Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
OR
☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number 333-259554
AEye, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 37-1827430 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
4670 Willow Road, Suite 125, Pleasanton, CA | 94588 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(925) 400-4366
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common stock, $0.0001 par value per share | LIDR | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Warrants to purchase one share of common stock | LIDRW | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ |
| | Emerging growth company | ☒ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant's executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10-D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of June 30, 2024 (the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the registrant had 7,871,310 shares of voting common stock that were held by non-affiliates. The approximate aggregate market value of shares held by non-affiliates was $15 million.
As of February 20, 2025, the registrant had 18,689,669 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s Proxy Statement relating to the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated. Such Proxy Statement, or an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Such statements are based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. For example, words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “strategy,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. You should not rely on forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Our actual results and the timing of certain events may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed elsewhere in this report, particularly in Part I, Item 1A titled “Risk Factors,” and the risks discussed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, filings. We undertake no obligation to update the forward-looking statements after the date of this report, except as required by law.
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
We are a provider of high-performance, active lidar systems for vehicle autonomy, advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS), and robotic vision applications. We have developed an artificial intelligence technology that enables adaptive “intelligent sensing,” differentiating us in the marketplace from our competition. Our proprietary 4SightTM Intelligent Sensing Platform includes a solid-state software definable active lidar sensor, an adaptive sensing SmartScan architecture to scan dynamic scenes/targets, and a sophisticated signal processing capability that provides precise measurements and imaging for various safety-critical applications.
We were founded in 2013 by Luis Dussan, a member of our Board of Directors and our first Chief Executive Officer, with the goal of creating a deterministic AI-driven sensing system that performs better than the human eye and visual cortex. Mr. Dussan's experience developing mission-critical targeting systems for fighter jets and ground troops on behalf of the U.S. military provided us with the background to develop a differentiated approach to visual sensing. While traditional sensing systems passively collect data, our active 4SightTM Intelligent Sensing Platform leverages principles from automated targeting systems and biomimicry to scan the environment, while intelligently focusing on what matters in order to enable safer, smarter, and faster decisions in complex scenarios. From our inception, our culture drew from esteemed scientists and electro-optics engineers from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation, the U.S. Air Force, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, to create the highest performing sensing and perception system for the most challenging situations, ensuring the highest levels of safety for autonomous driving.
As a result, our adaptive lidar is designed to enable higher levels of autonomy and functionality — SAE Levels 2 through 5 — with the goal of optimizing performance, power, and reducing cost. Our 4SightTM Intelligent Sensing Platform is software-definable and network-optimized, and leverages deterministic artificial intelligence at the edge. We have made substantial investments in our R&D processes and deliver value to our customers through our manufacturing partners. We perform the majority of our R&D activities in our 6,522 square foot corporate headquarters located in Pleasanton, California. Our modular design facilitates product hardware updates as technologies evolve, and its small size and modest heat generation enable very flexible placement options on the interior or exterior of a vehicle. 4SightTM also leverages a common architecture to create application-specific products across different markets.
Our systems-based approach encourages partnerships from the well-established automotive supply chain, including original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), as well as Tier 1 and Tier 2 OEM suppliers. There is strong alignment between us and our partners given what is required to produce high-performance automotive grade products at scale, including quality, reliability, and affordability. We anticipate our Tier 1 partners will add value with OEM customers through industrialization, manufacturing, integration, sales, marketing, product liability, and warranty. We anticipate our Tier 2 partners will provide automotive-grade sub-components, which are used not only in automotive lidar for ADAS use cases, but could also be used for products we may sell into the Non-Automotive market. We expect the result will be a high-quality, high-performance product at the right price point, which we believe to be a key enabler in accelerating adoption of lidar across various markets in Automotive and beyond.
In pursuing this strategy, we have partnered, and will continue seeking partnerships, with leading Tier 1 automotive suppliers. It is anticipated that our Tier 1 partners will bid for long-range lidar series production awards with OEMs and that these awards will represent a substantial portion of our future revenues; however, there is no guarantee that this Tier 1 partnership strategy will be successful. If we fail to remain engaged with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers, it may have an adverse effect on our business. The markets for lidar are projected to see significant growth in both the near and long term. We believe this expected growth will allow us to capture market share as well as pursue specialized opportunities like highway autonomous driving applications that benefit from our products. We expect that lidar will be a required sensing solution across many end markets, and we intend to be one of the leading solutions providers in these spaces.
As is common in early-stage companies with limited operating histories, we are subject to risks and uncertainties such as our ability to develop and commercialize our products; produce and deliver lidar and software products meeting acceptable performance metrics; attract new and retain existing customers; develop, obtain, or progress strategic partnerships; secure an automotive OEM design win; secure additional capital to support the business plan; and other risks and uncertainties such as those described in Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K. Since inception, we have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations and expect to continue incurring losses in the near-term. As a result, it remains critical for us to preserve cash and manage spending to extend our liquidity. We also plan to improve our liquidity position through securing additional financing, engaging with partners and OEMs, and executing on our critical milestones. However, successfully raising capital is outside of our control and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, on a timely basis, or at all.
Reverse Stock Split
On December 27, 2023, we effected a 1-for-30 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split, every thirty (30) shares of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock were combined into one (1) share of common stock. We did not issue fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who were otherwise entitled to fractional shares of common stock were instead entitled to receive a proportional cash payment. The number of shares of common stock issuable under our equity incentive plans and exercisable under the outstanding warrants were also proportionately adjusted.
In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, there was no change to the number of shares authorized or in the par value per share of common stock of $0.0001. Accordingly, unless we indicate otherwise, all historical per share data, number of shares issued and outstanding, stock awards, and other common stock equivalents for the periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.
Market Outlook/Overview
We believe that lidar will be a required sensing solution across many end markets. We broadly define our two key end markets as Automotive and Non-Automotive.
Automotive
According to the World Health Organization, the number of fatalities globally on roadways exceeds one million annually, road traffic injuries are the leading cause of death for children and young adults aged 5 to 29 years, and road traffic accidents cost most countries 3% of their gross domestic product on an annual basis. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, in the U.S. pedestrian fatalities have increased by over 80% since 2009. We believe the current technology solutions in the market are insufficient for mitigating this issue and that lidar, incorporated as a component of ADAS and fully autonomous driving or self-driving systems, could play a critical role in addressing this issue in the future. In 2024, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, adopted a new rule which mandates that passenger vehicles have automatic emergency braking, or AEB, and pedestrian AEB, and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration introduced proposed rulemaking to mandate AEB in heavy trucks. These rules may require additional hardware and software to meet these requirements. With that in mind, passenger and commercial vehicle OEMs are expected to introduce lidar sensors to enhance ADAS features and improve safety for passengers and pedestrians. Applications for the Automotive end market include lidar sensors and software for passenger and commercial vehicles. For vehicles to achieve greater autonomous functionality and perform those functions at higher speeds, we believe long-range lidar will be necessary. Our sensors were designed to search, detect, acquire, and track small objects at long distances. In the future, we may also introduce other mid- and short-range lidar systems based on the same 4SightTM Intelligent Sensing Platform. Our system is particularly well-suited to reduce the intensive compute (and associated power and latency) requirements of autonomous systems because our platform handles critical data processing at the sensor level, thereby allowing the self-driving system to focus limited compute resources on the vehicle's path planning. We believe that our strategy to partner with Tier 1 automotive suppliers to produce high-quality, long-range lidar at scale will help drive adoption of lidar into series production across major global OEMs.
| • | Passenger vehicle ADAS — highway autonomy in passenger vehicles is a highly relevant use case for our technology, as passenger vehicle OEMs are actively in the process of adding new features that enhance the consumer driving experience. These highway systems rely on consistent detection of dangerous, often small, obstacles at long distances and high speeds, which our system can optimize for in software. |
| • | Commercial vehicle ADAS — hub-to-hub autonomy in commercial vehicles, such as short- and long-range delivery vehicles, enabled by lidar, promises similar technological utility to that in passenger vehicles. Importantly, however, the value that a commercial vehicle operator derives from commercial ADAS is driven by increased utility and safety through reduced risk from driver fatigue. We believe that adoption rates for long-range lidar will be higher in commercial vehicles initially due to the significant share of time that highway driving represents for commercial customers. |
Non-Automotive
In 2023, we decided to wind down our legacy Non-Automotive product line and we dialed back support for this end market. Since the launch of our new product, Apollo, in 2024, we have seen renewed interest from Non-Automotive customers across a broad range of sectors and are actively engaged on multiple opportunities. We believe there is a broad range of use cases for lidar in Non-Automotive markets, including but not limited to rail, construction, mining, agriculture, aerospace, defense, security/foreign object detection, and intelligent transportation systems. We anticipate that our Apollo product will be well-suited to address the Non-Automotive markets without significant additional modifications. Such use cases in the Non-Automotive market may include:
| • | Rail — detecting and acquiring railway debris at long distances to stop the train to prevent derailment; assessing tracks for maintenance needs; and monitoring platform safety. |
| • | Construction, Mining, & Agriculture — detecting and acquiring obstacles, pedestrians, and animals in the path of large, autonomous construction and mining vehicles and agricultural equipment. |
| • | Aerospace & Defense — detecting airborne threats and automating logistics vehicles for the military. |
| | |
| • | Security and Foreign Object Detection (FOD) — Identifying and detecting unwanted objects or debris in various environments which can pose significant safety hazards and cause damage to equipment, products, or even people. FOD is crucial in industries such as aviation, aerospace, manufacturing, and perimeter security. |
| • | Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) — intersection traffic management, highway monitoring, tolling automation, smart mobility infrastructure, autonomous/smart parking, and work zone safety. |
Commercial
Overview
We employ two different go-to-market models: one model addresses the traditional Automotive end market and the other model addresses the Non-Automotive end market.
We employ a channel model in the traditional Automotive market by working through Tier 1 suppliers that sell products to OEM customers. We anticipate those Tier 1 suppliers will industrialize, manufacture, and sell lidar sensor solution units to OEMs that incorporate our proprietary design and software. We expect that we will receive royalty or other payments from those Tier 1 suppliers for each unit they sell to their OEM customers. The payments may take the form of a fixed amount per unit, a percentage of the average selling price of the sensor, profit-sharing, or some combination of these methods.
For the Non-Automotive market, we may either sell directly to the customer or work through systems integrators. Contract manufacturers with whom we have agreements assemble, test, and deliver these products. Systems integrators will build our technology into mass produced systems, such as autonomous mining haulers, locomotives, or intelligent transportation systems.
Our lidar products employ a single product platform that is based on components sourced from an established Tier 2 automotive supply chain to drive down costs and increase reliability. We expect to utilize those same components to address the Non-Automotive market, which enables us to leverage our volume in Automotive and drive costs down for the products made by our contract manufacturing partners.
In May, 2024, we announced our partnership with Accelight Technologies, Inc. (“ATI”) and LighTekton Co., Ltd. to deliver AEye’s 4Sight™ lidar solutions to the China market. China is leading the market in lidar adoption, where the TAM is expected to grow to $2.5 billion over the next 3 years.
Technology
AEye's 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform includes a solid-state software definable active lidar sensor, an adaptive sensing SmartScan architecture to scan dynamic scenes/targets, and a sophisticated signal processing capability that provides precise measurements and imaging for various safety-critical applications. The 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing platform captures more information with less data, facilitating faster, more accurate, and more reliable perception of the environment.
The 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform leverages a bistatic architecture, allowing for physically separated transmit and receive paths. This improves range, refresh rate, and resolution over conventional coaxial architectures employed by our competitors, by allowing the transmitter to direct energy independently of the receiver’s focus. The lidar system employs time-of-flight based scanning, delivered with extremely low latency.
The laser we utilize is a 1550nm fiber laser. The 1550nm wavelength provides a photon budget far exceeding (>100x) 905nm lasers, and because 1550nm is a retina-safe wavelength, more energy can be utilized by lidar solutions using 1550nm lasers.
We leverage custom high resonance micro-electro-mechanical systems, or MEMS, for agile scanning over a wide field of view. The MEMS that we use are extremely small when compared to competing MEMS-based lidar solutions, and when coupled with the extremely high resonant frequency at which they can operate, our MEMS meet and exceed shock and vibration requirements for both the Automotive and Non-Automotive markets.
All of the data collected is processed directly on the system-on-a-chip, where our algorithms continually evaluate the certainty of object detection in order to direct system energy and focus.
We have made substantial progress in our collaboration efforts with Nvidia, demonstrating significant advances in the high-speed and long range detection performance of our lidar systems, which we believe puts us on track for future integration with their Hyperion platform.
In June, 2024, we launched Apollo, the first product in our 4Sight™ Flex family of next-generation lidar sensors. Apollo delivers best-in-class range and resolution in a compact, power-efficient, and cost-effective form factor, making it suitable for both automotive and non-automotive applications. Apollo supports integration behind the windshield, on the roof, or in the grille, enabling OEMs to implement critical safety features with minimal impact on vehicle design. This innovative sensor leverages AEye's 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform, offering a highly programmable and customizable lidar solution that can be reconfigured through software updates. With a horizontal field of view up to 120° and long-range detection capabilities of up to 1 km. Apollo, we believe, is positioned as a key player in advancing vehicle safety and autonomy, as well as smart infrastructure and logistics applications.
4SightTM Intelligent Sensing Platform
4Sight™ is our proprietary intelligent sensing lidar platform. This intelligence is enabled by our patented bistatic architecture, which keeps the transmit and receive channels separate, allowing 4Sight™ to optimize for both. As each laser pulse is transmitted, the receiver is told where and when to look for its return. Ultimately, this establishes the 4Sight™ platform as active — allowing it to focus on what matters most in a vehicle’s surroundings.
The result mimics how the human visual cortex conceptually focuses on and evaluates the environment around the vehicle, driving conditions, and road hazards, enabling smarter, more accurate decision making — radically improving the probability of detection and the accuracy of classification. The sensor captures more intelligent information with less data, enabling faster, more accurate and more reliable perception.
4SightTM for Automotive
Built on this 4Sight™ platform, the Apollo lidar is specifically designed to address system requirements for advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles (AV) applications. It delivers best-in-class long-range and resolution in a small, power-efficient, low-cost form factor. Apollo’s design supports integration behind the windshield, on the roof, or in the grille, enabling automotive OEMs to implement safety features with minimal impact on vehicle design. Apollo is industrialized, manufactured, tested, and validated by our Tier 1 partners keeping in mind supply chain resiliency goals.
We believe the unique combination of features of 4Sight™ include:
| • | Active lidar enables user’s choice of deterministic scan patterns catered to specific use cases and applications, such as highway autopilot; |
| • | Feature-specific ROIs designed to detect objects from various locations; |
| • | Lidar perception made available through a software partner; |
| • | Windshield, grille, and other discreet vehicle integration options that are optimized by software configurability; |
| • | Size, Weight, and Power (“SWaP”) optimized; and |
| • | Designed with Functional Safety (“FuSa” or ISO26262) requirements in mind - providing necessary determinism for testing and validation for wide variety of edge cases. |
4SightTM for Non-Automotive
Built on our unique 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform, 4Sight™ meets the diverse array of performance and functional requirements for the Non-Automotive market with our industry-leading lidar performance, integrated intelligence, advanced vision capabilities, and unmatched reliability and safety. Once we achieve economies of scale in the Automotive market, we anticipate that 4Sight™ will be a cost-effective, customizable perception solution in Non-Automotive markets that may leverage the complete 4Sight™ software platform and will include a comprehensive software development kit for an extensible roadmap to autonomous functionality.
Flexible sensor location within the car
Our 4Sight™ Flex next-generation design allows for unique flexibility with respect to sensor placement. The unit’s performance level, power requirements, and small form factor makes it easier for OEM designers to integrate our sensors into a variety of locations in a vehicle, such as behind the windshield, on the roof, or in the grille. Competing solutions, on the other hand, may need to be integrated into the roof of the car in order to resolve challenges with excess heat or size. As a result, OEMs that install competing products may need to substantially alter the physical appearance of their vehicles to accommodate those products.
Competition
Lidar-based perception solutions for autonomous applications is an emerging market with a wide variety of possible applications across many different markets. We face competition from numerous companies worldwide that are developing lidar solutions, and some of these solutions may use a similar wavelength or scanning methodology. For example, we and at least two of our major competitors use lasers that have a 1550nm wavelength. Other competitors use MEMS-based scanning technologies, but we believe our MEMS solution is uniquely robust due its very small size and high resonant frequency. In addition to companies focused specifically on developing lidar solutions, we also face competition from current or potential partners and customers that may be developing lidar solutions internally. We believe that many of the other companies developing lidar solutions are focused on shorter-range sensors that passively collect data, and most of these sensors utilize 905nm lasers that limit their performance. We believe that we are differentiated from competitors by virtue of our ultra long-range performance, coupled with high resolution and software-based customization of scanning, and a compact form factor suitable for a variety of integrations. This is possible, in part, because we utilize 1550nm lasers that enable our lidar solutions to achieve a higher photon budget than many of our competitors that rely upon 905nm lasers. Our channel-based model with Tier 1 automotive suppliers also enable us to uniquely capitalize on Tier 1 supply chain leverage. As a result, we believe that we are able to compete favorably on product cost in the lidar market, particularly in market segments such as passenger vehicle ADAS highway pilot applications that can benefit from our active, long-range, high-resolution capabilities.
We believe that our modular, patented design, our embedded deterministic artificial intelligence, which is inherently enabled by our unique product, and our strong R&D capabilities will enable us to remain a technology leader in the lidar market.
Research and Development
We have made substantial investments into our R&D efforts historically, but with a reduced workforce and consolidated global footprint, we plan to be more focused on investments that support our strategy and product development goals in the near-term. We believe that this is essential to maintain our position as a provider of one of the most advanced lidar solutions in the market. While our R&D activities occur primarily at our headquarters in Pleasanton, California, we work with technology developers on a worldwide basis. Our engineers located in Pleasanton, California focus on developing sensor hardware, firmware, and software.
Our R&D team is responsible for both developing new technology, as well as enhancing the capabilities and performance of our lidar hardware, firmware, and software. Our R&D team also has responsibility for identifying, defining, and prototyping advanced components that we may utilize from key suppliers, as well as for our design-for-manufacturability, or DFM, and other critical capabilities. Additionally, this team works alongside our operations team to assist our Tier 1 and contract manufacturer partners as they develop large-scale manufacturing processes based on our lidar design.
Intellectual Property
We believe that our competitive advantage and our success depend in part upon our ability to develop and protect both our intellectual property and our technology. We own a portfolio of intellectual property which includes patents (issued and pending), registered trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and know-how in the development of our lidar solutions.
We have filed patent and trademark applications in order to further secure these rights and strengthen our ability to defend against third parties who may infringe on our rights. We also rely on trade secrets, design and manufacturing know-how, continuing technological innovations, and licensing and exclusivity opportunities to maintain and improve our competitive position. Additionally, we protect our proprietary rights through agreements with our commercial partners, vendors, employees, and consultants, as well as close monitoring of the developments, components, products, and competitors in the industry.
As of February 1, 2025, we owned 94 U.S. and foreign issued patents and we had 44 pending U.S. and foreign patent applications, with one patent application in the drafting stage. In addition, we have two registered trademarks and one pending trademark application. Our patents and patent applications cover a broad range of system level and component level aspects of our key technology including, among other things, bistatic lidar system architecture, laser, scanner, receiver, and perception technology.
Sales and Marketing
Historically we have utilized a combination of channel (indirect) sales and direct sales methods. In the Automotive market, we work with Tier 1 partners that are suppliers to OEMs and leverage their sales channels which allows us to substantially reduce our investment in sales and marketing. We intend to license our lidar designs and other intellectual property to our Tier 1 partners, who will then industrialize and sell our technology to their OEM customers. Working with Tier 1 partners allows us to use this existing automotive value chain and provides us with an opportunity to increase our penetration of the Automotive market more rapidly than would otherwise be possible. This, in turn, will substantially reduce our investment in sales and marketing, and it will also substantially reduce the associated costs for manufacturing, working capital, validation, and testing, as well as the overhead of product liability and warranty over the life of the multiyear series production programs with OEMs. In the past, we also maintained direct sales channels but expect sales and marketing costs associated with this to be reduced as a result of our revised strategic plan which significantly reduced our workforce and consolidated our global footprint to leverage our Tier 1 partners’ sales channels. Our technical team still remains in direct contact with these OEMs, which better enables us to understand the OEMs’ specific product requirements and facilitate the implementation of our product design into their vehicles.
In the Non-Automotive market, we anticipate using the same supply chain to manufacture through global contract manufacturers, and we will sell our products primarily through system integrator channel partners that may integrate our lidar sensor and software as part of a larger solution for an end customer. We anticipate that our Automotive product will be well-suited to address the Non-Automotive markets without significant additional modifications.
We solicit feedback directly from partners and customers in order to identify opportunities to improve our product design. We work with industry analysts, universities, and independent labs to conduct studies and performance tests, which provides third-party validation of our solutions to current and potential customers and partners. We also drive our brand management and increase our public visibility through news releases, advertising campaigns, events, industry panels, and other public relations programs.
Government Regulation
We believe that the U.S. has provided a constructive legal environment to enable the testing and development of autonomous capabilities. We do not expect any federal rules or regulations in the near future that would impact the use or demand for our lidar technology. Some states, such as California and New York, do enforce operational or registration requirements for some autonomous functions. U.S. federal regulations generally allow higher levels of safe and responsible autonomous functionality to be deployed. The European Union, China, and other foreign markets are also developing standards to define the requirements for deploying higher levels of autonomy.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, is the principal legal and regulatory authority that has oversight of vehicles equipped with our sensors as they are deployed on public roadways. The obligations of motor vehicle equipment manufacturers include regular reporting under the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation Act, or TREAD, as well as strict recall and reporting requirements for any defects related to highway safety or any non-compliance with the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. Similar such reporting and recall requirements exist in foreign markets. As the development of federal, state, and foreign legal frameworks around autonomous vehicles continue to evolve, we may be subject to additional regulatory schemes.
Lidar technology, such as ours, is subject to the Electronic Product Radiation Control Provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. These requirements are enforced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. Electronic product radiation includes laser technology. Regulations governing these products are intended to protect the public from hazardous or unnecessary exposure. Manufacturers are required to certify in product labeling and reports to the FDA that their products comply with applicable performance standards as well as maintain manufacturing, testing, and distribution records for their products.
We are also subject to import and export regulations of the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions. In addition, our operations are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the occupational health and safety of our employees and wage regulations. We are subject to the requirements of the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act, or OSHA, as amended, and comparable state laws that protect and regulate employee health and safety.
Like all companies operating in similar industries, we are subject to environmental regulation, including water use; air emissions; use of recycled materials; energy sources; the storage, handling, treatment, transportation, and disposal of hazardous materials; and the remediation of environmental contamination. Compliance with these rules may include permits, licenses, and inspections of our facilities and products.
Human Capital Resources
We believe that our culture is one of our competitive advantages. We have emphasized a collaborative, team-oriented, performance-based culture with a strong focus on both the development of differentiated technology and the success of our customers. Our leadership team comes from sectors including automotive, aerospace and defense, semiconductors, software, and computer hardware. As of December 31, 2024, we had over 45 employees worldwide. The majority of our employees are in the R&D function. We also engage consultants and contractors to supplement our regular full-time workforce. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be good. To date, we have not experienced any work stoppages.
Facilities
Our corporate headquarters is located in Pleasanton, California, where we lease approximately 6,522 square feet pursuant to a lease that initially expires on November 30, 2027 unless we choose to exercise a five-year renewal option. The Pleasanton facility contains engineering, R&D, operations, customer support, marketing, and administrative functions. We believe our existing facility is in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business.
Legal Proceedings
In or about July of 2024, AEye, Inc.’s wholly owned subsidiary, AEye Technologies, Inc. (“AEye Tech,” formerly known as AEye, Inc.) surrendered possession of the premises as described in that certain Office Lease dated April 26, 2019 (the “Lease”), entered into by and between the predecessor-in-interest to IGEP Park Place, LLC, as landlord (the “Landlord”) and AEye Tech, as tenant. A copy of the Lease was filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2021. In connection with AEye Tech’s surrender of possession, AEye Tech was purported to be served with a complaint that was filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Alameda on August 26, 2024 (the “Complaint”) that (1) alleges AEye Tech is in breach of the Lease because of, among other things, AEye Tech’s failure to pay rent as required by the Lease and (2) provides notice to AEye Tech that the Lease had been terminated by the Landlord. The Complaint does not quantify the damages sought thereunder, however, as discovery in the litigation has only recently commenced, the only quantification of damages is the Landlord’s informal demand at the outset of the litigation of approximately $4.35 million, which is net of the $2.15 million security deposit retained by the Landlord. If we are unable to resolve the purported default under the Lease and AEye, Inc. is subsequently found liable for the amounts claimed by the Landlord that are allegedly owed to it by AEye Tech, it could have a material adverse effect on AEye, Inc.’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, from time to time, we may become involved in actions, claims, suits, and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, including assertions by third parties relating to intellectual property infringement, breaches of contract or warranties, or employment-related matters. Other than as stated above, we are not currently a party to any actions, claims, suits, or other legal proceedings the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would individually or in the aggregate have a material effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Available Information
Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, along with all other reports and amendments thereto filed with or furnished to the SEC, are publicly available free of charge on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.aeye.ai or at www.sec.gov as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC. We also use our website as a tool to disclose important information about the company and comply with our disclosure obligations under Regulation Fair Disclosure. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the committee charters for our Board of Directors are also posted on the Investor Relations section of our website. The information on our website (or any webpages referenced in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) is not part of this or any other report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In conducting our business, we may face risks and uncertainties that may interfere with our business objectives. You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as all of the other information contained in this Annual Report, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The risks and uncertainties below are not the only ones that we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business. The occurrence of any of the following risks, or others specified below, could materially and adversely affect our business, strategies, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In such cases, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Summary of Risk Factors
As noted above, our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in this “Risk Factors” section, that represent challenges that we face in connection with the successful implementation of our strategy and growth of our business. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in the section titled “Risk Factors,” alone or in combination with other events or circumstances may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. Such risks include, but are not limited to:
| • | We are an early stage company with a history of losses and we expect to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for at least the next several years. |
| • | We substantially rely on relationships with Tier 1 automotive suppliers and our business could be materially and adversely affected if we cannot establish or maintain relationships with one or more Tier 1 partners, or if we, through our relationship with various Tier 1 partners, are unable to obtain a sufficient number of design wins and successfully enter into definitive agreements or other commercial arrangements with automotive OEMs with respect to such design wins. |
| • | We will need to raise additional capital in order to execute our business plan and to respond to changing market conditions, which additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. |
| • | If our deterministic artificial intelligence-driven sensing system is not selected for inclusion in advanced driver-assistance systems, or ADAS, by any automotive OEMs or their suppliers, our business will be materially and adversely affected. |
| • | We heavily rely on third-party suppliers and because some of the raw materials and key components in our products come from limited or single source suppliers, our ability to control the costs of such components and raw materials is uncertain; moreover, regardless of cost, we are susceptible to supply shortages, longer than anticipated lead times for components, and supply changes, any of which could disrupt our supply chain, could delay deliveries of our products to customers, and could negatively impact the adoption of our products and accordingly, our financial condition and operating results. |
| • | Although we believe that lidar is an essential technology for autonomous vehicles and other emerging applications, market adoption of lidar is uncertain. If market adoption of lidar does not continue to develop, or adoption is deferred, or otherwise develops more slowly than we expect, our business will be adversely affected. |
| • | The complexity of our products could result in unforeseen delays or expenses from undetected defects, errors, or reliability issues in our hardware or software which could reduce the market adoption of our products, damage our reputation with current or prospective customers, and expose us to product liability and other claims, thereby adversely affecting our operating costs. |
| • | Shareholder activism could cause us to incur significant expense, disrupt our business, result in a proxy contest or litigation, and impact our stock price. |
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business and Industry
We are an early stage company with a history of losses and we expect to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for at least the next few years.
We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception. In the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we incurred net losses of approximately $35.5 million and $87.1 million, respectively. We expect that we will continue to incur significant losses through at least the next few years as we:
| • | continue to utilize our third-party partners for design, testing, and commercialization; |
| • | expand our operations and supply chain capabilities to produce our lidar components and systems, including costs associated with outsourcing the production which, in some instances, requires significant upfront payments by us; |
| • | expand our design, development, and commercialization; |
| • | build up inventories of parts and components for our lidar solutions; and |
| • | maintain a level of general and administrative spending to meet the requirements of operating as a public company. |
As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $373.1 million. Even if we are able to increase sales or licensing of our products, there can be no assurance that we will be commercially successful. Since we will incur the costs and expenses from these efforts prior to receiving incremental revenues with respect thereto, our losses in future periods may be significant. In the past, design wins, the first step towards commercialization with a particular OEM, have taken longer than originally expected. Such delays, including delays that may occur in the future, will impact the timing of our revenue. If our products do not achieve sufficient market acceptance, we will not become profitable. If we fail to become profitable, or if we are unable to fund our continuing losses, we may be unable to continue our business operations. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve or sustain profitability.
Our business model for the Automotive market substantially relies on us maintaining a relationship with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers; our business could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to establish or maintain a relationship with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers, or even if we establish and maintain a relationship with one or more Tier 1 automotive supplies, if such Tier 1 automotive suppliers are unable to obtain a sufficient number of design wins and enter into definitive agreements or other commercial arrangements with automotive OEMs with respect to such design wins.
Our business prospects in the Automotive market are substantially based on us establishing and maintaining a relationship with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers. In 2021, we entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of Continental AG, a well-established Tier 1 automotive supplier, pursuant to which Continental licensed from us the rights to manufacture and integrate our lidar solution into automotive OEM model lines through long-term series production contracts with automotive OEMs. In late 2023, Continental informed us that they intended to discontinue our joint lidar development program due to their internal restructuring. Thereafter, we engaged LITEON as our new Tier 1 automotive partner and are actively working with LITEON to bring our products to market. If we fail to establish or maintain a relationship with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers, it may have a material and adverse effect on our business. There can be no assurance that we will be able to establish or maintain a relationship with any Tier 1 automotive supplier, or, even if we are successful in doing so, that the Tier 1 automotive suppliers will be in a position to secure orders for our product designs and software. If we are unable to maintain or progress our relationship with a Tier 1 automotive supplier, or if any Tier 1 automotive supplier is unable to secure a sufficient number of design wins and enter into definitive agreements or other commercial arrangements with automotive OEMs, then our business could be materially and adversely affected.
We will need to raise additional capital in order to execute our business plan and to respond to changing market conditions, which additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
We will need to raise additional capital either by issuing equity, debt, or a combination of the two, in order to respond to market timing delays, technological advancements, competition, competitive technologies, customer demands, business opportunities, other challenges, potential acquisitions, unforeseen circumstances, or other reasons. In order to further business relationships with current or potential customers or partners, we may issue equity or equity-linked securities to such customers or partners. Despite the need for additional capital, we may not be able to timely secure additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, or at all, especially given current market conditions where raising additional capital has proven particularly challenging. If we raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or convertible debt or other equity-linked securities or if we issue equity or equity-linked securities to current or potential customers to further our business relationships, our existing stockholders would likely experience dilution, which may be significant. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital or to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Additionally, under current SEC regulations, if at the time we file this Annual Report on Form 10-K our public float is less than $75 million, and for so long as our public float remains less than $75 million, the amount we can raise through primary public offerings of securities in any twelve-month period using shelf registration statements on Form S-3 is limited to an aggregate of one-third of our public float, which is referred to as the “baby shelf” rules.
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our public float is below $75 million. As such, we will be limited by the baby shelf rules until such time as our public float exceeds $75 million. If our public float decreases, the number of securities we may sell under our Form S-3 shelf registration statement will also decrease. We will remain constrained by the baby shelf rules under our Form S-3 shelf registration statement until such time as our public float exceeds $75 million, at which time, the number of securities we may sell under a Form S-3 registration statement will no longer be limited by the baby shelf rules.
In addition, regardless of the size of our public float, we are generally prohibited from issuing, in a private placement, shares of our common stock at or below market price in an amount equal to 20% or more of our outstanding shares at the time of such issuance, without the consent of a majority of our stockholders. This will also limit our ability to raise additional capital.
Any restructuring actions and cost reduction initiatives that we undertook, or may undertake in the future, may not deliver the results we expect, and these actions may adversely affect our business.
Since 2023, we have implemented multiple restructuring actions aimed at focusing the organization on the commercialization of our automotive products, while reducing fixed operating costs, including the elimination of our internal sales and marketing teams. Our capital light business model allows us to leverage one or more Tier 1 partners and their manufacturing capabilities, supply chains, OEM relationships, and sales teams to bring our products to market. Our recent restructurings could result in disruptions to our operations and adversely affect our business and our ability to maintain or obtain additional Tier 1 partners. For example, we are actively working with our current Tier 1 partner to pursue available RFQ opportunities and if our restructuring actions impede our ability to win these awards, this could materially impact our business. In addition, we cannot be sure that the cost reduction initiatives will be successful in reducing our overall expenses to the extent anticipated, or that unexpected costs will not offset any such reductions or related initiatives. If our operating costs are higher than we expect, or if we do not maintain adequate control of our costs and expenses, our operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
Our financial results could vary significantly from quarter to quarter and are difficult to predict, particularly in light of the current economic environment, which in turn could cause volatility in our stock price.
Our quarterly results of operations have fluctuated in the past and may vary significantly in the future. As such, historical comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. In particular, because our sales to date have primarily been to customers making purchases for their own R&D, sales in any given quarter can fluctuate based on the timing and success of our customers’ development projects. Accordingly, the results of any one quarter should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. We base our current and future expense levels on our internal operating plans and sales forecasts, and our operating costs are to a large extent fixed. As a result, we may not be able to reduce our costs sufficiently to compensate for an unexpected shortfall in revenues, and even a small shortfall in revenues could disproportionately and adversely affect financial results for that quarter. This was particularly true for 2023, as we implemented significant cost-reduction measures making it more difficult for us to further reduce our operating expenses without a material adverse impact on our prospects in future periods. We have and may continue to incur significant or unanticipated expenses related to long-lived asset impairments, inventory write-downs, and one-time termination benefits to restructure our business. For example, in 2023, we impaired $9.9 million of long-lived assets, wrote down $8.6 million of inventory and other current assets, and incurred $3.3 million of one-time termination benefit costs, primarily relating to our decision to wind down our legacy Non-Automotive product line and reduce support for this end market until we have sufficient scale in the Automotive market, which is our largest and highest priority market.
Our quarterly financial results may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business. These fluctuations could adversely affect our ability to meet our expectations or those of securities analysts, ratings agencies, or investors. If we do not meet these expectations for any period, the value of our business and our securities, could decline significantly.
Factors that may cause these quarterly fluctuations include, without limitation:
| • | the timing and magnitude of orders and shipments of our products in any quarter; |
| • | decreases in pricing we may adopt to drive market adoption or in response to competitive pressure; |
| • | our ability to retain our existing customers and strategic partners and attract new customers and strategic partners; |
| • | our ability to develop, introduce, manufacture, and ship, in a timely manner, products that meet customer requirements; |
| • | disruptions in our sales channels or termination of our relationships with important channel partners; |
| • | delays in customers’ purchasing cycles or deferments of customers’ purchases in anticipation of new products or updates from us or our competitors; |
| • | the timing of charges related to impairments of long-lived assets; |
| • | non-routine write-downs of inventory; |
| • | one time termination benefits and other restructuring costs; |
| • | fluctuations in demand for our products; |
| • | the mix of products sold or licensed by us in any given quarter; |
| • | the duration or worsening of the military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, and the time it will take for the economic recovery for such impact to occur; |
| • | the timing and rate of broader market adoption of ADAS or autonomous systems utilizing our solutions across the Automotive and other market sectors; |
| • | the timing and scale of the market acceptance of lidar generally; |
| • | further technological advancements by our competitors and other market participants; |
| • | the ability of our customers and strategic partners to commercialize systems that incorporate our products; |
| • | any change in the competitive dynamics of our markets, including consolidation of competitors, regulatory developments, and new market entrants; |
| • | our ability to effectively manage or outsource management of our inventory; |
| • | changes in the source, cost, availability of, and regulations pertaining to components and materials we use in our products; |
| • | impact of foreign currency fluctuations; |
| • | adverse litigation, judgments, settlements, or other litigation-related costs, or claims that may give rise to such costs; and |
| • | general economic, industry, and market conditions, including trade disputes. |
Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter.
We have been focused on developing our deterministic artificial intelligence-driven sensing system for vehicle autonomy, ADAS, and Non-Automotive applications since 2013. This relatively limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risks and challenges we may encounter, which include our ability to:
| • | develop and commercialize our products; |
| • | produce and deliver lidar and software products meeting acceptable performance metrics; |
| • | forecast our revenue and budget for and manage our expenses; |
| • | attract new customers and retain existing customers; |
| • | develop, obtain, or progress strategic partnerships; |
| • | comply with existing and new or modified laws and regulations applicable to our business; |
| • | plan for and manage capital expenditures for our current and future products, and manage our supply chain and supplier relationships related to our current and future products; |
| • | anticipate and respond to macroeconomic changes as well as changes in the markets in which we operate; |
| • | maintain and enhance the value of our reputation and brand; |
| • | effectively manage our growth and business operations, including the lingering impacts of macroeconomic factors on our business, such as the wars in Ukraine and in the Middle East; |
| • | develop and protect our intellectual property; |
| • | hire, integrate, and retain talented people at all levels of our organization; and |
| • | successfully develop new solutions to enhance the experience of customers. |
If we fail to address the risks and difficulties that we face, including those associated with the challenges listed above as well as those described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected. Further, because we have limited historical financial data and operate in a rapidly evolving market, any predictions about our future revenue and expenses may not be as accurate as those predictions would be if we had a longer operating history or operated in a more predictable market. We have encountered in the past, and will continue to encounter in the future, risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies with limited operating histories in rapidly changing industries. If our assumptions regarding these risks and uncertainties, which we use to plan and operate our business, are incorrect or change, or if we do not address these risks successfully, our results of operations could differ materially from our expectations and our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We continue to implement strategic initiatives designed to grow our business. These initiatives may prove more costly than we currently anticipate and we may not succeed in increasing our revenue in an amount sufficient to offset the costs of these initiatives or to achieve and maintain profitability.
We continue to make investments and implement initiatives designed to grow our business, including:
| • | investing in R&D and commercialization; |
| • | further enhancing our manufacturing processes and partnerships; |
| • | protecting our intellectual property; and |
| • | investing in legal, accounting, and other administrative functions necessary to support our operations as a public company. |
These initiatives may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenue, if at all, in an amount sufficient to offset these higher expenses or to achieve and maintain profitability. The market opportunities we are pursuing are at an early stage of development, and it may be many years before the end markets we expect to serve generate demand for our products at scale, if at all. Our revenue may be adversely affected for a number of reasons, including the development and/or market acceptance of new technology that competes with our products, if automotive original equipment manufacturers, or automotive OEMs, Tier 1 automotive suppliers, or other market participants change their view towards autonomous vehicles or ADAS technologies or strategies (as Continental did at the end of 2023), the failure of our customers to commercialize autonomous systems that include our solutions, our inability to effectively manage or outsource the management of our inventory, manufacturing, or contract manufacturing of products at scale, our inability to enter new markets or to help our customers adapt our products for new applications, or our failure to attract new customers or secure production orders from existing customers currently analyzing our solutions, or increasing competition. Furthermore, it is difficult to predict the size and growth rate of our target markets, customer demand for our products, commercialization timelines, developments in autonomous sensing, developments in ADAS and related technologies, the entry of competitive products, or the success of existing competitive products and services. For these reasons, we do not expect to achieve profitability over the near term. If our revenue does not grow over the long term, our ability to achieve and maintain profitability may be adversely affected, and the value of our business may significantly decrease.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile and could decline significantly.
The stock markets, including Nasdaq on which we list our shares of common stock, have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Even if an active, liquid, and orderly trading market develops and is sustained for our common stock, the market price of our common stock may continue to be volatile and could decline significantly. As previously disclosed, on January 20, 2023, we received notice from Nasdaq that we were no longer in compliance with the $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq. Although the notification did not have an immediate impact on our Nasdaq listing, we were given a period of 180 calendar days, or until July 19, 2023, to regain compliance with the requirement. At our request, on July 20, 2023, Nasdaq granted to us a second and final 180 calendar day period to regain compliance, or until January 16, 2024. To ensure compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by January 16, 2024, we held a special meeting of stockholders on December 12, 2023, to consider and authorize our Board of Directors to effect a reverse stock split. At the special meeting, the Company’s stockholders authorized the Board to effect a reverse stock split, in the Board's discretion, within one year from the date of the special meeting, at one of ten ratios in multiples of five between and including one-for-five to one-for-fifty. Thereafter, the Board resolved to effect a reverse stock split of our issued common stock at a ratio of one-for-thirty (the "Reverse Stock Split"), and pursuant to that resolution, on December 26, 2023, we caused a Certificate of Amendment to our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The Reverse Stock Split became effective upon the filing of the Certificate and our common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on The Nasdaq Capital Market at the opening of trading on December 27, 2023. Companies that implement a reverse stock split often see a materially negative impact on their stock price. In addition, since the Reverse Stock Split, and the resulting lower number of shares in our float, we have generally seen lower trading volumes in our stock. Since January 27, 2025, our stock has closed below $1.00 per share. Should this continue for a period of 30 consecutive trading days, we would expect to again receive notice from Nasdaq that we are no longer in compliance with the $1.00 per share minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on Nasdaq and thus we will need to regain compliance in accordance with Nasdaq rules. If we are unable to regain compliance, we will be subject to delisting. The trading volume of our common stock may fluctuate significantly for this or other reasons, which can have a significant impact on the price of our common stock. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at an attractive price, or at all. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate widely or decline significantly in the future.
Our business could be materially and adversely affected by the lingering impacts of the global COVID-19 pandemic or other potential epidemics and outbreaks, such as "bird flu."
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted and affected our business operations. The lingering effects of the pandemic are likely to continue to disrupt our business and supply chain in the future. Given the unpredictable nature of COVID-19 and its variants, it is difficult, if not impossible, to predict the potential continuing impact on our business operations or those of third parties upon which we rely. The lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including associated business interruptions and recovery, as well as other possible epidemics or outbreaks of other contagions, such as avian influenza, which is more commonly known as “bird flu,” could result in a material adverse impact on our business operations, or the business operations of our current or anticipated customers and suppliers, including the potential reduction or suspension of operations in the U.S. or other parts of the world. Our design and engineering operations, among others, cannot all be conducted remotely and often require on-site access to materials and equipment. We have customers, suppliers, and partners with international operations, and our customers, suppliers, and partners also depend on suppliers and manufacturers worldwide, which means that our business and prospects could be affected by the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic anywhere in the world. Depending upon the duration of the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated business interruptions, our customers, suppliers, manufacturers, and partners may suspend or delay their engagements with us. We and our customers’ and suppliers’ response to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may prove to be inadequate and they may be unable to continue their respective operations in the manner they had prior to the outbreak, and we may consequently endure interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our product development, and shipments, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, we cannot assure you as to the timing of the economic recovery given the lingering effects of the pandemic, which could have a material adverse effect on our target markets and our business.
If our deterministic artificial intelligence-driven sensing system is not selected for inclusion in ADAS technology by automotive OEMs or their suppliers, our business will be materially and adversely affected.
Automotive OEMs and their suppliers design and develop ADAS technology over several years. These automotive OEMs and suppliers undertake extensive testing or qualification processes prior to placing orders for large quantities of products, such as our lidar products, because such products will function as part of a larger system or platform and must meet specifications that we do not control or dictate. We have spent, and will continue to spend, significant time and resources to have our products selected by automotive OEMs and their suppliers, which we refer to as a “design win.” In the case of autonomous driving and ADAS technology, a design win means our lidar product has been selected for use in a particular vehicle model or models. If we do not achieve a design win with respect to a particular vehicle model, we may not have an opportunity to supply our products to the automotive OEM or its supplier for that vehicle model for a period of many years. In many cases, this period can be as long as five to seven years (or more). If our products are not selected by an automotive OEM or our suppliers for one vehicle model or if our products are not successful in that vehicle model, it is less likely that our product will be deployed in other vehicle models of that automotive OEM. If we fail to obtain design wins for a significant number of vehicle models from one or more automotive OEMs or their suppliers, our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.
Our forward-looking estimates of certain financial metrics may prove inaccurate.
We use various estimates in formulating our business plans. We base our estimates upon a number of assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business and economic uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Our estimates therefore may prove inaccurate, causing the actual amount to differ from our estimates. These factors include, without limitation:
| • | the extent to which we meet contractual terms and conditions; |
| • | the extent to which our technology is successfully integrated into our customers’ vehicles; |
| • | the timing of when our customers adopt our technology into their vehicles on a commercial basis which could be delayed for regulatory, safety, or reliability issues unrelated to our technology; |
| • | undetected or unknown errors, defects, or reliability issues in our hardware or software which could reduce the market adoption of our existing or new products; |
| • | loss of business with respect to, the failure or lack of commercial success of a vehicle model for which we are a significant supplier for reasons unrelated to our technology; |
| • | a decline, for any reason, in the production levels of our customers, particularly with respect to models which incorporate our technology; |
| • | customer cancellations of their contracts; |
| • | if our products are included as part of a vehicle option package, the extent to which end customers select it; and |
| • | other risk factors set forth in this Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
The period of time from a design win to implementation is long and we are subject to the risks of cancellation or postponement of the contract or unsuccessful implementation.
Prospective customers, including those in the automotive industry, generally must make significant commitments of resources to test and validate products like ours and confirm that they can integrate these products with other technologies before including them in any particular system, product, or model. The development cycles for our products with new customers varies widely depending on the application, market, customer, and the complexity of the product. In the Automotive market, for example, this development cycle can be five to seven years (or more). The development cycle in Non-Automotive markets can be months to one or two years (or more). These development cycles result in us investing our resources prior to realizing any revenue from commercialization. Further, we are subject to the risk that customers cancel or postpone implementation of our technology or our customers are unable to integrate our technology successfully into a larger system. If our customers face financial difficulties, they may also cancel current or future product programs that could materially and adversely impact our financial results. Further, our revenue could be less than forecasted if the system, product, or vehicle model that includes our lidar products is unsuccessful, including for reasons unrelated to our technology. Long development cycles and product cancellations or postponements may adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our products require key components and critical raw materials and our inability to reduce and control the cost of such components and raw materials could negatively impact the adoption of our products and accordingly, our financial condition and operating results.
The production of our components is dependent on sourcing certain key components and raw materials at acceptable price levels. We have experienced, and may continue to experience, supply chain-induced shortages of key components, leading to a scarcity of such components, a limited availability of such components at greatly inflated prices, or both. If we or our licensees or contract manufacturers are unable to adequately reduce and control the costs of such key components, we or they will be unable to realize manufacturing costs targets, which could reduce the market adoption of our products, damage our reputation with current or prospective customers, and have an adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
Continued pricing pressures, automotive OEM and Tier 1 supplier cost reduction initiatives, and the ability of automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers to source alternatives or cancel vehicle or technology programs may result in lower than anticipated revenues, or cause substantial losses, which may adversely affect our business.
Cost-cutting initiatives adopted by our customers may result in continued downward pressure on pricing. Our agreements and partnerships with automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers may require step-downs in pricing over the term of the agreement or partnership, or if commercialized, over the period of production. In addition, our automotive OEM and Tier 1 suppliers often reserve the right to terminate their supply contracts for convenience, which enhances their ability to obtain price concessions. Automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers also possess significant leverage over their suppliers, including us, because the automotive component supply industry is highly competitive, serves a limited number of customers, and has a high fixed cost base. See also the risk factor entitled, “We operate in a highly competitive market involving emerging technology. We compete against a number of competitors, some of whom have substantially greater resources than us,” below.
Automotive OEMs, like many manufacturers, are price sensitive to components used in their end products. We and our Tier 1 suppliers are sensitive to the cost we quote to such automotive OEMs to mitigate the risk of being eliminated from contention based solely on price. Despite our efforts, and the efforts of our Tier 1 suppliers, to reduce the overall cost of our products, we are not always able to achieve the cost targets we are seeking. The inability to reach our cost targets could have a material adverse impact on our ability to gain market acceptance for our products, regardless of the ability of our products to achieve the automotive OEMs' specifications.
Accordingly, we expect to be subject to substantial and continuing pricing pressure from automotive OEMs, Tier 1 suppliers, and lidar competitors, which may impact the revenue we receive from licensing our product designs or selling our products. It is possible that pricing pressures beyond our expectations could intensify as automotive OEMs, Tier 1 suppliers, and lidar competitors pursue restructuring, consolidation, and cost-cutting initiatives. If we are unable to identify sufficient design cost savings to meet the expectations of automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, our revenue and profitability would be adversely affected.
We expect to continue investing in R&D and commercializing new products, albeit at a reduced amount compared to prior years, which could significantly reduce our profitability and may never result in revenue to us.
Our future growth depends on penetrating new markets, adapting existing products to new applications and customer requirements, achieving volume-based component price reductions, and introducing new products that achieve market acceptance. We expect to continue to incur R&D costs as part of our efforts to design, develop, manufacture, and commercialize new products and enhance existing products. Our R&D expenses were approximately $16.4 million and $26.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and may increase in the future. Because we account for R&D as an operating expense, these expenditures will adversely affect our results of operations in the future. Further, our R&D program may not produce successful results, and our new products may not achieve market acceptance, create additional revenue, or become profitable.
Although we believe that lidar is an essential technology for autonomous vehicles and other emerging applications, market adoption of lidar is uncertain. If market adoption of lidar does not continue to develop, or adoption is deferred, or otherwise develops more slowly than we expect, our business will be adversely affected.
While our lidar-based sensing system can be applied to different use cases across end markets, an insignificant amount of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2024 and approximately 70% of our revenue during the year ended December 31, 2023 was generated from Automotive applications with the remainder from Non-Automotive applications. Despite the fact that the automotive industry has expended considerable effort to research and test lidar products for ADAS and autonomous driving applications, the automotive industry may not introduce lidar products in commercially available vehicles on a time frame that matches our expectations, or at all. We have experienced a number of instances where potential automotive OEMs have delayed their programs for the inclusion of lidar in their end products. We continually study emerging and competing sensing technologies and methodologies and we may incorporate new sensing technologies to our product portfolio over time. However, lidar products for use in the Automotive market remain relatively new and it is possible that other sensing modalities, or a new disruptive modality based on new or existing technologies, including a combination of technologies, will achieve acceptance or leadership in the ADAS and autonomous driving space. Even if lidar products are used in initial generations of autonomous driving technology and ADAS products, we cannot guarantee that lidar products will be designed into or included in subsequent generations of such commercialized technology. The speed of market adoption and growth for ADAS or autonomous vehicles is difficult, if not impossible, to predict, and it is more difficult to predict this market’s future growth in light of the economic consequences of the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and other macroeconomic factors. Although we currently believe we have a differentiated market leading technology for the autonomous vehicle market, by the time mass market adoption of autonomous vehicle technology is achieved, we expect competition among providers of sensing technology based on lidar and other modalities to increase substantially. If, by the time autonomous vehicle technology achieves mass market adoption, commercialization of lidar products is not successful, or not as successful as we or the market expects, or if other sensing modalities gain acceptance by developers of ADAS products, automotive OEMs, regulators, safety organizations, or other market participants, our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.
Over the longer term, we believe that our overall revenue growth, if any, will depend in part on our ability to expand within Non-Automotive markets such as aerospace and defense, shuttle, delivery vehicle, drone, railway, intelligent transport, mining and other markets as they emerge. Each of these markets presents distinct risks and, in many cases, requires that we expend our resources to address the particular requirements of that market.
Addressing these requirements can be time-consuming and costly. The market for lidar technology is relatively new, rapidly developing, and unproven in many markets or industries. Many of our prospective customers are still in the testing and development phases and we cannot be certain that they will commercialize products or systems with our lidar products, or at all. We cannot be certain that lidar will be sold into these markets, or that lidar will be sold into any markets at scale. Adoption of lidar products, including our products, will depend on numerous factors, including whether the technological capabilities of lidar and lidar-based products meet users’ current or anticipated needs, whether the benefits associated with designing lidar into larger sensing systems outweighs the costs, complexity, and time needed to deploy such technology or replace or modify existing systems that may have used other modalities, such as cameras and radar, whether users in other applications can move beyond the testing and development phases and proceed to commercializing systems supported by lidar technology and whether lidar developers such as us can keep pace with the expected rapid technological change in certain developing markets, and the global response to the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and other macroeconomic factors, and the length of any associated economic recovery. If lidar technology does not achieve commercial success, or if adoption of lidar is deferred or the market otherwise develops at a pace slower than we expect, our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected.
We may experience difficulties in managing our growth and expanding our operations.
Over the long term, we may experience significant growth in the scope and nature of our operations. Our ability to manage our operations and future growth will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial, and management controls, legal and compliance programs, and reporting systems. We may not be able to implement improvements in an efficient or timely manner and may discover deficiencies in existing controls, programs, systems, and procedures, which could have an adverse effect on our business, reputation, and financial results.
We rely on third-party suppliers and because some of the raw materials and key components in our products come from limited or single source suppliers, we are susceptible to supply shortages, longer than anticipated lead times for components, and supply changes, any of which could disrupt our supply chain and could delay deliveries of our products to customers.
Most of the components that go into the manufacturing of our solutions are sourced from third-party suppliers. To date, we have produced our products in relatively limited quantities for use in R&D programs. Although we do not have any experience in managing our supply chain to manufacture and deliver our products at scale, our future success will depend on our ability to do so. Some of the key components used to manufacture our products come from limited or single source suppliers. We are therefore subject to the risk of shortages and long lead times in the supply of these components and the risk that our suppliers discontinue or modify components used in our products.
As we rely on a global supply chain, the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, other epidemics and outbreaks, should they materialize, and other macroeconomic factors may adversely affect our ability to source components in a timely or cost-effective manner from our third-party suppliers due to, among other things, work stoppages or interruptions. For example, our products depend on lasers. Any shortage in the availability of these lasers could materially and adversely affect our ability to manufacture our solutions. In addition, the lead times associated with certain components are lengthy and preclude rapid changes in quantities and delivery schedules. While we have entered into agreements with some suppliers for the supply of certain components at set prices, such quantities are limited given we are not yet producing at scale. Therefore, we have in the past experienced, and may in the future experience, component shortages and significant price fluctuations of key components and materials, and the predictability of the availability and pricing of these components may be limited. Component shortages or pricing fluctuations could be material in the future, which could be exacerbated by employee retention issues at any of our suppliers. In the event of a component shortage, supply interruption, or a material pricing change from suppliers of these components, we may not be able to develop alternate sources in a timely manner, or at all, especially in the case of sole or limited source items. Developing alternate sources of supply for these components may be time-consuming, difficult, and costly and we may not be able to source these components on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, which may undermine our ability to meet our requirements or to fill customer orders in a timely manner. Any interruption or delay in the supply of any of these parts or components, or the inability to obtain these parts or components from alternate sources at acceptable prices and within a reasonable amount of time, would adversely affect our ability to meet our scheduled product deliveries to our customers. This could adversely affect our relationships with our customers and partners and could cause delays in shipment of our products and adversely affect our operating results. In addition, increased component costs could result in lower gross margins. Even where we are able to pass increased component costs along to our customers, there may be a lapse of time before we are able to do so such that we will be required to absorb some or all of the increased cost. If we are unable to buy these components in quantities sufficient to meet our requirements on a timely basis, we will not be able to deliver products to our customers, which may result in such customers using competitive products instead of our products.
We may face risks associated with our reliance on certain deterministic artificial intelligence and machine learning models.
We rely on deterministic artificial intelligence and machine learning models in the development of our solutions for vehicle autonomy, ADAS, and Non-Automotive applications. The models that we use are developed or trained using various data sets. If the models are incorrectly designed, the data we use to train them is incomplete, inadequate, or biased in some way, or if we do not have sufficient rights to use the data on which our models rely, the performance of our products, services, and business, as well as our reputation, could suffer or we could incur liability through the violation of laws, third-party privacy or other rights, or contracts to which we are a party.
Our outsourced manufacturing business model for the Non-Automotive market may not be successful, which could harm our ability to deliver products and recognize revenue in the Non-Automotive market.
In the fourth quarter of 2023, we made the decision to wind down our legacy Non-Automotive product. We anticipate that our new Automotive product, Apollo, will be well-suited to address the Non-Automotive markets without significant additional modifications. Our manufacturing strategy for the Non-Automotive market had been focused on outsourcing volume manufacturing to contract manufacturers while maintaining the design, engineering, prototyping, testing, and pilot manufacturing in-house at our facility in Pleasanton, California.
Reliance on third-party manufacturers reduces our control over the manufacturing process, including reduced control over quality, product costs, and product supply, and timing. We may experience delays in shipments or issues concerning product quality from our third-party manufacturers. If any of our third-party manufacturers experience interruptions, delays, or disruptions in supplying our products, including by natural disasters, the lingering effects of the global COVID-19 pandemic, or if other epidemics or outbreaks of other contagions materialize, such as “bird flu,” increased military conflict, especially in Ukraine and the Middle East, or work stoppages or capacity constraints, our ability to ship products would be delayed. In addition, unfavorable economic conditions could result in financial distress among third-party manufacturers upon which we rely, thereby increasing the risk of disruption of supplies necessary to fulfill our production requirements and meet customer demands. Additionally, if any of our third-party manufacturers experience quality control problems in their manufacturing operations and our products do not meet customer or regulatory requirements, we could be required to cover the cost of repair or replacement of any defective products. These delays or product quality issues could have an immediate and material adverse effect on our ability to fulfill orders and could have a negative effect on our operating results. In addition, such delays or issues with product quality could adversely affect our reputation and our relationship with our channel partners. If our third-party manufacturers experience financial, operational, manufacturing capacity, or other difficulties, or experience shortages in required components, or if they are otherwise unable or unwilling to continue to manufacture our products in required volumes or at all, our supply may be disrupted, we may be required to seek alternate manufacturers, and we may be required to redesign our products. It would be time-consuming, and could be costly and impracticable, to begin to use new manufacturers or designs, and such changes could cause significant interruptions in supply and could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our scheduled product deliveries, and may subsequently lead to the loss of sales. While we take measures to protect our trade secrets, the use of third-party manufacturers may also risk disclosure of our innovative and proprietary manufacturing methodologies, which could adversely affect our business.
Recently, we began an engagement with a new manufacturing partner in an effort to penetrate the lidar market in China, initially focused on the autonomous trucking and railway segments. Given this is a new endeavor, there is no guarantee that this will be successful or be effective at mitigating the risks associated with our outsourced manufacturing business model.
Our sales and operations in international markets expose us to associated operational, financial, and regulatory risks.
Sales to international customers accounted for 24% and 16% of our revenue during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
In May 2024, we announced that we have partnered with Accelight Technologies, Inc. and LighTekton Co., Ltd. to deliver our lidar solutions to the China market, specifically focused on autonomous trucking and railway, as the market in China appears to be ahead of the rest of the world in lidar adoption. However, we have not previously sold into the China market and our partners, although they regularly conduct business in China, do not have experience in the lidar market. There is also significant competition in China from local lidar manufacturers. We can provide no assurances that we will be successful in the China lidar market.
In general, international operations are subject to a number of other risks, including:
| • | the impact of tariffs and any escalation of a trade war between the U.S. and its trading partners; |
| • | exchange rate fluctuations; |
| • | political and economic instability, international terrorism, and anti-American sentiment, particularly in emerging markets; |
| • | global or regional health crises, such as the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic or other epidemics or outbreaks of other contagions; |
| • | military conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East; |
| • | potential for violations of anti-corruption laws and regulations, such as those related to bribery and fraud; |
| • | preference for locally branded products, and laws and business practices favoring local competition; |
| • | potential consequences of, and uncertainty related to, the “Brexit” process in the United Kingdom, which could lead to additional expense and complexity in doing business there; |
| • | increased difficulty in managing inventory; |
| • | delayed revenue recognition; |
| • | the potential for less effective protection of intellectual property; |
| • | stringent regulation of autonomous driving or other systems or products using our products and stringent consumer protection and product compliance regulations, including, but not limited, to the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR in the European Union, European competition law, the Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive, or RoHS, the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive, or WEEE, and the European Ecodesign Directive, all of which are costly to comply with and may vary from country to country; |
| • | difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
| • | import and export laws and associated regulations; |
| • | changes in local tax and customs duty laws or changes in the enforcement, application, or interpretation of such laws; and |
| • | the U.S. government’s restrictions on technology transfers to certain countries. |
The occurrence of any of these risks could negatively affect our international business and consequently our business, operating results, and financial condition.
The complexity of our products could result in unforeseen delays or expenses from undetected defects, errors, or reliability issues in our hardware or software which could reduce the market adoption of our products, damage our reputation with current or prospective customers, expose us to product liability and other claims, and thereby adversely affect our operating costs.
Our products are highly technical, very complex, and require high standards to manufacture. Our products have in the past experienced, and will likely in the future experience, defects, errors, or reliability issues at various stages of development, production, and use. We may be unable to timely release new products, manufacture existing products, correct problems that have arisen, or correct such problems to our customers’ satisfaction. Additionally, undetected errors, defects, or security vulnerabilities, especially as new products are introduced or as new versions are released, could result in serious injury to the end users of the technology incorporating our products, or those in the surrounding area, our customers never being able to commercialize technology incorporating our products, litigation against us, negative publicity, and other consequences. These risks are particularly prevalent in the highly competitive autonomous driving and ADAS markets. Some errors or defects in our products may only be discovered after they have been tested, commercialized, and deployed by customers. If that is the case, we may incur significant additional development costs and product recall, repair, or replacement costs. These problems may also result in claims, including class actions, against us. Our reputation or brand may be damaged as a result of these problems and customers may be reluctant to buy our products thereafter, which could adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers, and could adversely affect our financial results.
Our products are intended to be combined with third-party hardware and software as part of a larger system. These larger systems are also highly technical, complex, and require high standards to manufacture. The third-party components incorporated into these larger systems, have been and will be subject to defects, errors, and reliability issues during development, production, and use. Should these third-party components, in which our products are intended to be combined with, fail or require action to correct defects or errors, it would likely delay the sale of the larger system in which our products are to be incorporated, thereby adversely affecting our financial results. As the production of third-party components is largely outside of our control, we are subject to such third parties investing sufficient time and resources to manufacture their products without minimal defects. For example, if a third-party reseller intended to overlay perception software on our product prior to resale, but such perception software contained defects or errors such that it could not be introduced into the market, the sales of our products would be delayed or cancelled, thereby adversely affecting our financial results.
In addition, we could face material legal claims for breach of contract, product liability, fraud, tort, or breach of warranty as a result. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be costly and may divert management’s attention and adversely affect the market’s perception of us and our products. In addition, any insurance coverage we may have could prove inadequate with respect to a claim and future coverage may be unavailable on acceptable terms, or at all. These product-related issues could result in claims against us and our business could be adversely affected.
We may be subject to product liability or warranty claims that could result in significant direct or indirect costs, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our customers intend to use our solutions in autonomous driving and ADAS applications; the operation of motor vehicles, even with our solutions embedded, presents the risk of significant injury, including fatalities. We may be subject to claims if a product using our lidar technology is involved in an accident and persons are injured or purport to be injured. Any insurance that we carry may not be sufficient or it may not apply to all situations. Similarly, our customers could be subjected to claims as a result of such accidents and bring legal claims against us to attempt to hold us liable. In addition, if lawmakers or governmental agencies were to determine that the use of our products, autonomous driving, or certain other ADAS applications increased the risk of injury to all or a subset of our customers, they may pass laws or adopt regulations that limit the use of our products, increase the liability associated with the use of our products, or regulate the use of or delay the deployment of autonomous driving and ADAS technology. Any of these events could adversely affect our brand, relationships with customers, operating results, or financial condition.
Suppliers to automotive OEMs may require that we provide a warranty, either directly or indirectly, on our products, including our embedded software. The occurrence of any material defects in our products during the warranty period could make us liable for damages and warranty claims. In addition, we could incur significant costs to correct any defects, warranty claims, or other problems, including costs related to product recalls. Any negative publicity related to the perceived quality of our products could affect our brand image, partner and customer demand, and adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Also, warranty, recall, and product liability claims may result in litigation, including class actions, the occurrence of which could be costly, lengthy, and distracting, and adversely affect our business and operating results.
If we do not maintain sufficient inventory or if we do not adequately manage our inventory, we could lose sales or incur higher inventory-related expenses, including write-downs related to obsolete or excess items, which could negatively affect our operating results.
To ensure adequate inventory, we must forecast inventory needs and expenses, place orders sufficiently in advance with our suppliers and manufacturing partners, and manufacture products based on our estimates of future demand for particular products. Fluctuations in the adoption of lidar products may affect our ability to forecast our future operating results, including revenue, gross margins, cash flows, and profitability. Our ability to accurately forecast demand for our products could be affected by many factors, including the accuracy of the forecasts that we receive from our customers, the rapidly changing nature of the autonomous driving and ADAS markets in which we operate, the uncertainty surrounding the market acceptance and commercialization of lidar technology, the emergence of new markets, an increase or decrease in customer demand for our products or for products and services of our competitors, product introductions by competitors, the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, other epidemics or outbreaks of other contagions, such as “bird flu,” should they materialize, any work stoppages or interruptions, unanticipated changes in general market conditions, and the general weakening of economic conditions or consumer confidence, which may be exacerbated by the on-going military actions in Ukraine and the Middle East. If our lidar products are commercialized in autonomous driving and ADAS applications, both of which are experiencing rapid growth in demand, we may face challenges acquiring adequate supplies to manufacture our products and/or we and our manufacturing partners may not be able to manufacture our products at a rate necessary to satisfy the levels of demand, which would negatively affect our revenue. This risk may be enhanced by the fact that we may not carry or be able to obtain for our manufacturing partners a significant level of inventory to satisfy short-term increases in demand. If we fail to accurately forecast customer demand, we may experience excess inventory levels or a shortage of products available-for-sale.
Inventory levels in excess of customer demand may result in inventory write-downs or write-offs and the sale of excess inventory at discounted prices, which would adversely affect our financial results, including our gross margin, and have a negative effect on our brand. In the past, including in the fourth quarter of 2023, we took inventory write-downs for obsolete and excess components associated with our decision to wind-down our Non-Automotive product line. Conversely, if we underestimate customer demand for our products, we, or our manufacturing partners, may not be able to deliver products to meet our requirements, and this could result in damage to our brand and customer relationships, and adversely affect our revenue and operating results.
The average selling prices of our products or our fees or royalties from technology licenses could decrease rapidly over the life of the product or license term, which may negatively affect our revenue and gross margin.
We may experience declines in the average selling prices of our products generally as our customers seek to commercialize autonomous systems at prices low enough to achieve market acceptance or due to competitive pressures. In order to sell products that have a falling average unit selling price and maintain margins at the same time, we will need to continually reduce product and manufacturing costs. To manage manufacturing costs, we and our Tier 1 partners must continually engineer the most cost-effective design for our products. In addition, we continuously drive initiatives to reduce assembly cost, improve efficiency, reduce the cost of materials, use fewer materials, and further lower overall product costs by carefully managing component prices, inventory, and shipping costs. We also need to continually introduce new and competitive products in order to maintain our overall gross margin. We may also experience declines in fees or royalties from licensing our technology as customers reduce the prices of products incorporating our licensed technology in order to achieve market acceptance or due to competitive pressures. If we are unable to manage the cost structure of our products, successfully introduce new products with higher gross margins, and develop new technology that we can license at attractive royalty rates, our revenue and overall gross margin would likely decline.
Adverse conditions in the automotive industry or downturns in domestic or global economic conditions, or other macroeconomic factors more generally, could have adverse effects on our results of operations.
While we make our strategic planning decisions based on the assumption that the markets we are targeting will grow, our business is dependent, in large part on, and directly affected by, business cycles and other factors affecting the global automotive industry and the global economy generally. Automotive production and sales are highly cyclical and depend on general economic conditions and other factors, including consumer spending and preferences, changes in interest rates (which significantly increased beginning in 2022) and credit availability, changes in inflation rates (which the U.S. has recently experienced), consumer confidence, fuel costs, fuel availability, environmental impact, tariffs, governmental incentives and regulatory requirements, and political volatility, especially in energy-producing countries and growth markets. Increases in interest rates, especially if coupled with reduced government spending and volatility in financial markets, may have the effect of further increasing economic uncertainty and heightening these risks, which may impact our ability to raise additional capital in the future. In addition, the ongoing hostilities between Russia and Ukraine, the war in the Middle East, and global reactions thereto have increased U.S. domestic and global energy prices. Oil supply disruptions related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and sanctions and other measures taken by the U.S. and its allies, could lead to higher costs for gas, food, and goods in the U.S. and exacerbate the inflationary pressures on the economy, with potentially adverse impacts on our customers and on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Moreover, certain raw materials needed to produce components that are incorporated into our products, and the products of our customers, are primarily derived in the region in which the Russia-Ukraine conflict is occurring. The longer the Russia-Ukraine conflict continues and the more damage to Ukrainian infrastructure that occurs, the greater the impact could be on the supply of such raw materials, and the failure to have access to such raw materials could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, or CISA, has warned all organizations in the U.S. to be on guard against possible cyber attacks coming from Russia which has the potential to disrupt business operations, limit access to essential services, and threaten public safety.
Automotive production and sales can also be affected by our automotive OEM and Tier 1 supplier customers’ ability to continue operating in response to challenging economic conditions and in response to labor relations issues, regulatory requirements, trade agreements, and other factors, such as the unavailability of unrelated components in the assembly of automobiles, an example of which is the shortage of semiconductors necessary for automobile production. The volume of automotive production in North America, Europe, and the rest of the world has fluctuated, sometimes significantly, from year to year, and we expect such fluctuations to give rise to fluctuations in the demand for our products and licenses of our technology. Any significant adverse change in any of these factors may result in a reduction in automotive sales and production by our automotive OEM and Tier 1 supplier customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Customers with which we enter into supply agreements may require changes to our products or may be subject to renegotiation or termination in a short time period, which would materially and adversely affect our business.
If we and our partners are able to secure design wins so that our solutions are included in autonomous driving and ADAS products, we expect that we, or our Tier 1 partners will enter into supply agreements with that customer. Market practice dictates that these supply agreements typically require us to supply a customer’s requirements for a particular vehicle model or autonomous driving or ADAS product, rather than supply a set number of products. These arrangements can have short terms, be subject to renegotiation, or may be reduced or otherwise terminated, the occurrence of any of which may affect product pricing and future profitability. Therefore, even if we are successful in obtaining design wins, and we or our Tier 1 partners are able to enter into definitive agreements with OEMs, and the systems into which our products are built are commercialized, the discontinuation of, the loss of business with respect to, or a lack of commercial success of a particular vehicle model or technology package for which we are a significant supplier could mean that the expected sales of our products will not materialize, materially and adversely affecting our business.
Since many of the markets in which we compete are new and rapidly evolving, it is difficult to forecast long-term end-customer adoption rates and demand for our products.
We are pursuing opportunities in markets that are undergoing rapid changes, including technological and regulatory changes, and it is difficult to predict the timing and size of the opportunities. For example, autonomous driving and lidar-based ADAS applications require the utilization of complex technology. Because these systems depend on technology from many companies, commercialization of autonomous driving or ADAS products could be delayed or impaired on account of certain technological components not being ready to be deployed in automobiles. We are in the process of developing necessary relationships with commercial partners which may not result in the commercialization of our technology immediately, or at all. Regulatory, safety, or reliability developments, many of which are outside of our control, could also cause delays or otherwise impair commercial adoption of these new technologies, which will adversely affect our growth. Our future financial performance will depend on our ability to make timely investments in emerging market opportunities. If one or more of these markets experience a shift in customer or prospective customer demand, our products may not compete as effectively, if at all, and they may not be designed into commercialized products. Given the evolving nature of the markets in which we operate, it is difficult to predict customer demand or adoption rates for our products or the future growth of these markets. If demand does not develop or if we cannot accurately forecast customer demand, the size or timing of our markets, inventory requirements, or our future financial results, our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be adversely affected.
We currently have and target many customers that are large corporations with substantial negotiating power, exacting product standards, and potentially competitive internal solutions. If we are unable to sell our products to these customers, our prospects and results of operations will be adversely affected.
Many of our current and potential customers are large, multinational corporations with substantial negotiating power relative to us and, in some instances, may have internal solutions that are competitive to our products. These large, multinational corporations also have significant development resources, which may allow them to acquire or develop independently, or in partnership with others, competitive technologies. Meeting the technical requirements and securing design wins with any of these companies will require a substantial investment of our time and resources. We cannot assure you that our products will secure design wins from these or other companies or that we will generate meaningful revenue from the sales of our products to these key potential customers. If our products are not selected by these potential customers or if these potential customers develop or acquire competitive technology, it will have an adverse effect on our business.
Our business could be materially and adversely affected if we lose any of our customers or strategic partners, if their demand for our products declined due to factors outside of our control, including component shortages (whether related to our products or otherwise) that impact our customers’ overall production plans or product development plans, or if our customers were unable to pay their invoices.
Although we have and continue to pursue a broad customer base, we are currently courting a limited number of customers, most of which have strong purchasing power and for which the relationships are developing. For year ended December 31, 2023, Continental AG accounted for approximately 70% of our annual revenue. At the end of 2023, Continental informed us of their decision to end our existing arrangement as our Tier 1 partner. The loss of business from any of our potential customers (whether by lower overall demand for our products, component shortages that impact our customers’ production plans or product development plans, cancellation of existing contracts or product orders, or the failure to design in our products could have a material adverse effect on our business.
To the extent vehicle autonomy and ADAS become accepted by major automotive OEMs, we expect that we will rely increasingly for our revenue on Tier 1 suppliers through which automotive OEMs procure products. We expect that these Tier 1 suppliers will be responsible for certain hardware and software configuration activities specific to each automotive OEM, and they may not exclusively carry our solutions.
There is also a risk that one or more of our major customers could be unable to pay our invoices as they become due or that a customer will simply refuse to make such payments if it experiences financial difficulties, or otherwise. If our customers face financial difficulties, they may also cancel current or future product programs that could materially and adversely impact our financial results. If a major customer were to enter into bankruptcy proceedings or similar proceedings whereby contractual commitments are subject to a stay and the possibility of modifications, we could be forced to record a substantial loss.
If we are unable to establish and maintain confidence in our long-term business prospects among customers and analysts within our industry or we are subject to negative publicity, then our financial condition, operating results, business prospects, and access to capital may suffer materially.
Customers may be less likely to purchase our lidar solutions if they are not convinced that our business will succeed or that our service and support and other operations will continue in the long term.
Similarly, suppliers and other third parties will be less likely to invest time and resources in developing business relationships with us if they are not convinced that our business will succeed. Accordingly, in order to build and maintain our business, we must maintain confidence among customers, suppliers, analysts, ratings agencies, and others in our products, long-term financial viability, and business prospects. Maintaining such confidence may be particularly complicated by certain factors including those that are largely outside of our control, such as our limited operating history, our ability to continue to raise funding for ourselves until we reach profitability, customer familiarity with our lidar solutions, any delays in scaling production, delivery, and service operations to meet demand, competition, uncertainty regarding the future of autonomous vehicles, and our production and sales performance compared with market expectations.
Our investments in educating our customers and potential customers about the advantages of lidar and our applications may not result in sales of our products.
Educating our prospective customers, and to a lesser extent, our existing customers, about lidar, our advantages over other sensing technologies, and lidar’s ability to convey value in different industries and deployments is an integral part of developing new business and the lidar market generally. If prospective customers have a negative perception of, or experience with, lidar, or a competitor’s lidar products, they may be reluctant to adopt lidar in general or specifically, our products. Adverse statements about lidar by influential market participants, such as negative comments about lidar’s role in autonomous vehicles repeatedly made by Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, Inc. may also deter adoption. Some of our competitors have significant financial or marketing resources that may allow them to engage in public marketing campaigns about their alternative technology, lidar generally, or our solutions specifically. Our efforts to educate potential customers and the market generally, and to counter any adverse statements made by competitors or other market participants, will require significant financial and personnel resources. These educational efforts may not be successful, and we may not be in a position to offset the costs of such efforts with revenue from new customers. If we are unable to acquire new customers to offset these expenses or if the market accepts such adverse statements, our financial condition will be adversely affected.
We operate in a highly competitive market involving emerging technology. We compete against a number of competitors, some of whom have substantially greater resources than us.
The markets for sensing technology applicable to autonomous solutions across numerous industries are highly competitive. Our future success will depend on our ability to achieve a leadership position in our targeted markets by continuing to develop, and protect from infringement, advanced lidar technology in a timely manner and to stay ahead of existing and new competitors. Our competitors compete with us directly by offering lidar products and indirectly by attempting to solve some of the same challenges with different technologies. Our current and future competitors may enjoy competitive advantages, such as greater name recognition, established relationships, or existing contracts with Tier 1 suppliers and/or OEMs, and substantially greater financial, technical, and other resources.
Because automotive lidar technology appears to have been successfully commercialized in China, our competitors in that market have likely gained experience that comes with productization that suppliers outside of China, including us, have yet to gain.
We face competition from a number of sources including camera and radar companies, other developers of lidar products, Tier 1 suppliers, and other technology and automotive supply companies. In the Automotive market, our competitors have commercialized both lidar and non-lidar-based ADAS technology that has achieved market adoption, strong brand recognition, and is expected to improve over time. Other competitors are working towards commercializing autonomous driving technology and either by themselves, or with a publicly announced partner, and have substantial financial, marketing, R&D, and other resources. Some of our customers in the autonomous vehicle and ADAS markets have announced development efforts or made acquisitions directed at creating their own lidar-based or other sensing technologies, which would compete with our solutions. We do not know how close these competitors are to commercializing autonomous driving systems or novel ADAS applications. In the Non-Automotive markets, our competitors seek to develop new sensing applications across industries. Even in these emerging markets, we face substantial competition from numerous competitors seeking to prove the value of their technology.
Additionally, competition may result in pricing pressure and reduced margins, and may impede our ability to secure design wins, successfully enter into definitive agreements or other commercial arrangements, or successfully commercialize our products at scale, which may prevent us from achieving our projected market share. In particular, our competitors have in the past offered, and may in the future offer, their products and services on terms that we and/or our Tier 1 partners are unwilling to match, or our competitors could introduce new products with competitive price and performance characteristics, which may adversely affect our market share.
The markets in which we compete are characterized by rapid technological change, which requires us to continue to develop new products and product innovations, and could adversely affect market adoption of our products.
While we intend to invest substantial resources to remain on the forefront of technological development, continuing technological changes in sensing technology and lidar, and the markets for these products, including the ADAS and autonomous driving space, could adversely affect adoption of lidar and/or our products, either generally or for particular applications. Our future success will depend upon our ability to develop and introduce a variety of new capabilities and innovations to our existing product offerings, as well as introduce a variety of new product offerings, to address the changing needs of the markets in which we offer our products. We cannot guarantee that such new products will be released in a timely manner, or at all, or achieve market acceptance. Delays in delivering new products that meet customer requirements could damage our relationships with customers and lead them to seek alternative sources of supply. In addition, to date, we have focused on the delivery of our solutions to R&D programs in which developers are investing substantial capital to develop new systems that incorporate our solutions. Our future success relies heavily on the outcome of the R&D efforts by these customers. As autonomous technology reaches the stage of large-scale commercialization, we will be required to develop and deliver solutions at price points that enable wider and ultimately mass-market adoption. Delays in introducing products and innovations, the failure to choose correctly among technical alternatives, or the failure to offer innovative products or configurations at competitive prices may cause existing and potential customers to purchase our competitors’ products or turn to alternative sensing technologies.
If we are unable to devote adequate resources to develop products or cannot otherwise successfully develop products or system configurations that meet customer requirements on a timely basis or that remain competitive with alternatives, our products will lose market share, our revenue will decline, we will experience operating losses, and our business and prospects will be adversely affected.
Developments in alternative technologies may adversely affect the demand for our technology.
Significant developments in alternative technologies, such as cameras and radar, may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results in ways we do not currently anticipate. Existing and future camera and radar technologies may emerge as customers’ preferred alternative to our solutions. Any failure by us to develop new or enhanced technologies or processes, or to react to changes in existing technologies, could materially delay our development and introduction of new and enhanced products in the autonomous vehicle industry, which could result in the loss of competitiveness of our lidar solutions, decreased revenue, and a loss of market share to competitors (or a failure to increase revenue and/or market share). Our R&D efforts may not be sufficient to adapt to changes in technology. As technologies change, we plan to upgrade or adapt our lidar solutions with the latest technology. However, our solutions may not compete effectively with alternative systems if we are not able to source and integrate the latest technology into our existing lidar solutions.
The New Circle Purchase Agreement contains contractual limitations that may not allow us to draw all of the $50 million committed under the Purchase Agreement and to the extent we do draw under the Purchase Agreement, existing stockholders will be diluted.
On July 25, 2024, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with New Circle Principal Investments LLC, or New Circle, pursuant to which New Circle committed to purchase, subject to certain limitations, up to $50 million of our Common Stock should we elect to sell our common stock to them. Should we decide to sell our common stock to New Circle, existing stockholders at such time will experience dilution of their interest in us, which dilution will be heightened if the price at which we sell common stock is low, as there is no minimum price at which we can sell our common stock under the Purchase Agreement. Under the Purchase Agreement, we can only sell to New Circle up to 1,721,755 shares of our common stock, which is equal to 19.99% of the shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding as of the date of the Purchase Agreement, unless we first obtain stockholder approval or the average purchase price per share paid by New Circle exceeds $1.41, which is the lower of the closing price on the execution date of the Purchase Agreement, and the average closing prices for our common stock during the 5-trading day period immediately preceding the execution of the Purchase Agreement. Moreover, we may not issue shares to New Circle whereby they would own more than 4.99% of our outstanding shares at any one time, which on July 25, 2024, was 429,792 shares. At values below $2.00 per share, we would likely not be in a position to realize the full commitment of $50 million under the Purchase Agreement and existing stockholders would experience significant dilution. Therefore, the actual number of shares we will be able to sell to New Circle, the amount of dilution our stockholders will experience upon the sale of our common stock under the Purchase Agreement, and the total proceeds that we will derive from such sales, cannot be determined at this time.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be adversely affected.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules and regulations of Nasdaq. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming, and costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems, and resources.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. We are continuing to develop and refine our disclosure controls, internal control over financial reporting, and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we will file with the SEC are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules of and on the forms required by the SEC, and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers.
Our current controls, and any new controls that we develop, may be inadequate because of changes in conditions in our business. Further, weaknesses in our internal controls may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could adversely affect our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal controls also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we are required to include in the periodic reports we will file with the SEC under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and a lack of internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information.
In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs, and provide significant management oversight. Any failure to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially and adversely affect our ability to operate our business. If our internal controls are perceived as inadequate or that we are unable to produce timely or accurate financial statements, investors may lose confidence in our operating results and the price of our common stock could decline.
Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until after we are no longer an emerging growth company. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our controls are documented, designed, or operating. Any failure to maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could have a material and adverse effect on our business and operating results.
A significant portion of the components used in our products are manufactured abroad, which subjects us to various international risks and costs, including foreign trade issues, tariffs, trade wars, currency exchange rate fluctuations, shipment delays, supply chain disruptions, and political instability, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Most of our products, and the components thereof, are manufactured abroad. Relying on foreign-produced products subjects us to risks relating to changes in import duties, quotas, the potential for introduction of U.S. taxes on imported goods, the potential loss of “most favored nation” status with the U.S., and freight cost increases, as well as economic and political uncertainties, that could result in a trade war causing ever-increasing tariffs. We may also experience shipment delays caused by shipping port constraints, labor strikes, work stoppages, acts of war, including the current conflicts in Ukraine and in the Middle East, and terrorism, or other supply chain disruptions, including those caused by extreme weather, natural disasters, and pandemics or other public health concerns. Specifically, the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused delays in the manufacturing and shipping of our products and the associated raw materials. To the extent the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic result in continuation or worsening of manufacturing and shipping delays and constraints, our suppliers will continue to have challenges obtaining the materials necessary for the production of our products.
If any of these or other factors, including trade tensions between the U.S. and other nations, including China and Russia, as a result of the war in Ukraine or otherwise, were to cause a disruption of trade from other countries, and in particular, Taiwan, our ability to source products, components, or raw materials could be adversely affected. We may need to seek alternative suppliers or vendors, which may not be available, or make changes to our operations, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Also, the prices charged by foreign manufacturers for production or the acquisition of raw materials or components, may be affected by the fluctuation of their local currency against the U.S. dollar, which could cause the cost of our products to increase and negatively impact our business. In addition, if the supply of components for our products becomes more limited than we anticipated, competition to acquire the limited supply of components will drive prices higher than planned, negatively impacting our cash flows and gross margins.
Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could affect our future profitability.
Factors that could materially affect our future effective tax rates include, but are not limited, to:
| • | changes in tax laws (including tax rates) or the regulatory environment; |
| • | changes in accounting and tax standards or practices; |
| • | changes in the composition of operating income by tax jurisdiction; and |
| • | our operating results before taxes. |
Because we do not have a long history of operating at our present scale and we have significant expansion plans, our effective tax rate may fluctuate in the future. Future effective tax rates could be affected by operating losses in jurisdictions where no tax benefit can be recorded under GAAP, changes in the composition of earnings in countries with differing tax rates, changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, was signed into law making significant changes to the U.S. Tax Code. In particular, sweeping changes were made to the U.S. taxation of foreign operations. Changes include, but are not limited to, a permanent reduction to the corporate income tax rate, limiting interest deductions, adopting elements of a territorial tax system, assessing a repatriation tax or “toll-charge” on undistributed earnings and profits of U.S.-owned foreign corporations, and introducing certain anti-base erosion provisions, including a new minimum tax on global intangible low-taxed income, or GILTI, and base erosion and anti-abuse tax, or BEAT. The new legislation had no effect on our 2024 or 2023 provision for income taxes because we generated net tax losses and offset our deferred tax assets on the consolidated balance sheets with a full valuation allowance due to our current loss position and forecasted losses for the near future. The overall impact of this tax reform is uncertain, and our business and financial condition, including with respect to our non-U.S. operations, could be adversely affected.
In addition to the impact of the Tax Act on our federal taxes, the Tax Act may impact our taxation in other jurisdictions, including with respect to state income taxes. State legislatures have generally not responded to the Tax Act. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to how the laws will apply in the various state jurisdictions. Additionally, other foreign governing bodies may enact changes to their tax laws in reaction to the Tax Act that could result in changes to our global tax position and materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Additionally, the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, and several foreign tax authorities have increasingly focused attention on intercompany transfer pricing with respect to sales of products and services and the use of intangibles. Tax authorities could disagree with our future intercompany charges, cross-jurisdictional transfer pricing, or other matters and assess additional taxes. If we do not prevail in any such disagreements, our profitability may be affected.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $284 million of U.S. federal, and approximately $242 million of state net operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future taxable income. Of the approximately $284 million in U.S. federal operating loss carryforwards, approximately $272 million will be carried forward indefinitely for U.S. federal tax purposes and approximately $12 million will begin to expire in 2033. All of our U.S. state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2029. It is possible that we will not generate taxable income in time to use these net operating loss carryforwards before their expiration, or at all. Under legislative changes made in December 2017, U.S. federal net operating losses incurred in 2018 and in future years may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such net operating losses is limited. It is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to the newly enacted federal tax law. In addition, the federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and certain tax credits may be subject to significant limitations under Section 382 and Section 383 of the U.S. Tax Code, respectively, and similar provisions of state law. Under those sections of the U.S. Tax Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” the corporation’s ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change attributes, such as research tax credits, to offset our post-change income or tax may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” will occur if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5-percent shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws.
We are highly dependent on the services of our executive officers.
We are highly dependent on our executive officers, in particular, Matthew Fisch, our Chief Executive Officer, Andrew S. Hughes, our General Counsel, and Conor Tierney, our Chief Financial Officer. The loss of any of our executive officers or other senior executives could adversely affect our business because the loss could make it more difficult to, among other things, compete with other market participants, continue to develop innovative product designs, and retain existing customers or cultivate new ones. Negative public perception of, or negative news related to any of our executive officers or senior executives may adversely affect our brand, relationship with customers, or standing in the industry. In the past, we have lost the services of some of our executive officers for various reasons, including the departure of Luis C. Dussan as of November 15, 2023, who, until that time, was our Chief Technology Officer and Chief Product Strategist, but continues as a member of our Board of Directors, and T.R. Ramachandran, who resigned, effective April 5, 2024, as our Chief Operating Officer.
Our business depends substantially on the efforts of our executive officers and highly skilled personnel, and our operations may be severely disrupted if we lost their services.
Competition for highly skilled personnel is often intense, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area, where we are headquartered, and we may incur significant costs to attract the highly skilled personnel we require. We may not be successful in attracting, integrating, or retaining qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs. We have, from time to time, experienced, and we expect to continue to experience, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications, especially those with engineering skills. Our ability to attract and retain the highly skilled personnel we require has been further hampered by the overall reductions in personnel we have implemented, which places more responsibility on fewer individuals, our focus on cash conservation, which has limited our ability to provide increases in compensation, and the decline in our stock price, which has decreased the retention value of the stock awards we have made to our employees.
In addition, our equity plan is not well funded. We asked stockholders to approve an increase in the number of shares issuable under our equity plan at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. Our stockholders failed to approve the additional shares, therefore we have been unable to issue what we believe is sufficient equity to our employees, thereby decreasing our ability to retain them. Even if stockholders had approved the additional shares, the retention value of such shares may have been insufficient to adequately retain some or all of our employees.
Moreover, with the personnel reductions we have implemented, it may create, in some instances, single points of failure, such that if certain individuals voluntarily resign from the Company, it may adversely impact, or significantly delay, our ability to bring our products to market, which would severely impact our operations and have an adverse impact on our business prospects.
In addition, job candidates and existing employees often consider the value of the equity awards they receive in connection with their employment. If the perceived value of our equity or our equity awards decline, which has occurred in the past and may continue into the future, it may adversely affect our ability to retain highly skilled employees. If we fail to attract new personnel or we fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, our business and future growth prospects could be adversely affected.
Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fires, floods, and other natural catastrophic events, pandemics, and interruptions by manufactured events, such as terrorism. Material disruptions of our business or information systems resulting from these events could adversely affect our operating results.
A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire, flood, hurricane, or significant power outage or other similar events, such as infectious disease outbreaks or pandemic events, including the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic or a potential “bird-flu” pandemic, could have an adverse effect on our business and operating results. The lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this “Risk Factors” section, such as the demand for our products, our ability to achieve or maintain profitability, and our ability to raise additional capital in the future. Our corporate headquarters and major operations are located in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, which is a region known for significant seismic activity. In addition, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, or war could cause disruptions in our operations, our or our customers’ or channel partners’ businesses, our suppliers’ businesses, or the economy as a whole. We also rely on information technology systems to communicate among our workforce and with third parties. Any disruption to our communications, whether caused by a natural disaster or by manufactured events, such as power disruptions, could adversely affect our business. We do not have a formal disaster recovery plan or policy in place and do not currently require that our suppliers have such plans or policies in place. To the extent that any such disruptions result in delays or cancellations of orders or impede our suppliers’ ability to timely deliver components, or the deployment of our products, our business, operating results, and financial condition would be adversely affected.
We, as well as our suppliers and partners, are subject to cybersecurity risks to operational systems, security systems, infrastructure, integrated software in our lidar solutions, and the data processed by those solutions, and any material failure, weakness, interruption, cyber event, incident, or breach of security could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption of our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential or other business-critical information, and/or damage our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business financial condition, and operating results.
We are at risk for interruptions, outages, and breaches of our operational systems, including our business, financial, accounting, product development, and production processes, owned by us, our suppliers or our partners; our facility security systems, owned by us, our suppliers, or our partners; our in-product technology owned by us, our suppliers, or our partners; the integrated software in our lidar solutions; or the data that we process or our suppliers process on our behalf. In mid-2022, our previous partner, Continental, experienced a cyberattack in which data was improperly taken from their servers. To date, Continental has not notified us that any data belonging to us was compromised. A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems or those of our third-party vendors for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. Such cyber incidents could materially disrupt operational systems; result in loss of intellectual property, trade secrets or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information; compromise certain information of employees, suppliers, or others; jeopardize the security of our facilities; or affect the performance of in-product technology and the integrated software in our lidar solutions. A cyber incident could be caused by disasters, insiders (through inadvertence or with malicious intent), or malicious third parties (including nation-states or nation-state supported actors) using sophisticated, targeted methods to circumvent firewalls, encryption, and other security defenses, including hacking, fraud, trickery, phishing, or other forms of deception. The risks of a cybersecurity breach against companies based in the U.S., like us, may be enhanced as a byproduct of the on-going war in Ukraine, or by state-sponsored actors, primarily located in, or sponsored by, China, Russia, or North Korea. Despite careful security and controls design, our information technology systems and the systems used by our third-party vendors, may be subject to security breaches and cyberattacks the result of which could include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation, and damage to business relationships.
The techniques used by cyber attackers change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Continental, for example, failed to provide notice of the mid-2022 breach to us for about one month. Although we maintain information technology measures designed to protect us against intellectual property theft, data breaches, and other cyber incidents, such measures will require continual updates and improvements, and we cannot guarantee that such measures will be adequate to detect, prevent, or mitigate cyber incidents. The implementation, maintenance, segregation, and improvement of these systems requires significant management time, support, and cost. Moreover, there are inherent risks associated with developing, improving, expanding, and updating current systems, including the disruption of our data management, procurement, production execution, finance, supply chain, and sales and service processes. These risks may affect our ability to manage our data and inventory; procure parts or supplies; produce, sell, deliver, or service our solutions; adequately protect our intellectual property; or achieve and maintain compliance with, or realize available benefits under, applicable laws, regulations, and contracts. We cannot be sure that the systems upon which we rely, including those of our third-party vendors or suppliers, will be effectively implemented, maintained, or expanded as planned. If we do not successfully implement, maintain, or expand these systems as planned, our operations may be disrupted, our ability to accurately and timely report our financial results could be impaired, and deficiencies may arise in our internal control over financial reporting, which may impact our ability to certify our financial results. Moreover, our proprietary information or intellectual property could be compromised or misappropriated, and our reputation may be adversely affected. If these systems do not operate as we expect them to, we may be required to expend significant resources to make corrections or find alternative sources for performing these functions. We have implemented processes, procedures, and internal controls to help mitigate cybersecurity risks and cyber intrusions, but these measures, as well as our increased awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber-incident, do not guarantee that a cyber-incident will not occur and/or that our financial results, operations, or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident. Further, the remote working conditions resulting from the cultural shifts during and after the COVID-19 pandemic have heightened our vulnerability to a cybersecurity risk or incident.
A significant cyber incident could impact production capability, harm our reputation, cause us to breach our contracts with other parties, or subject us to regulatory actions and litigation, any of which could materially affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results. In addition, our insurance coverage for cyber-attacks may not be sufficient to cover all the losses we may experience as a result of a cyber incident.
Our cash and cash equivalents could be adversely affected if the financial institutions in which we hold our cash and cash equivalents fail.
We regularly maintain cash balances at third-party financial institutions, including Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit. When SVB was seized by regulators in March of 2023, we maintained our operating account at SVB. Shortly after the seizure by regulators, all of our funds were returned to us. Had the funds not been returned to us, it would have had a significant impact on our liquidity. We continue to maintain an operating account at SVB, but have established operating accounts at other financial institutions as well to mitigate the risk of any one bank failure. However, the failure of any depository institution to return any of our deposits, or if a depository institution is subject to other adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets, could impact access to our cash or cash equivalents and could adversely impact our operating liquidity and financial performance.
As part of growing our business, we may make acquisitions. If we fail to successfully select, execute, or integrate our acquisitions, then our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected, and our stock price could decline.
From time to time, we may undertake acquisitions to add new products and technologies, acquire talent, gain new sales channels, or enter into new markets or sales territories. In addition to possible stockholder approval, we may need approvals and licenses from relevant governmental authorities for the acquisitions and to comply with any applicable laws and regulations, which could result in increased delays and costs, and may disrupt our business strategy if we fail to obtain such required approvals. Furthermore, acquisitions and the subsequent integration of new assets, businesses, key personnel, customers, vendors, and suppliers will require significant attention from our management and could result in a diversion of resources from our existing business, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our operations. Acquired assets or businesses may not generate the financial results we expect. Acquisitions could result in the use of substantial amounts of cash, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the occurrence of significant goodwill impairment charges, amortization expenses for other intangible assets, and exposure to potential unknown liabilities of the acquired business. Moreover, the costs of identifying and closing acquisitions may be significant.
To date, we have very limited experience with acquisitions and the integration of acquired technology and personnel. Failure to successfully identify, complete, manage, and integrate acquisitions could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and could cause our stock price to decline.
Actions that we have taken, or may take in the future, related to the implementation of our strategic initiatives may be costly and not successful.
Given the rapidly evolving nature of the lidar and autonomous vehicle market, we have in the past, and anticipate that in the future, we will revise our strategic plan to allow us to realign our resources and significantly reduce operating expenses in line with the direction of the marketplace. In 2023, for example, we shifted our strategic focus to the Automotive market. We cannot guarantee that the implementation of any revised strategic plan will achieve or sustain the anticipated benefits, or that the benefits, even if achieved, will be adequate to meet long-term expectations. As a result of revising any strategic plan, we have incurred additional costs in the near term, including cash expenditures for separation payments, employee benefits, and related costs. Additional risks associated with the continuing impact of a revised strategic plan include, employee attrition beyond our intended reduction-in-force and adverse effects on employee morale, diversion of management attention, adverse effects to our reputation as an employer (which could make it more difficult for us to hire employees in the future), and potential failure or delays to meet our shift in focus from research and development to commercialization. If we do not realize the expected benefits of any revised strategic plan on a timely basis or at all, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Legal and Regulatory Risks Related to Our Business
We are subject to governmental import and export control laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our products and solutions are subject to import and export laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, other regulations issued by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and various economic and trade sanctions administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. U.S. export control laws and regulations and economic sanctions prohibit the shipment of certain products and services to U.S. embargoed or sanctioned countries, and specified persons and entities. In addition, complying with export control and sanctions regulations for a particular sale may be time-consuming and result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. Exports of our products and technology must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the possible loss of export or import privileges, and fines, which may be imposed on us and the employees or officers responsible to prohibit such shipments and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of the employees or officers responsible.
Changes to trade policy, tariffs, and import/export regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Changes in global political, regulatory, and economic conditions or in laws and policies governing foreign trade, manufacturing, development, and investment in the territories or countries where we currently purchase our components, sell our products, and conduct our business, could adversely affect our business. The U.S. has recently instituted or proposed changes in trade policies that include the negotiation or termination of trade agreements, the imposition of higher tariffs on imports into the U.S., economic sanctions on individuals, corporations, and countries, and other government regulations affecting trade between the U.S. and other countries where we conduct our business. A number of other nations have proposed or instituted similar measures directed at trade with the U.S. in response. As a result of these developments, there may be greater restrictions and economic disincentives on international trade that could adversely affect our business. For example, such changes could adversely affect the Automotive market, our ability to access key components or raw materials needed to manufacture our products (including rare-earth metals), our ability to sell our products or license our product designs and software to customers outside of the U.S., and the overall demand for our products. It may be time-consuming and expensive for us to alter our business operations to adapt to or comply with any such changes, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We have and may become involved in legal and regulatory proceedings and commercial or contractual disputes, which could have an adverse effect on our profitability and consolidated financial position.
We have been and may be, from time to time, involved in litigation, regulatory proceedings, and commercial or contractual disputes that may be significant. These matters may include disputes with our suppliers and customers, intellectual property claims, stockholder litigation, government investigations, class action lawsuits, personal injury claims, environmental issues, customs and value-added tax disputes, and employment and tax issues.
On August 28, 2024, we were purported to be served with a complaint that alleges we are in breach of a lease for office space in Dublin, California, entered into by our subsidiary, AEye Technologies, Inc. in 2019, because of an alleged failure to pay rent. The landlord claimed that the amount owed could be up to $8.5 million. We dispute, among other things, that the total damages claimed by the landlord equal the amount claimed. If the matter were decided adverse to us, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Additionally, in early 2023, we discovered that there may have been some uncertainty with respect to the validity of our Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which was approved by our stockholders at the special meeting of stockholders held on August 12, 2021. While this matter has been fully resolved, we cannot provide assurances that other matters similar in nature may not arise in the future.
We could face in the future a variety of labor and employment claims against us, which could include, but is not limited to, general discrimination, wage and hour, privacy, ERISA, or disability claims. In such matters, government agencies or private parties may seek to recover from us very large, indeterminate amounts in penalties or monetary damages (including, in some cases, treble or punitive damages), or seek to limit our operations in some way.
Any of these types of lawsuits, whether initiated by us or a third party, could require significant management time and attention or could involve substantial legal liability, adverse regulatory outcomes, and/or substantial expenses to defend. Often these cases raise complex factual and legal issues and create risks and uncertainties. No assurances can be given that any proceedings or claims will not have a material adverse impact on our operating results and consolidated financial position or that our established reserves or our available insurance will mitigate this impact.
Unforeseen issues could result in damage to certain property which could result in adverse effects on our business and reputation.
Our lidar utilizes lasers for performing 3D sensing. While we have developed system components designed to prevent our lidar lasers from causing property damage (including to cameras), in the event an unforeseen issue arises that results in property damage, our reputation or brand may be damaged and we could face material legal claims for breach of contract, product liability, tort, or breach of warranty as a result. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of merit, could be costly and may divert management’s attention and adversely affect the market’s perception of us and our products. In addition, our business liability insurance coverage could prove inadequate with respect to any claim and future coverage may be unavailable on acceptable terms, or at all.
We are subject to, and must remain in compliance with, numerous laws and governmental regulations concerning the manufacturing, use, distribution, and sale of our products. Some of our customers also require that we comply with the customers’ own unique requirements relating to these matters.
We manufacture and sell products that contain electronic components, and such components may contain materials that are subject to government regulation in both the locations where we manufacture and assemble our products, as well as the locations where we sell our products. For example, certain regulations limit the use of lead in electronic components. Since we operate on a global basis, ensuring simultaneous compliance in multiple jurisdictions is a complex process which requires continual monitoring of regulations and an ongoing compliance process to ensure we and our suppliers are in compliance with existing regulations in each market where we operate. If new, unanticipated regulations significantly impact our use and sourcing of various components or require more expensive components, those regulations could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our products are intended to be used for autonomous driving and ADAS applications, which are subject to complicated and evolving regulatory schemes that vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. These are rapidly evolving areas where new regulations could impose limitations on the use of lidar generally or our products specifically. If we fail to adhere to these new regulations or fail to continually monitor the updates, we may be subject to litigation, loss of customers, or negative publicity and our business, results of operations, and financial condition will be adversely affected.
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose substantial costs upon us and cause delays in building our production facilities.
Concerns over environmental pollution and climate change have produced significant legislative and regulatory efforts on a global basis, and we believe this will continue both in scope and in the number of countries participating. In addition, as climate change issues become more prevalent, foreign, federal, state, and local governments and our customers have been responding to these issues. The increased focus on environmental sustainability may result in new regulations and customer requirements, or changes in current regulations and customer requirements, which could materially and adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition. If we are unable to effectively manage real or perceived issues, including concerns about environmental impacts or similar matters, sentiments toward us or our products could be negatively impacted, and our business, results of operations, and financial condition could suffer.
In addition, any new environmental regulations or laws might increase the cost of raw materials or key components we use in our products. Environmental regulations require us to reduce product energy usage, monitor and exclude an expanding list of restricted substances, and participate in required recovery and recycling of our products. Environmental and health and safety laws and regulations can be complex, and we have limited experience complying with such laws and regulations. Capital and operating expenses needed to comply with environmental laws and regulations can be significant, and violations may result in substantial fines and penalties, damages, suspension of production, or a cessation of our operations.
Contamination at properties we currently operate at, where we formerly operated, or to which hazardous substances were sent by us, may subject us to liability pursuant to environmental laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, commonly known as CERCLA, which can impose liability for the full amount of remediation-related costs without regard to fault, for the investigation and cleanup of contaminated soil and ground water, for remediating contamination and impacts to human health, and for damages to natural resources. The costs of complying with environmental laws and regulations and any claims concerning noncompliance, or liability with respect to contamination in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or operating results. We may face unexpected delays in obtaining the requisite permit and approvals in connection with our planned production facilities that could require significant time and financial resources and delay our ability to operate these facilities, which would adversely impact our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
We are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. We can face criminal liability and other serious consequences for violations, which can harm our business.
We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and other anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct activities. Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit companies and their employees, agents, contractors, and other collaborators from authorizing, promising, offering, or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or anything else of value to recipients in the public or private sector. We can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of our employees, agents, contractors, and other collaborators, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. Any violations of the laws and regulations described above may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties, imprisonment, the loss of export or import privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm, and other consequences.
Our business may be adversely affected by changes in regulations of automobiles and lasers or concerns that drive further regulation of the Automotive and laser markets.
Government product safety regulations are an important factor for our business. Historically, these regulations imposed ever-more stringent safety regulations for automobiles and laser products. These safety regulations often require, or customers demand, automobiles have more safety features per vehicle and incorporate more advanced safety products.
While we believe increasing automotive and laser safety standards will present a market opportunity for our products, governmental safety regulations are subject to change based on a number of factors that are not within our control, including new scientific or technological data, adverse publicity regarding industry recalls and safety risks of autonomous driving and ADAS products, accidents involving our products, domestic and foreign political developments or considerations, and litigation relating to our products and our competitors’ products. Changes in government regulations, especially in the autonomous driving and ADAS industries could adversely affect our business. If government priorities shift and we are unable to adapt to changing regulations, our business may be materially and adversely affected.
Federal, state, and local regulators impose more stringent compliance and reporting requirements in response to product recalls and safety issues in the automotive industry. As the cars that utilize our sensors go into production, we will be subject to the existing stringent requirements of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, or the Vehicle Safety Act, including a duty to report, subject to strict timing requirements, safety defects with our products. The Vehicle Safety Act imposes potentially significant civil penalties for violations, including the failure to comply with such reporting actions. We are also subject to the existing U.S. Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation Act, or TREAD, which requires equipment manufacturers, such as us, to comply with “early warning” requirements by reporting certain information to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, such as information related to defects or reports of injury related to our products. TREAD imposes criminal liability for violating such requirements if a defect subsequently causes death or bodily injury. In addition, the Vehicle Safety Act authorizes NHTSA to require a manufacturer to recall and repair vehicles that contain safety defects or fail to comply with U.S. federal motor vehicle safety standards. Sales into foreign countries may be subject to similar regulations. If we cannot rapidly address any safety concerns or defects with our products, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be adversely affected.
The adoption of autonomous and ADAS features by automotive OEMs may be delayed and our business impacted, as additional emissions and safety requirements are imposed on vehicle manufacturers.
Vehicle regulators globally continue to consider new and enhanced emissions requirements, including electrification, to meet environmental and economic needs as well as pursue new safety standards to address emerging traffic risks. To control new vehicle prices, among other concerns, automotive OEMs may need to dedicate technology and cost additions to new vehicle designs to meet these emissions and safety requirements and postpone the additional costs associated with new autonomous and ADAS features. In the past year, we have seen what we reasonably believe to be delays in the implementation of ADAS features by OEMs that may utilize lidar technology, hence delaying sales of our products.
Our business may be adversely affected if we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or other requirements imposed by the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA.
As a lidar technology company, we are subject to the Electronic Product Radiation Control Provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. These requirements are enforced by the FDA. Electronic product radiation includes laser technology. Regulations governing these products are intended to protect the public from hazardous and unnecessary exposure. Manufacturers are required to certify by way of product labeling and reports to the FDA that their products comply with applicable performance standards as well as maintain manufacturing, testing, and distribution records for their products. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA, which could require us to cease distribution of our products, recall or remediate products already distributed to customers, or subject us to FDA enforcement actions.
Failures, or perceived failures, to comply with privacy, data protection, and information security requirements in the variety of jurisdictions in which we operate, may adversely impact our business, and such legal requirements are evolving, uncertain, and may require improvements in, or changes to, our policies and operations.
Our current and potential future operations and sales subject us to existing and future laws and regulations addressing privacy and the collection, use, storage, disclosure, transfer, and protection of various types of data. For example, the European Commission has adopted the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, and California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, both of which provide for potentially material penalties for non-compliance. These statutory regimes may, among other things, impose data security requirements, disclosure requirements, and restrictions on data collection, uses, and sharing that may impact our operations and the development of our business. While, generally, we do not have access to, collect, store, process, or share information collected by our solutions, unless our customers choose to proactively provide such information to us, our products may evolve both to address potential customer requirements or to add new features and functionality. Therefore, the full impact of these privacy regimes on our business is rapidly evolving across jurisdictions and remains uncertain at this time.
We may also be affected by cyber-attacks and other means of gaining unauthorized access to our products, systems, and data. For instance, cyber criminals or insiders may target us or third parties with which we have a business relationship in order to obtain data, or in a manner that disrupts our operations or compromises our products, or the systems into which our products are integrated.
We are assessing the continually evolving privacy and data security regimes and measures we believe are appropriate in response. Since these privacy and data security regimes are evolving, uncertain, and complex, especially for a global business like ours, we may need to update or enhance our compliance measures as our products, markets, and customer demands further develop, and these updates or enhancements may require implementation costs, which may be material. In addition, we may not be able to monitor and react to all developments in a timely manner. The compliance measures we adopt may prove ineffective. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with current and future regulatory or customer-driven privacy, data protection, and information security requirements, or to prevent or mitigate security breaches, cyber-attacks, or improper access to, use of, or disclosure of data, or any security issues or cyber-attacks affecting us, could result in significant liability, costs (including the costs of mitigation and recovery), and a material loss of revenue resulting from the adverse impact on our reputation and brand, loss of proprietary information and data, disruption to our business and relationships, and diminished ability to retain or attract customers and business partners. Such events may result in governmental enforcement actions and prosecutions, private litigation, fines and penalties or adverse publicity, and could cause our customers and business partners to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business.
Regulations related to conflict minerals may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the costs of certain metals used in the manufacturing of our products.
We are subject to the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires us to determine, disclose, and report whether our products contain metals sourced from specified geographies; these metals are generally referred to as “conflict minerals.” The implementation of these requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability, and pricing of the materials used in the manufacture of components used in our products. In addition, we will incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to conducting diligence procedures to determine the sources of conflict minerals that may be used in or necessary to the production of our products and, if applicable, potential changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. It is also possible that our reputation may be adversely affected if we determine that certain of our products contain minerals not determined to be conflict-free or if we are unable to alter our products, processes, or sources of supply to avoid use of such materials.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Despite the actions we take to defend and protect our intellectual property, we may not be able to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights or prevent unauthorized parties from copying or reverse engineering our solutions. Our efforts to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights and prevent third parties from violating our rights may be costly.
The success of our products and our business depends in large part on our ability to obtain patents and other intellectual property rights and maintain adequate legal protection for our products in the United States and other foreign jurisdictions. We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our proprietary rights, all of which can only provide limited protection.
We cannot guarantee that any patents will be issued with respect to our currently pending patent applications or that any trademarks will be registered with respect to our currently pending applications in a manner that gives us adequate defensive protection or competitive advantages, if at all, or that any patents issued to us or any trademarks registered by us will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented. We have filed for patents and trademarks in the United States and in certain foreign jurisdictions, but such protections may not be available in all countries in which we operate or in which we seek to enforce our intellectual property rights, or may be difficult to enforce in practice. Our currently issued patents and trademarks, and any patents and trademarks that may be issued or registered, as applicable, in the future with respect to pending or future applications, may not provide sufficiently broad protection or may not prove to be enforceable in actions against alleged infringers. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology or the reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, others may independently develop technologies that are competitive to us or infringe our intellectual property.
Protecting against the unauthorized use of our intellectual property, products, and other proprietary rights is expensive and can be difficult, particularly outside of the United States. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or reverse engineer our lidar technology or certain aspects of our solutions that we consider proprietary. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights, to prevent unauthorized parties from copying or reverse engineering our solutions, to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to block the importation of infringing products into the United States.
Any such litigation, whether initiated by us or a third party, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management resources, either of which could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. Even if we obtain favorable outcomes in litigation, we may not be able to enforce the remedies, especially in the context of unauthorized parties copying or reverse engineering our solutions.
Further, many of our current and potential competitors may have the ability to dedicate substantially greater resources to defending intellectual property infringement claims and to enforcing their intellectual property rights than we can. Attempts to enforce our rights against third parties could also provoke these third parties to assert their own intellectual property or other rights against us or result in a decision that invalidates or narrows the scope of our rights, in whole or in part. Effective patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret protection may not be available in every country in which our products are available, and competitors based in other countries may sell infringing products in one or more markets. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could result in our competitors offering similar products, potentially resulting in the loss of some of our competitive advantage and a decrease in our revenue, which would adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition, and prospects.
Third-party claims that we are infringing intellectual property, whether successful or not, could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses, and our business could be adversely affected.
Although we believe we hold key patents related to our products, a number of companies, both within and outside of the lidar industry, hold other patents covering various aspects of lidar products. In addition to these patents, participants in this industry typically also protect their technology, especially embedded software, through copyrights and trade secrets. As a result, there is frequent litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of intellectual property rights. We have received, and in the future may receive, inquiries from other intellectual property holders and may become subject to claims that we infringe their intellectual property rights, particularly as we expand our presence in the market, expand to new use cases, and face increasing competition. In addition, parties may claim that the names and branding of our products infringe their trademark rights in certain countries or territories. If such a claim were to prevail, we may have to change the names and branding of our products in the affected territories, and we could incur other costs.
We currently have a number of agreements in effect pursuant to which we have agreed to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless our customers, suppliers, and channel partners and other partners from damages and costs which may arise from the infringement of our products by third-party patents or other intellectual property rights. The scope of these indemnity obligations varies, but may, in some instances, include indemnification for damages and expenses, including attorneys’ fees. Our insurance may not cover all intellectual property infringement claims. A claim that our products infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, even if untrue, could adversely affect our relationships with our customers, may deter future customers from purchasing our products, and could expose us to costly litigation and settlement expenses. Even if we are not a party to any litigation between a customer and a third party relating to the infringement of our products, an adverse outcome in any such litigation could make it more difficult for us to defend our products against intellectual property infringement claims in any subsequent litigation in which we are a named party. Any of these results could adversely affect our brand and operating results.
Our defense of intellectual property rights claims brought against us or our customers, suppliers, or channel partners, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, expensive to litigate or settle, divert management resources and attention, and force us to acquire intellectual property rights and licenses, which may involve substantial royalty or other payments and may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Further, a party making such a claim, if successful, could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages or obtain an injunction prohibiting us from continuing to sell certain products. An adverse determination also could invalidate our intellectual property rights and could adversely affect our ability to offer our products to our customers and may require that we procure or develop substitute products that do not infringe, which could require significant effort and expense. Any of these events could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition, and prospects.
Any patent applications we file may not ultimately issue or be registered as we anticipated, or at all, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours.
We cannot be certain that we are the first inventor of the subject matter to which we have filed a particular patent application, or if we are the first party to file such a patent application. If another party has filed a patent application regarding the same subject matter as we have, we may not be entitled to the protection sought by the patent application. We also cannot be certain whether the claims included in a patent application will ultimately be allowed in the applicable issued patent. Further, the scope of protection of issued patent claims is often difficult to determine. As a result, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we file will ultimately issue, or that our issued patents will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. In addition, our competitors may design around our issued patents, which may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating results.
In addition to patented technology, we rely on our unpatented proprietary technology, trade secrets, processes, and know-how.
We rely on trade secrets, designs, know-how, and other confidential information to protect our intellectual property that may not be patentable or subject to copyright, trademark, trade dress, or service mark protection, or that we believe is best protected by means that do not require public disclosure. We generally seek to protect this information by entering into confidentiality agreements, or consulting services or employment agreements that contain non-disclosure and non-use provisions with our employees, consultants, contractors, commercial partners, vendors, and other third parties. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or may otherwise fail to provide adequate protection, prevent disclosure, third-party infringement, or misappropriation of our trade secrets, may be limited as to their term, and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. We have limited control over the protection of trade secrets used by our current or future manufacturing partners and suppliers and could lose future trade secret protection if any unauthorized disclosure of such information occurs. In addition, our proprietary information may otherwise become known or be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. To the extent that our employees, consultants, contractors, advisors, and other third parties use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us or designated in the agreements between such parties and us to be jointly owned, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain protection for our proprietary information could adversely affect our competitive business position. Furthermore, laws regarding trade secret rights in certain markets where we operate may afford little or no protection to our trade secrets.
We also rely on physical and electronic security measures to protect our proprietary information, but we cannot provide assurance that these security measures will not be breached or will provide adequate protection for our property. There is a risk that third parties may obtain and improperly utilize our proprietary information to our competitive disadvantage. We may not be able to detect or prevent the unauthorized use of such information or take appropriate and timely steps to enforce our intellectual property rights.
We employ third-party licensed software for use in our business, and the inability to maintain these licenses, errors in the software, or the terms of open source licenses could result in increased costs or reduced service levels, which would adversely affect our business.
Our business relies on certain third-party software obtained under licenses from other companies. We anticipate that it will continue to rely on such third-party software in the future. Although we believe that there are commercially reasonable alternatives to the third-party software we currently license, these alternatives may not always be available, or it may be difficult or costly to switch to an alternative. In addition, integration of new third-party software may require significant work and require substantial investment of our time and resources. Our use of additional or alternative third-party software would require us to enter into license agreements with third parties, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Many of the risks associated with the use of third-party software cannot be eliminated, and these risks could negatively affect our business.
Some of the third-party software used by us is licensed under the terms of open source software licenses. Companies that incorporate open source software into their technologies have, from time to time, faced claims challenging the use of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. As a result, we could be subject to lawsuits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or claiming noncompliance with open source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute such software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software and/or make available any derivative works of the open source code, which could include valuable proprietary code of the user, on unfavorable terms or at no cost. While we monitor the use of open source software and attempt to ensure that open source software is not used in a manner that would require us to disclose our internally developed source code or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, such use could inadvertently occur. Any requirement to disclose our internally developed source code or pay damages for breach of contract or copyright infringement could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations and could help our competitors develop services that are similar to or better than ours.
We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we or our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our employees’ former employers.
We may be subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of an employee’s former employer. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail to adequately defend such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to commercialize our products, which could severely harm our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and demand on management resources.
Risks Related to Being a Public Company
We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will devote substantial time to compliance initiatives.
We expect to incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company, and these expenses will likely increase after we are no longer an emerging growth company, as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act. As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the Dodd-Frank Act, as well as rules adopted, and to be adopted, by the SEC and Nasdaq. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, we expect these rules and regulations to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. These increased costs will increase our net loss. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. The impact of these requirements could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees, or as executive officers.
Additionally, there continues to be public interest and increased legislative pressure related to environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, activities of public companies. For example, there is a growing number of states requiring organizations to report their board composition as well as mandating gender diversity and representation from underrepresented communities. We risk negative stockholder reaction, including from proxy advisory services, as well as damage to our brand and reputation, if we do not act responsibly in a number of key areas, including diversity and inclusion, environmental stewardship, support for local communities, corporate governance and transparency, and considering ESG and human capital factors in our operations.
Our management team has limited experience managing a public company.
Most of the members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors, and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage their roles and responsibilities. Being a public company subjects us to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These obligations and constituents will require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results.
Our business and operations could be negatively affected if we become subject to stockholder activism, which could cause us to incur significant expense, disrupt our business, result in a proxy contest or litigation, or impact our stock price.
Stockholder activism, which can take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, including making public demands that we consider certain strategic alternatives, engaging in public campaigns to attempt to influence our corporate governance and/or our management, and commencing proxy contests to attempt to elect the activists’ representatives or others to our Board, has been increasing recently. Volatility in the price of our common stock or other reasons has caused, and may continue in the future to cause, us to become the target of securities litigation or stockholder activism. Activist stockholders who disagree with the composition of our Board, our strategy, or the way our Company is managed may seek to effect change through various strategies and channels, such as through commencing a proxy contest, making public statements critical of our performance or business, or engaging in other similar activities. Responding to any actions by activist stockholders, including proxy contests, can be costly and time-consuming, has diverted the attention of management, our Board, and our employees, and may be disruptive to our operations. We may be required to incur significant fees and other expenses related to activist stockholder matters, including for third-party advisors.
Our stock price has been and could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks, and uncertainties of any stockholder activism. Additionally, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction as a result of stockholder activism, including potential changes to the composition of our Board, may lead to the perception of a change in the strategic direction of our business; the loss of key employees, including our executive officers; a perception of instability or lack of continuity, particularly if the stockholder activism campaign results in the appointment of one or more activist stockholders to our Board, which may cause concern to our existing or potential collaboration partners (including Tier 1 automotive suppliers), employees, and other stockholders; may be exploited by our competitors; may result in the loss of potential business opportunities or limit our ability to develop and commercialize our products; and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners. In addition, activist directors may make overly burdensome demands of Company management and materially and unnecessarily increase management’s workload. Furthermore, if customers choose to delay, defer, or reduce transactions with us or do business with our competitors instead of us, then our business, financial condition, and operating results would be adversely affected. In addition, our share price could experience periods of increased volatility as a result of stockholder activism.
Our Charter provides, subject to limited exceptions, that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the sole and exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.
Our Charter requires, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, that derivative actions brought in our name, actions against our directors, officers, and employees for breach of fiduciary duty, and other similar actions may be brought only in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware except any action (A) as to which the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of the Court of Chancery within ten days following such determination), (B) which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery, or (C) for which the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction. In regard to any action arising under the Exchange Act, our Charter provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the sole and exclusive forum. In regard to any action arising under the Securities Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, our Charter provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum.
Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all lawsuits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to lawsuits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Our Charter provides that the exclusive forum provision will be applicable to the Securities Act to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. We note that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce the exclusive forum provision and that this exclusive forum provision does not purport to waive compliance with any federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If a court were to find such provision to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in another jurisdiction, which could harm our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our common stock shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to the forum provisions in our Charter. This choice of forum provision may limit the ability of one of our stockholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum that such stockholder might believe is more favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, other employees, or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims, although our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Charter to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in another jurisdiction, which could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The provision of our Charter that authorizes our board of directors to issue preferred stock from time to time based on terms approved by our board of directors may delay, defer, or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that stockholders might consider in their best interest.
The provision of our Charter that authorizes our board of directors to issue preferred stock from time to time based on terms approved by our board of directors may delay, defer, or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that stockholders might consider to be in their best interest.
If securities or industry analysts cease publishing research or reports about us, our business, our competitors, or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, then the price and trading volume of our common stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our competitors, or our market. If any of the analysts who may cover us change their recommendation regarding our stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the price of our common stock would likely decline. In the past, analysts that previously covered us, stopped their coverage of us. If no analysts cover us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
Interest in our common stock from retail and other individual investors could result in increased volatility in the market price of our common stock, which could have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock and your investment.
Retail and other individual investors, which we believe make up a significant segment of our overall stockholder base, may have played a significant role in the market dynamics that have resulted in substantial volatility in the trading volume and market price of our stock, similar to what has been experienced by, for example, the common stock of GameStop Corp., AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and certain other so-called “meme” stocks. At such times, the rapid and substantial increases or decreases in the trading volume or market price of our stock may be unrelated to our operating performance, macroeconomic trends, or industry fundamentals, and substantial increases in the trading volume or value of our stock at such times may obscure the significant risks and uncertainties that we face. This volatility has been attributed, in part, to strong and atypical retail investor interest, which may be expressed on financial trading and other social media sites and online forums.
We have in the past and may in the future experience significant interest in our common stock from such investors, and as a result the trading volume and market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. There is no guarantee that we will continue to benefit from such retail and individual investor interest, even if our business or financial performance is strong. If investor sentiment changes, this could have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock and your investment.
Retail and individual investor sentiment (including as may be expressed on financial trading and other social media sites and online forums) may also influence the amount and status of short interest in our common stock. This could increase the likelihood of our common stock being the target of a “short squeeze,” particularly because a proportion of our common stock has been in the past and may in the future be traded by short sellers. A short squeeze and/or focused investor trading in anticipation of a short squeeze could lead to volatile price movements in shares of our common stock that may be unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance or prospects. Or, if investors no longer believe a short squeeze is viable, the market price of our common stock may rapidly decline. Accordingly, investors that purchase shares of our common stock during what may be considered a short squeeze may lose a significant portion of their investment.
We do not expect to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.
We do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, our stockholders may need to rely on sales of their shares after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
Information technology is important to our business operations and we are committed to protecting the privacy, security, and integrity of our data, as well as our employee, customer, and vendor data. Accordingly, we have established processes, procedures, and controls to identify, manage, assess, and mitigate material risks from cybersecurity threats, as well as identify, contain, and respond to cybersecurity incidents. These processes include, but are not limited to, monitoring and updating of our information technology and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address, and mitigate risks associated with unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses, and other events that could have a security impact. Additionally, to protect and secure sensitive data, we employ multi-factor authentication, a suite of security tools, systems monitoring and alerting, audit logs, and controls across our major systems, devices, and business processes. We engage with external experts to evaluate and test our cybersecurity risk preparedness. Regular exams and threat and security assessments with these third parties ensure that our cybersecurity strategies align with industry best practices. To manage cybersecurity risks associated with third-party service providers, we impose security requirements upon our suppliers, including maintaining an effective security management program and notifying us in the event of any known or suspected cyber incident. We also conduct company-wide security awareness training periodically to provide employees the opportunity to gain an understanding of the various forms of cybersecurity incidents and enable our employees to handle and report the majority of suspicious activities or threats. We currently maintain a cyber insurance policy that provides coverage for security breaches; however, such insurance may not be sufficient in type or amount to cover us against claims related to security breaches, cyber-attacks, or other related breaches.
As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are not aware of any cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. However, despite our efforts, we cannot eliminate all risks from cybersecurity threats, or provide assurances that we have not experienced an undetected cybersecurity incident. For more information about these risks, see the risk factor within Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, entitled "We, as well as our suppliers and partners, are subject to cybersecurity risks to operational systems, infrastructure, integrated software in our lidar solutions, and the data processed by those solutions, and any material failure, weakness, interruption, cyber event, incident, or breach of security could adversely affect our business by causing a disruption of our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential or other business-critical information, and/or damage our business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our business financial condition, and operating results."
Cybersecurity Governance
Cybersecurity risks are among the enterprise risks that our Board of Directors oversees, primarily through delegation to the Audit Committee of the Board. The Audit Committee assists the Board in overseeing our privacy and information policies and reviewing our cybersecurity program. The Audit Committee engages with our management team, including our Director of IT and our Chief Financial Officer, and receives periodic reports on cybersecurity. In addition, management updates the Audit Committee, as necessary, regarding any material cybersecurity incidents, as well as any incidents with lesser impact potential. The Board receives regular updates on the activities of the Audit Committee, including with regard to cybersecurity oversight. These cybersecurity reviews by the Audit Committee or Board of Directors generally occur at least once annually, or more frequently as determined to be necessary.
The day to day operations of our cybersecurity risk management program are overseen by our Director of IT, who reports to our Chief Financial Officer. Our Director of IT has served in this position for 6 years. He has over 39 years of IT experience, including over 10 years of experience in security compliance. Our Director of IT supervises efforts to prevent, detect, mitigate, and remediate cybersecurity risks and incidents through various means, which may include briefings from internal personnel, threat intelligence, alerts, or reports produced by security tools deployed in the IT environment.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters is located in Pleasanton, California, where we lease 6,522 square feet pursuant to a lease that initially expires on November 30, 2027, unless we choose to exercise a five-year renewal option. The Pleasanton facility contains engineering, R&D, operations, customer support, marketing, and administrative functions. We believe our existing facility is in good condition and suitable for the conduct of our business.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In or about July of 2024, AEye, Inc.’s wholly owned subsidiary, AEye Technologies, Inc. (“AEye Tech,” formerly known as AEye, Inc.) surrendered possession of the premises as described in that certain Office Lease dated April 26, 2019 (the “Lease”), entered into by and between the predecessor-in-interest to IGEP Park Place, LLC, as landlord (the “Landlord”) and AEye Tech, as tenant. A copy of the Lease was filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2021. In connection with AEye Tech’s surrender of possession, AEye Tech was purported to be served with a complaint that was filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Alameda on August 26, 2024 (the “Complaint”) that (1) alleges AEye Tech is in breach of the Lease because of, among other things, AEye Tech’s failure to pay rent as required by the Lease and (2) provides notice to AEye Tech that the Lease had been terminated by the Landlord. The Complaint does not quantify the damages sought thereunder, however, as discovery in the litigation has only recently commenced, the only quantification of damages is the Landlord’s informal demand at the outset of the litigation of approximately $4.35 million, which is net of the $2.15 million security deposit retained by the Landlord. If we are unable to resolve the purported default under the Lease and AEye, Inc. is subsequently found liable for the amounts claimed by the Landlord that are allegedly owed to it by AEye Tech, it could have a material adverse effect on AEye, Inc.’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, from time to time, we may become involved in actions, claims, suits, and other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, including assertions by third parties relating to intellectual property infringement, breaches of contract or warranties, or employment-related matters. Other than as stated above, we are not currently a party to any actions, claims, suits or other legal proceedings the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would individually or in the aggregate have a material effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information for Common Stock
Our common stock has been listed on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “LIDR” since we started trading on the public markets following the close of the business combination on August 16, 2021.
Stockholders
As of February 18, 2025, we had approximately 57 holders of record of our common stock and thousands of additional beneficial holders. Because many of our shares of common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these record holders.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings and do not expect to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None, other than as previously disclosed by the Company.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Please read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with “Note about Forward-Looking Statements,” Part I, Item 1 “Business,” Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
This overview provides a high-level discussion of our operating results and some of the trends that affect our business. We believe that an understanding of these trends is important to understanding our financial results for fiscal year 2024, as well as our future prospects. This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, nor is it intended to be a substitute for the detailed discussion and analysis provided elsewhere in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
All dollar amounts expressed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are in thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts and unless otherwise specified.
Reverse Stock Split
On December 27, 2023, we effected a 1-for-30 reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split, every thirty (30) shares of issued and outstanding shares of common stock were combined into one (1) share of common stock. We did not issue fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who were otherwise entitled to fractional shares of common stock were instead entitled to receive a proportional cash payment. The number of outstanding warrants was also proportionately adjusted.
In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, there was no change to the number of shares authorized or in the par value per share of $0.0001. Accordingly, unless we indicate otherwise, all historical per share data, number of shares issued and outstanding, stock awards, and other common stock equivalents for the periods presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.
Dowslake Transaction
On May 10, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Dowslake Microsystems Corporation, or Dowslake, pursuant to which Dowslake agreed to purchase 330,823 shares of common stock for a purchase price of $854, which represents a per share purchase price of $2.58, and an unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $146 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000.
Registered Direct Offering
On May 29, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering, an aggregate of 727,706 shares of Common Stock at a per share purchase price of $3.448 for gross proceeds of approximately $2,509, before deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us.
New Circle Transaction
On July 25, 2024, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with New Circle Principal Investments LLC, or New Circle, pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to sell to New Circle, and New Circle is obligated to purchase, up to $50,000 of our Common Stock. Such sales of common stock by us, if any, may occur from time to time at our sole discretion, over a 36-month period.
A.G.P. Transaction
On September 12, 2024, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement with Alliance Global Partners, or A.G.P., pursuant to which we may issue and sell through A.G.P., up to $2,600 of our common stock from time to time through an "at-the-market" equity offering program. Such sales of common stock by us, if any, may occur from time to time at our sole discretion, over a 36-month period. In December 2024 and January 2025, we increased the amount of our common stock that we may issue and sell through AGP, up to $5,230 and $15,293, respectively.
Convertible Note Transaction
On January 2, 2025, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to finance an aggregate principal amount of up to $3,240 with a certain institutional investor and issued (i) a senior unsecured convertible promissory note (the "Note") in the aggregate principal amount of $3,240 for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000 and (ii) a warrant to purchase up to 805,263 shares of our common stock. The Note, subject to an original issue discount of 7.4%, has a term of eighteen months and accrues interest at the rate of 7.0% per annum. The Note is convertible into Common Stock, at a per share conversion price equal to $2.22, subject to adjustments noted in the Note. The Warrant has an initial exercise price of $2.22, and is exercisable after the six month and one day anniversary of its issuance (the “Initial Exercisability Date”) until for four years following the Initial Exercisability Date.
Key Factors Affecting Our Operating Results
We believe that our future performance and success depends to a substantial extent on our ability to capitalize on the opportunities described herein, which in turn are subject to significant risks and challenges, including those discussed below and the risk factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We are subject to those risks common in the technology industry and also those risks common to early stage companies including, but not limited to:
| • | the possibility of not being able to successfully develop or commercialize our products; |
| • | securing additional capital in a timely manner in order to meet operating cash flow needs; doing so on terms that are favorable to us, or at all, which may be challenging given the current capital markets and overall macroeconomic conditions; |
| • | maintain and establish relationships with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers to facilitate "design wins" with potential end customers, which in our case are automotive OEMs; |
| • | develop and protect our intellectual property; |
| • | comply with existing and new or modified laws and regulations applicable to our business; |
| • | maintain and enhance the value of our reputation and brand; |
| • | hire, integrate, and retain talented people at all levels of our organization; and |
| • | successfully develop new solutions to enhance the experience of, and deliver value to, our customers. |
Market Trends and Uncertainties
We anticipate growing demand for our 4SightTM Intelligent Sensing Platform across two major markets, Automotive and Non-Automotive. We believe this expected growth will allow us to capture market share as well as pursue specialized opportunities like highway autonomous driving applications that benefit from our products. We anticipate concentrating on the Automotive market by more effectively leveraging our business model, focusing on advanced driver-assistance systems, or ADAS, autonomous driving, and commercial trucking. In addition, we will look for opportunities in the Non-Automotive market, such as in the railway, security, and intelligent transportation systems, or ITS segments. This strategy provides us with multiple opportunities for sustained growth by enabling new applications and product features across these market segments. However, as our customers continue their R&D projects to commercialize solutions that rely on lidar technology, it is difficult to estimate the timing of ultimate end market demand and customer adoption. In the Automotive market for example, which accounted for an insignificant portion of our revenues in 2024 and 70% of our revenues in 2023, our growth and financial performance will be heavily influenced by our ability to successfully integrate into OEM programs that require years of development, testing, and validation. Because of the size and complexity of these OEM programs, having Tier 1 partnerships should provide a substantial competitive advantage over our competitors given their large scale, mass-production capabilities, and existing OEM relationships held by our Tier 1 partners. If we fail to remain engaged with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers, it may have an adverse effect on our business. The markets for lidar are projected to see significant growth in both the near and long-term.
As is common in early-stage companies with limited operating histories, we are subject to risks and uncertainties such as those described in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Since inception, we have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations and expect to continue incurring losses up to commercialization, which means we are dependent upon raising additional capital to provide the cash necessary to continue our ongoing operations. As a result, it remains critical for us to preserve cash and manage spending to extend our liquidity. We also plan to improve our liquidity position through securing additional financing, engaging with partners and OEMs, and executing on our critical milestones. However, successfully raising capital is outside of our control and there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to us, on a timely basis, or at all.
During 2024, we raised $12,905 in gross proceeds through share issuances on our stock purchase agreements and other financing initiatives. After year-end, we raised an additional $11,055 in gross proceeds through share issuances on our stock purchase agreements and a convertible note. We also have access to additional liquidity through our ELOC and ATM facilities.
Partnerships and Commercialization
Our technology is designed to be a key enabler in certain Automotive and Non-Automotive market applications. Because our technology must be integrated into a broader solution by our customers, it is critical that we achieve design wins with these customers. The time to achieve a design win varies based on the market and application. We consider design wins to be critical to our future success, although the revenue that may be generated by each design win and the time necessary to achieve such a design win can vary significantly, making it difficult to predict our financial performance. In the Non-Automotive market, our strategy has been to sell our lidar solutions to customers utilizing components that are sourced, in part, from the Tier 2 automotive supply chain and assembled by our contract manufacturing partners. In the Automotive market, we will utilize a licensing model with Tier 1 suppliers that would generate a royalty for us and, hence, can be more easily replicated with multiple Tier 1 suppliers. As the Tier 2 automotive supply chain matures, we intend to leverage those suppliers, and the volume created for the Automotive market, to participate in the Non-Automotive market. With that in mind, in the fourth quarter of 2023, we made the decision to wind down our legacy product line for the Non-Automotive market and curtailed support. Since the launch of our new product, Apollo, in 2024, we have seen renewed interest from Non-Automotive customers across a broad range of sectors and are actively engaged on multiple opportunities.
In early 2024, we engaged LITEON as our Tier 1 automotive supplier and are actively working with them to bring our products to market. As part of this initiative, LITEON has committed to building and delivering Apollo B0 samples to us by the first quarter of 2025, marking a significant milestone in our product development. This partnership has enabled us to leverage their manufacturing expertise to produce high-quality samples that meet stringent performance standards, which is a critical step towards scaling production and delivering our advanced lidar solutions to the market. In May 2024, we announced a strategic partnership with ATI and LighTekton Co., Ltd to manufacture and distribute our products in China. This collaboration opens access to a potential $2.5 billion market opportunity. By leveraging ATI's and LighTekton's extensive networks and manufacturing capabilities, we aim to accelerate our market penetration and deliver our advanced lidar solutions to a broader audience. We have also made substantial progress in our collaboration efforts with Nvidia, demonstrating significant advances in the high-speed and long-range detection performance of our lidar systems, which we believe puts us on track for future integration with their Hyperion platform. Given these engagements are relatively recent, there is no guarantee that these endeavors will be successful.
We believe our revenue and profitability will also be dependent upon our success in licensing our technology to Tier 1 automotive suppliers, such as our current Tier 1 partner, LITEON, or our previous partner Continental, which represented 70% of 2023 revenue, and these partners securing program awards from OEMS and scaling to high volume production of our lidar sensors. Delays in autonomy programs by OEMs that we are currently or plan to be working with through our Tier 1 partners could result in us being unable to achieve our revenue and profitability targets in the time frame we anticipate, or at all.
Restructuring
In 2023, we implemented a revised strategic plan, which focused on key products and critical customer engagements and aligned our operations with evolving business needs by focusing on our transition from research and development to the commercialization of our automotive products, while winding down our legacy Non-Automotive product and reducing fixed operating costs. In August 2024, fixed operating costs were further reduced by the termination of the prior headquarters lease.
The winding down of our legacy Non-Automotive product, combined with an accumulation of other triggering events such as the termination of our partnership with Continental, and a current period and history of cash flow losses, indicated that the carrying amount of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable. We performed an impairment review of our long-lived assets as of December 31, 2023 and wrote down our property and equipment and the ROU asset and leasehold improvements related to the prior headquarters lease to its fair value.
As a result of the implementation of our revised strategic plan and the impairment review of our long-lived assets, we recorded restructuring charges of $19,153 for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily relating to one-time employee termination benefits, inventory and other current asset write-downs, losses on purchase commitments, and impairment and disposal charges on our long-lived assets. We recorded restructuring gains of $368 for the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily relating to the net gain on the termination of the prior headquarters lease, losses on purchase commitments and one-time termination benefits.
Gross Margin
Our gross margins will depend on numerous factors, including, among others, the selling price of our products, pricing of our development contracts with customers, royalty rates on licenses we grant to our customers, unit volumes, product mix, component costs, personnel costs, contract manufacturing costs, overhead costs, and product features. Our gross margins have in the past and may continue to be negatively impacted by inventory write-downs. As an example, in 2023, we recorded inventory write-downs of $7,005 relating to the transition to certain higher grade components in our automotive products as well as the winding down of our legacy product line for the Non-Automotive market. In the future, we expect to generate attractive gross margins from licensing our lidar technology and software to our Tier 1 partners in the Automotive market. We also anticipate being able to leverage on our foundation in the Automotive market to move to other markets.
To date, our revenue has primarily been generated through development contracts with OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers, as well as unit sales of our products to Non-Automotive customers. These development contracts primarily focus on customization of our proprietary 4SightTM product capabilities to our customers’ applications, typically involving software implementation to assist with sensor connection and control, customization of scan patterns, and enhancement of particular perception capabilities to meet specific customer needs. In general, development contracts that require more complex configurations have higher prices. We expect development contracts to remain a significant part of our business in the near-term, but represent a smaller share of our total revenue over time, as we increase our focus on technology licensing in the Automotive market and over time leverage the economies of scale we achieve to move into other markets including the Non-Automotive market.
Investment and Innovation
Our proprietary adaptive, intelligent lidar technology delivers industry-leading performance, addressing the toughest challenges in achieving partial or full autonomy. Unlike traditional sensing systems that passively collect data, our active 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform employs principles from automated targeting systems and biomimicry to actively scan the environment, intelligently focusing on critical elements to enable safer, smarter, and faster decisions in complex scenarios.
In June 2024, we introduced Apollo, the first product in our 4Sight™ Flex family of next-generation lidar sensors. Apollo offers best-in-class range and resolution in a compact, power-efficient, and cost-effective form factor, making it ideal for both automotive and non-automotive applications. Apollo can be integrated behind the windshield, on the roof, or in the grille, allowing original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to implement essential safety features with minimal impact on vehicle design. This innovative sensor leverages our 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform, providing a highly programmable and customizable lidar solution that can be updated through software. With a horizontal field of view up to 120° and long-range detection capabilities of up to 1 km, Apollo is poised to be a key player in advancing vehicle safety and autonomy, as well as smart infrastructure and logistics applications.
We believe our financial performance is significantly dependent on our ability to maintain a technology leadership position. This is further dependent on the investments we make in research and development and our ability to commercialize our products. We believe price is becoming a critical differentiator in the marketplace and OEMs are favoring companies that have the infrastructure to build lower cost products at higher volumes. It is essential that we continually identify and respond to rapidly evolving customer requirements, develop and introduce innovative new products, enhance and service existing products, lower bill of materials, or BOM costs, industrialize, the manufacturing process, and generate strong market demand for our products. If we fail to do this, our market position and revenue may be adversely affected, and our investments in that area will not be recovered.
Basis of Presentation
We currently conduct our business through one operating segment.
Components of Results of Operations
Total Revenues
We categorize our revenue as (1) prototype sales and (2) development contracts. In 2024 and 2023, our prototype sales revenue primarily related to unit sales of our 4SightTM product. Revenue from prototype sales is typically recognized at a point in time when the control of goods is transferred to the customer, generally upon delivery or shipment to the customer.
Development contracts represented the majority of our total revenues in 2024 and 2023. Revenue from development and/or collaboration arrangement contracts are earned from R&D activities and collaboration with OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers. These contracts primarily focus on customization of our proprietary 4SightTM capabilities to our customers’ applications, typically involving software implementation to assist with sensor connection and control, customization of scan patterns, and enhancement of perception capabilities to meet specific customer needs. Revenue from development contracts is recognized when we satisfy performance obligations in the contract, which can result in recognition at either a point in time or over time. This assessment is made at the outset of the arrangement for each performance obligation.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue includes the costs directly associated with the production of prototypes and certain costs associated with development contracts. Such costs for prototypes include direct materials, direct labor, indirect labor, inventory write downs, losses on purchase commitments, warranty expense, and allocation of overhead. Costs associated with development contracts include the direct costs and allocation of overhead costs involved in the execution of the contracts.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development
Our research and development, or R&D, efforts are focused primarily on hardware, software, and system engineering related to the design and development of our advanced lidar solutions. R&D expenses include:
| • | personnel-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, bonuses, one-time termination benefits, and stock-based compensation expense; |
| • | third-party engineering and contractor costs; |
| • | engineering parts and test units; |
| • | new hardware and software expenses; and |
| • | allocated overhead expenses. |
R&D costs are expensed as they are incurred. With a reduced workforce and consolidated global footprint, we plan to be more focused on investments that support our strategy and product development goals in the future. We expect our R&D costs to increase slightly from 2024 as we continue to invest in the development of our Apollo product.
