Document And Entity Information
Document And Entity Information | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2023 | |
Document Information [Line Items] | |
Entity Registrant Name | Oxford Park Income Fund, Inc. |
Document Type | N-CSR |
Amendment Flag | false |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001959353 |
Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2023 |
N-2
N-2 | 12 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2023 $ / shares shares | |
Cover [Abstract] | |
Entity Central Index Key | 0001959353 |
Amendment Flag | false |
Document Type | N-CSR |
Entity Registrant Name | Oxford Park Income Fund, Inc. |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Investment Objectives and Practices [Text Block] | Investment Review The Fund’s investment objective is to maximize its portfolio’s risk -adjusted (1) -based Structurally, CLO vehicles are entities formed to originate and manage a portfolio of loans. The loans within a CLO vehicle are limited to those which, on an aggregated basis, have met established credit criteria and are subject to concentration limitations in order to limit a CLO vehicle’s exposure to a single credit or industry. The Fund’s investment strategy also includes warehouse facilities, which are financing structures intended to aggregate loans that may be used to form the basis of a CLO vehicle. Warehouse facilities typically incur leverage between four and six times prior to a CLO’s pricing. An investment in our Fund carries with it a significant number of meaningful risks, certain of which are discussed in the notes to our financial statements. Investors should read Note 5. Risks and Uncertainties and “PRINCIPAL RISKS” starting on page |
Risk [Text Block] | SUMMARY RISK FACTORS The value of the Fund’s assets, as well as the market price of its securities, will fluctuate. The Fund’s investments may be risky, and you may lose all or part of your investment in the Fund. • -diversified -end • • • -levering • • • -of-income • -related • • • • • -end • -end -end • • • • -made See “PRINCIPAL RISKS” below, as well as our prospectus, for additional discussion of factors you should carefully consider before investing in the Fund’s securities. PRINCIPAL RISKS Investing in the Fund’s shares of beneficial interest (“Shares”) involves a number of significant risks. In addition to the other information contained elsewhere in this prospectus, you should consider carefully the following information before making an investment in the Shares. If any of the following events occur, the Fund’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In such case, the net asset value of the Fund’s Shares could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Risks Related to the Fund’s Business and Structure No Operating History. -diversified -end Lack of Diversification. -diversified “Best -Efforts ” Offering Risk. Inadequate Network of Broker -Dealer Risk. -dealers Senior Management and Personnel of the Adviser. Accomplishing the Fund’s investment objective on a cost -effective -term The Fund’s success also requires that Oxford Park Management retain investment and administrative personnel in a competitive market. Its ability to attract and retain personnel with the requisite credentials, experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, its ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. Many of the entities, including investment funds (such as private equity funds, mezzanine funds and business development companies) and traditional financial services companies, with which the Fund competes for experienced personnel have greater resources than the Fund has. The Adviser has the right, under the Investment Advisory Agreement, to resign at any time upon 60 days’ written notice, whether the Fund has found a replacement or not. If the Adviser resigns, the Fund may not be able to find a new Adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If the Fund is unable to do so quickly, its operations are likely to experience a disruption, the Fund’s financial condition, business and results of operations as well as its ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected and the market price of the Fund’s Shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of the Fund’s internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer if the Fund is unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by the Adviser and its affiliates. Even if the Fund is able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with the Fund’s investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect the Fund’s financial condition, business and results of operations. Key Personnel. Although Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal have experience managing other investment portfolios, including those of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., a closed -end -based Incentive Fee Risks. -incentive -levering The Fund may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the securities and other instruments of other investment companies, including private funds, and, to the extent the Fund so invests, will bear its ratable share of any such investment company’s expenses, including management and performance fees. The Fund will also remain obligated to pay Management and Incentive Fees to Oxford Park Management with respect to the assets invested in the securities and other instruments of other investment companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of the Fund’s shareholders will bear his or her share of the Management and Incentive Fee of Oxford Park Management as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any investment companies in which the Fund invests. In the course of the Fund’s investing activities, the Fund will pay Management and Incentive Fees to Oxford Park Management and reimburse Oxford Park Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result, investors in the Fund’s Shares will invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in a lower rate of return than an investor might achieve through direct investments. In addition, given the structure of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Oxford Park Management, any general increase in interest rates will likely have the effect of making it easier for Oxford Park Management to meet the quarterly hurdle rate for payment of Incentive Fees under the Investment Advisory Agreement without any additional increase in relative performance on the part of Oxford Park Management. In addition, in view of the catch -up Valuation Risk. -party The determination of fair value and, consequently, the amount of unrealized gains and losses in the Fund’s portfolio, are to a certain degree subjective and dependent on a valuation process approved by the Board of Directors. Certain factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of the Fund’s investments include available indicative bids or quotations, as well as external events, such as private mergers, sales and acquisitions involving comparable companies. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The fair value of the Fund’s investments may differ materially from the values that would have been used if an active public market for these securities existed. The fair value of the Fund’s investments have a material impact on its net earnings through the recording of unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and may cause the Fund’s NAV on a given date to materially understate or overstate the value that the Fund may ultimately realize on one or more of its investments. Investors purchasing the Fund’s securities based on an overstated NAV may pay a higher price than the value of the Fund’s investments might warrant. Conversely, investors selling Shares during a period in which the NAV understates the value of the Fund’s investments may receive a lower price for their Shares than the value of its investments might warrant. Competition. Many of the Fund’s competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than the Fund. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that may not be available to the Fund. In addition, some of the Fund’s competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than the Fund has. These characteristics could allow the Fund’s competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer higher pricing than the Fund is willing to offer to potential sellers. The Fund may lose investment opportunities if its competitors are willing to pay more for the types of investments that the Fund intends to target. If the Fund is forced to pay more for its investments, the Fund may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on its investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. An increase in the number and/or the size of the Fund’s competitors in its target markets could force the Fund to accept less attractive investments. Furthermore, many of the Fund’s competitors have greater experience operating under, or are not be subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on the Fund as a closed -end Conflicts of Interest Risks. -end -traded -based Each of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., Oxford Square Capital Corp., Oxford Bridge II, LLC and the Oxford Gate Funds, as well as any affiliated investment vehicle formed in the future and managed by Oxford Park Management or its affiliates may, notwithstanding different stated investment objectives, have overlapping investment objectives with the Fund and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by the Fund. As a result, Oxford Park Management’s Investment Team may face conflicts in allocating investment opportunities between the Fund and such other entities. Although Oxford Park Management’s Investment Team will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, it is possible that, in the future, the Fund may not be given the opportunity to participate in investments made by investment funds, including Oxford Lane Capital Corp., Oxford Square Capital Corp., Oxford Bridge II, LLC and the Oxford Gate Funds, managed by Oxford Park Management or an investment manager affiliated with Oxford Park Management. In any such case, when Oxford Park Management’s Investment Team identifies an investment, it will be required to choose which investment fund should make the investment, although the Fund, Oxford Lane Capital Corp., Oxford Square Capital Corp., Oxford Bridge II, LLC and the Oxford Gate Funds are subject to an allocation policy to ensure the equitable distribution of such investment opportunities, consistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act. As a registered closed -end -invest -invest -investing -invest conclusions in connection with a co -investment -investment -investment -current The Fund will reimburse Oxford Funds an allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Oxford Funds in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees and expenses associated with performing administrative functions, and the Fund’s allocable portion of the compensation of its Chief Financial Officer and any administrative support staff, including accounting personnel. The Fund will also reimburse Oxford Funds for the costs associated with the functions performed by its Chief Compliance Officer that Oxford Funds pays on the Fund’s behalf pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the Fund and ACA. These arrangements may create conflicts of interest that the Board of Directors must monitor. Oxford Park Management will not be reimbursed for any performance -related Oxford Park Management or its affiliates will pay the Dealer Manager a fee of up to 1.00% with respect to Initial Shares purchased through institutional accounts. Risks Relating to our RIC Status. -level -of-income -term -term Risks Related to the Fund’s Investments Risks Related to CLOs. In addition to the general risks associated with investing in debt securities, CLO vehicles carry additional risks, including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the credit quality of the CLO Assets that serve as collateral may decline or the CLO Asset may default; (iii) the CLO may experience losses associated with selling CLO Assets at a loss; (iv) the Fund’s investments in CLO debt and equity will likely be subordinate to other senior classes of CLO debt; (v) the CLO vehicle itself may experience an event of default, leading to acceleration of the CLO’s debt and liquidation of CLO Assets at undesirable prices and (vi) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes among participants of the CLO transaction or unexpected investment results. The Fund’s NAV may also decline over time if its principal recovery with respect to CLO equity investments is less than the price the Fund paid for those investments. The CLO vehicles in which the Fund invests will issue and sell or have already issued and sold debt tranches that will rank senior to the debt and equity tranches in which the Fund invests. By their terms, such tranches entitle the holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which the Fund is entitled to receive payments with respect to the tranches in which the Fund invests. Also, in the event of default, insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a CLO vehicle, holders of senior debt instruments would be entitled to receive payment in full before the Fund receives any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such CLO vehicle may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to the Fund. In the case of tranches ranking equally with the tranches in which the Fund invests, the Fund would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other investors holding such securities in the event of a default, insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant CLO vehicle. Therefore, the Fund may not receive back the full amount of its investment (or any of its investment) in a CLO vehicle or may not receive its anticipated yield. The CLO equity market has experienced significant downturns from time to time. Due to the continued uncertainty in the CLO equity market, the Fund cannot assure you that it will achieve expected investment results and/or maintain its current level of cash distributions. The Fund’s future distributions are dependent upon the investment income the Fund receives on its portfolio investments, including its CLO equity investments. To the extent such CLO investments are terminated prior to the specified maturity date, such proceeds derived from a termination may be less than originally contemplated at that time of such investment. This may result in proceeds which may not be of a sufficient amount to invest in future CLO investments in order to generate cash returns that will enable the Fund to maintain the same level of distributions. This may result in a meaningful reduction in, or complete cessation of, the Fund’s distributions going forward. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to the Fund as a registered closed -end Accounting and Tax Implications. Limited Access to Information. Illiquidity of CLO Securities and their Investments. Failure to Satisfy Financial Tests. Risks Related to CLO Structure. prices of assets underlying CLOs will rise or fall, these prices (and, therefore, the prices of the CLOs’ securities) are influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect issuers of securities and capital markets generally. CLO Fees and Expenses. Risks Related to Concentration. Additionally, the CLO vehicles in which the Fund invests may have CLO Asset portfolios that are concentrated in a limited number of industries or borrowers. A downturn in any particular industry or borrower in which a CLO vehicle is heavily invested may subject that vehicle, and in turn the Fund, to a risk of significant loss and could significantly impact the aggregate returns the Fund realizes. If an industry in which a CLO vehicle is heavily invested suffers from adverse business or economic conditions, a material portion of the Fund’s investment in that CLO vehicle could be affected adversely, which, in turn, could adversely affect its financial position and results of operations. The Fund may also invest in multiple CLOs managed by the same CLO collateral manager, thereby increasing its risk of loss in the event the CLO collateral manager were to fail, experience the loss of key portfolio management employees or sell its business. Concentration of Underlying Obligors Across CLOs. Risks Related to Reinvestment of CLO Assets. -related on investment and may have a negative effect on the fair value of our assets and the market value of our securities. In addition, the reinvestment period for a CLO may terminate early, which would cause the holders of the CLO’s securities to receive principal payments earlier than anticipated. In addition, in CLO transactions in which the Fund owns a minority of the equity tranche, the holders of a majority of the equity tranche direct a call or refinancing of a CLO, thus causing such CLO’s outstanding CLO debt securities to be repaid at par earlier than expected. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to reinvest such amounts in an alternative investment that provides a comparable return relative to the credit risk assumed. Risks Related to CLO Managers. Additionally, there is no guarantee that, for any CLO the Fund invests in, the collateral manager in place when the Fund invests in such CLO securities will continue to manage such CLO through the life of our investment. Collateral managers are subject to removal or replacement by other holders of CLO securities without our consent, and may also voluntarily resign as collateral manager or assign their role as collateral manager to another entity. There can be no assurance that any removal, replacement, resignation or assignment of any particular CLO manager’s role will not adversely affect the returns on the CLO securities in which the Fund invests. Risks Related to Leverage of Underlying Obligors. If an obligor is unable to generate sufficient cash flow to meet principal and/or interest payments on its indebtedness, it may be forced to take other actions to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness. These alternative measures may include reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, seeking additional capital, or restructuring or refinancing indebtedness. Any of these actions could significantly reduce the value of the CLO Assets and thus the CLO securities in which the Fund invests. If such strategies are not successful and do not permit the obligor to meet its scheduled debt service obligations, the obligor may also be forced into liquidation, dissolution or insolvency, and the value of the CLO’s investment in such obligor could be significantly reduced or even eliminated. Bankruptcy or Insolvency of an Obligor of a CLO Asset. Various laws enacted for the protection of debtors may apply to the CLO Assets held by the CLOs in which the Fund invests. The information in this and the following paragraph represents a brief summary of certain points only, is not intended to be an extensive summary of the relevant issues and is applicable with respect to U.S. issuers and borrowers only. The following is not intended to be a summary of all relevant risks. Similar avoidance provisions to those described below are sometimes available with respect to non -U If a court in a lawsuit brought by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors of an issuer or borrower of a CLO Asset, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, were to find that such issuer or borrower did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for incurring the indebtedness constituting such CLO Asset and, after giving effect to such indebtedness, the issuer or borrower (1) was insolvent; (2) was engaged in a business for which the remaining assets of such issuer or borrower constituted unreasonably small capital; or (3) intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature, such court could decide to invalidate, in whole or in part, the indebtedness constituting the CLO Assets as a fraudulent conveyance, to subordinate such indebtedness to existing or future creditors of the issuer or borrower or to recover amounts previously paid by the issuer or borrower in satisfaction of such indebtedness. In addition, in the event of the insolvency of an issuer or borrower of a CLO Asset, payments made on such CLO Asset could be subject to avoidance as a “preference” if made within a certain period of time (which may be as long as one year under U.S. Federal bankruptcy law or even longer under state laws) before insolvency. The CLO Assets of the CLOs in which the Fund invests may be subject to various laws for the protection of debtors in other jurisdictions, including the jurisdiction of incorporation of the issuer or borrower of such CLO Assets and, if different, the jurisdiction from which it conducts business and in which it holds assets, any of which may adversely affect such issuer’s or borrower’s ability to make, or a creditor’s ability to enforce, payment in full, on a timely basis or at all. These insolvency considerations will differ depending on the jurisdiction in which an issuer or borrower or the related CLO Assets are located and may differ depending on the legal status of the issuer or borrower. U.S. Risk Retention. -Frank The Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules became fully effective on December 24, 2016, and to the extent applicable to CLOs in which the Fund invests, the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules contain provisions that may adversely affect the return of the Fund’s investments. On February 9, 2018, a three -judge -cv-0065 -owned to the extent none of the underlying collateral manager or its affiliates holds any CLO securities in any event, this will reduce the degree to which the relevant collateral manager’s incentives are aligned with those of the holders of the CLO debt or equity (which may include the Fund as a CLO investor). This could influence the way in which the relevant collateral manager manages the CLO assets and/or makes other decisions under the transaction documents related to the CLO in a manner that is adverse to the Fund. There can be no assurance or representation that any of the transactions, structures or arrangements currently under consideration by or currently used by CLO market participants will comply with the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules to the extent such rules are reinstated or otherwise become applicable to open market CLOs. The ultimate impact of the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules on the loan securitization market and the leveraged loan market generally remains uncertain, and any negative impact on secondary market liquidity for securities comprising a CLO may be experienced due to the effects of the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules on market expectations or uncertainty, the relative appeal of other investments not impacted by the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules and other factors. EU/UK Risk Retention. The due diligence requirements of Article 5 of the EU Securitization Regulation (the “EU Due Diligence Requirements”) apply to each investor that is an “institutional investor” (as such term is defined in the EU Securitization Regulation), being an investor which is one of the following: (a) an insurance undertaking as defined in Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking -up The due diligence requirements of Article 5 of the UK Securitization Regulation (the “UK Due Diligence Requirements” and, together with the EU Due Diligence Requirements, the “Due Diligence Requirements”) apply to each investor that is an “institutional investor” (as such term is defined in the UK Securitization Regulation), being an investor which is one of the following: (a) an insurance undertaking as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended, the “FSMA”); (b) a reinsurance undertaking as defined in the FSMA; (c) an occupational pension scheme as defined in the Pension Schemes Act 1993 that has its main administration in the UK, or a fund manager of such a scheme appointed under the Pensions Act 1995 that, in respect of activity undertaken pursuant to that appointment, is authorised under the FSMA; (d) an AIFM (as defined in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations 2013 (the “AIFM Regulations”)) which markets or manages AIFs (as defined in the AIFM Regulations) in the UK; (e) a management company as defined in the FSMA; (f) a UCITS as defined by the FSMA, which is an authorised open ended investment company as defined in the FSMA; (g) a FCA investment firm as defined by the CRR as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of EUWA (the “UK CRR”); or (h) a CRR investment firm as defined in the UK CRR, in each case, such investor a “UK Institutional Investor” and, such investors together with EU Institutional Investors, “Institutional Investors”. Among other things, the applicable Due Diligence Requirements require that prior to holding a “securitisation position” (as defined in each Securitization Regulation) an Institutional Investor (other than the originator, sponsor or original lender) has verified that: (1) (2) (3) (i) (ii) (4) -defined -granting The Due Diligence Requirements further require that prior to holding a securitisation position, an Institutional Investor, other than the originator, sponsor or original lender, carry out a due diligence assessment which enables it to assess the risks involved, including but not limited to (a) the risk characteristics of the individual securitisation position and the underlying exposures; and (b) all the structural features of the securitization that can materially impact the performance of the securitisation position, including the contractual priorities of payment and priority of payment -related -specific Any Institutional Investor that fails to comply with the applicable Due Diligence Requirements in respect of a securitization position which it holds may become subject to a range of regulatory sanctions including, in the case of a credit institution, investment firm, insurer or reinsurer, a punitive regulatory capital charge with respect to such securitization position, or, in certain other cases, a requirement to take corrective action. To the extent a CLO is structured in compliance with the Securitization Regulations, the Fund’s ability to invest in the CLO equity of such CLOs could be limited, or the Fund could be required to hold its investment for the life of the CLO. If a CLO has not been structured to comply with the Securitization Regulations, it will limit the ability of Institutional Investors to purchase CLO securities, which may adversely affect the price and liquidity of the securities (including the CLO equity) in the secondary market. Additionally, the Securitization Regulations and any regulatory uncertainty in relation thereto may reduce the issuance of new CLOs and reduce the liquidity provided by CLOs to the leveraged loan market generally. Reduced liquidity in the loan market could reduce investment opportunities for collateral managers, which could negatively affect the return of the Fund’s investments. Any reduction in the volume and liquidity provided by CLOs to the leveraged loan market could also reduce opportunities to redeem or refinance the securities comprising a CLO in an optional redemption or refinancing and could negatively affect the ability of obligors to refinance of their collateral obligations, either of which developments could increase defaulted obligations above historic levels. Japanese Risk Retention. The JRR Rule became effective on March 31, 2019. At this time, there are a number of unresolved questions and no established line of authority, precedent or market practice that provides definitive guidance with respect to the JRR Rule, and no assurances can be made as to the content, impact or interpretation of the JRR Rule. In particular, the basis for the determination of whether an asset is “inappropriately originated” remains unclear and, therefore, unless the JFSA provides further specific clarification, it is possible that CLO securities the Fund purchases may contain assets deemed to be “inappropriately originated” and, as a result, may not be exempt from the Japanese Retention Requirement. The JRR Rule or other similar requirements may deter Japanese Affected Investors from purchasing CLO securities, which may limit the liquidity of CLO securities and, in turn, adversely affect the price of such CLO securities in the secondary market. Whether and to what extent the JFSA may provide further clarification or interpretation as to the JRR Rule is unknown. Investment Risk. Market Risk. Rating Risk. In addition, the ratings assigned to the CLO Assets in which the CLOs invest are subject to change at any time, including for reasons unrelated to performance, such as changes in rating agency methodology, changes in economic conditions, changes in the loan markets, changes in the creditworthiness of the underlying obligors and a variety of other factors. If downgrade actions by a rating agency result in an increase in the number of CLO Assets with ratings of “Caa1” or “CCC+” or lower, then even if such CLO Asset do not suffer defaults or delinquencies or otherwise deteriorate in performance, the CLO vehicle could fail to satisfy certain tests, which could lead to the early amortization of some or all of the CLO debt. As a result, payments that would have otherwise been made to the CLO equity or CLO debt securities that the Fund holds would instead be diverted to buy additional loans within a given CLO or paid to senior CLO debt holders as an early amortization payment. Interest Rate Risk. -month -month -month -month -month -month In addition, CLOs may not be able to enter into hedge agreements, even if it may otherwise be in the best interests of the CLO to hedge such interest rate risk. Furthermore, in the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, underlying obligors may be unable to pay their debt liabilities or refinance, and loan defaults may increase, thus resulting in credit losses that would adversely affect our cash flow, fair value of our assets and operating results. Benchmark Floor Risk. Credit Risk. -payment -payment of collateral would satisfy the issuer’s obligation in the event of non -payment -investment Participation Risk. Liquidity Risk. -traded -term any national securities exchange or automated quotation system, and no active trading market exists for many CLO securities or CLO Assets. As a result, many CLO securities and CLO Assets are illiquid, meaning that the Fund may not be able to sell CLO securities quickly at a fair price, and the CLOs in which the Fund invests may not be able to sell underlying CLO Assets quickly at a fair price. The market for illiquid securities is more volatile than the market for liquid securities. Exposure to Foreign Markets. -U In addition, international trade tensions may arise from time to time which could result in trade tariffs, embargoes or other restrictions or limitations on trade. The imposition of any actions on trade could trigger a significant reduction in international trade, supply chain disruptions, an oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies or industries, which could have a negative impact on the value of the CLO securities that the Fund holds. Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures, and in certain markets there have been times when settlements have failed to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Delays in settlement could result in periods when our assets are uninvested. Our inability to make intended investments due to settlement problems or the risk of intermediary counterparty failures could cause it to miss investment opportunities. The inability to dispose of an investment due to settlement problems could result either in losses to the funds due to subsequent declines in the value of such investment or, if we have entered into a contract to sell the security, could result in possible liability to the purchaser. Transaction costs of buying and selling foreign securities also are generally higher than those involved in domestic transactions. Furthermore, foreign financial markets have, for the most part, substantially less volume than U.S. markets, and securities of many foreign companies are less liquid and their prices more volatile than securities of comparable domestic companies. The economies of individual non -U -sufficiency Although the Fund expects that most of its investments will be U.S. dollar -denominated -denominated -term -term Hedging Transactions. the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent the Fund from achieving the intended hedge and expose the Fund to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non -U Derivatives. -at-risk Non -Performing Investments. -down Middle -Market Loans. The success of a middle market business may also |
Effects of Leverage [Text Block] | Use of Leverage: Risk of Borrowing by the Fund. -end |
NAV Per Share | $ / shares | $ 26.79 |
Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract] | |
Outstanding Security, Authorized [Shares] | 200,000,000 |
Outstanding Security, Held [Shares] | 150,057 |
No Operating History [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | No Operating History. -diversified -end |
Lack of Diversification [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Lack of Diversification. -diversified |
Best-Efforts” Offering Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | “Best -Efforts ” Offering Risk. |
Inadequate Network of Broker-Dealer Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Inadequate Network of Broker -Dealer Risk. -dealers |
Senior Management and Personnel of the Adviser [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Senior Management and Personnel of the Adviser. Accomplishing the Fund’s investment objective on a cost -effective -term The Fund’s success also requires that Oxford Park Management retain investment and administrative personnel in a competitive market. Its ability to attract and retain personnel with the requisite credentials, experience and skills depends on several factors including, but not limited to, its ability to offer competitive wages, benefits and professional growth opportunities. Many of the entities, including investment funds (such as private equity funds, mezzanine funds and business development companies) and traditional financial services companies, with which the Fund competes for experienced personnel have greater resources than the Fund has. The Adviser has the right, under the Investment Advisory Agreement, to resign at any time upon 60 days’ written notice, whether the Fund has found a replacement or not. If the Adviser resigns, the Fund may not be able to find a new Adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If the Fund is unable to do so quickly, its operations are likely to experience a disruption, the Fund’s financial condition, business and results of operations as well as its ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected and the market price of the Fund’s Shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of the Fund’s internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer if the Fund is unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by the Adviser and its affiliates. Even if the Fund is able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with the Fund’s investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect the Fund’s financial condition, business and results of operations. |
Key Personnel [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Key Personnel. Although Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal have experience managing other investment portfolios, including those of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., a closed -end -based |
Incentive Fee Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Incentive Fee Risks. -incentive -levering The Fund may invest, to the extent permitted by law, in the securities and other instruments of other investment companies, including private funds, and, to the extent the Fund so invests, will bear its ratable share of any such investment company’s expenses, including management and performance fees. The Fund will also remain obligated to pay Management and Incentive Fees to Oxford Park Management with respect to the assets invested in the securities and other instruments of other investment companies. With respect to each of these investments, each of the Fund’s shareholders will bear his or her share of the Management and Incentive Fee of Oxford Park Management as well as indirectly bearing the management and performance fees and other expenses of any investment companies in which the Fund invests. In the course of the Fund’s investing activities, the Fund will pay Management and Incentive Fees to Oxford Park Management and reimburse Oxford Park Management for certain expenses it incurs. As a result, investors in the Fund’s Shares will invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in a lower rate of return than an investor might achieve through direct investments. In addition, given the structure of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Oxford Park Management, any general increase in interest rates will likely have the effect of making it easier for Oxford Park Management to meet the quarterly hurdle rate for payment of Incentive Fees under the Investment Advisory Agreement without any additional increase in relative performance on the part of Oxford Park Management. In addition, in view of the catch -up |
Valuation Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Valuation Risk. -party The determination of fair value and, consequently, the amount of unrealized gains and losses in the Fund’s portfolio, are to a certain degree subjective and dependent on a valuation process approved by the Board of Directors. Certain factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of the Fund’s investments include available indicative bids or quotations, as well as external events, such as private mergers, sales and acquisitions involving comparable companies. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities, are inherently uncertain, they may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates. The fair value of the Fund’s investments may differ materially from the values that would have been used if an active public market for these securities existed. The fair value of the Fund’s investments have a material impact on its net earnings through the recording of unrealized appreciation or depreciation of investments and may cause the Fund’s NAV on a given date to materially understate or overstate the value that the Fund may ultimately realize on one or more of its investments. Investors purchasing the Fund’s securities based on an overstated NAV may pay a higher price than the value of the Fund’s investments might warrant. Conversely, investors selling Shares during a period in which the NAV understates the value of the Fund’s investments may receive a lower price for their Shares than the value of its investments might warrant. |
Competition [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Competition. Many of the Fund’s competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than the Fund. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of capital and access to funding sources that may not be available to the Fund. In addition, some of the Fund’s competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than the Fund has. These characteristics could allow the Fund’s competitors to consider a wider variety of investments, establish more relationships and offer higher pricing than the Fund is willing to offer to potential sellers. The Fund may lose investment opportunities if its competitors are willing to pay more for the types of investments that the Fund intends to target. If the Fund is forced to pay more for its investments, the Fund may not be able to achieve acceptable returns on its investments or may bear substantial risk of capital loss. An increase in the number and/or the size of the Fund’s competitors in its target markets could force the Fund to accept less attractive investments. Furthermore, many of the Fund’s competitors have greater experience operating under, or are not be subject to, the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on the Fund as a closed -end |
Conflicts of Interest Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Conflicts of Interest Risks. -end -traded -based Each of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., Oxford Square Capital Corp., Oxford Bridge II, LLC and the Oxford Gate Funds, as well as any affiliated investment vehicle formed in the future and managed by Oxford Park Management or its affiliates may, notwithstanding different stated investment objectives, have overlapping investment objectives with the Fund and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by the Fund. As a result, Oxford Park Management’s Investment Team may face conflicts in allocating investment opportunities between the Fund and such other entities. Although Oxford Park Management’s Investment Team will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, it is possible that, in the future, the Fund may not be given the opportunity to participate in investments made by investment funds, including Oxford Lane Capital Corp., Oxford Square Capital Corp., Oxford Bridge II, LLC and the Oxford Gate Funds, managed by Oxford Park Management or an investment manager affiliated with Oxford Park Management. In any such case, when Oxford Park Management’s Investment Team identifies an investment, it will be required to choose which investment fund should make the investment, although the Fund, Oxford Lane Capital Corp., Oxford Square Capital Corp., Oxford Bridge II, LLC and the Oxford Gate Funds are subject to an allocation policy to ensure the equitable distribution of such investment opportunities, consistent with the requirements of the 1940 Act. As a registered closed -end -invest -invest -investing -invest conclusions in connection with a co -investment -investment -investment -current The Fund will reimburse Oxford Funds an allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by Oxford Funds in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees and expenses associated with performing administrative functions, and the Fund’s allocable portion of the compensation of its Chief Financial Officer and any administrative support staff, including accounting personnel. The Fund will also reimburse Oxford Funds for the costs associated with the functions performed by its Chief Compliance Officer that Oxford Funds pays on the Fund’s behalf pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the Fund and ACA. These arrangements may create conflicts of interest that the Board of Directors must monitor. Oxford Park Management will not be reimbursed for any performance -related Oxford Park Management or its affiliates will pay the Dealer Manager a fee of up to 1.00% with respect to Initial Shares purchased through institutional accounts. |
Risks Relating to our RIC Status [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Relating to our RIC Status. -level -of-income -term -term |
Risks Related to CLOs [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to CLOs. In addition to the general risks associated with investing in debt securities, CLO vehicles carry additional risks, including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the credit quality of the CLO Assets that serve as collateral may decline or the CLO Asset may default; (iii) the CLO may experience losses associated with selling CLO Assets at a loss; (iv) the Fund’s investments in CLO debt and equity will likely be subordinate to other senior classes of CLO debt; (v) the CLO vehicle itself may experience an event of default, leading to acceleration of the CLO’s debt and liquidation of CLO Assets at undesirable prices and (vi) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes among participants of the CLO transaction or unexpected investment results. The Fund’s NAV may also decline over time if its principal recovery with respect to CLO equity investments is less than the price the Fund paid for those investments. The CLO vehicles in which the Fund invests will issue and sell or have already issued and sold debt tranches that will rank senior to the debt and equity tranches in which the Fund invests. By their terms, such tranches entitle the holders to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which the Fund is entitled to receive payments with respect to the tranches in which the Fund invests. Also, in the event of default, insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a CLO vehicle, holders of senior debt instruments would be entitled to receive payment in full before the Fund receives any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such CLO vehicle may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to the Fund. In the case of tranches ranking equally with the tranches in which the Fund invests, the Fund would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other investors holding such securities in the event of a default, insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant CLO vehicle. Therefore, the Fund may not receive back the full amount of its investment (or any of its investment) in a CLO vehicle or may not receive its anticipated yield. The CLO equity market has experienced significant downturns from time to time. Due to the continued uncertainty in the CLO equity market, the Fund cannot assure you that it will achieve expected investment results and/or maintain its current level of cash distributions. The Fund’s future distributions are dependent upon the investment income the Fund receives on its portfolio investments, including its CLO equity investments. To the extent such CLO investments are terminated prior to the specified maturity date, such proceeds derived from a termination may be less than originally contemplated at that time of such investment. This may result in proceeds which may not be of a sufficient amount to invest in future CLO investments in order to generate cash returns that will enable the Fund to maintain the same level of distributions. This may result in a meaningful reduction in, or complete cessation of, the Fund’s distributions going forward. In addition, due to the asset coverage test applicable to the Fund as a registered closed -end |
Accounting and Tax Implications [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Accounting and Tax Implications. |
Limited Access to Information [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Limited Access to Information. |
Illiquidity of CLO Securities and their Investments [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Illiquidity of CLO Securities and their Investments. |
Failure to Satisfy Financial Tests [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Failure to Satisfy Financial Tests. |
Risks Related to CLO Structure [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to CLO Structure. prices of assets underlying CLOs will rise or fall, these prices (and, therefore, the prices of the CLOs’ securities) are influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect issuers of securities and capital markets generally. |
CLO Fees and Expenses [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | CLO Fees and Expenses. |
Risks Related to Concentration [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Concentration. Additionally, the CLO vehicles in which the Fund invests may have CLO Asset portfolios that are concentrated in a limited number of industries or borrowers. A downturn in any particular industry or borrower in which a CLO vehicle is heavily invested may subject that vehicle, and in turn the Fund, to a risk of significant loss and could significantly impact the aggregate returns the Fund realizes. If an industry in which a CLO vehicle is heavily invested suffers from adverse business or economic conditions, a material portion of the Fund’s investment in that CLO vehicle could be affected adversely, which, in turn, could adversely affect its financial position and results of operations. The Fund may also invest in multiple CLOs managed by the same CLO collateral manager, thereby increasing its risk of loss in the event the CLO collateral manager were to fail, experience the loss of key portfolio management employees or sell its business. |
Concentration of Underlying Obligors Across CLOs [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Concentration of Underlying Obligors Across CLOs. |
Risks Related to Reinvestment of CLO Assets [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Reinvestment of CLO Assets. -related on investment and may have a negative effect on the fair value of our assets and the market value of our securities. In addition, the reinvestment period for a CLO may terminate early, which would cause the holders of the CLO’s securities to receive principal payments earlier than anticipated. In addition, in CLO transactions in which the Fund owns a minority of the equity tranche, the holders of a majority of the equity tranche direct a call or refinancing of a CLO, thus causing such CLO’s outstanding CLO debt securities to be repaid at par earlier than expected. There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to reinvest such amounts in an alternative investment that provides a comparable return relative to the credit risk assumed. |
Risks Related to CLO Managers [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to CLO Managers. Additionally, there is no guarantee that, for any CLO the Fund invests in, the collateral manager in place when the Fund invests in such CLO securities will continue to manage such CLO through the life of our investment. Collateral managers are subject to removal or replacement by other holders of CLO securities without our consent, and may also voluntarily resign as collateral manager or assign their role as collateral manager to another entity. There can be no assurance that any removal, replacement, resignation or assignment of any particular CLO manager’s role will not adversely affect the returns on the CLO securities in which the Fund invests. |
Risks Related to Leverage of Underlying Obligors [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Related to Leverage of Underlying Obligors. If an obligor is unable to generate sufficient cash flow to meet principal and/or interest payments on its indebtedness, it may be forced to take other actions to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness. These alternative measures may include reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, seeking additional capital, or restructuring or refinancing indebtedness. Any of these actions could significantly reduce the value of the CLO Assets and thus the CLO securities in which the Fund invests. If such strategies are not successful and do not permit the obligor to meet its scheduled debt service obligations, the obligor may also be forced into liquidation, dissolution or insolvency, and the value of the CLO’s investment in such obligor could be significantly reduced or even eliminated. |
Bankruptcy or Insolvency of an Obligor of a CLO Asset [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Bankruptcy or Insolvency of an Obligor of a CLO Asset. Various laws enacted for the protection of debtors may apply to the CLO Assets held by the CLOs in which the Fund invests. The information in this and the following paragraph represents a brief summary of certain points only, is not intended to be an extensive summary of the relevant issues and is applicable with respect to U.S. issuers and borrowers only. The following is not intended to be a summary of all relevant risks. Similar avoidance provisions to those described below are sometimes available with respect to non -U If a court in a lawsuit brought by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors of an issuer or borrower of a CLO Asset, such as a trustee in bankruptcy, were to find that such issuer or borrower did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value for incurring the indebtedness constituting such CLO Asset and, after giving effect to such indebtedness, the issuer or borrower (1) was insolvent; (2) was engaged in a business for which the remaining assets of such issuer or borrower constituted unreasonably small capital; or (3) intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature, such court could decide to invalidate, in whole or in part, the indebtedness constituting the CLO Assets as a fraudulent conveyance, to subordinate such indebtedness to existing or future creditors of the issuer or borrower or to recover amounts previously paid by the issuer or borrower in satisfaction of such indebtedness. In addition, in the event of the insolvency of an issuer or borrower of a CLO Asset, payments made on such CLO Asset could be subject to avoidance as a “preference” if made within a certain period of time (which may be as long as one year under U.S. Federal bankruptcy law or even longer under state laws) before insolvency. The CLO Assets of the CLOs in which the Fund invests may be subject to various laws for the protection of debtors in other jurisdictions, including the jurisdiction of incorporation of the issuer or borrower of such CLO Assets and, if different, the jurisdiction from which it conducts business and in which it holds assets, any of which may adversely affect such issuer’s or borrower’s ability to make, or a creditor’s ability to enforce, payment in full, on a timely basis or at all. These insolvency considerations will differ depending on the jurisdiction in which an issuer or borrower or the related CLO Assets are located and may differ depending on the legal status of the issuer or borrower. |
U.S. Risk Retention [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | U.S. Risk Retention. -Frank The Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules became fully effective on December 24, 2016, and to the extent applicable to CLOs in which the Fund invests, the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules contain provisions that may adversely affect the return of the Fund’s investments. On February 9, 2018, a three -judge -cv-0065 -owned to the extent none of the underlying collateral manager or its affiliates holds any CLO securities in any event, this will reduce the degree to which the relevant collateral manager’s incentives are aligned with those of the holders of the CLO debt or equity (which may include the Fund as a CLO investor). This could influence the way in which the relevant collateral manager manages the CLO assets and/or makes other decisions under the transaction documents related to the CLO in a manner that is adverse to the Fund. There can be no assurance or representation that any of the transactions, structures or arrangements currently under consideration by or currently used by CLO market participants will comply with the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules to the extent such rules are reinstated or otherwise become applicable to open market CLOs. The ultimate impact of the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules on the loan securitization market and the leveraged loan market generally remains uncertain, and any negative impact on secondary market liquidity for securities comprising a CLO may be experienced due to the effects of the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules on market expectations or uncertainty, the relative appeal of other investments not impacted by the Final U.S. Risk Retention Rules and other factors. |
EU/UK Risk Retention [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | EU/UK Risk Retention. The due diligence requirements of Article 5 of the EU Securitization Regulation (the “EU Due Diligence Requirements”) apply to each investor that is an “institutional investor” (as such term is defined in the EU Securitization Regulation), being an investor which is one of the following: (a) an insurance undertaking as defined in Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking -up The due diligence requirements of Article 5 of the UK Securitization Regulation (the “UK Due Diligence Requirements” and, together with the EU Due Diligence Requirements, the “Due Diligence Requirements”) apply to each investor that is an “institutional investor” (as such term is defined in the UK Securitization Regulation), being an investor which is one of the following: (a) an insurance undertaking as defined in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended, the “FSMA”); (b) a reinsurance undertaking as defined in the FSMA; (c) an occupational pension scheme as defined in the Pension Schemes Act 1993 that has its main administration in the UK, or a fund manager of such a scheme appointed under the Pensions Act 1995 that, in respect of activity undertaken pursuant to that appointment, is authorised under the FSMA; (d) an AIFM (as defined in the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Regulations 2013 (the “AIFM Regulations”)) which markets or manages AIFs (as defined in the AIFM Regulations) in the UK; (e) a management company as defined in the FSMA; (f) a UCITS as defined by the FSMA, which is an authorised open ended investment company as defined in the FSMA; (g) a FCA investment firm as defined by the CRR as it forms part of UK domestic law by virtue of EUWA (the “UK CRR”); or (h) a CRR investment firm as defined in the UK CRR, in each case, such investor a “UK Institutional Investor” and, such investors together with EU Institutional Investors, “Institutional Investors”. Among other things, the applicable Due Diligence Requirements require that prior to holding a “securitisation position” (as defined in each Securitization Regulation) an Institutional Investor (other than the originator, sponsor or original lender) has verified that: (1) (2) (3) (i) (ii) (4) -defined -granting The Due Diligence Requirements further require that prior to holding a securitisation position, an Institutional Investor, other than the originator, sponsor or original lender, carry out a due diligence assessment which enables it to assess the risks involved, including but not limited to (a) the risk characteristics of the individual securitisation position and the underlying exposures; and (b) all the structural features of the securitization that can materially impact the performance of the securitisation position, including the contractual priorities of payment and priority of payment -related -specific Any Institutional Investor that fails to comply with the applicable Due Diligence Requirements in respect of a securitization position which it holds may become subject to a range of regulatory sanctions including, in the case of a credit institution, investment firm, insurer or reinsurer, a punitive regulatory capital charge with respect to such securitization position, or, in certain other cases, a requirement to take corrective action. To the extent a CLO is structured in compliance with the Securitization Regulations, the Fund’s ability to invest in the CLO equity of such CLOs could be limited, or the Fund could be required to hold its investment for the life of the CLO. If a CLO has not been structured to comply with the Securitization Regulations, it will limit the ability of Institutional Investors to purchase CLO securities, which may adversely affect the price and liquidity of the securities (including the CLO equity) in the secondary market. Additionally, the Securitization Regulations and any regulatory uncertainty in relation thereto may reduce the issuance of new CLOs and reduce the liquidity provided by CLOs to the leveraged loan market generally. Reduced liquidity in the loan market could reduce investment opportunities for collateral managers, which could negatively affect the return of the Fund’s investments. Any reduction in the volume and liquidity provided by CLOs to the leveraged loan market could also reduce opportunities to redeem or refinance the securities comprising a CLO in an optional redemption or refinancing and could negatively affect the ability of obligors to refinance of their collateral obligations, either of which developments could increase defaulted obligations above historic levels. |
Japanese Risk Retention [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Japanese Risk Retention. The JRR Rule became effective on March 31, 2019. At this time, there are a number of unresolved questions and no established line of authority, precedent or market practice that provides definitive guidance with respect to the JRR Rule, and no assurances can be made as to the content, impact or interpretation of the JRR Rule. In particular, the basis for the determination of whether an asset is “inappropriately originated” remains unclear and, therefore, unless the JFSA provides further specific clarification, it is possible that CLO securities the Fund purchases may contain assets deemed to be “inappropriately originated” and, as a result, may not be exempt from the Japanese Retention Requirement. The JRR Rule or other similar requirements may deter Japanese Affected Investors from purchasing CLO securities, which may limit the liquidity of CLO securities and, in turn, adversely affect the price of such CLO securities in the secondary market. Whether and to what extent the JFSA may provide further clarification or interpretation as to the JRR Rule is unknown. |
Investment Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Investment Risk. |
Market Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Market Risk. |
Rating Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Rating Risk. In addition, the ratings assigned to the CLO Assets in which the CLOs invest are subject to change at any time, including for reasons unrelated to performance, such as changes in rating agency methodology, changes in economic conditions, changes in the loan markets, changes in the creditworthiness of the underlying obligors and a variety of other factors. If downgrade actions by a rating agency result in an increase in the number of CLO Assets with ratings of “Caa1” or “CCC+” or lower, then even if such CLO Asset do not suffer defaults or delinquencies or otherwise deteriorate in performance, the CLO vehicle could fail to satisfy certain tests, which could lead to the early amortization of some or all of the CLO debt. As a result, payments that would have otherwise been made to the CLO equity or CLO debt securities that the Fund holds would instead be diverted to buy additional loans within a given CLO or paid to senior CLO debt holders as an early amortization payment. |
Interest Rates Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Interest Rate Risk. -month -month -month -month -month -month In addition, CLOs may not be able to enter into hedge agreements, even if it may otherwise be in the best interests of the CLO to hedge such interest rate risk. Furthermore, in the event of a significant rising interest rate environment and/or economic downturn, underlying obligors may be unable to pay their debt liabilities or refinance, and loan defaults may increase, thus resulting in credit losses that would adversely affect our cash flow, fair value of our assets and operating results. |
Benchmark Floor Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Benchmark Floor Risk. |
Credit Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Credit Risk. -payment -payment of collateral would satisfy the issuer’s obligation in the event of non -payment -investment |
Participation Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Participation Risk. |
Liquidity Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Liquidity Risk. -traded -term any national securities exchange or automated quotation system, and no active trading market exists for many CLO securities or CLO Assets. As a result, many CLO securities and CLO Assets are illiquid, meaning that the Fund may not be able to sell CLO securities quickly at a fair price, and the CLOs in which the Fund invests may not be able to sell underlying CLO Assets quickly at a fair price. The market for illiquid securities is more volatile than the market for liquid securities. |
Exposure to Foreign Markets [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Exposure to Foreign Markets. -U In addition, international trade tensions may arise from time to time which could result in trade tariffs, embargoes or other restrictions or limitations on trade. The imposition of any actions on trade could trigger a significant reduction in international trade, supply chain disruptions, an oversupply of certain manufactured goods, substantial price reductions of goods and possible failure of individual companies or industries, which could have a negative impact on the value of the CLO securities that the Fund holds. Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures, and in certain markets there have been times when settlements have failed to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Delays in settlement could result in periods when our assets are uninvested. Our inability to make intended investments due to settlement problems or the risk of intermediary counterparty failures could cause it to miss investment opportunities. The inability to dispose of an investment due to settlement problems could result either in losses to the funds due to subsequent declines in the value of such investment or, if we have entered into a contract to sell the security, could result in possible liability to the purchaser. Transaction costs of buying and selling foreign securities also are generally higher than those involved in domestic transactions. Furthermore, foreign financial markets have, for the most part, substantially less volume than U.S. markets, and securities of many foreign companies are less liquid and their prices more volatile than securities of comparable domestic companies. The economies of individual non -U -sufficiency Although the Fund expects that most of its investments will be U.S. dollar -denominated -denominated -term -term |
Hedging Transactions [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Hedging Transactions. the portfolio holdings being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent the Fund from achieving the intended hedge and expose the Fund to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non -U |
Derivatives [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Derivatives. -at-risk |
Non-Performing Investments [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Non -Performing Investments. -down |
Middle-Market Loans [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Middle -Market Loans. The success of a middle market business may also depend on the management talents and efforts of one or two persons or a small group of persons. The death, disability or resignation of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on the obligor. Accordingly, loans made to middle market companies may involve higher risks than loans made to companies that have greater financial resources or are otherwise able to access traditional credit sources. Middle market loans are less liquid and have a smaller trading market than the market for broadly syndicated loans and may have default rates or recovery rates that differ (and may be better or worse) than has been the case for broadly syndicated loans or investment grade securities. There can be no assurance as to the levels of defaults and/or recoveries that may be experienced with respect to middle market loans in any CLO in which the Fund may invest. As a consequence of the forgoing factors, the securities issued by CLOs that primarily invest in middle market loans (or hold significant portions thereof) are generally considered to be a riskier investment than securities issued by CLOs that primarily invest in broadly syndicated loans. |
Warehoused Investments [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Warehoused Investments. -term including price volatility, interest rate volatility and availability of investments suitable for the CLO, which could hamper the ability of the collateral manager to acquire a portfolio of collateral obligations that will satisfy specified concentration limitations and allow the CLO to reach the target initial par amount of collateral prior to the effective date. An inability or delay in reaching the target initial par amount of collateral may adversely affect the timing and amount of interest or principal payments received by the holders of the CLO debt securities and distributions on the CLO equity securities and could result in early redemptions which may cause CLO debt and equity investors to receive less than face value of their investment. Investments in warehouse facilities present risks similar to those of investments in CLOs and, accordingly, any references herein to CLOs in which the Fund invests or CLO equity investments shall also refer to warehouse facilities and investments therein, as the context requires. |
CLO Anti-Deferral Provision Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | CLO Anti -Deferral Provision Risks. If the Fund holds more than 10% of the shares in a foreign corporation that is treated as a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) (including equity tranche investments in a CLO vehicle treated as a CFC), the Fund may be treated as receiving a deemed distribution (taxable as ordinary income) each year from such foreign corporation in an amount equal to its pro rata share of the corporation’s income for the tax year (including both ordinary earnings and capital gains). If the Fund is required to include such deemed distributions from a CFC in its income, the Fund will be required to distribute such income to maintain its RIC tax treatment regardless of whether or not the CFC makes an actual distribution during such year. If the Fund is required to include amounts in income prior to receiving distributions representing such income, the Fund may have to sell some of its investments at times and/or at prices the Fund would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If the Fund is not able to obtain cash from other sources, the Fund may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate -level |
CLO Withholding Tax Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | CLO Withholding Tax Risks. -U -U -U -U |
Risks Associated with Changes in LIBOR [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Risks Associated with Changes in LIBOR. -week -month elsewhere. It is possible that banks will not continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR. Similarly, it is not possible to predict whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, or what the effect of any such changes in views or alternatives may have on the financial markets for LIBOR -linked To identify a successor rate for U.S. dollar LIBOR, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), a U.S. -based -backed -looking -month -month -month For CLOs which issue debt based on Term SOFR, investors should be aware that such CLO debt may fluctuate from one interest accrual period to another in response to changes in Term SOFR. Term SOFR has a limited history of use as a benchmark rate and, as a risk -free In any event, LIBOR is likely to perform differently than in the past and, ultimately, cease to exist as a global benchmark going forward. Until an alternative benchmark rate(s) becomes generally accepted and regularly implemented in the market, the uncertainty as to the future of LIBOR, its eventual phase -out To the extent that any benchmark rate utilized for senior secured loans differs from that utilized for debt of a CLO that holds those loans (including instances where the replacement rate is utilized for such loans prior to it being utilized by the CLO), for the duration of such mismatch, the CLO would experience an interest rate mismatch between its assets and liabilities, which would be expected to have an adverse impact on the cash flows distributed to CLO equity investors as well as the Fund’s net investment income and portfolio returns until such mismatch is corrected or minimized, which would be expected to occur when both the underlying senior secured loans and the CLO debt securities utilize the same benchmark. As of the date hereof, certain senior secured loans have already transitioned to utilizing SOFR based interest rates whereas not all CLO debt securities have transitioned to such replacement rate. Many underlying corporate borrowers can elect to pay interest based on a 1 -month -month -month -month negatively impacts the cash flows on a CLO’s equity tranche, which may in turn adversely affect the Fund’s cash flows and results of operations. Unless spreads are adjusted to account for such increases, these negative impacts may worsen as the amount by which the 3 -month The discontinuance of LIBOR may require the CLOs in which the Fund invests to renegotiate credit agreements entered into prior to the discontinuation of LIBOR and extending beyond the discontinuance with the underlying obligors that utilize LIBOR as a factor in determining the interest rate, in order to replace LIBOR with the new standard that is established. Once LIBOR is eliminated as a benchmark rate, it is uncertain whether broad replacement conventions in the CLO markets will develop and, if conventions develop, what those conventions will be and whether they will create adverse consequences for the issuer or the holders of CLO securities. Many of the CLOs in which the Fund expects to invest contemplate a scenario where LIBOR is no longer available by requiring the CLO administrator to calculate a replacement rate primarily through dealer polling on the applicable measurement date. However, there is uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of the dealer polling processes, including the willingness of banks to provide such quotations, which could adversely impact our net investment income. Some of the CLOs in which the Fund expects to invest have included, or have been amended to include, language permitting the CLO investment manager to implement a market replacement rate (like those proposed by the ARRC) upon the occurrence of certain material disruption events. However, the Fund cannot ensure that all CLOs in which it is invested will have such provisions, nor can the Fund ensure the CLO investment managers will undertake the suggested amendments when able. Furthermore, while the issuers and the trustee of a CLO may enter into a reference rate amendment or the collateral manager may designate a designated reference rate, in each case, subject to the conditions described in a CLO indenture, there can be no assurance that a change to any alternative benchmark rate (a) will be adopted, (b) will effectively mitigate interest rate risks or result in an equivalent methodology for determining the interest rates on the floating rate instrument, (c) will be adopted prior to any date on which the issuer suffers adverse consequences from the elimination or modification or potential elimination or modification of LIBOR or (d) will not have a material adverse effect on the holders of the CLO securities. Depending on several factors, including those set forth above, and the related costs of negotiating and documenting necessary changes to documentation, the Fund’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely impacted by the market transition or reform of certain reference rates and benchmarks. Other factors include the pace of the transition to replacement or reformed rates, the specific terms and parameters for and market acceptance of any alternative reference rates, prices and liquidity of trading markets for products based on alternative reference rates, and the Fund’s ability to transition and develop appropriate systems and analytics for one or more alternative reference rates. The IRS has issued regulations regarding the tax consequences of the transition from LIBOR or another interbank offered rate (“IBOR”) to a new reference rate in debt instruments and non -debt |
Shares Not Listed; No Market for Shares [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Shares Not Listed; No Market for Shares. |
Closed-end Fund; Liquidity Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Closed -end Fund; Liquidity Risks. -diversified -end -term -end -end -end |
Repurchase Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Repurchase Risks. Shareholders who require minimum annual distributions from a retirement account through which they hold Shares should consider the Fund’s schedule for repurchase offers and submit repurchase requests accordingly. |
Substantial Repurchases [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Substantial Repurchases. To the extent the Fund obtains repurchase proceeds by disposing of its interest in certain CLO securities, the Fund will thereafter hold a larger proportion of its assets in the remaining CLO securities, some of whose interests at times may be less liquid or illiquid. This could adversely affect the ability of the Fund to fund subsequent repurchase requests of shareholders or to conduct future repurchases at all. In addition, substantial repurchases of Shares could result in a sizeable decrease in the Fund’s net assets, resulting in an increase in the Fund’s total annual operating expense ratio. |
Possible Exclusion of a Shareholder Based on Certain Detrimental Effects [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Possible Exclusion of a Shareholder Based on Certain Detrimental Effects. -2 • • • • • • • The effect of these provisions may be to deprive an investor in the Fund of an opportunity for a return even though other investors in the Fund might enjoy such a return. |
Investment Dilution Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Investment Dilution Risk. |
Distribution Payment Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Distribution Payment Risk. -to-year In the event that the Fund encounters delays in locating suitable investment opportunities, all or a substantial portion of the Fund’s distributions may constitute a return of capital to shareholders. To the extent that the Fund pays distributions that constitute a return of capital for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it will lower an investor’s tax basis in his or her shares. A return of capital generally is a return of an investor’s investment, rather than a return of earnings or gains derived from the Fund’s investment activities, and generally results in a reduction of the tax basis in the Shares. As a result from such reduction in tax basis, shareholders may be subject to tax in connection with the sale of their Shares, even if such Shares are sold at a loss relative to the shareholder’s original investment. |
Anti-Takeover Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Anti -Takeover Risks. If the resolution exempting business combinations is repealed or the Board of Directors does not approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of the Fund and increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer. Additionally, the Fund is subject to the Maryland Control Share Act pursuant to its Bylaws, which makes it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of the Fund and increases the difficulty of consummating such a transaction. The Fund has also adopted measures that may make it difficult for a third party to obtain control of the Fund, including provisions of the Charter authorizing the Board of Directors to classify or reclassify Shares in one or more classes or series, to cause the issuance of additional Shares, to amend the Charter without shareholder approval and to increase or decrease the number of Shares that the Fund has authority to issue. These provisions, as well as other provisions of the Charter and Bylaws, may delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might otherwise be in the best interests of the shareholders. |
Adverse Developments in the Capital Markets [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Adverse Developments in the Capital Markets. |
Other Market Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Market Risk. -Hamas Economic sanctions may be, and have been, imposed against certain countries, organizations, companies, entities and/or individuals. Economic sanctions and other similar governmental actions or developments could, among other things, effectively restrict or eliminate the Fund’s ability to purchase or sell certain foreign securities or groups of foreign securities, and thus may make its investments in such securities less liquid or more difficult to value. Such sanctions may also cause a decline in the value of securities issued by the sanctioned country or companies located in or economically tied to the sanctioned country. In addition, as a result of economic sanctions and other similar governmental actions or developments, the Fund may be forced to sell or otherwise dispose of foreign investments at inopportune times or prices. As global systems, economies and financial markets are increasingly interconnected, events that once had only local impact are now more likely to have regional or even global effects. Events that occur in one country, region or financial market will, more frequently, adversely impact issuers in other countries, regions or markets. These impacts can be exacerbated by failures of governments and societies to adequately respond to an emerging event or threat. These types of events quickly and significantly impact markets in the U.S. and across the globe leading to extreme market volatility and disruption. The extent and nature of the impact on supply chains or economies and markets from these events is unknown, particularly if a health emergency or other similar event, such as the COVID -19 The value of the Fund’s investment may decrease as a result of such events, particularly if these events adversely impact the operations and effectiveness of the Adviser or key service providers or if these events disrupt systems and processes necessary or beneficial to the investment advisory or other activities on its behalf. The Fund’s investment strategy and the availability of opportunities satisfying its risk -adjusted Adverse economic conditions also decrease the value of collateral securing some of the Fund’s loans and the value of its equity investments. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in the Fund’s portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase its funding costs, limit the its access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to the Fund. These events could prevent the Fund from increasing investments and harm its operating results. An issuer’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by the Fund or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans are due and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross -defaults The prices of financial instruments in which the Fund may invest can be highly volatile. General fluctuations in the market prices of securities may affect the value of the investments held by the Fund. Instability in the securities markets may also increase the risks inherent in the Fund’s investments. |
Pandemics and Natural Disasters [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Pandemics and Natural Disasters. -19 -related |
Terrorist Activities [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Terrorist Activities. |
Environmental Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Environmental Risks. |
Changes in Laws and Regulations [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Changes in Laws and Regulations. |
Inflation Risk [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Inflation Risk. -than all of which would tend to further reduce returns to shareholders. Conversely, as inflation declines, the Fund, any CLO in which it invests and any underlying obligor of the CLO Assets may not be able to reduce expenses commensurate with any resulting reduction in revenue. In an attempt to stabilize inflation, countries may impose wage and price controls, tighten the monetary supply, or otherwise intervene in the economy. Governmental efforts to curb inflation often have negative effects on the level of economic activity. There can be no assurance that inflation will not become a serious problem in the future and have an adverse impact on the Fund’s returns. |
Cybersecurity Risks [Member] | |
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] | |
Risk [Text Block] | Cybersecurity Risks. -attack -party -based The Fund depends heavily upon computer systems to perform necessary business functions. Despite the Fund’s implementation of a variety of security measures, the Fund’s computers, networks, and data, like those of other companies, could be subject to cyber -attacks -ins Third parties with which the Fund does business may also be sources of cybersecurity or other technological risk. The Fund outsources certain functions and these relationships allow for the storage and processing of the Fund’s information, as well as client, counterparty, employee, and borrower information. While the Fund engages in actions to reduce its exposure resulting from outsourcing, ongoing threats may result in unauthorized access, loss, exposure, destruction, or other cybersecurity incident that affects its data, resulting in increased costs and other consequences as described above. The Fund’s business is highly dependent on its and third parties’ communications and information systems. Any failure or interruption of those systems, including as a result of the termination of an agreement with any third -party • • • • These events, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s operating results and negatively affect the market price of the Fund’s common stock and its ability to pay distributions to shareholders. |