DH Europe Finance II S.a.r.l. S-3ASR Automatic shelf registration

Exhibit 5.2

DLA Piper Luxembourg

37A, Avenue John F. Kennedy

L-1855 Luxembourg

T +352 26 29 04 2052

F +352 26 29 04 3000

W www.dlapiper.com

DH Europe Finance S.à r.l. 1 B, Heienhaff L-1736 Senningerberg Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in its capacity as Issuer 1 (as defined below) DH Europe Finance II S.à r.l. 1 B, Heienhaff L-1736 Senningerberg Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in its capacity as Issuer 2 (as defined below) Danaher Corporation 2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 800W Washington, D.C. 20037-1701 in its capacity as “Guarantor”	Your reference Our reference LM/CN/424732/105
(“Addressees” or “you”)	April 1, 2024

By Courier and E-mail

Dear Sirs,

FILING OF FORM S-3 REGISTRATION STATEMENT TO THE U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION – DH EUROPE FINANCE S.À R.L. AND DH EUROPE FINANCE II S.À R.L.

1. ROLE OF DLA PIPER LUXEMBOURG

1.1 DLA Piper Luxembourg (“DLA Piper Luxembourg”, “we” or “us”) has acted as special legal adviser in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (“Luxembourg”) to the following entities (collectively, the “Companies”):

• DH Europe Finance S.à r.l., a private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), incorporated and existing under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, having its registered office at 1 B, Heienhaff, L-1736 Senningerberg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and registered with the Luxembourg Register of Commerce and Companies (“RCSL”) under number B 197.470 (“Issuer 1”); and

• DH Europe Finance II S.à r.l., a private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), incorporated and existing under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, having its registered office at 1 B, Heienhaff, L-1736 Senningerberg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and registered with the RCSL under number B 235.237 (“Issuer 2”).

1.2 We have been requested by the Companies to render this legal opinion (“Opinion”) on certain matters of Luxembourg law in connection with the filing of the Form S-3 Registration Statement (as defined below) for the Companies with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”) and in connection with the offer and sale of senior debt securities, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Danaher Corporation (“Guarantor”) as guarantor (“Registration”).

Continuation 2

1.3 We have taken instructions solely from, and participated in discussions solely with, the Companies regarding the provisions contained in the Opinion Documents.

2. DOCUMENTS EXAMINED

2.1 For the purposes of rendering this Opinion, we have examined and relied upon an electronically transmitted copy of the following documents (together, the “Opinion Documents”):

2.1.1 the registration statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act to be filed on or about April 1, 2024 (“Form S-3 Registration Statement”), including in particular:

(a) a copy of the prospectus dated April 1, 2024 (“Prospectus”);

(b) a copy of the executed base indenture, governed by New York law, dated July 8, 2015 and entered into by Issuer 1 (formerly, DH Europe Finance S.A.), the Guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (“Base Indenture 1”), as supplemented by the third supplemental indenture, governed by New York law, dated July 1, 2019 and entered into by Issuer 1, the Guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (“Third Supplemental Indenture” and together with the Base Indenture 1, the “Indenture 1”); and

(c) a copy of the executed base indenture, governed by New York law, dated September 18, 2019 and entered into by Issuer 2, the Guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as trustee (“Indenture 2”).

Capitalised terms used but not defined in this Opinion shall have the same meaning as in the Opinion Documents.

2.2 For the purposes of rendering this Opinion, we have also examined an electronically transmitted (executed) copy of the following documents (together, the “Corporate Documents”) with respect to the Companies:

2.2.1 conversion deed relating to Issuer 1 dated June 24, 2019, including the amended and restated articles of association (statuts) of Issuer 1 drawn up by Maître Jacques Kesseler, notary residing in Pétange, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (“Articles 1”);

2.2.2 coordinated articles of association (statuts coordonnés) of Issuer 2 dated September 17, 2019 (“Articles 2” and together with the Articles 1, the “Articles”);

2.2.3 the circular resolutions of the managers of Issuer 1 dated February 20, 2024, approving, inter alia, the filing of the Form S-3 Registration Statement with the SEC by Issuer 1 (“Resolutions 1”);

2.2.4 the circular resolutions of the managers of Issuer 2 dated February 20, 2024, approving, inter alia, the filing of the Form S-3 Registration Statement with the SEC by Issuer 2 (“Resolutions 2” and together with the Resolutions 1, the “Resolutions”);

Continuation 3

2.2.5 an excerpt pertaining to Issuer 1 delivered by the RCSL, dated March 29, 2024 (“Issuer 1 RCS Excerpt”);

2.2.6 an excerpt pertaining to Issuer 2 delivered by the RCSL, dated March 29, 2024 (“Issuer 2 RCS Excerpt” and together with Issuer 1 RCS Excerpt, the “RCS Excerpts”);

2.2.7 a certificate of absence of a judicial decision or an administrative dissolution without liquidation from the RCSL (certificat de non-inscription d’une décision judiciaire ou de dissolution administrative sans liquidation) pertaining to Issuer 1, dated March 29 2024, with respect to the situation of Issuer 1 as at March 28, 2024 (“Issuer 1 RCS Certificate”); and

2.2.8 a certificate of absence of a judicial decision from the RCSL (certificat de non-inscription d’une décision judiciaire) pertaining to Issuer 2, dated March 29, 2024, with respect to the situation of Issuer 2 as at March 28, 2024 (“Issuer 2 RCS Certificate” and together with the Issuer 1 RCS Certificate, the “RCS Certificates”).

The Opinion Documents and the Corporate Documents are collectively referred to as the “Documents”.

2.3 We have not reviewed any document other than the Documents and we have made no other enquiries, save as expressly stated in this Opinion. We have not reviewed any document incorporated by reference, or referred to, in the Documents (unless included as a Document) and therefore our opinions do not extend to such documents.

3. SCOPE, INTERPRETATION AND CONDITIONS OF THIS OPINION

3.1 We, as Luxembourg qualified lawyers, are solely qualified to assess the meaning of, and to give an opinion on, the terms of the documents which are governed by Luxembourg law. This means that we are not qualified to assess the meaning or consequences of, or to give an opinion on, the terms of any Opinion Documents which are not governed by Luxembourg law. Accordingly, our review of such documents has been limited to the terms as they appear on the face thereof, without reference or consideration to the general body of law incorporated therein or made applicable thereto.

3.2 This Opinion is limited to Luxembourg law in force on the date hereof, and as construed and applied by Luxembourg courts in case law published in major Luxembourg legal journals on the date hereof. We have made no investigation of, and do not express or imply any views or opinions on, the law of any country other than Luxembourg. We do not express nor imply any views or opinions on European Union law as it affects any jurisdiction (save for rules implemented into Luxembourg law or directly applicable in Luxembourg), on any matters of direct or indirect taxation or matters of accounting, regulatory or transfer pricing, nor do we express or imply any views or opinions as to matters of fact. We undertake no obligation to update this Opinion or to advise of any changes in Luxembourg law, its construction or application.

3.3 The opinions given in this Opinion are based on the assumptions, and are subject to the qualifications, set out below. They are strictly limited to the commercial contractual matters stated herein and do not extend to any other matters.

Continuation 4

4. ASSUMPTIONS

For the purposes of this Opinion, we have assumed, and not verified the following:

4.1 all signatures, stamps and seals are genuine, all original documents are authentic, and all copies submitted to us are complete and conform to the originals;

4.2 all factual matters and statements relied upon, or assumed, in this Opinion are and were true, complete, accurate and up-to-date on the date of execution of the Documents (and any documents in connection therewith) and on the date of this Opinion;

4.3 each of the Companies has its central administration (administration centrale) and, for the purposes of the European Regulation No. 2015/848 of May 20, 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast) (“Insolvency Regulation”), the centre of its main interests (centre des intérêts principaux) at the place of its registered office (siège statutaire) (as defined under Luxembourg law) in Luxembourg, and has no establishment (as defined, respectively, in the Insolvency Regulation or Luxembourg law) outside Luxembourg;

4.4 the Articles are in full force and effect and have not been amended, rescinded, revoked or declared null and void;

4.5 the Resolutions (i) correctly and completely reflect the resolutions made by the respective board of managers of the Companies in respect of the transactions contemplated by the Opinion Documents and (ii) remain in full force and effect, and have not been amended, rescinded, revoked or declared null and void (including the delegation of powers granted therein);

4.6 that the obligations under the Opinion Documents are valid and binding;

4.7 none of the members of the respective board of managers of the Companies has a (potential) conflict of interest with Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, respectively, in connection with the Opinion Documents, or the transactions contemplated thereby, that would preclude any of them from validly representing the Companies, as the case may be;

