Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Principles of Consolidation The accompanying condensed consolidated and combined financial statements include the accounts of Cyclerion and its wholly owned subsidiary as of June 30, 2019. Segment Information Operating segments are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the Company’s chief operating decision‑maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company currently operates in one reportable business segment—human therapeutics. Use of Estimates The preparation of condensed consolidated and combined financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires the Company’s management to make estimates and judgments that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements, and the amounts of expenses during the reported periods. On an ongoing basis, the Company’s management evaluates its estimates, judgments and methodologies. Significant estimates and assumptions in the condensed consolidated and combined financial statements include those related to allocations of expenses, assets and liabilities from Ironwood’s historical financials to the Company, impairment of long-lived assets, income taxes, including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, research and development expenses, contingencies and share-based compensation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results in the period in which they become known. Fair Value of Investment Instruments Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable: Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 — Observable inputs (other than Level 1 quoted prices), such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to determining the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques. Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is its local currency, the Swiss franc. The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation effect for the Company’s foreign subsidiary is included as a foreign currency translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and as a component of comprehensive loss. The Company’s intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany balances are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. Related Party Accounts Receivable The Company makes judgments as to its ability to collect outstanding receivables and provides an allowance for receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. The Company’s receivables primarily relate to amounts earned under a development agreement with Ironwood. The Company believes that credit risks associated with Ironwood are not significant. To date, the Company has not had any significant write-offs of bad debt and the Company did not have an allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2019. Impairment of Long‑Lived Assets The Company regularly reviews the carrying amount of its long‑lived assets to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist, which warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. If indications of impairment exist, projected future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the carrying amount to determine whether the asset’s value is recoverable. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds such projected undiscounted cash flows, the asset will be written down to its estimated fair value. Leases Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”) using the optional transition method. The adoption of ASC 842 represents a change in accounting principle that aims to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for both operating and finance leases. In addition, the standard requires enhanced disclosures that meet the objective of enabling financial statement users to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The reported results for the six months ended June 30, 2019 reflect the application of ASC 842 guidance, while the reported results for prior periods were prepared in conjunction with ASC 840, Leases (“ASC 840”). The recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to the Company’s operating leases under ASC 842 has had a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated and combined financial statements. As part of the ASC 842 adoption, the Company has used certain practical expedients outlined in the guidance. These practical expedients include: · Account policy election to use the short-term lease exception by asset class; · Election of the practical expedient package during transition, which includes: · An entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases. · An entity need not reassess the classification for any expired or existing leases. As a result, all leases that were classified as operating leases in accordance with ASC 840 are classified as operating leases under ASC 842, and all leases that were classified as capital leases in accordance with ASC 840 are classified as finance leases under ASC 842. · An entity need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. The Company’s lease portfolio includes a property lease for its headquarters location at 301 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at the inception of the contract. The asset component of the Company’s operating leases is recorded as operating lease right-of-use assets, and the liability component is recorded as current portion of operating lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities, net of current portion, in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. Right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. The Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments if an implicit rate of return is not provided with the lease contract. Operating lease right-of-use assets are adjusted for incentives received. Lease cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and includes amounts related to short-term leases. Revenue Upon executing a revenue generating arrangement, the Company assesses whether it is probable the Company will collect consideration in exchange for the good or service it transfers to the customer. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), it performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies the performance obligations. The Company must develop assumptions that require significant judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract. The assumptions that are used to determine the stand-alone selling price may include forecasted revenues, development timelines, reimbursement rates for personnel costs, discount rates and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. The Company generates revenue from a development agreement with Ironwood, pursuant to which the Company provides certain research and development services with respect to certain of Ironwood’s products and product candidates. Such research and development activities are governed by a joint steering committee comprised of representatives of both companies. Services performed are invoiced at a mutually agreed upon rate and the initial term of the agreement is two years from the date of Separation and automatically renews for one year unless either party notifies the other at least six months prior to the expiration. Research and Development Costs The Company expenses research and development costs to operations as incurred. The Company defers and capitalizes nonrefundable advance payments made by the Company for research and development activities until the related goods are received or the related services are performed. Research and development expenses are comprised of costs incurred in performing research and development activities, which may include salary, benefits and other employee‑related expenses; share‑based compensation expense; laboratory supplies and other direct expenses; facilities expenses; overhead expenses; third‑party contractual costs relating to nonclinical studies and clinical trial activities and related contract manufacturing expenses, development of manufacturing processes and regulatory registration of third‑party manufacturing facilities; and other outside expenses. General and Administrative Expenses The Company expenses general and administrative costs to operations as incurred. General and administrative expense consists of compensation, share‑based compensation, benefits and other employee‑related expenses for personnel in the Company’s administrative, finance, legal, information technology, business development and human resource functions. Other costs include the legal costs of pursuing patent protection of the Company’s intellectual property, general and administrative related facility costs, insurance costs and professional fees for accounting and legal services. Income taxes In accordance with ASC 270, Interim Reporting, and ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company is required at the end of each interim period to determine the best estimate of its annual effective tax rate and then apply that rate in providing for income taxes on a current year-to-date (interim period) basis. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded no tax expense or benefit due to the expected current year loss and its historical losses. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company has concluded that a full valuation allowance is necessary for all of its net deferred tax assets. The Company had no amounts recorded for uncertain tax positions, interest or penalties in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Prior to the Separation, income taxes included current and deferred income taxes of Ironwood allocated to the Company’s stand-alone financials. In accordance with the tax matters agreement with Ironwood, Cyclerion is responsible for its own portion of income taxes beginning after the Separation date. Subsequent Events The Company considers events or transactions that have occurred after the balance sheet date of June 30, 2019, but prior to the filing of the financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional recognition or disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the filing of the financial statements accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q. New Accounting Pronouncements From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Except as discussed elsewhere in the notes to the consolidated and combined financial statements, the Company did not adopt any new accounting pronouncements during the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, that had a material effect on its consolidated and combined financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016‑02, Leases (“ASU 2016‑02”), which supersedes the lease accounting requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases, and most industry‑specific guidance with ASC Topic 842, Leases . ASU 2016‑02 requires the identification of arrangements that should be accounted for as leases by lessees. In general, for lease arrangements exceeding a 12‑month term, these arrangements must now be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet of the lessee. Under ASU 2016‑02, a right‑of‑use asset and lease obligation will be recorded for all leases, whether operating or financing, while the income statement will reflect lease expense for operating leases and amortization and interest expense for financing leases. The balance sheet amount recorded for existing leases at the date of adoption of ASU 2016‑02 must be calculated using the applicable incremental borrowing rate at the date of adoption. ASU 2016‑02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑10, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2018‑10”), Codification Improvements and ASU No. 2018‑11, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2018‑11”), to provide additional guidance for the adoption of Topic 842. ASU 2018‑10 clarifies certain provisions, and corrects unintended applications of the guidance, such as the rate implicit in a lease, impairment of the net investment in a lease, lessee reassessment of lease classifications, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and certain transition adjustments. The amendments in ASU 2018‑11 will allow for an additional transition method, whereby at the adoption date the entity recognizes a cumulative‑effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption, while the comparative period disclosures continue recognition under ASC Topic 840. Additionally, ASU 2018‑11 includes a practical expedient for separating contract components for lessors. In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑20, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2018‑20”), Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors , which provided clarification for lessors on how to apply the new leases standard when accounting for sales taxes, certain lessor costs, and certain requirements related to variable payments in contracts. In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019‑01, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2019‑01”), Codification Improvements , which aligned the new leases guidance with existing guidance for fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers. It also clarified an exemption for lessors and lessees from a certain interim disclosure requirement associated with adopting the board’s new lease accounting standard. The Company’s analysis includes, but is not limited to, reviewing existing leases, reviewing other service agreements for embedded leases, establishing policies and procedures, assessing potential disclosures and evaluating the impact of adoption on the Company’s consolidated and combined financial statements. The Company adopted ASU 2016‑02, ASU 2018‑10, ASU 2018‑11, ASU 2018‑20, and ASU 2019‑01 in the first quarter of 2019. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 will change how companies account for credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade receivables, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, companies will be required to recognize an allowance for credit losses rather than reducing the carrying value of the asset. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU 2016-13, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments (“ASU 2019-04”) and ASU No. 2019-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief (“ASU 2019-05”) to provide additional guidance on the adoption of ASU 2016-13. ASU 2019-04 added Topic 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, and made several amendments to the codification and also modified the accounting for available-for-sale debt securities. ASU 2019-05 provides targeted transition relief by providing an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option for certain financial assets previously measured at amortized cost basis. ASU 2016-13, ASU 2019-04 and ASU 2019-05 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of these ASUs will have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016‑16, Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra‑Entity Asset Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory (“ASU 2016‑16”). ASU 2016‑16 eliminates the ability to defer the tax expense related to intra‑entity asset transfers other than inventory. Under the new standard, entities should recognize the income tax consequences on an intra‑entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016‑16 is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2019. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share‑based Payments (“ASU 2018‑07”) . ASU 2018‑07 simplifies the accounting for share‑based payments to nonemployees by aligning with the accounting for share‑based payments to employees, with certain exceptions. Measurement of equity‑classified nonemployee awards issued in exchange for goods or services used or consumed in an entity’s own operations will be fixed at the grant date, which may lower the cost and reduce volatility in the income statement. Entities also may use the expected term to measure nonemployee options or elect to use the contractual term as the expected term, on an award‑by‑award basis. ASU 2018‑07 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted this standard during the first quarter of 2019. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirement for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”) which amends the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The amendments in ASU 2018-13 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2018-13 may have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018‑15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract (“ASU 2018‑15”). ASU 2018‑15 requires a customer in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract to follow the internal‑use software guidance in ASC 350‑40, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal Use Software (ASC 350‑40), to determine which implementation costs to capitalize as assets or expense as incurred. The internal‑use software guidance in ASC 350‑40 requires that certain costs incurred during the application development stage be capitalized and other costs incurred during the preliminary project and post‑implementation stages be expensed as they are incurred. A customer’s accounting for the hosting component of the arrangement is not affected by this guidance. The amendments in ASU 2018‑15 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that the adoption of ASU 2018‑15 may have on the Company’s financial position and results of operations. No other accounting standards known by the Company to be applicable to it that have been issued by the FASB or other standard‑setting bodies and that do not require adoption until a future date are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated and combined financial statements upon adoption. |