This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) amends and supplements the Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO originally filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 4, 2018 (together with any subsequent amendments and supplements thereto, the “Schedule TO”) by Sentry Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Firmenich Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for all outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Senomyx, Inc., a Delaware corporation, at a price per share of $1.50, net to the seller in cash, without any interest thereon and less any applicable withholding taxes, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase (together with any amendment or supplement thereto, the “Offer to Purchase”) and in the related Letter of Transmittal, which are annexed to and filed with the Schedule TO as Exhibits (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B), respectively. Except as otherwise set forth in this Amendment, the information set forth in the Schedule TO remains unchanged and is incorporated herein by reference to the extent relevant to the items in this Amendment.
ITEM 11. | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. |
The information set forth in the Offer to Purchase and Item 11 of the Schedule TO, to the extent such Item incorporates by reference the information contained in the Offer to Purchase, are hereby amended and supplemented by adding the following subsection at the end of Section 15 (“Certain Legal Matters”) of the Offer to Purchase:
“Legal Proceedings Related to the Offer and the Merger.
“Beginning on October 8, 2018, three putative class-action lawsuits were filed on behalf of purported Company stockholders (captionedKim v. Senomyx, Inc., et al.,No. 1:18-cv-01547 (filed October 8, 2018 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware) (the “Kim Complaint”);Link v. Senomyx, Inc., et al., No.3:18-cv-02336 (filed October 10, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California) (the “Link Complaint”); andRowe v. Senomyx, Inc., et al.,No. 3:18-cv-02338 (filed October 10, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California) (the “Rowe Complaint” and together with the Kim Complaint and Link Complaint, the “Complaints”)). The Kim Complaint was filed against (a) the Company, (b) Parent, (c) Purchaser and (d) the members of the Company Board (the “Individual Defendants”). The Link Complaint and the Rowe Complaint were each filed against (a) the Company and (b) the Individual Defendants. The Complaints generally allege that the defendants violated Section 14(e) and, in the case of the Kim Complaint, Section 14(d)(4), of the Exchange Act by, among other things, failing to disclose material information in theSchedule 14D-9 regarding potential conflicts of interest in the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, certain financial projections regarding the Company and certain inputs underlying Needham & Company’s financial analysis. The Complaints also allege the Individual Defendants and, in the case of the Kim Complaint, Parent, violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as controlling persons who had the ability to prevent theSchedule 14D-9 from being materially false and misleading. The Complaints seek, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and an award of costs and expenses, including a reasonable allowance for attorneys’ and experts’ fees.
While neither Purchaser nor Parent has knowledge that any other purported Company stockholder intends to file a similar complaint, it is possible additional similar cases may also be filed in connection with the Offer and the Merger.”