PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) DEF 14A Definitive proxy

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant☐

Check the appropriate box:
☐	Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☒	Definitive Proxy Statement
☐	Definitive Additional Materials
☐	Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name(s) of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒	No fee required.
☐	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
☐	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
☐	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

  PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 3043 Townsgate Road Westlake Village, California 91361

April 17, 2019

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. to be held on Thursday, May 30, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. The Annual Meeting will be held at our corporate offices located at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361.

The Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement are attached to this letter and contain information about the matters on which you will be asked to vote at the Annual Meeting. We will transact no other business at the Annual Meeting, except for business properly brought before the Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof by our Board of Directors. Only our stockholders of record at the close of business on April 1, 2019, the record date, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Your vote is very important. Please carefully read the Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement so that you will know the matters on which we plan to vote at the Annual Meeting, and then vote your shares by proxy by mail, by Internet or by telephone as soon as possible to make sure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. You may also cast your vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or bank, you must instruct that firm or bank as to how to vote your shares.

ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION: In order to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you will need to present your admission ticket, or an account statement showing your ownership of our common stock as of the record date, and valid government-issued photo identification. The indicated portion of your proxy card will serve as your admission ticket.

On behalf of our Board of Directors, we thank you for your participation and look forward to seeing you on May 30th.

Sincerely,

STANFORD L. KURLAND	DAVID A. SPECTOR
Executive Chairman	President and Chief Executive Officer

  PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 3043 Townsgate Road Westlake Village, California 91361

Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Date and Time:	Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time
Location:	PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 3043 Townsgate Road Westlake Village, California 91361
Record Date:	April 1, 2019. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of, and vote at, the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting, and any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof.
Mailing Date:	We intend to mail the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, or the Proxy Statement and proxy card, as applicable, on or about April 17, 2019 to our stockholders of record on the record date.
Items of Business:	•To elect the eleven (11) director nominees identified in the enclosed Proxy Statement to serve on our Board of Directors, each for aone-year term expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders;
	•To ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;
	•To approve, bynon-binding vote, our executive compensation; and
	•To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.
Attendance:	If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you will need to bring proof of ownership in order to be granted admission. Please read “INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION—Who can attend the Annual Meeting?” in the accompanying Proxy Statement.
Voting:	Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy by mail, by Internet or by telephone as soon as possible to make sure that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. You may also cast your vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm or bank, you must instruct that firm or bank as to how to vote your shares.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

DEREK W. STARK

Secretary

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 30, 2019:

This Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

  TABLE OF CONTENTS  

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY	1
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	6
PROPOSAL I — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS	15
Director Nominees	16
Non-Management Director Compensation	20
2018 Director Compensation Table	21
Non-Management Director Stock Ownership Guidelines	21
AUDIT MATTERS	22
Report of the Audit Committee	22
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	23
Fees to Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2018 and 2017	23
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures	23
PROPOSAL II —  RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	24
SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION	25
Security Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors	25
Security Ownership of Other Beneficial Owners	26
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	27
Our Executive Officers	27
Report of the Compensation Committee	28
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	29
Compensation Tables	42
CEO Pay Ratio	50
PROPOSAL III —  ADVISORY(NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	51
Supporting Statement	51
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS	52
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K	63
OTHER MATTERS	63
INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION	64

  |  2019 Proxy Statement i

  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

Proxy Statement Summary

This summary contains highlights about our Board and the upcoming 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or Annual Meeting. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider in advance of the Annual Meeting and we encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement before voting.

2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Date and Time:	Thursday, May 30, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time
Location:	3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361
Record Date:	April 1, 2019
Mail Date:	April 17, 2019

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

Matter		Our Board Vote Recommendation
Proposal I:	Election of eleven (11) directors to our Board of Directors	FOR each Director Nominee identified in this Proxy Statement
Proposal II:	Ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm	FOR
Proposal III:	Approval, bynon-binding vote, of our executive compensation	FOR

Director Nominees

Director Nominees	Age		Director Since		Principal Occupation / Key Experience	Committee Membership
Stanford L. Kurland		66		2012	Executive Chairman of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.	None
David A. Spector		56		2012	President and Chief Executive Officer of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.	None
Anne D. McCallion		64		2018	Senior Managing Director and Chief Enterprise Operations Officer of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.	None
Matthew Botein		46		2012	Managing Partner, Gallatin Point LLC	Compensation Finance
James K. Hunt*		67		2013	Former Managing Partner and CEO, Middle Market Credit at Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors LLC	Governance and Nominating Compensation
Patrick Kinsella †		65		2014	Adjunct Professor at USC Marshall School of Business and Retired Senior Audit Partner with KPMG, LLP	Audit Related-Party Matters Risk

† Audit Committee Financial Expert

* Independent Lead Director

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 1

  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

Director Nominees	Age	Director Since	Principal Occupation / Key Experience	Committee Membership
Joseph Mazzella	66	2012	Retired Managing Director and General Counsel of Highfields Capital Management LP	Governance and Nominating Related-Party Matters
Farhad Nanji	40	2012	Co-Founder of MFN Partners Management, L.P.	Compensation Governance and Nominating
Jeffrey A. Perlowitz	62	2019	Retired Managing Director andCo-Head of Global Securitized Markets of Citigroup and/or its Predecessors	Finance Risk
Theodore W. Tozer	62	2017	Senior Fellow at the Milken Institute’s Center for Financial Markets; Former President of Government National Mortgage Association	Audit Related-Party Matters Risk
Emily Youssouf	67	2013	Clinical Professor at NYU Schack Institute of Real Estate	Audit Finance

We believe our Board possesses deep and broad skill sets and specific experience and expertise that facilitate strong oversight and strategic direction for us as a leading specialty financial services firm focused on the production and servicing of U.S. mortgage loans and the management of investments related to the U.S. mortgage market.

Age Diversity

Board Skills
Financial Expertise						9
Investment Banking Experience				5
Financial Industry Knowledge							11
Mortgage Banking/Agency Expertise			4
Legal Experience		2
Risk Management Experience				5
Operating Experience					6
Accounting Experience			4
	out of 11 directors

2   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

Corporate Governance Highlights

We continuously monitor developments, trends and best practices in corporate governance and consider feedback from stockholders and proxy advisory firms such as Institutional Shareholder Services, or ISS, as appropriate, when enhancing our governance, policies and structure.

✓	Majority Voting Standard in the Election of Directors. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard for uncontested director elections and plurality voting standard for contested director elections.	✓	Independent Lead Director. The independent directors of our Board elected James K. Hunt as our independent lead director for a three-year term that expires in February 2020.
✓	Director Resignation Policy.Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include a requirement that any director nominee who fails to receive a majority vote, if required, for election orre-election will promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board.	✓	Retirement Age. It is our general policy that no director having attained the age of 75 years shall be nominated forre-election orre-appointment to the Board.
✓	Director Limitations on Number of Boards. A director who is currently serving as a chief executive officer of a public company, including our Chief Executive Officer, is not permitted to serve on more than two outside public company boards. No other director is permitted to serve on more than five outside public company boards.	✓	Regular Executive Sessions. Our independent directors meet privately on a regular basis. Our independent lead director presides at such meetings.
✓	Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines. We have robust stock ownership guidelines for ournon-management directors (five times the base annual retainer) and executive officers (five times base salary for our Executive Chairman and our President and Chief Executive Officer; three times base salary for all other executive officers).	✓	Regular Board Evaluation. The Governance and Nominating Committee sponsors an annual self-assessment of the Board’s performance as well as the performance of each committee of the Board.
✓	Stockholder Engagement. We value the perspectives of our stockholders and interact with stockholders through a variety of engagement activities.	✓	Annual Elections. Our Board is not classified and, therefore, we conduct annual elections for all directors who serve on our Board.

2018 Business Highlights

A summary of our full-year financial highlights is as follows:

Full-Year 2018 Highlights⁽¹⁾

• Completed a corporate reorganization on November 1, 2018, that simplified our corporate structure and converted all equity ownership to a single class of publicly-traded common stock

• Total net revenue of $984.6 million, up 3 percent from the prior year

• Pretax income was $267.7 million; down 20 percent from the prior year

• Diluted earnings per share of $2.59; includes a benefit of $0.20 resulting from the remeasurement oftax-related items

• Loan production totaled $67.6 billion in UPB, a decrease of 2 percent from the prior year; we were the 3^rd largest mortgage producer in the U.S. as of December 31, 2018, according toInside Mortgage Finance

• Servicing portfolio reached $299.3 billion in UPB, up 22 percent from December 31, 2017; we were the 8^th largest servicer in the U.S. as of December 31, 2018, according toInside Mortgage Finance

• Investment management had $1.6 billion of assets under management at year end, essentially unchanged from December 31, 2017

• Pretax return on equity for Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC, or PNMAC, was 19.6%

(1) For complete information regarding our Fiscal 2018 performance, stockholders should read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on March 5, 2019 and is being made available to stockholders with this Proxy Statement as a part of our 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 3

  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

A summary of the substantial growth in our book value per share is provided below.

4   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY  

Executive Compensation Highlights

Our compensation governance best practices are summarized as follows:

What We Do		What We Don’t Do
✓	Heavy bias toward performance-based equity: Our Board seeks to ensure that our long-term equity incentive awards are significantly weighted toward performance-based equity vehicles.	û	No minimum level of total compensation: We do not provide for guaranteed minimum levels of performance-based cash bonuses or long-term equity awards in our employment agreements.
✓	Minimum vesting periods: Our equity incentive plan provides that our equity awards are subject to a minimum vesting period of no less than one year on 95% of equity awards granted and our grants generally vest over three years, with approximately equal annual installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.	û	No automatic salary increases: Our named executive officers are not entitled to automatic base salary increases and none of the employment agreements with our named executive officers contain such provisions.
✓	Clawback policy: Our Board maintains a clawback policy that allows us to recoup certain incentive compensation paid on the basis of erroneous financial statements that result in a material accounting restatement.	û	No “single trigger” cash severance and equity or excise taxgross-ups: We do not provide for single trigger cash severance and equity vesting upon a Change in Control, if assumed. We also do not provide for excise taxgross-ups upon a Change in Control.
✓	Balanced risk-taking approach to our compensation program: Our compensation program is designed to discourage excessive risk taking and encourage long-term decision making in alignment with the interests of our stockholders. We consult with our independent compensation consultant in this regard.	û	No excessive perks: Our perquisites are limited to those with a clear business-related rationale.
✓	Robust stock ownership guidelines: We impose robust stock ownership guidelines on our directors and executive officers to ensure that their interests are aligned with those of our stockholders.	û	Nogross-ups for perks: We do not provide excise taxgross-ups of perquisites for our executive officers.
✓	Stockholder engagement: We value the perspectives of our stockholders and interact with stockholders through a variety of engagement activities.	û	Nore-pricing: Our equity incentive plan prohibits there-pricing of stock options and stock appreciation rights without stockholder approval.
✓	Consideration of stockholder feedback: We engage in careful consideration of stockholder feedback regarding compensation.	û	No speculative or short-term trading: We prohibit our officers, employees and directors from engaging in speculative and short-term trading of our securities.
✓	Comprehensive review of peer group: On an annual basis, we engage in a comprehensive review to assess and identify a relevant peer group of companies in our or a related industry.	û	No hedging, pledging, short sales, or margin trading: We prohibit our officers, employees and directors from engaging in hedging, pledging, short sales, trading in publicly traded put or call options or trading on margin involving our securities.
✓	Independent compensation consultant: We utilize the services of Pearl Meyer, which is engaged directly by the Compensation Committee as an outside independent compensation consultant to advise on executive compensation matters.	û	No supplemental executive retirement plans: We do not maintain any supplemental executive retirement plans for named executive officers.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 5

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Corporate Governance

Director Qualification and Selection Criteria

The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing the general criteria, subject to approval by the full Board, for use in identifying, evaluating and selecting qualified candidates for election orre-election to our Board. The Governance and Nominating Committee periodically reviews with our Board the appropriate skills and characteristics required of directors in the context of the current composition of our Board. Final approval of director candidates is determined by the full Board, and invitations to join our Board are extended by our Executive Chairman on behalf of the entire Board.

The Governance and Nominating Committee, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, seeks to create a board that is strong in its collective knowledge and has skills and experience with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, risk management, corporate governance, and knowledge of the mortgage and real estate investment trust sectors and the global markets. The Governance and Nominating Committee also focuses on issues of diversity, such as diversity of gender, race and national origin, education, professional experience, and differences in viewpoints and skills. We do not have a formal policy with respect to diversity; however, our Board and Governance and Nominating Committee believe that it is essential that our directors represent diverse viewpoints and backgrounds. In considering candidates for our Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards and in light of the needs of our Board and our Company at that time, given the then current mix of director attributes. The Governance and Nominating Committee also considers a candidate’s accessibility and availability to serve effectively on our Board, and it conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of potential candidates. With respect to the nomination of continuing directors forre-election, the individual’s past contributions to our Board are also considered.

Pursuant to separate stockholder agreements with BlackRock Mortgage Ventures, LLC, or BMV, and HC Partners LLC, or HCP, each of BMV and HCP has the right to nominate up to two individuals for election to our Board, depending on the percentage of the voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock that it holds, and we are obligated to use our best efforts to cause the election of those nominees. Based on current levels of ownership, each of BMV and HCP has the right to nominate two directors to the Board. BMV has elected to nominate one individual, Matthew Botein, for election to our Board. HCP has elected to nominate one individual, Joseph Mazzella, for election to our Board. Although each of BMV and HCP has chosen not to exercise its right to nominate a second director at this time, each reserves the right to do so in the future as provided in the BMV and HCP stockholder agreements.

The Governance and Nominating Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Governance and Nominating Committee assesses the appropriate size of our Board and whether any vacancies on our Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In connection with the appointment of Mr. Perlowitz to the Board, effective as of February 20, 2019, we increased the size of our Board to twelve directors. In connection with Mr. Wiedman’s departure from our Board on March 29, 2019, we decreased the size of our Board to eleven directors. In the event that a vacancy is anticipated, or otherwise arises, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers whether to fill any such vacancy and, if so, identifies various potential candidates for director. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Governance and Nominating Committee, and may be considered at any point during the year. In evaluating such nominations, the Governance and Nominating Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on our Board.

Candidates may come to the attention of the Governance and Nominating Committee through current members of our Board, professional search firms or other persons. The Governance and Nominating Committee also will consider recommendations for nominees properly submitted by our stockholders. These recommendations should be submitted in writing to our Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with a recommendation for a director nominee, such materials are forwarded to the Governance and Nominating Committee. Following verification of the stockholder status of persons proposing candidates, recommendations will be aggregated and considered by the Governance and Nominating Committee, in the same manner as other recommendations, at its next regularly scheduled or special meeting. During 2018, the Governance and Nominating Committee did not retain an independent third party to assist in identifying appropriate director candidates for our Board. Mr. Perlowitz was identified and recommended to the Governance and Nominating Committee by our Executive Chairman, our President and Chief Executive Officer and a stockholder.

6   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Independence of Our Directors

The NYSE rules require that at least a majority of our directors be independent of our Company and management. The rules also require that our Board affirmatively determine that there are no material relationships between a director and us (either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) before such director can be deemed independent. We have adopted independence standards consistent with NYSE rules and the rules of the SEC. Our Board has reviewed both direct and indirect transactions and relationships that each of our directors has or had with us and our management.

As a result of this review, our Board, based upon the fact that none of ournon-management directors have any material relationships with us other than as directors and holders of our common stock, affirmatively determined that eight of our directors are independent directors under NYSE rules. Our independent directors are Messrs. Botein, Hunt, Kinsella, Mazzella, Nanji, Perlowitz and Tozer and Ms. Youssouf.

Board of Directors Leadership

Our Board leadership structure is currently comprised of our Executive Chairman, our President and Chief Executive Officer, our independent lead director, and our independent Board committees. We believe this structure, including the separation of the offices of the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer, provides a well-functioning and effective balance between strong management leadership and appropriate safeguards and oversight bynon-management Board members. As Executive Chairman, Mr. Kurland is charged with leading our strategy, organizational development and governance and representing our Company with business partners, investors and other key external stakeholders, with a focus on advising and helping guide members of our senior management team in their respective areas of responsibility. As President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Spector has thein-depth focus andhands-on perspective of being ultimately responsible for theday-to-day management decisions and for leading our senior management team in the execution of our strategic initiatives.

Our Board believes that independent directors and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside our Company and industry, while the Executive Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer bring company-specific experience and expertise. We believe Mr. Kurland, as our former chief executive officer, is well situated to serve as Executive Chairman because we believe he is able to utilize thein-depth focus and perspective gained in running our Company to effectively and efficiently lead our Board. As the director most familiar with our business and industry, he is most capable of identifying new initiatives and businesses, strategic priorities and other critical and/or topical agenda items for discussion by our Board and then leading the discussion to ensure our Board’s proper oversight of these issues. As we announced in December 2018, Mr. Kurland will continue to serve as the Executive Chairman of our Board through December 31, 2019, and, beginning on January 1, 2020 and continuing through December 31, 2022, will serve as theNon-Executive Chairman of our Board, assuming he isre-elected to that post through such date.

Our Board believes that this leadership structure, which separates the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman roles, is appropriate at this time in light of our evolving business and operating environment, our need to facilitate the efficient information flow between senior management and our Board, our desire to provide guidance to senior management, and our continued focus on promoting strategy development and execution, all of which are essential to effective governance.

Independent Lead Director

We believe our Board leadership structure is also strengthened through the appointment of an influential independent lead director with a strong voice. The Independent lead director works with our Executive Chairman and other directors to provide informed, independent oversight of our management and affairs. Among other things, the independent lead director reviews and provides input on Board meeting agendas and materials, coordinates with committee chairs to ensure the committees are fulfilling the responsibilities set forth in their respective charters, serves as the principal liaison between our Executive Chairman and the independent directors, and chairs an executive session of the independent directors at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Our Board hasre-appointed Mr. Hunt as independent lead director for a three (3) year term that expires in February 2020.

Together, our Executive Chairman and the independent lead director provide leadership to and work with our Board to define its structure and activities in the fulfillment of its responsibilities.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 7

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

The Role of the Board in Risk Oversight

Our senior management is responsible for designing, implementing and maintaining an effective and appropriate approach for managing enterprise risk. Our Board and each of its committees, and in particular, the Risk Committee, have an active role in overseeing our risk management process, while supporting organizational objectives, improving long-term organizational performance and creating stockholder value. A fundamental part of risk management oversight is not only understanding the risks a company faces and what steps management is taking to manage those risks, but also understanding what level of risk is appropriate for our Company. The involvement of the full Board in determining our business strategy is a key part of its assessment of management’s appetite for risk and determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for our Company. While our Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, particularly with respect to those risks inherent in the operation of our businesses and the implementation of our strategic plan, the committees of our Board also share responsibility for overseeing specific areas of risk management as follows:

Committee	Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility
Audit	The Audit Committee focuses on risks associated with internal controls and securities, financial and accounting compliance, and receives an annual risk assessment report from our internal auditors.
Compensation	The Compensation Committee focuses on oversight of our compensation policies and practices, including whether such policies and practices balance risk taking and rewards in an appropriate manner so as not to encourage excessive risk taking.
Finance	The Finance Committee focuses on risks relating to our Company’s liquidity and capital resources and our investment policies and strategies.
Governance and Nominating	The Governance and Nominating Committee focuses on risks associated with proper board governance, including the independence of our directors and the assessment of the performance and effectiveness of each member and Committee of our Board.
Related-Party Matters	The Related-Party Matters Committee focuses on risks arising out of potential conflicts of interest between us or any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and (i) PMT and its subsidiaries, (ii) any othernon-wholly-owned entity that we may manage or over which we may have control (whether through ownership, voting power, contract or otherwise), and (iii) any other identified related party, on the other hand.
Risk	The Risk Committee oversees our enterprise risk management function in relation to our business activities and focuses on credit risk, mortgage compliance risk and operational risk, including cybersecurity risk.

While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board is regularly informed through committee reports about the nature of all such risks.

8   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board has established six principal committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee, the Governance and Nominating Committee, the Related-Party Matters Committee and the Risk Committee. Our Board committees have also adopted written charters that govern their conduct, each of which is available on our website at www.ir.pennymacfinancial.com.

The current chairs and members of the committees are identified in the following table:

Directors	Audit	Compensation	Finance	Governance and Nominating	Related- Party Matters	Risk
Non-Management Directors
Matthew Botein		CC	X
James K. Hunt*		X		CC
Patrick Kinsella	CC				X	X
Joseph Mazzella				X	CC
Farhad Nanji		X		X
Jeffrey A. Perlowitz			X			X
Theodore W. Tozer	X				X	CC
Emily Youssouf	X		CC
Management Directors
Stanford L. Kurland†
David A. Spector
Anne D. McCallion

†   – Executive Chairman

*     – Independent Lead Director

CC – Committee Chair

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 9

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

The primary committee responsibilities, current committee membership and number of meetings held by each such committee of our Board during 2018 are summarized below:

Audit Committee	Primary Responsibilities
Members:	The Audit Committee assists our Board in overseeing: •  our accounting and financial reporting processes; •  the integrity and audits of our financial statements; •  our internal control function; •  our compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements; •  the effectiveness of our compliance programs as they relate to applicable laws and regulations governing securities, financial and accounting matters; •  the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; and •  the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal auditors. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing an audit committee report to be included in our annual proxy statement, reviewing and discussing management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations to be included in our SEC filings, the engagement, retention and compensation of our independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with our independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and permissiblenon-audit fees, and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls.
Patrick Kinsella Theodore W. Tozer Emily Youssouf
Meetings in 2018: 8
Mr. Kinsella serves as an “audit committee financial expert,” as that term is defined by the SEC. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” under the rules of the NYSE. Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Audit Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. For additional information on the Audit Committee, please see the section below entitled “Report of the Audit Committee.”

