Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The following is a summary of our significant accounting policies used to prepare our consolidated financial statements. Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cantel and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year's presentation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and the estimates used in calculations of reserves as well as other judgmental financial statement items, including, but not limited to: collectability of accounts receivable, volume rebates and trade-in allowances, inventory values and obsolescence reserves, warranty reserves, contingent consideration, contingent guaranteed obligations, depreciation and amortization periods, deferred income taxes, goodwill and intangible assets, impairment of long-lived assets, unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions, reserves for legal exposure, stock-based compensation and expense accruals. Such estimates and assumptions are subjective in nature. We reflect such amounts based upon the most recent information available. Subsequent Events We performed a review of events subsequent to July 31, 2019 through the date of issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements. See Note 19, “Subsequent Events.” Revenue Recognition Sales are recognized as the performance obligations to deliver products or services are satisfied and are recorded based on the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for satisfying the performance obligations. Our sales continue to be recognized primarily when we transfer control to the customer, which can be on the date of shipment or on the date of receipt by the customer. Products and services are primarily transferred to customers at a point in time, with some transfers of services taking place over time. A provision for estimated sales returns, discounts and rebates is recognized as a reduction of sales in the same period that the sales are recognized. Our estimate of the provision for sales returns has been established based on contract terms with our customers and historical business practices and current trends. Shipping and handling costs incurred after the customer has obtained control of our products are treated as a fulfillment cost rather than as an additional promised service. Additionally, in certain U.S. states, we are required to collect sales taxes from our customers, and in certain international jurisdictions, we are required to collect value added taxes. The tax collected is recorded as a liability until remitted to the taxing authority. With respect to certain of our customers, rebates are provided. Such rebates, which consist primarily of volume rebates, are provided for as a reduction of sales at the time of revenue recognition. Such allowances are determined based on estimated projections of sales volume for the entire rebate periods. If it becomes known that sales volume to customers will deviate from original projections, the rebate provisions originally established would be adjusted accordingly. We also offer certain volume-based rebates to our distribution customers, which we record as variable consideration when calculating the transaction price. We use information available at the time and our historical experience with each customer to estimate the rebate amount by applying the expected value method. Such rebates, which consist primarily of volume rebates, are provided for as a reduction of sales at the time of revenue recognition, and amounted to $9,469 , $8,401 , and $6,291 in fiscal 2019 , 2018 , and 2017 , respectively. Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements Assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates; sales and expenses are translated using average exchange rates during the year. The cumulative effect of the translation of the accounts of the foreign subsidiaries is presented as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. Foreign exchange gains and losses related to the purchase of inventories denominated in foreign currencies are included in cost of sales and foreign exchange gains and losses related to the incurrence of operating costs denominated in foreign currencies and the conversion of foreign assets and liabilities into functional currencies are included in general and administrative expenses. Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Accounts receivable consist of amounts due to us from normal business activities. Allowances for doubtful accounts are reserves for the estimated loss from the inability of customers to make required payments. We use historical experience as well as current market information in determining the estimate. While actual losses have historically been within management’s expectations and provisions established, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Alternatively, if certain customers paid their delinquent receivables, reductions in allowances may be required. Inventories Inventories consist of raw materials, work-in-process and finished products which are sold in the ordinary course of our business and are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value. In assessing the value of inventories, we must make estimates and judgments regarding reserves required for product obsolescence, aging of inventories and other issues potentially affecting the saleable condition of products. In performing such evaluations, we use historical experience as well as current market information. With few exceptions, the saleable value of our inventories has historically been within management’s expectation and provisions established, however, rapid changes in the market due to competition, technology and various other factors could impact the value of our inventories, resulting in the need for additional reserves. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Additions and improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repair costs are expensed. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is removed from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income. Depreciation and amortization is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which generally range from 2 - 15 years for furniture and equipment, 3 - 10 years for software, 5 - 40 years for buildings and improvements and the shorter of the life of the asset or the life of the lease for leasehold improvements. Depreciation expense related to property and equipment in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017 was $21,510 , $17,473 and $15,045 , respectively. Goodwill and Intangible Assets Certain of our identifiable intangible assets, including customer relationships, technology, brand names, non-compete agreements and patents, are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives which range from 3 to 20 years. Additionally, we have recorded goodwill and trademarks and trade names, all of which have indefinite useful lives and are therefore not amortized. All of our intangible assets and goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, and goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed for impairment at least annually . Our management is responsible for determining if impairment exists and considers a number of factors, including third-party valuations, when making these determinations. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount before proceeding to step one of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test, if necessary. Such qualitative factors that are assessed include evaluating a segment’s financial performance, industry and market conditions, macroeconomic conditions and specific issues that can directly affect the segment such as changes in business strategies, competition, supplier relationships, operating costs, regulatory matters, litigation and the composition of the segment’s assets due to acquisitions or other events. At May 1, 2019, because we determined through qualitative factors that the fair values of our Medical, and Dental segments were more likely than not to be greater than the carrying value, we did not proceed to step one of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test for those two segments. We performed step one of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test for Dialysis due to the continuing shift by our customers from reusable to single-use dialyzers, which is having an adverse impact on our business and is expected to continue. In addition, we also performed step one of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test for Life Sciences as one of the segment’s key customers has been moving toward a dual source approach, in combination with a cyclical downturn in this business. In performing a detailed quantitative review for goodwill impairment, management uses a two-step process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of the related reporting units by using weighted fair value results of the discounted cash flow methodology, as well as the market multiple and comparable transaction methodologies, where applicable. The first step is a review for potential impairment, and the second step measures the amount of impairment, if any. We perform our annual impairment review for indefinite lived intangibles by first assessing qualitative factors, such as those described above, to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of such assets is less than the carrying values, and if necessary, we perform a quantitative analysis comparing the current fair value of our indefinite lived intangibles assets to their carrying values. At May 1, 2019 , because we determined through qualitative factors that the fair values of all of our indefinite lived intangible assets were more likely than not to be greater than the carrying value, we did not perform a quantitative analysis for those assets. With respect to amortizable intangible assets when impairment indicators are present, management would determine whether expected future non-discounted cash flows would be sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets; if not, the carrying value of the assets would be adjusted to their fair value. We did not recognize any impairment charges for goodwill or indefinite lived intangibles in the years presented. Long-Lived Assets We evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets including property, equipment and other assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An assessment is made to determine if the sum of the expected future non-discounted cash flows from the use of the assets and eventual disposition is less than the carrying value. If the sum of the expected non-discounted cash flows is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized based on fair value. Our historical assessments of our long-lived assets have not differed significantly from the actual amounts realized. However, the determination of fair value requires us to make certain assumptions and estimates and is highly subjective. On July 31, 2019 , management concluded that no other events or changes in circumstances have occurred that would indicate that the carrying amount of our long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Customer Relationship Intangible Assets Customer-relationship intangible assets are valued using an income-based valuation methodology which included certain assumptions such as forecasted cash flows, customer attrition rates, terminal growth rates and discount rates. The assumptions used in the financial forecasts are based on historical data, supplemented by current and anticipated growth rates, management plans, and market-comparable information. Fair-value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and factors. Preliminary assumptions may change and may result in significant changes to the final valuation. Debt Issuance Costs Debt issuance costs are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term of the related credit agreements. As of July 31, 2019 and 2018 , such debt issuance costs, net of related amortization, were included as a reduction to long-term debt and amounted to $2,149 and $2,698 , respectively. Warranties We provide for estimated costs that may be incurred to remedy deficiencies of quality or performance of our products at the time of revenue recognition. Most of our products have a one year warranty, although certain endoscopy and water purification and filtration products that require installation may carry a warranty period of up to 24 months . Additionally, many of our consumables, accessories, parts and service have a 90 -day warranty. We record provisions for product warranties as a component of cost of sales based upon an estimate of the amounts necessary to settle existing and future claims on products sold. As of July 31, 2019 and 2018 , our warranty reserves are included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets and amounted to $2,372 and $3,280 , respectively. Our warranty provisions and settlements in fiscal 2019 and 2018 were not material and principally relate to our endoscope reprocessing and water purification products. Stock-Based Compensation Stock-based compensation expense is recognized for any option or stock award grant based upon the fair value of the award. Our stock options and time-based stock awards are subject to graded vesting in which portions of the award vest ratably over the vesting period. We recognize compensation expense for the awards with performance conditions using the accelerated attribution method over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award when it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. We record expense for the awards with market conditions ratably over the vesting period regardless of whether the market condition is satisfied. We account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate forfeitures over the course of the vesting period. We determine the fair value of each time-based stock award and performance-based stock award by using the closing market price of our common stock on the last trading date immediately prior to the date of grant. We determine the fair value of each award with market conditions using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant. We estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option valuation model. The determination of fair value using valuation models is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of subjective variables. These variables may include, but are not limited to, the expected price volatility over the term of the award, the expected dividend yield, the expected term of the award, the probability of meeting performance objectives and the stock price of our peers in the S&P Healthcare Equipment Index. Advertising Costs Our policy is to expense advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising costs charged to expense were $2,885 , $4,115 and $3,694 in fiscal 2019 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively. Income Taxes Our provision for income taxes is based on our current period income, changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities, statutory income tax rates, changes in uncertain tax benefits and the deductibility of expenses or availability of tax credits in various taxing jurisdictions. Tax laws are complex, subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and the respective governmental taxing authorities and are subject to future modification, expiration or repeal by government legislative bodies. We use significant judgment on a quarterly basis in determining our annual effective income tax rate and evaluating our tax positions. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance, if necessary, based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that the recorded deferred tax assets, as adjusted for valuation allowances, will be realized. Additionally, deferred tax liabilities are regularly reviewed to confirm that such amounts are appropriately stated. A review of our deferred tax items considers known future changes in various income tax rates, principally in the United States. If income tax rates were to change in the future, particularly in the United States and to a lesser extent Germany, the U.K. and Italy, our items of deferred tax could be materially affected. All of such evaluations require significant management judgments. We record liabilities for an unrecognized tax benefit when a tax benefit for an uncertain tax position is taken or expected to be taken on a tax return, but is not recognized in our consolidated financial statements because it does not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold that the uncertain tax position would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority. Any adjustments upon resolution of income tax uncertainties are recognized in our results of operations. Unrecognized tax benefits are analyzed periodically and adjustments are made as events occur to warrant adjustment to the related liability. Historically, we have not had significant unrecognized tax benefits. Newly Adopted Accounting Standards In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities,” (“ASU 2017-12”) to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 (our fiscal year 2020), including interim periods within that reporting period. We early adopted ASU 2017-12 effective August 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “ (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting ,” (“ASU 2017-09”) to provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in ASC 718. ASU 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year 2019), including interim periods within that reporting period. Accordingly, we adopted ASU 2017-09 on August 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “(Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , ” (“ASU 2016-15”). This guidance makes eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year 2019). Accordingly, we adopted ASU 2016-15 on August 1, 2018. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , ” (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC 605”). ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2015-14”), which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 (our fiscal year 2019), including interim periods within that reporting period. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” (“ASU 2016-12”), which provided narrow scope improvements and practical expedients relating to ASU 2014-09. We adopted the collective standard (“ASC 606”) on August 1, 2018. See Note 3, “Revenue Recognition” for a discussion of the impact and required disclosures. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “ Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract ” (“ASU 2018-15”) to help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement (hosting arrangement) by providing guidance for determining when the arrangement includes a software license. ASU 2018-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (our fiscal year 2021), including interim periods within that reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2018-15 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “ Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement ” (“ASU 2018-13”) to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement”. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 (our fiscal year 2021), including interim periods within that reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “ Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ” (“ASU 2018-02”) to allow for the reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted in December 2017. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 (our fiscal year 2020), including interim periods within that reporting period. The adoption of ASU 2018-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “ (Topic 350) Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, ” (“ASU 2017-04”) to simplify the test for goodwill impairment. The revised guidance eliminates the existing Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test which required an entity to compute the implied fair value of its goodwill at the testing date in order to measure the amount of the impairment charge when the fair value of the reporting unit failed Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. The guidance will be applied on a prospective basis on or after the effective date. ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2019 (our fiscal year 2021) and early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “ (Topic 842) Leases, ” (“ASU 2016-02”) which requires lease assets and liabilities to be recorded on the balance sheet for leases with terms greater than twelve months. We will adopt this ASU and related amendments on August 1, 2019 and will elect certain practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance. Additionally, we will elect the optional transition method that allows for a cumulative-effect adjustment in the period of adoption and will not restate prior periods. We are substantially complete in assessing the transitional impact from adopting the standard; however, we are still assessing the lessor provisions under the standard but do not expect any material adjustments to the estimated right of use asset and/or lease liability. Excluding any impact associated with a recently announced acquisition, we currently estimate the impact of the adoption will result in the recognition of right of use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $30,000 to $35,000 as of August 1, 2019. The adoption of ASU 2016-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations or cash flows. |