term asset consists of the restricted deposit account related to the irrevocable standby letters of credit. Cash as reported in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows includes the aggregate amounts of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as presented on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Cash as reported in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows consists of (in thousands): June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018 Cash and cash equivalents $ 62,360 $ 4,253 Restricted cash 866 — Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 63,226 $ 4,253 [E] : In accordance with ASU No. 2016-02, as adopted on April 1, 2019, the Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset during the lease term, and operating lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating leases are included in ROU assets, current operating lease liabilities, and long-term operating lease liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease ROU assets and lease liabilities are initially recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date calculated using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate applicable to the lease asset, unless the implicit rate is readily determinable. Operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made at or before lease commencement and exclude any lease incentives received. The Company determines the lease term as the noncancellable period of the lease, and may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. Leases with a term of 12 months or less are not recognized on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s leases do not contain any residual value guarantees. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company accounts for lease and non-lease components as a single lease component for all its leases. Prior to April 1, 2019, at the inception of a lease, the Company evaluated the lease agreement to determine whether the lease was an operating or capital lease. For operating leases, the Company recognized rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term and recorded the difference between cash rent payments and the recognition of rent expense as a deferred liability. Where lease agreements contained rent escalation clauses, rent abatements and/or concessions, such as rent holidays and tenant improvement allowances, the Company applied them in the determination of straight-line rent expense over the lease term. [F] : Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss applicable to common shareholder by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common shareholders by the diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss, all common share equivalents are deemed anti-dilutive such that basic net loss per common share and diluted net loss per common share are equivalent. Potentially dilutive common shares have been excluded from the diluted net loss per common share computations in all periods presented because such securities have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per common share due to the Company’s net loss. There are no reconciling items used to calculate the weighted-average number of total common shares outstanding for basic and diluted net loss per common share data. At June 30, 2019 and 2018, potentially dilutive securities were as follows: June 30, 2019 2018 Options 4,031,231 2,422,158 Restricted stock units (unvested) 5,000 — Warrants 33,259 — Total 4,069,490 2,422,158 [G] Recently adopted accounting pronouncements : In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 which is a comprehensive new lease standard that amends various aspects of existing accounting guidance for leases. The core principle of ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to present the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on their consolidated balance sheets. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted this standard on April 1, 2019 using the optional modified retrospective transition method and applied the transition package of practical expedients allowed by the standard. Comparative periods were not restated. Upon adoption, on April 1, 2019, the Company recorded a $0.2 million increase in operating lease right-of-use assets and a $0.2 million increase in operating lease liabilities. The adoption of the new standard did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations and cash flows and did not have an impact on the Company’s beginning accumulated deficit balance. ASU No. 2016-02 provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. For leases that commenced prior to April 1, 2019, the Company elected the following package of practical expedients when assessing the transition impact: (1) not to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; (2) not to reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; and (3) not to reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company also elected to: (1) use the total lease term in its initial incremental borrowing rate calculation; (2) combine its lease and non-lease components and account for them as a single lease component; and (3) not apply the use of hindsight in determining the lease term when considering lessee options to extend or terminate the lease and to purchase the underlying asset. For additional information regarding the Company’s leases, see Note 10. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, C ompensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting Entities must apply the guidance retrospectively with a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The adoption of ASU No. 2018-07 on April 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and related disclosures. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-09, Codification Improvements The adoption of ASU No. 2018-19 on April 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and related disclosures. Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the SEC did not, or are not believed by management to, have a material impact on the Company’s present or future consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. [H] Recently issued accounting pronouncements : In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement |