December 22, 2022
Page 3
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/CORRESP/0001193125-22-311384/g413565g1223015147965.jpg)
Although the Company does not believe the Merck Agreement is a material agreement, the Company respectfully notes that it has disclosed in its filings with the Commission that, with respect to each target in the collaboration, the Company will be eligible to receive up to approximately $460.0 million in development, regulatory and commercialization milestones as well as tiered royalties on net sales. In future periodic reports filed with the Commission, the Company plans to disclose the amount of upfront payments received by the Company under the Merck Agreement. If the Company later determines that the Merck Agreement is a material agreement due to further development or other factors, the Company would expect to disclose additional terms of the Merck Agreement, including with respect to potential royalty and milestone payments.
| • | | Please provide us an analysis, and revise your future filings if necessary, of the components you have identified under this agreement that would fall under ASC 808 Collaborative Arrangements and the components under ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In your analysis, tell us how you have considered the unit of account guidance under ASC 808-10-15-5B. |
Response: The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and notes that per the Company’s analysis, the agreements with Merck fall under ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements.
The Company entered into the Original Agreement with Merck in December 2020 and, in January 2022, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Original Agreement. For each of the Original Agreement and the First Amendment, the Company analyzed whether the agreement falls under ASC 808, Collaborative Arrangements, and whether any component also fell under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In each analysis, the Company and Merck are both active participants in various research activities, and both the Company and Merck are exposed to significant risks and rewards. Each party is responsible for covering their own costs and the Company’s costs are not guaranteed to be covered by the upfront payment. Additionally, the Company may receive significant rewards in the form of milestone and royalty payments if the target compounds continue in development, and Merck will receive cash flows from commercialization, if a drug candidate under the collaboration is approved and commercialized. As such, the Company concluded that each arrangement falls under ASC 808.
The Company concluded that neither the Original Agreement nor the First Amendment is in the scope of ASC 606 as Merck was not deemed to be a customer and the provision of research and development (“R&D”) services for others is not part of the Company’s ordinary activities. The Company analogizes to ASC 606 for certain activities including the unit of account and recognition of revenue. Revenue recognized by analogizing to ASC 606 is recorded as “Revenue from collaborations”.
As per ASC 808-10-15-5B, the Company also assessed the performance obligations included in each agreement including a license of intellectual property (“IP”), provision of R&D services and participation in a Joint Research Committee. Based on the Company’s analysis, the Company believes that Merck cannot benefit from the exclusive license on its own, or with other resources readily available, as the license is to specific collaboration compounds discovered under this collaboration and being developed by both parties.