UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-23763
First Trust Real Assets Fund |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc.
235 West Galena Street
Milwaukee, WI 53212 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Ann Maurer
235 West Galena Street
Milwaukee, WI 53212 |
(Name and address of agent for service)
registrant's telephone number, including area code: (414) 299-2217
Date of fiscal year end: March 31
Date of reporting period: March 31, 2024
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
(a) | The Report to Shareholders is attached herewith. |
| | | | | 1 | | | |
| | | | | 3 | | | |
| | | | | 4 | | | |
| | | | | 5 | | | |
| | | | | 8 | | | |
| | | | | 9 | | | |
| | | | | 10 | | | |
| | | | | 11 | | | |
| | | | | 12 | | | |
| | | | | 13 | | | |
| | | | | 14 | | | |
| | | | | 27 | | |
MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (Unaudited)
| | | | ||
| Michael D. Peck, CFA | | | Brian R. Murphy | |
| Chief Executive Officer, Co-Chief Investment Officer | | | Co-Chief Investment Officer | |
| mpeck@firsttrustcapital.com | | | bmurphy@firsttrustcapital.com | |
FUND PERFORMANCE
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
| | Average Annual Total Returns as of March 31, 2024 | | | | One Year | | | | Since Inception | | |
| | First Trust Real Assets Fund – Class I (Inception Date June 29, 2022) | | | | 0.21% | | | | (0.98)% | | |
| | Bloomberg Investment Grade: REITs (USD) Index | | | | 7.11% | | | | 3.96% | | |
| | | | |
First Trust Real Assets Fund
June 5, 2024
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
As of March 31, 2024
| Principal Amount1 | | | | | | Value | | ||||||
| | | | ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES – 4.8% | | |||||||||
| | $ | 119,219 | | | | Home Partners of America Trust Series 2021-2, Class F, 3.799%, 12/17/20262 | | | | $ | 106,866 | | |
| | | | | | | Pretium Mortgage Credit Partners, LLC | | | | | | | |
| | | 139,774 | | | | Series 2022-NPL1, Class A1, 2.981%, 1/25/20522,3,4 | | | | | 136,271 | | |
| | | 190,605 | | | | Series 2023-RN1, Class A1, 8.232%, 9/25/20532,3,4 | | | | | 193,109 | | |
| | | | | | | PRP Advisors, LLC | | | |||||
| | | 161,495 | | | | Series 2021-3, Class A1, 1.867%, 4/25/20262,3,4 | | | | | 159,003 | | |
| | | | | | | Saluda Grade Alternative Mortgage Trust | | | | | | | |
| | | 227,330 | | | | Series 2023-FIG3, Class A, 7.067%, 8/25/20532,3,5 | | | | | 236,103 | | |
| | | 227,330 | | | | Series 2023-FIG3, Class B, 7.712%, 8/25/20532,3 | | | | | 234,057 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (Cost $1,041,959) | | | | | 1,065,409 | | |
| | | | BANK LOANS – 2.3% | | |||||||||
| | | | | | | CIRE Alto OpCo, LLC | | | | | | | |
| | | 500,000 | | | | 10.800%, 11/29/20246 | | | | | 500,000 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL BANK LOANS (Cost $500,000) | | | | | 500,000 | | |
| Number of Shares | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | CLOSED-END FUNDS – 7.3% | | |||||||||
| | | 111,073 | | | | Pender Real Estate Credit Fund – Class I | | | | | 1,115,173 | | |
| | | 43,328 | | | | Stepstone Private Infrastructure Fund – Class I* | | | | | 499,567 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL CLOSED-END FUNDS (Cost $1,602,120) | | | | | 1,614,740 | | |
| Principal Amount1 | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS – 12.4% | | |||||||||
| | | 250,000 | | | | Freddie Mac Structured Agency Credit Risk Debt Notes Series 2022-HQA3, Class M2, 10.670% (30-Day SOFR Average+535 basis points), 8/25/20422,3,7 | | | | | 272,215 | | |
| | | 200,000 | | | | Series 2023-HQA2, Class M1B, 8.670% (30-Day SOFR Average+335 basis points), 6/25/20432,3,7 | | | | | 211,896 | | |
| | | | | | | GCAT Trust | | | | | | | |
| | | 250,000 | | | | Series 2021-NQM6, Class M1, 3.414%, 8/25/20662,3,5 | | | | | 171,434 | | |
| | | 172,849 | | | | Series 2022-NQM4, Class A3, 5.730%, 8/25/20672,3,4 | | | | | 172,499 | | |
| | | | | | | GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Trust | | | | | | | |
| | | 227,000 | | | | Series 2023-CCM1, Class B1, 7.512%, 8/25/20532,3,5 | | | | | 223,626 | | |
| | | 223,019 | | | | Series 2023-PJ4, Class A15, 6.000%, 1/25/20542,3,5 | | | | | 223,882 | | |
| | | | | | | JP Morgan Mortgage Trust | | | | | | | |
| | | 168,105 | | | | Series 2016-4, Class B3, 3.808%, 10/25/20462,3,5 | | | | | 152,777 | | |
| | | 120,700 | | | | Series 2016-4, Class B4, 3.808%, 10/25/20462,3,5 | | | | | 84,997 | | |
| | | 164,947 | | | | Series 2016-4, Class B5, 3.808%, 10/25/20462,3,5 | | | | | 88,661 | | |
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — Continued
As of March 31, 2024
| Principal Amount1 | | | | | | Value | | ||||||
| | | | COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (Continued) | | |||||||||
| | $ | 250,000 | | | | New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust Series 2022-NQM1, Class M1, 3.601%, 4/25/20612,3,5 | | | | $ | 180,122 | | |
| | | 200,000 | | | | Radnor RE Ltd. Series 2022-1, Class M1B, 12.070% (30-Day SOFR Average+675 basis points), 9/25/20322,3,7 | | | | | 215,160 | | |
| | | 250,000 | | | | Series 2021-1, Class M2, 8.470% (30-Day SOFR Average+315 basis points), 12/27/20332,3,7 | | | | | 253,830 | | |
| | | | | | | Verus Securitization Trust | | | | | | | |
| | | 200,000 | | | | Series 2021-1, Class M1, 1.968%, 1/25/20662,3,5 | | | | | 152,212 | | |
| | | 200,000 | | | | Series 2021-7, Class B1, 4.143%, 10/25/20662,3,5 | | | | | 151,961 | | |
| | | 200,000 | | | | Series 2024-1, Class B1, 7.909%, 1/25/20692,3,5 | | | | | 198,954 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (Cost $2,807,275) | | | | | 2,754,226 | | |
| Number of Shares | | | | | | | | | | | |||
| | | | PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUNDS – 16.4% | | |||||||||
| | | 465,543 | | | | CBRE U.S. Core Partners LP | | | | | 747,797 | | |
| | | N/A8 | | | | HillPointe Workforce Partnership IV LP*,9 | | | | | 292,007 | | |
| | | N/A8 | | | | Nuveen Real Estate U.S. Cities Industrial Fund6 | | | | | 779,704 | | |
| | | N/A8 | | | | Nuveen Real Estate U.S. Cities Multifamily Fund LP6 | | | | | 155,281 | | |
| | | N/A8 | | | | Oak Street Real Estate Capital Net Lease Property Fund LP | | | | | 1,303,212 | | |
| | | N/A8 | | | | Wynwood BN, LLC | | | | | 356,184 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL PRIVATE INVESTMENT FUNDS (Cost $3,968,675) | | | | | 3,634,185 | | |
| | | | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS – 37.7% | | |||||||||
| | | 65,424 | | | | Bailard Real Estate Investment Trust LP | | | | | 2,017,663 | | |
| | | N/A8 | | | | Cire Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. | | | | | 1,850,611 | | |
| | | 71,592 | | | | Invesco Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.6 | | | | | 1,999,070 | | |
| | | 67,333 | | | | Jones Lang LaSalle Income Property Trust, Inc. – Class M-I | | | | | 814,053 | | |
| | | 63,139 | | | | RREEF Property Trust, Inc. – Class D | | | | | 868,164 | | |
| | | 34,445 | | | | Starwood Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.6 | | | | | 788,292 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS (Cost $9,118,735) | | | | | 8,337,853 | | |
| | | | SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS – 15.3% | | |||||||||
| | | 3,387,040 | | | | Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Fund – Government Portfolio – Institutional Class, 5.15%10 | | | | | 3,387,040 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Cost $3,387,040) | | | | | 3,387,040 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL INVESTMENTS – 96.2% (Cost $22,425,805) | | | | | 21,293,453 | | |
| | | | | | | Assets in Excess of Other Liabilities – 3.8% | | | | | 849,036 | | |
| | | | | | | TOTAL NET ASSETS – 100.0% | | | | $ | 22,142,489 | | |
|
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS — Continued
As of March 31, 2024
Securities With Restrictions on Redemptions | | | Redemptions Permitted | | | Redemption Notice Period | | | Cost | | | Fair Value | | | Original Acquisition Date | | ||||||
Bailard Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.1 | | | Quarterly | | | 30 Days | | | | $ | 2,321,586 | | | | | $ | 2,017,663 | | | | 6/29/2022 | |
CBRE U.S. Core Partners, LP1 | | | Quarterly | | | 60 Days | | | | | 950,000 | | | | | | 747,797 | | | | 9/30/2022 | |
Cire Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. | | | Quarterly | | | 90 Days | | | | | 1,746,997 | | | | | | 1,850,611 | | | | 3/31/2023 | |
Hillpointe Workforce Partnership IV, LP1 | | | Not Permitted | | | N/A | | | | | 302,500 | | | | | | 292,007 | | | | 3/9/2023 | |
Invesco Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. | | | Monthly | | | 30 Days | | | | | 2,150,808 | | | | | | 1,999,070 | | | | 4/29/2022 | |
Nuveen Real Estate U.S. Cities Industrial Fund1 | | | Quarterly | | | 45 Days | | | | | 825,000 | | | | | | 779,704 | | | | 10/2/2023 | |
Nuveen Real Estate U.S. Cities Multifamily Fund LP1 | | | Quarterly | | | 45 Days | | | | | 206,175 | | | | | | 155,281 | | | | 10/3/2022 | |
Oak Street Real Estate Capital Net Lease Property Fund, LP1 | | | Quarterly | | | 60 Days | | | | | 1,335,000 | | | | | | 1,303,212 | | | | 10/31/2022 | |
Pender Real Estate Credit Fund – Class I2 | | | Quarterly | | | N/A | | | | | 1,102,120 | | | | | | 1,115,173 | | | | 5/2/2022 | |
RREEF Property Trust, Inc. – Class D1 | | | Quarterly | | | N/A | | | | | 1,049,854 | | | | | | 868,164 | | | | 5/6/2022 | |
Starwood Real Estate Income Trust, Inc. | | | Monthly | | | 2 Days | | | | | 879,351 | | | | | | 788,292 | | | | 4/29/2022 | |
Stepstone Private Infrastructure Fund – Class I2 | | | Quarterly | | | N/A | | | | | 500,000 | | | | | | 499,567 | | | | 1/23/2024 | |
Wynwood BN, LLC1 | | | Not permitted | | | N/A | | | | | 350,000 | | | | | | 356,184 | | | | 1/26/2023 | |
Totals: | | | | | | | | | | $ | 13,719,391 | | | | | $ | 12,772,725 | | | | | |
CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS
As of March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
Security Type/Sector | | | Percent of Total Net Assets | | |||
Asset-Backed Securities | | | | | 4.8% | | |
Bank Loans | | | | | 2.3% | | |
Closed-End Funds | | | | | 7.3% | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | | | | 12.4% | | |
Private Investment Funds | | | | | 16.4% | | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | | | | 37.7% | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | 15.3% | | |
Total Investments | | | | | 96.2% | | |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities | | | | | 3.8% | | |
Total Net Assets | | | | | 100.0% | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
As of March 31, 2024
| Assets: | | | | | | | |
| Investments, at fair value (cost $22,425,805) | | | | $ | 21,293,453 | | |
| Cash | | | | | 613,481 | | |
| Receivables: | | | | | | | |
| Due from Adviser | | | | | 311,258 | | |
| Dividends and interest | | | | | 68,528 | | |
| Prepaid expenses | | | | | 8,651 | | |
| Total assets | | | | | 22,295,371 | | |
| Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Payables: | | | | | | | |
| Audit fee | | | | | 43,100 | | |
| Distribution fees – Class I (Note 3) | | | | | 16,287 | | |
| Shareholder reporting fees | | | | | 4,853 | | |
| Chief Compliance Officer fees | | | | | 2,217 | | |
| Fund services expense | | | | | 5,291 | | |
| Tax service fees | | | | | 22,000 | | |
| Legal | | | | | 57,408 | | |
| Accrued other expenses | | | | | 1,726 | | |
| Total liabilities | | | | | 152,882 | | |
| Net Assets | | | | $ | 22,142,489 | | |
| Components of Net Assets | | | | | | | |
| Paid-in Capital (par value of $0.01 per share with an unlimited number of shares authorized) | | | | $ | 23,248,232 | | |
| Total accumulated deficit | | | | | (1,105,743) | | |
| Net Assets | | | | $ | 22,142,489 | | |
| Class I Shares: | | | | | | | |
| Net assets applicable to shares outstanding | | | | $ | 22,142,489 | | |
| Shares of beneficial interest issued and outstanding | | | | | 2,368,039 | | |
| Net asset value, price per share | | | | $ | 9.35 | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended March 31, 2024
| Investment Income: | | | | | | | |
| Dividends | | | | $ | 127,349 | | |
| Interest | | | | | 475,079 | | |
| Total investment income | | | | | 602,428 | | |
| Expenses: | | | | | | | |
| Advisory fees | | | | | 300,893 | | |
| Legal fees | | | | | 183,807 | | |
| Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | | | 57,000 | | |
| Tax services | | | | | 52,481 | | |
| Registration fees | | | | | 46,497 | | |
| Audit fee | | | | | 46,200 | | |
| Chief Compliance Officer fees | | | | | 27,100 | | |
| Distribution fees – Class I (Note 3) | | | | | 25,676 | | |
| Shareholder reporting fees | | | | | 21,185 | | |
| Fund services expense | | | | | 19,807 | | |
| Offering costs (see Note 2) | | | | | 14,690 | | |
| Insurance fees | | | | | 10,399 | | |
| Miscellaneous | | | | | 3,175 | | |
| Total expenses | | | | | 808,910 | | |
| Advisory fees waived | | | | | (300,893) | | |
| Other expenses absorbed | | | | | (137,317) | | |
| Net expenses | | | | | 370,700 | | |
| Net investment income | | | | | 231,728 | | |
| Realized and Unrealized loss: | | | | | | | |
| Net realized gain on investments | | | | | 31,103 | | |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | | (225,275) | | |
| Net realized and unrealized loss on investments | | | | | (194,172) | | |
| Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations | | | | $ | 37,556 | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | For the Year Ended March 31, 2024 | | | For the Period May 2, 20221 Through March 31, 2023 | | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | | $ | 231,728 | | | | | $ | 415,811 | | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | | | | 31,103 | | | | | | (3,968) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | | (225,275) | | | | | | (907,077) | | |
Net increase (decrease) resulting from operations | | | | | 37,556 | | | | | | (495,234) | | |
Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | (553,177) | | | | | | (198,105) | | |
Return of capital | | | | | (353,776) | | | | | | — | | |
Total distributions to shareholders | | | | | (906,953) | | | | | | (198,105) | | |
Capital Transactions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | | | | 3,577,538 | | | | | | 24,210,580 | | |
Reinvestment of distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | | | | 23,632 | | | | | | 9,027 | | |
Cost of shares repurchased: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | | | | (3,429,301) | | | | | | (786,251) | | |
Net increase resulting from capital transactions | | | | | 171,869 | | | | | | 23,433,356 | | |
Total increase (decrease) in net assets | | | | | (697,528) | | | | | | 22,740,017 | | |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of period | | | | | 22,840,017 | | | | | | 100,0002 | | |
End of period | | | | $ | 22,142,489 | | | | | $ | 22,840,017 | | |
Capital Share Transactions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares sold: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | | | | 378,091 | | | | | | 2,430,026 | | |
Shares reinvested: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | | | | 2,479 | | | | | | 928 | | |
Shares repurchased: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | | | | (363,744) | | | | | | (79,741) | | |
Net increase in capital share transactions | | | | | 16,826 | | | | | | 2,351,213 | | |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended March 31, 2024
| Increase (Decrease) in Cash | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | | $ | 37,556 | | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash used for operating activities: | | | | | | | |
| Purchases of long-term portfolio investments | | | | | (6,735,749) | | |
| Sales of long-term portfolio investments | | | | | 5,803,530 | | |
| Return of capital dividends received | | | | | 389,252 | | |
| Purchase/Sales of short-term investments, net | | | | | 1,110,410 | | |
| Increase in due from adviser | | | | | (156,394) | | |
| Decrease in dividends and interest | | | | | 13,828 | | |
| Decrease in deferred organizational and offering costs (see Note 2) | | | | | 14,689 | | |
| Increase in prepaid expenses | | | | | (3,602) | | |
| Increase in audit fee | | | | | 23,100 | | |
| Increase in distribution fees – Class I (Note 3) | | | | | 2,144 | | |
| Increase in shareholder reporting fees | | | | | 2,873 | | |
| Increase in chief compliance officer fees | | | | | 2,217 | | |
| Decrease in fund services expense | | | | | (237) | | |
| Increase in tax service fees | | | | | 7,500 | | |
| Increase in legal fees | | | | | 57,408 | | |
| Decrease in accrued other expenses | | | | | (866) | | |
| Net amortization on investments | | | | | (23,896) | | |
| Net realized loss on investments | | | | | 120,484 | | |
| Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | | | | | 225,275 | | |
| Net cash used for operating activities | | | | | 889,521 | | |
| Cash flows provided by (used for) financing activities: | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from shares sold | | | | | 3,577,538 | | |
| Redemption of shares | | | | | (3,429,301) | | |
| Dividends paid to shareholders, net of reinvestments | | | | | (883,321) | | |
| Net cash used for financing activities | | | | | (735,084) | | |
| Net increase in cash | | | | | 154,437 | | |
| Cash: | | | | | | | |
| Beginning of period | | | | | 459,044 | | |
| End of period | | | | $ | 613,481 | | |
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities: | | | | | | | |
| Reinvested dividends | | | | $ | 23,632 | | |
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Class I
For a capital share outstanding throughout each period.
| | | For the Year Ended March 31, 2024 | | | For the Period May 2, 2022* Through March 31, 2023 | | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | | $ | 9.71 | | | | | $ | 10.00 | | |
Income from Investment Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | | | 0.10 | | | | | | 0.25 | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss on investments | | | | | (0.08) | | | | | | (0.46) | | |
Total from investment operations | | | | | 0.02 | | | | | | (0.20) | | |
Less Distributions: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | (0.23) | | | | | | (0.09) | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | (0.01) | | | | | | (0.00)2 | | |
From return of capital | | | | | (0.14) | | | | | | — | | |
Total from distributions | | | | | (0.38) | | | | | | (0.09) | | |
Net asset value, end of period | | | | $ | 9.35 | | | | | $ | 9.71 | | |
Total return | | | | | 0.21% | | | | | | (2.03)%3 | | |
Ratios and Supplemental Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | | $ | 22,142 | | | | | $ | 22,840 | | |
Ratio of expenses to average net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Before fees waived and expenses absorbed | | | | | 3.61% | | | | | | 4.73%4 | | |
After fees waived and expenses absorbed | | | | | 1.65% | | | | | | 1.65%4 | | |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) to average net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Before fees waived and expenses absorbed | | | | | (0.92)% | | | | | | (0.26)%4 | | |
After fees waived and expenses absorbed | | | | | 1.04% | | | | | | 2.81%4 | | |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | | | 32% | | | | | | 2%3 | | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2024
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
| 2026 | | | | $ | 456,465 | | |
| 2027 | | | | | 438,210 | | |
| Total | | | | $ | 894,675 | | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
| Cost of investments | | | | $ | 22,279,557 | | |
| Gross unrealized appreciation | | | | $ | 310,413 | | |
| Gross unrealized depreciation | | | | | (1,296,517) | | |
| Net unrealized depreciation on investments | | | | $ | (986,104) | | |
| Increase (Decrease) | | |||
| Paid-in Capital | | | Total Distributable Deficit | |
| $(14,690) | | | $14,690 | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
| Undistributed ordinary income | | | | $ | — | | |
| Undistributed long-term capital gains | | | | | — | | |
| Tax accumulated earnings | | | | | — | | |
| Accumulated capital and other losses | | | | | (119,639) | | |
| Unrealized depreciation on investments | | | | | (986,104) | | |
| Total accumulated deficit | | | | $ | (1,105,743) | | |
Distribution paid from: | | | 2024 | | | 2023 | | ||||||
Ordinary income | | | | $ | 470,178 | | | | | $ | 195,938 | | |
Net long-term capital gains | | | | | 82,999 | | | | | | 2,167 | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | 353,776 | | | | | | — | | |
Total taxable distributions | | | | $ | 906,953 | | | | | $ | 198,105 | | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
| | | | Repurchase Offer | | | Repurchase Offer | | | Repurchase Offer | | | Repurchase Offer | |
| Commencement Date | | | March 22, 2023 | | | June 21, 2023 | | | September 20, 2023 | | | December 21, 2023 | |
| Repurchase Request Date | | | April 21, 2023 | | | July 21, 2023 | | | October 20, 2023 | | | January 19, 2024 | |
| Repurchase Pricing Date | | | April 21, 2023 | | | July 21, 2023 | | | October 20, 2023 | | | January 19, 2024 | |
| Net Asset Value as of Repurchase Pricing Date | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I Shares | | | $9.61 | | | $9.51 | | | $9.39 | | | $9.32 | |
| Amount Repurchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I Shares | | | $674,701 | | | $607,718 | | | $889,257 | | | $1,247,626 | |
| Percentage of Outstanding Shares Repurchased | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class I Shares | | | 2.97% | | | 2.64% | | | 3.91% | | | 5.54% | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
| | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | | ||||||||||||
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities | | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 1,065,409 | | | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 1,065,409 | | |
Bank Loans | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | 500,000 | | | | | | 500,000 | | |
Closed-End Funds | | | | | 1,614,740 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | 1,614,740 | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | | | | — | | | | | | 2,754,226 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 2,754,226 | | |
Private Investment Funds | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | 934,985 | | | | | | 934,985 | | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | | | | 1,682,218 | | | | | | — | | | | | | 2,787,362 | | | | | | 4,469,580 | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | 3,387,040 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | 3,387,040 | | |
Subtotal | | | | $ | 6,683,998 | | | | | $ | 3,819,635 | | | | | $ | 4,222,347 | | | | | $ | 14,725,980 | | |
Private Investment Funds | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,699,200 | | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,868,273 | | |
Total Investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 21,293,453 | | |
| | | Bank Loans | | | Private Investment Funds | | | Real Estate Investment Trusts | | |||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2023 | | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | 201,829 | | | | | $ | 6,106,231 | | |
Transfers into Level 3 | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Transfers out of Level 3 | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Total gains or losses for the period | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets) | | | | | — | | | | | | (91,844) | | | | | | (2,539,353) | | |
Included in other comprehensive income | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
Net purchases | | | | | 500,000 | | | | | | 825,000 | | | | | | — | | |
Net sales | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | | (779,516) | | |
Balance as of March 31, 2024 | | | | $ | 500,000 | | | | | $ | 934,985 | | | | | $ | 2,787,362 | | |
Change in unrealized gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for assets held at the end of the reporting period | | | | $ | — | | | | | $ | (91,844) | | | | | $ | (2,539,353) | | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
Investments | | | Fair Value | | | Valuation Technique(s) | | | Unobservable Input | | | Range of Input | | |||
Bank Loans | | | | $ | 500,000 | | | | Recent Transaction Price | | | Recent Transaction Price | | | N/A | |
Private Investments Funds | | | | $ | 934,985 | | | | Adjusted Net Asset Value | | | Reported net asset/fair value adjustments | | | N/A | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | | | $ | 2,787,362 | | | | Adjusted Net Asset Value | | | Reported net asset/fair value adjustments | | | N/A | |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued
March 31, 2024
FUND INFORMATION
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
| | NAME, ADDRESS AND YEAR OF BIRTH | | | | POSITION(S) HELD WITH THE FUND | | | | LENGTH OF TIME SERVED | | | | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS | | | | NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX* OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE | | | | OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS HELD BY TRUSTEES | | |
| | David G. Lee Year of Birth: 1952 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Chairman and Trustee | | | | Since Inception | | | | Retired (since 2012); President and Director, Client Opinions, Inc. (2003 – 2012); Chief Operating Officer, Brandywine Global Investment Management (1998 – 2002). | | | | 17 | | | | None | | |
| | Robert Seyferth Year of Birth: 1952 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Trustee | | | | Since Inception | | | | Retired (since 2009); Chief Procurement Officer/Senior Managing Director, Bear Stearns/JP Morgan Chase (1993 – 2009). | | | | 17 | | | | None | | |
| | Gary E. Shugrue Year of Birth: 1954 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Trustee | | | | Since September 2021 | | | | Retired (since 2023); Managing Director, Veritable LP (investment advisory firm) (2016 – 2023); Founder/ President, Ascendant Capital Partners, LP (private equity firm) (2001 – 2015). | | | | 17 | | | | Trustee, Quaker Investment Trust (3 portfolios) (registered investment company). | | |
FUND INFORMATION — Continued
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
| | NAME, ADDRESS AND YEAR OF BIRTH | | | | POSITION(S) HELD WITH THE FUND | | | | LENGTH OF TIME SERVED | | | | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS | | | | NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX* OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE | | | | OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS HELD BY TRUSTEES | | |
| | Terrance P. Gallagher** Year of Birth: 1958 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Trustee | | | | Since June 2020 | | | | Executive Vice President and Trust Platform Director, UMB Fund Services, Inc. (2024 – Present); President and Trustee, Investment Managers Series Trust II (registered investment company) (2013 – Present); Executive Vice President and Director of Fund Accounting, Administration and Tax, UMB Fund Services, Inc. (2007 – 2023). | | | | 17 | | | | President and Trustee, Investment Managers Series Trust II (33 portfolios) (registered investment company). | | |
| | Michael Peck Year of Birth:1980 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | President | | | | Since Inception | | | | Chief Executive Officer and Co-CIO, First Trust Capital Management L.P. (formerly, Vivaldi Asset Management, LLC) (2012 – Present) President and Co-CIO, Vivaldi Capital Management LP (2012 – March 2024); Portfolio Manager, Coe Capital Management (2010 – 2012); Senior Financial Analyst and Risk Manager, the Bond Companies (2006 – 2008). | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | |
| | Chad Eisenberg Year of Birth: 1982 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Treasurer | | | | Since Inception | | | | Chief Operating Officer, First Trust Capital Management L.P. (formerly, Vivaldi Asset Management, LLC) (2012 – Present); Chief Operating Officer, Vivaldi Capital Management LP (2012 – March 2024); Director, Coe Capital Management LLC (2010 – 2011). | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | |
FUND INFORMATION — Continued
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
| | NAME, ADDRESS AND YEAR OF BIRTH | | | | POSITION(S) HELD WITH THE FUND | | | | LENGTH OF TIME SERVED | | | | PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION(S) DURING PAST 5 YEARS | | | | NUMBER OF PORTFOLIOS IN FUND COMPLEX* OVERSEEN BY TRUSTEE | | | | OTHER DIRECTORSHIPS HELD BY TRUSTEES | | |
| | Bernadette Murphy Year of Birth: 1964 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Chief Compliance Officer | | | | Since 2021 | | | | Director, Vigilant Compliance, LLC (investment management solutions firm) (2018 – Present). | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | |
| | Ann Maurer Year of Birth: 1972 c/o UMB Fund Services, Inc. 235 W. Galena St. Milwaukee, WI 53212 | | | | Secretary | | | | Since September 2018 | | | | Senior Vice President, Client Services (2017 – Present), Vice President, Senior Client Service Manager (2013 – 2017), Assistant Vice President, Client Relations Manager (2002 – 2013), UMB Fund Services, Inc. | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | |
FUND INFORMATION — Continued
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
FUND INFORMATION — Continued
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
FUND INFORMATION — Continued
March 31, 2024 (Unaudited)
235 West Galena Street
Milwaukee, WI 53212
Toll Free: (877) 779-1999
| | | | TICKER | | | CUSIP | | ||||||
| First Trust Real Assets Fund – Class I Shares | | | | | FTREX | | | | | | 33742N202 | | |
(b) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
(a) | The registrant, as of the end of the period covered by this report, has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party. |
(b) | The registrant’s code of ethics are written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote: (1) Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; (2) Full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a registrant files with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by the registrant; (3) Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules, and regulations; (4) The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and (5) Accountability for adherence to the code. |
(c) | There have been no amendments, during the period covered by this report, to a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, and that relates to any element of the code of ethics description. |
(d) | The registrant has not granted any waivers, during the period covered by this report, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, regardless of whether these individuals are employed by the registrant or a third party, that relates to one or more of the items set forth in paragraph (b) of this item's instructions. |
(e) | The registrant does not intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under paragraph (c) or (d) of this Item regarding an amendment to, or a waiver from, a provision of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item by posting such information on its Internet website. |
(f) | The registrant has included with this filing, pursuant to Item 13(a)(1), a copy of its code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, as an exhibit to its annual report on this Form N-CSR. |
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
(a) | As of the end of the period covered by the report, the registrant’s board of trustees has determined that Mr. David G. Lee and Mr. Robert Seyferth are qualified to serve as the audit committee financial experts serving on its audit committee and that they are “independent,” as defined by Item 3 of Form N-CSR. |
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Audit Fees
(a) | The aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements are $53,100 for 2023 (this includes $10,000 of fees for the audit of the Fund’s seed financials) and $43,100 for 2024. |
Audit-Related Fees
(b) | The aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item are $0 for 2023 and $0 for 2024. |
Tax Fees
(c) | The aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the review and preparation of tax returns are $0 for 2023 and $0 for 2024. |
All Other Fees
(d) | The aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item are $0 for 2023 and $0 for 2024. |
(e) | (1) The Registrant's Audit Committee must pre-approve the audit and non-audit services of the Auditors prior to the Auditor's engagement. |
(2) The percentage of services described in each of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item that were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X are as follows:
(b) 0%
(c) 0%
(d) 0%
(f) | The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the fiscal period from April 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024 that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees was less than fifty percent. |
(g) | The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the registrant's accountant for services rendered to the registrant, and rendered to the registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for each of the last two fiscal years of the registrant was $0 for 2023 and $0 for 2024. |
(h) | The registrant's audit committee of the board of trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant's independence. |
(i) | Not applicable. |
(j) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
(a) | Not applicable. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
(a) | Schedule of Investments in securities of unaffiliated issuers as of the close of the reporting period is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1(a) of this form. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
First Trust Capital Management L.P.
