Dispute and Litigation in India Regarding Control of Glocal Board of Directors
On November 20, 2020, GigCapital2, Inc., (now known as UpHealth, Inc., (“UpHealth”)) entered into a Business Combination Agreement to acquire UpHealth Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Holdings”). The acquisition of Holdings by UpHealth was completed on June 9, 2021. At the time of the acquisition of Holdings, Holdings owned five direct subsidiaries, one of which is Glocal Healthcare Systems Private Limited, an Indian company with its registered office in Kolkata, West Bengal, India (“Glocal”). Although Glocal is a direct subsidiary of Holdings, which as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Current Report”) owns 94.81% of the equity of Glocal, Holdings currently has no representatives on the board of directors of Glocal. Rather, the board of directors of Glocal consists of three individuals who have constituted such board since before Holdings acquired any ownership interest in Glocal — Dr. Syed Sabahat Azim (“Sabahat Azim”), Richa Azim (“Richa Azim”, and together with Sabahat Azim, the “Azims”) and Gautam Chowdhury (“Chowdhury”, and together with the Azims, the “Glocal Board”).
Following the closing of the acquisition of Holdings by UpHealth, Holdings has endeavored to have the Glocal Board appoint Holdings’ designees to the board of Glocal as provided for in the Amendment Agreement (as defined below). To date, the Glocal Board has not complied with the terms of the Amendment Agreement to appoint Holdings’ designees to the board of Glocal, and has deliberately acted to obstruct those appointments. As a result, Holdings has attempted to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting of the shareholders of Glocal (the “EGM”) where it, as the owner of 94.81% of the equity of Glocal, could vote in proportion to its shareholding to elect its designees to the board of Glocal and also to amend the Articles of Association of Glocal to provide that its designees would have certain affirmative voting rights on the board of Glocal. In July 2022, during the pendency of the Bray Action (as defined below), Holdings sent a written request to the Glocal Board to call an EGM, which request was not acted upon by the Glocal Board. Following this, on August 15, 2022, Holdings, as a supermajority shareholder, used a procedure provided for under Indian law and the Articles of Association of Glocal to requisition the EGM. Following that requisition, the Glocal Board called the EGM and set it for September 26, 2022.
Notwithstanding the Glocal Board calling the EGM and setting it for September 26, 2022, on September 21, 2022, all three members of the Glocal Board (i.e., the Azims and Chowdhury) and an employee and shareholder of Glocal (collectively, the “Petitioners”) filed a petition in India before the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench (the “NCLT”) against Glocal and Holdings, wherein the Petitioners claim that there was on October 30, 2020 an oral agreement entered into between Holdings and the Azims whereby Holdings would allegedly invest money into Glocal and would “just be an investor” but would not be involved with the operations of Glocal or be acquiring controlling equity ownership of Glocal, and that the Azims could allegedly “at will require [Holdings] to exit [Glocal] and return the investment . . . as long as [the Azims] were in a position to return the investment of [Holdings] with a reasonable interest i.e., return on their [sic] investment.” The petition states that this alleged oral agreement preceded the entry on October 30, 2020 into the Share Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) between Holdings, Glocal, and various shareholders of Glocal, including the Azims, Chowdhury and Kimberlite Social Infra Private Limited, an Indian entity of which the Azims are equity owners and the sole directors (“Kimberlite”), by which Holdings has acquired its ownership of 94.81% of the equity of Glocal. The petition also states that, notwithstanding the contrary terms of the SPA to this purported oral agreement, the Azims would be able to return to Holdings “the investment with a reasonable interest, i.e., return on its investment at the opportune time”, which the Azims now purport to want to do, and the Petitioners claim that Holdings allegedly refuses to do in breach of the alleged oral agreement. As a result, the Petitioners requested that the NCLT declare that Holdings is not entitled to certain of the shares of Glocal that Holdings owns and that such shares be cancelled and their prior issuance to Holdings be declared null, void and illegal; enjoin Holdings from representing that it is a shareholder of Glocal; enjoin the EGM of Glocal from being held on September 26, 2022; and prevent the election of Holdings’ designees and the amendments to the Articles of Association from being approved at the EGM.
Contrary to the above claims made by the Petitioners, there was no oral agreement between the Azims and Holdings made on October 30, 2020, or at any other time. In conjunction with the acquisition of Holdings by UpHealth in 2021, UpHealth prepared and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a Registration Statement on Form S-4. Sabahat Azim was involved with the preparation of this Registration Statement, as was Dr. Chirinjeev Kathuria (“Kathuria”), who was the President of Holdings on October 30, 2020. Neither Kathuria nor anyone else at Holdings ever disclosed to UpHealth as part of either the Business Combination Agreement or the preparation of the Registration Statement that there was an oral agreement between the Azims and Holdings. Nor did Sabahat Azim make such disclosure to UpHealth or inform UpHealth that the Registration Statement needed to be revised to reflect the existence of an oral agreement. Furthermore, Kathuria confirmed in a meeting of the full board of directors of UpHealth held on September 21, 2022 that neither he nor anyone else at Holdings ever discussed or entered into such oral agreement.
At a hearing before the NCLT held on September 23, 2022, on this basis, Indian counsel to Holdings informed the NCLT that (i) there is no such oral agreement as alleged by the Petitioners, and that the controlling agreement is the SPA, (ii) under the terms of the SPA, Holdings has acquired 94.81% equity ownership of Glocal, (iii) the Azims acquired shares of common stock of UpHealth, and (iv) the Azims attempted earlier this year to leverage their ownership of shares of common stock of UpHealth to advance Sabahat Azim becoming a director of UpHealth. Indian counsel to Holdings further informed the NCLT that these facts, together with Sabahat Azim having been involved with the preparation of various filings made by UpHealth with the SEC, which filings stated that Holdings was acquiring Glocal (consistent with the covenant included in the Amendment Agreement that is described below in “Background Context”), and having made no mention of the purported oral agreement to enable the Azims to return the investments of Holdings, contravened the sudden claim of the Petitioners that there is an oral agreement. Indian counsel to Holdings also provided legal arguments as to why the EGM could not be enjoined, and that the board of Glocal should be reconstituted to add Holdings’ designees and that the Articles of Association of Glocal should be amended as proposed. At the hearing, the NCLT verbally directed Glocal to delay the holding of the EGM on September 26, 2022, from 11:00 a.m. Indian time to 2:00 p.m. Indian time to enable the NCLT to issue a written ruling on the matter.