Explanatory Note
On April 25, 2024, NeoGames S.A. (the “Company”) completed the transactions contemplated by that certain Business Combination Agreement entered into on May 15, 2023 (the “Business Combination Agreement”) with Aristocrat Leisure Limited, a company organized under the laws of Australia (“Parent” or “Aristocrat”), and Anaxi Investments Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company and wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Company transferred (by way of continuation) its statutory seat, registered office (siège statutaire) and seat of central administration (siège de l’administration centrale) from Luxembourg to the Cayman Islands and changed its legal form as a Luxembourg law governed public limited liability company (société anonyme) to a Cayman Islands exempted company (without the dissolution of the Company or the liquidation of its assets) (the “Continuation”) and changed its name to Neo Group Ltd. effective from the Continuation. The Continuation became effective with receipt of the certificate of continuation from the Cayman Registrar on April 24, 2024. Thereafter, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into the Company, following which Merger Sub ceased to exist as a separate legal entity and the Company became the surviving company and a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Parent (the “Merger”). The Merger became effective with receipt of the certificate of merger from the Cayman Registrar on April 25, 2024.
With the effectiveness of the Merger, the Company intends to promptly delist its Ordinary Shares from The Nasdaq Global Market, terminate its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and deregister or suspend the registration of its securities under the Exchange Act.
Although this Annual Report on Form 20-F may reflect certain events material to the Company that occurred following December 31, 2023 and prior to the date hereof, the disclosures herein do not reflect the completion of the Business Combination Agreement, the effectiveness of the Continuation, the Company now being a Cayman Islands exempted company, or the effectiveness of the Merger.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item Number | Title | Page |
| |
|
| | 5
|
| | 5
|
| | 6
|
| | 6
|
| | 6
|
| |
|
PART ONE | |
|
| |
|
| | 10
|
| | 10
|
| | 10
|
| | 45
|
| | 65
|
| | 65
|
| | 80
|
| | 89
|
| | 93
|
| | 94
|
| | 95
|
| | 104
|
| | 105
|
| |
|
PART TWO | |
|
| |
|
| | 105
|
| | 105
|
| | 105
|
| | 106
|
| | 106
|
| | 106
|
| | 106
|
| | 107
|
| | 107
|
| | 107
|
| | 107
|
| | 108
|
| | 108
|
| | 108
|
| | 108
|
| |
|
PART THREE | |
|
| |
|
| | 109
|
| | 109
|
| | 110
|
DEFINITIONS
Unless where the context otherwise requires or otherwise indicated, terms “NeoGames” and the “Company” refer to NeoGames S.A. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, as a group, and the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the Company, together with NeoPollard Interactive LLC (“NPI” or the “Joint Venture”), as a group.
References to “Aspire” mean Aspire Global Limited (formerly, Aspire Global Plc), and together with its subsidiaries, the “Aspire Group”;
References to “BtoBet” mean BtoBet Limited;
References to “Pariplay” mean GMS Entertainment Ltd.;
References to “Caesars” and “Caesars group” mean Caesars Entertainment, Inc. and its subsidiaries, including American Wagering, Inc.;
References to the “Exchange Act” are to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
References to “Nasdaq” are to the Nasdaq Global Market;
References to “Ordinary Shares” are to our Ordinary Shares, no par value per share;
References to the “SEC” are to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;
References to the “Securities Act” are to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;
References to “B2B” mean business-to-business;
References to “B2C” mean business-to-consumer;
References to “B2G” mean business-to-government;
References to “Gross Gaming Revenue” or “GGR” mean gross sales less winnings paid to players;
References to “iLottery Penetration” mean, with respect to the gross sales generated by either a lottery or by all lotteries within a given market, the percentage of such gross sales that was generated by iLottery offerings;
References to “Net Gaming Revenue” or “NGR” mean (i) in North America, gross sales less winnings paid to players and any promotion dollar incentives granted to players, and (ii) in Europe, gross sales less winnings paid to players, any gambling tax or duty paid on such sales and any promotion incentives granted to players; and
References to “dollar,” “USD” and “$” are to U.S. dollars, “NIS” or “shekels” are to New Israeli Shekels, “pound sterling,” “pence” or “£” are to the legal currency of the United Kingdom, “€,” “EUR” or “euro” are to the currency introduced at the start of the third stage of European Economic and Monetary Union pursuant to the treaty establishing the European Community, as amended, and “C$” is to Canadian dollars.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
We report under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”). None of the Company’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). We present our consolidated financial statements in U.S. dollars. NPI’s financial statements included in this Annual Report were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have made rounding adjustments to some of the figures included in this Annual Report. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them.
Throughout this Annual Report, we provide a number of key performance indicators used by our management and often used by competitors in our industry. These and other key performance indicators are discussed in more detail in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Key Performance Indicators.”
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA
Unless otherwise indicated, information in this Annual Report concerning our industry, our markets and our competitive position, is based on information from our own internal estimates and research as well as from publicly available information, industry and general publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties such as the American Gaming Association, Eilers & Krejcik Gaming, Vixio (formerly “Gambling Compliance”), H2 Gambling Capital (“H2GC”) and La Fleur’s TLF Publications, in addition to reports from state lottery commissions.
Industry publications and forecasts generally state that the information they contain has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Forecasts and other forward-looking information obtained from these sources are subject to the same qualifications and uncertainties as the other forward-looking statements in this Annual Report. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
USE OF TRADEMARKS
We have proprietary rights to trademarks used in this Annual Report which are important to our business, many of which are registered under applicable intellectual property laws.
Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks, logos and trade names referred to in this Annual Report are without the ® and ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensors to these trademarks, service marks and trade names. This Annual Report contains additional trademarks, service marks and trade names of others, which are the property of their respective owners. All trademarks, service marks and trade names appearing in this Annual Report are, to our knowledge, the property of their respective owners. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trademarks, service marks, copyrights or trade names to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that relate to our current expectations and views of future events. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements contained in this Annual Report other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future operating results and financial position, our business strategy and plans, our acquisition by Aristocrat, market growth, growth across geographic locations, integration plans, our acquisition of Aspire and any future benefits and synergies related thereto, and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect,” “could,” “would,” “project,” “plan,” “target,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions. These forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections titled Item 3.D. “Key Information - Risk Factors,” Item 4. “Information on the Company,” and Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” These statements relate to events that involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are not a guarantee of future performance. Actual outcomes may differ materially from the information contained in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including, without limitation, the risk factors set forth in Item 3.D. “Key Information - Risk Factors.”
Many important factors could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in an evolving environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
The forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report relate only to events or information as of the date on which the statements are made in this Annual Report. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors described in this annual report, including factors beyond our ability to control or predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this Annual Report and the documents that we reference in this Annual Report and have filed as exhibits hereto completely and with the understanding that our actual future results or performance may be materially different from what we expect.
SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described in the section titled Item 3.D. “Key Information - Risk Factors,” in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. You should carefully consider these risks and uncertainties when investing in our Ordinary Shares. The principal risks and uncertainties affecting our business include the following:
| • | We have a concentrated customer base, and our failure to retain certain existing contracts with our customers could have a significant adverse effect on our business. |
| • | A reduction in discretionary consumer spending could have a material adverse impact on our business. |
| • | The growth of our business largely depends on our continued ability to procure new contracts. |
| • | We incur significant costs related to the procurement of new iLottery and iGaming contracts, which we may be unable to recover in a timely manner, or at all. |
| • | Intense competition exists in the iLottery and iGaming industries, and we expect competition to continue to intensify. |
| • | We are dependent on Pollard with respect to our joint operation of the Michigan iLottery for the Michigan State Lottery. |
| • | Conducting a business through a jointly-owned entity such as NPI entails risks that are commonly associated with joint ventures. |
| • | Our IT Systems and data may be vulnerable to security and cybersecurity attacks and/or security and cybersecurity incidents, including data security incidents, which could result in damage to our brand and reputation, material financial penalties, and legal and regulatory liability, and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. |
| • | We operate in industries that are affected by technological improvements and evolving player preferences. |
| • | We have incurred operating losses in the past, may incur operating losses in the future and may not be able to maintain sustainable profit margins. |
| • | Certain of our founding shareholders have significant influence over the nominations and elections of members of our board of directors and other matters submitted for shareholder approval. |
| • | Our inability to successfully integrate Aspire, or complete or integrate other future acquisitions, could limit our future growth or otherwise be disruptive to our ongoing business. |
| • | We are subject to substantial penalties for failure to perform. |
| • | We rely on information technology and other systems and platforms, and any failures, errors, defects or disruptions in our systems or platforms could diminish our brand and reputation, subject us to liability, disrupt our business, affect our ability to scale our technical infrastructure and adversely affect our business. |
| • | We rely on third-party service providers for key functions in our operations. |
| • | If we fail to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, our business could be materially affected. |
| • | We rely on third-party intellectual property. We cannot guarantee that such intellectual property will continue to be available. |
| • | The gaming industry is historically litigious with respect to intellectual property and there can be no assurance that our platforms will not infringe on the rights of others. |
| • | We are exposed to costs associated with changes in levies and taxes. |
| • | We are subject to taxation in multiple jurisdictions, which is complex and often requires making subjective determinations subject to scrutiny by, and disagreements with, tax regulators. |
| • | Our operations in Kyiv, Ukraine have been negatively impacted as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if the impacts resulting from the conflict in Ukraine are exacerbated. |
| • | Our platform contains third-party open source software components, which may pose particular risks to our proprietary software, technologies, products and services in a manner that could negatively affect our business. |
| • | We are highly dependent on our key personnel. If we are not successful in attracting, motivating and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy. |
| • | Generally, the competition for skilled technical and other personnel in Israel, Ukraine, Poland, Malta, Bulgaria and North Macedonia is intense, and as a result we may fail to continue to attract, recruit, develop and retain qualified employees, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
| • | We may not be able to service our debt under our financing agreements in connection with the acquisition of Aspire, or we may otherwise be in breach of those arrangements. |
| • | We may require additional capital to support our growth plans, and such capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and may result in shareholder dilution. This could impair our growth and materially and adversely affect our business. |
| • | Our management team has limited experience managing a public company. |
| • | We may become subject to litigation, from which we could incur significant monetary and reputational harm, irrespective of the merit of such claim or outcome of such litigation. |
| • | Our results of operations may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency values. |
| • | Expansion into new markets may be important to the growth of our business in the future, and if we do not manage the business and economic risks of this expansion effectively, it could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. |
| • | Our insurance may not provide adequate levels of coverage against claims. |
| • | If we fail to detect fraud or theft, including by our employees and our customers and their players, our reputation may suffer which could harm our brand and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and subject us to investigations and litigation. |
| • | We are subject to risks related to corporate social responsibility, responsible lottery and gaming, reputation and ethical conduct. |
| • | The illegal gaming market could negatively affect our business. |
| • | Political, economic and military conditions in Israel could materially and adversely affect our business. |
| • | The gaming and lottery industries are heavily regulated, and changes to the regulatory framework in the jurisdictions in which we operate could harm our existing operations. |
| • | Failure by us or by our major shareholders to comply with regulations may result in the revocation or suspension of our or our customers’ licenses to operate. |
| • | We may fail to identify and prevent risks related to digital gambling or support players who are suffering from gambling problems and addictions. |
| • | Our efforts to block or limit access to our gaming platforms in certain countries, whether entirely or within certain states thereof, may prove inadequate. |
| • | We may incur substantial costs in order to meet the varied and complex regulatory requirements to which we are subject in the different jurisdictions in which we operate. |
| • | Negative publicity concerning our Company, our brands or the gambling industry in general could result in increased regulations and reputational harm. |
| • | We are obligated to adhere to continually evolving laws and regulations concerning data privacy, data protection, information security, and consumer protection in various markets where we operate, such as the United States and the European Union. Additionally, we may be contractually required to meet specific industry standards, such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards. Any actual or perceived failure, by us or our vendors, to meet these obligations could lead to substantial liability and/or a loss of trust, potentially causing significant harm to our business, operational outcomes, and financial condition. |
| • | Any actual or perceived failure to comply with evolving regulatory frameworks around the development and use of artificial intelligence could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. |
| • | We are subject to anti-money laundering laws and regulations in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom as well as other jurisdictions in which we operate. |
| • | We are subject to economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations. |
| • | We are subject to global anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. |
| • | Our revenue may be impacted, to a significant extent, by macroeconomic conditions, as well as by health epidemics and contagious disease outbreaks. |
| • | Conditions in the jurisdictions where we operate could materially and adversely affect our business, including, for example, in connection with the ongoing war in Ukraine. |
PART ONE
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
3.A. [Reserved.]
3.B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
3.C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
3.D. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information contained in this Annual Report before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, or strategic objectives could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks and uncertainties. The trading price and value of our Ordinary Shares could decline due to any of these risks and uncertainties, and you may lose all or part of your investment. This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks and uncertainties faced by us described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
We have a concentrated customer base, and our failure to retain certain existing contracts with our customers could have a significant adverse effect on our business.
Our financial condition is heavily dependent on our ability to maintain our existing turnkey contracts, our large games contracts and our brand partner operators. We cannot guarantee that our existing contracts will be renewed, or that we will be able to win a procurement process for a new contract or successfully attract new operators. Even if we are successful in renewing such agreements, there is no assurance that such renewals will be on the same terms, and it is possible that renewals of existing agreements will be on less preferable terms. This has occurred in the past when certain customers required certain concessions upon the renewal of existing iLottery and iGaming agreements. As is typical with many government contracts, most of our iLottery customers can terminate our contracts for convenience.
Loss of any of our large customer or operator contracts in any of our business segments would result in a substantial decline in our revenues, which also could hinder our ability to pursue growth initiatives, both in the form of new or enhanced products and services and in expansion into new markets. The loss of any of our large customers or operators in any of our business segments could damage our reputation, which could materially damage our financial condition.
A reduction in discretionary consumer spending could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Lottery and gaming represent discretionary expenditures, which are subject to volatility during times of economic, social and political change. Changes in discretionary spending or player preferences are driven by changes outside of our control, such as, but not limited to, the following economic or socio-political factors:
| • | recessions or other economic slowdowns; |
| • | perceptions by potential players of weak or weakening economic conditions; |
| • | tax increases, including on lottery and gaming winnings; |
| • | significant declines in stock markets; |
| • | decreased liquidity in certain financial markets; |
| • | general tightening of credit; |
| • | civil unrest, terrorist activities or other forms of socio-political turbulence; and |
| • | pandemics, epidemics and the spread of contagious diseases. |
We generate the majority of our revenues from customer contracts based on a revenue sharing model, with our portion calculated as a percentage of GGR or NGR. Widespread reductions in disposable income could lead to a reduction in the number of lottery and gaming players and the amounts such players are willing and able to wager. Given the nature of our revenue sharing arrangements, fewer players and lower spending per player could have a significant adverse effect on our business.
Because our customers’ offerings are typically available only to players within their geographic borders, our revenue is highly concentrated in a limited number of locations. A significant portion of our revenue is generated from customers in the United States, from customers in Mali, Angola and Mozambique in Africa, as well as from customers in the UK, Germany and Nordic countries, and any adverse impact resulting from any of the foregoing economic factors would be magnified to the extent that it disproportionately impacts players in these locations, or other jurisdictions from which we derive revenues.
As our revenue sharing arrangements result in an intertwined relationship between our and our customers’ financial condition, we also face significant risks during times of uncertain and unfavorable economic and socio-political conditions affecting our customers. Unfavorable economic and socio-political factors and conditions could result in financial (including budgetary and liquidity) concerns for our customers, which may reduce the likelihood that we will be able to renew our existing contracts on substantially similar commercial terms or win new contracts with terms as favorable to us as the terms of our existing contracts.
The growth of our business largely depends on our continued ability to procure new contracts.
The future growth of our revenue from our iLottery and iGaming offerings depends to a large extent on our ability to procure new contracts. While a significant portion of our revenue growth over the past few years has come from increasing revenues generated by the MSL and other iLottery contracts, the addition of new iLottery contracts and iGaming operators has contributed substantially to the growth of our business. In particular, NPI began recognizing revenues from new turnkey contracts supporting the Virginia Lottery (the “VAL”) in 2015 and, later, the New Hampshire Lottery Commission (the “NHL”) the North Carolina Education Lottery (the “NCEL”) and the Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission (the “AGLC”) in 2018, 2019 and 2020, respectively, and the latter two contracts accounted collectively for 51.2% of the Company’s share in NPI’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 and 54.2% of the Company’s share in NPI’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022. In addition, the future growth of our revenue from our iGaming offerings depends to a large extent on our ability to partner with operators. Our largest operator contributed 13.3% of our iGaming revenue for the period ended December 31, 2023.
We may not continue to procure new iLottery customer contracts or new iGaming contracts with operators at the same rate as in the past, or at all. There can be no assurance that additional U.S. states will seek to implement iLottery offerings or that U.S. states seeking to implement iLottery offerings will do so through a process in which we can compete to be the turnkey solution provider. In particular, certain of our competitors currently serve as central lottery system providers for certain U.S. states, and if these states decide to implement iLottery offerings, they may choose to do so by expanding their existing relationships with our competitors without launching a public procurement process or by including iLottery in a broader lottery system procurement process in which we may not be able to successfully compete. Even if additional U.S. states seek to implement iLottery offerings through a public procurement process, there can be no assurance that we will procure any new contracts. Our failure to win new contracts could materially limit the growth of our business.
The pool of potential operators with which we may partner may decrease as the iGaming industry is currently experiencing a consolidation, with large operators acquiring local brands or merging with other operators and some of those operators may become our competitors or be acquired by them. This consolidation may also result in some of our current B2B iGaming customers being acquired by larger operators who have their own technology or who use technology from other vendors, including player account management and content aggregation platforms, sport betting solutions or other iGaming products that we currently provide to them, which may impact our ability to continue to generate revenues from these operators.
In addition, as a part of our B2B iGaming licenses in various jurisdictions around the world, we conduct extensive due diligence on our potential customers. This due diligence in some cases results in us not approving the operators as customers, or in operators choosing to go to a supplier that does not conduct such extensive due diligence. In addition, there is a risk that we might approve a customer after such due diligence, but the regulator might find that our due diligence is not sufficient, asking for further clarification or instructing us to decline the customer. For details regarding our due diligence, see Item 4.B. “Business Overview - Regulation.”
We incur significant costs related to the procurement of new iLottery and iGaming contracts, which we may be unable to recover in a timely manner, or at all.
The tender process to obtain a new iLottery contract is highly competitive and typically requires a significant upfront capital investment. In iGaming, sales cycles in the U.S. are lengthy and often require participation in RFIs and requests for proposals. The efforts and resources required to participate and win a request for proposal, commence operations of an iLottery program or U.S. iGaming operator and procure revenues from such program or operator are relatively long and may take several months or years to complete. This investment, which includes our management’s time, may never be recovered in the event that we fail in our bid. A typical request for proposals or a tender requires us to spend substantial time and effort assisting potential customers in evaluating our products and services, including providing demonstrations and benchmarking against other available offerings by our competitors. This process can be costly and time consuming, and we often do not know if any given sales efforts will be successful until the later stages of those efforts. After being awarded a contract, it can take years to set up the iLottery system or up to a year to set up the operator’s system, and for such contract to become profitable. The long procurement cycle in both iLottery and iGaming creates a significant time gap between the time we participate in a tender and dedicate the necessary resources, and the time we can recognize revenue or income from that program or operator, if at all. This time gap creates pressure on our cash flow, as it requires significant funding up front, and in the interim period, and may not result in any income, or result in income that will only be achieved quarters after the resources have been dedicated. If we are unable to forecast market demand and conditions, we may not be able to expand our sales efforts at appropriate times and our revenues and related results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Intense competition exists in the iLottery and iGaming industries, and we expect competition to continue to intensify.
We face significant competition in the evolving iLottery and iGaming industries.
We compete in the iLottery and iGaming markets with respect to our offering of technology solutions, games and related operational services on the basis of the content, features, quality, functionality, accuracy, reliability, innovation and price of such offerings. If we do not consistently deliver innovative, high-quality and reliable products and services, our ability to remain viable within the iLottery and iGaming industries may suffer, especially as the level of competition increases.
We provide through Aspire a unique solution for iGaming, offering a competitive B2B solution with a wide variety of services, unique proprietary tools and a proprietary Sportsbook platform, which enables our partners to focus on marketing and player acquisitions. However, our competitors may be able to provide similar or superior offerings, thereby preventing us from contracting with additional operators, which would negatively impact our business results.
In addition, pursuant to the January 2023 Agreements, Pollard may become a potential competitor for future iLottery contracts, since pursuant to such agreements, Pollard may pursue future iLottery opportunities in the North American market independently from us.
In addition to competitors we face in a given industry, our offerings also face competition from other related industries. While we believe that our offerings are unique and provide a differentiated experience from offerings in other related industries, the introduction of such offerings may allow new competitors to establish a foothold in regions where we are currently active, thereby drawing customers away from us. For example, on January 22, 2021, iGaming and online sports betting was launched in Michigan, which may draw customers away from the MSL. The MSL accounted for approximately 11.7% of our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2023 and 13.2% of our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2022.
Some of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources (including human resources) or experience than we do. Some of our competitors also have existing relationships and insight as the legacy retail lottery provider of certain U.S. states or other pre-existing relationships that we do not have in the iGaming industry and may realize synergies that we cannot. Competitors may devote more resources towards developing and testing products and services, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, offer more favorable pricing terms, pursue aggressive growth initiatives or otherwise develop more commercially successful products or services. In addition, certain of our competitors may enter into contracts with less favorable terms to prevent us from procuring new contracts or renewing our existing contracts. Such potential competitive disadvantages may make it difficult for us to retain existing contracts or secure new contracts without being willing to accept less favorable terms.
In addition to risks directly tied to our relative lack of resources, experience and longevity, we face risks that:
| • | we may fail to anticipate and adapt to quick changes in customer expectations, preferences and behavior patterns at the same rate as our competitors; |
| • | customers who currently utilize platforms offered by our competitors may be satisfied with such solutions or may determine that it is too costly and/or time consuming to adopt our platforms and solutions. For example, certain lotteries or operators may face significant switching costs if their platforms have been integrated with those of a competitor, potentially reducing the likelihood of us being the successful tenderer; |
| • | lotteries or operators that we currently view as potential customers may decide to develop internally products and services which compete with our products and services; and |
| • | new competitors, including large global corporations or large software vendors operating in adjacent industries, may enter our market. |
Moreover, current and future competitors may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with others, including our current or future strategic partners. By doing so, these competitors may increase their ability to meet the needs of our existing and prospective customers and their players. Furthermore, we believe there is currently a market trend whereby some operators, both in the iLottery and iGaming industries, elect to develop or maintain in-house products that they require, which could lead potential and existing customers to do so instead of purchasing our services. For example, Caesars had decided to develop its own player account management platform, and informed us that they may ask to replace our NeoSphere PAM solution with their own in certain states over time. Since then, the Company has amended and extended for three years the agreement with Caesars to provide the NeoSphere Platform at a guaranteed net profit level for the term of the agreement, but there can be no assurance that Caesars or other operators will prefer our products over developing them in-house in the future. These developments could make it more difficult for us to renew our existing contracts or win new contracts, and even if we are successful at renewing contracts or attracting new ones, they may be at higher cost to us or for smaller margins. If we are unable to compete effectively, successfully and at reasonable cost against our existing and future competitors, our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely impacted.
We are dependent on Pollard with respect to our joint operation of the Michigan iLottery for the Michigan State Lottery.
We act as a subcontractor to Pollard with respect to its agreement (the “MSL Agreement”) to provide development, implementation, operational support and maintenance (including technology platforms, games and added value services) to the Michigan State Lottery (the “MSL”). The MSL accounted for approximately 11.7% of our total revenues in the year ended December 31, 2023 and 13.2% of our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2022.
In 2014, following the procurement process for the predecessor to the MSL Agreement, we and Pollard established NPI to pursue other iLottery opportunities in the North American market. While the current MSL Agreement remains between Pollard and the MSL, NPI has since been awarded iLottery contracts with the VAL in August 2015, the NHL in September 2018 (as a subcontractor to Intralot, Inc. (“Intralot”)), the NCEL in October 2019, the AGLC in March 2020, the Atlantic Lottery Corporation (the “ALC”) in January 2022, the Georgia Lottery Corporation (the “Georgia Lottery”) in October 2022 and West Virginia Lottery in August 2023.
Conducting a business through a jointly-owned entity such as NPI entails risks that are commonly associated with joint ventures.
In 2014, following the procurement process for the predecessor to the MSL Agreement, we and Pollard established NPI to pursue other iLottery opportunities in the North American market. While the current MSL Agreement remains between Pollard and the MSL, NPI has since been awarded iLottery contracts with the VAL in August 2015, the NHL in September 2018 (as a subcontractor to Intralot), the NCEL in October 2019, the AGLC in March 2020, the ALC in January 2022, the Georgia Lottery in October 2022 and the West Virginia Lottery in August 2023.
Conducting a business through a jointly-owned entity such as NPI entails risks that are commonly associated with joint ventures, including the failure to maintain a good working relationship with other joint-owners, differing economic and business interests and goals and liability or reputational harm resulting from each other’s actions. Differences in views between us and Pollard, or a change in the ownership of Pollard, may also result in delayed decision-making or disputes at the shareholder and board level that could negatively impact the operations of NPI and its relationship with customers. In the event that our relationship with Pollard is terminated for any reason, there can be no assurance that any of NPI’s employees will remain with NPI or that we would have sufficient legal, administrative and customer relations capabilities and functions in our North American operations, which Pollard currently contributes to NPI, to proceed without Pollard.
On January 10, 2023, we and Pollard entered into an amendment to the Michigan JV Agreement (“Amended Michigan JV Agreement”) and, concurrently with the Amended Michigan JV Agreement, we entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement with Pollard (the “LLC Agreement” and together with the “Amended Michigan JV Agreement” – the “January 2023 Agreements”), which provide that NPI will perform its obligations pursuant to existing contracts and consider additional opportunities in other jurisdictions. However, the January 2023 Agreements provide us and Pollard the option to pursue future iLottery opportunities in the North American market either in partnership, as part of the Joint Venture or independently. In addition, the January 2023 Agreements do not preclude either party from entering into a business relationship with any one or more of NPI’s suppliers for its own business purposes, provided that any such business relationship does not intentionally interfere with or otherwise divert the supplier’s services from NPI.
Pursuant to the January 2023 Agreements, neither we nor Pollard will be obligated to cooperate with each other in pursuing iLottery opportunities in North America, and both we and Pollard may choose to pursue future iLottery opportunities without each other. In accordance therewith, we are pursuing opportunities independently from NPI. However, the tender process to obtain new iLottery contracts is highly competitive and typically requires a significant upfront capital investment, and Pollard has been responsible for NPI’s participation in such tenders. If we pursue additional future opportunities independently, we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure additional contracts in North America. Further, if we decide to collaborate with new partners with whom we have no prior relationship or track record of successful cooperation, we may fail to achieve the same degree of success that we have achieved with Pollard. We may also be delayed in pursuing future opportunities if we are required to negotiate new agreements and business arrangements with these new partners, and the terms we negotiate with these new partners may be less favorable than those we currently have with Pollard.
Our IT Systems and data may be vulnerable to security and cybersecurity attacks and/or security and cybersecurity incidents, including data security incidents, which could result in damage to our brand and reputation, material financial penalties, and legal and regulatory liability, and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We rely on information technology systems, including computer systems, hardware, software, network, online sites and mobile apps, as well as technology infrastructure including on premises data centers and co-locations, cloud infrastructure and cloud services, for both internal and external operations that are critical to our business (collectively, “IT Systems.”) We own and manage some of these IT Systems, but also rely on third parties and business partners for a range of IT Systems and related products and services including for example co-location data centers, cloud computing, third-party systems, software and services as well as third-party source code and open source. We and certain of our third-party providers and business partners collect, maintain, and process data about players, customers, employees, and others, including information about individuals as well as proprietary information belonging to our business such as trade secrets.
We face numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our IT Systems and the data we maintain, and we may be vulnerable to cybersecurity risks from diverse threat actors, including hackers and state-sponsored organizations, and through diverse attack vectors including employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions such as viruses, social engineering/phishing, malicious software or code embedded in open-source software, or misconfigurations, “bugs” or other vulnerabilities in commercial software integrated into our (or our suppliers or service providers) IT Systems, products, or services, break-ins, theft, computer hacking, AI-powered hacking or other security breaches. Hackers and data thieves are increasingly sophisticated and operate complex and large-scale attacks. Experienced computer programmers and hackers as well as AI-powered cybersecurity agents or systems may be able to penetrate our security controls, remove forensic evidence, and misappropriate or compromise our IT Systems or the data we maintain. They also may be able to develop and deploy malicious software programs that attack our IT Systems, such as spyware and ransomware, or otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities which may also affect the availability of our IT Systems, data leakage, or other disruptions. Our IT Systems and the data stored on those IT Systems may also be vulnerable to security incidents or security attacks, acts of vandalism or theft, coordinated attacks by activist entities, misplaced or lost data, human errors, or other similar events that could negatively affect our systems and the data stored on those systems. Further, third parties, such as hosted solution providers, that provide services to us as well as business partners could also be a source of security risks in the event of a failure of their own security systems and infrastructure.
The secure maintenance and transmission of player information is a critical element of our operations. Our IT Systems that maintain and transmit player information, or those of service providers or business partners, may be compromised by a cybersecurity attack or other security incident, including a malicious third-party penetration of our network security, or that of a third-party service provider or business partner, or impacted by intentional or unintentional actions or inactions by our employees, or those of a third-party service provider or business partner. As a result, our players’ information may be lost, disclosed, accessed or taken without their consent. We and certain of our third-party providers have experienced in the past, and expect to continue to experience in the future, attempts to breach our systems and other similar cyber incidents, including among others denial-of-service attacks, supply chain disruption, brute force attacks, data theft and phishing attacks. To date these attempts have not had a material impact on our operations or financial results, but we cannot provide assurance that they will not have a material impact in the future.
Advances in computer capabilities, new technological discoveries or other developments may result in the whole or partial failure of technology we may use to protect the availability and integrity of our IT Systems and data, including transaction data or other confidential and sensitive information, from being breached or compromised. In addition, websites, mobile apps, servers, network appliances, systems and services are often attacked through compromised credentials, including those obtained through phishing and credential stuffing.
There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls or procedures, and those of our third-party service providers and business partners will be fully implemented, complied with, or effective in protecting our IT Systems, information and data, and may not detect or prevent all attempts to breach our IT Systems, including through denial-of-service attacks, viruses, malicious software, break-ins, phishing attacks, social engineering, security breaches or other attacks and similar disruptions, or attempts at player fraud, and such incidents may lead to service disruption or unavailability and may also jeopardize the security of information stored in or transmitted by our IT Systems or that we or such third parties or business partners otherwise maintain, including payment card systems, which may subject us to fines or higher transaction fees or limit or terminate our access to certain payment methods. Moreover, we may fail to perform a risk assessment for a third-party vendor, service provider or business partner, or may perform an assessment in an inadequate manner or may otherwise fail to find or realize that there is a risk involved in using/contracting with a particular vendor, service provider or business partner. Threats to information security are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude – including through use of artificial intelligence – as threat actors are constantly evolving, including in diversity and sophistication. We and such third parties and business partners may not anticipate or prevent all types of attacks until after they have already been launched. Further, techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or sabotage systems change frequently and may not be known until launched against us or our third-party service providers or business partners. As a result, we may be unable to detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future attacks or incidents, or to avoid a material adverse impact to our IT Systems, data, or business. In addition, there can be no assurance that even if our and our third-party service providers’ and business partners’ cybersecurity risk management programs and processes, including policies, controls or procedures, are fully implemented and complied with, we will not sustain successful security or cybersecurity attacks or incidents, including data security incidents, that would result in undetected breaches to IT Systems and data and information breaches. In the event that we or our third-party service providers or business partners were to detect such breaches or incidents, there can be no assurance that we or they would do so timely, or that any action or attempt at remediating the breach or incident would be taken or done timely, appropriately or completely. Should such undetected successful breaches or incidents occur, we or our third-party service providers or business partners may be in breach of our or their respective regulatory, legal or contractual obligations. There can also be no guarantee that upon detection of such a successful breach or incident, that measures or actions taken will be appropriate or that they will not cause us or our third-party service providers or business partners additional harm.
In addition, security breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, including intentional or inadvertent breaches by our employees or by third parties. These risks may increase over time as the number of our employees and the complexity and number of technical systems and applications we use also increase. Breaches could result in unauthorized access to our IT Systems; unauthorized access to and misappropriation of player information, including players’ personal information, or other confidential or proprietary information of ourselves or third parties; viruses, worms, spyware or other malware being served from our IT Systems; deletion or modification of content or the display of unauthorized content on our sites; interruption, disruption or malfunction of operations; costs relating to breach remediation, deployment of additional personnel and protection technologies, response to governmental investigations and media inquiries and coverage; engagement of third-party experts and consultants; litigation, regulatory action and other potential liabilities. In the past, we and our customers have experienced social engineering, phishing, malware and similar attacks and threats of denial-of-service attacks, none of which to date has been material to our business. For example, on August 25, 2022, the NHL’s third-party hosting provider experienced a cyberattack, which impacted the NHL’s website, NHLottery.com, both of which (i.e. the hosting provider and the website) are not part of the solutions provided by NeoGames to the NHL. The NHL as a precaution decided to go offline for two days while they investigated the matter. During such time, the NHL decided to make all its online services, including the iLottery services that we provide, unavailable to the public. Such attacks against us or our customers could in the future have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Pursuant to a software license agreement with Pollard in respect of the offering to the MSL (the “Pollard Software License Agreement”), our iLottery software is installed on Pollard’s servers, through which it is made available to the MSL. Pollard is responsible for the security measures on its servers, and the Pollard Software License Agreement contains no representations or undertakings with regard to such security measures. A breach of Pollard’s server security could expose our software to the risks noted above. Moreover, our iLottery software is made available by NPI to the VAL, the NHL, the NCEL, the AGLC, and in the future to the ALC and the Georgia Lottery.
Furthermore, due to the political uncertainty involving Russia and Ukraine, there is also an increased likelihood that the tensions in this region could result in persistent cyber-attacks or cybersecurity incidents that could either directly or indirectly impact our operations. Any attempts by cyber attackers to disrupt our IT Systems, if successful, could harm our business, result in the misappropriation of funds, be expensive to remedy and damage our reputation or brand. Insurance may not be sufficient to cover expenses and losses related to such cyber-attacks and cybersecurity incidents.
If any of these breaches of security should occur, our reputation and brand could be damaged resulting in the loss of players or others, customers may terminate their contracts with us, our business may suffer, we could be required to expend significant capital and other resources to alleviate problems caused by such breaches and in relation to future compliance costs, and we could be exposed to a risk of loss, litigation or regulatory action and possible liability, including substantial fines and other penalties. We cannot guarantee that recovery protocols and backup systems will be sufficient to prevent data loss, including as a result of manmade or natural disasters such as fires, floods, storms, hurricanes, droughts, extreme temperatures, or earthquakes; certain natural disasters may also become more frequent or intense as a result of climate change. Additionally, climate change may contribute to chronic changes in the physical environmental, such as changes in ambient temperature and precipitation patterns as well as sea-level, which may also have adverse impacts on our operations or infrastructure on which we rely. Separately, actual or anticipated attacks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, train employees and engage third-party experts and consultants. Any or all of the foregoing could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Finally, we cannot be certain that any liability insurance policy coverage that we maintain will be adequate for liabilities actually incurred or that insurance will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, or at all.
In addition, any party or system that is able to illicitly obtain a player’s password may be able access such player’s transaction data or personal data (including payment information), resulting in the perception that our IT Systems are insecure. Any compromise or breach of our IT Systems or data, or the systems of our third-party service providers or business partners, could also expose us to liability under various laws and regulations across jurisdictions and increase the risk of litigation and governmental or regulatory investigation. Due to concerns about data security and integrity, a growing number of legislative and regulatory bodies have adopted breach notification and other requirements in the event that information subject to such laws is accessed by unauthorized persons and additional regulations regarding security of such data are possible. We may need to notify governmental authorities and affected individuals with respect to such incidents. For example, laws in the EU, UK, and the U.S. may require businesses to provide notice to individuals whose personal information has been disclosed as a result of a data security breach.
We operate in industries that are affected by technological improvements and evolving player preferences.
The iLottery and iGaming industries continue to experience rapid development of technological advances and player preferences. In some instances, advancements in technology trigger a change in player preferences. For example, as digital graphics improve, players may demand games with higher definition and a superior user interface. Our success depends on our ability to accurately anticipate and quickly respond to evolving industry standards and player preferences. We cannot assure you that we will be able to respond to such changes with innovative, high-quality, reliable and popular products and services or make the required adjustments to our existing products and services on a timely basis. In addition, the introduction of new products or updated versions of existing products has inherent risks, including, but not limited to:
| • | the timing with which we may realize the benefits of the commonly-required significant, upfront capital investments; |
| • | the accuracy of our estimates of player preferences, and the fit of the new products and features to such preferences; |
| • | the ability to adequately maintain our main technology systems, such as the NeoDraw platform and AspireCore; |
| • | the quality of our products and services, including the possibility of software defects, which could result in claims against us or the inability to sell our products and services; |
| • | the need to educate our sales, marketing and services personnel to work with the enhanced or new products and features, which may strain our resources and lengthen sales cycles; |
| • | market acceptance of new product releases; and |
| • | competitor product introductions or regulatory changes that render our products obsolete. |
In light of the costs required to create and introduce new or enhanced products and services, if our new or enhanced products fail to achieve commercial success, we will struggle to remain commercially viable, especially in the face of heightened competition.
Moreover, because we use tools, including third-party tools, that utilize artificial intelligence and machine learning, and we do not have full visibility to how these tools use data, these tools could create or enhance biases, potentially adversely impacting how players experience our services. We rely on the Internet, in-house proprietary technology, third-party software, infrastructure and applications, and customized off-the-shelf technology solutions across our business, and our ability to effectively manage all areas of our business depends in part on the reliability and capacity of these systems, however we cannot control, and in some instances do not have full visibility to, how these systems adhere to security measures, including the identification and appropriate elimination of algorithmic bias. Any systemic or algorithmic biases in the IT systems we use could damage our reputation, or result in loss of revenue or liability for damages, or adversely affect our growth prospects and our future business.
We have incurred operating losses in the past, may incur operating losses in the future and may not be able to maintain sustainable profit margins.
We expect to continue the development and expansion of our business, and we anticipate additional costs in connection with legal, accounting and other administrative expenses related to operating as a public company including costs related to the integration of Aspire and the larger corporate structure related thereto. If our revenue declines or fails to grow at a rate sufficient to offset increases in our operating expenses, we may generate losses. We cannot ensure that we will sustain profitability in the future.
Certain of our founding shareholders have significant influence over the nominations and elections of members of our board of directors and other matters submitted for shareholder approval.
Three of our founding shareholders, Barak Matalon, Elyahu Azur and Aharon Aran (collectively, the “Founding Shareholders”), have the exclusive right under our amended and restated articles of association to nominate up to 50% of our directors so long as they own in the aggregate at least 40.0% of our issued and outstanding share capital. As of April 20, 2024, the Founding Shareholders held approximately 53.4% of our issued and outstanding share capital. As a result, the Founding Shareholders have significant influence over the outcomes of other matters submitted to shareholders for approval.
The Founding Shareholders entered into a voting agreement with Pinhas Zahavi dated November 17, 2020 (the “Voting Agreement”) pursuant to which they vote as one group with regard to any matter relating to the nomination, election, appointment or removal of directors. On September 13, 2022, the Founding Shareholders and Mr. Zahavi amended the Voting Agreement (the “Amended Voting Agreement”), whereby Mr. Zahavi assigned all his voting authority to Mr. Azur, with such assignment to cease to apply from the date on which Mr. Zahavi holds less than 5% of the Ordinary Shares outstanding. On April 19, 2023, Mr. Zahavi sold 3,281,557 of his shares to the Founding Shareholders. As a result, Mr. Zahavi owned 4.99% of the Company’s shares as of April 19, 2023, and the Voting Agreement was terminated with respect to Mr. Zahavi. Except from the abovementioned voting agreements, in all other matters, the Founding Shareholders are entitled to vote their shares according to their own interests, and such interests may be different than the interests of our other shareholders and may delay, deter or prevent a change in control or other business combination that might otherwise be beneficial to our shareholders. See Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions - Voting Agreement,” and Item 6.C. “Board Practices - Board Composition.”
Our inability to successfully integrate Aspire, or complete or integrate other future acquisitions, could limit our future growth or otherwise be disruptive to our ongoing business.
Since our inception, we have consummated one acquisition in support of our strategic goals – the acquisition of Aspire in June 2022 – and therefore our experience in the integration of new acquisitions is limited. From time to time, we may pursue additional acquisitions in support of our strategic goals. Our ability to succeed in implementing our strategy will depend to some degree upon the ability of our management to identify, complete and successfully integrate commercially viable acquisitions. There can be no assurance that additional acquisition opportunities will be available on acceptable terms or at all or that we will be able to obtain necessary financing or regulatory approvals to complete potential acquisitions. Any acquisitions we complete could be viewed negatively by our partners or customers, which could have an adverse impact on our business. In addition, such acquisition transactions may disrupt our ongoing business and distract management from other responsibilities. In connection with any such acquisitions, we could face significant challenges in managing and integrating our expanded or combined operations, including acquired assets, operations, and personnel. If we are unsuccessful at integrating employees or technologies acquired in such acquisitions, including the acquisition of Aspire, our financial condition and results of operations, including revenue growth, could be adversely affected. Any acquisition and subsequent integration will require significant time and resources. We may not be able to successfully evaluate and use the acquired technology or employees, or otherwise manage the acquisition and integration processes successfully. With respect to Aspire, the process for realizing anticipated benefits in combining iLottery and iGaming businesses could be potentially more demanding and time consuming for the Company and its management than anticipated. In addition, disturbances, whether material or otherwise, in our business may occur throughout the integration process with Aspire or future acquisitions, and we may lose key or other employees, each of which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. As a result, some of the anticipated positive effects of the acquisition of Aspire and some or all of those of any future business combination may not be achieved. In addition, we will be required to pay cash, incur debt and/or issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition, each of which could adversely affect our financial condition. Our use of cash to pay for acquisitions would limit other potential uses of our cash, including investments in our sales and marketing and product development efforts. The issuance or sale of equity or convertible debt securities to finance any such acquisitions would result in dilution to our shareholders. If we incur debt, it would result in increased fixed obligations and could also impose covenants or other restrictions that could impede our ability to manage our operations. For information regarding the acquisition of Aspire, see Item 4.A. “History and Development of the Company - Selected Recent Developments”.
We are subject to substantial penalties for failure to perform.
Our lottery contracts in the United States and in other jurisdictions and other service contracts often require performance bonds or letters of credit to secure our performance under such contracts and require us to pay substantial monetary liquidated damages in the event of non-performance by us. In addition, Aspire was required to make a security deposit in connection with obtaining a license in Germany.
As of December 31, 2023, we had outstanding performance bonds and letters of credit in an aggregate amount of approximately $4.0 million. These instruments present a potential expense for us and divert financial resources from other uses. Claims on performance bonds, drawings on letters of credit, and payment of liquidated damages could individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects.
We rely on information technology and other systems and platforms, and any failures, errors, defects or disruptions in our systems or platforms could diminish our brand and reputation, subject us to liability, disrupt our business, affect our ability to scale our technical infrastructure and adversely affect our business.
Our technology infrastructure is critical to the performance of our platform and offerings and to customer and player satisfaction. We devote significant resources to network and data security to protect our systems and data. However, our systems and the systems of any third-party service providers on which we rely may not be adequately designed with the necessary reliability and redundancy to avoid performance delays or outages that could be harmful to our business. We cannot assure you that the measures we take to prevent or hinder cyber-attacks and protect our systems, data and player information and to prevent outages, data or information loss, fraud and to prevent or detect security breaches, including a disaster recovery strategy for server and equipment failure and back-office systems and the use of third parties for certain cybersecurity services, will provide absolute security. We have experienced, and we may in the future experience, website disruptions, outages and other performance problems due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors and capacity constraints. Such disruptions have not had a material impact on us; however, future disruptions from unauthorized access to, fraudulent manipulation of, or tampering with our computer systems and technological infrastructure, or those of third parties, could result in a wide range of negative outcomes, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Additionally, our software may contain errors, bugs, flaws or corrupted data. If a particular product offering is unavailable when players attempt to access it or navigation through our platforms is slower than they expect, players may be less likely to return to our customers’ platforms as often, if at all. Furthermore, programming errors, defects and data corruption could disrupt our operations, adversely affect the experience of players, harm our reputation and cause players to stop utilizing our customers’ offerings.
Our current systems may be unable to support a significant increase in online traffic or increased player numbers, especially during peak times or events (such as for significant jackpot runs). If there is a system disruption, customers may be able to make a contractual claim for damages against us.
We may at any time be required to expend significant capital or other resources, including staff and management time, to reduce the risk of network or IT failure or disruption, including replacing or upgrading existing business continuity systems, procedures and security measures. If such protective measures are implemented unsuccessfully or inefficiently, the quality of our products and services may be materially and adversely affected.
We rely on third-party service providers for key functions in our operations.
We rely upon various third-party service providers to maintain continuous operation of our platform, servers, hosting services, payment processing and various other key functions of our business. Know-your-customer and geolocation programs and technologies supplied by third parties are an important aspect of certain of our products and services. These services are costly, and their failure or inadequacy could materially affect our operations.
Additionally, we rely on third-party service providers for payment processing services, including the processing of credit and debit cards. Our business could be materially disrupted if these third-party service providers become unwilling or unable to provide these services to us.
Certain of these services discussed above are only provided by a limited number of third-party providers and in the event that any of these providers cease to provide us with their services (due to the termination of their agreement, a dispute between us and any such providers or for any other reason), we may struggle to locate a suitable replacement on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, which could lead to harmful disruptions to our operations.
If we fail to protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, our business could be materially affected.
We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright, trade secret, and domain-name-protection laws as well as contractual restrictions to protect our technology and intellectual property rights. While it is our policy to protect and defend our rights to our intellectual property, we cannot predict whether steps taken by us to protect our intellectual property will be adequate to prevent infringement, misappropriation, dilution or other violation of our intellectual property rights. Effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate our business. Third parties may infringe our proprietary rights (knowingly or unknowingly) and challenge proprietary rights held by us, and any potential future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. We have been required and in the future may be required to expend significant time and expense to prevent infringement or to enforce our rights. We also cannot guarantee that others will not independently develop technology with the same or similar functions to any proprietary technology we rely on to conduct our business and differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to copy or obtain and use our technology to develop offerings with the same functionality as our solutions, and policing unauthorized use of our technology and intellectual property rights is difficult and may not be effective. Any unauthorized use of our brand, technology or intellectual property could result in revenue loss as well as have an adverse impact on our reputation. We may be required to incur significant expenses in registering, monitoring and protecting our intellectual property rights. Any litigation could result in significant expense to us, including the diversion of management time and may not ultimately be resolved in our favor. Changes in the law or adverse court rulings may also negatively affect our ability to prevent others from using our technology.
We attempt to protect our intellectual property, technology and confidential information by requiring certain of our employees and consultants to enter into confidentiality and assignment of inventions agreements and certain third parties to enter into nondisclosure agreements. These agreements may not effectively grant all necessary rights to any inventions or works that may have been developed or created by the employees or consultants party thereto. In addition, these agreements may not effectively prevent unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information, intellectual property or technology and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information, intellectual property, or technology.
We currently hold rights to the neogames.com, pariplayltd.com, B2Bet.net and Aspireglobal.com internet domain names and various other related domain names. The regulation of domain names is subject to change. Regulatory bodies could establish additional top-level domains, appoint additional domain name registrars, or modify the requirements for holding domain names. In addition, third parties may already have registered, or may register in the future, domain names similar or identical to our registered and unregistered trademarks. As a result, we may not be able to acquire or maintain all domain names that use the names “NEOGAMES,” “PARIPLAYLTD” or are otherwise important for our business.
We also have certain registered and unregistered trademarks that are important to our business, such as the NEOGAMES trademark. If we fail to adequately protect or enforce our rights under this trademark, we may lose the ability to use this trademark or to prevent others from using it, which could adversely harm our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our software, games and marketing materials are protected under copyright law, and some also benefit from trade secret protection. We have chosen not to register any copyrights under the Library of Congress. In order to bring a copyright infringement lawsuit in the United States, the copyright must be registered. Accordingly, the remedies and damages available to us for unauthorized use of our software, games and materials may be limited.
We rely on third-party intellectual property. We cannot guarantee that such intellectual property will continue to be available.
We rely on third-party technologies, trademarks and other intellectual property. There can be no assurance that these licenses, or support for such licensed products and technology, will continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, the future success of our business may depend, in part, on our ability to obtain or expand licenses for lottery or gaming technologies we do not currently possess. In the event that we cannot retain, renew or expand existing licenses, we may be required to modify, limit or discontinue certain of our products or services, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the regulatory review process and licensing requirements of our government customers may preclude us from using technologies owned or developed by third parties if those parties are unwilling to subject themselves to regulatory review or do not meet regulatory requirements.
The gaming industry is historically litigious with respect to intellectual property and there can be no assurance that our platforms will not infringe on the rights of others.
There is a risk that our operations, platforms and services may infringe, or be alleged to infringe, the intellectual property rights of third parties. We have incurred and in the future may incur substantial time and expense in defending against third-party infringement claims, regardless of their merit. Additionally, due to diversion of management time, expenses required to defend against any claim and the potential liability associated with any lawsuit, any litigation could significantly harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we were found to have infringed the intellectual property rights of a third party, we could be liable for license fees, royalty payments, lost profits or other damages, and may be subject to injunctive relief to prevent us from using such intellectual property rights in the future. Such liability (if significant) or injunctive relief could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to costs associated with changes in levies and taxes.
We must comply with tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Tax rules or their interpretation may change in the markets in which we operate and in any markets we may enter in the future. Any changes to the corporate tax rate application in different jurisdictions, withholding taxes, transfer pricing rules, levels of value added tax, industry specific taxes and other levies, royalties and imposts could materially and adversely affect our financial position, performance and prospects. For example, there is a risk that we will not be able to pass on to our customers any additional gaming levies or taxes that apply to us. Another example is the United States Inflation Reduction Act which, among other changes, introduced a 15% corporate minimum tax on certain U.S. corporations and a 1% excise tax on certain stock redemptions by U.S. corporations, which the U.S. Treasury indicated may also apply to certain stock redemptions by a foreign corporation funded by certain U.S. affiliates. In addition, certain of our positions regarding the taxes that apply to us in the different jurisdictions in which we operate may not be accepted by the tax authorities in such jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our financial condition. On May 18, 2021, we obtained a pre-ruling from the Israeli Tax Authority regarding the transfer of certain intellectual property rights relating to the online lottery business of NeoGames S.A. to NGS. We cannot guarantee that the ruling will be acceptable with the Luxembourg tax authorities. See Item 10.E. “Taxation – Tax Ruling of the Israeli Tax Authority.”
We are subject to taxation in multiple jurisdictions, which is complex and often requires making subjective determinations subject to scrutiny by, and disagreements with, tax regulators.
We are subject to different forms of taxation in each of the countries and regions we or our subsidiaries are formed and/or conduct our business, including, but not limited to, income tax, withholding tax, gaming taxes, property tax, VAT, social security and other payroll-related taxes. Tax law and administration is complex, subject to change and varying interpretations and often requires us to make subjective determinations. In addition, we take positions in the course of our business with respect to various tax matters, including in connection with our operations. Tax authorities worldwide are increasingly rigorous in their scrutiny of corporate tax structures and may not agree with the determinations that are made, or the positions taken, by us with respect to the application of tax law. Such disagreements could result in lengthy legal disputes, an increased overall tax rate applicable to us and, ultimately, in the payment of substantial amounts of tax, interest and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, given the multijurisdictional developments under the OECD efforts to standardize and modernize global corporate tax policy described further below, it is generally expected that tax authorities in various jurisdictions in which we operate may increase their audit activity and may seek to challenge some of the tax positions we have adopted. It is difficult to assess if and to what extent such challenges, if raised, might impact our effective tax rate.+
For example, in August 2021 we received a request from the Israeli Tax Authority to provide certain information and documents related to our Israeli subsidiary Neogames Systems Ltd. with respect to the years 2016-2019, which was then updated in May 2023 with a request for certain information for the years 2017-2021. In February 2023, we were also requested to provide certain input and output VAT related documentation related to our Israeli subsidiary. We have not received additional requests or other notifications from the Israeli Tax Authority, pertaining to these matters, with any findings or that would clarify the reasons for such audit. Such audits and similar proceedings may result in assessments, fines, settlements, or increased overall tax rates. While we believe we comply with applicable tax laws, and given the absence of further communications from the Israeli Tax Authority as aforementioned, we cannot anticipate the results of such audit or other similar proceedings, and we have not set aside any reserves to provide for any outcomes related to the tax audits. The ultimate outcome of the Israeli tax audit, and any other audits that may commence by any other tax authority, and of any related litigation or other proceedings, could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Another example is the pre-ruling issued on May 18, 2021 by the Israeli Tax Authority regarding the transfer of certain intellectual property rights relating to the online lottery business of NeoGames S.A. to NGS. We cannot guarantee that the ruling will be acceptable to the Luxembourg tax authorities, or that the Israeli Tax Authority will not commence audit of other periods. Furthermore, the pre-ruling sets forth certain terms regarding the Company’s day to day practices. Failure by the Company to adhere to such terms may result in the loss of the beneficial tax rates set forth by the pre-ruling. See Item 10.E. “Taxation – Tax Ruling of the Israeli Tax Authority.”
Our operations in Kyiv, Ukraine have been negatively impacted as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if the impacts resulting from the conflict in Ukraine are exacerbated.
Our Ukrainian operations have been negatively affected by the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine which began in February 2022. We have invested significant resources in Ukraine over the last several years and we operate a development hub in Kyiv. As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately 381 employees and self-employed contractors serving our Ukrainian operations and 0.4% of our total Company assets in Ukraine. Since the invasion, we have strategically transitioned to Israel the responsibilities for the release of new features, and the monitoring of stability and health of the production environment and opened a new satellite office in Poland for those of our employees that have fled Ukraine subsequent to Russia’s invasion. Operations in the Poland office are in their initial stages. As of April 9, 2024, approximately 121 of our 379 Ukraine-based employees are working remotely either in the Poland office or other locations outside of Ukraine. As a result of these disruptions, we have experienced some decline in our delivery rates during fiscal 2022. However, the ultimate extent, length and impact of the ongoing military conflict are highly unpredictable. If the effects of the invasion are exacerbated in the future, this could materially impact our ability to meet our long term development delivery commitments, our cost structure and future planned development of capabilities in Ukraine and the surrounding region. It is unclear what impact the hostilities in Ukraine will have on our assets.
We have developed contingency plans to relocate work and/or personnel to other geographies and add new locations, as appropriate. Our business continuity plans are designed to address known contingency scenarios to ensure that we have adequate processes and practices in place to protect the safety of our people and to handle potential impacts to our operations. However, our crisis management procedures, business continuity plans and disaster recovery capabilities may not be effective at preventing or mitigating the effects of exacerbated prolonged civil unrest or military conflict to our people, our facilities, our operations, and infrastructure, such as utilities and network services, and the disruption of any or all of them could materially adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations, and cause volatility in the price of our shares. We are continuing to monitor the situation in Ukraine and assess options in relation to our ongoing operations and our ability to continue to do business in the region.
Our platform contains third-party open source software components, which may pose particular risks to our proprietary software, technologies, products and services in a manner that could negatively affect our business.
Our platform contains software modules licensed to us by third-party authors under “open source” licenses and we expect to use open source software in the future. Use and distribution of open source software may entail greater risks than use of third-party commercial software, as open source licensors generally do not provide support, warranties, indemnification or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or the quality of the code. To the extent that our platform depends upon the successful operation of open source software, any undetected errors, malicious code or defects in this open source software, or deprecated open source software, could prevent the deployment or impair the functionality of our platform, delay introduction of new solutions, result in a failure of our platform and injure our reputation. For example, deprecated, or undetected errors or defects in, open source software could render it vulnerable to breaches or security attacks, and, subsequently, make our systems more vulnerable to data breaches. In addition, the public availability of such software may make it easier for others to compromise our platform.
Some open source licenses require that source code for modifications or derivative works we created based on such open source software be made publicly available as open source software. If we combine our proprietary software with open source software in a certain manner, we could, under certain open source licenses, be required to release the source code of our proprietary software to the public. This would allow our competitors to create similar offerings with less investment of development effort and time and ultimately could result in a loss of our competitive advantages. Alternatively, to avoid the public release of the affected portions of our source code, we could be required to expend substantial time and resources to re-engineer some or all of our software.
In addition, the terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by United States or foreign courts, and there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a way that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to provide or distribute our platform. From time to time, there have been claims challenging the ownership of open source software against companies that incorporate open source software into their solutions. As a result, we could be subject to lawsuits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software. We cannot assure you that our processes for controlling our use of open source software in our platform will be effective, nor that the open-source software in our platform is updated and not at “end-of-life” or “end-of-support”, when the open-source community no longer releases updates or fixes for the software. If we are held to have breached or failed to fully comply with all the terms and conditions of an open source software license, we could face infringement or other liability, or be required to seek costly licenses from third parties, to continue providing our offerings on terms that are not economically feasible, to re-engineer our platform, to discontinue or delay the provision of our offerings if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis or to make generally available, in source code form, our proprietary code, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are highly dependent on our key personnel. If we are not successful in attracting, motivating and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.
We rely on the expertise, industry experience, know-how, customer relationships and leadership of our senior management, and the departure, death or disability of any one of our executive officers or other extended or permanent loss of any of their services, or any negative market or industry perception with respect to any of them or their loss, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We depend on our technical and operational employees for the design and development of our innovative products and services. The competition for these types of personnel is intense and we compete with other potential employers, including certain of our strategic partners, for the services of our employees. As a result, we may not succeed in retaining the key employees that we need in order to maintain and grow our business.
If we do not succeed in attracting, hiring, and integrating qualified personnel, or retaining and motivating existing personnel, we may be unable to grow effectively and our business could be adversely affected. We deploy our employees to certain of our customers’ worksites to assist in the development of their IT systems and platforms. The loss of employees who have been involved in the development of intellectual property and know-how and the development and maintenance of key strategic relationships with customers may result in the subsequent loss of key customers. If key employees were to leave, we may be unable to deliver our existing services or develop new products until such employees have been replaced. As our employees have very specific skillsets and are highly qualified, we may face difficulties in replacing them with new employees, and even if we succeed in recruiting new employees, we may incur substantial costs in the recruiting, training and integration of such new employees. See “Our operations in Kyiv, Ukraine have been negatively impacted as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected if the impacts resulting from the conflict in Ukraine are exacerbated” above regarding the situation in Ukraine.
Generally, the competition for skilled technical and other personnel in Israel, Ukraine, Poland, Malta, Bulgaria and North Macedonia is intense, and as a result we may fail to continue to attract, recruit, develop and retain qualified employees, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We compete in a market marked by rapidly changing technologies and an evolving competitive landscape. In order for us to successfully compete and grow, we must attract, recruit, retain and develop personnel with requisite qualifications to provide expertise across the entire spectrum of our intellectual capital and business needs. In addition, even though we are not responsible for attracting and hiring talent for NPI, our revenues from NPI are impacted by such decisions.
Our principal research and development centers are located in Israel, the Ukraine, Bulgaria and North Macedonia, and significant elements of our general and administrative activities are conducted at our headquarters in Israel. Historically as well as recently, there has been intense competition for qualified human resources in the high-tech industry in such countries as well as in the United States. Despite recent workforce reduction initiatives by high-tech companies in Israel and the U.S. since the third quarter of 2022 due, among other things, to inflation and rising interest rates in Israel and the U.S., there remains considerable competition for such employees, especially in the core technical sphere, in the countries where we have our principal research and developments centers. This intense competition has resulted in increasing wages in all countries where we have our principal research and developments centers, which may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified personnel, as many of the companies against which we compete for personnel have greater financial resources than we do. These competitors may also actively seek to hire our existing personnel away from us, even if such employees have entered into a non-compete agreement. We may be unable to enforce these agreements under the laws of the jurisdictions in which our employees work. For example, Israeli labor courts require employers seeking to enforce non-compete undertakings of a former employee to demonstrate that the competitive activities of the former employee will harm one of a limited number of material interests of the employer that have been recognized by the courts, such as the protection of a company’s confidential information or other intellectual property, taking into account, among other things, the employee’s tenure, position, and the degree to which the non-compete undertaking limits the employee’s freedom of occupation. We may not be able to make such a demonstration. Also, to the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or that they have divulged confidential information.
In addition, in making employment decisions, particularly in the internet and high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the value of the equity they are eligible to receive in connection with their employment. Employees may be more likely to leave us if the shares they own or the shares underlying their equity incentive awards have significantly appreciated or significantly reduced in value. Many of our employees may receive significant proceeds from sales of our equity in the public markets, which may reduce their motivation to continue to work for us and could lead to employee attrition. If we fail to attract new personnel, or fail to retain and motivate our current personnel, our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects could be harmed.
We may not be able to service our debt under our financing agreements in connection with the acquisition of Aspire, or we may otherwise be in breach of those arrangements.
In order to finance, among other things, part of the aggregate consideration payable by the Company pursuant to the acquisition of Aspire, the Company, NeoGames Connect S.à r.l. and NeoGames Connect Limited have entered into the Senior Facilities Agreement with the Lenders (each as defined below). Pursuant to the terms of the Senior Facilities Agreement, the Lenders (as defined below) have made available, in connection with the acquisition of Aspire, the Senior Facilities (as defined below). For more information regarding the financing for the acquisition of Aspire, see Item 5.B. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financing for the Acquisition of Aspire” below.
Following the consummation of the acquisition of Aspire, we have outstanding indebtedness with debt service requirements. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will depend on our future operating and financial performance, which in turn depends on our ability to successfully implement our business strategy as well as general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to meet our debt service obligations depends also on the interest rates and their volatility. For example, the interest rate payable by the Company under the Senior Facilities Agreement is linked to the EURIBOR, which increased in 2022 and 2023 and may continue to increase in the future. If we do not generate sufficient cash to service our debt under the Senior Facilities Agreement or if we fail to meet other obligations under the Senior Facilities Agreement, we may be in default, which may entitle the Lenders to certain rights and remedies against us, and such rights and remedies may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
The Senior Facilities Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants which may restrict our ability to operate our business (including a financial maintenance covenant). Our failure to comply with these covenants, including as a result of events beyond our control, could result in an event of default that could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In the event of a default under the Senior Facilities Agreement, that is not cured or waived, the Lenders could take certain actions, including terminating their commitments, declaring all amounts that we have borrowed under the Senior Facilities Agreement, to be due and payable, together with accrued and unpaid interest (and other fees) and/or enforce the security in favor of the Lenders that was granted in connection with the Senior Facilities Agreement. If the debt under the Senior Facilities Agreement or any other material financing arrangement that we have entered into or will subsequently enter into were to be accelerated, our assets may be insufficient to repay the indebtedness in full. Any such actions could force us into bankruptcy or liquidation, and we might not be able to repay our obligations in such an event.
For a summary of the costs we have incurred in connection with financing the acquisition of Aspire, see Item 5.B. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
We may require additional capital to support our growth plans, and such capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and may result in shareholder dilution. This could impair our growth and materially and adversely affect our business.
Our business generally requires significant upfront capital expenditures for software customization and implementation and systems and equipment installation and configuration. In connection with a renewal of or bid for a lottery or gaming contract, a customer may seek to impose new service requirements, which may require additional capital expenditures in order to retain or win the contract, as applicable.
To the extent that we do not have sufficient liquidity levels to fund such capital expenditures, our ability to procure new contracts and renew existing contracts would depend on, among other things, our ability to obtain additional financing on commercially reasonable terms. Our ability to obtain additional capital, if and when required, will depend on, among other factors, our business plans, investor demand and the capital markets.
We have historically funded our operations with, among other things, borrowings under the WH Credit Facility. On October 20, 2020, we entered into a loan agreement with William Hill Finance Limited, an affiliate of William Hill, which set out amended terms and an amended repayment schedule with respect to our outstanding loans under the WH Credit Facility and prohibited us from making any additional draws under the WH Credit Facility. All borrowed amounts under such agreements (including interest thereon) have been repaid in full by us on or before June 30, 2022. In addition, we financed the acquisition of Aspire through a EUR 200.8 million financing arrangement with Blackstone.
Any debt financing would increase our level of indebtedness and could negatively affect our liquidity and restrict our operations. Moreover, we can provide no assurances that the funds we raise will be sufficient to finance any future capital requirements. In addition, the impact of inflation and rising interest rates could significantly impact the cost of capital. As a result, we may be unable to raise additional funds on terms favorable to us or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital or generate sufficient cash flows, we may be unable to fund our future expenses. This may prevent us from increasing our market share, capitalizing on new business opportunities or remaining competitive in our industry, which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We completed our public listing on November 23, 2020 raising a total net amount of $43 million and our total cash balance as of December 31, 2023 was approximately $29 million.
Any financing through the sale of equity securities may dilute the value of our outstanding Ordinary Shares. Any debt financing may require us to comply with various financial covenants and may restrict our activities. We also can provide no assurance that the funds we raise will be sufficient to finance any future capital requirements. If we are unable to obtain additional capital when required on satisfactory terms, our ability to continue to grow our business could be adversely affected.
Furthermore, the Company maintains the majority of its cash and cash equivalents in accounts with major and highly rated multi-national or local financial institutions, and our deposits at certain of these institutions significantly exceed insured limits. Market conditions can impact the viability of these institutions. In the event of failure of any of the financial institutions where we maintain our cash and cash equivalents, there can be no assurance that we would be able to access uninsured funds in a timely manner or at all. Any inability to access or delay in accessing these funds could adversely affect our business and financial position.
Our management team has limited experience managing a public company.
Most members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly traded company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies listed in the United States. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage the Company, which is subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the U.S. federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. We also intend to continue to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations, and standards, and these obligations and constituents require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We may become subject to litigation, from which we could incur significant monetary and reputational harm, irrespective of the merit of such claim or outcome of such litigation.
There is a risk that we may become subject to litigation and other claims and disputes in the ordinary course of business, including contractual disputes and indemnity claims, misleading and deceptive conduct claims, employment-related claims, and intellectual property disputes and claims, including those based on allegations of infringement, misappropriations or other violations of intellectual property rights. We may incur significant expense defending or settling such litigation. For our additional information on our pending litigation matters, please refer to Item 4.B. “Business Overview – Litigation”.
Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, the posting of bonds requiring significant collateral, letters of credit or similar instruments, or we may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. These proceedings could also result in reputational harm, criminal sanctions, consent decrees or orders preventing us from offering certain products or requiring a change in our business practices in costly ways or requiring development of non-infringing or otherwise altered products or technologies. Litigation and other claims and regulatory proceedings against us could result in unexpected disciplinary actions, expenses and liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Similar to many online casinos, Aspire has been the target of civil claims brought against it by Austrian players. These civil claims allege the provision of unlicensed gambling in Austria. Similar to the claims in Austria, we are also handling civil claims in Germany, though these relate to services provided before the current German gambling regime came into place and Aspire has received a German license.
Our results of operations may be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency values.
The Company’s consolidated financial results are affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Foreign currency exchange rate exposures arise from current transactions and anticipated transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars and from the translation of foreign operations primarily derived through Aspire.
Approximately 29% of the Company’s revenues in the year ended December 31, 2023 were denominated in U.S. dollars, 37% in euros and 34% in other currencies. Any devaluation of the U.S. dollar compared to the New Israeli Shekel may result in increases in employee liabilities and other expenses, which may adversely affect the Company’s profit and financial performance. Exchange rate fluctuations have in the past adversely affected the Company’s operating results and cash flows and may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flows and the value of its assets outside the United States in the future. A devaluation of local currency in a jurisdiction in which the Company is paid in such currency may require the Company’s customers located in such jurisdiction to adjust the amounts paid in local currency for the Company’s products and services, which they may be unable or unwilling to make. Other than the FX Hedging Transaction entered into in connection with the acquisition of Aspire, NeoGames Systems Ltd. (“NGS”) entered into certain forward contracts to partially hedge its NIS cash flow exposure associated with expenses nominated in NIS during 2023. For more information regarding the financing for the acquisition of Aspire, see Item 5.B. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Financing for the Acquisition of Aspire.”
For information regarding the acquisition of Aspire, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions - Relationship with Aspire.”
Expansion into new markets may be important to the growth of our business in the future, and if we do not manage the business and economic risks of this expansion effectively, it could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We expect to continue to expand our operations to additional U.S. states and to expand our international operations. For example, on August 9, 2023, we announced that Pariplay signed a deal with SunBet, a market leader in South Africa, to provide content and aggregation services, and on November 8, 2023, we announced that NPI was selected by the West Virginia Lottery for a full turn-key iLottery program and that NeoGames Studio has expanded its offering into OPAP, the Greek Lottery Operator, through the relationship and integration provided through Pariplay. Any new markets or countries which we attempt to access may not be receptive. For example, we may not be able to expand further in some markets if we are not able to satisfy certain government requirements. In addition, our operations in new jurisdictions subject us to risks customarily associated with such operations, including the complexity of local laws, regulations and markets, the uncertainty of enforcement of remedies in foreign jurisdictions, the impact of local labor laws and disputes, the economic, tax and regulatory policies of local governments and the ability to attract and retain key personnel in new jurisdictions. Foreign jurisdictions could impose tariffs, quotas, trade barriers, and other similar restrictions on our international sales. In addition, our ability to expand successfully involves other risks, including difficulties in integrating operations, risks associated with entering jurisdictions in which we may have little experience and the day-to-day management of a growing and increasingly geographically diverse company.
Our investments in new jurisdictions often entail entering into joint ventures or other business relationships with locally-based entities, especially in jurisdictions in which governments prefer or are required to use locally-based entities. Our reliance on partnerships with locally-based entities can involve additional risks arising from our lack of sole decision-making authority, our reliance on a partner’s financial condition, inconsistency between our business interests or goals and those of our partners and disputes between us and our partners.
We may not realize the operating efficiencies, competitive advantages or financial results that we anticipate from our investments in new jurisdictions and our failure to effectively manage the risks associated with our operations in new jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, performance and prospects.
As a significant amount of our net profits and cash flows are generated outside Luxembourg, the repatriation of funds currently held in foreign jurisdictions may result in higher effective tax rates for us. In addition, heightened attention has been given at national and supranational levels, including through the G20 / OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project (BEPS), as well as in other public forums and the media, with regard to matters of cross-border taxation, and in particular, to taxation of the digital economy. On December 20, 2021, the OECD published the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (commonly referred to as “Pillar Two”) to ensure that multinational enterprise groups with annual consolidated revenues of EUR 750 million or more are subject to a minimum effective tax rate of 15% in each jurisdiction where they operate. The primary mechanism under Pillar Two is the income inclusion rule (IIR), pursuant to which a top-up tax is payable by a parent entity of a group if one or more constituent entities of the group have not been subject to an effective tax rate of 15%. In the event where the IIR does not apply at the ultimate parent entity level, a lower-level parent entity may be required to apply the IIR. A secondary fall back is provided by the undertaxed profit rule (UTPR) in case the IIR has not been applied. The UTPR can be applied by (i) limiting or denying a deduction or (ii) making an adjustment in the form of a top-up tax. In addition, jurisdictions may implement a qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT). A jurisdiction that incorporates the QDMTT becomes the first in line to levy any top-up tax from low-taxed entities located in its jurisdiction. It must compute profits and calculate any top-up tax due in the same way as the Pillar Two rules. Without a QDMTT, another jurisdiction, as determined by the Pillar Two rules, would be entitled to levy the top-up tax.
At European Union level, the European Commission published a draft directive on December 22, 2021 aiming at implementing these rules, which was adopted by the Council of the European Union on December 15, 2022 (the “Pillar Two Directive”). The OECD released the commentary relating to the model rules on March 14, 2022 and addressed co-existence with the US Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) rules. This was followed by the development of an implementation framework focused on administrative, compliance and co-ordination issues relating to Pillar Two. EU Member States were required to transpose the Pillar Two Directive in their national laws by December 31, 2023 and the rules had to become effective for tax years commencing on or after December 31, 2023, with the exception of the UTPR, which will apply for tax years commencing on or after December 31, 2024. Luxembourg has transposed the Pillar Two Directive through the law of December 22, 2023. In that context, Luxembourg opted to implement the UTPR in the form of an additional tax and to apply a QMDTT applicable for tax years starting on or after December 31, 2023.
It is expected that the global minimum tax will be implemented in a number of jurisdictions with effect from 2024. The Pillar Two rules, once implemented, are expected to apply to us, along with detailed transfer pricing reporting and exchange of tax information rules known as “Country by Country Reporting”, insofar as our annual consolidated revenues equal or exceed EUR 750 million.
Directive 2016/1164/EU, the so-called anti-tax avoidance directive (“ATAD”), was adopted on July 12, 2016 to implement in the EU Member States' domestic legal frameworks common measures to tackle tax avoidance practices. ATAD lays down (i) controlled foreign company rules, (ii) anti-hybrid mismatches within the EU context rules, (iii) general interest limitation rules, (iv) a general anti-abuse rule, and (v) exit taxation rules. Following the adoption of ATAD, the EU Member States decided to go further as regards hybrid-mismatches with third countries, and adopted the Directive 2017/952/EU (“ATAD 2”) amending the ATAD provisions with respect to anti-hybrid mismatches, on May 29, 2017. Luxembourg adopted (i) the law of December 21, 2018 implementing ATAD with effect as of January 1, 2019 and (ii) the law of December 20, 2019 implementing ATAD 2 with effect as of January 1, 2020 (except for the reverse hybrid mismatch rules, which apply as of January 1, 2022). Under certain circumstances, these rules could possibly increase the taxable base of the Company and therefore negatively impact the return of the investors.
Malta transposed ATAD into domestic law, including changes with respect to exit tax, General Anti-Abuse Rules and Controlled Foreign Corporation rules.
Due to pressure from the European Union, many offshore jurisdictions have introduced “substance” requirements including with regard to intangible property companies. The likelihood of scrutiny of tax practices by tax authorities in relevant jurisdictions and the aggressiveness of tax authorities remains high.
In this context, we expect to be subject to increased reporting requirements regarding our international tax structure.
Any changes in the rules regarding cross-border taxation or the revised interpretation of existing tax rules could increase our tax liability and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Our insurance may not provide adequate levels of coverage against claims.
We maintain insurance that we believe is customary for businesses of our size and type. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe are not economically reasonable to insure. Moreover, any loss incurred could exceed policy limits and policy payments made to us may not be made on a timely basis. Such losses could adversely affect our business prospects, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
If we fail to detect fraud or theft, including by our employees and our customers and their players, our reputation may suffer which could harm our brand and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations and subject us to investigations and litigation.
We may incur losses, whether directly or indirectly through our revenue share with our customers, from various types of financial fraud, including use of stolen or fraudulent credit card data, claims of unauthorized payments by our customers’ players and attempted payments by such players with insufficient funds. Bad actors use increasingly sophisticated methods to engage in illegal activities involving personal data, such as unauthorized use of another person’s identity, account information or payment information and unauthorized acquisition or use of credit or debit card details, bank account information and mobile phone numbers and accounts.
Acts of fraud may involve various tactics, including collusion. Successful exploitation of our systems could have negative effects on our product offerings, services and player experience and could harm our reputation. Failure to discover such acts or schemes in a timely manner could result in harm to our operations.
In addition, negative publicity related to such schemes could have an adverse effect on our reputation, potentially causing a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In the event of the occurrence of any such issues with our existing platform or product offerings, substantial engineering and marketing resources and management attention, may be diverted from other projects to correct these issues, which may delay other projects and the achievement of our strategic objectives.
In addition, any misappropriation of, or access to, players’ personal data or other proprietary information or other breach of our information security could result in legal claims or legal proceedings, including regulatory investigations and actions, or liability for failure to comply with privacy and information security laws, including for failure to protect personal data or for misusing personal data, which could disrupt our operations, force us to modify our business practices, damage our reputation and expose us to claims from our customers, their players, regulators, employees and other persons, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
We cannot guarantee that any measures we have taken or may take in the future to detect and reduce the occurrence of fraudulent or other malicious activity on our platform will be effective or will scale efficiently with our business. Our failure to adequately detect or prevent fraudulent transactions could harm our reputation or brand, result in litigation or regulatory action and lead to expenses that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to risks related to corporate social responsibility, responsible lottery and gaming, reputation and ethical conduct.
Many factors affect our reputation and the value of our brand, including the perception held by our customers, business partners, investors, other key stakeholders and the communities in which we operate, such as our social responsibility, corporate governance and responsible lottery practices. As with other companies, we have faced, and will likely continue to face, increased scrutiny related to environmental, social, governance (“ESG”), responsible lottery and gaming activities, and our reputation, operations and the value of our brands can be materially adversely harmed if we fail to act responsibly in a number of areas, such as diversity and inclusion, workplace conduct, responsible gaming, sustainable environmental practices, human rights, philanthropy and support for local communities.
While we may at times engage in voluntary initiatives (such as voluntary disclosures, certifications, or goals, among others) to improve the ESG profile of our company and/or products, such efforts may be costly and may not have the desired effect. Expectations around companies’ management of ESG matters continue to evolve rapidly, in many instances due to factors that are out of our control. Any actions we currently take may subsequently be determined to be insufficient by various stakeholders, and we may be subject to investor or regulatory engagement on our ESG initiatives, even if they are currently voluntary.
Certain market participants, including major institutional investors and capital providers, use third-party benchmarks and scores to assess companies’ ESG profiles in making investment or voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings could lead to increased negative investor sentiment towards us or our industry, which could negatively impact our share price as well as our access to and cost of capital. Any harm to our reputation could impact employee engagement and retention and the willingness of customers and partners to do business with us, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows. We believe that our reputation is critical to our role as a leader in the iLottery and iGaming industries and as a publicly traded company. Our management is heavily focused on the integrity of our directors, officers, senior management, employees, other personnel and third-party suppliers and partners. Illegal, unethical or fraudulent activities perpetrated by any of such individuals, suppliers or partners for personal gain could expose us to potential reputational damage and financial loss.
In addition, we expect there will likely be increasing levels of regulation, disclosure-related and otherwise, with respect to ESG matters. For example, the SEC very recently adopted rules that will require companies to provide certain climate-related disclosures. While we are still assessing the scope and impact of this rule given how recently it was adopted, we anticipate that this rule, as well as other ESG and sustainability-related regulation and legislation, may require us to incur significant additional costs to comply, including the implementation of significant additional internal controls, processes and procedures regarding matters that have not been subject to such controls in the past, and impose increased oversight obligations on our management and board of directors. Additional regulations have been adopted, or proposed, in Europe, including a number which may increase the oversight obligations of companies with respect to their suppliers and/or business partners. These and other changes in stakeholder expectations will likely lead to increased costs as well as scrutiny that could heighten all of the risks identified in this risk factor. Additionally, many of our customers and business partners may be subject to similar expectations, which may augment or create additional risks, including risks that may not be known to us.
The illegal gaming market could negatively affect our business.
A significant threat to the iLottery and iGaming industry arises from illegal activities. Such illegal activities may draw significant betting volumes away from the regulated industry. In particular, illegal gaming could take away a portion of the present players that are the focus of our business. The loss of such players could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects. Further, public trust is critical to the long-term success of regulated gaming, including lottery. Illegal gaming activities could impact the reputation of our customers, which would have an adverse impact on their revenues and our revenues.
Political, economic and military conditions in Israel could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our principal executive offices are located in Tel Aviv, Israel, where significant elements of our general and administrative activities are conducted. In addition, several of our officers and directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel and the surrounding region may directly affect our operations and, indirectly, our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its neighboring countries and terrorist organizations active in the region, including Hamas (an Islamist militia and political group in the Gaza Strip) and Hezbollah (an Islamist militia and political group in Lebanon).
In particular, on October 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists infiltrated Israel’s southern border from the Gaza Strip and conducted a series of attacks on civilian and military targets. Hamas also launched extensive rocket attacks on the Israeli population and industrial centers located along Israel’s border with the Gaza Strip and in other areas within the State of Israel. These attacks resulted in thousands of deaths and injuries, and the kidnapping by Hamas of many Israeli civilians and soldiers. Following the attack, Israel’s security cabinet declared war against Hamas and commenced a military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, and Hamas continued in parallel its rocket and terror attacks.
Following the events of October 7, 2023 several hundred thousand Israeli military reservists were drafted to perform immediate military service. To date, no members of our management were called for military reserve duty, but 16 of our employees were called for various durations of duty, and it is possible that there will be further or longer military reserve duty call-ups in the future. Military service call ups that result in absences of personnel from us for an extended period of time may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Since the war broke out on October 7, 2023, our operations have not been adversely affected by this situation, and we have not experienced disruptions to our operations or business. However, the intensity and duration of Israel’s current war against Hamas cannot be predicted at this stage, as are such war’s economic implications on our business and operations. If the war extends for a long period of time or expands to other fronts, such as Lebanon, Syria and the West Bank, our operations may be materially adversely affected.
In the event that hostilities disrupt our ongoing operations, our ability to provide services could be materially and adversely affected. Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover our potential damages. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to economic boycotts. Several countries still restrict business with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies and more countries may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies if hostilities continue or increase. These restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or the expansion of our business. A campaign of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions has been undertaken against Israel, which could also adversely affect our business. Actual or perceived political instability in Israel or any negative changes in the political environment, may individually or in the aggregate adversely affect the Israeli economy and, in turn, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Prior to the Hamas attack in October 2023, the Israeli government pursued changes to Israel’s judicial system. In response to the foregoing developments, certain individuals, organizations and institutions, both within and outside of Israel, have voiced concerns that such proposed changes, if adopted, may negatively impact the business environment in Israel including due to reluctance of foreign investors to invest or transact business in Israel as well as to increased currency fluctuations, downgrades in credit rating, increased interest rates, increased volatility in security markets, and other changes in macroeconomic conditions. Such proposed changes may also lead to political instability or civil unrest. To the extent that any of these negative developments will materialize, they may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to raise additional funds, if deemed necessary by our management and board of directors.
Risks Relating to Regulation of Our Business
The gaming and lottery industries are heavily regulated, and changes to the regulatory framework in the jurisdictions in which we operate could harm our existing operations.
We and our customers are subject to extensive laws and regulations, which vary across the jurisdictions in which we and they operate. The regulatory environment, including lottery and gaming laws, in any particular jurisdiction may change in the future, which may limit some or all of our or our customers’ existing operations in such jurisdiction. These risks may include, for example, changes in taxation, an obligation to have a national license and the ability to carry out marketing. There can be no assurance that our and our customers’ existing operations, or the iLottery and iGaming industries as a whole, in such jurisdictions will continue to be permitted. Further, even if we are still permitted to operate in a given jurisdiction, regulations may be imposed that make continued operations cost-prohibitive.
While we do our best to follow all applicable laws and regulations, we may be seen by regulatory bodies as having breached local laws. Prosecutors as well as private individuals may bring about criminal and/or civil proceedings, against us or against our business affiliates. Such events can negatively affect our business as they are costly proceedings, and may adversely affect our licensing objectives and our reputation.
We may become subject to additional regulations in any new jurisdiction in which we decide to operate in the future. The complexity of the regulatory environment may create challenges for us with respect to our ability to comply with applicable regulations, renew contracts, pursue tender offers and otherwise develop our business.
We may not be able to capitalize on the expansion of internet use and other changes in the lottery and gaming industries as a consequence of lack of legislative approvals, changes in regulations or regulatory uncertainty. We aim to take advantage of the liberalization of internet and mobile gaming, both within the United States and internationally. These industries involve significant risks and uncertainty, including legal, business and financial risks. This dynamic environment can make it difficult to plan strategically and can provide opportunities for competitors to grow revenues at our expense. Our ability to successfully pursue interactive lottery and gaming strategies depends on the regulation of gambling through online channels. Regulations and laws relating to internet lottery and gaming are evolving and we cannot predict the timing, scope or terms of any such state, federal or foreign regulations, or the extent to which any such regulations will facilitate or hinder our interactive strategies. Any such changes to regulations or laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Failure by us or by our major shareholders to comply with regulations may result in the revocation or suspension of our or our customers’ licenses to operate.
Our and our customers’ respective licenses to operate are subject to suspension or revocation by applicable regulatory authorities as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory requirements. In the event of our noncompliance, such authorities may pursue enforcement proceedings against us or certain of our customers. We can provide no assurance as to whether such proceedings would be likely to result in a favorable outcome. Further, such proceedings, irrespective of their outcome, may cause us or our customers to incur substantial costs, require operational changes and result in reputational damage, among other negative impacts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
On occasion, we are subject to regulatory and/or administrative investigations with respect to our services in various jurisdictions. Such investigations can affect our business, as well as our licenses and our reputation. Any violations of regulations uncovered in such investigations can carry with it financial penalties and/or additional licensing conditions. Such consequences negatively affect our business operations, by causing us to incur heavy costs and resulting in notification of other regulators in jurisdictions wherein we are licensed. Such penalties can also affect the procurement of future licenses, and negatively affect our reputation.
On January 23, 2019, the Belgian Gaming Commission (“BGC”) decided to revoke AG Software’s (as defined below) Class E software provider license, because AG Software had not implemented a technical requirement set by the BGC. As a result of this decision, AG Software can no longer offer its gambling software services in Belgium. No financial penalties were issued by the BGC. AG Software has filed an action for the annulment of the BGC’s decision. In February 2023, an auditor of the Council of State filed a report in AG Software’s favor, arguing that the BGC has no authority to impose a particular method of registration and identification, and age control of players. The BGC filed a brief contesting this view. AG Software filed a response, agreeing with the auditor’s conclusion, and refuting the BGC’s brief. In January 2024, the Council of State retroactively annulled the BGC’s decision to revoke the license, and the license was reinstated. The license itself had expired in 2019.
In addition, regulatory and gaming authorities may suspend, revoke or condition our existing licenses and permits, or refuse, delay or condition the grant of future licenses and permits, if our principal shareholders are subject to investigations or regulatory proceedings. For example, one of our major shareholders was recently required to divest his shares as a result of requirements by state gaming regulators. Should our shareholders not comply with regulatory standards, or not timely cooperate with us with to regain compliance, regulators may refuse to grant us or extend our licenses that are necessary for us to offer our services.
Were a license to be lost in any jurisdiction, this would trigger a reporting requirement in other jurisdictions, which can affect our license in those other jurisdictions, and it may also negatively affect applications for licenses in new jurisdictions, or even prevent us from being licensed in such existing or new jurisdictions.
We may fail to identify and prevent risks related to digital gambling or support players who are suffering from gambling problems and addictions.
Responsible gaming has been a topic of debate in Europe in recent years. Although we responded with updated guidelines, offer a variety of responsible gaming features on our platforms and have appointed an officer of responsible gaming to ensure that guidelines and routines are followed, there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify and prevent risks related to digital gambling including money laundering and gambling by minors, or identify and support all players who are suffering from gambling problems and addictions. The failure to do so could damage our reputation and lead to increased regulatory scrutiny of our operations and marketing strategies and potential regulatory and civil enforcement.
Our efforts to block or limit access to our gaming platforms in certain countries, whether entirely or within certain states thereof, may prove inadequate.
The legal and technological solutions and marketing limitations that we apply in certain jurisdictions to block or limit the access to and the use of services by end users may prove inadequate. In certain countries as well as in certain states of some countries it is prohibited to provide gaming services, and in some cases it is prohibited for customers to participate in any gambling activity, although the gaming operator is located in another country or another state of the same country where it has been legally licensed through regulation. Although we avoid marketing to customers in countries and states where online gaming is prohibited by law (unless the industry regards EU law as superseding national regulation) and apply technical blocking of IP from “blacklisted” countries, our efforts may prove unsuccessful, in which case we could be subject to monetary penalties or other sanctions in the country or state whose laws were violated.
We may incur substantial costs in order to meet the varied and complex regulatory requirements to which we are subject in the different jurisdictions in which we operate.
The form and scope of regulatory requirements within the iLottery, iGaming and online sports betting industries vary by jurisdiction. This lack of uniformity can increase the costs and burden of compliance, as well as increase the difficulty associated with expansion into new jurisdictions.
Regulatory frameworks associated with the iLottery, iGaming and online sports betting industries exist across a wide spectrum, including within particular countries. We currently have iLottery operations in approximately 25 jurisdictions, including several U.S. states where we hold supplier licenses as part of the arrangement with Caesars, whereby we customize the NeoSphere platform to assist Caesars in meeting the regulatory requirements of the states in which it operates our systems, including financing and software development arrangements between the parties. We also plan to expand our operations into new jurisdictions. In iGaming and sports wagering, we are licensed or temporarily approved to operate in 42 jurisdictions, and are currently in the process of obtaining licenses in 3 additional jurisdictions. Expansion into new jurisdictions will subject us to a wider range of different, and potentially conflicting, regulatory requirements, which may cause it to incur increased costs and expend a greater degree of time in ensuring compliance. Our business and operations may be adversely affected by inaccurate predictions of the financial cost and administrative burden of compliance in connection with expansion into new jurisdictions. Further, the likelihood of noncompliance may be heightened in the event of expansion, which could result in payment of liquidated damages or termination of contracts in the event of material noncompliance.
Negative publicity concerning our Company, our brands or the gambling industry in general could result in increased regulations and reputational harm.
The industries in which we operate are at times subject to negative publicity with regard to harmful gambling behavior, such as addiction, gambling by minors, risks related to digital gambling and alleged association with money laundering. Negative publicity regarding our Company or any of our brands, or publicity regarding problematic gambling and other concerns with the lottery, gaming and other gambling industries in general, even if not directly connected to us, could adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition. For example, if the perception develops that the lottery and/or gaming industries is failing to address such concerns adequately, the resulting political pressure may result in the industry becoming subject to increased regulation and restrictions on operations. Such an increase in regulation could adversely impact our results of operations, business, financial condition or prospects. This is a current trend in, for example, the United Kingdom, where in 2023, the government published the White Paper on the reform of gambling regulations, which includes, inter alia, onerous proposals to introduce stake limits for online slots, player protection checks, and restricted bonus offers. The proposals demonstrate the sustained level of scrutiny on the gambling industry, and the evolving and increasingly onerous regulation that we may be required to comply with.
We are obligated to adhere to continually evolving laws and regulations concerning data privacy, data protection, information security, and consumer protection in various markets where we operate, such as the United States (“U.S.”) and the European Union (“EU”). Additionally, we may be contractually required to meet specific industry standards, such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (“PCI DSS”). Any actual or perceived failure, by us or our vendors, to meet these obligations could lead to substantial liability and/or a loss of trust, potentially causing significant harm to our business, operational outcomes, and financial condition.
In the United States, Europe, and other jurisdictions, we are subject to various consumer protection, data privacy, and information security laws, regulations, industry standards, and other requirements. If we are found to have breached any consumer protection, data privacy, or information security laws, regulations, industry standards, or other requirements, we may be subject to enforcement actions that require us to change our business practices in a manner which may negatively impact our revenues, as well as exposed to litigation, fines, civil and/or criminal penalties and adverse publicity that could cause our customers or players to lose trust in us, negatively impacting our reputation and business in a manner that harms our financial position.
As part of our business and on behalf of our customers, we collect, store, use, disclose, and otherwise process information about individuals (including players, customers, employees, and others), also referred to as personal data under certain laws, and other potentially sensitive and/or regulated data. Furthermore, we rely on various third-party entities for the facilitation of our business operations, many of which are involved in the processing of personal data or other pertinent information on our behalf. It is important to note that we cannot guarantee the technical and organizational security measures or privacy standards of these third parties. Any violation of data or security laws by these third parties could have a material adverse effect on our business and result in fines and penalties.
Both our organization and our vendors are bound by a multitude of federal, state, and international data privacy laws, regulations, industry standards, and other requirements. These regulations dictate the requirements surrounding the collection, processing, storage, usage, and disclosure of personal data, while also establishing benchmarks for its security. Furthermore, they impose obligations regarding privacy practice notifications and grant individuals’ specific rights regarding their personal data (e.g. to opt-out of selling or sharing as defined under certain US privacy laws). It is essential to recognize that these requirements, along with their application, interpretation, and modification, undergo continual evolution and advancement.
In the U.S., both federal and various state governments have enacted or are contemplating laws, guidelines, and regulations governing the collection, distribution, usage, processing, disclosure, retention, and storage of information obtained from individuals, consumers, households, or their devices. There are a number of federal laws in the U.S. that impose restrictions or requirements concerning the collection, distribution, use, processing, disclosure, retention, security, and storage of personal data. For instance, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act empowers the FTC to combat unfair or deceptive practices, including the requirement for companies to align their practices regarding personal data with the commitments outlined in their privacy policies. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission and numerous state attorneys general are leveraging federal and state consumer protection laws to establish standards for the online collection, utilization, dissemination of personal data, and the security protocols governing such data. Concerning the use of personal data for direct marketing purposes, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003, also known as the CAN-SPAM Act, lays down specific requirements for commercial email communications and imposes penalties for the transmission of deceptive or non-compliant commercial email messages. Moreover, it requires senders of commercial emails to furnish recipients with the option to opt-out of receiving future communications. Similarly, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) stipulates particular requirements pertaining to text message marketing and telemarketing, with non-compliant companies being susceptible to private litigation and regulatory actions.
We are also subject to newly enacted US privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”), which entered into substantial effect on January 1, 2023. The CCPA imposes new operational requirements for companies, including new data privacy rights for consumers, increasing regulation on online advertising, creating a new California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) to enforce the law and adding greater transparency standards for privacy policies. Lack of compliance with the CCPA and its requirements could result in enforcement actions, litigation, fines and penalties (up to $7,500 per intentional violation and $2,500 per other violation). California consumers also have a private right of action under the CCPA for certain data breaches and can recover civil damages of up to $750 per incident, per consumer or actual damages, whichever is greater. In addition, over a dozen other states have passed or are considering similar legislation, which has created and will continue to create additional compliance obligations and risks. More generally, some observers have noted the CCPA and other state laws could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent United States federal privacy legislation, which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business.
In our operations within the European Union, we are required to comply with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“EU GDPR”) and relevant national supplementary laws, as well as, in the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018 (“UK GDPR”, and together with the EU GDPR, “GDPR”). The GDPR imposes extensive obligations regarding data privacy compliance concerning the collection, processing, sharing, disclosure, transfer, and other utilization of personal data.
As a controller, the GDPR imposes significant responsibilities including requirements to adhere to the principle of accountability, provide comprehensive disclosures regarding the collection and processing of personal data (in a clear, concise and easily accessible manner), ensure the presence of appropriate legal bases for data processing, facilitate data subject rights, comply with international data transfer restrictions, implement robust security measures, adhere to contractual obligations, and promptly report significant data breaches to regulatory authorities, and in certain cases, affected individuals. We also act as a data processor on behalf of our customers, which requires us to comply with obligations including relating to contracts, security, and assisting customers with their compliance with the GDPR.
We are subject to EU and UK restrictions on international data transfers outside of the EEA and UK. Recent legal developments and guidance have introduced complexity and uncertainty regarding such transfers, particularly to countries like the U.S. This necessitates a thorough review of the legal mechanisms involved in our personal data transfers to and from the U.S. and other non-EEA and non-UK countries, heightening the risk surrounding our international data transfer and operations. As regulatory authorities issue further guidance on personal data transfer mechanisms and begin enforcement actions, we may incur additional costs, complaints, or regulatory investigations or fines. The inability to lawfully transfer personal data among the countries and regions in which we operate could adversely impact our service provision or the methods we rely on in order to provide our services, including the geographic distribution or segregation of relevant systems and operations, and potentially harm our financial performance.
The penalties for certain GDPR violations can be substantial, and can reach monetary penalties of up to either 4% of total global annual turnover, or €20 million (for the EU GDPR)/£17.5 million (for the UK GDPR), whichever is greater. In addition to the foregoing, a breach of the GDPR could result in regulatory investigations, reputational damage, orders to cease or change our processing of personal data, or other types of regulatory enforcement action (e.g. a compulsory audit). We may also face civil claims including class action type litigation (where individuals have suffered harm), potentially amounting to significant compensation or damages liabilities, as well as associated costs, diversion of internal resources, and reputational harm.
Restrictions on the collection, use, sharing, processing or disclosure of personal data or additional requirements and liability for security and data integrity could require us to modify our solutions and features, possibly in a material manner, could limit our ability to develop new products and features and could subject us to increased compliance obligations and regulatory scrutiny.
These laws, regulations, and other requirements constantly evolve and remain subject to significant change. In addition, the application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain. New privacy laws add additional complexity, requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk, require additional investment in resources to compliance programs, and could impact trading strategies and availability of previously useful data.
Even though we believe that we and our vendors are generally in compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations relating to consumer protection, data privacy, and information security, these laws are in some cases relatively new, and the interpretation and application of these laws are uncertain. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with consumer protection, data privacy, or information security laws, rules, regulations, industry standards and other requirements could result in proceedings or actions against us by individuals, consumer rights groups, government agencies, or others. We could incur significant costs in investigating and defending such claims and, if found liable, pay significant damages or fines, or be required to make changes to our business. Further, these proceedings and any subsequent adverse outcomes may subject us to significant negative publicity and an erosion of trust. If any of these events were to occur, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Finally, we are also subject to contractual requirements governing electronic funds transfers, including PCI DSS imposed by major card schemes, including Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Discover and JCB. These security standards apply in addition to our regulatory obligations. Any failure to comply with the PCI DSS may violate payment card association operating rules and the terms of our contracts with payment processors and merchant banks. Such failure to comply may result in the loss of our ability to accept credit and debit card payments, subject us to contractual fines, penalties and damages. In addition, there is no guarantee that PCI DSS compliance will prevent illegal or improper use of our systems or the theft, loss or misuse of data pertaining to credit and debit cards, credit and debit card holders, and credit and debit card transactions.
Any actual or perceived failure to comply with evolving regulatory frameworks around the development and use of artificial intelligence could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Our business increasingly relies on artificial intelligence (“AI”), machine learning and automated decision making including generative AI, to improve our solutions, services and tailor our interactions with our customers. The regulatory framework around the development and use of these emerging technologies is rapidly evolving, and many federal, state and foreign government bodies and agencies have introduced and/or are currently considering additional laws and regulations. As a result, implementation standards and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future, and we cannot yet determine the impact future laws, regulations, standards, or perception of their requirements may have on our business.
For example, in October 2023, the President of the United States issued an executive order on the Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI, emphasizing the need for transparency, accountability and fairness in the development and use of AI. The order seeks to balance innovation with addressing risks associated with AI by providing eight guiding principles and priorities, such as ensuring that consumers are protected from fraud, discrimination and privacy risks related to AI. In November 2023, a bipartisan group of Senators introduced the Artificial Intelligence Research, Innovation, and Accountability Act of 2023 in the United States Senate. Legislation related to AI technologies has also been promulgated at the state level. For example, the California Privacy Protection Agency is currently in the process of finalizing regulations under the CCPA regarding the use of automated decision making.
In Europe, on December 8, 2023, the European Union legislators reached a political agreement on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (“EU AI Act”), which establishes a comprehensive, risk-based governance framework for AI in the EU market. The EU AI Act is expected to enter into force in 2024, and the majority of the substantive requirements will apply two years later. The EU AI Act will apply to companies that develop, use and/or provide AI in the EU and includes requirements around transparency, conformity assessments and monitoring, risk assessments, human oversight, security, accuracy, general purpose AI and foundation models, and proposes fines for breach of up to 7% of worldwide annual turnover. In addition, on 28 September 2022, the European Commission proposed two Directives seeking to establish a harmonized civil liability regime for AI in the EU, in order to facilitate civil claims in respect of harm caused by AI and to include AI-enabled products within the scope of the EU’s existing strict liability regime. Once fully applicable, the EU AI Act will have a material impact on the way AI is regulated in the EU.
Any of the foregoing, together with developing guidance and/or decisions in this area, may affect our use of AI and our ability to provide and improve our services, require additional compliance measures and changes to our operations and processes, and result in increased compliance costs and potential increases in civil claims against us. Any actual or perceived failure to comply with evolving regulatory frameworks around the development and use of AI, machine learning and automated decision making could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
We are subject to anti-money laundering laws and regulations in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom as well as other jurisdictions in which we operate.
We are subject to reporting, recordkeeping and anti-money laundering provisions in the United States, the European Union and the United Kingdom, and are subject to similar requirements in other jurisdictions in which we operate. Recently, there has been increased regulatory scrutiny by the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and other regulators and law enforcement agencies on companies in the gaming industry and compliance with anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Anti-money laundering laws and regulations are evolving quickly and could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. Any determination that we have violated such laws or regulations, or any accusations of money laundering or regulatory investigations into possible money laundering activities, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and cash flows, and changes in these laws or regulations could result in increased operating costs.
We are subject to economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations.
We are subject to economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those administered and enforced by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the United Nations Security Council and other relevant sanctions authorities in the United Kingdom and in European Member States, specifically Malta, Romania, Greece, Ireland, Germany, and Denmark. Our global operations expose us to the risk of violating, or being accused of violating, economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations may expose us to reputational harm as well as significant penalties, including criminal fines, imprisonment, civil fines, disgorgement of profits, injunctions and debarment from government contracts, as well as other remedial measures. Investigations of alleged violations can also be disruptive and cause us to incur significant legal and investigatory fees. Despite our compliance efforts and activities we cannot assure compliance by our employees or representatives for which we may be held responsible, and any such violation could materially adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to global anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery and similar laws and regulations in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”). The FCPA prohibits us and our officers, directors, employees, agents and business partners acting on our behalf, from corruptly offering, promising, authorizing or providing anything of value to a “foreign official” for the purposes of influencing official decisions or otherwise securing an improper advantage to obtain or retain business. The FCPA further requires companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges to make and keep books and records that accurately reflect transactions and dispositions of assets and to maintain a system of adequate internal accounting controls. We conduct business directly and indirectly (through third-party vendors) with U.S. and non-U.S. governments. We are also subject to governmental oversight around the world, which may bring our officers, directors, employees and business partners acting on our behalf, including agents, into contact with government officials, all of which creates compliance risks.
We have implemented and maintain policies and procedures designed to comply with applicable anti-corruption laws and regulations. However, we cannot provide assurance that our internal controls and compliance systems will always protect us from liability for acts committed by employees, agents or business partners of ours that would violate U.S. and/or non-U.S. laws, including the laws governing payments to government officials, bribery, fraud, kickbacks and other related laws. Any such improper actions or allegations of such acts could subject us to civil or criminal fines and penalties, disgorgement of profits, injunctions and debarment from government contracts, as well as related stockholder lawsuits and other remedial measures, all of which could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. Investigations of alleged violations can also be disruptive and cause us to incur significant legal and investigatory fees.
Our revenue may be impacted, to a significant extent, by macroeconomic conditions, as well as by health epidemics and contagious disease outbreaks.
Our business is sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Economic factors, such as heightened inflationary pressures, risks of a general recession, rising interest rates in key markets in which we operate, currency exchange rate volatility, changes in monetary and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence, supply chain issues and unemployment rates, are among the most significant factors that impact consumer spending behavior. Weak economic conditions or a significant deterioration in either global or certain regional economic conditions, including those resulting from general macroeconomic factors, such as the recent precipitous rise in inflation and interest rates, health epidemics, man-made events, such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, may limit supply chains or increase their cost, reduce the amount of disposable income consumers have, which, in turn, reduces consumer spending, and would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, new pandemics, similar health epidemics and contagious disease outbreaks may emerge in the future that could have negative effects on macroeconomic conditions generally and as a result may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Conditions in the jurisdictions where we operate could materially and adversely affect our business, including, for example, in connection with the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Our operations are exposed to the economic, political and social environment of the markets in which we operate (or may in the future operate), which have the potential for civil and political unrest, contributing to an uncertain operating environment. One of our offices is located in Kyiv, Ukraine, where we have approximately 381 employees and self-employed contractors and a significant part of the development team is located. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the related measures taken by the U.S., EU, UK and other jurisdictions, and NATO, including economic sanctions and export controls imposed as a result thereof, have created global security concerns and could have an impact on regional and global economies.
We cannot predict the impact of Russian activities in Ukraine and any heightened military conflict or geopolitical instability that may follow, including additional sanctions or counter-sanctions. While we continue to monitor the situation in Ukraine closely, any prolonged or expanded unrest, military activities or sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Risks Relating to the Ownership of Our Ordinary Shares
The trading price of our Ordinary Shares is likely to be volatile, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
The following factors, in addition to other risks described in this Annual Report, may have a significant effect on the market price of our Ordinary Shares:
| • | variations in our operating results; |
| • | actual or anticipated changes in the estimates of our operating results; |
| • | changes in stock market analyst recommendations regarding our Ordinary Shares, other comparable companies or our industry generally; |
| • | macro-economic conditions in the countries in which we do business; |
| • | currency exchange fluctuations and the denominations in which we conduct business and hold our cash reserves; |
| • | market conditions in our industry; |
| • | actual or expected changes in our growth rates or our competitors’ growth rates; |
| • | changes in regulation applicable to our industry; |
| • | changes in the market valuation of similar companies; |
| • | the trading volume of our shares on Nasdaq; |
| • | sales of our Ordinary Shares by us or our shareholders, including our Founding Shareholders; and |
| • | the adoption or modification of regulations, policies, procedures or programs applicable to our business. |
In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our Ordinary Shares could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, financial condition or operating results. The trading price of our Ordinary Shares might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry, even if these events do not directly affect us. Each of these factors, among others, could harm the value of your investment in our Ordinary Shares. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
If a U.S. person is treated as owning at least 10% of our Ordinary Shares, such holder may be subject to adverse United States federal income tax consequences.
If a U.S. person is treated as owning (directly, indirectly or constructively) at least 10% of the value or voting power of our Ordinary Shares, such person may be treated as a “U.S. shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our group (if any). Because our group includes a U.S. subsidiary, certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries will be treated as controlled foreign corporations (regardless of whether or not we are treated as a controlled foreign corporation). A U.S. shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to report annually and include in its United States taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income,” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we make any distributions. An individual that is a U.S. shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a U.S. shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject a U.S. shareholder to significant monetary penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to such shareholder’s United States federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurance that we will assist investors in determining whether we are or any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries is treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether any investor is treated as a U.S. shareholder with respect to any such controlled foreign corporation or furnish to any U.S. shareholders information that may be necessary to comply with the aforementioned reporting and tax paying obligations. The United States Internal Revenue Service has provided limited guidance on situations in which investors may rely on publicly available information to comply with their reporting and tax paying obligations with respect to foreign-controlled controlled foreign corporations. A U.S. investor should consult its advisers regarding the potential application of these rules to an investment in our Ordinary Shares.
Ownership in our Ordinary Shares is restricted by gambling laws, and persons found “unsuitable” by a competent authority may be required to dispose of their shares.
Gambling authorities or lottery authorities, as applicable, have the right to investigate any individual or entity having a relationship to, or involvement with, us or any of our subsidiaries or joint ventures, to determine whether such individual or entity is suitable as a business associate of ours. Many jurisdictions also require any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than a certain percentage of voting securities of a gambling company to report the acquisition to the local regulatory authorities, and those authorities may require such holders to apply for qualification or a finding of suitability, subject to limited exceptions for “institutional investors” that hold a company’s voting securities for investment purposes only.
Gambling and/or lottery authorities have very broad discretion in determining whether an applicant should be deemed suitable. Subject to certain administrative proceeding requirements, these regulators have the authority to deny any application or limit, condition, restrict, revoke or suspend any license, registration, finding of suitability or approval, or fine any person licensed, registered or found suitable or approved, for any cause deemed reasonable by those authorities.
Any person found unsuitable by a competent authority may be precluded from holding direct, indirect, beneficial or record ownership of any voting security, nonvoting security or debt security of any public corporation which is registered with the relevant gambling or lottery authority beyond the time prescribed by such authority.
Our failure, or the failure of any of our major shareholders, directors, officers, key employees, products or technology, to obtain or retain a required license or approval in one jurisdiction could negatively impact our ability (or the ability of any of our major shareholders, directors, officers, key employees, products or technology) to obtain or retain required licenses and approvals in other jurisdictions.
In light of these regulations and the potential impact on our business, our articles of association allow for the restriction of stock ownership by persons or entities who fail to comply with informational or other regulatory requirements under applicable gambling laws, who are found unsuitable to hold our shares by competent authorities, whose stock ownership adversely affects our ability to obtain, maintain, renew or qualify for a license, contract, franchise or other regulatory approval from a gambling or lottery authority or a purported transferee of a stockholder who acquires shares made invalid pursuant to our articles of association. Due to related licensing requirements, one of our founding shareholders has recently reduced his ownership stake in the Company. Should a shareholder fail to comply with regulatory requirements in this or a future case, and should the Company fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such compliance, we may face disciplinary action in the applicable jurisdiction or our licenses in such jurisdiction may be in peril.
The licensing procedures and background investigations of the authorities that regulate our businesses and the restriction in our articles of association may inhibit potential investors from becoming significant stockholders or inhibit existing stockholders from retaining or increasing their ownership.
We do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. Any future determination to pay dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to compliance with applicable laws and covenants under any future credit facility, which may restrict or limit our ability to pay dividends. The amount of any future dividend payments we may make will depend on, among other factors, our strategy, future earnings, financial condition, cash flow, working capital requirements, capital expenditures and applicable provisions of our articles of association. Unless and until we declare and pay dividends, any return on your investment will only occur if the value of our Ordinary Shares appreciates.
Additionally, under Luxembourg law, at least 5% of our net profits per year must be allocated to the creation of a legal reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal to 10% of our issued share capital. The allocation to the legal reserve becomes compulsory again when the legal reserve no longer represents 10% of our issued share capital. Our legal reserve is not available for distribution.
Future sales or the perception of future sales of our Ordinary Shares could adversely affect the price of our Ordinary Shares.
Subject to compliance with the Securities Act or exceptions therefrom, we, all of our directors and executive officers, and certain of our shareholders including the Founding Shareholders, may make Ordinary Shares available for sale into the public markets, which could cause the market price of our Ordinary Shares to decline and impair our ability to raise capital. Sales of a substantial number of shares or the perception that such sales may occur may also cause the market price of our Ordinary Shares to fall or make it more difficult for you to sell your Ordinary Shares at a time and price that you deem appropriate.
The coverage of our business or our Ordinary Shares by securities or industry analysts or the absence thereof could adversely affect the trading price and trading volume of our Ordinary Shares.
Our Ordinary Shares are listed on Nasdaq. However, we cannot assure you that an active trading market for our Ordinary Shares will be sustained. The trading market for our securities is influenced in part by the research and other reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business or industry from time to time. We do not control these analysts or the content and opinions included in their reports. We may be slow to attract equity research coverage, and the analysts who publish information about our securities will have had relatively little experience with our company, which could affect their ability to accurately forecast our results and make it more likely that we fail to meet their estimates. If no or few analysts commence equity research coverage of us, the trading price and volume of our securities would likely be negatively impacted. If analysts do cover us and one or more of them downgrade our securities, or if they issue other unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or inaccurate research, our stock price would likely decline. Furthermore, if one or more of these analysts cease coverage or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets. Any of the foregoing would likely cause our stock price and trading volume to decline. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of the likelihood that an active trading market will be sustained, the liquidity of any trading market, your ability to sell your Ordinary Shares when desired or the price that you may be able to obtain in any such sale.
We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Ordinary Shares less attractive to investors because we may rely on these reduced disclosure requirements.
We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act, and we could continue to be an emerging growth company for up to five years following the completion of our initial public offering.
For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may also take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including presenting only limited selected financial data and not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information that they may deem important. We cannot predict if investors will find our Ordinary Shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Ordinary Shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Ordinary Shares and our share price may be more volatile.
We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, we are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and are subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those of a U.S. domestic public company.
We report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including (1) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act, (2) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their share ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time and (3) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information. In addition, foreign private issuers are not required to file their annual report on Form 20-F as promptly as U.S. domestic issuers. In addition, we are permitted to disclose limited compensation information for our executive officers on an individual basis. Further, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material nonpublic information to, among others, broker-dealers and holders of a company’s securities under circumstances in which it is reasonably foreseeable that the holder will trade in the company’s securities on the basis of the information. These exemptions and leniencies reduce the frequency and scope of information and protections afforded to shareholders of a company that is not a foreign private issuer.
Additionally, as a foreign private issuer whose shares are listed on Nasdaq, we have the option to follow certain home country corporate governance practices rather than those of Nasdaq, including with respect to Nasdaq’s rule with respect to a majority independent board. This will be the case even if we cease to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the Nasdaq listing standards. Subject to the controlled company exemption, we may in the future elect to follow home country practices with regard to various corporate governance requirements for which exemptions are available to foreign private issuers, including certain requirements prescribed by Nasdaq with regard to, among other things, the composition of our board of directors and shareholder approval procedures for certain dilutive events and for the adoption of, and material changes to, equity incentive plans. As a result, our shareholders may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all Nasdaq corporate governance requirements. See Item 16G. “Corporate Governance.”
At this time, we do not follow any Luxembourg rules instead of Nasdaq corporate governance rules, except with respect to Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635 which sets forth the circumstances under which shareholder approval is required prior to an issuance of securities in connection with: (i) the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company; (ii) equity-based compensation of officers, directors, employees or consultants; (iii) a change of control; and (iv) transactions other than public offerings. With respect to the circumstances described in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635, we follow Luxembourg law which does not require approval of our shareholders with respect to the issuance of new shares within the limit and subject to the terms of the delegation granted to the board of directors in the form (and within the limits and conditions) of the authorized capital of the Company.
Although we are a foreign private issuer and may elect to follow home country rules in lieu of certain Nasdaq listing rules, we are required, among other things, to have an audit committee that satisfies Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2), including independence requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(ii). As previously disclosed, Ms. Lisbeth McNabb, who served as a member of the Board since May 2021, and also served as chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, resigned from the Board effective April 21, 2023. As a result, Nasdaq notified us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) requiring three members on our audit committee. We relied on the cure period allowed for under Nasdaq Listing Rules to fill such vacancy with a qualified individual, and on June 29, 2023 our shareholders elected Mr. Steve Capp to serve on our Board. Upon such election, the Board also appointed Mr. Capp to serve as the chairperson of the audit committee, following which the Company received notice from Nasdaq that it has regained compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A). Had we failed to do so, we could have become subject to delisting by Nasdaq.
We may lose our foreign private issuer status in the future, which could result in significant additional costs and expenses.
As discussed above, we are a foreign private issuer, and therefore, we are not required to comply with all of the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. The determination of foreign private issuer status is made annually on the last business day of an issuer’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and, accordingly, the next determination will be made with respect to us on June 30, 2023. In the future, we would lose our foreign private issuer status if (1) more than 50% of our outstanding voting securities are owned by U.S. residents and (2) a majority of our directors or executive officers are U.S. citizens or residents, or we fail to meet additional requirements necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. If we lose our foreign private issuer status, we will be required to file with the SEC periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. We will also have to mandatorily comply with U.S. federal proxy requirements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders will become subject to the short-swing profit disclosure and recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we will lose our ability to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements under the Nasdaq rules. As a U.S.-listed public company that is not a foreign private issuer, we will incur significant additional legal, accounting and other expenses that we will not incur as a foreign private issuer.
We are a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules, and we are able to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements that provide protection to shareholders of companies that are not controlled companies.
The Founding Shareholders held as of April 20, 2024 approximately 53.4% of our issued Ordinary Shares. Accordingly, we are a “controlled company” under Nasdaq rules. As a controlled company, we are exempt from Nasdaq rules with respect to certain corporate governance requirements, such as the requirement that we have a majority of independent directors and we utilize this exemption. While we do not currently take advantage of other exemptions, if we elect to take advantage of any other exemptions in the future, our shareholders will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all Nasdaq rules.
Our articles of association designate the federal district courts of the United States as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our shareholders.
Our articles of association provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the U.S. federal district courts shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any claim asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all such Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. This choice of forum provision may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees and may increase the costs associated with such lawsuits, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our articles of association inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in our share capital shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the choice of forum provisions of our articles of association described above. This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to United States Holders (as defined below) of our Ordinary Shares.
We would be classified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) for any taxable year if, after the application of certain look-through rules, either: (i) 75% or more of our gross income for such year is “passive income” (as defined in the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (as defined below)), or (ii) 50% or more of the value of our gross assets (generally determined on the basis of a quarterly average) during such year is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For these purposes, cash and other assets readily convertible into cash or that do or could generate passive income are categorized as passive assets, and the value of goodwill and other unbooked intangible assets is generally taken into account. Passive income generally includes, among other things, rents, dividends, interest, royalties, gains from the disposition of passive assets and gains from commodities and securities transactions. For purposes of this test, we will be treated as owning a proportionate share of the assets and earning a proportionate share of the income of any other corporation of which we own, directly or indirectly, at least 25% (by value) of the stock.
Based on our market capitalization and the composition of our income, assets and operations, we believe we were not a PFIC for the year ending December 31, 2023 and do not expect to be a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes for the current taxable year or in the foreseeable future. However, this is a factual determination that must be made annually after the close of each taxable year. Moreover, the aggregate value of our assets for purposes of the PFIC determination may be determined by reference to the trading value of our Ordinary Shares, which could fluctuate significantly. In addition, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service may take a contrary position with respect to our determination in any particular year, and, therefore, there can be no assurance that we were not a PFIC for the year ending December 31, 2023 or will not be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year or in the future. United States Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the application of these rules. Certain adverse United States federal income tax consequences could apply to a United States Holder if we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which such United States Holder holds our Ordinary Shares. See Item 10.E. “Taxation - Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations for United States Holders - Passive Foreign Investment Company.”
We continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.
As a public company, and particularly after we are no longer an emerging growth company, we will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Nasdaq rules and other applicable rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and continue to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors.
We continue to evaluate these rules and regulations and cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. These rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.
We are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in our annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of control over financial reporting. We are required to disclose material changes in internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis and are required to make annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(a). While we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404(b). To maintain compliance with Section 404 we are engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that we will not be able to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404. If we identify one or more significant deficiencies, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements. As a result, the market price of our Ordinary Shares could be negatively affected, and we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which could require additional financial and management resources.
If we were deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A), 3(a)(1)(C) and Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if (1) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities or (2) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and (i) it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis or (ii) it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 45% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) and/or more than 45% of its income is derived from investment securities on a consolidated basis with its wholly owned subsidiaries.. We do not believe that we are an “investment company,” as such term is defined in either of those sections of the 1940 Act.
We believe that on a consolidated basis less than 45% of our total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) are composed of, and less than 45% of our income is derived from, assets that could be considered investment securities under the 1940 Act. Accordingly, we do not believe that we are an “investment company” by virtue of the 45% tests in Rule 3a-1 of the 1940 Act as described in the foregoing paragraph. We intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. However, if we were to be deemed an investment company, restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on our capital structure and our ability to transact with affiliates, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to Our Incorporation in Luxembourg.
The rights of our shareholders may differ from the rights they would have as shareholders of a United States corporation, which could adversely impact trading in our Ordinary Shares and our ability to conduct equity financings.
The Company’s corporate affairs are governed by the Company’s articles of association and the laws of Luxembourg, including the Luxembourg Company Law, as amended from time to time (loi du 10 août 1915 concernant les sociétés commerciales, telle qu’elle a été modifiée). The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. For example, under Delaware law, the board of directors of a Delaware corporation bears the ultimate responsibility for managing the business and affairs of a corporation. In discharging this function, directors of a Delaware corporation owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporation and its shareholders. Luxembourg law imposes a duty on directors of a Luxembourg company to: (i) act in good faith with a view to the best interests of a company; and (ii) exercise the care, diligence, and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in a similar position and under comparable circumstances. Additionally, under Delaware law, a shareholder may bring a derivative action on behalf of a company to enforce a company’s rights. Under Luxembourg law, the board of directors has sole authority to decide whether to initiate legal action to enforce a company’s rights (other than, in certain circumstances, an action against members of our board of directors, which may be initiated by the general meeting of the shareholders, or, subject to certain conditions, by minority shareholders holding together at least 10% of the voting rights in the company). Further, under Luxembourg law, there may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or about U.S. issuers. In addition, Luxembourg laws governing the securities of Luxembourg companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg laws and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters might not be as protective of minority shareholders as are state corporation laws in the United States. Therefore, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our directors, officers or principal shareholders than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States. As a result of these differences, our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. issuer.
The Company is organized under the laws of Luxembourg and a substantial amount of its assets are not located in the United States. It may be difficult for you to obtain or enforce judgments or bring original actions against us or the members of our board of directors in the United States.
The Company is organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Most of the members of our board of directors, our senior management and the experts named in this Annual Report reside outside the United States and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for you to effect service of process within the United States upon these individuals or upon us or to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws against us in the United States. Awards of punitive damages in actions brought in the United States or elsewhere are generally not enforceable in Luxembourg and penalty clauses and similar clauses on damages or liquidated damages are allowed to the extent that they provide for a reasonable level of damages and the courts of Luxembourg have the right to reduce or increase the amount thereof if it is unreasonably high or low.
As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United States and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. A valid judgment obtained from a court of competent jurisdiction in the United States may be entered and enforced through a court of competent jurisdiction in Luxembourg, subject to compliance with the enforcement procedures (exequatur). The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments rendered by U.S. courts will be subject, prior to any enforcement in Luxembourg, to the procedure and the conditions set forth in the Luxembourg procedural code, which conditions may include that:
| • | the judgment of the U.S. court is final and enforceable (exécutoire) in the United States; |
| • | the U.S. court had jurisdiction over the subject matter leading to the judgment (that is, its jurisdiction was in compliance both with Luxembourg private international law rules and with the applicable domestic U.S. federal or state jurisdictional rules); |
| • | the U.S. court has applied to the dispute the substantive law that would have been applied by Luxembourg courts. Based on recent case law and legal doctrine, it is not certain that this condition would still be required for an exequatur to be granted by a Luxembourg court; |
| • | the judgment was granted following proceedings where the counterparty had the opportunity to appear and, if it appeared, to present a defense, and the decision of the foreign court must not have been obtained by fraud, but in compliance with the rights of the defendant; |
| • | the U.S. court has acted in accordance with its own procedural laws; and |
| • | the decisions and the considerations of the U.S. court must not be contrary to Luxembourg international public policy rules, must not have been given in proceedings of a tax or criminal nature and must not have been rendered subsequent to an evasion of Luxembourg law (fraude à la loi). |
In addition, actions brought in a Luxembourg court against us, the members of our board of directors, our officers or the experts named herein to enforce liabilities based on U.S. federal securities laws may be subject to certain restrictions. In particular, Luxembourg courts do generally not award punitive damages. It is possible that awards of damages made under civil liabilities provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws (for example, fines or punitive damages) would be classified by Luxembourg courts as being of a penal or punitive nature and would not be recognized by Luxembourg courts. Ordinarily an award of monetary damages would not be considered as a penalty, but if the monetary damages include punitive damages, such punitive damages may be considered as a penalty.
Derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under Luxembourg law. However, minority shareholders holding securities entitled to 10% of the voting rights at the general meeting that resolved on the granting of discharge to the directors may bring an action against the directors on behalf of the company. Minority shareholders holding at least 10% of the voting rights of a company may also ask the directors questions in writing concerning acts of management of the company or one of its subsidiaries, and if the company fails to answer these questions within one month, these shareholders may apply to the Luxembourg courts to appoint one or more experts instructed to submit a report on these acts of management. This provision of Luxembourg law does not apply to claims under the U.S. federal securities laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by a Luxembourg court in summary proceedings to acts that are alleged to constitute an abuse of majority rights against the minority shareholders.
Litigation in Luxembourg also is subject to rules of procedure that differ from the U.S. rules, including with respect to the taking and admissibility of evidence, the conduct of the proceedings and the allocation of costs. Proceedings in Luxembourg would have to be conducted in the French or German language, and all documents submitted to the court would, in principle, have to be translated into French or German.
There exists no published case law in Luxembourg in relation to the recognition of limited recourse provisions by which a party agrees to limit its recourse against the other party to the assets available at any given point in time with such other party and there exists no published case law in Luxembourg in relation to the recognition of foreign law governed subordination provisions whereby a party agrees to subordinate its claims of another party. If a Luxembourg court had to analyze the enforceability of such provisions, it is likely that such a court would consider the position taken by Belgian and Luxembourg legal scholars according to which limited recourse provisions are enforceable against the parties thereto but not against third parties.
A contractual provision allowing the service of process against a party to a service agent could be overridden by Luxembourg statutory provisions allowing the valid serving of process against a party subject to and in accordance with the laws of the country where such party is domiciled.
For these reasons, it may be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us, the members of our board of directors, our executive officers and the experts named in this Annual Report. In addition, even if a judgment against us, the non-U.S. members of our board of directors, senior management or the experts named in this Annual Report based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws is obtained, a U.S. investor may not be able to enforce it in U.S. or Luxembourg courts.
Luxembourg and European insolvency and bankruptcy laws are substantially different than U.S. insolvency laws and may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
As a company organized under the laws of Luxembourg and with its registered office in Luxembourg, the Company is subject to Luxembourg insolvency and bankruptcy laws in the event any insolvency proceedings are initiated against us including, among other things, Council and European Parliament Regulation (EU) 2015/848 of 20 May 2015 on insolvency proceedings (recast). Should courts in another European country determine that the insolvency and bankruptcy laws of that country apply to us in accordance with and subject to such EU regulations, the courts in that country could have jurisdiction over the insolvency proceedings initiated against us. Insolvency and bankruptcy laws in Luxembourg or the relevant other European country, if any, may offer our shareholders less protection than they would have under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws and make it more difficult for them to recover the amount they could expect to recover in a liquidation under U.S. insolvency and bankruptcy laws.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
4.A. History and Development of the Company
We are a technology-driven provider of end-to-end iLottery and iGaming solutions and were initially organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (“Luxembourg”) as a private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée) on April 10, 2014 and converted into a public limited liability company (société anonyme) under the laws of Luxembourg on November 10, 2020 by completing the Initial Public Offering (the “IPO”) of our Ordinary Shares and their listing on Nasdaq Global Market. As part of the conversion we executed a 1:8.234 reverse share split. On May 15, 2023 we entered into the Business Combination Agreement with Aristocrat and Anaxi Investments Limited for the acquisition of all of our outstanding shares by Aristocrat. For additional information on the Business Combination Agreement please refer to “-Selected Recent Development – Our Acquisition by Aristocrat”. Our registered office is located at 63-65 rue de Merl, L-2146 Luxembourg and our telephone number at this address is +352-2040119020.
Our principal executive offices are located at 10 Habarzel Street, Tel Aviv, 6971014, Israel. Our telephone number at this address is +972-73-372-3107. Our website address is https://neogames.com. The information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of, and shall not be incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report. We have included our website address as an inactive textual reference only. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as we, that file electronically, with the SEC at www.sec.gov. Under the rules of the SEC, we are currently eligible for treatment as a “foreign private issuer.” As a “foreign private issuer,” we will not be required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as domestic registrants whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. Our agent for service of process in the United States is Puglisi & Associates and its address is 850 Library Avenue, Suite 204, Newark, DE 19711.
Selected Recent Developments
Our Acquisition by Aristocrat
On April 25, 2024, the Company completed the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement. Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Company effected the Continuation and changed its name to Neo Group Ltd. effective from the Continuation. The Continuation became effective with receipt of the certificate of continuation from the Cayman Registrar on April 24, 2024. Thereafter, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, the Merger occurred and became effective with the receipt of the certificate of merger from the Cayman Registrar on April 25, 2024.
With the effectiveness of the Merger, the Company intends to promptly delist its Ordinary Shares from The Nasdaq Global Market, terminate its reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, and deregister or suspend the registration of its securities under the Exchange Act.
Subject to certain exceptions, each issued and outstanding ordinary share of the Company prior to the effective time of the Merger shall be converted automatically into, and shall thereafter represent the right to receive, an amount in cash equal to $29.50, without interest thereon and subject to applicable tax withholding.
Relationship with Pollard Banknote
In January 2023, the Company entered into an agreement with Pollard Banknote Limited formalizing its joint venture relationship with them regarding NPI and separately amended the existing Michigan Joint Venture Agreement with Pollard Banknote Limited. We believe that these agreements help reinforce the Company’s long-term approach aimed at promoting the continued success of NPI and, accordingly, the continuation of the Company’s support of NPI customers’ iLottery programs. In addition, the agreements provide the Company and Pollard the option to pursue future iLottery opportunities in the North American market either in partnership, as part of their joint venture, or independently.
Pariplay’s agreement with Resorts
On January 11, 2023, we announced that Pariplay has entered into an agreement with Resorts Digital Gaming, the online arm of the first casino in Atlantic City - Resorts Casino and Hotel. Resorts Digital’s customers will be able to access Pariplay’s proprietary content as well as very popular third-party licensed games.
This partnership with Resorts Digital Gaming increases Pariplay’s footprint across North America to being approved to operate in five of the six jurisdictions in the United States that have regulated online gaming, as well as additional Canadian provinces.
Agreement with Metropolitan Gaming
The Company announced on February 1, 2023 that Aspire has entered into a multi-year agreement with Metropolitan Gaming, a leading, land-based U.K. operator group, which operates one of London’s biggest casinos as well as seven other premium locations in the United Kingdom. Pursuant to the agreement, Aspire will provide Metropolitan Gaming with its comprehensive online solution, incorporating its platform (PAM), managed services and casino aggregation solution.
Pariplay’s content agreement with Betsson
On February 16, 2023, the Company announced that Pariplay entered into a content agreement with Betsson, a Sweden-based gaming company, that will give Betsson access to the full Wizard Games portfolio as well as a range of 14,000+ products on its Fusion aggregation platform. The titles they produce will be available to Betsson to offer its customers across its extensive global network, including the key regulated markets of Sweden, Denmark and Spain, as well as numerous other regions within Europe.
Launch with Intralot do Brazil
On March 6, 2023, the Company announced that it launched LotoMinas.com.br iLottery and online sports betting with Intralot do Brazil, in Minas Gerais, Brazil’s second largest state fully regulated by Loteria Mineira, the official state lottery. The turn-key project is the first cooperation between NeoGames’ iLottery solution, BtoBet sports betting as well as Aspire providing Managed Services.
Pariplay’s content agreement with DraftKings
On March 10, 2023, the Company announced that Pariplay entered into a content agreement with DraftKings, a major US-facing operator, in New Jersey. The Company’s in-house casino games studio content will be available to DraftKings customers in New Jersey. DraftKings will also have access to a large selection of top performing third-party games, including content exclusively available through Pariplay.
Agreement with PlayLive! Online Casino
On June 20, 2023, the Company announced that Aspire has agreed to deliver its full iGaming suite of products to PlayLive! Online Casino, an online casino in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania developed and run by the global gaming arm of the real estate and entertainment business The Cordish Companies. The online casino launched in 2020, followed by the openings of the world-class properties Live! Casino Pittsburgh and Live! Casino & Hotel Philadelphia.
Deal with SunBet
On July 26, 2023, the Company announced that Pariplay and SunBet have entered into a content agreement. SunBet is a South African online operator which is part of Sun International, a major casino brand in Africa. The Company will provide aggregation services and content from both Fusion and Wizard Games platforms.
Agreement with OPAP
On November 8, 2023, the Company announced that NeoGames Studio has expanded its offering into OPAP, the Greek Lottery Operator, through the relationship and integration provided through Pariplay.
Full turn-key iLottery program for the West Virginia Lottery
On November 8, 2023, the Company announced that NPI expanded its footprint in the U.S., winning a public procurement to provide the West Virginia Lottery with a full iLottery program. West Virginia represents the fifth state in which NPI will operate a full iLottery program in the U.S., growing our market share and leadership. On March 6, 2024, the Company announced that NPI was awarded a new ten-year contract to provide our turn-key iLottery solutions to the West Virginia Lottery, which is expected to launch during the fourth quarter of 2024.
Launch with Action 24/7
In March 2024, the Company launched with Action 24/7 in Tennessee, Aspire’s first U.S. customer to go live with OSB, including our suite of turn-key solutions.
Hungarian lottery public tender
On March 6, 2024, the Company announced that it has won the public tender in Hungary to provide eInstant games to the Hungarian lottery.
Extension of Agreement with Sazka
On April 2, 2024, the Company announced a three-year contract extension with its long-standing Czech lottery customer, SAZKA, with the agreement to remain in effect until the end of 2028. SAZKA, a part of Allwyn, is a multi-national lottery operator with leading market positions in the Czech Republic, Austria, Greece, Cyprus, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States (Illinois). In addition to being able to continue to leverage NeoGames’ industry-leading iLottery and iGaming solutions, including its market-leading NeoSphere platform and a diverse portfolio of interactive games, Sazka will also integrate content aggregation into its offering, to be supplied by NeoGames’ subsidiary Pariplay, with the addition set to significantly enhance the lottery’s online gaming offering.
Principal Capital Expenditures
For a description of our principal capital expenditures and divestitures for the three years ended December 31, 2023 and for those currently in progress, see Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”
4.B. Business Overview
Our Company
NeoGames is a technology-driven innovator and a global leader of iLottery and iGaming solutions and services for regulated lotteries and gaming operators, offering our customers a full-service suite of solutions, including proprietary technology platforms, two dedicated game studios with an extensive portfolio of engaging games – one in lottery and one in casino games, and a range of value-added services.
With the strategic acquisition of Aspire in June 2022, NeoGames now offers an innovative sports betting platform from BtoBet, an advanced content aggregation solution from Pariplay, and a complete set of B2B gaming tech and managed services. The combined Company has a true global presence, servicing customers in more than a twenty U.S. states, over ten countries throughout Europe, as well as operations throughout high growth regions such as Latin America and Africa. Expanding our customer base has also reduced the concentration of our revenues.
As a global B2G and B2B technology and service provider to state lotteries and other lottery operators, NeoGames offers our customers a full-service solution that includes all of the elements required for the offering of lottery games, including Instants and DBGs (both as defined below), via personal computers, smartphones and handheld devices (“iLottery”). These elements include technology platforms, a range of value-added services and a game studio with a large portfolio of games. The value-added services that NeoGames offers facilitate various aspects of the iLottery offering including regulation and compliance, payment processing, risk management, player relationship management and player value optimization. The complete solution allows customers to enjoy the benefits of marketing their brands and generating traffic to their iLottery sales channels.
NeoGames was established as an independent company in 2014, following a spin-off from Aspire (formerly known as NeoPoint Technologies Limited), formerly a B2C and B2B, and currently a B2B service provider in the iGaming industry. Prior to the spin-off from Aspire, our management team was responsible for the iLottery business of Aspire, which derived the majority of its revenues from the sale of iLottery games to various lotteries in Europe. In 2014, we began to focus on the U.S. iLottery market, which opened in 2012 with the introduction of online lottery ticket sales in Illinois. In order to access this significant market opportunity, we partnered with Pollard Banknote Limited (“Pollard”), one of the leading vendors to the global lottery industry. In 2014, we signed our first turnkey solution contract in the United States with the MSL, as a sub-contractor to Pollard.
In July 2014 NeoGames and Pollard formed NPI, a joint venture for the purpose of identifying, pursuing, winning and executing iLottery contracts in the North American lottery market. NPI combines the Company’s technology and iLottery business and operational experience with Pollard’s infrastructure, administrative capabilities and relationships with lotteries in North America. NPI is managed by an executive board of two members, consisting of two members appointed by NeoGames and two members appointed by Pollard. NPI has its own general manager and dedicated workforce and operates as a separate entity. However, it relies on NeoGames and Pollard for certain services, such as technology development, business operations and support services from NeoGames and corporate services, including legal, banking and certain human resources services, from Pollard.
Since its inception, NPI has secured iLottery contracts with the VAL, the NHL (as a sub-contractor to Intralot), the NCEL, the AGLC, the ALC, the Georgia Lottery and the West Virginia Lottery. All of our iLottery business in North America is currently conducted through NPI, except in Michigan, where we support the Michigan iLottery as a subcontractor of Pollard pursuant to a Joint Venture Agreement dated January 14, 2014 between the MSL and Pollard (the “Michigan JV Agreement”). We continue to conduct all of our iLottery business outside of North America through NeoGames.
On January 10, 2023, the Company entered into a Limited Liability Company Agreement with Pollard (the “Limited Liability Company Agreement”) to formalize the terms and conditions governing the operation and management of NPI and provide that the purpose of NPI shall be to perform its obligations pursuant to existing contracts and consider additional iLottery opportunities as they may arise in the future. In addition, on January 10, 2023, we also amended the Michigan JV Agreement to provide that the joint venture is no longer limited to activities in the state of Michigan (the “Amended Michigan JV Agreement”). Pursuant to both the Limited Liability Company Agreement and the Amended Michigan JV Agreement, neither the Company nor Pollard are precluded from entering into a business relationship with any one or more of NPI’s suppliers for its own business purposes or exploring additional iLottery opportunities as they may arise in the future, provided that any such business relationship and additional opportunities do not intentionally interfere with or otherwise divert services of the supplier from NPI. In accordance therewith, we are pursuing opportunities independently from NPI.
On June 28, 2022, the Company announced the entrance into a multi-year turnkey project with Intralot do Brasil, the lottery operator in Brazil’s second largest state of Minas Gerais. The agreement marks the Company’s entry into the Brazilian market with an end-to-end solution of iLottery and online sports betting. The agreement was the Company’s first cooperation with BtoBet, the sports betting solution it gained as part of the Aspire acquisition.
NeoGames are a 100% digital business that is using technology to transform the traditional retail-based lottery market. Lotteries are a crucial revenue source for our governmental customers as they provide much-needed contributions to state budgets to fund public projects and initiatives. The iLottery industry, and we as a company, benefit from long-term, multi-year contracts with our customers that generally start with an initial term of four to seven years with additional embedded extension option. Moreover, our software-as-a-service business model allows our platform to be highly scalable in a growing industry while benefiting from a visible revenue stream tied to our customers’ gaming revenues. There are also significant barriers to enter the iLottery industry due to complexities surrounding regulatory and government contracts and specialized technology requirements. Understanding these dynamics, we have developed a leading market position in the United States. We currently provide, through NPI, iLottery solutions to the largest number of U.S. iLottery customers, including the three highest per-capita grossing iLottery programs in the United States (the Michigan, Virginia and New Hampshire iLotteries), which are also the three highest in iLottery penetration.
Following the acquisition of Aspire, NeoGames has become a leading B2B provider of iGaming solutions, offering companies everything they need to operate a successful iGaming brand, covering casino and sports. The B2B offering comprises a robust technical platform, proprietary casino games, a proprietary sportsbook, a game aggregator and managed services. The platform itself can be availed of exclusively or combined with a wide range of services. With more than 15 years of operational experience in managing casino networks and developing in-house proprietary technology, NeoGames is able to provide an iGaming solution that ensures every aspect of our partners’ casinos: starting with a robust platform including game aggregation to regulation, compliance, payment processing, risk management, CRM, support and player value optimization. The B2B offering also includes a game-aggregation service for external operators through the subsidiary Pariplay and a complete sport betting solution through its subsidiary BtoBet.
Prior to its acquisition by NeoGames, Aspire expanded in January 2018 its offering to include sports, becoming the first provider of a full turnkey solution to sport operators – with active operations in more than five regulated markets. During October 2019, the Pariplay Group, a leading aggregator and game studio, was acquired and in October 2020 the acquisition of the leading B2B sportsbook provider BtoBet was completed. Both acquisitions add significantly to the Aspire value chain. In October 2021, Aspire announced that it has entered into an agreement with the US-based group EBET, Inc. (formerly Esports Technologies, Inc.) for the sale of Aspire’s B2C segment (including the Karamba brand), for an aggregate consideration of up to approximately EUR 65 million. In addition, Aspire entered into a four-year platform and managed services agreement with EBET, Inc. In December 2021, Aspire signed an agreement to acquire 25% of bingo supplier BNG Investment Group Ltd for USD 1.75 million in cash with an option to acquire all of the shares in three or five years’ time. This provides Aspire with access to a real omni channel technology and a proprietary offering in one of the biggest verticals in the iGaming industry. Aspire, Pariplay and BtoBet now provide all of their offerings through NeoGames.
The revenue model for B2B partnerships is characterized by relatively low set-up fees, moderate mark-up on services from third-party suppliers and mainly a share of the adjusted net gaming revenues. BtoBet and Pariplay apply revenue sharing models as well. The main operational costs are for technical development, licenses, customer service and the marketing of B2C brands up until the B2C divestment. As the license holder, Aspire receives net gaming revenues (NGR) directly from the players and keeps a royalty share before splitting revenues with partners, as opposed to many other platform providers, which receive a royalty payment from the operator regardless of the operator’s results. The iGaming business operates in more than 30 regulated markets spanning America, Europe and Africa, including countries such as the US, Colombia, Mexico, UK, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Netherlands and Denmark. Offices are located in Malta, Israel, Bulgaria, Ukraine, North Macedonia, India and Gibraltar.
Our iLottery Solutions and Services
We offer iLottery solutions through two distinct business lines - turnkey solutions and games. Our turnkey solutions are tailored to each customer and can include a combination of any of our platforms, value-added services and game studio. Our games offering is related to our game studio, but consists solely of offering our portfolio of iLottery games to lotteries.
We also provide certain software development services to NPI and sub-license certain platforms to Caesars.
Our Technology Platforms
NeoSphere
The central technology platform we offer, NeoSphere, delivers comprehensive iLottery and iGaming capabilities through its player account management (“PAM”) module, and acts as the system of record for all transactions.
The NeoSphere platform provides and controls the functionality related to the management of players throughout their entire lifecycle. This includes registration (regardless of the digital channel used by the player), age and identification verification, geolocation sign-in, responsible gaming monitoring, product usage, issue resolution, player compliance, player retention, marketing and player services, as well as the functionality required for wallet transactions. The PAM module is where we collect, process and record every transaction associated with a player’s identification across the entire turnkey solution. The data collected through these online interactions gives us an insight into player preferences, and consequently informs the execution of player segmentation strategies to drive insightful iLottery and iGaming campaigns. Utilizing our responsible gaming and compliance features embedded throughout our solution, we also monitor gaming activity and provide controls and alerts customized for each player’s profile.
We believe the highly flexible and versatile PAM that we offer can power the management and operations of many forms of online gaming and is trusted by our customers for its performance and reliability. This PAM serves as the central platform for more than 35 iGaming customers in 30 regulated jurisdictions and powering more than 80 brands, including the AGLC where we serve a broad range of gaming verticals such as online lotto games, slots, instants and virtual and live dealer table games.
NeoDraw is one of only four central gaming systems certified by the U.S. Multi-State Lottery Association for the issuance, sale and operation of Draw based games (“DBGs”). The proprietary technology of NeoDraw has been developed specifically for the iLottery market and online players and is fully-integrated with the NeoSphere platform to facilitate the rapid implementation of DBGs as part of the complete turnkey solution.
NeoDraw is an example of specialized technology that iLotteries require. Providers of online casino games or sports betting typically cannot apply their technology used for online casino and sports betting to DBG offerings given the multifaceted nuances of lottery game mechanics and math.
The main advantages of NeoDraw include:
| • | Greater flexibility for the lottery - NeoDraw can operate independently or in parallel with an existing retail central lottery system and is not constrained by limitations of traditional lottery systems. |
| • | Quicker time to market - NeoDraw is fully-integrated with NeoSphere. This reduces the complexity, resources and time required to integrate with a third-party system to launch traditional games. |
| • | Additional functionality - NeoDraw enables us and our lottery customers to introduce new innovations related to online purchase flows, shopping cart functionality and in-game features that are in some cases not available with legacy central lottery systems. |
Currently, all of our U.S. customers to whom we supply our turnkey solution have opted to employ NeoDraw to launch their iLottery offerings.
NeoPlay is the technology platform we offer that manages online Instants (“Instants”) in which players can instantly reveal a pre-determined result through which they can learn whether their ticket entitles them to a prize. It facilitates configurations, including prize tables, payouts, ticket series setups, ticket price points and many other variables, and supports channels, including mobile, desktop and applications.
NeoCube is our data warehouse solution that is the central point of data collection from all verticals, which allows the creation and analysis of financial and business reports. The data collected with NeoCube provides the foundation for our data analytics team and allows them to perform in-depth analysis for our own operations as well as for our customers, across all gaming verticals.
With more than 18 years of experience in the iLottery industry (including our management team’s operation of the iLottery business of Aspire), we have gained substantial knowledge and direct experience in the full spectrum of marketing and business operations which is essential to enable the revenue growth of our customers. The insights that we continue to gain from our broad view of analytics, game performance, player support, payment solutions management and more allow us to act as a strategic partner to our customers in jointly developing their iLottery businesses.
We provide services to our customers across four key areas: marketing operations, player operations, technology operations and business operations.
| • | Marketing operations – we provide targeted marketing services and data analytics to our North American customers through the entire player lifecycle, from digital acquisition and onboarding to game participation. Such operations include, but are not limited to: |
| - | implementation of promotional campaigns tailored to player segments; |
| - | maximization of the return generated from a player; |
| - | results-based analytics of player behavior; |
| - | player-level segmentation-based evaluation of the player’s activity status, game orientation, deposit characteristics, reaction to previous promotional campaigns and account balance status; |
| - | predictive analysis of the lifetime value of players acquired from different marketing and promotional campaigns; and |
| - | information regarding the decision on which player acquisition strategies and marketing campaigns to focus and which to abandon. |
| • | Player operations – leveraging years of experience managing players on behalf of our customers, we provide to our North American, European and other customers various services designed to offer the best possible services to iLottery and iGaming players. Such operations may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: |
| - | a customer service center based in the United States and Europe, which services our global customers; |
| - | CRM services for North American (through NPI), European and South American customers; |
| - | responsible gaming services to proactively detect and react to player gaming behaviors; |
| - | compliance services including anti-money-laundering (“AML”) and know-your-customer solutions to meet the customer’s local requirements; and |
| - | facilitating the flow of funds throughout the entire player lifecycle, from funding to cash-outs. |
| • | Technology operations – these operations, which we provide to many of our customers, are meant to provide the full spectrum of monitoring and maintenance of the platforms we deploy for our customers and protect the integrity of our back-end iLottery software. Such operations include, but are not limited to: |
| - | the deployment of our technology platforms in the form of a SaaS offering, with/out IaaS; |
| - | ongoing rollout of advanced versions of our software, third-party OS updates and security patches; |
| - | handling of all reported production incidents; |
| - | verification of technological defects, and potential escalation to the development team; and |
| - | monitoring system and the network’s performance for degradation and potentially fraudulent activity. |
| • | Business operations – we facilitate payment processing services by third-party vendors and manage customer-facing personnel. Such operations may include, but are not limited to: |
| - | integrating third-party solutions into our platforms to allow for Know Your Customer (KYC) services, geolocation services and various payment services such as credit and debit card transactions and bank transfers; |
| - | serving as merchant of record on behalf of our customers; |
| - | recruiting, training and managing customer service and CRM representatives; |
| - | acquisition marketing services; and |
| - | developing and managing the project plan required to deploy each solution. |
We believe that we were the first to build a separate business unit exclusively for the development of iLottery games. We believe that we have one of the largest iLottery game portfolios in the global lottery industry, having produced more than 350 proprietary games.
We believe that our competitive advantage extends to our operation of a game studio focused exclusively on iLottery. Games offered by lotteries need to comply with strict regulations and guidelines. We believe that our focus solely on iLottery enables us to produce the best iLottery games that meet such regulations and guidelines, while providing an entertaining and diverse player experience. We believe this ability is derived from our vast experience and deep understanding of the boundaries established by such regulations and guidelines and our proven ability to “innovate inside the box.”
Our games are developed by the highly dedicated members of our studio with experience across art design and advanced multimedia animations, software development, engineering and mathematics. Prior to and during the production of a game, we consider a number of fundamental factors, including, but not limited to:
| • | Entertainment value - the level of player interaction as part of the game, the complexity level of playing the game, the multimedia experience (design, animation and audio), and the duration of a game. |
| • | Mathematics - controlling the risk level of the game and optimizing the game experience to the risk profile of iLottery players (given the target payout ratio). |
iLottery Competitive Landscape
In order to protect the lottery’s stability and dependability as a source of funding for government budgets, governments have instituted practices and protocols that prospective vendors to the lotteries must follow in order to compete for lottery contracts, including the:
| • | use of complex official public procurement processes, requiring substantial commitments from participating vendors, such as performance bonds; |
| • | inclusion of termination at will provisions in contracts; and |
| • | requirement for specialized technology specifically for lottery that complies with lottery rules. |
Governments also have tended not to frequently change lottery vendors while lottery operations are ongoing, to avoid the risks inherent to such change. Currently, the number of companies that service the lottery industry is limited given the meaningful cost and required expertise.
The iLottery industry shares many characteristics with the traditional lottery industry, including an important role within government budgets, a high degree of regulation, limited competition and a long procurement process. These shared characteristics include:
| • | long sale cycles and substantial upfront investment; |
| • | long-term relationships with limited turnover; and |
| • | growth alongside other forms of gambling. |
iLottery has been able to grow alongside the traditional lottery, suggesting that typical iLottery players may have a distinct profile from that of typical traditional retail lottery players.
Launching a full iLottery program requires a considerable upfront investment in time and capital to develop what we refer to as “specialized technology” (the technology that is developed specifically for the lottery industry and requires considerable expertise), create a portfolio of tailored games and establish facilities to host the operations and data processing within the jurisdiction in which iLottery is offered.
Unlike in traditional retail lottery, where a single state may have multiple service providers for Instants and a separate service provider for DBGs, for iLottery a customer typically expects a single service provider to support the full suite of Instants and DBGs. These upfront investments are further amplified by a procurement process for government customers that involves significant restrictions and formalities, and a general requirement for an iLottery provider to deposit performance bonds to guaranty the program’s level of performance.
While competition in the lottery industry is limited as a result of various barriers explained above, the innovative nature of iLottery created an opportunity for a singularly-focused company to enter and compete with long-time incumbents of traditional lottery. Our experience suggests that brand awareness, compelling customer business results and credibility in solid delivery and services will remain vital for success within the iLottery industry. Just as it has with traditional lottery, we believe this will lead to stable contracts with limited turnover.
We believe that the iLottery industry is less exposed to new market entrants than other gambling markets, due to the considerable barriers to entry imposed by the government procurement process, regulations and the need for specialized technology, among other factors. There is, however, intense competition among the few existing iLottery providers with respect to new iLottery contracts. We compete both for contracts to supply our full turnkey solution and for contracts to supply our portfolio of games.
We compete primarily against International Game Technology PLC (“IGT”), Scientific Games Corp. (“SGMS”), which was acquired by Brookfield Business Partners L.P., and Intralot for turnkey solutions contracts. With the exception of Intralot, we compete against the same companies for game contracts, in addition to several other companies, such as Instant Win Gaming Ltd. Although these other companies, which do not offer turnkey solutions, may capture some content market share, they will need to host their games on platforms like ours. Other companies may in the future choose to enter the iLottery industry, but we believe the expertise and experience required to build and operate a successful iLottery technology platform will limit this expansion.
We have deployed our turnkey solution to more U.S. lotteries that engaged a full-service iLottery provider than any of our competitors.
Our Competitive Strengths in iLottery
Technology design and flexibility
We believe that our focus on iLottery solutions, building upon years of expertise and deep exposure to U.S. customers, has given us a superior understanding of iLottery customers and players that allows us to continue to outperform our competitors in iLottery solutions and games.
The fully-integrated iLottery turnkey solution that we offer is designed to be flexible, responsive and readily adaptable to meet each customer’s needs, as well as support future growth and innovation over time. The open architecture we utilize in the development of our technology provides several benefits to our customers. With a single code base, our platforms can be continuously adapted and improved without any hindrance or restrictions from third-party suppliers. This means that all of our customers can run the same core software version and receive the same advancements and updates in a relatively short period of time, allowing us to evolve our platforms and games at a fast pace and large scale.
We have produced more than 350 proprietary iLottery games, and we operate our own in-house game studio. Historically, our games have performed strongly relative to our competitors’ in terms of profitability and popularity. Our game studio allows us to offer our customers a complete solution, while certain of our competitors must use third party vendors in order to provide their customers with games. In addition, our extensive game portfolio allows us to extend our customer base to customers who do not need our full turnkey solution, but are looking to expand their online games offering for greater variety of entertaining content.
iLottery business operations experience
Our experience as a B2C and B2B gaming operator, initially within Aspire, followed by years of hands-on experience managing players on behalf of our U.S. customers as part of our player operations service, has helped inform how we manage and engage iLottery players. We have also gained substantial knowledge about the iLottery market and its participants in the past 18 years through our operations in Europe and the United States, and more recently South America. Our experience provides us a deep understanding of the characteristics of iLottery players, allowing us to customize our solutions to such players’ needs and interests.
We analyze our customers’ player game data daily to gain insights into game play mechanics and player preferences across multiple jurisdictions. Our focus is on the players and understanding their characteristics, perception of gambling, loyalty to the lottery brand and other attributes. We believe this understanding has contributed to the success of our game studio.
We have deployed our turnkey solution to more U.S. lotteries that engaged a full-service iLottery provider than any of our competitors. The advanced nature of our technology, combined with our shared code practices, internal project management and deployment practices, allow us to launch faster than our competitors. For example, we launched our turnkey solution for each of the NHL and Intralot do Brasil within seven months of being awarded the contract, and within six months for the AGLC.
Brand awareness and credibility
Given the important role of lotteries in government budgets, winning the trust of customers is critical for lottery platform and service providers to be awarded new contracts, and reputation and brand are important to winning that trust. While only entering the U.S. market in 2014, we believe we have emerged as a well-known and respected name in the iLottery industry in the United States and globally because of our performance supporting our customers’ growth. The Michigan iLottery has served as a model to other U.S. states seeking to offer iLottery, and we believe that state lotteries are aware of our operating acumen and the role our technology has played in driving that success.
Cooperation with various market players
Our openness to pursue opportunities that bring together strengths from different vendors has brought us to successfully cooperate with other vendors in the iLottery industry. We believe this approach allows us access to contracts that would otherwise have not been available for public procurement. For example, with respect to the NHL, we serve as a sub-contractor to Intralot and, with respect to the AGLC, we are cooperating with IGT to offer access to their suite of casino games, an area in which they specialize, to the benefit of the offering. We expect to continue to see similar opportunities, including opportunities to provide our successful game portfolio in cooperation with other vendors to the benefit of the state lotteries.
Revenues by category of iLottery activity are as follows:
| | For the year ended December 31, | |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | U.S. dollars (in millions) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Turnkey contracts: | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | | 22.4 | | | | 21.8 | | | | 22.9 | |
Europe | | | 8.6 | | | | 7.9 | | | | 7.0 | |
Games: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North America | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Europe | | | 2.0 | | | | 1.7 | | | | 2.0 | |
Total royalties | | | 33.0 | | | | 31.4 | | | | 31.9 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Development and other services from Aspire | | | 0 | | | | 0.8 | | | | 1.6 | |
Development and other services from NPI | | | 4.3 | | | | 5.7 | | | | 7.6 | |
Development and other services from Michigan Joint Operation | | | 1.5 | | | | 1.4 | | | | 1.4 | |
Total Development and other services | | | 5.8 | | | | 7.9 | | | | 10.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Access to IP rights | | | 18.2 | | | | 14.2 | | | | 8.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | | 57.0 | | | | 53.5 | | | | 50.4 | |
Our iLottery Growth Strategy
Our iLottery growth strategy is built upon the following pillars:
| • | expanding the penetration of our existing customer contracts; |
| • | winning new turnkey contracts in the United States and additional jurisdictions such as Brazil, and possibly, Europe; |
| • | growing our game studio customer base; |
| • | expanding the scope of our existing customer contracts; |
| • | bringing our acquired portfolio of market proven solution in gaming aggregation and sport betting to our iLottery customers; |
| • | expanding our range of offerings and geographical presence; and |
| • | leveraging Aspire’s expertise in managed services into the iLottery industry. |
Increase iLottery Penetration within Existing Markets
Based on our performance in Michigan and Virginia, our prior experience in certain European markets and more recently the launch in Brazil, we believe there remains considerable room for growth above the current level of iLottery Penetration both globally as well as in the United States. Leveraging our operational expertise and technology, we plan to work closely with our customers to strengthen the reach of our offering in each market.
Increase Scope of Existing Customer Contracts
We have a modular product offering. Each of our agreements can include some or all of the products that we offer. We believe there is significant potential to offer additional products and feature enhancements, after a customer has engaged with us initially with respect to some of our products. For example, when we procured our contract with the VAL in 2015, we offered only online subscription for DBGs. However, in March 2020, following a change in legislation, the VAL chose to expand our contract to include both Instants and DBG offerings. The offering under the expanded contract launched in July 2020 and has an initial term through 2026 plus the option to extend for five additional years. An additional example would be the NCEL with which we launched our turnkey solution in 2019, and on March 6, 2024 we announced that we launched our market leading eInstants with the NCEL. Additionally, our acquisition of Aspire has allowed, and we believe will continue to allow, us to bring to our existing and future iLottery customers our acquired portfolio of market proven solution in gaming aggregation and sport betting. For example, we were awarded, through NPI, the contract with the AGLC in October 2019, in 2022 Pariplay, a leading content and aggregator provider, went live in Alberta, capturing a significant share of the casino tab wallet market, and in 2023 we also launched our complete solution for online sports betting in Alberta. Furthermore, we have integrated Pariplay into Sazka. A number of our contracts are in their early years and, as such, provide us ample time to expand the offerings we provide to our existing customers.
We have gained substantial knowledge about the iLottery and iGaming markets and their participants in the past decade through our operations in Europe and the United States, and our experience provides us with a deep understanding of the characteristics of iLottery and iGaming players, allowing us to customize our solutions to such players’ needs and interests.
Win New Contracts in the United States
We are a market leader in iLottery in the United States. With 66% market share of U.S. iLottery gross wagers as of Q4 2023 according to Eilers & Krejcik Gaming’s U.S. iLottery Tracker, our customers drive, with our technology solutions, games and services, a majority of U.S. iLottery GGR.
We continuously seek to expand our operations in the U.S. by securing new contracts. While lottery is offered in 45 states and the District of Columbia, iLottery Instants or DBGs are currently offered in only ten states and the District of Columbia (excluding states that offer only subscription-based iLottery). As a result, 70% of the U.S. population in states that offer lotteries do not currently have access to iLotteries.
Grow our Game Studio Customer Base
We intend to further expand our revenue base by offering our popular iLottery games to new customers who use the platforms of other iLottery providers. We currently operate eight contracts in Europe pursuant to which we only provide games, and following our most recent NPI agreement, we plan to expand this offering and pursue opportunities in the Instants space independently in the United States and Canada.
Expanding our Range of Offerings and Geographical Presence
We are currently focused on expanding our North American business to become the dominant iLottery provider in the market. In doing so, we invest our resources and expertise into building top-tier iLottery technology and content. With a history of successful iLottery offerings developed for the North American market, we have expanded our offerings to Sazka, the lottery operator in the Czech Republic, Europe and Intralot do Brasil, the lottery operator in Brazil’s second largest state of Minas Gerais where we have “first mover advantage”, and we believe we have the ability to expand our offerings around the world. While we are currently focused on the North American market, we may decide to pursue additional opportunities around the world in the future. Additionally, following the acquisition of Aspire, we intend to use the distribution of Aspire customers to reach and expand the Instants presence in markets in jurisdictions in which Aspire operates.
Our iGaming Solutions and Services
Aspire is a leading B2B-provider of iGaming solutions, offering companies everything they need to operate a successful iGaming brand, covering casino and sports. Aspire’s iGaming business comprises a technical platform, proprietary casino games, a proprietary sportsbook, a game aggregator and managed services. Aspire also distributes third-party and proprietary games and sportsbook to external partners, through the acquisitions of game-aggregator and game studio Pariplay in 2019 and of BtoBet, a sportsbook provider, in 2020. Aspire operates in over 30 regulated markets spanning Europe, America and Africa, including countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Denmark, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Ireland, Columbia and Mexico. Offices are located in Malta, Israel, Bulgaria, Ukraine, North Macedonia, India and Gibraltar. Aspire was founded in 2003 and was listed on Stockholm’s Nasdaq First North Premier Growth Market from 2017 until it was acquired by NeoGames.
On December 1, 2021, Aspire announced it had finalized the divestment of its B2C segment to the US-based group EBET, Inc. The divestment followed Aspire’s review of the B2C segment that was announced in March 2021. The B2C segment represents Aspire’s proprietary brands led by Karamba. The proprietary brands operated on the Aspire platform, side by side with B2B brands. Following the completion of the transaction, the B2C brands became platform partners to Aspire. The divestment of the B2C segment meant that Aspire became a purely B2B company with a continued strong focus on profitable growth.
iGaming Division Overview
Aspire provides the full range of B2B-services with a proprietary technical platform, proprietary casino games, a proprietary sportsbook, a game aggregator and managed services. Aspire can offer its various products independently from each other and also as a ‘one stop shop’ solution for iGaming operators – with more than 90% of revenues coming from taxed, locally regulated or soon to become regulated markets. The B2B-offering is targeted at casino and sports operators as well as land-based operators and experts in marketing such as affiliates and media companies, with strong brand awareness and the ability to generate large volumes of online traffic. Aspire can manage every aspect from regulation and compliance to payment processing, risk management, CRM, support and player value optimization, allowing operators to focus on marketing their brand and generating traffic.
Our iGaming business comprises three segments: Core, Games (Pariplay), and Sports (BtoBet).
| • | Core: Aspire Core allows operators to operate under their own local licenses or under Aspire’s licenses in numerous markets, with the license in Malta covering all .com markets. Joining Aspire provides operators with access to a large number of markets without having to apply, in most cases, for licenses of their own. Aspire’s platform partners have access to on-demand data analysis services in addition to a wide array of analytical tools that provide complete control of statistics and activity, such as data collection, daily report management, business intelligence, API gateway reports, back-office systems and real time data capabilities. The platform is continuously updated with new features relating to regulation and ongoing compliance. The in-house regulation and compliance team monitors all operations, conducts ongoing training and provides partners with regulatory updates and marketing guidelines for their jurisdictions. The platform itself can be used exclusively or combined with a wide range of managed services such as customer support, CRM tools and financial services. |
| • | Games (Pariplay): Founded in 2010, Aspire subsidiary Pariplay is a leading aggregator and content provider. Within the games segment, Aspire offers both a wide variety of proprietary games produced from an in-house studio as well as a wide array of third-party games from suppliers, all integrated into one API and single integration, accompanied by engagement and retention tools on the aggregation platform. See below “- Our Wizard Games Studio” and “- Our content Aggregator - Pariplay” for further details. |
| • | Sports (BtoBet): The acquisition of BtoBet, a leading sportsbook provider, in October 2020 was a major step in the creation of an offering that covers all the main elements of the B2B iGaming value chain. With the proprietary sportsbook, Aspire controls the IP in major elements of the value chain and can steer the complete roadmap. In addition, it also provides Aspire with great flexibility when it comes to adding new features and securing fast time to market. |
Our iGaming businesses serve European, American and African markets.
On December 10, 2021, it was announced that Aspire had signed an agreement to acquire 25% of bingo supplier BNG Investment Group Ltd with an option to acquire all of the shares in three- or five-years’ time, providing Aspire with an access to a real omni channel technology and a proprietary offering in one of the biggest verticals in the iGaming industry.
With the acquisition of Aspire, we now have an additional games studio, Pariplay’s “Wizard Games”, which focuses on developing content for traditional Slots. Wizard Games focuses on regulated markets and we believe it is currently one of the leading games studios in regulated Canadian and European markets. Wizard Games has dedicated management with years of experience serving other leading games studios. The fact that Wizard Games is part of the NeoGames group, which provides managed services including direct communication with players, allows the studio to better understand player behavior, including their likes and dislikes. This shared knowledge allows Wizard Games to produce better games. Wizard Games currently produces approximately 25 games per year and is able to learn from the Company’s extensive database in order to improve the quality of the games it produces.
Our Wizard Games studio offers more than 150 games in more than 30 regulated markets.
Our Content Aggregator – Pariplay
Operators seek to have unique offerings so as to differentiate themselves from other operators, which they do by constantly expanding their offerings with new and attractive content. Operators who wish to expand their offerings can either do so by directly integrating with each and every content provider, which entails large expenditures and technical challenges and may divert the operator’s attention from its players. Additionally, content providers are required in regulated markets to comply with dynamic regulation, which can often be challenging. Alternatively, operators can choose to integrate with a content aggregator.
Our content aggregation solution, Pariplay’s “Fusion”, allows operators to have access not only to our proprietary studio Wizard Games, but also to many other games studios, without the need to integrate them one by one. In addition to connecting operators to content providers, we have developed additional marketing layers on the aggregation level, making our free spins, tournaments and prize tools accessible to operators through our backend and enabling them to offer any promotional tool they want to any content provider.
Pariplay’s solution and the experience gained by operating in many regulated markets allows it to enter a new market and learn the market and the players preferences, and share such knowledge with the Company’s subsidiaries. We believe that Pariplay has large potential in unregulated markets that move to being regulated and, in already regulated markets, where such regulation is complex or onerous.
Our Sports Betting Solution
Sports betting is one of the largest verticals in online gaming and is typically the first regulated vertical once an unregulated market moves to being regulated. This means that sports betting is essential, especially for operators who wish to be active in regulated markets, since acquiring sports betting players may lead to such players participating in other games offered by the same operator, which increases player value for such operators.
In some markets, land-based operators seeking to be active in the online space also want to offer retail terminals (SSBTs), so as to provide their players an omni-channel experience.
Although BtoBet has a relatively short operating history, it is already active in many regulated markets and has positioned itself as a top supplier in Africa. In addition, BtoBet can already offer its SSBTs to operators who wish to make their offering available to retail customers. We believe that BtoBet is positioned to meet the growing demand for a good sport product in North America, both online and retail. For example, in September 2023 we went live at PlayAlberta.ca and replaced the former sport betting solution, and demonstrated better results.
We provide portal development services to more than 20 of our iGaming customers as well as mobile apps to 5 of our iGaming partners.
iGaming Competitive Landscape
Many countries are beginning to regulate iGaming and sport betting directly. Due to such moves, operators and suppliers are required to move from a global license to a local license in each and every jurisdiction within which they wish to operate. This move filters out gaming companies that do not elect the regulated path. In addition, the requirements imposed on gaming companies that elect to pursue local licenses are higher than the requirements of a global license. We elected, in each of our four business segments, to pursue and obtain as many local licenses as possible in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and our competition has been characterized by such election.
Competition in iGaming in regulated markets is localized. For example, BtoBet’s competitors are Kambi, BetRadar, OpenBet and SportNco, while Pariplay’s Games studio competitors are Netent, Red Tiger, Light & Wonder, IGT and Playtech and in the aggregation business Pariplay faces competition from Light & Wonder, Relax Gaming, Games Global and EveryMatrix. Aspire, as a provider of solutions that combine a platform games and sport, faces competition from platform providers that also offer similar services, including Playtech, EveryMatrix, GIG and GAN. We also see companies that offer only a platform competing against us in some jurisdictions, but we question the long-term viability of that business model.
Our Competitive Strengths in iGaming
We believe we have the following competitive strengths:
| • | Our operational experience – our experience running a successful B2C business and our track record of providing managed services to more than 30 operators have put us in a position where we have both the experience and confidence required to provide our services on a larger scale. |
| • | Scale of our PAM – our PAM serves some of the largest operators in the world, both in the iLottery as well as the iGaming businesses. Our strong track record allows us to attract large operators, which tend to engage with companies that already have experience handling big data in real time, as well as attract smaller operators. |
| • | Our geographical presence – our presence in many regulated markets provides us the ability to formulate appropriate work procedures that allow us to meet the different demands imposed by local regulators. Following the launch of our first product in any regulated market, we are able to prepare the infrastructure for the entry and launch of our other products services. |
| • | Owning most of the value chain – operators, whether land-based or operating online, prefer nowadays more than before to engage with a single supplier that can offer and provide them everything that they need for them to operate successfully. This provides them advantages both from integration and product perspectives as well as financially. Our iGaming services provide fast access to markets and allow operators to focus on marketing and operations instead of administrative or technical aspects. |
Revenues by category of iGaming activity are as follows:
| | For the year ended December 31, 2023 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. dollars (in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | 56.7 | | | | 43.9 | | | | 34.0 | | | | - | | | | 134.6 | |
Revenues (inter-segment) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Our iGaming Growth Strategy
Our turnkey solutions growth strategy is comprised of:
| • | Increasing volume of our existing operators - our iGaming division has more than 100 operators/customers. We aim to improve our offering to them by opening new markets, increasing content and improving their players’ data value. We have dedicated partner success managers that work closely with these operators, and these dedicated partner success managers seek to assist the operators grow their business with us. |
| • | Expanding to new markets – our iGaming division is present in more than 30 regulated markets, and we continuously seek to enter additional regulated markets, which offers our local and international operators the opportunity to start their business or expand it. Given that regulated markets usually limit the number of active operators, our operators may face less competition than in a non-regulated market. |
| • | Adding marketing tools to our existing products – we believe that having a product live in a brand is not enough. In a saturated environment such as the iGaming industry, operators look for added value for their players. By providing additional, unique and, in some jurisdictions, proprietary marketing tools, we believe that our operators don’t have to wait long before they start seeing returns on their investment, which allows them to continually grow their business. |
| • | Expanding our proprietary product offering - operating in a regulated market requires operators to be fast and creative as well as seek to differentiate its offering from others, while maintaining a pricing model that makes their business more sustainable. Therefore, we continuously seek to increase our offerings to operators. |
Our content aggregation growth strategy is comprised of:
| • | integrating to as many operators as possible in the majority of regulated gaming markets, and specifically to the top three operators in each such market; |
| • | increasing the mix of our proprietary content; and |
| • | providing engagement features and functionality. |
Our sports betting growth strategy is comprised of:
| • | entering the North American market with our sports betting offering; and |
| • | expanding to additional markets in Latin America. |
Benefits of Combining iLottery and iGaming
The combination of NeoGames and Aspire has resulted in a well-diversified iLottery, digital sports betting and casino B2B leader in the global gaming marketplace and provides customers full turnkey technology solutions with respect to their iLottery, digital sports betting and casino offerings. The combined Company has a true global presence, servicing customers in more than twenty U.S. states, over fifteen countries throughout Europe, as well as operations throughout high growth regions such as Latin America and Africa.
The fact that both companies share a common origin and a common technology foundation, we believe, allows us to benefit from revenue synergies efficiently. These shared roots also mean that both companies share important cultural and management values which again smoothens the transitional period.
NeoGames believes the combination of NeoGames and Aspire results in the following benefits to the combined business:
Technology and Product Offering Enhancements Elevating the Go-To-Market Strategy
As lotteries around the world are seeking comprehensive turn-key solutions that include iLottery, online sports betting and iGaming products and services, we believe that the ability to provide a complete end-to-end solution is becoming an increasingly important consideration for lotteries around the world when selecting platform and content providers. The combination of iLottery, online sports betting and iGaming creates a comprehensive product offering that enables us to compete and win contracts in markets where lotteries operate sports betting and iGaming, providing additional revenue opportunities. Furthermore, the combination enhances our ability to address all aspects of our customers’ needs in-house, reducing the requirement for third party solutions.
Provides Strategic Opportunities to Accelerate and Diversify Growth
NeoGames’ positioning in the U.S. as a leading iLottery platform provider, with technology platforms that are deployed and operational in over twenty U.S. states across lotteries and gaming, could further facilitate and accelerate Aspire’s entry into the growing U.S. market. Further, Aspire’s online sports betting and iGaming operating capabilities with experience operating outside of the U.S. could assist NeoGames to establish a presence in the sports betting and iGaming verticals in emerging high growth regions, such as Latin America and Africa.
For example, we marked our entry into the Brazilian market with the announcement in June 2022 of a multi-year turnkey project with Intralot do Brasil, the lottery operator in Brazil’s second largest state of Minas Gerais, offering an end-to-end solution of iLottery and online sports betting. The agreement is the Company’s first lottery integration with BtoBet, the sports betting solution gained as part of the Aspire acquisition.
Diversified Revenue Streams and Improved Growth Profile
Aspire’s complementary online sports betting and iGaming offering diversifies NeoGames’ revenue streams, both geographically and by product. NeoGames will be able to pursue sports and gaming initiatives globally for lottery customers and enter into the adjacent TAMs of online sports betting and online gaming. Together, NeoGames and Aspire operate across three continents globally. Combining the power of the global reach with a comprehensive product offering, which brings efficient product development and faster new market launches, NeoGames believes meaningful revenue synergies could be realized over the long term. NeoGames believes that the combined product offering will better position the Company to win contracts in markets that were previously inaccessible.
Additionally, reducing third party costs and fees, eliminating duplicative public company costs, aligning of research and development activities and a reduction in general and administrative costs could potentially create cost synergies over time.
Committed to Continued Profitable Growth
Both NeoGames and Aspire have operated separately as high growth and profitable entities for a number of years. The combination of the companies, which we believe will result in reduced reliance on third party vendors and improved margins, increased TAM and growth profile, is expected to lead to additional opportunities to accelerate growth and to further expand already strong margins.
Enhanced Management Expertise
The combined company is led and supported by the market-leading capabilities of an experienced, joint management team. Having worked together successfully in the past, NeoGames’ and Aspire’s management teams represent a strong cultural fit as each focus on innovation and a customer-centric approach to their respective markets and products.
Our quarterly results of operations may vary as a result of seasonal fluctuations during periods such as holidays and weather conditions, during which users spend increased time on entertainment, including games and mobile applications, which increases our customers’ usage of our advertising network and other solutions and may impact our revenue. We may also experience fluctuations due to factors that may be outside of our control that drive usage up or down. While we believe that this seasonality has affected and will continue to affect our quarterly results, our rapid growth has largely masked seasonal trends to date. Further, as our revenue from quarter-to-quarter is dependent on various factors including external factors outside our control, it is difficult to isolate the impact of these seasonal trends on our business and there can be no assurance that these patterns will continue.
Sports betting is however subject to seasonal fluctuations that may impact our revenues and cash flows. Most major sports leagues and events do not operate year-round and our operations will be impacted by variations in the sports calendar over the course of a given year. In particular, certain sports leagues operate formats (playoffs, championships, cup finals, etc.) that naturally result in increased customer interest as the end of the season approaches for those sports. Similarly, certain sporting events only operate at specific times of the year (e.g. major tennis tournaments) and certain other events only operate on a multi-year cycle (Olympics, FIFA World Cup, UEFA Nations League, etc.). The majority of our sports betting revenues are generated during the major leagues’ seasons in the respective countries we serve, and we will continue to experience this effect on revenues from sports betting also in new markets that we enter.
We currently own most of the intellectual property required for our operations and use the remainder of the intellectual property required for our operations through a perpetual, assignable license.
We have obtained rights to use intellectual property of third parties through licenses and service agreements with those third parties. Although we believe these licenses are sufficient for the current operation of the Company, such licenses typically limit our use of the third parties’ intellectual property to specific uses and for specific time periods. We believe that we have the personnel needed to manage and adapt our intellectual property as necessary to support our business operations.
Most of our intellectual property is in the form of rights in software code and trade secrets that we use in the operation of our iLottery and iGaming offerings and related services, as well as registered and unregistered trademarks. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws in the United States, Europe and other jurisdictions, as well as license agreements and other contractual protections, to protect our proprietary technology. We also protect our intellectual property rights by implementing a policy that requires our employees and independent contractors involved in development of intellectual property to enter into agreements acknowledging that all intellectual property generated or conceived by them on our behalf are our property, and assigning to us any rights that they may claim or otherwise have in those works or property, to the extent allowable under applicable law. Our confidential information is protected by a combination of information security systems and non-disclosure agreements with third parties, including our employees and independent contractors.
Our agreements with business partners and lotteries to which we provide our iLottery and iGaming offerings and services contain provisions safeguarding our rights to our intellectual property.
After having acquired Aspire in 2022, we have added casino games and sports betting services to our group’s operations. These areas come with additional challenges. iGaming in the United States and certain markets in Europe, the provision of PAM module, and operation of lotteries in the United States and internationally are subject to extensive regulation.
Although certain features of a lottery (such as the limited number of lotteries, the percentage of gross sales that must be paid back to players in prize money and the allocation of revenues generated from gross sales) are usually set by legislation, lottery regulatory authorities (and, occasionally, the lottery corporation itself) generally exercise significant discretion, including with respect to the determination of the types of games played, the price of each wager, the manner in which the lottery is marketed and the selection of suppliers of equipment, technology and services, and retailers of lottery products.
To ensure the integrity of contract awards and lottery operations, most U.S. jurisdictions require detailed background disclosure on a continuous basis from, and conduct background investigations of, vendors and their officers, directors, subsidiaries, affiliates and principal stockholders. Background investigations of the vendors’ employees who will be directly responsible for the operation of lottery systems are also occasionally conducted and most states reserve the right to require the removal of employees who they deem to be unsuitable or whose presence they believe may adversely affect the operational security or integrity of the lottery. Certain jurisdictions also require extensive personal and financial disclosure and background checks from persons and entities that hold (either legally, beneficially or through voting rights) a specified percentage (typically five percent or more) of a vendor’s securities. Although most jurisdictions provide that “institutional investors” (as defined by a particular jurisdiction) can seek a waiver of these requirements, the granting of such a waiver may be conditioned on a regulatory investigation designed to ascertain that the applicant meets the definition of “institutional investor.”
The failure of our officers, directors and holders of our Ordinary Shares to submit to background checks and provide such disclosure could result in the imposition of penalties and could jeopardize the award of a contract to us or provide grounds for termination of an existing contract. Generally, any person or entity who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within the prescribed period after being advised by a competent authority that such person or entity is required to do so may be found unsuitable or denied a license, as applicable. If any director, officer, employee or significant shareholder is found unsuitable (including due to the failure to submit required documentation) by a competent regulator or authority, we may deem it necessary, or be required, to sever our relationship with such person or entity.
Furthermore, we may be subject to disciplinary action or our licenses may be in peril if, after we receive notice that a person or entity is unsuitable, we (i) pay that person or entity any dividend or interest upon our Ordinary Shares, (ii) allow that person or entity to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through Ordinary Shares held by that person or entity, (iii) pay remuneration in any form to that person or entity for services rendered or otherwise, or (iv) fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person or entity to relinquish its Ordinary Shares.
Subject to all applicable law and regulation, our articles of association provide for the suspension of certain rights attached to our Ordinary Shares that are held by unsuitable shareholders and the disposal of any of our Ordinary Shares owned or controlled by an unsuitable person or its affiliates by transfer to one or more third-party transferees. If such unsuitable person fails to dispose of our Ordinary Shares within the required period of time, we may in good faith dispose (or procure the disposal) of such Ordinary Shares to a designated third party at the highest price reasonably attainable or, subject to applicable law and regulation and our articles of association, acquire such Ordinary Shares by way of a redemption. Due to related licensing requirements, one of our founding shareholders has recently reduced his ownership stake in the Company. Should a shareholder fail to comply with regulatory requirements, and should the Company fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such compliance, we may face disciplinary action in the applicable jurisdiction or our licenses in such jurisdiction may be in peril.
The awarding of lottery contracts and ongoing operations of lotteries in international jurisdictions is also extensively regulated, although international regulations typically vary from those prevailing in the United States and tend to focus more on the vendor and its senior management, rather than on individual shareholders.
There are risks involved with the offering of our iGaming services under the umbrella of Aspire’s and Pariplay’s Maltese license, which allows for the offering of services on an offshore basis in various countries in which Aspire operates. This interpretation of the reach of the Maltese license in certain jurisdictions is occasionally at odds with the interpretation given to local laws by local regulators.
In addition, there has been recently an increase in civil litigation claims in Austria (and, to a lesser extent, Germany and the Netherlands) against operators who service the area using their offshore licenses, and the continued provision of services in these jurisdictions is currently under review. Austrian players are bringing about civil claims against operators who offer online casino games under the auspice of their offshore licenses, claiming such companies are operating without a proper license. Despite the contradiction with EU law in this area, Austrian courts are often ruling in favor of such players. As such, we are utilizing measures to reduce the risk in this area.
The addition of casino games and sports betting to our repertoire is also subject to the ongoing regulatory framework changes in Germany. Federal sports betting licenses and casino licenses are subject to a new regime change. As such, Aspire has obtained a local license in Germany in order to comply with this new regime.
In the United Kingdom, licensees (such as Aspire and GMS Entertainment Limited) are required to hold white label partners responsible for complying with local laws and regulations. Such requirements extend to areas of AML, advertising regulations and responsible gambling regulations. In the UK, extensive regulation is set in place in order to protect players in these areas. We are working to constantly improve our due diligence process on business partners and take various steps to assure our compliance with local regulations. Licensees also undergo periodical compliance assessment processes by the United Kingdom Gaming Commission (“UKGC”), intended to ensure the licensees are compliant with local laws and regulations.
On November 23, 2022, Aspire reached the conclusion of its license review by the UKGC, which identified certain shortcomings in the system of controls it uses to monitor risks associated with its relationship with its partners. Aspire cooperated with the UKGC throughout the investigation and took immediate corrective steps to address the identified failings. Aspire has received a warning and has agreed to pay a financial penalty of £237,600.
Aspire underwent a periodical compliance assessment by the UKGC in 2023. The UKGC noted preliminary deficiencies in such assessment and Aspire has been working inter alia with the UKGC on a remediation plan. Given the premature stage of the proceeding, the Company’s management cannot accurately estimate the outcome of thereof.
Social Responsibility and Responsible Gaming
We are committed to the integration of corporate social responsibility within our businesses, supporting the continued generation of sustainable value and enhancing our ability to deliver on its strategic objectives. We believe that our true value is reflected not simply by our balance sheet but through our intangible assets such as goodwill, our people and our reputation. As a leader in the iLottery and iGaming industries, we take our responsibilities to our customers and regulators seriously and are focused on cooperating with both on issues of responsible gambling. We provide our customers with robust solutions that facilitate responsible gaming for players, including embedded systems that assist in promoting a safe playing environment for all. By embracing policies and behaviors governing social responsibility, we create more valuable relationships with our stakeholders by demonstrating our focus on managing environmental and social risks in the business.
Our responsible gaming platform features include:
| • | Advanced self-management module, which enables players to define their responsible gaming limits within a wide range of parameters; |
| • | Operator-controlled module, which enables lottery customers to define and enforce policies and limitations on their players; and |
| • | Application programming interface, which connects to government and other gaming databases to provide in-game alerts to remind players to play responsibly. |
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings related to claims arising out of our operations. Other than as described above in “—Regulation” and as detailed below, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, including any such proceedings that are pending or threatened, of which we are aware.
On September 17, 2020, Aspire entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “BtoBet SPA”) with Eltsar Limited and Sousa Enterprises Limited (the “BtoBet Sellers”). Pursuant to the BtoBet SPA, the BtoBet Sellers sold their shares in BtoBet Limited to Aspire, for a consideration that was partially contingent (the “BtoBet Earnout Consideration”). The BtoBet Earnout Consideration was determined by the management at €8.2 million, and a notice regarding such determination was served on the BtoBet Sellers in March 2023. An additional provision of approximately €2 million was recorded in the purchase price allocation in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For additional information, see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. In February 2024, the Company concluded an expert determination procedure with the BtoBet Sellers regarding the BtoBet Earnout Consideration, in which it was determined that the Company shall pay an amount of €9.7 million in satisfaction of the BtoBet Earnout Consideration. The amount was paid on March 4, 2024.
Separately from the above claim, on September 5, 2023 the BtoBet Sellers filed a claim against Aspire for the amount of EUR 36,489,094.73 with the English Commercial Court in London (the “BtoBet Claim”), asserting breach of the BtoBet SPA as well as fraudulent behavior. Aspire filed a response firmly rejecting the BtoBet Claim and denying any liability. The BtoBet Claim is currently pending.
EBET, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“EBET”) and Aspire entered into certain agreements on October 1, 2021, under which Aspire sold to EBET Aspire’s B2C business, for a consideration of EUR 65,000,000 (the “EBET Sale Agreement”). On September 28, 2023, EBET filed a claim in Clark County, Nevada, against Aspire, alleging that Aspire breached the EBET Sale Agreement and acted in a fraudulent manner in the inducement to acquire the B2C business, and seeks compensation for rescission damages, in an amount of EUR 65 million, general damages in an amount of US$ 15 thousand, and punitive damages and other certain unspecified amounts. Aspire rejects EBET’s claims and filed several preliminary motions regarding change of venue and other matters, which are in line with the parties’ signed agreements. This claim is still pending. On February 23, 2024, EBET filed a motion for leave to amend its complaint, among other things, to add NeoGames S.A. and NeoGames Connect Limited as new defendants. In addition, on February 27, 2024, the Magistrate Judge heard arguments on the motion for stay and entered a stay of discovery until the Court has decided whether or not the case should proceed in arbitration. On March 15, 2024, NeoGames filed an opposition to EBET’s motion for leave to amend its complaint, to which EBET responded on March 26, 2024 by filing a reply in further support of its motion for leave to file an amended complaint.
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 221 employees located in Israel, 14 employees located in the United States, 137 employees located in Malta, 114 employees located in Bulgaria, 166 employees located in North Macedonia, and additional 59 team members spread across other EU Member States. Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, the Company had 43 dedicated contractors located in India, and 381 dedicated contractors and employees hired by our Ukrainian subsidiaries, of which, approximately 112 and a total of 118 left Ukraine to neighboring countries prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and as of December 31, 2023, respectively.
Our goal is to attract and retain highly qualified and motivated personnel. We also engage contractors to support our efforts. None of our employees and service providers are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good and we have never experienced a work stoppage.
We are committed to maintaining a working environment in which diversity and equality of opportunity are actively promoted and all unlawful discrimination is not tolerated. We are committed to ensuring employees are treated fairly and are not subjected to unfair or unlawful discrimination. We value diversity and to that end recognize the educational and business benefits of diversity amongst our employees, applicants and other people with whom we have dealings.
4.C. Organizational Structure
The legal name of our company is NeoGames S.A., and we are organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. For a broader perspective of our global reach, see below for an overview of our corporate structure.
NeoGames Corporate Structure
For a list of our significant subsidiaries, please refer to Exhibit 8.1 to this Annual Report.
4.D. Property, Plants and Equipment
The Company has an office in Tel Aviv, Israel, where it leases approximately 27,200 square feet of office space. The lease for this facility was extended for five years commencing on April 15, 2022 and will automatically extend for an additional five years unless we terminate it upon prior notice. A large part of our development team is located in Kyiv, Ukraine. To serve our team in Ukraine, we lease office space in the area of approximately 2,092 square feet. The lease for this facility will expire on July 31, 2032. The Company also leases office space, mostly for short terms, in Ukraine, Poland, Malta, Bulgaria, India, Gibraltar and Macedonia. NPI serves our iLottery customers in North America through an office space of approximately 18,100 square feet in Lansing, Michigan, USA. This facility is leased by Pollard iLottery Inc., and because it is used solely for the benefit of the operations of NPI and the MSL, the Company participates in 50% of its monthly costs. The lease for this facility will expire on March 31, 2027.
Shortly prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the Company’s wholly-owned Ukrainian subsidiary, NeoGames Ukraine, entered into an agreement for the renovation and long-term leasing of facilities in Kyiv to serve as a development hub for the Company. Pursuant to such agreement, the Company has prepaid approximately $490,000, to facilitate the construction and renovation project. This project has been put on hold until the situation in the region has stabilized and it becomes possible to continue the renovation plans.
We believe that our current facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the near future and that suitable additional or alternative space will be available on commercially reasonable terms to accommodate our foreseeable future operations.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” The discussion of our operating and financial review and prospects for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, can be found in Part I, Item 5. of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on April 28, 2023.
Our Company
We are a technology-driven innovator and a global leader of iLottery and iGaming solutions and services for regulated lotteries and gaming operators, offering our customers a full-service suite of solutions, including proprietary technology platforms, a sportsbook platform, two dedicated game studios with an extensive portfolio of engaging games – one in lottery and one in casino games, and a range of value-added services.
As a global B2G and B2B technology and service provider to state lotteries and other lottery and gaming operators, we offer our customers a full-service solution that includes all of the elements required for the offering of lottery and casino games, including Instants and DBGs, and sportsbook solution via personal computers, smartphones and handheld devices. These elements include technology platforms, a range of value-added services and game studios with a large portfolio of games. The value-added services that we offer facilitate various aspects of the iLottery and iGaming offering including regulation and compliance, payment processing, risk management, player relationship management and player value optimization. Our complete solution allows our customers to enjoy the benefits of marketing their brands and generating traffic to their iLottery and iGaming sales channels.
NeoGames was established as an independent company in 2014, following a spin-off from Aspire, a B2C and B2B service provider in the iGaming industry. Prior to the spin-off from Aspire, our management team was responsible for the iLottery business of Aspire, which derived the majority of its revenues from the sale of iLottery games to various lotteries in Europe. In 2014, we began to focus on the U.S. iLottery market, which opened in 2012 with the introduction of online lottery ticket sales in Illinois. In order to access this significant market opportunity, we partnered with Pollard, one of the leading vendors to the global lottery industry. In 2014, we signed our first turnkey solution contract in the United States with the MSL, as a sub-contractor to Pollard.
In July 2014 we formed NPI, a joint venture with Pollard, for the purpose of identifying, pursuing, winning and executing iLottery contracts in the North American lottery market. NPI combines the Company’s technology and iLottery business and operational experience with Pollard’s infrastructure, administrative capabilities and relationships with lotteries in North America. NPI is managed by an executive board of four members, consisting of two members appointed by NeoGames and two members appointed by Pollard. NPI has its own general manager and dedicated workforce and operates as a separate entity. However, it relies on NeoGames and Pollard for certain services, such as technology development, business operations and support services from NeoGames and corporate services, including legal, banking and certain human resources services, from Pollard.
Since its inception, NPI has secured iLottery contracts with the VAL, the NHL (as a sub-contractor to Intralot), the NCEL, the AGLC, the ALC, the Georgia Lottery and the West Virginia Lottery. All of our iLottery business in North America has been conducted through NPI, except in Michigan, where the contract is between the MSL and Pollard and we support the Michigan iLottery as a subcontractor of Pollard. However, pursuant to the January 2023 Agreements the Company may pursue future iLottery opportunities in the North American market independently from Pollard. We continue to conduct all of our business outside of North America through NeoGames.
Our Acquisition by Aristocrat
For information on our acquisition by Aristocrat, see Item 4.A. “History and Development of the Company – Selected Recent Developments – our Acquisition by Aristocrat.”
Aspire Acquisition
On June 14, 2022, we completed a tender offer to acquire the shares of Aspire (the “Aspire Tender Offer”), and on August 11, 2022 we completed a squeeze out procedure for the remaining outstanding shares, after which we now own 100% of Aspire. The consideration paid by us for Aspire shares was SEK 111.00 per Aspire share with respect to 50% of Aspire shares, and 0.320 NeoGames ordinary shares (in the form of Swedish Depository Receipts of the Company (“SDRs”)) for the remaining 50% of Aspire shares. The acquisition was funded through a combination of newly issued NeoGames ordinary shares and cash. We issued 7,604,015 ordinary shares (in the form of SDRs), and we also paid approximately $267.2 million (equivalent to SEK 2.64 billion) in cash. To partially fund the cash portion of the offer, we obtained fully committed debt financing from funds and accounts managed, advised or sub-advised by Blackstone Alternative Credit Advisors LP and/or its affiliates, consisting of a €187.7 million (approximately $198 million) term loan. The term loan, along with a €13.1 million (approximately $13.8 million) overfund facility, has a six-year maturity and bears interest at a rate of EURIBOR plus 6.25 percent per annum. See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report and Item 5.B. “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing for the Acquisition of Aspire”.
Since the completion of the acquisition we have been working to integrate Aspire into our business and to utilize efficiencies and realize synergies between the two companies. For example, following the acquisition we have been able to bring aggregation services, sports betting and managed services to our customers, and expanding lotteries to iGaming and sports betting. In addition, the acquisition allowed us to add complementary offerings to our product mix, consolidate functions and utilize economies of scale.
Our Customer Contracts
The core of our iLottery business model is our turnkey solution, which is our main iLottery revenue generator. Turnkey contracts generate long-term revenue streams that we believe we can increase over time, as in Michigan, to provide a strong return on investment.
We currently have, directly and through Pollard, Intralot and NPI, contracts to provide a turnkey solution to the MSL, the VAL, the NHL, the NCEL, the AGLC and Sazka and generate revenues from all these contracts. Our turnkey solution for the Michigan iLottery launched in August 2014, followed by our turnkey solution for Sazka, which launched in 2017. Our turnkey solutions for the NHL and NCEL were launched in September 2018 and October 2019, respectively, the VAL after a 2015 launch of an e-subscription program for DBG began operating a full iLottery program in July 2020 and our turnkey solution for the AGLC launched on September 30, 2020. The MSL Agreement was extended from December 2020 through July 2026. In 2022, we announced the entry into an agreement with the ALC for the provision of access to our game studio library of content through NPI, and a game content agreement with the Georgia Lottery. On June 28, 2022, we announced the entrance into a multi-year turnkey project with Intralot do Brasil, the lottery operator in Brazil’s second largest state of Minas Gerais. The agreement marks the Company’s entry into the Brazilian market with an end-to-end solution of iLottery and online sports betting. The agreement was the Company’s first cooperation with BtoBet, the sports betting solution it acquired as part of the Aspire acquisition. In August 2023, we have been awarded an agreement with the West Virginia Lottery to provide a full turn-key iLottery program, and in November 2023 the NCEL added the Company’s market leading eInstants to its offerings.
In addition to our long-term turnkey contracts, NeoGames currently has eleven confirmed games contracts with fifteen European customers, and we believe that we will secure additional games contracts in the future and that our revenues from games contracts will become a more significant part of our overall revenues, positively impacting our profitability.
For the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021, we generated 9.5%, 8.6% and 15.8% of our revenues, respectively, from our contracts with William Hill, which were assumed by and assigned to Caesars on June 30, 2022.
Our revenues from North America represented 24.3% and 26.1% of our revenues in the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
For our iGaming business model, we are a leading B2B provider of iGaming solutions to a wide variety of partners, ranging from tier 1 operators to start-ups. A significant portion of our customers are marketing companies specializing in “smart” on-line marketing, mostly in European markets and aiming to expand to Latin America. We offer everything a company needs to operate a successful iGaming brand, including casino and sports betting. The revenues we generate from our iGaming partners are from four separate streams: a fixed set-up fee, a mark-up on supplier services, a share of adjusted net gaming revenues and royalty payments.
Factors Affecting our Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Our financial condition and results of operations have been, and will continue to be, affected by a number of important factors, including those discussed below and in Item 3.D. “Risk Factors” of the Annual Report.
iLottery Penetration
The iLottery Penetration in each of the markets where we provide our turnkey solution varies and is dependent on a number of factors, including the range of iLottery products provided, the acceptable forms of payments and iLottery marketing budgets. The level of iLottery Penetration in any market where we operate has a direct impact on our or NPI’s revenues and any increase in iLottery Penetration is expected to increase such revenues.
Liberalization of lotteries in the United States
Lottery is a highly regulated industry. While lottery is offered in 45 states and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, iLottery Instants or DBGs are currently offered in only ten states and the District of Columbia (excluding states that offer only subscription-based iLottery), though the West Virginia Lottery scheduled to launch an iLottery in the third quarter of 2024. Expanding our business into additional U.S. states is an important part of our growth strategy and it is our belief that the growing credibility and brand awareness of certain iLottery platform and service providers, the demonstrated success of states with iLottery offerings and the increasing budgetary shortfalls in many U.S. states will accelerate the pace of deregulation and increase our growth potential.
