Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to U.S. GAAP, as found in the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, and Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB. Principles of consolidation The Company’s consolidated financial statements for 2020 and 2019 include the accounts of Galecto, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Use of estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include contract research accruals, stock-based compensation expense, the fair value of the Company’s common stock and valuation of the Company’s deferred tax assets. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Currency and currency translation The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, the Company’s reporting currency. Galecto, Inc., Galecto Securities Corporation and PharmAkea’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of the Company’s subsidiary Galecto Biotech AB, and its subsidiary Galecto Biotech ApS, is the Euro. Adjustments that arise from exchange rate changes on transactions of each group entity denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in other income and expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Assets and liabilities of Galecto Biotech AB and Galecto Biotech ApS recorded in their Euro functional currency are translated into the U.S. dollar reporting currency of the Company at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses of Galecto Biotech AB and Galecto Biotech ApS recorded in their Euro functional currency are translated into the U.S. dollar reporting currency of the Company at the average exchange rate prevailing during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded to other comprehensive income (loss), or OCI. Cash and cash equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at fair value and may include money market funds, U.S. Treasury and U.S. government-sponsored agency securities, corporate debt, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. The Company had money market funds of $142.9 million as of December 31, 2020, which are included in cash and cash equivalents and reported at fair value (Note 3). The Company had no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2019. Restricted cash The Company is required to maintain cash collateral on deposit in a segregated money market bank account, as a condition of its security deposit with one of its banks for the use of corporate credit cards. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company presented restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of $254,000 and $231,000, respectively. Concentrations of credit risk and off-balance sheet risk The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit and checking accounts that at times exceed insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk. Fair value of financial instruments Fair value is defined as the price the Company would receive to sell an investment in a timely transaction or pay to transfer a liability in a timely transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market, or in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the investment or liability. A framework is used for measuring fair value utilizing a three-tier hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: Level 1 —Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; Level 2 —Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instrument valuations for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and Level 3 —Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. Financial instruments are categorized in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment. To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by us in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. The Company monitors the availability of inputs that are significant to the measurement of fair value to assess the appropriate categorization of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another. In such instances, our policy is to recognize significant transfers between levels at the end of the reporting period. The significance of transfers between levels is evaluated based upon the nature of the financial instrument and size of the transfer relative to total net assets available for benefits. Research and development expenses Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The Company’s research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred for the development of its product candidates and include expenses incurred under agreements with contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, contract research organizations, or CROs, investigative sites and consultants to conduct clinical trials and preclinical and non-clinical studies, costs to acquire, develop and manufacture supplies for clinical trials and other studies, salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation, depreciation and other allocated facility-related and overhead expenses and licensing fees and milestone payments incurred under product license agreements where no alternative future use exists. From time to time, Galecto obtains grants from public and private funds for its research and development projects. The grant income for a given period is recognized as a cost reimbursement and is typically based on the time and the costs that Galecto has spent on the specific project during that period. During the year ended 2019, the Company had two active cost reimbursement grants with Tufts University and with the Innovation Fund of Denmark. The grants provided reimbursement of direct research and development costs. For the year ended December 31, 2019, research and development expenses in the consolidated statements of operations include $388,000 and of grant income cost reimbursement. There was no grant income cost reimbursement for the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company has met the requirements to receive a tax credit in Denmark for losses resulting from research and development costs of up to $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. The tax credit is reported as a reduction to research and development expense in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, research and development expenses include refundable tax credits of $809,000 and $824,000 respectively. Accrued research and development costs Substantial portions of the Company’s preclinical and clinical trials are performed by third-party laboratories, medical centers, CROs and other vendors, or collectively, CROs. These CROs generally bill monthly for services performed, or bill based upon milestone achievement. For preclinical studies, the Company accrues expenses based upon estimated percentage of work completed and the contract milestones remaining. For clinical studies, expenses are accrued based upon the number of patients enrolled and the duration of the study. The Company monitors patient enrollment, the progress of clinical studies and related activities to the extent possible through internal reviews of data reported to the Company by the CROs, correspondence with the CROs and clinical site visits. The Company’s estimates depend on the timeliness and accuracy of the data provided by the CROs regarding the status of each program and total program spending. The Company periodically evaluates the estimates to determine if adjustments are necessary or appropriate based on information it receives. Acquired in-process research and development expenses The Company includes costs to acquire or in-license product candidates in acquired in-process research and development expenses. The Company has acquired the right to develop and commercialize its product candidate PAT-1251, which the Company now refers to as GB2064. These costs are immediately expensed provided that the payments do not also represent processes or activities that would constitute a business as defined under U.S. GAAP or provided that the product candidate has not achieved regulatory approval for marketing and absent obtaining such approval, has no alternative future use. Leases In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases Leases Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842 Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases Targeted Improvements The Company adopted ASU 842 on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. The Company has completed a qualitative and quantitative assessment of its lease portfolio, in which the standard had a material impact on the consolidated balance sheets but did not have an impact on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Upon adoption, the Company recognized lease liabilities of $379,000 based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for the Company’s existing operating leases. The corresponding ROU assets of $379,000 recognized upon adoption are net of deferred rent. ASU 842 provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. The Company elected the package of practical expedients that permit lessees not to reassess under ASU 842 prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company did not elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements; the latter not being applicable to the Company. The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, ROU assets or lease liabilities will not be recognized, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for office leases. At inception of a contract, the Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease. For all leases, the Company determines the classification as either operating leases or finance leases. Operating leases are included in Operating lease right-of-use assets and Operating lease liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Lease recognition occurs at the commencement date and lease liability amounts are based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise that option. If a lease does not provide information to determine an implicit interest rate, the Company uses the Company’s incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of lease payments. ROU assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments under the lease. ROU assets also include any lease payments made prior to the commencement date and exclude lease incentives received. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise. Lease agreements with both lease and non-lease components, are generally accounted for together as a single lease component. Refer to Note 6 for further details. Convertible preferred stock The Company classifies convertible preferred stock outside of stockholders’ deficit on its consolidated balance sheet as the requirements of triggering a deemed liquidation event are not within the Company’s control. In the event of a deemed liquidation event, the proceeds from the event are distributed in accordance with liquidation preferences (see Note 9). The Company records the issuance of convertible preferred stock at the issuance price less related issuance costs and less any discount arising on allocation of proceeds to one or more derivative features. Immediately prior to consummation of the Company’s IPO, all outstanding shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock were converted into shares of common stock. Equity-based compensation The Company accounts for stock options granted in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation All share-based awards granted are measured based on the fair value on the date of the grant and compensation expense is recognized with respect to those awards over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the respective award. The Company reverses any previously recognized compensation cost associated with forfeited awards in the period the forfeiture occurs. Equity-based compensation expense is classified in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the same manner in which the award recipients’ payroll costs are classified or in which the award recipients’ service payments are classified. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. The following summarizes the inputs used: Expected volatility —The Company estimates its expected stock volatility based on the historical volatility of a publicly traded set of peer companies because we lack company-specific historical and implied volatility information due in part to the limited time in which we have operated as a publicly traded company. We expect to continue to do so until such time as we have adequate historical data regarding the volatility of our traded stock price. Expected term —The expected term of the Company’s stock options has been determined based on the expected time to liquidity. The Company uses the simplified method prescribed by the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment , to calculate the expected term of options granted because we lack company-specific historical and implied expected term information due in part to the limited time in which we have operated as a publicly traded company. Risk-free interest rate —The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury security at a constant maturity with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option granted. Dividends —Expected dividend yield is zero because the Company does not pay cash dividends on common shares and does not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Prior to the IPO, the Company’s board of directors, with input from management, determined the estimated fair value of the common shares as of the date of each incentive share grant considering the Company’s then-most recently available third-party valuation of common shares. Valuations are updated when facts and circumstances indicate that the most recent valuation is no longer valid, such as changes in the stage of development efforts, various exit strategies and their timing, and other scientific developments that could be related to the Company’s valuation, or, at a minimum, annually. Third-party valuations were performed in accordance with the guidance outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation Income taxes Deferred income tax assets and liabilities arise from temporary differences associated with differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as measured by the enacted tax rates, which are expected to be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company has generated net losses since inception and accordingly has not recorded a provision for income taxes. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 740-10, Uncertainty in Income Taxes, The Company has identified the United States, Denmark and Sweden as its major tax jurisdictions. Refer to Note 12 for further details. Net loss per share Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period, determined using the treasury-stock method and the as if-converted method, for convertible securities, if inclusion of these instruments is dilutive. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, both methods are equivalent. Basic and diluted net loss per share are described further in Note 13. Segments Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and that is regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker, or CODM, in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is its chief executive officer. The Company has determined it operates in one segment. Other comprehensive income (loss) OCI is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company’s OCI includes currency translation. Emerging growth company status The Company is an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or JOBS Act. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act, until such time as those standards apply to private companies. The Company may elect to use this extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until the earlier of the date that it (i) is no longer an emerging growth company or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opts out of the extended transition period provided in the JOBS Act. As a result, these financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with the new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates. Recently adopted accounting standards In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; and II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity Prior to January 1, 2019, the Company accounted for leases under ASC 840, Accounting for Leases Leases In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting Recently issued accounting standards In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging and Topic 825, Financial Instruments During August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, D isclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement Fair Value Measurement. The amendments are based on the concepts in the FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes |