Pioneer Bancorp (PBFS) 10-K/A 2020 FY Annual report (amended)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 2)

⌧ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Year Ended June 30, 2020

OR

◻TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _______________

Commission File Number: 001-38991

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Maryland	83-4274253
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
or organization)
652 Albany Shaker Road, Albany New York	12211
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

(518) 730-3025

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01	PBFS	The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ◻   No ⌧

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ◻   No ⌧

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧   No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ⌧   No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer    ◻  Accelerated filer    ◻  Non-accelerated filer    ⌧  Smaller reporting company    ⌧  Emerging growth company    ⌧ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ◻

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ◻   No ⌧

The aggregate value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing price of the common stock of $15.31 as of December 31, 2019 was $160.3 million.

As of September 25, 2020 there were 25,977,679 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1.	Business	5
ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	38
ITEM 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	54
ITEM 2.	Properties	55
ITEM 3.	Legal Proceedings	55
ITEM 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	58
ITEM 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	58
ITEM 6.	Selected Financial Data	58
ITEM 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	61
ITEM 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	75
ITEM 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	75
ITEM 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	138
ITEM 9A.	Controls and Procedures	138
ITEM 9B.	Other Information	140
ITEM 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	141
ITEM 11.	Executive Compensation	145
ITEM 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	151
ITEM 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	152
ITEM 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	153
ITEM 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	154
ITEM 16.	Form 10-K/A Summary	156

2

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Pioneer Bancorp” or the “Company”) is filing this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 (the “Amended Report”) which was originally filed on September 28, 2020 and amended on October 28, 2020 (the “Original Report” or “Annual Report on Form 10-K”), to reflect a restatement of our audited consolidated financial statements.

Description of Restatement

The Restatement results from a technical accounting correction to reflect the Mann Entities-related $15.8 million Loan Balances Impairment as a recognized (Type I) subsequent event in the quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, rather than as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2019, notwithstanding that the Company and the Bank did not start to become aware of the events causing the Impairment until the quarter ended September 30, 2019 (capitalized terms defined below).

On February 12, 2021, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, after consultation with management, determined that certain financial statements previously issued by the Company should be restated and no longer relied upon (the “Restatement”). The following financial statements of the Company are impacted by the Restatement: (a) the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2020, as reported in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for those years, and (b) the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the periods ended September 30, 2019, December 31, 2019, March 31, 2020, and September 30, 2020, as reported in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

As previously disclosed, after the Company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, but prior to December 10, 2019, the date the financial statements for that year were issued, the Company became aware of fraudulent activity associated with transactions by an established business customer of Pioneer Bank (the “Bank”), a subsidiary of the Company.  The customer, Michael Mann, and various affiliated entities (collectively, the “Mann Entities”) had numerous general deposit corporate operating accounts and loans with the Bank.

As reflected in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2019, the Company’s potential exposure with respect to the Mann Entities’ lending activity was approximately $15.8 million (the “Loan Balances”).  Subsequently, the Company learned that Mr. Mann had perpetrated a concealed fraud on the Bank and many other parties.  In the second quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company concluded that due to the impact of the potential fraudulent activity, the Loan Balances were impaired and, as a result, recorded a provision for loan losses in the amount of $15.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 related to the charge-off of the entire Loan Balances (the “Impairment”).

In July 2020, the Company received a comment letter from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) related to, among other matters, the classification of the Loan Balances Impairment as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019 (the “2019 Form 10-K”).  The Company and the Staff engaged in several discussions regarding the Staff’s position, based on technical accounting precepts, that the Loan Balances should be deemed impaired as of June 30, 2019, and the Loan Balances Impairment should have been recognized by the Company in the quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 as a Type I subsequent event and not as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event.  In its communications with the Staff, the Company described that its original determination that the Loan Balances Impairment was a Type II subsequent event in the Company’s 2019 Form 10-K recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2019, was based on the unique circumstances of the event.

As a result of the Staff’s position, the Restatement reflects the Loan Balances Impairment in the quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 (as a recognized (Type I) subsequent event), rather than as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2019.  This technical accounting correction is not a result of any new facts coming to light after the filing of the 2019 Form 10-K.

The principal effects of the Restatement for the respective comparative periods is as follows:

3

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2020		2019
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Selected Operating Data:
Increase (decrease) in:
Provision for loan losses	$	(15,800)	$	15,800
Income tax expense		4,093		(4,093)
Net income		11,707		(11,707)
Earnings per share	$	0.47		N/A

	For the Quarters Ended
	June 30, 2020		March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019		September 30, 2019		June 30, 2019
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Selected Operating Data:
Increase (decrease) in:
Provision for loan losses	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(15,800)	$	15,800
Income tax expense		—		—		—		4,093		(4,093)
Net income		—		—		—		11,707		(11,707)
Earnings per share	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	0.47		N/A

For additional information on the Restatement, see Note 2, Restatement of Consolidated Financial Statements to the audited consolidated financial statements.

Items Amended in this Filing

For the reasons discussed above, we are filing this Amended Report in order to amend the following items in our Original Report to the extent necessary to reflect the adjustments discussed above and make corresponding revisions to our financial data cited elsewhere in this Amended Report:

● Part I, Item 1. Business

● Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors

● Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data

● Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

● Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

● Part II, Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

● Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Except as noted above, no other information in our Original Report is amended hereby and is repeated herein solely for the reader’s convenience.

In order to preserve the nature and character of the disclosures set forth in the Original Report, except as expressly noted above, this Amended Report speaks as of the date of the filing of the Original Report, and we have not updated the disclosures in this Amended Report to speak as of a later date. All information contained in this Amended Report is subject to updating and supplementing as provided in our reports filed with the SEC subsequent to the date of the Original Report. Accordingly, this Amended Report should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the SEC subsequent to the Original Report, including any amendment to these filings.

4

PART I

ITEM 1.Business

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K/A contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which can be identified by the use of words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may.” A forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future events. Certain forward-looking statements are included in this Form 10-K/A, principally in the sections captioned “Business,” and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

● statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

● statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;

● statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

● estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.

In addition, the factors described under Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in Part II, Item 7, and Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A, as well as other possible factors not listed, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the following:

● risks and uncertainties related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic and resulting governmental and societal response;

● risks and uncertainties related to the Restatement of certain of our historical consolidated financial statements;

● risks related to the variety of litigation and other proceedings described in the “Legal Proceedings” section;

● general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market area, that are worse than expected;

● risks that COVID-19 may adversely impact our customers and lead to a long-term economic recession and continuing a severe disruption in the U.S. economy, and could potentially create business continuity issues for us;

● competition within our market area that is stronger than expected;

● changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and charge-offs and changes in estimates of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses;

● our ability to access cost-effective funding;

5

● fluctuations in real estate values and both residential and commercial real estate market conditions;

● demand for loans and deposits in our market area;

● changes in our partnership with a third-party mortgage banking company;

● our ability to continue to implement our business strategies;

● competition among depository and other financial institutions;

● inflation and changes in market interest rates that reduce our margins and yields, reduce the fair value of financial instruments or reduce our volume of loan originations, or increase the level of defaults, losses and prepayments on loans we have made and make, whether held in portfolio or sold in the secondary market;

● adverse changes in the securities markets;

● changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements;

● our ability to manage market risk, credit risk and operational risk;

● our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities;

● the imposition of tariffs or other domestic or international governmental polices impacting the value of the products of our borrowers;

● our ability to successfully integrate into our operations any assets, liabilities or systems we may acquire, as well as new management personnel or customers, and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto;

● changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

● our ability to maintain our reputation;

● our ability to prevent or mitigate fraudulent activity;

● changes in cost of legal expenses, including defending against significant litigation;

● changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board;

● our ability to retain key employees;

● our ability to evaluate the amount and timing of recognition of future tax assets and liabilities;

● our compensation expense associated with equity benefits allocated or awarded to our employees in the future; and

● changes in the financial condition, results of operations or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own.

6

Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A to reflect future events or developments.

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. is a Maryland corporation that was organized in March 2019 and owns all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Pioneer Bank. On July 17, 2019, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., became the holding company for the Bank, when it closed its stock offering in connection with the completion of the reorganization of the Bank into the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization. The Company sold 11,170,402 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share to depositors of the Bank for net proceeds of $109.1 million, issued 14,287,723 shares of common stock to Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and contributed 519,554 shares of common stock to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation. The Company’s common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “PBFS.”

As a result of the completed minority stock offering, the Company files interim, quarterly and annual reports with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers such as the Company that file electronically with the SEC. All filed SEC reports and interim filings can also be obtained from the Bank’s website (www.pioneerny.com), on the “Investor Relations” page, without charge from the Company.

The executive offices of the Company are located at 652 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, New York 12211, and its telephone number is (518) 730-3025. The Company is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) and the New York State Department of Financial Services (the “NYSDFS”).

Pioneer Bancorp, MHC

Pioneer Bancorp, MHC was formed as a New York mutual holding company and will, for as long as it is in existence, own a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.

Pioneer Bancorp, MHC’s principal assets are the common stock of the Company it received in the reorganization and offering and $100,000 in cash in initial capitalization. Presently, it is expected that the only business activity of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC will be to own a majority of the Company’s common stock. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC is authorized, however, to engage in any other business activities that are permissible for mutual holding companies under New York law, including investing in loans and securities. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Board and NYSDFS.

Pioneer Bank

General

Founded in 1889, Pioneer Bank is a New York-chartered savings bank that operates 22 retail banking offices in Albany, Greene, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady and Warren Counties in New York. We consider these six counties, Schoharie County and the surrounding areas, as our primary market area for our business operations. We attract deposits from the general public and municipalities and use those funds along with advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and funds generated from operations to originate commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, commercial construction loans and home equity loans and lines of credit and, to a lesser extent, consumer loans. Since January 2016, all of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans have been purchases through our relationship with Homestead Funding Corp., an unaffiliated mortgage banking company. We also invest in securities, which have historically consisted primarily of U.S. Government and agency obligations, municipal obligations and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock. We offer a variety of deposit accounts, including demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificate of deposit accounts. Municipal deposit banking services are provided through a limited purpose commercial bank subsidiary, Pioneer Commercial Bank. The Bank also sells commercial and consumer

7

insurance products and employee benefit products and services through Anchor Agency, Inc., its insurance agency subsidiary, and provides wealth management services through its subsidiary, Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.

At June 30, 2020, we had consolidated total assets of $1.5 billion, total deposits of $1.3 billion and shareholders’ equity of $224.0 million. The Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the NYSDFS and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). Our website address is www.pioneerny.com. Information on this website is not and should not be considered a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Market Area

Our primary market area encompasses Albany, Greene, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Schoharie and Warren Counties, which are located in the Capital Region of New York and include the cities of Albany, the capital of New York, Schenectady and Troy. Our offices are located in these counties and surrounding areas, with the exception of Schoharie County. The Capital Region has a diversified economy and representative industries include educational services, technology and health care, along with a strong state government workforce. Large employers in the Capital Region include General Electric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlobalFoundries, the Golub Corporation, St. Peter’s Health Partners, Albany Medical Center, the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the State of New York.

The total population in our primary market area in 2020 is approximately 1.0 million, as estimated by Claritas, which provides demographic data based on U.S. Census and other data sources. Of the seven counties in our market area, Saratoga County has the highest level of median household income, estimated at $91,676 in 2020 and projected to grow nearly 10.9% through 2026, and Schoharie County has the lowest median household income, estimated at $58,683 in 2020 and projected to grow 5.5% through 2026, compared to the 2020 estimated median household income of $74,462 and $67,761 for New York and the United States as a whole, respectively.

As of June 30, 2020, unemployment rates, according to the New York State Department of Labor, were 10.4% for Albany County, 11.4% for Greene County, 9.9% for Rensselaer County, 10.2% for Saratoga County, 11.7% for Schenectady County, 9.2% for Schoharie County and 11.5% for Warren County. As of June 30, 2020, the unemployment for the United States, New York State and the Capital Region of New York was 11.2%, 15.6% and 10.4%, respectively.

We believe that we have developed products and services that will meet the financial needs of our current and future customer base; however, we plan, and believe it is necessary, to expand the range of products and services that we offer to be more competitive in our market area. Our marketing strategies focus on the strength of our knowledge of local consumer and small business markets, as well as expanding relationships with current customers and reaching out to develop new, profitable business relationships.

Competition

We face significant competition for deposits and loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from the numerous financial institutions operating in our market area (including other community banks and credit unions), many of which are significantly larger than we are and have greater resources. We also face competition for investors’ funds from other sources such as brokerage firms, money market funds and mutual funds, as well as securities, such as Treasury bills, offered by the Federal Government. Based on FDIC data, at June 30, 2020 (the latest date for which information is available), we had 2.71% of the FDIC insured deposit market share in Albany County among the 21 institutions with offices in the county, 16.59% of the FDIC insured deposit market share in Rensselaer County among the 11 institutions with offices in the county, 3.30% of the FDIC insured deposit market share in Saratoga County among the 17 institutions with offices in the county, 1.65% of the FDIC insured deposit market share in Greene County among the seven institutions with offices in the county, 4.47% of the FDIC insured deposit market share in Schenectady County among the 12 institutions with offices in the county and 0.64% of the FDIC insured deposit market share in Warren County among the 10 institutions with offices in the county. In all six counties, either New York City money center banks (e.g. JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America) or large regional banks (e.g., Key Bank, Citizens Bank, M&T Bank and TD Bank) have a large presence.

8

Our competition for loans comes primarily from the competitors referenced above and from other financial service providers, such as mortgage companies and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial service companies participating in the mortgage market, such as insurance companies, securities companies, financial technology companies, specialty finance firms and technology companies.

We expect competition to remain intense in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the internet and made it possible for non-depository institutions, including financial technology companies, to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.

Lending Activities

General. Our principal lending activity has been originating commercial real estate loans (including multi-family real estate loans), commercial and industrial loans, commercial construction loans and home equity loans and lines of credit. Beginning in January 2016, we entered into a strategic partnership with Homestead Funding Corp., a mortgage banking company, to outsource our residential mortgage loan originations, underwriting and closing processes. Through this partnership, we refer our customers to the mortgage banking company and then we decide whether we want to purchase the one- to four-family residential real estate loans originated by the mortgage banking company for our portfolio.

Our commercial lending efforts focus on the small-to-medium sized business market, targeting borrowers with outstanding loan balances that typically range between $2.5 million to $10.0 million. We focus primarily on commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans and commercial construction loans in our market area. As part of the commercial lending strategy, we will continue to use our commercial relationships to increase our commercial transactional deposit accounts.

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio by type of loan at the dates indicated.

	At June 30,
	2020				2019				2018				2017				2016
	Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent		Amount		Percent
					(As Restated)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	$	450,452	38.5	%	$	414,375	39.6	%	$	375,852	37.7	%	$	399,074	42.2	%	$	293,445	36.7	%
Commercial and industrial		237,223	20.3	%		167,462	15.9	%		194,183	19.5	%		179,908	19.1	%		123,470	15.5	%
Commercial construction(1)		91,805	7.8	%		85,274	8.1	%		84,569	8.5	%		67,928	7.2	%		96,223	12.1	%
One-to four-family residential real estate		279,960	23.9	%		281,388	26.8	%		249,635	25.0	%		202,733	21.5	%		197,670	24.8	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit		80,345	6.9	%		80,258	7.6	%		78,286	7.8	%		76,132	8.1	%		69,423	8.7	%
Consumer		30,860	2.6	%		21,482	2.0	%		14,977	1.5	%		18,042	1.9	%		17,878	2.2	%
Total loans receivable		1,170,645	100.0	%		1,050,239	100.0	%		997,502	100.0	%		943,817	100.0	%		798,109	100.0	%
Less:
Net deferred loan costs		605				2,398				1,910				765				695
Allowance for losses		(22,851)				(14,499)				(13,510)				(11,820)				(9,794)
Total loans receivable, net	$	1,148,399			$	1,038,138			$	985,902			$	932,762			$	789,010

(1) Represents amounts disbursed at June 30, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The undrawn amounts of the commercial construction loans totaled $35.8 million, $83.7 million, $68.3 million, $76.8 million and $49.1 million at June 30, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

9

Contractual Maturities. The following tables set forth the contractual maturities of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2020. Demand loans, loans having no stated repayment schedule or maturity, and overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less. The table presents contractual maturities and does not reflect repricing or the effect of prepayments. Actual maturities may differ.

							One- to Four-
	Commercial Real		Commercial and		Commercial		Family
June 30, 2020	Estate		Industrial		Construction (1)		Residential
	(In thousands)
Amounts due in:
One year or less	$	27,739	$	98,114	$	12,743	$	122
More than one to five years		127,287		126,541		32,120		2,667
More than five years		295,426		12,568		46,942		277,171
Total	$	450,452	$	237,223	$	91,805	$	279,960

(1) Includes commercial construction loans that convert to commercial real estate loans upon completion of the construction phase.

	Home Equity
	Loans and Lines
June 30, 2020	of Credit		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)
Amounts due in:
One year or less	$	88	$	19,799	$	158,605
More than one to five years		2,357		9,350		300,322
More than five years		77,900		1,711		711,718
Total	$	80,345	$	30,860	$	1,170,645

The following table sets forth our fixed and adjustable-rate loans at June 30, 2020 that are contractually due after June 30, 2021.

	Due After June 30, 2021
	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(In thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	$	43,997	$	378,716	$	422,713
Commercial and industrial		113,554		25,555		139,109
Commercial construction		10,226		68,836		79,062
One- to four-family residential real estate		236,850		42,988		279,838
Home equity loans and lines of credit		47,932		32,325		80,257
Consumer		6,329		4,732		11,061
Total loans	$	458,888	$	553,152	$	1,012,040

Commercial Real Estate Loans. At June 30, 2020, we had $450.5 million in commercial real estate loans, representing 38.5% of our total loan portfolio. Our commercial real estate loans are secured primarily by office buildings, industrial facilities, retail facilities, multi-family properties and other commercial properties, substantially all of which are located in our primary market area. At June 30, 2020, multi-family residential real estate loans, which are described below, totaled $82.5 million. Excluding multi-family loans, $106.3 million of our commercial real estate portfolio was owner-occupied real estate and $261.7 million was secured by income producing, or non-owner-occupied real estate.

We generally originate commercial real estate loans with maximum terms of 10 years based on a 20-year amortization schedule, and loan-to-value ratios of up to 80% (or 75% for non-owner occupied) of the appraised value of the property. Our typical commercial real estate loan has an adjustable rate which generally adjusts every five years that is indexed to the five-year Federal Home Loan Bank of New York amortizing advance indications, plus a margin, subject to an interest rate floor. All of our commercial real estate loans are subject to our underwriting procedures and guidelines,

10

including requiring borrowers to generally have cash infusions of at least 10% of the loan amount or project cost and that properties with a loan in excess of $500,000 are subject to biennial inspections to verify if appropriate maintenance is being performed.

We consider a number of factors in originating commercial real estate loans. We evaluate the qualifications and financial condition of the borrower (including credit history), profitability and expertise, as well as the value and condition of the mortgaged property securing the loan. When evaluating the qualifications of the borrower, we consider the financial resources of the borrower, the borrower’s experience in owning or managing similar property and the borrower’s payment history with us and other financial institutions. In evaluating the property securing the loan, the factors we consider include the net operating income of the mortgaged property before debt service and depreciation, the debt service coverage ratio (the ratio of net operating income to debt service) to ensure that it is at least 120% of the monthly debt service and the ratio of the loan amount to the appraised value of the mortgaged property. Our commercial real estate loans are generally appraised by outside independent appraisers approved by the board of directors. Personal guarantees are often obtained from commercial real estate borrowers. The borrower’s financial information on such loans is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring periodic financial statement updates.

Loans secured by commercial real estate generally are larger than one- to four-family residential loans and involve greater credit risk. Commercial real estate loans often involve large loan balances to a single borrower or a group of related borrowers. Repayment of these loans depends to a large degree on the results of operations and management of the properties securing the loans or the businesses conducted on such property and may be affected to a greater extent by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy in general. As a result, the nature of these loans makes them more difficult for management to monitor and evaluate.

At June 30, 2020, multi-family real estate loans, which we consider a sub-category of commercial real estate loans, totaled $82.5 million, or 18.3% of our commercial real estate loan portfolio. Our multi-family real estate loans are generally secured by properties consisting of five to 100 rental units within our market area. We originate a variety of adjustable-rate multi-family residential real estate loans with terms and amortization periods generally of up to 25 years (or 30 years if the age of the collateral is less than 10 years old), which may include balloon payments. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans adjust generally every five years and generally are indexed to the comparable Federal Home Loan Bank of New York amortizing advance indications, plus a margin.

In underwriting multi-family residential real estate loans, we consider several factors, which include a debt service coverage ratio of at least 120%, the age and condition of the collateral, the financial resources and income level of the borrower and the borrower’s experience in owning or managing similar properties. Multi-family residential real estate loans have loan-to-value ratios of up to 80% of the appraised value of the property securing the loans. The borrower’s financial information on such loans is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring periodic financial statement updates.

If we foreclose on a multi-family real estate loan, the marketing and liquidation period to convert the real estate to cash can be a lengthy process with substantial holding costs. In addition, vacancies, deferred maintenance, repairs and market stigma can result in prospective buyers expecting sale price concessions to offset their real or perceived economic losses for the time it takes them to return the property to profitability.

Commercial and Industrial Loans. We originate commercial loans and lines of credit to a variety of small and medium sized businesses in our market area. These loans are generally secured by accounts receivable, inventory or other business assets, and we may support this collateral with liens on real property. At June 30, 2020, commercial and industrial loans totaled $237.2 million, or 20.3% of our total loan portfolio. Customers for these loans include professional businesses, family-owned businesses and not for profit businesses. As part of our relationship-driven focus, we generally require our commercial borrowers to maintain a deposit account with us, which improves our interest rate spread, margin and overall profitability.

Commercial lending products include revolving lines of credit and term loans. Our commercial lines of credit are typically made with adjustable interest rates, indexed to either the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or The Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, plus a margin, and we can demand repayment of the borrowed amount due at any time. Term loans are generally made with fixed interest rates, indexed to the comparable Federal Home Loan Bank of New York

11

amortizing advance indications, plus a margin, and are for terms up to 10 years. We focus our efforts on experienced, growing small- to medium-sized, privately-held companies with solid operating history and projected cash flow that operate in our market area.

When making commercial and industrial loans, we consider the financial statements of the borrower, our lending history with the borrower, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business and the value of the collateral, accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Depending on the collateral used to secure the loans, commercial and industrial loans are made in amounts generally of up to 75% of the value of the collateral securing the loan. We generally do not make unsecured commercial and industrial loans. Personal guarantees are often obtained from commercial and industrial borrowers.

Commercial and industrial loans also include loans originated under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), a $650 billion specialized low-interest loan program funded by the U.S. Treasury Department and administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”). In 2020, the Bank became a qualified SBA lender and was authorized to originate PPP loans.  An eligible business can generally apply for a PPP loan up to the greater of: 2.5 times its average monthly payroll costs, or $10.0 million.  PPP loans have an interest rate of 1.0%, a two-year or five-year loan term to maturity, and principal and interest payments deferred until the lender receives the applicable forgiven amount or ten months after the period the business has used such funds.  The SBA guarantees 100% of the PPP loans made to eligible borrowers.  The entire principal amount of the borrower’s PPP loan, including any accrued interest, is eligible to be reduced by the loan forgiveness amount under the PPP so long as employee and compensation levels of the business are maintained and 60% of the loan proceeds are used for payroll expenses, with the remaining 40% of the loan proceeds used for other qualifying expenses. Through June 30, 2020, the Bank has originated 624 PPP loans totaling $74.0 million.

Commercial and industrial loans generally have greater credit risk than residential real estate loans. Unlike residential real estate loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial and industrial loans generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Further, any collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value. We try to minimize these risks through our underwriting standards.

Commercial Construction Loans. We originate loans primarily to established local developers to finance the construction of commercial and multi-family properties or to acquire land for development of commercial and multi-family properties and to fund infrastructure improvements. We also provide construction loans primarily to local developers for the construction of one- to four-family residential developments. We also originate rehabilitation loans, enabling a borrower to partially or totally refurbish an existing structure, which are structured as construction loans and monitored in the same manner. At June 30, 2020, commercial construction loans totaled $91.8 million, or 7.8% of our total loan portfolio. Most of these loans are secured by properties located in our primary market area. We also had undrawn amounts on the commercial construction loans totaling $35.8 million at June 30, 2020.

Our commercial construction loans are generally interest-only loans that provide for the payment of interest during the construction phase, which is usually 12 to 24 months. The interest rate is generally a variable rate based on an index rate, typically The Wall Street Journal Prime Rate or LIBOR, plus a margin. At the end of the construction phase, the loan generally converts to a permanent commercial real estate mortgage loan, but in some cases it may be payable in full. However, our construction loans for the construction of one- to four-family residential developments do not convert to permanent residential real estate loans. Loans can be made with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 75% of the appraised market value upon completion of the project.

Before making a commitment to fund a commercial construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser. The construction phase is carefully monitored to minimize our risk. All construction projects must be completed in accordance with approved plans and approved by the municipality in which they are located. Loan proceeds are disbursed periodically in increments as construction progresses and as inspections by our approved inspectors warrant.

12

One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending. At June 30, 2020, $280.0 million, or 23.9%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of one- to four-family residential real estate loans (residential mortgages). In January 2016, we entered into a strategic partnership with Homestead Funding Corp., an unaffiliated mortgage banking company, to outsource our residential mortgage loan originations, underwriting and closing processes. As a result, we no longer process this type of loan in-house; and instead residential mortgage loans are processed through Homestead Funding Corp. Pioneer Bank has no ownership interest in this company or any common employees or directors. Homestead Funding Corp.’s staff receives the loan referral from us and then handles the underwriting, processing and closing of the loan. One- to four-family residential real estate loans are funded by Homestead Funding Corp. with an option for the Bank to purchase the loan upon funding. Through our relationship with Homestead Funding Corp., we can assist applicants in obtaining financing from the mortgage banking company, but we are not required to commit to purchase or portfolio any loan originated by Homestead Funding Corp. The decision whether to acquire each loan is made at the time the borrower’s application is submitted to Homestead Funding Corp. and must generally comply with underwriting guidelines that we have approved. However the Bank normally purchases such loans so long as they meet our underwriting standards. We may also purchase one- to four-family residential real estate loans from Homestead Funding Corp. to customers who were not referred to the mortgage banking company by the Bank.

For each purchased loan, we generally pay a fixed aggregate fee to Homestead Funding Corp. of 1.75% of the loan balance. This fixed aggregate fee is paid by us regardless of whether the loan was originated by the mortgage banking company directly or was due to our customer referral. We receive no fee for referring a customer to Homestead Funding Corp. For the year ended June 30, 2020, we purchased for our portfolio $46.8 million of loans originated through Homestead Funding Corp. As part of purchasing the loans, we typically acquire the servicing rights to the loans in order to best assist the customer relationship. The purchased loans are acquired from Homestead Funding Corp. without recourse or any right against the mortgage banking company to require the loans to be repurchased from us. The fixed aggregate fee we pay to acquire the loan and servicing rights are deferred as part of the loan balance and amortized over the contractual life of the loan under the interest method.

We purchase for our portfolio both fixed-rate single-family mortgage loans, as well as adjustable-rate single-family loans, with maturities up to 30 years. At June 30, 2020, our one- to four-family residential real estate loans consisted of $237.0 million of fixed-rate loans and $43.0 million of adjustable-rate loans. Most of these one- to four-family residential properties are located in our primary market area and many are underwritten according to Fannie Mae guidelines. We refer to loans that conform to the Fannie Mae guidelines as “conforming loans.”  We also purchase for our portfolio loans above the maximum conforming loan limits as established by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which at June 30, 2020 was $510,400 for single-family homes in our market area. Loans that exceed that limit are considered “jumbo loans.” At June 30, 2020, we had $52.9 million in jumbo loans.

Our purchased loans generally adhere to the following guidelines: (1) the loan is an owner-occupied one- to four-family residential real estate loan; (2) the loan does not provide for negative amortization of principal, such as “Option Arm” loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on the loan, resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan; (3) the loan is not an “interest only” mortgage loan; (4) the maximum loan term is 30 years; (5) the loan has a loan-to-value ratio up to a maximum of 90%, provided, however, that the loan-to-value ratio may exceed 90% as long as the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance; and (6) the borrower has a maximum debt-to-income ratio of 45%. We may, at our discretion, decide not to purchase a loan based on the income level of the borrower, the appraisal or any other information that is obtained in originating the loan. We do not purchase any “subprime loans” (loans that are made with low down-payments to borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments, bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity as evidenced by low credit scores or high debt-burden ratios) or Alt-A loans (defined as loans having less than full documentation).

Our purchased adjustable-rate residential real estate loans have interest rates that are fixed for an initial period ranging from one to 10 years. After the initial fixed period, the interest rate on adjustable-rate residential real estate loans is generally reset every year based upon a contractual spread or margin above the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities or LIBOR, adjusted to a constant maturity of one year, as published weekly by the Federal Reserve Board, subject to periodic and lifetime limitations on interest rate changes. All of our adjustable-rate residential real estate loans with initial

13

fixed-rate periods of one, five, seven or 10 years have initial and periodic caps of 2% on interest rate changes, with a current cap of 5% over the life of the loan.

Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. We offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit, both of which are secured by either first mortgages or second mortgages on owner occupied, one- to four-family residences. At June 30, 2020, outstanding home equity loans and equity lines of credit totaled $80.3 million, or 6.9% of total loans outstanding. At June 30, 2020, the unadvanced portion of home equity lines of credit totaled $46.5 million.

The underwriting standards used for home equity loans and home equity lines of credit include a title review, the recordation of a lien, a determination of the applicant’s ability to satisfy existing debt obligations and payments on the proposed loan, and the value of the collateral securing the loan. The loan-to-value ratio for our home equity loans and our lines of credit is generally limited to 90% when combined with the first security lien, if applicable. Home equity loans are offered with fixed rates of interest and with terms of up to 20 years. Our home equity lines of credit generally have 25-year terms and adjustable rates of interest, subject to a contractual floor, which are indexed to The Wall Street Journal Prime Rate.

Home equity loans and lines of credit secured by junior mortgages have greater risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans secured by first mortgages. At June 30, 2020, $30.1 million of our home equity loans and lines of credit were in a junior lien position, nearly all of which were second mortgages. We face the risk that the collateral will be insufficient to compensate us for loan losses and costs of foreclosure, after repayment of the senior mortgages, if applicable. When customers default on their loans, we attempt to foreclose on the property and resell the property as soon as possible to minimize foreclosure and carrying costs. However, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to compensate us for the amount of the unpaid loan and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the remaining balance from those customers.

Consumer Loans. We offer a limited range of consumer loans, principally to customers residing in our primary market area with other relationships with us and with acceptable credit ratings. Our consumer loans primarily consist of personal loans to the owners of certain commercial businesses who have commercial loans with us, and to a lesser extent, loans on automobiles and overdraft accounts. At June 30, 2020, consumer loans were $30.9 million, or 2.6% of our total loan portfolio.

Consumer loans may entail greater risk than residential real estate loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as motor vehicles. Repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and a small remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. Consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

Originations, Purchases, Participations and Sales of Loans

Lending activities are conducted by our loan personnel operating at our main and branch office locations. We also obtain referrals from existing or past customers and from accountants, real estate brokers, builders and attorneys. All loans that we originate or purchase are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures, which incorporate Fannie Mae underwriting guidelines to the extent applicable for residential loans. We originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. Our ability to originate fixed or adjustable-rate loans depends upon the relative customer demand for such loans, which is affected by current market interest rates as well as anticipated future market interest rates. Our loan origination and purchase activity may be adversely affected by a rising interest rate environment, which typically results in decreased loan demand.

We generally do not purchase whole loans from third parties other than the one- to four-family residential real estate loans described above. However, we sell participations in loans to other financial institutions in which we generally act as the lead lender. Through our loan participations, we and the other participating lenders generally share ratably in cash flows and any gains or losses that may result from a borrower’s noncompliance with the contractual terms of the loan.

14

We primarily participate in commercial real estate loans (including multi-family real estate loans), commercial and industrial loans and commercial construction loans. From time to time, we may purchase participation interests in loans where we are not the lead lender. We underwrite our participation interest in the loans that we purchase according to our own underwriting criteria and procedures. At June 30, 2020, the outstanding balances of our loan participations where we are not the lead lender totaled $49.4 million, of which $20.1 million were commercial or multi-family real estate loans, $19.6 million were commercial and industrial loans and $9.7 million were commercial construction loans.

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority

Pursuant to New York law, the aggregate amount of loans that Pioneer Bank is permitted to make to any one borrower or a group of related borrowers is generally limited to 15% of Pioneer Bank’s capital, surplus fund and undivided profits (25% if the amount in excess of 15% is secured by “readily marketable collateral”). At June 30, 2020, based on the 15% limitation, Pioneer Bank’s loans-to-one-borrower limit was approximately $27.8 million. On the same date, Pioneer Bank had no borrowers with outstanding balances in excess of this amount.

Our lending is subject to written underwriting standards and origination procedures. Decisions on residential loan applications are made on the basis of detailed applications submitted by the prospective borrower, credit histories that we obtain, and property valuations (consistent with our appraisal policy) prepared by outside independent licensed appraisers approved by our board of directors as well as internal evaluations, where permitted by regulations. The loan applications are designed primarily to determine the borrower’s ability to repay the requested loan, and the more significant items on the application are verified through use of credit reports, bank statements and tax returns.

Purchases of residential real estate loans up to $750,000 from Homestead Funding Corp. must be approved by one of the following officers: the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Retail Lending Officer or the Retail Loan Servicing Officer. Purchases of residential real estate loans greater than $750,000 must be approved by our board loan committee, which is comprised of all of the members of the board of directors.

For commercial loans, loans in excess of the commercial officers’ lending limits require approval from our staff loan committee, which is comprised of the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Credit Officer, Chief Banking Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Commercial Senior Vice Presidents, Commercial Vice Presidents and Commercial Loan Officers. The staff loan committee can approve individual loans of up to prescribed limits, depending on the type of the loan. Loans in excess of the Staff Loan Committee’s loan approval authority require the approval of our board of directors. Specifically, commercial real estate loans in excess of $6.0 million, commercial lines of credit in excess of $2.0 million and commercial loans with a new customer relationship in excess of $1.0 million must be approved by our board of directors.

Certain loans that involve policy exceptions must be approved by our board of directors.

We require title insurance on our mortgage loans as well as fire and extended coverage casualty insurance in amounts at least equal to the principal amount of the loan or the value of improvements on the property, depending on the type of loan.

Delinquencies and Asset Quality

Delinquency Procedures. System-generated late notices are mailed to a borrower after the late payment “grace period,” which is 15 days in the case of all loans secured by residential or commercial real estate and 15 days in the case of commercial and industrial and most consumer loans. A second notice will be mailed to a borrower if the loan remains past due after 30 days, and we attempt to contact the borrower and develop a plan of repayment. By the 90^th day of delinquency, we will issue a pre-foreclosure notice that will require the borrower to bring the loan current within 30 days in order to avoid the beginning of foreclosure proceedings for loans secured by residential real estate. Commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, commercial construction and consumer loans are managed on a loan by loan basis. Decisions to send a demand notice are based on conversations with the borrower to address the delinquency issues. A report of all loans 30 days or more past due is provided to the board of directors monthly.

15

Loans Past Due and Non-Performing Assets. Loans are reviewed on a regular basis. Management determines that a loan is impaired or non-performing when it is probable that at least a portion of the loan will not be collected in accordance with the original terms due to a deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower or the value of the underlying collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When a loan is determined to be impaired, the measurement of the loan in the allowance for loan losses is based on the present value of expected future cash flows, except that all collateral-dependent loans are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. Non-accrual loans are loans for which collectability is questionable and, therefore, interest on such loans will no longer be recognized on an accrual basis. All loans that become 90 days or more delinquent are placed on non-accrual status unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is fully reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received on a cash basis or cost recovery method.

When we acquire real estate as a result of foreclosure, the real estate is classified as real estate owned. The real estate owned is recorded at the lower of carrying amount or fair market value, less estimated costs to sell. Any excess of the recorded value of the loan over the fair market value of the property is charged against the allowance for loan losses, or, if the existing allowance is inadequate, charged to expense in the current period. After acquisition, all costs incurred in maintaining the property are expensed. Costs relating to the development and improvement of the property, however, are capitalized to the extent of estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell.

A loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring if, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we grant a concession to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. This usually includes a modification of loan terms, such as a reduction of the interest rate to below market terms, capitalizing past due interest or extending the maturity date and possibly a partial forgiveness of the principal amount due. Interest income on restructured loans is accrued after the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay under the restructured terms through a sustained period of repayment performance, which is generally six consecutive months. Refer to the Loan Deferrals Related to COVID-19 Pandemic section on page 19.

16

Delinquent Loans. The following tables set forth our loan delinquencies, including non-accrual loans, by type and amount at the dates indicated.

	At June 30,
	2020						2019						2018
	30‑59		60‑89		90 Days		30‑59		60‑89		90 Days		30‑59		60‑89		90 Days
	Days		Days		or More		Days		Days		or More		Days		Days		or More
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due
	(In thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	$	23	$	211	$	2,270	$	3	$	—	$	5,490	$	634	$	21	$	2,083
Commercial and industrial		—		26		1,551		—		—		42		1,346		45		659
Commercial construction		—		—		1,319		—		—		1,377		205		—		—
One- to four-family residential real estate		2,666		1,272		3,505		156		217		2,699		716		781		4,696
Home equity loans and lines of credit		1,217		1,259		1,383		476		318		988		205		385		1,183
Consumer		39		4		12		5		—		19		7		1		24
Total	$	3,945	$	2,772	$	10,040	$	640	$	535	$	10,615	$	3,113	$	1,233	$	8,645

	At June 30,
	2017						2016
	30‑59		60‑89		90 Days		30‑59		60‑89		90 Days
	Days		Days		or More		Days		Days		or More
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due
	(In thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	$	476	$	2,135	$	2,599	$	256	$	535	$	1,480
Commercial and industrial		61		—		7		—		5		59
Commercial construction		—		—		—		—		—		—
One- to four-family residential real estate		1,080		399		3,908		1,188		7		3,270
Home equity loans and lines of credit		462		58		1,028		205		212		1,192
Consumer		101		100		354		314		144		300
Total	$	2,180	$	2,692	$	7,896	$	1,963	$	903	$	6,301

Loans that were 30-59 days past due totaled $3.9 million at June 30, 2020, representing an increase from $640,000 at June 30, 2019 and loans that were 60-89 days past due totaled $2.8 million at June 30, 2020, an increase from $535,000 at June 30, 2019. Increases in the 30-59 and 60-89 day past due categories were primarily one-to four family residential real estate and home equity loans and lines of credit and were related to borrowers affected by COVID-19 who did not request loan deferment as of June 30, 2020.

17

Non-Performing Assets. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the dates indicated. Non-accrual loans include non-accruing troubled debt restructurings of zero, $185,000, $235,000, $2.1 million and, $768,000 as of June 30, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

	At June 30,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016
				(As Restated)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial real estate	$	3,364		$	5,618		$	2,236		$	2,375		$	1,386
Commercial and industrial		95			42			705			3			59
Commercial construction		1,319			1,377			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential real estate		4,807			4,028			3,834			3,325			2,874
Home equity loans and lines of credit		1,865			1,497			970			899			955
Consumer		210			—			—			—			—
Total non-accrual loans		11,660			12,562			7,745			6,602			5,274
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:
Commercial real estate		143			58			180			225			95
Commercial and industrial		1,455			—			—			4			—
Commercial construction		—			—			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential real estate		—			—			1,232			583			395
Home equity loans and lines of credit		—			41			330			129			237
Consumer		12			19			24			354			300
Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more		1,610			118			1,766			1,295			1,027
Real estate owned:
Commercial real estate		99			—			—			—			—
Commercial and industrial		—			—			—			—			—
Commercial construction		—			—			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential real estate		161			158			—			—			—
Home equity loans and lines of credit		—			—			72			—			—
Consumer		—			—			—			—			—
Total real estate owned		260			158			72			—			—
Total non-performing assets	$	13,530		$	12,838		$	9,583		$	7,897		$	6,301
Total accruing troubled debt restructured loans	$	2,200		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,418
Total non-performing loans to total loans		1.13	%		1.21	%		0.95	%		0.84	%		0.79	%
Total non-performing assets to total assets		0.89	%		0.87	%		0.75	%		0.70	%		0.63	%

For the year ended June 30, 2020, gross interest income that would have been recorded had our non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms was $639,000. Interest income recognized on such loans for the year ended June 30, 2020 was $228,000.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, non-accrual loans decreased primarily with respect to one commercial real estate loan totaling $3.2 million paying off, partially offset by an increase in other commercial real estate loans of $1.2 million, an increase in one-to four-family residential real estate loans totaling $779,000 and an increase in home equity loans and lines of credit totaling $368,000. At June 30, 2020, accruing commercial and industrial loans past due 90 days or more increased to $1.5 million from none at June 30, 2019 and was related to one loan that paid off in full subsequent to June 30, 2020.

18

Loan Deferrals Related to COVID-19 Pandemic.  The COVID-19 pandemic has created economic uncertainty resulting in increased unemployment as well as the mandated closure of nonessential businesses.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), in addition to providing financial assistance to both businesses and consumers, creates a forbearance program for federally-backed mortgage loans, protects borrowers from negative credit reporting due to loan accommodations related to the national emergency, and provides financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) related to troubled debt restructurings for a limited period of time to account for the effects of COVID-19. The Federal and New York State banking regulatory agencies have likewise issued guidance encouraging financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are, or may be, unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. That guidance, with concurrence of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and provisions of the CARES Act allow modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were generally current with their payments prior to any relief, to not be treated as troubled debt restructurings. Modifications may include payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment term, or other delays in payment. The Company has worked with its customers affected by COVID-19 and accommodated a significant amount of loan modifications across its loan portfolios. The Company anticipates that the number and amount of these modifications will decrease in the first fiscal quarter of 2021. To the extent that additional modifications meet the criteria previously described, such modifications are not expected to be classified as troubled debt restructurings.

19

In the table below, the commercial loan portfolio is presented by industry sector with loan deferrals as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the CARES Act, the deferrals listed below are not considered troubled debt restructurings.  The commercial loan industry sector balances are as of June 30, 2020 and deferrals are as of June 30, 2020 and September 22, 2020.

	Loans by Industry Sector				Deferrals as of June 30, 2020				Deferrals as of September 22, 2020
			Percentage of				Percentage of				Percentage of
	June 30, 2020		Commercial				Commercial				Commercial
	Balance		Loans		Balance		Loans		Balance		Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Loans:
Real estate
Residential real estate, including lessors of residential buildings	$	135,298	17.4	%	$	58,560	7.4	%	$	1,255	0.2	%
Non-residential real estate
Office		61,409	7.9	%		9,106	1.2	%		—	0.0	%
Retail		76,889	9.9	%		17,631	2.3	%		—	0.0	%
Industrial		25,927	3.3	%		1,109	0.1	%		—	0.0	%
Self-storage		6,913	0.9	%		402	0.1	%		—	0.0	%
Mixed use		26,427	3.4	%		10,045	1.3	%		—	0.0	%
Other real estate		31,103	4.0	%		5,609	0.7	%		513	0.1	%
Total real estate		363,966	46.8	%		102,462	13.1	%		1,768	0.3	%
Construction		123,466	15.7	%		9,580	1.2	%		—	0.0	%
Accommodation and food service		65,876	8.5	%		33,599	4.3	%		21,841	2.8	%
Retail trade		38,395	4.9	%		744	0.1	%		—	0.0	%
Wholesale trade		27,884	3.6	%		520	0.1	%		—	0.0	%
Finance and insurance		21,919	2.8	%		236	0.0	%		—	0.0	%
Healthcare and social assistance		26,083	3.3	%		6,434	0.9	%		—	0.0	%
Manufacturing		25,895	3.3	%		3,202	0.4	%		1,061	0.1	%
Arts, entertainment and recreation		13,739	1.8	%		5,700	0.7	%		346	0.0	%
Other		72,257	9.3	%		7,794	1.0	%		—	0.0	%
Total commercial loans	$	779,480	100.0	%	$	170,271	21.8	%	$	25,016	3.2	%

In the table below, the residential mortgage, home equity loans and lines, and consumer loan portfolios are presented with loan deferrals as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the CARES Act, the deferrals listed below are not considered troubled debt restructurings.  The loan portfolio balances are as of June 30, 2020 and deferrals are as of June 30, 2020 and September 22, 2020:

	Loans by Portfolio		Deferrals as of June 30, 2020				Deferrals as of September 22, 2020
	June 30, 2020				Percentage of				Percentage of
	Balance		Balance		Loan Category		Balance		Loan Category
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential mortgages	$	279,960	$	23,243	8.3	%	$	5,492	2.0	%
Home equity loans and lines		80,345		1,390	1.7	%		95	0.1	%
Consumer		30,860		2,737	8.9	%		1,228	4.0	%

On June 17, 2020, the New York legislature passed, and Governor Cuomo signed, new legislation which allows certain borrowers to seek forbearance on residential mortgage loans (including home equity loans) if financial hardship is

20

demonstrated as a result of COVID-19 for up to 180 days with an option for an additional 180 days. The Company anticipates that this new law could increase the amount of residential forbearances in future periods.

Classified Assets. Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans and other assets, such as debt and equity securities considered to be of lesser quality, as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss.”  An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.”  Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss allowance is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are designated as “special mention.”

When an insured institution classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, it may establish general allowances in an amount deemed prudent by management to cover probable accrued losses. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to cover probable accrued losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of that portion of the asset so classified or to charge-off such amount. An institution’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the regulatory authorities, which may require the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.

The following table sets forth our amounts of all classified loans and loans designated as special mention as of June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018. The classified loans total at June 30, 2020 includes $11.7 million of non-performing loans.

	At June 30,
	2020		2019		2018
	(In thousands)
Classification of Loans:
Substandard	$	31,234	$	16,517	$	10,016
Doubtful		53		—		659
Loss		—		—		—
Total Classified Loans	$	31,287	$	16,517	$	10,675
Special Mention	$	6,499	$	2,666	$	3,330

Total classified loans increased $14.8 million from $16.5 million at June 30, 2019 to $31.3 million at June 30, 2020 primarily with respect to an increase in substandard loans consisting of a loan relationship mainly consisting of commercial real estate loans totaling $8.6 million, a loan relationship mainly consisting of commercial real estate loans totaling $5.3 million, a loan relationship including two commercial and industrial loans of $1.3 million, a loan relationship including two commercial real estate loans totaling $1.2 million and a loan relationship including one commercial and industrial loan totaling $1.0 million.

Total special mention loans increased $3.8 million from $2.7 million at June 30, 2019 to $6.5 million at June 30, 2020 primarily with respect to two commercial and industrial loan relationships totaling $3.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively, partially offset by one loan relationship including two commercial real estate loans totaling $1.2 million migrated to substandard.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss

21

experience, specific impaired loans, and economic conditions. Allowances for loans that are individually classified as impaired are generally determined based on collateral values or the present value of estimated cash flows. Because of uncertainties associated with collateral values, future cash flows on impaired loans, and national and regional economic conditions it is reasonably possible that management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the related allowance may change materially in the near-term. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense and reduced by full and partial charge-offs, net of recoveries. Changes in the allowance relating to impaired loans are charged or credited to the provision for loan losses. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on various factors, including, but not limited to, historical loss experience, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, geographic and industry concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the borrower, results of internal loan reviews and other qualitative and quantitative factors which could affect potential credit losses.

In addition, the NYSDFS and the FDIC periodically review our allowance for loan losses and as a result of such reviews, we may have to materially adjust our allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs.

The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the years indicated.

	At or for the Years Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2018			2017			2016
	(As Restated)			(As Restated)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance at beginning of year	$	14,499		$	13,510		$	11,820		$	9,794		$	9,011
Provision for loan losses		6,790			18,150			1,970			2,395			1,180
Charge offs:
Commercial real estate		—			—			121			—			—
Commercial and industrial		5			16,886			53			38			169
Commercial construction		—			—			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential real estate		19			85			—			148			118
Home equity loans and lines of credit		—			47			17			104			57
Consumer		162			179			152			165			160
Total charge-offs		186			17,197			343			455			504
Recoveries:
Commercial real estate		—			—			—			—			10
Commercial and industrial		1,707			—			—			5			5
Commercial construction		—			—			—			—			—
One- to four-family residential real estate		—			—			—			—			—
Home equity loans and lines of credit		1			—			3			15			14
Consumer		40			36			60			66			78
Total recoveries		1,748			36			63			86			107
Net (recoveries) charge-offs		(1,562)			17,161			280			369			397
Allowance at end of year	$	22,851		$	14,499		$	13,510		$	11,820		$	9,794
Allowance to non-performing loans		172.20	%		114.35	%		142.05	%		149.68	%		155.44	%
Allowance to total loans outstanding at the end of the year		1.95	%		1.38	%		1.35	%		1.25	%		1.23	%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding during the year		(0.14)	%		1.66	%		0.03	%		0.04	%		0.05	%

During the year ended June 30, 2020 we increased our provision for loan losses due primarily to an increase in our qualitative loss reserve factors relating to local, national, and global economic conditions which have experienced

22

significant deterioration beginning late in the third fiscal quarter of 2020 and continuing into the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Due to the adverse economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our market area and our customers, the Company expects that its provision for loan losses will be elevated in the first fiscal quarter of 2021 and potentially beyond. The year ended June 30, 2020 also included a partial recovery in the amount of $1.7 million related to the charge-off of the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships in the third fiscal quarter of 2020. During the year ended June 30, 2019, our total charge-offs of $17.2 million included a $15.8 million charge-off related to the entire principal balance owed to the Bank related to the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships which were recognized in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the allowance for loan losses included specific reserves totaling $929,000, including $904,000 for two commercial and industrial loan relationships classified as impaired and $25,000 for one commercial real estate loan classified as impaired.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following tables set forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category and the percent of the allowance in each category to the total allocated allowance at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

	At June 30,
	2020						2019						2018
							(As Restated)
			Percent of						Percent of						Percent of
			Allowance		Percent of				Allowance		Percent of				Allowance		Percent of
			in Category		Loans in				in Category		Loans in				in Category		Loans in
	Allowance		to Total		Each		Allowance		to Total		Each		Allowance		to Total		Each
	for Loan		Allocated		Category to		for Loan		Allocated		Category to		for Loan		Allocated		Category to
	Losses		Allowance		Total Loans		Losses		Allowance		Total Loans		Losses		Allowance		Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	$	10,549	46.2	%	38.5	%	$	6,440	44.4	%	39.6	%	$	5,254	38.8	%	37.7	%
Commercial and industrial		4,885	21.4	%	20.3	%		3,293	22.7	%	15.9	%		3,977	29.5	%	19.5	%
Commercial construction		2,136	9.3	%	7.8	%		1,324	9.1	%	8.1	%		1,183	8.8	%	8.5	%
One- to four-family residential real estate		3,484	15.2	%	23.9	%		2,360	16.3	%	26.8	%		2,166	16.0	%	25.0	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit		1,303	5.7	%	6.9	%		813	5.6	%	7.6	%		770	5.7	%	7.8	%
Consumer		494	2.2	%	2.6	%		269	1.9	%	2.0	%		160	1.2	%	1.5	%
Total	$	22,851	100.0	%	100.0	%	$	14,499	100.0	%	100.0	%	$	13,510	100.0	%	100.0	%

	At June 30,
	2017						2016
			Percent of						Percent of
			Allowance						Allowance
			in Category		Percent of				in Category		Percent of
	Allowance		to Total		Loans in		Allowance		to Total		Loans in
	for Loan		Allocated		Category to		for Loan		Allocated		Category to
	Losses		Allowance		Total Loans		Losses		Allowance		Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial:
Commercial real estate	$	5,978	50.6	%	42.3	%	$	4,468	45.6	%	36.8	%
Commercial and industrial		2,565	21.7	%	19.1	%		1,795	18.3	%	15.5	%
Commercial construction		963	8.1	%	7.2	%		1,374	14.0	%	12.1	%
One- to four-family residential real estate		1,427	12.1	%	21.5	%		1,390	14.2	%	24.8	%
Home equity loans and lines of credit		740	6.3	%	8.1	%		625	6.4	%	8.7	%
Consumer		147	1.2	%	1.9	%		142	1.5	%	2.2	%
Total	$	11,820	100.0	%	100.0	%	$	9,794	100.0	%	100.0	%

23

Investment Activities

General. Our board of directors is responsible for approving and overseeing our investment policy. The investment policy is reviewed at least annually by the board of directors. This policy dictates that investment decisions be made based on the safety of the investment, liquidity requirements, potential returns and consistency with our interest rate risk management strategy. Authorized officers, as selected by the board of directors, oversee our investing activities and strategies. The authorized officers include our President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Vice President, Controller.

Our current investment policy authorizes us to invest in various types of investment securities and liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored enterprises, residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, municipal securities, deposits at the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, corporate debt securities (limited to no more than 5% of total assets and no more than 15% of our capital in any single issuer), common or preferred stock of a company trading on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index or if the company has $5.0 billion or greater in capitalization (limited to no more than 15% of our capital) and common stock of a company with over $2.0 billion, but less than $5.0 billion, in capitalization (limited to less than 10% of our investment portfolio). We do not engage in any investment hedging activities or trading activities, nor do we purchase any high-risk mortgage derivative products, corporate junk bonds, and certain types of structured notes.

Debt securities investment accounting guidance requires that, at the time of purchase, we designate a debt security as held to maturity, available for sale, or trading, depending on our ability and intent.

U.S. Governmental Securities. We maintain these investments, to the extent appropriate, for liquidity purposes, at zero risk weighting for capital purposes and as collateral for borrowings. At June 30, 2020, U.S. Government securities consisted primarily of U.S. Treasury securities.

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations. We invest in fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) issued by Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae. A CMO is a type of mortgage-backed security that creates separate pools of pass-through rates for different classes of bondholders with varying maturities, called tranches. The repayments from the pool of pass-through securities are used to retire the bonds in the order specified by the bonds’ prospectus.

Ginnie Mae is a government agency within the Department of Housing and Urban Development and is intended to help finance government-assisted housing programs. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration, or guaranteed by the Veterans Administration. The timely payment of principal and interest on Ginnie Mae securities is guaranteed by Ginnie Mae and backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Freddie Mac is a private corporation chartered by the U.S. Government. Freddie Mac issues participation certificates backed principally by conventional mortgage loans. Freddie Mac guarantees the timely payment of interest and the ultimate return of principal on participation certificates. Fannie Mae is a private corporation chartered by the U.S. government with a mandate to establish a secondary market for mortgage loans. Fannie Mae guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on Fannie Mae securities.

Municipal Securities. We invest in fixed-rate investment grade bonds issued primarily by municipalities in the State of New York.

Corporate Debt Securities. We invest in corporate debt securities issued primarily by companies in the financial sector.

Mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities. We invest in mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae and in other asset backed securities.

Equity Securities. Equity securities are comprised of both common and preferred stock of companies in the financial, energy, health care, information technology, consumer cyclicals, industrials, materials and utility sectors.

24

The following tables set forth the amortized cost and estimated fair value of our securities portfolio (excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of New York common stock) at the dates indicated.

	At June 30,
	2020				2019				2018
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	61,299	$	61,511	$	70,706	$	70,867	$	58,743	$	58,558
Mortgage-backed securities		78		78		109		112		146		150
Asset-backed securities		65		110		75		128		115		162
Collateralized mortgage obligations		430		684		525		889		692		1,079
Municipal obligations		13,381		13,385		14,666		14,699		19,264		19,263
Total	$	75,253	$	75,768	$	86,081	$	86,695	$	78,960	$	79,212

	At June 30,
	2020				2019				2018
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Securities held to maturity:
Municipal obligations	$	4,822	$	4,917	$	3,873	$	3,887	$	5,297	$	5,326
Corporate debt securities		2,000		2,000		—		—		—		—
Total	$	6,822	$	6,917	$	3,873	$	3,887	$	5,297	$	5,326

	At June 30,
	2020				2019				2018
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Equity Securities:
Preferred stock	$	6,007		5,056		6,007		5,040		6,007		5,749
Common stock		2,807	$	3,477	$	2,807	$	3,618	$	2,541	$	3,102
Total	$	8,814	$	8,533	$	8,814	$	8,658	$	8,548	$	8,851

Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the debt securities portfolio at June 30, 2020 are summarized in the following tables. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the effect of scheduled principal repayments, prepayments, or early redemptions that may occur.

					More than One Year				More than Five Years
	One Year or Less				through Five Years				through Ten Years				More than Ten Years				Total
			Weighted				Weighted				Weighted				Weighted						Weighted
	Amortized		Average		Amortized		Average		Amortized		Average		Amortized		Average		Amortized				Average
	Cost		Yield		Cost		Yield		Cost		Yield		Cost		Yield		Cost		Fair Value		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	46,016	1.63	%	$	15,283	0.18	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	61,299	$	61,511	1.27	%
Mortgage-backed securities		—	—	%		3	4.08	%		37	2.85	%		38	2.98	%		78		78	2.96	%
Asset-backed securities		—	—	%		—	—	%		—	—	%		65	3.37	%		65		110	3.37	%
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—	—	%		—	—	%		5	2.64	%		425	4.18	%		430		684	4.16	%
Municipal obligations		10,381	1.23	%		3,000	0.73	%		—	—	%		—	—	%		13,381		13,385	1.12	%
Total	$	56,397			$	18,286			$	42			$	528			$	75,253	$	75,768

25

					More than One Year				More than Five Years
	One Year or Less				through Five Years				through Ten Years				More than Ten Years				Total
			Weighted				Weighted				Weighted				Weighted						Weighted
	Amortized		Average		Amortized		Average		Amortized		Average		Amortized		Average		Amortized				Average
	Cost		Yield		Cost		Yield		Cost		Yield		Cost		Yield		Cost		Fair Value		Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities held to maturity:
Municipal obligations	$	3,636	2.34	%	$	1,076	2.38	%	$	110	5.49	%	$	—	—	%	$	4,822	$	4,917	2.42	%
Corporate debt securities		—	—	%		—	—	%		2,000	5.50	%		—	—	%		2,000		2,000	5.50	%
Total	$	3,636			$	1,076			$	2,110			$	—			$	6,822	$	6,917

Sources of Funds

General. Deposits have traditionally been our primary source of funds for our lending and investment activities. We also use borrowings, primarily Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances, to supplement cash flows, as needed. In addition, funds are derived from scheduled loan payments, investment maturities, loan sales, loan prepayments, retained earnings and income on interest earning assets. While scheduled loan payments and income on interest earning assets are relatively stable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions and levels of competition.

Deposit Accounts. The substantial majority of our deposits are from depositors who reside in our primary market area. We access deposit customers by offering a broad selection of deposit instruments for individuals, businesses and municipalities. We generally request commercial business borrowers to maintain their primary deposit accounts with us. At June 30, 2020, we had no brokered deposits, but our policy permits us to access such funds if additional liquidity is necessary. We offer deposit accounts to municipalities through our limited purpose subsidiary, Pioneer Commercial Bank, at June 30, 2020, we held $267.3 million in municipal deposits, which represented 21.0% of our deposits. We have developed a program for the retention and management of municipal deposits. These deposits are from local government entities such as towns, cities, school districts and other municipalities. We generally solicit their operating and savings accounts and not time-based deposits. Municipal deposit accounts are collateralized by Federal Home Loan Bank of New York letters of credit and by eligible government and government agency securities and municipal obligations. We believe that municipal deposits provide a low cost and stable source of funds and we intend to continue to solicit these types of funds.

Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time period that funds must remain on deposit, and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, our liquidity needs, profitability, and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit pricing on a monthly basis and continually review our deposit mix. Our deposit pricing strategy has generally been to offer competitive rates, but generally not the highest rates offered in the market, and to periodically offer special rates to attract deposits of a specific type or with a specific term.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and other prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts offered allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and responding to changes in consumer demand. Based on experience, we believe that our deposits are relatively stable. However, the ability to attract and maintain deposits and the rates paid on these deposits, has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.

26

The following tables set forth the distribution of total deposits by account type at the dates indicated.

	At June 30,
	2020						2019						2018
					Average						Average						Average
	Amount		Percent		Rate		Amount		Percent		Rate		Amount		Percent		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand accounts	$	437,536	34.4	%	—		$	357,523	26.9	%	—		$	345,048	30.0	%	—
Demand accounts		110,711	8.7	%	0.13	%		220,546	16.6	%	0.17	%		97,191	8.4	%	0.31	%
Savings accounts		258,581	20.4	%	0.05	%		250,856	18.8	%	0.05	%		244,050	21.2	%	0.05	%
Money market accounts		343,763	27.1	%	0.27	%		371,828	27.9	%	0.59	%		334,884	29.1	%	0.43	%
Certificates of deposit		119,559	9.4	%	1.61	%		130,565	9.8	%	1.77	%		129,089	11.2	%	1.29	%
Total	$	1,270,150	100.0	%	0.25	%	$	1,331,318	100.0	%	0.38	%	$	1,150,262	100.0	%	0.31	%

As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate amount of all our certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was approximately $57.1 million. The following table sets forth the maturity of these certificates as of June 30, 2020.

	At
	June 30, 2020
	(In thousands)
Maturity Period:
Three months or less	$	15,814
Over three through six months		11,174
Over six through twelve months		13,832
Over twelve months		16,243
Total	$	57,063

Borrowings. Our borrowings consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. At June 30, 2020, the Company pledged approximately $449.5 million of residential mortgage, home equity and commercial loans as collateral for borrowings and stand-by letters of credit at the FHLBNY. At June 30, 2020, the maximum amount of funding available from the FHLBNY was $375.9 million, of which none was utilized for borrowings and $222.5 million was utilized for irrevocable stand-by letters of credit issued to secure municipal deposits, resulting in $153.4 million of available borrowing capacity.

The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our borrowings at and for the periods shown:

	At or For the Year Ended June 30,
	2020			2019			2018
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance outstanding at end of period	$	—		$	—		$	—
Weighted average interest rate at the end of period		—	%		—	%		—	%
Maximum amount of borrowings outstanding at any month end during the period	$	20,000		$	30,000		$	5,000
Average balance outstanding during the period	$	4,433		$	4,027		$	151
Weighted average interest rate during the period		0.68	%		2.66	%		1.32	%

Subsidiaries

Pioneer Commercial Bank. Pioneer Commercial Bank is a New York-chartered limited-purpose commercial bank wholly owned by Pioneer Bank. Pioneer Bank incorporated Pioneer Commercial Bank in October 2004 in order to be able to accept municipal deposits. New York State law prohibits a savings bank from soliciting and servicing public funds (deposits of counties, cities, towns, school districts, etc.). The limited-purpose commercial bank subsidiary has enabled us to establish banking relationships with municipalities and other public entities throughout our market area. At

27

June 30, 2020, Pioneer Commercial Bank had $303.7 million in assets, consisting primarily of cash and municipal obligations. Pioneer Commercial Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation by the NYSDFS, as its chartering authority, and by the FDIC. All disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A relating to Pioneer Bank’s consolidated investments and deposits include the investments and deposits that are held by Pioneer Commercial Bank.

Anchor Agency, Inc. In 2016, Pioneer Bank acquired Anchor Agency, Inc., a New York corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Bank, which is a full-service insurance agency offering personal and commercial insurance, including homeowners, automobile and comprehensive business insurance. Anchor Agency, Inc. works with major national insurance companies as well as specialty markets. Anchor Agency, Inc. also offers employee benefits products and consulting services under the name Pioneer Benefits Consulting, including group health, dental, disability and life insurance products and defined contribution and defined benefit administration and human resource management services. Anchor Agency, Inc. operates from Pioneer Bank’s headquarters in Albany, New York. Expansion into the insurance and employee benefit services business has enabled Pioneer Bank to evolve from a traditional depository institution into a full-service financial services organization. All disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A relating to Pioneer Bank are consolidated to include the activities of Anchor Agency, Inc.

Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. Pioneer Financial Services, Inc., a New York corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Pioneer Bank, provides wealth management services to Pioneer Bank’s customers in partnership with LPL Financial, a registered broker dealer. It had $552.7 million of assets under management at June 30, 2020. Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. operates from Pioneer Bank’s headquarters in Albany, New York under the name Pioneer Wealth Management, and has licensed representatives available in our branch offices. Wealth management services provided by Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. to customers include investment advice, retirement income planning, estate planning, business succession and employer retirement planning. All disclosures in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A relating to Pioneer Bank are consolidated to include the activities of Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.

Personnel

As of June 30, 2020, we had 245 full-time employees and 22 part-time employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have good working relations with our employees.

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

As a New York-chartered savings bank, Pioneer Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation by the NYSDFS, as its chartering authority, and by the FDIC. Pioneer Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York and its deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. Pioneer Bank is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the NYSDFS concerning its activities and financial condition and must obtain regulatory approvals before entering into certain transactions, including mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial institutions. This regulatory structure is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies regarding classifying assets and establishing an adequate allowance for loan losses for regulatory purposes.

As a New York-chartered mutual holding company, Pioneer Bancorp, MHC is regulated and subject to examination by the NYSDFS and the Federal Reserve Board. As a bank holding company, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. also is required to comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board and the NYSDFS. It is required to file certain reports with the Federal Reserve Board and is subject to examination by and the enforcement authority of the Federal Reserve Board and the NYSDFS. Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. also is subject to the rules and regulations of the SEC under the federal securities laws.

Set forth below is a brief description of material regulatory requirements that are applicable to Pioneer Bank, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC. The description is limited to certain material aspects of certain statutes

28

and regulations that are addressed, and is not intended to be a complete list or description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Pioneer Bank, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC.

New York Banking Law and Supervision

Supervision and Enforcement Authority. Pioneer Bank, as a New York-chartered savings bank, is regulated and supervised by the NYSDFS. The NYSDFS is required to regularly examine each state-chartered bank. The approval of the NYSDFS is required to establish or close branches, to merge with another bank and to undertake many other activities. Any New York-chartered savings bank that does not operate according to the regulations, policies and directives of the NYSDFS may be subject to sanctions for non-compliance, including seizure of the property and business of the savings bank and suspension or revocation of its charter. The NYSDFS may, under certain circumstances, suspend or remove officers or directors who have violated the law, conducted the savings bank’s business in an unsafe or unsound manner or contrary to the depositors’ interests, or have been negligent in the performance of their duties. In addition, upon finding that a savings bank has engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice, the NYSDFS may issue an order to cease and desist and impose a fine on the savings bank. The NYSDFS also has the authority to appoint a receiver or conservator if it determines that the savings bank is conducting its business in an unsafe or unauthorized manner, and under certain other circumstances. New York consumer protection and civil rights statutes applicable to Pioneer Bank permit private individual and class action law suits, and provide for the rescission of consumer transactions, including loans, and the recovery of statutory and punitive damage and attorney’s fees in the case of certain violations of those statutes.

The powers that New York-chartered savings banks can exercise under these laws include the following:

Lending Activities. A New York-chartered savings bank may make a wide variety of mortgage loans including fixed-rate loans, adjustable-rate loans, participation loans, construction and development loans, condominium and co-operative loans, second mortgage loans and other types of loans that may be made according to applicable regulations. Commercial loans may be made to corporations and other commercial enterprises with or without security. Consumer and personal loans may also be made with or without security.

Investment Activities. In general, Pioneer Bank may invest in certain types of debt securities (including certain corporate debt securities, and obligations of federal, state, and local governments and agencies thereof), certain types of corporate equity securities, and certain other assets. However, this investment authority is subject to restrictions under federal law. See “—Federal Bank Regulation—Investment Activities” for such federal restrictions.

Dividends. Under New York Banking Law, Pioneer Bank may declare and pay dividends from its net profits, unless there is an impairment of capital. Additionally, the approval of the NYSDFS is required if the total of all dividends declared in a calendar year would exceed the total of its net profits for that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years, subject to certain adjustments provided for under applicable law.

Loans to Trustees, Directors and Executive Officers. Under applicable New York Banking Law, Pioneer Bank may not make a loan or other extension of credit directly or indirectly to any of its trustees or executive officers of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, except that Pioneer Bank may make a loan to an executive officer to become an owner of real property so long as the loan is secured by either (1) a first mortgage or cooperative apartment unit loan, which the property or apartment is to be occupied by the executive officer’s primary residence and is specifically approved in writing by the board of trustees; or (2) a deposit maintained by the executive officer with Pioneer Bank. Following the mutual holding company reorganization, the aforementioned lending restrictions would not apply to executive officers and directors of Pioneer Bank, so long as the Superintendent of the NYSDFS deems the restrictions inapplicable.

NYSDFS Cybersecurity Rule. Effective March 1, 2017, the NYSDFS requires New York chartered banks and other financial services companies to establish and maintain a cybersecurity program designed to protect consumers and ensure the safety and soundness of the bank. Specifically, NYSDFS requires regulated financial services company to establish a cybersecurity program; adopt a written cybersecurity policy; designate a Chief Information Security Officer responsible for implementing, overseeing and enforcing its new program and policy; and have policies and procedures designed to ensure the security of information systems and nonpublic information accessible to, or held by, third-parties, along with a variety of other requirements to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information systems.

29

Federal Bank Regulation

Recent Regulatory Reform. On May 24, 2018, The Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 (the “Regulatory Relief Act”) was enacted, which repeals or modifies certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and eases regulations on all but the largest banks. The Regulatory Relief Act’s provisions include, among other things: (1) exempting banks with less than $10 billion in assets from the ability-to-repay requirements for certain qualified residential mortgage loans held in portfolio; (2) not requiring appraisals for certain transactions valued at less than $400,000 in rural areas; (3) exempting banks that originate fewer than 500 open-end and 500 closed-end mortgages from HMDA’s expanded data disclosures; (4) clarifying that, subject to various conditions, reciprocal deposits of another depository institution obtained using a deposit broker through a deposit placement network for purposes of obtaining maximum deposit insurance would not be considered brokered deposits subject to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s brokered-deposit regulations; (5) raising eligibility for the 18-month exam cycle from $1 billion to banks with $3 billion in assets; (6) allowing qualifying federal savings banks to elect to operate with the same powers available to a national bank; and (7) simplifying capital calculations by requiring regulators to establish for institutions under $10 billion in assets a community bank leverage ratio (tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets) at a percentage not less than 8% and not greater than 10% that such institutions may elect to replace the generally applicable leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the capital ratio for determining well-capitalized status. The federal banking regulators jointly issued a final rule on October 29, 2019 providing that a bank with less than $10 billion in assets may elect to use the community bank leverage ratio capital framework whereby it will be considered well-capitalized so long as the community bank’s leverage ratio is greater than 9%.  The new rule took effect on January 1, 2020. Pursuant to the CARES Act, the federal banking agencies in August 2020 issued a final rule to set the community bank leverage ratio at 8% beginning in the second calendar quarter of 2020 through the end of 2020. Beginning in 2021, the community bank leverage ratio will increase to 8.5% for the calendar year. Community banks will have until Jan. 1, 2022, before the community bank leverage ratio requirement will return to 9%. Pioneer Bank elected not to be subject to this new definition when it became effective on January 1, 2020.

Supervision and Enforcement Authority. Pioneer Bank is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the FDIC as the insurer of its deposits. This regulatory structure is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors.

Pioneer Bank must file reports with the FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals before entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial institutions. There are periodic examinations by the FDIC to evaluate Pioneer Bank’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements.

The regulatory structure also gives the FDIC extensive discretion in connection with its supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of an adequate allowance for loan losses for regulatory purposes. The enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations, breaches of fiduciary duty and unsafe or unsound practices. The FDIC may also appoint itself as conservator or receiver for an insured bank under specified circumstances, including: (1) insolvency; (2) substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices; (3) existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business; (4) insufficient capital; or (5) the incurrence of losses that will deplete substantially all of the institution’s capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment without federal assistance.

Capital Requirements. Under FDIC regulations, Pioneer Bank is subject to a comprehensive capital framework for U.S. banking organizations that was established in July 2013 (the Basel III capital rules).

The capital standards require the maintenance of common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, 6% and 8%, respectively, and a leverage ratio of at least 4% Tier 1 capital. Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity and retained earnings. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and Additional Tier 1 capital. Additional Tier 1 capital generally includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated

30

subsidiaries. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital. Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt. Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”), up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Institutions that have not exercised the AOCI opt-out have AOCI incorporated into common equity Tier 1 capital (including unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale-securities). Pioneer Bank exercised the opt-out election regarding the treatment of AOCI. Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.

In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating risk-based capital ratios, a bank’s assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets (e.g., recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests), are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on perceived risks inherent in the type of asset. Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk. For example, a risk weight of 0% is assigned to cash and U.S. government securities, a risk weight of 50% is generally assigned to prudently underwritten first lien one- to four-family residential mortgages, a risk weight of 100% is assigned to commercial and consumer loans, a risk weight of 150% is assigned to certain past due loans and a risk weight of between 0% to 600% is assigned to permissible equity interests, depending on certain specified factors.

In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement began being phased in as of January 1, 2016 and was fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019.

The federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have issued a rule pursuant to the Regulatory Relief Act to establish for institutions with assets of less than $10 billion a “community bank leverage ratio” (the ratio of a bank’s tier 1 capital to average total consolidated assets) of 8% that such institutions may elect to use in lieu of the generally applicable leverage and risk-based capital requirements under Basel III. Pursuant to the CARES Act, the federal banking agencies in August 2020 issued a final rule to set the community bank leverage ratio at 8% beginning in the second calendar quarter of 2020 through the end of 2020. Beginning in 2021, the community bank leverage ratio will increase to 8.5% for the calendar year. Community banks will have until Jan. 1, 2022, before the community bank leverage ratio requirement will return to 9%. If an election to use the community bank leverage ratio capital framework is made, a bank with less than $10 billion in assets with capital exceeding 8% will be considered compliant with all applicable regulatory capital and leverage requirements, including the requirement to be “well capitalized.” As of June 30, 2020 Pioneer Bank elected not to be subject to this new definition.

The FDIC also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon determination that an institution’s capital level is, or is likely to become, inadequate in light of the particular circumstances. At June 30, 2020, Pioneer Bank exceeded each of its capital requirements.

Standards for Safety and Soundness. As required by statute, the federal banking agencies have adopted final regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines address internal controls and information systems, internal audit systems, credit underwriting, loan documentation, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. The agencies have also established standards for safeguarding customer information. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.

Investment Activities. All state-chartered savings banks insured by the FDIC are generally limited in their investment activities to principal and equity investments of the type and in the amount authorized for national banks,

31

notwithstanding state law, subject to certain exceptions. For example, state-chartered banks may, with FDIC approval, continue to exercise state authority to invest in common or preferred stocks listed on a national securities exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market and to invest in the shares of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The maximum permissible investment is 100% of Tier 1 capital, as specified by the FDIC’s regulations, or the maximum amount permitted by New York law, whichever is less.

In addition, the FDIC is authorized to permit state-chartered banks and savings banks to engage in state-authorized activities or investments not permissible for national banks (other than non-subsidiary equity investments) if they meet all applicable capital requirements and it is determined that such activities or investments do not pose a significant risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC has adopted procedures for institutions seeking approval to engage in such activities or investments. In addition, a nonmember bank may control a subsidiary that engages in activities as principal that would only be permitted for a national bank to conduct in a “financial subsidiary” if a bank meets specified conditions and deducts its investment in the subsidiary for regulatory capital purposes.

Interstate Banking and Branching. Federal law permits well capitalized and well managed bank holding companies to acquire banks in any state, subject to Federal Reserve Board approval, certain concentration limits and other specified conditions. Interstate mergers of banks are also authorized, subject to regulatory approval and other specified conditions. In addition, banks may establish de novo branches on an interstate basis provided that interstate branching is authorized by the law of the host state for the banks chartered by that state.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.

The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action framework under the Basel III capital rules. An institution is considered “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 6.5% or greater. An institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and a common equity Tier 1 ratio of 4.5% or greater. An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 4.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 4.5%. An institution is “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, a leverage ratio of less than 3.0% or a common equity Tier 1 ratio of less than 3.0%. An institution is “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets equal to or less than 2.0%. At June 30, 2020, Pioneer Bank was classified as a “well capitalized” institution.

At each successive lower capital category, an insured depository institution is subject to more restrictions and prohibitions, including restrictions on growth, interest rates paid on deposits, payment of dividends, and acceptance of brokered deposits. Furthermore, if an insured depository institution is classified in one of the undercapitalized categories, it is required to submit a capital restoration plan to the appropriate federal banking agency, and its holding company, if applicable, must guarantee the performance of that plan. Based upon its capital levels, a bank that is classified as well-capitalized, adequately capitalized, or undercapitalized may be treated as though it were in the next lower capital category if the appropriate federal banking agency, after notice and opportunity for hearing, determines that an unsafe or unsound condition, or an unsafe or unsound practice, warrants such treatment. An undercapitalized bank’s compliance with a capital restoration plan is required to be guaranteed by any company that controls the undercapitalized institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0% of the institution’s total assets when deemed undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve the status of adequately capitalized. If an “undercapitalized” bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.” “Significantly undercapitalized” banks must comply with one or more of a number of additional restrictions, including an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets, cease receipt of deposits from correspondent banks or dismiss directors or officers, and restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, compensation of executive officers and capital distributions by the parent holding company. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to additional measures including, subject

32

to a narrow exception, the appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after it is determined to be critically undercapitalized.

Transaction with Affiliates and Regulation W of the Federal Reserve Regulations. Transactions between banks and their affiliates are governed by federal law. Generally, Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act and the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation W limit the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10.0% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus, and with all transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20.0% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus. Section 23B applies to “covered transactions” as well as to certain other transactions and requires that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the institution or subsidiary as those provided to a non-affiliate. The term “covered transaction” includes making loans to, purchasing assets from, and issuing guarantees to, an affiliate, and other similar transactions. Section 23B transactions also include the bank’s providing services and selling assets to an affiliate. In addition, loans or other extensions of credit by a bank to an affiliate are required to be collateralized according to the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.

Sections 22(g) and (h) of the Federal Reserve Act place restrictions on loans to a bank’s insiders, i.e., executive officers, directors and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer and to a greater than 10.0% stockholder of a financial institution, and certain affiliated interests of these persons, together with all other outstanding loans to such persons and affiliated interests, may not exceed specified limits. Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act also requires that loans to directors, executive officers and principal stockholders be made on terms substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the institution’s unimpaired capital and surplus. Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional restrictions on loans to executive officers.

Federal Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Pioneer Bank is a member of the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is administered by the FDIC. Deposit accounts in Pioneer Bank are insured up to a maximum of $250,000 for each separately insured depositor. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule order or regulatory condition imposed in writing. We do not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of Pioneer Bank’s deposit insurance.

Privacy Regulations. FDIC regulations generally require that Pioneer Bank disclose its privacy policy, including identifying with whom it shares a customer’s “non-public personal information,” to customers at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter. In addition, Pioneer Bank is required to provide its customers with the ability to “opt-out” of having their personal information shared with unaffiliated third parties and to not disclose account numbers or access codes to non-affiliated third parties for marketing purposes.

Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, or CRA, as implemented by FDIC, a state non-member bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA requires the FDIC, in connection with its examination of each state non-member bank, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such institution, including applications to acquire branches and other financial institutions. The CRA requires the FDIC to provide a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. Pioneer Bank’s latest Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation CRA rating in October 2017 was “Satisfactory.”

New York has its own statutory counterpart to the CRA, which is applicable to Pioneer Bank. New York Banking law requires the NYSDFS to consider a bank’s record of performance under New York law in considering any application by the bank to establish a branch or other deposit-taking facility, to relocate an office or to merge or consolidate with or

33

acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of any other banking institution. Pioneer Bank’s most recent rating under New York law was “Satisfactory”.

Consumer Protection and Fair Lending Regulations. Pioneer Bank is subject to a variety of federal and New York statutes and regulations that are intended to protect consumers and prohibit discrimination in the granting of credit. These statutes and regulations provide for a range of sanctions for non-compliance with their terms, including imposition of administrative fines and remedial orders, and referral to the Attorney General for prosecution of a civil action for actual and punitive damages and injunctive relief. Certain of these statutes, including Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive acts and practices against consumers, authorize private individual and class action lawsuits and the award of actual, statutory and punitive damages and attorneys’ fees for certain types of violations. Federal laws also prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices against consumers, which can be enforced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the FDIC and state Attorneys General.

Federal Reserve System

Under federal law and regulations, Pioneer Bank is required to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure safe and sound banking practices. Regulation D, promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, imposes reserve requirements on all depository institutions, including Pioneer Bank, which maintain transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. In April 2020, due to a change in its approach to monetary policy due to COVID-19, the Federal Reserve Board announced an interim rule to amend Regulation D requirements and reduce reserve requirement ratios to zero.  The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that it has no plans to re-impose reserve requirements, but may do so in the future if conditions warrant. 

Federal Home Loan Bank System

Pioneer Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Banks provide a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. Pioneer Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. Pioneer Bank was in compliance with this requirement at June 30, 2020.

Holding Company Regulation

Federal Holding Company Regulation. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. are bank holding companies registered with the Federal Reserve Board and subject to regulations, examination, supervision and reporting requirements applicable to bank holding companies. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and their non-savings bank subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings bank.

A bank holding company is generally prohibited from engaging in non-banking activities, or acquiring direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting securities of any company engaged in non-banking activities. One of the principal exceptions to this prohibition is for activities the Federal Reserve Board determines to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of the principal activities that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be so closely related to banking are: (1) making or servicing loans; (2) performing certain data processing services; (3) providing discount brokerage services; (4) acting as fiduciary, investment or financial advisor; (5) leasing personal or real property; (6) making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare; and (7) acquiring a savings and loan association whose direct and indirect activities are limited to those permitted for bank holding companies.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 authorizes a bank holding company that meets specified conditions, including that its depository institution subsidiaries are “well capitalized” and “well managed,” to opt to become a “financial holding company.” A “financial holding company” may engage in a broader array of financial activities than permitted a typical bank holding company. Such activities can include insurance underwriting and investment banking. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. elected to become “financial holding companies.”

34

Capital. The Federal Reserve Board must establish for all bank and savings and loan holding companies minimum consolidated capital requirements that are as stringent as those required for their insured depository subsidiaries. Pursuant to the Regulatory Relief Act, bank holding companies with less than $3.0 billion in consolidated assets generally are not subject to the capital requirements unless otherwise advised by the Federal Reserve Board.

Dividends and Stock Repurchases. A bank holding company is generally required to give the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of then outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the Federal Reserve Board. There is an exception to this approval requirement for well-capitalized bank holding companies that meet certain other conditions.

The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement regarding capital distributions, including dividends, by bank holding companies. In general, the policy provides that dividends should be paid only from current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the bank holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The policy also requires that a bank holding company serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks by standing ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to those banks during periods of financial stress or adversity, and by maintaining the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks where necessary. Additionally, under the prompt corrective action laws, the ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

Waivers of Dividends by Pioneer Bancorp, MHC. Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. may pay dividends on its common stock to public stockholders. If it does, it is also required to pay the same dividends per share to Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, unless Pioneer Bancorp, MHC elects to waive the receipt of dividends. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC must receive the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board before it may waive the receipt of any dividends from Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. However, current Federal Reserve Board policy prohibits a mutual holding company that is regulated as a bank holding company, such as Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, from waiving the receipt of dividends paid by its subsidiary holding company. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board has issued an interim final rule applicable to federally-chartered mutual holding companies, stating that it will not object to dividend waivers under certain circumstances, provided (1) the mutual holding company’s members have approved the dividend waivers by a majority of eligible votes, (2) each officer or trustee of the mutual holding company and mid-tier stock holding company, and any tax-qualified or non-tax qualified stock benefit plan in which such individual participates that holds any shares of stock to which the waiver would apply waives the right to receive any dividends declared, or the dividend waivers are approved by a majority of the entire board of trustees of the mutual holding company with any officer or trustee of the mutual holding company having any direct or indirect ownership interest in the common stock of the subsidiary mid-tier holding company abstaining from the board vote, and (3) any dividends waived by the mutual holding company are considered in determining an appropriate exchange ratio in the event of a conversion of the mutual holding company to stock form.

Because of the foregoing Federal Reserve Board restrictions on the ability of a mutual holding company, such as Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, to waive the receipt of dividends declared by its subsidiary mid-tier stock holding company, it is unlikely that Pioneer Bancorp, MHC will be able to waive the receipt of any dividends declared by Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. Therefore, unless Federal Reserve Board regulations or policy change by allowing Pioneer Bancorp, MHC to waive the receipt of dividends declared by Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. without diluting minority stockholders, it is unlikely that Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. will pay any dividends.

Possible Conversion of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC to Stock Form. In the future, Pioneer Bancorp, MHC may convert from the mutual to capital stock form of ownership, in a transaction commonly referred to as a “second-step conversion.”  In a second-step conversion, depositors of Pioneer Bank would have subscription rights to purchase common stock of the fully-converted Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and the public stockholders of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. would be entitled to exchange their shares of common stock for an equal percentage of shares of the fully-converted Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.,

35

subject to adjustment if required by the Federal Reserve Board, to reflect any dividends waived by Pioneer Bancorp, MHC or assets owned by Pioneer Bancorp, MHC.

The board of trustees of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC has no current plans to undertake a second-step conversion transaction. Any second-step conversion transaction would require the approval of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. common stock (excluding shares held by Pioneer Bancorp, MHC) and the approval of depositors of Pioneer Bank. Stockholders will not be able to force a second-step conversion without the consent of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since a second-step conversion also requires the approval of a majority of all of the outstanding common stock of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., which can only be achieved if Pioneer Bancorp, MHC votes to approve the second-step conversion.

Acquisition. Federal laws and regulations provide that no company may acquire control of a bank holding company, such as Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., without the prior non-objection or approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Control, as defined under the applicable regulations, means the power, directly or indirectly, to direct the management or policies of the company or to vote 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the company. Acquisition of 10% or more of any class of a bank holding company’s voting securities constitutes a rebuttable presumption of control under certain circumstances, including where, as is the case with Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., the issuer has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any company that acquires such control becomes a “bank holding company” subject to registration, examination and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board.

New York Holding Company Regulation. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. are subject to regulation under New York banking law. Among other requirements, Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. must receive the approval of the NYSDFS before acquiring 10% or more of the voting stock of another banking institution, or to otherwise acquire a banking institution by merger or purchase.

Federal Securities Laws

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock is registered with the SEC. Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of shares of common stock issued in the offering does not cover the resale of those shares. Shares of common stock purchased by persons who are not affiliates of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. may be resold without registration. Shares purchased by an affiliate of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. will be subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. If Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. meets the current public information requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, each affiliate that complies with the other conditions of Rule 144, including those that require the affiliate’s sale to be aggregated with those of other persons, would be able to sell in the public market, without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any three-month period, the greater of 1% of the outstanding shares of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., or the average weekly volume of trading in the shares during the preceding four calendar weeks.

Emerging Growth Company Status. Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), a company with total annual gross revenues of less than $1.07 billion during its most recently completed fiscal year qualifies as an “emerging growth company.”  Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. qualifies as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act.

An “emerging growth company” may choose not to hold stockholder votes to approve annual executive compensation (more frequently referred to as “say-on-pay” votes) or executive compensation payable in connection with a merger (more frequently referred to as “say-on-golden parachute” votes). An emerging growth company also is not subject to the requirement that its auditors attest to the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting, and can provide scaled disclosure regarding executive compensation. Finally, an emerging growth company may elect to comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same manner as a private company, but must make such election when the company is first required to file a registration statement. Such an election is irrevocable

36

during the period a company is an emerging growth company. Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. has elected to comply with new or amended accounting pronouncements in the same manner as a private company.

A company loses emerging growth company status on the earlier of: (1) the last day of the fiscal year of the company during which it had total annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more; (2) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities of the company pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933; (3) the date on which such company has, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt; or (4) the date on which such company is deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under Securities and Exchange Commission regulations (generally, a “large accelerated filer” is defined as a corporation with at least $700 million of voting and non-voting equity held by non-affiliates).

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is intended to improve corporate responsibility, provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. has policies, procedures and systems designed to comply with these regulations, and Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. will review and document such policies, procedures and systems to ensure continued compliance with these regulations.

TAXATION

Federal Taxation

General. The Company and subsidiaries are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize material federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and Pioneer Bank.

Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, the Company currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31 for filing its federal income tax returns.

Net Operating Loss Carryovers. Effective with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, net operating loss carrybacks are no longer permitted, and net operating losses are allowed to be carried forward indefinitely. Net operating loss carryforwards arising from tax years beginning after January 1, 2018 are limited to offset a maximum of 80% of a future year’s taxable income. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES) was enacted.  The CARES Act includes several provisions that impact the Company, including net operating losses.  Under the Cares Act, the current net operating loss rules put in place under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were temporarily revised to allow losses arising in 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be carried back five years.

Capital Loss Carryovers. Generally, a financial institution may carry back capital losses to the preceding three taxable years and forward to the succeeding five taxable years. Any capital loss carryback or carryover is treated as a short-term capital loss for the year to which it is carried. As such, it is grouped with any other capital losses for the year to which carried and is used to offset any capital gains. Any loss remaining after the five year carryover period that has not been deducted is no longer deductible. At June 30, 2020, Pioneer Bank had no capital loss carryovers.

Corporate Dividends. We may generally exclude from our income 100% of dividends received from Pioneer Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations.

Audit of Tax Returns. Pioneer Bank’s federal income tax returns and New York State income tax returns have not been audited in the last three years.

37

State Taxation

In March 2014, tax legislation was enacted that changed the manner in which financial institutions and their affiliates are taxed in New York State. Taxable income is apportioned to New York State based on the location of the taxpayer’s customers, with special rules for income from certain financial transactions. The location of the taxpayer’s offices and branches are not relevant to the determination of income apportioned to New York State. The statutory tax rate is currently 6.5%. An alternative tax on apportioned capital, capped at $5.0 million for a tax year, is imposed to the extent that it exceeds the tax on apportioned income. The New York State alternative tax rate is 0.05% for 2019, 0.025% for 2020 and completely phased out as of January 1, 2021. Qualified community banks and thrift institutions that maintain a qualified loan portfolio are entitled to a specially computed modification that reduces the income taxable to New York State.

ITEM 1A.Risk Factors

Risks Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic

The economic impact of the COVID-19 outbreak could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In December 2019, a coronavirus (COVID-19) was reported in China, and, in March 2020, the World Health Organization declared it a pandemic. On March 12, 2020 the President of the United States declared the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States a national emergency.  The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant economic dislocation in the United States as many state and local governments have ordered non-essential businesses to close and residents to shelter in place at home, including the State of New York. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020, some of these restrictions were removed and some non-essential businesses were allowed to re-open in a limited capacity, adhering to social distancing and disinfection guidelines. It is not clear when the pandemic will abate. This crisis has resulted in an unprecedented slow-down in economic activity and a related increase in unemployment as the U.S. economy entered a recession. Since the COVID-19 outbreak, millions of people have filed claims for unemployment, and stock markets have experienced extreme volatility with bank stocks significantly declining in value. In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the Federal Reserve Board has reduced the benchmark Fed funds rate to a target range of 0% to 0.25%, and the yields on 10 and 30-year treasury notes have declined to historic lows.  The State of New York and certain Federal agencies are requiring lenders to provide forbearance and other relief to borrowers (e.g., waiving late payment and other fees). Recent New York legislation allows certain borrowers to seek forbearance on residential mortgage loans (including home equity loans) if financial hardship is demonstrated as a result of COVID-19 for up to 180 days with an option for an additional 180 days. The federal banking agencies have encouraged financial institutions to prudently work with affected borrowers and recently passed legislation has provided relief from reporting loan classifications due to modifications related to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Additionally, we are a participating lender in the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) under the CARES Act.  Under the PPP, small businesses may, subject to certain regulatory requirements, obtain low interest (1%), government-guaranteed SBA loans. These loans may be forgiven if the funds are used for designated expenses and meet certain designated requirements. If our borrowers fail to qualify for PPP loan forgiveness, or if the PPP loans are not fully guaranteed by the US government, we risk holding loans with unfavorable terms and may experience losses related to our PPP loans.  

Finally, the spread of the coronavirus has caused us to modify our business practices, including employee travel, employee work locations, and cancellation of physical participation in meetings, events and conferences.  We have many employees working remotely and we may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, customers and business partners.

Given the ongoing and dynamic nature of the circumstances, we cannot predict the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our business and on our prospects. The extent of such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including when the pandemic can be controlled and abated and when and how the economy may be fully reopened.  As the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related adverse economic consequences, we could be subject

38

to any of the following risks, any of which could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, prospects and results of operations:

● demand for our products and services may decline, making it difficult to grow assets and income;

● if the economy is unable to fully reopen, and high levels of unemployment continue for an extended period of time, loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures may increase, resulting in increased charges and reduced income;

● collateral for loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, which could cause loan losses to increase;

● our allowance for loan losses may have to be increased if borrowers experience financial difficulties beyond forbearance periods or if the federal government fails to guarantee or forgive our customers’ PPP loans, which will adversely affect our net income;

● the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments to us;

● as the result of the decline in the Federal Reserve Board’s target federal funds rate to near 0%, the yield on our assets may decline to a greater extent than the decline in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, reducing our net interest margin and spread and reducing net income;

● our wealth management revenues may decline with continuing market turmoil;

● our PPP customers may fail to qualify for PPP loan forgiveness, or we may experience other uncertainties or losses related to our PPP loans;

● our cyber security risks are increased as the result of an increase in the number of employees working remotely;

● we rely on third party vendors for certain services and the unavailability of a critical service due to the COVID-19 outbreak could have an adverse effect on us; and

● FDIC premiums may increase if the agency experiences additional resolution costs.

Moreover, our future success and profitability substantially depends on the management skills of our executive officers and directors, many of whom have held officer and director positions with us for many years. The unanticipated loss or unavailability of key employees due to the outbreak could harm our ability to operate our business or execute our business strategy. We may not be successful in finding and integrating suitable successors in the event of key employee loss or unavailability.

Any one or a combination of the factors identified above could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and prospects.

COVID-19 has adversely impacted certain industries in which our customers operate and may impair their ability to fulfill their obligations to us. Further, the spread of the outbreak has disrupted banking and other financial activity in the areas in which we operate, and has lead to an economic recession and severe disruptions in the U.S. economy, and could potentially create business continuity issues for us.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major economic disruption and volatility as a result of governmental mandates (e.g., “shelter in place” mandates, business and school closures) and voluntary changes in consumer behavior (e.g., “social distancing”). In response to the shelter in place orders, currently many of our employees continue to work remotely to enable us to continue to provide banking services to our customers. Heightened cybersecurity, information security and operational risks may result from these work-from-home arrangements. We also could be adversely affected if key personnel or a significant number of employees were to become unavailable due to the effects and restrictions of

39

the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, we rely upon our third-party vendors to conduct business and to process, record, and monitor transactions. If any of these vendors are unable to continue to provide us with these services, it could negatively impact our ability to serve our customers. Although we have business continuity plans and other safeguards in place, there is no assurance that such plans and safeguards will be effective.

There is pervasive uncertainty surrounding the future economic conditions that will emerge in the months and years following the pandemic. As a result, management is confronted with a significant and unfamiliar degree of uncertainty in estimating the impact of the pandemic on our credit quality, revenues and asset values. To date, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in declines in loan demand and loan originations, market interest rates and negatively impacted many of our business and consumer borrower’s ability to make their loan payments. Because the length of the pandemic and the efficacy of the measures being put in place to address its economic consequences are unknown, including recent reductions in the targeted federal funds rate, we expect our net interest income and net interest margin to be adversely affected. Many of our borrowers face unemployment, and certain businesses are at risk of insolvency as revenues declined precipitously, and the impact of the national and local recovery measures abate. We cannot predict whether businesses will ultimately reopen as there is a significant level of uncertainty regarding the level of economic activity that will return to our region over time.  We also cannot predict the impact of governmental assistance, the speed of economic recovery, the resurgence of COVID-19 in subsequent seasons and changes to demographic and social norms that will take place and the possible impact these items may have on our business.

The impact of the pandemic is expected to continue to adversely affect us during fiscal 2021 and beyond as the ability of many of our customers to make loan payments has been significantly affected. Although the Bank has made estimates of credit losses related to the pandemic, such estimates involve significant judgment and are made in the context of significant uncertainty as to the impact that the pandemic will have on the credit quality of our loan portfolio. The extent of the economic impact of the pandemic is also impossible to determine with certainty at this time as it is partly dependent on a still evolving virus. Accordingly, estimates of the pandemic’s effect on credit losses could change over time as additional information becomes available. If our estimates are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses in our loan portfolio. Any increases in such allowances will result in a decrease in net income and, most likely, capital, and may have a material negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, the Bank is providing assistance to commercial business and consumer loan borrowers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, by offering short-term modifications such as interest only payments, payment deferrals, loan re-amortization, and increases of lines of credit. Notwithstanding these modifications, these borrowers may not be able to resume making full payments on their loans once the COVID-19 pandemic is resolved. If the economic disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic continues or worsens, it may result in increased loan delinquencies, adversely classified loans and loan charge-offs. As a result, our allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio, which would cause our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition to be adversely affected.

Further, given the widespread level of disruption to commercial and consumer activity due to COVID-19, the Company decided to adopt certain measures to assist its deposit customers in affected areas. These measures include the waiver of certain fees and charges, such as early withdrawal penalties for certificates of deposit and overdrafts, and while important to assist our customers, these concessions will negatively impact our results of operations.

In accordance with GAAP, we record assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their fair value with the excess of the purchase consideration over the net assets acquired resulting in the recognition of goodwill. If adverse economic conditions or the recent decrease in our stock price and market capitalization as a result of the pandemic were to be deemed sustained rather than temporary, it may significantly affect the fair value of our goodwill and may trigger impairment charges. Any impairment charge could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

The U.S. economy is experiencing a recession, and we anticipate our business to be materially and adversely affected by a prolonged recession.

40

Risks Related to Our Business

The Restatement of certain of our historical consolidated financial statements may have an adverse effect on us.

Management is assessing the effect of the Restatement on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and its disclosure controls and procedures, all as described in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Because of the inherent limitations of any control system, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis, or at all. As with any company, if we are unable to provide reliable and timely financial reports in the future, our business and reputation may be harmed. As with any company, restated financial statements and issues related to internal control over financial reporting may render us unable to meet our reporting obligations, negatively affect investor and customer confidence in us and the accuracy of our financial statements and disclosures, or result in adverse publicity and concerns from investors and customers, any of which could have a negative effect on the price of our common stock, subject us to regulatory investigations and penalties, and have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

We intend to continue our remediation activities. In doing so, we will continue to incur expenses and expend management’s time on remediation-related issues. However, as with any company, we cannot guarantee that the steps that we have taken or will take will be successful. If we are unable to successfully complete our remediation efforts or favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, our operating results, financial position, ability to accurately report our financial results and timely file our SEC reports, and our stock price could be adversely affected.

As a result of the Restatement, we may become subject to a number of significant risks, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including: we may be subject to potential civil litigation, including shareholder class action lawsuits and derivative claims made on behalf of us, and regulatory proceedings or actions, the defense of which may require us to devote significant management attention and to incur significant legal expense and which litigation, proceedings or actions, if decided against us, could require us to pay substantial judgments, settlements or other penalties.

Our loan portfolio consists of a high percentage of loans secured by commercial real estate. These loans carry a greater credit risk than loans secured by one- to four-family properties.

Our loan portfolio includes commercial real estate loans, primarily loans secured by office buildings, industrial facilities, retail facilities, multi-family properties and other commercial properties. At June 30, 2020, our commercial real estate loans totaled $450.5 million, or 38.5%, of our total loan portfolio. Our commercial real estate loans expose us to greater risk of nonpayment and loss than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation and income stream of the borrowers. If we foreclose on these loans, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for a one- to four-family residential property because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral. In addition, commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one- to four-family residential loans. Accordingly, charge-offs on commercial real estate loans may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with our residential or consumer loan portfolios. An unexpected adverse development on one or more of these types of loans can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan. In addition, the physical condition of non-owner occupied properties may be below that of owner-occupied properties due to lax property maintenance standards, which have a negative impact on the value of the collateral properties. As our commercial real estate loans increase, the corresponding risks and potential for losses from these loans may also increase, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

41

A large portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial and industrial loans secured by accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other business assets, the deterioration in value of which could increase the potential for future losses.

At June 30, 2020, $237.2 million, or 20.3% of our total loan portfolio, was comprised of commercial and industrial loans and lines of credit to a variety of small and medium-sized businesses in our market area collateralized by general business assets including, among other things, accounts receivable and inventory, and we may augment this collateral with additional liens on real property. These commercial and industrial loans are typically larger in amount than loans to individuals and, therefore, have the potential for larger losses on a per loan basis. Additionally, the repayment of commercial and industrial loans is subject to the ongoing business operations of the borrower. The collateral securing such loans generally includes moveable property such as inventory, which may decline in value more rapidly than we anticipate, or may be difficult to market and sell, exposing us to increased credit risk. Significant adverse changes in the economy or local market conditions in which our commercial lending customers operate or individual business activities of our commercial customers could cause rapid declines in loan collectability and the values associated with general business assets, resulting in inadequate collateral coverage that may expose us to credit losses and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We make and hold in our portfolio commercial construction loans, which are considered to have greater credit risk than residential loans made by financial institutions.

We originate and purchase commercial construction loans primarily to local developers to finance the construction of commercial and multi-family properties or to acquire land for development of commercial and multi-family properties and to finance infrastructure improvements. We also provide commercial construction loans to local developers for the construction of one- to four-family residential developments, and originate rehabilitation loans, enabling the borrower to partially or totally refurbish an existing structure. At June 30, 2020, commercial construction loans were $91.8 million, or 7.8% of our total loan portfolio. We also had undrawn amounts on the commercial construction loans totaling $35.8 million at June 30, 2020. Commercial construction loans are considered more risky than residential mortgage loans. The primary credit risks associated with construction lending are underwriting risks, project risks and market risks. Project risks include cost overruns, borrower credit risk, project completion risk, general contractor credit risk, and environmental and other hazard risks. Market risks are risks associated with the sale of the completed project. They include affordability risk, which means the risk of affordability of financing by borrowers, product design risk, and risks posed by competing projects.

We have a significant number of loans secured by real estate, and a downturn in the local real estate market could negatively impact our profitability.

At June 30, 2020, approximately $902.6 million, or 77.1%, of our total loan portfolio was secured by real estate, most of which is located in our primary lending market, the Capital Region of New York and surrounding markets. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused the U.S. economy to enter a recession. Unemployment in the Capital Region of New York was at 10.4% as of June 30, 2020. Future declines in the real estate values in the Capital Region of New York and surrounding markets as a result of the recession could significantly impair the value of the particular collateral securing our loans and our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure for an amount necessary to satisfy the borrower’s obligations to us. This could require increasing our allowance for loan losses to address the decrease in the value of the real estate securing our loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.

Unlike larger financial institutions that are more geographically diversified, our profitability depends primarily on the general economic conditions in our primary market area. Local economic conditions have a significant impact on our residential real estate, commercial real estate, construction, commercial and industrial and consumer lending, including, the ability of borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans.

Economic conditions in our primary market have recently been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and further deterioration in economic conditions could result in the following consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations:

42

● demand for our products and services may decrease;

● loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures may increase;

● collateral for loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, thereby reducing customers’ future borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with existing loans;

● the value of our securities portfolio may decrease; and

● the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decrease, thereby impairing their ability to honor commitments made to us.

Moreover, a significant decline in general economic conditions, caused by inflation, acts of terrorism, an outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic calamities or other factors beyond our control could further impact these local economic conditions and could further negatively affect our financial performance. In addition, deflationary pressures, while possibly lowering our operating costs, could have a significant negative effect on our borrowers, especially our business borrowers, and the values of underlying collateral securing loans, which could negatively affect our financial performance.

We have experienced fraudulent activities that will adversely impact our financial performance and results of operations.

We are susceptible to fraudulent activity committed against us or our clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation. We have experienced fraudulent activities that are adversely impacting our current financial performance and results of operations. See Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Potentially Fraudulent Activity,” for details. We expect these activities to continue to negatively impact our financial performance and results of operations. We are involved in numerous legal and other proceedings as a result of the apparent fraud. See Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings,” for details. In addition, we are subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection with the origination of loans, ACH transactions, wire transactions, ATM transactions, checking transactions, and debit cards that we have issued to our customers and through our online banking portals. There can be no assurance that such incidents or losses will not occur again or that such acts will be detected in a timely manner.

We maintain a system of internal controls and other measures to mitigate against such risks, including data processing system failures and errors, and customer fraud. If we fail to prevent or detect any such occurrence, or if any resulting loss is not insured, exceeds applicable insurance limits or if the insurance companies dispute or deny coverage, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. With respect to the fraud described in Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Potentially Fraudulent Activity,” and the proceedings described in Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings,” our insurance carriers have (a) denied coverage on the claims, (b) sought additional information from the Company in order to further evaluate coverage or (c) not responded to our requests for coverage. It is possible that our insurance may not cover any claims or costs related to the proceedings described in these two sections. We cannot give any assurance regarding the recovery, if any, we may obtain from our insurance carriers.

The Company is a defendant in a variety of litigation and other actions, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company and Pioneer Bank are involved in a variety of litigation and other proceedings. See Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings,” and Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Potentially Fraudulent Activity,” for details. We are prosecuting and defending these lawsuits and other proceedings vigorously, and management believes that the Bank has substantial defenses to the claims that have been asserted. The ultimate outcome of any such proceedings, cannot be predicted with any certainty. It also remains possible that other parties will pursue additional claims against the Bank as a result of the Bank’s dealings with certain of the Mann Entities

43

or as a result of the actions taken by the Pioneer Parties. The Company’s and the Bank’s legal fees, costs and expenses related to these actions are significant and are expected to continue being significant. In addition, costs associated with potentially prosecuting, litigating or settling any litigation, satisfying any adverse judgments, if any, or other proceedings, could be significant. These future costs, settlements, judgments, sanctions or other expenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, it is inherently difficult to assess the outcome of these matters, and we may not prevail in such proceedings or litigation. Any such legal or regulatory actions will subject us to substantial compensatory or punitive damages, significant fines, sanctions, penalties, obligations to change our business practices or other requirements resulting in increased expenses, diminished income and damage to our reputation. Our involvement in any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise, and even if the matters are ultimately determined in our favor, could also cause significant harm to our reputation and divert management attention from the operation of our business.  In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, we cannot predict the eventual outcome of the pending matters, timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters, or eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter. We establish an accrued liability when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. These estimates are based upon currently available information and are subject to significant judgment, a variety of assumptions and known and unknown uncertainties. As a result, the ultimate outcome of our legal or regulatory actions may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses, which is established through a provision for loan losses that represents management’s best estimate of probable incurred losses within the existing portfolio of loans. We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of loans in our portfolio, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of loans. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we rely on our experience and our evaluation of economic conditions. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, or if certain intervening events occur (like fraud by a customer or the COVID-19 pandemic), our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, and adjustments may be necessary to address different economic conditions or adverse developments in the loan portfolio. Consequently, a problem with one or more loans could require us to significantly increase our provision for loan losses. In addition, federal and state regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize additional loan charge-offs. Material additions to the allowance for loan losses would materially decrease our net income and would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted a new accounting standard that will be effective for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and Pioneer Bank for our fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023. This standard, referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, will require financial institutions to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans, and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for loan losses. This will change the current method of establishing allowances for loan losses that are probable, which may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, and increase the data we would need to collect and review to determine the appropriate level of our allowance for loan losses.

Changes in management’s estimates and assumptions may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and our financial condition or operating results.

In preparing periodic reports we are required to file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including our consolidated financial statements, our management is and will be required under applicable rules and regulations to make estimates and assumptions as of specified dates. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and experience at such times and are subject to substantial risk and uncertainty. Materially different results may occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known. Areas requiring significant estimates and assumptions by management includes the items discussed in Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Potentially Fraudulent Activity,” the proceedings described in Item 3 – “Legal Proceedings,” the items describe in our “Summary of Critical Accounting Policies,” our evaluation of the legal remedies available to the Bank related to the potentially fraudulent activities, our evaluation of our contingent liabilities and

44

adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, the determination of our deferred income taxes, our fair value measurements, our determination of other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, impairment of goodwill, our evaluation of contingent liabilities, and our evaluation of our defined benefit pension plan obligations.

Our estimates of potential losses will change over time and the actual losses may vary significantly, and there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. As a matter develops, we, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluate on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable. Once the loss contingency is deemed to be both probable and estimable, we establish an accrued liability and record a corresponding amount of expense. We continue to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established. However, in light of the significant judgment, variety of assumptions and uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond our control, and the large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could have an adverse material impact on our business, prospects, results of operations for any particular reporting period, or cause significant reputational harm.

Changes in interest rates may reduce our profits.

Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions, depends to a large extent upon our net interest income, which is the difference between our interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and our interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed funds. Accordingly, our results of operations depend largely on movements in market interest rates and our ability to manage our interest-rate-sensitive assets and liabilities in response to these movements. Factors such as inflation, recession and instability in financial markets, among other factors beyond our control, may affect interest rates.

In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the Federal Reserve Board has reduced the benchmark fed funds rate to a target range of 0% to 0.25%, and the yields on 10 and 30-year treasury notes have declined to historic lows. Decreases in interest rates can result in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance to reduce their borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject to reinvestment risk as we may have to reinvest such loan or securities prepayments into lower-yielding assets, which may also negatively impact our income. Conversely, if interest rates rise, and the interest rates on our deposits increase faster than the interest rates we receive on our loans and investments, our interest rate spread would decrease, which would have a negative effect on our net interest income and profitability. Furthermore, increases in interest rates may adversely affect the ability of borrowers to make loan repayments on adjustable-rate loans, as the interest owed on such loans would increase as interest rates increase.

If interest rates rise, we expect that our net portfolio value of equity would decrease. Net portfolio value of equity represents the present value of the expected cash flows from our assets less the present value of the expected cash flows arising from our liabilities, adjusted for the value of off-balance sheet contracts. At June 30, 2020, and assuming a 200 basis points increase in market interest rates, we estimate that our net portfolio value would decrease by $2.3 million, or 0.8%.  Additionally, at June 30, 2020 and assuming a 100 basis points decrease in market interest rates, we estimate that our net portfolio value would increase by $7.5 million, or 2.5%.

Any substantial, unexpected or prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. While we pursue an asset/liability strategy designed to mitigate our risk from changes in interest rates, changes in interest rates can still have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Changes in interest rates also may negatively affect our ability to originate real estate loans, the value of our assets and our ability to realize gains from the sale of our assets, all of which ultimately affect our earnings. Also, our interest rate risk modeling techniques and assumptions cannot fully predict or capture the impact of actual interest rate changes on our balance sheet or projected operating results.

Municipal deposits are price sensitive and could result in an increase in interest expense or funding fluctuations.

Municipal deposits are a significant source of funds for our lending and investment activities. At June 30, 2020, $267.3 million, or 21.0% of our total deposits, consisted of municipal deposits from local government entities such as towns, cities, school districts and other municipalities, which are collateralized by letters of credit from the Federal Home

45

Loan Bank of New York and investment securities. Given our dependence on high-average balance municipal funds deposits as a source of funds, our inability to retain such funds could significantly and adversely affect our liquidity. Further, our municipal deposits are primarily demand deposit accounts and are therefore more sensitive to interest rate risk. If we are forced to pay higher rates on our municipal accounts to retain those funds, or if we are unable to retain such funds and we are forced to resort to other sources of funds for our lending and investment activities, such as borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, the interest expense associated with these other funding sources may be higher than the rates we are currently paying on our municipal deposits, which would adversely affect our net income.

The level of our commercial real estate loan portfolio subjects us to additional regulatory scrutiny.

The FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies have promulgated joint guidance on sound risk management practices for financial institutions with concentrations in commercial real estate lending. Under the guidance, a financial institution that, like us, is actively involved in commercial real estate lending should perform a risk assessment to identify concentrations. A financial institution may have a concentration in commercial real estate lending if, among other factors, (i) total reported loans for construction, land acquisition and development, and other land represent 100% or more of total capital, or (ii) total reported loans secured by multi-family and non-owner occupied, non-farm, non-residential properties, loans for construction, land acquisition and development and other land, and loans otherwise sensitive to the general commercial real estate market, including loans to commercial real estate related entities, represent 300% or more of total capital. Based on these factors, we have a concentration in loans of the type described in (ii) above of 192.5% of our total capital at June 30, 2020. The purpose of the guidance is to assist banks in developing risk management practices and capital levels commensurate with the level and nature of real estate concentrations. The guidance states that management should employ heightened risk management practices including board and management oversight and strategic planning, development of underwriting standards, risk assessment and monitoring through market analysis and stress testing. Our bank regulators could require us to implement additional policies and procedures consistent with their interpretation of the guidance that may result in additional costs to us or that may result in a curtailment of our commercial real estate and multi-family lending and/or the requirement that we maintain higher levels of regulatory capital, either of which would adversely affect our loan originations and profitability.

We use a third party to originate one- to four-family residential mortgage loans.

We have used a third-party mortgage banking company, Homestead Funding Corp., to underwrite, process and close our residential mortgage loans since January 2016. We use this company in order to offer our customers this loan product without the expense of maintaining and operating an in-house residential mortgage loan department. At June 30, 2020, one- to four-family residential real estate loans acquired from Homestead Funding Corp. totaled $192.6 million, or 16.5%, of our total loans receivable. Should we discontinue this relationship or otherwise be unable to use this company in the future, our ability to purchase residential mortgage loans may be disrupted unless we are able to find a suitable replacement or have or re-develop the capability to originate residential mortgage loans through our lending staff. Should we add more staff in such an event, our compensation expense would increase. Our income may be negatively affected if our residential mortgage lending program is disrupted.

Our business strategy involves moderate growth, and our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

Our assets increased $530.5 million, or 53.3%, from $995.9 million at June 30, 2016 to $1.5 billion at June 30, 2020, primarily due to increases in loans receivable. Over the next several years, we expect to experience moderate growth in our total assets and deposits, and the scale of our operations. Achieving our growth targets requires us to attract customers that currently bank at other financial institutions in our market. Our ability to grow successfully will depend on a variety of factors, including our ability to attract and retain experienced bankers, the availability of attractive business opportunities, competition from other financial institutions in our market area and our ability to manage our growth. While we believe we have the management resources and internal systems in place to successfully manage our future growth, there can be no assurance growth opportunities will be available or that we will successfully manage our growth. If we do not manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to achieve our business plan, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

46

Changes in the valuation of our securities portfolio may reduce our profits and our capital levels.

Our securities portfolio may be affected by fluctuations in market value, potentially reducing accumulated other comprehensive income or earnings. Fluctuations in market value may be caused by changes in market interest rates, lower market prices for securities and limited investor demand. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis, with more frequent evaluation for selected issues. In analyzing a debt issuer’s financial condition, management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, industry analysts’ reports and spread differentials between the effective rates on instruments in the portfolio compared to risk-free rates. If this evaluation shows impairment to the actual or projected cash flows associated with one or more securities, we may take a charge to earnings to reflect such impairment. Changes in interest rates may also have an adverse effect on our financial condition, as our available-for-sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value, and therefore are affected by fluctuations in interest rates. We increase or decrease our stockholders’ equity by the amount of change in the estimated fair value of the available-for-sale securities, net of taxes. Declines in market value may result in other-than-temporary impairments of these assets, which may lead to accounting charges that could have a material adverse effect on our net income and stockholders’ equity. We also increase or decrease our stockholders’ equity by the amount of change in the fair value of equity securities through net income (loss) in the consolidated statement of operations.

A portion of our loan portfolio consists of loan participations secured by properties outside our market area. Loan participations may have a higher risk of loss than loans we originate because we are not the lead lender and we have limited control over credit monitoring.

We occasionally purchase commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and commercial construction loan participations secured by properties outside our market area in which we are not the lead lender. We have purchased loan participations secured by various types of collateral such as real estate, equipment and other business assets located in New York and Vermont. Loan participations may have a higher risk of loss than loans we originate because we rely on the lead lender to monitor the performance of the loan. Moreover, our decisions regarding the classification of a loan participation and loan loss provisions associated with a loan participation are made in part based upon information provided by the lead lender. A lead lender also may not monitor a participation loan in the same manner as we would for loans that we originate. At June 30, 2020, our loan participations where we are not the lead lender totaled $49.4 million, or 4.2% of our loan portfolio. At June 30, 2020, commercial and industrial loan participations outside our market area totaled $14.1 million, or 5.9% of the commercial and industrial loan portfolio, commercial construction loan participations outside our market area totaled $9.7 million, or 10.5% of the commercial construction loan portfolio and commercial real estate loan participations outside our market area totaled $2.1 million, or 0.6% of the commercial real estate loan portfolio. At June 30, 2020, no loan participations were delinquent 60 days or more. If our underwriting of these participation loans is not sufficient, our non-performing loans may increase and our earnings may decrease.

We may, in the future, participate in structured financing transactions involving businesses inside and outside our market area that require alternative financing arrangements. While these types of arrangements may generate more income than our traditional commercial loans that we originate and hold in portfolio, they generally have greater credit risk because they involve lending to borrowers with higher risk profiles, the issuance of more complex financial instruments and the valuation of more complex underlying collateral.

Conditions in insurance markets could adversely affect our earnings.

As we have diversified our sources of income, we have become increasingly reliant on non-interest income, particularly insurance fees and commissions. Revenue from these sources could be negatively affected by fluctuating premiums in the insurance markets or other factors beyond our control. Other factors that affect our insurance revenue are the profitability and growth of our clients, continued development of new products and services, as well as our access to new markets. Our insurance revenues and profitability may also be adversely affected by regulatory developments impacting healthcare and insurance markets, possibly including recent legislative proposals and discussions relating to national health insurance and the elimination of the private health insurance market.

47

Involvement in wealth management creates risks associated with the industry.

Our wealth management operations with Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. present special risks not borne by institutions that focus exclusively on other traditional retail and commercial banking products. For example, the investment advisory industry is subject to fluctuations in the stock market that may have a significant adverse effect on transaction fees, client activity and client investment portfolio gains and losses. Also, additional or modified regulations may adversely affect our wealth management operations. In addition, our wealth management operations, are dependent on a small number of established financial advisors, whose departure could result in the loss of a significant number of client accounts. A significant decline in fees and commissions or trading losses suffered in the investment portfolio could adversely affect our income and potentially require the contribution of additional capital to support our operations.

Changes in market conditions, changes in discount rates, changes in mortality assumptions or lower returns on assets may increase required contributions to, and costs associated with, our tax-qualified defined benefit plan in future periods.

The funded status and benefit obligations of our tax-qualified defined benefit plan (“pension plan”) is dependent upon many factors, including returns on invested assets, certain market interest rates, the discount rates and mortality assumptions used to determine pension obligations. The pension plan liability is calculated based on various actuarial assumptions, including mortality expectations, discount rates and expected long-term rates of return on plan assets. Unfavorable returns on plan assets could materially change the amount of required plan funding, which would reduce the cash available for our operations. In addition, a decrease in the discount rate and/or changes in the mortality assumptions used to determine pension obligations could increase the estimated value of our pension obligations, which would require us to increase the amounts of future contributions to the plan, thereby reducing our equity and our costs associated with the plan may substantially increase in future periods.

Changes in laws and regulations and the cost of regulatory compliance with new laws and regulations may adversely affect our operations and/or increase our costs of operations.

We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by our banking regulators, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC and NYSDFS. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which a financial institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of insurance funds and the depositors and borrowers of Pioneer Bank rather than for the protection of our stockholders. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the ability to impose restrictions on our operations, classify our assets and determine the level of our allowance for loan losses. These regulations, along with the currently existing tax, accounting, securities, deposit insurance and monetary laws, rules, standards, policies, and interpretations, control the ways financial institutions conduct business, implement strategic initiatives, and prepare financial reporting and disclosures. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, new regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations. Further, changes in accounting standards can be both difficult to predict and may involve judgment and discretion in their interpretation by us and our independent accounting firms. These changes could materially impact, potentially retroactively, how we report our financial condition and results of operations.

Replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR after 2021. This announcement indicates that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. Consequently, at this time, it is not possible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR. Similarly, it is not possible to predict whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR or what the effect of any such changes in views or alternatives may be on the markets for LIBOR-indexed financial instruments. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has proposed that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to LIBOR for use in derivatives and other financial contracts that

48

are currently indexed to LIBOR. ARRC has proposed a paced market transition plan to SOFR from LIBOR and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to LIBOR.

We have material loans and interest rate swap agreements that are indexed to LIBOR and are monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks. If LIBOR rates are no longer available and we are required to implement substitute indices for the calculation of interest rates, we may incur expenses in effecting the transition, and may be subject to disputes or litigation with customers and security holders over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the substitute indices, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. Additionally, since alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under loans and interest rate swap agreements referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition may change our market risk profile, requiring changes to risk and pricing models.

Strong competition within our market area may reduce our profits and slow growth.

We face strong competition in making loans and attracting deposits. Price competition for loans and deposits sometimes requires us to charge lower interest rates on our loans and pay higher interest rates on our deposits, and may reduce our net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult and costly to attract and retain qualified employees. Many of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. Our competitors often aggressively price loan and deposit products when they enter into new lines of business or new market areas. If we are unable to effectively compete in our market area, our profitability would be negatively affected. The greater resources and broader offering of deposit and loan products of some of our competitors may also limit our ability to increase our interest-earning assets.

We continually encounter technological changes and the failure to understand and adapt to these changes could hurt our business.

The financial services industry is continually undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services which increase efficiency and enable financial institutions to serve customers better and to reduce costs. Technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for "non-banks" to offer traditional bank products and services using innovative technological platforms such as Fintech and Blockchain. These "digital banks" may be able to achieve economies of scale and offer better pricing for banking products and services than the Company can. The Company’s future success depends, in part, upon its ability to leverage technology to increase our operational efficiency as well as address the current and evolving needs of our customers. However, our competitors may have greater resources to invest in technological improvements, we may not always have capital levels which are sufficient to support a robust investment in our technology infrastructure or we may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to our customers. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological changes affecting the financial services industry could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and, in turn, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

We are subject to stringent capital requirements, which may adversely impact our return on equity, require us to raise additional capital, or restrict us from paying dividends or repurchasing shares.

Federal regulations establish minimum capital requirements for insured depository institutions, including minimum risk-based capital and leverage ratios, and define what constitutes “capital” for calculating these ratios. The minimum capital requirements are: (1) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (2) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 6%; (3) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (4) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4%. The regulations also require unrealized gains and losses on certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings to be included for calculating regulatory capital requirements unless a one-time opt-out is exercised. We elected to exercise our one-time option to opt-out of the requirement under the final rule to include certain “available-for-sale” securities holdings for calculating our regulatory capital requirements. The regulations also establish a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5%, resulting in the following minimum ratios: (1) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (2) a Tier 1 to risk-based assets capital ratio of 8.5%, and (3) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The capital conservation buffer requirement began being phased in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increased each year until it was fully implemented in January 2019. An institution will be subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital

49

level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that can be utilized for such actions. As of June 30, 2020, we have not elected the community bank leverage ratio framework and accordingly the Basel III capital requirements remain applicable.

The application of more stringent Basel III capital requirements could, among other things, result in lower returns on equity, require the raising of additional capital, and result in regulatory actions if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements. Implementation of changes to asset risk weightings for risk-based capital calculations, items included or deducted in calculating Basel III regulatory capital and/or additional Basel III capital conservation buffers could result in management modifying its business strategy, and could limit our ability to pay dividends or repurchase our shares.

Non-compliance with the USA PATRIOT Act, Bank Secrecy Act, or other laws and regulations will subject us to fines or sanctions.

The USA PATRIOT and Bank Secrecy Acts require financial institutions to develop programs to prevent financial institutions from being used for money laundering and terrorist activities. Once such activities are detected, financial institutions are obligated to file suspicious activity reports with the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These rules require financial institutions to establish procedures for identifying and verifying the identity of customers that open new financial accounts. Failure to comply with these regulations could result in fines or sanctions. We are in the process of improving and enhancing our Bank Secrecy Act policies and procedures in order to bring us into full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Failure to adequately maintain our Bank Secrecy Act programs could lead to restrictions on conducting acquisitions or establishing new branches and other regulatory actions and could also have serious reputational consequences for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our success depends on retaining certain key personnel.

Our performance largely depends on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals who comprise our senior management team. We rely on key personnel to manage and operate our business, including major revenue generating functions such as loan and deposit generation, wealth management and insurance businesses. The loss of key staff may adversely affect our ability to maintain and manage these functions effectively, which could negatively affect our income. In addition, loss of key personnel could result in increased recruiting and hiring expenses, which would reduce our net income. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees.

Systems failures or breaches of our network security could subject us to increased operating costs as well as litigation and other liabilities.

Our operations depend upon our ability to protect our computer systems and network infrastructure against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or a similar catastrophic event, as well as from security breaches, denial of service attacks, viruses, worms and other disruptive problems caused by hackers. Any damage or failure that causes an interruption in our operations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Computer break-ins, phishing and other disruptions could also jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network infrastructure, which may result in significant liability to us and may cause existing and potential customers to refrain from doing business with us. Although we, with the help of third-party service providers, intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures designed to prevent such damage, our security measures may not be successful. In addition, advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we and our third-party service providers use to encrypt and protect customer transaction data. A failure of such security measures could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. We face potential heightened cybersecurity risks during the COVID-19 pandemic as people continue to work from home, including our customers, our employees and the employees of our vendors. While we have implemented appropriate safeguards to protect our employees from potential cybersecurity threats while they work from home, these security measures may not be successful.

50

Threats to the security of our networks and data, as described above, continue to increase as the frequency, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions increase around the world. In response to these threats there has been heightened regulatory focus on data privacy and cybersecurity from our federal and state banking regulators and as a result, we must comply with an evolving set of legal requirements in this area, including substantive cybersecurity standards as well as requirements for notifying regulators and affected individuals in the event of a data security incident. This regulatory environment is increasingly challenging and may present material obligations and risks to our business, including significantly expanded compliance burdens, costs and enforcement risks.

It is possible that we could incur significant costs associated with a breach of our computer systems. While we have cyber liability insurance, there are limitations on coverage. Furthermore, cyber incidents carry a greater risk of injury to our reputation. Finally, depending on the type of incident, banking regulators can impose restrictions on our business and consumer laws may require reimbursement of customer losses.

Changes in accounting standards could affect reported earnings.

The bodies responsible for establishing accounting standards, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and bank regulators, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting guidance that governs the preparation of our financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially impact how we record and report our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, we could be required to apply new or revised guidance retroactively.

The cost of additional finance and accounting systems, procedures and controls in order to satisfy our public company reporting requirements will increase our expenses.

As a result of the completion of our initial public offering, we became a public reporting company. The obligations of being a public company, including the substantial public reporting obligations, require significant expenditures and place additional demands on our management team. We have made, and will continue to make, changes to our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and accounting systems to meet our reporting obligations as a stand-alone public company. However, the measures we take may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations as a public company. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes Oxley Act”) requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, beginning with this annual report. Any failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price. In addition, we may need to hire additional compliance, accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical knowledge, and we may not be able to do so in a timely fashion. As a result, we may need to rely on outside consultants to provide these services for us until qualified personnel are hired. These obligations will increase our operating expenses and could divert our management’s attention from our operations.

Our risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and reducing the potential for significant losses.

Our risk management framework is designed to minimize risk and loss to us. We try to identify, measure, monitor, report and control our exposure to risk, including strategic, market, liquidity, compliance and operational risks. While we use broad and diversified risk monitoring and mitigation techniques, these techniques are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or unknown risks. Recent economic conditions and heightened legislative and regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, among other developments, have increased our level of risk. Accordingly, we could suffer losses if we fail to properly anticipate and manage these risks.

