The section of the definitive proxy statement/prospectus entitled “Proposal No. 1—The Business Combination Proposal—Regulatory Matters” is hereby amended and supplemented as follows:
The third paragraph following the subheading “Regulatory Matters” on page 209 of the definitive proxy statement/prospectus is amended and restated in its entirety (new language indicated by bold underline):
Additionally, under applicable foreign direct investment (“FDI”) laws in certain foreign jurisdictions, certain transactions may not be consummated until approval is granted or applicable waiting periods expire or terminate. The Business Combination is subject to these requirements in Finland, France, Germany and possibly the United Kingdom, and may not be completed until such approvals are obtained or the applicable waiting periods have expired. As of October 8, 2021, each of the applicable authorities in Finland, France and Germany have provided clearance for the Business Combination, and no additional regulatory or FDI approvals in the United Kingdom or any other country are expected to be required or a condition to closing of the Business Combination.
The second paragraph following the subheading “Finnish FDI” on page 209 of the definitive proxy statement/prospectus is amended and restated in its entirety (new language indicated by bold underline):
On October 1, 2021, the Ministry provided clearance for the Business Combination.
The fifth paragraph following the subheading “French FDI” on page 210 of the definitive proxy statement/prospectus is amended and restated in its entirety (new language indicated by bold underline):
On October 8, 2021, the French Minister for Economy provided clearance for the Business Combination subject to certain conditions set forth in a commitment letter entered into by GSAH. The commitments relate to maintaining certain industrial capacities for French customers in France and include restrictions on the transfer of certain French intellectual property and the protection of sensitive data. GSAH believes that the commitments will not impact Mirion’s business from how it is presently conducted in any material respect.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Current Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the vote to approve the potential business combination. Such statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. When used in this Current Report, words such as “pro forma,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “strive,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. When the Company or Mirion discusses its strategies or plans, including as they relate to the potential transaction, it is making projections, forecasts and forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on the beliefs of, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to, the Company’s or Mirion’s management.
These forward-looking statements involve significant risk and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from the expected results. Most of these factors are outside the Company and Mirion’s control and are difficult to predict. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: (1) the Company’s ability to complete the potential transaction; (2) satisfaction or waiver (if applicable) of the conditions to the potential transaction, including with respect to the approval of the stockholders of the Company; (3) the ability to maintain the listing of the combined company’s securities on the New York Stock Exchange; (4) the inability to complete the PIPE Investment; (5) the risk that the proposed transaction disrupts current plans and operations of the Company or Mirion as a result of the announcement and consummation of the transaction described herein; (6) the ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the proposed transaction, which may be affected by, among other things, competition, the ability of the combined company to grow and manage growth profitably, maintain relationships with customers and suppliers and retain its management and key employees; (7) costs related to the proposed transaction; (8) changes in applicable laws or regulations and delays in obtaining, adverse conditions contained in, or the inability to obtain necessary regulatory approvals required to complete the potential transaction; (9) the possibility that the Company and Mirion may be adversely affected by other economic, business and/or competitive factors; (10) the outcome of any legal proceedings that may be instituted against the Company and