Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Revenue Recognition We derive revenue from the sale of security products, subscriptions, software as a service (“SaaS”) offerings, support and maintenance, professional services, or a combination of these items, primarily through our indirect relationships with our partners or direct relationships with end customers through our internal sales force. On December 31, 2017, we adopted ASC Topic 606 under the modified retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Results for the reporting period beginning December 31, 2017 are presented under ASC Topic 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted. We recognize revenue pursuant to the five-step framework within ASC Topic 606: 1. Identify the contract(s) with a customer : Contracts are generally evidenced by a binding and non-cancelable purchase order or agreement that creates enforceable rights and obligations. 2. Identify the performance obligations in the contract : Performance obligations are the promises contained in the contract to provide distinct goods or services. 3. Determine the transaction price : The amount of consideration we expect to be entitled for transferring the promised goods and services to the customer. 4. Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract : SSP is determined for each performance obligation in the contract and a proportion of the overall transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the relative value of its SSP in comparison to the transaction price except when a discount or variable consideration can be allocated to a specific performance obligation in the contract. 5. Recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation : Recognition for a performance obligation may happen over time or at a point in time depending on the facts and circumstances. We generally consider our customer to be the entity with which we have a contractual agreement. This could be the end user, or when we sell products and services through the channel, our customer could be either the distributor or the reseller. As part of determining whether a contract exists, probability of collection is assessed on a customer-by-customer basis at the outset of the contract. Customers are subjected to a credit review process that evaluates the customers’ financial position and the ability and intention to pay. At contract inception, we assess the goods and services promised in our contracts with customers and identify a performance obligation for each promise to transfer to the customer a good or service (or bundle of goods or services) that is distinct — i.e., if a good or service is separately identifiable from other items in the bundled package and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or together with other resources that are readily available to the customer. To identify our performance obligations, we consider all of the goods or services promised in the contract regardless of whether they are explicitly stated or are implied by customary business practices. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations or should be combined to create a single performance obligation may require significant judgment. We recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation by transferring control of a good or service to a customer. The transaction price is determined based on the consideration to which we will be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to the customer, adjusted for estimated variable consideration, if any. We typically estimate the transaction price impact of sales returns and discounts offered to the customers, including discounts for early payments on receivables, rebates or certain distribution partner incentives, including marketing programs. Constraints are applied when estimating variable considerations based on historical experience where applicable. Once we have determined the transaction price, we allocate it to each performance obligation in a manner depicting the amount of consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for transferring the goods or services to the customer (the “allocation objective”). If the allocation objective is met at contractual prices, no allocations are made. Otherwise, we allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation identified in the contract on a relative SSP basis, except when the criteria are met for allocating variable consideration or a discount to one or more, but not all, performance obligations in the contract. To determine the SSP of our goods or services, we conduct a regular analysis to determine whether various goods or services have an observable SSP. If we do not have an observable SSP for a particular good or service, then SSP for that particular good or service is estimated using an approach that maximizes the use of observable inputs. We generally determine SSPs using various methodologies such as historical prices, expected cost plus margin, adjusted market assessment or non-standalone selling prices. We recognize revenue as control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for the promised goods or services. Revenue is recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities. Control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers at either a point in time or over time, depending on the performance obligation. Nature of Products and Services Certain of our perpetual software licenses or hardware with integrated software are not distinct from their accompanying maintenance and support, as they are dependent upon regular threat updates. These contracts typically contain a renewal option that we have concluded creates a material right for our customer. The license, hardware and maintenance and support revenue is recognized over time, as control is transferred to the customer over the term of the initial contract period while the corresponding material right is recognized over time beginning at the end of the initial contractual period over the remainder of the technology constrained customer life. Alternatively, certain of our perpetual software licenses, hardware appliances, or hardware with integrated software provide a benefit to the customer that is separable from the related support as they are not dependent upon regular threat updates. Revenue for these products is recognized at a point in time when control is transferred to our customers, generally at shipment. The related maintenance and support represent a separate performance obligation and the associated