Securities and Exchange Commission
December 1, 2022
Page 4
Response: The Registrant has revised the Registration Statement at page 20 in the Tax Risk Factors section, and at pages 144-145 in the U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations section. The Company respectfully submits that, for the reasons set forth below, Item 21(a) of Form F-4 and Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K do not require a tax opinion to be filed in connection with the registration statement. This conclusion is consistent with the approach taken in a number of registration statements recently reviewed by the SEC that similarly involved transactions where a SPAC was the acquired entity and the closing was not conditioned on the receipt of a tax ruling or tax opinion.
Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K requires opinions on tax matters for registered offerings where “the tax consequences are material to an investor and a representation as to tax consequences is set forth in the filing.” The Company notes the requirements for a tax opinion pursuant to the Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19, Section III are consistent with those in Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K. Because the disclosure does not contain a representation as to the tax treatment of the Merger - and in fact expressly disavows any such representation—the Company respectfully submits that a tax opinion (either in long-form or short-form) is not required.
The existing disclosure describes the significant factual and legal uncertainties regarding the qualification of the Merger as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Due to these uncertainties, the closing of the transaction is not conditioned on the receipt of any tax ruling or tax opinion regarding the qualification of the Merger as a reorganization despite the parties’ intention recited in the transaction agreement that the Merger so qualify. The absence of such a closing condition is not unusual in transactions of this type. In recognition of the lack of guidance directly relevant to the reorganization treatment of Merger in which a SPAC is acquired, the disclosure sets forth a summary of the tax consequences that would obtain if the Mergers were to qualify as a reorganization, as well as the tax consequences that would obtain if the Merger were to fail to so qualify. In addition, the disclosure clearly states that the closing of the Merger is not conditioned upon the receipt of any tax ruling or tax opinion, the qualification of the Merger as a reorganization is uncertain, and the Company is not making any representations as to the tax consequences of the Merger. Furthermore, the Company has revised the Registration Statement to add disclosure making clear that although it is the current intention of the Company and AERWINS to take the position that the Merger qualifies as a reorganization to the extent permitted by applicable law, the facts and circumstances of the proposed transaction render the issue highly uncertain and no assurance can be given that, at the relevant time, the Merger so qualifies or that the IRS will not challenge such qualification.
Based on the above, the Company respectfully submits that no tax opinion is required under Item 601(b)(8) of Regulation S-K or Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19.
Information about Aerwins
Significant Market Opportunities, page 168
7. Please revise to explain which product flight was tested in 2019, and which product or products you started selling in October 2021. Please include the month that deliveries began, and state how may unites have been sold.
Response: We have revised this disclosure in the filing to explain which product was flight tested in 2019, and which product AERWINS started selling in October 2021, and to include the month that deliveries will begin and state how many units have been sold.
8. Your disclosure in the fourth paragraph implies that you are making cost-effective air mobility solutions a reality. We note, however, your disclosure on page 132 which states that the private side of AERWINS’ client segment is sales to mainly high net worth individuals. Please revise to identify and discuss the price point for your products.
Response: We have revised our disclosure in the filing to clarify that for the private side AERWINS is initially intentionally targeting high net worth individuals and that as AERWINS get more orders they believe that they will be able to decrease the price points and become more cost-effective. We have additionally revised the filing to identify and discuss the price points for AERWINS products.
9. Please provide support for your statement that you design, develop, manufacture, market, and operate unmanned aircraft and their supporting systems and infrastructure for a wide range of industries and applications, including passenger transportation, logistics, and smart city management.
Response: We have revised the disclosure in the filing to provide support in the form of examples of how AERWINS designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and operates unmanned aircraft and their supporting systems and infrastructure for a wide range of industries and applications, including passenger transportation, logistics, and smart city management.