Any consent, non-renewal, termination or other similar rights under any of our contracts that are triggered by the reorganization could have an adverse effect on our operations and financial performance, and the terms of the UNFI Merger Agreement may restrict our ability to obtain consents or waivers under such contracts.
Our relationships with our customers, suppliers, landlords, employees and other third parties are typically governed by written contracts. Certain of these contracts may include provisions that would permit the third party to terminate or modify the contract, or that would require its consent under the terms of the contract, as a result of the reorganization merger or other aspects of the reorganization. In those situations, we may need to negotiate with the applicable third party to obtain a consent or waiver of a contractual right, and the third-party may fail to grant the consent or waiver or impose new terms or conditions that are adverse to us in connection with doing so. In addition, the prior consent of UNFI may be required under the UNFI Merger Agreement in the event that we would propose to agree to certain amendments to third-party contracts or make other concessions to obtain such consents or waivers. UNFI’s incentives may be different than our own in connection with considering whether to grant such a consent. Any non-renewals, terminations, unfavorable renegotiation or changes of terms that result from the reorganization of our third party contracts could have an adverse effect on our business and operations, including product or service availability and cost, and on our financial performance and results of operations.
Due to restrictions in the UNFI Merger Agreement and other considerations, we may not complete a sale or sales of certain of our retail assets to third parties or another strategic transaction prior to the expiration of our capital loss carryforward in February 2019, or at all, in which case we may not be able to utilize that carryforward.
We believe that the reorganization could facilitate our ability to utilize a portion of our capital loss carryforward in a tax efficient manner, which could generate approximately $300 million of cash tax benefits for the Company over the next approximately 15 years (assuming, among other things, the occurrence of certain future events, sufficient future taxable income to realize these cash tax benefits and no change in applicable corporate tax rates). To utilize our capital loss carryforward, we must engage in a strategic transaction involving the sale of certain of our assets following the reorganization, but prior to February 23, 2019, when our capital loss carryforward expires. The Board has previously announced that it intends to seek to sell certain of our retail assets to third parties and focus on the Company’s Wholesale business. However, we may not be able to identify a third party for such a strategic transaction, or any third parties that we do identify may not be willing to agree to terms that are acceptable to us. As a result, such a strategic transaction may not be completed by February 23, 2019.
In addition, as discussed in the section of this Supplement entitled “Certain Matters Relating to the Holding Company Proposal Resulting from the UNFI Merger Agreement,” the prior written consent of UNFI will be required for certain such strategic transactions. If we do not complete such a strategic transaction prior to February 23, 2019, we may not be able to utilize our capital loss carryforward and the potential cash tax benefits for the Company would not be generated from the reorganization.
The reorganization merger may not qualify as a tax-free transaction under U.S. federal income tax laws, in which case SUPERVALU stockholders could be subject to significant U.S. federal income tax liabilities.
The U.S. federal income tax consequences of the reorganization merger to SUPERVALU stockholders are not certain. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the reorganization merger might qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code or an exchange described in Section 351 of the Code. Alternatively, the reorganization merger might be treated, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as a taxable exchange of SUPERVALU common stock for SUPERVALU Enterprises common stock.
If the reorganization merger does not qualify either as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code or an exchange described in Section 351 of the Code, you will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the receipt of SUPERVALU Enterprises common stock in exchange for your shares of SUPERVALU common stock in the reorganization merger. For further information, see the section entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences” in this Supplement.
As a holding company, SUPERVALU Enterprises will depend in large part on its operating subsidiaries to satisfy its obligations.
After the completion of the reorganization merger, SUPERVALU Enterprises will be a holding company with no business operations of its own. Its only significant assets will be the outstanding capital stock of its subsidiaries. As a result, it will rely on funds from its current subsidiaries and any subsidiaries that it may form in the future to meet its obligations.