Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”). This ASU amends the existing accounting standards for lease accounting, including requiring lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets. The FASB also issued various ASUs which subsequently amended ASU 2016-02. These amendments and ASU 2016-02, collectively known as Accounting Standard Codification 842 (“ASC 842”), are effective for annual and interim reporting periods of public entities beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company adopted ASC 842 on a modified retrospective The cumulative effect of the change to our consolidated January 1, 2019 balance sheet for the adoption of ASC 842 was as follows (in thousands): Balance at December 31, 2018 Adjustments Due to ASC 842 Balance at January 1, 2019 Assets Deferred income taxes $ 3,411 $ 51 $ 3,462 Other long-term assets 24,530 59,820 84,350 Total Assets 2,979,056 59,871 3,038,927 Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Accrued liabilities 231,356 13,018 244,374 Total Current Liabilities 898,893 13,018 911,911 Deferred credits and other long-term liabilities 36,483 46,999 83,482 Total Liabilities 1,693,753 60,017 1,753,770 Retained earnings 1,419,449 (144) 1,419,305 Total Stockholders' Equity 1,285,303 (144) 1,285,159 Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity 2,979,056 59,871 3,038,927 In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”). This ASU amends the accounting on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available-for-sale debt securities. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods of public entities beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2018. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operation, financial position and cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment” (“ASU 2017-04”). The amendments in this ASU eliminate the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods of public entities beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operation, financial position and cash flows. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other–Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract” (“ASU 2018-15”). This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods of public entities beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operation, financial position and cash flows. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates of the Company can include, among other things, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, medical claims payable, other medical liabilities, stock compensation assumptions, tax contingencies and legal liabilities. In addition, the Company also makes estimates in relation to revenue recognition under Accounting Standard Codification 606 (“ASC 606”) which are explained in more detail in “ Revenue Recognition Revenue Recognition Year Ended December 31, 2018 Healthcare Pharmacy Management Elimination Total Major Service Lines Behavioral & Specialty Health Risk-based, non-EAP $ 1,511,532 $ — $ (263) $ 1,511,269 EAP risk-based 349,751 — — 349,751 ASO 247,953 34,130 (344) 281,739 Magellan Complete Care Risk-based, non-EAP 2,473,570 — — 2,473,570 ASO 55,816 — — 55,816 PBM, including dispensing — 2,183,151 (189,708) 1,993,443 Medicare Part D — 442,266 — 442,266 PBA — 132,112 — 132,112 Formulary management — 70,900 — 70,900 Other — 3,285 — 3,285 Total net revenue $ 4,638,622 $ 2,865,844 $ (190,315) $ 7,314,151 Type of Customer Government $ 3,432,901 $ 946,606 $ — $ 4,379,507 Non-government 1,205,721 1,919,238 (190,315) 2,934,644 Total net revenue $ 4,638,622 $ 2,865,844 $ (190,315) $ 7,314,151 Timing of Revenue Recognition Transferred at a point in time $ — $ 2,625,417 $ (189,708) $ 2,435,709 Transferred over time 4,638,622 240,427 (607) 4,878,442 Total net revenue $ 4,638,622 $ 2,865,844 $ (190,315) $ 7,314,151 Year Ended December 31, 2019 Healthcare Pharmacy Management Elimination Total Major Service Lines Behavioral & Specialty Health Risk-based, non-EAP $ 1,504,472 $ — $ (290) $ 1,504,182 EAP risk-based 339,377 — — 339,377 ASO 237,186 40,348 (302) 277,232 Magellan Complete Care Risk-based, non-EAP 2,695,132 — — 2,695,132 ASO 62,379 — — 62,379 PBM, including dispensing — 1,949,225 (180,799) 1,768,426 Medicare Part D — 287,604 — 287,604 PBA — 137,885 — 137,885 Formulary management — 84,567 — 84,567 Other — 2,639 — 2,639 Total net revenue $ 4,838,546 $ 2,502,268 $ (181,391) $ 7,159,423 Type of Customer Government $ 3,674,152 $ 831,673 $ — $ 4,505,825 Non-government 1,164,394 1,670,595 (181,391) 2,653,598 Total net revenue $ 4,838,546 $ 2,502,268 $ (181,391) $ 7,159,423 Timing of Revenue Recognition Transferred at a point in time $ — $ 2,236,829 $ (180,799) $ 2,056,030 Transferred over time 4,838,546 265,439 (592) 5,103,393 Total net revenue $ 4,838,546 $ 2,502,268 $ (181,391) $ 7,159,423 Per Member Per Month (“PMPM”) Revenue. Under certain government contracts, our risk scores are compared with the overall average risk scores for the relevant state and market pool. Generally, if our risk score is below the average risk score we are required to make a risk adjustment payment into the risk pool, and if our risk score is above the average risk score we will receive a risk adjustment payment from the risk pool. Risk adjustments can have a positive or negative retroactive impact to rates. Pharmacy Benefit Management Revenue. The Company’s customers for PBM business, including pharmaceutical dispensing operations, are generally comprised of MCOs, employer groups and health plans. PBM relationships generally have an expected term of one year or longer. A master services arrangement (“MSA”) is