This page was intentionally left blank.
This page was intentionally left blank.
This page was intentionally left blank.
This page was intentionally left blank.
This page was intentionally left blank.
We are pleased to offer a variety of convenient ways for you to contact us for assistance or information.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus.
The Fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-PORT by visiting the Commission’s web site at https://www.sec.gov.
Amundi Pioneer Asset Management, Inc.
Securities offered through Amundi Pioneer Distributor, Inc.
GENERAL AUDIT COMMITTEE APPROVAL POLICY:
o For all projects, the officers of the Funds and the Fund’s auditors will each make an assessment to determine that any proposed projects will not impair independence.
o Potential services will be classified into the four non-restricted service categories and the “Approval of Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and Other Services” Policy above will be applied. Any services outside the specific pre-approved service subcategories set forth above must be specifically approved by the Audit Committee.
o At least quarterly, the Audit Committee shall review a report summarizing the services by service category, including fees, provided by the Audit firm as set forth in the above policy.
(2) Disclose the percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
Non-Audit Services
Beginning with non-audit service contracts entered into on or after May 6, 2003, the effective date of the
new SEC pre-approval rules, the Fund’s audit committee is required to pre-approve services to
affiliates defined by SEC rules to the extent that the services are determined to have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the Fund. For the year ended July 31 2020 there were no services provided to an affiliate that required the Fund’s audit committee pre-approval.
(f) If greater than 50 percent, disclose the percentage of hours expended on the principal accountants engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
N/A
(g) Disclose the aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrants accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant.
The aggregate non-audit fees for the Fun were $10,817 payable to Ernst & Young LLP for the year ended July 31, 2020.
(h) Disclose whether the registrants audit committee of the board of trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any subadviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
The Fund’s audit committee of the Board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the Affiliates (as defined) that were not pre- approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS
(a) If the registrant is a listed issuer as defined in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10A-3), state whether or not the registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). If the registrant has such a committee, however designated, identify each committee member. If the entire board of directors is acting as the registrant’s audit committee as specified in Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(B)), so state.
N/A
(b) If applicable, provide the disclosure required by Rule 10A-3(d) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10A-3(d)) regarding an exemption from the listing standards for audit committees.
N/A
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
File Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period as set forth in 210.1212 of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210.12-12], unless the schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Included in Item 1
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
A closed-end management investment company that is filing an annual report on this Form N-CSR must, unless it invests exclusively in non-voting securities, describe the policies and procedures that it uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities, including the procedures that the company uses when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of its shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the company’s investment adviser; principal underwriter; or any affiliated person (as defined in Section 2(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(3)) and the rules thereunder) of the company, its investment adviser, or its principal underwriter, on the other. Include any policies and procedures of the company’s investment adviser, or any other third party, that the company uses, or that are used on the company’s behalf, to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
POLICY
Each of the Pioneer Funds and certain other clients of Amundi Pioneer Asset
Management, Inc. and Amundi Pioneer Institutional Asset Management, Inc.
(collectively, “Amundi Pioneer”) have delegated responsibility to vote proxies
related to portfolio holdings to Amundi Pioneer. Amundi Pioneer is a fiduciary
that owes each of its clients the duties of care and loyalty with respect to
all services undertaken on the client’s behalf, including voting proxies for
securities held by the client. When Amundi Pioneer has been delegated
proxy-voting authority for a client, the duty of care requires Amundi Pioneer
to monitor corporate events and to vote the proxies. To satisfy its duty of
loyalty, Amundi Pioneer must place the client’s interests ahead of its own and
must cast proxy votes in a manner consistent with the best interest of the
client. It is Amundi Pioneer’s policy to vote proxies presented to Amundi
Pioneer in a timely manner in accordance with these principles.
Amundi Pioneer’s sole concern in voting proxies is the economic effect of the
proposal on the value of portfolio holdings, considering both the short- and
long-term impact. In many instances, Amundi Pioneer believes that supporting
the company’s strategy and voting “for” management’s proposals builds portfolio
value. In other cases, however, proposals set forth by management may have a
negative effect on that value, while some shareholder proposals may hold the
best prospects for enhancing it. Amundi Pioneer monitors developments in the
proxy voting arena and will revise this policy as needed.
Amundi Pioneer believes that environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors
can affect companies’ long-term prospects for success and the sustainability of
their business models. Since ESG factors that may affect corporate performance
and economic value are considered by our investment professionals as part of
the investment management process, Amundi Pioneer also considers these factors
when reviewing proxy proposals. This approach is consistent with the stated
investment objectives and policies of funds and investment strategies.
It should be noted that the proxy voting guidelines below are guidelines, not
rules, and Amundi Pioneer reserves the right in all cases to vote contrary to
guidelines where doing so is determined to represent the best economic
interests of our clients. Further, the Pioneer Funds or other clients of Amundi
Pioneer may direct Amundi Pioneer to vote contrary to guidelines.
Amundi Pioneer’s clients may request copies of their proxy voting records and
of Amundi Pioneer’s proxy voting policies and procedures by either sending a
written request to Amundi Pioneer’s Proxy Coordinator, or clients may review
Amundi Pioneer’s proxy voting policies and procedures on-line at Amundi
Pioneer.com. Amundi Pioneer may describe to clients its proxy voting policies
and procedures by delivering a copy of Amundi Pioneer’s Form ADV (Part II), by
separate notice to the client or by other means.
APPLICABILITY
This Proxy Voting policy and the procedures set forth below are designed to
complement Amundi Pioneer’s investment policies and procedures regarding its
general responsibility to monitor the performance and/or corporate events of
companies that are issuers of securities held in accounts managed by Amundi
Pioneer. This policy sets forth Amundi Pioneer’s position on a number of issues
for which proxies may be solicited but it does not include all potential voting
scenarios or proxy events. Furthermore, because of the special issues
associated with proxy solicitations by closed-end Funds, Amundi Pioneer will
vote shares of closed-end Funds on a case-by-case basis.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that proxies for United States (“US”)
and non-US companies that are received in a timely manner will be voted in
accordance with the principles stated above. Unless the Proxy Voting Oversight
Group (as described below) specifically determines otherwise, all shares in a
company held by Amundi Pioneer-managed accounts for which Amundi Pioneer has
proxy-voting authority will be voted alike, unless a client has given specific
voting instructions on an issue.
5
Amundi Pioneer does not delegate the authority to vote proxies relating to
securities held by its clients to any of its affiliates. Any questions about
this policy should be directed to Amundi Pioneer’s Director of Investment
Operations (the “Proxy Coordinator”).
PROCEDURES
PROXY VOTING SERVICE
Amundi Pioneer has engaged an independent proxy voting service to assist in the
voting of proxies. The proxy voting service works with custodians to ensure
that all proxy materials are received by the custodians and are processed in a
timely fashion. The proxy voting service votes all proxies in accordance with
the proxy voting guidelines established by Amundi Pioneer and set forth herein,
to the extent applicable. The proxy voting service will refer proxy questions
to the Proxy Coordinator (described below) for instructions under circumstances
where: (1) the application of the proxy voting guidelines is unclear; (2) a
particular proxy question is not covered by the guidelines; or (3) the
guidelines call for specific instructions on a case-by-case basis. The proxy
voting service is also requested to call to the Proxy Coordinator’s attention
specific proxy questions that, while governed by a guideline, appear to involve
unusual or controversial issues. Amundi Pioneer reserves the right to attend a
meeting in person and may do so when it determines that the company or the
matters to be voted on at the meeting are strategically important to its
clients.
To supplement its own research and analysis in determining how to vote on a
particular proxy proposal, Amundi Pioneer may utilize research, analysis or
recommendations provided by the proxy voting service on a case-by-case basis.
Amundi Pioneer does not, as a policy, follow the assessments or recommendations
provided by the proxy voting service without its own analysis and
determination.
PROXY COORDINATOR
The Proxy Coordinator coordinates the voting, procedures and reporting of
proxies on behalf of Amundi Pioneer’s clients. The Proxy Coordinator will deal
directly with the proxy voting service and, in the case of proxy questions
referred by the proxy voting service, will solicit voting recommendations and
instructions from the Portfolio Management Group, or, to the extent applicable,
investment sub-advisers. The Proxy Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that
these questions and referrals are responded to in a timely fashion and for
transmitting appropriate voting instructions to the proxy voting service. The
Proxy Coordinator is responsible for verifying with the General Counsel or his
or her designee whether Amundi Pioneer’s voting power is subject to any
limitations or guidelines issued by the client (or in the case of an employee
benefit plan, the plan’s trustee or other fiduciaries).
REFERRAL ITEMS
The proxy voting service will refer proxy questions to the Proxy Coordinator or
his or her designee that are described by Amundi Pioneer’s proxy voting
guidelines as to be voted on a case-by-case basis, that are not covered by
Amundi Pioneer’s guidelines or where Amundi Pioneer’s guidelines may be unclear
with respect to the matter to be voted on. Under such circumstances, the Proxy
Coordinator will seek a written voting recommendation from the Chief Investment
Officer, U.S. or his or her designated equity portfolio-management
representative. Any such recommendation will include: (i) the manner in which
the proxies should be voted; (ii) the rationale underlying any such decision;
and (iii) the disclosure of any contacts or communications made between Amundi
Pioneer and any outside parties concerning the proxy proposal prior to the time
that the voting instructions are provided.
SECURITIES LENDING
In accordance with industry standards, proxies are not available to be voted
when the shares are out on loan through either Amundi Pioneer’s lending program
or a client’s managed security lending program. However, Amundi Pioneer will
reserve the right to recall lent securities so that they may be voted according
to Amundi Pioneer’s instructions. If a portfolio manager would like to vote a
block of previously lent shares, the Proxy Coordinator will work with the
portfolio manager and Investment Operations to recall the security, to the
extent possible, to facilitate the vote on the entire block of shares. Certain
clients participate in securities lending programs. Although such programs
allow for the recall of securities for any reason, Amundi Pioneer may determine
not to vote securities on loan and it may not always be possible for securities
on loan to be recalled in time to be voted.
6
SHARE-BLOCKING
“Share-blocking” is a market practice whereby shares are sent to a custodian
(which may be different than the account custodian) for record keeping and
voting at the general meeting. The shares are unavailable for sale or delivery
until the end of the blocking period (typically the day after general meeting
date).
Amundi Pioneer will vote in those countries with “share-blocking.” In the event
a manager would like to sell a security with “share-blocking”, the Proxy
Coordinator will work with the Portfolio Manager and Investment Operations
Department to recall the shares (as allowable within the market time-frame and
practices) and/or communicate with executing brokerage firm. A list of
countries with “share-blocking” is available from the Investment Operations
Department upon request.
PROXY VOTING OVERSIGHT GROUP
The members of the Proxy Voting Oversight Group include Amundi Pioneer’s Chief
Investment Officer, U.S. or his or her designated equity portfolio management
representative, the Chief of Staff, U.S., and the Chief Compliance Officer of
the Adviser and Funds. Other members of Amundi Pioneer will be invited to
attend meetings and otherwise participate as necessary. The Chief of Staff,
U.S. will chair the Proxy Voting Oversight Group.
The Proxy Voting Oversight Group is responsible for developing, evaluating, and
changing (when necessary) Amundi Pioneer’s proxy voting policies and
procedures. The Group meets at least annually to evaluate and review this
policy and the services of its third-party proxy voting service. In addition,
the Proxy Voting Oversight Group will meet as necessary to vote on referral
items and address other business as necessary.
AMENDMENTS
Amundi Pioneer may not amend this policy without the prior approval of the
Proxy Voting Oversight Group.
FORM N-PX
The Proxy Coordinator and the Director of Regulatory Reporting are responsible
for ensuring that Form N-PX documents receive the proper review by a member of
the Proxy Voting Oversight Group prior to a Fund officer signing the forms.
The Investment Operations department will provide the Compliance department
with a copy of each Form N-PX filing prepared by the proxy voting service.
Compliance files N-PX. The Compliance department will ensure that a
corresponding Form N-PX exists for each Amundi Pioneer registered investment
company.
Following this review, each Form N-PX is formatted for public dissemination via
the EDGAR system.
Prior to submission, each Form N-PX is to be presented to the Fund officer for
a final review and signature.
Copies of the Form N-PX filings and their submission receipts are maintained
according to Amundi Pioneer record keeping policies.
PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES
ADMINISTRATIVE
While administrative items appear infrequently in U.S. issuer proxies, they are
quite common in non-U.S. proxies.
We will generally support these and similar management proposals:
o Corporate name change.
o A change of corporate headquarters.
o Stock exchange listing.
o Establishment of time and place of annual meeting.
o Adjournment or postponement of annual meeting.
o Acceptance/approval of financial statements.
o Approval of dividend payments, dividend reinvestment plans and other
dividend-related proposals.
7
o Approval of minutes and other formalities.
o Authorization of the transferring of reserves and allocation of income.
o Amendments to authorized signatories.
o Approval of accounting method changes or change in fiscal year-end.
o Acceptance of labor agreements.
o Appointment of internal auditors.
Amundi Pioneer will vote on a case-by-case basis on other routine
administrative items; however, Amundi Pioneer will oppose any routine proposal
if insufficient information is presented in advance to allow Amundi Pioneer to
judge the merit of the proposal. Amundi Pioneer has also instructed its proxy
voting service to inform Amundi Pioneer of its analysis of any administrative
items that may be inconsistent, in its view, with Amundi Pioneer’s goal of
supporting the value of its clients’ portfolio holdings so that Amundi Pioneer
may consider and vote on those items on a case-by-case basis in its discretion.
AUDITORS
We normally vote for proposals to:
Ratify the auditors. We will consider a vote against if we are concerned about
the auditors’ independence or their past work for the company. Specifically, we
will oppose the ratification of auditors and withhold votes for audit committee
members if non-audit fees paid by the company to the auditing firm exceed the
sum of audit fees plus audit-related fees plus permissible tax fees according
to the disclosure categories proposed by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
o Restore shareholder rights to ratify the auditors.
We will normally oppose proposals that require companies to:
o Seek bids from other auditors.
o Rotate auditing firms, except where the rotation is statutorily required or
where rotation would demonstrably strengthen financial disclosure.
o Indemnify auditors.
o Prohibit auditors from engaging in non-audit services for the company.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
On issues related to the board of directors, Amundi Pioneer normally supports
management. We will, however, consider a vote against management in instances
where corporate performance has been poor or where the board appears to lack
independence.
GENERAL BOARD ISSUES
Amundi Pioneer will vote for:
o Audit, compensation and nominating committees composed of independent
directors exclusively.
o Indemnification for directors for actions taken in good faith in accordance
with the business judgment rule. We will vote against proposals for broader
indemnification.
o Changes in board size that appear to have a legitimate business purpose and
are not primarily for anti-takeover reasons.
o Election of an honorary director.
We will vote against:
o Minimum stock ownership by directors.
o Term limits for directors. Companies benefit from experienced directors, and
shareholder control is better achieved through annual votes.
o Requirements for union or special interest representation on the board.
o Requirements to provide two candidates for each board seat.
8
We will vote on a case-by case basis on these issues:
o Separate chairman and CEO positions. We will consider voting with
shareholders on these issues in cases of poor corporate performance.
ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS
In uncontested elections of directors we will vote against:
o Individual directors with absenteeism above 25% without valid reason. We
support proposals that require disclosure of director attendance.
o Insider directors and affiliated outsiders who sit on the audit,
compensation, stock option or nominating committees. For the purposes of our
policy, we use the definition of affiliated directors provided by our proxy
voting service.
We will also vote against:
o Directors who have failed to act on a takeover offer where the majority of
shareholders have tendered their shares.
o Directors who appear to lack independence or are associated with poor
corporate or governance performance.
We will vote on a case-by case basis on these issues:
Re-election of directors who have implemented or renewed a dead hand or
modified dead-hand poison pill (a “dead-hand poison pill” is a shareholder
rights plan that may be altered only by incumbent or “dead” directors. These
plans prevent a potential acquirer from disabling a poison pill by obtaining
control of the board through a proxy vote).
o Contested election of directors.
o Election of a greater number of independent directors (in order to move
closer to a majority of independent directors) in cases of poor performance.
o Mandatory retirement policies.
o Directors who have ignored a shareholder proposal that has been approved by
shareholders for two consecutive years.
We will vote for:
o Precatory and binding resolutions requesting that the board changes the
company’s bylaws to stipulate that directors need to be elected with
affirmative majority of votes cast, provided that the resolutions allow for
plurality voting in cases of contested elections.
TAKEOVER-RELATED MEASURES
Amundi Pioneer is generally opposed to proposals that may discourage takeover
attempts. We believe that the potential for a takeover helps ensure that
corporate performance remains high.
Amundi Pioneer will vote for:
o Cumulative voting.
o Increasing the ability for shareholders to call special meetings.
o Increasing the ability for shareholders to act by written consent.
o Restrictions on the ability to make greenmail payments.
o Submitting rights plans to shareholder vote.
o Rescinding shareholder rights plans (“poison pills”).
o Opting out of the following state takeover statutes:
- Control share acquisition statutes, which deny large holders voting rights
on holdings over a specified threshold.
- Control share cash-out provisions, which require large holders to acquire
shares from other holders.
- Freeze-out provisions, which impose a waiting period on large holders
before they can attempt to gain control.
