FRIESS RETIREMENT PLAN FILES PRELIMINARY PROXY MATERIALS OPPOSING REPLACEMENT
OF BRANDYWINE FUND MANAGERS
AMG Funds I Replaced the Longtime Managers of the Brandywine Funds with AMG-Affiliated Managers without
Advance Notice to Shareholders and Now Seeks Retroactive Approval by Fund Shareholders
Shareholders of the Former Brandywine Funds Were Denied a Say in the
Termination of their Chosen Manager, and Had the Investment Objectives of their Funds
Dramatically Changed Without Prior Notice or Input
As a Result of the Unilateral Change Foisted on Them, Shareholders who Hold Shares
in Taxable Accounts Incurred a Significant Tax Liability
GREENVILLE, DE—April 22, 2021—Friess Associates, LLC 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Friess Plan”), together with certain other participants identified herein (collectively, the “Participants,” “we,” “us” or “our”), today announced that it has filed a preliminary proxy statement in connection with the upcoming combined special meeting of shareholders (the “Meeting”), currently scheduled for May 18, 2021, of (i) AMG Boston Common Global Impact Fund (formerly AMG Managers Brandywine Fund) (the “Global Impact Fund”) and (ii) AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (formerly AMG Managers Brandywine Blue Fund) (the “Global Real Return Fund”) (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”). The Funds are each a series of AMG Funds I (“AMG Funds I” or the “Trust”) and are managed by AMG Funds LLC (the “Investment Manager”), a subsidiary of Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (“AMG”).
On March 22, 2021, the Board of Trustees of AMG Funds I (the “Board”) announced that it had terminated Friess Associates, LLC (“Friess”) and Friess Associates of Delaware, LLC (“Friess of Delaware,” collectively with Friess, the “Friess Advisers”), who had successfully managed the Funds’ $1.16 billion in assets for more than thirty years, and replaced them with subadvisers who are affiliates of AMG and the Investment Manager. The Board took this action without any advance notice to the Funds’ shareholders, and apparently without regard for the significant negative consequences of its decisions.
In its preliminary proxy statement, the Friess Plan urges the Funds’ shareholders to vote against the Board’s proposals, including the request to retroactively approve the subadvisory agreements with AMG’s affiliates. The preliminary proxy statement details why the Board’s decision is not in the best interests of shareholders:
| • | | The Board drastically altered investment objectives and strategies. Without a say, shareholders of the Funds ended up invested in very different mutual funds that primarily hold global as opposed to domestic equities, with the Global Impact Fund following an ESG mandate and the Global Real Return Fund following a real return strategy including short positions in global index futures. As a result, the Funds may no longer fit within shareholders’ investment portfolios. |
| • | | The Board’s approval of the changes in investment objectives resulted in a large taxable distribution for taxable accounts. The subadviser change has already forced a special distribution upon shareholders that is mostly comprised of higher taxed short-term gains, an eventuality many shareholders surely would have wanted to avoid. In addition to taxes owed as a result, these distributions may result in increased marginal tax rates for investors and frustrate their tax planning. |
| • | | The Investment Manager appears to benefit more from the fee changes than the fund shareholders. The Board’s purported reason for replacing the Friess Advisers was to reduce fees, but the advisory fees charged either have not changed (in the case of the Global Real Return Fund) or have changed very little (in the case of the Global Impact Fund), and the vast majority of benefits are going to the Investment Manager, not to the Funds’ shareholders. The Investment Manager’s outright proportion of the fees received from shareholders increased significantly, and the Investment Manager’s total revenue increased even more when considering its equity interests in the two affiliated subadvisers. Further, the expense caps touted by the Board for both Funds expire in less than two years. |