Compensation Committee	Primary Responsibilities
Members:	The principal functions of the Compensation Committee are to: •  evaluate the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; •  review and/or recommend to the Board the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers; •  adopt and administer compensation policies, plans and benefit programs for our executive officers and all other members of our executive team; •  review and recommend to our Board compensation plans, policies and programs; •  prepare the compensation committee report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement; •  review and discuss our compensation discussion and analysis to be included in our annual proxy statement; •  recommend to our Board the compensation for our independent directors; and •  administer the issuance of any securities under the PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, or the 2013 Plan. The Compensation Committee may form, and delegate authority to, subcommittees when it deems appropriate to the extent permitted under applicable law.
Matthew Botein James K. Hunt Farhad Nanji
Meetings in 2018: 6
Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Compensation Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE and SEC. For additional information on the Compensation Committee, please see the section below entitled “Report of the Compensation Committee.”

10   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Finance Committee	Primary Responsibilities
Members:	The Finance Committee is responsible for overseeing the financial objectives, policies, procedures and activities of our Company, including a review of our capital structure, sources of funds, liquidity and financial position. In connection with these responsibilities of the Finance Committee, its principal functions are to: •review, assess and monitor our capital structure, liquidity, capital adequacy and reserves; •review and assess any policies we may establish from time to time that relate to our liquidity management, capital structure and dividend approvals; •review our short- and long-term investment strategy, investment policies and the performance of our investments; •monitor our capital budget; and •review our policies and procedures on derivatives transactions.
Matthew Botein Jeffrey A. Perlowitz Emily Youssouf
Meetings in 2018: 4
Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Finance Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

Governance and Nominating Committee	Primary Responsibilities
Members:	The principal functions of the Governance and Nominating Committee are to: •  seek, consider and recommend to the full Board qualified candidates for election as directors and then recommend nominees for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders; •  recommend to our Board individuals qualified to be appointed as our executive officers; •  periodically prepare and submit to our Board for adoption the Governance and Nominating Committee’s selection criteria for director nominees; •  review and make recommendations to our Board on matters involving the general operation of our Board and our corporate governance guidelines; •  annually recommend to our Board nominees for each of its committees; and •  annually facilitate the assessment of the performance of the individual committees and our Board as a whole and reporting thereon to our Board.
James K. Hunt Joseph Mazzella Farhad Nanji
Meetings in 2018: 4
Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Governance and Nominating Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 11

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Related-Party Matters Committee	Primary Responsibilities
Members:	The principal functions of the Related-Party Matters Committee are to: •  establish policies and procedures related to the identification and management of certain transactions, and resolve other potential conflicts of interest, between our Company and any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PMT and its subsidiaries and any othernon-wholly-owned entity that we manage or over which we have control (whether through ownership, voting power, contract or otherwise), on the other hand; •  establish policies and procedures related to the identification of any other transactions in which certain related parties, including our directors, executive officers and their family members, have a direct or indirect interest; •  oversee and administer all such policies; and •  review and, if necessary, approve and/or make recommendations to the Board regarding all such transactions, including, but not limited to, our management agreement, flow servicing agreement, mortgage banking services agreement, MSR recapture agreement, and master spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreements with PMT, and any amendments of or extensions to such agreements.
Patrick Kinsella Joseph Mazzella Theodore W. Tozer
Meetings in 2018: 4
Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Related-Party Matters Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

Risk Committee	Primary Responsibilities
Members:	The principal function of the Risk Committee is to assist our Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to: (i) our Company’s aggregate risk profile; (ii) specific risks expressly delegated to the Risk Committee, including credit risk, mortgage compliance risk, and operational risk; and (iii) management’s approach for assessing, monitoring and controlling such aggregate and specific risks. In carrying out its duties, the responsibilities of the Risk Committee include, but are not limited to, the following: •  reviewing, discussing and overseeing our management’s establishment and operation of our Company’s enterprise risk management (and any significant changes thereto); •  reviewing annually a schedule of all identified risks facing our Company and the alignment of such risks with our management committees and committees of our Board; •  reviewing annually our enterprise risk management policy; •  reviewing and overseeing credit risk, mortgage compliance risk, and operational risk (including risks arising from cybersecurity), as well as the establishment and operation of policies and procedures and remediation for any deficiencies with respect to such specific risks; and •  directing management to evaluate the effectiveness of our risk management.
Patrick Kinsella Jeffrey A. Perlowitz Theodore W. Tozer
Meetings in 2018: 4
Our Board has determined that all of the directors serving on the Risk Committee are independent under the applicable rules of the NYSE.

12   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Board of Directors and Committee Meetings

During Fiscal 2018, our full Board held five regular meetings. All directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees of which they are members. Each of our current directors who served on the Board during Fiscal 2018 attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings held in Fiscal 2018 for the period during which such director served, with respect to meetings of our Board and each committee on which such director served.

Executive Sessions of the Independent Directors

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require that our Board hold at least four regularly scheduled meetings each year and that our independent directors meet in executive session without management on a regularly scheduled basis. These executive sessions, which are designed to promote unfettered discussions among our independent directors, are presided over by the independent lead director, Mr. Hunt. During Fiscal 2018, ournon-management directors, all of whom are independent, held five meetings in executive session.

Attendance by Members of our Board of Directors at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

We expect each member of the Board to attend our annual meetings of stockholders except for absences due to causes beyond the reasonable control of the director. Each of the current members of our Board attended the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, except for Mr. Perlowitz who did not join our Board until 2019.

Board Evaluations and Refreshment

As described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, it is our general policy that no director having attained the age of 75 years shall be nominated forre-election orre-appointment to the Board, although the Board may waive this policy in individual cases. In addition, as described above, the Governance and Nominating Committee annually facilitates the assessment of the effectiveness and performance of individual committees and our Board as a whole. The key areas of focus for the evaluation are Board operations, Board accountability and committee performance. The results of the evaluation are reviewed with the Governance and Nominating Committee and the full Board.

Codes of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which sets forth the basic principles and guidelines for resolving various legal and ethical questions that may arise in the workplace and in the conduct of our business. This code is applicable to all of our officers and directors, as well as to the employees of PNMAC.

In addition, we have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which sets forth specific policies to guide these individuals in the performance of their duties. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for the Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers are available on our website at www.ir.pennymacfinancial.com.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on our website at www.ir.pennymacfinancial.com, which, in conjunction with the charters and key practices of the committees of our Board, provide the framework for the governance of our Company. In connection with the change to a majority voting standard in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, our Board also amended and restated our Corporate Governance Guidelines to provide that if any nominee for director fails to receive a majority vote for election orre-election, if so required, the director will promptly tender to the Board for its consideration his or her offer to resign from the Board.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 13

  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  

Corporate Sustainability and Social Responsibility

We strive not only to drive high operational and financial performance but also to serve a greater social purpose through our core businesses, which are centered around homeownership. Mortgage banking allows us to serve our customers throughout the country by facilitating home purchases, refinancings that make homes more affordable, and, when necessary, loss mitigation alternatives designed to avoid foreclosure and keep our customers and their families in their homes.

We also encourage and support principles of corporate sustainability through Board governance best practices, in our operations and throughout our communities. We believe these principles promote the sustainable, long-term growth of our organization for the benefit of our stockholders and the housing industry for the benefit of our customers, improving the environment in which we live. We hold ourselves accountable for managing our social, environmental and economic impact through a number of initiatives.

Corporate Governance. Our Board has established a set of principles, guidelines and practices that support sustainable financial performance and long-term value creation for our stockholders.

Board Diversity. Currently, two women serve on our Board, representing 18% of our total Board members. In addition, we have a number of directors who represent other diverse backgrounds and experiences. Our Board believes that these sorts of diversity factors are essential in promoting our long-term sustainable growth.

Environmental Sustainability. We seek to operate our facilities in an environmentally sustainable manner that manages our impact on the environment by investing in sustainable products and services, committing to increased waste recycling, focusing on energy efficiency and engaging in conservative water consumption practices. In the same way that we set the highest of standards for our business operations, we apply the highest corporate responsibility standards and rigorous performance goals to these efforts.

Diversity and Inclusion. We believe that building a diverse and inclusive, high-performing workforce where our employees bring diverse perspectives and varied experiences to work every day allows us to develop better and more innovative solutions for our customers. During Fiscal 2017, we established a mentorship program that is designed to promote opportunities for women at our company to strengthen networks, exchange ideas and build skills and relationships.

Human Capital. Our long-term sustainability as a company is highly dependent upon our people. Our goal is to recruit and develop the best talent, provide a supportive work environment and promote healthy living. We support the U.S. military through our continued focus on recruiting and creating opportunities for veterans. We have also partnered with a third party to establish a comprehensive, fully integrated wellness program designed to enhance the productivity of our employees.

We believe that every small effort is a step in the right direction, and we are confident that our corporate sustainability initiatives have made and will continue to make a positive impact both in and beyond our business.

Communications with our Board of Directors

Our stockholders and other interested persons may send written communications to the Board, committees of the Board and individual directors (including our independent lead director or theindependent/non-management directors as a group) by mailing those communications to:

[Specified Addressee]

c/o PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

3043 Townsgate Road

Westlake Village, California 91361

Email:PFSI_IR@pnmac.com

Attention: Investor Relations

Generally, these communications are sent by us directly to the specified addressee. Any communication that is primarily commercial, offensive, illegal or otherwise inappropriate, or does not substantively relate to the duties and responsibilities of our Board, may not be forwarded.

14   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

We have eleven (11) directors. The Board has nominated Stanford L. Kurland, David A. Spector, Anne D. McCallion, Matthew Botein, James K. Hunt, Patrick Kinsella, Joseph Mazzella, Farhad Nanji, Jeffrey A. Perlowitz, Theodore W. Tozer and Emily Youssouf for election as directors, and each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve if elected. If our director nominees are elected at this year’s Annual Meeting, they will serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2020 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Because this is considered an uncontested election under our Amended and Restated Bylaws, a nominee for director is elected to the Board if he or she receives a majority of the votes cast for his or her election, meaning the number of shares voted for such nominee’s election exceeds the number of shares voted against such nominee’s election. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not affect the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted. If an incumbent director receives a greater number of votes against his or her election than votes for such election, such director shall tender his or her resignation as provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board will then act on an expedited basis to determine whether to accept the director’s tendered resignation and will submit such recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board. In considering whether to accept or reject the tendered resignation, the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board will consider any factors they deem relevant.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR STANFORD L. KURLAND, DAVID A. SPECTOR, ANNE D. MCCALLION, MATTHEW BOTEIN, JAMES K. HUNT, PATRICK KINSELLA, JOSEPH MAZZELLA, FARHAD NANJI, JEFFREY A. PERLOWITZ, THEODORE W. TOZER AND EMILY YOUSSOUF AS DIRECTORS TO SERVE UNTIL OUR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS AND UNTIL THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS ARE DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFIED.

The following paragraphs provide the name and age (as of April 17, 2019) of each director, as well as each director’s business experience over the last five years or more. Immediately following the description of each director’s business experience is a description of the particular experience, skills and qualifications that were instrumental in the Governance and Nominating Committee’s determination that the director should serve on our Board.

Name	Age	Position
Stanford L. Kurland	66	Director, Executive Chairman
David A. Spector	56	Director
Anne D. McCallion	64	Director
Matthew Botein	46	Director
James K. Hunt	67	Independent Lead Director
Patrick Kinsella	65	Director
Joseph Mazzella	66	Director
Farhad Nanji	40	Director
Jeffrey A. Perlowitz	62	Director
Theodore W. Tozer	62	Director
Emily Youssouf	67	Director

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 15

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

Director Nominees

STANFORD L. KURLAND	Mr. Kurland has been a member of our Board since our formation in December 2012 and has been our Executive Chairman since January 2017. Prior thereto, he had been our chairman of the board and chief executive officer from February 2013 through December 2016. Mr. Kurland also served as the chief executive officer of PNMAC from May 2013 through December 2016 and, prior thereto, served as chairman of the board and chief executive officer from its formation in January 2008 to May 2013. In addition, Mr. Kurland has been the executive chairman of PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust, or PMT, since January 2017 and, prior thereto, had been the chairman of the board and chief executive officer of PMT from its formation in May 2009 through December 2016. He has also served as the chairman of PNMAC Capital Management, LLC, or PCM, since its formation in March 2008, and the chairman of PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, or PLS, since its formation in February 2008. Prior to PNMAC’s formation, Mr. Kurland served as a director and, from January 1979 to September 2006, held several executive positions, including president, chief financial officer and chief operating officer, at Countrywide Financial Corporation, or Countrywide, a diversified financial services company. Mr. Kurland holds a BS from California State University, Northridge. We believe Mr. Kurland is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience as our previous chief executive officer and as an accomplished financial services executive with more than 40 years of experience in the mortgage banking arena.
Board Member Since:2012  Age: 66

DAVID A. SPECTOR	Mr. Spector has been a member of our Board since our formation in December 2012 and has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2017. He served as our executive managing director, president and chief operating officer from February 2016 through December 2016 and, prior thereto, as president and chief operating officer from February 2013 to February 2016. Mr. Spector also has been president and chief executive officer of PNMAC since January 2017 and, prior thereto, served in a variety of similar executive positions at PNMAC from January 2008 through December 2016. In addition, Mr. Spector has been a member of the board of PMT since its formation in May 2009 and chairman of the board of directors of PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, L.P. and PNMAC Mortgage Opportunity Fund, LLC since May 2008. Prior to joining PNMAC, Mr. Spector wasco-head of global residential mortgages for Morgan Stanley, a global financial services firm, based in London. Before joining Morgan Stanley in September 2006, Mr. Spector was the senior managing director, secondary marketing, at Countrywide, where he was employed from May 1990 to August 2006. Mr. Spector holds a BA from the University of California, Los Angeles. We believe Mr. Spector is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience as a member of our executive management team and as an experienced executive with broad mortgage banking expertise in portfolio investments, interest rate and credit risk management, and capital markets activity that includes pricing, trading and hedging.
Board Member Since:2012  Age: 56

ANNE D. MCCALLION	Ms. McCallion has been a member of our Board since February 2018. She has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Enterprise Operations Officer since January 2017. Prior thereto, she served as our senior managing director and chief financial officer from February 2016 through December 2016 and as our chief financial officer from January 2013 to February 2016. Ms. McCallion also has served in a variety of similar executive positions at PNMAC since May 2009. She has been senior managing director and chief enterprise operations officer of PMT since January 2017 and, prior thereto, had been its chief financial officer from its formation in 2009 through December 2016. Ms. McCallion is responsible for overseeing our enterprise operations function and has management responsibility for legal, regulatory relations, human resources, information technology and corporate administration. Prior to joining PNMAC, Ms. McCallion was employed by Countrywide (and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor), where she worked in a variety of executive positions, including deputy chief financial officer and senior managing director, finance, from 1991 to 2008. She also was a member of the technical staff at the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Ms. McCallion holds a BS degree from Gannon University and an MBA degree from Ashland University. She is also a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). We believe Ms. McCallion is qualified to serve on our Board because she is a seasoned executive with significant financial expertise and considerable experience in the financial and operational aspects of the mortgage banking business.
Board Member Since:2018  Age: 64

16   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

MATTHEW BOTEIN	Mr. Botein has been a member of our Board since our formation in December 2012. Since January 2017, Mr. Botein has served as managing partner at Gallatin Point LLC, a private investment and advisory firm. Since January 2017, he also has served as a consultant to BlackRock, Inc., or BlackRock, a global investment management firm, as part of a two year initial term during which he will advise BlackRock on certain aspects of its alternative investment business. Prior thereto, from November 2009 to January 2017, he was employed at BlackRock and held the position of managing director andco-head of BlackRock Alternative Investors and the title of chief investment officer for alternative investments. He previously served as chairman of Botein & Co., LLC, a private investment and advisory firm, from July 2009 through November 2009 and as a managing director of Highfields Capital Management LP, or Highfields, an investment management firm, from 2003 through June 2009. Mr. Botein also currently serves on the boards of Northeast Bancorp, a bank holding company, Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited, a specialty insurance and reinsurance provider, Hunt Capital Holdings, a real asset investment manager, and Fortune Holdings Ltd. He formerly served on the boards of First American Corporation, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust and CoreLogic, Inc. Mr. Botein holds an AB from Harvard College and an MBA from the Harvard Business School. We believe Mr. Botein is qualified to serve on our Board because of his considerable experience in the financial services industry, where he has managed portfolio investments in the banking, insurance, asset management, capital markets and financial processing sectors.
Board Member Since:2012  Age: 46
Committees: •  Compensation (Chair) •  Finance

JAMES K. HUNT Independent Lead Director	Mr. Hunt has been a member of our Board since April 2013 and has been appointed to serve as our independent lead director. Mr. Hunt is currently retired. From November 2015 until his retirement in August 2016, Mr. Hunt served as the managing partner and CEO, middle market credit at Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors LLC, a leading alternative investment firm in the areas of energy, real estate, credit and specialty growth capital. From August 2014 to November 2015, Mr. Hunt served asnon-executive chairman of the board of THL Credit, Inc., an externally-managed,non-diversifiedclosed-end management investment company. Mr. Hunt served as chief executive officer and chief investment officer of THL Credit, Inc. and of THL Credit Advisors, a registered investment advisor that provides administrative services to THL Credit, Inc., from April 2010 to July 2014 and, prior thereto, held similar executive positions with predecessor entities since May 2007. Previously, Mr. Hunt was chief executive officer and managing partner of Bison Capital Asset Management, LLC, a private equity firm, from 2001 to 2007. Prior toco-founding Bison Capital, Mr. Hunt was the president of SunAmerica Corporate Finance and executive vice president of SunAmerica Investments (subsequently, AIG SunAmerica). Mr. Hunt currently serves on the board of CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund, a diversified,closed-end management investment company. Mr. Hunt formerly served on the boards of THL Credit, Inc., THL Credit Advisors, Primus Guaranty, Ltd., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Lender Processing Services, Inc. Mr. Hunt received a BBA from the University of Texas at El Paso and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. We believe Mr. Hunt is qualified to serve on our Board because of his experience in capital markets and in managing financial services companies.
Board Member Since:2013  Age: 67
Committees: •  Compensation •  Governance and Nominating (Chair)

PATRICK KINSELLA	Mr. Kinsella has been a member of our Board since July 2014. Mr. Kinsella has served as an adjunct professor at the USC Marshall School of Business since August 2011. Prior to his retirement as a senior audit partner with KPMG LLP, or KPMG, in May 2013, Mr. Kinsella spent over 35 years at KPMG serving clients generally concentrated in the financial services sector, including banks, thrifts, mortgage companies, automotive finance companies, alternative investment companies and real estate companies. Mr. Kinsella also currently serves on the board of directors of Wrap Technologies, Inc., a developer of security products. Mr. Kinsella received a BS from California State University, Northridge and is a licensed certified public accountant in the State of California. We believe Mr. Kinsella is qualified to serve on our Board because of his extensive experience in providing professional accounting and auditing services to the financial services industry.
Board Member Since:2014  Age: 65
Committees: •  Audit (Chair) •  Related-Party Matters •  Risk

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 17

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

JOSEPH MAZZELLA	Mr. Mazzella has been a member of our Board since our formation in December 2012. Mr. Mazzella retired in March 2017 after serving as the managing director and the general counsel of Highfields, which he joined in 2002. Prior to joining Highfields, Mr. Mazzella was a partner at the law firm of Nutter, McClennen & Fish, L.L.P., in Boston, Massachusetts. Prior to private practice, he was an attorney at the Securities and Exchange Commission from 1978 to 1980, and previously served as a law clerk in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Mr. Mazzella has served on multiple public company boards of directors, including Alliant Techsystems, Inc. and Data Transmission Networks Corporation, and he served as chairman of the board of Insurance Auto Auctions, Inc. Mr. Mazzella received a BA from City College of New York and a JD from Rutgers University School of Law. We believe Mr. Mazzella is qualified to serve on our Board because of his broad experience and strong business and legal backgrounds in the financial services industry.
Board Member Since:2012  Age: 66
Committees: •  Governance and Nominating •  Related-Party Matters (Chair)

FARHAD NANJI	Mr. Nanji has been a member of our Board since our formation in December 2012. In December 2016, Mr. Nanjico-founded MFN Partners Management, L.P., a value-oriented investment management firm based in Boston, Massachusetts. Prior thereto, until December 2015, Mr. Nanji served as a managing director of Highfields, where he focused on portfolio investments in distressed securities, restructurings, structured credit and global financial services from 2006. Prior to joining Highfields, Mr. Nanji was an associate with HighVista Strategies, an investment management firm, and he also served as an engagement manager in the financial institutions group at McKinsey & Company, a global consulting firm. Mr. Nanji received an MBA from Harvard Business School and a B.Com. degree from McGill University. We believe Mr. Nanji is qualified to serve on our Board because of his expertise in the mortgage and financial services businesses.
Board Member Since:2012  Age: 40
Committees: •  Compensation •  Governance and Nominating

JEFFREY A. PERLOWITZ	Mr. Perlowitz has been a member of our Board since February 2019. He is currently retired. From 1998 until his retirement in 2016, Mr. Perlowitz served as managing director andco-head of global securitized markets at Citigroup and predecessor entities, where he was responsible for sales and trading of residential mortgage loans, commercial mortgages and consumer products. He holds a B.S. in economics and accounting from The State University of New York at Albany. We believe Mr. Perlowitz is qualified to serve on our Board because of his extensive mortgage finance background and expertise in the securitization of residential mortgage loans.
Board Member Since:2019  Age: 62
Committees: •  Finance •  Risk

18   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

THEODORE W. TOZER	Mr. Tozer has been a member of our Board since August 2017. Mr. Tozer currently serves as a senior fellow at the Milken Institute’s Center for Financial Markets, where he leads the Institute’s housing finance reform work. Prior thereto, Mr. Tozer served as the president of the Government National Mortgage Association, or Ginnie Mae, from February 2010 to January 2017. Before joining Ginnie Mae, Mr. Tozer served as senior vice president of capital markets at National City Mortgage Company. He also has served as a charter member of the National Lender Advisory Boards of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, chairman of the Capital Markets Committee of the Mortgage Bankers Association of America (MBA), and as a member of the Residential Board of Governors of the MBA. Mr. Tozer received a B.S. degree in Accounting and Finance from Indiana University in 1979, and is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and a Certified Management Accountant. We believe Mr. Tozer is qualified to serve on our Board because of his numerous years of experience in the mortgage and financial services businesses and his deep understanding of mortgage banking and agency relations.
Board Member Since:2017  Age: 62
Committees: •  Audit •  Related-Party Matters •  Risk (Chair)

EMILY YOUSSOUF	Ms. Youssouf has been a member of our Board since November 2013. Ms. Youssouf has served as a clinical professor at the NYU Schack Institute of Real Estate since 2009. Ms. Youssouf served as vice chair of the New York City Housing Development Corporation from 2011 to 2013 and as a member of its board from 2013 to 2014. Previously, she served as an independent consultant from 2008 to 2011, during which time her clients included Rockefeller Foundation, Washington Square Partners and various real estate investors. Prior thereto, she was a managing director with JPMorgan Securities, Inc., a broker-dealer, from 2007 to 2008, and the president of the NYC Housing Development Corporation from 2003 to 2007. Ms. Youssouf has also held various senior positions at Natlis Settlements, LLC, Credit Suisse First Boston, Daiwa Securities America, Prudential Securities, Merrill Lynch and Standard & Poor’s. Ms. Youssouf currently serves as a board member of numerous organizations, including the NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation, the NYC School Construction Authority, the NYS Job Development Authority, the TransitCenter, and JP Morgan Exchange-Traded Funds Trust. Ms. Youssouf is a graduate of Wagner College and holds an MA in Urban Affairs and Policy Analysis from The New School for Social Research. We believe Ms. Youssouf is qualified to serve on our Board because of her numerous years of experience in the investment banking, finance and real estate industries and deep understanding of the housing market.
Board Member Since:2013  Age: 67
Committees: •  Audit •  Finance (Chair)

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 19

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

Non-Management Director Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviews and recommends to our Board the form and level of director compensation and seeks outside advice from our independent compensation consultants on market practices when changes are contemplated. Director compensation was reviewed during September 2018 by our independent compensation consultants who found that our ongoing compensation was below the median of pay among the same peer companies utilized for our executive compensation analysis. The compensation program for ournon-management directors is intended to be competitive and fair so that we can attract the best talent to our Board, and recognize the time and effort required of a director given the size and complexity of our operations. In addition to cash compensation, we provide equity grants and have stock ownership guidelines to align the directors’ interests with our stockholders’ interests and to motivate our directors to focus on our long-term growth and success. Management directors who also serve as our executive officers are not paid any fees for serving on our Board or for attending Board meetings.

The following table summarizes the annual retainer fees of ournon-management directors during Fiscal 2018:

Base Annual Retainer, allnon-management directors	$	80,000	(1)
Additional Base Annual Retainer, independent lead director	$	30,000	(1)
Base Annual Retainer, allnon-management committee members:
Audit Committee	$	10,000
Compensation Committee	$	7,750
Finance Committee	$	7,750
Governance and Nominating Committee	$	5,750
Related-Party Matters Committee	$	5,750
Risk Committee	$	10,000
Additional Annual Retainer, all committee chairs:
Audit Committee	$	12,000
Compensation Committee	$	10,750
Finance Committee	$	10,750
Governance and Nominating Committee	$	7,750
Related-Party Matters Committee	$	7,750
Risk Committee	$	12,000

(1) In September 2018, the Base Annual Retainer for allnon-management directors was increased from $75,000 to $80,000 and the additional base annual retainer for the independent lead director was increased from $20,000 to $30,000.

In addition to the standing committees described above, our Board formed a committee, or the Special Committee, consisting of Messrs. Hunt, Kinsella and Tozer and Ms. Youssouf. The purpose of the Special Committee was to review and evaluate the transactions contemplated by our proposed corporate reorganization that was approved and closed on November 1, 2018. During Fiscal 2018, the Special Committee held eight meetings. We paid each member of the Special Committee aone-time retainer in the amount of $10,000. Upon the closing of the corporate reorganization, the Special Committee was disbanded.

Our directors are also eligible to receive certain types of equity-based awards under the 2013 Plan. During Fiscal 2018, each of Messrs. Botein, Hunt, Kinsella, Mazzella, Nanji, Tozer and Wiedman and Ms. Youssouf received a grant of 3,975 time-based restricted stock units, or RSUs, on March 9, 2018 with a grant date fair value of approximately $97,000. These RSUs vest ratably over a three (3) year period beginning on the one (1) year anniversary of the date of the grant, subject to continued service through each vesting date. Prior to the vesting of an RSU, such RSU is generally subject to forfeiture upon termination of service to us.

In addition, effective as of September 26, 2018, each independent director newly elected or appointed to our Board is entitled to receive aone-time initial RSU grant with a grant date fair value of approximately $102,000 in RSUs (annualized for the annual equity award cycle). Accordingly, upon Mr. Perlowitz’s appointment to our Board on February 20, 2019, he received aone-time initial equity grant of 195 RSUs with a grant date fair value of approximately $4,751 (which was the prorated amount based on days of service during the annual equity award cycle). Such RSUs will vest in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

20   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROPOSAL I – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  

Further, all members of our Board will be reimbursed for their reasonable out of pocket costs and expenses in attending all meetings of our Board and its committees and certain other Company-related functions.

Policy Regarding Receipt of Shares in Lieu of Cash Director Fees. During 2014, the Board adopted a policy wherebynon-management director fees may be paid in cash or common stock at the election of eachnon-management director. The number of shares of common stock delivered in lieu of any cash payment of director fees shall be equivalent in value to the amount of forgone director fees divided by the market value (as defined in our 2013 Plan) of the common stock on the last market trading day preceding the day on which the director fees otherwise would have been paid in cash to thenon-management director, rounded down to the nearest whole share.

Change of Control. Upon a change of control (as defined in our 2013 Plan), all outstanding equity awards granted tonon-management directors will be assumed, or substantially equivalent rights will be substituted, or the awards otherwise will be continued in a manner satisfactory to the Compensation Committee, by the acquiring or succeeding entity or its affiliate.

2018 Director Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the compensation earned by eachnon-management director who served on our Board for Fiscal 2018.

Name(1)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(2)		Stock Awards ($)(3)(4)		Total   ($)
Matthew Botein		102,568		97,000		199,568
James K. Hunt		—		234,954		234,954
Patrick Kinsella		124,068		97,000		221,068
Joseph Mazzella		—		192,568		192,568
Farhad Nanji		—		199,568		199,568
Theodore W. Tozer		106,818		97,000		203,818
Mark Wiedman (5)		109,818		97,000		206,818
Emily Youssouf		112,068		97,000		209,068

(1) Mr. Kurland, our Executive Chairman, Mr. Spector, a director and our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ms. McCallion, a director and our Senior Managing Director and Chief Enterprise Operations Officer, are not included in this table as they are officers of our Company and thus receive no additional compensation for their services as directors. Messrs. Kurland and Spector and Ms. McCallion received compensation as officers of our Company for Fiscal 2018. Compensation for Messrs. Kurland and Spector is included in the “2018 Summary Compensation Table.”

(2) Reflects fees earned by the director in Fiscal 2018, whether or not paid in such year. During Fiscal 2018, each of Messrs. Hunt, Mazzella and Nanji elected to receive his director fees in shares of common stock in lieu of cash.

(3) Reflects the grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, of RSUs granted to Messrs. Botein, Hunt, Kinsella, Nanji, Mazzella, Tozer and Wiedman and Ms. Youssouf on March 9, 2018. For more information on the assumptions used in our estimates of value, please refer toNote 21—Stock-based Compensation in our Annual Report on Form10-K filed on March 5, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, each of our directors held an aggregate number of RSUs in the following amounts: Messrs. Botein, Hunt, Kinsella, Mazzella, Nanji and Wiedman and Ms. Youssouf—10,128, and Mr. Tozer—6,141.

(4) Each of Messrs. Hunt, Mazzella and Nanji elected to receive shares of our common stock in lieu of cash director fees during Fiscal 2018.

(5) Mr. Wiedman resigned from our Board, effective as of March 29, 2019.

Non-Management Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

Non-management directors are subject to robust stock ownership guidelines whereby each such director is expected to hold common stock and unvested RSUs with an aggregate market value equal to at least five times the base annual retainer.Non-management directors are expected to meet the ownership guidelines within five years from the date of appointment or election to the Board. Eachnon-management director who has been a member of our Board for five years or more is in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines. The Governance and Nominating Committee will annually review each director’s progress toward meeting the stock ownership guidelines.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 21

  AUDIT MATTERS  

Audit Matters

Report of the Audit Committee

The Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the independence and experience requirements of The New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, and that Mr. Kinsella is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and the NYSE.

The Audit Committee met eight times in 2018. The Audit Committee’s agenda is established by the Chair of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee engaged Deloitte & Touche LLP, or Deloitte, as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and reviewed with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Deloitte the overall audit scope and plans, the results of the external audit examination, evaluations by the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company’s internal controls and the quality of its financial reporting.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Audit Committee also discussed with Deloitte other matters required to be discussed by a registered public accounting firm with the Audit Committee under applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. The Audit Committee received and discussed with Deloitte its annual written report on its independence from the Company’s and its management, which is made pursuant to applicable requirements of the PCAOB and considered with Deloitte whether the provision ofnon-audit services is compatible with its independence.

In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and, necessarily, in its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, which has the primary responsibility for financial statements and reports, and of Deloitte, which, in its report, expresses an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s annual financial statements to generally accepted accounting principles and on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as ofyear-end.

In reliance on these reviews and discussions, and the report of Deloitte, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors approved, the inclusion of the Company’s audited financial statements in its Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2019.

The foregoing report has been furnished by the current members of the Audit Committee:

Patrick Kinsella,Chair

Theodore W. Tozer

Emily Youssouf

22   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  AUDIT MATTERS  

Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

In addition to performing the audits of our financial statements in Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017, Deloitte provided other audit-related andnon-audit-related services for us during these years.

Fees to Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2018 and 2017

The following table shows the fees billed by Deloitte for the audit and other services it provided to us in respect of Fiscal 2018 and Fiscal 2017.

	2018		2017
Audit Fees (1)	$	1,934,275	$	1,773,496
Audit-Related Fees (2)		499,315		308,750
Tax Fees		14,085		—
All Other Fees (3)		30,000		60,000
Total	$	2,477,675	$	2,142,246

(1) Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the annual audit and reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form10-Q and the audit of the annual financial statements of certain of our subsidiaries.

(2) Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for professional services provided in connection with the issuance of comfort letters and consents in connection with SEC filings and other compliance related testing.

(3) All Other Fees consist of certain agreed upon procedures related to certain of our financing transactions.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee approved all services performed by Deloitte during Fiscal 2018 in accordance with applicable SEC requirements. The Audit Committee has alsopre-approved the use of Deloitte for certain audit-related andnon-audit-related services, setting a specific limit on the amount of such services that we may obtain from Deloitte before additional approval is necessary. In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated to the chair of the Audit Committee the authority to approve both audit-related andnon-audit-related services provided by Deloitte, provided that the chair will present any decision to the full Audit Committee for ratification at its next scheduled meeting.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 23

  PROPOSAL II – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   

PROPOSAL II – RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee is presenting a proposal to ratify its appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP and its affiliated entities, or Deloitte, which has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since our formation. During this time, Deloitte has performed accounting and auditing services for us. We expect that representatives of Deloitte will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. If the appointment of Deloitte is not ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMEND A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2019.

24   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION  

Security Ownership Information

Security Ownership of Executive Officers and Directors

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of common stock by (1) each of our named executive officers, (2) each of our current directors and director nominees, and (3) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly and the indicated person has sole voting and investment power.

	Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1)
	Number		Percentage
Executive Officers and Directors
Stanford L. Kurland (2)		9,467,543		12.09	%
David A. Spector (3)		2,048,799		2.62	%
Anne D. McCallion (4)		540,356		*
Doug Jones (5)		859,804		1.10	%
Vandad Fartaj (6)		1,006,907		1.29	%
Andrew S. Chang		1,035,445		1.32	%
David M. Walker (7)		605,284		*
Matthew Botein		705,687		*
James K. Hunt		67,937		*
Patrick Kinsella		22,444		*
Joseph Mazzella (8)		792,673		1.01	%
Farhad Nanji		180,563		*
Jeffrey A. Perlowitz		—		*
Theodore W. Tozer		2,407		*
Emily Youssouf		24,401		*
Directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)		17,360,250		22.17	%

* Represents less than 1.0%.

(1) Based on 78,317,843 shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule13d-3 under the Exchange Act. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares of common stock if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to those shares or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days of the record date. As used herein, “voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares. None of the shares have been pledged as security.

(2) Includes 8,314,990 shares of common stock owned by Kurland Family Investments, LLC and 93,347 shares of common stock owned by the 1998 Kurland Revocable Trust.

(3) Includes 465,604 shares of common stock owned by ST Family Investment Company LLC.

(4) Includes 423,920 shares of common stock held in a family trust.

(5) Includes 712,767 shares of common stock held in a family trust.

(6) Includes 845,254 shares of common stock held in a family trust.

(7) Includes 463,085 shares of common stock held in a family trust.

(8) Includes 407,031 shares of common stock owned by the Mazzella Family Irrevocable Trust. Mr. Mazzella is not a trustee of that entity, however, and disclaims beneficial ownership of the common stock held by that entity.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 25

  SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION  

Security Ownership of Other Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth certain information relating to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our shares of our common stock, based on our review of publicly available statements of beneficial ownership filed with the SEC on Schedules 13D and 13G as of the record date. Beneficial ownership reflected in the table below is based on 78,317,843 shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date and review of publicly available statements of beneficial ownership filed with the SEC on Schedules 13D and 13G through February 14, 2019.

	Common Stock Beneficially Owned
	Number		Percentage
5% Stockholders
HC Partners LLC (1)   200 Clarendon Street, 59th Floor   Boston, Massachusetts 02116		20,169,732		25.75	%
BlackRock, Inc. (2)   55 East 52nd Street   New York, New York 10022		16,030,399		20.47	%
The Vanguard Group (3)   100 Vanguard Boulevard   Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355		5,153,474		6.58	%
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (4)   100 E. Pratt Street   Baltimore, Maryland 212025		4,897,731		6.25	%
Kurland Family Investments, LLC   3043 Townsgate Road   Westlake Village, California 91361		8,314,990		10.62	%

(1) As reported in Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019 by HC Partners, LLC, or HCP. In the Schedule 13G amendment, HCP disclosed that it has the sole voting power and sole dispositive power over 20,169,732 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2018.

(2) As reported in Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on November 5, 2018 by BlackRock, Inc., or BlackRock. In the Schedule 13D amendment, BlackRock disclosed that its holdings consist of 469,752 shares of common stock acquired in its role as an investment adviser for certain client accounts and 15,560,647 shares of common stock held by BlackRock Mortgage Ventures, LLC, or BMV. BMV is indirectly wholly-owned by BlackRock, Inc. who controls the voting and investment power with respect to the securities held by BMV and, therefore, may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by that entity. BlackRock also reported that it has the sole voting power over 16,026,090 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 16,030,399 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2018.

(3) As reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019 by The Vanguard Group, or Vanguard. In the Schedule 13G, Vanguard disclosed that it has the sole voting power over 25,866 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power over 5,128,493 shares of common stock, and shared dispositive power over 24,981 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2018.

(4) As reported in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., or T. Rowe Price. In the Schedule 13G, T. Rowe Price disclosed that it has the sole voting power over 1,127,025 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power over 4,897,731 shares of common stock as of December 31, 2018.

26   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Executive Officers and Executive Compensation

Our Executive Officers

The following sets forth certain information with respect to our current executive officers:

Name	Age	Position Held with the Company
Stanford L. Kurland	66	Director, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
David A. Spector	56	Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Anne D. McCallion	64	Director, Senior Managing Director and Chief Enterprise Operations Officer
Andrew S. Chang	41	Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer
Vandad Fartaj	44	Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer
Doug Jones	62	Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer
David M. Walker	63	Senior Managing Director and Chief Risk Officer

Biographical information for Messrs. Kurland and Spector and Ms. McCallion is provided above under the caption “Proposal I - Election of Directors.” Certain biographical information for the other executive officers is set forth below.

Andrew S. Chang. Mr. Chang has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer since January 2017. Prior thereto, he served as our senior managing director and chief business development officer from February 2016 through December 2016 and as our chief business development officer from February 2013 to February 2016. Mr. Chang also has served in a variety of similar executive positions at PNMAC since May 2008. Mr. Chang is responsible for overseeing our financial management, reporting and controls and tax management, as well as our corporate development and investor relations activities. Prior to joining PNMAC, from June 2005 to May 2008, Mr. Chang was employed at BlackRock and was a senior member in its advisory services practice, specializing in financial strategy and risk management for banks and mortgage companies. Mr. Chang is an experienced financial services executive with substantial experience in corporate finance and mortgage banking.

Vandad Fartaj. Mr. Fartaj has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer since September 2018. Prior thereto, he served as senior managing director and chief capital markets officer from February 2016 to September 2018 and as chief capital markets officer from February 2013 to February 2016. Mr. Fartaj also has served in a variety of similar executive positions at PNMAC since April 2008. Mr. Fartaj is responsible for all capital markets and investment-related activities, including the development and execution of investment strategies, secondary marketing, hedging activities and capital markets strategies with government-sponsored enterprises. In addition, Mr. Fartaj is responsible for developing and managing relationships with Wall Street broker-dealers and fixed income investors. Prior to joining PNMAC, from November 1999 to April 2008, Mr. Fartaj was employed in a variety of positions at Countrywide Securities Corporation, including managing the strategy and execution of the whole loan conduit. Mr. Fartaj is an experienced mortgage banking executive with substantial experience in capital markets, mortgage-related investments, and interest rate and credit risk management.

Doug Jones. Mr. Jones has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer since January 2017 and the president of PLS since March 2017. Prior thereto, he served as our senior managing director and chief institutional mortgage banking officer from February 2016 through December 2016, as our chief institutional mortgage banking officer from March 2015 to February 2016, and as our chief correspondent lending officer from February 2013 to March 2015. Mr. Jones also has served in a variety of similar executive positions at PNMAC since June 2011. Mr. Jones is responsible for all business activities relating to our loan production, loan servicing and application development operations. Prior to joining PNMAC, Mr. Jones worked in several executive positions, including senior managing director, correspondent lending, at Countrywide (and Bank of America Corporation, as its successor) from 1997 until 2011, where he was responsible for managing and overseeing correspondent and warehouse lending operations. Mr. Jones is an experienced mortgage banking executive with significant experience in the correspondent production and warehouse lending businesses.

David M. Walker. Mr. Walker has been our Senior Managing Director and Chief Risk Officer since February 2016. Prior thereto, he served as our chief risk officer from July 2015 to February 2016, as chief credit and enterprise risk officer from May 2013 to July 2015, and as our chief credit officer from February 2013 to May 2013. Mr. Walker also has served in a variety of similar executive positions at PNMAC since January 2008. Mr. Walker is responsible for enterprise risk management, credit risk management, mortgage compliance management and internal audit. From June 2002 to April 2007, Mr. Walker served in a variety of executive positions at Countrywide Bank, N.A., including chief credit officer and chief lending officer. From October 1992 to June 2002, Mr. Walker served in a variety of executive positions at Countrywide, including executive vice president of secondary marketing and managing director and chief credit officer. Mr. Walker is a seasoned financial services executive with significant experience in credit risk management.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 27

  REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE  

Report of the Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of RegulationS-K and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended that our Board of Directors include the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement and our 2018 Annual Report on Form10-K.

The Compensation Committee

Matthew Botein,Chair

James K. Hunt

Farhad Nanji

28   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Table of Contents

2018 Named Executive Officers	29
Executive Summary of 2018 Compensation	29
Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy	31
Performance-Based Compensation Mix	31
2018 Compensation Program Overview	32
Compensation Decisions Made in Fiscal 2018	32
Executive Compensation Decision Making Process	35
Peer Group and Benchmarking	36
Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines	37
Clawback Provisions	38
Trading Controls and Anti-Pledging and Anti-Hedging Policies	38
Employment andChange-in-Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers	38

This compensation discussion and analysis provides a detailed description of our executive compensation programs and policies, the material compensation decisions made under such programs and policies with respect to our named executive officers, and the material factors that were considered in making those decisions. This narrative discussion should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below.

2018 Named Executive Officers

Our “named executive officers,” consisting of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our next three most highly compensated executives during Fiscal 2018, were:

• Stanford L. Kurland, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors;

• David A. Spector, President and Chief Executive Officer;

• Doug Jones, Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer;

• Vandad Fartaj, Senior Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer; and

• Andrew S. Chang, Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer.

Executive Summary of 2018 Compensation

Our Executive Compensation Program

The goals of our executive compensation program are to:

• Create apay-for-performance culture that rewards executives for high Company and individual performance;

• Align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders;

• Facilitate the attraction, motivation and retention of highly talented executive leaders who will be crucial to our long-term success and ultimate sustainability; and

• Encourage our executives to focus on the achievement of our annual and long-term business goals.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 29

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

How We Pay Our Named Executive Officers

In order to achieve these objectives, the executive compensation program for our named executive officers consists of the following primary elements:

• Annual Base Salary;

• Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonus Incentives; and

• Long-Term Equity Awards comprised of performance-contingent and time-based awards.

Our named executive officers also participate in our broad-based retirement and benefit programs generally available to all other employees and receive certain perquisites.

Pay-for-Performance Philosophy and Total Versus Realized Pay

Consistent with ourpay-for-performance philosophy, a significant portion of our named executive officers’ 2018 compensation consisted of variable performance-based annual and long-term incentives. As an illustration of our commitment to pay for performance, below is our CEO’s total compensation over the last three years as set forth in the “2018 Summary Compensation Table” of this Proxy Statement and our past annual proxy statements, compared to the total amount of compensation actually realized by our CEO for each year. The 2018 and 2017 compensation amounts provided below were in connection with Mr. Spector’s role as our President and Chief Executive Officer, whereas the 2016 compensation amounts were in connection with his role as our President and Chief Operating Officer.

Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Total Cash ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total Grant Date Fair Value of Long-Term Equity Incentive Opportunity ($)(1)		Total Realized Value of Long-Term Equity Incentive Opportunity ($)(2)		Total Grant Date Compensation ($)		Total Realized Compensation ($)
2018		750,000		2,900,000		3,650,000		76,271		2,051,348		1,986,072		5,777,619		5,712,343
2017		741,667		3,000,000		3,741,667		174,603		2,061,729		430,962		5,977,999		4,347,232
2016		550,000		3,750,000		4,300,000		114,518		1,031,441		—		5,445,959		4,414,518

(1) This amount includes the grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of RSUs and performance-based RSUs, or PSUs, awarded on March 9, 2018, March 6, 2017 and March 7, 2016. The performance-based RSUs included in this column are reported at target payout levels. See the “2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for additional details.

(2) For Fiscal 2018, this amount includes the vesting of 9,233 RSUs on March 6, 2018 and 77,902 PSUs on April 2, 2018 based on the fair market value of our common stock on the respective vesting dates.

Note: Total Realized Compensation is not a substitute for Total Compensation. Total Compensation is as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table in this and prior Proxy Statements. Total Realized Compensation includes long-term incentive awards (e.g., nonstatutory stock options and time-based and performance-based RSUs), only to the extent they were “realized,” i.e., to the extent they were exercised or vested during the years described.

30   |  2019 Proxy Statement

��   COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

The overall objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract, motivate, reward and retain high-quality talent. We believe that in order to achieve these objectives, our compensation and benefits programs must be competitive with executive compensation arrangements generally provided to similarly situated executive officers in our business markets, as well as at other companies in our industry where we compete for talent. The various components of our executive compensation program are designed to create apay-for-performance culture that rewards executives for high company and individual performance, aligns the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders, facilitates the attraction, motivation and retention of highly talented executive leaders, and encourages our executives to focus on the achievement of our annual and long-term business goals.

Our Compensation Committee aims to position the total compensation of our named executive officers at a level commensurate with the total compensation paid to other executives holding comparable positions at companies similar in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication with which we compete for executive talent. Our Compensation Committee has structured our executive compensation program to meet these objectives.

Performance-Based Compensation Mix

We have three primary elements of total compensation: base salary, annual performance-based cash bonus incentives, and long-term equity awards. As illustrated by the segments in the following graphs, 87% of our CEO’s target total compensation opportunity was performance-based and aligned with our stockholders in the form of annual performance-based cash bonus incentives and long-term equity compensation. For our other Named Executive Officers as a group, 87% of their total compensation opportunity also was performance-based.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 31

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

2018 Compensation Program Overview

Our executive compensation program consists of three primary elements: annual base salary, annual performance-based cash bonuses and long-term equity awards. The following table provides a snapshot of those primary elements and describes why each element is provided.

Compensation Element	Characteristics	Performance Based?	Primary Purpose
Annual Base Salary	Competitive fixed compensation	No	•  Provides a competitive fixed amount of cash compensation based on individual performance, level of responsibility, experience, internal equity and reasonable pay levels •  Supports attraction and retention of talented executives
Annual Performance- Based Cash Bonuses	Variable compensation opportunity contingent on achievement of corporate financial, operational and strategic goals and individual performance	Yes	•  Aligns executive compensation with annual performance •  Provides reasonable short-term incentive opportunity for achieving financial, operational and strategic objectives •  Supports attraction and retention of talented executives
Long-Term Equity Awards (nonstatutory stock options and performance-based and time-based RSUs)	Variable compensation opportunity contingent on measurable and objective performance criteria established at the beginning of the measurement period, stock price performance and individual performance	Yes	•  Creates incentives for long-term performance •  Provides reasonable long-term incentive opportunity for achieving financial, operational and strategic objectives •  Aligns our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders •  Recognizes executive’s individual performance and future contributions •  Supports attraction and retention of talented executives •  Provides a direct correlation of realized pay to operating and stock price performance •  Provides a total compensation opportunity with payouts varying based on our operating, financial and stock price performance

Our named executive officers also receive other benefits, which may include health, dental and vision insurance; vacation, holidays and sick days; life, accidental death and dismemberment and long-term disability insurance; 401(k) plan matching; andgross-ups related to payment of self-employment tax liabilities. In addition, certain of our named executive officers receive minimal perquisites including an automobile allowance and payment for tax advice and financial counseling.

We tailor our executive compensation program each year to provide what we consider to be a proper balance of these basic elements. In recent years, the executive compensation program has been weighted toward long-term equity awards and performance-based cash bonuses, rather than toward annual base salaries, in order to ensure that a significant portion of compensation is tied to company and stock performance and to maximize retention. We continue to assess the compensation elements for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, and are committed to ensuring that our executive compensation program remains generally consistent with market practices and focused on long-term performance.

Compensation Decisions Made in Fiscal 2018

In making compensation decisions during Fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee considered the 2018say-on-pay advisory vote. The Compensation Committee also considers additional factors, which are summarized below.

Annual Base Salaries

In setting annual base salaries, the Compensation Committee generally considers benchmarking data derived from a review of the proxy statement disclosures of our peer group, various survey sources, and, in the case of the named executive officers other than Mr. Kurland, recommendations and assessments by the Executive Chairman regarding the performance of the other named executive officers. The

32   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Compensation Committee uses the data from these market surveys to ensure that it establishes reliable points of reference to determine whether and to what extent it is establishing competitive levels of compensation for our named executive officers.

The Compensation Committee conducted an annual compensation review in February 2018 and did not approve any increases to the annual base salaries of our named executive officers. A summary of the 2018 annual base salaries is provided below:

Name	2018 Annual Base Salary
Stanford L. Kurland	$	1,000,000
David A. Spector	$	750,000
Doug Jones	$	500,000
Vandad Fartaj	$	325,000
Andrew S. Chang	$	325,000

The Compensation Committee believes that these annual base salaries are appropriate given the competitive market for the services provided by the named executive officers, as well as their individual performances and strong leadership skills.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives

We believe that our executive compensation program objectives have resulted in decisions regarding executive compensation that have appropriately encouraged growth in our businesses and the achievement of financial goals, thus benefiting our stockholders and generating long-term stockholder value. To determine annual bonus amounts, the Compensation Committee first sets a target level of bonus for each named executive officer for the fiscal year based on competitive market data. Each named executive officer’s potential bonus payout varies based on such individual’s level of responsibility and position within our organization.

The annual performance-based cash incentives paid to our named executive officers are based on the achievement of actual earnings per share, or EPS, and pretax income as compared to EPS and pretax income targets set at the beginning of each year as well as the individual performance of each named executive officer. We believe that EPS and pretax income are appropriate measures for annual performance-based cash incentive bonuses because they provide our named executive officers with an incentive to achieve favorable current results, while also producing sustainable long-term stockholder value. In setting EPS and pretax income targets, we consider our current and historical performance, the performance of companies in industries in which we compete, and current and anticipated market conditions.

Actual bonuses are determined based on actual EPS and pretax income achieved relative to targets for EPS and pretax income, as well as target bonus amounts set for each named executive officer; however, adjustments to the bonus amounts are sometimes made by the Compensation Committee based on market factors, the named executive officer’s individual performance as compared to such named executive officer’s key performance indicators, and the named executive officer’s contribution to the execution of our strategic initiatives during the fiscal year.

Based on the overall assessment of these factors and recommendations made by the Executive Chairman, the Compensation Committee approved the annual performance-based cash incentive amounts for Messrs. Spector, Jones, Fartaj and Chang. The Compensation Committee then reviewed and approved management’s recommendation regarding annual performance-based cash incentive amounts. Based on the factors above, the Compensation Committee also approved the annual performance-based cash incentive paid to Mr. Kurland.

The table below summarizes the actual annual performance-based cash bonuses earned during Fiscal 2018:

Name	Actual Bonus
Stanford L. Kurland	$	3,825,000
David A. Spector	$	2,900,000
Doug Jones	$	1,500,000
Vandad Fartaj	$	1,050,000
Andrew S. Chang	$	832,500

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 33

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Long-Term Equity Awards

In determining the equity awards granted in Fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, the recommendations of management and various reports provided by our independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee also considered (i) the value of the proposed equity awards; (ii) the historical equity awards previously granted to each named executive officer and the corresponding values at the time of the consideration of the 2018 grants; (iii) the value of share grants to our named executive officers providing comparable services at our industry and sector peers; (iv) the anticipated contribution by the named executive officer in future fiscal years, taking into account the role, responsibility and scope of each position and the Compensation Committee’s perception regarding the quality of the services provided by each named executive officer in carrying out those responsibilities; (v) our financial and operating performance in the past year and our perceived future prospects; and (vi) general market practices. The Compensation Committee considered these multiple factors in determining whether to increase or decrease the target amounts from the prior year’s equity award grants. There was no formulaic approach in the use of these various factors in determining the number of shares to award to each named executive officer. The share amounts were determined on a subjective basis, using the various factors, in the Compensation Committee’s sole discretion.

For Fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee approved the following mix of long-term incentive elements, generally consistent with approvals made in Fiscal Year 2017, with a continued emphasis on performance-based equity awards. An illustration of the mix of long-term incentive elements is provided below:

Non-Statutory Stock Options

During Fiscal 2018, our named executive officers were awardednon-statutory stock options. The stock option award agreement provides for the award of stock options to purchase the optioned shares. In general, and except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee,one-third (1/3) of the optioned shares will vest in a lump sum on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the vesting commencement date, subject to the recipient’s continued service through each anniversary (with certain exceptions as specified under the award agreement or the provisions of our 2013 Plan), and each stock option will have a term of ten years from the date of grant. Additionally, the stock options expire (1) immediately upon termination of the holder’s employment or other association with us for cause, (2) one year after the holder’s employment or other association is terminated due to death or disability, and (3) three months after the holder’s employment or other association is terminated for any other reason.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units

During Fiscal 2018, our named executive officers also were awarded performance-based RSUs. The performance-based RSU award agreement provides for the award of performance-based RSUs to obtain, upon the vesting of each RSU, a variable number of shares of our common stock. The number of shares received upon vesting of performance-based RSUs is determined based on the attainment of the performance goals, subject to conditions including continued employment throughout the performance period.

Return on equity, or ROE, was the sole measure of company performance for the performance-based RSUs granted during Fiscal 2018. Vesting of the target award amount is tied to the achievement of certain ROE metrics during the performance period, with 80% of the target amount earned if the threshold performance level is met, 100% of the target amount earned if the target performance level is met and 130% of the target amount earned if the highest performance level is met. The payout that is determined based on the ROE component is

34   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

then multiplied by a factor of 0% to 100% for named executive officers based on an individual effectiveness rating ranging from unsatisfactory to outstanding. Holders of performance-based RSUs do not have any voting rights or dividend rights with respect to those units. A summary of the performance measures contained in the performance-based RSUs granted to our named executive officers during Fiscal 2018 is provided below:

2018 PSU Awards
Performance- Based Restricted Stock Units	Performance Component	Performance Target	% of Targeted Award
	1. PNMAC ROE (1)	16.4% - Cumulative Annualized ROE	100%
	2. Individual Effectiveness (2)	5 - Outstanding	0% to 100%

(1) Calculated by dividing GAAPpre-tax income by average stockholders’ equity for the period, as reported by the company. The payout scale for component 1 is 0% to 130%.

(2) Based on individual overall achievement of goals over the three-year performance period. The range of the multiplier is 0% to 100%.

Time-Based Restricted Stock Units

During Fiscal 2018, all of our named executive officers other than our Executive Chairman were awarded time-based RSUs. These time-based RSUs, which vest in three equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, are to be settled in an equal number of shares of common stock upon vesting.

The table below summarizes the grant date fair value of the annual long-term equity awards made on March 9, 2018:

Name	Grant Date Fair Value of Performance- Based PSUs		Number of Performance- Based PSUs		Grant Date Fair Value of Time-Based RSUs		Number of Time-Based RSUs		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Options		Number of Stock Options		Total Grant   Date Fair Value   of Long-Term   Equity Incentive   Opportunity
S. Kurland	$	2,999,980		122,950		—		—	$	970,512		102,459		$3,970,492
D. Spector	$	1,033,291		42,348		$   516,646		21,174		$501,411		52,935		$2,051,348
D. Jones	$	516,646		21,174		$   258,323		10,587		$250,701		26,467		$1,025,669
V. Fartaj	$	413,312		16,939		$   206,644		8,469		$200,564		21,174		$    820,520
A. Chang	$	413,312		16,939		$   206,644		8,469		$200,564		21,174		$    820,520

Each of the stock options has an exercise price of $24.40 and a Black-Scholes Value of $9.47 at the date of grant. Each of the performance-based and time-based RSUs has a grant date fair value of $24.40, which is based on our closing stock price on the NYSE on the date of grant.

Executive Compensation Decision Making Process

Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for recommending to our Board the compensation of our Executive Chairman and our CEO and determining the compensation of our other named executive officers. Members of the Compensation Committee are appointed by the Board. During Fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee consisted of three members of the Board, Messrs. Botein, Hunt and Nanji, none of whom served as our executive officers. Each of Messrs. Botein, Hunt and Nanji qualified as an “independent director” under the rules of the NYSE. Each of Messrs. Hunt and Nanji also qualified as an “outside director” under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and served as a member of a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee that was formed to approve the grant of awards to certain individuals for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. See the section entitled “CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—Committees of the Board of Directors.” Each year, the Compensation Committee conducts an evaluation of each named executive officer to determine if changes in such officer’s compensation are appropriate based on the considerations described below. At the Compensation Committee’s request, the Executive Chairman and the CEO provide input for the Compensation Committee regarding the performance and appropriate compensation of the other named executive officers. The Compensation Committee gives considerable weight to their evaluation of the other named executive officers because of their direct knowledge of each such officer’s performance and contributions.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 35

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

The Role of the Outside Independent Compensation Consultant.Our Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain, compensate and terminate any independent compensation consultant of its choosing in assessing our compensation program and determining the appropriate, competitive levels of compensation for our executive officers. Pursuant to such authority, the Compensation Committee utilized Pearl Meyer & Partners, or Pearl Meyer, as its independent compensation consultant during Fiscal 2018. Pearl Meyer provided the following services to the Compensation Committee:

• Attended Compensation Committee meetings and prepared certain meeting materials in connection with such meetings;

• Reviewed the Company’s peer group for executive compensation purposes for Fiscal 2018 and provided recommendations for changes to such peer group;

• Evaluated the competitive positioning of our named executive officers’ base salaries, annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation relative to our peer companies to support Fiscal 2018 decision-making;

• Advised on Fiscal 2018 target award levels within the annual and long-term incentive program and, as needed, on actual compensation actions;

• Conducted a review of the competitive market data (including base salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive targets) for our named executive officers;

• Assessed our executive compensation peer group and recommended changes as necessary;

• Assessed compensation levels within our peer group for named executive officers and other executive officers;

• Reviewed historical financial performance for peer group companies under metrics used in our long-term incentive plan;

• Provided market research on various issues as requested by our Company;

• Prepared materials for and participated in Compensation Committee meetings, as requested;

• Consulted with our Compensation Committee regarding compensation strategy, internal communications related to equity compensation and compensation best practices;

• Assisted in compensation plan designs and modifications, as requested;

• Assessed whether our compensation programs might encourage inappropriate risk taking that could have a material adverse effect on us; and

• Assisted with the preparation of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis for this Proxy Statement.

Assessment of Outside Independent Compensation Consultant Conflicts of Interest. Under rules promulgated by the SEC, the Compensation Committee must determine, after taking into account six independence-related factors, whether any work completed by a compensation consultant raised any conflict of interest. Factors considered by the Compensation Committee include the following six factors specified by the NYSE rules: (1) other services provided to us by the compensation consultant; (2) what percentage of the compensation consultant’s total revenue is made up of fees from us; (3) policies or procedures of the compensation consultant that are designed to prevent a conflict of interest; (4) any business or personal relationships between individual consultants involved in the engagement and Compensation Committee members; (5) any shares of our common stock owned by individual consultants involved in the engagement; and (6) any business or personal relationships between our executive officers and the compensation consultant or the individual consultants involved in the engagement. For Fiscal 2018, the Compensation Committee did not identify any conflict of interest with respect to Pearl Meyer.

Peer Group and Benchmarking

The Use of Peer Group and Competitive Market Data.On an annual basis we engage in a comprehensive review of peer companies with our independent compensation consultant. To assist in decision-making regarding our compensation and benefits program, our management and the Compensation Committee review competitive market data from a “peer group” of publicly traded companies in specific industries in which we compete for executive talent, among other factors, to assist in decision-making regarding our compensation and benefits programs. The market data reviewed includes both peer proxy data and survey data of companies similar in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication. Proxy data was gathered from proxy statements and other publicly filed documents.

Since our peer group was initially established in 2013, we have undertaken comprehensive annual reviews of the appropriateness of such peer group. The Compensation Committee reviews other public companies similar in industry, size, structure, scope and sophistication.

36   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

How We Establish our Peer Group.The Compensation Committee updated its peer group used for evaluating Fiscal 2018 compensation decisions based on objective criteria as presented in the table below:

Objective Criteria Considered

Fiscal 2018 Peer Group

•   Companies in the financial services and specialty finance industries •   Companies with market capitalizations within a reasonable range of our pro forma capitalization •   Companies with pretax income within a reasonable range •   Companies with revenue within a reasonable range •   Competitors for executive talent •   Companies of comparable scope and complexity •   Competitors for equity investor capital •   Companies that identify us as their direct peer •   Companies with similar pay practices

•   Black Knight, Inc. •   CoreLogic, Inc. •   Essent Group Ltd. •   Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. •   iStar Financial Inc. •   Ladder Capital Corp. •   MGIC Investment Corp. •   Mr. Cooper Group, Inc. •   Ocwen Financial Corporation •   OneMain Holdings, Inc. •   Radian Group Inc. •   Redwood Trust, Inc. •   Walker & Dunlop Inc.

Compensation Policies and Practices As They Relate to Our Risk Management. We have designed our executive compensation program to reward strong Company and individual performance. Company performance objectives are based on our overall performance rather than on only a few discrete performance measures related to a particular aspect of our Company’s business. We believe that this structure, as further explained below, minimizes risks resulting from compensation practices.

Our Compensation Committee believes that its compensation policies and practices for all employees of PNMAC, including our named executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. We believe that appropriate safeguards are in place with respect to our compensation programs and policies that assist in mitigating excessive risk-taking that could harm the value of our Company or reward poor judgment by executives and employees.

In that regard, the Compensation Committee requested assistance from our independent compensation consultant in reviewing our compensation policies and practices. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation policies and practices as they apply to our named executive officers are designed with an appropriate balance of risk and reward in relation to our overall business strategy and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Company.

As part of the review, numerous factors were noted that reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking, which include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Our compensation mix is balanced among fixed components such as salary and benefits, variable components such as annual performance-based cash bonuses, and long-term equity awards including performance-based RSUs and stock options;

• Our Compensation Committee has ultimate authority to determine, and adjust, if appropriate, compensation provided to our executive officers, including each of the named executive officers;

• Incentive compensation paid to named executive officers and other senior managers is subject to clawback upon a material accounting restatement as a result of erroneous data in our financial statements;

• Our named executive officers are subject to stock ownership guidelines that require a certain minimum level of stock ownership; and

• Our Compensation Committee has the authority to retain any advisor it deems necessary to fulfill its obligations.

Executive Stock Ownership Guidelines

Our executive stock ownership guidelines, which are approved by our Compensation Committee, are intended to further the objective of aligning the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. These stock ownership guidelines provide that our named executive officers and other executive officers should accumulate a minimum number of shares equal in value to a multiple of their base salary over a specified time frame.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 37

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

A summary of the stock ownership guidelines (as a multiple of base salary) are set forth in the following table:

Executive Officer Title	Stock Ownership Guideline	Compliant
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors	5x	✓
President and Chief Executive Officer	5x	✓
Other Executive Officers	3x	✓

For purposes of the guidelines, stock ownership includes common stock owned directly,in-the-money value of exercisable stock options and unvested time-based RSUs. The types and amounts of stock-based awards are intended, in part, to facilitate the accumulation of sufficient shares by our executives to allow them to meet the stock ownership guidelines within the applicable timeline. Each executive officer is expected to meet the respective level of stock ownership within five years of becoming subject to such guidelines. The Compensation Committee will annually review each executive officer’s compliance with or progress toward meeting the stock ownership guidelines. Each of our executive officers is presently in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.

Clawback Provisions

During 2018, we adopted a policy regarding the recoupment of incentive compensation which provides that if we issue a material accounting restatement as a result of erroneous data in our financial statements, our Board or an authorized Board committee will have the authority, in its sole discretion, to recover any incentive compensation that (i) is received by any executive officer or any other officer with a title of senior managing director or higher during the two fiscal years immediately preceding the date of such accounting restatement issuance, and (ii) exceeds the amount that would have been paid to such individual(s) under the accounting restatement, calculated on apre-tax basis.

Trading Controls and Anti-Pledging and Anti-Hedging Policies

Our named executive officers, directors and certain other employees are required to obtain preclearance prior to entering into any transaction involving company securities. Trading is generally permitted only during open trading windows. Any such individuals who are subject to preclearance restrictions may enter into trading plans under Rule10b5-1 of the Exchange Act, but these trading plans may be entered into only during an open trading window and must bepre-approved as well.

We also prohibit our named executive officers, directors and other employees from pledging any company securities or entering into margin accounts involving company securities. We prohibit these transactions because of the potential that sales of company securities could occur outside trading periods and without the required preclearance approval.

In addition, our named executive officers, directors and other employees are prohibited from entering into hedging transactions involving company securities.

Employment andChange-in-Control Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

Employment Agreements. On December 28, 2018, we entered into employment agreements by and among us, PNMAC and each of Mr. Kurland (the “Kurland Agreement”), Mr. Spector (the “Spector Agreement”) and Mr. Jones (the “Jones Agreement”) for terms commencing on January 1, 2019 and expiring on December 31, 2022, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions set forth in each such agreement. The terms of the employment agreements are described below.

Pursuant to the Kurland Agreement, Mr. Kurland shall continue to serve as the Executive Chairman of our Board through December 31, 2019, and, beginning on January 1, 2020 and continuing through the end of the term, shall serve as theNon-Executive Chairman of our Board, assuming he isre-elected to that post through the end of such term. Mr. Spector shall continue to serve as a member of our Board and as our President and Chief Executive Officer and the President and Chief Executive Officer of PNMAC throughout the term of the Spector Agreement. Mr. Jones shall continue to serve as our Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer and the Senior Managing Director and Chief Mortgage Banking Officer of PNMAC throughout the term of the Jones Agreement.