- Stakeholder laws, which permit directors to consider interests of
non-shareholder constituencies.
- Disgorgement provisions, which require acquirers to disgorge profits on
purchases made before gaining control.
- Fair price provisions.
9
- Authorization of shareholder rights plans.
- Labor protection provisions.
- Mandatory classified boards.
We will vote on a case-by-case basis on the following issues:
o Fair price provisions. We will vote against provisions requiring
supermajority votes to approve takeovers. We will also consider voting
against proposals that require a supermajority vote to repeal or amend the
provision. Finally, we will consider the mechanism used to determine the
fair price; we are generally opposed to complicated formulas or requirements
to pay a premium.
o Opting out of state takeover statutes regarding fair price provisions. We
will use the criteria used for fair price provisions in general to determine
our vote on this issue.
o Proposals that allow shareholders to nominate directors.
We will vote against:
o Classified boards, except in the case of closed-end funds, where we shall
vote on a case-by-case basis.
o Limiting shareholder ability to remove or appoint directors. We will support
proposals to restore shareholder authority in this area. We will review on
case-by-case basis proposals that authorize the board to make interim
appointments.
o Classes of shares with unequal voting rights.
o Supermajority vote requirements.
o Severance packages (“golden” and “tin” parachutes). We will support proposals
to put these packages to shareholder vote.
o Reimbursement of dissident proxy solicitation expenses. While we ordinarily
support measures that encourage takeover bids, we believe that management
should have full control over corporate funds.
o Extension of advance notice requirements for shareholder proposals.
o Granting board authority normally retained by shareholders, particularly the
right to amend the corporate charter.
o Shareholder rights plans (“poison pills”). These plans generally allow
shareholders to buy additional shares at a below-market price in the event
of a change in control and may deter some bids.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Managements need considerable flexibility in determining the company’s
financial structure, and Amundi Pioneer normally supports managements’
proposals in this area. We will, however, reject proposals that impose high
barriers to potential takeovers.
Amundi Pioneer will vote for:
o Changes in par value.
o Reverse splits, if accompanied by a reduction in number of shares.
o Shares repurchase programs, if all shareholders may participate on equal
terms.
o Bond issuance.
o Increases in “ordinary” preferred stock.
o Proposals to have blank-check common stock placements (other than shares
issued in the normal course of business) submitted for shareholder approval.
o Cancellation of company treasury shares.
We will vote on a case-by-case basis on the following issues:
o Reverse splits not accompanied by a reduction in number of shares,
considering the risk of delisting.
o Increase in authorized common stock. We will make a determination
considering, among other factors:
- Number of shares currently available for issuance;
- Size of requested increase (we would normally approve increases of up to
100% of current authorization);
10
- Proposed use of the proceeds from the issuance of additional shares; and
- Potential consequences of a failure to increase the number of shares
outstanding (e.g., delisting or bankruptcy).
o Blank-check preferred. We will normally oppose issuance of a new class of
blank-check preferred, but may approve an increase in a class already
outstanding if the company has demonstrated that it uses this flexibility
appropriately.
o Proposals to submit private placements to shareholder vote.
o Other financing plans.
We will vote against preemptive rights that we believe limit a company’s
financing flexibility.
COMPENSATION
Amundi Pioneer supports compensation plans that link pay to shareholder returns
and believes that management has the best understanding of the level of
compensation needed to attract and retain qualified people. At the same time,
stock-related compensation plans have a significant economic impact and a
direct effect on the balance sheet. Therefore, while we do not want to
micromanage a company’s compensation programs, we place limits on the potential
dilution these plans may impose.
Amundi Pioneer will vote for:
o 401(k) benefit plans.
o Employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), as long as shares allocated to ESOPs
are less than 5% of outstanding shares. Larger blocks of stock in ESOPs can
serve as a takeover defense. We will support proposals to submit ESOPs to
shareholder vote.
o Various issues related to the Omnibus Budget and Reconciliation Act of 1993
(OBRA), including:
- Amendments to performance plans to conform with OBRA;
- Caps on annual grants or amendments of administrative features;
- Adding performance goals; and
- Cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans.
o Establish a process to link pay, including stock-option grants, to
performance, leaving specifics of implementation to the company.
o Require that option repricing be submitted to shareholders.
o Require the expensing of stock-option awards.
o Require reporting of executive retirement benefits (deferred compensation,
split-dollar life insurance, SERPs, and pension benefits).
o Employee stock purchase plans where the purchase price is equal to at least
85% of the market price, where the offering period is no greater than 27
months and where potential dilution (as defined below) is no greater than
10%.
We will vote on a case-by-case basis on the following issues:
o Shareholder proposals seeking additional disclosure of executive and director
pay information.
o Executive and director stock-related compensation plans. We will consider the
following factors when reviewing these plans:
- The program must be of a reasonable size. We will approve plans where the
combined employee and director plans together would generate less than 15%
dilution. We will reject plans with 15% or more potential dilution.
- Dilution = (A + B + C) / (A + B + C + D), where
- A = Shares reserved for plan/amendment,
- B = Shares available under continuing plans,
- C = Shares granted but unexercised and
- D = Shares outstanding.
- The plan must not:
11
- Explicitly permit unlimited option repricing authority or have allowed
option repricing in the past without shareholder approval.
- Be a self-replenishing “evergreen” plan or a plan that grants discount
options and tax offset payments.
- We are generally in favor of proposals that increase participation beyond
executives.
- We generally support proposals asking companies to adopt rigorous vesting
provisions for stock option plans such as those that vest incrementally
over, at least, a three- or four-year period with a pro rata portion of
the shares becoming exercisable on an annual basis following grant date.
- We generally support proposals asking companies to disclose their window
period policies for stock transactions. Window period policies ensure that
employees do not exercise options based on insider information
contemporaneous with quarterly earnings releases and other material
corporate announcements.