PROXY POLICY AND PROCEDURE
INTRODUCTION
First Trust Capital Management L.P. (“FTCM”) acts as either the advisor or sub-advisor to a number of registered investment companies (the “Funds”). In accord with Rule 206(4)-6 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, FTCM has adopted the following policies and procedures to provide information on FTCM’s proxy policy generally as well as on procedures for each of the Funds specifically (the “Proxy Policy and Procedure”). These policies and procedures apply only to FTCM. Investment managers engaged as sub-advisors for one of the Funds are required to vote proxies in accord with their own policies and procedures and any applicable management agreements.
GENERAL GUIDELINES
FTCM’s Proxy Policy and Procedure is designed to ensure that proxies are voted in a manner (i) reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders1 and (ii) not affected by any material conflict of interest. FTCM considers shareholders’ best economic interests over the long term (i.e., addresses the common interest of all shareholders over time). Although shareholders may have differing political or social interests or values, their economic interest is generally uniform.
FTCM has adopted voting guidelines to assist in making voting decisions on common issues. The guidelines are designed to address those securities in which the Funds generally invest and may be revised in FTCM’s discretion. Any non-routine matters not addressed by the proxy voting guidelines are addressed on a case-by-case basis, considering all relevant facts and circumstances at the time of the vote, particularly where such matters have a potential for major economic impact on the issuer’s structure or operations. In making voting determinations, FTCM typically will rely on the individual portfolio managers who invest in and track particular companies as they are the most knowledgeable about, and best suited to make decisions regarding, particular proxy matters. In addition, FTCM may conduct research internally and/or use the resources of an independent research consultant. FTCM may also consider other materials such as studies of corporate governance and/or analyses of shareholder and management proposals by a certain sector of companies and may engage in dialogue with an issuer’s management.
FTCM acknowledges its responsibility to identify material conflicts of interest related to voting proxies. FTCM’s employees are required to disclose to the Chief Compliance Officer any personal conflicts, such as officer or director positions held by them, their spouses or close relatives, in any publicly traded company. Conflicts based on business relationships with FTCM, any affiliate or any person associated with FTCM, will be considered only to the extent that FTCM has actual knowledge of such relationships. FTCM then takes appropriate steps to address identified conflicts. Typically, in those instances when a proxy vote may present a conflict between the interests of the Fund, on the one hand, and FTCM’s interests or the interests of a person affiliated with FTCM on the other, FTCM will abstain from making a voting decision and will document the decision and reasoning for doing so.
1 Actions taken in accord with the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders are those which align most closely with the Funds’ stated investment objectives and strategies.
First Trust Capital Management | 225 W. Wacker Drive | 21st Floor | Chicago, IL 60606 | P: 773.828.6700 | F: 847.386.2910
In some cases, the cost of voting a proxy may outweigh the expected benefits. For example, casting a vote on a foreign security may involve additional costs such as hiring a translator or traveling to the foreign country to vote the security in person. In such situations, FTCM may abstain from voting a proxy if the effect on shareholders’ economic interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant.
In certain cases, securities on loan as part of a securities lending program may not be voted. Nothing in the proxy voting policies shall obligate FTCM to exercise voting rights with respect to a portfolio security if it is prohibited by the terms of the security or by applicable law or otherwise.
FTCM will not discuss with members of the public how they intend to vote on any particular proxy proposal.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The Funds are subject to the restrictions of Sections 12(d)(1)(A)(i) and (B)(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”). Generally, these provisions require that any fund and any entity controlled by that fund (including ETFs that are registered investment companies) may not (i) own, in the aggregate, more than three percent (3%) of the total outstanding voting securities of any registered open-end or closed-end investment company, including money market funds2; (ii) invest more than 5% of its total assets in any one investment company; or (iii) invest more than 10% of its total assets in the securities of other investment companies. Section 12(d)(1)(F) of the Act provides that the Section 12(d)(1) limitations do not apply to the securities acquired by a fund if (x) immediately after the purchase or acquisition of not more than 3% of the total outstanding stock of such registered investment company is owned by the fund and all affiliated persons of the fund, and (y) the fund is not proposing to offer or sell any security issued by it through a principal underwriter or otherwise at a public or offering price which includes a sales load of more than one and a half percent (1.5%). In the event that one of Funds relies upon Section 12(d)(1)(F), FTCM, acting on behalf of the Fund, will, when voting with respect to any investment company owned by the Fund, comply with either of the following voting restrictions:
● | Seek instruction from the Fund’s shareholders with regard to the voting of all proxies and vote in accordance with such instructions, or |
● | Vote the shares held by the Fund in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of such security. |
In addition to Section 12(d)(1)(F), Rule 12d1-4 under the Act states that a registered investment company (“Acquiring Fund”) may purchase or otherwise acquire the securities issued by another registered investment company (the “Acquired Fund”) in excess of the limits of Section 12(d)(1) and an Acquired Fund may sell or otherwise dispose of the securities issued by the Acquiring Fund in excess of the limits of Section 12(d)(1) if certain conditions are met. One of the conditions is that if the Acquiring Fund and its advisory group (as defined by Rule 12d1-4), in aggregate (A) hold more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of an Acquired Fund that is a registered open-end management investment company or registered unit investment trust as a result of a decrease in the outstanding voting securities of an Acquired Fund, or (B) hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of an Acquired Fund that is a registered closed-end management investment company or business development company, each of those holders will vote its securities in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of such securities. When relying on Rule 12d1-4, the Fund will comply with such voting restrictions as required by Rule 12d1-4 and any applicable provision in the respective Fund of Funds Agreement with the Acquired Fund.
2 The three percent (3%) limit is measured at the time of investment.
First Trust Capital Management | 225 W. Wacker Drive | 21st Floor | Chicago, IL 60606 | P: 773.828.6700 | F: 847.386.2910
ISS ProxyEdge
FTCM has a contractual relationship with Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (“ISS”) through which ISS provides certain proxy management services to FTCM’s portfolio management teams. Specifically, ISS (i) provides access to the ISS ProxyExchange web-based voting and research platform to access vote recommendations, research reports, execute vote instructions and run reports relevant to Subscriber’s proxy voting environment; (ii) implements and maps FTCM’s designated proxy voting policies to applicable accounts and generates vote recommendations based on the application of such policies; and (iii) monitors FTCM’s incoming ballots, performs ballot-to-account reconciliations with FTCM and its third party providers to help ensure that ISS is receiving all ballots for which FTCM has voting rights.