Sales and Marketing
Historically, our sales and marketing, or S&M, efforts were focused primarily on sales, business development, and marketing programs in pursuit of revenue contracts from potential and existing customers. S&M expenses include:
| • | personnel-related expenses, including salaries, benefits, bonuses, one time termination benefits, and stock-based compensation expense; |
| • | demonstration equipment; |
| • | trade shows expenses, advertising, and promotions expenses for press releases and other public relations services; and |
| • | allocated overhead expenses. |
We expect our S&M expenses to continue to be relatively low as we expect to leverage our Tier 1 partners to commercialize our products and manage relationships with the OEMs in the Automotive market. In the Non-Automotive market, we anticipate using the same supply chain to manufacture through global contract manufacturers, and we expect to sell our products primarily through system integrator channel partners that may integrate our lidar sensor and software as part of a larger solution for an end customer.
General and Administrative
Our general and administrative, or G&A, spending supports all business functions. G&A expenses include:
| • | personnel-related costs, including salaries, benefits, bonuses, one-time termination benefits, and stock-based compensation expense for executive, finance, legal, operations, human resources, technical support, and other administrative personnel; |
| • | consulting, accounting, audit, legal, and other professional fees; |
| • | insurance premiums, software and computer equipment costs, general office expenses; and |
| • | allocated overhead expenses. |
We expect our G&A expenses to decrease slightly with reduced facility costs and professional fees, while continuing to incur expenses to support other departments as we continue to develop and commercialize our Apollo product.
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Note and Warrant Liabilities
The changes in fair value of the 2022 Note and warrant liabilities are the result of the change in fair value at each reporting date. The 2022 Note and warrant liabilities are recorded at fair value for each reporting period, and the changes in fair value are reported within other income (expense), net during the period. We also elected to record interest expense on the 2022 Note as changes in fair value.
Interest Income, Interest Expense and Other
Interest income and other consists primarily of interest earned on our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. These amounts will vary based on our cash and cash equivalents balances and market rates. Interest income and other also includes gains on sale of property and equipment. Interest expense and other consists primarily of financing costs, and amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on marketable securities, net.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2024 and 2023
The results of operations presented below should be reviewed in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included elsewhere in this report. The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands, except for percentages):
| | Year ended December 31, | | | Change | | | Change | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | | | $ | | | | % |
Prototype sales | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 477 | | | $ | (380 | ) | | | (80 | )% |
Development contracts | | | 105 | | | | 987 | | | | (882 | ) | | | (89 | )% |
Total revenue | | | 202 | | | | 1,464 | | | | (1,262 | ) | | | (86 | )% |
Cost of revenue | | | 778 | | | | 15,319 | | | | (14,541 | ) | | | (95 | )% |
Gross loss | | | (576 | ) | | | (13,855 | ) | | | 13,279 | | | | (96 | )% |
Research and development | | | 16,389 | | | | 26,171 | | | | (9,782 | ) | | | (37 | )% |
Sales and marketing | | | 551 | | | | 12,528 | | | | (11,977 | ) | | | (96 | )% |
General and administrative | | | 18,312 | | | | 25,234 | | | | (6,922 | ) | | | (27 | )% |
Impairment of long-lived assets | | | — | | | | 9,988 | | | | (9,988 | ) | | | (100 | )% |
Total operating expenses | | | 35,252 | | | | 73,921 | | | | (38,669 | ) | | | (52 | )% |
Loss from operations | | | (35,828 | ) | | | (87,776 | ) | | | 51,948 | | | | (59 | )% |
Change in fair value of convertible note and warrant liabilities | | | — | | | | (858 | ) | | | 858 | | | | (100 | )% |
Interest income and other | | | 799 | | | | 1,317 | | | | (518 | ) | | | (39 | )% |
Interest expense and other | | | (433 | ) | | | 248 | | | | (681 | ) | | | (275 | )% |
Total other income (expense), net | | | 366 | | | | 707 | | | | (341 | ) | | | (48 | )% |
Loss before income tax | | | (35,462 | ) | | | (87,069 | ) | | | 51,607 | | | | (59 | )% |
(Benefit) provision for income tax | | | (2 | ) | | | 57 | | | | (59 | ) | | | (104 | )% |
Net loss | | $ | (35,460 | ) | | $ | (87,126 | ) | | $ | 51,666 | | | | (59 | )% |
Revenue
Prototype Sales
Prototype sales decreased by $380, or 80%, to $97 for the year ended December 31, 2024 from $477 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This was primarily due to a decrease in units sold of our 4Sight™-based Non-Automotive product due to our focus in 2024 on executing key automotive product development milestones.
Development Contracts
Development contracts decreased by $882, or 89%, to $105 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $987 for the year ended December 31, 2023. The decrease was primarily due to lower development contract revenue as we fulfilled our obligations under a Tier 1 automotive supplier contract in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue decreased by $14,541, or 95%, to $778 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $15,319 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to fewer Non-Automotive product units sold in the current year, and also due to lower development contract costs as we completed our obligations under a Tier 1 automotive supplier contract in the fourth quarter of 2023. The decrease was also due to non-routine inventory write-downs associated with transitioning to certain higher-grade components in our automotive products as well as the implementation of our revised strategic plan which resulted in further inventory write-downs and losses related to purchase commitments.
Operating Expenses
Research and Development
Research and development expenses decreased by $9,782, or 37%, to $16,389 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $26,171 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily driven by the implementation of our revised strategic plan in 2023, with decreases in personnel costs of $4,055, stock-based compensation expense of $3,388, information technology and facilities expense of $778, engineering parts and lab equipment expense of $639, depreciation expense of $567, and third party research and development work of $534.
Sales and Marketing
Total sales and marketing expenses decreased by $11,977, or 96%, to $551 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $12,528 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily driven by the implementation of our revised strategic plan, with decreases in personnel costs of $5,853, stock-based compensation of $2,746, marketing and consultant spend of $2,090, travel and entertainment expenses of $446, and information technology and facilities expense of $642.
General and Administrative
Total general and administrative expenses decreased by $6,922, or 27%, to $18,312 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $25,234 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily driven by the implementation of our revised strategic plan, with decreases in stock-based compensation of $2,754, accounting, legal, and consulting fees of $1,036, insurance of $947, facility and information technology, net of allocations, of $853, depreciation expense of $644 and personnel costs of $547.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Impairment of long-lived assets decreased to zero for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $9,988 for the year ended December 31, 2023, primarily as a result of the non-cash impairment of property and equipment and right-of-use assets that occurred in 2023, but no similar event in 2024. In the fourth quarter of 2023 we determined that an accumulation of triggering events, including the winding down of our legacy Non-Automotive product as a result of the implementation of our automotive-first strategic plan to focus on commercialization of our automotive product, the termination of our partnership with a large Tier 1 automotive supplier, and a current period and history of cash flow losses, required an impairment review of our long-lived assets, resulting in our long-lived assets being written down to their fair values.
Change in Fair Value of Convertible Note and Warrant Liabilities
Change in fair value of convertible note and warrant liabilities decreased by $858, or 100%, to zero for the year ended December 31, 2024, from a loss of $858 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to settlement of the 2022 Note in 2023 and an immaterial change in the fair value of warrant liabilities in 2024.
Interest Income and Other
Interest income and other decreased by $518, or 39%, to $799 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $1,317 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to less interest earned on our marketable securities in the current period.
Interest Expense and Other
Interest expense and other increased by $681, or 275%, to a loss of $433 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from a gain of $248 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was primarily due to costs of $1,124 related to financing arrangements executed in the period, partially offset by an increase in accretion of discounts on marketable securities, net of $220.
(Benefit) Provision for Income Tax
(Benefit) provision for income tax decreased to a benefit of $2 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from a provision of $57 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This change is due to changes in pretax income (loss) in the U.S. and certain foreign entities and changes in tax rates.
Net Loss
Net loss decreased by $51,666, or 59%, to $35,460 for the year ended December 31, 2024, from $87,126 for the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was primarily due to decreases in operating expenses following restructuring and cost reduction efforts in connection with our revised strategic plan as announced during 2023 and decreases in cost of revenues as we completed our obligations related to a Tier 1 automotive supplier contract in the fourth quarter of 2023.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not exclusively, sales volume and timing of revenue, our efforts to establish and maintain relationship with one or more Tier 1 automotive suppliers and the timing of an OEM design win, our ability to extend our cash runway based on the restructuring initiatives announced in the previous year, the timing and extent of spending to support R&D efforts, how quickly we can commercialize our products, and market adoption of new and enhanced products and features. As of December 31, 2024, our cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities totaled $22,278. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had a net loss of $35,460 and $87,126, respectively. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for at least the next several years.
To date, our principal sources of liquidity have been proceeds received from the issuance of equity. In December 2021, we entered into a Purchase Agreement, with Tumim Stone Capital LLC, or Tumim Stone, pursuant to which we had the right, but not the obligation, to issue and sell to Tumim Stone over a 36-month period up to $125,000 of our common stock. On May 6, 2022, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1, which related to the offer and resale of up to 1,028,847 shares of our common stock to be purchased by Tumim Stone, pursuant to the Purchase Agreement. On July 24, 2024, this Purchase Agreement was terminated in conjunction with us entering into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement, or CSPA, with New Circle. In total, 996,866 shares were issued under the Tumim Stone CSPA.
In September 2022, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an investor allowing for the sale and issuance of up to two convertible notes, each with cash proceeds of $10,000, for a total of $20,000 in proceeds between the two issuances (each, a "Note Closing"). On September 15, 2022, we closed the first Note Closing with the investor and received cash proceeds of $9,850 (net of fees paid to the investor). On March 15, 2024, our right to effect a Second Closing under the Securities Purchase Agreement terminated.
On September 26, 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission declared our registration statement on Form S-3 to be effective which allows us to raise up to $200,000 in capital over the next three years subject to baby shelf limitations.
On May 10, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Dowslake, pursuant to which Dowslake agreed to purchase 330,823 shares of common stock for a purchase price of $854, which represents a per share purchase price of $2.58, and an unsecured convertible promissory note with a principal amount of $146 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,000.
On May 29, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering using our shelf registration statement on Form S-3, an aggregate of 727,706 shares of common stock at a per share purchase price of $3.448 for gross proceeds of $2,509, before deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us.
On July 25, 2024, we entered into a CSPA with New Circle, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell up to $50,000 of common stock, at our discretion from time to time, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in the CSPA.
On September 12, 2024, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement, or ATM Agreement, with A.G.P., pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell up to $2,600 of common stock, at our discretion from time to time through an "at-the-market" equity offering, subject to the satisfaction of the conditions in the ATM Agreement. In December 2024 and January 2025, we increased the amount of our common stock that we may issue and sell through AGP, having a new aggregate value offering of up to $5,230 and $15,293 respectively.
On January 2, 2025, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to finance an aggregate principal amount of up to $3,240 with a certain institutional investor and issued a note and warrant to purchase up to 805,263 shares of our common stock.
Until we can generate sufficient revenue from the sale of our products to cover operating expenses, working capital, and capital expenditures, we expect the funds raised in the transactions described above, and other potential sources of capital, to fund our near-term cash needs.
If we are required to raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, dilution of stockholders will result. Any debt securities issued may also have rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. The terms of debt securities or borrowings could impose significant restrictions on our operations. We may also be unable to raise additional capital through the sale of securities and debt financing, or to do so on terms that are favorable to us, particularly given current capital market and overall macroeconomic conditions.
We are dependent upon raising additional capital to provide the cash necessary to continue our ongoing operations and execute against our strategic objectives. We believe that our potential liquidity will enable us to fund our operating expenses, working capital, and capital expenditure requirements for a period of at least twelve months from the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If our cash needs are greater than we anticipate, we may be required to reduce our operating expenses further or raise additional capital sooner. Given the current macroeconomic environment, OEMs appear to be more cautious about their capital spending and investments into new technologies and as a result we have seen the timelines for certain opportunities delayed which may negatively impact the time for us to reach positive cash flows from operations. Our plans for the use of cash in the long-term (beyond twelve months from this Annual Report) are primarily related to funding operating expenses to support the commercialization of our products. For additional information regarding our cash requirements from lease obligations, lease termination liability, and contractual obligations, see Notes 6 and 21 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, was appointed as receiver. On March 27, 2023, First Citizens Bank entered into a whole bank purchase of SVB. We had and continue to have deposit accounts at SVB. The standard deposit insurance amount is up to $250 per depositor, per insured bank, for each account ownership category. We do not maintain any other material accounts or lines of credit with SVB. Although we continue to maintain an operating account at SVB, we subsequently established operating accounts at other financial institutions to mitigate the risks associated with any one financial institution's potential risk of insolvency or receivership.
Cash Flow Summary
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Net cash provided by (used in): | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | (26,620 | ) | | $ | (50,725 | ) |
Investing activities | | $ | 7,744 | | | $ | 55,351 | |
Financing activities | | $ | 10,060 | | | $ | (6,758 | ) |
Operating Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash used in operating activities was $26,620. Factors affecting our operating cash flows during this period were a net loss of $35,460, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on marketable securities, net of change in accrued interest of $611, and gain on termination of operating lease, net, of $491, offset by stock-based compensation of $9,047, common stock purchase agreement costs of $1,124, noncash lease expense of $956, and depreciation and amortization of $129. Within operating activities, the net changes in operating assets and liabilities were cash used of $1,498, primarily driven by decreases in accrued expenses and other liabilities, operating lease liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities of $2,389, $955 and $345, respectively. Cash used was offset by cash provided by decreases in prepaid and other current assets, inventories, and other noncurrent assets of $1,490, $245 and $215, respectively, and an increase in accounts payable of $156.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in operating activities was $50,725. Factors affecting our operating cash flows during this period were net loss of $87,126, offset by stock-based compensation of $18,071, impairment of long-lived assets of $9,988, inventory write-downs of $7,712, depreciation and amortization of $1,547, noncash lease expense of $1,406, loss on advances to suppliers of $1,385, and change in fair value of convertible note and warrant liabilities of $858. Within operating activities, the net changes in operating assets and liabilities were cash used of $4,460, primarily driven by increases in inventories of $2,459, and decreases in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and operating lease liabilities of $3,135 and $1,528, respectively. Cash used was offset by cash provided by decreases in prepaid and other current assets, accounts receivable, and other noncurrent assets of $2,279, $451, and $284, respectively, and an increase in accounts payable of $252.
Investing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by investing activities was $7,744. The primary factors affecting net cash provided by investing activities during this period were proceeds from redemptions and maturities of marketable securities of $32,426, partially offset by the purchases of marketable securities of $24,241 and purchases of property and equipment of $486.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash provided by investing activities was $55,351. The primary factors affecting net cash provided by investing activities during this period were proceeds from redemptions and maturities of marketable securities of $76,350, partially offset by the purchases of marketable securities of $19,331 and purchases of property and equipment of $1,951.
Financing Activities
For the year ended December 31, 2024, net cash provided by financing activities was $10,060. The primary factors affecting our financing cash flows during this period were proceeds from common stock purchase agreements of $11,080, partially offset by stock issuance costs related to common stock purchase agreements of $1,232.
For the year ended December 31, 2023, net cash used in financing activities was $6,758. The primary factors affecting our financing cash flows during this period were payments for convertible note redemptions of $6,235 and payments for taxes related to net settlement of equity awards of $1,445, partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and from issuance of common stock through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of $455 and $334, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are in accordance with GAAP. We are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods, fair value measures, and the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our actual results may differ significantly from these estimates due to changes in judgments, assumptions and conditions as a result of unforeseen events or otherwise, which could have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations. We believe our critical accounting policies involve the greatest degree of judgement and complexity and have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
We recognize revenues from R&D and development arrangements with OEMs and suppliers to the OEMs and from the sale of prototype products. Revenue represents the amount of expected consideration we are entitled to receive upon the transfer of promised goods or services in the ordinary course of our activities and is recorded net of sales taxes. We recognize revenue when performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of a promised good or service to a customer. For performance obligations that are satisfied at a point in time, we also consider the following indicators to assess whether control of a promised good or service is transferred to the customer: (i) right to payment; (ii) transfer of legal title; (iii) physical possession; (iv) significant risks and rewards of ownership; and (v) acceptance of the goods or service. For performance obligations satisfied over time, we recognize revenue over time by measuring the progress toward complete satisfaction of a performance obligation.
The application of various accounting principles related to the measurement and recognition of revenue requires us to make judgments and estimates. Specifically, complex development arrangements with nonstandard terms and conditions may require relevant contract interpretation to determine the appropriate accounting treatment, including whether the promised goods and services specified in a multiple element arrangement are capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. Determining whether products or services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together may sometimes require significant judgment. When a contract involves multiple performance obligations, we account for individual products and services separately if the customer can benefit from the product or service on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the product or service is separately identifiable from other promises in the arrangement. For multiple element arrangements, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation using the relative stand-alone selling price, or SSP. Judgment is required to determine SSP for each distinct performance obligation. We use a range of amounts to estimate SSP when products and services are sold separately. In instances where SSP is not directly observable, we determine SSP using information that may include other observable inputs, or use a residual approach to estimate the SSP for performance obligations where SSP is highly variable or uncertain. Changes in judgments with respect to these assumptions and estimates could impact the timing or amount of revenue recognition.
Emerging Growth Company Status
Section 102(b)(1) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can choose not to take advantage of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, and any such election to not take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable.
We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, and we have elected to take advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period for new or revised financial accounting standards. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of that year’s second fiscal quarter, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more during such fiscal year (as indexed for inflation), (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt in the prior three-year period, or (iv) December 31, 2025. We expect to continue to take advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period, although we may decide to adopt such new or revised accounting standards early to the extent permitted by such standards. This may make it difficult or impossible to compare our financial results with the financial results of another public company that is either not an emerging growth company or is an emerging growth company that has chosen not to take advantage of the extended transition period exemptions because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for recently adopted accounting pronouncements and recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of our business. Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position due to adverse changes in financial market prices and rates.
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Nonetheless, if our costs were to become subject to significant inflationary pressures, we may not be able to fully offset such higher costs. Our inability or failure to do so could harm our business, results of operations or financial condition.
Interest Rate Risk
As of December 31, 2024, we had cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $22,278, which consisted primarily of deposits in our bank accounts, money market funds, and marketable securities. Such interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Our investment policy is focused on the preservation of capital and supporting our liquidity needs. We invest in highly rated securities, while limiting the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer other than the U.S. government. A hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations due to the short-term nature of our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Credit Risk
Our concentration of credit risk is determined by evaluating each customer and each vendor that accounts for more than 10% of our accounts receivable and accounts payable, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, there were three customers each accounting for 10% or more of our accounts receivable and one vendor accounting for 10% or more of our accounts payable.
We perform credit evaluations as needed and generally do not require collateral for our customers. We analyze accounts receivable, historical percentages of uncollectible accounts, and changes in payment history when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts for potential credit losses on customers’ accounts. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we wrote off $70 and $0, respectively, and recorded a $35 and $35 provision for expected credit losses, respectively.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Our foreign currency exchange gains and losses have been generated primarily from fluctuations in the euro versus the U.S. dollar, and the Japanese yen versus the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of all our entities is the U.S. dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities and transactions denominated in currencies other than an entity’s functional currency are remeasured into its functional currency using current exchange rates, whereas non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured using historical exchange rates. We recognize gains and losses from such remeasurements within interest income and other, or interest expense and other, as applicable on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss in the period of occurrence. We have in the past experienced, and in the future expect to experience, foreign currency exchange gains and losses on our non-functional currency-denominated balances. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. To date, we have not engaged in exchange rate hedging activities, and we do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
AEye, Inc.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and Board of Directors of AEye, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of AEye, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2024.
Santa Clara, California
February 24, 2025
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and Board of Directors of AEye, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AEye, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023, and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2023, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 16 to the financial statements, the accompanying 2023 and 2022 financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Francisco, California
March 26, 2024 (February 24, 2025 as to Note 16)
We began serving as the Company’s auditor in 2018. In 2024 we became the predecessor auditor.
AEYE, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share and par value) |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 10,266 | | | $ | 16,932 | |
Marketable securities | | | 12,012 | | | | 19,591 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 11 | | | | 131 | |
Inventories, net | | | 176 | | | | 583 | |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 2,706 | | | | 2,517 | |
Total current assets | | | 25,171 | | | | 39,754 | |
Right-of-use assets | | | 652 | | | | 11,226 | |
Property and equipment, net | | | 605 | | | | 281 | |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | 2,150 | |
Other noncurrent assets | | | 692 | | | | 906 | |
Total assets | | $ | 27,120 | | | $ | 54,317 | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 3,598 | | | $ | 3,442 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | 7,709 | | | | 6,585 | |
Total current liabilities | | | 11,307 | | | | 10,027 | |
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent | | | 479 | | | | 14,858 | |
Convertible notes | | | 146 | | | | — | |
Other noncurrent liabilities | | | 64 | | | | 409 | |
Total liabilities | | | 11,996 | | | | 25,294 | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 20) | | | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock—$0.0001 par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding | | | — | | | | — | |
Common stock—$0.0001 par value: 600,000,000 shares authorized; 13,734,160 and 6,310,090 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2024 and 2023 | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 388,213 | | | | 366,647 | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | | 5 | | | | 10 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (373,095 | ) | | | (337,635 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | | | 15,124 | | | | 29,023 | |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 27,120 | | | $ | 54,317 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AEYE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (In thousands, except share and per share data) |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
REVENUE: | | | | | | | | |
Prototype sales | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 477 | |
Development contracts | | | 105 | | | | 987 | |
Total revenue | | | 202 | | | | 1,464 | |
Cost of revenue | | | 778 | | | | 15,319 | |
Gross loss | | | (576 | ) | | | (13,855 | ) |
OPERATING EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | |
Research and development | | | 16,389 | | | | 26,171 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 551 | | | | 12,528 | |
General and administrative | | | 18,312 | | | | 25,234 | |
Impairment of long-lived assets | | | — | | | | 9,988 | |
Total operating expenses | | | 35,252 | | | | 73,921 | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | | (35,828 | ) | | | (87,776 | ) |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of convertible note and warrant liabilities | | | — | | | | (858 | ) |
Interest income and other | | | 799 | | | | 1,317 | |
Interest expense and other | | | (433 | ) | | | 248 | |
Total other income (expense), net | | | 366 | | | | 707 | |
Loss before income tax | | | (35,462 | ) | | | (87,069 | ) |
(Benefit) provision for income tax | | | (2 | ) | | | 57 | |
Net loss | | $ | (35,460 | ) | | $ | (87,126 | ) |
Change in net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax | | | (5 | ) | | | 1,264 | |
Change in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk, net of tax | | | — | | | | (21 | ) |
Net losses reclassified into income during the period, net of tax | | | — | | | | 46 | |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (35,465 | ) | | $ | (85,837 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
PER SHARE DATA | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per common share (basic and diluted) | | $ | (4.89 | ) | | $ | (14.95 | ) |
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted) | | | 7,253,683 | | | | 5,827,721 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AEYE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (In thousands, except share data) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | Other | | | | | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Paid-in | | | Comprehensive | | | Accumulated | | | Stockholders’ | |
| | Preferred Stock | | | Common Stock | | | Capital | | | Income (Loss) | | | Deficit | | | Equity | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE—December 31, 2023 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 6,310,090 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 366,647 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | (337,635 | ) | | $ | 29,023 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,047 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 9,047 | |
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 44,255 | | | | — | | | | 134 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 134 | |
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units | | | — | | | | — | | | | 558,223 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | (137,803 | ) | | | — | | | | (161 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (161 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under the Common Stock Purchase Agreements | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,852,059 | | | | — | | | | 13,041 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 13,041 | |
Stock issuance costs related to the Common Stock Purchase Agreements | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (588 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (588 | ) |
Issuance of common stock through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | — | | | | — | | | | 107,336 | | | | — | | | | 93 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 93 | |
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5 | ) | | | — | | | | (5 | ) |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (35,460 | ) | | | (35,460 | ) |
BALANCE—December 31, 2024 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 13,734,160 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 388,213 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | (373,095 | ) | | $ | 15,124 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Additional | | | Other | | | | | | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Paid-in | | | Comprehensive | | | Accumulated | | | Stockholders’ | |
| | Preferred Stock | | | Common Stock | | | Capital | | | Income (Loss) | | | Deficit | | | Equity | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE—December 31, 2022 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 5,436,637 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 345,757 | | | $ | (1,279 | ) | | $ | (250,509 | ) | | $ | 93,970 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,071 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,071 | |
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 81,814 | | | | — | | | | 455 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 455 | |
Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units | | | — | | | | — | | | | 330,661 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards | | | — | | | | — | | | | (125,825 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,441 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,441 | ) |
Issuance of common stock under the Common Stock Purchase Agreement | | | — | | | | — | | | | 19,500 | | | | — | | | | 136 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 136 | |
Stock issuance costs related to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (3 | ) |
Issuance of common stock through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | — | | | | — | | | | 64,773 | | | | — | | | | 334 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 334 | |
Conversions of convertible note into common stock | | | — | | | | — | | | | 502,530 | | | | — | | | | 3,338 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,338 | |
Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,289 | | | | — | | | | 1,289 | |
Net loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (87,126 | ) | | | (87,126 | ) |
BALANCE—December 31, 2023 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 6,310,090 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | 366,647 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | (337,635 | ) | | $ | 29,023 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AEYE, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) |
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (35,460 | ) | | $ | (87,126 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 129 | | | | 1,547 | |
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment, net | | | (12 | ) | | | 59 | |
Noncash lease expense relating to operating lease right-of-use assets | | | 956 | | | | 1,406 | |
Gain on termination of operating lease, net | | | (491 | ) | | | (35 | ) |
Impairment of long-lived assets | | | — | | | | 9,988 | |
Common stock purchase agreement costs | | | 1,124 | | | | — | |
Inventory write-downs, net of scrapped inventory | | | 161 | | | | 7,712 | |
Loss on advances to suppliers | | | — | | | | 1,385 | |
Change in fair value of convertible note and warrant liabilities | | | — | | | | 858 | |
Realized loss on instrument-specific credit risk | | | — | | | | 46 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 9,047 | | | | 18,071 | |
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on marketable securities, net of change in accrued interest | | | (611 | ) | | | (211 | ) |
Expected credit losses, net of write-off | | | 35 | | | | 35 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 85 | | | | 451 | |
Inventories, current and noncurrent, net | | | 245 | | | | (2,459 | ) |
Prepaid and other current assets | | | 1,490 | | | | 2,279 | |
Other noncurrent assets | | | 215 | | | | 284 | |
Accounts payable | | | 156 | | | | 252 | |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | | (2,389 | ) | | | (3,135 | ) |
Operating lease liabilities | | | (955 | ) | | | (1,528 | ) |
Contract liabilities | | | — | | | | (987 | ) |
Other noncurrent liabilities | | | (345 | ) | | | 383 | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (26,620 | ) | | | (50,725 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Purchases of property and equipment | | | (486 | ) | | | (1,951 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment | | | 45 | | | | 283 | |
Proceeds from redemptions and maturities of marketable securities | | | 32,426 | | | | 76,350 | |
Purchases of marketable securities | | | (24,241 | ) | | | (19,331 | ) |
Net cash provided by investing activities | | | 7,744 | | | | 55,351 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | | 134 | | | | 455 | |
Proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes | | | 146 | | | | — | |
Payments for convertible note redemptions | | | — | | | | (6,235 | ) |
Taxes paid related to the net share settlement of equity awards | | | (161 | ) | | | (1,445 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under the Common Stock Purchase Agreements | | | 11,080 | | | | 136 | |
Stock issuance costs related to the Common Stock Purchase Agreements | | | (1,232 | ) | | | (3 | ) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through the Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | 93 | | | | 334 | |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | | | 10,060 | | | | (6,758 | ) |
NET DECREASE IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | | | (8,816 | ) | | | (2,132 | ) |
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH—Beginning of period | | | 19,082 | | | | 21,214 | |
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH—End of period | | $ | 10,266 | | | $ | 19,082 | |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid for interest | | $ | - | | | $ | 115 | |
Cash (refunded) paid for income taxes, net | | | (2 | ) | | | 16 | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Operating lease liabilities extinguished upon termination of lease | | | 16,325 | | | | 335 | |
Operating lease right-of-use asset derecognized upon termination of lease | | | 10,371 | | | | — | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligation | | | 753 | | | | — | |
Conversion of convertible notes and accrued interest into Class A common stock | | | — | | | | 3,338 | |
Stock issuance costs included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 198 | | | | — | |
Stock issuance costs through issuance of common stock | | | 282 | | | | — | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in prepaid and other current assets | | | 1,679 | | | | — | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AEYE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data or otherwise stated)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
AEye, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company” or “AEye”) is a provider of high-performance, active lidar systems for vehicle autonomy, advanced driver-assistance systems, or ADAS, and robotic vision applications. AEye's 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing Platform includes a solid-state software definable active lidar sensor, an adaptive sensing SmartScan architecture to scan dynamic scenes/targets, and a sophisticated signal processing capability that provides precise measurements and imaging for various safety-critical applications. The 4Sight™ Intelligent Sensing platform captures more information with less data, facilitating faster, more accurate, and more reliable perception of the environment.
AEye, formerly known as CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III, (“CF III”), was originally incorporated in Delaware on March 15, 2016 under the name CF SPAC Re Inc. On February 17, 2021, AEye Technologies, Inc., then known as AEye, Inc., entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with CF III. Based on CF III’s business activities, it was a “shell company” as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. On August 16, 2021, the business combination contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger was closed and CF III changed its name to AEye, Inc.
The Company’s common stock and public warrants are listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) under the symbols “LIDR” and “LIDRW”, respectively. Unless otherwise specified, “we,” “us,” “our,” “AEye,” and the “Company” refers to AEye, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Principle of Consolidation and Liquidity
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AEye, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company has funded its operations primarily through the business combination and issuances of stock. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s existing sources of liquidity included cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $22,278.
ASC 205-40, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern, requires management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. In each reporting period, including interim periods, an entity is required to assess conditions known and reasonably knowable as of the financial statement issuance date to determine whether it is probable an entity will not meet its financial obligations within one year from the financial statement issuance date.
As is common in early-stage companies with limited operating histories, the Company is subject to risks and uncertainties such as its ability to develop and commercialize its products; produce and deliver lidar and software products meeting acceptable performance metrics; attract new and retain existing customers; develop, obtain, or progress strategic partnerships; secure an automotive OEM design win; secure additional capital to support the business plan; and other risks and uncertainties related to liquidity.
Since its inception, the Company has incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $373,095. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred a net loss of $35,460 and $87,126, respectively, and the Company had net cash outflows from operating activities of $26,620 and $50,725, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $22,278 of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. As the Company is still in its early stages, it is expected to incur additional operating losses and negative cash flows as it continues to focus on achieving commercialization of its lidar solutions. It remains critical for the Company to preserve cash and manage spending to extend its liquidity.
[
The Company is dependent upon raising additional capital to provide the cash necessary to continue its ongoing operations and execute against its strategic objectives. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2024, the Company issued shares through stock purchase agreements and a convertible note totaling $12,905. Subsequent to year-end, the Company raised an additional $11,055 in gross proceeds through financing activities (see Note 23, Subsequent Events.) However, successfully raising capital is outside of management's control and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain additional financing on terms acceptable to the Company, on a timely basis, or at all. Based on cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 31, 2024, together with the net proceeds from financing activities subsequent to year-end, cash, available cash equivalents and marketable securities is sufficient to fund the Company’s operations for at least the next 12 months from the filing date of these consolidated financial statements. At some point after that time, the Company anticipates it will require additional financing to fund its future operations.
Based upon the results of Management’s assessment, which has been performed as of February 24, 2025, these consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
Reverse Stock Split
On December 27, 2023, the Company effected a 1-for-30 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the "Reverse Stock Split"). Pursuant to the Reverse Stock Split, every thirty (30) shares of issued and outstanding shares of common stock were combined into one (1) share of common stock. The Company did not issue fractional shares in connection with the Reverse Stock Split. Stockholders who were otherwise entitled to fractional shares of common stock were instead entitled to receive a proportional cash payment. The number of shares of common stock issuable under our equity incentive plans and exercisable under the outstanding warrants were also proportionately adjusted.
In connection with the Reverse Stock Split, there was no change to the number of shares authorized or in the par value per share of common stock of $0.0001. Accordingly, all historical per share data, number of shares issued and outstanding, stock awards, and other common stock equivalents for the periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect the Reverse Stock Split.
Emerging Growth Company
The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and it may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected to take advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period for new or revised financial accounting standards. This may make it difficult or impossible to compare the Company’s financial results with the financial results of another public company that is either not an emerging growth company or is an emerging growth company that has chosen not to take advantage of the extended transition period exemptions because of the potential differences in accounting standards used.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include lease termination liability, write-downs of inventory to the lower of cost or net realizable value, investments, embedded derivative and warrant liabilities, stock-based compensation, impairment of long-lived assets, and fair value of the 2022 convertible note.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Marketable Securities
The Company considers all highly liquid investments, such as treasury bills, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, and money market instruments with maturities of three months or less at the time of acquisition to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents primarily consist of amounts held in interest-bearing money market accounts that are readily convertible to cash. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair market value.
Marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value as determined based upon quoted market prices or pricing models for similar securities. Unrealized gains and losses in fair value of the available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities are reported in other comprehensive income (loss). When the AFS debt securities are sold, cost is based on the specific identification method, and the realized gains and losses are included in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation at each balance sheet date. The Company considers all AFS debt securities as available for use to support current operations, including those with maturity dates beyond one year and are classified as current assets under marketable securities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. AFS debt securities included in marketable securities on the consolidated balance sheets consist of securities with original maturities greater than three months at the time of purchase. Interest on marketable securities is included within interest income and other on the consolidated statements of operations. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are included within interest expense and other on the consolidated statements of operations.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash of $2,150 as of December 31, 2023, consisted of funds that were contractually restricted as to usage or withdrawal due to a contractual agreement. The Company had a letter of credit to the amount of $2,150 with Citibank N.A. as of December 31, 2023 as security for the payment of rent on its headquarters. In August 2024, the former landlord drew down on the letter of credit and the restricted cash was used to offset the letter of credit draw (see further discussion in Note 6). The Company had no restricted cash as of December 31, 2024.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities, and accounts receivable. The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with major financial institutions, which management assesses to be of high credit quality, to limit the exposure of each investment. The Company’s marketable securities have investment grade ratings when purchased which mitigates risk.
The Company’s accounts receivable are derived from customers located in the U.S. and Europe. The Company mitigates its credit risks by performing ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial conditions. The Company generally does not require collateral.
The Company’s concentration of risk related to accounts receivable and accounts payable was determined by evaluating the number of customers and vendors accounting for 10% or more of accounts receivable (“AR”) and accounts payable (“AP”). As of December 31, 2024, the Company had three customers, each accounting for 10% or more of AR and one vendor accounting for 10% or more of AP. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had four customers, each accounting for 10% or more of AR and one vendor accounting for 10% or more of AP.
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, revenue from the Company’s major customers representing 10% or more of total revenue was as follows:
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Customer A | | | 50 | % | | | * | |
Customer B | | | 32 | % | | | * | |
Customer C | | | * | | | | 70 | % |
*Customer accounted for less than 10% of total revenue in the period.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company defines fair value as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that is determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. For additional discussion on fair value of financial instruments, see Note 2.
Derivatives
The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). The Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, and how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for affect the financial statements.
The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible debt instruments are reviewed to determine whether they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract and recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value.
An evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of the derivative issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability. The fair value of derivative liabilities is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. For additional discussion of derivatives, see Note 2.
Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Amounts collected on accounts receivable are included in net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
If necessary, accounts receivable are reduced by a provision for expected credit losses, which is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of credit losses inherent in its existing accounts receivable. The Company reviews the provision quarterly based on historical experience with each customer and the specifics of each arrangement. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had write-offs of $70 and $0, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, the Company recorded a $35 provision for expected credit losses. There is no provision for credit losses as of December 31, 2024.
Inventories, net
Inventories consist of raw materials, work in progress, and finished goods. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value and costs are computed under the standard cost method. Inventories that are not expected to be consumed in the next 12 months are classified within Other noncurrent assets. Prototype inventory cost consists of the associated raw material, direct labor, indirect labor and other overhead costs. The Company evaluates the need for inventory write-downs associated with obsolete, slow moving, and non-sellable inventory by reviewing estimated net realizable values on a periodic basis and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory to adjust the carrying value of inventory as needed. The Company's current and noncurrent inventory held as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 was written down by $4,659 and $5,062, respectively, in order to record inventory at its estimated net realizable value.
Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from 2 to 7 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or expected useful life of the improvements. Construction in progress is the construction or development of property and equipment that have not yet been placed in service. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the consolidated balance sheet and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss in the period realized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the test for recoverability identifies a possible impairment, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. The fair value is calculated based on estimated salvage value, estimated orderly liquidation value, or a value-in-use approach depending on the asset's highest and best use. When an impairment loss is recognized for assets to be held and used, the adjusted carrying amount of the long-lived asset becomes its new cost basis which is depreciated over the asset's remaining useful life. The Company recorded $9,988 of non-cash impairment charges in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2023. No impairment charges were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Warrant Liability
The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant's specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance. The warrants assumed in connection with the 2022 convertible note are accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, under which the warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as liabilities. The Private Placement Warrants issued in connection with the business combination are classified as liabilities. The Company adjusts the warrants to fair value at each reporting period. The warrant liabilities are subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date until exercised, and any change in fair value is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement is or contains a lease at inception. The Company evaluates the classification of leases at commencement, and, as necessary, at modification. Operating leases, consisting of office leases, are included in Right-of-use ("ROU") assets, Accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent, on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The Company did not have any finance leases as of December 31, 2024. ROU assets represent the Company's right to an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the Company's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made prior to lease commencement and initial direct costs and excludes lease incentives. Variable lease payments not dependent on an index or a rate are expensed as incurred and are not included within the ROU asset and lease liability calculation. Variable lease payments primarily include reimbursements of costs incurred by lessors for common area maintenance and utilities. As most of the Company's leases do not include an implicit rate, the Company uses the incremental borrowing rate based on the estimated rate of interest for collateralized borrowing over a similar term of the lease payments at commencement date in determining the present value of future payments. The incremental borrowing rate is a hypothetical rate based on the Company's understanding of what its credit rating would be for a secured borrowing when the lease was executed. The Company's lease term includes the noncancelable period, any rent-free periods provided by the lessor, and options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that it will exercise that option. At lease inception, and in subsequent periods as necessary, the Company estimates the lease term based on its assessment of extension and termination options that are reasonably certain to be exercised. Operating lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company elected to exclude from its balance sheets recognition of leases having a term of 12 months or less (short-term leases) and elected to not separate lease components and non-lease components for its long-term real estate leases.
Convertible Notes
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2020-06, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (“ASU 2020-06”). The Company has elected to apply the fair value measurement option to the 2022 convertible note on the date that the Company first recognized the convertible note on September 15, 2022. The Company acknowledges that its election to apply the fair value option is irrevocable. As of December 31, 2024, the 2022 convertible note has no outstanding principal balance as all outstanding principal and accrued interest has been fully settled. Changes in fair value were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and changes in fair value related to credit risk are recorded in other comprehensive loss. The Company reported interest expense, including accrued interest, related to this convertible debt under the fair value option, within the change in fair value of convertible notes in the consolidated statement of operations.
Revenue Recognition
The Company generates revenues from the sale of prototypes and from development arrangements with automakers and suppliers to automakers. Under FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), the Company accounts for such arrangements as contracts with customers and accordingly recognizes revenue by applying the following steps:
| • | Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer |
| • | Identification of the performance obligations in the contract |
| • | Determination of the transaction price |
| • | Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract |
| • | Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation |
Revenue from the sale of prototypes is generally recognized at a point in time when control of the goods is transferred. Certain prototype sales contracts include services to install and commission or customize the prototypes for customers. Revenues from these services are categorized as prototype revenue and recognized either over time as the services are being performed, or at a point in time, depending on the nature of the services and whether the criteria for recording revenue over time are met in accordance with ASC 606.
Revenue from development arrangements is either recognized at a point in time or over time depending on the performance obligations in the contract. For performance obligations that are satisfied over time, such as services which require engineering and development based on customer requirements, the Company recognizes revenue using an input method based on contract costs incurred to date compared to total estimated contract costs.
See Note 17, Revenue, for additional information related to the application of ASC 606 to the Company’s primary revenue streams.
Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis and therefore are excluded from revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations
When a contract involves multiple performance obligations, the Company accounts for individual products and services separately if the customer can benefit from the product or service on its own or with other resources that are readily available to the customer and the product or service is separately identifiable from other promises in the arrangement. The consideration is allocated between separate performance obligations in proportion to their estimated standalone selling price (SSP). The SSP reflects the price the Company would charge for a specific product or service if it were sold separately in similar circumstances and to similar customers. If the selling price is not directly observable, the Company determines SSP using information that may include other observable inputs, such as the cost plus margin approach, to estimate SSP. In instances where SSP is not directly observable, the Company determines SSP using information that may include other observable inputs such as expected costs plus margin, or uses the residual approach for performance obligations whose SSP is highly variable or uncertain.
The Company provides standard product warranties for a term of typically 30 days to one year to ensure that its products comply with agreed-upon specifications. Standard warranties are considered to be assurance type warranties and are not accounted for as separate performance obligations. Estimated future warranty costs are accrued and charged to cost of sales in the period that the related revenue is recognized. These estimates are based on historical warranty experience and any known or expected changes in warranty exposure, such as trends of product reliability and costs of repairing and replacing defective products. The Company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities on a quarterly basis and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Warranty costs are included within accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 9 for further information on warranty reserve amounts.
Other Policies, Judgments and Practical Expedients
Contract assets and liabilities. Contract assets primarily represent revenues recognized for performance obligations that have been satisfied but for which amounts have not been billed. Contract liabilities relate to deferred revenue. Deferred revenue consists of amounts that have been invoiced and/or cash received but for which revenue has not been earned. This generally includes unrecognized revenue balances for development arrangements. Deferred revenue that will be realized during the succeeding 12-month period is recorded within current liabilities and the remaining deferred revenue is recorded as noncurrent liabilities. The Company did not have any contract assets or contract liabilities as of December 31, 2024.
Right of return. The Company’s general terms and conditions for its contracts do not contain a right of return that allows the customer to return products and receive a credit. Therefore, the Company does not estimate returns and generally recognizes revenue at contract price upon product shipment or delivery.
Significant financing component. In certain arrangements, the Company receives payment from a customer either before or after the performance obligation has been satisfied. The expected timing difference between the payment and satisfaction of performance obligations for all of the Company’s contracts is one year or less; therefore, the Company applies a practical expedient and does not consider the effects of the time value of money on transaction price. The Company’s contracts with customer prepayment terms do not include a significant financing component because the primary purpose is not to receive financing from the customers. The Company did not have any outstanding receivables with financing components as of December 31, 2024.
Contract modifications. The Company may modify contracts to offer customers additional products or services. Each of the additional products and services are generally considered distinct from those products or services transferred to the customer before the modification. The Company evaluates whether the contract price for the additional products and services reflects the standalone selling price as adjusted for facts and circumstances applicable to that contract. In these cases, the Company accounts for the additional products or services as a separate contract. In other cases where the pricing in the modification does not reflect the standalone selling price as adjusted for facts and circumstances applicable to that contract, the Company accounts for the additional products or services as part of the existing contract primarily on a prospective basis.
Judgments and estimates. Accounting for contracts recognized over time under ASC 606 involves the use of various techniques to estimate total contract revenue and costs. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, it is possible that estimates of costs to complete a contract will be revised in the near term. The Company reviews and updates its contract-related estimates quarterly, and records adjustments as needed. For those performance obligations for which revenue is recognized using a cost-to-cost input method, changes in total estimated costs, and related progress towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation, are recognized in the period in which the revisions to the estimates are made.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue primarily consists of costs directly associated with the production of those prototypes that are held for sale and certain costs associated with development arrangements. Such costs for prototypes are direct materials, direct labor, indirect labor, inventory write-downs, losses on purchase commitments, warranty expense, and allocation of overhead. Direct and indirect labor includes personnel-related costs and packaging and procurement respectively associated with the production of prototypes. Other costs such as indirect manufacturing costs are recognized in research and development and general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Costs associated with development arrangements include the direct costs and allocation of overhead costs involved in the execution of the contract.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses include personnel costs (including salaries, benefits, bonuses, one-time termination benefits, and stock-based compensation), new hardware and software materials to the extent no future economic benefits are expected, other related expenses such as lab equipment, third party development-related contractors, and allocated overhead expenses. Substantially all the R&D expenses are related to the development of new products and services, including contract development expenses. They are expensed as incurred and included in the consolidated statements of operation and comprehensive loss.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation by measuring and recognizing compensation expense for all share-based awards based on estimated grant-date fair values. The Company uses the straight-line attribution method to allocate compensation cost to reporting periods over each awardee’s requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the award. The Company measures nonemployee awards at the date of grant, which generally is the date at which a grantor and a grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a share-based payment award. The Company’s policy is to recognize the effect of forfeitures in the period they occur. The grant-date fair value of the restricted stock units, or “RSUs,” is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. The grant-date fair value for stock options and stock purchase rights under the employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP") is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The grant-date fair value for RSUs with an associated market condition is estimated using the Monte-Carlo simulation model. Both the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the Monte-Carlo simulation model require the input of subjective assumptions, including the award’s expected term and the price volatility of the underlying stock.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets to the extent that these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies, and results of recent operations. If the Company determines that it would be able to realize deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance would be made to reduce the provision for income taxes.
The Company records uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) on the basis of a two-step process in which determinations are made (1) whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Accrued interest and penalties are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no interest or penalties recorded.
Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed using net loss available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share reflects the dilutive effects of stock options, restricted stock units, preferred stock, stock to be issued under the ESPP, convertible notes, and warrants outstanding during the period to the extent such securities would not be anti-dilutive and is determined using the if-converted and treasury stock methods.
The Company calculates weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period using the Company’s common stock outstanding.
Basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders was the same for all periods presented as the inclusion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding was anti-dilutive, as AEye is currently operating in a net loss position.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity (net assets) from non-owner sources during a period, changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk, and net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures to increase the transparency and usefulness of income tax information through improvements to the income tax disclosures primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the effects of the new guidance.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires annual and interim disclosure of disaggregated disclosures of certain costs and expenses on the income statement. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, .2027, with early adoption permitted. Amendments are applied on a prospective basis with retrospective application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
The Company adopted ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, in the fourth quarter of 2024. The amendments in this update require public entities to disclose, on an annual and interim basis, significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker (the “CODM”) and which are included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss as well as disclosure of other segment items and a description of their composition. The amendments also require public entities to disclose the title and position of the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measure(s) of segment profit or loss in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate resources. The adoption of this guidance resulted in incremental disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
.
2. | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS |
The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities is determined in accordance with the fair value hierarchy established in FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy of ASC 820 requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs when measuring fair value and classifies those inputs into three levels:
Level 1—Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2—Observable inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, which are observable either directly or indirectly or can be corroborated by observable market data using quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Company's financial instruments that are not remeasured at fair value include accounts receivable, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, other current and noncurrent liabilities, and convertible note. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level of inputs used for such measurements were as follows (in thousands):
| | Fair Value Measured as of December 31, 2024 Using: | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and | | | | | |
| | Adjusted | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | | | Cash | | | Marketable | |
| | Cost | | | gains | | | Value | | | Equivalent | | | Securities | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 5,823 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,823 | | | $ | 5,823 | | | $ | — | |
Level 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate bonds | | | 9,660 | | | | 4 | | | | 9,664 | | | | — | | | | 9,664 | |
Commercial paper | | | 945 | | | | — | | | | 945 | | | | — | | | | 945 | |
U.S. Government securities | | | 1,402 | | | | 1 | | | | 1,403 | | | | — | | | | 1,403 | |
Total financial assets | | $ | 17,830 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 17,835 | | | $ | 5,823 | | | $ | 12,012 | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Private placement warrant liability | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Level 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative warrant liability | | | — | | | | — | | | | 26 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total financial liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| | Fair Value Measured as of December 31, 2023 Using: | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and | | | | | |
| | Adjusted | | | Unrealized | | | Fair | | | Cash | | | Marketable | |
| | Cost | | | gains | | | Value | | | Equivalent | | | Securities | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 16,377 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 16,377 | | | $ | 16,377 | | | $ | — | |
Level 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate bonds | | | 2,880 | | | | 1 | | | | 2,881 | | | | — | | | | 2,881 | |
Commercial paper | | | 8,809 | | | | 5 | | | | 8,814 | | | | — | | | | 8,814 | |
U.S. Government securities | | | 7,892 | | | | 4 | | | | 7,896 | | | | — | | | | 7,896 | |
Total financial assets | | $ | 35,958 | | | $ | 10 | | | $ | 35,968 | | | $ | 16,377 | | | $ | 19,591 | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Private placement warrant liability | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Level 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Derivative warrant liability | | | — | | | | — | | | | 26 | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total financial liabilities | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 26 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The Company’s financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value procedures were comprised of the following:
Money Market Funds: The Company holds financial assets consisting of money market funds. These securities are valued using observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Marketable Securities: The Company holds financial assets consisting of fixed-income U.S. government agency securities, corporate bonds, and commercial paper. The securities are valued using prices from independent pricing services based on quoted prices of identical instruments in less active or inactive markets. Additionally, quoted prices of similar instruments in active market or industry models using data inputs such as interest rates and prices that can be directly observed or corroborated in active markets are used to value marketable securities.
Derivative Warrant Liability: On September 15, 2022, the Company entered into a convertible note agreement with a face value of $10,500 (the "2022 Note"). The Company’s derivative warrant liability includes the warrants that were issued by the Company as part of the 2022 Note. The warrants are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The fair value is based on unobservable inputs, which represent Level 3 measurements within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value estimate of the warrants was based on a Monte-Carlo simulation model. Inherent in a Monte-Carlo simulation model are assumptions related to price, volatility, risk-free interest rate, term to expiration, and dividend yield. The price is based on the publicly traded price of the Company's common stock as of the measurement date. The Company estimated the volatility for the warrants based on the historical and implied volatilities of the Company's publicly traded common stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on interpolated U.S. Treasury rates, commensurate with a similar term to the warrants. The term to expiration was calculated as the contractual term of the warrants of four years. Finally, the Company does not currently anticipate paying a dividend. Any changes in these assumptions can change the valuation significantly. Changes in fair value are recognized in other income (expense) for each reporting period. Derivative Warrant Liability is included within other noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Private Placement Warrant Liability: The Private Placement Warrants are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The fair value is based on observable Level 2 inputs, specifically, the observable input of the Company's public warrants, as terms of both warrants are substantially similar. Any changes in the fair value of the liability are reflected in other income (expense), net, on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Private Placement Warrant liability is included within other noncurrent liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company measures certain nonfinancial assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, primarily property and equipment and ROU assets, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The fair value of the Company's property and equipment was based upon estimated salvage value or estimated orderly liquidation value, depending on the asset's highest and best use. As the fair value of property and equipment was estimated using primarily unobservable inputs, these are considered Level 3 fair value measurements. The fair value of the Company’s headquarters ROU asset and associated leasehold improvements were based on a value-in-use approach utilizing market rent comparable information, and is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement. For more information regarding impairment charges, see Notes 1, 6, 7, and 18.
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 inputs.
3. | CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH |
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 10,266 | | | $ | 16,932 | |
Restricted cash | | | — | | | | 2,150 | |
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | | $ | 10,266 | | | $ | 19,082 | |
Restricted cash of $2,150 as of December 31, 2023 consisted of funds that were contractually restricted as to usage or withdrawal due to a contractual agreement. The Company had a letter of credit in the amount of $2,150 with Citibank N.A. as security for the payment of rent on its headquarters. In August 2024, the landlord drew down on the letter of credit and the restricted cash was used to offset the letter of credit draw (see further discussion in Note 6, Leases).
Inventory, net of write-downs, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Raw materials | | $ | 158 | | | $ | 405 | |
Work in-process | | | — | | | | 159 | |
Finished goods | | | 18 | | | | 19 | |
Total inventory, net | | $ | 176 | | | $ | 583 | |
The Company also had $209 and $208 of noncurrent inventory (raw materials), net of write-downs, classified within other noncurrent assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively.
5. | PREPAID AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS |
Prepaid and other current assets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Prepaid expenses | | $ | 966 | | | $ | 2,386 | |
Advances to suppliers | | | — | | | | 79 | |
Receivable for issuance of common stock | | | 1,679 | | | | — | |
Other | | | 61 | | | | 52 | |
Total prepaid and other current assets | | $ | 2,706 | | | $ | 2,517 | |
The Company's advances to suppliers as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were written down by $1,041 and $1,385, respectively, associated with the winding down of its legacy Non-Automotive product as part of its revised strategic plan in 2023. See Note 18, Restructuring, for further details.
The Company leases office facilities in Northern California under non-cancelable operating leases. In July 2024, the Company entered into two new long-term leases, one of which the Company uses as its headquarters.
Some of the Company's leases include options to renew, with renewal terms that, if exercised by the Company, extend the lease term from two to five years. The exercise of these renewal options is at the Company's discretion. The Company's lease agreements do not contain any material terms and conditions of residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. The Company's short-term lease expense was determined to not be material.
On November 14, 2023, the Company assigned an operating lease resulting in the Company being relieved of its primary obligation under this lease. As a result of the lease assignment, a new tenant assumed the primary obligation under the lease, with the Company becoming secondarily liable. If the new tenant should fail to perform under the lease, the Company could be liable to fulfill any remaining lease obligations. The lease had a remaining term of 2.7 years as of December 31, 2024 with the Company serving as guarantor for the remaining term. The resulting maximum exposure includes $265 of undiscounted future minimum lease payments plus potential additional payments to satisfy maintenance, taxes, and insurance requirements for the remainder of the lease term.
In August 2024, one of the Company's existing leases, originally set to expire on November 30, 2026, was terminated early. In conjunction with the early termination, the Company recorded a net gain of $491 on termination of the operating lease during the year ended December 31, 2024. The net gain included a gain of $5,954, comprised of a $16,325 net liability reduction, partially offset by a $10,371 decrease in its remaining right of use asset. Additionally, in accordance with terms in the lease agreement and based on certain assumptions, the Company recorded a lease termination loss of $5,463, representing estimated unpaid rent for the remaining term. The net gain was recorded in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The lease termination liability was reduced by the draw-down of the $2,150 letter of credit by the landlord in August 2024; the remaining lease termination liability of $3,313 is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 18, Restructuring, and Note 21, Commitments and Contingencies, for further discussion.
The Company recorded a gain of $35 on early lease termination for one of its leases, originally set to expire in August 2027, within interest income and other on the consolidated statements of operations during the twelve months ended December 31, 2023.
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded an impairment charge on right-of-use assets of $2,570, included within impairment of long-lived assets within the Company's consolidated statements of operations. See Note 18, Restructuring. No impairment charges were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2024.
The components of operating lease expenses, excluding the gain on lease termination, for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Operating lease cost | | $ | 1,498 | | | $ | 2,379 | |
Variable lease cost | | | 204 | | | | 340 | |
Total operating lease cost | | $ | 1,702 | | | $ | 2,719 | |
Supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Cash paid for operating leases included in operating cash flows | | $ | (1,497 | ) | | $ | (2,500 | ) |
Supplemental balance sheet information related to operating leases as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 was as follows (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Operating lease right-of-use assets | | $ | 652 | | | $ | 11,226 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Operating lease liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Operating lease liabilities, current | | $ | 267 | | | $ | 2,415 | |
Lease termination liability | | | 3,313 | | | | — | |
Operating lease liabilities, non-current | | | 479 | | | | 14,858 | |
Total operating lease liabilities | | $ | 4,059 | | | $ | 17,273 | |
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | | | 2.89 | | | | 7.89 | |
Weighted average discount rate | | | 6.40 | % | | | 5.32 | % |
Maturities of lease liabilities, excluding the lease termination liability, were as follows (in thousands).
Years ending - December 31: | | | | |
2025 | | $ | 275 | |
2026 | | | 283 | |
2027 | | | 258 | |
Total lease payments | | | 816 | |
Less amount to discount to present value | | | (70 | ) |
Present value of lease liabilities | | $ | 746 | |
7. | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET |
Property and equipment, net as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 consists of the following (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Machinery and equipment | | $ | 171 | | | $ | 171 | |
Computers, software and related equipment | | | 25 | | | | 26 | |
Office furniture and equipment | | | 5 | | | | 24 | |
Vehicles | | | 56 | | | | 60 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 204 | | | | — | |
Construction in progress | | | 246 | | | | — | |
Total property and equipment | | | 707 | | | | 281 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (102 | ) | | | — | |
Property and equipment, net | | $ | 605 | | | $ | 281 | |
During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recorded impairment charges on assets classified as property and equipment of $7,418, included within impairment of long-lived assets within the Company's consolidated statements of operations. No impairment charges were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2024.
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment amounted to $129 and $1,547 recognized within research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The Company recorded disposals of gross property and equipment of $59 and $1,041 in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The carrying amounts of the property and equipment disposed in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $32 and $342, respectively.
8. | OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS |
Other noncurrent assets as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Noncurrent inventory | | $ | 209 | | | $ | 208 | |
Long-term prepaid expenses | | | 352 | | | | 626 | |
Security deposits | | | 131 | | | | 72 | |
Total other noncurrent assets | | $ | 692 | | | $ | 906 | |
9. | ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES |
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 were as follows (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Lease termination liability | | $ | 3,313 | | | $ | — | |
Accrued bonuses | | | 2,875 | | | | 2,053 | |
Accrued payroll | | | 347 | | | | 540 | |
Operating lease liabilities | | | 267 | | | | 2,415 | |
Accrued severance | | | — | | | | 402 | |
Accrued payroll taxes | | | 159 | | | | 317 | |
Accrued other | | | 748 | | | | 858 | |
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | $ | 7,709 | | | $ | 6,585 | |
2022 Convertible Note
On September 14, 2022, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an investor allowing for the sale and issue of up to two convertible notes, each with a principal balance of $10,500 and gross cash proceeds of $10,000, for a total of $20,000 in proceeds between the two issuances (each, a "Note Closing"). The first Note Closing ("First Closing") occurred on September 15, 2022, and the Company entered into a Senior Unsecured Convertible Note with the investor pursuant to which the Company issued to the investor one convertible note ("2022 Note") with a principal balance of $10,500 for net cash proceeds of $9,850. As part of the First Closing, the Company also issued warrants to the investor see Note 12 for further details. The second Note Closing ("Second Closing") lapsed on March 15, 2024, upon which the Company's right to effect a Second Closing automatically terminated.
The 2022 Note bore interest at an annual rate of 5.0%, in addition to an original issue discount of 4.76%, and had an initial a maturity date of March 15, 2024.
Beginning December 14, 2022, and the first trading day of each subsequent month (each a "Monthly Redemption Date" or an "Installment Date"), the Company was required to redeem the Monthly Redemption Amount until the 2022 Note was fully redeemed. The Monthly Redemption Amount, in most instances, was 1/15th of the original principal amount, plus any amount accelerated pursuant to the 2022 Note, accrued but unpaid interest, and late fees, if any. The principal and interest could be settled in cash or, so long as certain equity conditions were met and at the option of the Company, shares of common stock, which was payable together with the Monthly Redemption Amount.
If the Company elected to settle the Monthly Redemption Amount in shares of common stock, the number of shares to be settled was based on an Installment Conversion Price equal to the lower of (i) $75.00 or (ii) 95% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the applicable Monthly Redemption Date. If the Company elected to settle the Monthly Redemption Amount in cash, the Monthly Redemption Amount would have included a 5% premium.
The investor was permitted to accelerate up to four Monthly Redemption Amounts in any calendar month (each, an "Acceleration," and each such amount, an "Acceleration Amount", and the Conversion Date of any such Acceleration, each an "Acceleration Date") at the Acceleration Conversion Price, subject to a $2,800 limit per month. The Acceleration Conversion Price was the lower of (i) the Installment Conversion Price for such current Installment Date or (ii) the greater of $9.00 and 95% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the Acceleration Date.
If either the relevant Installment Conversion Price or Acceleration Conversion Price, as applicable, was less than $9.00 per share, then a Conversion Floor Price Condition existed and the Company must deliver to the investor the Conversion Installment Floor Amount in cash, in addition to the required number of shares, which were valued at $9.00 regardless of the actual trading price of the Company's shares. The Conversion Installment Floor Amount was an amount in cash equal to the product obtained by multiplying (A) the higher of (i) the highest price that the common stock traded at on the Trading Day immediately preceding the relevant Share Delivery Date and (ii) the applicable Installment Conversion Price or Acceleration Conversion Price and (B) the difference obtained by subtracting (i) the number of shares of common stock delivered to the investor on the applicable Share Delivery Date with respect to such Conversion from (ii) the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the applicable Installment or Acceleration amount subject to such Conversion, by (y) the applicable Installment Conversion Price. Interest payments were also trued-up in cash when the value of the Company's shares was below $9.00 per share.
The Company elected to apply the fair value option to the measurement of the 2022 Note. As a result of adopting the fair value option, no embedded derivatives were bifurcated from the 2022 Note. The Company classified the 2022 Note as a liability at fair value and remeasured the 2022 Note to fair value at each reporting period. The fair value measurement included the assumption of accrued interest and expense and thus a separate amount was not reflected on the consolidated statement of operations.
The 2022 Note was fully settled through Monthly Redemptions and Accelerations in 2023. As part of the debt extinguishment, the Company reclassified the accumulated change in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk out of accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet and into interest expense and other on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
The Company evaluated the Second Closing and associated warrants to be a contingently issuable financial asset with a fair value of zero at inception in accordance with ASC 815-40 Contracts in an Entity's own Equity. The contingently issuable warrants are considered issued for accounting purposes - see Note 12 for further details.
2024 Convertible Note
On May 10, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with an investor for the sale and issuance of 330,823 shares of common stock and a 5-year promissory note with a principal balance of $146 ( “May 2024 Note”) for total gross cash proceeds of $1,000. The May 2024 Note bears interest at an annual rate equal to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 1.0%, which is compounded quarterly in arrears, and has a maturity date of June 4, 2029. At maturity, the principal balance and accrued, unpaid and uncapitalized interest can be settled in cash, shares of common stock based on the closing price of the common stock as of the immediately preceding trading day, or any combination of the foregoing at the option of the investor.
11. | INTEREST EXPENSE AND OTHER |
Interest expense and other for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Common stock purchase agreement costs | | $ | 1,124 | | | $ | — | |
Amortization of premiums (accretion of discounts) on marketable securities, net | | | (694 | ) | | | (474 | ) |
Expected credit losses | | | 35 | | | | 35 | |
Loss on disposal of assets | | | — | | | | 111 | |
Other | | | (32 | ) | | | 80 | |
Interest expense and other | | $ | 433 | | | $ | (248 | ) |
The Company is authorized to issue 600,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 13,734,160 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
Class A Common Stock — Class A common stock has the following rights:
Voting rights: Each holder of Class A common stock will be entitled to one (1) vote in person or by proxy for each share of the Class A common stock held of record by such holder. The holders of shares of the Class A common stock will not have cumulative voting rights. Except as otherwise required in the Charter or by applicable law, the holders of the Class A common stock vote together as a single class on all matters on which stockholders are generally entitled to vote.
Dividend rights: Subject to any other provisions of the Charter, each holder of Class A common stock will be entitled to receive, in proportion to the number of shares of the Class A common stock held, such dividends and other distributions in cash, stock or property of the Company when, as and if declared thereon by the Board from time to time out of assets or funds of the Company legally available therefor.
Rights upon liquidation: In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up (either voluntary or involuntary) of the Company, after payments to creditors of the Company that may at the time be outstanding, and subject to the rights of any holders of the Company preferred stock that may then be outstanding, holders of shares of the Class A common stock will be entitled to receive ratably, in proportion to the number of shares of the Class A common stock held by them, all remaining assets of the Company available for distribution.
Preferred Stock — The Company has the authority, without stockholder approval, to issue shares of preferred stock from time to time on terms it may determine, to divide shares of preferred stock into one or more class or series and to fix for each such class or series the designations, preferences, privileges, and restrictions of preferred stock, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preference, and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of any series to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law. The issuance of the Company’s preferred stock could have the effect of decreasing the trading price of the Class A common stock, restricting dividends on the capital stock of the Company, diluting the voting power of the Class A common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of the capital stock of the Company, or delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. Although the Company does not currently intend to issue any shares of preferred stock, the Company may choose to do so in the future.
The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each with a par value of $0.0001 per share. As of December 31, 2024, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
Warrants — As of December 31, 2024, the Company had 5,555 Private Placement warrants and 255,555 Public warrants outstanding. Each warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of the Company's common stock at a price of $ 345.00 per share.
On September 15, 2022, in connection with the issuance of the 2022 Note, the Company issued warrants to the investor. The warrants are immediately exercisable and entitle the investor to purchase up to 58,333 shares of common stock at a price of $ 105.00 per share, subject to a four year term. As of December 31, 2024, no shares were exercised pursuant to the warrants.
Contingent Warrants - As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 58,333 contingently issuable warrants outstanding associated with the potential Second Closing under the Securities Purchase Agreement. As the Company did not effect a Second Closing by March 15, 2024, these warrants are no longer outstanding and will not be issued to the investor.
Tumim Stone Common Stock Purchase Agreement — On December 8, 2021, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and a Registration Rights Agreement with Tumim Stone Capital LLC (“Tumim Stone”). Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the Purchase Agreement, the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell to Tumim Stone, and Tumim Stone is obligated to purchase up to the lesser of (i) $125,000 of the Company’s common stock, or (ii) the Exchange Cap equal to 1,028,847 shares of the Company's common stock, unless the Company’s stockholders approve the issuance of shares in excess of the Exchange Cap, or the average price of all applicable sales of common stock to Tumim Stone under the Purchase Agreement equals or exceeds $148.46 per share. Upon the satisfaction of various commencement conditions, such as the filing of the registration statement which provides for the resale of such shares pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company has sole discretion to initiate such sales of common stock over the period of 36 months commencing December 8, 2021. In all instances, the Company may not sell shares of its common stock to Tumim Stone under the Purchase Agreement if doing so would result in Tumim Stone beneficially owning more than 9.99% of its common stock.
The purchase price per share to be purchased by Tumim Stone is equal to the volume-weighted average price for common stock on the applicable purchase date multiplied by 0.9615 (to be adjusted for any reorganization, recapitalization, non-cash dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, or similar transaction). The maximum number of shares the Company may sell to Tumim Stone on any single business day is the lesser of (i) $20,000 divided by the closing sale price of the common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the purchase date, and (ii) 0.15 multiplied by the average daily trading volume in common stock for the three trading days preceding the purchase date.
In connection with the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 10,087 restricted common shares in the Company to Tumim Stone. The Company determined that the right to sell additional shares represents a freestanding put option under ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging, and as such, the financial instrument was classified as a derivative asset with a fair value of zero at inception of the Purchase Agreement on December 8, 2021.
During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company issued 939,200 shares of its common stock under the Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of $2,489. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued 19,500 shares of its common stock under the Purchase Agreement for gross proceeds of $136. In July 2024 this Purchase Agreement was terminated.
New Circle Principal Investments LLC (“New Circle”) Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “CSPA”) — On July 25, 2024, the Company entered into a CSPA and a Registration Rights Agreement with New Circle. Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the CSPA, the Company has the right, but not the obligation, to sell to New Circle, and New Circle is obligated to purchase up to the lesser of (i) $50,000 of the Company's common stock, or (ii) the Exchange Cap equal to 1,721,755 shares of the Company's common stock, unless the Company's stockholders approve the issuance of shares in excess of the Exchange Cap, or the average price of all applicable sales of common stock to New Circle equals or exceeds $1.41 per share. The Company has sole discretion to initiate such sales of common stock over a period of 36 months. In all instances, the Company may not sell shares of its common stock to New Circle under the CSPA if doing so would result in New Circle beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the Company's common stock.
The purchase price per share to be purchased by New Circle shall equal either (i) the lowest volume-weighted average price for common stock either over a one-day trading period or 15 minutes after the number of intraday shares traded exceeds 500% of the shares included the purchase notice or one hour after the receipt of the purchase notice, or (ii) the volume-weighted average price for common stock for the three consecutive trading days commencing on the purchase notice date multiplied by 97.5%. The maximum number of shares the Company may sell to New Circle on any single business day is the lesser of (i) the number of shares equal to 100% of the average daily trading volume of the common stock of the Company during the five trading days immediately preceding the purchase notice, and (ii) 400,000 shares of common stock.
In connection with the CSPA, the Company issued to New Circle 225,563 shares of common stock in the Company as commitment shares for the facility. At issuance, the 225,563 shares of common stock had a fair value of $282 and were recorded to Interest expense and other in the Company's consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company determined that the right to sell additional shares represents a freestanding put option under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and as such, the financial instrument was classified as a derivative asset with a fair value of zero at inception of the CSPA on July 25, 2024.
As of December 31, 2024, including the commitment shares, the Company had issued 1,325,713 shares of its common stock to New Circle under the CSPA for gross proceeds totaling $1,679.
Alliance Global Partners (“AGP”) At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “ATM Agreement”) — On September 12, 2024, the Company entered into the ATM and a Registration Rights Agreement with A.G.P. Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the ATM Agreement, the Company may issue and sell through AGP the Company's common stock having an aggregate value offering price of up to $2,600 ("Placement Shares") from time to time through an "at-the-market" equity offering program. The Company has sole discretion to initiate such sales of common stock over a period of 36 months. Under the terms and subject to the conditions of the ATM Agreement, the Company will set the parameters for the sale of shares, including the number or dollar amount of Placement Shares to be issued, the time period during which sales are requested to be made, any limitation on the number or dollar amount of Placement Shares that may be sold in any one trading day and any minimum price below which sales may not be made. The Company will pay a cash commission rate of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of Placement Shares sold pursuant to the ATM Agreement. In December 2024, the Company increased the amount of the Company's common stock that it may issue and sell through AGP, having a new aggregate value offering of up to $5,230.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company sold 3,528,617 shares through A.G.P. under the ATM Agreement for gross proceeds totaling $5,229.
Registered Direct Offering — On May 29, 2024, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, in a registered direct offering, an aggregate of 727,706 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at a per share purchase price of $3.4480 for gross proceeds totaling $2,509.
13. | ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are as follows (in thousands):
| | Unrealized gains | | | Change in | | | | | |
| | (losses) on | | | fair value | | | | | |
| | available-for-sale | | | due to instrument- | | | | | |
| | securities | | | specific credit risk | | | Total | |
Balance at December 31, 2022 | | $ | (1,254 | ) | | $ | (25 | ) | | $ | (1,279 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax | | | 1,264 | | | | (21 | ) | | | 1,243 | |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | | — | | | | 46 | | | | 46 | |
Net other comprehensive income | | | 1,264 | | | | 25 | | | | 1,289 | |
Balance at December 31, 2023 | | $ | 10 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 10 | |
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of tax | | | (5 | ) | | | — | | | | (5 | ) |
Balance at December 31, 2024 | | $ | 5 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5 | |
The amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 are included within Interest expense and other on the consolidated statement of operations.
The following table sets forth the basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share data):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Numerator: | | | | | | | | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | | $ | (35,460 | ) | | $ | (87,126 | ) |
Denominator: | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding- Basic | | | 7,253,683 | | | | 5,827,721 | |
Dilutive effect of potential common shares | | | — | | | | — | |
Weighted average common shares outstanding- Diluted | | | 7,253,683 | | | | 5,827,721 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - Basic and Diluted | | $ | (4.89 | ) | | $ | (14.95 | ) |
Due to net losses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, basic and diluted net loss per share were the same, as the effect of all potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the anti-dilutive common share equivalents for the periods listed:
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Common stock options issued and outstanding | | | 139,320 | | | | 289,015 | |
Unvested restricted stock units | | | 384,783 | | | | 652,453 | |
Warrants | | | 319,443 | | | | 319,443 | |
Common Stock Purchase Agreements | | | 23,675,174 | | | | — | |
Conversion of convertible notes | | | 119,582 | | | | — | |
ESPP | | | 37,882 | | | | 23,816 | |
Total | | | 24,676,184 | | | | 1,284,727 | |
15. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
The Company has five equity incentive plans, the 2014 US LADAR Inc. Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), the 2016 Stock Plan (the “2016 Plan”), the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), the 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"), and the 2023 CEO Inducement Grant Plan (the "CEO Plan"). On August 16, 2021, the Company’s 2014 Plan and 2016 Plan were terminated in connection with the closing of the business combination as defined in Note 1, but continue to govern the terms of outstanding equity awards that were granted prior to the termination of the plans.
2014 Plan and 2016 Plan
The 2014 and 2016 Plan provide for the grant of incentive stock options to employees only and non-statutory stock options and RSUs to employees, directors, and consultants of the Company. As of August 16, 2021, the Company no longer grants equity awards pursuant to the 2014 Plan or 2016 Plan, and as of December 31, 2024, 58,056 RSUs were granted.
Under the 2016 Plan, options to purchase common stock generally vest over four years with 25% vesting at the end of the first year and the rest vesting ratably over the next three years. RSUs generally vest 25% at the end of the first year with the remaining RSUs vesting ratably over the next three years or they vest ratably over the four years. Under the 2014 Plan, the vesting period for options to purchase common stock range from immediate to four years. Under each plan, the options expire ten years from the date of grant.
2021 Equity Incentive Plan
The Incentive Plan became effective immediately upon the closing of the business combination on August 16, 2021 and initially reserved 514,681 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. The Incentive Plan includes an evergreen provision that provides for an annual increase in the number of shares of common stock available for issuance thereunder beginning on January 1, 2022 and ending on January 1, 2032, equal to 5% of the shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on December 31, 2021 for the first year and by 3% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year for each year thereafter, or a lesser number of shares as determined by the Board of Directors. Since January 1, 2022, the Board of Directors have authorized the addition of 1,143,844 shares of common stock to be added to the Incentive Plan for issuance.
Under the Incentive plan, RSU’s vest depending on their vesting schedule. For newly hired employees, RSU’s generally vest 25% during the quarterly release date following the recipient’s one year anniversary of their start date. The remaining amounts generally vest quarterly over the next three years. For existing employees, these RSUs generally vest quarterly over three years. The fair value of the RSU is equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.
As of December 31, 2024, 1,761,881 RSUs were granted to certain individuals under the Incentive Plan.
2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On May 10, 2022, the Company's stockholders approved the 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "ESPP"), authorizing 66,666 shares of common stock to be reserved for issuance under the ESPP. The number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the ESPP shall be cumulatively increased by the 1% of the number of shares issued and outstanding on December 31 of the preceding calendar year for each year thereafter, or a lesser number of shares as determined by the Board of Directors. Since January 1, 2023, the Board of Directors have authorized the addition of 117,465 shares of common stock to be added to the ESPP for issuance.
The ESPP provides an offering period of 24 months, with four purchase periods that are generally six months long and end on April 30 and October 31 of each year. The first purchase period to the Company's employees to purchase shares under the ESPP began on November 1, 2022. Each employee who is a participant in the ESPP may purchase shares by authorizing contributions at a minimum of 1% up to a maximum of 10% of his or her compensation for each pay period, to a maximum of $15 per purchase period and $25 per year, which will then be used to purchase shares on the last business day of the purchase period at a price equal to 85% of the fair market value of common stock on the offering date or the exercise date whichever is less.
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, 107,336 and 64,773 shares, respectively, were purchased under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has withheld $41 and $58 of contributions from its employees within accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
2023 CEO Inducement Grant Plan
The CEO Plan became effective on February 13, 2023 with 233,332 shares of common stock initially reserved for issuance.
In connection with the appointment of the Company's CEO on February 13, 2023, the Company granted 166,666 service-based RSUs and 66,666 market-based RSUs to the CEO. The service-based RSUs will vest over three years. The market-based RSUs would have vested quarterly over six (6) calendar quarters following the satisfaction of the market condition. The market condition would have been satisfied if the closing price of the Company's common stock, as reported by NASDAQ, met or exceeded $36.00 per share for any ten (10) consecutive trading days prior to March 1, 2024. As the market condition was not satisfied by March 1, 2024, the market-based RSUs were forfeited.
A summary of stock option activity related to the Plans as of December 31, 2024 is as follows:
| | | | | | Weighted | | | Weighted | | | | | |
| | Outstanding | | | Average | | | Average | | | Aggregate | |
| | Stock | | | Exercise | | | Contractual | | | Intrinsic | |
| | Options | | | Price | | | Life (Years) | | | Value | |
Balance at December 31, 2023 | | | 289,015 | | | $ | 11.29 | | | | 3.07 | | | $ | — | |
Granted | | | — | | | | — | | | | | | | | | |
Exercised | | | (44,255 | ) | | | 3.02 | | | | | | | | | |
Forfeited | | | (1,504 | ) | | | 18.79 | | | | | | | | | |
Expired | | | (103,936 | ) | | | 13.23 | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2024 | | | 139,320 | | | $ | 12.39 | | | | 3.84 | | | $ | — | |
Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2024 | | | 139,320 | | | $ | 12.39 | | | | 3.84 | | | $ | — | |
Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2024 | | | 139,320 | | | $ | 12.39 | | | | 3.84 | | | $ | — | |
The aggregate intrinsic value is the difference between the current fair value of the underlying common stock and the exercise price for in-the-money stock options. The Company did not grant any options during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
The following table summarizes the RSU award activity under the Plans:
| | | | | | Weighted | |
| | | | | | Average | |
| | | | | | Grant date | |
| | | | | | Fair Value | |
| | Shares | | | per Share | |
Unvested at December 31, 2023 | | | 652,453 | | | $ | 30.29 | |
Granted | | | 497,543 | | | | 3.89 | |
Forfeited | | | (206,990 | ) | | | 26.52 | |
Vested | | | (558,223 | ) | | | 17.41 | |
Unvested at December 31, 2024 | | | 384,783 | | | $ | 16.88 | |
The total fair value of RSUs that vested during the year ended December 31, 2024 was $9,716.
Stock-Based Compensation Expense —The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recorded in each financial statement line item in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Cost of revenue | | $ | — | | | $ | 136 | |
Research and development | | | 3,433 | | | | 6,821 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 247 | | | | 2,993 | |
General and administrative | | | 5,367 | | | | 8,121 | |
Total stock-based compensation | | $ | 9,047 | | | $ | 18,071 | |
The total unrecognized compensation expense for RSUs was $5,603 as of December 31, 2024 which is expected to be recognized over an estimated weighted average period of 1.03 years. The total unrecognized compensation expense for the ESPP was $282 as of December 31, 2024 which is expected to be recognized over an estimated weighted average period of 1.00 years. There is no unrecognized compensation expense for stock options as of December 31, 2024.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the grant-date fair value of ESPP purchase rights. The fair value of each of the four purchase periods is estimated separately. The Company uses the Monte-Carlo simulation model to estimate the grant date fair value of awards with a market condition. Both models require the input of subjective assumptions such as expected term, expected stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield as discussed below.
Expected Term—The expected term for ESPP is the length of time from the grant date to the date on which the stock is purchased by the employees. The expected term for awards with a market condition is the length of time from the grant date to the date the market condition expires.
Expected Volatility—Expected volatility is estimated using a combination of the average historical volatility of the Company's own stock and those of comparable companies’ stock at the time of the grant.
Risk-Free Interest Rate—The risk-free interest rates are based on US Treasury yields in effect at the grant date for notes with comparable terms as the awards.
Dividend Yield—The expected dividend-yield assumption is based on the Company’s current expectations about its anticipated dividend policy.
The following table summarizes the range of valuation assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the ESPP during the period:
| | Year ended | |
| | December 31, 2024 | |
Expected term (years) | | | 0.50 - 2.00 | |
Expected volatility | | | 122.2% - 165.9% | |
Risk-free interest rate | | | 4.2% - 5.5% | |
Dividend yield | | | — | % |
The Company adopted ASU 2023-07 during the year ended December 31, 2024 retrospectively to all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements. The Company has one reportable segment managed on a consolidated basis by the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) who is the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). In identifying one reportable segment, the Company considered the basis of organization for the design and development of high-performance, active lidar systems and applications.
The accounting policies of the segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The CODM assesses performance and decides how to allocate resources based on consolidated net loss as reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. There are no other expense categories regularly provided to the CODM that are not already included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.
Sale of Prototypes
The Company recorded revenue for prototype sales of $97 and $477 in 2024 and 2023 respectively. The Company does not incur significant contract costs in fulfilling or obtaining their contracts with customers.
Development Contracts
The Company has entered into research and development contracts as well as a sales, marketing and technical support service contract with companies primarily in the automotive industry. The Company assessed the number of performance obligations associated with the promises under each agreement, primarily the delivery of customized 4SightTM perception-related goods and services, and recognized $105 and $987 in revenue for performance obligations satisfied during years ended 2024 and 2023 respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The Company recognized the following revenues by geographic area based on the primary billing address of the customer and by the timing of the transfer of goods or services to customers (point in time or over time), as it believes such criteria best depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Total revenue based on the disaggregation criteria described above is as follows (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Revenue by primary geographical market: | | | | | | | | |
United States | | $ | 154 | | | $ | 1,223 | |
Europe | | | 48 | | | | 184 | |
Asia-Pacific | | | — | | | | 57 | |
Total | | $ | 202 | | | $ | 1,464 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Revenue by timing of recognition: | | | | | | | | |
Recognized at a point in time | | $ | 97 | | | $ | 477 | |
Recognized over time | | | 105 | | | | 987 | |
Total | | $ | 202 | | | $ | 1,464 | |
Contract Liabilities
The Company had no contract liabilities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023. The following table shows the significant changes in contract liabilities balance as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Beginning balance | | $ | — | | | $ | 987 | |
Revenue recognized that was included in the contract liabilities beginning balance | | | — | | | | (987 | ) |
Ending balance | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
Remaining Performance Obligations
Revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations represents the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied, or partially unsatisfied. It includes unearned revenue and amounts that will be invoiced and recognized as revenue in future periods and does not include contracts where the customer is not committed. The customer is not considered committed where they are able to terminate for convenience without payment of a substantive penalty under the contract. Additionally, as a practical expedient, the Company has not disclosed the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts with an original expected length of one year or less. The contract liabilities balance represents the remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original duration of greater than one year.
In 2023, the Company implemented a revised strategic plan, which focused on key products and critical customer engagements in the Automotive market, and aligned the Company's operations with evolving business needs by focusing on a transition from research and development to the commercialization of the Company's automotive products, while winding down the legacy Non-Automotive product, and reducing fixed operating costs. In August 2024, the Company further reduced fixed operating costs and terminated its headquarters lease. See discussion in Note 6, Leases.
The winding down of the Company's legacy non-Automotive product in 2023, in combination with an accumulation of other triggering events, indicated that the carrying amount of the Company's long-lived assets may not be recoverable. An impairment review was performed on the Company's long-lived assets as of December 31, 2023, resulting in a write-down of its property and equipment and ROU asset to fair value.
As a result of the implementation of the revised strategic plan and the impairment review of long-lived assets, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $19,153 for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily relating to one-time employee termination benefits, inventory and other current asset write-downs, losses on purchase commitments, and impairment and disposal charges on its long-lived assets. The Company recorded a net gain of $368, primarily relating to the net gain on termination of lease, losses on purchase commitments and one-time termination benefits. Restructuring-related liabilities are included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Restructuring charges were included in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Cost of revenue | | $ | 105 | | | $ | 5,721 | |
Research and development | | | — | | | | 941 | |
Sales and marketing | | | 18 | | | | 2,079 | |
General and administrative | | | (491 | ) | | | 472 | |
Impairment of long-lived assets | | | — | | | | 9,940 | |
Total restructuring charges | | $ | (368 | ) | | $ | 19,153 | |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of cash restructuring charges, including one-time employee termination benefits, losses on purchase commitments, and other restructuring charges, which are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, is as follows (in thousands):
| | One-time | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | employee | | | Losses on | | | Lease | | | | | | | | | |
| | termination | | | purchase | | | Termination | | | | | | | | | |
| | benefits | | | commitments | | | Liability | | | Other | | | Total | |
Balance as of December 31, 2023 | | $ | 402 | | | $ | 233 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 56 | | | $ | 691 | |
Charges | | | 18 | | | | 105 | | | | 5,463 | | | | — | | | $ | 5,586 | |
Cash payments | | | (420 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | | (2,150 | ) | | | (51 | ) | | $ | (2,662 | ) |
Balance as of December 31, 2024 | | $ | — | | | $ | 297 | | | $ | 3,313 | | | $ | 5 | | | $ | 3,615 | |
Employees of the Company may participate in the AEye, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "401(k) Plan"), a defined contribution plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating employees may contribute into a traditional plan with pretax salary or into a Roth plan with after tax salary up to statutory limits. In 2024 and 2023, the 401(k) Plan provides for Company safe harbor matching contributions of 100% of the employee contribution, up to 5% of each employee's earnings, which vest upon the first day of employment. The Company made contributions of $447 and $899 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized a (benefit) provision for income taxes of $(2) and $57, respectively. The benefit for the year ended December 31, 2024 was comprised of $2 and $(4) in state and foreign taxes, respectively. The provision for the year ended December 31, 2023 was comprised of $3 and $54 in state and foreign taxes, respectively.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the federal statutory rate of 21% to the Company's effective tax rate for the periods presented:
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
U.S. federal tax benefit at statutory rate | | | 21 | % | | | 21 | % |
Non-deductible expenses and other | | | (0.8 | )% | | | (0.4 | )% |
Stock-based compensation | | | (6.7 | )% | | | (4.6 | )% |
Research and development credits | | | 2.2 | % | | | 2.3 | % |
Change in valuation allowance, net | | | (15.7 | )% | | | (18.4 | )% |
Effective tax rate | | | 0.0 | % | | | (0.1 | )% |
For 2024 and 2023, the Company's effective tax rate differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal and state income tax rates to net loss before income tax, primarily as the result of state income taxes, R&D credits and changes in the Company's valuation allowance.
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 are presented below (in thousands):
| | As of December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Deferred tax assets: | | | | | | | | |
Net operating loss carryforwards | | $ | 80,580 | | | $ | 69,612 | |
Research and development credit carryforward | | | 10,719 | | | | 9,941 | |
Stock-based compensation | | | 215 | | | | 301 | |
Property and equipment | | | 1,090 | | | | 2,364 | |
Operating lease liabilities | | | 1,208 | | | | 4,967 | |
Capitalized R&D expenses | | | 12,401 | | | | 14,194 | |
Other accruals | | | 1,715 | | | | 689 | |
Gross deferred tax assets | | | 107,928 | | | | 102,068 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (107,734 | ) | | | (98,840 | ) |
Deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance | | | 194 | | | | 3,228 | |
Deferred tax liabilities: | | | | | | | | |
Right-of-use assets | | | (194 | ) | | | (3,228 | ) |
Gross deferred tax liabilities | | | (194 | ) | | | (3,228 | ) |
Total deferred tax assets (liabilities), net | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The Company reports income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, which requires an asset and liability approach in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax amounts are determined by using the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance reduces the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future taxable earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. The Company has a history of operating losses and has incurred cumulative book losses since its formation. Based upon the history of losses, the Company has determined that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be realized, and accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been recorded. The valuation allowance as of December 31, 2024 was $107,734 which increased from $98,840 at December 31, 2023. The increase in the valuation allowance is primarily related to additional deferred tax assets recorded for net operating losses and research credits generated during the year ended December 31, 2024.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $284,368 and $241,652 of federal and state net operating losses available to reduce future taxable income, respectively, of which $12,256 will begin to expire in 2033 for federal tax purposes and $241,652 will begin to expire in 2029 for state tax purposes. Approximately $272,112 of federal net operating loss included above can be carried forward indefinitely.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had $247,802 and $202,887 of federal and state net operating losses available to reduce future taxable income, which will begin to expire in 2033 for federal and 2029 for state tax purposes.
The Company also has federal and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of $8,203 and $6,255 as of December 31, 2024 and $7,591 and $5,829 as of December 31, 2023. The federal credits begin to expire in 2034 and the state credits have no expiration date.
Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Company’s ability to utilize NOL or other tax attributes, such as research tax credits, in any taxable year, may be limited if the Company has experienced an “ownership change.” Generally, a Section 382 ownership change occurs if there is a cumulative increase of more than 50 percentage points in the stock ownership of one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who owns at least 5% of a corporation’s stock within a specific testing period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. Based on the Section 382 analysis performed through December 31, 2021, the Company concluded all of its NOLs and credits would be available to use as of December 31, 2021, however, future changes in ownership may limit the ability to use tax attributes under Section 382.
The following is a tabular reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits (in thousands):
| | Year ended December 31, | |
| | 2024 | | | 2023 | |
Unrecognized tax benefits as of the beginning of the year | | $ | 3,480 | | | $ | 2,822 | |
Decreases (increases) related to prior year tax provisions | | | (5 | ) | | | 161 | |
Increase related to current year tax provisions | | | 265 | | | | 497 | |
Unrecognized tax benefits as of the end of the year | | $ | 3,740 | | | $ | 3,480 | |
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters as a component of income tax expense. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 there was no accrued interest nor penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S., various state jurisdictions, and foreign jurisdictions. The U.S., state and foreign jurisdictions have statutes of limitations that generally range from three to five years. Due to the Company’s net losses, substantially all of its federal, state and local income tax returns are subject to examination for federal and state purposes since inception. The Company is not currently under examination for federal or state income tax purposes.
Effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2022, pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, companies are required to capitalize Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") Section 174 research and experimental expenses paid or incurred during the year. These expenses are amortized over 5 years for research and development performed in the United States and over 15 years for expenses related to research and development performed outside of the United States. As a result of the IRC Section 174 research and development capitalization, the Company recognized a deferred tax asset for the future tax benefit of the amortization deductions.
21. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Legal Matter
The Company may be subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Litigation can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict and the Company’s view of these matters may change in the future as the litigation and events related thereto unfold. The Company expenses legal fees as incurred. The Company records a provision for contingent losses when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
On August 28, 2024, the Company was served with a complaint that was filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Alameda on August 26, 2024 that (1) alleges the Company is in breach of the lease for its former headquarters office in Dublin, California because of the Company’s failure to pay rent as required by the lease and (2) provides notice that the lease had been terminated by the landlord effective as of August 23, 2024. The landlord claimed that the amount owed could be up to $8,500. Thereafter, in August 2024, the landlord fully drew down the standby letter of credit of $2,150, which was held as security for the payment of rent, due to the alleged default of the lease. The Company disputes, among other things, that the total damages claimed by the landlord equal the amount claimed. Depending on the outcome of this matter, there could be a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company. An initial trial date has been set for April 2026.
From November 2016 to December 2023, the Company had employed a sibling of Mr. Dussan, a director and the Company’s former Chief Technology Officer, who held the position of Director, Human Resources and Sr. Manager of Human Resources during 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2023, Mr. Dussan’s sibling received total cash compensation of $149 and was granted 2,000 RSUs. In addition, he participated in all other benefits that the Company generally offers to all of its employees. There were no related party transactions during the year ended December 31, 2024.
Management has evaluated subsequent events through February 24, 2025 and determined that there were no such events requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, other than as noted below.
In January 2025, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement to finance an aggregate principal amount of up to $3,240 with a certain institutional investor and issued (i) a senior unsecured convertible promissory note (the "Note") for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000 and (ii) a warrant to purchase up to 805,263 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Note, subject to an original issue discount of 7.4%, has a term of eighteen months and accrues interest at the rate of 7.0% per annum. The Note is convertible into Common Stock, at a per share conversion price equal to $ 2.22, subject to adjustments noted in the Note. The Warrant has an initial exercise price of $ 2.22, and is exercisable after the six month and one day anniversary of its issuance (the “Initial Exercisability Date”) until for four years following the Initial Exercisability Date.
In January 2025, the Company increased the amount of the Company's common stock that it may issue and sell through A.G.P. under the ATM Agreement, having a new aggregate value offering of up to $15,293 and sold 2,359,023 shares for gross proceeds totaling $3,015. Further, the Company issued 2,155,000 shares of its common stock to New Circle under the CSPA for gross proceeds totaling $4,800.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as required under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2024. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2024.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision of and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024 based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2024.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit emerging growth companies such as our company to provide only management’s report in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has determined that our internal controls are reasonably designed and implemented to assure reliable financial reporting and preparation of our financial statements. However, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than described above, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the annual period ended December 31, 2024 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans. During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, no director or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The following sets forth certain information, as of February 18, 2025, for each our directors:
| | | | | | Classification |
Name | | Age | | Position(s) | | (Term Expiration) |
Timothy J. Dunn | | 67 | | Lead Independent Director and Nominee | | Class I (2025) |
Sue E. Zeifman | | 70 | | Director and Nominee | | Class I (2025) |
Luis C. Dussan | | 50 | | Director | | Class II (2026) |
Matthew Fisch | | 56 | | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | | Class II (2026) |
Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk | | 81 | | Director | | Class III (2027) |
Jonathon B. Husby | | 51 | | Director | | Class III (2027) |
Timothy J. Dunn has served as a Class I director since the closing of our business combination with CF Acquisition Corp. III (the “Business Combination”). Mr. Dunn most recently served as an Operating Partner at TPG Capital, a private equity firm with more than $50 billion of assets under management until from 2005 to 2022. Prior to TPG, Mr. Dunn served as Chief Financial Officer at Hotwire from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Dunn served as Gap, Inc.’s Gap Division Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer between 1998 and 2001. Prior to joining Gap, Mr. Dunn worked at PepsiCo Inc. in a series of finance and strategic planning roles. Over the course of his career, Mr. Dunn has held several international roles, including in London as the Chief Financial Officer for Pizza Hut International for Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Earlier in his career, Mr. Dunn served as the Controller for PepsiCo Restaurants International and the Chief Financial Officer for Gap’s Domestic and International businesses. Mr. Dunn worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers and is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) in California. Mr. Dunn has served on private and public company boards, including Chair of the Audit Committee for two TPG portfolio companies – Ellucian, an ERP software company for higher education, and Vertafore, a software company for insurance carriers, brokers, and agencies – as well as Nordstrom’s Federal Savings Bank, a credit card bank owned by Nordstrom, Inc. Mr. Dunn is also Emeritus Chair of the Board for St. Anthony Foundation, a preeminent non-profit in San Francisco, California. Mr. Dunn holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the University of Southern California.
Mr. Dunn is qualified to serve as a director based on his broad experience as a senior executive and board member of private and publicly listed companies.
Sue E. Zeifman has served as a Class I director since her appointment to our Board of Directors in January 2022. Ms. Zeifman has over 30 years of experience in the marketing and communications industry. Her most recent professional experience includes nine years, 2009 to 2018, at Apple, Inc. as Senior Director of Global Marketing Production, where she was responsible for leadership and advisement to Apple’s global marketing team for strategic direction and production of multi-layered programs. Ms. Zeifman’s prior positions include Senior Vice-President, Creative Services & Production, for Young & Rubicam Advertising from 2000 to 2009; Vice-President, Managing Director, of Y&R 2.1 Interactive Agency from 1997 to 2000, and Manager of Creative Services for Young & Rubicam, San Francisco from 1990 to 1997. Ms. Zeifman’s experience includes the management of highly complex and technical marketing programs with multiple deliverables and budgetary constraints. She developed global initiatives and enhanced cross-functional partnerships with Creative, Sales, Retail, Technology, Procurement, and Product Marketing teams. Ms. Zeifman holds a B.A. in Broadcast Communication Arts from San Francisco State University and attended extensive Apple University Executive Curriculum courses, including Strategic Planning and Management.
Ms. Zeifman is uniquely qualified to serve as a member of AEye’s Board of Directors based on her broad marketing and communications experience for leading technology companies.
Luis C. Dussan has served as a Class II director since the closing of the Business Combination. Mr. Dussan served as our Chief Technology Officer and Chief Product Strategist until November 2023. Mr. Dussan co-founded AEye Technologies in 2013 and was a member of the AEye Technologies Board of Directors since its inception. From 2020 to the closing of the Business Combination, he served as the President and Chief Technology Officer of AEye Technologies. From December 2013 through 2014 he served as the President, and from 2014 through 2020 as the Chief Executive Officer of AEye Technologies. Mr. Dussan has more than 20 years of experience in the aerospace and defense industry. He started his career at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) in 1997 working for the Jet Propulsion Lab in the Deep Space Network that communicated with NASA planetary and deep space probes. From 2002 through 2009 he worked at Lockheed Martin Corporation in their Missiles and Fire Control Division. From 2009 through 2013, Mr. Dussan worked for Northrop Grumman Corporation – Laser Systems, as Chief Technologist, where he was responsible for managing the division’s research and development of electro-optical sensors. Mr. Dussan holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, an M.S. in Quantum Optics, and an M.S. in Optics & Photonics. Mr. Dussan is responsible for many of our foundational patents in lidar and perception as well as being responsible for several trade secrets for his previous employers in the aerospace and defense industry. Mr. Dussan has been given several awards since founding AEye Technologies, with one of the most recent being the 2020 Vision Award by AutoSens. He is considered a top expert in lidar technology as well as remote sensing and vehicle perception.
Mr. Dussan is qualified to serve as a director based on his technical and operational expertise gained from serving as a Board member of the Company since inception and as a co-founder of the Company.
Matthew Fisch has served as a Class II director and as our Chief Executive Officer since February 2023, and as our Chairman of the Board since May 2023. Mr. Fisch has over 30 years of experience in technology development and leadership. Prior to joining us, Mr. Fisch was the Senior Vice President & Chief Technology Officer at Gentherm Incorporated, a developer of thermal management technologies for the automotive and other industries, from April 2020 until February 2023. Prior to Gentherm, Mr. Fisch was employed by North American Bancard, a payments technology company, where he served as Executive Vice President & Chief Technology Officer of Hospitality Services from October 2019 until April 2020. Prior to joining North American Bancard, Mr. Fisch worked at Verifone Systems, Inc., a global leader in payments and commerce solutions, where he served as the Executive Vice President of Global R&D from August 2018 to October 2019, and Senior Vice President of Global Engineering from May 2016 to August 2018. At Verifone, Mr. Fisch led research and development for all product lines, including hardware application and cloud software services. Prior to Verifone, he was the Vice President of R&D for Harman International Industries, Inc.’s lifestyle division from 2014 to 2016, where he led the global R&D organization that was responsible for developing Harman’s car audio business for North America, Europe, China, Japan, and Korea. Prior to joining Harman, Mr. Fisch had a 22-year career at Intel Corporation where he held positions of increasing responsibility in engineering. Mr. Fisch holds a Master of Engineering in Computer Engineering, and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering, both from Cornell University.
Mr. Fisch is qualified to serve as a director based on his experience serving as our Chief Executive Officer, his professional experience, and his background in technology.
Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk has served as a Class III director since the closing of the Business Combination. Prof. Dr. Gottschalk, born in Lübeck, Germany, studied economics at the Universities of Hamburg, Saarbrücken, and Stanford, California. He earned his doctorate in 1971 at the University of Hamburg (Dr. rer. pol.). From 1972 to 1996, he worked in various divisions at Daimler-Benz AG, including Assistant to the CEO, Plant Manager Mannheim (Engines, Buses, Foundry), and President of Mercedes-Benz do Brasil. In 1992, he was appointed as an ordinary member of the Managing Board of Mercedes-Benz AG, responsible for the Commercial Vehicles Division (trucks, vans, buses) worldwide. From 1997 until 2008, Prof. Dr. Gottschalk served as President of the German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA). Prof. Dr. Gottschalk also had various responsibilities in the national and international industry over the years: he was President of the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers (OICA) in Paris, and Vice President of the Federation of German Industries (BDI). Prof. Dr. Gottschalk is also founder, owner, and managing partner of AutoValue GmbH, Frankfurt, a provider of automotive expertise. Prof. Dr. Gottschalk is a member of supervisory boards of various publicly listed companies such as Schaeffler AG and Compagnie Plastic Omnium SA, Paris. Since November 2020 he has served as a Member of the Supervisory Board of Benteler International AG.
Prof. Dr. Gottschalk is qualified to serve as a director based on his broad experience in the automotive industry as a founder, senior executive, and as a Board member of private and publicly listed companies.
Jonathon B. Husby has served as a Class III director since October 2023 and currently serves as President and Chief Executive Officer of ADAC, a privately held vehicle access and diversified solutions company. He joined ADAC in August 2022 and was named to its Board of Directors in January 2024. Prior to ADAC, Mr. Husby served as President and CEO of North America for SEG Automotive, a rotating mechanical and e-machine technology company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly traded company in China – ZMJ. Mr. Husby served in that role from January 2018 to July 2022 and concurrently served as SVP Global Sales from December 2020 to July 2022. Prior to SEG Automotive, Mr. Husby worked for Harman International, a U.S.-based publicly traded company, as Vice President and General Manager Customer Business Units from August 2011 to November 2017, where he led a team building the largest customer business unit globally with advanced technologies in electronics, software, branded audio, and cybersecurity solutions. Mr. Husby worked at TomTom, a publicly traded Dutch company, and a TomTom acquired company, Tele Atlas, a Belgian-based company, from February 2003 to August 2011. During that tenure, Mr. Husby managed global teams while serving as Vice President of Sales and Marketing – Automotive Business Unit, including time working abroad in Europe. Prior to TomTom/Tele Atlas, Mr. Husby worked for Japanese-based automotive supplier DENSO Corporation from May 1994 to February 2003. During his time at DENSO, he worked in both corporate and manufacturing environments in human resources, communications, public relations, and sales management. Mr. Husby has served on the Board of Directors of MEMA Original Equipment Suppliers since November 2019, including serving as chair of the Board in 2023. Mr. Husby also serves as chair of the Board of Directors of the Automotive Hall of Fame, which he joined in April 2019. Mr. Husby holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Management from Albion College and a Master of Business Administration from Wayne State.
Mr. Husby is qualified to serve as a director based on his board experience as a senior executive at several companies in the automotive industry and as the chief executive officer in the automotive space.
COMPOSITION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors currently consists of six (6) directors. Pursuant to our Bylaws, the number of directors is fixed by our Board of Directors from time to time. Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with each director serving a three-year term, and one class being elected at each year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Timothy J. Dunn and Sue E. Zeifman serve as Class I directors with terms expiring in 2025. Luis C. Dussan and Matthew Fisch serve as Class II directors with terms expiring in 2026, and Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk and Jonathon B. Husby serve as Class III directors with terms expiring in 2027.
BOARD MEETING QUORUM REQUIREMENTS
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) provides that a majority of the total number of directors then in office will constitute a quorum.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Board met nine (9) times. In 2024, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of Board meetings and committee meetings on which he or she then served.
We encourage our directors to attend our annual meetings of stockholders and believe that attendance at annual meetings is just as important as attendance at Board and committee meetings. At our 2024 annual meeting, all of our directors were present.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The composition, duties, and responsibilities of our committees are as set forth below. As of December 31, 2024, the standing committees of our Board of Directors consisted of an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, in 2024 our Board of Directors established a Strategic Financing and M&A Committee. In the future, our Board of Directors may establish other committees, as it deems appropriate, to assist it with its responsibilities.
As of February 18, 2025, the chair and members of each committee are identified in the following table.
Name (Class) | Audit Committee | Compensation Committee | Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Strategic Financing and M&A Committee |
Timothy J. Dunn (Class I)* | C | M | | M |
Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk (Class III) | M | | C | |
Jonathon B. Husby (Class III) | M | M | | C |
Sue E. Zeifman (Class I) | | C | M | |
| | | | |
C = Committee Chair | | | | |
M = Member | | | | |
* = Lead Independent Director | | | | |
Audit Committee
Our Audit Committee met four (4) times in 2024. Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other matters:
| • | reviewing the audit plans and findings of our independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit and risk review staff, as well as the results of regulatory examinations, and tracks management’s corrective action plans where necessary; |
| • | reviewing our financial statements, including any significant financial items and/or changes in accounting policies, with our senior management and independent registered public accounting firm; |
| • | reviewing our financial risk and control procedures, compliance programs and significant tax, legal, and regulatory matters; |
| • | approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| • | having the sole discretion to annually appoint our independent registered public accounting firm, evaluate its independence and performance and set clear hiring policies for employees or former employees of the independent registered public accounting firm; and |
| • | reviewing and approving in advance any proposed related party transactions. |
Our Audit Committee consists of Timothy J. Dunn, Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk, and Jonathon B. Husby, with Mr. Dunn chairing this Committee. Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the NASDAQ rules require us to have an Audit Committee composed entirely of independent directors. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that each of Mr. Dunn, Prof. Dr. Gottschalk, and Mr. Husby all meet the definition of “independent director” for purposes of serving on the Audit Committee under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Our Board of Directors has determined that each director appointed to the Audit Committee is financially literate, and our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Dunn is our Audit Committee financial expert within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on the “Investors Relations” section of our principal corporate website at www.aeye.ai.
Compensation Committee
Our Compensation Committee met four (4) times in 2024. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other matters:
| • | reviewing, modifying, and approving (or if it deems appropriate, making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding) our overall compensation strategy and policies |
| • | reviewing and recommending to our Board of Directors the salaries, benefits, and equity incentive grants provided to our chief executive officer and directors; |
| • | reviewing and approving the salaries, benefits, and equity incentive grants provided to our executive officers, other than our chief executive officer; |
| • | reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to executive officer compensation, evaluating executive officer performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determining executive officer compensation based on that evaluation; |
| • | reviewing and approving the terms of any employment agreements, severance arrangements, changing in control protections, and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers; |
| • | overseeing our compensation and employee benefit plans; and |
| • | administering our Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy and make all determinations as to the amount and method of recovery for the “clawback” of compensation as set forth therein. |
Our Compensation Committee consists of Timothy J. Dunn, Jonathon B. Husby, and Sue E. Zeifman, with Ms. Zeifman chairing this Committee. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on the “Investors Relations” section of our principal corporate website at www.aeye.ai.
Our Board has determined that each of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Husby, and Ms. Zeifman meet the definition of “independent director” for purposes of serving on the Compensation Committee under the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market. No member of our Compensation Committee is or has been one of our officers or employees, and none have any relationships with us of the type that is required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member of the Board of Directors, Compensation Committee, or other Board committee performing equivalent functions of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of our directors or on our Compensation Committee.
In accordance with its charter, the Compensation Committee has the authority to engage outside consultants to assist in the performance of its duties and responsibilities. The Compensation Committee may delegate its authority under its charter to a subcommittee as it deems appropriate from time to time.
In 2021, the Compensation Committee retained the services of Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”) as its external compensation consultant to advise on executive and director compensation matters, including our overall compensation program design and the collection of market data for our compensation programs for our executives and members of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee intends to engage Compensia in the future on an as-needed basis.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met three (3) times in 2024. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other matters:
| • | reviewing the performance of our Board of Directors and making recommendations to our Board of Directors regarding the selection of candidates, qualification and competency requirements for service on our Board of Directors, and the suitability of proposed nominees as directors; |
| • | advising our Board of Directors with respect to the corporate governance principles applicable to us; and |
| • | overseeing the evaluation of our Board of Directors and management. |
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk and Sue E. Zeifman, with Prof. Dr. Gottschalk chairing this Committee. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which is available on the “Investors Relations” section of our principal corporate website at www.aeye.ai.
Our Board has determined that each of Prof. Dr. Gottschalk and Ms. Zeifman meet the definition of “independent director” for purposes of serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee under the corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market.
Strategic Financing and M&A Committee
Our Strategic Financing and M&A Committee was established in April 2024 and is responsible for, among other things, reviewing, discussing, and recommending strategic financing or other strategic initiatives that may be proposed by management from time to time. Our Strategic Financing and M&A Committee consists of Timothy J. Dunn and Jonathon B. Husby, with Mr. Husby chairing this Committee.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The table below sets forth information regarding non-employee director compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.
| | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | | Stock Awards | | | Total | |
Name | | ($) | | | ($)(1) | | | ($) | |
Timothy J. Dunn | | $ | 157,083 | | | $ | 59,485 | | | $ | 216,568 | |
Luis C. Dussan | | $ | 141,667 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 141,667 | |
Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk | | $ | 157,500 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 157,500 | |
Jonathon B. Husby | | $ | 129,167 | | | $ | 37,753 | | | $ | 166,920 | |
Sue E. Zeifman | | $ | 157,500 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 157,500 | |
(1) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB Topic 718”). The stock awards granted in 2024 consisted of grants of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted pursuant to our 2021 Equity Plan (as defined below). For the first and second quarters of 2024, Mr. Dunn elected to receive all of his cash compensation for Board service in the form of immediately vested equity and received 13,585 shares on January 1, 2024, and 21,335 shares on April 1, 2024. For the first and second quarters of 2024, Mr. Husby was only entitled to immediately vested equity for his Board service compensation and received 10,655 shares on January 1, 2024 and 10,040 shares on April 1, 2024. |
Director Compensation in 2024
All of our non-employee directors are compensated for their services in accordance with our non-employee director compensation policy that became effective in connection with the closing of the Business Combination and as modified from time to time thereafter, as described in further detail below.
Mr. Fisch, as an employee director, does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
Cash Compensation
Each non-employee director is eligible to receive the following cash compensation (as applicable) for his or her service on our Board of Directors and its committees:
| • | $50,000 annual cash retainer for service as a Board member, plus, effective as of August 2024, Board members receive an additional $175,000 annually in lieu of equity compensation (as discussed in more detail below); |
| • | $60,000 additional annual cash retainer for service as our non-executive chair of our Board of Directors, or an additional cash retainer of $50,000 for service as our lead independent director; |
| • | $10,000 annual cash retainer for service as a member of the Audit Committee and $20,000 annual cash retainer for service as chair of the Audit Committee (in lieu of the committee member service retainer); |
| • | $7,500 annual cash retainer for service as a member of the Compensation Committee and $15,000 annual cash retainer for service as chair of the Compensation Committee (in lieu of the committee member service retainer); |
| • | $5,000 annual cash retainer for service as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $10,000 annual cash retainer for service as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (in lieu of the committee member service retainer); and |
| • | $8,750 annual cash retainer for service as a member of the Strategic Financing and M&A Committee and $17,500 annual cash retainer for service as chair of the Strategic Financing and M&A Committee (in lieu of the committee member service retainer). |
In April 2024, the Board created the Strategic Financing and M&A Committee. The purpose of this committee is to review, discuss, and recommend strategic financing or other strategic initiatives that may be proposed by management from time to time and be able to react to such proposals more quickly. After the establishment of the Strategic Financing and M&A Committee, the Board set the compensation levels for service on this committee as shown above.
The annual cash compensation amounts are payable in equal quarterly installments and are earned on the first day of each calendar quarter in which the service occurred.
Each non-employee director appointed prior to October 27, 2023 had the option, once per year, to elect to receive shares of immediately vested RSUs in lieu of some or all of his or her quarterly cash compensation. If elected by a director to take stock instead of cash, the number of shares to be awarded each quarter is determined by dividing the cash compensation that would otherwise be due, by the five-day average closing price of our stock during the five trading days prior to the first day of the calendar quarter. In 2024, Mr. Dunn opted to take equity in lieu of all of his cash compensation earned in the first and second quarters of 2024. Similarly, Mr. Husby, as the only non-employee director appointed on or after October 27, 2023, could only receive his quarterly cash compensation in the form of immediately vested RSUs.
In May 2024, the Board modified the compensation for non-employee directors, such that effective immediately, non-employee directors were no longer entitled to initial equity grants upon appointment nor annual equity grants. In addition, non-employee directors no longer have the ability to elect equity in lieu of cash compensation. The primary reason for the Board’s decision was based on the limited number of shares available for issuance under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan, which was exacerbated when stockholders failed to authorize additional shares for the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan at the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. The elimination of equity compensation for non-employee directors significantly impacted their total compensation and, in August of 2024, to offset this impact, the Board increased the cash component of non-employee director compensation by $175,000 per year, payable quarterly, with the first quarterly payment of $43,750 being made to each non-employee director for the third quarter of 2024.
Equity Compensation
Prior to May 2024, each new non-employee director who joined our Board of Directors on or after October 27, 2023 was eligible to receive a one-time RSU award having a value of $175,000 (the “Initial RSU Grant”), vesting in three equal annual installments following the grant date. On the date of each annual meeting of our stockholders, each non-employee director previously received an RSU award having a value of $175,000 (the “Annual RSU Grant”), provided that the non-employee director has served for a minimum of six months prior to the date of the annual meeting of stockholders. Each Annual RSU Grant vested in full on the earlier of (1) the date of the following annual meeting of our stockholders or (2) the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the non-employee director’s continued service through the applicable vesting date. The number of shares for the Initial RSU Grant and Annual RSU Grant were determined by dividing the stated dollar value of the award by the five-day average closing price of our stock during the five trading days prior to the date of grant. As indicated above, in May of 2024, prior to the 2024 annual meeting of stockholders, the Board determined that no non-employee director would be eligible for an equity grant thereafter.
Reimbursement of Expenses
In addition to the compensation outlined above, we will reimburse each eligible non-employee director for reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses to cover in-person attendance at and participation in meetings of our Board of Directors and any committee of the Board of Directors.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following sets forth certain information as of February 18, 2025 regarding our named executive officers.
Name | | Age | | Position(s) |
Matthew Fisch | | 56 | | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Andrew S. Hughes | | 59 | | General Counsel and Secretary |
Conor B. Tierney | | 47 | | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
The biography for Matthew Fisch is provided above in “Our Board of Directors.”
Andrew S. Hughes has served as our General Counsel and Secretary since the closing of the Business Combination and joined AEye Technologies in March 2021 as General Counsel. Mr. Hughes has over 30 years of legal experience and prior to joining us, he was the General Counsel for the Americas at Renesas Electronics Corporation (TSE: 6723), a global automotive and industrial semiconductor manufacturer, from 2017 through 2021. From 2015 to 2017, he was the General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Intersil Corporation (NASDAQ: ISIL), a power management semiconductor solutions provider. During his career, Mr. Hughes has also served as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at Ikanos Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: IKAN), Bell Microproducts, Inc. (NASDAQ: BELM), and LSI Logic Corporation (NYSE: LSI), and served as a Division Counsel at Harris Corporation (NYSE: HRS) as well as a partner at a regional law firm in Southern California. Mr. Hughes holds a B.A. degree from the University of California, Los Angeles, and a J.D. and M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.
Conor B. Tierney has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since January 2022 and Chief Financial Officer since March 2023. Mr. Tierney has over 20 years of financial experience and prior to joining us, Mr. Tierney served as the Head of Finance at Wing Aviation LLC (NASDAQ: GOOG), Alphabet’s drone delivery service from 2018 through to 2021. Mr. Tierney also served in various positions at Glu Mobile Inc. (NASDAQ: GLUU), a free-to-play mobile gaming company, from 2009 to 2018, including Corporate Controller. Prior to Glu, Mr. Tierney served at Deloitte & Touche L.L.P. in their Transactions Services Team from 2008 to 2009. During his career, Mr. Tierney also served as an auditor at Price Waterhouse L.L.P., where he focused primarily on semiconductor clients and initial public offerings from 2005 to 2007. He holds a B.S. in Accounting from University College Cork, is an Irish Chartered Accountant, and a Certified Public Accountant (Inactive).
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
With respect to the roles of Chairperson of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the roles may be separated or combined, and our Board of Directors is able to exercise its discretion in combining or separating these positions as it deems appropriate in light of prevailing circumstances. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the flexibility for our Board of Directors to modify our leadership structure in the future as appropriate.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Our Board of Directors has undertaken a review of the independence of our directors and considered whether any such director has a material relationship with us that could compromise that director’s ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out that director’s responsibilities. Our Board of Directors has determined that each of Timothy J. Dunn, Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk, Jonathon B. Husby, and Sue E. Zeifman is an “independent director,” as defined under the rules of NASDAQ.
RISK OVERSIGHT
Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our risk management process. Our Audit Committee focuses on our general risk management strategy and the most significant risks facing us, and oversees the implementation of risk mitigation strategies by management. Our Audit Committee is apprised of particular risk management matters in connection with its general oversight and approval of corporate matters and significant transactions.
ANTI-HEDGING POLICY
All of our officers, directors, and employees and certain consultants specified by our management are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions relating to our stock. Additionally, spouses, minor children, and any other family member sharing the same household as the foregoing, as well as any other account, trust, or entity over which the foregoing may make or influence investment decisions, whether or not the securities are held directly or indirectly, are similarly prohibited from engaging in such hedging transactions.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
No member of our Compensation Committee is or has been one of our officers or employees and none has any relationships with us of the type that is required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. None of our executive officers serves or has served as a member of the Board of Directors, Compensation Committee, or other Board committee performing equivalent functions of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as one of our directors or on our Compensation Committee.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our directors, officers, and employees, a copy of which is available on the “Investors Relations” section of our principal corporate website at www.aeye.ai.
DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become members of our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will ensure that our Board has the requisite expertise and that its membership consists of persons with sufficiently diverse and independent backgrounds. Our Board is responsible for selecting the nominees for election to our Board.
DIRECTOR SELECTION
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall recommend to our Board criteria for Board and committee membership, which shall include a description of any specific, minimum qualifications that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes must be met by a nominee, and a description of any specific qualities or skills believed to be necessary for one or more of the Company’s directors to possess. The adequacy of such criteria will be reassessed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically and any proposed changes will be submitted to our Board for approval.
STOCKHOLDER RECOMMENDATIONS
Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing all stockholder nominations and determining whether the nomination and nominee satisfy all applicable eligibility requirements. Stockholders may recommend director candidates for consideration by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee by sending notice to AEye, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 4670 Willow Road, Suite 125, Pleasanton, CA 94588.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
We are committed to adhering to corporate governance practices that meet applicable U.S. corporate governance standards. Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that serve as a flexible framework within which our Board and its committees operate. These guidelines cover a number of areas including the size and composition of the Board, Board membership criteria and director qualifications, director responsibilities, Board agenda, meetings of independent directors, committee responsibilities and assignments, Board member access to management and independent advisors, director communications with third parties, director compensation, director orientation and continuing education, evaluation of senior management, and management succession planning.
The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines may be viewed on the “Investors Relations” section of our principal corporate website at www.aeye.ai.
BOARD SELF-ASSESSMENT
The Board anticipates that it will conduct, and that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will oversee, an annual self-evaluation to determine whether our Board is functioning effectively. Our Board will periodically consider the mix of skills and experience that directors bring to the Board to assess whether the Board has the necessary tools to perform its oversight function effectively.
In addition, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Audit Committee, and Compensation Committee each plan to conduct their own annual self-assessment, which includes an assessment of the adequacy of their performance as compared to their respective charters.
EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF INDEPENDENT BOARD MEMBERS
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our non-employee directors meet in executive session at least four times per year, with no members of management or non-independent directors present.
COMMUNICATING WITH OUR DIRECTORS
Our Board welcomes communications from the Company’s stockholders, and it is the policy of the Company to facilitate communication from stockholders. Our Board generally believes it is in the Company’s best interests that designated members of management speak on behalf of the Company. Stockholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate with our Board or with an individual Board member concerning the Company may do so by writing to our Board or to a particular Board member, by mailing such correspondence to AEye, Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 4670 Willow Road, Suite 125, Pleasanton, CA 94588.
Please indicate on the envelope or in the email whether the communication is from a stockholder or other interested party. Our Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary and other relevant members of management to examine incoming communications and forward such communication to our Board or the individual Board members, as appropriate, if such communications are deemed relevant to the Board’s roles and responsibilities. Our Board has requested that certain types of communications not be forwarded, and redirected if appropriate, such as: spam, business solicitations or advertisements, resumes or employment inquiries, service complaints or inquiries, surveys, or any threatening or hostile materials.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, certain officers, and any beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock to file reports relating to their ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NASDAQ by certain deadlines. Based on a review of Section 16 filings with respect to our Company made during or with respect to the portion of the year ended December 31, 2024 during which Section 16(a) was applicable to such persons, we believe that each of our directors, executive officers, and 10% stockholders were in compliance with the filing requirements applicable to them.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
This section sets forth the compensation of our principal executive officer and our other two most highly compensated executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (collectively, our “NEOs”). Our NEOs are:
• | Matthew Fisch, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; |
• | Andrew S. Hughes, our General Counsel and Secretary; and |
• | Conor B. Tierney, our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. |
As an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, we are permitted to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Accordingly, we have not included in this section a compensation discussion and analysis of our executive compensation programs or tabular compensation information other than the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table below. In addition, for so long as we are an emerging growth company, we will not be required to submit certain executive compensation matters to our stockholders for advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency” votes.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth the compensation of our NEOs for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (referred to herein as fiscal year 2024) and our fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (referred to herein as fiscal year 2023).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Non-Equity | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Stock | | | | Option | | | | Incentive Plan | | | | All other | | | | Total | |
| | | | | Salary | | | | Awards | | | | Awards | | | | Compensation | | | | compensation | | | | Compensation | |
Name and Principal Position | | Year | | | ($) | | | | ($)(1) | | | | ($) | | | | ($)(2) | | | | ($)(3) | | | | ($) | |
Matthew Fisch | | 2024 | | | $ | 500,000 | | | | $ | 344,470 | | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 109,375 | | | | $ | 517,592 | | | | $ | 1,471,437 | |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | | 2023 | | | | $ 422,349 | | | | | $ 4,605,800 | | | | | $ - | | | | | $ 329,538 | | | | | $ 14,574 | | | | | $ 5,372,261 | |
Andrew S. Hughes | | 2024 | | | $ | 385,000 | | | | $ | 63,983 | | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 164,227 | | | | $ | 402,250 | | | | $ | 1,015,460 | |
General Counsel and Secretary | | 2023 | | | $ | 371,875 | | | | $ | 283,629 | | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 181,961 | | | | $ | 15,250 | | | | $ | 852,715 | |
Conor B. Tierney | | 2024 | | | $ | 330,000 | | | | $ | 164,372 | | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 46,922 | | | | $ | 347,586 | | | | $ | 888,880 | |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | | 2023 | | | $ | 318,472 | | | | $ | 609,200 | | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 142,393 | | | | $ | 15,250 | | | | $ | 1,085,315 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted, computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“FASB Topic 718”). Each of the stock awards consist of grants of RSUs granted pursuant to the 2021 Equity Plan. Terms of the 2024 RSUs are summarized in “Equity Awards For Fiscal Year 2024,” below. The fair value of each RSU is measured based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. |
(2) | Represents amounts earned under our annual cash bonus program for the year indicated (see “Elements of Executive Compensation – Annual Cash Bonus,” below). |
(3) | Represents the Company’s contribution to each NEO’s account in the Company’s 401(k) plan, the payment of previously disclosed retention bonuses that were earned as of December 31, 2024, in the amount of $500,000 for Mr. Fisch, $385,000 for Mr. Hughes, and $330,000 for Mr. Tierney, and in the case of Mr. Fisch and Mr. Tierney, a $342 and $336 reimbursement for gym membership, respectively. |
ELEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Base Salary
Base salaries are intended to provide a level of compensation sufficient to attract and retain an effective executive team, when considered in combination with the other components of our executive compensation program. The relative levels of base salary for our NEOs are designed to reflect each NEO’s scope of responsibility and accountability. The base salary paid to each of our NEOs for 2024 is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” above.
Annual Cash Bonus
We provide our NEOs with short-term incentive compensation through an annual cash bonus program. The annual cash bonus program holds the NEOs accountable to business and individual objectives, rewards the NEOs based on actual business results, and helps sustain a “pay for performance” culture. For fiscal year 2024, the annual bonus targets were set by our Compensation Committee as follows: for Mr. Fisch, 100% of his base salary; for Mr. Hughes, 65% of his base salary; and for Mr. Tierney, 65% of his base salary.
At the beginning of 2024, our Compensation Committee, on the recommendations of management, set corporate goals and objectives for the year. In early 2025, our Compensation Committee, based on management’s recommendation, determined that management had achieved some, but not all of the corporate goals for 2024 and funded a bonus pool at that level. Each of Messrs. Fisch, Hughes, and Tierney received a percentage of their bonus target, which equated to $437,500 for Mr. Fisch, $218,969 for Mr. Hughes, and $187,688 for Mr. Tierney. However, the Compensation Committee, with input from management, allocated a portion of the total bonus payout for each NEO between cash and the RSUs reflected below. The amounts reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above reflect the cash portion of the short-term incentive compensation, and the amounts reflected in the “Stock Awards” column reflect the equity portion of the short-term incentive compensation for each NEO in fiscal year 2024.
Equity Awards For Fiscal Year 2024
During fiscal year 2024, none of our NEOs received any equity awards, however, each of our NEOs did receive an equity award in early 2025 for performance in 2024 under the Company’s short-term incentive compensation program.
Restricted Stock Units
In early 2025, each of our NEOs received an award of RSUs granted from our 2021 Equity Plan in recognition of achievement under the Company’s short-term incentive compensation program for 2024.
Mr. Fisch received an award of 351,500 RSUs, Mr. Hughes received an award of 58,700 RSUs, and Mr. Tierney received an award of 150,800 RSUs. All of these RSUs vested, in full, as of February 15, 2025.
The Company generally intends to grant annual equity awards pursuant to our 2021 Equity Plan to senior management, including our NEOs.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS WITH OUR NEOS
Other than a standard Employee Proprietary Information and Invention Agreement (“EPIIA”) that is signed by each of our employees at the commencement of their employment, including our NEOs, we do not have employment agreements with any of our NEOs. Each NEO is employed on at “at-will” basis. However, our Compensation Committee did provide each of our NEOs with a Change in Control Severance Agreement that provides in the event of a defined change in control and a separation from service, also known as a “double trigger,” the NEO would be entitled to 1.5 times annual base pay and target bonus, prorated target bonus for the year in which the separation from service occurred, an acceleration of all granted but unvested equity awards, and paid health insurance premiums for 18 months from the separation of service. In addition, in 2023, our Compensation Committee provided each of our NEOs with a retention agreement that provides each NEO with a lump sum payment equal to each NEOs respective annual base salary if the NEO remains employed by us and maintains satisfactory job performance through December 31, 2024. Each of our NEOs satisfied the conditions required by the retention agreements and were paid the lump sum payment equal to each NEOs respective annual base salary.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2024.
| | Share-based awards | |
| | Equity incentive plan awards: | | | Equity incentive plan awards: | |
| | number of unearned shares, units or | | | market or payout value of unearned shares, | |
| | other rights that have not vested | | | units or other rights that have not vested | |
Name | | (#) | | | ($)(1) | |
Matthew Fisch | | | 84,374 | (2) | | $ | 107,155 | |
Andrew S. Hughes | | | 466 | (3) | | $ | 592 | |
| | | 8,179 | (4) | | $ | 10,387 | |
| | | 1,056 | (5) | | $ | 1,341 | |
| | | 10,419 | (6) | | $ | 13,232 | |
Conor B. Tierney | | | 13,890 | (7) | | $ | 17,640 | |
| | | 10,419 | (8) | | $ | 13,232 | |
| | | 3,125 | (9) | | $ | 3,969 | |
(1) | The value of each unvested restricted stock unit is based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2024, which was $1.27. |
(2) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 9,375 RSUs on the 15th day of the second month of every calendar quarter until fully vested. |
(3) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 155 RSUs on the 15th day of every month until fully vested. |
(4) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 817 RSUs on the 15th day of every month until fully vested. |
(5) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 1,056 RSUs on the 15th day of the second month of every calendar quarter until fully vested. |
(6) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 2,083 RSUs on the 15th day of the second month of every calendar quarter until fully vested. |
(7) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 2,778 RSUs on the 15th day of the second month of every calendar quarter until fully vested. |
(8) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 2,083 RSUs on the 15th day of the second month of every calendar quarter until fully vested. |
(9) | This grant shall continue to vest at the rate of 625 RSUs on the 15th day of the second month of every calendar quarter until fully vested. |
RETIREMENT PLAN AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
All of our U.S. employees are eligible to participate in broad-based and comprehensive employee benefit programs, including medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance, and a 401(k) plan with Company contributions. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in these plans on the same basis as our other employees and do not participate in executive level benefit programs. Other than our 401(k) plan, we do not sponsor or maintain any deferred compensation or retirement plans. The Company contributions to the 401(k) plan on behalf of each NEO in fiscal year 2024 are included in the “Summary Compensation Table” above under the column “All Other Compensation.”
TERMINATION AND CHANGE IN CONTROL PROVISIONS
Employment Agreements with our NEOs
A description of the severance payments and benefits to be provided to our NEOs, including in respect of equity awards held by our NEOs, in connection with certain terminations of employment both in connection with a change in control and not in connection with a change in control, is set forth in “Employment Agreements with our NEOs” above.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information known to the Company regarding the beneficial ownership of the common stock as of February 18, 2025, by:
| • | each person who is known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of the outstanding shares of the common stock; |
| • | each Named Executive Officer and director of the Company; and |
| • | all current executive officers and directors of the Company, as a group. |
Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC, which generally provide that a person or entity has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she, or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power over that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days.
The beneficial ownership percentages set forth in the table below are based on 18,676,377 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of February 18, 2025. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of such person, we deemed to be outstanding all shares subject to equity awards held by the person that are currently exercisable, or would be exercisable or would vest based on service-based vesting conditions within 60 days of February 18, 2025. However, we did not deem such shares outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to the following table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to their beneficially owned common stock and preferred stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | | Number of Shares of | | | Percent | |
| | Common stock | | | Owned | |
Directors and Named Executive Officers: | | | | | | | | |
Timothy J. Dunn(2) | | | 85,456 | | | | * | |
Luis C. Dussan(3) | | | 290,727 | | | | 1.56 | % |
Matthew Fisch(4) | | | 238,520 | | | | 1.28 | % |
Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk(5) | | | 37,915 | | | | * | |
Jonathon B. Husby(6) | | | 29,647 | | | | * | |
Sue E. Zeifman(7) | | | 32,976 | | | | * | |
Andrew S. Hughes(8) | | | 74,037 | | | | * | |
Conor B. Tierney(9) | | | 125,600 | | | | * | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 individuals)(10) | | | 914,878 | | | | 4.90 | % |
Five Percent Holders: | | | | | | | | |
None | | | | | | | | |
* Less than 1%.
(1) | Unless otherwise noted, the business address of each of the following entities or individuals is c/o AEye, Inc., 4670 Willow Road, Suite 125, Pleasanton, CA 94588. |
(2) | Consists of 83,886 shares of common stock held of record by Mr. Dunn, 950 shares of common stock held of record by the Dunn Family Trust U/A/D 7/10/2001, for which Mr. Dunn serves as a trustee, and options to purchase 620 shares of common stock. |
(3) | Consists of 3,493 shares of common stock held of record by Mr. Dussan, 241,832 held by the Luis Dussan Trust A U/A/D 5/18/2022, for which Mr. Dussan is the trustee and beneficiary, 33,000 held by the Jennifer Dussan Trust A U/A/D 5/18/2022, for which Mr. Dussan’s spouse is the beneficiary and Mr. Dussan is the trustee, and 12,402 shares of common stock held of record by the Luis Carlos Dussan Family Trust dated January 20, 2021, however, with respect to the shares held in this trust, Mr. Dussan disclaims beneficial ownership except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. |
(4) | Consists of 238,520 shares held of record by Mr. Fisch. |
(5) | Consists of 35,435 shares of common stock held of record by Prof. Dr. Gottschalk and options to purchase 2,480 shares of common stock. |
(6) | Consists of 29,647 shares of common stock held of record by Mr. Husby. |
(7) | Consists of 32,976 shares of common stock held of record by Ms. Zeifman. |
(8) | Consists of 72,245 shares of common stock held of record by Mr. Hughes and 1,792 shares of common stock subject to equity awards held by Mr. Hughes that are expected to vest within 60 days of February 18, 2025. |
(9) | Consists of 125,600 shares of common stock held of record by Mr. Tierney. |
(10) | Consists of 909,986 shares of common stock held of record and 4,892 shares of common stock subject to equity awards that are expected to vest and/or be exercisable within 60 days of February 18, 2025. |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below provides information relating to our equity compensation plans, including individual compensation arrangements, under which our common stock is authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2024, as adjusted for stock splits:
| | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2023 CEO Inducement Grant Plan | | | 84,374 | | | $ | 0 | | | | 0 | |
2021 Equity Incentive Plan | | | 299,812 | (1) | | $ | 0 | | | | 706,520 | (2) |
2016 Stock Plan | | | 128,848 | (3) | | $ | 13.19 | | | | 0 | (4) |
2014 US LADAR Inc. Equity Incentive Plan | | | 11,007 | (5) | | $ | 3.02 | | | | 0 | (6) |
2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | | 12,061 | (7) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | 0 | | | $ | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Total | | | 524,041 | | | | | | | | 718,581 | |
(1) | Represents 299,812 shares of common stock issuable upon the settlement of outstanding restricted stock units granted under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2024. As of February 18, 2025, no stock options had been issued under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. |
(2) | To the extent that outstanding awards under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by the Company, satisfied without the issuance of shares of common stock, or are otherwise terminated (other than by exercise or vesting), such shares subject to such awards will be available for future issuance under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. In addition, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2021 Equity Incentive Plan are expected to increased by 406,024 shares after December 31, 2024, representing 3% of the common stock issued and outstanding calculated on a fully diluted basis as of December 31, 2024, and will be cumulatively increased on each January 1 hereafter, through and including January 1, 2031, by a number of shares of common stock of up to 3% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding calculated on a fully-diluted basis on the immediately preceding December 31. The number here does not reflect the increase in shares available for grant occurring after December 31, 2024. |
(3) | Represents 128,848 shares of common stock issuable upon settlement of outstanding restricted share units and shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2024 under the 2016 Stock Plan. To the extent that outstanding awards under the 2016 Stock Plan are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by the Company, satisfied without the issuance of shares of common stock, or are otherwise terminated (other than by exercise or vesting), such shares subject to such awards will not be available for future issuance under the 2016 Stock Plan or any other equity plan. |
(4) | No further shares of common stock will be issued under the 2016 Stock Plan. |
(5) | Represents 11,007 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2024 under the 2014 US LADAR Inc. Equity Incentive Plan. To the extent that outstanding awards under the 2014 US LADAR Inc. Equity Incentive Plan are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by the Company, satisfied without the issuance of shares of common stock, or are otherwise terminated (other than by exercise or vesting), such shares subject to such awards will not be available for future issuance under the 2014 US LADAR Inc. Equity Incentive Plan or any other equity plan. |
(6) | No further shares of common stock will be issued under the 2014 US LADAR Inc. Equity Incentive Plan. |
(7) | Represents the number of shares available for issuance as of December 31, 2024 under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In addition, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan are expected to be increased by 135,341 shares after December 31, 2024, representing 1% of the common stock issued and outstanding calculated on a fully diluted basis as of December 31, 2024, and will be cumulatively increased on each January 1 hereafter, through and including January 1, 2032, by a number of shares of common stock of up to 1% of the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding calculated on a fully-diluted basis on the immediately preceding December 31. The number here does not reflect the increase in shares available for grant occurring after December 31, 2024. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following includes a summary of transactions since January 1, 2023 to which we have been a party, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded $120,000, and in which any of our directors, executive officers or, to our knowledge, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than equity and other compensation, termination, change of control, and other arrangements, which are described under the section entitled “Executive Compensation.”
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP
From November 2016 until December 15, 2023, we employed Miguel Dussan, a sibling of our Company’s director and former Chief Technology Officer, who was our Director, Human Resources. In 2023, Mr. Dussan received total cash compensation of $149,000. In 2023, Mr. Dussan was granted 333 RSUs that vested over three quarters and 1,666 RSUs that vest over three years. In addition, he participated in all other benefits that the Company generally offers to all of its employees.
INDEMNIFICATION UNDER CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS; INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS
Our Bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), subject to certain exceptions contained in our Bylaws. In addition, our Certificate of Incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty.
We have also entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors. The indemnification agreements provide the indemnitees with contractual rights to indemnification, and expense advancement and reimbursement, to the fullest extent permitted under the DGCL, subject to certain exceptions contained in those agreements.
POLICY REGARDING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our Board of Directors has adopted a written policy on transactions with related persons that is in conformity with the requirements for issuers having publicly held common stock that is listed on NASDAQ. The purpose of the policy is to describe the procedures used to identify, review, approve, and disclose, if necessary, any transaction, arrangement, or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships) in which (i) we were, are, or will be a participant, (ii) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000, and (iii) a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest, in each case, other than compensation arrangements approved by our Board of Directors. For purposes of the policy, a related person is (a) any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year was, a director or executive officer of us or a nominee to become a director, (b) any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our voting securities, (c) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons sharing the same household as such person, or (d) any firm, corporation, or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed or is a general partner or principal or in a similar position, or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest. Our Audit Committee reviews and approves, or ratifies, each related party transaction, taking into account whether the terms are comparable to those that would be obtained in an arm’s length transaction, the extent of the related person’s interest, and other relevant factors. If advance approval of a related party transaction is not feasible, then the transaction may be preliminarily entered into by management upon prior approval by the General Counsel, subject to ratification by our Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. No director may participate in approval of a related party transaction for which he or she is a related person.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference our Proxy Statement for the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within 120 days of the year ended December 31, 2024.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements. The financial statements included in “Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules. None.
3. Exhibits. Exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Exhibit Number | Description | | Form | File Number | Exhibit/ Appendix Reference | Filing Date | Filed Herewith |
2.1† | Merger Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2021, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III, Merger Sub and AEye. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 2.1 | 5/13/2021 | |
2.2 | Amendment to the Merger Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2021, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III, merger Sub and AEye Technologies. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 2.2 | 5/13/2021 | |
3.1 | Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AEye, Inc. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 3.1 | 08/23/2021 | |
3.2 | Certificate of Amendment of the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AEye, Inc. | | 10-Q | 001-39699 | 3.2 | 05/11/2023 | |
3.3 | Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, filed on December 26, 2023. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 3.1 | 12/29/2023 | |
3.4 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of AEye, Inc. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 3.2 | 08/23/2021 | |
4.1 | Registration Rights Agreement by and between AEye, Inc. and Tumim Stone Capital LLC, dated December 8, 2021. | | 8-K/A | 001-39699 | 4.1 | 12/15/2021 | |
4.2 | Warrant Agreement dated November 12, 2020, between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 4.1 | 05/13/2021 | |
4.3 | Specimen Warrant Certificate. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 4.2 | 05/13/2021 | |
4.4 | Registration Rights Agreement, by and between AEye, Inc. and New Circle Principal Investment LLC, dated July 25, 2024 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 4.1 | 07/29/2024 | |
4.5 | Registration Rights Agreement by and between AEye, Inc. and the purchaser named in the signature pages thereto, dated January 2, 2025 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.2 | 01/03/2025 | |
4.6 | Form of Senior Unsecured Convertible Promissory Note to be issued by the Company pursuant to and in accordance with the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 2, 2025 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 4.1 | 01/03/2025 | |
4.7 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant to be issued by the Company pursuant to and in accordance with the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 2, 2025 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 4.2 | 01/03/2025 | |
4.8 | Description of Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | | 10-K | 001-39699 | 4.5 | 03/28/2022 | |
10.1 | Form of PIPE Subscription Agreement. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.1 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.2 | Form of Stockholder Support Agreement, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III and certain stockholders of AEye, Inc. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.2 | 02/17/2021 | |
10.3 | Form of Amended and Restated Stockholder Support Agreement, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III and certain stockholders of AEye, Inc. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.2 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.4 | Form of Sponsor Support Agreement, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III, CF Finance Holdings III, LLC and AEye, Inc. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.3 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.5 | Form of Amendment to Sponsor Support Agreement, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III, CF Finance Holdings III, LLC and AEye, Inc. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.4 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.6 | Form of Lock-Up Agreement, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III, AEye, Inc. and the holder signatory thereto. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.5 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.7 | Promissory Note dated April 30, 2021. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.3 | 05/03/2021 | |
10.8+ | Amended and Restated AEye, Inc. 2021 Equity Incentive Plan. | | AEye, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A | 001-39699 | Annex B | 03/20/2023 | |
10.9+ | Form of Indemnification Agreement. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.2 | 08/23/2021 | |
10.10 | Office Lease by and between TRT NOIP DUBLIN LP and the company, dated April 26, 2019. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.8 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.11+ | Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 03/18/2022 | |
10.12 | Common Stock Purchase Agreement by and between AEye, Inc. and Tumim Stone Capital LLC, dated December 8, 2021. | | 8-K/A | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 12/15/2021 | |
10.13 | Registration Rights Agreement, by and among CF Finance Acquisition Corp. III and the investors listed thereto. | | S-4 | 333-256058 | 10.6 | 05/13/2021 | |
10.14 | Form of Senior Unsecured Convertible Note, dated September 15, 2022. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 4.1 | 09/16/2022 | |
10.15 | Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated September 15, 2022. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 4.2 | 09/16/2022 | |
10.16 | Securities Purchase Agreement by and among AEye, Inc. and 3i, LP, dated September 15, 2022. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 09/16/2022 | |
10.17 | Registration Rights Agreement by and among AEye, Inc. and 3i, LP, dated September 15, 2022. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.2 | 09/16/2022 | |
10.18+ | Offer Letter by and between the Company and Matthew Fisch, dated January 20, 2023. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 02/01/2023 | |
10.19+ | Form Retention Agreement. | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 11/07/2023 | |
10.20+ | AEye, Inc. 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | | AEye, Inc. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A | 001-39699 | Annex A | 03/31/2022 | |
10.21+ | AEye, Inc. 2023 CEO Inducement Grant Plan. | | S-8 | 333-270731 | 10.3 | 03/22/2023 | |
10.22 | Share Purchase Agreement by and among AEye, Inc. and New Circle Principal Investments LLC, dated July 25, 2024 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 07/29/2024 | |
10.23 | Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 29, 2024, between AEye, Inc. and the Purchasers | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 05/29/2024 | |
10.24 | Form of Lock-Up Agreement | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.2 | 05/29/2024 | |
10.25 | Securities Purchase Agreement by and among AEye, Inc. and Dowslake Microsystems Corporation, dated May 10, 2024 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 05/15/2024 | |
10.26 | At Market Issuance Sales Agreement by and between AEye, Inc. and A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners, dated September 12, 2024 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 09/13/2024 | |
10.27 | Securities Purchase Agreement by and between AEye, Inc. and the purchaser named in the signature pages thereto, dated January 2, 2025 | | 8-K | 001-39699 | 10.1 | 01/03/2025 | |
19.1 | Insider Trading Policy effective as of August 3, 2023 | | 10-K | 333-259554 | 19.1 | 03/27/2024 | |
21.1 | List of Significant Subsidiaries. | | | | | | X |
23.1 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. | | | | | | X |
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | X |
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15(d)-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | X |
32.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | | | | | | X |
97.1 | AEye, Inc. Dodd Frank Clawback Policy | | 10-K | 333-259554 | 97.1 | 03/27/2024 | |
101.INS | Inline XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | X |
101.SCH | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | X |
101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | X |
101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | | | X |
101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | | | | | X |
101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | X |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | | | | | | X |
† Certain of the exhibits and schedules to this Exhibit have been omitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 601(a)(5). The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of all omitted exhibits and schedules to the SEC upon its request.
* The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K is deemed furnished and not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of AEye, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: February 24, 2025
AEye, Inc.
By: /s/ Matthew Fisch
Matthew Fisch
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
By: /s/ Conor Tierney
Conor Tierney
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
POWER OF ATTORNEY
By signing this Annual Report on Form 10-K below, I hereby appoint each of Matthew Fisch and Conor Tierney as my attorney-in-fact to sign all amendments to this Form 10-K on my behalf, and to file this Form 10-K (including all exhibits and other documents related to the Form 10-K) with the Securities and Exchange Commission. I authorize each of my attorneys-in-fact to (1) appoint a substitute attorney-in-fact for himself and (2) perform any actions that he believes are necessary or appropriate to carry out the intention and purpose of this Power of Attorney. I ratify and confirm all lawful actions taken directly or indirectly by my attorneys-in-fact and by any properly appointed substitute attorneys-in-fact.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Matthew Fisch
Matthew Fisch
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 24, 2025
By: /s/ Conor Tierney
Conor Tierney
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
February 24, 2025
By: /s/ Timothy J. Dunn
Timothy J. Dunn
Director
February 24, 2025
By: /s/ Luis C. Dussan
Luis C. Dussan
Director
February 24, 2025
By: /s/ Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk
Prof. Dr. Bernd Gottschalk
Director
February 24, 2025
By: /s/ Jonathon B. Husby
Jonathon B. Husby
Director
February 24, 2025
By: /s/ Sue E. Zeifman
Sue E. Zeifman
Director
February 24, 2025