SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation, Principles of Consolidation and Principles of Combination The financial information beginning March 20, 2019 is referred to as “Successor” company information and reflects the consolidated financial statements of OneSpaWorld, including the financial statement effects of recording fair value adjustments and the capital structure resulting from the Business Combination. Black lines have been drawn to separate the Successor’s financial information from that of the Predecessor since their financial statements are not comparable as a result of the application of acquisition accounting and the Company’s capital structure resulting from the Business Combination. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated and combined financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in quarterly financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to the SEC’s rules and regulations. However, management believes that the disclosures contained herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (which are of a normal recurring nature) necessary to present fairly our unaudited financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The unaudited results of operations and cash flows for the period from January 1 to June 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or cash flows that may be expected for the remainder of 2020. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “2019 10-K”). The preparation of consolidated and combined financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Successor: The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the period from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 and from March 20, 2019 to June 30, 2019, includes the condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows of OneSpaWorld. All significant intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Predecessor: The condensed combined OSW financial statements (the “OSW financial statements”) include the accounts of the wholly-owned and indirect subsidiaries of Steiner Leisure listed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2019 10-K and include the accounts of a company majority-owned by OneSpaWorld Medispa (Bahamas) Limited, in which OneSpaWorld (Bahamas) Limited (100% owner of OneSpaWorld Medispa (Bahamas) Limited) had a controlling interest. The OSW condensed combined financial statements also include the accounts and results of operations associated with the timetospa.com website owned by Elemis USA, Inc at that time. The OSW condensed financial statements do not represent the financial position and results of operations of a legal entity but rather a combination of entities under common control of Steiner Leisure that have been “carved out” of the Steiner Leisure consolidated financial statements and reflect significant assumptions and allocations. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in combination. The accompanying condensed combined OSW financial statements may not be indicative of what they would have been had OSW actually been a separate stand-alone entity. The accompanying condensed combined OSW financial statements include the equity, revenues and expenses specifically related to OSW’s operations. OSW receives services and support from various functions performed by Steiner Leisure and costs associated with these functions have been allocated to OSW. These allocations are necessary to reflect all of the costs of doing business and include costs related to certain Steiner Leisure corporate functions, including, but not limited to, senior management, legal, human resources, finance, IT and other shared services that have been allocated to OSW based on direct usage or benefit where identifiable, with the remainder allocated on a pro rata basis determined by an estimate of the percentage of time Steiner Leisure employees devoted to OSW, as compared to total time available or by the headcount of employees at Steiner Leisure corporate headquarters that are fully dedicated to the OSW entities in relation to the total employee headcount. These allocated costs are reflected in salary and payroll taxes and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed combined OSW statements of operations. Management considers these allocations to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services by or benefit provided to OSW. However, the allocations may not be indicative of the actual expenses that would have been incurred had OSW operated as an independent, stand-alone entity. Net Parent investment represents the Steiner Leisure controlling interest in the recorded net assets of OSW, specifically, the cumulative net investment by Steiner Leisure in OSW and cumulative operating results through the date presented. The net effect of the settlement of transactions between OSW, Steiner Leisure, and other affiliates of Steiner Leisure are reflected in the accompanying condensed combined statements of cash flows as a financing activity and in the condensed combined balance sheet as Net Parent investment. Certain expenses and operating costs were paid by Steiner Leisure on behalf of OSW. The Parent has paid on behalf of OSW expenses associated with the allocation of Steiner Leisure corporate overhead and costs associated with the purchase of products from related parties. Operating cash flows for the predecessor periods exclude OSW expenses and operating costs paid by Steiner Leisure on behalf of OSW. Consequently, OSW’s historical cash flows may not be indicative of cash flows had OSW actually been a separate stand-alone entity or future cash flows of OSW. Management believes the assumptions and allocations underlying the accompanying condensed combined OSW financial statements and notes to the OSW condensed combined financial statements are reasonable, appropriate and consistently applied for the periods presented. Management believes the accompanying condensed combined OSW financial statements reflect all costs of doing business. The accompanying OSW condensed combined financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. ( Loss) Income Per Share (Successor) As discussed in Note 6 - Equity, the Company has two classes of common stock, Voting and Non-Voting. Shares of Non-Voting common stock are in all respects identical to and treated equally with shares of Voting common stock except for the absence of voting rights. Basic (loss) income per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of Voting and Non-Voting common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted (loss) income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of diluted Voting and Non-voting common shares, as calculated under the treasury stock method, which includes the potential effect of dilutive common stock equivalents, such as options and warrants to purchase Voting and Non-Voting common shares. If the entity reports a net loss, rather than net income for the period, the computation of diluted loss per share excludes the effect of dilutive common stock equivalents, as their effect would be anti-dilutive. The Company has not presented (loss) income per share under the two-class method, because the (loss) income per share are the same for both Voting and Non-Voting common stock since they are entitled to the same liquidation and dividend rights. The following table provides details underlying OneSpaWorld’s (loss) income per basic and diluted share calculation (in thousands, except per share amounts): Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 March 20 to June 30, 2019 Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders – basic and diluted (a) $ (31,407 ) $ 3,609 $ (230,069 ) $ (19,074 ) Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 65,916 61,118 63,543 61,118 Diluted 65,916 72,047 63,543 61,118 (Loss) income per share Voting and Non-Voting: Basic $ (0.48 ) $ 0.06 $ (3.62 ) $ (0.31 ) Diluted $ (0.48 ) $ 0.05 $ (3.62 ) $ (0.31 ) (a) Calculated as total net loss less amounts attributable to noncontrolling interest. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2020 and for the period from March 20, 2019 to March 31, 2019, potential common shares under the treasury stock method and the if-converted method were antidilutive because the Company reported a net loss in these periods. Consequently, the Company did not have any adjustments in these periods between basic and diluted loss per share related to stock options, restricted share units and warrants. The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic and diluted per share computation for the three months ended June 30, 2019 (in thousands): Weighted average shares outstanding 61,118 Common stock warrants 4,066 Deferred shares 6,600 Employee stock options 263 Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted 72,047 The table below presents the weighted-average number of antidilutive potential common shares that are not considered in the calculation of diluted loss per share (in thousands): Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 March 20 to June 30, 2019 Common stock warrants 25,139 24,774 24,500 Deferred shares 5,611 6,105 6,600 Employee stock options 4,375 4,375 4,547 Restricted stock units 242 221 — 35,367 35,475 35,647 Restricted Cash (Successor) These balances include amounts held in escrow accounts, as a result of a legal proceeding related to tax assessments. The following table reconciles cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020 to the total amount presented in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2020 (in thousands): Cash and cash equivalents $ 64,728 Restricted cash 1,896 Total cash and restricted cash in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows $ 66,624 Lease Concessions (Successor) In April 2020, the FASB issued guidance allowing entities to make a policy election whether to account for lease concessions related to the COVID-19 pandemic as lease modifications, and OneSpaWorld made such election. The election applies to any lessor-provided lease concession related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, provided the concession does not result in a substantial increase in the rights of the lessor or in the obligations of the lessee. Most of our destination resorts agreements are required to pay rent based on a percentage of our revenues with others having fixed rent. We have received lease concessions from certain destination resorts where a fixed rent is required, in the form of rent deferrals and forgiveness during the three months ended June 30, 2020. We have elected not to account for these rent concessions as lease modifications. The recognition of these rent concessions did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020. Adoption of Accounting Pronouncements On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the requirement to calculate the fair value of the individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure goodwill impairment (Step 2). Under the new ASU, when required to test goodwill for recoverability, an entity will perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value (Step 1) and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. We have applied this ASU on a prospective basis. As a result of the adoption of this standard, we used step 1 to measure the goodwill impairment charge recognized during the first quarter of 2020. See Note 4 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” and “Note 13. Fair Value Measurement and Derivatives” for further details. Recent Accounting Pronouncements With the exception of those discussed below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements that are of significance, or potential significance, to the Company. The following summary of recent accounting pronouncements is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the respective pronouncement. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”) to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing rights and obligations resulting from leases as lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The update requires lessees to recognize for all leases with a term of 12 months or more at the commencement date: (a) a lease liability or a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis and (b) a right-of-use asset or a lessee’s right to use or control the use of a specified asset for the lease term. Under the update, lessor accounting remains largely unchanged. The update requires a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements and do not require any transition accounting for leases that expire before the earliest comparative period presented. In June 2020, the FASB issued guidance (ASU 2020-05) that defers the effective dates of the lease standard (ASU 2016-02) for entities that have not yet issued financial statements adopting the standard. The update is effective retrospectively for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022, with early adoption permitted. We intend to elect the optional transition method, which allows entities to initially apply the standard at the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326).” This ASU amends the FASB’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The ASU adds to GAAP an impairment model (known as the current expected credit losses model) that is based on an expected losses model rather than an incurred losses model. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses. The ASU is also intended to reduce the complexity of GAAP by decreasing the number of impairment models that entities use to account for debt instruments. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements. The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), announced in July 2017 its intent to phase out the use of LIBOR by the end of 2021. The U.S. Federal Reserve, in conjunction with the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred benchmark alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR represents a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is calculated based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-backed repurchase transactions. In March 2020, in response to this transition, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) – Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financing Reporting consolidated financial statements |