As previously disclosed, on February 16, 2024, Fathom Digital Manufacturing Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Fathom”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Fathom Digital Manufacturing Intermediate, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Parent”), Fathom Digital Manufacturing Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Company Merger Sub”), Fathom Digital Manufacturing Merger Sub 2, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Company Merger Sub (“LLC Merger Sub”), Fathom Holdco, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and the partially-owned operating subsidiary of the Company (“OpCo LLC”), and the Company, pursuant to which, among other things, (i) LLC Merger Sub will merge with and into OpCo LLC with OpCo LLC surviving the merger as a partially owned subsidiary of the Company (the “LLC Merger”) and (ii) immediately following the LLC Merger, Company Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving corporation (such transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, collectively, the “Merger”). Parent, Company Merger Sub and LLC Merger Sub are affiliates of CORE Industrial Partners, LLC (“CORE”). On March 20, 2024, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a preliminary proxy statement, an amended version of which was filed with the SEC on April 15, 2024 (as amended, the “Preliminary Proxy Statement”). On April 19, 2024, the Company filed a definitive proxy statement (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) with respect to the special meeting of the Company’s stockholders scheduled to be held virtually on May 17, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Central Time in connection with the Merger (the “Special Meeting”).
Demand Letters Related to the Merger
On April 17, 2024, Fathom received a demand letter on behalf of a purported Fathom stockholder, Denise Redfield (the “Redfield Demand”). The Redfield Demand alleges that the Preliminary Proxy Statement filed by Fathom in connection with the Merger omits certain material information with respect to such transactions, and requests that Fathom disseminate corrective disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Preliminary Proxy Statement.
Additionally, on April 19, 2024, Fathom received a second demand letter on behalf of a purported Fathom stockholder, Yadira Torres (the “Torres Demand”). The Torres Demand alleges that the Preliminary Proxy Statement filed by Fathom in connection with the Merger omits certain material information with respect to such transactions, and requests that Fathom disseminate corrective disclosures in an amendment or supplement to the Preliminary Proxy Statement.
Finally, on May 3, 2024, the Company received a third demand letter from another putative stockholder demanding access to certain books and records pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law allegedly for the purpose of, among other things, (i) investigating potential wrongdoing, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and/or mismanagement in connection with the Merger and events leading thereto; (ii) evaluating the fairness of the Merger to the Company’s stockholders; and (iii) investigating the independence and disinterestedness of the members of the Fathom Board of Directors (the “Section 220 Demand,” and together with the Redfield Demand and the Torres Demand, the “Demand Letters”).
While the Company believes that the Demand Letters are without merit and that no Supplemental Disclosures (as defined below) are required under applicable law, in order to avoid the risk of potential shareholder litigation (“Shareholder Litigation”) delaying or adversely affecting the consummation of the Merger and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in Shareholder Litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement as provided below in order to moot the claims (the “Supplemental Disclosures”).
Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable law of the Supplemental Disclosures. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations that any of the Supplemental Disclosures, or any other additional disclosures, were or are required.
This Current Report on Form 8-K and the disclosure provided herein does not affect the Merger or the timing of the Special Meeting, each as described more fully in the Definitive Proxy Statement. The Fathom Board of Directors continues to unanimously recommend that you vote “FOR” the proposal to approve and adopt the Merger Agreement and the Merger and “FOR” the proposal to adjourn the Special Meeting, if necessary or appropriate.
Supplemental Disclosures to the Definitive Proxy Statement
The following supplemental disclosures should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. Defined terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement. For clarity, new text within restated paragraphs from the Definitive Proxy Statement is indicated below by bold, underlined text and deleted text within restated paragraphs from the Definitive Proxy Statement is indicated below by strikethrough text.
1