38   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

Base Salary and Incentive Compensation

The Kurland Agreement provides Mr. Kurland with an annual base salary of no less than $900,000 from January 1, 2019 through and including December 31, 2019. During that time, Mr. Kurland is also entitled to receive cash and equity incentive compensation, with such compensation awarded at levels based on annual performance targets determined by our Board and the Compensation Committee of our Board. From January 1, 2020 and for so long as Mr. Kurland remains on our Board asNon-Executive Chairman, Mr. Kurland will also be entitled to receive (i) annual director fees in cash in amount equal to 2.5 times the annual retainer fees of the highest paidnon-employee Board member, and (ii) annual equity awards in an amount equal to 2.5 times the amount granted to any othernon-employee Board member.

The Spector Agreement provides Mr. Spector with an annual base salary of no less than $900,000, which amount will increase to $1,000,000 on January 1, 2020. The Jones Agreement provides Mr. Jones with an annual base salary of no less than $550,000, which amount shall increase to $600,000 on January 1, 2020. During the terms of their employment agreements, each of Mr. Spector and Mr. Jones is also entitled to receive annual cash and equity incentive compensation, with such compensation awarded at levels based on annual performance targets determined by our Board and the compensation committee of our Board.

All equity awards are granted pursuant to our 2013 Plan and are subject to vesting requirements as specified in the relevant award agreement. Pursuant to the Kurland Agreement, any unvested awards shall immediately vest upon the death or disability of the executive, a termination by us other than for cause (as defined in the employment agreement), or a termination by the executive for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement) unless such termination is the result of the expiration of the term of the Kurland Agreement or Mr. Kurland’s termination for good reason at his option at any time on or after January 1, 2020.

Pursuant to the Spector Agreement and the Jones Agreement, any unvested awards shall immediately vest upon the death or disability of the executive, a termination by us other than for cause (as defined in the employment agreements), or a termination by the executive for good reason (as defined in the employment agreements) unless such termination is the result of the expiration of the term of the Spector Agreement or the Jones Agreement. If such termination is the result of the expiration of term of the Spector Agreement or the Jones Agreement, any such unvested awards shall continue to vest, if applicable, in accordance with their terms, and the termination date of each of the Spector Agreement or the Jones Agreement shall be deemed to be the retirement date as defined in the related award document; provided, however, that if the related award document does not contain any reference to retirement or a retirement date, then the affected unvested awards shall become immediately and fully vested.

All nonstatutory stock options granted pursuant to our 2013 Plan are exercisable, subject only to vesting provisions, for a period of ten years from the date of grant, and are eligible for cashless exercise in all circumstances.

Other Benefits

The employment agreements provide for the annual accrual of forty days of paid time off for Mr. Kurland and twenty days of paid time off for Mr. Spector and Mr. Jones, in each case at the executive’s regular base pay rate during each year of the term. The agreements also provide for medical benefits, reimbursement for expenses related to tax advice and financial counseling not to exceed $25,000, an automobile allowance of up to $1,500 per month for Mr. Kurland and Mr. Spector, reimbursement of reasonable business expenses, and participation in such other benefits programs as are provided to our executives generally.

Payments Upon Specific Termination Events

Pursuant to the employment agreements, upon a termination due to death or disability, a termination by us other than for cause, a termination by the executive for good reason, or a termination as a result of change of control, in addition to any other amounts required by law to be paid to him, the executive would be entitled to any cash bonus earned but unpaid for the year prior to the year in which the termination date occurs and the pro rata portion of any cash bonus earned but unpaid for the year during which the termination date occurs. In any such termination event, any unvested equity awards granted pursuant to the 2013 Plan shall vest immediately. We will also generally reimburse the executive or his estate for any amounts paid by him or his estate for coverage of him and his family under our group health medical benefits plan pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, or COBRA, for as long as the executive or his family is eligible to receive such benefits under COBRA. Upon a termination due to death, the executive’s estate will also receive a continuing payment of executive’s annual base salary as of the termination date for a period of six months following such termination.

Upon a termination of Mr. Spector’s or Mr. Jones’ employment as a result of a change of control or by us other than for cause, or upon a termination by Mr. Spector or Mr. Jones for good reason, the executive shall also receive a severance payment equal to two years of

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 39

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

executive’s annual base salary plus two years of executive’s cash incentive compensation (based on the average cash incentive bonus received in the most recent two years), with such amounts to be paid in 24 monthly installments. Upon termination of Mr. Spector’s or Mr. Jones’ employment by us or PNMAC for cause, the executive shall receive his annual base salary through the termination date, any accrued but unused paid time off and reimbursement of any unreimbursed incurred expenses.

Consulting Services

Upon the expiration of the term of the Kurland Agreement or upon a termination of Mr. Kurland’s employment by us other than for cause or a termination by Mr. Kurland for good reason, Mr. Kurland shall serve as a consultant to us for an18-month period commencing on the termination date. During the consulting period, Mr. Kurland will receive a consulting fee of $1.5 million, with approximately $1 million of such amount paid in 18 monthly installments of $55,555 and the remainder paid upon the completion of the consulting period; provided, however, that such compensation will cease if the executive engages in services for a business that competes with us.

Upon the expiration of the term of the Spector Agreement, Mr. Spector shall serve as a consultant to us for an18-month period commencing on the termination date. During the consulting period, Mr. Spector will receive a consulting fee of $1.5 million, with approximately $1 million of such amount paid in 18 monthly installments $55,555 and the remainder paid upon the completion of the consulting period; provided, however, that such compensation will cease if the executive engages in services for a business that competes with us.

Upon the expiration of the term of the Jones Agreement, Mr. Jones shall serve as a consultant to us for an18-month period commencing on the termination date. During the consulting period, Mr. Jones will receive a consulting fee of $1 million, with approximately $750,000 of such amount paid in 18 monthly installments of $41,666 and the remainder paid upon the completion of the consulting period; provided, however, that such compensation will cease if the executive engages in services for a business that competes with us.

For purposes of the employment agreement, Mr. Kurland will have “good reason” to terminate the Kurland Agreement (a) at his option at any time on or after January 1, 2020, or (b) if we (or any resulting or surviving entity in the event of certain transactions) or PNMAC (1) materially breaches the Kurland Agreement; (2) requires Mr. Kurland to report to anyone other than our Board; (3) requires Mr. Kurland to be based anywhere more than fifty (50) miles from the office where he is located as of the effective date of the Kurland Agreement; (4) takes any other action which results in a material diminution or adverse change in Mr. Kurland’s status, title, position, compensation, or responsibilities, other than an insubstantial action not taken in bad faith and remedied promptly after receipt of notice by Mr. Kurland; or (5) fails to indemnify and advance all expenses to Mr. Kurland in response to a proper request for indemnity and advancement.

For purposes of the employment agreement, each of Mr. Spector and Mr. Jones will have “good reason” to terminate his employment agreement, as applicable, if we (or any resulting or surviving entity in the event of certain transactions) or PNMAC (1) materially breaches the Spector Agreement or Jones Agreement; (2) requires Mr. Spector to report to anyone other than our Board or Mr. Jones to report to anyone other than the President and Chief Executive Officer; (3) requires Mr. Spector to be based anywhere more than fifty (50) miles from the office where he is located as of the effective date of the Spector Agreement or requires Mr. Jones to be based anywhere more than fifteen (15) miles from the office where he is located as of the effective date of the Jones Agreement; (4) takes any other action which results in a material diminution or adverse change in Mr. Spector’s or Mr. Jones’ status, title, position, compensation, or responsibilities, other than an insubstantial action not taken in bad faith and remedied promptly after receipt of notice by Mr. Spector or Mr. Jones; or (5) fails to indemnify and advance all expenses to Mr. Spector or Mr. Jones in response to a proper request for indemnity and advancement.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control. Pursuant to our 2013 Plan and subject to any contrary provisions in any applicable award agreement or employment agreement, upon the occurrence of a change of control:

• all outstanding unvested awards and awards subject to a risk of forfeiture, other than awards conditioned on the achievement of performance goals, will immediately become vested in full and no longer be subject to any risk of forfeiture unless they are assumed or otherwise continued in a manner satisfactory to the Committee, or substantially equivalent rights are provided in substitution for such awards, in each case by the acquiring or succeeding entity or one of its affiliates; and

• if a pro rata portion of the performance goals under awards conditioned on the achievement of performance goals or other business objectives has been achieved as of the effective date of the change of control, then such performance goals or other business objectives shall be deemed satisfied as of such change of control with respect to a pro rata portion of the number of shares subject to the original award. The pro rata portion of the performance goals or other business objectives and the number of shares subject to the original awards shall each be based on the length of time within the performance period which has elapsed prior to the change of control. The pro rata portion of any award deemed earned in this manner will be paid out within

40   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  

30 days following the change of control. The remaining portion of such an award that is not eligible to be deemed earned as of the change of control will be deemed to have been satisfied, earned, or forfeited as of the change of control in such amounts as the Committee shall determine in its sole discretion unless that remaining portion is assumed by the acquiring or succeeding entity or one of its affiliates, which will be deemed to occur if that remaining portion is subjected to (i) comparable performance goals based on the post-change of control business of the acquiror or succeeding entity or one of its affiliates, and (ii) a measurement period using a comparable period of time to the original award, each in a manner satisfactory to the Committee.

A change of control is defined as the occurrence of any of the following: (1) a transaction, as described above, unless securities possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of the resulting entity or ultimate parent entity are held by one or more persons who held securities possessing more than 50% of the total combined voting power of our Company immediately prior to the transaction; (2) any person or group of persons, excluding us and certain other related entities, directly or indirectly acquires beneficial ownership of securities possessing more than 20% of the total combined voting power of our Company, unless pursuant to a tender or exchange offer that our Board recommends stockholders accept; (3) over a period of no more than 36 consecutive months there is a change in the composition of our Board such that a majority of our directors ceases to be composed of individuals who either (i) have been directors continuously since the beginning of that period, or (ii) have been elected or nominated for election as members of our Board during such period by at least a majority of the remaining members of our Board who have been directors continuously since the beginning of that period; or (4) a majority of the members of our Board vote in favor of a decision that a change of control has occurred.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 41

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

Compensation Tables

2018 Summary Compensation Table

The following “2018 Summary Compensation Table” presents compensation earned by our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our next three most highly compensated persons serving as executive officers as of the end of Fiscal 2018. We refer to these executive officers as our “named executive officers.”

Name and Principal Position(1)	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)(2)		Stock Awards ($)(3)		Option Awards ($)(4)		All Other Compensation ($)(5)		Total ($)
Stanford L. Kurland Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors		2018		1,000,000		3,825,000		2,999,980		970,512		73,828		8,869,320
		2017		1,000,000		4,250,000		2,999,982		990,304		218,055		9,458,341
		2016		1,000,000		5,250,000		1,964,445		761,748		142,509		9,118,702
David A. Spector President and Chief Executive Officer		2018		750,000		2,900,000		1,549,937		501,411		76,271		5,777,619
		2017		741,667		3,000,000		1,566,578		495,152		174,603		5,977,999
		2016		550,000		3,750,000		743,239		288,202		114,518		5,445,959
Doug Jones		2018		500,000		1,500,000		774,968		250,701		291,726		3,317,395
Senior Managing Director and		2017		448,958		1,500,000		783,280		247,576		327,210		3,307,024
Chief Mortgage Banking Officer		2016		325,000		2,000,000		290,053		112,472		252,140		2,979,665
Vandad Fartaj		2018		325,000		1,050,000		619,955		200,564		311,626		2,507,146
Senior Managing Director and		2017		325,000		925,000		626,624		198,055		340,101		2,414,780
Chief Investment Officer		2016		325,000		1,200,000		290,053		200,518		266,748		2,194,273
Andrew S. Chang		2018		325,000		832,500		619,955		200,564		285,406		2,263,426
Senior Managing Director and		2017		325,000		925,000		626,624		198,055		333,390		2,408,069
Chief Financial Officer

(1) Mr. Chang was not a named executive officer in Fiscal 2016.

(2) The amounts in this column represent the total amount of bonus earned by the named executive officers for Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, whether or not paid in such years.

(3) The amounts shown in this column in respect of 2018, 2017 and 2016 represent the grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of time-based RSUs awarded on March 9, 2018 and March 6, 2017 in the amounts of: (i) 21,174 and 27,700 for Mr. Spector; 10,587 and 13,850 for Mr. Jones; 8,469 and 11,080 for Mr. Fartaj; and 8,469 and 11,080 for Mr. Chang, respectively. Also includes the grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of the (a) performance-based RSUs awarded on March 9, 2018, March 6, 2017 and March 7, 2016 in the amounts of (i) 122,950, 166,204 and 174,153 for Mr. Kurland; (ii) 42,348, 59,091 and 65,890 for Mr. Spector; (iii) 21,174, 29,545 and 25,714 for Mr. Jones; and (iv) 16,939, 23,636 and 25,714 for Mr. Fartaj, respectively; and (b) performance-based RSUs awarded on March 9, 2018 and March 6, 2017 in the amounts of 16,939 and 23,636 for Mr. Chang, pursuant to our 2013 Plan. See “—2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End” below. The value of the performance-based RSUs awarded on March 9, 2018, March 6, 2017 and March 7, 2016, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved and based on a grant date fair value per share of $24.40, $18.05 and $11.28, is $3,899,974, $3,899,977, and $2,553,780 for Mr. Kurland; $1,343,269, $1,386,570, and $966,211 for Mr. Spector; $671,634, $693,273, and $377,070 for Mr. Jones; and $537,288, $554,619 and $377,070 for Mr. Fartaj, respectively. The value of the performance-based RSUs awarded on March 9, 2018 and March 6, 2017, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved and based on a grant date fair value per share of $24.40 and $18.05, is $537,288 and $554,619 for Mr. Chang.

(4) The amounts shown in this column represent the grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of the nonstatutory stock options awarded on March 9, 2018, March 6, 2017 and March 7, 2016 in the amounts of 102,459, 138,504 and 188,086 for Mr. Kurland; 52,935, 69,252 and 71,161 for Mr. Spector; 26,467, 27,771 and 23,829 for Mr. Jones; and 21,174, 27,700 and 27,771 for Mr. Fartaj, respectively; and awarded on March 9, 2018 and March 6, 2017 in the amounts of 21,174 and 27,700 for Mr. Chang, respectively, pursuant to our 2013 Plan. See “—2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End” below.

(5) All Other Compensation for all five named executive officers consists of insurance premiums,gross-up payments for the payment of self-employment tax liabilities by each named executive officer, financial counseling and other payments. We paidgross-up payments to the named executive officers in the following amounts: $20,648 for Mr. Kurland, $17,477 for Mr. Spector, $14,305 for Mr. Jones, $12,084 for Mr. Fartaj and $12,084 for Mr. Chang during Fiscal 2018; $160,136 for Mr. Kurland, $116,516 for Mr. Spector, $65,146 for Mr. Jones, $43,411 for Mr. Fartaj and $43,411 for Mr. Chang during Fiscal 2017; and $83,488 for Mr. Kurland, $58,838 for Mr. Spector, $33,809 for Mr. Jones and $25,472 for Mr. Fartaj during Fiscal 2016. PNMAC paid insurance premiums on behalf of the named executive officers in the following amounts: $16,459 for Mr. Kurland, $22,490 for Mr. Spector, $8,921 for Mr. Jones, $22,888 for Mr. Fartaj and $7,811 for Mr. Chang during Fiscal 2018; $14,919 for Mr. Kurland, $20,323 for Mr. Spector, $7,378 for Mr. Jones, $20,596 for Mr. Fartaj and $7,055 for Mr. Chang during Fiscal 2017; and $11,565 for Mr. Kurland, $15,222 for Mr. Spector, $15,573 for Mr. Jones, and $15,744 for Mr. Fartaj during Fiscal 2016. PNMAC paid an automobile allowance to the named executive officers in the following amounts: $15,750 for each of Mr. Kurland and Mr. Spector during Fiscal 2018, and $18,000 for each of Mr. Kurland and Mr. Spector during Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016. PNMAC made payments related to company paid spousal travel in the amounts of $4,456 for Mr. Kurland and $3,453 for Mr. Spector during Fiscal 2016.

We paid or provided reimbursement for expenses related to tax advice and financial counseling to the named executive officers in the following amounts: $20,970 for Mr. Kurland, $20,555 for Mr. Spector, $14,760 for Mr. Fartaj and $11,685 for Mr. Chang during Fiscal 2018; $25,000 for Mr. Kurland, $19,765 for

42   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

Mr. Spector, and $14,400 for each of Mr. Fartaj and Mr. Chang during Fiscal 2017; and $25,000 for Mr. Kurland, $19,005 for Mr. Spector and $14,000 for Mr. Fartaj during Fiscal 2016.

With respect to Mr. Jones, All Other Compensation also includes a $17,607 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan (a portion of which includes missed matching contributions for Fiscal 2017), $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $249,993 in time-based and performance-based restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Jones for Fiscal 2018, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense; a $3,792 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan, $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $249,994 in time-based and performance-based restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Jones for Fiscal 2017, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense; and a $10,800 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan (a portion of which includes missed matching contributions for Fiscal 2015), $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $191,057 in restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Jones for Fiscal 2016.

With respect to Mr. Fartaj, All Other Compensation also includes an $11,000 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan, $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $249,993 in time-based and performance-based restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Fartaj for Fiscal 2018, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense; a $10,800 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan, $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $249,994 in time-based and performance-based restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Fartaj for Fiscal 2017, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense; and a $19,575 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan (a portion of which includes missed matching contributions for Fiscal 2015), $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $191,057 in restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Fartaj for Fiscal 2016, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense.

With respect to Mr. Chang, All Other Compensation also includes a $3,833 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan and $249,993 in time-based and performance-based restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Chang for Fiscal 2018, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense; and a $17,629 contribution paid by PNMAC to his 401(k) plan (a portion of which includes missed matching contributions for Fiscal 2016), $900 for mobile phone expenses, and $249,994 in time-based and performance-based restricted share units awarded by PMT to Mr. Chang for Fiscal 2017, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy, and recorded by PNMAC as a portion of its compensation expense.

In addition, time-based and performance-based restricted share units were awarded by PMT to Mr. Kurland and Mr. Spector during Fiscal 2018, Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, consistent with its compensation program and philosophy. These restricted share units were granted on March 12, 2018, February 23, 2017 and February 24, 2016, and have grant date fair values, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of $1,091,967, $1,091,991 and $1,028,252 for Mr. Kurland, and $747,988, $747,988 and $704,897 for Mr. Spector, respectively. These grant date fair values are not included in All Other Compensation for Mr. Kurland and Mr. Spector.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 43

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information about plan-based awards granted under our 2013 Plan to our named executive officers in Fiscal 2018:

			Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)						All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)		All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)(2)		Exercise Price of Option Awards ($/sh)		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(3)
Name	Grant Date		Threshold (#)		Target (#)		Maximum (#)
Stanford L. Kurland
PSUs		03/09/18		98,360		122,950		159,835								2,999,980
RSUs		03/09/18														—
Stock Options		03/09/18										102,459		24.40		970,512
David A. Spector
PSUs		03/09/18		33,878		42,348		55,052								1,033,291
RSUs		03/09/18								21,174						516,646
Stock Options		03/09/18										52,935		24.40		501,411
Doug Jones
PSUs		03/09/18		16,939		21,174		27,526								516,646
RSUs		03/09/18								10,587						258,323
Stock Options		03/09/18										26,467		24.40		250,701
Vandad Fartaj
PSUs		03/09/18		13,551		16,939		22,020								413,312
RSUs		03/09/18								8,469						206,644
Stock Options		03/09/18										21,174		24.40		200,564
Andrew S. Chang
PSUs		03/09/18		13,551		16,939		22,020								413,312
RSUs		03/09/18								8,469						206,644
Stock Options		03/09/18										21,174		24.40		200,564

(1) Represents the potential payout range of performance-based RSUs granted in Fiscal 2018. Awards vest based on thepre-tax ROE of PNMAC for fiscal years 2018-2020. The combined maximum payout under the performance goals is 130% of the target award. If ROE for a fiscal year is less than the threshold ROE, no portion of the granted RSUs will become vested. In addition to the performance conditions, the named executive officers must satisfy a service condition in order for the award to vest.

(2) One-third (1/3) of the nonstatutory stock options will vest in a lump sum on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the vesting commencement date, subject to the recipient’s continued service through each anniversary.

(3) Represents the grant date fair value, as determined in accordance with ASC 718, of time-based RSUs, performance-based RSUs and nonstatutory stock options awarded during Fiscal 2018.

