Appendix A
This Appendix A provides supplemental information regarding the Reorganization and, in particular, the proposed accounting survivor of the Reorganization under the factors set forth in the NAST Letter. For the reasons set forth below, we believe that the Acquiring Fund has been properly designated as the accounting survivor in a manner consistent with the application of the NAST Letter factors. For the purposes of this letter, the Acquiring Fund, as it would exist after the completion of the Reorganization, is referred to as the “Combined Fund.”
The NAST Letter
The NAST Letter sets forth the factors that the SEC staff (the “Staff”) believes are relevant to the continuation of a performance record in a reorganization transaction, and it has also been applied more generally to an analysis of the accounting survivor in a fund reorganization. The standards articulated by the Staff in the NAST Letter are as follows:
In determining whether a surviving fund, or a new fund resulting from a reorganization, may use the historical performance of one of several predecessor funds, funds should compare the attributes of the surviving or new fund and the predecessor funds to determine which predecessor fund, if any, the surviving or new fund most closely resembles. Among other factors, funds should compare the various funds’ investment advisers; investment objectives, policies, and restrictions; expense structures and expense ratios; asset size; and portfolio composition. These factors are substantially similar to the factors the staff considers in determining the accounting survivor of a business combination involving investment companies. We believe that, generally, the survivor of a business combination for accounting purposes, i.e., the fund whose financial statements are carried forward, will be the fund whose historical performance may be used by a new or surviving fund.
We believe that the parties to a fund reorganization transaction are entitled to deference with respect to their determination of the accounting survivor in a reorganization transaction when they have duly considered the foregoing factors with respect to a particular transaction. As the Staff stated in The Riverfront Funds, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (pub. avail. Nov. 8, 1995), “[w]e express no opinion with respect to your analysis of the treatment of the MIM Stock Appreciation Fund as the surviving fund, as this is primarily a factual determination.” (emphasis added).
The following analysis applies each of the foregoing factors from the NAST Letter to the Reorganization and clearly supports the finding that, with respect to the Reorganization, the Acquiring Fund has been appropriately designated as the accounting survivor.
A-1