Prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, for so long as any shares of our Series F common stock remain outstanding, we will not have the power, without the prior affirmative vote or consent of the holders of a majority of the shares of our Series F common stock then outstanding, voting as a separate class, to amend, alter or repeal any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise, if such amendment, alteration or repeal would alter or change the powers, preferences or relative, participating, optional or other special rights of the Series B common stock.
For so long as any shares of our Series B common stock or Series F common stock are issued and outstanding, we will not have the power, without the prior affirmative vote or consent of the holders of a majority of the voting power of our Series B common stock and Series F common stock then outstanding, voting together as a single class, to issue any shares of our Series B common stock or equity securities convertible into shares of our Series B common stock, or our Series F common stock or equity securities convertible into shares of our Series F common stock to any person other than LMC and its wholly owned subsidiaries or an existing beneficial owner of issued and outstanding shares of our Series B common stock.
Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the holders of our Series B common stock and/or Series F common stock, as applicable, may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of the outstanding shares of our Series B common stock and/or Series F common stock, as applicable, having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares of our Series B common stock and/or Series F common stock, as applicable, were present and voted.
Exclusive Forum for Certain Lawsuits
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if and only if the Court of Chancery does not have subject matter jurisdiction, another state court within the State of Delaware or, if no state court in Delaware has subject matter jurisdiction, the federal district courts of the United Stated States of America) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any stockholder (including a beneficial owner within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act) to bring (1) any derivative action, suit or proceeding brought or purportedly brought on behalf of our company, (2) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, stockholder, officer, employee or agent of our company to our company or our stockholders, or any claim of aiding and abetting such breach, (3) any action, suit or proceeding asserting a claim arising pursuant to, or seeking to enforce any right, obligation, or remedy under, any provision of the DGCL or the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the amended and restated bylaws, (4) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the amended and restated bylaws, (5) any action asserting a claim against our company or any director or officer of our company governed by the internal affairs doctrine, (6) any action, suit, or proceeding as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery, or (7) any action, suit or proceeding asserting an “internal corporate claim” as defined in Section 115 of the DGCL; in all cases, subject to the court’s having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this paragraph will not apply to any actions arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or otherwise arising under federal securities laws, for which the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum.
Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all such Securities Act actions. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. To prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation also provides that the federal district courts of the United States of America will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.