ISS provides two options for how proxy ballots are executed:
1. | Implied Consent: ISS executes ballots on FTCM’s behalf based on policy guidelines chosen at the time FTCM entered into the relationship with ISS. |
2. | Mandatory Signoff: ISS is not permitted to mark or process any ballot on FTCM’s behalf without first receiving FTCM’s specific voting instructions via ProxyExchange. |
FTCM has opted for Option 1. Implied Consent and in so doing has chosen to allow ISS to vote proxies on its behalf “with management’s recommendations.” FTCM has the option, however, to change its vote from the “with management’s recommendations” default at any point prior to the voting deadline if the portfolio managers following the subject company determine it is in the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders to do so. In those instances when the subject company’s management has not provided a voting recommendation, FTCM will either vote based on its own determination of what would align most closely with the best interests of the Funds and their shareholders or will opt to allow ISS to submit an “abstain” vote on its behalf. In addition, in those limited instances when share blocking3 may apply, FTCM has instructed ISS not to cast a vote on FTCM’s behalf unless FTCM provides specific instructions via ProxyExchange.
FUND-SPECIFIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Infinity Core Alternative Fund, Destiny Alternative Fund LLC, Destiny Alternative Fund (TEI) LLC, First Trust Private Assets Fund, and First Trust Hedged Strategies Fund (collectively, the “Funds of Funds”) are “fund of funds” that invest primarily in general or limited partnerships, funds, corporations, trusts or other investment vehicles (collectively, “Investment Funds”). While it is unlikely that the Funds of Funds will receive notices or proxies from Investment Funds (or in connection with any other portfolio securities), to the extent that the Funds of Funds do receive such notices or proxies and the Funds of Funds have voting interests in such Investment Funds, the responsibility for decisions regarding proxy voting for securities held by the Funds of Funds lies with FTCM as their advisor. FTCM will vote such proxies in accordance with the proxy policies and procedures noted above.
3 Proxy voting in certain countries requires share blocking. Shareholders wishing to vote their proxies must deposit their shares shortly before the meeting date with a designated depositary. During this blocking period, any shares held by the designated depositary cannot be sold until the meeting has taken place and the shares have been returned to FTCM’s custodian banks. FTCM generally opts not to participate in share blocking proxies given these restrictions on their ability to trade.
First Trust Capital Management | 225 W. Wacker Drive | 21st Floor | Chicago, IL 60606 | P: 773.828.6700 | F: 847.386.2910
The Funds of Funds are required to file Form N-PX with its complete proxy voting record for the twelve (12) months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Funds of Funds Form N-PX filings will be available: (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 1.877.779.1999 or (ii) by visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
All Other Funds
With the exception of the First Trust Merger Arbitrage Fund and First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF, Infinity Core Alternative Fund, Destiny Alternative Fund LLC, Destiny Alternative Fund (TEI) LLC, First Trust Private Assets Fund, and First Trust Hedged Strategies Fund, the Funds for which FTCM is presently either an advisor or a sub-advisor are managed by multiple internal and external portfolio management teams. As noted above, the policies and procedures outlined within this Proxy Policy and Procedure apply to those securities being held in that portion of the Funds’ portfolios managed by a FTCM portfolio manager only (including Infinity Core Alternative Fund).
Each Fund will be required to file Form N-PX annually, with its complete proxy voting record for the twelve (12) months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s Form N-PX filing will be available: (i) without charge, upon request, from the Fund’s administrator or (ii) by visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
First Trust Capital Management | 225 W. Wacker Drive | 21st Floor | Chicago, IL 60606 | P: 773.828.6700 | F: 847.386.2910
Proxy Voting
Application to Investment Advisers
The Compliance team for Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC conducts the compliance function for multiple investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”):
1. | Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC |
2. | Falcons I, LLC |
The Proxy Voting Policy (the “Policy”) applies to each of the registered investment advisers listed above (each an “Adviser” and, collectively, the “Advisers”).
Policy
The Advisers as a matter of policy and as a fiduciary to our Clients1 have responsibility for voting proxies for portfolio securities consistent with the best economic interests of our Clients. Proxy voting is an important right of shareholders and reasonable care and diligence must be undertaken to ensure that such rights are properly and timely exercised.
Investment advisers registered with the SEC, which exercise voting authority with respect to Client securities, are required by Rule 206(4)-6 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to (a) adopt and implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to ensure that Client securities are voted in the best interests of Clients, including how an adviser addresses material conflicts that can arise between an adviser’s interests and those of its Clients; (b) disclose to Clients how they obtain information from the adviser with respect to the voting of proxies for their securities; (c) describe to Clients a summary of its proxy voting policies and procedures and, upon request, furnish a copy of the policies and procedures to its Clients. In addition, SEC Rule 204-2(c)(2) requires investment advisers that exercise voting authority with respect to Client securities to maintain certain records relating to the adviser’s proxy voting activities.
The Advisers will vote all proxies in the best interests of Clients and in accordance with the procedures outlined below, unless otherwise mandated by Client instructions, the investment management agreement, or applicable law. Our policy includes the responsibility to receive and vote Client proxies and disclose any potential conflicts of interest as well as making information available to Clients about the voting of proxies for their portfolio securities and maintaining relevant and required records.
When voting proxies for holdings of U.S. Registered Funds managed by the Advisers, please review the relevant Trust’s Proxy Voting Policy.
1 | Clients of the Advisers may include: Publicly offered open-end and closed-end registered investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Registered Funds”); a publicly offered Undertaking for Collective Investment of Transferable Securities (UCITS) fund registered with the Central Bank of Ireland (“UCITS Fund”); private investment funds organized as pooled investment vehicles exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 by Section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) (“Private Funds”); publicly traded real estate investment trusts (“Public REITs”); pooled investment vehicles exempt from registration under the Investment Company Act of 1940 by Section 3(c)(5) (“3(c)(5) Funds”); and institutional and high net-worth individual investors (“Separately Managed Accounts”). |
Proxy Voting | 1 |
When voting proxies for Client holdings in other Registered Funds, please ensure voting decisions comply with the relevant Trust’s Fund of Funds Investments Policy and the Advisers’ Affiliated Fund Investments Policy.
Procedures
● | If Clients delegate proxy voting to the Advisers, the relevant Clients’ custodians are connected to ProxyEdge, a third-party proxy management system from Broadridge used to track and vote proxies. This set-up is part of the Compliance team’s new Client onboarding process. The Advisers have not engaged ProxyEdge, Broadridge, or any other third-party for proxy advisory services. The Compliance team must preclear any use of prepopulated or automated voting in ProxyEdge. |
● | The Compliance team adds all portfolio managers as users in ProxyEdge if the portfolio manager oversees holdings that have proxy votes. |
● | Prior to voting any proxy, the portfolio manager of the holding with the proxy vote, in consultation with the Compliance team if necessary, will determine if there are any conflicts of interest related to the proxy. If a conflict is identified, the Compliance team will decide as to whether the conflict is material. If it is deemed to be material, the conflict will be addressed as outlined below. In addition to analyzing whether there are conflicts of interest, the portfolio manager is required to determine that any information relied upon to vote the proxy is believed to be materially accurate and complete. |
● | Absent material conflicts, the portfolio manager will determine how the relevant Adviser should vote the proxy in accordance with applicable voting guidelines as described below. It is the relevant portfolio manager’s duty to ensure that all proxy votes are cast in a timely manner. |
Voting Guidelines
● | In the absence of specific voting guidelines from the Client, the Advisers will vote proxies in the best interests of each particular Client. The Advisers’ policy is to vote all proxies from a specific issuer the same way for each Client unless instructed otherwise by a Client or unless there is a situation where the differing investment objectives of Clients lead to different voting directions being in the best interest of different Clients. Clients are permitted to place reasonable restrictions on each Adviser’s voting authority in the same manner they place restrictions on the selection of account securities or establish other investment guidelines. |
● | In certain situations, proxy voting is delegated to sub-advisors who advise on the relevant investments undergoing a proxy. These proxies are managed solely by the sub-advisor and are not tracked by the Advisers. As indicated in the Advisers’ Sub-Advisor Due Diligence Policy, the Advisers review the sub-advisor’s proxy voting policy to confirm the policy is effective and complies with the SEC’s requirements. On a quarterly basis, the Compliance team will confirm with any relevant sub-advisor whether they are maintaining appropriate records with respect to the proxies voted on behalf of the Advisers’ Clients. |
● | The Advisers will generally vote in favor of routine corporate housekeeping proposals such as the election of directors and selection of auditors, unless conflicts of interest are raised by an auditor’s non-audit services. The Advisers will seek to maximize long-term value for Clients, protect Clients’ rights, and promote governance structures and practices that reinforce the accountability of corporate management and boards of directors to shareholders. |
Proxy Voting | 2 |
● | The Advisers will generally vote against proposals that cause board members to become entrenched or that cause unequal voting rights. |
● | In reviewing proposals, the Advisers will further consider the opinion of management as well as the effect of the proposal on management, shareholder value, and the issuer’s business practices. Throughout the proxy voting window, the Advisers will assess all known and publicly available information with respect to the proxy vote. This can include information made available by the issuer after the proxy vote has been initiated but prior to the proxy vote submission deadline. For example, this may entail information released by the issuer in response to recommendations made by proxy advisory firms. |
● | In certain circumstances, the Advisers may refrain from voting where the economic or other opportunity cost to a Client of voting a company’s proxy exceeds any anticipated benefits (for the relevant Client) of that proxy proposal. In each situation, the relevant portfolio manager’s decision not to vote will be documented, reviewed by Compliance, and retained in the relevant Adviser’s books and records. The portfolio manager will be required to confirm that they believe that refraining from voting is in the best interest of the relevant Client. |
Additional ERISA Considerations
The Advisers may manage assets of a benefit plan for the purposes of Title I of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). For each ERISA fund managed, the Advisers would need to comply with ERISA’s Fiduciary Duties Regarding Proxy Voting and Shareholder Rights rule (the “ERISA Rule”). The ERISA Rule is largely in-keeping with this Policy. The ERISA Rule adds additional emphasis regarding ERISA fiduciaries’ requirement to carry out all proxy votes prudently and solely in the interests of plan participants and beneficiaries and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and beneficiaries, additionally noting that ERISA fiduciaries must act solely in accordance with the economic interest of the plan considering only factors that they prudently determine will affect the economic value of the plan’s investment based on a determination of risk and return over an appropriate investment horizon. The ERISA Rule contains additional due diligence and monitoring requirements with respect to the selection and use of third-party proxy advisory firms. The Advisers do not use a proxy advisory firm as noted below.
Conflicts of Interest
● | The Advisers will identify any conflicts that exist between the interests of any Adviser and any Client by reviewing the relationship of the Advisers with the issuer of each security to determine if any Adviser has any relationship with the issuer. |
● | The Advisers will identify any conflicts that exist between the interests of any Client and another Client by reviewing each Client’s holdings in the relevant issuer to ensure whether any Client’s holdings at other levels in the issuer’s capital structure conflict with the holdings for which there is a proxy vote. |
● | If a material conflict of interest exists, the relevant Adviser will disclose the conflict to the affected Client(s), to give the Client(s) an opportunity to vote the proxies themselves, or to address the voting issue through other objective means such as voting in a manner consistent with a predetermined voting policy or receiving an independent third-party voting recommendation. |
● | The Advisers will maintain a record of the voting resolution of any conflict of interest. |
Proxy Voting | 3 |
Client Requests for Information
● | All Client requests for information regarding proxy votes, or policies and procedures, received by any employee should be forwarded to the Compliance team. |
● | In response to any request, the Compliance team will prepare a written response to the Client with the information requested, and as applicable will include the name of the issuer, the proposal voted upon, and how the relevant Adviser voted the Client’s proxy with respect to each proposal about which the Client inquired. |
Use of Third-Party Proxy Advisory Services
Registered investment advisers can use independent third-party proxy advisory services to assist the adviser by making recommendations regarding how proxies should be voted. The use of proxy advisory services does not relieve an adviser’s obligation to vote in the client’s best interest nor remove an adviser’s obligation to provide full and fair disclosure of any conflicts of interest. Currently, the Advisers predominantly trade fixed-income products which generally do not hold proxy votes and therefore very few proxies are voted by the Advisers. Given the limited number of proxies, the Advisers have not engaged a third-party proxy advisory service. In the future, the Advisers may engage such a service. At that time, the Advisers would be required to vet the independence of the firm engaged to cast those votes, ascertain whether the firm has the capacity and competency to adequately analyze proxy voting issues, evaluate the staffing adequacy and quality of the firm’s personnel, and review the robustness of the firm’s policies and procedures to ensure accurate votes and mitigate conflicts of interest.
In addition, given the Advisers’ obligations to provide full and fair disclosure to their Clients of all material facts relating to the advisory relationship, any future engagements with proxy advisory firms will be disclosed to all Clients. If the Advisers use any automated or pre-populated voting services provided by the proxy advisory firms, the Advisers would disclose the extent of that use and under what circumstances the Advisers use such services. Moreover, the Advisers would need to create policies and disclosures to address the use of automated or pre-populated voting in cases where the Advisers become aware before the proxy voting submission deadline that the issuer intends to file or has filed additional soliciting materials with the SEC regarding a matter to be voted upon.
Certification
Portfolio managers are required to certify each quarter, that all proxies, if any, voted by the portfolio manager have been voted in the best interest of the Client(s). Such certification will demonstrate that each Adviser’s personnel are periodically reminded of their obligations under this Policy even during extended periods of no proxy activity involving Client positions.
Regulatory Reporting
Form N-PX
Each U.S. Registered Fund has an obligation to file Form N-PX with the SEC no later than August 31 of each year, containing the proxy voting record of each Registered Fund for the twelve-month period ended June 30. Form N-PX is generally filed by the Registered Funds’ administrator.
Proxy Voting | 4 |
The relevant Adviser of any Registered Fund will assist the administrator with the filing of Form N-PX by notifying the administrator of any proxy votes cast on behalf of a Registered Fund and providing the following information for each security for which a proxy vote was cast during the reporting period: (a) the name of the issuer; (b) the exchange ticker symbol; (c) the CUSIP identifier; (d) the shareholder meeting date; (e) a brief description of the matter voted on; (f) whether the matter was proposed by the issuer or by a security holder; (g) whether a vote was cast on behalf of the Registered Fund; (h) how the vote was cast (e.g., for or against the proposal, or abstain; for or withhold for election of directors); and (i) whether the registrant cast its vote for or against management.
The Compliance team will review for accuracy a draft of the Form N-PX provided by the administrator prior to filing and will provide the relevant Adviser’s authorization to file the Form N-PX with the SEC.