We are subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, and we could become subject to environmental liabilities with respect to one or more of these properties. During the ordinary course of business, we may foreclose on and take title to properties securing defaulted loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous conditions or toxic substances are found on these properties, we may be liable for

51

remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage, civil fines and criminal penalties regardless of when the hazardous conditions or toxic substances first affected any particular property. Environmental laws may require us to incur substantial expenses to address unknown liabilities and may materially reduce the affected property’s value or limit our ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase our exposure to environmental liability. Although we have policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure on nonresidential real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are a community bank and our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to the success of our business and the failure to do so may materially adversely affect our performance.

We are a community bank, and our reputation is one of the most valuable components of our business. A key component of our business strategy is to rely on our reputation for customer service and knowledge of local markets to expand our presence by capturing new business opportunities from existing and prospective customers in our market area and contiguous areas. As such, we strive to conduct our business in a manner that enhances our reputation. This is done, in part, by recruiting, hiring and retaining employees who share our core values of being an integral part of the communities we serve, delivering superior service to our customers and caring about our customers and associates. If our reputation is negatively affected as a result of certain actions we take, by the actions of our employees, by our inability to conduct our operations in a manner that is appealing to current or prospective customers, or otherwise, our business and, therefore, our operating results may be materially adversely affected.

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Pioneer Bancorp, MHC’s majority control of our common stock will enable it to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders and will prevent stockholders from forcing a sale or a second-step conversion transaction you may find advantageous.

Pioneer Bancorp, MHC owns a majority of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.’s common stock and, through its board of trustees, will be able to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders. Most of the directors and officers who manage Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and Pioneer Bank also manage Pioneer Bancorp, MHC. As a New York-chartered mutual holding company, the board of trustees of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC must ensure that the interests of depositors of Pioneer Bank are represented and considered in matters put to a vote of stockholders of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. Therefore, the votes cast by Pioneer Bancorp, MHC may not be in your personal best interests as a stockholder. For example, Pioneer Bancorp, MHC may exercise its voting control to defeat a stockholder nominee for election to the board of directors of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and will be able to elect all of the directors of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. Some stockholders may desire a sale or merger transaction, since stockholders typically receive a premium for their shares, or a second-step conversion transaction, since, on a fully converted basis most fully stock institutions tend to trade at higher multiples of book value than mutual holding companies. However, stockholders will not be able to force a merger or a second-step conversion transaction without the consent of Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since such transactions also require, under New York and federal law, the approval of a majority of all of the outstanding voting stock, which can only be achieved if Pioneer Bancorp, MHC votes to approve such transactions.

Our common stock is not heavily traded, and the stock price may fluctuate significantly.

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the symbol “PBFS.” Certain brokers currently make a market in the common stock, but such transactions are infrequent and the volume of shares traded is relatively small. Management cannot predict whether these or other brokers will continue to make a market in our common stock. Prices on stock that is not heavily traded, such as our common stock, can be more volatile than heavily traded stock. Factors such as our financial results, the introduction of new products and services by us or our competitors, publicity regarding the banking industry, and various other factors affecting the banking industry may have a significant impact on the market price of the shares of the common stock. Management also cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained in the future. Accordingly, stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of our common stock at the volumes, prices, or times that they desire.

52

Federal Reserve Board regulations and policy effectively prohibit Pioneer Bancorp, MHC from waiving the receipt of dividends, which will likely preclude us from paying any dividends on our common stock.

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.’s board of directors will have the authority to declare dividends on our common stock subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. We currently intend to retain all our future earnings, if any, for use in our business and do not expect to pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be made by our board of directors and will depend upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions under Federal Reserve Board regulations and policy, our business strategy and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant.

Under current Federal Reserve Board regulations and policy, if Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. pays dividends to its public stockholders, it also would be required to pay dividends to Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, unless Pioneer Bancorp, MHC waives the receipt of such dividends. Federal Reserve Board policy has been to prohibit mutual holding companies that are regulated as bank holding companies, such as Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, from waiving the receipt of dividends and the Federal Reserve Board’s regulations implemented after the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act effectively prohibit federally-chartered mutual holding companies from waiving dividends declared by their subsidiaries. Therefore, unless Federal Reserve Board regulations or policy change to allow Pioneer Bancorp, MHC to waive the receipt of dividends declared by Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. without diluting minority stockholders, it is unlikely that Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. will pay any dividends.

Our stock value may be negatively affected by applicable regulations that restrict stock repurchases.

Applicable regulations restricted us from repurchasing any of our shares of common stock during the first year following the offering and limit us from repurchasing our shares of common stock during each of the second and third years following the offering to 5% of our outstanding shares, unless we obtain prior approval from the NYSDFS. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory authorities have increased their scrutiny of stock repurchase plans and the capital impact on banks and their holding companies. Stock repurchases are a capital management tool that can enhance the value of a company’s stock, and our inability to repurchase any of our shares of common stock during the first year following the offering and limitations on our ability to repurchase our shares of common stock during the second and third years following the offering may negatively affect our stock price.

Various factors may make takeover attempts more difficult to achieve.

Stock banks and savings banks or holding companies, as well as individuals, may not acquire control of a mutual holding company, such as Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. As result, the only persons that may acquire control of a mutual holding company are other mutual savings institutions or mutual holding companies. Accordingly, it is very unlikely, that Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. would be subject to any takeover attempt by activist stockholders or other financial institutions. In addition, certain provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws and state and federal banking laws, including regulatory approval requirements, could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. without our board of directors’ prior approval.

Under Federal Reserve Board regulations, for a period of three years following completion of the offering, no person may directly or indirectly acquire or offer to acquire beneficial ownership of more than 10% of our common stock without prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. Under federal law, subject to certain exemptions, a person, entity or group must notify the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring control of a bank holding company. Acquisition of 10% or more of any class of voting stock of a bank holding company creates a rebuttable presumption that the acquirer “controls” the bank holding company. Also, a bank holding company must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board and the NYSDFS before, among other things, acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares of any bank, including Pioneer Bank.

There also are provisions in our articles of incorporation that may be used to delay or block a takeover attempt, including a provision that generally prohibits any person, other than Pioneer Bancorp, MHC, from voting more than 10% of the shares of common stock outstanding. Taken as a whole, these statutory provisions and provisions in our articles of

53

incorporation could result in our being less attractive to a potential acquirer and thus could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We are an emerging growth company, and if we elect to comply only with the reduced reporting and disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, our common stock may be less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we currently intend to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies but not to “emerging growth companies,” including, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Investors may find our common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on these exemptions.

As an emerging growth company, we are not subject to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which would require that our independent auditors review and attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We are eligible to remain an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of our initial public offering. We will cease to be an emerging growth company upon the earliest of: (1) the end of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of this offering; (2) the first fiscal year after our annual gross revenues are $1.07 billion or more; (3) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt securities; or (4) the end of any fiscal year in which the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeded $700 million at the end of the second quarter of that fiscal year.

Our contribution to the charitable foundation may not be tax deductible, which could reduce our profits.

We may not have sufficient profits to be able to fully use the tax deduction from our contribution to the charitable foundation. Under the Internal Revenue Code, an entity is permitted to deduct up to 10% of its taxable income (generally income before federal income taxes and charitable contributions expense) in any one year for charitable contributions. Any contribution in excess of the 10% limit may be deducted for federal income tax purposes over each of the five years following the year in which the charitable contribution is made. Accordingly, a charitable contribution could, if necessary, be deducted over a six-year period and expires thereafter.

ITEM 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable to a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K.

54

ITEM 2.Properties

As of June 30, 2020, the net book value of our office properties was $35.0 million. The following table sets forth information regarding our offices.

	Leased or	Year Acquired	Net Book Value of
Location	Owned	or Leased	Real Property
			(In thousands)
Main Office:
652 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, NY 12211	Owned (1)	2016	$	15,731
Other Properties:
21 Second Street, Troy, NY 12180	Leased	2016		55
531 Troy-Schenectady Road, Latham, NY 12110	Owned	2008		1,939
2000 Second Avenue, Watervliet, NY 12189	Leased	2017		141
1828 Altamont Avenue, Schenectady, NY 12305	Owned	2012		1,903
1208 Route 146, Clifton Park, NY 12065	Leased	1995		5
10 Kendall Way, Malta, NY 12020	Owned	2016		1,840
78 Main Avenue, Wynantskill, NY 12198	Owned	2014		1,846
712 Hoosick Street, Brunswick, NY 12180	Owned	2015		1,664
329 Glenmont Road, Glenmont, NY 12077	Leased	2014		217
142 Saratoga Avenue, Waterford, NY 12188	Owned	2015		1,559
1770 Central Avenue, Albany, NY 12205	Leased	2019		261
602 North Greenbush Road, Rensselaer, NY 12144	Leased	2017		275
90 State Street, Albany, NY 12207	Leased	2013		216
1881‑1883 Western Avenue, Albany, NY 12203	Owned	2018		4,810
184 Delaware Avenue, Delmar, NY 12054	Owned	2010		940
843 Route 146, Clifton Park, NY 12065	Leased	2012		206
426 State Street, Schenectady, NY 12305	Leased	2014		220
440 Main Street, Cairo, NY 12413	Owned	2016		380
11565 NY‑32, Greenville, NY 12083	Leased	2016		29
739 Upper Glen Street, Queensbury, NY 12804	Leased	2017		72
100 Mohawk Street, Cohoes, NY 12047	Owned	2017		537

(1) The property is subject to a ground lease.

We believe that the current facilities are adequate to meet our present and foreseeable needs, subject to possible future expansion.

ITEM 3.Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, governmental and other proceedings or investigations concerning matters arising from the conduct of our business, including the matters described below. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly where the claimants seek large or indeterminate damages, we generally cannot predict the eventual outcome of the pending matters, timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters, or eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, we establish an accrued liability when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. These estimates are based upon currently available information and are subject to significant judgment, a variety of assumptions and known and unknown uncertainties. Our estimates of potential losses will change over time and the actual losses may vary significantly, and there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. As a matter develops, we, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluate on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable; or where a loss is reasonably possible, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, whether it is possible to estimate a range of possible loss. Once the loss contingency is deemed to be both probable and estimable, we establish an accrued

55

liability and record a corresponding amount of expense. We continue to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established.    

Information is provided below regarding the nature of the matters and associated claimed damages. The amount of reasonably possible losses for the matters described below cannot be estimated at this time. The Company and the Bank are defending each of these matters vigorously, and the Company believes that it and the Bank have substantial defenses, including affirmative defenses, counterclaims and cross-claims to the various allegations that have been asserted. Based on current knowledge, other than disclosed below, we are not a party to any pending legal or other proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In light of the significant judgment, variety of assumptions and uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond our control, and the large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could have an adverse material impact on our business, prospects, results of operations for any particular reporting period, or cause significant reputational harm.

On October 31, 2019, Southwestern Payroll Services, Inc. (“Southwestern”) filed a complaint against the Company and the Bank (“Pioneer Parties”), Michael T. Mann, Valuewise Corporation, MyPayrollHR, LLC and Cloud Payroll, LLC (collectively, the “Mann Parties”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleged that the Pioneer Parties (i) wrongfully converted certain funds belonging to Southwestern, (ii) engaged in fraudulent and wrongful collection and retention of funds belonging to Southwestern, and (iii) committed gross negligence and that Southwestern is entitled to a constructive trust limiting how the Pioneer Parties distribute the funds in question, which are about $9.8 million. On November 26, 2019, the Pioneer Parties moved to dismiss Southwestern’s fraud claim, which also postponed the Pioneer Parties’ deadline to file an answer until 14 days after the court decides the motion to dismiss. On December 10, 2019, Southwestern filed a response to the Pioneer Parties’ motion to dismiss and an amended complaint, which rendered the Pioneer Parties’ motion to dismiss moot. The amended complaint named several additional corporate entities affiliated with the Mann Parties as co-defendants and asserted claims against the Pioneer Parties for declaratory judgment, conversion, actual and constructive fraud, gross negligence, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, and an accounting. The amended complaint sought a monetary judgment of at least $9.8 million. Each party has filed numerous motions in the proceedings. On January 10, 2020, the Pioneer Parties moved again to dismiss Southwestern’s fraud claim in the amended complaint, which also postponed the Pioneer Parties’ deadline to file an answer to the amended complaint until 14 days after the court decided the motion to dismiss. On April 16, 2020, the court granted the Pioneer Parties’ motion to dismiss Southwestern’s fraud claim. On April 30, 2020, Southwestern filed a motion for both leave to file a second amended complaint and for reconsideration of the court’s dismissal of Southwestern’s fraud claim.  On May 1, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed their answer to Southwestern’s amended complaint. The Pioneer Parties asserted numerous affirmative defenses, counterclaims against Southwestern, and cross-claims against certain of the Mann Parties, including for common law fraud under New York law and violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. The Pioneer Parties contend that the actions of Southwestern and certain of the Mann Parties resulted in damages of $15.6 million, plus pre-judgment interest. On July 7, 2020, the court granted Southwestern leave to file a second amended complaint, which Southwestern filed on July 16, 2020. Southwestern’s second amended complaint asserted claims against the Pioneer Parties for declaratory judgment, conversion, actual and constructive fraud, gross negligence, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, and an accounting – and sought a monetary judgment of at least $9.8 million. On July 30, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed an amended answer to Southwestern’s second amended complaint, which asserted the same affirmative defenses, counterclaims, and cross-claims as the Pioneer Parties’ prior answer to Southwestern’s amended complaint.

On December 10, 2019, National Payment Corp. (“NatPay”) filed a motion to intervene as a plaintiff in Southwestern’s lawsuit against the Pioneer Parties and the Mann Parties as described above. On January 10, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed opposition to NatPay’s motion to intervene. On August 4, 2020, the magistrate judge issued a decision recommending that NatPay be allowed to intervene. While the district judge has not yet adopted the magistrate’s recommended decision, NatPay was allowed to file its complaint in intervention on August 18, 2020. NatPay’s complaint includes claims for declaratory judgment, conversion, fraud, gross negligence, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, and for an accounting against the Pioneer Parties. The prayer for relief in NatPay’s complaint seeks “compensatory damages in an amount of no less than $4 million” (the complaint also seeks punitive damages and interest in unspecified amounts). On September 8, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed their answer and affirmative defenses to NatPay’s complaint.

56

On January 21, 2020, Cachet Financial Services (“Cachet”), a third-party automated clearing house service provider, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the Central District of California, Los Angeles Division. Cachet is currently involved in legal proceedings against certain Mann Parties and other related parties. The Bank is not listed as a creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings. However, in the filings with the bankruptcy court, Cachet asserts that the Bank is holding $7.0 million of its funds. The Company and the Bank dispute this assertion and, if necessary, intend to defend themselves vigorously.

On February 4, 2020, Berkshire Hills Bancorp Inc.’s wholly owned subsidiary Berkshire Bank (“Berkshire Bank”) filed a complaint against the Bank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for Albany County resulting from Berkshire Bank’s participation interest in the commercial loan relationship to the Mann Entities. The complaint alleges that the Bank (1) breached the amended and restated loan participation agreement between the Bank and Berkshire Bank dated as of June 27, 2018, (2) breached the amended and restated loan participation agreement between the Bank and Berkshire Bank dated as of August 12, 2019, (3) engaged in constructive fraud, (4) engaged in fraudulent inducement, (5) engaged in fraudulent concealment, and (6) negligently misrepresented certain material information. The complaint seeks to recover $15.6 million and additional damages. On August 14, 2020, the Bank filed a motion to dismiss five of Berkshire Bank’s claims.

On February 4, 2020, Chemung Financial Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Chemung Canal Trust Company (“Chemung”), filed a complaint against the Bank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for Albany County resulting from Chemung’s participation interest in the commercial loan relationship to the Mann Entities. The complaint alleges that the Bank (1) breached the participation agreement between the Bank and Chemung dated as of August 12, 2019, (2) engaged in fraudulent activities, (3) engaged in constructive fraud, and (4) negligently misrepresented and omitted certain material information. The complaint seeks to recover $4.2 million and additional damages. On August 14, 2020, the Bank filed a motion to dismiss three of Chemung’s four claims.

On April 30, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), with the authorization of a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury, filed a civil complaint against the Company and the Bank (and Cloud Payroll, LLC) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company and the Bank wrongfully seized approximately $7.3 million from an account held by Cloud Payroll to apply towards debts allegedly owed to the Bank by Cloud Payroll and other affiliates of Michael Mann. The complaint alleges that the funds in question were comprised of payroll taxes and thus subject to a statutory trust under 26 U.S.C. § 7501 that prohibited the Bank from seizing those funds to apply towards debts owed to the Bank. The complaint seeks return of any payroll taxes, plus interest. The Bank and the Company must answer or otherwise respond to the government’s complaint by October 1, 2020. The complaint relates to the same set of facts described below in Item 7 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Recent Developments - Potentially Fraudulent Activity,” and the alleged payroll taxes, plus interest, sought in this proceeding may be part of the recovery sought in the Southwestern and NatPay complaints described above.

On August 31, 2020, AXH Air-Coolers, LLC (“AXH”) filed a complaint against the Company, the Bank, and unnamed employees of the Pioneer Parties in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleges that the Pioneer Parties (i) wrongfully converted certain tax funds belonging to AXH, (ii) were unjustly enriched by the wrongful taking of tax funds belonging to AXH, and (iii) were grossly negligent in allowing AXH’s tax funds to be misappropriated, offset, converted, or stolen. The prayer for relief in AXH’s complaint seeks $336,000, plus penalties and interest, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. The complaint relates to the same set of facts as the DOJ complaint as described above, and the alleged taxes sought in the DOJ, Southwestern, and NatPay complaints. The Pioneer Parties must answer or otherwise respond to AXH’s complaint by November 5, 2020.

The Company and the Bank have received inquiries and requests for information from regulatory agencies relating to some of the entities and events that are the subjects of certain lawsuits described above. This has resulted in, or may in the future result in, regulatory agency investigations, litigation, subpoenas, enforcement actions, and related sanctions or costs. The Company and the Bank continue to cooperate with inquiries and respond to requests as appropriate.

The Company and the Bank continue to investigate these matters and it is possible that the Company and the Bank will be subject to similar legal, regulatory, governmental or other proceedings and additional liabilities. The ultimate

57

outcome of any such proceedings, involving the Company, the Bank or the Pioneer Parties, cannot be predicted with any certainty. It also remains possible that other parties will pursue additional claims against the Bank as a result of the Bank’s dealings with certain of the Mann Entities or as a result of the actions taken by the Pioneer Parties. The Company’s and the Bank’s legal fees and expenses related to these actions are significant. In addition, costs associated with potentially prosecuting, litigating or settling any litigation, satisfying any adverse judgments, if any, or other proceedings, could be significant. These costs, settlements, judgments, sanctions or other expenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. has been listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “PBFS” since July 18, 2019. At September 15, 2020, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. had approximately 1,116 stockholders of record.

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. currently does not anticipate paying a dividend to its stockholders. The payment and amount of any dividend payments will be subject to statutory and regulatory limitations, and will depend upon a number of factors, including the following: regulatory capital requirements; our financial condition and results of operations; our other uses of funds for the long-term value of stockholders; tax considerations; the Federal Reserve Board’s current regulations restricting the waiver of dividends by mutual holding companies; and general economic conditions.

The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy statement providing that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if our prospective rate of earnings retention is consistent with our capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Regulatory guidance also provides for prior regulatory consultation with respect to capital distributions in certain circumstances such as where the holding company’s net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund the dividend or the holding company’s overall rate or earnings retention is inconsistent with its capital needs and overall financial condition. In addition, Pioneer Bank’s ability to pay dividends may be limited if it does not have the capital conservation buffer required by certain capital rules, which may limit our ability to pay dividends to stockholders. No assurances can be given that any dividends will be paid or that, if paid, will not be reduced or eliminated in the future. Special cash dividends, stock dividends or returns of capital, to the extent permitted by regulations and policies of the Federal Reserve Board and the NYSDFS, may be paid in addition to, or in lieu of, regular cash dividends.

There were no sales of unregistered securities or repurchases of shares of common stock during the year ended June 30, 2020.

ITEM 6.Selected Financial Data

As discussed in the Explanatory Note to this Amended Report, we are restating certain amounts in our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. The information below also reflects the Restatement of the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. See Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” – Note 2, “Restatement of the Consolidated Financial Statements” for further information about the Restatement of certain of our consolidated financial statements.

The following tables set forth selected consolidated historical financial and other data for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. on a consolidated basis at and for the year ended June 30, 2020 and Pioneer Bank, on a consolidated basis, at and for the years ended June 30, 2019, 2018, 2017 and 2016. It is only a summary and it should be read in conjunction with the business and financial information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, including the consolidated

58

financial statements that appear starting on page 77 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. The information at June 30, 2020 and 2019 and for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. The information at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is derived in part from audited consolidated financial statements not appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

	At June 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
			(As Restated)
	(In thousands except for per share amounts)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	1,526,412	$	1,468,285	$	1,284,128	$	1,134,139	$	995,918
Cash and cash equivalents		156,903		230,109		120,280		40,261		34,518
Securities available for sale		75,768		86,695		79,212		73,215		91,531
Securities held to maturity		6,822		3,873		5,297		2,213		3,811
Equity securities		8,533		8,658		8,851		8,760		9,420
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,010		924		883		1,149		1,584
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses		1,148,399		1,038,138		985,902		932,762		789,010
Bank-owned life insurance		17,240		17,834		17,715		17,601		17,527
Premises and equipment, net		40,863		41,710		42,902		37,384		30,703
Deposits		1,270,150		1,331,318		1,150,262		1,010,026		864,188
Borrowings		—		—		—		5,000		17,000
Shareholders' equity		223,966		123,258		118,063		104,012		93,610

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
	(As Restated)		(As Restated)
	(In thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest and dividend income	$	53,519	$	54,159	$	46,486	$	37,621	$	32,161
Interest expense		4,731		4,480		3,186		2,411		1,648
Net interest income		48,788		49,679		43,300		35,210		30,513
Provision for loan losses		6,790		18,150		1,970		2,395		1,180
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		41,998		31,529		41,330		32,815		29,333
Non-interest income		15,682		14,407		12,804		10,897		8,226
Non-interest expense		51,685		37,890		36,325		35,366		30,272
Income before income taxes		5,995		8,046		17,809		8,346		7,287
Income tax expense		797		737		6,310		2,715		2,289
Net income		5,198		7,309		11,499		5,631		4,998
Earnings per share	$	0.21

59

	At or For the Years Ended June 30,
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016
	(As Restated)		(As Restated)
Performance Ratios:
Return on average assets	0.36	%	0.55	%	0.92	%	0.52	%	0.53	%
Return on average equity	2.34	%	5.74	%	10.51	%	5.83	%	5.18	%
Interest rate spread (1)	3.51	%	3.93	%	3.67	%	3.47	%	3.43	%
Net interest margin (2)	3.71	%	4.10	%	3.78	%	3.57	%	3.51	%
Non-interest expenses to average assets	3.56	%	2.85	%	2.91	%	3.27	%	3.19	%
Efficiency ratio (3)	80.17	%	59.12	%	64.75	%	76.70	%	78.14	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities	156.49	%	145.04	%	141.49	%	139.29	%	139.05	%
Capital Ratios (4):
Average equity to average assets	15.29	%	9.57	%	8.77	%	8.93	%	10.17	%
Total capital to risk weighted assets	16.59	%	12.91	%	12.86	%	12.41	%	14.10	%
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets	15.33	%	11.63	%	11.59	%	11.18	%	12.91	%
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets	15.33	%	11.63	%	11.59	%	11.18	%	12.91	%
Tier 1 capital to average assets	11.53	%	9.14	%	9.17	%	9.60	%	10.87	%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans	1.95	%	1.38	%	1.35	%	1.25	%	1.23	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans	172.20	%	114.35	%	142.05	%	149.68	%	155.44	%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average outstanding loans during the year	(0.14)	%	1.66	%	0.03	%	0.04	%	0.05	%
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans	1.13	%	1.21	%	0.95	%	0.84	%	0.79	%
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets	0.87	%	0.86	%	0.74	%	0.70	%	0.63	%
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets	0.89	%	0.87	%	0.75	%	0.70	%	0.63	%
Other:
Number of offices	22		22		22		22		18
Number of full-time equivalent employees	256		258		259		251		215

(1) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the years.

(2) Represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

(3) Represents non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.

(4) Capital Ratios are for Pioneer Bank

60

ITEM 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As discussed in the Explanatory Note to this Amended Report and in Item 8, “Financial statements and Supplementary Data – Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2 – Restatement of the Consolidated Financial Statements,” this Amended Report reflects Restatements of our previously filed audited consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth below reflects the effects of these Restatements.

This discussion and analysis reflects our consolidated financial statements and other relevant statistical data, and is intended to enhance your understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. The information in this section has been derived in part from the consolidated financial statements that appear beginning on page 77 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and other consolidated financial statements that are not included herein. Please read the information in this section in conjunction with the business and financial information regarding Pioneer Bancorp, Inc., Pioneer Bank and the consolidated financial statements that appear starting on page 77 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Overview

Net Interest Income. Our primary source of income is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest we pay on our deposits and borrowings.

Provision for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. The allowance for loan losses is increased through charges to the provision for loan losses. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectability of the principal loan amount is not probable. Recoveries on loans previously charged-off, if any, are credited to the allowance for loan losses when realized. It is likely we will incur elevated provision for loan losses and charge-offs due to the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy of our market area and our customers.

Non-interest Income. Our primary sources of non-interest income are banking fees and service charges, insurance, employee benefits and wealth management services income. Our non-interest income also includes net gain or losses on equity securities, net gain or losses on sales and calls of available for sale securities, net gains in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance, net gain or loss on disposal of assets, other gains and losses, and miscellaneous income.

Non-Interest Expense. Our non-interest expenses consist of salaries and employee benefits, net occupancy and equipment, data processing, advertising and marketing, federal deposit insurance premiums, professional fees, and other general and administrative expenses.

Salaries and employee benefits consist primarily of salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, and expenses for worker’s compensation and disability insurance, health insurance, retirement plans and other employee benefits, as well as commissions and other incentives.

Net occupancy and equipment expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of depreciation charges, rental expenses, furniture and equipment expenses, maintenance, real estate taxes and costs of utilities. Depreciation of premises and equipment is computed using a straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets or the expected lease terms, if shorter.

Data processing expenses are fees we pay to third parties for use of their software and for processing customer information, deposits and loans.

Advertising and marketing includes most marketing expenses including multi-media advertising (public and in-store), promotional events and materials, civic and sales focused memberships, and community support.

Federal deposit insurance premiums are payments we make to the FDIC for insurance of our deposit accounts.

61

Professional fees includes legal and other consulting expenses.

Other expenses include expenses for office supplies, postage, telephone, insurance and other miscellaneous operating expenses.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). Our income tax expense (benefit) is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

Recent Developments

COVID-19 Pandemic

In early January 2020, the World Health Organization issued an alert that a novel coronavirus outbreak was emanating from the Wuhan Province in China. Later in January, the first death related to the novel coronavirus, identified as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), occurred in the United States. Over the course of the next several weeks, the outbreak continued to spread to various regions of the World prompting the World Health Organization to declare COVID-19 a global pandemic on March 11, 2020. In the United States, the rapid spread of the COVID-19 virus invoked various Federal and State, including New York State, authorities to make emergency declarations and issue executive orders to limit the spread of the disease. Measures included restrictions on international and domestic travel, restrictions on business operations, limitations on public gatherings, implementation of social distancing protocols, school closings, orders to shelter in place and mandates to close all non-essential businesses to the public. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020 (the quarter ending June 30, 2020), some of these restrictions were removed and some non-essential businesses were allowed to re-open in a limited capacity, adhering to social distancing and disinfection guidelines. However, these restrictions and other consequences of the pandemic have resulted in significant adverse effects for many different types of businesses and have resulted in a significant number of layoffs and furloughs of employees in our market area. The direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in dramatic reductions in the level of economic activity in our market area and have severely hampered the ability for businesses and consumers to meet their current repayment obligations.

Concerns about the spread of the disease and its anticipated negative impact on economic activity, severely disrupted both domestic and international financial markets prompting Central Banks around the World to inject significant amounts of monetary stimulus into their economies. In the United States, the Federal Reserve System’s Federal Open Market Committee, swiftly cut the target Federal Funds rate to a range of 0% to 0.25%, including a 50 basis point reduction in the target federal funds rate on March 3, 2020 and an additional 100 basis point reduction on March 15, 2020. In addition, the Federal Reserve rolled out various market support programs to ease the stress on financial markets. The estimated value of the pandemic-related monetary stimulus package provided through the Federal Reserve’s activities is estimated at $4 trillion. In addition the United States Congress, on March 27, 2020, passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which is intended to provide approximately $2.5 trillion of direct support to U.S. citizens and businesses affected by the COVID-19 outbreak, and on April 24, 2020, passed the Paycheck Protection and Health Care Enhancement Act (“Enhancement Act”), which is intended to provide $484 billion in additional funding to replenish and supplement key programs under the CARES Act.

As the COVID-19 events unfolded throughout the second half of fiscal 2020, the Company implemented various plans, strategies and protocols to protect its employees, maintain services for customers, assure the functional continuity of the Company’s operating systems, controls and processes, and mitigate financial risks posed by changing market conditions. In order to protect its employees and assure workforce and operational continuity, the Company imposed business travel restrictions, implemented quarantine and work from home protocols and physically separated, to the extent possible, the critical operations site workforce that are unable to work remotely. To limit the risk of virus spread, the Company implemented drive-thru only and by appointment operating protocols for its bank branch network. The Company also maintained regular communications with its primary regulatory agencies and critical vendors to assure all mission-critical activities and functions are being performed in line with regulatory expectations and the Company’s service

62

standards. Late in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020, the Company implemented a return-to-work plan and currently has a majority of its employees working in a traditional office environment. The Company has also re-opened the lobbies of a majority of its branch network to the public.

Although there is a high degree of uncertainty around the magnitude and duration of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s management believes that it was well positioned with adequate levels of capital as of June 30, 2020. At June 30, 2020, all of the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios exceeded all well-capitalized standards. More specifically, the Bank’s Tier 1 Leverage Ratio, a common measure to evaluate a financial institutions capital strength, was 11.57% at June 30, 2020.

In addition, management believes the Company was well positioned with adequate levels of liquidity as of June 30, 2020. The Bank maintains a funding base largely comprised of core noninterest bearing demand deposit accounts and low cost interest-bearing savings and money market deposit accounts with customers that operate, reside or work within its branch footprint. At June 30, 2020, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance was $156.9 million. The Company also maintains an available-for-sale investment securities portfolio, comprised primarily of highly liquid U.S. Treasury securities and highly-rated municipal securities. This portfolio not only generates interest income, but also serves as a ready source of liquidity and capital. At June 30, 2020, the Company’s available-for-sale investment securities portfolio totaled $75.8 million.  The Bank’s unused borrowing capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York at June 30, 2020 was $153.4 million. The Company did not experience significant draws on available working capital lines of credit and home equity lines of credit during the second half of fiscal 2020 due to the COVID-19 crisis.

The Bank also participated in the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), a $650 billion specialized low-interest loan program funded by the U.S. Treasury Department and administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”). In 2020, the Bank became a qualified SBA lender and was authorized to originate PPP loans. An eligible business was generally able to apply for a PPP loan up to the greater of: 2.5 times its average monthly payroll costs, or $10.0 million.  PPP loans have an interest rate of 1.0%, a two-year or five-year loan term to maturity, and principal and interest payments deferred until the lender receives the applicable forgiven amount or 10 months after the period the business has used such funds. The SBA will guarantee 100% of the PPP loans made to eligible borrowers.  The entire principal amount of the borrower’s PPP loan, including any accrued interest, is eligible to be reduced by the loan forgiveness amount under the PPP so long as employee and compensation levels of the business are maintained and 60% of the loan proceeds are used for payroll expenses, with the remaining 40% of the loan proceeds used for other qualifying expenses. Through August 31, 2020, the Bank has closed 660 PPP loans totaling $75.8 million.  The Federal Reserve has instituted a program, the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (“PPPLF”), authorized under section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act, which is intended to facilitate lending by banks to small businesses under the PPP while maintaining strong liquidity to meet cash flow needs. Under the PPPFL, the Federal Reserve Banks lent to banks on a non-recourse basis, taking PPP loans as collateral. Principal repayment of PPPLF borrowings, if any, were made upon receipt of payment on the underlying PPP loans pledged as collateral and interest is charged at a rate of 0.35%. At June 30, 2020, the Bank’s unused borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York through the PPPLF was $74.0 million. The Bank continues to evaluate its liquidity needs and has access to borrow funds through the PPPLF if deemed necessary.

From a credit risk and lending perspective, the Company has taken actions to identify and assess its COVID-19 related credit exposures based on asset class and borrower type. No specific COVID-19 related credit impairment was identified within the Company’s investment securities portfolio, including the Company’s municipal securities portfolio, during fiscal 2020. With respect to the Company’s lending activities, the Company implemented customer payment deferral programs to assist both consumer and commercial borrowers that may be experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19 related challenges, whereby short-term deferrals of payments (generally three to six months) have been provided. Through June 30, 2020, the Company granted payment deferral requests for consumer borrowers related to 110 loans representing $27.4 million of the Company’s residential mortgage, home equity loans and lines of credit, and consumer loan balances, and for commercial borrowers related to 144 loans representing $170.3 million of the Company’s commercial loan balances. Loans in deferment status will continue to accrue interest during the deferment period unless otherwise classified as nonperforming. Consistent with industry regulatory guidance, borrowers that were otherwise current on loan payments that were granted COVID-19 related financial hardship payment deferrals will continue to be reported as current loans throughout the agreed upon deferral period and not classified as troubled-debt restructured loans during fiscal 2020. Borrowers that were delinquent in their payments to the Bank prior to requesting a COVID-19 related

63

financial hardship payment deferral were reviewed on a case by case basis for troubled debt restructure classification and non-performing loan status. In the instances where the Bank granted a payment deferral to a delinquent borrower, the borrower’s delinquency status was frozen as of March 20, 2020, and their loans will continue to be reported as delinquent during the deferment period based on their delinquency status as of March 20, 2020. The Company anticipates that the number and amount of COVID-19 deferral agreements will decrease during the first fiscal quarter of 2021. While the deferrals are still ongoing, it is difficult to assess whether a customer will be able to perform under the original terms of the loan once the deferral period expires. Once these deferrals expire, it may become apparent that more customers than expected are unable to perform and the Company may be required to make additional provisions for loan losses.

The Company’s fiscal 2020 financial results were adversely impacted by the effects of the pandemic, which contributed to an increase in the provision for loan losses. The COVID-19 crisis is expected to continue to adversely impact the Company’s financial results, as well as demand for its services and products during the first fiscal quarter of 2021 and beyond. The short and long-term implications of the COVID-19 crisis, and related monetary and fiscal stimulus measures, on the Company’s future revenues, earnings results, allowance for loan losses, capital reserves, and liquidity are unknown at this time. At this point, the extent to which COVID-19 may impact our future financial condition or results of operations is uncertain and not currently estimable, however the impact could be material.

Potentially Fraudulent Activity

During the first fiscal quarter of 2020 (the quarter ending September 30, 2019), the Company became aware of potentially fraudulent activity associated with transactions by an established business customer of the Bank. The customer and various affiliated entities (collectively, the “Mann Entities”) had numerous accounts with the Bank. The transactions in question related both to deposit and lending activity with the Mann Entities.

For the fraudulent activity related to the Mann Entities, the Bank’s potential exposure with respect to its deposit activity was approximately $18.5 million. In the first fiscal quarter of 2020, the Bank exercised its rights pursuant to state and federal law and the relevant Mann Entity general deposit account agreements to take actions to set off/recover approximately $16.0 million from general deposit corporate operating accounts held by the Mann Entities at the Bank to partially cover overdrafts/negative account balances in Mann Entity general deposit corporate operating accounts that primarily resulted from another bank returning/calling back $15.6 million in checks on August 30, 2019, that the Mann Entities had deposited into and then withdrawn from their accounts at the Bank the day before.  In the first fiscal quarter of 2020, the Bank recognized a charge to non-interest expense in the amount of $2.5 million based on the net negative deposit balance of the various Mann Entities’ accounts after the setoffs/overdraft recoveries. No additional charges to non-interest expense were recognized during the year ended June 30, 2020, related to the deposit transactions with the Mann Entities.

With respect to the Bank’s lending activity with the Mann Entities, its potential exposure was approximately $15.8 million (which represents the Bank’s participation interest in the approximately $35.8 million commercial loan relationships for which the Bank is the originating lender). In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019, the Bank recognized a provision for loan losses in the amount of $15.8 million, related to the charge-off of the entire principal balance owed to the Bank related to the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships. During the third fiscal quarter of 2020 and the first fiscal quarter of 2021, the Bank recognized partial recoveries in the amount of $1.7 million and $34,000, respectively, related to the charge-off of the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships, which were credited to the allowance for loan losses. No additional charges to the provision for loan losses were recognized during the year ended June 30, 2020, related to the loan transactions with the Mann Entities.

Several other parties are asserting claims against the Company and the Bank related to the series of transactions between the Company or the Bank, on the one hand, and the Mann Entities, on the other. The Company and the Bank continue to investigate these matters and it is possible that the Company and the Bank will be subject to additional liabilities which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company is pursuing all available sources of recovery and other means of mitigating the potential loss, and the Company and the Bank are vigorously defending all claims asserted against them arising out of or otherwise related to the fraudulent activity of the Mann Entities. For additional details regarding legal, other proceedings and related matters, see, “Part I, Item 3 – Legal Proceedings.”

64

Mutual Holding Company Reorganization and Minority Stock Issuance

On July 17, 2019, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. became the holding company of Pioneer Bank when it closed its stock offering in connection with the completion of the reorganization of the Bank into the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization. The Company sold 11,170,402 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, for net proceeds of $109.1 million, issued 14,287,723 shares to Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and contributed 519,554 shares of common stock and $250,000 in cash to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation.  The Company recognized a charge to non-interest expense in the amount of $5.4 million, in the first fiscal quarter of 2020, related to the contribution to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation.  The Company established an ESOP which owns 1,018,325 shares of common stock of the Company. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC now owns 55% of the common stock of the Company.

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to operate as a well-capitalized and profitable community bank dedicated to providing personal service to our individual, business and municipal customers. We believe that we have a competitive advantage in the markets we serve because of our 130-year history in the community, our knowledge of the local marketplace and our long-standing reputation for providing superior, relationship-based customer service. We believe we can distinguish ourselves by maintaining the culture of a local community bank, but offering the products of a comprehensive financial services provider by promoting and continuing to expand our insurance, consulting and wealth management businesses. The following are the key elements of our business strategy:

Continue our emphasis on commercial lending. Over the last six years, we have increased our commercial loan portfolio, which consists of commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and commercial construction loans, consistent with safe and sound underwriting practices. This has had the benefits of increasing the yield on our loan portfolio while reducing the average term to repricing of our loans. However, we have sought to maintain an appropriate balance in the overall loan portfolio between our commercial and non-commercial loans in order to diversify our credit risk. At June 30, 2020, our commercial loan portfolio totaled $779.5 million, or 66.6% of total loans, compared with $513.1 million, or 64.3% of total loans, at June 30, 2016. We view the growth of commercial lending as a means of increasing our interest income and establishing relationships with local businesses, which offer a recurring and potentially broader source of fee income through commercial deposits, commercial insurance, and employee benefits products and consulting. We also generally require that commercial and industrial loan borrowers establish a commercial deposit account with us, which assists our efforts to grow core deposits and cross-sell our other products and services. The additional capital raised in the offering will enable us to increase our originations of commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and commercial construction loans in our primary market area, and originate loans with larger balances that we intend to retain in our portfolio.

Diversify our products and services in order to increase non-interest income. We continue to seek ways of increasing our non-interest income by growing our financial services businesses. We sell commercial and personal insurance products and provide employee benefits products and services through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Anchor Agency, Inc., which we acquired in 2016. We expanded our employee benefits products and services business through our acquisition in 2017 of substantially all of the operating assets of Capital Region Strategic Employee Benefits Services, LLC, an employee benefits and consulting firm. We initially entered into the wealth management services business by establishing Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. in 1997 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pioneer Bank (which operates under the name Pioneer Wealth Management). We substantially grew this business with the acquisition of substantially all of the operating assets of Ward Financial Management, LTD in 2018. At June 30, 2020, Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. had $552.7 million of assets under management. We believe that there will be opportunities to cross-sell these products to our deposit and borrower customers which may further increase our non-interest income, and also to cross-sell our banking services and products to customers and clients of Anchor Agency, Inc. and Pioneer Financial Services, Inc. We intend to consider future acquisition opportunities to expand our insurance, wealth management activities (including the amount of the assets that we have under management) or other complementary financial services businesses.

Increase our Share of Lower-Cost Core Deposits. We continue to emphasize offering core deposits (demand deposit accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts) to businesses, municipalities and individuals located in our market area. Core deposits represent our best opportunity to develop customer relationships that enable us to cross-

65

sell the products and services of our complementary subsidiaries. We attract and retain transaction accounts by offering competitive products and rates and providing quality customer service. Our core deposits increased $409.0 million to $1.2 billion at June 30, 2020 from $741.6 million at June 30, 2016. At June 30, 2020, core deposits comprised 90.6% of our total deposits. Core deposits are our least costly source of funds which improves our interest rate spread and also contributes non-interest income from account- related services.

Strategically Grow our Balance Sheet. We believe there is a large customer base in our market that prefers doing business with local institutions and may be dissatisfied with the service they receive from the larger regional banks. By offering personalized customer service, along with our extensive knowledge of our local markets and employees who have strong relationships with our customers which leads to referrals and repeat business, we believe we can leverage these strengths to attract and retain customers. We have recently undergone a significant rebranding effort and updated our branch layout, website and other technology infrastructure that prioritizes the customer experience and moves away from the traditional single branch channel. We also believe we can capitalize on commercial deposit and personal banking relationships derived from an increase in commercial real estate and commercial business lending. Based on the foregoing, our attractive market area and strategic investment in technology to enhance the customer experience, we believe we are well-positioned to increase our balance sheet, particularly loans and deposits.

Summary of Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions that we use are based on historical experience and various other factors and are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

The JOBS Act contains provisions that, among other things, reduce certain reporting requirements for qualifying public companies. As an “emerging growth company” we may delay adoption of new or revised accounting pronouncements applicable to public companies until such pronouncements are made applicable to private companies. We intend to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Accordingly, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

The following represent our critical accounting policies:

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to absorb credit losses incurred in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the relevant balance sheet date. The amount of the allowance is based on significant estimates, and the ultimate losses may vary from such estimates as more information becomes available or conditions change. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management due to the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses. See Item 7 – “Recent Developments – COVID-19 Pandemic”.

As a substantial percentage of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions are instrumental in determining the value of properties. Overly optimistic assumptions or negative changes to assumptions could significantly affect the valuation of a property securing a loan and the related allowance determined. Management carefully reviews the assumptions supporting such appraisals to determine that the resulting values reasonably reflect amounts realizable on the related loans.

Management performs an evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly. We consider a variety of factors in establishing this estimate including, but not limited to, current economic conditions, delinquency statistics, credit concentrations, the adequacy of the underlying collateral, the financial strength of the

66

borrower, results of internal loan reviews and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates by management that may be susceptible to significant change based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions.

The evaluation has specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are deemed to be impaired and classified as special mention, substandard, doubtful, or loss. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is generally established when the collateral value of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.

Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance we have established which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense (benefit) is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for temporary differences between carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. We recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in other expense. A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. Management determines the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance based upon the realizability of tax benefits from the reversal of temporary differences creating the deferred tax assets, as well as the amounts of available open tax carrybacks, if any. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, no valuation allowance was required.

We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax assets and liabilities. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets are inherently subjective and are reviewed on a regular basis as regulatory or business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance that results in additional income tax expense in the period in which it is recognized would negatively affect earnings.

Fair Value Measurements. The fair value of a financial instrument is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the particular asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We estimate the fair value of a financial instrument and any related asset impairment using a variety of valuation methods. Where financial instruments are actively traded and have quoted market prices, quoted market prices as of the measurement date are used for fair value. When the financial instruments are not actively traded, other observable market inputs, such as quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data, may be used, if available, to determine fair value. When observable market prices do not exist, we estimate fair value. These estimates are subjective in nature and imprecision in estimating these factors can impact the amount of revenue or loss recorded.

Investment Securities. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed by management on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant, for possible other-than-temporary impairment. In determining other-than-temporary impairment, management considers many factors, including the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospectus of the issuer, whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions and whether the Company has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the statement of operations. The assessment of whether other-than-temporary impairment exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time. In order to determine other-than-temporary impairment for mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, we compare the present value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding evaluation date to the

67

current expected remaining cash flows. Other-than-temporary impairment is deemed to have occurred if there has been an adverse change in the remaining expected future cash flows.

Pension Obligations.  We maintain a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of our full-time employees hired before September 1, 2019. The benefits are developed from actuarial valuations and are based on the employee’s years of service and compensation. Actuarial assumptions such as interest rates, expected return on plan assets, turnover, mortality and rates of future compensation increases have a significant impact on the costs, assets and liabilities of the plan. Pension expense is the net of service cost, interest cost, return on plan assets and amortization of gains and losses not immediately recognized.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets.   The excess of the cost of acquired entities over the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is carried at its acquired value and is reviewed annually for impairment, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may be impaired.

Acquired identifiable intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful economic life. Customer relationship intangibles are generally amortized over fifteen years based upon the projected discounted cash flows of the accounts acquired. Core deposit premium related to the Bank’s assumption of certain deposit liabilities is being amortized over fifteen years. Acquired identifiable intangible assets that are amortized are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may be impaired.

68

Average Balances and Yields  

The following table sets forth average balances, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the years indicated.  No tax-equivalent yield adjustments have been made, as the effects would be immaterial.  All average balances are daily average balances.  Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances.  The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts, and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or interest expense, as applicable.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2020							2019							2018
	(As Restated)							(As Restated)
	Average							Average							Average
	Outstanding					Average		Outstanding					Average		Outstanding					Average
	Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost		Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost		Balance			Interest		Yield/Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	1,092,425		$	49,510	4.53	%	$	1,031,592		$	49,818	4.83	%	$	969,624		$	43,649	4.50	%
Securities		92,981			2,108	2.27	%		107,572			2,541	2.36	%		82,514			1,367	1.66	%
Interest-earning deposits		129,097			1,901	1.47	%		72,686			1,800	2.48	%		92,757			1,470	1.58	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,314,503			53,519	4.07	%		1,211,850			54,159	4.47	%		1,144,895			46,486	4.06	%
Non-interest-earning assets		137,952							118,482							102,942
Total assets	$	1,452,455						$	1,330,332						$	1,247,837
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	110,444			215	0.19	%	$	114,699			341	0.30	%	$	106,309			249	0.23	%
Savings deposits		241,471			127	0.05	%		246,055			126	0.05	%		241,357			124	0.05	%
Money market deposits		351,790			1,997	0.57	%		338,883			1,818	0.54	%		328,242			1,231	0.38	%
Certificates of deposit		127,671			2,268	1.78	%		128,041			1,960	1.53	%		129,495			1,491	1.15	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		831,376			4,607	0.55	%		827,678			4,245	0.51	%		805,403			3,095	0.38	%
Borrowings and other		8,624			124	1.44	%		7,857			235	2.99	%		3,773			91	2.41	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		840,000			4,731	0.56	%		835,535			4,480	0.54	%		809,176			3,186	0.39	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		390,366							367,468							329,262
Total liabilities		1,230,366							1,203,003							1,138,438
Total shareholders' equity		222,089							127,329							109,399
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,452,455						$	1,330,332						$	1,247,837
Net interest income				$	48,788						$	49,679						$	43,300
Net interest rate spread (1)						3.51	%						3.93	%						3.67	%
Net interest-earning assets (2)	$	474,503						$	376,315						$	335,719
Net interest margin (3)						3.71	%						4.10	%						3.78	%
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities		156.49	%						145.04	%						141.49	%

(1) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.

(2) Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(3) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

69

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents the sum of the prior two columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	Year Ended June 30,						Year Ended June 30,
	2020 vs. 2019						2019 vs. 2018
	(As Restated)						(As Restated)
					Total						Total
	Increase (Decrease) Due to				Increase		Increase (Decrease) Due to				Increase
	Volume		Rate		(Decrease)		Volume		Rate		(Decrease)
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	2,849	$	(3,157)	$	(308)	$	2,884	$	3,285	$	6,169
Securities		(334)		(99)		(433)		489		685		1,174
Interest-earning deposits		1,025		(924)		101		(368)		698		330
Total interest-earning assets		3,540		(4,180)		(640)		3,005		4,668		7,673
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits		(12)		(114)		(126)		21		71		92
Savings deposits		(2)		3		1		2		—		2
Money market deposits		71		108		179		41		546		587
Certificates of deposit		(6)		314		308		(17)		486		469
Total interest-bearing deposits		51		311		362		47		1,103		1,150
Borrowings and other		21		(132)		(111)		118		26		144
Total interest-bearing liabilities		72		179		251		165		1,129		1,294
Change in net interest income	$	3,468	$	(4,359)	$	(891)	$	2,840	$	3,539	$	6,379

Exclusive of the impact of PPP loans, the Company expects its first fiscal quarter of 2021 net interest margin to decrease due to the precipitous drop in the Federal Funds, Prime and LIBOR interest rates in the latter half of the third fiscal quarter of 2020, and the continued drop in the LIBOR interest rates in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020. Expected decreases in average interest earning asset yields are unlikely to be fully offset by expected decreases in the average cost of funds. Although the stated interest rate on PPP loans is fixed at 1.00%, the Company’s recognition of the interest income on origination fees, net of deferred origination costs, on PPP loans is uncertain at this time and will likely cause interest earning asset yield volatility as loans are forgiven by the SBA.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019

Total Assets. Total assets increased $58.1 million, or 4.0%, to $1.52 billion at June 30, 2020 from $1.47 billion at June 30, 2019. The increase was due primarily to an increase of $110.3 million, or 10.6%, in net loans receivable as well as a $31.8 million, or 121.6%, increase in other assets partially offset by a decrease of $73.2 million, or 31.8%, in cash and cash equivalents and a decrease of $10.9 million, or 11.9%, in securities available for sale. The $31.8 million increase in other assets from $26.2 million at June 30, 2019 to $58.0 million at June 30, 2020 was primarily due to an increase in the estimated fair value of derivative assets related to interest rate swaps.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $73.2 million, or 31.8%, to $156.9 million at June 30, 2020 from $230.1 million at June 30, 2019. This decrease resulted from net decreases in deposits of $61.2 million, which included $38.8 million of deposits returned as a result of unfilled stock subscriptions related to the completion of our mutual holding company reorganization and minority stock issuance in July 2019, as well as, from an

70

increase in net loans receivable of $94.5 million, or 9.0%, for the year ended June 30, 2020.  These uses of cash were partially offset by the minority stock issuance which resulted in $109.1 million of net proceeds to the Company.

Securities Available for Sale. Total securities available for sale decreased $10.9 million, or 12.6%, to $75.8 million at June 30, 2020 from $86.7 million at June 30, 2019. The decrease was primarily due to maturities of municipal obligations and U.S. Government obligations, as well as, the sale of U.S. Government obligations during the year ended June 30, 2020.  Due to the meaningful decline in fixed income yields during fiscal 2020, along with uncertainties related to COVID-19, management favored maintaining increased levels of cash and cash equivalents to fund loans and/or provide for deposit outflows as opposed to reinvesting proceeds from maturing securities.

Securities Held to Maturity. Total securities held to maturity increased $2.9 million, or 76.1%, to $6.8 million at June 30, 2020 from $3.9 million at June 30, 2019 due primarily to the purchase of a $2.0 million corporate debt security.

Net Loans. Net loans of $1.15 billion at June 30, 2020 increased $110.3 million, or 10.6%, from $1.04 billion at June 30, 2019. By loan category, commercial real estate loans increased by $36.1 million, or 8.7%, to $450.5 million at June 30, 2020 from $414.4 million at June 30, 2019; commercial and industrial loans increased $69.7 million, or 41.7%, to $237.2 million at June 30, 2020 from $167.5 million at June 30, 2019 and consumer loans increased by $9.4 million, or 43.7%, to $30.9 million at June 30, 2020 from $21.5 million at June 30, 2019. In addition, commercial construction loans increased $6.5 million, or 7.6%, to $91.8 million at June 30, 2020 from $85.3 million at June 30, 2019. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in one- to four-family residential mortgage loans of $1.4 million, or 0.5%, to $280.0 million at June 30, 2020 from $281.4 million at June 30, 2019. The increase in commercial real estate loans was related to the funding of multiple relatively large loan commitments during the year ended June 30, 2020 which are secured by seasoned properties inside of our market area, as well as, the conversion of several commercial construction loans to permanent financing during the same year. The increase in commercial and industrial loans was primarily due to the funding of $74.0 million of PPP loans during the year ended June 30, 2020. The increase in consumer loans reflected an increase in personal loans to the owners of certain commercial businesses.

Deposits. Total deposits decreased $61.2 million, or 4.6%, to $1.27 billion at June 30, 2020 from $1.33 billion at June 30, 2019. The decrease in deposits reflected a decrease in interest-bearing demand accounts of $109.8 million, or 49.8%, to $110.7 million at June 30, 2020 from $220.5 million at June 30, 2019, a decrease in money market accounts of $28.0 million, or 7.5%, to $343.8 million at June 30, 2020 from $371.8 million at June 30, 2019 and a decrease in certificates of deposit of $11.0, million, or 8.4%, to $119.6 million at June 30, 2020 from $130.6 million at June 30, 2019, partially offset by an increase in non-interest bearing demand accounts of $80.0 million, or 22.4%, to $437.5 million at June 30, 2020 from $357.5 million at June 30, 2019 and an increase in savings accounts of $7.7 million, or 3.1%, to $258.6 million at June 30, 2020 from $250.9 million at June 30, 2019. The decrease in interest-bearing demand accounts and money market accounts was primarily due to stock subscription orders from our minority stock offering being fulfilled or returned to subscribers. The decrease in certificates of deposit was primarily due to the maturity of certain large dollar accounts.  The increase in non-interest bearing demand accounts and the increase in savings accounts were primarily due to deposit customers increasing cash balances during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Total Shareholders’ Equity. Total shareholders’ equity increased $100.7 million, or 81.7%, to $224.0 million at June 30, 2020 from $123.3 million at June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to the completion of our minority stock issuance which resulted in $109.1 million in net proceeds to the Company in July 2019, as well as, net income of $5.2 million during the year ended June 30, 2020. The increase was partially offset by unallocated common stock held by the ESOP of $12.6 million and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $6.3 million from our available for sale securities and employee benefit plans.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2020 and June 30, 2019

General.  Net income decreased by $2.1 million, or 28.9%, to $5.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $7.3 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.  The decrease was primarily due to a $13.8 million increase in non-interest expense and a $0.9 million decrease in net interest income, offset by an $11.4 million decrease in the provision for loan losses and a $1.3 million increase in non-interest income.  

71

Interest and Dividend Income.  Interest and dividend income decreased $640,000, or 1.2%, to $53.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2020, from $54.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to decreases in interest income on loans and interest income on securities, partially offset by an increase in interest income on interest-earning deposits. The decrease reflected a 40 basis points decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets to 4.07% for the year ended June 30, 2020, from 4.47% for the year ended June 30, 2019, offset by a $102.7 million increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets.

Interest income on loans decreased $308,000, or 0.6%, to $49.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $49.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Interest income on loans decreased primarily due to a 30 basis points decrease in the average yield on loans to 4.53% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 4.83% for the year ended June 30, 2019, largely offset by a $60.8 million increase in the average balance of loans to $1.1 billion for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $1.0 billion for the year ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in the average yield on loans was primarily due to the downward adjustment of interest rates on our existing adjustable-rate loans following the actions taken by the Federal Reserve during the second and third fiscal quarters of 2020 to reduce short-term interest rates and the origination of PPP loans which have a 1.0% interest rate. The increase in the average balance of loans was due to our continued effort to increase our commercial loan portfolio, as well as, the Company’s funding of PPP loans during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020.

Interest income on securities decreased $433,000, or 17.0%, to $2.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $2.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Interest income on securities decreased due to a $14.6 million decrease in the average balance of securities to $93.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $107.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 as well as a nine basis points decrease in the average yield on securities to 2.27% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 2.36% for the year ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in the average balance and average yield of securities was due to scheduled U.S. government and agency and municipal obligation maturities of higher yielding securities, as well as, with the sale of U.S. government and agency obligations.

Interest income on interest-earning deposits increased $101,000, or 5.6%, to $1.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $1.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Interest income on interest-earning deposits increased as average balances on interest-earning deposits increased by $56.4 million to $129.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $72.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 as management favored maintaining increased levels of cash and cash equivalents during the COVID-19 pandemic. The increase was offset by a 101 basis points decrease in the average yield on interest-earning deposits to 1.47% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 2.48% for the year ended June 30, 2019 as market interest rates decreased.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased $251,000, or 5.6%, to $4.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $4.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 as a result of an increase in interest expense on deposits. The increase primarily reflected a two basis points increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 0.56% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 0.54% for the year ended June 30, 2019, as well as a $4.5 million increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities.

Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased $362,000, or 8.5%, to $4.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $4.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits increased primarily due to a four basis points increase in the average cost on interest-bearing deposits to 0.55% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 0.51% for the prior year as well as a $3.7 million increase in the average balance of deposits to $831.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $827.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. The increase in the average cost of deposits reflected competition from other financial service providers operating in our market, specifically with regard to certificates of deposit.

Interest expense on Federal Home Loan Bank of New York borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities decreased $111,000 to $124,000 for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to $235,000 for the year ended June 30, 2019. The decrease was due primarily to a 155 basis points decrease in the average cost of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances and other interest-bearing liabilities to 1.44% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 2.99% for the year ended June 30, 2019, partially offset by, a $767,000 increase in the average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank of New

72

York advances and other interest-bearing liabilities to $8.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $7.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.

Net Interest Income.  Net interest income decreased $891,000, or 1.8%, to $48.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to $49.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.  The decrease reflected a 42 basis points decrease in the net interest rate spread to 3.51% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 3.93% for the year ended June 30, 2019, largely offset by, a $98.2 million increase in the average balance of net interest-earning assets to $474.5 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $376.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.The net interest margin decreased 39 basis points to 3.71% for the year ended June 30, 2020 from 4.10% for the year ended June 30, 2019 due to the sharp decrease in interest rates in response to the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We expect further compression in our net interest margin in future periods.

Provision for Loan Losses.  We recorded a provision for loan losses of $6.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to $18.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. The decrease in the provision of $11.4 million was primarily due to a specific provision in the amount of $15.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2019 related to the charge-off of the entire principal balance owed to the Bank related to the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships. The provision for loan losses recorded in 2020 was due primarily to an increase in our qualitative loss reserve factors relating to local and national economic conditions as well as industry conditions and concentrations, which have experienced deterioration as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the adverse economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our market area and our customers, the Company expects that its provision for loan losses will be elevated in the first fiscal quarter of 2021 and potentially beyond. Net charge-offs decreased to a net recovery of $1.6 million for the year ended June 30, 2020, compared to net charge-offs of $17.2 million for the year ended June 30, 2019. Non-performing assets increased to $13.5 million, or 0.89% of total assets, at June 30, 2020, compared to $12.8 million, or 0.87% of total assets, at June 30, 2019. The allowance for loan losses was $22.9 million, or 1.95% of net loans outstanding, at June 30, 2020 and $14.5 million, or 1.38% of net loans outstanding, at June 30, 2019. We expect economic uncertainty to continue for additional periods which may result in the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans increasing in the future.

Non-Interest Income.  Non-interest income increased $1.3 million, or 8.7%, to $15.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $14.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.  The increase was primarily due to an increase of $407,000 in bank fees and service charges, a $555,000 decrease in the loss on disposal of assets, and a $429,000 increase in Bank-owned life insurance, partially offset by a $125,000 net loss on equity securities. Bank fees and service charges increased primarily due to commercial loan fees. The decrease in loss on disposal of assets for the year ended June 30, 2020 was primarily the result of the sale of a branch location during the year ended June 30, 2019. The increase in bank-owned life insurance income was primarily due to proceeds from a death benefit during the year ended June 30, 2020. Net loss on equity securities during the year ended June 30, 2020 was due to the mark to market of our equity securities during a period of severe market volatility related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Non-Interest Expense.  Non-interest expense increased $13.8 million, or 36.4%, to $51.7 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $37.9 million for the year ended June 30, 2019.  The $13.8 million increase was primarily the result of the $5.4 million contribution of stock and cash to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation in conjunction with our minority stock issuance, and a $2.5 million charge based on the net negative deposit balance of the various Mann Entities’ accounts after setoffs. Salaries and benefits expense increased $2.3 million due to annual increases and employee stock ownership program (“ESOP”) expenses. Additionally, professional fees increased $3.3 million to $3.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $420,000 for the year ended June 30, 2019, mainly due to expenses related to the Mann Entities’ potentially fraudulent activity and related litigation. The increase in non-interest expense was partially offset by a decrease in FDIC insurance premiums related to Small Bank Assessment Credits.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased $60,000 to $797,000 for the year ended June 30, 2020 from $737,000 for the year ended June 30, 2019. The income tax expense for the year ended June 30, 2020 included the tax benefit related to our $5.4 million contribution to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation. Income tax expense for the year ended June 30, 2019 reflected a $580,000 tax benefit related to the final evaluation of our net deferred tax asset in connection with the rate reduction resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Our effective tax rate was 13.3% for the year ended June 30, 2020 compared to 9.2% for the year ended June 30, 2019.

73

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity. Liquidity describes our ability to meet the financial obligations that arise in the ordinary course of business. Liquidity is primarily needed to meet the borrowing and deposit withdrawal requirements of our customers and to fund current and planned expenditures. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and securities, and proceeds from calls, maturities and sales of securities. We also have the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York. At June 30, 2020, we had the ability to borrow up to $375.9 million, of which none was utilized for borrowings and $222.5 million was utilized as collateral for letters of credit issued to secure municipal deposits. At June 30, 2020, we had a $20.0 million unsecured line of credit with a correspondent bank with no outstanding balance. We cannot predict what the impact of the events described in “Recent Developments – COVID-19 Pandemic and Potentially Fraudulent Activity” above may have on our liquidity and capital resources beyond the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.

The board of directors is responsible for establishing and monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists for meeting the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawals of our customers as well as unanticipated contingencies. We believe that we had enough sources of liquidity to satisfy our short and long-term liquidity needs as of June 30, 2020.

While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and competition. Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any period. At June 30, 2020, cash and cash equivalents totaled $156.9 million. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $75.8 million at June 30, 2020.

We are committed to maintaining a strong liquidity position. We monitor our liquidity position on a daily basis. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds to meet our current funding commitments. Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2020 totaled $81.8 million, or 6.4%, of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or borrowings than we currently pay. We believe, however, based on past experience that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

Capital Resources. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by NYSDFS and the FDIC. At June 30, 2020, we exceeded all applicable regulatory capital requirements, and were considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See Note 17 in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements.

The net offering proceeds significantly increased our liquidity and capital resources. The initial level of liquidity will continue to be reduced as net offering proceeds are used for general corporate purposes, including funding loans. Our financial condition and results of operations have been enhanced by the net offering proceeds, resulting in increased net interest-earning assets and net interest income. However, due to the increase in equity resulting from the net offering proceeds, as well as other factors associated with the offering, our return on equity will be lower immediately following the offering.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. The financial instruments include commitments to originate loans, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit, which involve elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. Our exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of the instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

74

At June 30, 2020, we had $273.7 million of commitments to originate loans, comprised of $183.5 million of commitments under commercial loans and lines of credit (including $35.8 million of unadvanced portions of commercial construction loans), $49.2 million of commitments under home equity loans and lines of credit, $32.8 million of commitments to purchase one- to four-family residential real estate loans and $8.2 million of unfunded commitments under consumer lines of credit. In addition, at June 30, 2020, we had $30.7 million in standby letters of credit outstanding. See Note 15 in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information.

Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include data processing services, operating leases for premises and equipment, agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please refer to Note 3 in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements that appear starting on page 86 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for a description of recent accounting pronouncements that may affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

ITEM 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable, as Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. is a “smaller reporting company.”

ITEM 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	76
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2020 and 2019	77
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019	78
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019	79
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Net Worth for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively	81
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019	82
Notes to consolidated financial statements	83

75

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Shareholders of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.

Albany, New York

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of condition of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity, changes in net worth, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2020, and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated September 28, 2020, except for the effect of the material weaknesses described in the second and third paragraphs as to which the date is February 22, 2021, expressed an adverse opinion thereon.

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has restated its June 30, 2020 and 2019 consolidated financial statements to correct misstatements.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2014.

/s/ Bonadio & Co., LLP

Syracuse, New York

September 28, 2020, except for the effect of the restatement

disclosed in Note 2, as to which the date is February 22, 2021

76

PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019
			(As Restated)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	21,188	$	48,385
Federal funds sold		1,382		2,083
Interest-earning deposits with banks		134,333		179,641
Cash and cash equivalents		156,903		230,109
Securities available for sale, at fair value		75,768		86,695
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $6,917 at June 30, 2020; and $3,887 at June 30, 2019)		6,822		3,873
Equity securities, at fair value		8,533		8,658
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock		1,010		924
Net loans receivable		1,148,399		1,038,138
Accrued interest receivable		3,467		4,374
Premises and equipment, net		40,863		41,710
Bank-owned life insurance		17,240		17,834
Goodwill		7,292		7,292
Other intangible assets, net		2,159		2,523
Other assets		57,956		26,155
Total assets	$	1,526,412	$	1,468,285
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	437,536	$	357,523
Interest bearing deposits		832,614		973,795
Total deposits		1,270,150		1,331,318
Mortgagors’ escrow deposits		6,044		6,044
Due to broker		7,758		—
Other liabilities		18,494		7,665
Total liabilities		1,302,446		1,345,027
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of June 30, 2020)		—		—
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized, 25,977,679 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2020)		260		—
Additional paid in capital		113,963		—
Retained earnings		139,734		134,361
Unallocated common stock of Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP")		(12,621)		—
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(17,370)		(11,103)
Total shareholders' equity		223,966		123,258
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,526,412	$	1,468,285

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

77

PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

	For the Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
	(As Restated)		(As Restated)
Interest and dividend income:
Loans	$	49,510	$	49,818
Securities		2,108		2,541
Interest-earning deposits with banks and other		1,901		1,800
Total interest and dividend income		53,519		54,159
Interest expense:
Deposits		4,607		4,245
Borrowings and other		124		235
Total interest expense		4,731		4,480
Net interest income		48,788		49,679
Provision for loan losses		6,790		18,150
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		41,998		31,529
Noninterest income:
Bank fees and service charges		8,473		8,066
Insurance and wealth management services		6,477		6,457
Net loss on equity securities		(125)		—
Net gain on available for sale securities transactions		138		6
Net loss on disposal of assets		(28)		(583)
Bank-owned life insurance		548		119
Other		199		342
Total noninterest income		15,682		14,407
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		24,982		22,647
Net occupancy and equipment		6,140		5,875
Data processing		3,232		2,940
Advertising and marketing		678		925
FDIC insurance premiums		118		676
Contribution to Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation		5,446		—
Fraudulent activity		2,500		—
Professional fees		3,759		420
Other		4,830		4,407
Total noninterest expense		51,685		37,890
Income before income taxes		5,995		8,046
Income tax expense		797		737
Net income	$	5,198	$	7,309
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.21
Diluted	$	0.21
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted		25,013,452

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

78

PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(dollars in thousands)

	For the Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
	(As Restated)		(As Restated)
Net income	$	5,198	$	7,309
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gains/losses on securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		39		(90)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(138)		(6)
		(99)		(96)
Tax benefit		(25)		(25)
		(74)		(71)
Defined benefit plan:
Change in funded status of defined benefit plans		(9,623)		(3,526)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net actuarial loss		1,080		760
		(8,543)		(2,766)
Tax effect		(2,234)		(723)
		(6,309)		(2,043)
Total other comprehensive loss		(6,383)		(2,114)
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(1,185)	$	5,195

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

79

PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

					Additional				Unallocated		Accumulated Other		Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Retained		Common		Comprehensive		Shareholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Earnings		Stock of ESOP		Loss		Equity
Balance as of July 1, 2019 (as restated)		—	$	—	$	—	$	134,361	$	—	$	(11,103)	$	123,258
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - revenue recognition (1)		—		—		—		291		—		—		291
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - equity securities (2)		—		—		—		(116)		—		116		—
Net income		—		—		—		5,198		—		—		5,198
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		—		—		—		(6,383)		(6,383)
Issuance of common stock to the mutual holding company		14,287,723		143		—		—		—		—		143
Issuance of common stock for the initial public offering, net of offering costs		11,170,402		112		108,800		—		—		—		108,912
Issuance of common stock to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation		519,554		5		5,191		—		—		—		5,196
Purchase of common stock by the ESOP (1,018,325 shares)		—		—		—		—		(13,644)		—		(13,644)
ESOP shares committed to be released (76,374 shares)		—		—		(28)		—		1,023		—		995
Balance as of June 30, 2020		25,977,679	$	260	$	113,963	$	139,734	$	(12,621)	$	(17,370)	$	223,966

(1) Adoption of Accounting Standard Update 2014-09.

(2) Adoption of Accounting Standard Update 2016-01.

80

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET WORTH

(dollars in thousands)

			Accumulated
			Other		Total
	Retained		Comprehensive		Net
	Earnings		Loss		Worth
Balance as of July 1, 2018	$	127,052	$	(8,989)	$	118,063
Net income		7,309		—		7,309
Other comprehensive loss		—		(2,114)		(2,114)
Balance as of June 30, 2019 (as restated)	$	134,361	$	(11,103)	$	123,258

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

81

PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

	For the Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
	(As Restated)		(As Restated)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	5,198	$	7,309
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,906		2,814
Provision for loan losses		6,790		18,150
Net accretion on securities		(329)		(533)
ESOP compensation		995		—
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance		(548)		(119)
Proceeds from sale of loans		—		227
Net loss on the sale, disposal or write-down of premises and equipment, and other real estate owned		28		583
Net loss on equity securities		125		—
Net gain on available for sale securities transactions		(138)		(6)
Deferred tax benefit		(3,492)		(63)
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		907		(520)
Increase in due to broker		7,758		—
Stock contribution to Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation		5,196		—
Increase in other assets		(24,059)		(18,279)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		688		(3,434)
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,025		6,129
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities, paydowns and calls of securities available for sale		80,875		61,534
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		5,030		—
Purchases of securities available for sale		(74,610)		(68,381)
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of securities held to maturity		3,763		5,252
Purchases of securities held to maturity		(6,712)		(3,828)
Net purchases of FHLBNY stock		(86)		(41)
Net increase in loans receivable		(117,311)		(70,887)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,703)		(2,284)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment, and other real estate owned		138		617
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance death benefit		1,142		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(109,474)		(78,018)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits		(61,168)		181,056
Net increase in mortgagors’ escrow deposits		—		662
Issuance of common stock		109,055		—
Purchase of shares by the ESOP		(13,644)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		34,243		181,718
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(73,206)		109,829
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		230,109		120,280
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	156,903	$	230,109
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	4,714	$	4,474
Income taxes	$	1,800	$	5,350
Non-cash investing and financing activity:
Loans transferred to other real estate owned	$	260	$	274

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

82

PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2020 AND 2019

1.        NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Nature of Operations

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a mid-tier stock holding company whose wholly owned subsidiary is Pioneer Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is a New York State chartered savings bank whose wholly owned subsidiaries are Pioneer Commercial Bank, Anchor Agency, Inc. and Pioneer Financial Services, Inc.

The Company provides diversified financial services through the Bank and its subsidiaries, with 22 offices in the Capital Region of New York State. The Company, through its subsidiaries, offers a broad array of deposit, lending, and other financial services to individuals, businesses, and municipalities.   There are no significant concentrations of loans to any one customer or industry. However, the customers’ ability to repay their loans is dependent on the real estate and general economic conditions in the Bank’s market area.

Mutual Holding Company Reorganization and Minority Stock Issuance

On July 17, 2019, Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. became the holding company of the Bank when it closed its stock offering in connection with the completion of the reorganization of the Bank into the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization. The Company sold 11,170,402 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, for net proceeds of $109.1 million, issued 14,287,723 shares to Pioneer Bancorp, MHC and contributed 519,554 shares of common stock and $250,000 in cash to the Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation. The Company established an ESOP which owns 1,018,325 shares of common stock of the Company. The remaining amount of subscription proceeds received and recorded as a liability on June 30, 2019, was refunded to subscribers. Pioneer Bancorp, MHC now owns 55% of the common stock of the Company.

83

2.     RESTATEMENT OF THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Restatement results from a technical accounting correction to reflect the Mann Entities-related $15.8 million Loan Balances Impairment as a recognized (Type I) subsequent event in the quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, rather than as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2019, notwithstanding that the Company and the Bank did not start to become aware of the events causing the Impairment until the quarter ended September 30, 2019 (capitalized terms defined below).

On February 12, 2021, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, after consultation with management, determined that certain financial statements previously issued by the Company should be restated and no longer relied upon (the “Restatement”).  The following financial statements of the Company are impacted by the Restatement: (a) the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2020, as reported in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for those years, and (b) the unaudited consolidated financial statements for the periods ended September 30, 2019, December 31, 2019, March 31, 2020, and September 30, 2020, as reported in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

As previously disclosed, after the Company’s fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, but prior to December 10, 2019, the date the financial statements for that year were issued, the Company became aware of fraudulent activity associated with transactions by an established business customer of the Bank. The customer, Michael Mann, and various affiliated entities (collectively, the “Mann Entities”) had numerous general deposit corporate operating accounts and loans with the Bank.

As reflected in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 11, 2019, the Company’s potential exposure with respect to the Mann Entities’ lending activity was approximately $15.8 million (the “Loan Balances”).  Subsequently, the Company learned that Mr. Mann had perpetrated a concealed fraud on the Bank and many other parties.  In the second quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company concluded that due to the impact of the potential fraudulent activity, the Loan Balances were impaired and, as a result, recorded a provision for loan losses in the amount of $15.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2020 related to the charge-off of the entire Loan Balances (the “Impairment”).  

In July 2020, the Company received a comment letter from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) related to, among other matters, the classification of the Loan Balances Impairment as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019 (the “2019 Form 10-K”). The Company and the Staff engaged in several discussions regarding the Staff’s position, based on technical accounting precepts, that the Loan Balances should be deemed impaired as of June 30, 2019, and the Loan Balances Impairment should have been recognized by the Company in the quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 as a Type I subsequent event and not as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event. In its communications with the Staff, the Company described that its original determination that the Loan Balances Impairment was a Type II subsequent event in the Company’s 2019 Form 10-K recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2019, was based on the unique circumstances of the event.

As a result of the Staff’s position, the Restatement reflects the Loan Balances Impairment in the quarter and fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 (as a recognized (Type I) subsequent event), rather than as a disclosure only nonrecognized (Type II) subsequent event recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2019.  This technical accounting correction is not a result of any new facts coming to light after the filing of the 2019 Form 10-K.

84

The effects of the Restatement on the consolidated statement of condition as of June 30, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2019
	As Previously		Restatement
	Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Condition
Net loans receivable	$	1,053,938	$	(15,800)	$	1,038,138
Other assets		22,062		4,093		26,155
Total assets		1,479,992		(11,707)		1,468,285
Total liabilities		1,345,027		—		1,345,027
Retained earnings		146,068		(11,707)		134,361
Total net worth		134,965		(11,707)		123,258
Total liabilities and net worth		1,479,992		(11,707)		1,468,285

The tables below show the effects of the Restatement on the consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) and consolidated statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except for per share data).

	Year Ended June 30, 2020
	As Previously		Restatement
	Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Net interest income	$	48,788	$	—	$	48,788
Provision for loan losses		22,590		(15,800)		6,790
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		26,198		15,800		41,998
Total noninterest income		15,682		—		15,682
Total noninterest expense		51,685		—		51,685
Income (loss) before income taxes		(9,805)		15,800		5,995
Income tax expense (benefit)		(3,296)		4,093		797
Net income (loss)		(6,509)		11,707		5,198
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.26)	$	0.47	$	0.21
Diluted	$	(0.26)	$	0.47	$	0.21
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss:
Net income (loss)	$	(6,509)	$	11,707	$	5,198
Comprehensive loss		(12,892)		11,707		(1,185)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Net income (loss)	$	(6,509)	$	11,707	$	5,198
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		22,590		(15,800)		6,790
Increase in other assets		(28,152)		4,093		(24,059)

85

	Year Ended June 30, 2019
	As Previously		Restatement
	Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Net interest income	$	49,679	$	—	$	49,679
Provision for loan losses		2,350		15,800		18,150
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		47,329		(15,800)		31,529
Total noninterest income		14,407		—		14,407
Total noninterest expense		37,890		—		37,890
Income before income taxes		23,846		(15,800)		8,046
Income tax expense		4,830		(4,093)		737
Net income		19,016		(11,707)		7,309
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income:
Net income	$	19,016	$	(11,707)	$	7,309
Comprehensive income		16,902		(11,707)		5,195
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Net income	$	19,016	$	(11,707)	$	7,309
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		2,350		15,800		18,150
Increase in other assets		(14,186)		(4,093)		(18,279)

In addition to the above, various footnotes reflect the effects of these Restatements, including but not limited to, Note 6, Net Loans Receivable; Note 14, Income Taxes; and Note 22, Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited).

3.        SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank, and the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Financial information for the periods before the Company’s mutual holding company reorganization and stock offering on July 17, 2019 are those of the Bank and its subsidiaries.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ substantially from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses, valuation of securities and other financial instruments, the funded status and expense of employee benefit plans, and the realizability of deferred tax assets are particularly subject to change.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the statement of condition date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the statement of condition, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing consolidated financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the statement of condition but arose after that date.

86

Management has reviewed events occurring through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued and, when appropriate, recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements or notes to the consolidated financial statements.  See Note 21 “Subsequent Events,” for additional information.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold with maturities less than three months, and interest-bearing deposits with banks. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, changes in mortgagor’s escrow deposits, and short-term borrowings.

Securities Available for Sale, Securities Held to Maturity and Equity Securities

Management determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of purchase. If management has the positive intent and ability to hold debt securities to maturity, they are classified as securities held to maturity and are stated at amortized cost. If debt securities are purchased for the purpose of selling them in the near term, they are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reflected in current earnings. All other debt securities are classified as securities available for sale and reported at fair value, with net unrealized gains or losses reported, net of income taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive loss, a component of shareholders’ equity. All marketable equity securities are reported at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through net income (loss) in the consolidated statement of operations. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, and during the periods then ended, the Company did not hold any securities considered to be trading securities.

Gains or losses on the sale or call of securities are based on the net proceeds received and the amortized cost of the securities sold or called, using the specific identification method. Unrealized losses on securities which reflect a decline in value which is other-than-temporary are charged to income. The cost of securities is adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, which is calculated on an effective interest method.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. In determining OTTI, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the entity has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time. In order to determine OTTI for mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, the Company compares the present value of the remaining cash flows as estimated at the preceding evaluation date to the current expected remaining cash flows. OTTI is deemed to have occurred if there has been an adverse change in the remaining expected future cash flows.

When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

Securities are exposed to various risks such as interest rate, market and credit risks. Due to the level of risk associated with certain securities, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in the values of securities will occur

87

in the near term and that such changes could materially affect the amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) Stock

The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors. FHLBNY stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends, if any, are reported as income.

Loans Held for Sale

Management determines the appropriate classification of mortgage loans at the time of commitment for new loan originations or, for convertible adjustable rate loans, at the time of conversion to a fixed interest rate. Mortgage loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value as determined by outstanding commitments from investors or fair value based upon recent sales for loans with no commitments. In order to limit the interest rate risk associated with loans held for sale, the Company may enter into various agreements to sell loans in the secondary mortgage market at fixed rates.

Gains and losses on the disposition of loans held for sale are determined based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the loan sold plus the value of servicing rights, if retained.

At June 30, 2020 and 2019 the Company had no loans held for sale.

Net Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are reported at the principal amount outstanding, plus net deferred loan costs and net of the allowance for loan losses. Interest income accrues on the unpaid principal balance. Interest income on loans is not recognized when considered doubtful of collection by management (generally, when principal or interest payments are ninety days or more past due). Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually evaluated impaired loans. A loan is moved to non-accrual status in accordance with the Company’s policy, typically after 90 days of non-payment.

All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on a cost recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Fees received from loan originations and certain direct origination costs are deferred and amortized into interest income to provide for a level-yield on the underlying loans without anticipating prepayments.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. The allowance for loan losses is increased through charges to the provision for loan losses. Loans are charged against the allowance when management believes that the collectability of the principal is not probable. Recoveries on loans previously charged-off are credited to the allowance for loan losses when realized. The allowance is an amount that management believes is adequate for probable incurred losses on existing loans.

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans, for which the terms have been modified, and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, are considered troubled debt restructurings and classified as impaired.

88

Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Commercial business, commercial real estate, commercial construction, and certain residential real estate loans are individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment, and accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures unless classified as a troubled debt restructuring.

Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Company determines the amount of an allowance in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.

The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the most recent one, three, five or ten year periods, whichever is highest. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other economic factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment. These economic factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels of and trends in charge-offs and recoveries; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices; experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff; national and local economic trends and conditions; industry conditions; and effects of changes in credit concentrations. The following portfolio segments have been identified: Commercial, Residential Mortgages, Home Equity Loans and Lines, and Consumer. Commercial loan classes include commercial and industrial, real estate, and construction.

The risk characteristics of each of the identified portfolio segments and classes are as follows:

Commercial – Commercial and industrial loans are commercial loans other than those secured by real estate. Commercial and industrial loans are generally of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value. Commercial and industrial loans also include Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans which carry a 100% SBA guarantee if made to eligible borrowers.

Commercial real estate loans are secured by multi-family and nonresidential real estate and generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans depend on the global cash flow analysis of the borrower and the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. Of primary concern in commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the cash flow from the property. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent than residential real estate loans, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Commercial real estate is also subject to adverse market conditions that cause a decrease in market value or lease rates, obsolescence in location or function and market conditions associated with oversupply in a specific region.

89

Commercial construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, additional funds may be required to be advanced in excess of the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the value of the building may be insufficient to assure full repayment if liquidation is required. If foreclosure is required on a building before or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs will be recovered.

Residential Mortgages– Residential mortgage loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable. Repayment of residential mortgage loans is subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy leading to increased default rate and decreased market values from oversupply in a geographic area. In general, residential mortgage loans depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

Home Equity Loans and Lines – Home equity loans secured by real estate may entail greater risk than first-lien residential mortgage loans due to a lower lien position. In general, repayment of home equity loans depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

Consumer - Consumer loans, particularly unsecured loans and loans secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as motor vehicles, are subject to greater risk. In all cases, collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and a small remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower.

Derivatives

In the normal course of business, the Company utilizes interest rate swaps with certain commercial borrowers and third-party counterparties. These transactions are accounted for as derivatives. The derivatives are entered into in connection with the Company’s asset and liability management activities and not for trading purposes.

The derivatives are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes and therefore all derivatives are recorded at fair value as derivative assets and derivative liabilities, included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated statement of condition, with changes in fair value recognized as non-interest income in the consolidated statement of operations.

Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets (39 years for buildings, 15 years for land improvements and 3 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the term of the related leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets. Land is carried at cost.

Other Real Estate Owned

Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is initially recorded at fair value of the asset acquired less an estimate of the costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis. Fair value of OREO is generally determined through independent appraisals. At the time of foreclosure or when the Company obtains legal title to the property, the excess, if any, of

90

the recorded investment in the loan over the fair value of the asset received is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent declines in the fair value of such assets, or increases in the estimated costs to sell the properties and net operating expenses of such assets, are charged directly to other expenses. OREO is included in other assets in the consolidated statements of condition.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance

The Company is the beneficiary of a policy that insures the lives of certain current and former officers of the Company. The Company has recognized the cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized under the insurance policy, as an asset in the consolidated statements of condition. Changes in the cash surrender value and insurance benefit payments are recorded in noninterest income.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The excess of the cost of acquired entities over the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, less liabilities assumed, is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is carried at its acquired value and is reviewed annually for impairment, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may be impaired.

Acquired identifiable intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful economic life. Customer relationship intangibles are generally amortized over fifteen years based upon the projected discounted cash flows of the accounts acquired. Core deposit premium related to the Company’s assumption of certain deposit liabilities is being amortized over fifteen years. Acquired identifiable intangible assets that are amortized are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may be impaired.

Due to Broker

As of June 30, 2020, the Company recorded a liability classified as Due to Broker for the purchase of securities with trade dates prior to year-end and settlement dates subsequent to year-end.

Advertising

The Company expenses costs associated with advertising as they are incurred.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in other expense.

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded.

Statutory Transfer of Surplus

A quarterly transfer of 10% of net income may be made to surplus in accordance with New York State Banking Regulations. No transfer is required if net worth as a percent of deposits exceeds 10% at the end of each quarter. In accordance with State of New York Banking Law, surplus is subject to certain restrictions, including a prohibition of its use for payment of dividends, except with the approval of the Department of Financial Services.

Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to certain financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk such as commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit and standby letters of credit. The face amount for these items represents exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral, or ability to repay. The Company’s policy is to record such instruments when funded.

91

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights are recognized in other assets when loans are sold with servicing retained based on their estimated fair values. The cost allocated to the servicing right is capitalized as a separate asset and amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Capitalized mortgage servicing rights are assessed for impairment based on the fair value of those rights, and any impairment loss is recognized through a valuation allowance.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) represents the sum of net income (loss) and items of other comprehensive income or loss, which are reported directly in shareholders’ equity, net of tax. Other comprehensive income or loss includes the unrealized gain or loss on securities available for sale and changes in the funded status of the Company’s defined benefit pension and other post-retirement plans, net of tax.

Cash Reserve Requirement

The Company may be required to maintain certain reserves of cash and/or deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company had no reserve requirement at June 30, 2020 and 2019.

Employee Benefits

The Company has a defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees hired before September 1, 2019. The benefits are developed from actuarial valuations and are based on the employee’s years of service and compensation. Actuarial assumptions such as interest rates, expected return on plan assets, turnover, mortality and rates of future compensation increases have a significant impact on the costs, assets and liabilities of the plan. Pension expense is the net of service cost, interest cost, return on plan assets and amortization of gains and losses not immediately recognized.

The Company also provides post-retirement medical and life insurance benefits to certain employees and retirees. The cost of post-retirement benefits is recognized on an accrual basis as employees perform services. Effective October 1, 2006, the post-retirement medical portion of the plan was frozen. Accordingly, after that date there have been no new plan participants.

The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Employer 401(k) expense is the amount of matching contributions. Deferred compensation and supplemental retirement plan expense principally represents investment performance on the various plan assets.

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) covering substantially all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of shareholders’ equity. Compensation expense is based on the market price of shares as they are committed to be released to participant accounts.

Reclassifications

Amounts in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements are reclassified whenever necessary to conform to the current year’s presentation.

Correction of an Immaterial Error

During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment that effected the Consolidated Statements of Condition, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss).  The adjustment related to an error in the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, for three legacy preferred stock holdings in the Company’s investment securities portfolio. 

The impact of this adjustment resulted in a current period decrease in net loss on equity securities of $16,000, a decrease in income tax benefit of $4,000, and a decrease in unrealized holding gains, net of tax, arising during the period of $12,000.  The Company also recorded a decrease in retained earnings of $702,000, a reduction in

92

accumulated other comprehensive loss of $702,000, a decrease in securities available for sale of $5.1 million and an increase in equity securities of $5.1 million as of June 30, 2020.  The Company reviewed and determined that the impact of this error was not material to the previously issued interim consolidated financial statements. 

Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09 amending guidance on “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” and all subsequent ASU’s that modified Topic 606.  The objective of the ASU is to align the recognition of revenue with the transfer of promised goods or services provided to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  This ASU replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP.  A significant amount of the Company’s revenues are derived from net interest income on financial assets and liabilities, which are excluded from the scope of the amended guidance.  With respect to noninterest income, the Company has identified revenue streams within the scope of the guidance, which include insurance revenues, wealth management services, service charges on deposits, interchange income, and gains (losses) from the transfer of other real estate owned.  The Company recorded a net increase to beginning retained earnings of $291,000 as of July 1, 2019 due to the cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606, primarily driven by the recognition of insurance commission income. Refer to Note 18 for additional disclosures required by Topic 606.

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-01 amending guidance on “Financial Instruments (Subtopic 825-10)”.  This amendment addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments.  These amendments require equity securities to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value to be recognized through net income. The amendments also simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring assessment for impairment qualitatively at each reporting period. As of June 30, 2019, the Company had equity investments with a cost of $2.8 million and an estimated fair value of $3.6 million.  On July 1, 2019, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to decrease retained earnings in the amount of $116,000 representing the unrealized loss, net of tax, on these equity securities.  Change in fair value during the year ended June 30, 2020 has been recognized in net income (loss).

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-15 which clarifies how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments are intended to reduce diversity in practice. The amendment covers the following cash flows: Cash payments for debt prepayment or extinguishment costs will be classified in financing activities. Upon settlement of zero-coupon bonds and bonds with insignificant cash coupons, the portion of the payment attributable to imputed interest will be classified as an operating activity, while the portion of the payment attributable to principal will be classified as a financing activity. Cash paid by an acquirer that is not soon after a business combination for the settlement of a contingent consideration liability will be separated between financing activities and operating activities. Cash payments up to the amount of the contingent consideration liability recognized at the acquisition date will be classified in financing activities; any excess will be classified in operating activities. Cash paid soon after the business combination will be classified in investing activities. Cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims will be classified on the basis of the related insurance coverage (that is, the nature of the loss). Cash proceeds from lump-sum settlements will be classified based on the nature of each loss included in the settlement. Cash proceeds received from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) and bank-owned life insurance (BOLI) policies will be classified as cash inflows from investing activities. Cash payments for premiums on COLI and BOLI may be classified as cash outflows for investing, operating, or a combination of both. A transferor’s beneficial interest obtained in a securitization of financial assets will be disclosed as a noncash activity, and cash received from beneficial interests will be classified in investing activities. Distributions received from equity method investees will be classified using either a cumulative earnings approach or a look- through approach as an accounting policy election. The ASU contains additional guidance clarifying when an entity should separate cash receipts and cash payments and classify them into more than one class of cash flows (including when reasonable judgment is required to estimate and allocate cash flows) versus when an entity should classify the aggregate amount into one class of cash flows on the basis of predominance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

93

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-18 related to guidance on “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash” which addresses diversity in practice from entities classifying and presenting transfers between cash and restricted cash as operating, investing or financing activities or as a combination of those activities in the statement of cash flows. The ASU requires entities to show the changes in the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the Statement of Cash Flows. As a result, transfers between such categories will no longer be presented in the Statement of Cash Flows. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-07 related to guidance on “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)” which improves the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 to its guidance on “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new leases standard applies a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record, for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset and a liability to make lease payments. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a practical expedient is available whereby a lessee may elect, by class of underlying asset, not to recognize an ROU asset or lease liability. The new leases standard requires a lessor to classify leases as either sales-type, direct financing or operating, similar to existing GAAP. Classification depends on the same five criteria used by lessees plus certain additional factors. The subsequent accounting treatment for all three lease types is substantially equivalent to existing GAAP for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. However, the new standard updates certain aspects of the lessor accounting model to align it with the new lessee accounting model, as well as with the new revenue standard under Topic 606. Lessees and lessors are required to provide certain qualitative and quantitative disclosures to enable users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU will result in a gross up of the Consolidated Statements of Condition for right-of-use assets and associated lease liabilities for operating leases in which the Company is the lessee. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842 - Leases to address certain narrow aspects of the guidance issued in ASU No. 2016-02. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), Leases (Topic 842), to (1) add an optional transition method that would permit entities to apply the new requirements by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the year of adoption, and (2) provide a practical expedient for lessors regarding the separation of the lease and non-lease components of a contract. In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-20, Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which addresses issues related to (1) sales tax and similar taxes collected from lessees, (2) certain lessor costs, and (3) recognition of variable payments for contracts with lease and non-lease components. In June 2020, the FASB issued No. ASU 2020-05, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in response to the pandemic which has adversely affected the global economy and caused significant and widespread business and capital market disruptions. The FASB is committed to supporting and assisting stakeholders during this difficult time. The FASB issued ASU 2020-05 as a limited deferral of the effective dates of certain ASUs, including ASU 2016-02 (including amendments issued after the issuance of the original) to provide immediate, near-term relief for certain entities for whom these ASUs are either currently effective or imminently effective. The Company plans to defer the adoption of the amendments in ASU 2016-02 to the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022. The Company is evaluating the significance and other effects of adoption on the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company is performing its

94

accounting analysis of its branch building and other leases underlying contracts. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 to its guidance on “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model). Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments, but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument. The ASU also replaces the current accounting model for purchased credit impaired loans and debt securities. The allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD assets”), should be determined in a similar manner to other financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis. However, upon initial recognition, the allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price (“gross up approach”) to determine the initial amortized cost basis. The subsequent accounting for PCD financial assets is the same expected loss model described above. Further, the ASU made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment model for available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities.  For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023. An entity will apply the amendments in this ASU through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (that is, a modified-retrospective approach). In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, which aligns the implementation date for nonpublic entities’ annual financial statements with the implementation date for their interim financial statements and clarifies the scope of the guidance in the amendments in ASU 2016-13. In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments.  ASU 2019-04 clarifies or addresses stakeholders’ specific issues about certain aspects of the amendments in Update 2016-13 related to measuring the allowance for loan losses under the new guidance. The effective dates and transition requirements for the amendments related to this Update are the same as the effective dates and transition requirements in Update 2016-13. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments Credit Losses clarifying certain amendments to various provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 relating to (1) purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, (2) financial assets secured by collateral maintenance agreements, (3) transition relief for troubled debt restructurings, and (4) disclosure relief when the practical expedient for accrued interest receivables is applied. The initial adjustment will not be reported in earnings and therefore will not have any material impact on our consolidated results of operations, but it is expected that it will have an impact on our consolidated financial position at the date of adoption of this ASU. At this time, we have not calculated the estimated impact that this ASU will have on our allowance for loan losses, however, we anticipate it will have a significant impact on the methodology process we utilize to calculate the allowance. Alternative methodologies are currently being considered. Data requirements and integrity are being reviewed and enhancements incorporated into standard processes. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08 to its guidance on “Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20) related to premium amortization on purchased callable debt securities. The amendments in this Update shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.  An entity should apply the amendments in this Update on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Additionally, in the period of adoption, an entity should provide disclosure about a change in accounting principle. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

95

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 to its guidance on “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)”. This update modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The following disclosure requirements were removed from Topic 820: (1) the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; (2) the policy for timing of transfers between levels; (3) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements; and (4) for nonpublic entities, the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in earnings for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period. The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820: (1) in lieu of a rollforward for Level 3 fair value measurements, a nonpublic entity is required to disclose transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and purchases and issues of Level 3 assets and liabilities; (2) for investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value, an entity is required to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee’s assets and the date when restrictions from redemption might lapse only if the investee has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly; and (3) the amendments clarify that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date. The following disclosure requirements were added to Topic 820; however, the disclosures are not required for nonpublic entities: (1) the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period; and (2) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average) in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. In addition, the amendments eliminate at a minimum from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements, and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of ASU No. 2018-13 and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In August 2018, the FASB has issued ASU  2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”, that applies to all employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The amendments modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The following disclosure requirements were removed from Subtopic 715-20: (1) the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year; (2) the amount and timing of plan assets expected to be returned to the employer; (3) the disclosures related to the June 2001 amendments to the Japanese Welfare Pension Insurance Law; related party disclosures about the amount of future annual benefits covered by insurance and annuity contracts and significant transactions between the employer or related parties and the plan; (4) for nonpublic entities, the reconciliation of the opening balances to the closing balances of plan assets measured on a recurring basis in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. However, nonpublic entities will be required to disclose separately the amounts of transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and purchases of Level 3 plan assets; and (5) for public entities, the effects of a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the (a) aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs and (b) benefit obligation for postretirement health care benefits. The following disclosure requirements were added to Subtopic 715-20: (1) the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates; and (2) an explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. The amendments also clarify the disclosure requirements in paragraph 715-20-50-3, which state that the following information for defined benefit pension plans should be disclosed: (1) the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and fair value of plan assets for plans with PBOs in excess of plan assets; and (2) the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) and fair value of

96

plan assets for plans with ABOs in excess of plan assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2021. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In April 2019, the FASB issued an Update (ASU 2019-04), Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments.

The amendments to Topic 326 and other Topics in this Update include items related to the amendments in Update 2016-13 discussed at the June 2018 and November 2018 Credit Losses TRG meetings. The amendments clarify or address stakeholders’ specific issues about certain aspects of the amendments in Update 2016-13 on a number of different topics, including the following:  

● Accrued Interest

● Transfers between Classifications or Categories for Loans and Debt Securities

● Recoveries

● Consideration of Prepayments in Determining the Effective Interest Rate

● Consideration of Estimated Costs to Sell When Foreclosure Is Probable

● Vintage Disclosures— Line-of-Credit Arrangements Converted to Term Loans

● Contractual Extensions and Renewals

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes Topic 740.  This update simplifies and improves accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the general rules and clarifying or amending other current guidance. The scope of FASB ASC Subtopic 740-10, Income Taxes -Overall, has been amended to require that, if a franchise (or similar tax) is partially based on income, (1) deferred tax assets and liabilities should be recognized and accounted for pursuant to FASB ASC 740, as should the amount of current tax expense that is based on income, and (2) any incremental amount incurred should be recorded as a non-income-based tax. Note that under the amended guidance, the effect of potentially paying a non-income-based tax in future years need not be considered in evaluating the realizability of deferred tax assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2022. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If early adoption is elected, all of the amended guidance must be adopted in the same period. If early adoption is initially applied in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the annual period that includes that interim period.  The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on adoption of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848).  The amendments in this update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments (1) apply to contract modifications that replace a reference rate affected by reference rate reform, (2) provide exceptions to existing guidance related to changes to the critical terms of a hedging relationship due to reference rate reform (3) provide optional expedients for fair value hedging relationships, cash flow hedging relationships, and net investment hedging relationships, and (4) provide a onetime election to sell, transfer, or both sell and transfer debt securities classified as held to maturity that reference a rate affected by reference rate reform and that are classified as held to maturity before January 1, 2020.  The amendments for contract modifications can be elected to be applied as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020. The amendments for existing hedging relationships can be elected to be applied as of the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020 and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact on adoption of this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.    

97

4.        COVID-19

In early January 2020, the World Health Organization issued an alert that a novel coronavirus outbreak was emanating from the Wuhan Province in China. Later in January, the first death related to the novel coronavirus, identified as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), occurred in the United States. Over the course of the next several weeks, the outbreak continued to spread to various regions of the World prompting the World Health Organization to declare COVID-19 a global pandemic on March 11, 2020.  In the United States, the rapid spread of the COVID-19 virus invoked various Federal and State, including New York State, authorities to make emergency declarations and issue executive orders to limit the spread of the disease. Measures included restrictions on international and domestic travel, restrictions on business operations, limitations on public gatherings, implementation of social distancing protocols, school closings, orders to shelter in place and mandates to close all non-essential businesses to the public. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2020 (the quarter ended June 30, 2020), some of these restrictions were removed and some non-essential businesses were allowed to re-open in a limited capacity, adhering to social distancing and disinfection guidelines. However, these restrictions and other consequences of the pandemic have resulted in significant adverse effects for many different types of businesses and have resulted in a significant number of layoffs and furloughs of employees in the Company’s market area. The direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in dramatic reductions in the level of economic activity in the Company’s market area and have severely hampered the ability for certain businesses and consumers to meet their current repayment obligations.  The Company’s fiscal 2020 results were adversely impacted by the effects of the pandemic, which contributed to an increase in the provision for loan losses.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), in addition to providing financial assistance to both businesses and consumers, creates a forbearance program for federally-backed mortgage loans, protects borrowers from negative credit reporting due to loan accommodations related to the national emergency, and provides financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain requirements under GAAP related to troubled debt restructurings for a limited period of time to account for the effects of COVID-19. The Federal and New York State banking regulatory agencies have likewise issued guidance encouraging financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are, or may be, unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. That guidance, with concurrence of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, and provisions of the CARES Act allow modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were generally current with their payments prior to any relief, to not be treated as troubled debt restructurings. Modifications may include payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment term, or other delays in payment. The Company has worked with its customers affected by COVID-19 and accommodated a significant amount of modifications across its loan portfolios. To the extent that such modifications meet the criteria previously described, such modifications are not expected to be classified as troubled debt restructurings.

As a result of the spread of COVID-19, economic uncertainties have arisen which are likely to negatively impact the Company’s operational and financial performance. The extent of the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s operational and financial performance will depend on certain developments, including the duration and spread of the outbreak and impact on our customers, employees and vendors, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. At this point, the extent to which COVID-19 may impact our future financial condition or results of operations is uncertain and not currently estimable, however the impact could be material.

98

5.        INVESTMENT SECURITIES

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	61,299	$	215	$	(3)	$	61,511
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		78		—		—		78
Asset-backed securities		65		49		(4)		110
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential		430		298		(44)		684
Municipal obligations		13,381		6		(2)		13,385
Total available for sale securities	$	75,253	$	568	$	(53)	$	75,768
Securities held to maturity:
Municipal obligations	$	4,822	$	95	$	—	$	4,917
Corporate debt securities		2,000		—		—		2,000
Total held to maturity securities	$	6,822	$	95	$	—	$	6,917
Equity securities:
Preferred stock	$	6,007	$	29	$	(980)	$	5,056
Common stock		2,807		1,204		(534)		3,477
Total equity securities	$	8,814	$	1,233	$	(1,514)	$	8,533

	June 30, 2019
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	70,706	$	164	$	(3)	$	70,867
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		109		3		—		112
Asset-backed securities		75		55		(2)		128
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential		525		401		(37)		889
Municipal obligations		14,666		33		—		14,699
Total available for sale securities	$	86,081	$	656	$	(42)	$	86,695
Securities held to maturity:
Municipal obligations	$	3,873	$	14	$	—	$	3,887
Equity securities:
Preferred stock	$	6,007	$	52	$	(1,019)	$	5,040
Common stock		2,807		1,066		(255)		3,618
Total equity securities	$	8,814	$	1,118	$	(1,274)	$	8,658

99

The estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by security category and length of time such securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	10,195	$	(3)	$	—	$	—	$	10,195	$	(3)
Mortgage-backed securities - residential (1)		33		—		2		—		35		—
Asset-backed securities		5		(1)		4		(3)		9		(4)
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential		21		(1)		137		(43)		158		(44)
Municipal obligations		3,609		(2)		—		—		3,609		(2)
	$	13,863	$	(7)	$	143	$	(46)	$	14,006	$	(53)

	June 30, 2019
	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or Longer				Total
	Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	4,969	$	(1)	$	7,988	$	(2)	$	12,957	$	(3)
Mortgage-backed securities - residential (1)		1		—		2		—		3		—
Asset-backed securities		—		—		5		(2)		5		(2)
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential		15		(9)		160		(28)		175		(37)
	$	4,985	$	(10)	$	8,155	$	(32)	$	13,140	$	(42)

(1) Unrealized losses on these securities are less than $500.

The above tables represent securities at June 30, 2020 and 2019, where the current fair value is less than the related amortized cost. There were 58 and 37 securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Unrealized losses on debt securities are primarily related to increases in credit spreads since the securities were purchased. Unrealized losses on agency-backed and certain private-label mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligation securities are not considered other than temporary based upon analysis completed by management considering credit rating of the instrument, length of time each security has spent in an unrealized loss position and the strength of the underlying collateral.

During the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, management reviewed all private-label mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations which were rated less than investment grade for impairment, resulting in no additional impairment charges in fiscal 2020 and 2019. In fiscal 2020, 55 securities with an amortized cost of $0.4 million and remaining par value of $1.8 million were evaluated. In fiscal 2019, 62 securities with an amortized cost of $0.5 million and remaining par value of $2.0 million were evaluated.

The table below presents a rollforward of the credit losses recognized in earnings (dollars in thousands):

Balance, July 1, 2018	$	1,506
Reductions for amounts realized for securities transactions		(29)
Balance, June 30, 2019		1,477
Reductions for amounts realized for securities transactions		(263)
Balance, June 30, 2020	$	1,214

100

The fair value of debt securities and carrying amount, if different, by contractual maturity were as follows (dollars in thousands). Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.

	June 30, 2020
	Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
Due in one year or less	$	56,397	$	56,613
Due after one to five years		18,283		18,283
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		78		78
Asset-backed securities		65		110
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential		430		684
	$	75,253	$	75,768
Securities held to maturity:
Due in one year or less	$	3,636	$	3,731
Due after one to five years		1,076		1,076
Due after five to ten years		2,110		2,110
	$	6,822	$	6,917

	June 30, 2019
	Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
Due in one year or less	$	75,416	$	75,593
Due after one to five years		9,956		9,973
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		109		112
Asset-backed securities		75		128
Collateralized mortgage obligations - residential		525		889
	$	86,081	$	86,695
Securities held to maturity:
Due in one year or less	$	3,748	$	3,762
Due after one to five years		—		—
Due after five to ten years		125		125
	$	3,873	$	3,887

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company received $5.0 million in proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale, realizing gross gains of $83,000. During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company realized gross gains of $58,000 from other securities transactions. During the year ended June 30, 2019, there were no sales of securities available for sale.

During the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no sales of securities held to maturity.

At June 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of our equity. As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the carrying value of available for sale securities pledged to secure FHLBNY advances and municipal deposits was $65.0 million and $84.9 million, respectively.

101

6.       NET LOANS RECEIVABLE

A summary of net loans receivable is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019
			(As Restated)
Commercial:
Real estate	$	450,452	$	414,375
Commercial and industrial		237,223		167,462
Construction		91,805		85,274
Total commercial		779,480		667,111
Residential mortgages		279,960		281,388
Home equity loans and lines		80,345		80,258
Consumer		30,860		21,482
		1,170,645		1,050,239
Net deferred loan costs		605		2,398
Allowance for loan losses		(22,851)		(14,499)
Net loans receivable	$	1,148,399	$	1,038,138

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment (dollars in thousands):

	For the Year Ended June 30, 2020
	(As Restated)
			Residential
	Commercial		Mortgages		Home Equity		Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	11,057	$	2,360	$	813	$	269	$	14,499
Provisions charged to operations		4,811		1,143		489		347		6,790
Loans charged off		(5)		(19)		—		(162)		(186)
Recoveries on loans charged off (1)		1,707		—		1		40		1,748
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	17,570	$	3,484	$	1,303	$	494	$	22,851

(1) The year ended June 30, 2020 included a partial recovery in the amount of $1.7 million related to the charge-off of the Mann Entities commercial loan relationships which was recognized in the third fiscal quarter of 2020.

	For the Year Ended June 30, 2019
	(As Restated)
			Residential
	Commercial		Mortgages		Home Equity		Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	10,414	$	2,166	$	770	$	160	$	13,510
Provisions charged to operations (1)		17,529		279		90		252		18,150
Loans charged off (1)		(16,886)		(85)		(47)		(179)		(17,197)
Recoveries on loans charged off		—		—		—		36		36
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	11,057	$	2,360	$	813	$	269	$	14,499

(1) The year ended June 30, 2019 included a provision for loan losses in the amount of $15.8 million related to the charge-off of the entire principal balance owed to the Bank related to the Mann Entities commercial loan relationships which were recognized in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019.

102

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
			Residential
	Commercial		Mortgages		Home Equity		Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Related to loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	929	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	929
Related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment		16,641		3,484		1,303		494		21,922
Ending balance	$	17,570	$	3,484	$	1,303	$	494	$	22,851
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	8,407	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,407
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		771,073		279,960		80,345		30,860		1,162,238
Ending balance	$	779,480	$	279,960	$	80,345	$	30,860	$	1,170,645

	June 30, 2019
	(As Restated)
			Residential
	Commercial		Mortgages			Home Equity	Consumer		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Related to loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	426	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	426
Related to loans collectively evaluated for impairment		10,631		2,360		813		269		14,073
Ending balance	$	11,057	$	2,360	$	813	$	269	$	14,499
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	8,067	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	8,067
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		659,044		281,388		80,258		21,482		1,042,172
Ending balance	$	667,111	$	281,388	$	80,258	$	21,482	$	1,050,239

The following table presents information related to impaired loans by class (dollars in thousands):

							For the Year Ended
	June 30, 2020						June 30, 2020
	Unpaid				Allowance for		Average		Interest
	Principal		Recorded		Loan Losses		Recorded		Income
	Balance		Investment		Allocated		Investment		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial:
Real estate	$	5,417	$	5,342	$	—	$	5,203	$	265
Commercial and industrial		46		42		—		46		—
Construction		1,319		1,319		—		1,320		—
Subtotal		6,782		6,703		—		6,569		265
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial:
Real estate		233		221		25		234		—
Commercial and industrial		1,494		1,483		904		1,513		88
Subtotal		1,727		1,704		929		1,747		88
Total	$	8,509	$	8,407	$	929	$	8,316	$	353

103

							For the Year Ended
	June 30, 2019						June 30, 2019
	Unpaid				Allowance for		Average		Interest
	Principal		Recorded		Loan Losses		Recorded		Income
	Balance		Investment		Allocated		Investment		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial:
Real estate	$	5,593	$	5,376	$	—	$	5,608	$	—
Commercial and industrial		59		48		—		59		—
Construction		1,377		1,377		—		1,106		—
Subtotal		7,029		6,801		—		6,773		—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial:
Real estate		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		1,266		1,266		426		1,293		95
Subtotal		1,266		1,266		426		1,293		95
Total	$	8,295	$	8,067	$	426	$	8,066	$	95

Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized using the cost recovery method. Interest income on impaired loans that were on nonaccrual status and cash-basis interest income for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 was nominal.

The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable and deferred loan fees, net due to immateriality.

At various times, certain loan modifications are executed which are considered to be troubled debt restructurings. Substantially all of these modifications include one or a combination of the following: extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk; temporary reduction in the interest rate; change in scheduled payment amount including interest only; or extensions of additional credit for payment of delinquent real estate taxes or other costs.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the Company implemented customer payment deferral programs to assist both consumer and commercial borrowers that may be experiencing financial hardship due to COVID-19 related challenges, whereby short-term deferrals of payments (generally three to six months) will be provided.  Commercial, residential mortgage, home equity loans and lines, and consumer loans in deferment status will continue to accrue interest on the deferred principal during the deferment period unless otherwise classified as nonaccrual.  Consistent with industry regulatory guidance, borrowers that were otherwise current on loan payments that were granted COVID-19 related financial hardship payment deferrals will continue to be reported as current loans throughout the agreed upon deferral period and therefore, not classified as troubled-debt restructured loans. Borrowers that are delinquent in their payments prior to requesting a COVID-19 related financial hardship payment deferral will be reviewed on a case by case basis for troubled debt restructure classification and non-performing loan status. At June 30, 2020, the Company granted payment deferral requests for consumer borrowers related to 110 loans representing $27.4 million of the Company’s residential mortgage, home equity loans and lines of credit, and consumer loan balances, and for commercial borrowers related to 144 loans representing $170.3 million of the Company’s commercial loan balances.

During the year ended June 30, 2020, certain loan modifications were executed which were considered to be troubled debt restructurings.

104

The following table summarizes troubled debt restructurings by loan classification that occurred during the year ended June 30, 2020 (dollars in thousands):

		Pre-modification		Post-modification
	Number of	Outstanding Recorded		Outstanding Recorded
	Contracts	Investments		Investments
Commercial	1	$	2,200	$	2,200

The modification included an extension of the maturity date at a stated rate of interest lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk.

There were no loans modified as troubled debt restructurings during the year ended June 30, 2019.

Loans subject to a troubled debt restructuring are evaluated as impaired loans for the purpose of determining the specific component of allowance for loan losses.

The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual and loans past due over 90 days still on accrual by class of loans (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,				June 30,
	2020				2019
			Past Due				Past Due
			90 Days				90 Days
			Still on				Still on
	Nonaccrual		Accrual		Nonaccrual		Accrual
Commercial:
Real estate	$	3,364	$	143	$	5,618	$	58
Commercial and industrial		95		1,455		42		—
Construction		1,319		—		1,377		—
Residential mortgages		4,807		—		4,028		—
Home equity loans and lines		1,865		—		1,497		41
Consumer		210		12		—		19
	$	11,660	$	1,610	$	12,562	$	118

Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually evaluated impaired loans.

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in loans by class of loans (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	30 - 59		60 - 89		90 or more
	Days		Days		Days		Total		Loans Not
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Total
Commercial:
Real estate	$	23	$	211	$	2,270	$	2,504	$	447,948	$	450,452
Commercial and industrial		—		26		1,551		1,577		235,646		237,223
Construction		—		—		1,319		1,319		90,486		91,805
Residential mortgages		2,666		1,272		3,505		7,443		272,517		279,960
Home equity loans and lines		1,217		1,259		1,383		3,859		76,486		80,345
Consumer		39		4		12		55		30,805		30,860
Total	$	3,945	$	2,772	$	10,040	$	16,757	$	1,153,888	$	1,170,645

105

	June 30, 2019
	(As Restated)
	30 - 59		60 - 89		90 or more
	Days		Days		Days		Total		Loans Not
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Total
Commercial:
Real estate	$	3	$	—	$	5,490	$	5,493	$	408,882	$	414,375
Commercial and industrial		—		—		42		42		167,420		167,462
Construction		—		—		1,377		1,377		83,897		85,274
Residential mortgages		156		217		2,699		3,072		278,316		281,388
Home equity loans and lines		476		318		988		1,782		78,476		80,258
Consumer		5		—		19		24		21,458		21,482
Total	$	640	$	535	$	10,615	$	11,790	$	1,038,449	$	1,050,239

The Company categorizes commercial loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention – Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard – Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Commercial loans not meeting the criteria above are considered to be pass rated loans.

The following table presents commercial loans summarized by class of loans and the risk category (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
			Special
	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Commercial
Real estate	$	433,948	$	106	$	16,398	$	—	$	450,452
Commercial and industrial		222,777		6,393		8,000		53		237,223
Construction		89,869		—		1,936		—		91,805
	$	746,594	$	6,499	$	26,334	$	53	$	779,480

106

	June 30, 2019
	(As Restated)
			Special
	Pass		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Commercial
Real estate	$	406,317	$	2,440	$	5,618	$	—	$	414,375
Commercial and industrial		163,299		226		3,937		—		167,462
Construction		83,897		—		1,377		—		85,274
	$	653,513	$	2,666	$	10,932	$	—	$	667,111

The Company considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential and consumer loan classes, the Company also evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan, which was previously presented, and by payment activity.

At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had residential real estate loans in process of foreclosure of $2.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had pledged $449.5 million and $485.6 million respectively, of residential mortgage, home equity and commercial loans as collateral for FHLBNY borrowings and stand-by letters of credit.

At June 30, 2020 and 2019, loans to executive officers, directors, or to associates of such persons, as well as activity in such loans for the years then ended were immaterial as a percentage of total loans receivable.

The Company retains the servicing rights on certain mortgage loans sold, and may release the servicing rights on others. Total residential mortgage loans serviced by the Company for unrelated third parties were approximately $26.8 and $29.4 million at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the unamortized balance of mortgage servicing rights on loans sold with servicing retained was approximately $231,000 and $251,000, respectively. The estimated fair value of these mortgage servicing rights was in excess of their carrying value at June 30, 2020 and 2019, and therefore no valuation reserve was necessary. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company held escrow funds in trust on loans serviced for others of $610,000 and $645,000, respectively.

7.       DERIVATIVES

In the normal course of servicing our commercial customers, the Company acts as an interest rate swap counterparty for certain commercial borrowers. The Company manages its exposure to such interest rate swaps by entering into corresponding and offsetting interest rate swaps with third parties that match the terms of the interest rate swap with the commercial borrowers. These positions directly offset each other and the Company’s exposure is the fair value of the derivatives due to potential changes in credit risk of our commercial borrowers and third parties.

The notional amount of the interest rate swaps does not represent amounts exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged is determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the individual interest rate swap agreements. At June 30, 2020, the Company held derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, comprised of back-to-back interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $706.6 million, consisting of $353.3 million of interest rate swaps with commercial borrowers and $353.3 million of offsetting interest rate swaps with third-party counterparties on substantially the same terms. At June 30, 2019, the Company held derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, comprised of back-to-back interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $515.4 million, consisting of $257.7 million of interest rate swaps with commercial borrowers and $257.7 million of offsetting interest rate swaps with third-party counterparties on substantially the same terms.

107

The fair value of derivatives are classified as a component of other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated statement of condition. The estimated fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
	Derivative		Derivative
	Assets		Liabilities
Gross interest rate swaps	$	42,922	$	42,922
Less: master netting arrangements		—		—
Less: cash collateral applied		—		(42,922)
Net amount	$	42,922	$	—

	June 30, 2019
	Derivative		Derivative
	Assets		Liabilities
Gross interest rate swaps	$	13,550	$	13,550
Less: master netting arrangements		(88)		(88)
Less: cash collateral applied		—		(13,318)
Net amount	$	13,462	$	144

Under terms of the agreements with the third-party counterparties, the Company provides cash collateral to the counterparty for the initial trade. Subsequent to the trade, the margin is exchanged in either direction, based upon the estimated fair value of the underlying contracts. At June 30, 2020, the Company had deposited $42.9 million as collateral for swap agreements with third-party counterparties. At June 30, 2019, the Company had deposited $13.3 million as collateral for swap agreements with third-party counterparties.

8.       PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

Premises and equipment consists of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019
Land	$	6,678	$	6,678
Leaseholds and land improvements		2,574		2,272
Buildings		30,103		29,630
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		15,072		14,252
Construction in progress		303		1,000
		54,730		53,832
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(13,867)		(12,122)
	$	40,863	$	41,710

Depreciation and amortization included in occupancy and equipment expense amounted to $2,542,000 and $2,463,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

108

9.       GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Acquired other intangible assets were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019
Customer relationship intangibles:
Gross carrying amount	$	2,645	$	2,645
Less: accumulated amortization		(800)		(493)
Net carrying amount		1,845		2,152
Core deposit intangibles:
Gross carrying amount		562		562
Less: accumulated amortization		(248)		(191)
Net carrying amount		314		371
Total other intangible assets:
Gross carrying amount		3,207		3,207
Less: accumulated amortization		(1,048)		(684)
Net carrying amount	$	2,159	$	2,523

Estimated amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year ending June 30,
2021	$	337
2022		309
2023		281
2024		254
2025		226

Aggregate amortization expense was $364,000 and $351,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

There were no changes in goodwill for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

There were no impairment losses on goodwill or intangible assets for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

10.       DEPOSITS

Deposit account balances are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019
Non-interest bearing demand accounts	$	437,536	$	357,523
Interest-bearing accounts:
Interest-bearing demand accounts		110,711		220,546
Savings accounts		258,581		250,856
Money market accounts		343,763		371,828
Time deposits		119,559		130,565
Total interest bearing accounts		832,614		973,795
Total deposits	$	1,270,150	$	1,331,318

Overdrawn demand deposit balances of $181,000 and $238,000 were reclassified as loan balances as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

109

Time deposits outstanding that had balances of $250,000 and over amounted to approximately $30.0 million and $34.5 million at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year ending June 30,
2021	$	81,836
2022		17,391
2023		11,309
2024		6,109
2025		2,914
	$	119,559

Deposits of related parties amounted to $7.5 million and $6.0 million at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

11.       BORROWINGS

The Company has the ability to borrow (Non-Repo Advances) in an amount up to 30% of its total assets from the FHLBNY. All borrowings from the FHLBNY are collateralized by FHLBNY stock, certain qualifying loans, and certain available for sale securities. In addition, overall credit exposure, including Non-Repo Advances, cannot exceed 50% of total assets. FHLBNY borrowings have prepayment penalties.

At June 30, 2020, the Company pledged approximately $449.5 million of residential mortgage, home equity and commercial loans as collateral for borrowings and stand-by letters of credit at the FHLBNY. At June 30, 2020, the maximum amount of funding available from the FHLBNY was $375.9 million, of which none was utilized for borrowings and $222.5 million was utilized for irrevocable stand-by letters of credit issued to secure municipal deposits.

At June 30, 2019, the Company pledged approximately $485.6 million of residential mortgage, home equity and commercial loans as collateral for borrowings and stand-by letters of credit at the FHLBNY. At June 30, 2019, the maximum amount of funding available from the FHLBNY was $405.0 million, of which none was utilized for borrowings and $207.0 million was utilized for irrevocable stand-by letters of credit issued to secure municipal deposits.

In addition, the Company has an unsecured $20.0 million line of credit available with an unrelated financial institution; there were no draws against the line made during the year ended June 30, 2020.

110

12.     OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Details About Accumulated Other					Affected Line Item in the Statement
Comprehensive Loss Components					Where Net Income is Presented
	Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
Unrealized gains/losses on securities (before tax):
Net gains included in net income	$	138	$	6	Net gain on available for sale securities transactions
Tax expense		(36)		(1)	Income tax expense
Net of tax		102		5
Amortization of defined benefit plan items (before tax):
Net actuarial loss		(1,080)		(760)	Salaries and employee benefits
Tax benefit		282		198	Income tax expense
Net of tax		(798)		(562)
Total reclassification for the period, net of tax	$	(696)	$	(557)

The balances and changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	For the Year Ended June 30,
					Accumulated
	Unrealized				Other
	Gains/Losses		Defined		Comprehensive
	on Securities		Benefit Plans		Loss
2020:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of July l, 2019	$	338		(11,441)	$	(11,103)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		28		(7,107)		(7,079)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(102)		798		696
Reclassification for change in accounting principle (1)		116		—		116
Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2020		380		(17,750)		(17,370)
2019:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of July l, 2018		410		(9,399)		(8,989)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications		(67)		(2,604)		(2,671)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(5)		562		557
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of June 30, 2019	$	338		(11,441)	$	(11,103)

(1) Adoption of ASU 2016-01 – cumulative effect of change in measurement of equity securities.

111

The amounts of income tax expense (benefit) allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	For the Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
Unrealized gains/losses on securities:
Unrealized holdings gains (losses) arising during the period	$	11	$	(24)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income		(36)		(1)
		(25)		(25)
Defined benefit plans:
Change in funded status		(2,516)		(921)
Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net actuarial loss		282		198
		(2,234)		(723)
	$	(2,259)	$	(748)

112

13.     EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan and a defined benefit post-retirement plan. Plan assets and obligations that determine the funded status are measured as of the end of the fiscal year.

Amounts recognized in the consolidated statement of condition related to the Company’s plans are as follows as of June 30 (dollars in thousands):

	2020		2019
Other liabilities
Unfunded pension liability	$	10,293	$	464
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation		2,204		1,835
	$	12,497	$	2,299
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes
Pension plan	$	17,387	$	11,308
Post-retirement benefit plan		363		133
	$	17,750	$	11,441

Pension Plan

The Company maintains a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its full-time employees hired before September 1, 2019. Through December 31, 2009, pensions were paid as an annuity using a pension formula of 2.0% of the average of the five highest consecutive years of total compensation over the last ten years multiplied by credited service up to thirty years. Effective January 1, 2010, the plan was amended and service rendered thereafter is paid using a pension formula of 1.5%. Amounts contributed to the plan are determined annually on the basis of (a) the maximum amount allowable under Internal Revenue Service regulations and (b) the amount certified by a consulting actuary as necessary to avoid an accumulated funding deficiency as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The defined benefit pension plan was amended, effective August 31, 2019, to close the plan to new employees hired on or after September 1, 2019, therefore, no new employees hired on or after September 1, 2019 would be eligible to participate in the defined benefit pension plan.

113

The following table sets forth information on the Company’s defined benefit pension plan as of June 30 (dollars in thousands):

	2020		2019
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	56,150	$	48,137
Service cost		2,252		1,574
Interest cost		1,968		1,918
Actuarial loss		7,718		5,976
Benefits paid		(3,322)		(1,455)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year		64,766		56,150
Change in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		55,686		50,958
Actual return on plan assets		2,206		6,237
Expenses		(97)		(54)
Benefits paid		(3,322)		(1,455)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		54,473		55,686
Unfunded status of plan at end of year	$	(10,293)	$	(464)

Net periodic pension cost included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations included the following components (dollars in thousands):

	For the Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
Service cost	$	2,252	$	1,574
Interest cost		1,968		1,918
Expected return on plan assets		(3,703)		(3,518)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		1,080		760
Net periodic pension cost	$	1,597	$	734

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax effect consist of net actuarial losses of $23,541,000 and $15,311,000 at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The estimated net actuarial loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit cost during the year ending June 30, 2021, is $1,732,000.

The actuarial assumptions used in determining the present value of the projected benefit obligations and net periodic pension cost as of and for the years ended June 30 were as follows:

	2020		2019
Weighted average assumptions – benefit obligations
Discount rate	2.87	%	3.49	%
Annual rate of compensation increase	3.00	%	3.00	%
Weighted average assumptions – net periodic benefit cost
Discount rate	3.49	%	4.12	%
Annual rate of compensation increase	3.00	%	3.00	%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets	6.75	%	7.00	%

114

For the year ended June 30, 2020, the discount rate assumption has changed to the above median curve. For the year ended June 30, 2019, the discount rate assumption was the standard discount curve.

Accumulated Benefit Obligation

The accumulated benefit obligation (the actuarial present value of benefits, vested and nonvested, earned by employees based on current and past compensation levels) for the Company’s defined benefit pension plan totaled $58,143,000 and $51,034,000 as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Investment Policies and Strategies

Plan assets are invested in various mutual funds and are held in trust by Charles Schwab Corporation. The Employer, as the Plan Sponsor, determines the appropriate strategic asset allocation versus plan liabilities.

Currently, the Plan asset allocation targets 65% of assets to equity securities, and 35% to fixed income through a combination of short-term and long-term bond funds. The overall long-term investment objectives are to maintain plan assets at a level that will sufficiently cover long-term obligations and to generate a return on plan assets that will meet or exceed the rate at which long-term obligations will grow. The strategy is designed to provide long-term growth of assets with the objective of achieving an investment return in excess of the costs of funding active lives, deferred vested, and all longer-term obligations. In addition, the plan’s assets are rebalanced quarterly to the target percentages for each investment option no later than the 10^th business day following the end of each calendar quarter.

Determination of Long-Term Rate-of-Return

The long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption was set based on historical returns earned by equities and fixed-income securities, adjusted to reflect expectations of future returns as applied to the plan’s target allocation of asset classes. Equities and fixed-income securities were assumed to earn real rates of return in the ranges of 5-9% and 1-4%, respectively. The long-term inflation rate was estimated to be 2.5%.

Contributions

For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021, the Company is not required to make a cash contribution to the plan, but may elect to do so.

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The benefit payments expected to be paid over the next ten years are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Fiscal year ending June 30,
2021	$	1,517
2022		1,563
2023		1,602
2024		1,685
2025		1,800
Years 2026 – 2030		11,768

The Company’s pension plan asset allocation at June 30, 2020 and 2019, target allocation for 2020, and expected long-term rate of return by asset category are as follows:

		Percentage of					Weighted-
	Target		Plan Assets at				Average Expected
	Allocation		Year End				Long-Term Rate
Asset Category	2020		2020		2019		of Return
Equity securities	65.0	%	62.6	%	62.5	%	5.00 – 9.00	%
Fixed income securities	35.0	%	37.4	%	37.5	%	1.00 – 4.00	%
Total			100.0	%	100.0	%

115

Fair Value of Plan Assets

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of plan asset:

Equity, Debt, Investment Funds and Other Securities

The fair values for securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3). Discounted cash flows are calculated using spread to swap and LIBOR curves that are updated to incorporate loss severities, volatility, credit spread and optionality. During times when trading is more liquid, broker quotes are used (if available) to validate the model. Rating agency and industry research reports as well as defaults and deferrals on individual securities are reviewed and incorporated into the calculations.

116

The fair values of the plan assets at June 30, by asset category, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

			June 30, 2020
			Fair Value Measurements
				Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
				Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Mutual funds
American Funds New World R6	$	2,861	$	2,861	$	—	$	—
Cohen & Steers Real Estate SECS I		1,625		1,625		—		—
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund		2,706		2,706		—		—
PIMCO Commodities Plus Strat Fd Inst		1,740		1,740		—		—
PIMCO Long Term Credit Bond Inst		8,247		8,247		—		—
PIMCO Low Duration Incm Fd I		2,156		2,156		—		—
Vanguard Developed Mkts Index Inst		7,182		7,182		—		—
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Instl		7,862		7,862		—		—
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Funds Admiral		3,798		3,798		—		—
Vanguard Small Cap I		3,210		3,210		—		—
Vanguard Value Index Instl Shares		7,322		7,322		—		—
Western Asset Core Bd Fd I		5,389		5,389		—		—
Cash		375		375		—		—
Total plan assets	$	54,473	$	54,473	$	—	$	—

			June 30, 2019
			Fair Value Measurements
				Quoted Prices in		Significant		Significant
				Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Mutual funds
American Funds New World R6	$	2,819	$	2,819	$	—	$	—
Cohen & Steers Real Estate SECS I		1,614		1,614		—		—
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund		2,778		2,778		—		—
PIMCO Commodities Plus Strat Fd Inst		1,711		1,711		—		—
PIMCO Long Term Credit Bond Inst		8,417		8,417		—		—
PIMCO Low Duration Incm Fd I		2,212		2,212		—		—
Vanguard Developed Mkts Index Inst		7,283		7,283		—		—
Vanguard Growth Index Fund Instl		7,736		7,736		—		—
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Funds Admiral		3,893		3,893		—		—
Vanguard Small Cap I		3,338		3,338		—		—
Vanguard Value Index Instl Shares		7,787		7,787		—		—
Western Asset Core Bd Fd I		5,548		5,548		—		—
Cash		550		550		—		—
Total plan assets	$	55,686	$	55,686	$	—	$	—

There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

Post-Retirement Healthcare Plan

The Company offers a defined benefit post-retirement plan which provides medical and life insurance benefits to employees meeting certain requirements. Effective October 1, 2006, the plan was amended so that there have been no new plan participants for medical benefits. The cost of post-retirement plan benefits is recognized on an accrual basis as employees perform services. Active employees are eligible for retiree medical coverage upon reaching age sixty with twenty-five or more years of service. Employees with a minimum of thirty years of service are eligible for individual and spousal coverage. Retirees are eligible to participate in any bank-sponsored health insurance programs. The Company’s contributions for retiree medical are limited to a monthly premium of $210 for individual

117

coverage and $420 for employee and spousal coverage. The Company’s funding policy is to pay insurance premiums as they come due.

The following table sets forth the plan’s funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements at June 30 (dollars in thousands):

	2020		2019
Change in accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation:
Accumulated benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	1,835	$	1,570
Service cost		36		30
Interest cost		64		65
Actuarial loss		19		32
Effect of changes in assumptions		295		181
Benefits paid		(45)		(43)
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year		2,204		1,835
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		—		—
Actual return on plan assets		—		—
Employer contributions		45		43
Benefits paid		(45)		(43)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		—		—
Unfunded status at end of year	$	(2,204)	$	(1,835)

Net periodic post-retirement benefit cost included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income included the following components (dollars in thousands):

	For the Year Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
Service cost	$	36	$	30
Interest cost		64		65
Recognized actuarial loss		3		—
Net periodic post-retirement benefit cost	$	103	$	95

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax effect, at June 30, consist of (dollars in thousands):

	2020		2019
Net actuarial loss	$	491	$	180

The estimated net actuarial loss for the post-retirement plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic benefit costs during the year ending June 30, 2021, is $30,000.

The discount rates used in determining the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation were 2.60% and 3.45% at June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

For measurement purposes, the medical care cost trend rate has no effect on the Company’s cost since the insurance premiums are a fixed amount (capped). However, increasing or decreasing the benefit cost cap for plan participants could have a significant impact on the accumulated benefit obligation and employer cost.

118

The projected benefit payments under the plan over the next ten years are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Fiscal year ending June 30,
2021	$	66
2022		67
2023		68
2024		70
2025		76
Years 2026 – 2030		417

401(k) Plan

The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. Participants may contribute up to the maximum amount allowed under the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches 100% on the first 1% of employee contributions and 50% on the next 5% after the employee has completed one year of service. The 401(k) plan contribution expense was approximately $459,000 and $411,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Supplemental Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company had a Targeted Benefit Supplemental Retirement Plan for executives. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had an accrued benefit liability of $435,000 and $488,000, respectively. Effective June 2010, the plan was terminated and there have been no additional contributions. There were no provisions for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Changes in the accrued benefit liability equal the changes in the fair values of designated assets, less participant payments.

The Company has a Deferred Compensation Plan for directors and certain of its officers. Under the plan, participants can elect to defer all, or portion of their directors fees, or salaries and/or bonuses, and invest those funds in various investment fund options. At June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Company had an accrued benefit liability of $652,000 and $658,000, respectively. Changes in the accrued benefit liability equal the changes in the fair values of the invested assets, additional deferrals, less participant payments, if any.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

On July 17, 2019, the Company established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) to provide eligible employees the opportunity to own Company stock. The ESOP is a tax-qualified retirement plan for the benefit of Company employees. The Company granted loans to the ESOP for the purchase of 1,018,325 shares of the Company’s common stock at an average price of $13.40 per share. The loan obtained by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the common stock is payable annually over 20 years at a rate per annum equal to the Prime Rate. Loan payments are principally funded by cash contributions from the Bank. The loan is secured by the shares purchased, which are held in a suspense account for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid. The balance of the ESOP loan at June 30, 2020 was $12.9 million. Contributions are allocated to eligible participants on the basis of compensation, subject to federal tax limits. The number of shares committed to be released annually is 50,916 through the year 2038. Participants receive the shares at the end of employment.

Shares held by the ESOP include the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
Allocated	50,916
Committed to be allocated	25,458
Unallocated	941,951
Total Shares	1,018,325

Total compensation expense recognized in connection with the ESOP for the year ended June 30, 2020 was $995,000.

119

14.     INCOME TAXES

The components of income tax expense were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	For the Years Ended
	June 30,
	2020		2019
	(As Restated)		(As Restated)
Current tax expense	$	4,289	$	800
Deferred tax		(3,492)		(63)
Total income tax expense	$	797	$	737

Income tax expense differs from the amount expected based on the federal income tax statutory rate due to the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,
	2020				2019
	(As Restated)				(As Restated)
	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
Income before tax at the federal tax rate	$	1,259	21.0	%	$	1,690	21.0	%
State expense, net of federal benefit		(227)	(3.8)	%		(195)	(2.4)	%
Federal tax rate change		—	—	%		(580)	(7.2)	%
Tax-exempt income		(141)	(2.4)	%		(164)	(2.0)	%
Bank-owned life insurance		(115)	(1.9)	%		(25)	(0.3)	%
Other, net		21	0.4	%		11	0.1	%
Total income tax expense	$	797	13.3	%	$	737	9.2	%

The tax effects that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019
Deferred tax assets
Allowance for loan losses	$	6,786	$	4,441
OTTI – securities		368		406
Post-retirement benefit obligations		468		452
Deferred compensation		285		309
Unfunded defined benefit and postretirement benefit plan liabilities		6,282		4,049
Contribution carryforward		1,295		—
Other		263		251
Total deferred tax assets		15,747		9,908
Deferred tax liabilities
Depreciation		(2,451)		(2,174)
Net deferred loan origination costs		(569)		(571)
Prepaid pension		(3,643)		(4,083)
Prepaid expenses		(160)		(139)
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale		(135)		(120)
Other		(448)		(191)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(7,406)		(7,278)
Net deferred tax asset at end of year	$	8,341	$	2,630

Net deferred tax assets are included in other assets in the consolidated statement of condition.

120

Management determines the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance based upon the realizability of tax benefits from the reversal of temporary differences creating the deferred tax assets, as well as the amount of available open tax carrybacks, if any. As of June 30, 2020, and 2019, no valuation allowance was required.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law. The Tax Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from a maximum 35% to a flat 21% rate, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction in the corporate tax rate under the Tax Act, the Bank revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017. The re-measurements resulted in a discrete tax benefit of $580,000 that was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2019.

For the years ending June 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no amounts accrued and/or paid for interest and penalties.

As a thrift institution, the Company is subject to special provisions in the Federal income tax laws regarding its allowable bad debt deduction and related tax basis bad debt reserves. Deferred income tax liabilities are to be recognized with respect to any base-year reserves which are to become taxable (or “recaptured”) in the foreseeable future.

Under current income tax laws, the base-year reserves would be subject to recapture if the Company pays a cash dividend in excess of earnings and profits or liquidates. The Company does not expect to take any actions in the foreseeable future that would require the recapture of any base-year reserves.

A deferred tax liability has not been recognized with respect to the Federal base-year reserve of $9.3 million at June 30, 2020 and 2019, because the Company does not expect that this amount will become taxable in the foreseeable future. The unrecognized deferred tax liability with respect to the Federal base-year reserve was $2.4 million at June 30, 2020 and 2019. It is more likely than not that this liability will never be incurred because, as noted above, the Company does not expect to take any action in the future that would result in this liability being incurred.

The Company is subject to routine audits of its tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. The Company is no longer subject to examination by either taxing authority for years before calendar 2016.

15.     COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

Off-Balance-Sheet Financing and Concentrations of Credit

The Company is a party to certain financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include the Company’s commitments to extend credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized on the consolidated statement of condition. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments which are presented in the

121

tables below (dollars in thousands). The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

	June 30, 2020
	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk (including unused lines of credit and unadvanced loan funds):
Commitments to extend credit	$	41,573	$	232,137	$	273,710
Standby letters of credit		—		30,654		30,654
	$	41,573	$	262,791	$	304,364

	June 30, 2019
	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk (including unused lines of credit and unadvanced loan funds):
Commitments to extend credit	$	23,892	$	357,223	$	381,115
Standby letters of credit		—		33,385		33,385
	$	23,892	$	390,608	$	414,500

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and require payment of a fee. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral, if any, required by the Company for the extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.

Commitments to extend credit may be written on a fixed rate basis thus exposing the Company to interest rate risk, given the possibility that market rates may change between commitment and actual extension of credit.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee payment on behalf of a customer or to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Since a portion of these instruments will expire unused, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer is evaluated individually for creditworthiness under the same underwriting standards used for commitments to extend credit and on-balance-sheet instruments. Bank policies governing loan collateral apply to standby letters of credit at the time of credit extension.

Certain residential mortgage loans are written on an adjustable basis and include interest rate caps which limit annual and lifetime increases in interest rates. Generally, adjustable rate mortgages have an annual rate increase cap of 2% and lifetime rate increase cap of 5% to 6% above the initial loan rate. These caps expose the Company to interest rate risk should market rates increase above these limits. At June 30, 2020, approximately $43.8 million of adjustable rate residential mortgage loans had interest rate caps. At June 30, 2019, approximately $47.6 million of adjustable rate residential mortgage loans had interest rate caps. In addition, certain adjustable rate residential mortgage loans have a conversion option whereby the borrower may elect to convert the loan to a fixed rate during a designated time period. At June 30, 2020, approximately $3.5 million of the adjustable rate mortgage loans had conversion options. At June 30, 2019, approximately $4.3 million of the adjustable rate mortgage loans had conversion options.

The Company periodically sells residential mortgage loans to FNMA and to the State of New York Mortgage Agency. At June 30, 2020, the Company had no loans held for sale. In addition, the Company has no loan commitments with borrowers at June 30, 2020 with rate lock agreements which are intended to be held for sale, if closed. The Company generally determines whether or not a loan is held for sale at the time that loan commitments are entered into or at the time a convertible adjustable rate mortgage loan converts to a fixed interest rate. In order to reduce the interest rate risk associated with the portfolio of loans held for sale, as well as loan commitments with locked interest rates which are intended to be held for sale if closed, the Company enters into agreements to sell

122

loans in the secondary market. At June 30, 2020, the Company had no commitments to sell loans to unrelated investors.

Concentrations of Credit

The Company primarily grants loans to customers located in the New York State counties of Albany, Greene, Rensselaer, Schenectady, Saratoga, and Warren. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and construction-related sectors of the economy.

Leases

The Company leases certain branches and equipment under various noncancelable operating leases. The future minimum payments by year and in the aggregate, under all significant noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more, are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year ending June 30,
2021	$	562
2022		541
2023		550
2024		495
2025		350
Thereafter		837
	$	3,335

Total rent expense was approximately $711,000 and $748,000 for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Legal Proceeding and Other Contingent Liabilities

In the ordinary course of business, the Company and the Bank are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, governmental and other proceedings or investigations concerning matters arising from the conduct of their business, including the matters described below. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly where the claimants seek large or indeterminate damages, the Company generally cannot predict the eventual outcome of the pending matters, timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters, or eventual loss, fines or penalties related to each pending matter. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes an accrued liability when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and estimable. These estimates are based upon currently available information and are subject to significant judgment, a variety of assumptions and known and unknown uncertainties. The Company’s estimates of potential losses will change over time and the actual losses may vary significantly, and there may be an exposure to loss in excess of any amounts accrued. As a matter develops, management, in conjunction with any outside counsel handling the matter, evaluate on an ongoing basis whether such matter presents a loss contingency that is probable and estimable; or where a loss is reasonably possible, whether in excess of a related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, whether it is possible to estimate a range of possible loss. Once the loss contingency is deemed to be both probable and estimable, the Company establishes an accrued liability and records a corresponding amount of expense. The Company continues to monitor the matter for further developments that could affect the amount of the accrued liability that has been previously established.

Information is provided below regarding the nature of the matters and associated claimed damages. The amount of reasonably possible losses for the matters described below in the “Legal Proceedings” cannot be estimated at this time. The Company and the Bank are defending each of these matters vigorously, and the Company believes that it and the Bank have substantial defenses, including affirmative defenses, counterclaims and cross-claims to the various allegations that have been asserted. Based on current knowledge, other than disclosed below, the Company is not a party to any pending legal or other proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. In light of the significant judgment, variety of assumptions and uncertainties involved in these matters, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, and the large or indeterminate damages sought in some of these matters, an adverse outcome in one or more of these matters could

123

have an adverse material impact on the Company’s business, prospects, results of operations for any particular reporting period, or cause significant reputational harm.

Potentially Fraudulent Activity

During the first fiscal quarter of 2020 (the quarter ending September 30, 2019), the Company became aware of potentially fraudulent activity associated with transactions by an established business customer of the Bank. The customer and various affiliated entities (collectively, the “Mann Entities”) had numerous accounts with the Bank. The transactions in question related both to deposit and lending activity with the Mann Entities.

For the fraudulent activity related to the Mann Entities, the Bank’s potential exposure with respect to its deposit activity was approximately $18.5 million. In the first fiscal quarter of 2020, the Bank exercised its rights pursuant to state and federal law and the relevant Mann Entity general deposit account agreements to take actions to set off/recover approximately $16.0 million from general deposit corporate operating accounts held by the Mann Entities at the Bank to partially cover overdrafts/negative account balances in Mann Entity general deposit corporate operating accounts that primarily resulted from another bank returning/calling back $15.6 million in checks on August 30, 2019, that the Mann Entities had deposited into and then withdrawn from their accounts at the Bank the day before. In the first fiscal quarter of 2020, the Bank recognized a charge to non-interest expense in the amount of $2.5 million based on the net negative deposit balance of the various Mann Entities’ accounts after the setoffs/overdraft recoveries. No additional charges to non-interest expense were recognized during the year ended June 30, 2020, related to the deposit transactions with the Mann Entities.

With respect to the Bank’s lending activity with the Mann Entities, its potential exposure was approximately $15.8 million (which represents the Bank’s participation interest in the approximately $35.8 million commercial loan relationships for which the Bank is the originating lender). In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2019, the Bank recognized a provision for loan losses in the amount of $15.8 million, related to the charge-off of the entire principal balance owed to the Bank related to the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships. During the third fiscal quarter of 2020 and the first fiscal quarter of 2021, the Bank recognized partial recoveries in the amount of $1.7 million and $34,000, respectively, related to the charge-off of the Mann Entities’ commercial loan relationships, which were credited to the allowance for loan losses. No additional charges to the provision for loan losses were recognized during the year ended June 30, 2020, related to the loan transactions with the Mann Entities.

Several other parties are asserting claims against the Company and the Bank related to the series of transactions between the Company or the Bank, on the one hand, and the Mann Entities, on the other. The Company and the Bank continue to investigate these matters and it is possible that the Company and the Bank will be subject to additional liabilities which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company is pursuing all available sources of recovery and other means of mitigating the potential loss, and the Company and the Bank are vigorously defending all claims asserted against them arising out of or otherwise related to the fraudulent activity of the Mann Entities.

Legal Proceedings

On October 31, 2019, Southwestern Payroll Services, Inc. (“Southwestern”) filed a complaint against the Company and the Bank (“Pioneer Parties”), Michael T. Mann, Valuewise Corporation, MyPayrollHR, LLC and Cloud Payroll, LLC (collectively, the “Mann Parties”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleged that the Pioneer Parties (i) wrongfully converted certain funds belonging to Southwestern, (ii) engaged in fraudulent and wrongful collection and retention of funds belonging to Southwestern, and (iii) committed gross negligence and that Southwestern is entitled to a constructive trust limiting how the Pioneer Parties distribute the funds in question, which are about $9.8 million. On November 26, 2019, the Pioneer Parties moved to dismiss Southwestern’s fraud claim, which also postponed the Pioneer Parties’ deadline to file an answer until 14 days after the court decides the motion to dismiss. On December 10, 2019, Southwestern filed a response to the Pioneer Parties’ motion to dismiss and an amended complaint, which rendered the Pioneer Parties’ motion to dismiss moot. The amended complaint named several additional corporate entities affiliated with the Mann Parties as co-defendants and asserted claims against the Pioneer Parties for declaratory judgment, conversion,

124

actual and constructive fraud, gross negligence, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, and an accounting. The amended complaint sought a monetary judgment of at least $9.8 million. Each party has filed numerous motions in the proceedings. On January 10, 2020, the Pioneer Parties moved again to dismiss Southwestern’s fraud claim in the amended complaint, which also postponed the Pioneer Parties’ deadline to file an answer to the amended complaint until 14 days after the court decided the motion to dismiss. On April 16, 2020, the court granted the Pioneer Parties’ motion to dismiss Southwestern’s fraud claim. On April 30, 2020, Southwestern filed a motion for both leave to file a second amended complaint and for reconsideration of the court’s dismissal of Southwestern’s fraud claim.  On May 1, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed their answer to Southwestern’s amended complaint. The Pioneer Parties asserted numerous affirmative defenses, counterclaims against Southwestern, and cross-claims against certain of the Mann Parties, including for common law fraud under New York law and violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. The Pioneer Parties contend that the actions of Southwestern and certain of the Mann Parties resulted in damages of $15.6 million, plus pre-judgment interest. On July 7, 2020, the court granted Southwestern leave to file a second amended complaint, which Southwestern filed on July 16, 2020. Southwestern’s second amended complaint asserted claims against the Pioneer Parties for declaratory judgment, conversion, actual and constructive fraud, gross negligence, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, and an accounting – and sought a monetary judgment of at least $9.8 million. On July 30, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed an amended answer to Southwestern’s second amended complaint, which asserted the same affirmative defenses, counterclaims, and cross-claims as the Pioneer Parties’ prior answer to Southwestern’s amended complaint.

On December 10, 2019, National Payment Corp. (“NatPay”) filed a motion to intervene as a plaintiff in Southwestern’s lawsuit against the Pioneer Parties and the Mann Parties as described above. On January 10, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed opposition to NatPay’s motion to intervene. On August 4, 2020, the magistrate judge issued a decision recommending that NatPay be allowed to intervene. While the district judge has not yet adopted the magistrate’s recommended decision, NatPay was allowed to file its complaint in intervention on August 18, 2020. NatPay’s complaint includes claims for declaratory judgment, conversion, fraud, gross negligence, unjust enrichment and constructive trust, and for an accounting against the Pioneer Parties. The prayer for relief in NatPay’s complaint seeks “compensatory damages in an amount of no less than $4 million” (the complaint also seeks punitive damages and interest in unspecified amounts). On September 8, 2020, the Pioneer Parties filed their answer and affirmative defenses to NatPay’s complaint.

On January 21, 2020, Cachet Financial Services (“Cachet”), a third-party automated clearing house service provider, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the Central District of California, Los Angeles Division. Cachet is currently involved in legal proceedings against certain Mann Parties and other related parties. The Bank is not listed as a creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings. However, in the filings with the bankruptcy court, Cachet asserts that the Bank is holding $7.0 million of its funds.

On February 4, 2020, Berkshire Hills Bancorp Inc.’s wholly owned subsidiary Berkshire Bank (“Berkshire Bank”) filed a complaint against the Bank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for Albany County resulting from Berkshire Bank’s participation interest in the commercial loan relationship to the Mann Entities. The complaint alleges that the Bank (1) breached the amended and restated loan participation agreement between the Bank and Berkshire Bank dated as of June 27, 2018, (2) breached the amended and restated loan participation agreement between the Bank and Berkshire Bank dated as of August 12, 2019, (3) engaged in constructive fraud, (4) engaged in fraudulent inducement, (5) engaged in fraudulent concealment, and (6) negligently misrepresented certain material information. The complaint seeks to recover $15.6 million and additional damages. On August 14, 2020, the Bank filed a motion to dismiss five of Berkshire Bank’s claims.

On February 4, 2020, Chemung Financial Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, Chemung Canal Trust Company (“Chemung”), filed a complaint against the Bank in the Supreme Court of the State of New York for Albany County resulting from Chemung’s participation interest in the commercial loan relationship to the Mann Entities. The complaint alleges that the Bank (1) breached the participation agreement between the Bank and Chemung dated as of August 12, 2019, (2) engaged in fraudulent activities, (3) engaged in constructive fraud, and (4) negligently misrepresented and omitted certain material information. The complaint seeks to recover $4.2 million and additional damages. On August 14, 2020, the Bank filed a motion to dismiss three of Chemung’s four claims.

125

On April 30, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), with the authorization of a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury, filed a civil complaint against the Company and the Bank (and Cloud Payroll, LLC) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company and the Bank wrongfully seized approximately $7.3 million from an account held by Cloud Payroll to apply towards debts allegedly owed to the Bank by Cloud Payroll and other affiliates of Michael Mann. The complaint alleges that the funds in question were comprised of payroll taxes and thus subject to a statutory trust under 26 U.S.C. § 7501 that prohibited the Bank from seizing those funds to apply towards debts owed to the Bank. The complaint seeks return of any payroll taxes, plus interest. The Bank and the Company must answer or otherwise respond to the government’s complaint by October 1, 2020. The complaint relates to the same set of facts described above in “Potentially Fraudulent Activity”, and the alleged payroll taxes, plus interest, sought in this proceeding may be part of the recovery sought in the Southwestern and NatPay complaints described above.

On August 31, 2020, AXH Air-Coolers, LLC (“AXH”) filed a complaint against the Company, the Bank, and unnamed employees of the Pioneer Parties in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleges that the Pioneer Parties (i) wrongfully converted certain tax funds belonging to AXH, (ii) were unjustly enriched by the wrongful taking of tax funds belonging to AXH, and (iii) were grossly negligent in allowing AXH’s tax funds to be misappropriated, offset, converted, or stolen. The prayer for relief in AXH’s complaint seeks $336,000, plus penalties and interest, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. The complaint relates to the same set of facts as the DOJ complaint as described above, and the alleged taxes sought in the DOJ, Southwestern, and NatPay complaints. The Pioneer Parties must answer or otherwise respond to AXH’s complaint by November 5, 2020.

The Company and the Bank have received inquiries and requests for information from regulatory agencies relating to some of the entities and events that are the subjects of certain lawsuits described above. This has resulted in, or may in the future result in, regulatory agency investigations, litigation, subpoenas, enforcement actions, and related sanctions or costs. The Company and the Bank continue to cooperate with inquiries and respond to requests as appropriate.

The Company and the Bank continue to investigate these matters and it is possible that the Company and the Bank will be subject to similar legal, regulatory, governmental or other proceedings and additional liabilities. The ultimate outcome of any such proceedings, involving the Company, the Bank or the Pioneer Parties, cannot be predicted with any certainty. It also remains possible that other parties will pursue additional claims against the Bank as a result of the Bank’s dealings with certain of the Mann Entities or as a result of the actions taken by the Pioneer Parties. The Company’s and the Bank’s legal fees and expenses related to these actions are significant. In addition, costs associated with potentially prosecuting, litigating or settling any litigation, satisfying any adverse judgments, if any, or other proceedings, could be significant. These costs, settlements, judgments, sanctions or other expenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

16.     FAIR VALUE

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

126

The fair values of securities are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).

The fair value of interest rate swaps are based on valuation models using observable market data as of the measurement date (Level 2). The fair value of derivatives are classified as a component of other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated statements of condition.

The fair value of impaired loans with specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses is generally based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Nonrecurring adjustments to certain commercial and residential real estate properties classified as OREO are measured at fair value, less costs to sell. Fair values are based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may use a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements at
			June 30, 2020 Using
					Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other		Significant
			Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
			Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	61,511	$	61,511	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		78		—		78		—
Asset-backed securities		110		—		110		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations – residential		684		—		684		—
Municipal obligations		13,385		—		13,385		—
Total available for sale securities		75,768		61,511		14,257		—
Equity securities		8,533		5,528		3,005		—
Derivative assets		42,922		—		42,922		—
Total	$	127,223	$	67,039	$	60,184	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

127

			Fair Value Measurements at
			June 30, 2019 Using
					Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other		Significant
			Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
			Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Government and agency obligations	$	70,867	$	70,867	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities - residential		112		—		112		—
Asset-backed securities		128		—		128		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations – residential		889		—		889		—
Municipal obligations		14,699		—		14,699		—
Total available for sale securities		86,695		70,867		15,828		—
Equity securities		8,658		5,588		3,070		—
Derivative assets		13,462		—		13,462		—
Total	$	108,815	$	76,455	$	32,360	$	—
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	144	$	—	$	144	$	—
Total	$	144	$	—	$	144	$	—

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (dollars in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements Using
					Significant
			Quoted Prices in		Other		Significant
			Active Markets for		Observable		Unobservable
			Identical Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
June 30, 2020
Impaired loans:
Commercial loans	$	775	$	—	$	—	$	775
OREO		260		—		—		260
June 30, 2019
Impaired loans:
Commercial loans	$	840	$	—	$	—	$	840
OREO		158		—		—		158

Impaired loans, which are assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $1.7 million with a valuation allowance of $929,000 resulting in an estimated fair value of $775,000 as of June 30, 2020. Impaired loans, which are assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, using the fair value of collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $1.3 million with a valuation allowance of $426,000 resulting in an estimated fair value of $840,000 as of June 30, 2019.

OREO measured at fair value less costs to sell, had a carrying amount of $260,000 at June 30, 2020. There were write-downs of $8,000 for the year ended June 30, 2020.

OREO measured at fair value less costs to sell, had a carrying amount of $158,000 at June 30, 2019. There were write-downs of $17,000 for the year ended June 30, 2019.

128

The carrying and estimated fair values of financial assets and liabilities as of June 30 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2020
						Fair Value Measurements Using
								Significant
					Active Markets			Other		Significant
					for Identical			Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Estimated		Assets			Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)			(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	156,903	$	156,903	$	156,903		$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale		75,768		75,768		61,511			14,257		—
Securities held to maturity		6,822		6,917		—			6,917		—
Equity securities		8,533		8,533		5,528			3,005		—
FHLBNY stock		1,010		1,010		—			1,010		—
Net loans receivable		1,148,399		1,180,002		—			—		1,180,002
Accrued interest receivable		3,467		3,467		—			3,467		—
Derivative assets		42,922		42,922		—			42,922		—
Financial liabilities
Deposits
Savings, money market, and demand accounts	$	1,150,591	$	1,150,591	$	—	��	$	1,150,591	$	—
Time deposits		119,559		120,921		—			120,921		—
Mortgagors’ escrow deposits		6,044		6,044		—			6,044		—
Due to broker		7,758		7,758		7,758			—		—
Accrued interest payable		35		35		—			35		—

	June 30, 2019
	(As Restated)
						Fair Value Measurements Using
							Significant
					Active Markets		Other		Significant
					for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Carrying		Estimated		Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	230,109	$	230,109	$	230,109	$	—	$	—
Securities available for sale		86,695		86,695		70,867		15,828		—
Securities held to maturity		3,873		3,887		—		3,887		—
Equity securities		8,658		8,658		5,588		3,070		—
FHLBNY stock		924		924		—		924		—
Net loans receivable		1,038,138		1,049,528		—		—		1,049,528
Accrued interest receivable		4,374		4,374		—		4,374		—
Derivative assets		13,462		13,462		—		13,462		—
Financial liabilities
Deposits
Savings, money market, and demand accounts	$	1,200,753	$	1,200,753	$	—	$	1,200,753	$	—
Time deposits		130,565		130,680		—		130,680		—
Mortgagors’ escrow deposits		6,044		6,044		—		6,044		—
Accrued interest payable		17		17		—		17		—
Derivative liabilities		144		144		—		144		—

129

Short-Term Financial Instruments

The fair value of certain financial instruments are estimated to approximate their carrying amounts because the remaining term to maturity or period to repricing of the financial instrument is less than ninety days. Such financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and payable, due to brokers and mortgagor’s escrow deposits.

Securities

Fair values of securities available for sale, securities held to maturity and equity securities are determined as outlined earlier in this footnote.

FHLBNY Stock

The fair value of FHLB stock approximates its carrying value due to transferability restrictions.

Loans

Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type, including residential real estate, commercial real estate, and consumer loans and whether the interest rates are fixed and/or variable.

The estimated fair values of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the respective loan portfolio.

Estimated fair values for nonperforming loans are based on estimated cash flows discounted using a rate commensurate with the credit risk involved. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.

Derivatives

Fair values of derivative assets and liabilities are determined as outlined earlier in this footnote.

Deposits

The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as savings, money market and demand deposits, is regarded to be the amount payable on demand. The estimated fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using market rates for time deposits with similar maturities. The fair value estimates for deposits do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposits as compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market.

Borrowings

The estimated fair value of FHLB advances, if any, is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for borrowings with similar remaining maturities.

The fair values of commitments to extend credit, unused lines of credit, and standby letters of credit are not considered material.

17.     REGULATORY CAPITAL

The Bank and Pioneer Commercial Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgements by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

130

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank and Pioneer Commercial Bank to maintain minimum capital amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined), and common equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and total capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined). Basel III transitional rules became effective for the Bank and Pioneer Commercial Bank on January 1, 2015 with all of the requirements being phased in over a multi-year schedule, and fully phased in by January 1, 2019. Under Basel III rules, banks must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The required capital conservation buffer is 2.50% for 2020 and 2019.

As of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the Bank and Pioneer Commercial Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. Further, the most recent FDIC notification categorized the Bank and Pioneer Commercial Bank as well capitalized institutions under the prompt corrective action regulations. There have been no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s or Pioneer Commercial Bank’s capital classification.

The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Bank and Pioneer Commercial Bank, are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):

													To be Well
									For Capital				Capitalized Under
					For Capital				Adequacy Purposes				Prompt
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes				with Capital Buffer				Corrective Action
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Pioneer Bank:
As of June 30, 2020
Tier 1 (leverage) capital	$	175,424	11.53	%	$	60,868	4.00	%		N/A	N/A		$	76,085	5.00	%
Risk-based capital
Common Tier 1	$	175,424	15.33	%	$	51,503	4.50	%	$	80,115	7.00	%	$	74,393	6.50	%
Tier 1	$	175,424	15.33	%	$	68,670	6.00	%	$	97,283	8.50	%	$	91,561	8.00	%
Total	$	189,835	16.59	%	$	91,561	8.00	%	$	120,173	10.50	%	$	114,451	10.00	%
As of June 30, 2019 (as restated)
Tier 1 (leverage) capital	$	125,172	9.14	%	$	54,808	4.00	%		N/A	N/A		$	68,510	5.00	%
Risk-based capital
Common Tier 1	$	125,172	11.63	%	$	48,441	4.50	%	$	75,353	7.00	%	$	69,970	6.50	%
Tier 1	$	125,172	11.63	%	$	64,588	6.00	%	$	91,500	8.50	%	$	86,117	8.00	%
Total	$	138,923	12.91	%	$	86,117	8.00	%	$	113,029	10.50	%	$	107,647	10.00	%

													To be Well
									For Capital				Capitalized Under
					For Capital				Adequacy Purposes				Prompt
	Actual				Adequacy Purposes				with Capital Buffer				Corrective Action
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
Pioneer Commercial Bank:
As of June 30, 2020
Tier 1 (leverage) capital	$	27,144	8.11	%	$	13,388	4.00	%		N/A	N/A		$	16,736	5.00	%
Risk-based capital
Common Tier 1	$	27,144	45.91	%	$	2,661	4.50	%	$	4,139	7.00	%	$	3,843	6.50	%
Tier 1	$	27,144	45.91	%	$	3,548	6.00	%	$	5,026	8.50	%	$	4,730	8.00	%
Total	$	27,144	45.91	%	$	4,730	8.00	%	$	6,209	10.50	%	$	5,913	10.00	%
As of June 30, 2019
Tier 1 (leverage) capital	$	24,502	7.64	%	$	12,826	4.00	%		N/A	N/A		$	16,032	5.00	%
Risk-based capital
Common Tier 1	$	24,502	42.25	%	$	2,610	4.50	%	$	4,059	7.00	%	$	3,769	6.50	%
Tier 1	$	24,502	42.25	%	$	3,480	6.00	%	$	4,929	8.50	%	$	4,639	8.00	%
Total	$	24,502	42.25	%	$	4,639	8.00	%	$	6,089	10.50	%	$	5,799	10.00	%

131

18.     REVENUE RECOGNITION

On July 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 606. As stated in Note 3 – “Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements,” results for reporting periods beginning after July 1, 2019 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605. The Company recorded a net increase to beginning retained earnings of $291,000 as of July 1, 2019 due to the cumulative impact of adopting Topic 606, primarily driven by the recognition of insurance commission income.

Under Topic 606, the Company made any necessary revisions to its policies related to the new revenue recognition guidance. In general, for revenue not associated with financial instruments, guarantees and lease contracts, we apply the following steps when recognizing revenue from contracts with customers: (i) identify the contract, (ii) identify the performance obligations, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations and (v) recognize revenue when performance obligation is satisfied. Our contracts with customers are generally short term in nature, typically due within one year or less or cancellable by us or our customer upon a short notice period. Performance obligations for our customer contracts are generally satisfied at a single point in time, typically when the transaction is complete. In some cases, we act in an agent capacity, deriving revenue through assisting other entities in transactions with our customers. In such transactions, we recognized revenue and the related costs to provide our services on a net basis in our financial statements. These transactions primarily relate to insurance and brokerage commissions, and fees derived from our customers' use of various interchange and ATM/debit card networks.

Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as fees associated with mortgage servicing rights, financial guarantees, derivatives, and certain credit card fees are also not in scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest revenue streams such as deposit related fees, interchange fees, and insurance and wealth management services commissions. However, the recognition of these revenue streams did not change significantly upon adoption of Topic 606.

Insurance Services Income: Prior to the adoption of Topic 606, commission revenue on insurance policies billed in installments were recognized on the latter of the policy effective date or the date that the premium was billed to the client. As a result of the adoption of Topic 606, revenue associated with the issuance of policies will be recognized upon the effective date of the associated policy regardless of the billing method, meaning that commission revenues billed on an installment basis will be now recognized earlier than they had been previously. Revenue will be accrued based upon the completion of the performance obligation creating a current asset for the unbilled revenue until such time as an invoice is generated, typically not to exceed twelve months. The Company does not expect the overall impact of these changes to be significant, but it will result in slight variances from quarter to quarter. Contingent commissions represent a form of variable consideration associated with the same performance obligation, which is the placement of coverage, for which we earn core commissions. The Company records a monthly accrual for contingent commissions.

Wealth Management Services Income: The Company earns fees from investment brokerage services provided to its customers by a third-party service provider. The Company receives commissions from the third-party service provider on a monthly basis based upon customer activity for the respective month. The Company acts as an agent in arranging the relationship between the customer and the third-party service provider. Investment brokerage fees are presented net of related costs.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts: The Company earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which included services such as ATM use fees, and stop payment charges, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the customer’s request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are recognized at the time the maintenance occurs. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.

132

Card Services Fee Income: The Company earns interchange fees from debit cardholder transactions conducted through the Mastercard payment network. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to cardholder.

Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, check orders, and safe deposit box rental. Wire transfer fees are charged on per item basis, and are charged at the time of transfer and charged directly to the customer account. Check order charges are charged to the customer at the time the order is placed directly to the customer account.  Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Company determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation.

The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the year ended June 30, 2020.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2020		2019
	(dollars in thousands)
Non-interest Income
In scope of "ASC" Topic 606:
Insurance services	$	3,727	$	3,545
Wealth management services		2,750		2,912
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,095		3,351
Card services income		2,779		2,739
Other		199		343
Non-interest income in scope of "ASC" Topic 606		12,550		12,890
Non-interest income out of scope of "ASC" Topic 606		3,132		1,517
Total non-interest income	$	15,682	$	14,407

133

19.     EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Unallocated ESOP shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations. There were no potentially diluted common stock equivalents as of June 30, 2020. Earnings per share data is not applicable for the year ended June 30, 2019 as the Company had no shares outstanding.

	For the Year Ended
	June 30, 2020
	(As Restated)
	(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Net income applicable to common stock	$	5,198
Average number of common shares outstanding		25,977,679
Less: Average unallocated ESOP shares		964,227
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per common share		25,013,452
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.21
Diluted	$	0.21

20.     CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PIONEER BANCORP, INC.

The following condensed financial statements summarize the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the year ended June 30, 2020.

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Statement of Financial Condition
As of June 30, 2020
(in thousands)
	2020
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,681
Investment in subsidiaries		167,506
Loan receivable		12,863
Other assets		1,952
Total assets	$	224,002
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Total liabilities	$	36
Total shareholders' equity		223,966
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	224,002

134

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended June 30, 2020
(in thousands)
	2020
	(As Restated)
INCOME
Interest-earning assets	$	682
Total income		682
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Contribution to Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation		5,446
Other		81
Total operating expenses		5,527
Loss before tax benefit and equity in undistributed net loss of subsidiaries		(4,845)
Income tax (benefit)		(1,583)
Loss before equity in undistributed net loss of subsidiaries		(3,262)
Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries		8,460
Net income	$	5,198

Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Statement of Cash Flow
For the Year Ended June 30, 2020
(in thousands)
	2020
	(As Restated)
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$	5,198
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Undistributed income of subsidiaries		(8,460)
Stock contribution to Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation		5,196
Net increase in other assets		(1,952)
Net increase in other liabilities		36
Net cash provided by operating activities		18
Cash flow from investing activities:
Increase in loan receivable		(12,863)
Investment in subsidiary		(54,500)
Net cash used by investing activities		(67,363)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock		109,055
Other		(29)
Net cash provided by financing activities		109,026
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		41,681
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		—
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	41,681

135

21.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to the end of the fiscal year, a party filed a complaint against the Company and the Bank.   On August 31, 2020, AXH Air-Coolers, LLC (“AXH”) filed a complaint against the Company, the Bank, and unnamed employees of the Pioneer Parties in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleges that the Pioneer Parties (i) wrongfully converted certain tax funds belonging to AXH, (ii) were unjustly enriched by the wrongful taking of tax funds belonging to AXH, and (iii) were grossly negligent in allowing AXH’s tax funds to be misappropriated, offset, converted, or stolen. The prayer for relief in AXH’s complaint seeks $336,000, plus penalties and interest, attorney’s fees, and punitive damages. See “Note 15 – Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” for additional information regarding legal proceedings.

22.     QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)

The Company has restated the quarterly periods of fiscal 2020, to reflect the effects of the Restatement described in Note 2. The following tables summarize the impacts of the Restatements on our previously reported consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive loss and consolidated statement of cash flows included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for each respective period (in thousands except for per share data).

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
	As Previously		Restatement
	Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Net interest income	$	13,258	$	—	$	13,258
Provision for loan losses		16,370		(15,800)		570
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses		(3,112)		15,800		12,688
Total noninterest income		3,969		—		3,969
Total noninterest expense		18,231		—		18,231
Income (loss) before income taxes		(17,374)		15,800		(1,574)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(4,690)		4,093		(597)
Net income (loss)		(12,684)		11,707		(977)
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.51)	$	0.47	$	(0.04)
Diluted	$	(0.51)	$	0.47	$	(0.04)
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss:
Net income (loss)	$	(12,684)	$	11,707	$	(977)
Comprehensive income (loss)		(12,443)		11,707		(736)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Net income (loss)	$	(12,684)	$	11,707	$	(977)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		16,370		(15,800)		570
Increase in other assets		(11,489)		4,093		(7,396)

136

	For the Six Months Ended December 31, 2019
	As Previously		Restatement
	Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Net interest income	$	25,811	$	—	$	25,811
Provision for loan losses		17,890		(15,800)		2,090
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,921		15,800		23,721
Total noninterest income		9,375		—		9,375
Total noninterest expense		29,836		—		29,836
Income (loss) before income taxes		(12,540)		15,800		3,260
Income tax expense (benefit)		(3,706)		4,093		387
Net income (loss)		(8,834)		11,707		2,873
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.35)	$	0.47	$	0.12
Diluted	$	(0.35)	$	0.47	$	0.12
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss:
Net income (loss)	$	(8,834)	$	11,707	$	2,873
Comprehensive income (loss)		(8,584)		11,707		3,123
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Net income (loss)	$	(8,834)	$	11,707	$	2,873
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		17,890		(15,800)		2,090
Increase in other assets		(4,979)		4,093		(886)

137

	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020
	As Previously		Restatement
	Reported		Adjustments		As Restated
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Net interest income	$	37,865	$	—	$	37,865
Provision for loan losses		20,440		(15,800)		4,640
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		17,425		15,800		33,225
Total noninterest income		12,071		—		12,071
Total noninterest expense		40,976		—		40,976
Income (loss) before income taxes		(11,480)		15,800		4,320
Income tax expense (benefit)		(3,495)		4,093		598
Net income (loss)		(7,985)		11,707		3,722
Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.32)	$	0.47	$	0.15
Diluted	$	(0.32)	$	0.47	$	0.15
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss:
Net income (loss)	$	(7,985)	$	11,707	$	3,722
Comprehensive income (loss)		(8,208)		11,707		3,499
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:
Net income (loss)	$	(7,985)	$	11,707	$	3,722
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		20,440		(15,800)		4,640
Increase in other assets		(28,850)		4,093		(24,757)

ITEM 9.Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

ITEM 9A.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2020. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

In connection with the filing of the original Annual Report on Form 10-K in September 2020, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by the report, our

138

disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Subsequent to the evaluation made in connection with the original Annual Report on Form 10-K in September 2020 and in connection with the preparation and filing of the Restatement and this Form 10-K/A, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer re-evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2020 at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weakness described below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.”

Overview of Internal Control

Internal control helps entities achieve important objectives and sustain and improve performance. The COSO Framework (as defined below) enables organizations to effectively and efficiently develop systems of internal control that adapt to changing business and operating environments, mitigate risks at acceptable levels and support sound decision making and governance of organizations. The COSO Framework defines internal control as “a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives relating to operations, reporting and compliance.” The COSO Framework provides three categories of objectives, which allow organizations to focus on differing aspects of internal control: (a) Operations Objectives, (b) Reporting Objectives and (c) Compliance Objectives.

As noted below in the “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting”, as a result of the Restatement, management was required to identify a technical accounting shortcoming in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting associated with review of significant loans that were both modified and identified as impaired subsequent to quarter end but prior to the financial statements being issued. Under applicable SEC accounting rules, this is also labeled a “material weakness.” To be clear, this relates solely to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified below and does not affect or relate to either the Company’s compliance with laws or regulations or the Company’s operations (e.g., credit underwriting, loan issuance, loan servicing, disclosure of information to contractual counterparties, deposit management, collection/retention of funds, account management, compliance with Anti-Money Laundering policies or any other operational policies). Under applicable SEC accounting rules, the mere existence of the Restatement gives rise to a shortcoming in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, and it is being identified below solely due to the Restatement.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.

Management evaluates the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and tests for reliability of recorded financial information through a program of ongoing internal audits. Any system of internal control, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations, including the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal control will provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation.Under applicable SEC accounting related rules, a material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the 2013 framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO Framework).

139

As a result of the Restatement of our consolidated financial statements including the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, and the unaudited quarterly financial information for each quarter in the year ended June 30, 2020, management has identified a technical accounting shortcoming in our in internal control over financial reporting associated with review of significant loans that were both modified and identified as impaired subsequent to a quarter end but prior to the financial statements being issued. Under applicable SEC accounting rules, this is also called a “material weakness.” Specifically, the Company did not design and maintain effective internal control over the assessment of the accounting for significant subsequent event loan modifications, including the determination of whether a modification results in a new loan.

As a result of the material weakness described above, management has concluded that, as of June 30, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Management’s Financial Reporting Remediation Initiatives

In order to remediate the material weakness, management has commenced the redesign of specific processes and controls associated with review of the financial reporting of significant subsequent event loan modifications, including a quarterly identification and review of significant loan modifications occurring subsequent to quarter end but prior to the financial statements being issued, to ensure that the relevant accounting implications are identified and considered.

Management is committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and believes this remediation effort will represent an improvement in existing controls. Management anticipates that the new controls, as implemented and when tested for a sufficient period of time, will remediate the material weakness. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, we may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or modify certain activities of the remediation measures described above.

Notwithstanding the existence of the material weakness as described above, we believe that the financial statements in this annual report present fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated statements of condition, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income (loss), statements of cash flows and statements of shareholders’ equity as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in conformity with GAAP.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the changes described above under “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting,” there were no changes made in our internal controls during the quarter ended June 30, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.Other Information

None.

140

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The Company’s Board of Directors is currently comprised of seven members.  The Company’s Bylaws provide that directors are divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible, with one class of directors elected annually. The following sets forth certain information regarding current members of the Company’s Board of Directors, including the terms of office of board members. Age information is as of June 30, 2020, and term as a director includes service with Pioneer Bank. With respect to directors, the biographies contain information regarding the person’s business experience and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Board of Directors to determine that the person should serve as a director. Each director of Pioneer Bancorp is also a director of Pioneer Bank.

Directors

The following directors of Pioneer Bancorp have terms ending at the annual meeting for the year ended June 30, 2020:

Dr. James K. Reed (age 71) is President and Chief Executive Officer of St. Peter’s Health Partners.  Dr. Reed became President and Chief Executive Officer upon the merger of Northeast Health, Seton Health and St. Peter’s Health Care Services.  As President and Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Reed oversees the management and growth of the region’s largest and most comprehensive not-for-profit network of high-quality, advanced medical care, primary care, rehabilitation and senior services.  Dr. Reed has also held a number of high level finance positions, including Director of Corporate Finance at International Paper Company, and Director of Acquisitions and Divestitures at Union Pacific Corporation. He then went on to become the Chief Medical Officer of Northeast Health, before becoming President and Chief Executive Officer of St. Peter’s Health Partners.  Dr. Reed is also a board officer of the Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company (MLMIC), and a board member of HealthNow New York Inc.  Dr. Reed has a proven record of success in managing large and complex organizations and has a special understanding of the health care and technology sectors.   Dr. Reed joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2017 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

Edward Reinfurt (age 67) was the Director of the Empire State Development Division of Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR), retiring from this position in February 2014.  Prior to his appointment at NYSTAR, Mr. Reinfurt was Vice President of The Business Council of New York State for 27 years.  He also served in the capacity of Director of Government Affairs for both the Carrier Corporation and Associated Industries of New York State. During his career, Mr. Reinfurt has spent considerable time on a wide variety of public policy issues. He was a member of the New York State Department of Health's Committee on Public Health Priorities, the New York Governor's Task Force to Restructure Employment, Health and Social Services, and the Accountability Team of the Labor and Education Department's joint committee reviewing the New York State's Workforce Development System.  Mr. Reinfurt also served as past chair and board member of Northeast Health, Inc. and formerly served as Vice Chairman of "Kids Count" in Watervliet.  Mr. Reinfurt’s strong government affairs experience and leadership skills are an invaluable asset to the board.  Mr. Reinfurt joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2006 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

141

The following directors of Pioneer Bancorp have terms ending at the annual meeting for the year ending June 30, 2021:

Thomas L. Amell (age 53) has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Bank since June 2013.  Mr. Amell’s banking career spans 30 years working in different areas of banking, including retail and commercial sales management and executive leadership.  Before joining Pioneer Bank, Mr. Amell served as President – Commercial Services of State Employees Federal Credit Union.  Prior to that, Mr. Amell was Regional President at First Niagara Bank.  Mr. Amell is actively involved in various organizations, currently as the Immediate Past Chair and Board Member of the Independent Bankers Association of New York State, a member of the Board of Directors for the New York Bankers Association, a member of the 50 Group, a past Chairman of the CEG and a member of the Executive Committee of the Siena College Board of Trustees.  He has also received many awards during his career, including Albany Business Review’s “Executive of the Year” and “40 Under 40,” the AMA of New York Capital Region Chapter’s “Marketer of Excellence,” Hudson Valley Community College’s “Otto V. Guenther Career Achievement Award,” the Big Brothers’/Big Sisters’ “Spirits of September Honoree” and 2015 Champion for Children Award from Northern Rivers.  Mr. Amell’s extensive knowledge of the banking industry and strong leadership skills provides the board with invaluable insight and guidance into the business and regulatory requirements of today’s banking environment. Mr. Amell joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2012 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

Donald E. Fane (age 60) is the President of Callanan Industries, Inc., a leading supplier of asphalt concrete, aggregates, ready mix concrete and construction services in New York State.  Prior to being named President in 2014, Mr. Fane held the position of Executive Vice President at Callanan. He also serves as President of Clemente Latham Concrete. Mr. Fane is involved in and serves on various local boards, including Friendly Sons of Saint Patrick’s and the Lansingburgh Boys & Girls Club. He formerly served on the board of Hudson Valley Community College, Seton Health Foundation, the Historic Troy 20/20 Group and the Troy Savings Bank Music Hall. He is the former Commissioner of the Spiegleltown Fire Company. In 1999, Mr. Fane was bestowed with the "Uncle Sam Citizen of the Year" Award, in 2003 the Troy Police Benevolent Association's "Gold Shield Award" and in 2006 the Rensselaer County Boy Scout's “Good Scout Award.”  Mr. Fane’s career as a business executive provides the board with knowledge of the challenges facing business in Pioneer Bank’s market area.  Further, Mr. Fane, both through his business and as an active member of the community, is knowledgeable of Pioneer Bank’s local customer environment.  Mr. Fane joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2006 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

Shaun Mahoney (age 56) is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of the Mahoney Performance Institute, which he began in 2009. As founder of the Mahoney Performance Institute, Mr. Mahoney has developed a continuum of leadership, strategy, and culture development programs.  He has also served in a number of management and executive roles at private and public companies such as The Chase Manhattan Bank, Equifax, and Housecall Medical Resources. Mr. Mahoney is Chairman and board member of NextRidge Inc., a board member for Black Watch Premier Soccer Club and a member of the Albany 50 Group.  He is a former board member of the Center of Economic Growth and the former Chairman of the Dean’s Advisory Council for the Siena College School of Business. He is also a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA). Mr. Mahoney’s skills in driving company performance and knowledge of the local community will assist Pioneer Bancorp as it continues its growth as a public company. Mr. Mahoney joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2019 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

142

The following directors of Pioneer Bancorp have terms ending at the annual meeting for the year ending June 30, 2022:

Eileen C. Bagnoli (age 71) served in various capacities with Pioneer Bank since 1972 until her retirement with Pioneer Bank in June 2013 after a 41-year career.  During her tenure, Ms. Bagnoli held positions at Pioneer Bank in retail branch management, marketing, human resources and operations, and served as Chief Executive Officer from June 2010 until June 2013 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2003 until June 2010.  Ms. Bagnoli was actively involved in the New York Bankers Association, as well as the Independent Bankers Association of New York State. She served as a director and past board chair of the Commission on Economic Opportunity and the New York State Higher Education Services Corporation Board and additionally served for over 22 years on the board of the Helping Hands School.  In 2008, she was honored for her distinguished career with the "Women of Excellence" award by the Albany-Colonie Regional Chamber of Commerce and in 2010 was the recipient of the Capital District Business Review's Women in Business Outstanding Executive award.  Ms. Bagnoli served on the board of WMHT Educational Telecommunications until 2016.  Ms. Bagnoli’s extensive experience in the local banking industry and involvement in business and civic organizations in the communities in which Pioneer Bank serves affords the board valuable insight regarding the Bank’s business and operations.  Ms. Bagnoli joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2010 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

Madeline Taylor (age 74) is a consultant to the Association Management Division of Capital Hill Management Services where she is involved in Business Development and Client Relations. Prior to this, Ms. Taylor spent 17 years with the Albany-Colonie Regional Chamber of Commerce where she served in various executive level positions, the last seven years of which were as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Chamber. During her tenure as Chamber President, Ms. Taylor was credited with spearheading the "Tech Valley" initiative of the Capital Region and became a founding member of the Tech Valley Chamber Coalition. Ms. Taylor has served on the boards of the New York State Economic Development Council, the Empire State Certified Development Corporation, the Albany Academy for Girls, Albany Memorial and Samaritan Hospitals and as a member of the President's Council of Russell Sage College.  Ms. Taylor was also appointed by former New York Governor George Pataki to serve on the Board of the Harriman Campus Development Corp.  Ms. Taylor has been the recipient of several awards, including being named one of the "100 Women of Excellence" by the Women's Business Council of the Albany-Colonie Chamber, the Marketer of the Year by the American Marketing Association, Distinguished Leadership Award by the National Association for Community Leadership and was featured as a "Woman in the News" by the Women's Press Club of New York State.  Ms. Taylor’s business and public policy experience, community service and strong knowledge of the business climate of the New York Capital Region brings extensive insight into the customers who live in Pioneer Bank’s market area and economic developments affecting its market area.  Ms. Taylor joined Pioneer Bank’s board in 2003 and has been a member of the boards of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bancorp, MHC since their incorporation.

143

Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

The following sets forth information regarding executive officers who are not directors of Pioneer Bancorp.  Age information is as of June 30, 2020.  The executive officers of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bank are elected annually.

Susan M. Hollister, age 54, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since August 2016.  Prior to joining Pioneer Bank, Ms. Hollister served as Senior Human Resources Manager for First Niagara Bank in the Eastern New York region from 1993 until August 2016.  

Patrick J. Hughes, age 47, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2016.  Prior to joining Pioneer Bank, Mr. Hughes spent 20 years with UHY Advisors/UHY LLP, a professional services firm.  From 2006 until November 2016, Mr. Hughes served at the firm as a Managing Director and Partner.  

Laura A. Mazzara, age 57, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer since December 2008 after having previously served in various positions at Pioneer Bank since 1987.    

Robert J. Nichols, age 56, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer since September 2020. Previously he served as Senior Vice President, Commercial Development since November 2019. Prior to joining Pioneer Bank, Mr. Nichols served as Director of Commercial Banking for Key Bank since 2016, and Division Executive of Business Banking for First Niagara Bank in the Eastern New York region from 2012 until 2016. 

Frank C. Sarratori, age 55, has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since 2013.  Prior to 2013, Mr. Sarratori served as Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Secretary and General Counsel since his date of hire in 2004.  Mr. Sarratori was appointed as a director of Pioneer Bank in April 2019.  

Jesse Tomczak, age 47, was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer in 2019. Previously, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Customer Experience Officer since October 2013.  Mr. Tomczak previously served as Director of Business Development at State Employees Federal Credit Union.

Code of Ethics for Senior Officers

Pioneer Bancorp has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers that applies to Pioneer Bancorp’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics for Senior Officers is available on the Company’s website at http://investors.pioneerbanking.com/govdocs.  Amendments to and waivers from the Code of Ethics for Senior Officers will also be disclosed on the Company’s website.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is comprised of Directors Reed, Bagnoli, Reinfurt and Taylor each of whom is “independent” in accordance with applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules and Nasdaq listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that Director Reed qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules.

144

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Compensation

The following table sets forth for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, certain information as to the total remuneration paid by Pioneer Bank to Mr. Amell, who served as President and Chief Executive Officer and the two other most highly compensated executive officers for the year ended June 30, 2020.  Each individual listed in the table below is referred to as a “named executive officer.”

		Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal						Non-equity incentive		All other
position	Year	Salary		Bonus (1)		plan compensation (2)		compensation (3)		Total
Thomas L. Amell	2020	$	651,182	$	—	$	127,236	$	17,392	$	795,810
President and Chief Executive Officer	2019	$	651,182	$	—	$	187,731	$	27,218	$	866,131
Frank C. Sarratori	2020	$	248,462	$	50,000	$	51,432	$	21,710	$	371,604
Executive Vice President , Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary	2019	$	242,565	$	—	$	95,532	$	7,887	$	345,984
Patrick J. Hughes (4)	2020	$	242,960	$	25,000	$	49,621	$	19,433	$	337,014
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

________________

(1) Represents discretionary cash bonuses paid.

(2) Payments were payable pursuant to the Pioneer Bank Targeted Incentive Plan. The annual performance period under the Targeted Incentive Plan is a 12-month period ending on December 31 of each year. Payments are made in the first calendar quarter of each year. The amounts payable in 2020 were based on the satisfaction of certain performance goals for the annual performance period ending on December 31, 2019 and such bonuses that were earned with respect to such performance period were paid in February, 2020.

(3) A breakdown of the elements of the All Other Compensation column for the named executive officers for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 is detailed in the following table. 

Officer	Perquisites (a)		401(k) Plan		ESOP (b)		Total
Thomas L. Amell	$	—	$	7,913	$	9,479	$	17,392
Frank C. Sarratori	$	—	$	12,231	$	9,479	$	21,710
Patrick J. Hughes	$	—	$	9,954	$	9,479	$	19,433

(a) Did not exceed $10,000.

(b) Based on Pioneer Bancorp’s closing stock price of $9.15 on June 30, 2020.

(4) Mr. Hughes was not a named executive officer with respect to the year ended June 30, 2019.

Benefit Plans and Agreements

Employment Agreement with Thomas L. Amell.   On July 17, 2019, Pioneer Bank entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Amell.  The employment agreement has an initial term that ends on December 31, 2021. The initial term will extend automatically for one additional year on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2020 unless either Pioneer Bank or Mr. Amell give notice no later than 30 days before the anniversary date that the term will not be renewed. At least 30 days prior to each anniversary date of the employment agreement, disinterested members of the board of directors of Pioneer Bank will conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation and review of Mr. Amell’s performance for purposes of determining whether to take action to not renew the employment agreement.

The employment agreement specifies Mr. Amell’s base salary, which currently is $651,182. The compensation committee of the board of directors (the “Compensation Committee”) may increase, but not decrease, Mr. Amell’s base salary.  In addition to the base salary, the agreement provides that Mr. Amell is eligible to participate in any bonus plan or arrangement of Pioneer Bank in which senior management is eligible to participate and/or may receive a bonus on a

145

discretionary basis, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Amell is also entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans, arrangements and perquisites offered to employees and officers of Pioneer Bank and the reimbursement of reasonable travel and other business expenses incurred in the performance of his duties with Pioneer Bank, including memberships in organizations as Mr. Amell and the board mutually agree are necessary and appropriate.

Pioneer Bank may terminate the executive’s employment, and Mr. Amell may resign, at any time with or without good reason.  In the event of Mr. Amell’s (1) termination without cause other than due to death or disability, or (2) voluntary resignation for good reason (a “qualifying termination event”), Pioneer Bank would pay Mr. Amell a cash lump sum payment equal to the base salary he would have earned had he remained employed for the greater of: (1) the remaining term of the employment agreement; or (2) 12 months (the “benefits period”).  In addition, Mr. Amell would receive non-taxable medical and dental insurance coverage under Pioneer Bank’s group health plan at the same cost-sharing arrangement in effect as of the date of determination during the benefits period or, if earlier, until Mr. Amell receives substantially comparable health and welfare coverage from another employer. A “good reason” condition for purposes of the employment agreement would include a material reduction in base salary, a material reduction in authority, duties or responsibilities associated with Mr. Amell’s position with Pioneer Bank, a relocation of Mr. Amell’s principal place of employment by more than 35 miles from Pioneer Bank’s main office or a material breach of the employment agreement by Pioneer Bank.

In the event Mr. Amell’s qualifying termination event occurs on or after a change in control of Pioneer Bancorp or Pioneer Bank, Mr. Amell would be entitled to (in lieu of the payments and benefits described in the previous paragraph) a severance payment equal to three times the sum of his: (1) base salary in effect as of the date of his termination or immediately prior to the change in control, whichever is higher; and (2) the highest annual cash bonus earned for the three most recently completed performance periods prior to the change in control.   Such payment will be made in a cash lump sum within 30 days following the Mr. Amell’s date of termination. In addition, Pioneer Bank (or its successor) will continue to provide Mr. Amell with life insurance and non-taxable medical and dental insurance coverage substantially comparable to the coverage provided to him immediately before his date of termination at no cost to Mr. Amell.  Such continued coverage will cease upon the earlier of: (1) 36 months after the date of termination; or (2) the date on which Mr. Amell becomes a full-time employee of another employer and receives comparable health and welfare benefits.

The employment agreement would immediately terminate upon the earlier of Mr. Amell’s voluntary resignation without good reason, death or disability, and Pioneer Bank would have no obligation to pay any additional severance benefits to Mr. Amell under the employment agreement.

Upon termination of employment (other than a termination in connection with a change in control), Mr. Amell will be required to adhere to one-year non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions set forth in his employment agreement.

Change in Control Agreements.  Pioneer Bank entered into individual change in control agreements with five other executive officers, including Frank C. Sarratori, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Jesse Tomczak, Executive Vice President and Chief Banking Officer, and Patrick J. Hughes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.  The change in control agreements have terms that initially end on December 31, 2020.  Each agreement will extend automatically for one additional year on January 1 of each year beginning January 1, 2020 so that the remaining term is two years unless either Pioneer Bank or the executive gives notice no later than 30 days before such anniversary date that the agreement will not be renewed. At least 30 days prior to each anniversary date of the change in control agreements, disinterested members of the board of directors of Pioneer Bank will conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation and review of each executive’s performance for purposes of determining whether to not renew the executive’s change in control agreement.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that Pioneer Bancorp or Pioneer Bank enters into a transaction that would be considered a change in control as defined under the agreements, the term of the agreements would extend automatically so that they would expire no less than two years beyond the effective date of the change in control.

In the event of the executive’s involuntary termination of employment other than for cause, disability or death, or voluntary resignation for “good reason” on or after the effective date of a change in control of Pioneer Bancorp or

146

Pioneer Bank, each executive would be entitled to a severance payment equal to two times the sum of the executive’s: (1) base salary in effect as of the date of his termination or immediately prior to the change in control, whichever is higher; and (2) the highest annual cash bonus earned for the three most recently completed performance periods prior to the change in control.  Such payment will be made in a cash lump sum within 30 days following the executive’s date of termination.  In addition, Pioneer Bank (or its successor) will continue to provide each executive with life insurance and non-taxable medical and dental insurance coverage substantially comparable to the coverage provided to him or her immediately before the date of termination at no cost to the executive.  Such continued coverage will cease upon the earlier of: (1) 24 months after the date of termination; or (2) the date on which the executive becomes a full-time employee of another employer and receives comparable health and welfare benefits.

A “good reason” condition for purposes of each change in control agreement would include a material reduction in base salary, a material reduction in authority, duties or responsibilities associated with the executive’s position with Pioneer Bank, a relocation of the executive’s principal place of employment by more than 35 miles from Pioneer Bank’s main office or a material breach of the change in control agreement by Pioneer Bank.

Targeted Incentive Plan (TIP).  Pioneer Bank adopted the TIP for its executive officers who are approved annually by the board.  Each named executive officer is a participant in the TIP.  The TIP is designed to provide participants with incentives and motivation to increase Pioneer Bank’s profitability and growth while maintaining its safety and soundness.  The TIP provides annual incentive awards to participants based on overall bank-wide, department and/or individual performance goals established annually, which are determined by using performance history, peer data, market data and the Compensation Committee’s judgment based on previous experience and projected market conditions.  

Each participant can achieve annual incentive awards based on a percentage of base salary, depending on performance goals at certain percentages of achievement, ranging from 90% to 115% for the Chief Executive Officer and 90% to 110% for the other executive officers.  Each performance goal established is weighted.  The annual performance period under the TIP is a 12-month period ending on December 31 of each year (the “plan year”). The calculation of adjusted net income as applied to the performance goals for the plan year ended December 31, 2019 is net income under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, excluding gains or losses on securities transactions and the contribution to the Pioneer Bank Foundation.  For the plan year ended December 31, 2019, the performance goals established were based on: (1) current year return on assets; (2) three-year return on assets; (3) core deposit growth; and (4) three-year return on assets compared to a peer group of all federally insured savings banks having assets between $300 million and $1.0 billion. The performance goals were equally weighted for each participant, except for the CEO, whose performance goals were weighted 15%, 40%, 15% and 30%, respectively, to be more focused on the long-term performance of Pioneer Bank. Furthermore, any annual incentive award payable under the TIP was contingent upon Pioneer Bank obtaining minimum performance goals related to net income and safety and soundness and the participant having satisfactory job performance during the plan year.  Each named officer’s annual incentive award opportunities for the plan year ended December 31, 2019, as a percentage of base salary, was 40%.

Each participant’s annual incentive award is payable in a cash lump sum as soon as practicable following the completion of the plan year, provided, however, that such payment will be made no later than two and one-half months following the end of the plan year.  A participant must be actively employed on the last day of the plan year in order to receive the annual incentive award.  Based on the foregoing, Messrs. Amell, Sarratori and Hughes earned $127,236, $51,432 and $49,621, respectively, under the TIP for the plan year ended December 31, 2019 and such bonuses were paid to Messrs. Amell, Sarratori and Hughes in February, 2020.

Board of Directors and Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan.  Pioneer Bank maintains the Pioneer Bank Board of Directors and Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan for directors and certain executives of Pioneer Bank who are designated to participate in the plan by the board.  Mr. Sarratori is the only named executive officer participating in the plan.  Participants may make an election on a deferral election form (the “election form”) to defer a portion the participants’ compensation, up to 100%.  Amounts deferred are credited to a bookkeeping account established in the name of each participant.  The participant’s account balance accrues earnings, as if the balance was invested in one or more investment funds as selected by the employer, in multiples of 1%.  Participants are always 100% vested in their deferral accounts.  Participants must elect on the participation agreements the form and timing of

147

distribution at the time the participant makes the deferral election. If the participant fails to properly elect the time and form of distribution, the participant’s account will be designated as a separate account and will be paid in a lump sum.  Unless the participant has elected for his or her account balance to be payable while employed with Pioneer Bank, the participant’s account balance is generally distributed upon the earlier of death, disability or termination of employment.  

Tax-Qualified Retirement Plans

Pension Plan.  Pioneer Bank maintains The Retirement Plan of Pioneer Savings Bank, a qualified, tax-exempt non-contributory defined benefit plan (the “pension plan”) for employees of Pioneer Bank, excluding union employees and leased employees. Employees hired prior to September 1, 2019 are enrolled on January 1 or July 1 following the completion of one year of service and attainment of age 21.  Part-time employees are eligible if they have worked a minimum of 1,000 hours in their first year of employment or in any subsequent pension plan year.  Employee hired on or after September 1, 2019 are not eligible to participate in the pension plan.  Contributions to the pension plan are made to satisfy the actuarially determined minimum funding requirements according to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”).  A participant becomes 100% vested in his or her accrued benefit under the pension plan after five years of service with Pioneer Bank.    

Upon attainment of normal retirement date (age 65 for participants who entered the plan before October 1, 1988, or the later of age 65 or the fifth anniversary of participation in the plan for participants who entered the plan on or after October 1, 1988), the participant is entitled to a normal retirement benefit, which is an monthly benefit equal to 1/12 of the product of 2% of the participant’s average annual earnings, multiplied by the participant’s full and fractional years of service (up to a maximum of 30 years) earned before January 1, 2010, plus the product of 1.5% of the participant’s average annual earnings multiplied by the participant’s full and fractional years of service earned after December 31, 2009 (up to a maximum of 30 years reduced by years of service earned prior to January 1, 2010) payable for the life of the participant.  Alternative forms of payments include the actuarial equivalent of the normal retirement benefit paid in the form of a lifetime benefit, with a guaranteed minimum of 10 or 15 years, a 50%, 75% or 100% survivor lifetime benefit for the participant and his or her joint annuitant, and an annuity with the option to elect the form of survivor benefit which meets the requirements of Section 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code.

If the participant has attained his or her early retirement date (the date on which the participant has completed 30 years of service or attainment of age 60 with 20 years of service) and elects the normal retirement benefit to commence prior to the normal retirement date, the participant would receive an early retirement benefit equal to the participant’s accrued pension benefit, reduced by 0.4166% for each of the first 60 months before the normal retirement date and 0.2083% for each additional month before the normal retirement date.  

If a participant terminates employment prior to the normal retirement date and early retirement date, the participant would be entitled to the participant’s vested accrued benefit, determined as of the date of termination of employment, payable as of the participant’s normal retirement date; provided, however, that if  the participant has completed 20 years of service for the normal retirement benefit, the participant may elect to begin benefit payments as of the first day of any month following the month in which the participant would have been eligible for early retirement if the participant had continued employment adjusted by the same factors as the early retirement benefit.  

401(k) Plan.  Pioneer Bank maintains the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan, which is a qualified, tax-exempt profit-sharing plan with a salary deferral feature under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “401(k) Plan”).  All eligible employees may participate in the plan upon reaching age 21 and working for at least three months with respect to making elective salary deferrals and receiving all other employer contributions.  Eligible employees are permitted to make elective salary deferrals in an amount up to $19,500 (as indexed annually).  Eligible employees who have not made a salary deferral election automatically have withheld 6% of their salary deferred as a pre-tax contribution which will be invested in accordance with the plan’s investment policies.  Eligible employees may designate their salary deferrals as either pre-tax or after-tax Roth deferrals.

An employee may also contribute rollover contributions to the plan from another eligible retirement plan.  Employees who have attained age 50 before the end of a plan year are also eligible to make catch-up contributions during

148

the year in an amount not to exceed $6,500 (as indexed annually).  All employee elective salary deferrals, catch-up contributions and “rollover” contributions are fully and immediately vested.  

In addition, Pioneer Bank currently makes an employer matching contribution for the amount a participant contributes as salary deferrals up to 100% of the amount contributed for the first 1% of the participant’s plan compensation plus 50% of the amount contributed between 1% and 6% of the participant’s plan compensation.  Pioneer Bank may also make discretionary qualified non-elective contributions.  Pioneer Bank may also make a discretionary pro-rata employer contribution each plan year.  

Employer matching contributions and employer discretionary pro-rata contributions are subject to a six-year vesting schedule, such that the participant vests in the first 20% of his or her account attributable to employer matching and profit-sharing contributions after two years of service and an additional 20% each year thereafter until fully vested after six years.  The qualified non-elective contributions are fully and immediately vested.  Generally, a participant is not entitled to an in-service distribution of his or her account balance until the participant attains age 59-1/2.  In addition, the 401(k) Plan permits loans to participants within the limits set forth in the Internal Revenue Code and according to loan procedures established by Pioneer Bank.  Participants are entitled to benefit payments upon termination of employment, disability or death.  Participants may elect that benefits be distributed in the form of a lump sum or in equal annual installments paid over a set of number of years.  Pioneer Bank has established an employer stock fund in the 401(k) Plan so that participants can acquire an interest in the common stock of Pioneer Bancorp through their accounts in the 401(k) Plan.  

Employee Stock Ownership Plan.  In connection with its mutual holding company reorganization and related stock offering, Pioneer Bank adopted an employee stock ownership plan (the “ESOP”) for eligible employees.  The named executive officers are eligible to participate in the ESOP just like other eligible employees.  Eligible employees who have attained age 21 on the first entry date commencing on or after the eligible employee’s completion of one year of service.  

The ESOP trustee purchased, on behalf of the ESOP, 1,018,325 shares of Pioneer Bancorp common stock outstanding, funded with a loan from Pioneer Bancorp equal to the aggregate purchase price of the common stock.  The loan is repaid principally through Pioneer Bank’ discretionary contributions to the ESOP and any dividends payable on common stock held by the ESOP over the 20-year term of the loan.  The interest rate for the ESOP loan is the prime rate, as published in The Wall Street Journal.  The interest rate adjusts annually and is the prime rate on the first business day of the calendar year.  

The trustee holds the shares purchased by the ESOP in an unallocated suspense account, and shares are released from the suspense account on a pro-rata basis as the loan is repaid. The trustee allocates the shares released among participants on the basis of each participant’s proportional share of compensation relative to all participants.  Participants will vest in the first 20% of their account balances after two years of service and an additional 20% each year thereafter until full vesting occurs after six years. No vesting credit will be given for years of service prior to January 1, 2019. Participants also will become fully vested automatically upon normal retirement, death or disability, a change in control, or termination of the ESOP.  Generally, participants will receive distributions from the ESOP upon separation from service in accordance with the terms of the plan document.  The ESOP reallocates any unvested shares forfeited upon termination of employment among the remaining participants.

149

Directors’ Compensation

The following table sets forth for the year ended June 30, 2020 certain information as to the total remuneration Pioneer Bank paid to the directors.  Neither Mr. Amell nor Mr. Sarratori received director fees for the year ended June 30, 2020.  

Director Compensation for the Year Ended June 30, 2020
	Fees Earned or		All Other
	Paid in Cash		Compensation		Total
Name	($)		($)(1)		($)
Eileen Bagnoli	$	64,000	$	—	$	64,000
Donald E. Fane	$	64,000	$	—	$	64,000
Shaun Mahoney	$	63,200	$	—	$	63,200
Dr. James K. Reed	$	64,000	$	—	$	64,000
Edward Reinfurt	$	64,400	$	—	$	64,400
Madeline D. Taylor	$	64,400	$	—	$	64,400

(1) For the year ended June 30, 2020, no director had perquisites, the aggregate value of which exceeded $10,000.

Director Fees

During the year ended June 30, 2020, the directors received a fee of $4,600 for each director meeting attended and a fee of $400 for each loan committee meeting attended.  

Each person who also serves as a director/trustee of Pioneer Bancorp or Pioneer Bancorp, MHC earns director fees only in his or her capacity as a board or committee member of Pioneer Bank.

Director Plans

Dr. Reed is a participant in the Board of Directors and Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan.  Please see the description of the plan set forth under “—Benefit Plans and Agreements” for further details.  

150

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Principal Holders

Persons and groups who beneficially own in excess of 5% of the shares of common stock are required to file certain reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding such ownership. The following table sets forth, as of September 25, 2020, the shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Company’s directors and executive officers, individually and as a group, and by each person who was known to the Company as the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock.  The mailing address for each of the Company’s directors and executive officers is 652 Albany Shaker Road, Albany, New York 12211. No director or executive officer has pledged Pioneer Bancorp common stock as collateral for a loan.

	Shares of Common
	Stock Beneficially		Percent of Shares of
	Owned as of the		Common Stock
	Record Date (1)		Outstanding (2)
Persons Owning Greater than 5%
Pioneer Bancorp, MHC	14,287,723		55.0%
652 Albany Shaker Road
Albany, New York 12211
Directors
Thomas L. Amell	31,036	(3)	*
Eileen C. Bagnoli	5,000		*
Donald E. Fane	30,000	(4)	*
Shaun Mahoney	—		*
Dr. James K. Reed	5,000		*
Edward Reinfurt	15,000		*
Madeline Taylor	15,000	(5)	*
Executive Officers who are not Directors
Susan M. Hollister	15,971	(6)	*
Patrick J. Hughes	18,536	(7)	*
Laura A. Mazzara	15,914	(8)	*
Robert J. Nichols	—		*
Frank C. Sarratori	31,036	(9)	*
Jesse Tomczak	5,990	(10)	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)	188,483		*%

* Less than 1%.

(1) In accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner, for purposes of this table, of any shares of Pioneer Bancorp common stock if he has or shares voting or investment power with respect to such common stock or has a right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days from September 25, 2020.  As used herein, “voting power” is the power to vote or direct the voting of shares and “investment power” is the power to dispose or direct the disposition of shares.  Except as otherwise noted, ownership is direct and the named individuals and group exercise sole voting and investment power over the shares of Pioneer Bancorp common stock.

(2) Based on a total of 25,977,679shares of common stock outstanding as of September 25, 2020.

(3) Includes 15,000 shares held in the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan, 1,036 shares held in the Pioneer Bank employee stock ownership plan, 14,400 shares held by his spouse and 600 shares held by a son who shares the same household.

(4) Includes 15,000 shares held by spouse.

(5) Includes 5,900 shares held in an individual retirement account.

(6) Includes 15,000 shares held in the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan and 971 shares held in the Pioneer Bank employee stock ownership plan.

(7) Includes 4,913 shares held in the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan, 1,250 shares held as custodian for son, 1,250 shares held as custodian for daughter and 1,036 shares held in the Pioneer Bank employee stock ownership plan.

(8) All 15,000 shares held in the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan and 914 shares held in the Pioneer Bank employee stock ownership plan.

151

(9) Includes 15,000 shares held in the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan, 1,036 shares held in the Pioneer Bank employee stock ownership plan and 15,000 shares held by his spouse.

(10) All 4,954 shares held in the Pioneer Bank 401(k) Plan and 1,036 shares held in the Pioneer Bank employee stock ownership plan.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Board Independence

The board of directors of Pioneer Bancorp has determined that each of the Company’s directors, except Mr. Amell, is “independent” as defined in, and for purposes of satisfying the listing standards of, the Nasdaq Stock Market.  Mr. Amell is not considered independent because he is an executive officer of Pioneer Bancorp and Pioneer Bank.  

In determining the independence of the Company’s directors, the Board of Directors considered relationships between Pioneer Bank and the directors that are not required to be reported under “— Transactions With Certain Related Persons,” below. TAGSolutions, an IT vendor for Pioneer Bank, is a wholly owned subsidiary of NextRidge Inc., a business partly owned by Director Mahoney. TAGSolutions received from Pioneer Bank payments totaling $274,000 during the year ended June 30, 2020. In addition, Mahoney Performance Institute, of which Director Mahoney is the owner and Chief Executive Officer, provided leadership training to the employees of Pioneer Bank and received $3,500 in fees during the year ended June 30, 2020.

Transactions With Certain Related Persons

Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits an issuer from: (1) extending or maintaining credit; (2) arranging for the extension of credit; or (3) renewing an extension of credit in the form of a personal loan for an officer or director.  There are several exceptions to this general prohibition, one of which is applicable to Pioneer Bank.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act does not apply to loans made by a depository institution that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and is subject to the insider lending restrictions of the Federal Reserve Act.  All loans to Pioneer Bank’s directors and officers are made in conformity with the Federal Reserve Act and applicable regulations.  

All loans made by Pioneer Bank to executive officers, directors, immediate family members of executive officers and directors, or organizations with which executive officers and directors are affiliated, were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans to persons not related to Pioneer Bank, and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.  Pioneer Bank is in compliance with federal regulations with respect to its loans and extensions of credit to executive officers and directors. The aggregate amount of Pioneer Bank’s outstanding loans to executive officers and directors was approximatively $6.5 million at June 30, 2020.  As of June 30, 2020, these loans were performing according to their original repayment terms.  

Pursuant to the Policy and Procedures for Approval of Related Person Transactions, the Audit Committee periodically reviews, no less frequently than twice a year, a summary of transactions in excess of $25,000 with directors, executive officers, and their family members, for the purpose of determining whether the transactions are within the Company’s policies and should be ratified and approved.  Additionally, pursuant to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, all executive officers and directors must disclose any personal or financial interest in any matter that comes before Pioneer Bancorp.

152

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Set forth below is certain information concerning aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Bonadio & Co., LLP for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

	Year Ended		Year Ended
	June 30, 2020		June 30, 2019
Audit Fees	$	149,077	$	121,720
Audit-Related Fees	$	25,000	$	89,550
Tax Fees	$	32,870	$	29,800
All Other Fees	$	—	$	—

Audit Fees. Audit Fees include aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of Pioneer Bancorp’s and Pioneer Bank’s annual consolidated financial statements for the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and the reviews of quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements included in periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission during fiscal 2020 and 2019, including out of pocket expenses.

Audit-Related Fees.  During the year ended June 30, 2020, audit-related fees consisted of fees for professional services for the audits of two of Pioneer Bancorp’s employee benefit plans. During the year ended June 30, 2019, audit-related fees consisted of fees for services related to the mutual holding company reorganization of Pioneer Bank and the related stock offering, including review of the registration statement and prospectus, the issuance of consents and a state tax opinion, participation in drafting sessions and the preparation of a comfort letter.

Tax Fees.  During the years ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, tax fees billed by Bonadio & Co., LLP were for tax preparation services and other tax-related consulting.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services, which relate primarily to tax services is compatible with maintaining the independence of Bonadio & Co., LLP.  The Audit Committee concluded that performing such services does not affect the independence of Bonadio & Co., LLP in performing its function as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee’s current policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, either by approving an engagement prior to the engagement or pursuant to a pre-approval policy with respect to particular services, subject to the de minimus exceptions for non-audit services described in Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.  The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more members of the Audit Committee when expedition of services is necessary.  The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date.  The Audit Committee pre-approved 100% of audit-related fees and tax fees billed and paid during the year ended June 30, 2020, as indicated in the table above.

153

PART IV

ITEM 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)(1)     Financial Statements

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

(a)(2)     Financial Statement Schedules

None.

(a)(3)     Exhibits

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 333-230208), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2019)
3.2	Bylaws of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 333-230208), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2019)
4.1	Form of Common Stock Certificate of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 333-230208), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2019)
4.6	Description of Registrant’s Securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 001-38991) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2019)
10.1	Employment Agreement by and between Pioneer Bank and Thomas L. Amell (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 001-38991) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2019)+
10.2	Change in Control Agreement by and between Pioneer Bank and Frank C. Sarratori (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 001-38991) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2019)+
10.3	Change in Control Agreement by and between Pioneer Bank and Jesse Tomczak (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 001-38991) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2019)+
10.4	Change in Control Agreement by and between Pioneer Bank and Patrick J. Hughes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 001-38991) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2019)+
10.5	Pioneer Bank Targeted Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 333-230208), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2019)+
10.6	Pioneer Bank Board of Trustees and Executive Employees Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 333-230208), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2019)+

154

10.7	Purchase Agreement by and between Pioneer Savings Bank and Homestead Funding Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (File No. 333-230208), initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2019)
21**	Subsidiaries of Registrant
23.1**	Consent of Bonadio & Co., LLP
23.2*	Consent of Bonadio & Co., LLP
31.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.3***	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amend, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.4***	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amend, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.5*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amend, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.6*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amend, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101*	The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Net Worth, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

+Indicates management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement of the Company.

* Documents filed or furnished with this report.

** Previously included with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2020.

*** Previously included with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2020.

155

ITEM 16.Form 10-K/A Summary

Not applicable

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		PIONEER BANCORP, INC.
Date: February 22, 2021	By:	/s/ Thomas L. Amell
		Thomas L. Amell
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
		(Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures	Title	Date
/s/ Thomas L. Amell	President, Chief Executive Officer	February 22, 2021
Thomas L. Amell	and Director (Principal Executive
	Officer)
/s/ Patrick J. Hughes	Executive Vice President and	February 22, 2021
Patrick J. Hughes	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial and
	Accounting Officer)
/s/ Madeline Taylor	Chairman of the Board	February 22, 2021
Madeline Taylor
/s/ Eileen Bagnoli	Director	February 22, 2021
Eileen Bagnoli
/s/ Donald E. Fane	Director	February 22, 2021
Donald E. Fane
/s/ Stacey Hengsterman	Director	February 22, 2021
Stacey Hengsterman
/s/ Shaun Mahoney	Director	February 22, 2021
Shaun Mahoney
/s/ Dr. James K. Reed	Director	February 22, 2021
Dr. James K. Reed
/s/ Edward Reinfurt	Director	February 22, 2021
Edward Reinfurt

156