Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements Fair value measurements are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s view of market assumptions in the absence of observable market information. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. All financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value are required to be classified into one of the following categories: Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 securities include U.S. Treasury securities and exchange traded equity securities and derivative instruments. Level 2 Observable inputs, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, for the asset or liability or prices for similar assets and liabilities. Most debt securities that are model priced using observable inputs are classified within Level 2. Also included are freestanding and embedded derivative instruments that are priced using models with observable market inputs. Level 3 Valuations that are derived from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs are unobservable (including assumptions about risk). Embedded derivatives that are valued using unobservable inputs are included in Level 3. Because Level 3 fair values, by their nature, contain unobservable market inputs, considerable judgment may be used to determine the Level 3 fair values. Level 3 fair values represent the Company’s best estimate of an amount that could be realized in a current market exchange absent actual market exchanges. In many situations, inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In these situations, the Company determines the level in which the fair value falls based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the determination of the fair value. As a result, both observable and unobservable inputs may be used in the determination of fair values that the Company has classified within Level 3. The Company determines the fair values of certain financial assets and liabilities based on quoted market prices, where available. The Company may also determine fair value based on estimated future cash flows discounted at the appropriate current market rate. When appropriate, fair values reflect adjustments for counterparty credit quality, the Company’s credit standing, liquidity and risk margins on unobservable inputs. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair value estimates are made at a point in time, based on relevant market data, as well as the best information about the individual financial instrument. At times, illiquid market conditions may result in inactive markets for certain of the Company’s financial instruments. In such instances, there may be no or limited observable market data for these assets and liabilities. Fair value estimates for financial instruments deemed to be in an illiquid market are based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, liquidity discounts, currency, credit and interest rate risks, loss experience and other factors. These fair values are estimates and involve considerable uncertainty and variability as a result of the inputs selected and may differ materially from the values that would have been used had an active market existed. As a result of market inactivity, such calculated fair value estimates may not be realizable in an immediate sale or settlement of the instrument. In addition, changes in the underlying assumptions used in the fair value measurement technique could significantly affect these fair value estimates. The following table summarizes the fair value and carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments (in millions): December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair Assets Debt securities (1) $ 44,762 $ 44,762 $ 53,375 $ 53,375 Equity securities 393 393 279 279 Mortgage loans (1) 11,549 10,841 11,482 11,910 Limited partnerships 3,212 3,212 2,831 2,831 Policy loans (1) 4,377 4,377 4,475 4,475 Freestanding derivative instruments 1,270 1,270 1,417 1,417 Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis ("FHLBI") capital stock 146 146 125 125 Cash and cash equivalents 4,298 4,298 2,623 2,623 GMIB reinsurance recoverable 170 170 262 262 Separate account assets 195,906 195,906 248,949 248,949 Liabilities Annuity reserves (2) 35,203 30,223 40,389 48,711 Reserves for guaranteed investment contracts (3) 1,128 1,099 894 923 Trust instruments supported by funding agreements (3) 5,887 5,760 5,986 6,175 FHLB funding agreements (3) 2,004 2,104 1,950 1,938 Funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties (1) 22,957 22,957 29,007 29,007 Long-term debt 2,635 2,344 2,649 2,745 Securities lending payable 36 36 17 17 Freestanding derivative instruments 2,065 2,065 41 41 Notes issued by consolidated VIEs 1,732 1,732 1,404 1,404 Repurchase agreements 1,012 1,012 1,572 1,572 Separate account liabilities 195,906 195,906 248,949 248,949 (1) Includes items carried at fair value under the fair value option and trading securities. (2) Annuity reserves represent only the components of other contract holder funds and reserves for future policy benefits and claims payable that are considered to be financial instruments. The fair value amounts shown in the table for 2021 have been revised for an immaterial error related to the historical disclosure for annuity reserves not reported at fair value within the Fair Value Measurement note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The prior period error did not impact the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (3) Included as a component of other contract holder funds on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following is a discussion of the methodologies used to determine fair values of the financial instruments measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis reported in the following tables. Debt and Equity Securities The fair values for debt and equity securities are determined using information available from independent pricing services, broker-dealer quotes, or internally derived estimates. Priority is given to publicly available prices from independent sources, when available. Securities for which the independent pricing service does not provide a quotation are either submitted to independent broker-dealers for prices or priced internally. Typical inputs used by these three pricing methods include reported trades, benchmark yields, credit spreads, liquidity premiums and/or estimated cash flows based on default and prepayment assumptions. As a result of typical trading volumes and the lack of specific quoted market prices for most debt securities, independent pricing services will normally derive the security prices through recently reported trades for identical or similar securities, making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available market observable information as outlined above. If there are no recently reported trades, the independent pricing services and broker-dealers may use matrix or pricing model processes to develop a security price where future cash flow expectations are developed based upon collateral performance and discounted at relevant market rates. Certain securities are priced using broker-dealer quotes, which may utilize proprietary inputs and models. Additionally, the majority of these quotes are non-binding. Included in the pricing of asset-backed securities are estimates of the rate of future prepayments of principal over the remaining life of the securities. Such estimates are derived based on the characteristics of the underlying structure and prepayment assumptions believed to be relevant for the underlying collateral. Actual prepayment experience may vary from these estimates. Internally derived estimates may be used to develop a fair value for securities for which the Company is unable to obtain either a reliable price from an independent pricing service or a suitable broker-dealer quote. These fair value estimates may incorporate Level 2 and Level 3 inputs and are generally derived using expected future cash flows, discounted at market interest rates available from market sources based on the credit quality and duration of the instrument. For securities that may not be reliably priced using these internally developed pricing models, a fair value may be estimated using indicative market prices. These prices are indicative of an exit price, but the assumptions used to establish the fair value may not be observable or corroborated by market observable information and, therefore, represent Level 3 inputs. The Company performs an analysis on the prices and credit spreads received from third parties to ensure that the prices represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. This process involves quantitative and qualitative analysis and is overseen by investment and accounting professionals. Examples of procedures performed include initial and ongoing review of third-party pricing service methodologies, review of pricing statistics and trends, back testing recent trades and monitoring of trading volumes. In addition, the Company considers whether prices received from independent broker-dealers represent a reasonable estimate of fair value using internal and external cash flow models, which are developed based on spreads and, when available, market indices. As a result of this analysis, if the Company determines there is a more appropriate fair value based upon the available market data, the price received from the third party may be adjusted accordingly. For those securities that were internally valued at December 31, 2022 and 2021, the pricing model used by the Company utilizes current spread levels of similarly rated securities to determine the market discount rate for the security. Furthermore, appropriate risk premiums for illiquidity and non-performance are incorporated in the discount rate. Cash flows, as estimated by the Company using issuer-specific default statistics and prepayment assumptions, are discounted to determine an estimated fair value. On an ongoing basis, the Company reviews the independent pricing services’ valuation methodologies and related inputs and evaluates the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy distribution based upon trading activity and the observability of market inputs. Based on the results of this evaluation, each price is classified into Level 1, 2, or 3. Most prices provided by independent pricing services, including broker-dealer quotes, are classified into Level 2 due to their use of market observable inputs. Limited Partnerships Fair values for limited partnership interests, which are included in other invested assets, is generally determined using the proportion of the Company’s investment in the value of the net assets of each fund (“NAV equivalent”) as a practical expedient for fair value, and generally, are recorded on a three-month lag. No material adjustments were deemed necessary at December 31, 2022 and 2021. The Company’s limited partnership interests are not redeemable and distributions received are generally the result of liquidation of the underlying assets of the partnerships. The Company generally has the ability under the partnership agreements to sell its interest to another limited partner with the prior written consent of the general partner. In cases when the Company expects to sell the limited partnership interest, the estimated sales price is used to determine the fair value rather than the practical expedient. These limited partnership interests are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. In cases when a limited partnership's financial statements are unavailable and a NAV equivalent is not available or practical, the fair value may be based on an internally developed model or provided by the general partner as determined using private transactions, information obtained from the primary co-investor or underlying company, or financial metrics provided by the lead sponsor. These investments are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Policy Loans Policy loans are funds provided to policyholders in return for a claim on the policies values and function like demand deposits which are redeemable upon repayment, death or surrender, and there is only one market price at which the transaction could be settled – the then current carrying value. The funds provided are limited to the cash surrender value of the underlying policy. The nature of policy loans is to have a negligible default risk as the loans are fully collateralized by the value of the policy. Policy loans do not have a stated maturity and the balances and accrued interest are repaid either by the policyholder or with proceeds from the policy. Due to the collateralized nature of policy loans and unpredictable timing of payments, the Company believes the carrying value of policy loans approximates fair value. The reinsurance related component of policy loans at fair value under the fair value option have been classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Freestanding Derivative Instruments Freestanding derivative instruments are reported at fair value, which reflects the estimated amounts, net of payment accruals, which the Company would receive or pay upon sale or termination of the contracts at the reporting date. Changes in fair value are included in net gains (losses) on derivatives and investments. Freestanding derivatives priced using third party pricing services incorporate inputs that are predominantly observable in the market. Inputs used to value derivatives include interest rate swap curves, credit spreads, interest rates, counterparty credit risk, equity volatility and equity index levels. Freestanding derivative instruments classified as Level 1 include futures, which are traded on active exchanges. Freestanding derivative instruments classified as Level 2 include interest rate swaps, cross currency swaps, cross-currency forwards, credit default swaps, total return swaps, put-swaptions and certain equity index call and put options. These derivative valuations are determined by third-party pricing services using pricing models with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Freestanding derivative instruments classified as Level 3 include interest rate contingent options that are valued by third-party pricing services utilizing significant unobservable inputs. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents primarily include money market instruments and bank deposits. Cash equivalents also includes all highly liquid securities and other investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. Certain money market instruments are valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified as Level 1. Funds Withheld Payable Under Reinsurance Treaties The funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties includes both the funds withheld payable which are held at fair value under the fair value option and the funds withheld embedded derivative liability. The fair value of the funds withheld payable which are held at fair value under the fair value option is equal to the fair value of the assets held as collateral, which primarily consists of policy loans using industry standard valuation techniques. The funds withheld embedded derivative liability is determined based upon a total return swap technique referencing the fair value of the investments held under the reinsurance contract and requires certain significant unobservable inputs. The funds withheld payable which are held at fair value under the fair value option and the funds withheld embedded derivative are considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Separate Account Assets Separate account assets are comprised of investments in mutual funds that transact regularly, but do not trade in active markets as they are not publicly available, and, are categorized as Level 2 assets. Variable Annuity Guarantees Variable annuity contracts issued by the Company offer various guaranteed minimum death, withdrawal, income and accumulation benefits. Certain benefits, including non-life contingent components of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits for life (“GMWB for Life”), guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”), and the reinsurance recoverable on the Company’s guaranteed minimum income benefits (“GMIB”), are recorded at fair value. Guaranteed benefits that are not subject to fair value accounting are accounted for as insurance benefits. The Company discontinued offering the GMIB in 2009 and GMAB in 2011. GMABs and non-life contingent components of GMWB and GMWB for Life contracts are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in net gains (losses) on derivatives and investments. The fair value is based on the expectations of future benefit payments and certain future fees associated with the benefits. At the inception of the contract, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of rider fees collected from the contract holder, which is then held static in future valuations. Those fees, generally referred to as the attributed fees, are set such that the present value of the attributed fees is equal to the present value of future claims expected to be paid under the guaranteed benefit at the inception of the contract. In subsequent valuations, both the present value of future benefits and the present value of attributed fees are revalued based on current market conditions and policyholder behavior assumptions. The difference between each of the two components represents the fair value of the embedded derivative. Thus, when unfavorable equity market movements cause declines in the contract holder’s account value relative to the guarantee benefit, the valuation of future expected claims would generally increase relative to the measurement performed at the inception of the contract, resulting in an increase in the fair value of the embedded derivative liability (and vice versa). The Company’s GMIB book is reinsured through an unrelated party, and due to the net settlement provisions of the reinsurance agreement, this contract meets the definition of a derivative. Accordingly, the GMIB reinsurance agreement is recorded at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in net gains (losses) on derivatives and investments. Due to the inability to economically reinsure or hedge new issues of the GMIB, the Company discontinued offering the benefit in 2009. Fair values for GMWB, GMWB for Life, and GMAB embedded derivatives, as well as GMIB reinsurance recoverables, are calculated using internally developed models because active, observable markets do not exist for those guaranteed benefits. The fair value calculation is based on the present value of future cash flows comprised of future expected benefit payments, less future attributed rider fees, over the lives of the contracts. Estimating these cash flows requires numerous estimates and subjective judgments related to capital market inputs, as well as actuarially determined assumptions related to expectations concerning policyholder behavior. Capital market inputs include expected market rates of return, market volatility, correlations of market index returns to funds, fund performance and discount rates. The more significant actuarial assumptions include benefit utilization by policyholders, lapse, mortality, and withdrawal rates. Best estimate assumptions plus risk margins are used as applicable. At each valuation date, the fair value calculation reflects expected returns based on constant maturity treasury rates as of that date to determine the value of expected future cash flows produced in a stochastic process. Volatility assumptions are based on a weighting of available market data for implied market volatility for durations up to 10 years, grading to a historical volatility level by year 15, where such long-term historical volatility levels contain an explicit risk margin. Additionally, non-performance risk is incorporated into the calculation through the adjustment of the risk-free rate curve based on spreads indicated by a blend of yields on similarly rated peer debt and yields on JFI debt (adjusted to operating company levels). Risk margins are also incorporated into the model assumptions, particularly for policyholder behavior. Estimates of future policyholder behavior are subjective and are based primarily on the Company’s experience. As markets change, mature and evolve and actual policyholder behavior emerges, management continually evaluates the appropriateness of its assumptions for this component of the fair value model. The use of the models and assumptions described above requires a significant amount of judgment. Management believes the aggregation of each of these components results in an amount that the Company would be required to transfer for a liability, or receive for an asset, to or from a willing buyer or seller, if one existed, for those market participants to assume the risks associated with the guaranteed benefits and the related reinsurance. However, the ultimate settlement amount of the asset or liability, which is currently unknown, could likely be significantly different than this fair value. Fixed Index Annuities The fair value of the fixed index annuities embedded option, incorporating such factors as the volatility of returns, the level of interest rates and the time remaining until the option expires, is calculated using the closed form Black-Scholes Option Pricing model or Monte Carlo simulations, as appropriate for the type of option. Additionally, assumed withdrawal rates are used to estimate the expected volume of embedded options that will be realized by policyholders. RILA The fair value of the RILA embedded option, incorporating such factors as the volatility of returns, the level of interest rates and the time remaining until the option expires, is calculated using the closed form Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. Additionally, assumed withdrawal rates are used to estimate the expected volume of embedded options that will be realized by policyholders. Notes Issued by Consolidated VIEs These notes, at fair value under the fair value option, are based on the fair values of corresponding fixed maturity collateral. The CLO liabilities are also reduced by the fair value of the beneficial interest the Company retains in the CLO and the carrying value of any beneficial interests that represent compensation for services. As the notes are valued based on the reference collateral, they are classified as Level 2. Fair Value Option The Company elected the fair value option for debt securities related to certain consolidated investments totaling $2,014 million and $1,546 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These debt securities are reflected on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as debt securities, at fair value under the fair value option. The Company has elected the fair value option for certain funds withheld assets, which are held as collateral for reinsurance, totaling $4,160 million and $3,632 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as discussed above, and includes mortgage loans as discussed below. The Company elected the fair value option for certain mortgage loans held under the funds withheld reinsurance agreement. The fair value option was elected for these mortgage loans, purchased or funded after December 31, 2021, to mitigate inconsistency in earnings that would otherwise result between these mortgage loan assets and the funds withheld liability, including the associated embedded derivative, and are valued using third-party pricing services. Changes in fair value are reflected in net investment income on the Consolidated Income Statements. The fair value and aggregate contractual principal for mortgage loans where the fair value option was elected after December 31, 2021, were as follows (in millions): December 31, 2022 Fair value $ 582 Aggregate contractual principal 591 As of December 31, 2022, no loans for which the fair value option was elected were in non-accrual status, and no loans were more than 90 days past due and still accruing interest. The Company elected the fair value option for notes issued by consolidated VIEs totaling $1,732 million and $1,404 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Income and changes in unrealized gains and losses on other assets for which the Company has elected the fair value option are immaterial to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis The following tables summarize the Company’s assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value by hierarchy levels (in millions): December 31, 2022 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Debt securities U.S. government securities $ 5,185 $ 5,184 $ 1 $ — Other government securities 1,467 — 1,467 — Public utilities 5,225 — 5,225 — Corporate securities 25,146 — 25,090 56 Residential mortgage-backed 464 — 464 — Commercial mortgage-backed 1,638 — 1,638 — Other asset-backed securities 5,637 — 5,637 — Equity securities 393 165 106 122 Mortgage loans 582 — — 582 Limited partnerships (1) 440 — — 440 Policy loans 3,419 — — 3,419 Freestanding derivative instruments 1,270 — 1,270 — Cash and cash equivalents 4,298 4,298 — — GMIB reinsurance recoverable 170 — — 170 Separate account assets 195,906 — 195,906 — Total $ 251,240 $ 9,647 $ 236,804 $ 4,789 Liabilities Embedded derivative (assets) liabilities (2) $ (1,018) $ — $ 1,136 $ (2,154) Funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties (3) 424 — — 424 Freestanding derivative instruments 2,065 — 2,065 — Notes issued by consolidated VIEs 1,732 — 1,732 — Total $ 3,203 $ — $ 4,933 $ (1,730) (1) Excludes $2,772 million of limited partnership investments measured at NAV. (2) Includes net embedded derivative (assets) liabilities of $(2,154) million related to GMWB reserves included in reserves for future policy benefits and claims payable, and $205 million related to RILA and $931 million of fixed index annuities, both included in other contract holder funds on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (3) Includes the Athene Embedded Derivative asset of $3,158 million and funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties at fair value under the fair value option. December 31, 2021 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Assets Debt securities U.S. government securities $ 4,321 $ 4,321 $ — $ — Other government securities 1,619 — 1,619 — Public utilities 6,715 — 6,715 — Corporate securities 31,146 — 31,137 9 Residential mortgage-backed 569 — 569 — Commercial mortgage-backed 2,038 — 2,038 — Other asset-backed securities 6,967 — 6,967 — Equity securities 279 111 56 112 Limited partnerships (1) 413 — 17 396 Policy loans 3,467 — — 3,467 Freestanding derivative instruments 1,417 — 1,417 — Cash and cash equivalents 2,623 2,623 — — GMIB reinsurance recoverable 262 — — 262 Separate account assets 248,949 — 248,949 — Total $ 310,785 $ 7,055 $ 299,484 $ 4,246 Liabilities Embedded derivative (assets) liabilities (2) $ 4,071 $ — $ 1,445 $ 2,626 Funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties (3) 3,759 — — 3,759 Freestanding derivative instruments 41 — 41 — Notes issued by consolidated VIEs 1,404 — 1,404 — Total $ 9,275 $ — $ 2,890 $ 6,385 (1) Excludes $2,418 million of limited partnership investments measured at NAV. The fair value amounts shown in the table and the amount disclosed as measured at NAV have been revised for an immaterial error related to the historical disclosure of certain limited partnerships which are measured using a Level 3 fair value measurement as being measured using NAV as a practical expedient within the Fair Value Measurement note to the consolidated financial statements. The prior period error did not impact the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (2) Includes net embedded derivative (assets) liabilities of $2,626 million related to GMWB reserves included in reserves for future policy benefits and claims payable, and $6 million related to RILA and $1,439 million of fixed index annuities, both included in other contract holder funds on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. (3) Includes the Athene Embedded Derivative liability of $120 million and funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties at fair value under the fair value option. Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Level 3 Assets and Liabilities by Price Source The table below presents the balances of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value with their corresponding pricing sources (in millions): December 31, 2022 Assets Total Internal External Debt securities: Corporate $ 56 $ — $ 56 Equity securities 122 1 121 Mortgage loans 582 — 582 Limited partnerships 440 8 432 Policy loans 3,419 3,419 — GMIB reinsurance recoverable 170 170 — Total $ 4,789 $ 3,598 $ 1,191 Liabilities Embedded derivative (assets) liabilities (1) $ (2,154) $ (2,154) $ — Funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties (2) 424 424 — Total $ (1,730) $ (1,730) $ — (1) Includes the net embedded derivative (asset) liability related to GMWB reserves presented in reserves for future policy benefits and claims payable. (2) Includes the Athene Embedded Derivative asset of $3,158 million and funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties at fair value under the fair value option. December 31, 2021 Assets Total Internal External Debt securities: Corporate $ 9 $ — $ 9 Equity securities 112 1 111 Limited partnerships (3) 396 1 395 Policy loans 3,467 3,467 — GMIB reinsurance recoverable 262 262 — Total $ 4,246 $ 3,731 $ 515 Liabilities Embedded derivative (assets) liabilities (1) $ 2,626 $ 2,626 $ — Funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties (2) 3,759 3,759 — Total $ 6,385 $ 6,385 $ — (1) Includes the net embedded derivative (asset) liability related to GMWB reserves presented in reserves for future policy benefits and claims payable. (2) Includes the Athene Embedded Derivative liability of $120 million and funds withheld payable under reinsurance treaties at fair value under the fair value option. (3) The fair value amounts shown in the table have been revised for an immaterial error related to the historical disclosure of certain limited partnerships which are measured using a Level 3 fair value measurement as being measured using NAV as a practical expedient within the Fair Value Measurement note to the consolidated financial statements. The prior period error did not impact the consolidated balance sheets. External pricing sources for securities represent unadjusted prices from independent pricing services and independent indicative broker quotes where pricing inputs are not readily available. Quantitative Information Regarding Internally-Priced Level 3 Assets and Liabilities The table below presents quantitative information on internally priced Level 3 assets and liabilities that use significant unobservable inputs (in millions): As of December 31, 2022 Fair Valuation Technique(s) Significant Unobservable Input(s) Assumption or Input Range Impact of Increase in Input on Fair Value Assets GMIB reinsurance recoverable $ 170 Discounted cash flow Mortality (1) 0.01% - 51.25% Decrease Lapse (2) 2.97% - 8.10% Decrease Utilization (3) 0.00% - 20.00% Increase Withdrawal (4) 4.75% - 5.25% Increase Nonperformance risk adjustment (5) 0.64% - 2.27% Decrease Long-term Equity Volatility (6) 18.50% - 23.68% Increase Liabilities Embedded derivative (assets) liabilities $ (2,154) Discounted cash flow Mortality (1) 0.04% - 49.20% Decrease Lapse (2) 0.12% - 41.28% Decrease Utilization (3) 1.35% - 100.00% Increase Withdrawal (4) 58.75% - 100.00% Increase Nonperformance risk adjustment (5) 0.64% - 2.27% Decrease Long-term Equity Volatility (6) 18.50% - 23.68% Increase (1) Mortality rates vary by attained age, tax qualification status, GMWB benefit election, and duration. The range displayed reflects ages from the minimum issue age for the benefit through age 95, which corresponds to the typical maturity age. A mortality improvement assumption is also applied. (2) Base lapse rates vary by contract-level factors, such as product type, surrender charge schedule and optional benefits election. Lapse rates are further |