4.8 the execution, entry into and performance by the Companies of the Opinion Documents, and the transactions in connection therewith, (i) are in its corporate interest, (ii) are with the intent of pursuing profit (but lucratif), (iii) serve its corporate object, and (iv) do not constitute a misuse of corporate assets as referred to under Article 1500-11 of the Luxembourg law of August 10, 1915 on commercial companies, as amended (“1915 Law”);

4.9 the Companies are not under any contractual obligation to obtain the consent, approval, co-operation, permission or otherwise of any third party or person in connection with the execution of, entry into, or performance of its obligations under, the Opinion Documents;

4.10 each of the parties to the Opinion Documents, other than the Companies (“Other Parties” and, together with the Companies, the “Parties”), is validly existing under the laws by which it is purported to be governed (including, without limitation, the laws of the jurisdiction of its place of incorporation, establishment or constitution, registered office or place of central administration, as the case may be), has all requisite power or capacity (corporate or otherwise, including the qualification or licence to carry on its business in its country of incorporation, establishment or constitution) to execute, enter into and deliver, and to perform its obligations under, the Opinion Documents, and the Opinion Documents have been validly authorised, duly executed by, or on behalf of, the Other Parties;

Continuation 5

4.11 the appointment by the Companies of a process agent as its respective authorised agent upon whom process may be served in any proceedings before the courts of New York arising out of or in relation to the Indenture 1, the Indenture 2 and the Form S-3 Registration Statement constitutes, respectively, a valid and legally binding appointment under any applicable laws (other than Luxembourg law);

4.12 the due compliance by the Parties with all requirements (including, without limitation, the obtaining of the necessary consents, licences, approvals, orders and authorisations, the making of the necessary filings, registrations and notifications and the payment of stamp duties and other taxes) under any laws in connection with the execution and entry into the Opinion Documents and performance of their obligations thereunder (and any documents in connection therewith);

4.13 all acts, conditions or things required to be fulfilled, performed or effected in connection with the execution, entry into and performance of the Opinion Documents under the laws of any jurisdiction (other than Luxembourg) have been duly fulfilled, performed and effected;

4.14 insofar as any obligation of the Parties under the Opinion Documents (or any documents in connection therewith) is to be performed in, or is otherwise affected by the laws of, any jurisdiction other than Luxembourg, its performance would not be illegal or ineffective under the laws of that jurisdiction;

4.15 there are no provisions in the laws of any jurisdiction outside Luxembourg or in the documents mentioned in the Opinion Documents, which would adversely affect, or otherwise have any negative impact on this Opinion or which would render ineffective execution or delivery of any Opinion Document or the performance of the obligations thereunder;

4.16 that the determination of the governing law and the recognition of trusts by Luxembourg courts will be made in accordance with the Convention dated July 1, 1985 on the law applicable to trusts and their recognition (ratified by a law dated July 27, 2003 on trusts and fiduciary contracts) (“Hague Trusts Convention”), to the extent the relevant trust comes within the scope thereof. The law chosen by the parties will in principle be recognised as governing law, and the effects of the trust will be recognised in accordance with the Hague Trusts Convention, subject to the exceptions established therein, including the non-recognition of the chosen governing law if the situation has a closer link with another jurisdiction which does not recognise trusts, the application of mandatory laws of Luxembourg and other jurisdictions in the matters referred to in Article 15 of the Hague Trusts Convention and the general exception of public order;

4.17 each of the Parties entered into and will perform its obligations under the Opinion Documents in good faith, for the purpose of carrying out its business and without any intention to defraud or deprive of any legal benefit any other party (including third party creditors) or to circumvent any mandatory law or regulation of any jurisdiction or any contractual arrangement.

5. OPINIONS

Based on the assumptions set out above and subject to the qualifications set out below, and subject to any factual matters not disclosed to us in the course of our investigations and without expressing any opinion as to matters or documents other than the Opinion Documents, and when:

Continuation 6

(a) the Form S-3 Registration Statement and any amendments thereto have become effective under the Securities Act;

(b) a prospectus supplement has been prepared and filed with the SEC describing the senior debt securities to be offered thereby and is in compliance, at all times, with all applicable laws;

(c) the terms of the issuance and sale of the senior debt securities have been established in conformity with the Indenture 1 or Indenture 2, as applicable, and duly approved by Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, in conformity with its Articles and Luxembourg law and all other necessary corporate action on the part of Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, has been taken in connection therewith and in a manner so as not to violate any applicable law or result in a default under or breach of any agreement or instrument then binding on Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable and so as to comply with any requirement or restriction imposed by any court or government body having jurisdiction over Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable;

