Exhibit 99.2
| | |
20/F, Kerry Plaza Tower 3, 1-1 Zhongxinsi Road, Futian District Shenzhen 518048, Guangdong, PRC Tel: +86 755 3680 6500 Fax: +86 755 3680 6599 Beijing · Shanghai · Shenzhen · Hong Kong · Haikou · Wuhan · Singapore · New York www.hankunlaw.com | | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/F-1A/0001193125-24-168741/g441261dsp015.jpg) |
June 26, 2024
To: | Autozi Internet Technology (Global) Ltd. (the “Company”) |
Building B09, Intelligence Park No. 26 Yongtaizhuang North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
Dear Sirs or Madams:
We are lawyers qualified in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC” or “China”, which, for purposes of this opinion only, does not include the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macau Special Administrative Region or Taiwan) and as such are qualified to issue this opinion on the laws, regulations, rules, judicial interpretations and other legislations of the PRC effective as of the date hereof.
We are acting as PRC counsel to the Company, a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, in connection with (i) the proposed initial public offering (the “Initial Public Offering”) of 2,500,000 class A ordinary shares, par value US$0.000001 per share (the “Ordinary Shares”) of the Company, and the proposed resale (the “Resale”, together with the Initial Public Offering, the “Offering”) of additional 2,500,000 Ordinary Shares offered by two existing shareholders of the Company, as set forth in the Company’s registration statement on Form F-1 (File No.: 333-273166), including all amendments or supplements thereto (the “Registration Statement”), filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (as amended) in relation to the Offering, and (ii) the Company’s proposed listing of the Ordinary Shares on the NASDAQ Global Market.
A. | Documents and Assumptions |
In rendering this opinion, we have carried out due diligence and examined copies of the Registration Statement and other documents (collectively the “Documents”) as we have considered necessary or advisable for the purpose of rendering this opinion. Where certain facts were not independently established and verified by us, we have relied upon certificates or statements issued or made by the relevant Governmental Agencies (as defined below) and appropriate representatives of the Company and the PRC Companies (as defined below). In giving this opinion, we have made the following assumptions (the “Assumptions”):
(1) | all signatures, seals and chops are genuine, each signature on behalf of a party thereto (other than the PRC Companies) is that of a person duly authorized by such party to execute the same, all Documents submitted to us as originals are authentic, and all Documents submitted to us as certified or photostatic copies conform to the originals; |
(2) | each of the parties to the Documents, other than the PRC Companies, (i) if a legal person or other entity, is duly organized and is validly existing in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization and/or incorporation, (ii) if an individual, has full capacity for civil conduct; each of them, other than the PRC Companies, has full power and authority to execute, deliver and perform its, her or his obligations under the Documents to which it, she or he is a party in accordance with the laws of its jurisdiction of organization and/or the laws that it, she or he is subject to; |
CONFIDENTIALITY. This document contains confidential information which may be protected by privilege from disclosure. Unless you are the intended or authorised recipient, you shall not copy, print, use or distribute it or any part thereof or carry out any act pursuant thereto and shall advise Han Kun Law Offices immediately by telephone, e-mail or facsimile and return it promptly by mail. Thank you.