- We generally support proposals asking companies to adopt stock holding
periods for their executives.
o All other employee stock purchase plans.
o All other compensation-related proposals, including deferred compensation
plans, employment agreements, loan guarantee programs and retirement plans.
o All other proposals regarding stock compensation plans, including extending
the life of a plan, changing vesting restrictions, repricing options,
lengthening exercise periods or accelerating distribution of awards and
pyramiding and cashless exercise programs.
We will vote against:
o Pensions for non-employee directors. We believe these retirement plans reduce
director objectivity.
o Elimination of stock option plans.
We will vote on a case-by case basis on these issues:
o Limits on executive and director pay.
o Stock in lieu of cash compensation for directors.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Amundi Pioneer will vote for:
o Confidential voting.
o Equal access provisions, which allow shareholders to contribute their
opinions to proxy materials.
o Proposals requiring directors to disclose their ownership of shares in the
company.
We will vote on a case-by-case basis on the following issues:
o Change in the state of incorporation. We will support reincorporations
supported by valid business reasons. We will oppose those that appear to be
solely for the purpose of strengthening takeover defenses.
o Bundled proposals. We will evaluate the overall impact of the proposal.
o Adopting or amending the charter, bylaws or articles of association.
o Shareholder appraisal rights, which allow shareholders to demand judicial
review of an acquisition price.
We will vote against:
o Shareholder advisory committees. While management should solicit shareholder
input, we prefer to leave the method of doing so to management’s discretion.
o Limitations on stock ownership or voting rights.
o Reduction in share ownership disclosure guidelines.
MERGERS AND RESTRUCTURINGS
Amundi Pioneer will vote on the following and similar issues on a case-by-case
basis:
o Mergers and acquisitions.
12
o Corporate restructurings, including spin-offs, liquidations, asset sales,
joint ventures, conversions to holding company and conversions to
self-managed REIT structure.
o Debt restructurings.
o Conversion of securities.
o Issuance of shares to facilitate a merger.
o Private placements, warrants, convertible debentures.
o Proposals requiring management to inform shareholders of merger
opportunities.
We will normally vote against shareholder proposals requiring that the company
be put up for sale.
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Many of our portfolios may invest in shares of closed-end funds or open-end
funds (including exchange-traded funds). The non-corporate structure of these
investments raises several unique proxy voting issues.
Amundi Pioneer will vote for:
o Establishment of new classes or series of shares.
o Establishment of a master-feeder structure.
Amundi Pioneer will vote on a case-by-case basis on:
o Changes in investment policy. We will normally support changes that do not
affect the investment objective or overall risk level of the fund. We will
examine more fundamental changes on a case-by-case basis.
o Approval of new or amended advisory contracts.
o Changes from closed-end to open-end format.
o Election of a greater number of independent directors.
o Authorization for, or increase in, preferred shares.
o Disposition of assets, termination, liquidation, or mergers.
o Classified boards of closed-end funds, but will typically support such
proposals.
In general, business development companies (BDCs) are not considered investment
companies for these purposes but are treated as corporate issuers.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES
Amundi Pioneer believes that environmental and social issues may influence
corporate performance and economic return. Indeed, by analyzing all of a
company’s risks and opportunities, Amundi Pioneer can better assess its
intrinsic value and long-term economic prospects.
When evaluating proxy proposals relating to environmental or social issues,
decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. We consider each of these proposals
based on the impact to the company’s shareholders and economic return, the
specific circumstances at each individual company, any potentially adverse
economic concerns, and the current policies and practices of the company.
For example, shareholder proposals relating to environmental and social issues,
and on which we will vote on a base-by-case basis, may include those seeking
that a company:
o Conduct studies regarding certain environmental or social issues;
o Study the feasibility of the company taking certain actions with regard to
such issues; or
o Take specific action, including adopting or ceasing certain behavior and
adopting company standards and principles, in relation to such issues.
In general, Amundi Pioneer believes these issues are important and should
receive management attention.
13
Amundi Pioneer will support proposals where we believe the proposal, if
implemented, would improve the prospects for the long-term success of the
business and would provide value to the company and its shareholders. Amundi
Pioneer may abstain on shareholder proposals with regard to environmental and
social issues in cases where we believe the proposal, if implemented, would not
be in the economic interests of the company, or where implementing the proposal
would constrain management flexibility or would be unduly difficult, burdensome
or costly.
When evaluating proxy proposals relating to environmental or social issues,
Amundi Pioneer may consider the following factors or other factors deemed
relevant, given such weight as deemed appropriate:
o approval of the proposal helps improve the company’s practices;
o approval of the proposal can improve shareholder value;
o the company’s current stance on the topic is likely to have negative effects
on its business position or reputation in the short, medium, or long term;
o the company has already put appropriate action in place to respond to the
issue contained in the proposal;
o the company’s reasoning against approving the proposal responds appropriately
to the various points mentioned by the shareholder when the proposal was
presented;
o the solutions recommended in the proposal are relevant and appropriate, and
if the topic of the proposal would not be better addressed through another
means.
In the event of failures in risk management relating to environmental and
social issues, Amundi Pioneer may vote against the election of directors
responsible for overseeing these areas.
Amundi Pioneer will vote against proposals calling for substantial changes in
the company’s business or activities. We will also normally vote against
proposals with regard to contributions, believing that management should
control the routine disbursement of funds.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Amundi Pioneer recognizes that in certain circumstances a conflict of interest
may arise when Amundi Pioneer votes a proxy.
A conflict of interest occurs when Amundi Pioneer’s interests interfere, or
appear to interfere, with the interests of Amundi Pioneer’s clients.
A conflict may be actual or perceived and may exist, for example, when the
matter to be voted on concerns:
o An affiliate of Amundi Pioneer, such as another company belonging to the
Credit Agricole banking group ( “Credit Agricole Affiliate”);
o An issuer of a security for which Amundi Pioneer acts as a sponsor, advisor,
manager, custodian, distributor, underwriter, broker, or other similar
capacity (including those securities specifically declared by its parent
Amundi to present a conflict of interest for Amundi Pioneer);
o An issuer of a security for which Amundi has informed Amundi Pioneer that a
Credit Agricole Affiliate acts as a sponsor, advisor, manager, custodian,
distributor, underwriter, broker, or other similar capacity; or
o A person with whom Amundi Pioneer (or any of its affiliates) has an existing,
material contract or business relationship.
Any member of the Proxy Voting Oversight Group and any other associate involved
in the proxy voting process with knowledge of any apparent or actual conflict
of interest must disclose such conflict to the Proxy Coordinator and the Chief
Compliance Officer of Amundi Pioneer and the Funds. If any associate is lobbied
or pressured with respect to any voting decision, whether within or outside of
Amundi Pioneer, he or she should contact a member of the Proxy Voting Oversight
Group or Amundi Pioneer’s Chief Compliance Officer.
The Proxy Voting Oversight Group will review each item referred to Amundi
Pioneer by the proxy voting service to determine whether an actual or potential
conflict of interest exists in connection with the proposal(s) to be voted
upon. The review will be conducted by comparing the apparent parties affected
by the proxy proposal being voted
14
upon against the Controller’s and Compliance Department’s internal list of
interested persons and, for any matches found, evaluating the anticipated
magnitude and possible probability of any conflict of interest being present.
The Proxy Voting Oversight Group may cause any of the following actions to be
taken when a conflict of interest is present:
o Vote the proxy in accordance with the vote indicated under “Voting
Guidelines,” if a vote is indicated, or
o Direct the independent proxy voting service to vote the proxy in accordance
with its independent assessment or that of another independent adviser
appointed by Amundi Pioneer or the applicable client for this purpose.
If the Proxy Voting Oversight Group perceives a material conflict of interest,
the Group may also choose to disclose the conflict to the affected clients and
solicit their consent to proceed with the vote or their direction (including
through a client’s fiduciary or other adviser), or may take such other action
in good faith (in consultation with counsel) that would protect the interests
of clients.
For each referral item, the determination regarding the presence or absence of
any actual or potential conflict of interest will be documented in a Conflicts
of Interest Report prepared by the Proxy Coordinator.
The Proxy Voting Oversight Group will review periodically the independence of
the proxy voting service. This may include a review of the service’s conflict
management procedures and other documentation and an evaluation as to whether
the service continues to have the competency and capacity to vote proxies.
DECISIONS NOT TO VOTE PROXIES
Although it is Amundi Pioneer’s general policy to vote all proxies in
accordance with the principles set forth in this policy, there may be
situations in which the Proxy Voting Oversight Group does not vote a proxy
referred to it. For example, because of the potential conflict of interest
inherent in voting shares of a Credit Agricole Affiliate, Amundi Pioneer will
abstain from voting the shares unless otherwise directed by a client. In such a
case, the Proxy Coordinator will inform Amundi Compliance before exercising
voting rights.
There exist other situations in which the Proxy Voting Oversight Group may
refrain from voting a proxy. For example, if the cost of voting a foreign
security outweighs the benefit of voting, the Group may not vote the proxy. The
Group may not be given enough time to process a vote, perhaps because it
receives a meeting notice too late or it cannot obtain a translation of the
agenda in the time available. If Amundi Pioneer has outstanding “sell” orders,
the proxies for shares subject to the order may not be voted to facilitate the
sale. Although Amundi Pioneer may hold shares on a company’s record date, if
the shares are sold prior to the meeting date the Group may decide not to vote
those shares.
SUPERVISION
ESCALATION
It is each associate’s responsibility to contact his or her business unit head,
the Proxy Coordinator, a member of the Proxy Voting Oversight Group or Amundi
Pioneer’s Chief Compliance Officer if he or she becomes aware of any possible
noncompliance with this policy.
TRAINING
Amundi Pioneer will conduct periodic training regarding proxy voting and this
policy. It is the responsibility of the business line policy owner and the
applicable Compliance Department to coordinate and conduct such training.
RELATED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Amundi Pioneer’s Investment Management, Inc. Books and Records Policy and the
Books and Records of the Pioneer Funds’ Policy.
RECORD KEEPING
The Proxy Coordinator shall ensure that Amundi Pioneer’s proxy voting service:
o Retains a copy of each proxy statement received (unless the proxy statement
is available from the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and
Retrieval (EDGAR) system);
o Retains a record of the vote cast;
o Prepares Form N-PX for filing on behalf of each client that is a registered
investment company; and
15
o Is able to promptly provide Amundi Pioneer with a copy of the voting record
upon its request.
The Proxy Coordinator shall ensure that for those votes that may require
additional documentation (i.e. conflicts of interest, exception votes and
case-by-case votes) the following records are maintained:
o A record memorializing the basis for each referral vote cast;
o A copy of any document created by Amundi Pioneer that was material in making
the decision on how to vote the subject proxy;
o A copy of any recommendation or analysis furnished by the proxy voting
service; and
o A copy of any conflict notice, conflict consent or any other written
communication (including emails or other electronic communications) to or
from the client (or in the case of an employee benefit plan, the plan’s
trustee or other fiduciaries) regarding the subject proxy vote cast by, or
the vote recommendation of, Amundi Pioneer.
Amundi Pioneer shall maintain the above records in the client’s file in
accordance with applicable regulations.
RELATED REGULATIONS
Form N-1A, Form N-PX, ICA Rule 30b1-4, Rule 31a1-3, Rule 38a-1 and IAA 206(4)
-6, Rule 204 -2
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
(a) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company that is filing an annual report on this Form N-CSR, provide the following information:
(1) | State the name, title, and length of service of the person or persons employed by or associated with the registrant or an investment adviser of the registrant who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant’s portfolio (“Portfolio Manager”). Also state each Portfolio Manager’s business experience during the past 5 years. |
PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PORTFOLIO MANAGER
OTHER ACCOUNTS MANAGED BY THE PORTFOLIO MANAGER
The table below indicates, for the portfolio manager of the fund, information
about the accounts other than the fund over which the portfolio manager has
day-to-day investment responsibility. All information on the number of accounts
and total assets in the table is as of July 31, 2020. For purposes of the
table, “Other Pooled Investment Vehicles” may include investment partnerships,
undertakings for collective investments in transferable securities (“UCITS”)
and other non-U.S. investment funds and group trusts, and “Other Accounts” may
include separate accounts for institutions or individuals, insurance company
general or separate accounts, pension funds and other similar institutional
accounts but generally do not include the portfolio manager’s personal
investment accounts or those which the manager may be deemed to own
beneficially under the code of ethics. Certain funds and other accounts managed
by the portfolio manager may have substantially similar investment strategies.
NUMBER OF ASSETS
ACCOUNTS MANAGED
MANAGED FOR FOR WHICH
WHICH ADVISORY ADVISORY
NUMBER OF FEE IS FEE IS
NAME OF ACCOUNTS TOTAL ASSETS PERFORMANCE- PERFORMANCE-
PORTFOLIO MANAGER TYPE OF ACCOUNT MANAGED MANAGED (000’S) BASED BASED (000’S)
Noah Funderburk Other Registered Investment Companies 2 $5,311,340 N/A N/A
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles 3 $505,085 N/A N/A
Other Accounts 4 $359,248 N/A N/A
Nicolas Pauwels Other Registered Investment Companies 2 $5,311,340 N/A N/A
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles 2 $ 487,597 N/A N/A
Other Accounts 5 $ 861,045 N/A N/A
POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
When a portfolio manager is responsible for the management of more than one
account, the potential arises for the portfolio manager to favor one account
over another. The principal types of potential conflicts of interest that may
arise are discussed below. For the reasons outlined below, Amundi Pioneer does
not believe that any material conflicts are likely to arise out of a portfolio
manager’s responsibility for the management of the fund as well as one or more
other accounts. Although Amundi Pioneer has adopted procedures that it believes
are reasonably designed to detect and prevent violations of the federal
securities laws and to mitigate the potential for conflicts of interest to
affect its portfolio management decisions, there can be no assurance that all
conflicts will be identified or that all procedures will be effective in
mitigating the potential for such risks. Generally, the risks of such conflicts
of interest are increased to the extent that a portfolio manager has a
financial incentive to favor one account over another. Amundi Pioneer has
structured its compensation arrangements in a manner that is intended to limit
such potential for conflicts of interest. See “Compensation of Portfolio
Manager” below.
o A portfolio manager could favor one account over another in allocating new
investment opportunities that have limited supply, such as initial public
offerings and private placements. If, for example, an initial public
offering that was expected to appreciate in value significantly shortly
after the offering was allocated to a single account, that account may be
expected to have better investment performance than other accounts that did
not receive an allocation of the initial public offering. Generally,
investments for which there is limited availability are allocated based upon
a range of factors including available cash and
1
consistency with the accounts’ investment objectives and policies. This
allocation methodology necessarily involves some subjective elements but is
intended over time to treat each client in an equitable and fair manner.
Generally, the investment opportunity is allocated among participating
accounts on a pro rata basis. Although Amundi Pioneer believes that its
practices are reasonably designed to treat each client in an equitable and
fair manner, there may be instances where a fund may not participate, or may
participate to a lesser degree than other clients, in the allocation of an
investment opportunity.
o A portfolio manager could favor one account over another in the order in
which trades for the accounts are placed. If a portfolio manager determines
to purchase a security for more than one account in an aggregate amount that
may influence the market price of the security, accounts that purchased or
sold the security first may receive a more favorable price than accounts
that made subsequent transactions. The less liquid the market for the
security or the greater the percentage that the proposed aggregate purchases
or sales represent of average daily trading volume, the greater the
potential for accounts that make subsequent purchases or sales to receive a
less favorable price. When a portfolio manager intends to trade the same
security on the same day for more than one account, the trades typically are
“bunched,” which means that the trades for the individual accounts are
aggregated and each account receives the same price. There are some types of
accounts as to which bunching may not be possible for contractual reasons
(such as directed brokerage arrangements). Circumstances may also arise
where the trader believes that bunching the orders may not result in the
best possible price. Where those accounts or circumstances are involved,
Amundi Pioneer will place the order in a manner intended to result in as
favorable a price as possible for such client.
o A portfolio manager could favor an account if the portfolio manager’s
compensation is tied to the performance of that account to a greater degree
than other accounts managed by the portfolio manager. If, for example, the
portfolio manager receives a bonus based upon the performance of certain
accounts relative to a benchmark while other accounts are disregarded for
this purpose, the portfolio manager will have a financial incentive to seek
to have the accounts that determine the portfolio manager’s bonus achieve
the best possible performance to the possible detriment of other accounts.
Similarly, if Amundi Pioneer receives a performance-based advisory fee, the
portfolio manager may favor that account, whether or not the performance of
that account directly determines the portfolio manager’s compensation.
o A portfolio manager could favor an account if the portfolio manager has a
beneficial interest in the account, in order to benefit a large client or to
compensate a client that had poor returns. For example, if the portfolio
manager held an interest in an investment partnership that was one of the
accounts managed by the portfolio manager, the portfolio manager would have
an economic incentive to favor the account in which the portfolio manager
held an interest.
o If the different accounts have materially and potentially conflicting
investment objectives or strategies, a conflict of interest could arise. For
example, if a portfolio manager purchases a security for one account and
sells the same security for another account, such trading pattern may
disadvantage either the account that is long or short. In making portfolio
manager assignments, Amundi Pioneer seeks to avoid such potentially
conflicting situations. However, where a portfolio manager is responsible
for accounts with differing investment objectives and policies, it is
possible that the portfolio manager will conclude that it is in the best
interest of one account to sell a portfolio security while another account
continues to hold or increase the holding in such security.
COMPENSATION OF PORTFOLIO MANAGER
Amundi Pioneer has adopted a system of compensation for portfolio managers that
seeks to align the financial interests of the portfolio managers with those of
shareholders of the accounts (including Pioneer funds) the portfolio managers
manage, as well as with the financial performance of Amundi Pioneer. The
compensation program for all Amundi Pioneer portfolio managers includes a base
salary (determined by the rank and tenure of the employee) and an annual bonus
program, as well as customary benefits that are offered generally to all
full-time employees. Base compensation is fixed and normally reevaluated on an
annual basis. Amundi Pioneer seeks to set base compensation at market rates,
taking into account the
2
experience and responsibilities of the portfolio manager. The bonus plan is
intended to provide a competitive level of annual bonus compensation that is
tied to the portfolio manager achieving superior investment performance and
align the interests of the investment professional with those of shareholders,
as well as with the financial performance of Amundi Pioneer. Any bonus under
the plan is completely discretionary, with a maximum annual bonus that may be
in excess of base salary. The annual bonus is based upon a combination of the
following factors:
o QUANTITATIVE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE. The quantitative investment performance
calculation is based on pre-tax investment performance of all of the
accounts managed by the portfolio manager (which includes the fund and any
other accounts managed by the portfolio manager) over a one-year period (20%
weighting) and four-year period (80% weighting), measured for periods ending
on December 31. The accounts, which include the fund, are ranked against a
group of mutual funds with similar investment objectives and investment
focus (60%) and a broad-based securities market index measuring the
performance of the same type of securities in which the accounts invest
(40%). As a result of these two benchmarks, the performance of the portfolio
manager for compensation purposes is measured against the criteria that are
relevant to the portfolio manager’s competitive universe.
o QUALITATIVE PERFORMANCE. The qualitative performance component with respect
to all of the accounts managed by the portfolio manager includes objectives,
such as effectiveness in the areas of teamwork, leadership, communications
and marketing, that are mutually established and evaluated by each portfolio
manager and management.
o AMUNDI PIONEER RESULTS AND BUSINESS LINE RESULTS. Amundi Pioneer’s financial
performance, as well as the investment performance of its investment
management group, affect a portfolio manager’s actual bonus by a leverage
factor of plus or minus (+/-) a predetermined percentage.
The quantitative and qualitative performance components comprise 80% and 20%,
respectively, of the overall bonus calculation (on a pre-adjustment basis). A
portion of the annual bonus is deferred for a specified period and may be
invested in one or more Pioneer funds.
Certain portfolio managers participate in other programs designed to reward and
retain key contributors. Portfolio managers also may participate in a deferred
compensation program, whereby deferred amounts are invested in one or more
Pioneer funds or collective investment trusts or other unregistered funds with
similar investment objectives, strategies and policies.
SHARE OWNERSHIP BY PORTFOLIO MANAGER
The following table indicates as of July 31, 2020 the value, within the
indicated range, of shares beneficially owned by the portfolio manager of the
fund.
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP
NAME OF PORTFOLIO MANAGER OF THE FUND*
Noah Funderburk D
Nicolas Pauwels A
* Key to Dollar Ranges
A. None
B. $1 - $10,000
C. $10,001 - $50,000
D. $50,001 - $100,000
E. $100,001 - $500,000
F. $500,001 - $1,000,000
G. Over $1,000,000
3
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
(a) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company, in the following tabular format, provide the information specified in paragraph (b) of this Item with respect to any purchase made by or on behalf of the registrant or any affiliated purchaser, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.10b-18(a)(3)), of shares or other units of any class of the registrant’s equity securities that is registered by the registrant pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 781).
During the period covered by this report, there were no purchases made by or on behalf of the registrant or any affiliated purchaser as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act), of shares of the registrants equity securities that are registered by the registrant pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
Describe any material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors, where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-R(17 CFR 229.407)(as required by Item 22(b)(15)) of Schedule 14A (17 CFR 240.14a-101), or this Item.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s board of directors since the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-R of Schedule 14(A) in its definitive proxy statement, or this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Disclose the conclusions of the registrant’s principal executive and principal financials officers, or persons performing similar functions, regarding the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30(a)-3(b) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Disclose any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occured during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
There were no significant changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company, provide the following dollar amounts of income and compensation related to the securities lending activities of the registrant during its most recent fiscal year:
N/A
(1) Gross income from securities lending activities;
N/A
(2) All fees and/or compensation for each of the following securities lending activities and related services: any share of revenue generated by the securities lending program paid to the securities lending agent(s) (revenue split); fees paid for cash collateral management services (including fees deducted from a pooled cash collateral reinvestment vehicle) that are not included in the revenue split; administrative fees that are not included in the revenue split; fees for indemnification that are not included in the revenue split; rebates paid to borrowers; and any other fees relating to the securities lending program that are not included in the revenue split, including a description of those other fees;
N/A
(3) The aggregate fees/compensation disclosed pursuant to paragraph (2); and
N/A
(4) Net income from securities lending activities (i.e., the dollar amount in paragraph (1) minus the dollar amount in paragraph (3)).
If a fee for a service is included in the revenue split, state that the fee is included in the revenue split.
N/A
(b) If the registrant is a closed-end management investment company, describe the services provided to the registrant by the securities lending agent in the registrants most recent fiscal year.
N/A
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS.
(a) File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated.
SIGNATURES
[See General Instruction F]
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Pioneer Securitized Income Fund
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones, President & Chief Executive Officer
Date October 9, 2020
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Lisa M. Jones
Lisa M. Jones, President & Chief Executive Officer
Date October 9, 2020
By (Signature and Title)* /s/ Mark E. Bradley
Mark E. Bradley, Treasurer & Chief Accounting & Financial Officer
Date October 9, 2020
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.