The Registrant has requested confidential treatment of this draft registration statement and associated correspondence
pursuant to Rule 83 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Sales commissions and certain other incentive payments (e.g., bonuses that are contingent solely on obtaining a contract or a pool of contracts) earned by the Joint Venture’s sales organization are capitalized as incremental costs to obtain a contract. The Joint Venture typically does not offer commissions on contract renewals. Decremented commissions upon renewal (i.e., non-commensurate with initial commissions) are offered to the Joint Venture’s sales associates for certain customers and are not material. Under ASC 606, all commissions and other qualifying incentive payments capitalized are amortized over an expected period of benefit defined as the initial contract term plus anticipated renewals. In contrast, under ASC 605 these capitalized costs were amortized over the specific revenue contract terms, which are typically 12 to 60 months. In making the significant judgment in determining the appropriate period of benefit, the Joint Venture evaluated both qualitative and quantitative factors such as the expected customer relationship period and technology obsolescence. In addition, prior to solution go-live, the Joint Venture incurs certain contract fulfillment costs primarily related to SaaS setup for our clients. These costs are capitalized to the extent they are directly related to a contract, are recoverable, and create a resource used to deliver the Joint Venture’s SaaS services. Capitalized costs to fulfill a contract are amortized over the expected period of benefit.
At September 30, 2019, the Joint Venture had capitalized costs to obtain a contract of $12,407 in prepaid and other current assets and $67,426 in other noncurrent assets. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2019, the Joint Venture recognized $5,098 and $9,207 of amortization expense related to such capitalized costs, respectively, which is included in the total operating expenses. At September 30, 2019, the Joint Venture had capitalized costs to fulfill a contract of $1,383 in prepaid and other current assets and $8,571 in other noncurrent assets. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2019, the Joint Venture recognized $313 and $609 of amortization expense, respectively, related to such capitalized costs, which is included in cost of operations.
Postage Revenues
Postage revenues are the result of providing delivery services to customers in the Joint Venture’s payment and communication solutions. Postage revenues are generally billed as a pass-through cost to the Joint Venture’s customers. The service is part of a combined performance obligation with the printing and handling services provided to the customer because the postage services are not distinct within the context of the contract. The Joint Venture presents Postage Revenue separately from Solutions Revenue on the consolidated statements of operation as it makes the financial statements more informative for the users. The revenue related to the combined performance obligation of the postage, printing, and handling service is recognized as the transactions are processed, and the revenue is recognized over the individual days in which the services are performed.
Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations
The Joint Venture engages in customer arrangements which may include multiple performance obligations, such as any combination of software, hardware, implementation, SaaS-based offerings, consulting services, or maintenance services. For such arrangements, the Joint Venture allocates revenues to each performance obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis.For substantially all such arrangements, aAperformance obligation’s standalone selling price is determined based on the directly observable prices charged to customers., when available or estimated using other methodsWhen directly observable prices charged to customers are not available, other methods are usedsuch as the adjusted market assessment approach, the expected cost plus a margin approach, or other approaches in cases where distinct performance obligations are not sold separately but instead sold at a bundled price. For performance obligations with historical pricing that is highly variable, the residual approach is used. Such instances primarily relate to the Joint Venture’s perpetual software arrangements in which the Joint Venture sells the same products to different customers for a broad range of amounts.
Remaining Performance Obligations
The aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied (or partially unsatisfied) for executed contracts includes deferred revenue and other revenue yet to be recognized from non-cancellable contracts. As of September 30, 2019, the Joint Venture’s total remaining performance obligations approximated $1,347,000, of which approximately 52% is expected to be recognized over the next twelve months, and the remaining 48% thereafter.
In this balance, the Joint Venture does not include the value of unsatisfied performance obligations related to those contracts for which it recognizes revenue at the amount for which it has the right to invoice for services performed. Additionally, this balance does not include revenue related to performance obligations that are part of a contract with an original expected duration of one year or less. Lastly, this balance does not include