Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2024 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | Recent Accounting Pronouncements In November 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2023-07, S egment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The ASU expands public entities’ segment disclosures by requiring disclosure of significant segment expenses that are regularly reviewed by the Chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss, an amount and description of its composition for other segment items, and interim disclosures of a reportable segment’s profit or loss and assets. The ASU also allows, in addition to the measure that is most consistent with U.S. GAAP, the disclosure of additional measures of segment profit or loss that are used by the CODM in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. All disclosure requirements under ASU 2023-07 are also required for public entities with a single reportable segment. The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 during the year-ended December 31, 2024. For further details refer to Note 11. In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments require (i) enhanced disclosures in connection with an entity's effective tax rate reconciliation and (ii) income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures. |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates The preparation of the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts (including the stand-alone selling price (“SSP”) for the RPD, allowance for credit losses, reserves for inventory excess and obsolescence, carrying value of long-lived assets, the useful lives of long-lived assets, accounting for marketable securities, income taxes, fair value of debt, fair value of warrants and stock-based compensation) and related disclosures. Estimates have been prepared based on the current and available information. However, actual results could differ from estimated amounts. |
Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Currency Transactions | Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Currency Transactions The financial position and results of operations of the Company’s operating non-U.S. subsidiaries are generally determined using the respective local currency as the functional currency of that subsidiary. Assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each period end. Income statement accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. Adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s non-operating subsidiaries that use the U.S. Dollar as their functional currency remeasure monetary assets and liabilities at exchange rates in effect at the end of each period and nonmonetary assets and liabilities at historical rates. Gains and losses resulting from these remeasurements are included in earnings in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Gains and losses for remeasurement were minimal for the year-ended December 31, 2024 and $ 22,000 for the year-ended December 31, 2023. The Company records certain revenues and operating expenses in foreign currencies. These revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. Dollars based on the average exchange rate for the reporting period. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate in effect as of the balance sheet date. For the years-ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred losses of approximately $ 21,000 and $ 15,000 , respectively, included in Other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. |
Comprehensive Loss | Comprehensive Loss The components of comprehensive loss consist of net loss, foreign currency translation adjustments (“CTA”) from its subsidiaries not using the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, unrealized gains and losses in investments available for sale and changes in fair value due to instrument specific credit risk on the debt. During the year-ended December 31, 2023, the Company liquidated the Company's foreign subsidiaries. In accordance with ASC 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters (“ASC 830”), the CTA was reclassified into earnings. As such, the Company reclassified $ 9.4 million from comprehensive loss to earnings for the winding down of the foreign subsidiaries. The amount is recorded in Other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. |
Reorganization of Foreign Subsidiaries and Deed of Cross Guarantee | Reorganization of Foreign Subsidiaries and Deed of Cross Guarantee During the year-ended December 31, 2023, the business activities of AVITA Medical Pty Limited, AVITA Medical Europe Limited, Visiomed Group Pty Ltd, C3 Operations Pty Ltd and Infamed Pty Ltd were liquidated. AVITA Medical Americas LLC was transferred from C3 Operations Pty Ltd to be directly held by the Company in preparation for each of AVITA Medical Pty Limited, AVITA Medical Europe Limited, Visiomed Group Pty Ltd, C3 Operations Pty Ltd and Infamed Pty Ltd to be de-registered during the year-ended December 31, 2024. In March 2024, the Company’s deed of cross guarantee, dated June 29, 2020, with each of its Australian wholly-owned subsidiaries was revoked as part of the Company’s reorganization of foreign subsidiaries. In January 2025, the Company was notified that the de-registration of each of its wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries listed above was completed. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition The Company generates revenues primarily from: • The sale of RECELL EOU, RPK, and PermeaDerm products to hospitals, other treatment centers, and distributors. • Maintenance fee received from BARDA to ensure first right of access to our inventory. In the prior year, the Company recorded service revenue for the emergency preparedness services provided to BARDA. • Lease revenue for the RPD. The Company’s sale of the RECELL EOU and PermeaDerm products are accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from contracts with customers (“ASC 606”). Revenue for the RECELL GO system is disaggregated between two accounting standards: (1) ASC 606 for the RPK and (2) ASC 842, Leases (“ASC 842”) for the RPD. Revenues from BARDA are accounted for under ASC 606, and are included in Sales revenues within the Consolidated Statements of Operations. To determine revenue recognition for contracts that are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: 1. Identify the contract with a customer 2. Identify the performance obligations 3. Determine the