Coronado Global Resources 10Q 2024 Q1 Quarterly report | CODQL Filing

Table

of Contents

Coronado Global Resources Inc.

Form 10-Q March 31, 2024

Exhibit 95.1

Mine Safety Disclosures

Safety is

the cornerstone

of our

Company’s

values and

is the

number one

priority for

all employees

at Coronado

Global Resources.

Our mining

operation at

Curragh,

located in Australia, is subject to regulation by the Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mine and Energy, or DNRME, under the Coal Mining Safety and Health

Act 1999 (Qld). The operation of our mines located

in the United States is subject to regulation by

the Mine Safety and Health Administration, or MSHA, under the

Federal

Mine Safety and Health Act

of 1977, or the Mine

Act. MSHA inspects these

mines on a regular basis

and issues various citations

and orders when it believes

a violation

has occurred

under the

Mine Act.

We present

information below

regarding certain

mining safety

and health

citations that

MSHA has

issued with

respect to

our mining

operations. In evaluating

this information, consideration

should be given

to factors

such as: (i)

the number of

citations and orders

will vary

depending on the

size of the

mine; (ii) the

number of citations

issued will vary

from inspector to

inspector and mine

to mine; and

(iii) citations and

orders can be

contested and appealed

and, in that

process, are often reduced

in severity and amount,

and are sometimes dismissed.

Since MSHA is a

branch of the U.S. Department

of Labor,

its jurisdiction only applies

to our operations in the United States.

As such, the mine safety disclosures included herein do

not contain information related to our Australian mines.

Under the Dodd-Frank

Act, each operator

of a coal or

other mine is required

to include certain

mine safety results

within its periodic

reports filed with

the Securities and

Exchange Commission,

or the

SEC. As

required

by the

reporting requirements

included

in §1503(a)

of the

Dodd-Frank

Act and

Item

104 of

Regulation

S-K (17

CFR

229.104), we present

the following

items regarding certain

mining safety and

health matters,

for the quarter

ended March 31,

2024, for

each of our

U.S. mine

locations

that are covered

under the scope of the Dodd-Frank Act.

The table that follows

reflects citations and orders

issued to us by MSHA

during the quarter ended

March 31, 2024.

The table only includes

those U.S. mines that

were

issued orders

or citations

during this

period, and commensurate

with SEC regulations,

does not

reflect orders

or citations

issued to independent

contractors working

our mines.

The proposed assessments for the quarter ended March 31,

2024, were retrieved from the MSHA Data Retrieval System, or

MSHA DRS, as of April 1, 2024.

(A)

(B)

(C)

(D)

(E)

(F)

(G)

MSHA Mine

ID No.

Mine Name (1)(2)(3)

Section

104

S&S

Citations

Section

104(b)

Orders

Section 104(d

)

Citations and

Orders

Section 110(b)(2)

Violations

Section

107(a)

Orders

Total Dollar Value of

MSHA Assessments

Proposed

($ Thousands)

Total Number of

Mining Related

Fatalities

4404856

Buchanan Mine #1

—

$31.0

—

4602140

Saunders Prep Plant

—

$0.6

—

4609217

Powellton #1 Mine

—

$1.0

—

4609319

Lower War Eagle

—

$16.0

—

4609563

Eagle No. 1 Mine

—

$10.3

—

4609564

Elklick Surface Mine

—

4609583

North Fork Winifrede Deep Mine

—

$4.0

—

4609514

Muddy Bridge

—

$16.6

—

4609125

Mountaineer Pocahontas No. 1

Prep Plant

—

$0.1

—

4609645

Middle Fork Surfac

—

Total:

—

$79.6

—

Table

of Contents

Coronado Global Resources Inc.

Form 10-Q March 31, 2024

(1)

The definition of “mine”

under Section 3

of the Mine Act

includes the mine, as

well as other items

used in, or to

be used in, or

resulting from, the

work of extracting

coal, such

as land,

structures, facilities,

equipment, machines,

tools and

coal preparation

facilities. Also,

there are

instances where

the mine

name per

the MSHA

system differs from the mine name utilized by us.

(2)

Idle facilities are

not included in

the table above

unless they received

a citation,

order or assessment

by MSHA during

the current quarterly

reporting period or

are

subject to pending legal actions.

(3)

During the quarter ended

March 31, 2024, none

of the Company’s

mines have received written

notice from MSHA

of a pattern of

violations or the potential

to have

such a pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as

could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and

effect of coal or other mine health or safety standards

under section 104(e) of the Mine Act.

References used in the table above are as follows:

The total

number of

violations of

mandatory health

or safety

standards that

could significantly

and substantially

contribute to

the cause

and effect

of a

coal or

other mine safety or health hazard under section 104 of

the Mine Act (30 U.S.C. 814) for which the operator received

a citation from MSHA.

The total number of orders issued under section 104(b)

of the Mine Act (30 U.S.C. 814(b)).

The total number of citations and orders for unwarrantable failure of the mine operator to comply with mandatory health or safety standards under section 104(d)

of the Mine Act (30 U.S.C. 814(d)).

The total number of flagrant violations under section

110(b)(2) of the

Mine Act.

The total number of imminent danger orders issued under section

107(a) of the Mine Act (30 U.S.C. 817(a)).

The total dollar value of proposed assessments from MSHA

under the Mine Act (30 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).

The total number of mining-related fatalities.

The table below presents legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety

and Health Review Commission, or FMSHRC, for each of

the Company’s U.S. mines as

of March 31, 2024, together with the number of legal actions

initiated and the number of legal actions resolved during

the quarter ended March 31, 2024.

Table

of Contents

Coronado Global Resources Inc.

Form 10-Q March 31, 2024

Legal Actions Pending as of Last Day

of Quarter (March 31, 2024)

(1)

MSHA

Mine ID

No.

Mine Name

Contests of

Citations

and Orders

(Subpart B)

Contests of

Proposed

Penalties

(Subpart C)

Complaints for

Compensation

(Subpart D)

Complaints of

Discharge,

Discrimination

or Interference

(Subpart E)

Applications of

Temporary Relief

(Subpart F)

Appeals of Judges’

Decisions or

Orders

(Subpart H) (2)

Legal Actions

Initiated

During Quarter

Legal Actions

Resolved

During Quarter

4404856

Buchanan Mine #1

—

4609563

Eagle No. 1 Mine

—

4609564

Elklick Surface Mine

—

4609217

Powellton

—

4602140

Saunders Prep Plant

—

4609514

Muddy Bridge

—

4609319

Lower War Eagle

—

4609583

North Fork Winifrede

Deep Mine

—

4609101

Toney

Fork Surface Mine

—

Total:

—

(1)

The legal

actions

pending

shown in

the

table

above

have been

categorized

by type

proceeding

with

reference

the

procedural

rules

established

by the

FMSHRC under 29 CFR Part 2700. Reference to the

applicable Subparts under this Rule are listed in the columns

above.

(2)

Appeal of Administrative Law Judge’s order

denying motions for settlement approval in dockets

WEVA 2021-0294

and WEVA

2022-0403.

(3)

Includes a Motion to reopen docket WEVA

2024-0163, filed February 1, 2024.

(4)

A complaint

for discrimination

was

filed

with

MSHA

March

2024,

by a

former

employee

Greenbrier

Minerals.

As of

April

2024, no

formal

105(c)

complaint has

been filed

by the

U.S. Department

of Labor

or by

the employee

with the

Federal Mine

Safety and

Health Review

Commission.

Since he

was

classified as an employee of the Toney

Fork Surface Mine, the complaint is listed here for the Toney

Fork mine, but he also performed work duties at the Elklick

Surface Mine, the Middle Fork Surface Mine, and the North Fork

Surface Mine.

Positive
Negative
Uncertain
Constraining
Legalese
Litigous
Readability	6th grade Good

Coronado Global Resources (CODQL) 10-Q2024 Q1 Quarterly report

Content analysis