Ms. Karen Rossotto
September 24, 2018
Page 3
3. Comment: The disclosure states: “Under the Investment Adviser’s allocation of investment opportunities procedures, in the event of demand among the Investment Adviser’s clients, including the Fund, exceeding the available allocation of investment opportunities, the Investment Adviser will determine whether to reduce a client’s access to the investment opportunity based on the Investment Adviser’s allocation policy and procedures then in effect. As a result of these procedures, certain clients may be given priority with respect to certain investment opportunities. The Fund will not be able to invest alongside any other client of the Investment Adviser in any investment opportunities presented by the Investment Adviser to its clients. Because of this, the Fund will only be permitted to invest in investment opportunities if all other clients of the Investment Adviser with similar investment mandates have determined that the investment opportunity is not suitable for them and have determined not to express interest in the investment opportunity.” In your response letter, please confirm that this investment allocation policy is consistent with the fiduciary duty imposed on the Investment Adviser as a result of Section 206 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended.
Response: For the reasons set forth in the Registrant’s response dated August 17, 2018, concerning the limited number of investments that are suitable for both the Fund and for the other clients of Broadstone Asset Management, LLC, the investment adviser to the Fund (the “Investment Adviser”), the Investment Adviser does not believe that there is significant overlap between the investment strategies of the other clients of the Investment Adviser and those of the Fund. Additionally, the Investment Adviser has represented to the Registrant that it has clearly disclosed in its ADV Part II and to its clients, including the Fund as reflected in the Registrant’s disclosure, the method used for allocating limited availability investments. Accordingly, the Investment Adviser has confirmed to the Registrant that the investment allocation policy set forth in the Registration Statement is, in its view, consistent with the Investment Adviser’s fiduciary duties to all of its clients, including the Registrant.
4. Comment: Please provide your analysis of how the Fund meets the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a) of the Investment Company Act.
Response: Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act provides that “investment company” includes “any issuer which . . . is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily or proposes to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities.”
As disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Private CRE Investment Funds “may be structured as limited partnerships or limited liability companies and that hold real estate assets including office, industrial, multifamily and office properties.” Thus, the Fund’s investments in the Private CRE Investment Funds will consist of limited partnership interests or limited liability company interests, both of which meet the definition of “securities” under Section 2(a)(36) of the Investment Company Act.
In addition, the Fund’s investments in Publicly Traded CRE Securities and CRE Debt Investments will both meet the definition of “securities” under Section 2(a)(36) of the Investment Company Act. Because the Fund holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in Private CRE Investment Funds, Publicly Traded CRE Securities, and CRE Debt Investments, the Fund meets the definition of “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act.
Additionally, Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act provides that “investment company” includes “any issuer which . . . is engaged or proposes to engage in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding, or trading in securities, and owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40 per centum of the value of such issuer’s total assets (exclusive of Government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis.”