Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-274315
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1, DATED OCTOBER 30, 2023
(to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus dated October 11, 2023)
SUPPLEMENT TO
PROXY STATEMENT FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY AND PROSPECTUS FOR CLASS A LIMITED VOTING SHARES OF BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus supplement (this “Supplement”) supplements the joint proxy statement/prospectus, dated October 11, 2023 (the “Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus”) that was mailed by American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, an Iowa corporation (the “Company”) to its shareholders on or about October 12, 2023 in connection with the proposed merger (“Merger”) of the Company with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company limited by shares (“Parent”). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia (“BAM”), filed the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as part of a registration statement on Form F-4 (Registration No. 333-274315).
You should read carefully and in their entirety this Supplement and the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and all accompanying annexes and exhibits. In particular, you should review and consider carefully the matters discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” of the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
The SEC and state securities regulators have not approved or disapproved these securities or determined if the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or this Supplement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This Supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is dated October 30, 2023.
Supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
All page references are to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and capitalized terms used below, unless otherwise defined, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. To the extent the following information differs from or conflicts with the information contained in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, the information set forth below shall be deemed to supersede the respective information in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
The disclosure in the section entitled “Litigation Relating to the Merger” of the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is replaced with the following:
On October 23, 2023, a lawsuit was filed by a purported shareholder against AEL and certain of its directors and officers in the Iowa District Court for Polk County, captioned City Of Hialeah Employees’ Retirement System v. American Equity Investment Life Holding Company, et al., Case No. 05771 CVCV066262 (the “Hialeah Action”). The plaintiff alleges that certain terms of the proposed Merger violate § 490.1110 of the IBCA and seeks equitable, injunctive and/or declaratory relief, including a temporary injunction prohibiting consummation of the proposed Merger. Among other things, the plaintiff alleges that the AEL Board did not approve the transactions through which Parent became an “interested shareholder” of AEL (which is defined under § 490.1110 of the IBCA as any person that is the “owner” (as defined in the statute) of ten percent or more of the outstanding voting stock of AEL and the affiliates and associates of such person), and that, pursuant to § 490.1110 of the IBCA, AEL therefore may not complete a business combination with Parent (such as the Merger) for a period of three years following the time that Parent first became an interested shareholder unless such business combination is approved by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding AEL Common Stock not held by Parent or an affiliate or associate of Parent.
AEL believes the Hialeah Action is without merit and intends to defend the Hialeah Action vigorously. A hearing is scheduled in the Iowa Business Specialty Court for November 8, 2023 to consider plaintiff’s request for temporary injunctive relief.
If the majority of votes cast (in person or by proxy) by the Shareholders present and voting together as a single class at the Special Meeting are in favor of the Merger Proposal, the shareholder approval condition to closing under the Merger Agreement will be satisfied. If such majority approval includes votes cast in favor of the Merger Proposal by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of AEL Common Stock not held by Parent or an affiliate or associate of Parent, the statutory criteria as alleged in the Hialeah Action to be applicable to the Merger would be satisfied, and AEL believes that the assertions in the Hialeah Action would be rendered moot. If such majority approval does not include votes cast in favor of the Merger Proposal by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding shares of AEL Common Stock not held by Parent or an affiliate or associate of Parent, the shareholder approval condition to closing under the Merger Agreement will still be satisfied, but if the Hialeah Action were to result in an injunction or other order preventing the completion of the Merger, the completion of the Merger would not occur until the Hialeah Action is resolved or such injunction or other order is otherwise no longer in effect.
If additional complaints or petitions similar to the Hialeah Action are filed, absent new or significantly different allegations, AEL will not necessarily disclose such additional filings. AEL is not aware of any other litigation related to the Merger Agreement, the Merger or the Transactions having been filed. As of the date of this Supplement, AEL has received several demand letters from attorneys representing purported Shareholders, alleging insufficiencies in the disclosures in the Proxy Statement, which allegations AEL believes are without merit. Additional lawsuits arising out of the Merger Agreement, the Merger and the Transactions may be filed in the future.
AEL and the AEL Board continue to believe that the Merger is in the best interests of AEL and all Shareholders. The AEL Board continues to recommend Shareholders vote “FOR” the Merger Proposal.