Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates and assumptions reflected in these consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, the accrual of research and development expenses, the valuation of the earn-out liability and the valuation of stock-based awards. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to accrued liabilities and stock-based compensation expense. Actual results could differ from the Company’s estimates. Cash and cash equivalents: The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at acquisition date to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents, which consist of money market accounts, are stated at fair value. Restricted cash: Restricted cash consists of two savings accounts. One is required as collateral for the business credit cards which remains restricted until the contract is terminated and the obligation is paid in full. The second is a security deposit for an office lease in Larkspur, California and remains in place until the lease ends in 2026. Investments: The Company considers all investments with original maturities of more than three months but less than one year to be short-term investments. All investments in marketable securities are classified as available for sale. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with temporary unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, while other-than-temporary gains or losses are included in earnings. The cost of securities sold is determined on a specific identification basis, and realized gains and losses are included in other income (expense) within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Concentration of credit risk and significant customers: Cash, cash equivalents and investments are the primary exposure for the Company to concentrations of credit risk. Periodically, the Company maintains deposits in government insured financial institutions in excess of government insured limits. The Company deposits its cash in financial institutions that it believes are financially sound and have not experienced any losses on such accounts and does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on cash. Further, management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s investments are financially sound and, accordingly, are subject to minimal credit risk. The Company does not believe that it is subject to unusual credit risk beyond the normal credit risk associated with commercial banking relationships. For the year ended December 31, 2021, a single customer comprised 65.4 % of the Company’s revenue (see Note 4). There was no significant concentration in any single customer for the year ended December 31, 2022. Fair value of financial instruments: The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts payable, accrued expenses, a corporate bond, note payable and preferred shares. The carrying amount of accounts payable and accrued expenses are considered a reasonable estimate of their fair value, due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company’s cash equivalents and short-term investments are carried at fair value, determined according to the fair value hierarchy described below (see Note 13). The Company follows the guidance in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, or ASC 820, which defines fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below: Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2: Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 3: Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified from Level I to Level 2 or Level 2 to Level 3. Property and equipment: Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. When parts of an item of property and equipment have different useful lives, they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property and equipment. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets: Furniture and fixtures 5 - 7 years Computer equipment and software 3 years Office equipment 3 years Leasehold improvements 3 - 7 years (Or remaining term of the lease, if shorter) Internal-use software 2 - 5 years Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at least annually and adjusted, if appropriate. Impairment of long-lived assets: The Company periodically reviews the carrying amount of long-lived assets which consist of property and equipment, to determine whether current events or circumstances indicate that such carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or an asset group to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds these estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group, based on discounted cash flows. Management judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of asset groups. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. The Company has not identified any circumstances that would warrant an impairment charge for any long-lived assets on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2022 or 2021. Internal-use software development costs: With respect to the Company’s software products sold under subscription arrangements with customers, costs incurred in the preliminary design and development stages of a project are expensed as incurred in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software. Once a project has reached the application development stage and it is probable that the software will be completed for its intended function, certain internal, external, direct and indirect costs may be subject to capitalization. Generally, costs are capitalized until the technology is available for its intended use. Subsequent costs incurred for the development of future upgrades and enhancements, which are expected to result in additional functionality, follow the same protocol for capitalization. Capitalized software development costs are recorded in property and equipment on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Leases: The Company determines whether a contract is, or contains, a lease at inception. The Company classifies each of its leases as operating or financing considering factors such as the length of the lease term, the present value of the lease payments, the nature of the asset being leased, and the potential for ownership of the asset to transfer during the lease term. Leases with terms greater than one-year are recognized on the consolidated balance sheets as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities and are measured at the present value of the fixed payments due over the expected lease term less the present value of any incentives, rebates or abatements we expect to receive from the lessor. Options to extend a lease are included in the expected lease term if exercise of the option is deemed reasonably certain. Costs determined to be variable and not based on an index or rate are not included in the measurement of the lease liability and are expensed as incurred. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilized the appropriate incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis an amount equal to the lease payments over a similar term and in a similar economic environment. To estimate our incremental borrowing rate, a credit rating applicable to the Company is estimated using a synthetic credit rating analysis since it does not currently have a rating agency-based credit rating. The Company records expense to recognize fixed lease payments on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. The Company has elected the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components for real estate leases. Deferred revenue: Deferred revenue represents payment received in advance of revenue being earned and is comprised of fees received in advance of the delivery or completion of the services and amounts received in instances when revenue recognition criteria have not been met. Deferred revenue associated with upfront payments for a subscription to the Company’s FDA approved video game product is amortized ratably over the subscription period. Legacy Convertible Preferred Stock: In connection with the Business Combination, all Legacy Convertible Preferred Stock were converted to common stock of Legacy Akili. See Notes 1, 3, and 11 for further information. The Company recorded shares of Legacy Convertible Preferred Stock at their respective estimated fair values on the dates of issuance, net of issuance costs. Legacy Convertible Preferred Stock was classified outside of stockholders’ deficit because the holders of such shares had liquidation and redemption rights in the event of a deemed liquidation event that, in certain situations, are not solely within the control of the Company, such as a merger, acquisition, and sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. Earn-Out Liabilities: In connection with the Business Combination, holders of Legacy Akili common stock, Legacy Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase shares of Legacy Akili common stock ("Earn-Out Shareholders") and employees or individual service providers holding options to purchase shares of Legacy Akili common stock, in each case as designated by the Board of Akili as an earn-out service provider prior to the Closing Date (“Earn-Out Service Providers”) received the contingent right to receive additional Common Stock upon the achievement of certain earn-out targets (the “Rights”). The Company concluded the issuance of Rights to Earn-Out Shareholders constitutes a deemed dividend and evaluated the Rights for classification under guidance applicable to financial instruments. In assessing classification, the Company considered ASC Subtopic 815-40 “ Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity ” and determined the Rights contain settlement provisions that preclude them from being indexed to the Company’s stock and accordingly liability classification is required. The Company concluded issuance of the Rights to Earn-Out Service Providers represents compensation in scope of ASC Topic 718, " Compensation - Stock Compensation. " In considering relevant classification guidance, the Company determined the Rights issued to Earn-Out Service Providers are liabilities because they are indexed to whether such Earn-Out Service Providers hold qualifying equity instruments when the earn-out targets are achieved. The fair value of the contingent earn-out consideration is estimated as of the Closing Date at the present value of the expected contingent earn-out consideration using a Monte Carlo Simulation Method ("MCSM"). The Company reviews the probability of achievement of the earn-out targets to determine the impact on the fair value of the earn-out consideration on a quarterly basis over the earn-out period. For Earn-Out Shareholders, the corresponding fair value was initially recorded against additional paid-in capital. Changes in the estimated fair value of the contingent earn-out consideration related to Earn-Out Shareholders are recorded in other income (expense) in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and are reflected in the period in which they are identified. For Earn-Out Service Providers, the corresponding fair value was initially recorded within operating expenses in the same functional category as the grantees' operating expenses. Changes in the estimated fair value of contingent earn-out consideration related to Earn-Out Service Providers is recorded as stock compensation for the period. Changes in the estimated fair value of the contingent earn-out consideration may materially impact or cause volatility in the Company's operating results. Transaction Costs: The Company has allocated certain transaction costs to the Earn-out Shares based on the relative fair value of these instruments as compared to the other newly issued instruments as part of the Business Combination. The portion of transaction costs allocated to these instruments is reflected as a reduction to cash and an increase in selling, general and administrative expense. The costs were determined to relate to future share issuances and not to the initial recapitalization and therefore they were expensed on the Closing Date. All costs allocated to the other newly issued instruments, which consisted of Common Stock, were recorded in total permanent equity as a reduction of additional paid-in capital. Revenue: The Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). Under ASC 606, an entity recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the entity performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The Company only applies the five-step analysis to contracts when it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it is entitled in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. At contract inception, once the contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract, determines those that are performance obligations, and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct. The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company generates patient revenue from contracts with caregivers and patients (“Clients”) who purchase subscriptions to access the Company’s FDA approved video game. Clients are billed in advance for the entire subscription term. Along with the subscription to the video game product, the Clients also receive reporting metrics and technical support services. The subscription to the video game product, reporting metrics and technical support services are combined as a single stand-ready performance obligation because while the components are separate performance obligations, they have the same method and pattern of recognition. Accordingly, the purchase consideration is recognized ratably on an over time basis over the subscription period which begins once the access code is inputted into the game by the Client and game play has started. The Company has generated revenue from a collaboration agreement with Shionogi. The consideration allocated to each performance obligation is recognized as revenue when control is transferred for the related goods or services. For performance obligations that consist of licenses and other promises, the Company applies judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition. The Company has determined that the licenses and other promises under the Collaboration Agreement are a single combined performance obligation satisfied over time. The Company must select a single measure of progress that best depicts the Company’s measurement of progress. ASC 606-10-26-33 states that appropriate methods of measuring progress include output methods and input methods and notes that an entity should consider the nature of the good or service that the entity promised to transfer to the customer in determining the appropriate method for measuring progress. Since activities performed to research and validate one phase may be useful in researching and validating subsequent phases, the Company believes that an input method, which tracks the Company’s efforts required to perform the contracted activities during the contract term, is more representationally faithful than an output method, which might track the agreed upon deliverables that are not similar to one another. If an arrangement includes development and regulatory milestone payments or royalties, the Company evaluates whether the milestones or royalties are considered probable of being reached and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone or royalty value is included in the transaction price. Payments that are not within the Company’s control or the licensee’s control, such as regulatory approvals, are generally not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The following table presents the Company’s revenue by type: Year Ended 2022 2021 Product revenue $ 323 $ 186 Collaboration revenue - 352 Total $ 323 $ 538 As of December 31, 2022, the Company has a contract liability related to product revenue, which consists of amounts that have been paid but have not been recognized as revenue. All amounts are expected to be recognized as revenue within 12 months of the balance sheet date and are classified as current deferred revenue. The Company recognized $ 96 of product revenue in the year ended December 31, 2022 that was previously included in the December 31, 2021 deferred revenue balance. Contract Liabilities Product Balance at December 31, 2021 $ 96 Revenue recognized ( 323 ) Revenue deferred 333 Balance at December 31, 2022 $ 106 Cost of revenue: Cost of revenue includes pharmacy dispense fees, personnel and related costs, third party contractor expenses, royalties, amortization of capitalized software related to our commercialized product and software subscriptions related to our product and hosting fees. Research and development costs: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs include personnel and related costs, consulting costs, external contract research and development expenses, as well as depreciation and utilities. The Company has several agreements with non-related entities to conduct research on behalf of the Company. The expenses incurred associated with these agreements are expensed as incurred within research and development costs. Advertising: The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses were $ 7,861 and $ 12,889 during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 . Accounting for stock-based compensation: Stock-based compensation made to employees and non-employees, including stock options, restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance stock units with market conditions (“PSUs”), is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards and is recognized as compensation expense typically on a straight-line basis over the period during which the share-based award holder is required to perform services in exchange for the award (the vesting period) for stock options and RSUs and on an accelerated attribution basis for each vesting tranche over the respective derived service period for PSUs. The Company classifies stock-based compensation expense in its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the same manner in which the award recipient’s payroll costs are classified or in which the award recipients’ service payments are classified. The Company recognizes adjustments to stock compensation expense for forfeitures as they occur. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black- Scholes option-pricing model. RSUs are measured based on the fair values of the underlying stock on the date of grant. We use the MCSM to estimate the fair value of PSUs. See Note 12 for further discussion of stock-based compensation. Income taxes: Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using rates anticipated to be in effect when such temporary differences reverse. A change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period of the enactment date. A valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets is required if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company also assesses the probability that the positions taken or expected to be taken in its income tax returns will be sustained by taxing authorities. A “more likely than not” (more than 50%) recognition threshold must be met before a tax benefit can be recognized. Tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position, are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Tax positions are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 % likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The difference between the benefit recognized for a position and the tax benefit claimed on a tax return is referred to as an unrecognized tax benefit. Potential interest and penalties associated with such uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense. Comprehensive Loss: Comprehensive loss includes net loss as well as other changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) that result from transactions and economic events other than those with stockholders. Net Loss Per Share: The Company follows the two-class method when computing net loss per share, or EPS, as the Company has issued shares that meet the definition of participating securities. The two-class method determines net loss per share for each class of common and participating securities according to dividends declared or accumulated and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The two-class method requires income available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between common and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed. Basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders is computed by adjusting net loss attributable to common stockholders to reallocate undistributed earnings based on the potential impact of dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, including potential dilutive common shares assuming the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. The Company’s convertible preferred stock contractually entitles the holders of such shares to participate in dividends but does not contractually require the holders of such shares to participate in losses of the Company. Accordingly, in periods in which the Company reports a net loss, such losses are not allocated to such participating securities. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss attributable to common stockholders, diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is the same as basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, since dilutive common shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti- dilutive. The Company reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 . Segment and Geographic Information: Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer, or CEO. The Company views its operations as and manages its business in one operating segment operating exclusively in the United States. Emerging Growth Company Status: The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 permits an emerging growth company, or EGC, such as Akili to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with the new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. The Company has elected to use this extended transition period under the JOBS Act until such time the Company is no longer considered to be an EGC, which means that when a standard is issued or revised, it has different applications for public or private companies, the Company will adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard and will do so until such time that the Company either (i) irrevocably elect to “opt-out” of such extended transition period or (ii) no longer qualify as an EGC. Recently adopted accounting pronouncements: In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842) as amended by ASU 2019-10 and ASU 2020-05, which supersedes the guidance in former ASC Topic 840, Leases . The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less are not impacted by the new guidance. The Company adopted this guidance, effective January 1, 2022 , using the modified retrospective method as of the date of adoption such that prior periods will not be restated. The Company elected a package of practical expedients, under which an entity need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, or initial direct costs for any existing leases. Additional disclosures related to accounting for leases under this new standard are included in Note 7. The adoption incrementally increased the Company’s assets and liabilities by the right-of-use asset and lease liabilities. As the leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company’s incremental borrowing rate was determined based on the information available at the date of adoption to measure its lease liability. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and did not require a cumulative adjustment to accumulated deficit on its consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2022. In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes-Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. ASU 2019-12 eliminates certain exceptions related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. It also clarifies and simplifies other aspects of the accounting for income taxes. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2022. The Company adopted this guidance for the year ending December 31, 2022, however there was no impact to the tax provision. Recently issued accounting pronouncements: In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), as amended by ASU 2019-10. ASU 2016-13 will change how companies account for credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments. For trade receivables, loans and held-to-maturity debt securities, companies will be required to recognize an allowance for credit losses rather than reducing the carrying value of the asset. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company for the annual reporting period beginning January 1, 2023. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact this standard may have on its consolidated financial statements and results of operations. |