(d) the Indenture 1 or Indenture 2, as applicable, has been duly qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended;

(e) a definitive purchase, underwriting or similar agreement and any other necessary agreement with respect to the senior debt securities has been duly authorised and validly executed by Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, and the other parties thereto and Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, has received the payment of the issue price of the senior debt securities to be issued by it;

(f) the senior debt securities have been duly subscribed, authenticated by the trustee, executed, delivered on behalf of Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, against payment to Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, of the subscription price and duly registered in the bondholder’s register held at the registered office of respectively, Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, in accordance with the terms of the Indenture 1 or Indenture 2 and of the agreement under which they are sold and in the manner contemplated by the Form S-3 Registration Statement and/or the applicable prospectus supplement,

Continuation 7

we are of the opinion that:

5.1 Status

Each of Issuer 1 and Issuer 2 is a private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), incorporated and legally existing under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

5.2 Corporate power and authority

Each of Issuer 1 and Issuer 2 has the corporate power and authority to enter into and perform the Opinion Documents.

5.3 Due execution

Each Opinion Document to which it is a party has been duly executed on behalf of Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable.

5.4 Choice of Law

In any judicial proceedings commenced in Luxembourg for the enforcement of the provisions of the Opinion Documents stipulated to be governed by New York law, the choice of New York law as the law governing the contractual obligations contained in the Opinion Documents is valid and binding upon the Companies under Luxembourg law in accordance with, and subject to, the European Regulation No. 593/2008 of June 17, 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations.

5.5 No Conflict

The filing of the Form S-3 Registration Statement by the Companies does not result in any violation of (i) the Articles or (ii) the 1915 Law.

5.6 Enforceability

The obligations arising from the Indenture 1 or the Indenture 2, as applicable, and the senior debt securities will be enforceable against Issuer 1 or Issuer 2, as applicable, pursuant to their terms and the expressed governing law subject to all limitations by reason of national or foreign bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, controlled management, suspension of payment, fraudulent conveyance, general settlement of composition with creditors, reorganisation or similar laws affecting the rights of creditors generally.

Continuation 8

5.7 Submission to jurisdiction

In any judicial proceedings commenced in Luxembourg for the enforcement of the provisions of the Opinion Documents stipulated to be governed by New York law, the submission to the jurisdiction of the state or federal court of the city of New York, State of New York, United States of America, by the Companies contained in the Opinion Documents constitutes an effective submission by each of Issuer 1 and Issuer 2 to the jurisdiction of such courts.

6. QUALIFICATIONS

This Opinion is subject to the following qualifications:

6.1 This Opinion is subject to all limitations resulting from the application of Luxembourg public policy rules, overriding statutes and mandatory laws as well as to all limitations by reasons of bankruptcy (faillite), composition with creditors (concordat préventif de la faillite) initiated prior to 1 November 2023, suspension of payments (sursis de paiement), controlled management (gestion contrôlée) initiated prior to 1 November 2023, insolvency, liquidation, reorganisation or the appointment of a temporary administrator (administrateur provisoire) judicial officer (mandataire de justice), conciliator (conciliateur d’entreprise), administrative dissolution without liquidation (dissolution administrative sans liquidation) and any similar Luxembourg or foreign proceedings, regimes or officers relating to, or affecting, the rights of creditors generally (“Insolvency Proceedings”).

6.2 Powers of attorney, mandates (mandats) or appointments of agents (including appointments made for security purposes) may terminate by law and without notice upon the occurrence of Insolvency Proceedings and may be revoked despite being expressed to be irrevocable.

6.3 The terms “enforceable”, “enforceability”, “valid”, “legal”, “binding” and “effective” (or any combination thereof) where used herein, mean that the obligations assumed by the relevant party under the relevant document are of a type which the laws of Luxembourg generally recognises or enforces; enforcement by a Luxembourg court will in any event be subject to:

(i) the extent to which the relevant obligations are enforceable under their governing law (if other than Luxembourg law);

(ii) the power or obligation of a Luxembourg court to stay proceedings or decline jurisdiction if prior concurrent proceedings have been brought elsewhere;

(iii) the rules of civil and commercial procedure as applied by a Luxembourg court, the rules of force majeure, good faith (bonne foi), abuse of law (abus de droit), unforeseen circumstances and other defences and remedies afforded by Luxembourg law generally (specific performance may not always be available and may result only in damages);

(iv) any matter or factual circumstance such as fraud, coercion, duress, undue influence or mistake;

(v) general principles of criminal law, investigations and prosecution, including but not limited to criminal freezing orders; and

(vi) public law sanctions or restraining measures taken from time to time under applicable laws, treaties or other instruments.

Continuation 9

6.4 In particular, (a) equitable remedies, such as the grant of an injunction or an order for specific performance, are not automatically admitted by Luxembourg courts and when such remedies are available, they are discretionary and, accordingly, the Luxembourg courts might make and award of damages where an equitable remedy is sought, (b) claims may be or become barred by prescription or lapse of time or may be or become subject to defences of set-off or counterclaim, (c) enforcement of obligations (and the contractually binding nature thereof) may be invalidated by reason of fraud and (d) enforcement of the obligations under the Indenture 1 or Indenture 2, as applicable, and the senior debt securities may be limited to the extent that matters which it has been expressly assumed herein will be done have not been done.

6.5 A final, conclusive and non-appealable commercial judgment in respect of the Opinion Documents rendered against Issuer 1 or Issuer 2 in the competent courts of New York would be recognised by Luxembourg courts subject to the applicable enforcement procedure (exequatur) as set out in the relevant provisions of the Luxembourg New Civil Procedure Code. Pursuant to Luxembourg case law, the granting of exequatur is subject to the following requirements:

• the foreign judgment must be enforceable (exécutoire) in the country of origin;

• the foreign court must have had jurisdiction both according to its own laws and to the Luxembourg conflict of jurisdiction rules;

• the foreign procedure must have been regular according to the laws of the country of origin;

• the foreign judgment must not have violated the rights of defence and must not have been obtained by fraud (fraude à la loi);

• the foreign court must have applied the law which would have been designated by Luxembourg conflict law of rules, or, at least, the foreign judgment must not have contravened the principles underlying these rules (based on case law and legal doctrine, it is not certain that this condition would still be required for an exequatur to be granted by a Luxembourg court); and

• the considerations of the foreign judgment must not contravene Luxembourg international public policy.

Luxembourg courts do currently not review the merits of a judgment rendered by a competent court of New York.

6.6 We do not express, nor imply, any opinion whatsoever on any tax, transfer pricing, regulatory (including, but not limited to, AIFMD and Data Protection regulations), accounting or public or administrative law matters, the obligations thereunder or the consequences thereof.

7. MISCELLANEOUS

7.1 This Opinion is an exhibit to the Form S-3 Registration Statement and may be relied upon for the purpose of the Registration.

7.2 Each person relying on this Opinion agrees, in so relying, that only DLA Piper Luxembourg shall have any liability in connection with this Opinion, and that, except as otherwise required by the Securities Act, the agreement in this clause 7.2 and all liability and other matters relating to this Opinion shall be governed exclusively by Luxembourg law.

Continuation 10

7.3 This Opinion must be filed by the Companies as an exhibit to the Form S-3 Registration Statement and the Companies may refer to DLA Piper Luxembourg giving this Opinion under the heading “Legal Matters” in the prospectus included in the Form S-3 Registration Statement and any prospectus supplement thereto. The previous sentence is no admittance from us that we are in the category of persons whose consent for the filing and reference in that clause 7.3 is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act or any rules or regulations of the SEC promulgated under it.

7.4 Luxembourg legal concepts are expressed in English terms, which may not correspond to the original French or German terms relating thereto. We accept no liability for omissions or inaccuracies attributable to the use of English terms.

7.5 Nothing in this Opinion should be construed as implying that we are familiar with the affairs of any of the Other Parties, and this Opinion is based solely on the investigations and subject to the limits stated herein. The opinions in this Opinion are strictly limited to the matters stated herein and do not extend to, and are not to be read as extending by implication to, any other matter or the transactions to which they relate or otherwise. The delivery of this Opinion shall in no event imply or intend, or deem to imply or intend, to provide legal advice to the Addressees or recommendation by us with respect to the appropriateness of (i) the transaction referred to, or described, in the Opinion Documents or (ii) the reliance on this Opinion, which are commercial decisions for the Addressees. This Opinion cannot be used, considered, seen or quoted as a precedent for any other legal opinion, note, memorandum or advice whatsoever given by DLA Piper Luxembourg to the Addressees in the future, and no other opinion is, or may be, implied or inferred herefrom.

Yours faithfully,
/s/ DLA PIPER LUXEMBOURG
DLA PIPER LUXEMBOURG
By:	LAURENT MASSINON
	Partner - Gérant - Avocat à la Cour