44   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table provides information about outstanding equity awards of our named executive officers as of the end of Fiscal 2018:

			Option Awards(1)								Stock Awards
Name	Grant Date		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($/sh)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Unearned Shares or Units of Stock Granted That Have Not Vested (#)			Market Value of Unearned Shares or Units of Stock Granted That Have Not Vested ($)(2)
Stanford L. Kurland		03/09/2018		—		102,459		24.40		03/08/2028		122,950	(3)		2,613,917
		03/06/2017		46,168		92,336		18.05		03/05/2027		166,204	(4)		3,533,497
		03/07/2016		125,390		62,696		11.28		03/06/2026		174,153	(5)		3,702,493
		03/03/2015		161,529		—		17.52		03/02/2025		—			—
		02/26/2014		191,098		—		17.26		02/25/2024		—			—
		06/13/2013		107,656		—		21.03		06/12/2023		—			—
David A. Spector		03/09/2018		—		52,935		24.40		03/08/2028		63,522	(3)		1,350,478
		03/06/2017		23,084		46,168		18.05		03/05/2027		77,558	(4)		1,648,883
		03/07/2016		47,440		23,721		11.28		03/06/2026		65,890	(5)		1,400,821
		03/03/2015		61,120		—		17.52		03/02/2025		—			—
		02/26/2014		72,301		—		17.26		02/25/2024		—			—
		06/13/2013		40,735		—		21.03		06/12/2023		—			—
Doug Jones		03/09/2018		—		26,467		24.40		03/08/2028		31,761	(3)		675,239
		03/06/2017		11,542		23,084		18.05		03/05/2027		38,779	(4)		824,442
		03/07/2016		18,514		9,257		11.28		03/06/2026		25,714	(5)		546,680
		03/03/2015		23,829		—		17.52		03/02/2025		—			—
		02/26/2014		28,216		—		17.26		02/25/2024		—			—
		06/13/2013		15,882		—		21.03		06/12/2023		—			—
Vandad Fartaj		03/09/2018		—		21,174		24.40		03/08/2028		25,408	(3)		540,174
		03/06/2017		9,233		18,467		18.05		03/05/2027		31,023	(4)		659,549
		03/07/2016		18,514		9,257		11.28		03/06/2026		25,714	(5)		546,680
		03/03/2015		23,829		—		17.52		03/02/2025		—			—
		02/26/2014		28,216		—		17.26		02/25/2024		—			—
		06/13/2013		15,882		—		21.03		06/12/2023		—			—
Andrew S. Chang		03/09/2018		—		21,174		24.40		03/08/2028		25,408	(3)		540,174
		03/06/2017		9,233		18,467		18.05		03/05/2027		31,023	(4)		659,549
		03/07/2016		18,514		9,257		11.28		03/06/2026		25,714	(5)		546,680
		03/03/2015		23,829		—		17.52		03/02/2025		—			—
		02/26/2014		28,216		—		17.26		02/25/2024		—			—
		06/13/2013		15,882		—		21.03		06/12/2023					—

(1) One-third (1/3) of the optioned shares will vest in a lump sum on each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the vesting commencement date, subject to the recipient’s continued service through each anniversary.

(2) Per share value of stock awards is $21.26 based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018.

(3) The indicated number of unearned units consists of time-based RSUs (for all named executive officers other than Mr. Kurland) and performance-based RSUs with a performance period that ends on December 31, 2020 and is described above under the heading “—Elements of our Executive Compensation Program—Annual Long-Term Equity Awards.” Based on current performance levels, the performance-based RSUs are reported at the target payout level.

(4) The indicated number of unearned units consists of time-based RSUs (for all named executive officers other than Mr. Kurland) and performance-based RSUs with a performance period that ends on December 31, 2019 and is described above under the heading “—Elements of our Executive Compensation Program—Annual Long-Term Equity Awards.” Based on current performance levels, these RSUs are reported at the target payout level.

(5) The indicated number of unearned units consists entirely of the performance-based RSUs with a performance period that ends on December 31, 2018 and is described above under the heading “—Elements of our Executive Compensation Program—Annual Long-Term Equity Awards.” Based on current performance levels, these RSUs are reported at the target payout level.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 45

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information regarding exercises of options to purchase shares of common stock and stock awards (RSUs and PSUs) for our named executive officers during Fiscal 2018:

	Option Awards				Stock Awards(1)
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)		Value Realized on Exercise ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2)
Stanford L. Kurland		—		—		153,653		3,520,190
David A. Spector		—		—		67,367		1,553,442
Doug Jones		—		—		27,303		630,543
Vandad Fartaj		—		—		26,380		608,391
Andrew S. Chang		—		—		26,380		608,391

(1) Amounts reported in these columns consist of vested RSUs and PSUs. If the named executive officer sold a portion of the common stock acquired upon vesting of RSUs or PSUs to satisfy the tax obligation with respect to such vesting, the number of shares of common stock acquired is less than the amount shown. The number of shares of common stock acquired and the value realized on vesting as reflected in this column have not been reduced to reflect the sale of common stock to satisfy any tax obligations. The allocation of RSUs and PSUs is as follows:

	RSUs				PSUs
Name	Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(1)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)		Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)(2)		Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Stanford L. Kurland		—		—		153,653		3,520,190
David A. Spector		9,233		221,592		58,134		1,331,850
Doug Jones		4,616		110,784		22,687		519,759
Vandad Fartaj		3,693		88,632		22,687		519,759
Andrew S. Chang		3,693		88,632		22,687		519,759

(1) Amounts reported in this column represent an RSU award that vested on March 6, 2018.

(2) Amounts reported in this column represent a PSU award that vested on March 15, 2019 and the payout of shares of common stock pursuant to the award was determined based on our return on equity (ROE) (100% of the award) for the period of January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018 as measured against the target performance goal set by the Compensation Committee of the Board when the award was granted in 2016. The payout percentage for the award was 88.23%.

(2) The value realized on vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares of common stock received upon vesting of RSUs and PSUs by the fair market value of our common stock on the respective vesting dates.

46   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control

The information below describes and estimates certain compensation that would become payable under existing plans and arrangements assuming the named executive officer’s employment had terminated or a “change in control” had occurred on December 31, 2018. These benefits are in addition to benefits available generally to salaried employees.

Potential Payments Pursuant to Employment Agreements

As described in the “Employment Agreements” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, three of our named executive officers, Mr. Kurland, Mr. Spector and Mr. Jones, currently have employment agreements in place with PNMAC. These employment agreements provide for severance payments, vesting of equity awards, and other benefits in the event the executive’s employment is terminated due to disability or death, terminated for “cause,” terminated “other than for cause,” or terminated for “good reason” by the executive.

Name	Benefit	Disability		Death		Termination For Cause or Voluntary Resignation		Termination Other than For Cause or For Good Reason
Stanford L. Kurland	Consulting Fees(1)		—		—		—		$  1,500,000
	Base Salary		—	$	500,000		—		—
	COBRA Benefits Continuation	$	36,957	$	45,878		—		$       22,939
	Cash Incentive-Based Compensation	$	3,825,000	$	3,825,000		—		$  3,825,000
	Accelerated Vesting – Stock Options(2)	$	922,105	$	922,105		—		$     922,105
	Accelerated Vesting – Performance-Based RSUs(3)	$	9,849,907	$	9,849,907		—		$  9,849,907
	Aggregate Payment Amount	$	14,633,968	$	15,142,889		—		$16,119,950
David A. Spector	Consulting Fees(1)		—		—		—		—
	Base Salary		—	$	375,000		—		$  1,500,000
	COBRA Benefits Continuation	$	52,786	$	65,528		—		$       32,764
	Cash Incentive-Based Compensation	$	2,900,000	$	2,900,000		—		$  6,750,000
	Accelerated Vesting – Stock Options(2)	$	384,935	$	384,935		—		$     384,935
	Accelerated Vesting – Performance-Based RSUs(3)	$	3,557,415	$	3,557,415		—		$  3,557,415
	Accelerated Vesting – Time-Based RSUs(4)	$	$842,768	$	$842,768		—		$     842,768
	Aggregate Payment Amount	$	7,737,903	$	8,125,645		—		$13,067,881
Doug Jones	Consulting Fees(1)		—		—		—		—
	Base Salary		—	$	250,000		—		$  1,000,000
	COBRA Benefits Continuation	$	41,210	$	51,158		—		$       25,579
	Cash Incentive-Based Compensation	$	1,500,000	$	1,500,000		—		$  3,500,000
	Accelerated Vesting – Stock Options(2)	$	166,485	$	166,485		—		$     166,485
	Accelerated Vesting – Performance-Based RSUs(3)	$	1,624,966	$	1,624,966		—		$  1,624,966
	Accelerated Vesting – Time-Based RSUs(4)	$	421,394	$	421,394		—		$     421,394
	Aggregate Payment Amount	$	3,754,055	$	4,014,002		—		$  6,738,423

(1) Represents consulting fees for Mr. Kurland in the amount of $1.5 million, with approximately $1 million of such amount paid in 18 monthly installments of $55,555 during the consulting period and the remainder paid upon the completion of the consulting period. Mr. Spector and Mr. Jones are entitled to consulting fees only upon the expiration of the terms of their respective employment agreements.

(2) Represents the vesting in full of all outstanding unvested stock options. Calculated as the difference between the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018 and the exercise or strike price of the stock options multiplied by the number of underlying shares of common stock.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 47

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

(3) Represents the vesting in full of all unvested performance-based RSUs based on the achievement of target level performance. Calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018 multiplied by the number of underlying shares of common stock.

(4) Represents the vesting in full of all unvested time-based RSUs. Calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018 multiplied by the number of underlying shares of common stock.

Potential Payments Pursuant to the 2013 Plan

Pursuant to the 2013 Plan, all of our named executive officers are also entitled to certain rights in connection with a termination of employment upon the occurrence of a “change of control.” Provided below is a summary of such rights:

Name	Benefit	Acceleration Upon a Change of Control
Stanford L. Kurland	Vested Stock Options Spread Value(1)	$2,792,863
	Performance-Based RSU Value(2)	$6,929,463
David A. Spector	Vested Stock Options Spread Value(1)	$1,074,713
	Performance-Based RSU Value(2)	$2,538,444
	Time-Based RSU Value(3)	$   842,768
Doug Jones	Vested Stock Options Spread Value(1)	$   427,457
	Performance-Based RSU Value(2)	$1,115,484
	Time-Based RSU Value(3)	$   421,394
Vandad Fartaj	Vested Stock Options Spread Value(1)	$   420,045
	Performance-Based RSU Value(2)	$1,001,722
	Time-Based RSU Value(3)	$   337,099
Andrew S. Chang	Vested Stock Options Spread Value(1)	$   420,045
	Performance-Based RSU Value(2)	$1,001,722
	Time-Based RSU Value(3)	$   337,099

(1) Calculated as the difference between the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018 and the exercise or strike price of the stock options multiplied by the number of underlying shares of common stock.

(2) Represents the vesting of a pro rata portion of all unvested performance-based RSUs as of December 31, 2018, assuming achievement of target level performance. The pro rata portion is based on the length of time within the performance period which has elapsed prior to December 31, 2018.

(3) Represents the vesting of all unvested time-based RSUs as of December 31, 2018. Calculated based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2018.

Due to the number of factors that affect the nature and amount of any benefits provided upon the events discussed above, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be different. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of any such event and our Company’s stock price. There can be no assurance that a termination or “change in control” would produce the same or similar results as those described if occurring on another date or at another price, or if any assumption used to prepare this information is not correct in fact.

2018 Pension Benefits

The table for “Pension Benefits” has been omitted because it is not applicable. We do not provide any of our named executive officers with any pension plans or benefits.

2018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The table for “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” has been omitted because it is not applicable. We do not provide any of our named executive officers with any nonqualified deferred compensation plans or benefits.

48   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  COMPENSATION TABLES  

401(k) Plan

PNMAC maintains atax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan for all employees who satisfy certain eligibility requirements. Under our 401(k) plan, employees may elect to defer a portion of their eligible compensation subject to applicable annual Code limits. Under the 401(k) plan, PNMAC makes matching contributions to participants equal to 100% of the participant’s elective deferrals, up to a maximum of $11,000 with respect to Fiscal 2018. We intend for the 401(k) plan to qualify under Section 401(a) and 501(a) of the Code so that contributions by employees to the 401(k) plan, and income earned on those contributions, are not taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k) plan.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Compensation Committee is comprised of three director: Mr. Botein, the chair of the Compensation Committee, and Messrs. Hunt and Nanji. None of them has ever served as an officer or employee of our Company or any of our affiliates or has any other business relationship or affiliation with our Company, except his or her service as a director. During Fiscal 2018, none of our executive officers served as a director or a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers was a director or a member of our Compensation Committee.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 49

  CEO PAY RATIO   

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of RegulationS-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. David Spector, our President and Chief Executive Officer, or our CEO:

For 2018, our last completed fiscal year:

• the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO) was $67,076; and

• the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the “2018 Summary Compensation Table” included in this Proxy Statement, was $5,777,619.

Based on this information, for 2018 the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 86 to 1.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps:

1. We determined that, as of December 31, 2018, our employee population consisted of 3,463 individuals with all of these individuals located in the United States. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time, and temporary employees. In determining whether our workers are employees, we applied widely recognized employment and tax laws and classified approximately 67 individuals as independent contractors who were therefore excluded from our employee population.

2. For Fiscal 2018, we did not perform are-evaluation to identify a new “median employee.” There were no changes in the employee population or employee compensation that would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure and require any suchre-evaluation. In order to identify the median employee during Fiscal 2017, we compared the amount of salary, bonus, wages, overtime and other cash compensation of our employees as reflected in our payroll records. In making that determination, we did not annualize the compensation of any employees.

3. Once we confirmed our median employee, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for Fiscal 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of RegulationS-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $67,076.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. Therefore, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

50   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  PROPOSAL III – ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  

Proposal III – Advisory(Non-Binding) Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

As required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are presenting a proposal that gives stockholders the opportunity to cast an advisory(non-binding) vote on our executive compensation for named executive officers by voting for or against it. We currently present such proposals annually, and we expect the next proposal to be presented in 2020. At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, 80.6% of the stockholders voting on our “say on pay” proposal (constituting 73.7% of our total outstanding shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting) voted for that proposal. We recognize that our stockholders’ ability to provide input with respect to our executive compensation practices and disclosure is an important element of good corporate governance, and we carefully considered the results of the 2018say-on-pay vote in making our 2018 compensation decisions.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS AN ADVISORY(NON-BINDING) VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION APPROVING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the compensation discussion and analysis, the compensation tables and any narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement, is hereby APPROVED.”

Supporting Statement

We aim to create apay-for-performance culture that rewards our named executive officers for high Company and individual performance, aligns the interests of our named executive officers with those of our stockholders, facilitates the attraction, motivation and retention of highly talented executive leaders, supports our long-term success and sustainability, and encourages our named executive officers to focus on the achievement of our annual and long-term business goals.

We have three primary elements of total compensation – base salary, annual performance-based cash bonuses, and long-term equity awards – and this compensation is heavily weighted toward performance-based compensation. Approximately 87% of our CEO’s target total compensation opportunity was performance-based and aligned with our stockholders in the form of annual performance-based cash bonuses and long-term equity compensation, and approximately 87% of our other named executive officers’ total compensation opportunity was performance-based.

We believe that this performance-based pay culture supports our efforts to motivate and reward our named executive officers for achieving company performance and strategic accomplishments that drive long-term stockholder value.

We encourage our stockholders to read the section in this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” in which we describe in greater detail our compensation program, objectives and policies for our named executive officers. For the reasons described therein and above, we recommend that our stockholders endorse our compensation program for our named executive officers. While our Board intends to carefully consider the stockholder vote resulting from this proposal, the final vote will not be binding on us and is advisory in nature.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 51

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Each of our executive officers is also an executive officer of PMT and an officer of one or more of its subsidiaries. In addition, certain of our executive officers serve on the boards of one or more of these entities and/or hold an ownership interest in PMT. We describe below certain related transactions, during and since our last fiscal year, to which we were a party or will be a party, in which:

• the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and

• any of the directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of the membership interests of PNMAC, or any member of the immediate family of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Compensation arrangements for our directors and named executive officers are described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Exchange Agreement

On May 8, 2013, we entered into an exchange agreement with certain former owners of PNMAC that entitled those owners to exchange their ownership interests in PNMAC for shares of our common stock on aone-for-one basis. On November 1, 2018, in connection with the closing of our corporate reorganization, the exchange agreement with each of our former owners was terminated.

Amended and Restated Stockholder Agreements

On November 1, 2018, in connection with the closing of our corporate reorganization, we entered into separate amended and restated stockholder agreements with BlackRock and Highfields which provide that each of BlackRock and Highfields will have the right to nominate two individuals for election to our Board as long as it, together with its affiliates, holds at least 15% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock, and the right to nominate one individual for election to our Board as long as it, together with its affiliates, holds at least 10% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock. We, in turn, are obligated to use our best efforts to ensure that these nominees are elected. In addition, those agreements provide that each of BlackRock and Highfields, as long as it, together with its affiliates, holds at least 10% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock, will have the right to nominate one member of each committee of our Board. As long as those nominees meet the independence standards applicable to those committees, we will appoint them as members of those committees. Those agreements also provide that neither our certificate of incorporation nor our bylaws, as in effect from time to time, may be amended in any manner that is adverse to BlackRock, Highfields or their respective affiliates without the consent of BlackRock or Highfields, as applicable, as long as it, together with its affiliates, holds at least 5% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock.

Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement

On November 1, 2018, in connection with the closing of our corporate reorganization, we entered into an amended and restated registration rights agreement with BlackRock, Highfields and the other owners of PNMAC other than us pursuant to which BlackRock, Highfields and certain permitted transferees have the right, under certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions, to require us to register for resale the shares of our common stock received by them in exchange for their ownership interests in PNMAC in connection with the closing of our corporate reorganization. In November 2018, we filed a post-effective amendment to a registration statement to register for resale such shares of our common stock held by each of BlackRock, Highfields and certain other selling stockholders. The post-effective amendment to the registration statement was declared effective on November 19, 2018. All securities registered under this registration statement are available for sale in the open market unless restrictions apply.

Demand Registration Rights. BlackRock and Highfields and certain permitted transferees each have the right to demand that we register their common stock for resale, subject to the conditions set forth in the registration rights agreement, no more than three times in any12-month period. BlackRock and Highfields and certain permitted transferees have the right under the registration rights agreement to require that we register their common stock for resale. Such registration demand must reasonably be expected to result in aggregate gross cash proceeds to such demanding stockholder in excess of $25 million. Each of BlackRock and Highfields and certain permitted transferees will have the right to participate in any such demand registrations. We will not be obligated to effect a demand registration within 120 days of the effective date of a registration statement filed by us. We may postpone the filing of a registration statement for up to 60 days once in any12-month period if our Board determines in good faith that the filing would reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect any

52   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

material financing or acquisition of ours or require premature disclosure of information that would reasonably be expected to be materially adverse to us. The underwriters of any underwritten offering have the right to limit the number of shares to be included in a registration statement filed in response to the exercise of these demand registration rights. We must pay all expenses, except for underwriters’ discounts and commissions, incurred in connection with these demand registration rights.

Piggyback Registration Rights. BlackRock, Highfields, certain of their permitted transferees and the minority stockholders which are parties to the agreement will each have the right to “piggyback” on any registration statements that we file on an unlimited basis, subject to the conditions set forth in the registration rights agreement. If we register any securities for public sale, stockholders with piggyback registration rights under the registration rights agreement have the right to include their shares in the registration for resale by them, subject to specified limitations and exceptions.

S-3 Registration Rights. If we are eligible to file a registration statement on FormS-3, the stockholders withS-3 registration rights under the registration rights agreement and certain permitted transferees can request that we register their shares for resale. Any registration must be reasonably expected by the demanding stockholder to result in aggregate gross cash proceeds to such demanding stockholder in excess of $10 million, and no more than three demands for anS-3 registration may be made in any12-month period. If we are eligible as a Well Known Seasoned Issuer, or WKSI, the requesting stockholders may request that the shelf registration statement utilize the automatic shelf registration process under Rule 415 promulgated under the Securities Act. If we are not eligible as a WKSI or are otherwise ineligible to utilize the automatic shelf registration process, then we are required to use our reasonable efforts to have the shelf registration statement declared effective.

Tax Receivable Agreement

On May 8, 2013, we entered into a tax receivable agreement with the former owners of PNMAC that provides for the payment from time to time by the corporate taxpayer to those owners of 85% of the amount of the net tax benefits, if any, that the corporate taxpayer is deemed to realize under certain circumstances as a result of (i) increases in tax basis resulting from exchanges of ownership interests in PNMAC and (ii) certain other tax benefits related to our entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement. These payment obligations are obligations of the corporate taxpayer and not of PNMAC. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, the tax benefit deemed realized by the corporate taxpayer will be computed by comparing the actual income tax liability of the corporate taxpayer (calculated with certain assumptions) to the taxes that the corporate taxpayer would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of PNMAC as a result of the exchanges, and had the corporate taxpayer not entered into the tax receivable agreement. The term of the tax receivable agreement will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless we exercise our right to terminate the tax receivable agreement. Following the closing of the corporate reorganization on November 1, 2018, we succeeded to certain obligations under the tax receivable agreement and, therefore, are thetop-level parent entity and the corporate taxpayer who will make payments, if any, under the tax receivable agreement to those certain prior owners of PNMAC who effected exchanges of ownership interests in PNMAC for our common stock prior to the closing of the corporate reorganization. Any prior owners of PNMAC who did not complete such exchanges prior to the closing of the corporate reorganization, or prior owners that only completed such exchanges with respect to some but not all of their interests in PNMAC, will not be entitled to any future payments under the tax receivable agreement in respect of any ownership interests not exchanged prior to the closing.

In the event of termination of the tax receivable agreement, we would be required to make an immediate payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future net tax benefits, which upfront payment may be made years in advance of the actual realization of such future benefits. Estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the tax receivable agreement is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors. The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the tax receivable agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

• the timing of prior exchanges—for instance, the increase in any tax deductions will vary depending on the fair value, which may fluctuate over time, of the depreciable or amortizable assets of PNMAC at the time of each exchange;

• the price of shares of our common stock at the time of the exchange—the tax basis increase in assets of PNMAC for the corporate taxpayer, as well as any related increase in allocations of tax deductions to the corporate taxpayer, is directly proportional to the price of shares of our common stock at the time of the exchange;

• the extent to which such exchanges are taxable—if an exchange is not taxable for any reason, increased deductions will not be available; and

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 53

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

• the amount and timing of our income—the corporate taxpayer will be required to pay 85% of the net tax benefits as and when those benefits are treated as realized under the terms of the tax receivable agreement. If the corporate taxpayer does not have taxable income, the corporate taxpayer generally is not required (absent a change of control or circumstances requiring an early termination payment) to make payments under the tax receivable agreement for that taxable year because no benefit will have been actually realized. However, any tax benefits that do not result in realized benefits in a given tax year will likely generate tax attributes that may be utilized to generate benefits in previous or future tax years. The utilization of such tax attributes will result in payments under the tax receivable agreement.

We expect that the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement will be substantial. There may be a material negative effect on our liquidity if, as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise, the payments under the tax receivable agreement exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement and/or distributions to us by PNMAC are not sufficient to permit us to make payments under the tax receivable agreement after we have paid taxes. Furthermore, our obligations to make payments under the tax receivable agreement could make us a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of an acquirer that cannot use some or all of the tax benefits that are deemed realized under the tax receivable agreement. The payments under the tax receivable agreement are not conditioned upon the continued ownership of us by the exchanging owners of PNMAC.

