![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/CORRESP/0001193125-23-250043/g441541g1003033320631.jpg)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
October 3, 2023
Page 4
8. | We note that Banzai’s CEO and co-founder will receive shares of New Banzai Class B common stock, which entitles the holder to 10 votes per share. Please tell us whether the Class B common stock held by Mr. Davy prior to the merger carried different voting rights than the Class A common shares and provide us with the percentage of voting control held by Mr. Davy prior to the merger. Also, tell us how you considered whether Mr. Davy’s voting rights in New Banzai constituted a modification to the founder’s equity and whether you intend to record additional compensation expense as a result of such modification. Refer to ASC 718-20-35-2A. If so, please revise to include the necessary pro forma adjustment to reflect such expense. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and respectfully informs that Staff that the Class B common stock of Banzai held by Mr. Davy prior to the merger does carry different voting rights than the Class A common shares of Banzai, as the Class A common shares of Banzai entitle their holders to only one vote per share, but does not carry different voting rights than the New Banzai Class B common stock Mr. Davy will receive following the merger. The Class B common stock currently held by Mr. Davy entitles him to 10 votes per share, which is approximately 55.81% of the voting control of Banzai. Following the merger, Mr. Davy’s ownership of New Banzai Class B common stock will continue to entitle him to 10 votes per share of New Banzai Class B common stock, and the New Banzai Class A common stock will entitle holders to one vote per share.
Further in response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has reviewed the guidance in ASC 718-20-35-2A with respect to whether Mr. Davy’s voting rights in New Banzai would constitute a modification to the founder’s equity. In summary, the Company has determined that a pro forma adjustment would not be required as Mr. Davy’s voting rights before and after the merger do not change and thus would not constitute a modification to the founder’s equity.
9. | You state that pro forma adjustment G assumes a scenario in which 3,329,638 public shares are redeemed for $35.2 million. Please explain why the transaction adjustment under the maximum redemption scenario in the pro forma balance sheet includes an adjustment for only ($35,205) or revise. In addition, provide us with the calculations that support the $35,205,207 in pro forma cash and cash equivalents under the minimum redemption scenario after giving effect to pro forma adjustments A, B, E and I, and ensure the amounts in this minimum redemption column foot. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has made changes on page 79 of Amendment No. 1. The Company respectfully informs the Staff that the adjustment of ($35,205) has been corrected to ($35,205,207) and that the pro forma cash and cash equivalents balance of $35,205,207 under the “Assuming No Redemption” scenario has been corrected to $53,062,974. The Company has ensured the $53,062,974 in the “Assuming No Redemption” scenario, after giving effect to pro forma adjustments A, B, E, and I, correctly foots for this column.