transaction price 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations 5. Recognize revenue when/as a performance obligation(s) is(are) satisfied In order for an arrangement to be considered a contract, it must be probable that the Company will collect the consideration to which it is entitled for goods or services to be transferred. The Company then assesses the goods or services promised within the contract to determine whether each promised good or service is a performance obligation. Performance obligations are promises in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer that (i) the customer can benefit from on its own or together with other readily available resources, and (ii) is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. The Company determines the transaction price based on the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive for providing the promised goods or services in the contract. Consideration may be fixed, variable, or a combination of both. At contract inception for arrangements that include variable consideration, the Company estimates the probability and extent of consideration it expects to receive under the contract utilizing either the most likely amount method or expected amount method, whichever best estimates the amount expected to be received. The Company then considers any constraints on the variable consideration and includes in the transaction price variable consideration to the extent it is deemed probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. When accounting for a contract that contains multiple performance obligations, the Company must develop judgmental assumptions to determine the estimated SSP for each performance obligation identified in the contract. We utilize the observable SSP when available, which represents the price charged for the promised product or service when sold separately. When the SSP for our products or services are not directly observable, we determine the SSP using relevant information available and apply suitable estimation methods including, but not limited to, the cost-plus margin approach. The Company then allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative SSP and recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) control is transferred to the customer and the performance obligation is satisfied. Most of the Company’s contracts have a single performance obligation. As such, the Company recognizes revenue when its customers obtain control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Revenue is recognized net of volume discounts (variable consideration). For the Company’s contracts that have an original duration of one year or less, since contract inception and customer payment occur within the same period the Company does not consider the time value of money. Further, because of the short duration of these contracts, the Company has not disclosed the transaction price for the remaining performance obligations as of each reporting period or when the Company expects to recognize this revenue. The Company has further applied the practical expedient to exclude sales tax in the transaction price and expense contract acquisition costs such as commissions and shipping and handling expenses as incurred. Revenue recognition for contracts that are within the scope of ASC 606 and ASC 842 The Company enters into contracts with customers where it receives consideration for the RPK and does not receive additional consideration for the RPD. As a result, judgment and analysis are required to determine the appropriate accounting, including: (i) whether the arrangement contains an embedded lease, and if so, whether such embedded lease is a sales-type lease or an operating lease, (ii) the amount of the total consideration, as well as variable consideration, (iii) the identification of the distinct performance obligations contained within the arrangement, (iv) how the arrangement consideration should be allocated to each performance obligation when multiple performance obligations exist, including the determination of standalone selling price, and (v) when to recognize revenue on the performance obligations. For these contracts the Company considers the guidance under ASC 842 to determine if furnishing the RPD to the customer during the period of use establishes an embedded lease. To determine if the contract contains a lease, the Company evaluates the customer’s rights and ability to control the use of the underlying equipment throughout the contract term, including any equipment substitution rights retained by the Company. As the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time, the contract was determined to contain a lease. The Company then evaluated the lease classification based on the below: • Pursuant to ASC 842-30, the Company will classify a lease as a sales-type lease if: (i) the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (ii) the lease grants the lessee an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise, (iii) the lease term is for the major part of the remaining economic life of the underlying asset, (iv) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset, or (v) the underlying asset is of such a specialized nature that it is expected to have no alternative use to the lessor at the end of the lease term. • Pursuant to ASC 842-30, when none of the sales-type lease classification criteria are met, a lessor would classify the lease as a direct financing lease when both of the following criteria are met: (i) the present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments and/or any other third party unrelated to the lessor equals or exceeds substantially all (90% or more) of the fair value of the underlying asset and (ii) it is probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary to satisfy a residual value guarantee. • Pursuant to ASC 842-30, a lessor would classify a lease as an operating lease when none of the sales-type or direct financing lease classification criteria are met. Further, per ASC 842, a lessor is required to classify a lease with variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or rate as an operating lease at lease commencement if the lease would have been classified as a sales-type lease or a direct financing lease in accordance with the classification criteria of ASC 842 and the lessor would have otherwise recognized a loss at the lease commencement date. In determining whether the lease components are related to a sales-type lease or an operating lease, the Company evaluates if the lease transfers ownership at the end of the lease term, purchase options, the lease term in relation to the economic life of the asset, if the lease payments exceed the fair value of the asset, and if the asset is of a specialized nature. The Company also evaluates if the lease results in a loss at the lease commencement date. As the lease term is for a major part of the economic life, the lease meets the classification criteria for sales-type lease. However, t o determine if the contract results in a loss at the lease commencement date the Company evaluated the consideration in the contract. The consideration at lease commencement does not contain fixed payments, purchase options, penalty payments or residual value guarantees. The variable consideration is related to the sale of the RPK. As the variable lease payments are not dependent on an index or rate, the variable consideration is excluded from consideration at contract inception resulting in a loss at lease commencement. As such, the Company classifies the lease as an operating lease. The contracts contain a lease component, the RPD, and a non-lease component, the RPK. The lease component will be accounted for under ASC 842 and the non-lease component will be accounted for under ASC 606, as described above. Per ASC 842, the consideration in the contract will be allocated to each separate lease component and non-lease component of the contract. The consideration is allocated to these lease and non-lease components based on the SSP (as described above for contracts within the scope of ASC 606). In accordance with ASC 842, variable lease payments will be recognized once the sale of the RPK occurs and control has transferred to the customer. Consideration will be allocated to the RPD and RPK based on the SSP. Consideration related to the RPD will be recognized as Lease revenue and consideration related to the RPK will be recognized as Sales revenues in accordance with guidance in ASC 606, as described above, upon transfer of control of the RPK, which generally occurs at the time the product is shipped or delivered depending on the customer's shipping terms. Assets in the Company’s lease program are reported in Plant and equipment, net on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and are depreciated over the useful life of the RPD device's 200 uses, as indicated in the Instructions for Use that were approved by the FDA, and expensed as Costs of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The RPD depreciation has a direct relationship to the number of RPK units sold. Based on customer usage, each purchase of an RPK unit results in a 1/200 depreciation to the RPD . |
Contract Liabilities | Contract Liabilities The Company receives payments from customers based on contractual terms. Trade receivables are recorded when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. The Company satisfies its performance obligation on product sales when the products are shipped or delivered, depending on the terms of the sale. Payment terms on invoiced amounts are typically 30 days , and do not include a financing component. Contract liabilities are recorded when the Company receives payment prior to satisfying its obligation to transfer goods to a customer. |
Cost of Sales | Cost of Sales Cost of sales related to products includes costs to manufacture or purchase, package, and ship the Company’s products. Costs also include relevant production overhead and depreciation and amortization. These costs are recognized when control of the product is transferred to the customer and revenue is recognized. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income or loss in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits on the income tax expense line in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations. Accrued interest and penalties are included on the related tax liability line in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company reviews its uncertain tax positions regularly. An uncertain tax position represents the Company’s expected treatment of a tax position taken in a filed return, or planned to be taken in a future tax return or claim that has not been reflected in measuring income tax expense for financial reporting purposes. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination on the basis of the technical merits or the statute of limitations for the relevant taxing authority to examine and challenge the tax position has expired. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash held at deposit institutions, money market funds and short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company holds cash at deposit institutions in the amount of $ 2.3 million and $ 10.7 million, respectively. The Company holds no cash denominated in foreign currencies in foreign institutions as of December 31, 2024 and $ 69,000 denominated in foreign currencies in foreign institutions as of December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company held cash equivalents in the amount of $ 11.7 million and $ 11.4 million, respectively. |
Concentrations | Concentrations Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, BARDA receivables and other receivables. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, substantially all of the Company’s cash was deposited in accounts at financial institutions, and those deposited amounts may exceed federally insured limits and are subject to the risk of bank failure. As of December 31, 2024, two commercial customers accounted for more than 10 % of accounts receivable. Customer A accounted for 21 % and Customer B for 11 % of accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2023, no single commercial customer accounted for more than 10 % of accounts receivable. For the years-ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, no single commercial customer accounted for more than 10 % of total revenues. BARDA revenues for the procurement of the RECELL system accounted for zero and 1 % of total revenues for the years-ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. BARDA receivables for the procurement of the RECELL system and emergency preparedness accounted for 100 % and 27 % of BARDA receivables as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, BARDA receivables were $ 56,000 and $ 30,000 , respectively, |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | Fair Value of Financial Instruments Certain assets and liabilities are carried at fair value under GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable: ● Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. ● Level 2 — Observable inputs (other than Level 1 quoted prices), such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. ● Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to determining the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques. The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. For further details refer to Note 4. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company’s financial instruments included cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, long-term debt and warrant liabilities. The carrying amounts of accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. |
Long-term Debt | Long-term Debt The Company elected the fair value option (“FVO”) of accounting under ASC 825-10, Financial Instruments (“ASC 825”) , to record the debt at fair value at issuance and subsequently remeasures to fair value each reporting period. The Company elected the fair FVO option of accounting of ASC 825 for the debt from the issuance date in order to not have to bifurcate any embedded derivatives in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity's Own Equity (“ASC 815”). The debt accounted for under the FVO represents a financial instrument containing embedded features which would otherwise be required to be bifurcated from the debt-host and recognized as separate derivative liabilities subject to initial and subsequent periodic estimated fair value measurements under ASC 815. The Company has elected to present interest expense separately from changes in fair value and therefore will present interest expense associated with the debt as Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Any changes in fair value caused by instrument-specific credit risk are presented separately in Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in fair value attributable to changes in credit risk are determined using observable option adjusted spreads for the issuer or comparable companies with similar credit ratings. All costs associated with the issuance of the Credit Agreement accounted for using the FVO were expensed upon issuance. The fair value of the debt is determined using a Monte Carlo Simulation and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. For further details refer to Note 4. |
Presentation and Valuation of the Warrants | Presentation and Valuation of the Warrants Warrants are accounted for as liabilities in accordance with ASC 815-40 and were presented within Warrant liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets . The initial fair value of the warrant liability is measured at fair value at the date of issuance and are remeasured at each reporting date until settlement. Changes in the fair value of the warrant liability is recognized in Other income, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company established the fair value of the warrants utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assumptions used in the valuation are the price of the company stock, expected share-price volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The Company estimates the volatility based on historical volatility that matches the expected remaining life of the warrants. The expected term of the warrants is assumed to be equivalent to their remaining contractual term. The dividend rate is based on the historical rate, which the Company anticipates to remain at zero . The warrants were classified Level 3 fair value measurement, due to the use of unobservable inputs. For further details refer to Note 4. |
Marketable Securities | Marketable Securities The Company classifies all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase as cash equivalents and all highly liquid investments with stated maturities of greater than three months as marketable securities. The Company classifies marketable securities as short-term when they have remaining contractual maturities of one year or less from the balance sheet date, and as long-term when the investments have remaining contractual maturities of more than one year from the balance sheet date. Classification is determined at the time of purchase and re-evaluated each balance sheet date. Short-term marketable securities represent investment of cash available for current operations. The Company accounts for our marketable securities as available-for-sale securities. All marketable securities, which consist of corporate debt securities, asset backed securities, U.S treasury and commercial paper are denominated in the U.S. dollars, have been classified as “available for sale”, and are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of any related tax effects, are excluded from earnings and are included in other comprehensive income (loss) and reported as a separate component of stockholders equity until realized. Realized gains and losses on marketable securities are included in Other income, net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The cost of any marketable securities sold is based on the specific identification method. The amortized cost of marketable securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Interest on marketable securities is included in Other income, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In accordance with the Company’s investment policy, management invests to diversify credit risk and only invests in securities with high credit quality, including U.S. government securities, and the maximum final maturity from the date of purchase is thirty-seven months . If necessary, the Company will recognize an allowance for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities on an individual basis, and will no longer consider other than-temporary impairment or immediately reduce the cost basis of the investment provided that it is more likely than not that the security will be held to recovery or maturity. Further, the Company will recognize any improvements in estimated credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities immediately in earnings and reduce the existing allowance for credit losses. The Company will disaggregate its available-for-sale marketable securities into the following categories: commercial paper, corporate debt, government and agency securities and money market funds. The Company’s government and agency securities are U.S. treasury bonds, and U.S. agency bonds. The Company has analyzed government and agency securities and identified that both types of securities have similar risk characteristics in that they are traded infrequently and have contractual interest rates and maturity dates. To evaluate for impairment, management reviews credit rating changes, securities trends, interest rate movements and unrealized loss at the security level of the Company’s available for sale debt securities. If any of these give rise to a potential credit concern, the Company performs a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the credit portion of the impairment. The discounted cash flow analysis will be performed either internally or through the assistance of a qualified third party. Once the credit component of the impairment is determined, the Company will record the impaired amount as an allowance to the available-for-sale debt securities balance and as a charge to other income in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, not to exceed the amount of the unrealized loss. The Company assesses expected credit losses at the end of each reporting period and adjusts the allowance through Other income, net. |
Accounts Receivable | Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable are recorded net of customer allowances for expected credit losses. The Company estimates an allowance for expected credit losses (i.e., the inability of our customers to make required payments). These estimates are based on a combination of past experience and current trends. In estimating the allowance for expected credit losses, consideration is given to the current aging of receivables, a specific review for potential bad debts and an evaluation of historic write-offs. The resulting bad debt expense is included in Sales and marketing expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Receivables are written-off when deemed uncollectible. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the allowance for expected credit losses was $ 71,000 and $ 48,000 , respectively. A rollforward of the activity in the Company’s allowance for expected credit losses is as follows (in thousands): Year-ended December 31, 2024 December 31, 2023 Balance at beginning of year $ 48 $ 24 Additions: change to cost and expense 23 24 Deductions: write-offs, net of recovery - - Balance at end of year $ 71 $ 48 |
BARDA Income and Receivables | BARDA Income and Receivables The Company has concluded that grants under the BARDA grant are not within the scope of ASC 606, as they do not meet the definition of a contract with a “customer.” The Company has further concluded that Subtopic 958-605, Not-for-Profit-Entities-Revenue Recognition also does not apply, as the Company is a business entity and the grants are with governmental agencies or units. With respect to the BARDA grant, the Company considered the guidance in IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, by analogy. BARDA income and related receivables are recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received, and all attaching conditions have been complied with. When the grant relates to an expense item, the grant received is recognized as income over the period when the expense was incurred. |
Inventory | Inventory Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value and is reflected in cost of sales. Costs incurred in bringing each product to its present location and condition are accounted for at purchase cost on a first-in, first-out basis (“FIFO”). The Company capitalizes inventory costs associated with the Company’s products when, based on management’s judgment, future commercialization is considered probable and the future economic benefit is expected to be realized; otherwise, such costs are expensed as research and development. Inventory is evaluated for impairment periodically to identify inventory obsolescence when an inventory item’s cost basis is in excess of its net realizable value. These adjustments are based upon multiple factors, including inventory levels, projected demand, and product shelf life. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs of completion and costs to complete the sale. |
Lessee Right-of-Use Assets and Lease Liabilities | Lessee Right-of-Use Assets and Lease Liabilities The Company has operating leases for corporate office space, manufacturing and warehouse facility. The Company’s operating leases have remaining lease terms of one year to five years , some of which include options to renew the lease. At contract inception, the Company determines whether the contract is a lease or contains a lease. A contract contains a lease if the Company is both able to identify an asset and can conclude it has the right to control the identified asset for a period of time. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the Company’s right to control an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As the Company’s leases do not provide an explicit rate, the Company used its incremental borrowing rate (“IBR”) based on the information available at commencement date in determining the discount rate used to present value lease payments. In determining the IBR, the Company considered its credit rating and current market interest rates. The IBR used approximates the interest that the Company would be required to pay for a collateralized loan over a similar term. The Company’s leases typically do not include any residual value guarantees or asset retirement obligations. The Company’s lease terms are only for periods in which it has enforceable rights. A lease is no longer enforceable when both the lessee and the lessor each have the right to terminate the lease without permission from the other party with no more than an insignificant penalty. The Company has options to renew some of these leases for three years after their expiration. The Company considers these options, which may be elected at the Company’s sole discretion, in determining the lease term on a lease-by-lease basis. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is primarily included in General and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company has lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are accounted for as a single lease component for all underlying asset classes. Some leases require variable payments for common area maintenance, property taxes, parking, insurance and other variable costs. The variable portion of lease payments is not included in operating lease assets or liabilities. Variable lease costs are expensed when incurred. |
Plant and Equipment | Plant and Equipment The Company’s plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the various asset classes, generally three to seven years . Depreciation for the leased RECELL GO RPD devices, which have a useful life of 200 uses, is computed based on customer usage as determined by orders placed for the sales of RPK units. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the related asset or the remaining term of the lease. Costs associated with customized internal-use software systems that have reached the application development stage and technological feasibility are capitalized and include external direct costs utilized in developing or obtaining the applications and payroll and payroll-related expenses for employees who are directly associated with the application development. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. |
Intangible Assets | Intangible Assets The Company maintains definite-lived intangible assets related to patents and a license initially measured at cost and amortized over estimated useful lives of approximately 2 — 19 years. The Company had capitalized patent costs of $ 770,000 and $ 616,000 as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, related to regulatory approval of the RECELL System, and are being amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company also had a capitalized license of $ 5.0 million as of December 31, 2024, related to the Regenity Agreement and the 510(k) approval for Cohealyx. For further details see Note 12. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the estimated, undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, then an impairment is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined using the market, income, or cost approaches as appropriate for the asset. Any write-downs are treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amount of the asset and recognized as an operatin g loss. The Company did no t have any impairments in long-lived assets for the year-ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. |
Sales and Marketing Expenses | Sales and Marketing Expenses Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation and employee benefits of sales and marketing personnel and related field sales organization, marketing events, advertising costs, travel, trade shows and other marketing materials. The Company expenses all selling and marketing costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were $ 539,000 and $ 398,000 for the years-ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. |
Research and Development Expenses | Research and Development Expenses Research and development expenses represent costs incurred to develop the Company’s products. Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel costs, clinical trial costs, regulatory costs and manufacturing costs for non-commercial products. The Company expenses all research and development costs in the periods in which they are incurred. |
Stock-Based Compensation | Stock-Based Compensation The Company records compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock units (“RSU”) based on the fair market value of the awards on the date of grant. The fair value of stock-based compensation awards is amortized over the vesting period of the award. Compensation expense for performance-based awards is evaluated based on the number of shares ultimately expected to vest, evaluated each reporting period and based on management’s expectations regarding the relevant performance criteria. The Black-Scholes option pricing model and Monte Carlo Simulation are used to estimate the fair value of the time-based and performance-based options, respectively. Under ASU 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting , the Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The following assumptions were used in the valuation of stock options. • Expected volatility – determined using the historical volatility using daily intervals over the expected term. • Expected dividends - based on the fact that the Company has never paid cash dividends and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future • Expected term – the expected term of the Company’s stock options for tenure only vesting has been determined utilizing the “simplified” method as described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 relating to share-based compensation. The simplified method was chosen because the Company has limited historical option exercise experience due to its short operating history of awards granted, with the first plan being established in 2016 which was primarily used for executive awards. Further, the Company does not have sufficient history of exercises in the U.S. market given the Company’s redomiciliation from Australia to the United States in 2020. The expected term of options with a performance condition or market condition was set to the contractual term of 10 years. The contractual term was used for options with a performance or market condition as these are primarily awarded to executives and the Company assumes that they will hold them longer than rank and file employees. • Risk-free interest rate – the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant for a period approximately equal to the expected term of the award. |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan | Employee Stock Purchase Plan The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), features two six-month offering periods per year, running from June 1 to November 30 and December 1 to May 31. The ESPP provides eligible employees with an opportunity to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions of up to 15 % of their eligible compensation. Under the ESPP, employees can purchase the Company’s Common Stock at the lower of 85 % of the fair value of shares on either the first or last day of the offering period. Amounts deducted and accumulated by the participant are recorded as ESPP liability and included in Accrued wages and fringe benefits in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This amount is used to purchase shares of common stock at the end of each six-month purchase period. Once the shares are purchased, the ESPP liability is reclassified to stockholders’ equity on the purchase date. The ESPP is a compensatory plan accounted for under the expense recognition provision of share-based payment accounting standards. Compensation expense is recorded based on the fair market value at the grant date, which corresponds to the first day of each purchase period. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to estimate the grant date fair value. |
Loss per Share | Loss per Share Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, assuming potentially dilutive ordinary shares from option exercises, employee share awards, ESPP and warrants and other dilutive instruments that have been issued. For periods where the Company has presented a net loss, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as they would be anti-dilutive. In accordance with ASC 710-10, Compensation – General (“ASC 710”), shares of common stock held by the rabbi trust are excluded from the denominator in the basic and diluted EPS calculations. |
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Liability and Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Asset | Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan Liability and Corporate-Owned Life Insurance Asset The Company’s non-qualified deferred compensation plan (the “NQDC plan”), which became effective in October 2021, allows highly compensated key employees to elect to defer a portion of their salary, bonus and RSU awards to later years. Management determined that the cash deferrals under the NQDC plan shall be accounted for similarly to a defined benefit plan under ASC 715, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (“ASC 715”), and should follow accounting treatment that is similar to a cash balance plan. Management determined that the employee portion and employer portion of the deferred compensation should be recognized as a compensation expense with a corresponding credit to deferred compensation liability. The matching contribution will be accrued over the vesting period of two years with 25 % vesting in the first year and 75 % vesting in the second year. Employees aged 55 or older immediately vest in employer matching contributions. The change in the liability between each reporting period is accounted for as compensation expense with a corresponding adjustment to deferred compensation liability. Upon distribution, the Company will record the distribution as a decrease to deferred compensation liability with a corresponding cre dit to cash. The Company funds the NQDC plan through a Corporate-Owned Life Insurance (“COLI”). Per the ASC 325-30-25-1A , Investments – Other , COLI is recorded as an asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as it does not meet the definition of a plan asset under ASC 715. The Company invests in COLI policies relating to its deferred compensation plan. Investments in COLI policies are recorded at their cash surrender values as of each balance sheet date. Changes in the cash surrender value during the period are recorded as a gain or loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in Other income, net. |
Rabbi Trust | Rabbi Trust During April 2022, the Company established a rabbi trust for a select group of participants in which share awards granted under the 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“2020 Plan”) and deferred under the NQDC plan may be deposited. In addition to the deferral of shares, the rabbi trust holds the assets in the COLI for the NQDC plan. The rabbi trust is an irrevocable trust, and no portion of the trust fund may be used for any purpose other than the delivery of those assets to the participants. The assets held in the rabbi trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency. The value of the assets of the rabbi trust is consolidated into our financial statements. The NQDC plan permits diversification of vested shares (common stock) into other equity securities subject to a six-month and one day holding period subsequent to vesting. Per ASC 710-10-25-15, accounting for deferred common stock will be under plan type C or D. Accounting will depend on whether or not the employee has diversified the common stock. Under plan type C, diversification is permitted but the employee has not diversified. Under plan type D, diversification is permitted, and the employee has diversified. For common stock that has not been diversified, the employer stock held in the rabbi trust is classified in a manner similar to treasury stock and presented separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Company common stock held by the NQDC plan. The common stock will be recorded at the fair value of the stock at the time it vested, subsequent changes in the value of the common stock will not be recognized. The deferred compensation obligation is measured independently at fair value of the common stock with a corresponding charge or credit to compensation cost. The fair value is calculated as the product of the common stock and the closing price of the stock each reporting period. Under plan type D, the accounting for the assets held by the rabbi trust is subject to the accounting pronouncements under applicable GAAP for each asset type. The deferred compensation obligation is measured independently at fair value of the underlying assets. During the years-ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the diversified stock was invested in funds under the COLI policy. |
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Stock Awards | Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Stock Awards In accordance with ASC 718 , Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), the deferred RSU awards under the NQDC plan are classified as an equity instrument and changes in fair value of the amount owed to the participant are not recognized. As the plan permits diversification, presentation outside of permanent equity in accordance with ASR 268, Redeemable Preferred Stock is appropriate. The redemption amounts are based on the vested percentage and are recorded outside of equity as Non-qualified deferred compensation share awards on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred awards will be presented outside of permanent equity until the awards are vested. For further details refer to Note 17. |
Segment Reporting | Segment Reporting Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision-maker is its Chief Executive Officer, who reviews consolidated financial results when making resource allocation decisions or evaluating Company performance. To date, the Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as one segment. As of December 31, 2024, the Company has no material long-lived assets outside of the U.S. and approximately 3 % of its total revenues for the year-ended December 31, 2024 are from foreign countries. For further details refer to Note 11. |