In addition, the tax receivable agreement provides that upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, the corporate taxpayer’s (or its successor’s) obligations with respect to exchanged or acquired ownership interests in PNMAC (whether exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that the corporate taxpayer would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement. As a result, (i) we could be required to make payments under the tax receivable agreement that are greater than or less than the specified percentage of the actual net tax benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement and (ii) if we elect to terminate the tax receivable agreement early, we would be required to make an immediate payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future net tax benefits, which upfront payment may be made years in advance of the actual realization of such future benefits. In these situations, our obligations under the tax receivable agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity, as well as our attractiveness as a target for an acquisition.

Decisions made by certain prior owners of PNMAC in the course of running our business, such as with respect to mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments that are received by an exchanging or selling owner under the tax receivable agreement. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction will generally accelerate payments under the tax receivable agreement and increase the present value of such payments.

Payments are generally due under the tax receivable agreement within a specified period of time following the filing of our tax return for the taxable year with respect to which the payment obligation arises, although interest on such payments will begin to accrue at a rate of LIBOR plus 100 basis points from the due date (without extensions) of such tax return. Payments not made when due under the tax receivable agreement generally would accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 500 basis points. However, in the event that we do not have sufficient cash available to make a payment under the tax receivable agreement when that payment is due, under certain circumstances we may elect to defer that payment for up to two years. Payments that are deferred pursuant to this election would accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 350 basis points.

Payments under the tax receivable agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that we will determine. Although we are not aware of any issue that would cause the IRS to challenge a tax basis increase, the corporate taxpayer will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the tax receivable agreement (except to the extent such amounts can be applied against future amounts that would otherwise be due under the tax receivable agreement). As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the tax receivable agreement in excess of the benefits that the corporate taxpayer actually realizes in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement.

PNMAC Limited Liability Company Agreement

On November 1, 2018, in connection with the closing of the corporate reorganization, we and PNMAC Holdings, Inc. entered into the fifth amended and restated limited liability company agreement of PNMAC. We are the managing member of PNMAC. Accordingly, we operate and control all of the business and affairs of PNMAC and, through PNMAC and its operating entity subsidiaries, conduct our business.

54   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

Pursuant to the limited liability company agreement of PNMAC, we have the right to determine when distributions will be made to the members of PNMAC and the amount of any such distributions, other than with respect to tax distributions as described below. If a distribution is authorized; such distribution will be made to the members of PNMAC pro rata in accordance with the percentages of their respective limited liability company interests.

The unit holders of PNMAC, including us, will incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on their proportionate share of any taxable income of PNMAC. Except as otherwise required under Section 704(c) of the Code, net profits and net losses of PNMAC will generally be allocated to its members (including us) pro rata in accordance with their respective limited liability company interests. The limited liability company agreement of PNMAC will provide for quarterly cash distributions, which we refer to as “tax distributions,” to the members of PNMAC if we, as the managing member of PNMAC, determine that the taxable income of PNMAC gives rise to taxable income for such holders. Generally, these quarterly tax distributions will be computed based on the taxable income of PNMAC multiplied by an assumed tax rate determined by us. Tax distributions will be made only to the extent that all distributions from PNMAC for the relevant year were insufficient to cover such tax liabilities.

The limited liability company agreement of PNMAC also provides that substantially all expenses incurred by or attributable to us, but not including our obligations incurred under the tax receivable agreement and our income tax expenses, will be borne by PNMAC.

Other than us, in our capacity as managing member, no member of PNMAC will have voting rights with respect to PNMAC.

Management Agreements

Our subsidiary, PCM, may enter into investment management agreements with investment companies or funds that invest in residential mortgage assets. Presently, PCM is party to a management agreement with PMT.

This management agreement requires us to oversee the business affairs of PMT in conformity with the investment policies that are approved and monitored by PMT’s board or management. We are responsible for PMT’sday-to-day management and perform such services and activities related to PMT’s assets and operations as may be appropriate.

PMT Management Agreement

We externally manage and advise PMT pursuant to a management agreement, or the PMT Management Agreement, which was amended and restated effective September 12, 2016. The PMT Management Agreement requires us to oversee PMT’s business affairs in conformity with the investment policies that are approved and monitored by its board of trustees. We are responsible for PMT’sday-to-day management and will perform such services and activities related to its assets and operations as may be appropriate.

Pursuant to the PMT Management Agreement, we collect a base management fee and may collect a performance incentive fee, both payable quarterly and in arrears. The PMT Management Agreement expires on September 12, 2020, subject to automatic renewal for additional18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The base management fee is calculated at a defined annualized percentage of “shareholders’ equity.” PMT’s “shareholders’ equity” is defined as the sum of the net proceeds from any issuances of its equity securities since its inception (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such issuances during the fiscal quarter of any such issuance); plus its retained earnings at the end of the quarter; less any amount that PMT pays for repurchases or redemptions of its equity securities (allocated on a pro rata daily basis for such repurchases and redemptions during the fiscal quarter of any such repurchases or redemptions); and excludingone-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain othernon-cash charges as agreed between PMT and us.

Pursuant to the terms of the PMT Management Agreement, the base management fee is equal to the sum of (i) 1.5% per year of shareholders’ equity up to $2 billion, (ii) 1.375% per year of shareholders’ equity in excess of $2 billion and up to $5 billion, and (iii) 1.25% per year of shareholders’ equity in excess of $5 billion. The base management fee is paid in cash.

The performance incentive fee is calculated at a defined annualized percentage of the amount by which “net income,” on a rolling four-quarter basis and before deducting the incentive fee, exceeds certain levels of annualized return on PMT’s “equity.” For the purpose of determining the amount of the performance incentive fee, “net income” is defined as net income or loss attributable to PMT’s common shareholders, computed in accordance with GAAP and adjusted to excludeone-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain othernon-cash charges determined as agreed between PMT and us. For this purpose, “equity” is the weighted average of the issue price per common share of all of PMT’s public offerings of common shares, multiplied by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (including restricted share units issued under PMT’s equity incentive plans) in the four-quarter period.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 55

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

The performance incentive fee is calculated quarterly and escalates as net income (stated as a percentage of return on equity) increases over certain thresholds. On each calculation date, the threshold amount represents a stated return on equity, plus or minus a “high watermark” adjustment. The performance fee payable for any quarter is equal to: (a) 10% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds (i) an 8% return on equity plus the high watermark, up to (ii) a 12% return on equity; plus (b) 15% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds (i) a 12% return on equity plus the high watermark, up to (ii) a 16% return on equity; plus (c) 20% of the amount by which net income for the quarter exceeds a 16% return on equity plus the high watermark.

The “high watermark” is the quarterly adjustment that reflects the amount by which the net income (stated as a percentage of return on equity) in that quarter exceeds or falls short of the lesser of 8% and the Fannie Mae MBS Yield (the target yield) for such quarter. If the net income is lower than the target yield, the high watermark is increased by the difference. If the net income is higher than the target yield, the high watermark is reduced by the difference. Each time a performance incentive fee is earned, the high watermark returns to zero. As a result, the threshold amount required for us to earn a performance incentive fee is adjusted cumulatively based on the performance of PMT’s net income over (or under) the target yield, until the net income in excess of the target yield exceeds the then-current cumulative high watermark amount, and a performance incentive fee is earned. The performance incentive fee may be paid to us in cash or in PMT’s common shares (subject to a limit of no more than 50% paid in common shares), at PMT’s option.

We are entitled to reimbursement of our organizational and operating expenses, including third-party expenses, incurred on PMT’s behalf, it being understood that we and our affiliates shall allocate a portion of our personnel’s time to provide certain legal, tax and investor relations services for our direct benefit and for which we shall be reimbursed $120,000 per fiscal quarter, such amount to be reviewed annually and not preclude reimbursement for any other services performed by us or our affiliates.

In addition, PMT is required to pay its and its subsidiaries’ pro rata portion of our and our affiliates’ rent, telephone, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other office, internal and overhead expenses required for PMT’s and its subsidiaries’ operations. These expenses will be allocated based on the ratio of PMT’s and its subsidiaries’ proportion of gross assets compared to all remaining gross assets managed by us as calculated at each fiscal quarter end.

We may also be entitled to a termination fee under certain circumstances. Specifically, the termination fee is payable for (1) PMT’s termination of the PMT Management Agreement without cause, (2) our termination of the PMT Management Agreement upon a default by PMT in the performance of any material term of the agreement that has continued uncured for a period of 30 days after receipt of written notice thereof, or (3) our termination of the agreement after the termination by PMT without cause (excluding anon-renewal) of the MBS agreement, the MSR recapture agreement or the PMT Servicing Agreement (each as described and/or defined below). The termination fee is equal to three times the sum of (a) the average annual base management fee and (b) the average annual (or, if the period is less than 24 months, annualized) performance incentive fee earned by us during the24-month period immediately preceding the date of termination.

PMT may terminate the PMT Management Agreement without the payment of any termination fee under certain circumstances, including, among other circumstances, uncured material breaches of the PMT Management Agreement by us, upon a change in control of us (defined to include a 50% change in our shareholding in a single transaction or related series of transactions or Mr. Stanford L. Kurland’s failure to continue as our chief executive officer to the extent we have not retained his suitable replacement (in PMT’s discretion) within six months thereof) or upon our termination of the MBS agreement, the MSR recapture agreement or the PMT Servicing Agreement without cause. In December 2016, we announced that Mr. David A. Spector would succeed Mr. Kurland as our Chief Executive Officer, effective as of January 1, 2017, and that Mr. Kurland would continue to serve in a new capacity as our Executive Chairman. PMT determined that Mr. Spector, who previously served as its Executive Managing Director, President and Chief Operating Officer, was a suitable replacement for Mr. Kurland. Accordingly, in December 2016, PMT also announced changes to the roles of Mr. Spector and Mr. Kurland, electing Mr. Spector as its President and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Kurland as its Executive Chairman, effective as of January 1, 2017.

The PMT Management Agreement also provides that, prior to the undertaking by us or our affiliates of any new investment opportunity or any other business opportunity requiring a source of capital with respect to which we or our affiliates will earn a management, advisory, consulting or similar fee, we shall present to PMT such new opportunity and the material terms on which we propose to provide services to PMT before pursuing such opportunity with third parties.

We earned approximately $23.0 million in base management fees and $1.4 million in performance incentive fees in Fiscal 2018 in connection with work performed under the PMT Management Agreement.

Investment Funds Management Agreements

Three investment funds, or the Investment Funds, that we previously managed were dissolved during 2018. Before their dissolution, we had investment management agreements with these Investment Funds pursuant to which we received management fees consisting of base

56   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

management fees and carried interest determined by the Investment Funds’ performance and our contractual rights to share in the Investment Funds’ returns in excess of the preferred returns, if any, accruing to the Investment Funds’ investors. The management fees were based on the lesser of the funds’ net asset values or aggregate capital contributions. The base management fees accrued at annual rates ranging from 1.5% to 2.0% of the applicable amounts on which they were based.

Servicing Agreements

Through our subsidiary, PLS, we enter into servicing agreements with investment companies or funds that invest in residential mortgage loans pursuant to which we provide servicing for our clients’ portfolio of residential mortgage loans. Presently, PLS is party to servicing agreements with PMT and the Investment Funds.

The loan servicing to be provided by us under the servicing agreements includes collecting principal, interest and escrow account payments, if any, with respect to mortgage loans, as well as managing loss mitigation, which may include, among other things, collection activities, loan workouts, modifications, foreclosures and short sales. We may also engage in certain loan origination activities that include refinancing mortgage loans and financings that facilitate sales of real estate acquired upon settlement of loans, or REOs.

PMT Servicing Agreement

We and PMT have entered into a loan servicing agreement, or the PMT Servicing Agreement, which was amended and restated effective September 12, 2016 and pursuant to which we provide servicing for PMT’s portfolio of residential mortgage loans and subservicing for its portfolio of mortgage servicing rights, or MSRs. The term of the PMT Servicing Agreement expires on September 12, 2020, subject to automatic renewal for additional18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

The base servicing fee rates for distressed whole mortgage loans are charged based on a monthlyper-loan dollar amount, with the actual dollar amount for each loan based on the delinquency, bankruptcy and/or foreclosure status of such loan or whether the underlying mortgage property has become REO. The base servicing fee rates for distressed whole mortgage loans range from $30 per month for current loans up to $85 per month for loans where the Borrower has declared bankruptcy. The base servicing fee rate for REO is $75 per month. To the extent that PMT rents its REO under its REO rental program, we collect an REO rental fee of $30 per month per REO, an REO property lease renewal fee of $100 per lease renewal, and a property management fee in an amount equal to our cost if property management services and/or any related software costs are outsourced to a third-party property management firm or 9% of gross rental income if we provide property management services directly. We are also entitled to retain any tenant paid application fees and late rent fees and seek reimbursement for certain third-party vendor fees.

We are also entitled to certain activity-based fees for distressed whole mortgage loans that are charged based on the achievement of certain events. These fees range from $750 for a streamline modification to $1,750 for a liquidation and $500 for adeed-in-lieu of foreclosure. We are not entitled to earn more than one liquidation fee,re-performance fee or modification fee per loan in any18-month period.

The base servicing fee rates fornon-distressed mortgage loans we subservice on PMT’s behalf are also calculated through a monthlyper-loan dollar amount, with the actual dollar amount for each loan based on whether the mortgage loan is a fixed-rate or adjustable-rate loan. The base servicing fee rates for mortgage loans we subservice on PMT’s behalf are $7.50 per month for fixed-rate mortgage loans and $8.50 per month for adjustable-rate mortgage loans. To the extent that these mortgage loans become delinquent, we are entitled to an additional servicing fee per mortgage loan falling within a range of $10 to $55 per month and based on the delinquency, bankruptcy and foreclosure status of the loan or $75 per month if the underlying mortgaged property becomes REO. We are also entitled to customary ancillary income and certain market-based fees and charges, including boarding and deboarding fees, liquidation and disposition fees, and assumption, modification and origination fees.

In addition, because PMT has limited employees and infrastructure, we are required to provide a range of services and activities significantly greater in scope than the services provided in connection with a customary servicing arrangement. For these services, we receive a supplemental servicing fee of $25 per month for each distressed whole loan.

Except as otherwise provided in the MSR recapture agreement, when we effect a refinancing of a loan on PMT’s behalf and not through a third-party lender and the resulting loan is readily saleable, or we originate a loan to facilitate the disposition of the real estate acquired by PMT in settlement of a loan, we are entitled to receive from PMT market-based fees and compensation consistent with pricing and terms we offer unaffiliated third parties on a retail basis.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 57

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

PMT currently participates in the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP (or other similar mortgage loan modification programs). HAMP establishes standard loan modification guidelines for “at risk” homeowners and provides incentive payments to certain participants, including mortgage loan servicers, for achieving modifications and successfully remaining in the program. The PMT Servicing Agreement entitles us to retain any incentive payments made to us and to which we are entitled under HAMP; provided, however, that with respect to any such incentive payments paid to us in connection with a mortgage loan modification for which PMT previously paid us a modification fee, we are required to reimburse PMT an amount equal to the incentive payments.

We are entitled to reimbursement for all customary, bona fide reasonable and necessaryout-of-pocket expenses incurred by us in connection with the performance of our servicing obligations.

We earned approximately $42.0 million in loan servicing fees in Fiscal 2018 in connection with work performed for PMT under the PMT Servicing Agreement.

Investment Funds Servicing Agreements

The Investment Funds were dissolved during Fiscal 2018. Before their dissolution, our servicing agreements with the Investment Funds generally provided for fee revenue, which varied depending on the type and quality of the loans being serviced. We were also entitled to certain customary market-based fees and charges.

We earned approximately $3,000 in loan servicing fees in Fiscal 2018 in connection with work performed for the Investment Funds.

Other Agreements with PMT

PMT Mortgage Banking Services Agreement

Pursuant to a mortgage banking services agreement, or the MBS agreement, which was amended and restated effective September 12, 2016, we provide PMT with certain mortgage banking services, including fulfillment and disposition-related services, with respect to loans acquired by PMT from correspondent sellers.

Pursuant to the MBS agreement, we have agreed to provide such services exclusively for PMT’s benefit, and we and our affiliates are prohibited from providing such services for any other third party. However, such exclusivity and prohibition shall not apply, and certain other duties instead will be imposed upon us, if PMT is unable to purchase or finance mortgage loans as contemplated under our MBS agreement for any reason. The MBS agreement expires, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement, on September 12, 2020, subject to automatic renewal for additional18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

In consideration for the mortgage banking services we provide with respect to PMT’s acquisition of mortgage loans, we are entitled to a monthly fulfillment fee in an amount that shall equal (a) no greater than the product of (i) 0.35% and (ii) the unpaid principal balance, or the Initial UPB, of all mortgage loans purchased in such month, plus (b) in the case of all mortgage loans other than mortgage loans sold to or securitized through Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, no greater than the product of (i) 0.50% and (ii) the aggregate Initial UPB of all such mortgage loans sold and securitized in such month; provided however, that no fulfillment fee shall be due or payable to us with respect to any Ginnie Mae mortgage loans. PMT does not hold the Ginnie Mae approval required to issue Ginnie Mae MBS and act as a servicer. Accordingly, under the MBS agreement, we currently purchase loans underwritten in accordance with the Ginnie Mae Mortgage-Backed Securities Guide “as is” and without recourse of any kind from PMT at its cost less an administrative fee plus accrued interest and a sourcing fee ranging from two to three andone-half basis points, generally based on the average number of calendar days that mortgage loans are held by PMT prior to purchase by us.

In consideration for the mortgage banking services we provide with respect to PMT’s acquisition of mortgage loans under our early purchase program, we are entitled to fees accruing (i) at a rate equal to $1,500 per year per early purchase facility administered by us, and (ii) in the amount of $35 for each mortgage loan that PMT acquires thereunder.

Notwithstanding any provision of the MBS agreement to the contrary, if it becomes reasonably necessary or advisable for us to engage in additional services in connection with post-breach or post-default resolution activities for the purposes of a correspondent agreement, then PMT has generally agreed with us to negotiate in good faith for additional compensation and reimbursement of expenses to be paid to us for the performance of such additional services.

58   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

We earned approximately $81.4 million in fulfillment fees in Fiscal 2018 under our mortgage banking services agreement with PMT, and we paid to PMT approximately $10.9 million in sourcing fees in Fiscal 2018.

MSR Recapture Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of an MSR recapture agreement, or the MSR recapture agreement, which was entered into by and between us and PMT and amended and restated effective September 12, 2016, if we refinance through our consumer direct lending business mortgage loans for which PMT previously held the MSRs, we are generally required to transfer and convey to PMT cash in an amount equal to 30% of the fair market value of the MSRs relating to all such mortgage loans so originated. The MSR recapture agreement expires, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement, on September 12, 2020, subject to automatic renewal for additional18-month periods, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement.

PMT recognized $2.2 million in recapture income pursuant to the terms of the MSR recapture agreement during Fiscal 2018.

Spread Acquisition and MSR Servicing Agreements

On December 19, 2016, we amended and restated a master spread acquisition and MSR servicing agreement, or the Spread Acquisition Agreement, with PMT, pursuant to which we may sell to PMT, from time to time, the right to receive participation certificates representing beneficial ownership in ESS arising from Ginnie Mae MSRs acquired by us, in which case we generally would be required to service or subservice the related mortgage loans for Ginnie Mae. The primary purpose of the amendment and restatement was to facilitate the continued financing of the ESS owned by PMT in connection with the parties’ participation in the GNMA MSR Facility (as defined below).

To the extent we refinance any of the mortgage loans relating to the ESS PMT has acquired, the Spread Acquisition Agreement also contains recapture provisions requiring that we transfer to PMT, at no cost, the ESS relating to a certain percentage of the unpaid principal balance of the newly originated mortgage loans. However, under the Spread Acquisition Agreement, in any month where the transferred ESS relating to newly originated Ginnie Mae mortgage loans is not equivalent to at least 90% of the product of the excess servicing fee rate and the unpaid principal balance of the refinanced mortgage loans, we are also required to transfer additional ESS or cash in the amount of such shortfall. Similarly, in any month where the transferred ESS relating to modified Ginnie Mae mortgage loans is not equivalent to at least 90% of the product of the excess servicing fee rate and the unpaid principal balance of the modified mortgage loans, the Spread Acquisition Agreement contains provisions that require us to transfer additional ESS or cash in the amount of such shortfall. To the extent the fair market value of the aggregate ESS to be transferred for the applicable month is less than $200,000, we may, at our option, wire cash to PMT in an amount equal to such fair market value in lieu of transferring such ESS.

During Fiscal 2018, we made ESS repayments to PMT totaling $46.8 million. During Fiscal 2018, we also incurred $2.6 million in ESS recapture expense payable to PMT.

Master Repurchase Agreement with the Issuer Trust

On December 19, 2016, through PLS, we entered into a master repurchase agreement, or the PMH Repurchase Agreement, with one of PMT’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, PennyMac Holdings, LLC, or PMH, pursuant to which PMH may borrow from us for the purpose of financing PMH’s participation certificates representing beneficial ownership in ESS. PLS thenre-pledges such participation certificates to PNMAC GMSR ISSUER TRUST, or the Issuer Trust, under a master repurchase agreement, or the PC Repurchase Agreement, by and among PLS, the Issuer Trust and PNMAC, as guarantor. The Issuer Trust was formed for the purpose of allowing PLS to finance MSRs and ESS relating to such MSRs in a structured financing transaction referred to as the “GNMA MSR Facility.”

In connection with the GNMA MSR Facility, PLS pledges and/or sells to the Issuer Trust participation certificates representing beneficial interests in MSRs and ESS pursuant to the terms of the PC Repurchase Agreement. In return, the Issuer Trust (a) has issued to PLS, pursuant to the terms of an indenture, the Series 2016-MSRVF1 Variable Funding Note, dated December 19, 2016, known as the “PNMAC GMSR ISSUER TRUST MSR Collateralized Notes, Series 2016-MSRVF1,” or the VFN, and (b) has issued and may, from time to time pursuant to the terms of any supplemental indenture, issue to institutional investors additional term notes, or the Term Notes, in each case secured on a pari passu basis by the participation certificates relating to the MSRs and ESS. The maximum principal balance of the VFN is $1 billion.

The principal amount paid by PLS for the participation certificates under the PMH Repurchase Agreement is based upon a percentage of the market value of the underlying ESS. Upon PMH’s repurchase of the participation certificates, PMH is required to repay PLS the principal amount relating thereto plus accrued interest (at a rate reflective of the current market and consistent with the weighted average note rate of the VFN and any outstanding Term Notes) to the date of such repurchase. PLS is then required to repay the Issuer Trust the corresponding amount under the PC Repurchase Agreement.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 59

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

During Fiscal 2018, PMT paid us $7.5 million in interest to finance ESS under the PMH Repurchase Agreement and we, in turn, paid an identical amount to the Issuer Trust under the PC Repurchase Agreement.

Loan Purchase Agreement

We have entered into a mortgage loan purchase agreement with PMT. Currently, we use the mortgage loan purchase agreement for the purpose of selling to PMT residential mortgage loans originated by us. The loan purchase agreement contains customary terms and provisions, including representations and warranties, covenants, repurchase remedies and indemnities. The purchase prices paid to us by PMT for such loans are market-based.

During Fiscal 2018, PMT purchased from us under the mortgage loan purchase agreement residential mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of $3.3 billion at an aggregate purchase price of $3.3 billion.

Reimbursement Agreement

In connection with the initial public offering of PMT’s common shares on August 4, 2009, or the IPO, we entered into a reimbursement agreement with PMT pursuant to which PMT agreed to reimburse us for the $2.9 million payment, or the Conditional Reimbursement, that we made to the underwriters for the IPO if we satisfied certain performance measures over a specified period of time. Effective February 1, 2013, we amended the terms of the reimbursement agreement to provide for PMT’s payment of the Conditional Reimbursement if PMT is required to pay us performance incentive fees under the PMT Management Agreement at a rate of $10 in reimbursement for every $100 of performance incentive fees earned. The payment of the Conditional Reimbursement is subject to a maximum reimbursement in any particular12-month period of approximately $1.0 million and the maximum amount that may be reimbursed under the reimbursement agreement is approximately $2.9 million. The term of the reimbursement agreement was extended and now expires on February 1, 2023.

We received $69,000 in reimbursement payments from PMT during Fiscal 2018.

Investments in PMT

Our Investment in PMT

We received dividends of $140,000 in Fiscal 2018 as a result of our investment in common shares of PMT.

Other Transactions With Related Persons

Related Party Employment Relationships

Presently, we employ Mr. Kurland’sbrother-in-law, Robert Schreibman. We established Mr. Schreibman’s compensation in accordance with our employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities holding similar positions. None of the executive officers has a material interest in this employment relationship nor do any of them share a home with Mr. Schreibman. Mr. Schreibman does not report directly to any of our executive officers.

We have employed Mr. Schreibman since 2008, and his current title is Senior Vice President, Asset Management. In this capacity, he received the following approximate amounts in Fiscal 2018: $255,000 in base salary and bonus, agross-up for payment of self-employment tax liabilities in the amount of $11,292, insurance premium payments in the amount of $16,696, a $11,001 contribution to his 401(k) plan and a $900 payment for mobile phone expenses. During Fiscal 2018, we granted Mr. Schreibman time-based and performance-based RSUs and nonstatutory stock options with a total grant date fair value of $48,449. Mr. Schreibman has also been entitled to receive employee benefits generally available to all employees.

Presently, we also employ Mr. Vandad Fartaj’s brother, Vala Fartaj. We established Mr. Vala Fartaj’s compensation in accordance with our employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities holding similar positions. None of the executive officers has a material interest in this employment relationship nor do any of them share a home with Mr. Vala Fartaj. Mr. Vala Fartaj does not report directly to any of our executive officers.

We have employed Mr. Vala Fartaj since 2008, and his current title is Executive Vice President, Portfolio Investments. In this capacity, he received the following approximate amounts in Fiscal 2018: $344,250 in base salary and bonus, agross-up for payment of self-

60   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

employment tax liabilities in the amount of $14,078, insurance premium payments in the amount of $6,100, a $12,372 contribution to his 401(k) plan and a $900 payment for mobile phone expenses. During Fiscal 2018, we granted Mr. Vala Fartaj time-based and performance-based RSUs and nonstatutory stock options with a total grant date fair value of $93,225. Mr. Vala Fartaj has also been entitled to receive employee benefits generally available to all employees.

Presently, we also employ Mr. Kurland’sson-in-law, Oliver Rubinstein. We established Mr. Rubinstein’s compensation in accordance with our employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities holding similar positions. None of the executive officers has a material interest in this employment relationship nor do any of them share a home with Mr. Rubinstein. Mr. Rubinstein does not report directly to any of our executive officers.

We have employed Mr. Rubinstein since 2011, and his current title is Senior Vice President, Products and Pricing Strategy. In this capacity, he received the following approximate amounts in Fiscal 2018: $182,110 in base salary and bonus, insurance premium payments in the amount of $14,950, a $6,788 contribution to his 401(k) plan and a $300 payment for mobile phone expenses. During Fiscal 2018, we granted Mr. Rubinstein time-based and performance-based RSUs and nonstatutory stock options with a total grant date fair value of $13,472. Mr. Rubinstein has also been entitled to receive employee benefits generally available to all employees.

PNMAC Foodservice Agreement with Me N U Kitchen, Inc.

PNMAC offers its employees a cafeteria and dining area in several of its locations for the purpose of providing the employees access to breakfast and lunch onsite, as well as catering services for special company events. PNMAC bears all costs and expenses associated with managing and operating the cafeteria and kitchen facilities, including food, labor, rent, owned and leased equipment and utilities (including telephone and internet availability). Such costs and expenses are partially offset by revenues generated through food sales, with the remainder subsidized by PNMAC.

The cafeterias are managed and operated under a foodservice agreement with Me N U Kitchen, Inc., or MNU. Marci Grogin, who owns 100% of MNU, is the wife of Jeffrey P. Grogin, who served as one of our executive officers during Fiscal 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the foodservice agreement, MNU provides onsite foodservice (including cafeteria and catering services) to PNMAC and its employees on a contract basis. MNU also facilitates PNMAC’s payment of certain of the costs and expenses described, and PNMAC reimburses or otherwise advances to MNU the amounts necessary to pass through such costs and expenses. For these services, PNMAC pays MNU a monthly management fee of $10,000. For its services in 2018, PNMAC paid MNU management fees of $120,000. We believe that the management fees paid to MNU are fair and reasonable.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that we will indemnify and advance expenses to our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL. In addition, our certificate of incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty, except as otherwise prohibited under the DGCL.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors. The indemnification agreements provide the executive officers and directors with contractual rights to indemnification, expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL. In addition, our indemnification agreements also provide that we are required to advance expenses to our directors and officers as incurred in connection with legal proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified and that the rights conferred in the indemnification agreements are not exclusive.

The limited liability company agreement of PNMAC also requires PNMAC to indemnify its officers, members, managers and other affiliates to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, and advance expenses to its officers, members, managers and other affiliates as incurred in connection with legal proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified. The rights conferred in the limited liability company agreement of PNMAC are not exclusive.

There is no pending litigation or proceeding naming any of our directors or officers to which indemnification is being sought, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director or officer.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 61

  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS  

Approval of Related Party Transactions

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires everyone subject to the code to be scrupulous in avoiding a conflict of interest as it relates to our interests and the interests of our employees, officers and directors when such individuals are acting for or on our behalf. The code prohibits us from, among other things, entering into a transaction or a business relationship with a related party or an immediate family member of such related person or with a company in which such a related party or such immediate family member has a substantial financial interest, unless such transaction and relationship are disclosed to and approved in advance by our Board.

We have also adopted a written policy that specifically governs related party transactions. The related party transactions policy generally prohibits any related party transaction unless it is reviewed and approved by our Related-Party Matters Committee and/or a majority of our independent directors in accordance with the policy. With certain exceptions, a related party transaction is a transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which we (including any of our subsidiaries) were, are or will be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 in the aggregate in any calendar year, and in which any related party has, had or will have a direct or indirect interest. A related party is any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year was, an employee, director or executive officer of our Company or a nominee to become a director of our Company; any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities; any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons (which means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling,mother-in-law,father-in-law,son-in-law,daughter-in-law,brother-in-law, orsister-in-law of any of the foregoing persons); and any firm, corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the Related-Party Matters Committee and/or independent directors consider all facts and circumstances that they deem relevant to the transaction, including, among other things, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

The related party transactions policy governs the process for identifying potential related party transactions and seeking review, approval and/or ratification of such transactions. In addition, each of our employees, directors and executive officers is required to complete an annual disclosure questionnaire and report all transactions with us in which they and their immediate family members had or will have a direct or indirect material interest with respect to us. We review these questionnaires and, if we determine that it is necessary, discuss any reported transactions with our Related-Party Matters Committee and/or our Board in accordance with the related party transactions policy.

62   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K  

Annual Report on Form10-K

Our Annual Report on Form10-K for Fiscal 2018, which contains our consolidated financial statements for Fiscal 2018, accompanies this Proxy Statement, but is not a part of our soliciting materials. Stockholders of record as of the record date may obtain, without charge, a paper copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, without the accompanying exhibits, upon written request to Investor Relations, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc., 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361. A list of exhibits is included in our Annual Report on Form10-K and exhibits are available from us upon the payment to us of the cost of furnishing them. Our Annual Report on Form10-K is also available on our website, www.ir.pennymacfinancial.com, under “SEC Filings,” A list of exhibits is included in the Form10-K and exhibits are available from us upon payment to us of the cost of furnishing them.

Other Matters

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

We believe that based solely upon our review of copies of forms we have received or written representations from reporting persons, during Fiscal 2018, all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act applicable to our officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than ten percent of our common stock were complied with on a timely basis.

Other Matters for Consideration at the Annual Meeting

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, our Board does not know of any matter that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than as described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your signed proxy card authorizes Stanford L. Kurland, our Executive Chairman, and Derek W. Stark, our Secretary, to vote on those matters according to their best judgment.

Householding of Proxy Materials

As permitted by the SEC, we will deliver a single copy of the notice, proxy statement and annual report to stockholders who have the same address and last name, unless we have received contrary instructions from such stockholders. Each stockholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, called “householding,” will reduce the volume of duplicate information you receive and reduce our printing and postage costs, which is consistent with our corporate sustainability efforts. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report to any such stockholder upon written or oral request. A stockholder wishing to receive a separate proxy statement or annual report can notify us at Investor Relations, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc., 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, telephone: (818)264-4907. Similarly, stockholders currently receiving multiple copies of these documents can request the elimination of duplicate documents by contacting us as described above.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 63

  INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

Information Concerning Voting and Solicitation

General Meeting Information

Our Annual Meeting will be held at our corporate offices located at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, on Thursday, May 30, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time, subject to any postponements or adjournments thereof. The Board is soliciting proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting. Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials primarily via the Internet, rather than mailing paper copies of these materials to each stockholder. On or about April 17, 2019, we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which contains instructions on how to access the proxy materials, vote, and request paper copies of the proxy materials. Access to the proxy materials and online voting will be available at www.proxyvote.com. We believe this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of the proxy materials, lowers the cost of printing and distribution, and reduces the environmental impact associated with the Annual Meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 30, 2019

This Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, are available atwww.proxyvote.com. At this website, you will find a complete set of the following proxy materials: Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report and form proxy card. You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before submitting a proxy or voting at the Annual Meeting.

What am I voting on?

You will be entitled to vote on the following scheduled proposals at the Annual Meeting:

• The election of eleven (11) directors, Stanford L. Kurland, David A. Spector, Anne D. McCallion, Matthew Botein, James K. Hunt, Patrick Kinsella, Joseph Mazzella, Farhad Nanji, Jeffrey A. Perlowitz, Theodore W. Tozer, and Emily Youssouf, each for aone-year term expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders;

• The ratification of the appointment of Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019; and

• The approval, bynon-binding vote, of our executive compensation.

How does our Board of Directors recommend that I vote on these proposals?

Our Board of Directors, or the Board, recommends that you vote“FOR” the approval of all proposals set forth herein.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

Our Board has set April 1, 2019 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. If you were a stockholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting, although seating is limited. If you plan to attend, please check the appropriate box on your proxy card and return it as directed on the proxy card.

If you hold your common stock through a brokerage firm or bank and you would like to attend, please either (1) write us at Investor Relations, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc., 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, (2) email us atPFSI_IR@pnmac.com, or (3) bring to the Annual Meeting a copy of your brokerage account statement or an omnibus proxy (which you can get from your broker).

In addition, you must bring valid, government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or a passport. No cameras or recording devices of any kind, or signs, placards, banners or similar materials, may be brought into the Annual Meeting. Anyone who refuses to comply with these requirements will not be admitted.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

If you were a stockholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on the record date, you are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof. As of the record date, 78,317,843 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. You are entitled to one vote on each proposal for each share of common stock you held on the record date.

How many shares must be present to hold the Annual Meeting?

The presence in person or by proxy of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting on any matter constitutes a quorum, which is required in order to hold

64   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

the Annual Meeting and conduct business. Since there were 78,317,843 eligible votes as of the record date, we will need at least 39,158,922 votes present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting for a quorum to exist. If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, we expect that the Annual Meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies.

What stockholder approvals are required to approve the proposals?

Election of Directors. Our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard for the election of directors in an uncontested election. Under this voting standard, directors will be elected at the annual meeting by a majority of votes cast by holders of our common stock, meaning that the number of shares voted “FOR” a director must exceed the number of shares voted “AGAINST” that director. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

If any nominee for director fails to receive the required majority vote for election orre-election, the director will promptly tender to the Board for its consideration his or her offer to resign from the Board.

Other Proposals. Approval of each of the other proposals (namely, our proposals to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP and to approve our executive compensation) also requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal. While brokernon-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the approval of these proposals, abstentions will be treated as votes against Proposals II and III.

Please note, however, that the vote on our proposals to approve our executive compensation and to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be advisory only and will not be binding. The results of the votes on these proposals will be taken into consideration by our Board or the appropriate committee of our Board, as applicable, when making future decisions regarding these matters.

How will voting on any other business be conducted?

Other than the three proposals described in this Proxy Statement, we know of no other business to be considered at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your signed proxy card or Internet or telephonic voting instructions will authorize Stanford L. Kurland, our Executive Chairman and Derek W. Stark, our Secretary, to vote on those matters according to their best judgment.

How do I vote my shares as a stockholder of record?

If you were a stockholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on the record date, you may vote as instructed on the proxy card by using one of the following methods:

	By Mail. If you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, please mark your selections on, and sign and date, the printed proxy card, and return the proxy card by mail in the postage-paid envelope provided.
	By Internet. To vote by Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions at that website. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. If you vote by Internet, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a registered stockholder, you will need to have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for Internet voting instructions.
	By Telephone. To vote by telephone, registered stockholders should dial800-690-6903 and follow the recorded instructions. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by phone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. You will need the control number found either on the Notice or on the proxy card if you are receiving a printed copy of these materials. If you vote by telephone, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you are a registered stockholder, you will need to have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for telephone voting instructions.
	In Person. If you attend the Annual Meeting and plan to vote in person, you will be provided with a ballot at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are considered the stockholder of record and you have the right to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in “street name” and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must request a legal proxy by following the instructions atwww.proxyvote.com. Whether you are a stockholder of record or your shares are held in “street name,” you must bring valid, government-issued photo identification to gain admission to the Annual Meeting.

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 65

  INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

If you vote prior to the Annual Meeting, it will assure that your vote is counted. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting, so your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting. Whether you vote by mail, by Internet, by telephone or in person at the Annual Meeting, the proxies identified will vote the shares as to which you are the stockholder of record in accordance with your instructions. If a printed proxy card is signed and returned and no instructions are marked, the shares will be voted as recommended by our Board in this Proxy Statement.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a “street name” holder?

If your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. If your shares of common stock are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, then the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. However, you still are considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and your shares are said to be held in “street name.” Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and must instead instruct the broker, bank, trust or other nominee how to vote their shares.

If my broker holds my shares in “street name,” how do I vote my shares?

If you own your shares of common stock in “street name,” you must vote your shares in the manner prescribed by your broker or other nominee. Your broker or other nominee has provided a voting instruction form for you to use in directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares. Please follow the instructions provided on such voting instruction form.

What if I do not specify how I want my shares voted?

If you submit a signed proxy card and do not specify how you want to vote your shares, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations as follows:

• FOR the election of the director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement to serve on our Board of Directors, each for a term expiring at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders;

• FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019; and

• FOR the approval, bynon-binding vote, of our executive compensation.

May I revoke my proxy and change my vote after submitting my proxy?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote before it is taken at the Annual Meeting by (1) delivering a written notice of

revocation to the attention of our Secretary at 3043 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, California 91361, (2) delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or (3) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. As noted above, if you own your shares through a brokerage account or in another nominee form, you cannot vote in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a proxy from your broker or nominee and bring that proxy to the Annual Meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

It means that your shares may be registered differently and in more than one account. Sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all your shares are voted.

How are votes counted?

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the election of each nominee for the Board identified in this Proxy Statement. You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 and the proposal to approve, bynon-binding vote, our executive compensation. An abstention is the voluntary act of not voting by a shareholder who is present at a meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.

Abstentions and brokernon-votes with respect to any matter will be counted as present and entitled to vote on that matter for purposes of establishing a quorum. A brokernon-vote will not have any effect on a proposal where the requirement for approval is the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast by the holders of vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal, while abstentions will be treated as a vote against such proposal. Accordingly, brokernon-votes will not have any effect on Proposals II and III, while abstentions will be treated as votes against Proposals II and III. Neither abstentions nor brokernon-votes will have any effect on Proposal I.

If you hold your shares in “street name” and do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote under the rules of The New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE. Under NYSE rules, brokers that hold our common stock in street name for customers that are the beneficial owners of those shares may not give a proxy to vote those shares on certain matters, including the election of directors and our executive compensation program, without specific instructions from those customers. When a broker lacks authority to vote under these circumstances, this is referred to as a “brokernon-vote.” Brokernon-votes will be counted as present at the Annual Meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum but will not be considered votes cast and, accordingly, will have no effect on any proposal to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

66   |  2019 Proxy Statement

  INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION  

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will count the votes for shares held in “street name” and the votes of stockholders of record. Representatives of our Company will serve as the Inspector of Elections.

How will we solicit proxies for the Annual Meeting?

We are soliciting proxies from our stockholders by mailing the Notice and providing internet access, atwww.proxyvote.com, to our Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders, and proxy card or voting instruction form. In addition, some of our directors and officers may make additional solicitations by telephone or in person.

Who bears the cost of soliciting proxies?

We will pay the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including preparing and mailing the Notice. To the extent any of our directors or officers solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile transmission or other personal contact, such persons will receive no additional compensation. Brokerage houses and other nominees, fiduciaries and custodians who are holders of record of our common stock will be requested to forward proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of such shares and will be reimbursed by us for their charges and expenses in connection therewith at customary and reasonable rates.

Can I access the Company’s proxy materials and Annual Report to Stockholders electronically?

This Proxy Statement and our 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year

ended December 31, 2018, or Fiscal 2018, are available at www.proxyvote.com and on our Investor Relations website, www.ir.pennymacfinancial.com/2019AnnMtg.

When are stockholder proposals due for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?

No stockholder proposals were received by us to be presented at the Annual Meeting. We intend to hold next year’s annual meeting of stockholders on approximately the same date as the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, if you are submitting a proposal for possible inclusion in next year’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, we must receive the proposal no later than December 19, 2019. If you are submitting a proposal or nomination for consideration at next year’s annual meeting other than pursuant to Rule14a-8 of the Exchange Act, we must receive the proposal or nomination no earlier than January 31, 2020 and no later than March 1, 2020.

Who can help answer my questions?

If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares or if you need additional copies of this Proxy Statement or the proxy card, you should contact:

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Attention: Investor Relations

3043 Townsgate Road

Westlake Village, California 91361

Phone: (818)264-4907

Email:PFSI_IR@pnmac.com

  |  2019 Proxy Statement 67

PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

3043 TOWNSGATE ROAD

WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:   E74711-P23934 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——   ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——   ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——   ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——   ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——   ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  ——  — —  —  ——  ——

  PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD         DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

      The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR

      the following:

      1.   Election of Directors

	Nominees:		For	Against	Abstain
	1a.	Stanford L. Kurland	☐	☐	☐
	1b.	David A. Spector	☐	☐	☐
	1c.	Anne D. McCallion	☐	☐	☐
	1d.	Matthew Botein	☐	☐	☐
	1e.	James K. Hunt	☐	☐	☐
	1f.	Patrick Kinsella	☐	☐	☐
	1g.	Joseph Mazzella	☐	☐	☐
	1h.	Farhad Nanji	☐	☐	☐
	1i.	Jeffrey A. Perlowitz	☐	☐	☐
For address changes and/or comments, please check this box and write them on the back where indicated.					☐
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.			☐	☐
			Yes	No
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

		For	Against	Abstain
	1j.       Theodore W. Tozer	☐	☐	☐
	1k.      Emily Youssouf	☐	☐	☐
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.
2.	To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.	☐	☐	☐
3.	To approve, by non-binding vote, our executive compensation.	☐	☐	☐
NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]                   Date            

Signature (Joint Owners)                                         Date             

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2019 Annual Meeting:

The Notice of 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report to

Stockholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — —

E74712-P23934            

PENNYMAC FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 30, 2019 11:00 AM PDT THE PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Stanford L. Kurland and Derek W. Stark, and each of them, with the power to act without the other and with power of substitution, as proxies andattorneys-in-fact, and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all of the shares of PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon other such business as may properly come before the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held May 30, 2019, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, with all the powers the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.
	Address Changes/Comments:
(If you noted any Address Changes/Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)
Continued and to be signed on reverse side