The level of competition in the iLottery industry and the number of competitors
The iLottery industry is less exposed to new market entrants than other gambling markets due to the considerable barriers to entry imposed by government regulations and the need for unique and iLottery-tailored technology solutions. There is, however, intense competition among the few existing iLottery providers with respect to new iLottery contracts. We compete both for contracts to supply our turnkey solution and for contracts to supply our games.
The level of competition and number of competitors in our market is an important factor affecting our ability to win new contracts and to expand our business.
Operating jurisdictions for iGaming business
Our iGaming business is concentrated on winning market share in regulated markets, which are currently limited in number. If more jurisdictions, mainly in the EU and across the U.S. decide to permit regulated gaming activities and operations through a licensing model, we believe that our experience and scale, as demonstrated by our social responsibility practices and existing relationships with gaming regulators, will allow us to present a compelling product suite coupled with experience and knowledge in operating in regulated gaming markets. That being said, regulated markets would normally be expected to generate lower operating margins due to taxation and product and other certification requirements, as well as greater platform customization required to meet regulatory requirements.
Intense competition in the B2B landscape in the U.S. iGaming market
We face significant competition in the evolving iGaming industry, especially in the U.S. market. Moreover, given that industry leaders control their own tech stack, the competition for the remaining contracts is very substantial. We compete on the basis of the content, features, quality, functionality, accuracy, reliability, innovation and price of our iGaming technology solutions, games and related operational services. We believe that we provide a unique solution for iGaming, offering a wide variety of B2B services, unique proprietary tools and a proprietary Sportsbook platform, which enables our partners to focus on marketing and player acquisitions. However, our competitors may be able to provide similar or superior solutions, and some of our competitors and potential competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources (including human resources) or experience than we do, which could limit our ability to contract with additional operators.
Reportable Segments
Since the Aspire acquisition was completed on June 14, 2022, we have managed our operations through four reportable segments: NeoGames, which represents all of our iLottery and related operations, and the following three reportable segments constituting our iGaming division with Aspire: Core, Games (Pariplay), and Sports (BtoBet).
| | For the year ended December 31, 2023 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | U.S. dollars (in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | 56,980 | | | | 56,728 | | | | 43,879 | | | | 33,951 | | | | - | | | | 191,538 | |
Revenues (inter-segment) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company’ share in profit of Joint Venture and associate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Segment results | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
iLottery Segment
iLottery segment revenues increased 6.3% for the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, mainly due to continued positive growth trend across most major accounts, as well as a jackpot runs during 2023. The segment profit increased to $45.1 million due to increase in revenues and operational efficiencies.
Core Segment
Aspire Core segment revenues contributed $56.7 million for the year ended on December 31, 2023.
Aspire Core allows operators to operate either under their own local licenses or under Aspire’s licenses in numerous markets. Aspire’s platform partners have access to on-demand data analysis services in addition to a variety of analytical tools. The platform is frequently updated with new features relating to regulation and ongoing compliance. The in-house regulation and compliance team monitors operations, conducts ongoing training and provides partners with regulatory updates and marketing guidelines for their jurisdictions. The platform itself can be used exclusively or combined with a wide range of managed services, such as customer support, CRM tools and financial services.
Aspire has been working with its partners using revenue sharing arrangements. In arrangements wherein Aspire is the principal in the transaction, revenue is recognized on a gross basis and the third-party revenue portion related to the sale is recognized within distribution expenses as royalties. Conversely, in arrangements wherein the Company acts as an agent between the customer and the vendor, revenue is recognized net of costs.
In most arrangements through December 31, 2023, the Company was the agent. To determine whether Aspire is an agent or principal, management considers whether Aspire obtains control of the services or products before they are transferred to the customer. In making this evaluation, several factors are considered, most notably whether we have primary responsibility for fulfillment to the customer, what is the degree of our control of services and products, as well as pricing discretion.
After the sale of its B2C segment in 2021 and related value proposition, Aspire has been working with the majority of its partners to transition to them the respective B2C capabilities. Since January 1, 2023, Aspire changed the related legal terms of partner contracts, allowing a substantial degree of control of the services or products to its partners. Thus, since then, Aspire has reported revenues from the majority of its arrangements on a net basis.
Games (Pariplay)
Games segment has two growing product lines, proprietary content (“Wizard”) and aggregation service (“Fusion”), primarily driven by expansion of Pariplay into the North American regulated gaming market and expansion of content and aggregation services with our primary existing partners. Total segment revenues for the year ending on December 31, 2023 were $56.9 million, of which $13.0 million constitute sales to internal group segments.
Sports (BtoBet)
BtoBet is a sportsbook provider with a proprietary sportsbook. In addition, BtoBet provides us and other group companies with flexibility when it comes to adding new features and securing fast time to market. BtoBet segment revenues contributed $34.5 million for the year ended on December 31, 2023, of which $0.6 million constitute sales to internal group segments.
Non-IFRS Information
This Annual Report includes E(L)BIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, which are financial measures not presented in accordance with IFRS that we use to supplement our results presented in accordance with IFRS. We define “E(L)BIT” as net profit (loss), plus income taxes, and interest and finance-related expenses. We define “EBITDA” as E(L)BIT, plus depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA, plus business combination related expenses, share-based compensation and the Company’s share in NPI depreciation and amortization.
We believe E(L)BIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful in evaluating our operating performance, as they are similar to measures reported by other public companies in our industry and are regularly used by security analysts, institutional investors and others in analyzing operating performance and prospects. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a substitute for any IFRS financial measure and, as calculated, may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of performance of other companies in other industries or within the same industry.
We include these non-IFRS financial measures because they are used by our management to evaluate our operating performance and trends and to make strategic decisions regarding the allocation of capital and new investments. E(L)BIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA exclude certain expenses that are required in accordance with IFRS because they are non-cash or are not associated with the operational activity of the business.
The following table reconciles our E(L)BIT, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to our net income (loss), the closest IFRS measure, for the periods indicated:
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net (loss) income | | $ | (18,277 | ) | | $ | (18,965 | ) | | $ | 4,652 | |
Income tax expenses | | | 4,158 | | | | 1,546 | | | | 325 | |
Finance expenses | | | 24,778 | | | | 15,105 | | | | 6,312 | |
| | | 10,659 | | | | (2,314 | ) | | | 11,289 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 55,940 | | | | 35,611 | | | | 14,613 | |
EBITDA | | | 66,599 | | | | 33,297 | | | | 25,902 | |
Business combination related expenses | | | 6,477 | | | | 17,984 | | | | 3,841 | |
Share-based compensation | | | 2,910 | | | | 2,994 | | | | 3,448 | |
Company share of NPI depreciation and amortization(1) | | $ | 212 | | | | 222 | | | | 193 | |
Adjusted EBITDA | | $ | 76,198 | | | $ | 54,497 | | | $ | 33,384 | |
(1) Represents 50% of NPI’s depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 of $423,000, $445,000 and $385,000, respectively. In accordance with IFRS, NeoGames’ share of NPI’s expense is not recorded in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), but is rather reflected in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the equity method, as we share in 50% of the profit (loss) of NPI. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Components of Results of Operations
Revenues
We generate revenues from our B2B iGaming solutions offered through Aspire, iLottery turnkey solutions and games, contract with Caesars, joint operation of the Michigan iLottery for the MSL (the “Michigan Joint Operation”) and development services we provide to NPI.
The iGaming revenues we generate are from four separate streams: a fixed set-up fee, a mark-up on supplier services, a share of adjusted net gaming revenues and royalty payments.
| • | Fixed set-up fee – A fixed set-up fee is charged immediately following an agreement. |
| • | Mark-up on supplier services – A “cost plus” mark-up is charged for third-party services, such as fees to payment solution providers and game providers. We keep the mark-up at a moderate level while focusing on the revenue sharing element. |
| • | Share of adjusted net gaming revenue – When a brand is launched on the platform, we and the partner split the net gaming revenues (NGR). We keep our share and pay the remaining share of NGR to the partner when we act as a principal. To limit downside risk, in some cases a minimum platform fee is charged. |
| • | Royalties – Royalties from games and sport betting are calculated and invoiced as a percentage of the adjusted game win (player bets less player wins less adjustments), a fee for proprietary titles and another for aggregation of third-party games. |
Our iLottery turnkey solution contracts and certain of our games contracts provide for a revenue share model that entitles us, either directly, or indirectly through Pollard, Intralot or NPI, to a predetermined share of either the NGR or the GGR generated by iLotteries using our platforms and/or games. Our share of NGR or GGR varies between customers and generally depends on the type and scope of value-added services provided to the customer.
We post as revenues at least 50% of the revenues earned by the Michigan Joint Operation from the MSL, with an incremental 3 to 5% above our 50% share of royalties earned by the Michigan Joint Operation from certain games subsequently developed and provided by NeoGames as compensation for our development of such games. We record as revenues 100% of the revenues earned from our European customers.
As with the revenues earned by the Michigan Joint Operation, we are entitled to at least 50% of the revenues earned by NPI from our customers, with an incremental 3 to 5% above our 50% share of royalties earned by NPI from certain games subsequently developed and provided by NeoGames as compensation for our development of such games (which we refer to collectively as our “NPI Revenues Interest”). However, while our revenues earned from the Michigan Joint Operation are reflected as revenues in our consolidated statement of operations, our NPI Revenues Interest is not recorded as revenues, but is rather reflected in our financial statements in accordance with the equity method. We share in 50% of the profit of NPI, subject to certain adjustments (including the incremental royalties mentioned above).
We generate revenues from Caesars in the form of a monthly fee charged to Caesars for its access to the sub-licensed NeoSphere platform.
We also record as revenue a monthly fee we receive from each of the Michigan Joint Operation and NPI for certain software development and support services, which is calculated on a margin over cost basis.
The table below presents the revenues (including through the Michigan Joint Operation), as well as NeoGames’ NPI Revenues Interest, for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021.
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Royalties from turnkey contracts(1) | | $ | 31,001 | | | $ | 29,729 | | | $ | 29,882 | |
Royalties from games contracts | | | 1,977 | | | | 1,709 | | | | 1,994 | |
Access to IP rights | | | 18,155 | | | | 14,293 | | | | 7,959 | |
Development and other services - Aspire | | | -
| | | | 767 | | | | 1,617 | |
Development and other services - NPI(2) | | | 4,349 | | | | 5,651 | | | | 7,578 | |
Development and other services - Michigan Joint Operation | | | 1,498 | | | | 1,449 | | | | 1,433 | |
Revenues | | $ | 56,980 | | | $ | 53,598 | | | $ | 50,463 | |
Aspire Global revenues | | | 134,558 | | | | 112,100 | | | | -
| |
Total Revenues | | | 191,538 | | | | 165, 698 | | | | 50, 463 | |
NeoGames’ NPI Revenues Interest(3) | | $ | 63,045 | | | | 44,473 | | | $ | 34,052 | |
(1) Includes NeoGames’ revenues mainly from the Michigan Joint Operation and Sazka.
(2) Represents revenues recognized by NeoGames for services provided to NPI. Such amounts were also recognized as expenses by NPI. We share in 50% of the profit of NPI.
(3) Represents 50% of NPI’s revenues in the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022 and 2021 of $118.7 million, $84.5 million and $64 million, respectively, plus an incremental $3,700 thousand, $2,400 thousand and $1,820 thousand, respectively, of royalties from certain games as compensation for our subsequent development of such games. We refer to this, collectively, as our “NPI Revenues Interest” — however, in accordance with IFRS, our NPI Revenues Interest is not recorded as revenues in our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), but is rather reflected in our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the equity method, as we share in 50% of the profit of NPI subject to certain adjustments (including the incremental royalties mentioned above). See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
Operating expenses
Distribution expenses. Distribution expenses are primarily comprised of royalties payable to Aspire operator partners, traffic-related costs, including processing fees (including geo-location costs and ID verification costs), third-party content costs, gaming taxes, call center expenses (including hardware and software maintenance costs, and telecommunication expenses), charges associated with contracts delivery contractual commitments, licensing tools and cloud solutions, personnel-related costs associated with these functions and occupancy costs associated with the facilities where these functions are performed.
Development expenses. Our research and development expenses are primarily comprised of costs of our research and development personnel, contractor services in Ukraine and other development-related expenses. Research and development costs are expensed when incurred, except to the extent that such costs qualify for capitalization. We believe continued investments in research and development are important to maintain our competitive strengths and expect research and development costs to increase in absolute dollars, but to decrease as a percentage of total revenues.
Selling and marketing expenses. Our selling and marketing expenses are primarily comprised of costs of our marketing personnel, travel expenses and other sales and marketing-related expenses. Selling and marketing expenses are expensed as incurred. We intend to continue to invest in our sales and marketing capabilities in the future to continue to increase our brand awareness. While our selling and marketing expenses have decreased during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on international traveling, conventions and marketing events, during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023 and in tandem with the removal of pandemic related restrictions, we have resumed our participation in industry conventions and expending on international traveling.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses primarily include costs of our executive, finance, legal, business development and other administrative personnel and service providers. General and administrative expenses are expensed as incurred. We expect that our general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future as we expand our business, as well as to cover the additional cost and expenses associated with being a publicly listed company.
Aspire business combination related expenses. Acquisition related expenses include primarily legal, investment banking, consultancy and accounting fees and expenses.
Aristocrat merger related expenses. Acquisition related expenses include primarily legal, investment banking, consultancy and accounting fees and expenses.
Depreciation and amortization
Our depreciation and amortization expenses are comprised of amortization of capitalized research and development costs we incur in connection with our technical group personnel. We amortize these capitalized costs on a straight-line basis beginning when development is complete and the asset is available for use and continuing over their useful life, as well as amortization of Aspire’s newly acquired intangible assets.
Finance expense
Our interest expenses are primarily comprised of interest we incur on the Senior Facilities Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2023, we incurred $21.4 million of interest expense in connection with the Senior Facilities Agreement, paid by the Company for the funding of the cash portion of Aspire transaction.
Income taxes expense
We are subject to Luxembourg corporation taxes on profits derived from activities carried out in Luxembourg. NGS, our Israeli subsidiary, is subject to Israeli corporate taxes. NPI, NeoGames US, LLP and NeoGames Solutions LLC are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as certain state income taxes. Due to the resources invested in growing and developing our business, we have, until recently, generated losses. As of December 31, 2021, our estimated cumulative carry forward tax losses were approximately $22 million. On May 18, 2021, we obtained a pre-ruling from the Israeli Tax Authority regarding the transfer of certain intellectual property rights relating to the online lottery business of NeoGames S.A. to NGS, the transfer price for which was determined by a third-party study to be $57.0 million, which had the effect of reducing our cumulative carry forward tax losses by the same amount. The book value of $57 million representing the value of the transferred intellectual property rights, will be amortized for tax purposes over a period of 8 years starting the year ended December 31, 2021. For more information regarding the pre-ruling, see Item 10.E. “Taxation – Tax Ruling of the Israeli Tax Authority.”
Income taxes are calculated in accordance with the tax legislation and applicable tax rates in force at the end of the reporting year in the countries in which the Company or its consolidated subsidiaries have been incorporated. The iGaming companies are subject to corporation taxes on profits derived from activities carried out in various jurisdiction: Malta, Israel, Ukraine, Bulgaria, the United States, India, Gibraltar, North Macedonia, Spain and Italy.
Company’s share in profits of NPI
We own 50% of the equity of NPI and we record 50% of NPI’s profit or loss as our profit or loss, as adjusted to compensate the Company for our games development and DBG sales.
5.A. Results of Operations
The following tables set forth our results of operations in U.S. dollars and as a percentage of total revenues for the periods presented.
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | $ | 191,538 | | | $ | 165,698 | | | $ | 50,463 | |
Distribution expenses | | | 96,497 | | | | 97,579 | | | | 9,889 | |
Development expenses | | | 14,896 | | | | 10,278 | | | | 9,428 | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | | 10,859 | | | | 5,364 | | | | 1,549 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | 33,544 | | | | 23,306 | | | | 12,300 | |
Business combination related expenses | | | 6,477 | | | | 17,984 | | | | 3,841 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 55,940 | | | | 35,611 | | | | 14,613 | |
| | | 218,213 | | | | 190,122 | | | | 51,620 | |
Loss from operations | | | (26,675 | ) | | | (24,424 | ) | | | (1,157 | ) |
Interest expense with respect to funding from related parties | | | - | | | | 2,867 | | | | 4,811 | |
Finance expenses | | | 24,778 | | | | 12,238 | | | | 1,501 | |
Company share in profits of Joint Venture and associated companies | | | 37,344 | | | | 22,110 | | | | 12,446 | |
Profit (loss) before income tax expenses | | | (14,119 | ) | | | (17,419 | ) | | | 4,977 | |
Income taxes expenses | | | (4,158 | ) | | | (1,546 | ) | | | (325 | ) |
Net income (loss) | | $ | (18,277 | )
| | $ | (18,965 | ) | | $ | 4,652 | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | | (as a % of revenues in absolute numbers) | |
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % | | | 100.0 | % |
Distribution expenses | | | | 50.4 | | | | 58.9 | | | | 19.6 | |
Development expenses | | | | 7.8 | | | | 6.2 | | | | 18.7 | |
Selling and marketing expenses | | | | 5.7 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 3.0 | |
General and administrative expenses | | | | 17.5 | | | | 14.1 | | | | 24.4 | |
Business combination related expenses | | | | 3.4 | | | | 10.8 | | | | 7.6 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | | 29.2 | | | | 21.5 | | | | 29.0 | |
Loss from operations | | | | (14.0 | ) | | | (14.7 | ) | | | (2.3 | ) |
Interest expense with respect to funding from related parties | | | | - | | | | 1.7 | | | | 9.5 | |
Finance income | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Finance expenses | | | | 12.9 | | | | 7.4 | | | | 3.0 | |
Company share in profits of Joint Venture and associated companies | | | | 19.5 | | | | 13.3 | | | | 24.7 | |
Profit (loss) before income tax expenses | | | | (7.4 | ) | | | (10.5 | ) | | | 9.9 | |
Income taxes expenses | | | | 2.1 | | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.7 | |
Net income (loss) | | | | (9.5 | )% | | | (11.4 | )% | | | 9.2 | % |
Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to year ended December 31, 2022
Revenues
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $191.5 million, an increase of $25.8, or 15.6%, compared to $165.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2022.
iLottery revenues were $57.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $53.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, representing an increase of 6.3% year-over-year.
Revenues from our turnkey solution contracts increased in 2023 by 4.3% to $31 million, compared to $29.7 million in 2022. The increase was primarily driven by a continuous growth in revenues from Michigan and Sazka.
Revenues from our games increased by 15.7% in 2023 to $2 million, compared to $1.7 million in 2022. The increase was primarily driven by enhancement of our games portfolio across our content customers.
Revenues from our contracts with William Hill, which were assumed by and assigned to Caesars on June 30, 2022, and certain software services we provide to NPI and the Michigan Joint Operation, increased by 4% in 2023 to $24.0 million, compared to $23.1 million in 2022. This increase was primarily attributed to Caesars expanding its usage of our IP rights.
Revenues from Aspire contributed $134.6 to the overall 2023 revenues mix, which represents approximately 20% of the total year over year growth. See also Item 4.B. “Business Overview – iGaming Revenues” by category for further details. Revenues generated by Aspire in 2023 were consolidated by the Company all year, while in 2022 the Company consolidated revenues generated by Aspire from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022, offset by the change in the accounting for the majority of Aspire Core revenues on a net basis compared to historical figures of 2022, which were prepared on a gross basis.
Distribution expenses
Distribution expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $96.5 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 1.1%, compared to $97.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily driven by the change in the accounting for the majority of Aspire Core revenues on a net basis compared to historical figures which were prepared on a gross basis, offset mainly by the consolidation of Aspire’s distribution expenses in the entire year 2023, while Aspire’s distribution expenses in 2022 were consolidated from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022.
Development expenses
Development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $14.9 million, an increase of $4.6 million, or 44.9%, compared to $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the consolidation of Aspire’s development expenses in the entire year 2023, while in 2022 Aspire’s development expenses were consolidated from the closing date of the acquisition of Aspire in June 2022, as well as by an increase of our technological headcount, continuous enhancements to our technological infrastructure.
Selling and marketing expenses
Selling and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $10.9 million, an increase of $5.5 million, or 102.4%, compared to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the consolidation of Aspire’s selling and marketing expenses for the entire year 2023, while Aspire’s selling and marketing expenses in 2022 were consolidated from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022, as well as due to increased sales and marketing activities, such as attending conferences.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $33.5 million, an increase of $10.2 million, or 43.9%, compared to $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the consolidation of Aspire’s general and administrative expenses for the entire year 2023, while Aspire’s general and administrative expenses in 2022 were consolidated from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022.
Business combinations related expenses
Business combinations expenses relating to the Company’s acquisition by Aristocrat were $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, a decrease of $11.5 million compared to $18 million related to the Company’s acquisition of Aspire for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Depreciation and amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $55.9 million, an increase of $20.3 million, or 57.1%, compared to $35.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the consolidation of Aspire’s depreciation and amortization expenses for the entire year 2023, while Aspire’s depreciation and amortization expenses in 2022 were consolidated from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022.
Finance expenses
Finance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $24.8 million, an increase of $12.6 million, or 102.5%, compared to $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily driven by the finance expenses generated from the Blackstone financing for the entire year 2023, while such financing expenses were incorporated in 2022 from May 2022. For more information, see also Item 5.B “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Income taxes expense
Income taxes expense for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $4.2 million, an increase of $2.7 million, or 168.9%, compared to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily due to consolidation of Aspire’s income tax expenses for the entire year 2023, while such income tax expenses in 2022 were consolidated from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022. In addition, in 2022 the Company recorded deferred tax benefit related to previous years.
Company’s share in profits of NPI
The Company share in the profits of NPI for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $37.3 million, an increase of $15.2 million compared to $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily driven by increases in all accounts served by NPI, but principally the VAL, NCEL, NH and AGLC, which experienced increases of 58%, 52%, 29% and 23%, respectively. For additional details, see “- Results of Operations of NPI.”
Results of Operations of NPI
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Revenues | | $ | 118,790 | | | $ | 84,533 | | | $ | 64,032 | |
Distribution expenses | | | 59,881 | | | | 49,093 | | | | 44,970 | |
Selling, general and marketing expenses | | | 693 | | | | 1,044 | | | | 993 | |
Depreciation | | | 308 | | | | 340 | | | | 385 | |
Net and total comprehensive income | | $ | 57,908 | | | $ | 34,056 | | | $ | 17,684 | |
Net and total comprehensive income 50% | | | 28,954 | | | | 17,028 | | | | 8,842 | |
Adjustments(*) | | | 7,386 | | | | 4,557 | | | | 3,604 | |
Share in profits of NPI | | | 36,340 | | | | 21,585 | | | | 12,446 | |
(*) The adjustments mostly represent royalty commissions earned from NPI on certain games developed and delivered by the Company, whereby the Company’s share of the underlying results is higher than 50%.
Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to year ended December 31, 2022
Revenue
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $118.8 million, an increase of $34.3 million, or 40.5%, compared to $84.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily driven by increases in revenues across all portfolio accounts, as follows: the VAL increased by $18.0 million, or 58%; the NHL increased by $2.8 million, or 29%; the NCEL increased by $9.2 million, or 52%; and the AGLC increased by $7.2 million, or 23%. We have seen a higher frequency of mega jackpot runs during the year ended December 31, 2023, which helped drive up the volume of online sales for the entire U.S. iLottery, triggering an increase of our revenues generated through those programs.
Distribution expenses
Distribution expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $59.9 million, an increase of $10.8 million, or 22 % compared to $49.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in costs linked to revenues growth, such as clearing and processing fees, content third-parties fees, KYC and identity verification.
Selling, general and marketing expenses
Selling and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2023 were $0.7 million, a decrease of $0.34 million, or 33.6% compared to $1.04 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. This decrease was primarily driven by optimization of the expenditure.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Our recent accounting pronouncements are shown in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
JOBS Act
We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act. The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This provision allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of this extended transition period until the earlier of the date we (x) are no longer an emerging growth company, or (y) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period. As a result, our operating results and financial statements may not be comparable to those of companies that comply with new or revised accounting pronouncements as of public company effective dates.
5.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Overview
We measure liquidity in terms of our ability to fund the cash requirements of our business operations, including working capital and capital expenditure needs, contractual obligations and other commitments, with cash flows from operations and other sources of funding. Since our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through cash generated from our operations, the proceeds from the initial public offering of our Ordinary Shares and the Senior Facilities Agreement obtained from Blackstone and which was primarily used to fund the cash portion of the consideration paid for the acquisition of Aspire. As of December 31, 2023, we had $133.8 million equity, $9.7 million working capital and $29 million cash and cash equivalents, compared to $145.3 million equity, $13.3 million working capital and $41.2 million cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022.
Our primary requirements for liquidity and capital resources are to finance working capital, capital expenditures (including the deposit of performance bonds required under our iLottery contracts or deposits required by gaming regulators), to satisfy contingent consideration on business combination assumed from Aspire upon completion of the acquisition, quarterly interest, principal payments under the Senior Facilities Agreement, and general corporate purposes. We believe that our sources of liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient to meet our business needs for at least the next 12 months from the date of this Annual Report. As we remain in a growing stage of our business, we expect to continue to invest in research and development. We maintain the majority of our cash and cash equivalents in accounts with major, highly rated, multi-national and local financial institutions, and our deposits at these institutions exceed insured limits. Market conditions can impact the viability of these institutions, and any inability to access or delay in accessing these funds could adversely affect our business and financial position. Our future cash and capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth rate; the timing and extent of our spending to support our research and development efforts; capital expenditures to purchase hardware and software; the expansion of sales and marketing activities; and our continued need to invest in our IT infrastructure to support our growth. In addition, we may enter into additional strategic partnerships as well as agreements to acquire or invest in complementary products, teams and technologies, including intellectual property rights, which could increase our cash requirements. As a result of these and other factors, we may choose or be required to seek additional equity or debt financing sooner than we currently anticipate. If additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or generate cash flows necessary to expand our operations and invest in continued innovation, we may not be able to compete successfully, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The discussion of our liquidity and capital resources for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the year ended December 31, 2022, can be found in Part I, Item 5.B. of our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on April 28, 2023.
On October 9, 2020, Aspire (prior to its acquisition by the Company) completed a business combination with BtoBet Limited, in consideration for €20.8 million in cash, of which €15.8 million were paid on October 9, 2022 and €5 million 12 months after the closing of the transaction. In addition, the consideration included performance based contingent consideration of 7-times BtoBet’s adjusted EBIT on the second anniversary of the closing minus €20 million. The Company assessed such contingent consideration based on the 2022 adjusted EBIT to be Euro 8.2 million, and an additional provision of approximately Euro 2 million was recorded in the preliminary purchase price allocation. In February 2024, the Company concluded an expert determination procedure with the BtoBet Sellers regarding the BtoBet Earnout Consideration, in which it was determined that the Company shall pay an amount of €9.7 million in satisfaction of the BtoBet Earnout Consideration. The amount was paid on March 4, 2024.
Financing for the Acquisition of Aspire
On May 30, 2022, NeoGames S.A., NeoGames Connect S.à r.l. (the “Borrower”) and NeoGames Connect Limited (“Bidco”) entered into a senior facilities agreement (the “Senior Facilities Agreement”) with Blackstone Private Credit Fund, GSO ESDF II (Luxembourg) Holdco S.à r.l., GSO ESDF II (Luxembourg), Levered Holdco II S.à r.l., GSO ESDF II (Luxembourg) Levered Holdco I S.à r.l. and G QCM (Luxembourg) Holdco S.à r.l. (together, the “Lenders”). On 12 September 2022, NeoGames Systems Ltd, NeoGames US, LLP and NeoGames Solutions LLC acceded to the Senior Facilities Agreement as additional guarantors. Pursuant to the Senior Facilities Agreement, the following term loan facilities were made available by the Lenders:
| • | a euro denominated term loan facility in an aggregate amount of €187.7 million (“Facility B1”); and |
| • | a euro denominated term loan facility in an aggregate amount of €13.1 million (“Facility B2” and, together with Facility B1, the “Senior Facilities”). |
The Senior Facilities were fully drawn on June 13, 2022 in connection with the acquisition of Aspire. The proceeds of loans drawn under the Senior Facilities were applied towards, among other things, financing part of the aggregate consideration payable by the Company pursuant to the acquisition of Aspire and/or refinancing existing indebtedness. Such loans have a maturity of 6 years and bear interest linked to EURIBOR plus 6.25 percent per annum.
The Senior Facilities Agreement contains customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants (including covenants in respect of financial indebtedness, disposals, security, permitted holding company activity, dividends and share redemption, acquisitions and mergers and conduct of the Aspire Tender Offer), indemnities and events of default, each with appropriate carve-outs and materiality thresholds. In addition, the Company, the Borrower, Bidco, NeoGames Systems Ltd, NeoGames US, LLP and NeoGames Solutions LLC have each given a customary guarantee in favor of the Lenders under the terms of the Senior Facilities Agreement.
In connection with the debt financing documented by the Senior Facilities Agreement, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have granted certain guarantees in favor of the Lenders. Additionally, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries have granted, or will grant, security in favor of the Lenders over shares (and other ownership interests) owned in certain subsidiaries, certain bank accounts, certain material intercompany receivables, certain material intellectual property and, in the case of subsidiaries located in England and Wales and the United States, substantially all of their assets (subject to customary exceptions). Accordingly, we recorded interest expenses of $20.5 million in 2023 related to the loan from Blackstone.
The loans drawn under the Senior Facilities Agreement in connection with the acquisition of Aspire were in EUR but the consideration payable by the Company in respect of the acquisition was in SEK. Therefore, the Company entered into a deal contingent FX forward with Deutsche Bank AG (the “DC Bank”) on January 17, 2022 (the “FX Hedging Transaction”) under which the Company received the full SEK consideration from the DC Bank in exchange for an equivalent EUR amount calculated by reference to a pre-agreed exchange rate. The Company posted the charges associated with the FX forward and other financing initiation costs such as ticking and set up charges as deferred financing costs amortized over the term of the loan. During the year ended December 31, 2023, a total of $0.9 million were booked as fees amortization as part of the Blackstone related interest expenses.
On May 24, 2023, the SDR program was terminated, upon which all holders of SDRs who were direct shareholders listed in the VPC Register (as defined in the Company’s Form CB filed with the SEC on April 27, 2022) and who had not yet converted their SDRs into Ordinary Shares, had their SDRs automatically redeemed through Mangold Fondkommission AB, the issuer of the SDRs, whereby the Ordinary Shares that the SDRs represented were sold in the market and the net average sales proceeds were then paid pro rata to the previous holders of such SDRs. In connection with the termination of the SDR program, Aspire shareholders, who at the time of termination still had not converted their SDRs into Ordinary Shares in the Company, were subject to forced conversion in which their SDRs were converted into Ordinary Shares in the Company.
Loan Agreement
On February 14, 2024, NeoGames and Barak Matalon, one of our founding shareholders, entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) pursuant to which NeoGames received from Mr. Matalon an unsecured and subordinated loan in the amount of $7.0 million, bearing interest of 9.5% per annum that is due and payable on a monthly basis (the “Loan”). The Loan matures and becomes due and payable on the earlier to occur of 30 days following the closing of the Business Combination Agreement and 12 months following the date of the Loan Agreement, or on a later date as agreed upon in writing between the parties.
Cash Flows
The Company generates its inbound cash flow through the collection of revenues being charged to its customers monthly. The Company’s share of cash generated through North American turnkey contracts is being delivered through regular monthly settlements of net collections of customers’ revenues less NPI’s or Pollard’s share of costs contributed by us to support delivery commitments.
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods presented:
| | Year Ended December 31, | |
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | | | 2021 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net cash generated from operating activities | | $ | 59,376 | | | $ | 38,349 | | | $ | 27,997 | |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (45,007 | ) | | | (225,944 | ) | | | (18,534 | ) |
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities | | | (28,075 | ) | | | 162,157 | | | | (3,148 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | (13,706 | ) | | $ | (25,438 | ) | | $ | 6,315 | |
Year ended December 31, 2023 compared to year ended December 31, 2022
Net cash generated from operating activities
Net cash generated from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $59.4 million, an increase of $21.1 million, compared to $38.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase primarily resulted from continuous growth of the business, with Aspire contributing for the full year of 2023 compared to the contribution in 2022 from the closing date of the Aspire acquisition in June 2022.
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $45 million, a decrease of $180.9 million, compared to $225.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2023 compared to 2022, in which the Company used cash for the acquisition of Aspire in 2022.
Net cash used in financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $28.1 million, a decrease of $190.3 million, compared to cash generated by financing activities of $162.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cash generated by financing activities in 2023, compared to 2022, in which the Company entered into the Senior Facilities Agreement with the Lenders to fund the acquisition of Aspire.
Net increase/decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $13.7 million, an increase of $11.7 million, compared to a decrease of $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was primarily the result of the Company’s improved business results.
Material Cash Requirements for Known Contractual and Other Obligations
We are a party to many contractual obligations involving commitments to make payments to third parties. These obligations impact our short-term and long-term liquidity and capital resource needs. Certain contractual obligations are reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2023, while others are considered future commitments. Our contractual obligations primarily consist of $10.8 million as contingent consideration for business combinations. For additional information, refer to Item 5.B “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and to Note 14 “Contingent Consideration On Business Combination and Other” of our annual financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
We also indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while the officer is or was serving at our request in such capacity. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. However, our director and officer insurance policy limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. Historically, we have not been obligated to make any payments for these obligations and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022 or 2023.
5.C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
Our research and development expenses are primarily comprised of costs of our research and development personnel, contractor services in Ukraine and Poland and other development-related expenses. Research and development costs are expensed when incurred, except to the extent that such costs qualify for capitalization. We believe continued investments in research and development are important to maintain our competitive strengths and expect research and development costs to increase in absolute dollars, but to decrease as a percentage of total revenues. Research and development expenses were $14.9 million, $10.2 million and $9.4 million in 2023, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
5.D. Trend Information.
Other than as described in Item 3.D. “Risk Factors” and in Item 5. “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects — Factors Affecting our Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our total revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that caused the disclosed financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial condition.
5.E. Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with IFRS, as issued by the IASB. In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the application of our accounting policies which affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Our critical accounting judgements and sources of estimation uncertainty are described in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
6.A. Directors and Senior Management
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table presents information about our executive officers and directors, including their ages as of April 20, 2024:
Name | | | Age | | | Position | |
Executive Officers | | | | | | | |
Moti Malul | | | 52 | | | Chief Executive Officer and Director | |
Tsachi Maimon | | | 45 | | | President, Head of iGaming | |
Motti Gil | | | 51 | | | Chief Financial Officer | |
Oded Gottfried | | | 54 | | | Chief Technology Officer | |
Rinat Belfer | | | 44 | | | Chief Operations Officer | |
Non-Executive Directors | | | | | | | |
Barak Matalon | | | 53 | | | Non-Executive Director | |
Aharon Aran | | | 74 | | | Non-Executive Director | |
Laurent Teitgen(1) (2) | | | 45 | | | Non-Executive Director | |
John E. Taylor, Jr.(1) (2) | | | 57 | | | Non-Executive Director, Chairman | |
Steve Capp(1) (2) | | | 62 | | | Non-Executive Director | |
| (1) | Independent director in accordance with Nasdaq rules. |
| (2) | Member of the audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees. |
Unless otherwise indicated, the current business addresses for each of our executive officers and each of the members of our board of directors is c/o NeoGames S.A., 63-65, rue de Merl, L-2146 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.
Executive Officers
The following is a brief summary of the business experience of our executive officers.
Moti Malul has served as our and as NGS’, our Israeli subsidiary, Chief Executive Officer and as a member of our board of directors, since October 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Malul served as our Executive Vice President of Sales and Business Development for three years. Prior to our spin-off from Aspire in 2014, Mr. Malul served in various roles at Aspire for five years. Prior to joining Aspire, Mr. Malul served for over 12 years in key marketing and management positions in the telecommunications and internet industries, for companies such as Ericsson and Smile Media. Mr. Malul holds a B.A. in Business Administration from Bar-Ilan University in Israel, and an M.B.A from Tel Aviv University in Israel.
Tsachi Maimon has served as our President, Head of iGaming since June 30, 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Maimon was CEO of Aspire, a position he held from 2013 until the closing of the Aspire Tender Offer. Mr. Maimon also serves on the board of directors of several private companies, including Neolotto Ltd., Minotauro Media Ltd. and MarketPlay Ltd. Mr. Maimon holds an M.A. in business from the College of Management Academic Studies in Rishon LeZion, Israel and a B.A. from Hebrew University of Jerusalem – Interdisciplinary Studies for Outstanding Officers.
Motti Gil has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 2023. Mr. Gil had served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aspire from 2016 to August 2023, including five years as a publicly listed company, prior to its acquisition by NeoGames. Prior to joining Aspire, he spent seven years as the Chief Financial Officer of GoNet Systems, a wireless technology company which followed positions as a finance executive and controller in the telecom technology industry, in private and publicly listed companies. Mr. Gil began his career with Ernst & Young. Mr. Gil holds a B.A. in Accounting and Economics from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
Oded Gottfried has served as our Chief Technology Officer since our spin-off from Aspire in 2014 and the Chief Technology Officer of NGS, our Israeli subsidiary, since January 2015. Prior to our spin-off from Aspire, Mr. Gottfried served as the Chief Technology Officer of Aspire since 2008. Prior to joining Aspire in 2008 Mr. Gottfried founded two companies and served as their Chief Executive Officer. He also served as an engineer for the Israel Defense Forces. Mr. Gottfried holds a B.Sc in Mathematics & Computer Science from Tel Aviv University in Israel.
Rinat Belfer has served as our Chief Operations Officer since January 2019 after serving as Vice President of Projects of NGS from January 2015 and until December 2018. Prior to our spin-off from Aspire in 2014, Ms. Belfer served in a number of roles with Aspire since 2009. Ms. Belfer holds a B.Tech degree in Industrial Engineering and Management from Shenkar College in Israel and an MBA from Ben Gurion University in Israel.
Non-Executive Directors
The following is a brief summary of the business experience of the non-executive members of our board of directors.
Barak Matalon, the co-founder of Aspire, has served as a member of our board of directors since our spin-off from Aspire in 2014. Mr. Matalon currently serves on the board of directors of Lotym Holdings Ltd. Prior to the closing of the Aspire Tender Offer, Mr. Matalon served on Aspire’s board of directors and as a member of its remuneration committee. Mr. Matalon holds a B.A. in Economics from the Academic College of Tel Aviv Jaffa in Israel.
Aharon Aran has served as member of our board of directors since September 2019. Mr. Aran currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of the Israeli Audience Research Board, a position he has held since August 2019, and previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of TMF Media, Omnicom Media Group-Israel office, a leading global media agency network, from 2007 until 2019. Prior to the closing of the Aspire Tender Offer, Mr. Aran served on the board of directors of Aspire and as a member of its audit committee. Mr. Aran holds a B.A. in Economics and an M.B.A. from Tel Aviv University in Israel.
Laurent Teitgen has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2017. Mr. Teitgen currently serves on the board of directors of Codere Online Luxembourg S.A since November 2021, Ellomay Luxembourg Holdings S.à r.l. since September 2016, Chelsey Investissement S.C.A. since July 2016, Menora Central Europe Investments S.A. since November 2017, MiddleCap Group S.A. since April 2018, and Kaman Lux Holding S.à r.l since September 2015, and he is Head of Accounting Department at Fiduciaire Jean-Marc Faber S.à r.l, a private accounting firm, since May 2009. Mr. Laurent also serves as a member of the audit committee of Codere Online Luxembourg S.A since November 2021. Mr. Teitgen is a resident of Luxembourg and previously held positions with BDO, Intertrust, and TASL (now Orangefield/Vistra). Mr. Teitgen holds a B.A. in Accounting and Financial Management with a specialization in Accounting Review from Université de Lorraine, IUT Henri Poincaré, France.
John E. Taylor, Jr. has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2020. Mr. Taylor has served as the managing director of Faulkner & Howe, LLC, a business consulting firm primarily focused on the internet gaming industry, since 2002. Mr. Taylor served as Chairman of the board of directors of Twin River Worldwide Holdings (NYSE: TRWH) from 2010 to 2016, as Executive Chairman from 2017 to 2019, and as a member of the audit, compensation and compliance committees from 2010 to 2019. Mr. Taylor was formerly the Chief Executive Officer and President of GameLogic, Inc., a provider of internet based games for the regulated gaming industry. Mr. Taylor also served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Dreamport, the gaming and entertainment subsidiary of GTECH Corporation, a then-NYSE listed company while also serving as a member of the Executive Management Committee of GTECH. Earlier in his career he served as a senior advisor to the Governor of Rhode Island. Mr. Taylor currently serves as a Trustee of Johnson & Wales University and holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rhode Island College. In 2018, Mr. Taylor received an honorary Doctor of Business Administration from Johnson & Wales University.
Steve Capp has served as a member of our board of directors since June 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Capp was appointed as a non-voting member of our Board of Directors in an observer capacity on May 22, 2023. Mr. Capp has served as an independent financial advisor to the gaming and technology industries since May 2022. Prior to that, Mr. Capp served as EVP and CFO of Bally’s Corporation (NYSE: BALY), a regional gaming and hospitality company, from January 2019 until April 2022. During this time, Bally’s was taken public and subsequently acquired and integrated more than twenty (20) entities, including casino hotel properties and internet-based companies in the daily fantasy sports, free-to-play, sports wagering and iCasino spaces. Prior to Bally’s, Mr. Capp was a director and financial consultant at Right Angle, a financial and strategic consulting firm, from April 2011 until December 2018. Mr. Capp also served on the board of Bally’s predecessor private company, Twin River Management Group, for approximately seven years and as a director, advisor or consultant for several other private gaming, hospitality and technology companies. Mr. Capp has also served as EVP and CFO for regional gaming and hospitality company Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. Prior to these positions, Mr. Capp was in the financial services sector, working for many years with BancAmerica Securities, culminating in the position of Managing Director for Bear Stearns & Co., focusing on the U.S. leveraged finance market. Mr. Capp holds a finance degree from the University of Arizona and an MBA from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
Arrangements Concerning Election of Directors
Our Founding Shareholders have the exclusive right under our articles of association to elect up to 50% of our directors so long as they own in the aggregate at least 40.0% of our issued and outstanding share capital. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Founding Shareholders have entered into a voting agreement pursuant to which the Founding Shareholders vote as one group with regard to any matter relating to the nomination, election, appointment or removal of directors. The Voting Agreement was terminated with respect to Pini Zehavi following the sale of his shares, following which Mr. Zahavi held less than 5% of our share capital. See Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions - Voting Agreement.”
Board Diversity
The table below provides certain information regarding the diversity of our board of directors as of April 20, 2024.
Board Diversity Matrix* |
Country of Principal Executive Offices: | Grand Duchy of Luxembourg |
Foreign Private Issuer | Yes |
Disclosure Prohibited under Home Country Law | No |
Total Number of Directors | 6 |
| Female* | Male | Non- Binary | Did Not Disclose Gender |
Part I: Gender Identity | |
Directors | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Part II: Demographic Background | |
Underrepresented Individual in Home Country Jurisdiction | 0 |
LGBTQ+ | 0 |
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background | 0 |
* We acknowledge and support the general principles behind the diversity objectives set forth in Rule 5605(f)(2)(B) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. However, given the Company’s operations in a regulated market and in light of the business combination with Aristocrat, the Company’s board of directors does not believe that achieving Nasdaq’s diversity objectives is currently feasible given the Company’s circumstances. We believe that the current composition of our board of directors is suitable for the current scale of and goals for our business and operations. The members of our board of directors are familiar with our Company’s history and business operations and provide us with a variety of personal, professional and industry backgrounds, with appropriate experience and skill sets.
6.B. Compensation
Executive Officer Compensation
The compensation for each of our executive officers is comprised of the following elements: base salary, bonus, contractual benefits, pension contributions and relocation expenses reimbursement by the Company, as applicable. The total amount of compensation paid and benefits in kind provided to our executive officers and members of our board of directors, other than our independent directors, for the 2023 financial year was approximately $3.1 million (inclusive of annual bonuses). We do not currently maintain formal bonus or profit-sharing plans for the benefit of our executive officers; however, from time to time upon approval of the compensation committee of the board of directors we may pay discretionary bonuses to certain of our executive officers. We make monthly contributions to pension, retirement or similar benefits to our executive officers as required under Israeli law or any other relevant jurisdiction.
Board Member Compensation
Our independent directors receive both cash and equity compensation for service on our board of directors. Our compensation program for independent directors is designed to meet the following objectives:
| • | to provide fair compensation to directors commensurate with the time commitments, responsibilities and strict gaming licensing requirements that must be maintained for service on our Board; |
| • | to attract and retain experienced, highly-qualified individuals to serve on our Board; and |
| • | to provide a compensation program that aligns the interest of directors with shareholders by providing a significant portion of annual compensation in the form of equity. |
The amount of compensation paid to our independent directors for the 2023 financial year was as follows: Mr. John E. Taylor Jr. received cash compensation of approximately $168 thousand and the board of directors has approved equity compensation in the form of a grant of 14,168 restricted share units, approved by shareholders at the 2023 shareholders meeting, with a cliff vesting of all such restricted share units on June 30, 2024; Mr. Laurent Teitgen received cash compensation of approximately $44 thousand and the board of directors has approved equity compensation in the form of a grant of 3,542 restricted share units and; Mr. Steve Capp who joined the board on June 29, 2023 received cash compensation of $54 and 3,400 restricted share units.
Executive Officer and Board Member Employment Agreements
Each of the Company’s executive officers is employed under an employment agreement for an indefinite period of time. These agreements contain customary provisions regarding noncompetition, nonsolicitation, confidentiality of information and assignment of inventions. However, the enforceability of the non-competition provisions may be limited under applicable law. With respect to certain executive officers, either we or the executive officer may terminate his or her employment by giving advance written notice to the other party, with notice periods ranging from 90 days to a year. We may also terminate an executive officer’s employment agreement for good reason (as defined the applicable employment agreement).
Each of our independent board members has been appointed through June 30, 2024. The appointments may be extended by mutual agreement. The terms of engagement contain customary provisions regarding directors’ liability insurance, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information and assignment of intellectual property rights. We may immediately terminate the appointment of independent directors for the causes set forth in the terms of engagement, or in accordance with our articles of association or any applicable laws. In addition, our shareholders and our board may terminate an independent director’s appointment. Either party may terminate the appointment with a 30 days prior written notice. The Terms of engagement with independent board members provide that upon a change of control over the Company or termination of appointment without cause, RSUs are accelerated, and become unrestricted.
Long-Term Incentive Plans
2015 Plan (as amended in 2019)
The 2015 Share Option Plan was adopted on January 29, 2015 and amended thereafter (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan provides for the grant of options to acquire Ordinary Shares of the Company. As of April 2024, there were 621,009 outstanding options granted under the 2015 Plan covering 621,009 Ordinary Shares of the Company at a weighted average exercise price of $1.31, out of which 609,927 were vested and 11,082 were unvested.
All our employees and consultants are eligible to participate in the 2015 Plan. All outstanding options to purchase Ordinary Shares of the Company granted under the 2015 Plan that are held by employees of NGS, are subject to the beneficial tax arrangement known as the trustee capital gains route of Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New Version] 1961.
Our board of directors determines the terms and conditions of the options granted including the vesting terms and the exercise price. The terms and conditions are set forth in the applicable options agreement. The terms and conditions of individual options may vary.
Following the completion of our initial public offering, the Company ceased granting options under the 2015 Plan. Any Ordinary Shares underlying options granted under the 2015 Plan that expire were added to the pool of the 2020 Plan (as defined below). The 2015 Plan will continue to apply to all options granted under the 2015 Plan prior to our initial public offering.
2020 Plan
In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted an omnibus equity plan by the name of 2020 Incentive Award Plan (the “2020 Plan”), which allows for the grant of various equity awards such as options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units and other equity based awards. The 2020 Plan initially included a pool of 132,750 Ordinary Shares which shall be increased automatically upon expiration of any option granted under the 2015 Plan and by an annual increase on the first day of each calendar year beginning January 1, 2021 and ending on and including January 1, 2030, equal to the lesser of (A) 3% of the aggregate number of shares outstanding on the final day of the immediately preceding calendar year and (B) such smaller number of shares as is determined by our board of directors. As of April 2024, there were (i) 143,063 unvested RSUs outstanding under the 2020 Plan, (ii) outstanding options granted under the 2020 Plan covering 48,581 Ordinary Shares at a weighted average exercise price of $17.0, of which 48,581 were vested, and (iii) 711,984 Ordinary Shares remaining available for issuance pursuant to future awards that may be granted under the 2020 Plan.
The 2020 Plan is managed by our board of directors or by a committee thereof nominated for the purpose of administrating the 2020 Plan.
The administrator has the authority to determine the terms and conditions of the awards granted under the 2020 Plan. However, the exercise price of options and share appreciation rights must be no less than the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant.
The 2020 Plan includes an Israeli sub-plan for the purpose of enabling the Company to grant Israeli employees awards under the tax beneficial route known as the trustee capital gains route of Section 102 of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance [New Version] 1961.
Insurance and Indemnification
We provide liability insurance for our directors and officers against certain liabilities, which they may incur in connection with their activities on our behalf.
Our articles of association provide that directors and officers, past and present, are entitled to indemnification from us to the fullest extent permitted by Luxembourg law, against liabilities and all expenses reasonably incurred or paid by him or her in connection with any claim, action, suit, or proceeding in which he or she is involved by virtue of him or her being or having been a director or officer of the Company and against amounts paid or incurred by him or her in the settlement thereof.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the provisions of our articles of association or otherwise, we have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered hereunder, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
6.C. Board Practices
Board Composition
Our board of directors is currently comprised of six members, each of whom was elected for a term ending as of the date of the annual general meeting of the Company to be held in 2024 and related to the financial year ended on December 31, 2023. Our directors are elected at our general meeting of shareholders in accordance with our articles of association and each may be re-appointed to additional terms. Pursuant to our articles of association, for so long as the Founding Shareholders (i) own in the aggregate at least 40.0% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company, a number of directors equal to 50.0% of the total number of directors will be elected from nominees selected by the Founding Shareholders, (ii) own in the aggregate less than 40% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company, but still own in the aggregate at least 25.0% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company, a number of directors equal to 33.0% of the total number of directors will be elected from nominees selected by the Founding Shareholders, and (iii) own in the aggregate less than 25% of the issued and outstanding share capital of the Company, but still own in the aggregate at least 15.0% of the issued and outstanding share capital, one director will be elected from nominees selected by the Founding Shareholders.
As previously disclosed, Ms. Lisbeth McNabb, who served as a member of the Board since May 2021, and also served as chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, resigned from the Board effective April 21, 2023. Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) of the Nasdaq rules requires the audit committee to be comprised of at least three independent directors. As a result, Nasdaq notified us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A). The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducted a search for a qualified replacement to fill the vacancy resulting from Ms. McNabb’s resignation and on June 29, 2023, our shareholders elected Mr. Steve Capp to serve on our Board. Upon such election, the Board also appointed Mr. Capp to serve as the chairperson of the audit committee, following which the Company received notice from Nasdaq that it has regained compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).
Foreign Private Issuer Status
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange Act from, among other things, the rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
Controlled Company Exemption
In addition to exemptions on which we may rely as a foreign private issuer, our Founding Shareholders beneficially own more than 50% of the voting power of our shares eligible to vote in the election of directors, and we may therefore be able to rely on certain exemptions as a “controlled company” as set forth in the Nasdaq rules. Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect to utilize exemptions from certain corporate governance standards, including the requirement (1) that a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) to have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, and (3) that our director nominations be made, or recommended to the full board of directors, by our independent directors or by a nominations committee that is composed entirely of independent directors and that we adopt a written charter or board resolution addressing the nominations process. We utilize the exemption from the requirement to have a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors. In the event that we cease to be a “controlled company,” and to the extent we may not rely on similar exemptions as a foreign private issuer, we will be required to comply with these provisions within the applicable transition periods so long as our Ordinary Shares continue to be listed on Nasdaq.
Board Committee Composition
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee.
Audit Committee
The audit committee, which consists of Steve Capp, John E. Taylor, Jr. and Laurent Teitgen, assists the board in overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. Steve Capp serves as chair of the committee. The audit committee consists exclusively of members of our board of directors who are financially literate, and Steve Capp is considered an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC. Our board has determined that Steve Capp, John E. Taylor, Jr. and Laurent Teitgen meet the “independence” requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the Nasdaq rules, including the heightened independence standards applicable to audit committee members. The audit committee is governed by a charter that complies with Nasdaq rules.
Under Nasdaq rules, the audit committee is required to be comprised of at least three independent directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducted a search for a qualified replacement to fill the vacancy resulting from Ms. McNabb’s resignation and on June 29, 2023, our shareholders elected Mr. Steve Capp to serve on our Board. Upon such election, the Board also appointed Mr. Capp to serve as the chairperson of the audit committee, following which the Company received notice from Nasdaq that it has regained compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).
The audit committee is responsible, among others, for:
| • | recommending the appointment of the independent auditor to the general meeting of shareholders; |
| • | the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of any accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit services; |
| • | pre-approving the audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor before the auditor is engaged to render such services; |
| • | evaluating the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance and independence, and presenting its conclusions to our board of directors on at least an annual basis; |
| • | reviewing and discussing with our board of directors and the independent auditor our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to the filing of the respective annual and quarterly reports; |
| • | reviewing our compliance with laws and regulations, including major legal and regulatory initiatives and also reviewing any major litigation or investigations against us that may have a material impact on our financial statements; and |
| • | reviewing and discussing the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the management of financial risks, cybersecurity and information security risks; |
| • | establishing procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and |
| • | reviewing and approving transactions (other than transaction related to the compensation or terms of services) that require the committee’s approval under the rules of Nasdaq and in accordance with our related person transaction policy and procedures. |
The audit committee meets as often as one or more members of our audit committee deem necessary, but in any event meets at least four times per year. The audit committee meets at least once per year with our independent accountant, without our executive officers being present.
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee, which consists of John E. Taylor, Jr., Steve Capp and Laurent Teitgen, assists our board of directors in determining executive officer compensation. John E. Taylor, Jr. serves as chair of the committee. The committee recommends to our board of directors the compensation of each of our executive officers. Under SEC and Nasdaq rules, there are heightened independence standards for members of our compensation committee, including a prohibition against the receipt of any compensation from us other than standard board member fees. All of our compensation committee members meet this heightened standard.
The compensation committee is responsible for:
| • | identifying, reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to executive officer compensation; |
| • | analyzing the possible outcomes of the variable remuneration components and how they may affect the remuneration of our executive officers; |
| • | evaluating each executive officer’s performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining each executive officer’s compensation based on such evaluation; |
| • | determining any long-term incentive component of each executive officer’s compensation in line with the remuneration policy and reviewing our executive officer compensation and benefits policies generally; |
| • | periodically reviewing, in consultation with our Chief Executive Officer, our management succession planning; and |
| • | reviewing and assessing risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees and whether any such risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us. |
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The nominating and corporate governance committee, which consists of John E. Taylor, Jr., Steve Capp and Laurent Teitgen, assists our board of directors in identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors consistent with criteria established by our board of directors and in developing our corporate governance principles. Laurent Teitgen serves as chair of the committee.
The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for:
| • | drawing up selection criteria and appointment procedures for board members; |
| • | reviewing and evaluating the composition, function and duties of our board of directors; |
| • | recommending nominees for selection to our board of directors and its corresponding committees; |
| • | making recommendations to our board of directors as to determinations of board member independence; |
| • | leading our board of directors in a self-evaluation, at least annually, to determine whether it and its committees are functioning effectively; |
| • | overseeing and recommending for adoption by the general meeting of shareholders the compensation for our board members; |
| • | overseeing our ESG policies, programs and strategies; and |
| • | developing and recommending to our board of directors our rules governing the board of directors and code of business conduct, reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of such rules and recommending any proposed changes to our board of directors. |
Duties of Board Members and Conflicts of Interest
Under Luxembourg law, members of our board of directors have a duty of loyalty to act honestly, in good faith and with a view to our best interests. The members of our board of directors also have a duty to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In fulfilling their duty of care to us, the members of our board of directors must ensure compliance with our articles of association. In certain limited circumstances, a shareholder has the right to seek damages if a duty owed by a member of our board is breached.
Pursuant to Luxembourg law, any director having a direct or indirect financial interest in a transaction submitted for approval to our board of directors may not participate in the deliberations and vote thereon, unless the transaction is not in the ordinary course of our business and conflicts with our interest, in which case the director shall be obliged to advise our board of directors thereof and to cause a record of such director’s statement to be included in the minutes of the meeting. He or she may not take part in these deliberations nor vote on such a transaction. At the next general meeting of shareholders, before any other resolution is put to a vote, a special report shall be made on any transactions in which any of the directors may have had an interest that conflicts with our interest.
Directors’ service contracts
There are no arrangements or understandings between us and any of our subsidiaries, on the one hand, and any of our directors, on the other hand, providing for benefits upon termination of their employment or service as directors of our Company or any of our subsidiaries.
6.D. Employees
As of December 31, 2023, the Company had 221 employees located in Israel, 14 employees located in the United States, 137 employees located in Malta, 114 employees located in Bulgaria, 166 employees located in North Macedonia, and additional 59 team members spread across other EU Member States. Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, the Company had 43 dedicated contractors located in India, and 381 dedicated contractors and employees hired by our Ukrainian subsidiaries. As of April 9, 2024, approximately 121 of our Ukraine-based employees are working remotely either in the Poland office or other locations outside of Ukraine.
Our goal is to attract and retain highly qualified and motivated personnel. We also engage contractors to support our efforts. None of our employees and service providers are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We consider our employee relations to be good and we have never experienced a work stoppage.
We are committed to maintaining a working environment in which diversity and equality of opportunity are actively promoted and all unlawful discrimination is not tolerated. We are committed to ensuring employees are treated fairly and are not subjected to unfair or unlawful discrimination. We value diversity and to that end recognize the educational and business benefits of diversity amongst our employees, applicants and other people with whom we have dealings.
6.E. Share Ownership
For information regarding the share ownership of directors and officers, see Item 7.A. “Major Shareholders.” For information as to our equity incentive plans, see Item 6.B. “Compensation - Long-Term Incentive Plans.”
6.F. Disclosure of a Registrant’s Action to Recover Erroneously Awarded Compensation
Not applicable.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
7.A. Major Shareholders
The following table sets forth information relating to the beneficial ownership of our Ordinary Shares as of April 20, 2024 by:
| • | each person, or group of affiliated persons, known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our outstanding Ordinary Shares; |
| • | each of our executive officers and directors; and |
| • | all of our executive officers and directors as a group. |
For further information regarding material transactions between us and principal shareholders, see Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions.”
The number of Ordinary Shares beneficially owned by each entity, person, executive officer or director is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares over which the person has sole or shared voting power or investment power. Additionally, Ordinary Shares that a person has the right to acquire within 60 days of April 20, 2024 through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right, are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by such person for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of such person, but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person, except with respect to the percentage ownership of all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all Ordinary Shares held by that person.
The percentage of Ordinary Shares beneficially owned is computed on the basis of 33,895,026 Ordinary Shares outstanding as of April 20, 2024.
The information set forth below regarding the beneficial ownership for each of our principal shareholders has been furnished by such shareholders. Unless otherwise indicated below, the address for each beneficial owner listed is NeoGames S.A., 10 Habarzel Street, Tel Aviv, 6971014, Israel.
Name of beneficial owner | | Number | | | Percent | |
5% or Greater Shareholders | | | | | | |
Elyahu Azur (1) | | | 6,033,712 | | | | 17.5 | % |
Aristocrat Leisure Limited (2) | | | 20,382,242 | | | | 59.2 | % |
Executive officers and directors | | | | | | |
Moti Malul (3) | | | 474,562 | | | | 1.4 | % |
Motti Gil (4) | | | 12,468 | | | | * | |
Oded Gottfried (5) | | | 612,554 | | | | 1.8 | % |
Rinat Belfer (6) | | | 74,889 | | | | * | |
Tsachi Maimon (7) | | | 153,477 | | | | * | |
Barak Matalon (1) | | | 9,667,599 | | | | 28.1 | % |
Aharon Aran (1) | | | 2,413,483 | | | | 7.0 | % |
Laurent Teitgen (10) | | | 3,542 | | | | * | |
John E. Taylor, Jr. (8) | | | 77,458 | | | | * | |
Steve Capp (9) | | | 5,400 | | | | * | |
All executive officers and directors as a group (10 persons) (11) | | | 13,495,428 | | | | 39.2 | % |
* Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the total outstanding Ordinary Shares.
(1) Based on information reported on Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13D filed on May 22, 2023. As a result of the Voting Agreement and the Amended Voting Agreement (each as defined in Item 7.B. “Voting Agreement”), each of Mr. Azur, Mr. Matalon and Mr. Aran has the shared power to vote, or direct the voting of, an aggregate of 18,114,790 Ordinary Shares that each of them may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of. Each of Mr. Azur, Mr. Matalon and Mr. Aran has the sole power to dispose of, or direct the disposition of, the Ordinary Shares held directly by him. Each of Mr. Azur, Mr. Matalon and Mr. Aran disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities beneficially owned by any other such person. The address for each of Mr. Azur, Mr. Matalon and Mr. Aran is c/o NeoGames, 10 Habarzel St., Tel Aviv, Israel. Based on information reported on Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13D filed on April 25, 2023, a Share Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) was entered into on April 19, 2023 by and among Mr. Matalon, Mr. Azur and Mr. Aran (each, a “Purchaser”) and Pinhas Zahavi (the “Seller”). Pursuant to the SPA, the Purchasers, severally and not jointly, purchased 3,281,557 Ordinary Shares from the Seller, as follows: Mr. Matalon purchased 1,751,318 Ordinary Shares, Mr. Azur purchased 1,093,028 Ordinary Shares and Mr. Aran purchased 437,211 Ordinary Shares. As part of the SPA, the Voting Agreement was terminated with respect to Mr. Zahavi.
(2) Based solely on information reported on Schedule 13D filed on May 25, 2023. As a result of the Support Agreement with certain shareholders of the Company, Aristocrat may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of 20,382,242 of ordinary shares, each without par value. The principal business address of Aristocrat is Building A, Pinnacle Office Park, 85 Epping Road, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.
(3) Shares beneficially owned includes 71,855 Ordinary Shares of the Company and 391,632 options exercisable as of April 20, 2024, 391,632 options exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2024, and 11,075 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(4) Shares beneficially owned includes 9,998 Ordinary Shares of the Company, and 2,470 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(5) Shares beneficially owned includes 596,678 Ordinary Shares of the Company, and 10,476 options exercisable as of April 20, 2024 and 5,400 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(6) Shares beneficially owned includes 15,181 Ordinary Shares of the Company and 52,833 options exercisable as of April 20, 2024, and 52,833 options exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2024, and 6,875 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(7) Shares beneficially owned includes 150,277 Ordinary Shares of the Company, and 3,200 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(8) Shares beneficially owned includes 14,709 Ordinary Shares of the Company and 48,581 options exercisable as of April 20, 2024, 48,581 options exercisable within 60 days of April 20, 2024, and 14,168 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(9) Shares beneficially owned includes 2,000 Ordinary Shares of the Company and 3,400 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
(10) Shares beneficially owned includes 3,542 RSUs exercisable for Ordinary Shares of the Company.
Our directors and executive officers hold, in the aggregate, options exercisable for 553,652 Ordinary Shares, as of April 20, 2024. The options have a weighted average exercise price of $2.2 per share and have expiration dates generally 10 years after the grant date of the option.
Significant Changes in Ownership of Major Shareholders
To our knowledge, other than as disclosed in the table above, our other filings with the SEC and this Annual Report, there has been no significant change in the percentage ownership held by any major shareholder during the past three years.
Voting Rights
The major shareholders listed above do not have voting rights with respect to their Ordinary Shares that are different from the voting rights of other holders of our Ordinary Shares.
Registered Holders
Based on a review of the information provided to us by our transfer agent, as of April 20, 2024, there were five registered holders of our Ordinary Shares, one of which (Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depositary Trust Company) is a United States registered holder, holding approximately 39.9% of our outstanding Ordinary Shares. The number of record holders in the United States is not representative of the number of beneficial holders nor is it representative of where such beneficial holders are resident since many of these Ordinary Shares were held by brokers or other nominees.
Change in Control Arrangements
Other than our acquisition by Aristocrat described in Item 4.A. “History and Development of the Company - Selected Recent Developments – Our Acquisition by Aristocrat”, we are not aware of any arrangement that may at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of the Company.
7.B. Related Party Transactions
The following is a description of our ongoing or presently proposed related party transactions since January 1, 2023.
Relationship with Aspire
NeoGames was established as an independent company in 2014, following a spin-off from Aspire. Between 2014 and August 2022, Barak Matalon and Aharon Aran, members of our board of directors, were also members of Aspire’s board of directors. Further, Barak Matalon, Elyahu Azur and Aharon Aran, who collectively owned a majority of the shares of Aspire, hold as of April 20, 2024 approximately 53.4% of our Ordinary Shares.
On August 11, 2022, NeoGames completed the tender offer and related squeeze-out proceeding for all of the outstanding shares of Aspire. Upon the closing of the Aspire Tender Offer, Aspire ceased to be a “related person” (as defined below) and became a wholly owned subsidiary of NeoGames. For information regarding the tender offer, see Item 4.A. “History and Development of the Company - Selected Recent Developments” above.
Prior to the tender offer, the Company was party to the following agreements with the Aspire Group, which were terminated following the close of the Aspire Tender Offer:
Framework Agreement
On April 24, 2015, with effect as of April 30, 2014, NeoGames entered into an agreement (the “Aspire Framework Agreement”) with Aspire and AG Software Limited (“AG Software”), a member of the Aspire Group that provides the framework for the restructuring and the separate operation of each of the parties and their respective businesses. NeoGames acquired from the Aspire Group the suite of software products used solely in the iLottery market, as well as the rights to certain contracts held by the Aspire Group, in consideration for the Aspire Promissory Notes.
Trademark License Agreement
On April 24, 2015, NeoGames entered into a trademark license agreement with Aspire and William Hill (as amended and restated on August 6, 2015, the “Aspire Trademark License Agreement”) pursuant to which Aspire granted to NeoGames an exclusive license to use the “NEOGAMES” trademark in connection with our business. In September 2020, Aspire and NeoGames executed a trademark assignment agreement and filed deeds of assignment in respect of the registered NEOGAMES trademarks in the EU and the United States that has been recorded in the public registrar.
Aspire Software License Agreement
In April 2015, NeoGames entered into a software license agreement (as amended in August 2015 and in June 2018, the “Aspire Software License Agreement”) with AG Software, Aspire and William Hill, pursuant to which ownership of intellectual property in a suite of software products was allocated between NeoGames and Aspire. In accordance with the Aspire Software License Agreement, software used in both the iLottery business and the iGaming business (the “Mixed-Use Software”) remained in the ownership of Aspire but was exclusively and irrevocably licensed to NeoGames for use in our iLottery business. The Mixed-Use Software includes components such as the wallet, cashier functions and random numbers generator used in our iLottery offerings.
The license from Aspire allows NeoGames to use the Mixed-Use Software to (i) facilitate its iLottery business worldwide, (ii) design, develop and implement online gaming, lottery or sports products and services for B2B customers in the gaming and sports businesses in the United States, (iii) grant a sub-license to William Hill for use when William Hill is operating under its own brand, and under certain circumstances when William Hill is operating under third-party brands, for its gaming and sports business and (iv) design, develop and implement games content (including scratch card, instant win, table and casino games) to customers (except for platform providers or white label companies who are competitors of Aspire) worldwide. The license from Aspire allows NeoGames to make broad use of the Mixed-Use Software in connection with the foregoing rights, including but not limited to adapting, modifying or enhancing it, granting sub-licenses, and distributing and selling it.
Meanwhile, Aspire can use the Mixed-Use Software to (i) facilitate its B2C gaming or sports business worldwide, (ii) facilitate its B2C iLottery business worldwide (except in jurisdictions where NeoGames operates its iLottery business), (iii) design, develop and implement online gaming, lottery or sports products and services for B2G customers in the iLottery business (except in the United States) and (iv) offer online games content (including scratch card, instant win, table and casino games) to customers (except for B2G customers in the United States and certain competitors of NeoGames) worldwide.
Pursuant to the terms of the Aspire Software License Agreement, the CZR Features (as defined below) and modifications to the Mixed-Use Software developed by NeoGames and used exclusively in the iLottery offering are owned by NeoGames and licensed to Aspire on the same terms as Aspire’s rights to use the Mixed-Use Software set forth above. Pursuant to the terms of the Aspire Software License Agreement, modifications to the Mixed-Use Software developed by Aspire and used exclusively in the iGaming offering are owned by Aspire and licensed to NeoGames on the same terms as NeoGames’ license to the Mixed-Use Software set forth above.
In accordance with the terms of the Aspire Software License Agreement, NeoGames is not permitted to design, develop or implement casino and slots content for games aggregators, and Aspire is not permitted to design, develop and implement scratch and instant content for games aggregators.
Consultancy Agreement
On June 1, 2015, NGS and LOTYM HOLDINGS LTD. (“LOTYM”) entered into an agreement pursuant to which LOTYM provides to NGS and consulting services through Barak Matalon (one of the Founding Shareholders) for a monthly consideration in the amount of NIS 45,000 (plus VAT). The agreement has an unlimited term, and may be terminated for convenience by either party, subject to 180-days’ prior written notice. Mr. Matalon and LOTYM have signed undertakings, effective through the term of the agreement and for 12 months following its termination, regarding (i) ownership in inventions by, and assignment thereof to, the Company, (ii) non-competition against the Company, and (iii) non-solicitation of its employees, consultants, suppliers, customers, investors and any party commercially engaged by it. Aspire and LOTYM have entered into an agreement pursuant to which LOTYM provides Aspire with consulting services through Barak Matalon on similar terms to those described above.
The Company paid to LOTYM approximately $289 thousand in the year ended December 31, 2023.
Loan Agreement
For details regarding the loan agreement entered into between NeoGames and Barak Matalon, see the Item 5.B. “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Loan agreement.”
Voting Agreement
Three of our Founding Shareholders have the exclusive right under our articles of association to nominate up to 50% of our directors so long as they own in the aggregate at least 40.0% of our issued and outstanding share capital. In furtherance of the foregoing, the Founding Shareholders entered into a voting agreement dated November 17, 2020 pursuant to which the Founding Shareholders vote as one group with regard to any matter relating to the nomination, election, appointment or removal of directors (the “Voting Agreement”). On April 19, 2023, the SPA was entered into by and among Mr. Matalon, Mr. Azur and Mr. Aran (each, a “Purchaser”) and Mr. Zahavi (the “Seller”). Pursuant to the SPA, the Purchasers, severally and not jointly, purchased 3,281,557 Ordinary Shares from the Seller, as follows: Mr. Matalon purchased 1,751,318 Ordinary Shares, Mr. Azur purchased 1,093,028 Ordinary Shares and Mr. Aran purchased 437,211 Ordinary Shares. As part of the SPA, the Voting Agreement was terminated with respect to Mr. Zahavi.
Other Agreements with Directors and Executive Officers
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers in the ordinary course of business. The agreements provide for the terms of each individual’s employment or service with the Company. Since our inception, we have also granted to our executive officers and to certain of our directors options to purchase Ordinary Shares. For a description of transactions and arrangements with our directors and executive officers, see Item 6.B. “Compensation - Executive Officer Compensation”, Item 6.B. “Compensation - Board Member Compensation” and Item 6.B. “Compensation - Executive Officer and Board Member Employment Agreements.”
Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. See Item 6.B. “Compensation – Insurance and Indemnification” for a description of these indemnification agreements.
Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
Our board of directors has adopted a policy providing that the audit committee will review and approve or ratify material transactions, arrangements, or relationships in which we participate and in which any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. This policy covers interested party transactions under the Companies Law, interested party transactions as defined in Part I, Item 7.B. of Form 20-F and transactions between the Company and an interested party, which are material to the Company or the interested party, and any such transactions between the Company and an interested party that are unusual in their nature or conditions, involving goods, services, or tangible or intangible assets. A “related person” is any of the following: (1) enterprises that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, control or are controlled by, or are under common control with, the Company; (2) associates; (3) individuals owning, directly or indirectly, an interest in the voting power of the Company that gives them significant influence over the Company, and close members of any such individual’s family; (4) key management personnel, that is, those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of the Company, including directors and senior management of companies and close members of such individuals’ families; and (5) enterprises in which a substantial interest in the voting power is owned, directly or indirectly, by any person described in (3) or (4) or over which such a person is able to exercise significant influence. This includes enterprises owned by directors or major shareholders of the Company and enterprises that have a member of key management in common with the Company. Transactions in the ordinary course of business involving an amount less than $120,000 have been pre-approved under the policy. Direct or indirect material interests may arise by virtue of control or significant influence of the related person to the transaction or by a direct or indirect pecuniary interest of the related person in the transaction. Under this policy, the audit committee shall review whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction, and shall also take into account the conflicts of interest and corporate opportunity provisions of the Code of Ethics and Conduct that we have adopted. All of the transactions described above were entered into prior to the adoption of this policy.
Certain of the foregoing disclosures are summaries of agreements, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such agreements.
7.C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
8.A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Item 18 “Financial Statements.”
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may be involved in various claims and legal proceedings related to claims arising out of our operations. Other than as described above in “—Regulation” and in Item 4.B. “Business Overview – Litigation”, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, including any such proceedings that are pending or threatened, of which we are aware.
Dividend Policy
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business.
There are no legislative or other legal provisions currently in force in Luxembourg or arising under our articles of association that restrict the payment of dividends or distributions to holders of our Ordinary Shares not residing in Luxembourg, except for withholding tax requirements and regulations restricting the remittance of dividends, distributions and other payments in compliance with United Nations and EU sanctions. Under Luxembourg law the amount and payment of dividends or other distributions is determined by a simple majority vote at a general meeting of shareholders based on the recommendation of our board of directors, except in certain limited circumstances. Pursuant to our articles of association, our board of directors has the power to pay interim dividends or make other distributions in accordance with applicable Luxembourg law.
Distributions (in the form of either dividends, share premium or capital surplus reimbursements) may be lawfully declared and paid if our net profits and/or distributable reserves are sufficient under Luxembourg law.
| • | Under Luxembourg law, at least 5% of our net profits per year must be allocated to the creation of a legal reserve until such reserve has reached an amount equal to 10% of our issued share capital. The allocation to the legal reserve becomes compulsory again when the legal reserve no longer represents 10% of our issued share capital As of December 31, 2023 we had a legal reserve in the amount of $230 thousand. |
| • | Under Luxembourg law, the amount of distributions paid to shareholders (including in the form of dividends, share premium reimbursements or capital surplus reimbursements) may not exceed the amount of profits at the end of the last financial year plus any profits carried forward and any amounts drawn from reserves that are available for that purpose, less any losses carried forward and sums to be placed in reserve in accordance with Luxembourg law or our articles of association. Furthermore, no distributions (including in the form of dividends, share premium reimbursements or capital surplus reimbursements) may be made if net assets were, at the end of the last financial year (or would become, following such a distribution), less than the amount of the subscribed share capital plus the non-distributable reserves. Distributions in the form of dividends may only be made out of net profits and profits carried forward, whereas distributions in the form of share premium reimbursements may only be made out of available share premium and distributions in the form of capital surplus reimbursements may only be made out of available capital surplus. |
The amount of any future dividend payments we may make will depend on, among other factors, our strategy, future earnings, financial condition, cash flow, working capital requirements, capital expenditures and applicable provisions of our articles of association. Any profits we declare as dividends and any share premium or capital surplus we distribute will not be available to be reinvested in our operations.
We have not declared nor paid dividends in any of the years ended December 31, 2021, 2022 and 2023.
8.B. Significant Changes
None.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
9.A. Offer and Listing Details
In November 2020, our Ordinary Shares commenced trading on Nasdaq under the symbol “NGMS.” Prior to this, no public market existed for our Ordinary Shares.
9.B. Plan of Distribution
Not applicable.
9.C. Markets
See “—Offer and Listing Details” above.
9.D. Selling Shareholders
Not applicable.
9.E. Dilution
Not applicable.
9.F. Expenses of the Issue
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
10.A. Share Capital
Not applicable.
10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association
Other than as set forth below, the information called for by this Item 10.B. is set forth in Exhibit 2.1 to this Annual Report. Our articles of association were last amended on March 18, 2024 to reflect the exercising of stock options which had been exercised until December 31, 2023, and the related issuance of new shares. A copy of our amended and restated articles of association is attached as Exhibit 1.1 to this Annual Report.
We are registered with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies’ Register (Registre de Commerce et des Sociétés, Luxembourg) under number B186309. Our corporate purpose, as stated in Article 4 of our articles of association, is to develop activities in relation with iLottery and iGaming solutions and services as well as any related areas. This includes the (i) the acquisition, holding and disposal, in any form, by any means, whether directly or indirectly, of participations, rights and interests in, and obligations of, Luxembourg and foreign companies, (ii) the acquisition by purchase, subscription, or in any other manner, as well as the transfer by sale, exchange or in any other manner of stock, partnership interests, bonds, debentures, notes and other securities or financial instruments of any kind (including notes or parts or units issued by Luxembourg or foreign mutual funds or similar undertakings) and receivables, claims or loans or other credit facilities and agreements or contracts relating thereto, and (iii) the ownership, administration, development and management of a portfolio of assets (including, among other things, the assets referred to in (i) and (ii) above).
The Company may borrow in any form. It may enter into any type of loan agreement and it may issue notes, bonds, debentures, certificates, shares, beneficiary parts, warrants and any kind of debt or equity securities including under one or more issuance programs. The Company may further list all or part of its shares on a regulated or unregulated stock exchange in or outside of the European Union. The Company may lend funds including the proceeds of any borrowings and/or issues of securities to its subsidiaries, affiliated companies or any other company.
The Company may also give guarantees and grant security interests over some or all of its assets including, without limitation, by way of pledge, transfer or encumbrance, in favor of or for the benefit of third parties to secure its obligations or the obligations of its subsidiaries, affiliated companies or any other company.
The Company may enter into, execute and deliver and perform any swaps, futures, forwards, derivatives, options, repurchase, stock lending and similar transactions. The Company may generally use any techniques and instruments relating to investments for the purpose of their efficient management, including, but not limited to, techniques and instruments designed to protect it against credit, currency exchange, interest rate risks and other risks.
The Company may carry out any commercial, industrial, and financial operations, which are directly or indirectly connected with its purpose or which may favor its development. In addition, the Company may acquire and sell real estate properties, for its own account, either in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg or abroad and it may carry out all operations relating to real estate properties.
In general, the Company may take any controlling and supervisory measures and carry out any operation or transaction which it considers necessary or useful in the accomplishment and development of its purpose.
The descriptions above are to be construed broadly and their enumeration is not limiting. The Company’s purpose shall include any transaction or agreement which is entered into by the Company, provided it is not inconsistent with the foregoing matters.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our Ordinary Shares is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (n/k/a Equiniti Trust Company, LLC). Its address is 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, and its telephone number is 718-921-8300.
10.C. Material Contracts
Except as disclosed in this Annual Report in Item 3.D “Risk Factors,” Item 5.B “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” Item 6.B “Compensation,” Item 7.B “Related Party Transactions” and Item 19 “Exhibits”, we are not currently, nor have we been for the two years immediately preceding the date of this Annual Report, party to any material contract, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business.
10.D. Exchange Controls
We are not aware of any governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation in Luxembourg that restrict the export or import of capital, including the availability of cash and cash equivalents for use by our affiliated companies, or that affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our securities, except for regulations restricting the remittance of dividends, distributions, and other payments in compliance with United Nations and EU sanctions.
10.E. Taxation
The following summary contains a description of certain Luxembourg and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Ordinary Shares, but it does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase Ordinary Shares. The summary is based upon the tax laws of Luxembourg and regulations thereunder and on the federal income tax laws of the United States and regulations thereunder as of the date hereof, which are subject to change.
Material Luxembourg Tax Considerations
The following information is of a general nature only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice.
Prospective investors in the Ordinary Shares should therefore consult their own professional advisers as to the effects of state, local or foreign laws, including Luxembourg tax law, to which they may be subject.
Please be aware that the residence concept used under the respective headings below applies for Luxembourg income tax assessment purposes only. Any reference in the present section to a tax, duty, levy, impost or other charge or withholding of a similar nature, or to any other concepts, refers to Luxembourg tax law and/or concepts only. Also, please note that a reference to Luxembourg income tax encompasses corporation income tax (impôt sur le revenu des collectivités), municipal business tax (impôt commercial communal), a solidarity surcharge (contribution au fonds pour l’emploi) as well as personal income tax (impôt sur le revenu) generally. Investors may further be subject to net wealth tax (impôt sur la fortune) as well as other duties, levies or taxes. Corporate income tax, municipal business tax, the solidarity surcharge (together referred to as “Luxembourg Corporation Taxes”) as well as net wealth tax invariably apply to most corporate taxpayers resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes. Individual taxpayers are generally subject to personal income tax and the solidarity surcharge. Under certain circumstances, where an individual taxpayer acts in the course of the management of a professional or business undertaking, municipal business tax may apply as well.
Taxation of the Company
From a Luxembourg tax perspective, Luxembourg companies are considered as being resident in Luxembourg provided that they have either their registered office or their central administration in Luxembourg. The Company (a fully taxable company) will be considered as a resident of Luxembourg both for the purposes of Luxembourg domestic tax law and for the purposes of the double taxation treaties entered into by Luxembourg, and should therefore be able to obtain a residence certificate from the Luxembourg tax authorities.
The Company will be liable for Luxembourg Corporation Taxes. The standard applicable rate of Luxembourg Corporation Taxes for a company established in Luxembourg-city is 24.94% for the financial year ending on December 31, 2023 (the same rate is applicable in Luxembourg-city for the financial year ending on December 31, 2023). Luxembourg Corporation Taxes apply to the Company’s worldwide income (including capital gains), subject to the provisions of any relevant double taxation treaty. The taxable income of the Company is computed by application of all rules of the Luxembourg income tax law of December 4, 1967, as amended (loi concernant l’impôt sur le revenu), as commented and currently applied by the Luxembourg tax authorities (the “LIR”). Under the LIR, all income of the Company will be taxable in the financial period to which it economically relates and all deductible expenses of the Company will be deductible in the financial period to which they economically relate. Under certain conditions, dividends received by the Company from qualifying participations and capital gains realized by the Company on the sale of such participations may be exempt from Luxembourg Corporation Taxes under the Luxembourg participation exemption regime.
The Company will generally be subject to net wealth tax levied annually at a 0.5% rate. Under certain conditions, qualifying participations may be exempt from net wealth tax under the Luxembourg participation exemption regime.
Taxation of Holders of Ordinary Shares
Withholding tax
Under Luxembourg tax laws currently in force, dividends paid by the Company are in principle subject to a Luxembourg withholding tax equal to 15% of the gross dividend (17.65% of the net dividend if the Company bears the cost of the withholding tax, which is not mandatory under Luxembourg tax laws). Responsibility for the withholding of the tax is assumed by the Company.
However, if a double tax treaty between Luxembourg and the country of residence of a holder of the Ordinary Shares applies, an exemption or a reduction of the Luxembourg withholding tax may be available pursuant to the relevant provisions of such double tax treaty.
In addition, pursuant to current Luxembourg tax laws, an exemption from Luxembourg dividend withholding tax may apply under the following conditions:
| • | the holder of Ordinary Shares receiving the dividends is either (i) a fully taxable Luxembourg resident collective entity, (ii) a collective entity resident in an EU Member State and falling within the scope of article 2 of the Council directive of November 30, 2011 (2011/96/EU) on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different EU Member States, as amended (the “EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive”), (iii) the Luxembourg State, a Luxembourg municipality, an association of a Luxembourg municipality or an operation of Luxembourg public- law entity, (iv) a permanent establishment of an entity referred to at letters (i), (ii) or (iii) above, (v) a Swiss resident joint-stock company subject to corporate income tax in Switzerland without benefiting from any exemption, (vi) a joint-stock company or a cooperative company resident in an EEA country (other than an EU Member State) to the extent that such company is fully taxable and subject (in its country of residence) to a tax corresponding to Luxembourg Corporation Taxes, as well as a permanent establishment of such company, or (vii) a collective entity resident in a treaty country, to the extent that such entity is fully taxable and subject (in its country of residence) to a tax corresponding to Luxembourg Corporation Taxes, as well as a Luxembourg permanent establishment of such entity; and |
| • | on the date on which the income is made available, the holder of Ordinary Shares holds or commits to hold directly (or even indirectly under certain conditions), for an uninterrupted period of at least twelve months, a participation of at least 10% in the share capital of the Company (or with an acquisition price of at least €1,200,000). |
Income Taxation
(i) Taxation of dividend income
Holders of our Ordinary Shares who are either Luxembourg resident individuals or Luxembourg fully taxable resident companies (or foreign shareholders having a permanent establishment in Luxembourg through which such shares are held) will in principle be subject to tax at the ordinary rates on any dividends received from the Company. However, under Luxembourg tax laws currently in force, 50% of the amount of any dividend may be tax exempt at the level of these holders of our Ordinary Shares.
The Luxembourg withholding tax levied at source on the dividends paid may, under certain conditions, be credited against the Luxembourg income tax due on these dividends.
Furthermore, certain corporate holders of our Ordinary Shares may benefit from an exemption from Luxembourg Corporation Taxes on dividend income under the following conditions:
| • | the holder of our Ordinary Shares receiving the dividends is either (i) a fully taxable Luxembourg resident collective entity, (ii) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of an EU resident collective entity falling within the scope of article 2 of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive, (iii) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of a joint-stock company that is resident in a jurisdiction with which Luxembourg has concluded a double tax treaty, or (iv) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of a joint-stock company or of a cooperative company which is a resident of an EEA Member State (other than an EU Member State); and |
| • | on the date on which the income is made available, the holder of our Ordinary Shares holds or commits to hold directly (or even indirectly through certain entities) for an uninterrupted period of at least twelve months, a participation of at least 10% in the share capital of the Company (or with an acquisition price of at least €1,200,000). |
The holder of our Ordinary Shares which is a Luxembourg resident entity governed by (i) the law of December 17, 2010 on undertakings for collective investment, as amended, (ii) the law of February 13, 2007 on specialized investment funds, as amended, (iii) the law of May 11, 2007 on the family estate management company, as amended, or (iv) the law of July 23, 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds, as amended, and which does not fall under the special tax regime set out in article 48 of the law of July 23, 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds, as amended, is not subject to any Luxembourg Corporation Taxes in respect of dividends received from the Company. No tax credit is then available for Luxembourg withholding tax on dividends received from the Company.
Non-resident shareholders (not having a permanent establishment in Luxembourg through which the shares are held) will in principle not be subject to Luxembourg income tax on any dividends received from the Company (except for the withholding tax mentioned above, if applicable).
(ii) Taxation of capital gains
Under current Luxembourg tax laws, capital gains realized by a Luxembourg resident individual holder of our Ordinary Shares (acting in the course of the management of his/her private wealth) upon the disposal of his/her shares are not subject to Luxembourg income tax, provided this disposal takes place more than six months after the shares were acquired and he/she does not hold a Substantial Participation (as defined below). The participation is considered a “Substantial Participation” if the holder of our Ordinary Shares (i) holds or has held (either solely or together with his/her spouse or partner and minor children) directly or indirectly more than 10% of the share capital of the Company at any time during a period of five years before the realization of the capital gain or (ii) acquired his/her shares for free during the five years preceding the disposal of his/her shares or, in the case of subsequent gratuitous transfers, one of the previous holders has held (either solely or together with his/her spouse or partner and minor children) directly or indirectly more than 10% of the share capital of the Company at any time during a period of five years before the realization of the capital gain.
Capital gains realized upon the disposal of shares by a Luxembourg resident corporate shareholder (fully subject to Luxembourg Corporation Taxes) are in principle fully taxable. However, an exemption from Luxembourg Corporation Taxes applies under the following conditions:
| • | the holder of our Ordinary Shares realizing the capital gains is either (i) a fully taxable Luxembourg resident collective entity, (ii) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of an EU resident collective entity falling within the scope of article 2 of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive, (iii) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of a joint-stock company that is resident in a jurisdiction with which Luxembourg has concluded a double tax treaty, or (iv) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of a joint-stock company or of a cooperative company which is a resident of an EEA Member State (other than an EU Member State); and |
| • | on the date on which the disposal takes place, the holder of our Ordinary Shares has held for an uninterrupted period of at least twelve months a participation of at least 10% in the share capital of the Company (or with an acquisition price of at least €6,000,000). |
The holder of our Ordinary Shares which is a Luxembourg resident entity governed by (i) the law of December 17, 2010 on undertakings for collective investment, as amended, (ii) the law of February 13, 2007 on specialized investment funds, as amended, (iii) the law of May 11, 2007 on the family estate management company, as amended, or (iv) the law of July 23, 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds, as amended, and which does not fall under the special tax regime set out in article 48 of the law of July 23, 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds, as amended, is not subject to any Luxembourg Corporation Taxes in respect of capital gains realized upon disposal of its shares.
Under Luxembourg tax laws currently in force (subject to the provisions of double taxation treaties), capital gains realized by a holder of our Ordinary Shares (not acting via a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in Luxembourg through which/whom the shares are held) are not taxable in Luxembourg unless (a) the holder of our Ordinary Shares holds a Substantial Participation in the Company and the disposal of the shares takes place less than six months after the shares were acquired or (b) the holder of our Ordinary Shares has been a former Luxembourg resident for more than fifteen years and has become a non-resident, at the time of transfer, less than five years ago.
Net Wealth Taxation
A corporate holder of our Ordinary Shares that is either a resident of Luxembourg for tax purposes or that maintains a permanent establishment or a permanent representative in Luxembourg through which/whom such shares are held is subject to Luxembourg wealth tax on such shares, except if the holder of our Ordinary Shares is governed by the law of May 11, 2007 on the family estate management company, as amended, by the law of December 17, 2010 on undertakings for collective investment, as amended, by the law of February 13, 2007 on specialized investment funds, as amended, by the law of July 23, 2016 on reserved alternative investment funds, as amended, or is a securitization company governed by the law of March 22, 2004 on securitization, as amended, or is a capital company governed by the law of June 15, 2004 on venture capital vehicles, as amended. Please however note that securitization companies governed by the law of March 22, 2004 on securitization, as amended, capital companies governed by the law of June 15, 2004 on venture capital vehicles, as amended, or reserved alternative investment funds governed by the law of July 23, 2016, as amended and which fall under the special tax regime set out under article 48 thereof may, under certain conditions, be subject to minimum net wealth tax.
Any holder of our Ordinary Shares which is (i) a Luxembourg resident fully taxable collective entity, (ii) a Luxembourg permanent establishment of an EU resident collective entity falling within the scope of article 2 of the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive, (iii) a domestic permanent establishment of a joint-stock company that is resident in a State with which Luxembourg has concluded a double tax treaty, or (iv) a domestic permanent establishment of a joint-stock company or of a cooperative company which is a resident of an EEA Member State (other than an EU Member State) may be exempt from Luxembourg net wealth tax on its shares if it holds a participation of at least 10% in the share capital of the Company (or with an acquisition price of at least €1,200,000).
An individual holder of our Ordinary Shares, whether he/she is resident of Luxembourg or not, is not subject to Luxembourg wealth tax on his/her shares.
Other Taxes
Under current Luxembourg tax laws, no registration tax or similar tax is in principle payable by the holder of our Ordinary Shares upon the acquisition, holding or disposal of the shares. However, a fixed registration duty of €12 may be due in the case where the shares are physically attached to a public deed or to any other document subject to mandatory registration, as well as in the case of a registration of the shares on a voluntary basis.
When the holder of our Ordinary Shares is a Luxembourg resident for inheritance tax assessment purposes at the time of his/her death, the shares are included in his/her taxable estate for Luxembourg inheritance tax assessment purposes.
Luxembourg gift tax may be due on a gift or donation of the shares if embodied in a notarial deed signed before a Luxembourg notary or recorded in Luxembourg.
Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations for United States Holders
The following summary describes certain United States federal income tax considerations generally applicable to United States Holders (as defined below) of Ordinary Shares. This summary deals only with Ordinary Shares held as capital assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”). This summary also does not address the tax considerations that may be relevant to holders in special tax situations including, without limitation, dealers in securities, traders that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting, holders that own Ordinary Shares as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion transaction,” or other integrated investment, banks or other financial institutions, individual retirement accounts and other tax-deferred accounts, insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, United States expatriates, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders subject to any alternative minimum tax, holders that acquired Ordinary Shares in a compensatory transaction, holders which are entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for United States federal income tax purposes or holders that actually or constructively through attribution own 10% or more of the total voting power or value of our outstanding Ordinary Shares. In addition, the following summary does not discuss the tax consequences of the Continuation or the Merger. For a description of the tax consequences of the Continuation or the Merger, see “Material U.S. Federal and Luxembourg Income Tax Consequences and Israeli Tax Consequences of the Continuation and the Merger” in the Convening Notices and Shareholder Circular attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 6-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2024.
This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code, applicable United States Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements and judicial decisions, in each case as in effect on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). No ruling will be requested from the United States Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) regarding the tax considerations described herein, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree with the discussion set forth below. This summary does not address any United States federal tax considerations other than United States federal income tax considerations (such as the estate and gift tax or the Medicare tax on net investment income).
As used herein, the term “United States Holder” means a beneficial owner of the Ordinary Shares that is, for United States federal income tax purposes, (i) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created or organized under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or therein or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust (a) that is subject to the supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more United States persons as described in Internal Revenue Code Section 7701(a)(30), or (b) that has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a “United States person.”
If an entity or other arrangement treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes acquires Ordinary Shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such a partner or partnership should consult its tax adviser as to the particular United States federal income tax considerations of acquiring, owning, and disposing of Ordinary Shares in its particular circumstance.
THE SUMMARY OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS SET FORTH BELOW IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. UNITED STATES HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE PARTICULAR TAX CONSIDERATIONS TO THEM OF OWNING ORDINARY SHARES, INCLUDING THE APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S. TAX LAWS AND POSSIBLE CHANGES IN TAX LAW.
Dividends
As stated above under Item 8.A. “Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information - Dividend Policy,” we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our Ordinary Shares in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business. However, if we do pay any dividends, subject to the discussion below under “-Passive Foreign Investment Company,” the amount of dividends paid to a United States Holder with respect to Ordinary Shares before reduction for any Luxembourg taxes withheld therefrom will generally be included in the United States Holder’s gross income as ordinary income from foreign sources to the extent paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for United States federal income tax purposes). Distributions in excess of earnings and profits will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the United States Holder’s adjusted tax basis in those Ordinary Shares and thereafter as capital gain. However, we do not intend to calculate our earnings and profits under United States federal income tax principles. Therefore, United States Holders should expect to treat a distribution as a dividend even if that distribution would otherwise be treated as a non-taxable return of capital or as capital gain under the rules described above. The amount of any distribution paid in foreign currency will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such currency, translated at the spot rate of exchange on the date such distribution is received, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars at that time.
Foreign withholding tax (if any) paid on dividends on Ordinary Shares at the rate applicable to a United States Holder (taking into account any applicable income tax treaty) may, subject to limitations and conditions, be treated as foreign income tax eligible for credit against such holder’s United States federal income tax liability or, at such holder’s election, eligible for deduction in computing such holder’s United States federal taxable income. Pursuant to applicable United States Treasury regulations (subject to temporary relief potentially available under applicable IRS Notices until further IRS guidance), however, if a United States Holder is not eligible for the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty or does not elect to apply such tax treaty, then such holder may not be able to claim a foreign tax credit arising from any foreign tax imposed on a distribution on Ordinary Shares, depending on the nature of such foreign tax. Dividends paid on Ordinary Shares will generally constitute “passive category income” for purposes of the foreign tax credit. However, if the Company is a “United States-owned foreign corporation,” solely for foreign tax credit purposes, a portion of the dividends allocable to our United States source earnings and profits may be re-characterized as United States source. A “United States-owned foreign corporation” is any foreign corporation in which United States persons own, directly or indirectly, 50% or more (by vote or by value) of the stock. In general, United States-owned foreign corporations with less than 10% of earnings and profits attributable to sources within the United States are excepted from these rules.
If the Company is or were to become a United States-owned foreign corporation, and if 10% or more of the Company’s earnings and profits are attributable to sources within the United States, a portion of the dividends paid on the Ordinary Shares allocable to our United States source earnings and profits will be treated as United States source, and, as such, a United States Holder may not offset any foreign tax withheld as a credit against United States federal income tax imposed on that portion of dividends. If a United States Holder is not eligible for the benefits of an applicable income tax treaty or does not elect to apply such treaty, then such holder may not be able to claim a foreign tax credit arising from any foreign tax imposed on a distribution on our Ordinary Shares, depending on the nature of such foreign tax. The rules governing the treatment of foreign taxes imposed on a United States Holder and foreign tax credits are complex, and United States Holders should consult their tax advisers about the impact of these rules in their particular situations, including their eligibility for benefits under an applicable income tax treaty and the potential impact of the applicable United States Treasury regulations and IRS Notices.
Dividends paid to a non-corporate United States Holder by a “qualified foreign corporation” may be subject to reduced rates of taxation if certain holding period and other requirements are met. “Qualified foreign corporation” generally includes a foreign corporation (other than a foreign corporation that is a PFIC with respect to the relevant United States Holder for the taxable year in which the dividends are paid or for the preceding taxable year) (i) whose shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, or (ii) which is eligible for benefits under a comprehensive United States income tax treaty that includes an exchange of information program and which the United States Treasury Department has determined is satisfactory for these purposes. In this regard, shares are generally considered to be readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States if they are listed on Nasdaq, as Ordinary Shares are. United States Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced tax rate on dividends paid with respect to Ordinary Shares. The dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction available to United States Holders that are corporations in respect of dividends received from other United States corporations.
Disposition of Ordinary Shares
Subject to the discussion below under “-Passive Foreign Investment Company,” a United States Holder will generally recognize capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes on the sale or other taxable disposition of Ordinary Shares equal to the difference, if any, between the amount realized and the United States Holder’s tax basis in those Ordinary Shares. In general, capital gains recognized by a non-corporate United States Holder, including an individual, are subject to a lower rate if such United States Holder held the Ordinary Shares for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any such gain or loss will generally be treated as United States source income or loss for purposes of the foreign tax credit. A United States Holder’s tax basis in Ordinary Shares will generally equal the cost of such Ordinary Shares. The rules governing the treatment of foreign taxes imposed on a United States Holder and foreign tax credits are complex, and United States Holders should consult their tax advisers about the impact of these rules in their particular situations.
Passive Foreign Investment Company
The Company would be a PFIC for any taxable year if, after the application of certain look-through rules, either: (i) 75% or more of its gross income for such year is “passive income” (as defined in the relevant provisions of the Internal Revenue Code), or (ii) 50% or more of the value of its assets (generally determined on the basis of a quarterly average) during such year is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For these purposes, cash and other assets readily convertible into cash or that do or could generate passive income are categorized as passive assets, and the value of goodwill and other unbooked intangible assets is generally taken into account. Passive income generally includes, among other things, rents, dividends, interest, royalties, gains from the disposition of passive assets and gains from commodities and securities transactions. For purposes of this test, we will be treated as owning a proportionate share of the assets and earning a proportionate share of the income of any other corporation of which we own, directly or indirectly, at least 25% (by value) of the stock. Based on our market capitalization and the composition of our income, assets and operations, we believe we were not a PFIC for the year ended December 31, 2023 and do not expect to be a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes for the current taxable year or in the foreseeable future. However, this is a factual determination that must be made annually after the close of each taxable year. Moreover, the aggregate value of our assets for purposes of the PFIC determination may be determined by reference to the trading value of Ordinary Shares, which could fluctuate significantly. In addition, it is possible that the Internal Revenue Service may take a contrary position with respect to our determination in any particular year, and, therefore, there can be no assurance that we were not a PFIC for the year ended December 31, 2023 or will not be classified as a PFIC for the current taxable year or in the foreseeable future. Certain adverse United States federal income tax consequences could apply to a United States Holder if we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during which such United States Holder holds Ordinary Shares. Under the PFIC rules, if we were considered a PFIC at any time that a United States Holder holds Ordinary Shares, we would continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such holder’s investment unless (i) we cease to be a PFIC and (ii) the United States Holder has made a “deemed sale” election under the PFIC rules.
If we are a PFIC for any taxable year that a United States Holder holds Ordinary Shares, any gain recognized by the United States Holder on a sale or other disposition of Ordinary Shares would be allocated pro-rata over the United States Holder’s holding period for the Ordinary Shares. The amounts allocated to the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and to any year before we became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income. The amount allocated to each other taxable year would be subject to tax at the highest rate in effect for individuals or the highest rate in effect for corporations, as appropriate, for that taxable year, and an interest charge would be imposed. Further, to the extent that any distribution received by a United States Holder on Ordinary Shares exceeds 125% of the average of the annual distributions on the Ordinary Shares received during the preceding three years or the United States Holder’s holding period, whichever is shorter, that distribution would be subject to taxation in the same manner as gain on the sale or other disposition of Ordinary Shares if we were a PFIC, described above. Certain elections may be available that would result in alternative treatments, such as mark-to-market treatment, of the Ordinary Shares. Each United States Holder should consult its tax adviser as to whether a mark-to-market election would be available or advisable with respect to the Ordinary Shares. If we are treated as a PFIC with respect to a United States Holder for any taxable year, the United States Holder will be deemed to own equity in any of the entities in which we own equity that also are PFICs. However, an election for mark-to-market treatment would likely not be available with respect to any such entities. We do not expect to prepare or provide the information that would enable United States Holders to make a qualified electing fund election. If we are considered a PFIC, a United States Holder also will be subject to annual information reporting requirements. United States Holders should consult their tax advisers about the potential application of the PFIC rules to an investment in the Ordinary Shares.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding
Dividends on and proceeds from the sale or other taxable disposition of Ordinary Shares may be subject to information reporting to the IRS. In addition, a United States Holder (other than an exempt holder who establishes its exempt status if required) may be subject to backup withholding on cash payments received in connection with any dividend payments and proceeds from the sale or other taxable disposition of Ordinary Shares made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries.
Backup withholding will not apply, however, to a United States Holder who furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number, makes other required certification and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules will be creditable or refundable against the United States Holder’s United States federal income tax liability, provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.
Foreign Financial Asset Reporting
Certain United States Holders are required to report their holdings of certain foreign financial assets, including equity of foreign entities, if the aggregate value of all of these assets exceeds certain threshold amounts. The Ordinary Shares are expected to constitute foreign financial assets subject to these requirements unless the Ordinary Shares are held in an account at certain financial institutions. United States Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the application of these reporting requirements.
Tax Ruling of the Israeli Tax Authority
On May 18, 2021, the Israeli Tax Authority issued a pre-ruling, pursuant to which the Israeli Tax Authority confirmed that following the transfer of certain intellectual property rights relating to the online lottery business of NeoGames S.A. to NGS, the Company will be considered a “preferred technological enterprise” for Israeli tax purposes, and therefore, subject to the conditions set forth in the ruling and applicable law, will be entitled to certain tax benefits, including under certain circumstances a reduced corporate tax rate of 12% to 16%, a 20% tax rate on dividends to Israeli residents, and a 4% tax rate on dividends to non-Israeli corporations. The pre-ruling will expire after tax-year 2025.
The pre-ruling sets forth certain terms regarding the Company’s day to day practices. Failure by the Company to adhere to such terms may result in the loss of the beneficial tax rates set forth by the pre-ruling.
10.F. Dividends and Paying Agents
Not applicable.
10.G. Statement by Experts
Not applicable.
10.H. Documents on Display
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 20-F and current reports on Form 6-K. The SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt under the Exchange Act from, among other things, the rules prescribing the furnishing and content of proxy statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Furthermore, as a foreign private issuer, we are also not subject to the requirements of Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) promulgated under the Exchange Act. In addition, we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. Instead, we must file with the SEC, within four months after the end of each fiscal year, or such other applicable time as required by the SEC, an annual report on Form 20-F containing consolidated financial statements audited by an independent registered public accounting firm. We also intend to furnish certain other material information to the SEC under cover of Form 6-K.
We maintain a corporate website at https://neogames.com. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website does not constitute a part of this annual report on Form 20-F. We also make available on the Investors section of our website, free of charge, our Annual Report and the text of our reports on Form 6-K, including any amendments to these reports, as well as certain other SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. We have included our website address in this annual report on Form 20-F solely as an inactive textual reference.
10.I. Subsidiary Information
Not applicable.
10.J. Annual Report to Security Holdings
Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our operations are exposed to a variety of financial risks: market risk including currency and interest rate risk, contractual risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. Our overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on our financial performance.
Risk management is carried out by management under policies approved by our board of directors.
Further quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented throughout our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
There have been no substantive changes in our exposure to financial instrument risks, our objectives, policies and processes for managing those risks or the methods used to measure them from previous periods unless otherwise stated below.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss that may arise from changes in market factors such as interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
Currency Risk
We have exposure to foreign currency risk. See also Note 24 “Sensitivity Analysis to Currency Risks” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report, where we have included a breakdown of our monetary assets and liabilities by operating currency to provide better visibility to the currency environment we operate in.
The Lottery segment’s functional currency is the USD while Aspire segments’ functional currency is the EUR.
The Lottery segment has presence in Israel and therefore is exposed to the NIS. Our Israeli subsidiary has entered certain forward USD/NIS contracts to hedge its exposure associated with expenses nominated in NIS during 2023. As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company has no open positions.
A significant portion of our business is denominated in EUR. which is the functional currency of Aspire. Financial assets denominated in EUR are mainly payment processors and trade receivables, which fund our working capital needs across the EU, as well as serve our quarterly interest payments on our Senior Facilities Agreement with Blackstone.
A significant portion of Aspire business is in GBP. This is mainly driven by our revenues generated in the UK and relating operating commitments: royalties to partners and gaming taxes with the UKGC.
Our board of directors carefully monitors exchange rate fluctuations and reviews their impact on our net assets and position. Exchange rates are negotiated with our main provider of banking services as and when needed.
Interest Rate Risk
Our senior financing facility with Blackstone is linked to EURIBOR and bears interest at a rate of EURIBOR plus 6.25 percent per annum. See Item 5.B. “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing for the Acquisition of Aspire”.
Due to our specific exposure to interest rate risk (EURIBOR), we have not prepared any sensitivity analysis.
Contractual Risk
In the ordinary course of business, we contract with various parties. These contracts may include performance obligations, indemnities and contractual commitments and termination for convenience clauses. Also, in certain contracts we are committed to follow strict service-level agreement delivery commitments associated with heavy liquidated damages for events of failures. Our management monitors our performance under contracts with any relevant counterparties against such contractual conditions to mitigate the risk of material, adverse non-compliance.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the financial loss if a customer or counterparty to financial instruments fails to meet its contractual obligation. Credit risk arises from our cash and cash equivalents and trade and other receivables. The concentration of our credit risk is considered by counterparty, geography and currency.
An allowance for impairment is made where there is an identified loss event which, based on previous experience, is evidence of a reduction in the recoverability of the cash flows, although there have been no such impairments over the review year. We use forward looking information in the analysis of expected credit losses for all instruments, which is limited to the carry value of cash and cash equivalents and trade and other balances. Our management considers the above measures to be sufficient to control the credit risk exposure.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our financial obligations when due. This risk relates to our prudent liquidity risk management and implies maintaining sufficient cash. Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with our board of directors. Our board of directors manages liquidity risk by regularly reviewing our cash requirements by reference to short-term cash flow forecasts and medium-term working capital projections prepared by management.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not Applicable.
PART TWO
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Our amended and restated articles of association were last amended on March 18, 2024 to reflect the exercise of stock options which had been exercised until December 31, 2023, and the related issuance of new shares. See Item 10.B. “Memorandum and Articles of Association.”
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) | Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2023. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2023, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to accomplish their objectives at the reasonable assurance level.
(b) | Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act).
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on such evaluation under the framework set forth in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023
(c) | Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm |
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for “emerging growth companies.”
(d) | Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16. [RESERVED]
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Our board of directors has determined that each of Mr. Capp, Mr. Taylor and Mr. Teitgen satisfy the “independence” requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has also determined that Mr. Capp is considered an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct that applies to all our employees, officers and directors, including our principal executive, principal financial and principal accounting officers. Our Code of Ethics and Conduct addresses, among other things, the handling of conflicts of interest, compliance issues and other corporate policies such as equal opportunity and non-discrimination standards. Our Code of Ethics and Conduct is available on our website at www.neogames.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.
Under Item 16B of Form 20-F, if a waiver or amendment of the Code of Ethics and Conduct applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and other persons performing similar functions and relates to standards promoting any of the values described in Item 16B(b) of Form 20-F, we will disclose such waiver or amendment to the extent, and as, required under the rules of the SEC or the Nasdaq (i) on our website or (ii) through the filing of a Form 6-K. We granted no waivers under our Code of Ethics in fiscal year 2023.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The table below sets out the total amount billed to us by Ziv Haft, Certified Public Accountants, Isr., BDO Member Firm, and other BDO Member Firms, for services performed in the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023, and breaks down these amounts by category of service:
| | 2023 | | | 2022 | |
| | (in thousands) | |
Audit Fees | | $ | 676 | | | $ | 583 | |
Audit Related Fees | | | 76 | | | | 170 | |
Tax Fees | | | 422 | | | | 277 | |
All Other Fees | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | $ | 1,174 | | | $ | 1,030 | |
Audit Fees
The fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and procedures performed with respect to the prospectuses.
Audit Related Fees
The fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements for the first, second and third quarters, as well as the Company’s annual financial statements, as well as audit and attestation services with respect to the acquisition of Aspire and for NPI.
Tax Fees
Tax fees for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2023 were related to tax compliance and tax related services.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The advance approval of the Audit Committee or members thereof, to whom approval authority has been delegated, is required for all audit and non-audit services provided by our auditors.
All services provided by our auditors are approved in advance by the Audit Committee.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
None.
ITEM 16F. CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT
None.
ITEM 16G. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Practices
We are a “foreign private issuer” (as such term is defined in Rule 3b-4 under the Exchange Act) and our Ordinary Shares are listed on Nasdaq.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted under Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5615(a)(3) to follow certain of our home country, Luxembourg, corporate governance practices instead of the Nasdaq corporate governance rules, provided we disclose which requirements we are not following and the equivalent Luxembourg requirement. We must also provide Nasdaq with a letter from outside counsel in Luxembourg, certifying that our corporate governance practices are not prohibited by Luxembourg law.
At this time, we do not follow any Luxembourg rules instead of Nasdaq corporate governance rules, except with respect to Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635 which sets forth the circumstances under which shareholder approval is required prior to an issuance of securities in connection with: (i) the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company; (ii) equity-based compensation of officers, directors, employees or consultants; (iii) a change of control; and (iv) transactions other than public offerings. With respect to the circumstances described in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5635, we follow Luxembourg law which does not require approval of our shareholders with respect to the issuance of new shares within the limit and subject to the terms of the delegation granted to the board of directors in the form (and within the limits and conditions) of the authorized capital of the Company.
In addition to the above, we currently utilize the controlled company exemption described under Item 6.C “Board Practices—Controlled Company Exemption” from the requirement to have a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors.
Subject to the controlled company exemption, we may in the future elect to follow home country practices with regard to various corporate governance requirements for which exemptions are available to foreign private issuers, including certain requirements prescribed by Nasdaq with regard to, among other things, the composition of our board of directors and shareholder approval procedures for certain dilutive events and for the adoption of, and material changes to, equity incentive plans. Following our home country governance practices, as opposed to the requirements that would otherwise apply to a company listed on Nasdaq, may provide less protection than is accorded to investors under Nasdaq rules applicable to domestic issuers.
Although we are a foreign private issuer and may elect in the future to follow our home country practices in lieu of following certain Nasdaq listing rules, we are still required to, among other things, have an audit committee that satisfies Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2) and ensure that such audit committee members meet the independence requirement in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A)(ii). As previously disclosed, Ms. Lisbeth McNabb, who previously served as a member of the Board since May 2021, and also served as chair of the Audit Committee and as a member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, resigned from the board of directors effective April 21, 2023. As a result, Nasdaq notified us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A) requiring three members on our audit committee. As such, we relied on the cure period allowed for under Nasdaq Listing Rules to fill such vacancy with a qualified individual. On June 29, 2023 our shareholders elected Mr. Steve Capp to serve on our Board. Upon such election, the Board also appointed Mr. Capp to serve as the chairperson of the audit committee, following which the Company received notice from Nasdaq that it has regained compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(c)(2)(A).
ITEM 16H. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 16I. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTION THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
ITEM 16J. INSIDER TRADING POLICIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16K. CYBERSECURITY
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
We have developed and implemented a cybersecurity risk management program intended to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our critical systems and information. Our cybersecurity risk management program includes a cybersecurity incident response plan.
We design and assess our program based on the ISO-27001 cybersecurity framework. This does not imply that we meet each and every particular technical specification or requirement, only that we use ISO-27001 as a guide and best practice to help us identify, assess and manage cybersecurity risks relevant to our business as best as we can.
Our cybersecurity risk management program is integrated into our overall enterprise risk management program, and shares common methodologies, reporting channels and governance processes that apply across the enterprise risk management program to other legal, compliance, strategic, operational and financial risk areas.
Our cybersecurity risk management program includes:
| • | risk assessments designed to help identify material cybersecurity risks to our critical systems, information, products, services and our broader enterprise IT environment; |
| • | An internal cybersecurity team, led by our Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), principally responsible for managing our cybersecurity “Governance, Risk and Compliancy” (GRC), which includes risk assessment processes and periodic internal and external audits through third parties to help us ensure that security controls are in place; |
| • | a cybersecurity incident response plan, including incident response personnel and procedures for addressing and responding to cybersecurity incidents; |
| • | the use of external service providers, where appropriate, to assess, test or otherwise assist with aspects of our security controls; |
| • | cybersecurity awareness training of our employees, incident response personnel and senior management; and |
| • | a third-party risk management process for service providers, suppliers and vendors. |
We have not identified risks from known cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any prior cybersecurity incidents, that have materially affected us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. We face risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. See Item 3.D. “Risk Factors – Our IT Systems and data may be vulnerable to security and cybersecurity attacks and/or security and cybersecurity incidents, including data security incidents, which could result in damage to our brand and reputation, material financial penalties, and legal and regulatory liability, and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.”
Cybersecurity Governance
Our board of directors considers cybersecurity risk as part of its risk oversight function and has delegated to the audit committee oversight of cybersecurity and other information technology risks. The audit committee oversees management’s implementation of our cybersecurity risk management program.
The audit committee receives periodic reports from our CISO on our cybersecurity risks, including our risk management program. In addition, the CISO updates the audit committee, as necessary, regarding any material cybersecurity incidents. Periodically, the cybersecurity team, led by our CISO, provides an update to executive management members that are responsible among others for implementing the audit committee’s cybersecurity risk management program, regarding among others our cybersecurity status, roadmap of issues and progress toward addressing those issues, as well as main risks and challenges.
Our cybersecurity team, which consists of Danny Katz (CISO), Oded Gottfried (CTO), Rinat Belfer (COO), Doron Mor (VP TechOps), Aditya Bhushan (EVP Technologies) and Gabby Naftali (EVP Product, has primary responsibility for our overall cybersecurity risk management program and supervises our cybersecurity personnel. Our cybersecurity team supervises efforts to prevent, detect, mitigate and remediate cybersecurity risks and incidents through various means, which may include briefings from internal security personnel; threat intelligence and other information obtained from governmental, public or private sources, including external consultants engaged by us; and alerts and reports produced by security tools deployed in the IT environment.
Our CISO, Mr. Katz, has over 20 years of experience in global IT and cybersecurity and has worked at NeoGames for more than seven years. Mr. Katz holds a bachelor’s degree in information technologies systems and is a Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) by ISACA and Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) by ISC2. Our cybersecurity management forum includes the Company’s senior management members, many of whom have tens of years’ experience in the hi-tech and gaming industries, have been employed by the Company for more than 10 years and have a vast understanding, knowledge and experience in assessing risks and compliance requirements, among others.
PART THREE
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have provided financial statements pursuant to Item 18.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The audited consolidated financial statements as required under Item 18 are attached hereto starting on page F-1 of this Annual Report. The audit report of Ziv Haft, Certified Public Accountants, Isr., BDO Member Firm, an independent registered public accounting firm, is included herein preceding the audited consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Senior Facilities Agreement, dated May 30, 2022, between NeoGames S.A., NeoGames Connect S.à r.l., NeoGames Connect Limited, Global Loan Services Limited, Glas Trust Corporation Limited, and the guarantors and lenders party thereto (filed as Exhibit 4.10 to NeoGames S.A.’s Form 20-F filed on April 28, 2023, File No. 001-39721, and incorporated herein by reference). |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
101.INS* | Inline XBRL Instance Document. |
101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
101.CAL* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
101.DEF* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document. |
101.LAB* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
101.PRE* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
104* | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document) |
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
# Portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to Item 4 of the Instructions As To Exhibits of Form 20-F because it is both (i) not material and (ii) the type of information that the Company customarily and actually treats as private or confidential. The Company hereby agrees to furnish an unredacted copy of the exhibit to the SEC upon request.
+ Certain schedules have been redacted pursuant to Instructions as to Exhibits to Form 20-F. The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish an unredacted copy of the exhibit to the SEC upon request.
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf.
| NEOGAMES S.A. | |
| | | |
Date: April 26, 2024 | By: | /s/ Moti Malul | |
| | Moti Malul | |
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer | |