![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/CORRESP/0001193125-19-323441/g856862g75s01.jpg)
Response Letter
Comment 2. In Response 1 of the Response Letter, the Fund states that if the Fund transitions to an auction fund, it would rely on Rule 13e-4 of the Exchange Act. However, Rule 13e-4 falls under the exception to Rule 102(b)(2)(ii) of Regulation M. This exception would not be available due to the auction on Nasdaq Private Markets. Accordingly, repurchases should be discretionary repurchases pursuant to Rule 23c-3(c), which allows for discretionary repurchases every two years. (See Rule 102(b)(2)(i))
Response 2. We respectfully acknowledge your comment. The disclosure has been revised to clarify that the Fund, following Board approval, would seek to take advantage of the two year testing-the-waters approach described in Nasdaq’s exemptive relief.
Comment 3. The Staff is re-issuing Comment 4 of the Response Letter. Please remove the prior performance information from the Registration Statement. Such disclosure is not permitted by Form N-2 nor consistent with Staff no-action precedent. The cited advertisement rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 is a proposed rule. It is not finalized, and more importantly, the extracted performance referenced in the proposed rule refers to information to be provided in advertisements and not offering documents.
Response 3. We respectfully acknowledge your comment. We are currently discussing the prior performance presentation with the Chief Counsel’s office.
Comment 4. The Staff is re-issuing Comment 6(a) of the Response Letter. The Fund’s Registration Statement states that the Fund’s strategies are focused on investing in private equity, private debt and real assets. We restate our position that a fund that uses “private markets” in the name is subject to the 80% test because investing in private markets is a type of investment.
Response 4. The disclosure has been revised accordingly.
Accounting Comments
Comment 5. Please provide expense table recalculations, given that the 3, 5 and 10 year expense estimates provided appear to be too low.
Response 5. The disclosure has been revised accordingly.
5. | Summary of Fees and Expenses |
2