transaction price allocated to it is recognized over time as control is transferred to the customer. The nature of our promise to the customer to provide our SaaS offerings and time-based software licenses and related support and maintenance is to stand ready to provide protection for a specified or indefinite period of time. Maintenance and support in these cases are typically not distinct performance obligations as the licenses are dependent upon regular threat updates to the customer. Instead the maintenance and support is combined with a software license to create a single performance obligation. We typically satisfy these performance obligations over time, as control is transferred to the customer as the services are provided. Revenue for professional services that are a separate and distinct performance obligation is recognized as services are provided to the customer. Additional Revenue Recognition Considerations Royalties and Managed Service Provider Revenues Our original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) and managed service provider (“MSP”) sales channels have revenues derived from sales- or usage-based royalties. Such revenue is excluded from any variable consideration and transaction price calculations and is recognized at the later of when the sale or usage occurs, or the performance obligation is satisfied or partially satisfied. Consideration Payable to a Customer We make various payments to our channel partners, which may include revenue share, product placement fees and marketing development funds. Costs that are incremental to revenue, such as revenue share, are capitalized and amortized over time as cost of sales ( Note 4 Under certain of our channel partner agreements, the partners pay us royalties on our technology sold to their customers, which we recognize as revenue in accordance with our revenue recognition policy. In these situations, the payments made to our channel partners are recognized as consideration paid to a customer, and thus are recorded as reductions to revenue up to the amount of cumulative revenue recognized from the contract with the channel partner during the period of measurement. Payment Terms and Warranties Our payment terms vary by the type and location of our customer and the products or services offered. The term between invoicing and when payment is due is not significant. For certain products or services and customer types, we require payment before the products or services are delivered to the customer. We provide assurance warranties on our products and services. The warranty timeframe varies depending on the product or service sold, and the resolution of any issues is at our discretion to either repair, replace, reperform or refund the fee. Contract Costs Contract acquisition costs consist mainly of sales commissions and associated fringe benefits, as well as revenue share under programs with certain of our distribution partners. For revenue share, the partner receives a percentage of the revenue we receive from an end user upon conversion to a paid customer or renewal. These costs would not have been incurred if the contract was not obtained and are considered incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a contract with a customer. These costs are capitalized and amortized over time in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 340-40. We typically recognize the initial commissions that are not commensurate with renewal commissions over the longer of the customer relationship (generally estimated to be four to five years) or over the same period as the initial revenue arrangement to which these costs relate. Renewal commissions paid are generally amortized over the renewal period. Contract fulfillment costs consist of hardware and software and related costs. These costs are incremental and recoverable and are capitalized and amortized on a systematic basis that is consistent with the pattern of transfer of the goods and services to which the asset relates. Advertising Expenses Marketing programs that are facilitated through third parties not considered customers are expensed as incurred. Total advertising expenses were $56 million, $53 million, and $62 million for the years ended December 26, 2020, December 28, 2019, and December 29, 2018, respectively, excluding amounts included in sales and marketing as discussed in the revenue recognition section above. Accounts Receivable We record accounts receivable at the invoiced amount and maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reserve for potentially uncollectible receivables. We review accounts receivable to identify specific customers with known disputes or collectability issues and maintain an allowance for expected credit losses for all other receivables not included in the specific reserve by applying a set percentage for projected uncollectible amounts to the accounts receivable balance. In determining this percentage, judgment based on historical collection experience and current economic trends is applied. We recorded an allowance for credit losses of $5 million and less than $1 million as of December 26, 2020 and December 28, 2019, respectively. Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid investments with original maturities of 95 days or less are considered cash equivalents. Goodwill Goodwill is recorded as the excess of consideration transferred over the acquisition-date fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. We assign goodwill to our reporting units based on the relative fair value expected at the time of the acquisition ( Note 10 We perform an annual impairment assessment on the first day of the third month in the fourth quarter or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, which includes evaluating qualitative and quantitative factors to assess the likelihood of an impairment of a reporting unit’s goodwill. For reporting units in which this assessment concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value is more than its carrying value, goodwill is not considered impaired and we are not required to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. For reporting units in which the impairment assessment concludes that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value, we perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test, which compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. Our goodwill impairment test considers the income method and/or market method to estimate a reporting unit’s fair value. Identified Intangible Assets We amortize all finite-lived intangible assets that are subject to amortization over their estimated useful life of economic benefit on a straight-line basis ( Note 10 For significant intangible assets subject to amortization, we perform a quarterly assessment to determine whether facts and circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than we had originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, we assess recoverability by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. If an asset’s useful life is shorter than originally estimated, we accelerate the rate of amortization and amortize the remaining carrying value over the updated, shorter useful life. For our intangible assets not subject to amortization, we perform an annual impairment assessment on the first day of the third month in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. If necessary, a quantitative impairment test is performed to compare the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset with its carrying value. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. Research and Development Costs incurred in the research and development of new software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility is established. Research and development costs include salaries and benefits of researchers, supplies, and other expenses incurred during research and development efforts. Development costs are capitalized beginning when a product’s technological feasibility has been established and ending when the product is available for general release to customers. Technological feasibility is reached when the product reaches the working-model stage. To date, new products and enhancements generally have reached technological feasibility and have been released for sale at substantially the same time. All research and development costs to date have been expensed as incurred except for software subject to a hosting arrangement. Software development costs of both internal-use applications and software sold subject to hosting arrangements are capitalized when we have determined certain factors are present, including factors that indicate technology exists to achieve the performance requirements, the decision has been made to develop internally versus buy and our management has authorized the funding for the project. Capitalization of software costs ceases when the software is substantially complete and is ready for its intended use and capitalized costs are amortized over their estimated useful life of three to five years using the straight-line method. When events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of internal use software might not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of these assets by determining whether the amortization of the asset balance over its remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. Equity-Based Awards We currently provide various equity-based compensation to those whom, in the opinion of the Board or its designee, are in a position to make a significant contribution to our success. Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and recognized as expense over the appropriate service period. Determining the fair value of equity-based awards requires considerable judgment, including assumptions and estimates of the following: • fair value of the unit; • life of the award; • volatility of the unit price; and • dividend yield Before our IPO, the fair value of the unit was determined by the Board reasonably and in good faith. Generally, this involved a review of an independent valuation of our business, which requires judgmental inputs and assumptions such as our cash flow projections, peer company comparisons, market data, growth rates and discount rate. The Board reviewed its prior determination of fair value of a unit on a quarterly basis to decide whether any change was appropriate (including whether to obtain a new independent valuation), considering such factors as any significant financial, operational, or market changes affecting the business since the last valuation date. Due to us not having sufficient historical volatility, we used the historical volatilities of publicly traded companies which are similar to us in size, stage of life cycle and financial leverage. We will continue to use this peer group of companies unless a situation arises within the group that would require evaluation of which publicly traded companies are included or once sufficient data is available to use our own historical volatility. In addition, for awards where vesting is dependent upon achieving certain operating performance goals, we estimate the likelihood of achieving the performance goals. For goals dependent upon a qualifying liquidity event, (i.e., a change of control or public offering registered on a Form S-1 (or successor form), in either case, occurring on or before April 3, 2024) (a “Qualifying Liquidity Event”), we will not recognize any expense until the event occurs. Upon consummation of our IPO, we recognized a cumulative catch-up of expense based on the vesting dates for our time-based awards and expected vesting dates for our performance-based awards. We recognize forfeitures as they occur. For awards with only time-vesting requirement, we recognize the expense over a straight-line basis during the vesting period. After the close of our IPO, our outstanding Management Equity Participation Units (“MEPUs”) and Cash RSU (“CRSUs”) were converted into RSUs (“Replacement RSUs”), which are to be settled in Class A common stock. The fair value of these Replacement RSUs was our IPO price less the present value of the expected dividends not received during the vesting period. For all other RSU grants after our IPO, we utilize the closing price of our common stock on the day of the grant date, less the present value of expected dividends not received during the vesting period to determine grant date fair value. In addition, certain MEPU holders were also granted stock options with a strike price equal to our IPO price. For all other stock option grants after our IPO, we utilize the closing price of our common stock on the day of grant date to determine the strike price. All of our granted stock options are non-qualified and expire 10 years after grant. We utilize a Black-Scholes model to determine grant date fair value of our stock options. Our time-based awards generally vest evenly over the 16 quarters following grant date. For time-based awards granted to our new hires, the vesting period is generally 25% vest one year after grant date and quarterly thereafter for 12 quarters. Time-based awards granted to our non-employee directors vest one year from grant date. Generally, unvested awards are forfeited upon termination of employment with us, however, our executive officers may have provisions permitting acceleration or pro rata acceleration upon termination without cause (as defined in the respective award agreements). Our performance-based RSU awards (“PSU”s) are granted to executive officers and certain employees annually. These awards vest after approximately three years, with the number vesting based upon internal profitability targets that are communicated to employees in the year to which the targets relate. The number of shares of common stock issued will range from zero to stretch, with stretch typically defined as 130% of target. At the time our Board approves such grants, the targets for performance years other than the current year are not known or knowable by us nor our employees. Upon determination and communication of such targets in future years, grant date fair value is determined based upon the closing price, less the present value of expected dividends not received during the vesting period. A portion of our RSU awards and all of our performance-based stock option and performance-based MIU awards vest upon achievement of certain return of cash metrics. In January 2021, these awards were modified to vest annually in equal tranches over the three year anniversaries of our IPO. If the original return of cash performance is achieved prior to such anniversaries, the awards vest in full. In both cases, the unvested portion of the awards are forfeited upon termination. Upon the settlement of RSUs, we withhold a portion of the earned units to cover no more than the maximum statutory income and employment taxes and remit the net shares to an individual brokerage account. Authorized shares of our common stock are used to settle RSUs and stock options. Awards granted prior to our IPO and/or converted at the time of our IPO are covered under our 2017 Management Incentive Plan (“2017 Plan”). Stock options granted at our IPO and/or awards granted at our IPO or after are covered under our 2020 Equity Omnibus Plan (“2020 Plan”). No new awards may be authorized under our 2017 Plan. After the close of the separation from Intel, our employees were no longer eligible for Intel Awards (as defined below). Prior to the transaction, Intel’s stockholders approved the adoption of the Intel Corporation 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. The plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units (collectively “Intel Awards”) to eligible full-time and part-time employees and non-employee directors. These awards generally vested over three or four years. Stock options generally expire ten years from the date of grant. Awards were generally granted with only a time-vesting requirement, but may have had certain performance and/or market conditions required for vesting. All outstanding Intel Awards were replaced with fixed cash payouts (“retention awards”) or unvested Class A Unit awards ( Note 12 Note 6 Derivative and Hedging Instruments The fair values of each of our derivative instruments are recorded as an asset or liability on a net basis at the balance sheet date within other current or long-term assets or liabilities. The change in fair value of our derivative instruments is recorded through earnings in the line item on the Consolidated Statements of Operations to which the derivatives most closely relate, primarily in Interest expense and other, net. Changes in the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities associated with the hedged risk are generally offset by the changes in the fair value of the related derivatives. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative trading purposes. To reduce the interest rate risk inherent in variable rate debt, we entered into certain interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of our variable rate borrowing into a fixed rate obligation ( Note 15 Leases We adopted ASC Topic 842 which primarily requires leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. We adopted the standard using the modified retrospective approach with an effective date as of the beginning of our fiscal year, December 30, 2018. Prior year financial statements were not recast under the new standard. We determine if an arrangement contains a lease and classification of that lease, if applicable, at inception based on: • Whether the contract involves the use of a distinct identified asset; • Whether we obtain the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period; and • Whether we have a right to direct the use of the asset. Right-of-use (“ROU”) assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make minimum lease payments arising from the lease. A ROU asset is initially measured at an amount which represents the lease liability, plus any initial direct costs incurred and less any lease incentives received. The lease liability is initially measured at lease commencement date based on the present value of minimum lease payments over the lease term. The lease term may include options to extend or terminate when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, and the non-lease components are generally accounted for separately and not included in our leased assets and corresponding liabilities. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Payments related to short-term leases are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term and reflected as a component of lease cost within our consolidated statements of operations. Lease payments generally consist of fixed amounts, as well as variable amounts based on a market rate or an index which are not material to our consolidated lease cost. Our leases do not contain significant terms and conditions for variable lease payments. When available, we use the rate implicit in the lease to discount lease payments to present value; however, most of our leases do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate. Therefore, we estimate our incremental borrowing rate to discount the lease payments based on information available at lease commencement. For leases which commenced prior to our adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, and all related updates (collectively, “ASC Topic 842”), we estimated our incremental borrowing rate as of adoption date based on our credit rating, current economic conditions, and collateralized borrowing. |