executed by the Company and the customer, which outlines the terms and conditions of the PBM services to be provided. When a member in the customer’s organization submits a prescription, a claim is created which is presented for approval. The acceptance of each individual claim creates enforceable rights and obligations for each party and represents a separate contract. For each individual claim, the performance obligations are limited to the processing and adjudication of the claim, or dispensing of the products purchased. Generally, the transaction price for PBM services is explicitly listed in each contract and does not represent variable consideration. The Company recognizes PBM revenue, which consists of a negotiated prescription price (ingredient cost plus dispensing fee), co-payments and any associated administrative fees, when claims are adjudicated or the drugs are shipped. The Company recognizes PBM revenue on a gross basis (i.e. including drug costs and co-payments) as it is acting as the principal in the arrangement, controls the underlying service, and is contractually obligated to its clients and network pharmacies, which is a primary indicator of gross reporting. In addition, the Company is solely responsible for the claims adjudication process, negotiating the prescription price for the pharmacy, collecting payments from the client for drugs dispensed by the pharmacy, and managing the total prescription drug relationship with the client’s members. If the Company enters into a contract where it is only an administrator, and does not assume any of the risks previously noted, revenue will be recognized on a net basis. For dispensing, at the time of shipment, the earnings process is complete; the obligation of the Company’s customer to pay for the specialty pharmaceutical drugs is fixed, and, due to the nature of the product, the member may neither return the specialty pharmaceutical drugs nor receive a refund. Medicare Part D. st Pharmacy Benefit Administration Revenue. Formulary Management Revenue. The Company administers formulary management programs for certain clients through which the Company coordinates the achievement, calculation and collection of rebates and administrative fees from pharmaceutical manufacturers on behalf of clients. Formulary management contracts generally have a term of one year or longer. All formulary management contracts have a single performance obligation that constitutes a series for the provision of rebate services for a drug, with utilization measured and settled on a quarterly basis, for the duration of the arrangement. The Company retains its administrative fee and/or a percentage of rebates that is included in its contract with the client from collecting the rebate from the manufacturer. While the administrative fee and/or the percentage of rebates retained is fixed, there is an unknown quantity of pharmaceutical purchases (utilization) during each quarter; therefore the transaction price itself is variable. The Company uses the expected value methodology to estimate the total rebates earned each quarter based on estimated volumes of pharmaceutical purchases by the Company’s clients during the quarter, as well as historical and/or anticipated retained rebate percentages. The Company does not record as rebate revenue any rebates that are passed through to its clients. In relation to the Company’s PBM business, the Company administers rebate programs through which it receives rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers that are shared with its customers. The Company recognizes rebates when the Company is entitled to them and when the amounts of the rebates are determinable. The amount recorded for rebates earned by the Company from the pharmaceutical manufacturers is recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold. Government EAP Risk-Based Revenue. The Company has certain contracts with federal customers for the provision of various managed care services, which are classified as EAP risk-based business. These contracts are generally multi-year arrangements. The Company’s federal contracts are reimbursed on either a fixed fee basis or a cost reimbursement basis. The performance obligation on a fixed fee contract is to stand ready to provide the staffing required for the contracted period. For fixed fee contracts, the Company believes the invoiced amount corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance completed to date; therefore, the Company is utilizing the “right to invoice” practical expedient, with revenue recognition in the amount for which the Company has the right to invoice. The performance obligation on a cost reimbursement contract is to stand ready to provide the activity or services purchased by the customer, such as the operation of a counseling services group or call center. The performance obligation represents a series for the duration of the arrangement. The reimbursement rate is fixed per the contract; however, the level of activity (e.g., number of hours, number of counselors or number of units) is variable. A majority of the Company’s cost reimbursement transaction price relates specifically to its efforts to transfer the service for a distinct increment of the series (e.g. day or month) and is recognized as revenue when the portion of the series for which it relates has been provided (i.e. as the Company provides hours, counselors or units of service). In accordance with ASC 606-10-50-13, the Company is required to include disclosure on its remaining performance obligations as of the end of the current reporting period. Due to the nature of the contracts in the Company’s PBM and Part D business, these reporting requirements are not applicable. The majority of the Company’s remaining contracts meet certain exemptions as defined in ASC 606-10-50-14 through 606-10-50-14A, including (i) performance obligation is part of a contract that has an original expected duration of one year or less; (ii) the right to invoice practical expedient; and (iii) variable consideration related to unsatisfied performance obligations that is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied promise to transfer a distinct service that forms part of a single performance obligation, and the terms of that variable consideration relate specifically to our efforts to transfer the distinct service, or to a specific outcome from transferring the distinct service. For the Company’s contracts that pertain to these exemptions: (i) the remaining performance obligations primarily relate to the provision of managed healthcare services to the customers’ membership; (ii) the estimated remaining duration of these performance obligations ranges from the remainder of the current calendar year to three years; and (iii) variable consideration for these contracts primarily includes net per member per month fees associated with unspecified membership that fluctuates throughout the contract. Accounts Receivable, Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities December 31, December 31, 2018 2019 $ Change % Change Accounts receivable $ 786,395 $ 915,656 $ 129,261 16.4% Contract assets 4,647 2,231 (2,416) (52.0%) Contract liabilities - current 16,853 6,728 (10,125) (60.1%) Contract liabilities - long-term 13,441 11,099 (2,342) (17.4%) 2020 2021 2022 2023 Significant Customers Customers exceeding ten percent of the consolidated Company’s net revenues The Company has contracts with the Commonwealth of Virginia (the “Virginia Contracts”). The Company began providing Medicaid managed long-term services and supports to enrollees in the Commonwealth Coordinated Care Plus (“CCC Plus”) program on August 1, 2017. The CCC Plus contract expires annually on December 31, and automatically renews annually on January 1 for a period of five The Company had a contract with the State of New York (the “New York Contract”) to provide integrated managed care services to Medicaid and Medicare enrollees in the State of New York. The Company’s New York Contract terminated on December 31, 2016; however, the Company, along with other participating managed care plans in the state, continues to provide services while a new contract is being finalized. The Company began recognizing revenue in relation to the New York Contract on January 1, 2014 as a result of the acquisition of AlphaCare Holdings, Inc. The Company’s revenues under the New York Contracts increased starting on November 1, 2017 as a result of the acquisition of SWH Holdings, Inc. The New York Contracts generated net revenues of $265.2 million, $691.6 million and $836.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The Company has contracts with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and CMS (the “Massachusetts Contracts”) to provide integrated managed care services to Medicaid and Medicare enrollees in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Medicaid services are provided under a Senior Care Options contract (“SCO Contract”) which began on January 1, 2016 and extends through December 31, 2021, with the potential for up to five additional one year extensions. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts may terminate the contract with cause without prior notice and upon 180 days ’ notice without cause. Medicare services are provided under a one-year contract with CMS. The CMS contract currently extends through December 31, 2019. The Company began recognizing revenue in relation to the Massachusetts Contracts on November 1, 2017 as a result of the acquisition of SWH Holdings, Inc. The Massachusetts Contracts generated net revenues of $109.1 million, $682.1 million and $718.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Customers exceeding ten percent of segment net revenues In addition to the Massachusetts Contracts, New York Contract and Virginia Contracts previously discussed, the following customers generated in excess of ten percent of net revenues for the respective segment for the respective segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (in thousands): Segment Term Date 2017 2018 2019 Healthcare Customer A December 31, 2023 $ 605,917 $ 618,227 $ 211,106 * Pharmacy Management Customer B March 31, 2021 346,405 344,479 335,682 * Revenue amount did not exceed 10 percent of net revenues for the respective segment for the year presented. Amount is shown for comparative purposes only. Concentration of Business The Company also has a significant concentration of business with various counties in the State of Pennsylvania (the “Pennsylvania Counties”) which are part of the Pennsylvania Medicaid program, with members under its contract with CMS and with various agencies and departments of the United States federal government. Net revenues from the Pennsylvania Counties in the aggregate totaled $490.0 million, $544.6 million and $537.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Net revenues from members in relation to its contract with CMS in aggregate totaled $511.0 million, $442.3 million and $287.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Net revenues from contracts with various agencies and departments of the United States federal government in aggregate totaled $341.5 million, $308.7 million, and $299.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The Company’s contracts with customers typically have stated terms of one one Income Taxes The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return with its eighty-percent or more controlled subsidiaries. The Company previously filed separate consolidated federal income tax returns for AlphaCare of New York, Inc. (“AlphaCare”) and its parent, AlphaCare Holdings, Inc. (“AlphaCare Holdings”). During 2017, AlphaCare and AlphaCare Holdings became members of the Magellan federal consolidated group. The Company and its subsidiaries also file income tax returns in various state and local jurisdictions. The Company estimates income taxes for each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves determining both permanent and temporary differences resulting from differing treatment for tax and book purposes. Deferred tax assets and/or liabilities are determined by multiplying the temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax reporting bases for assets and liabilities by the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such differences are recovered or settled. The Company then assesses the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered from the reversal of temporary differences, the implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies, and future taxable income. To the extent the Company cannot conclude that recovery is more likely than not, it establishes a valuation allowance. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred taxes is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Reversals of both valuation allowances and unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in the period they occur, typically as reductions to income tax expense. The Company recognizes interim period income taxes by estimating an annual effective tax rate and applying it to year-to-date results. The estimated annual effective tax rate is periodically updated throughout the year based on actual results to date and an updated projection of full year income. Although the effective tax rate approach is generally used for interim periods, taxes on significant, unusual and infrequent items are recognized at the statutory tax rate entirely in the period the amounts are realized. Health Care Reform The Patient Protection and the Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “Health Reform Law”), imposes a mandatory annual fee on health insurers for each calendar year beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The Company has obtained rate adjustments from customers which the Company expects will cover the direct costs of these fees and the impact from non-deductibility of such fees for federal and state income tax purposes. To the extent the Company has such a customer that does not renew, there may be some impact due to taxes paid where the timing and amount of recoupment of these additional costs is uncertain. In the event the Company is unable to obtain rate adjustments to cover the financial impact of the annual fee, the fee may have a material impact on the Company. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 imposed a one-year moratorium on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act health insurer fee (“HIF”) fee, suspending its application for 2017. The HIF fee went back into effect for 2018, however, on January 23, 2018 the United States Congress passed the Continuing Resolution which imposed another one-year moratorium on the HIF fee, suspending its application for 2019. For 2018, the HIF fees were $29.9 million, which have been paid and are included in direct service costs and other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid interest-bearing investments with maturity dates of three months or less when purchased, consisting primarily of money market instruments. Book overdrafts are reflected within accounts payable on the balance sheets. There were no book overdrafts at December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2019, the Company had $0.5 million in book overdrafts. At December 31, 2019, the Company’s excess capital and undistributed earnings for the Company’s regulated subsidiaries of $134.8 million are included in cash and cash equivalents. Restricted Assets The Company has certain assets which are considered restricted for: (i) the payment of claims under the terms of certain managed care contracts; (ii) regulatory purposes related to the payment of claims in certain jurisdictions; and (iii) the maintenance of minimum required tangible net equity levels for certain of the Company’s subsidiaries. Significant restricted assets of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 were as follows (in thousands): 2018 2019 Restricted cash and cash equivalents $ 160,967 $ 146,455 Restricted short-term investments 363,840 318,464 Restricted deposits (included in other current assets) 43,401 38,602 Restricted long-term investments 2,854 10,111 Total $ 571,062 $ 513,632 The Company’s equity in restricted net assets of consolidated subsidiaries represented approximately 28.1% of the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2019 and consisted of net assets of the Company which were restricted as to transfer to Magellan in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances under regulatory restrictions. Fair Value Measurements The Company has certain assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets and liabilities are to be measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy, which are as follows: Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs). Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including the Company’s data. In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 (in thousands): December 31, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Cash and cash equivalents (1) $ — $ 263,462 $ — $ 263,462 Investments: U.S. Government and agency securities 67,815 — — 67,815 Obligations of government-sponsored enterprises (2) — 5,229 — 5,229 Corporate debt securities — 292,049 — 292,049 Certificates of deposit — 20,650 — 20,650 Total assets held at fair value $ 67,815 $ 581,390 $ — $ 649,205 Liabilities Contingent consideration $ — $ — $ 10,124 $ 10,124 Total liabilities held at fair value $ — $ — $ 10,124 $ 10,124 December 31, 2019 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Cash and cash equivalents (3) $ — $ 313,509 $ — $ 313,509 Investments: U.S. Government and agency securities 104,159 — — 104,159 Corporate debt securities — 239,693 — 239,693 Certificates of deposit — 1,305 — 1,305 Total assets held at fair value $ 104,159 $ 554,507 $ — $ 658,666 (1) Excludes $8.8 million of cash held in bank accounts by the Company. (2) Includes investments in notes issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank, Federal Farm Credit Banks and Federal National Mortgage Association. (3) Excludes $11.7 million of cash held in bank accounts by the Company. For the years ended December 31, 2018 2019 Company not The carrying values of financial instruments, including accounts receivable and accounts payable, approximate their fair values due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of the Notes (as defined below) of $403.4 million as of December 31, 2019 was determined based on quoted market prices and would be classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair value of the Company’s term loan of $280.6 million as of December 31, 2019 was based on current interest rates for similar types of borrowings and is in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The estimated fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instruments that could be realized as of the balance sheet date or that will be realized in the future. All of the Company’s investments are classified as “available-for-sale” and are carried at fair value. As of the balance sheet date, the fair value of contingent consideration is determined based on probabilities of payment, projected payment dates, discount rates, projected operating income, member engagement and new contract execution. The Company used a probability weighted discounted cash flow method to arrive at the fair value of the contingent consideration. As the fair value measurement for the contingent consideration is based on inputs not observed in the market, these measurements are classified as Level 3 measurements as defined by fair value measurement guidance. The unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement include the discount rate, probabilities of payment and projected payment dates. As of December 31, 2018, the Company estimated undiscounted future contingent payments of $10.6 million. As of December 31, 2018, the fair value of the short-term and long-term contingent consideration was $8.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and is included in short-term contingent consideration and long-term contingent consideration, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had no estimated future contingent payments. The change in the fair value of the contingent consideration was $0.7 million, $1.3 million and $(2.1) million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, which were recorded as direct service costs and other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income. The decreases during 2019 were mainly a result of changes in the estimated undiscounted liability. The following table summarizes the Company’s liability for contingent consideration (in thousands): December 31, December 31, 2018 2019 Balance as of beginning of period $ 8,817 $ 10,124 Changes in fair value 1,307 (2,124) Payments — (8,000) Balance as of end of period $ 10,124 $ — Investments All of the Company’s investments are classified as “available-for-sale” and are carried at fair value. Securities which have been classified as Level 1 are measured using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities while those which have been classified as Level 2 are measured using quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active. The Company’s policy is to classify all investments with contractual maturities within one year as current. Investment income is recognized when earned and reported net of investment expenses. Net unrealized holding gains or losses are excluded from earnings and are reported, net of tax, as “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of comprehensive income until realized, unless the losses are deemed to be other-than-temporary. Realized gains or losses, including any provision for other-than-temporary declines in value, are included in the consolidated statements of income. If a debt security is in an unrealized loss position and the Company has the intent to sell the debt security, or it is more likely than not that the Company will have to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the decline in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary and is recorded to other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in income in the consolidated statements of income. For impaired debt securities that the Company does not intend to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell such securities, but the Company expects that it will not fully recover the amortized cost basis, the credit component of the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in other-than-t |