Form ADV
A brief summary of each Adviser’s proxy voting policy and procedures will be included in the Adviser’s Form ADV Part 2A and will be updated at least annually or at any time there are material changes to the policy or procedures. The summary will include information as to how Clients can request a copy of each Adviser’s proxy voting policy and procedures and how Clients can request information from the Adviser regarding how proxies were voted on behalf of the Client’s account.
Testing
In order to determine that the Advisers are casting votes on behalf of Clients consistent with this Policy, the Advisers’ Compliance team samples at least ten percent of the proxy votes cast on behalf of Clients on an annual basis to confirm compliance with the Policy.
As part of the Advisers’ annual review, the Advisers review and document at least annually the adequacy of this Policy to ensure that it has been formulated reasonably and implemented effectively, including whether the Policy continues to be reasonably designed to ensure that the Advisers cast any votes in the best interests of Clients.
Recordkeeping
The Advisers will retain the following proxy records in accordance with the SEC’s five-year retention requirement.
● | These policies and procedures and any amendments; |
● | Each proxy statement that each Adviser receives which is detailed in an automated monthly report received from ProxyEdge which details the Advisers’ full proxy voting record; |
● | A record of each vote that an Adviser casts; |
● | Any document an Adviser created that was material to deciding how to vote proxies, or that memorializes that decision; |
● | Any documentation of a determination that a conflict of interest exists and the resolution of that conflict; and |
● | A copy of each written request from a Client for information on how an Adviser voted such Client’s proxies, and a copy of any written response. |
Proxy Voting | 5 |
Reviewed/Amended: March 21, 2018; August 31, 2018; July 24, 2019 (no changes); October 22, 2019; July 29, 2020; August 24, 2020; December 18, 2020; June 24, 2021; December 6, 2021; March 24, 2022; September 2, 2022; October 17, 2022; September 30, 2023 (no changes).
Proxy Voting | 6 |
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
(a) | (1) The following table provides brief biographical information about the members of First Trust Capital Management L.P. (the “Investment Adviser”) and Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC, (the "Sub-Adviser"), who are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management of First Trust Real Assets Fund’s portfolio as of the date of the filing of this report: |
Name of Portfolio Management Team Member | Title | Length of Time of Service to the Fund | Business Experience During the Past 5 Years | Role of Portfolio Management Team Member |
Michael Peck | Chief Executive Officer & Co-Chief Investment Officer | Since Inception | Chief Executive Officer and Co-CIO, First Trust Capital Management L.P. (formerly, Vivaldi Asset Management, LLC) (2012 - Present); President and Co-CIO, Vivaldi Capital Management LP (formerly, Vivaldi Capital Management, LLC) (2012 – March 2024) | Portfolio Management |
Brian Murphy | Co-Chief Investment Officer | Since Inception | Co-Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager, First Trust Capital Management L.P. (formerly, Vivaldi Asset Management, LLC) (2014 - Present), Portfolio Manager, Vivaldi Capital Management LP (formerly, Vivaldi Capital Management, LLC) (2014 – March 2024) | Portfolio Management |
Namit Sinha | Chief Investment Officer | 5/31/2024 | Chief Investment Officer, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC 2018-present | Portfolio Management |
Clayton Triick | Head of Portfolio Management of Public Strategies | 5/31/2024 | Senior Portfolio Manager, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC 2011-2018; Head of Portfolio Management of Public Strategies, Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC 2024-present | Portfolio Management |
7 |
(a) | (2) The following table provides information about portfolios and accounts, other than First Trust Real Assets Fund, for which the Portfolio Management Team Members are primarily responsible for the day-to-day management as of the end of the period covered by this report. Namit Sinha and Clayton Triick were added as portfolio managers of the Fund as of May 31, 2024, as such information presented below for each of them is as of May 31, 2024. |
Name of Portfolio Management Team Member | Number of Accounts and Total Value of Assets for Which Advisory Fee is Performance-Based: | Number of Other Accounts Managed and Total Value of Assets by Account Type for Which There is No Performance-Based Fee: | ||||
Name
| Registered investment companies | Other pooled investment vehicles | Other accounts | Registered investment companies | Other pooled investment vehicles | Other accounts |
Michael Peck | 1 Account $16M | 22 Accounts $262M | 0 Accounts | 6 Accounts $2,196M | 7 Accounts $85M | 0 Accounts |
Brian Murphy | 1 Account $16M | 22 Accounts $262M | 0 Accounts | 6 Accounts $2,196M | 14 Accounts $118M | 0 Accounts |
Namit Sinha | 0 Accounts | 13 Accounts $2B | 0 Accounts | 9 Accounts $4B | 2 Accounts $420M | 9 Accounts $53M |
Clayton Triick | 0 Accounts | 1 Account $111M | 0 Accounts | 9 Accounts $4B | 0 Accounts | 13 Accounts $352M |
Conflicts of Interest
The Investment Adviser, the Sub-Adviser and Portfolio Managers may manage multiple funds and/or other accounts, and as a result may be presented with one or more of the following actual or potential conflicts:
The management of multiple funds and/or other accounts may result in the Investment Adviser, the Sub-Adviser or a Portfolio Manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund and/or other account. The Investment Adviser seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of a Portfolio Manager by having the Portfolio Manager focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a Portfolio Manager are managed using the same investment models that are used in connection with the management of the Fund.
If the Investment Adviser, the Sub-Adviser or a Portfolio Manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one fund or other account, a fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible funds and other accounts. To deal with these situations, the Investment Adviser and the Sub-Adviser have adopted procedures for allocating portfolio transactions across multiple accounts.
The Investment Adviser and Sub-Adviser have adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
(a)(3) The below information is provided as of March 31, 2024.
Mr. Peck and Mr. Murphy receive base salaries and bonuses, neither of which is based on performance, and are eligible to avail themselves of life insurance, medical and dental benefits offered to all employees of the Investment Adviser and to participate in the Investment Adviser’s 401(k) plan. In addition, they are members of VFT Holdings LP and receive compensation based on the overall profitability of the firm and its affiliates.
A competitive base salary and a performance-based bonus (paid in April each year) structure are in place for all asset management team members of Angel Oak. Portfolio managers, analysts, and other associates are paid a competitive base salary and discretionary bonus based on their fiduciary investment responsibilities, performance of the individual and firm. The discretionary bonus structure gives Angel Oak the ability to remain competitive under current market conditions affecting compensation across the industry. The compensation structure of key investment professionals is structured to incent long-term client retention and client service.
(a)(4) The following is listing of the dollar range of shares beneficially owned by each Portfolio Management Team Member as of March 31, 2024. Namit Sinha and Clayton Triick were added as portfolio managers of the Fund as of May 31, 2024, as such information presented below for each of them is as of May 31, 2024.
Name of Portfolio Management Team Member: | Dollar Range of Shares Beneficially Owned by Portfolio Management Team Member: |
Michael Peck | $10,001 - $50,000 |
Brian Murphy | None |
Namit Sinha | None |
Clayton Triick | None |
(b) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which the shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's board of trustees, where those changes were implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to the requirements of Item 407(c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.407), or this Item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act") (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. DISCLOSURE OF SECURITIES LENDING ACTIVITIES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT COMPANIES.
(a) | Not applicable. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 13. EXHIBITS.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(a)(4) Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(registrant) | First Trust Real Assets Fund |
By (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Michael Peck | |
Michael Peck, President | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date | June 7, 2024 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Michael Peck | |
Michael Peck, President | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) |
Date | June 7, 2024 |
By (Signature and Title)* | /s/ Chad Eisenberg | |
Chad Eisenberg, Treasurer | ||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
Date | June 7, 2024 |
* Print the name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature.