Response: The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 9, 33 to 34, 45 to 46 and 102 to 118 in response to the Staff’s comment.
As of the date of this letter, a lender for such short-term borrowings has not been identified. However, the maximum redemption scenario in the proxy statement/prospectus has been presented on the assumption that CIIG II stockholders exercise their redemption rights with respect to 27,252,892 shares of CIIG II Class A Common Stock upon consummation of the Business Combination (at a redemption price of approximately $10.21 per share based on cash and marketable securities held in the trust account as of September 30, 2022 and an additional redemption amount of $0.10 per share pursuant to the Extension Loan), being the maximum number of shares of CIIG II Class A Common Stock that may be redeemed in order for the Minimum NTA Condition to be satisfied and assuming that Pubco has cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1.2 million upon closing of the Business Combination. Pursuant to CIIG II’s current certificate of incorporation, CIIG II cannot consummate the proposed Business Combination if it has less than $5,000,001 of net tangible assets remaining after the closing of the Business Combination. Given that in no event will CIIG II redeem Public Shares in an amount that would cause its net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001 upon closing of the Business Combination, the Company respectfully advises the Staff that it would not be relevant to include disclosure that CIIG II would not have the ability to fund the acquisitions due to the material negative cash balance after removing the pro forma effect of the $11.5 million short-term borrowing proceeds.
3. We note your disclosure that you cannot consummate the proposed Business Combination if you have less than $5,000,001 of net tangible assets remaining after the closing. We also note that in the maximum redemption scenario, it appears that you are unable to maintain at least $5,000,001 in net tangible assets. Please revise your disclosures to address the following:
| • | | Expand your risk factor discussion under “CIIG II may not have sufficient funds to consummate the Business Combination” on page 89 to discuss the risks arising from the maximum redemption scenario, including the magnitude of the potential cash shortfall and your inability to fund the acquisition in the event you do not obtain sufficient funding from the issuance of Zapp Convertible Loan Notes, and the possibility that you may fail to meet the net tangible assets requirement and will not be able to proceed with the business combination. |
| • | | Identify a scenario depicting the maximum number (and dollar amount) of CIIG II common shares that may be redeemed to maintain a sufficient amount of net tangible assets after redemption for the business combination to proceed. The additional scenario should also be presented within your pro forma financial statements. |
Response: The Company respectfully acknowledges the Staff’s comment and has revised the disclosure on pages 9 to 12, 33 to 36, 45 to 46, 90 and 102 to 118 in response to the Staff’s comment.
***
Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at +65 6437 5464, with any questions or comments regarding any of the foregoing.
|
Very truly yours, |
|
/s/ Sharon Lau |
|
Sharon Lau of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP |
cc: | Swin Chatsuwan, Kiattipong Arttachariya, David Sturgeon, Zapp Electric Vehicles Limited |
F. Peter Cuneo, Gavin Cuneo, Michael Minnick, CIIG Capital Partners II, Inc.
Alice Hsu, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Ackneil Muldrow, III, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP