the SDFL Class Action Matter seek various forms of monetary damages as well as injunctive and other unspecified equitable
relief.
On October 27, 2023, we entered into a proposed settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in the SDFL Class Action
Matter, on behalf of a nationwide settlement class that includes the NDCA Class Action Matter, which provides for a payment
of $13.0 million by us. On October 30, 2023, the plaintiffs in the SDFL Class Action Matter filed a motion and memorandum
in support of preliminary approval of the proposed class action settlement and, on October 31, 2023, the SDFL granted
preliminary approval of the proposed settlement. The proposed settlement is subject to final approval of the court. Members
of the class have the opportunity to opt-out of the class and commence their own actions.
In response to the proposed settlement in the SDFL Class Action Matter, plaintiffs in the NDCA Class Action Matter filed
(i) on November 1, 2023, a motion in the NDCA for an order to require us to cease litigation of, or alternatively file a motion
to stay in, the SDFL Class Action Matter and enjoin us from seeking settlement with counsel other than plaintiffs’ counsel in
the NDCA Class Action Matter; and (ii) on November 2, 2023, a motion in the SDFL for that court to allow them to intervene
and appear in the SDFL action, transfer the SDFL Class Action Matter to the NDCA and reconsider and deny its preliminary
approval of the proposed settlement. The SDFL has issued an order requiring the SDFL plaintiffs to, among other things, file
a response to the NDCA plaintiffs' motion to intervene. Additionally, U.S. District Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín in the NDCA
issued an order for us to show cause as to why we should not be sanctioned for an alleged failure to provide notification to
the NDCA of the pendency of the SDFL Class Action Matter. We filed our written response to this order on November 8,
2023. The NDCA held a hearing on November 14, 2023, and ordered parties to the litigation to participate in mediation. The
parties participated in mediation on January 10, 2024, and have agreed to participate in an additional day of mediation,
which occurred on March 7, 2024. Negotiations between the parties remain ongoing.
Based on the proposed settlement agreement, we determined that an estimated $13.0 million loss was probable and
accrued $12.5 million as of December 31, 2023, which was net of an initial $0.5 million payment to a third party qualified
settlement fund that we do not own, which will be disbursed to the plaintiffs if required conditions are satisfied. Based on
ongoing negotiations and mediation between the parties, we determined the estimated probable loss to be $28.0 million as
of March 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024. The $27.5 million estimated net liability was accrued within accrued expenses and
other current liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2024. While this amount represents our
best judgment of the probable loss based on the information currently available to us, it is subject to significant judgments
and estimates and numerous factors beyond our control, including, without limitation, final approval of the court or the results
of mediation. In addition, while it is reasonably possible an incremental loss may have been incurred for the indemnification
of certain parties named in the class action lawsuits, a loss, or a range of loss, is not reasonably estimable. The results of
legal proceedings are inherently uncertain, and upon final resolution of these matters, it is reasonably possible that the
actual loss may differ from our estimate.
On April 22, 2024, Lisa Marie Barsuli, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a class action
lawsuit against us and certain of our executive officers in the United States District Court for the Central District of California
(Case No. 2:24-cv-3282). The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages and equitable relief as well as interest, fees and costs.
The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder,
and asserts that we and certain of our executive officers failed to disclose to investors the risk relating to a grocery chain
taking actions that impacted acceptance of our discounted pricing for a subset of prescription drugs from PBMs, whose
pricing we promote on our platform (the “grocer issue”), which occurred late in the first quarter of 2022. As alleged in the
complaint, when we disclosed the occurrence of the grocer issue, our stock price fell, causing investor losses. On July 25,
2024, U.S. District Judge André Birotte Jr. appointed The Kalmanson Family as the lead plaintiff and approved selection of
lead plaintiff's counsel. We intend to file a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Additionally, on May 23, 2024, Benjamin Solomon
filed a derivative lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California purportedly on behalf of us
against certain of our executive officers and current and former directors (Case No. 2:24-cv-04301). The derivative complaint
asserts claims for violations of, and contribution under, the Exchange Act, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse
of control, gross mismanagement and corporate waste. These claims are based on allegations substantially similar to those
in the class action lawsuit described above and also allege that we failed to maintain adequate internal controls. Plaintiff in
the derivative lawsuit is seeking declaratory relief, monetary damages, restitution and certain governance reforms. The case
was stayed pending the resolution of our forthcoming motion to dismiss the securities class action lawsuit. We intend to
vigorously defend against the claims asserted in both lawsuits. We believe we have meritorious defenses to such claims and
based upon information presently known to management, we have not accrued a loss for either lawsuit as a loss is not
probable and reasonably estimable. While it is reasonably possible a loss may have been incurred, we are unable to
estimate a loss or range of loss in these matters.
These pending proceedings involve complex questions of fact and law and may require the expenditure of significant
funds and the diversion of other resources to defend. In addition, during the normal course of business, we may become
subject to, and are presently involved in, legal proceedings, claims and litigation. Such matters are subject to many
uncertainties and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. We have not accrued for a loss for any other matters as a
loss is not probable and a loss, or a range of loss, is not reasonably estimable. Accruals for loss contingencies are
recognized when a loss is probable, and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. See "Note 4. Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities." Loss recoveries are recognized when a loss has been incurred and the recovery is
probable. See "Note 3. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets."