Oaktree Gardens OLP 10-12G Registration of securities

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2023

File No.                 

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10

GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES

PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OAKTREE GARDENS OLP, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Delaware	93-2553158
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or registration)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
333 S. Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA	90071
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(213) 830-6300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

with copies to:

Mary Gallegly Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC 333 S. Grand Avenue, 28th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 830-6300 William J. Tuttle, P.C. Erin M. Lett Kirkland & Ellis LLP 1301 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 (202) 389-5000

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Units

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☐
Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ☒

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
EXPLANATORY NOTE			1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS			1
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS		3
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS		32
ITEM 2.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		73
ITEM 3.	PROPERTIES		75
ITEM 4.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		75
ITEM 5.	DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		76
ITEM 6.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		82
ITEM 7.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE		82
ITEM 8.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		83
ITEM 9.	MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS		84
ITEM 10.	RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES		85
ITEM 11.	DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED		85
ITEM 12.	INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS		88
ITEM 13.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA		88
ITEM 14.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		89
ITEM 15.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS		89

-i-

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC is filing this registration statement on Form 10 (the “Registration Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), on a voluntary basis prior to its election to be regulated as a business development company (a “BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), and to provide current information to the investment community while conducting a private offering of its securities. In this Registration Statement, each of “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refers to Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC.

Once this Registration Statement is effective, we will be subject to the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, which will require us, among other things, to file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and we will be required to comply with all other obligations of the Exchange Act applicable to issuers filing registration statements pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Concurrent with initial filing of this Registration Statement, we intend to elect to be regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act and will become subject to the Investment Company Act requirements applicable to BDCs. In addition, we intend to elect to be treated, and expect to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Registration Statement contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “forecast,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “should,” “may,” “continue,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” or the negatives thereof and variations thereon or other comparable terminology. Due to various risks and uncertainties, including those described in this Registration Statement, actual events or results or our actual performance may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our plans, strategies, prospects and expectations concerning our business, operating results, financial condition and other similar matters. Our forward-looking statements include information in this Registration Statement regarding general domestic and global economic conditions, our future financing plans, our ability to operate as a BDC and the expected performance of, and the yield on, our portfolio companies. In particular, there are forward-looking statements under “Item 1. Business.” There may be events in the future, however, that we are not able to predict accurately or control. The factors listed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” as well as any cautionary language in this Registration Statement, provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Before you invest in our common units, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in these risk factors and elsewhere in this Registration Statement could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial position. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which we make them. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. Under Section 21E(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 do not apply to statements made in this Registration Statement or periodic reports we file under the Exchange Act.

The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:

• an economic downturn could impair our portfolio companies’ ability to continue to operate, which could lead to the loss of some or all of our investments in such portfolio companies;

1

• a contraction of available credit, which could impair our lending and investment activities;

• our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;

• interest rate volatility, which could adversely affect our results, particularly if we elect to use leverage as part of our investment strategy;

• our future operating results;

• our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

• the financial condition of and ability of our current and prospective portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

• competition with other entities and our affiliates for investment opportunities;

• an inability to replicate the historical success of any previously launched fund managed by our Adviser;

• the speculative and illiquid nature of our investments;

• the use of borrowed money to finance a portion of our investments;

• the adequacy of our financing sources and working capital;

• the costs associated with being a public entity;

• the loss of key personnel;

• the timing, form and amount of any dividend distributions;

• the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;

• the ability of Oaktree Fund Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser” and including its affiliates, individually or collectively, as the context requires, “Oaktree”), our investment adviser, to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments;

• the ability of our Adviser to attract and retain highly talented professionals that can provide services to our Adviser and Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC (the “Administrator”), a Delaware limited liability company and our administrator;

• our ability to qualify and maintain our qualification as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and as a BDC;

• the effect of legal, tax and regulatory changes; and

• the other risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Registration Statement.

2

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

We were formed as a closed-end management investment company primarily focused on lending to large private equity-owned companies. Concurrent with the initial filing of this Registration Statement, we intend to elect to be regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act and also intend to elect to be treated, and to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code.

We are externally managed by the Adviser. Our investment objective is to generate current income and long-term capital appreciation by primarily focusing on private lending opportunities to large private equity-owned companies. We will seek to build a diverse portfolio across industries and expect most of our investments to be in the debt of eligible portfolio companies, generally in loans that are $500 million or more to companies with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation or amortization (“EBITDA”) of $100 million or greater. To a lesser extent, we may invest in small- and medium-sized companies, including bespoke, highly negotiated loans, including loans to life sciences companies, and attractive, publicly-traded credits, including opportunistic investments in discounted, high-quality investments that may result from broad market dislocations or specific situational challenges. The Investment Professionals (as defined below) will prioritize risk control and downside protection by evaluating credit fundamentals, monitoring appropriate credit metrics such as loan-to-value (“LTV”) and pursuing ample structural protections. We intend to focus primarily on first lien secured loans but may occasionally invest in junior instruments.

We will be part of Oaktree’s Private Credit strategy, which is a combination of Oaktree’s Strategic Credit, U.S. Private Debt and European Private Debt strategies. The Adviser and its affiliates also provide discretionary investment management services to other managed accounts and investment funds within these strategies, including, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation, a publicly traded BDC (“OCSL”), and Oaktree Strategic Credit Fund, a continuously offered BDC (“OSCF”).

Formation Transactions

We were organized on February 6, 2023 as a Delaware limited liability company.

We are conducting a private offering (the “Private Offering”) of our common units of limited liability company interest to investors in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). At each closing during the Private Offering, each investor participating in that closing will make a capital commitment (each, a “Capital Commitment”) to purchase common units. Each investor will be required to enter into a subscription agreement with us in connection with its Capital Commitment (a “Subscription Agreement”). Investors will be required to fund drawdowns to purchase common units up to the amount of their respective Capital Commitments on an as-needed basis with a minimum of ten calendar days’ prior notice (excluding the initial drawdown). If an investor’s Subscription Agreement is accepted in whole or in part by the Adviser on our behalf, then upon the acquisition of common units, the investor will become a unitholder, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Subscription Agreement and our limited liability company agreement (the “LLC Agreement”) (as applicable).

We expect to commence our investment activities contemporaneously with our initial capital drawdown in the Private Offering (the “Initial Drawdown”). We expect that the proceeds from the Initial Drawdown and, if entered into, the Revolving Facility and the Subscription Facility (each as defined below in “Item 2. Financial Information— Credit Facilities”) will provide us with the necessary seed capital to commence operations. We anticipate raising additional equity capital for investment purposes through additional closings under the Private Offering. In addition, we may issue debt securities and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the Investment Company Act. See “—Certain BDC Regulatory Considerations—Senior Securities” below.

Our Adviser

Our investment activities are managed by the Adviser. Subject to the overall supervision of our board of directors, the Adviser will manage our day-to-day operations and provide investment advisory services to us pursuant to the investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) by and between our Adviser and us.

3

The Adviser is a Delaware limited liability company registered with the SEC as an investment adviser under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). The Adviser is an affiliate of Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. (“OCM”), a leading global investment management firm headquartered in Los Angeles, California focused on less efficient markets and alternative investments. A number of the senior executives and investment professionals of the Adviser and its affiliates have been investing together for over 35 years and have generated impressive investment performance through multiple market cycles. As of December 31, 2022, Oaktree (together with its affiliates) had approximately $170 billion of assets under management¹. Oaktree emphasizes an opportunistic, value-oriented and risk-controlled approach to investments in distressed debt, corporate debt (including mezzanine finance, high yield debt and senior loans), control investing, real estate, convertible securities, listed equities and multi-strategy solutions.    

Oaktree’s primary firm-wide goal is to achieve attractive returns while bearing less-than-commensurate risk. Oaktree believes that it can achieve this goal by taking advantage of market inefficiencies in which financial markets and their participants fail to accurately value assets or fail to make available to companies the capital that they reasonably require.

Oaktree believes that its defining characteristic is its adherence to the highest professional standards, which has yielded several important benefits. First and foremost, this characteristic has allowed Oaktree to attract and retain an extremely talented group of investment professionals (the “Investment Professionals”) as well as accounting, valuation, legal, compliance and other administrative professionals. Second, it has permitted the investment team to build strong relationships with brokers, banks and other market participants. These institutional relationships have been instrumental in strengthening access to trading opportunities, to understanding the current market, and to executing the investment team’s investment strategies. OCM aims to attract, motivate and retain talented employees (both Investment Professionals and accounting, valuation, legal, compliance and other administrative professionals) by making them active participants in, and beneficiaries of, the platform’s success. In addition to competitive base salaries, all of OCM’s investment professionals share in a discretionary bonus pool. An employee’s participation in the bonus pool is based on the overall success of the Adviser and its affiliates and the individual employee’s performance and level of responsibility.

The Adviser and its affiliates provide discretionary investment management services to other managed accounts and investment funds, which may have investment objectives and strategies that overlap with ours and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. The activities of such managed accounts and investment funds may raise actual or potential conflicts of interest. See “Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest,” “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest — There may be conflicts of interest related to obligations that the Adviser’s senior management and investment team have to Other Oaktree Funds” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest — Oaktree currently manages and will continue to raise additional investment vehicles that may have a substantially similar investment focus as us” below.

¹  References to total “assets under management” or “AUM” represent assets managed by Oaktree and a proportionate amount of the AUM reported by DoubleLine Capital LP (“DoubleLine Capital”), in which Oaktree owns a 20% minority interest. Oaktree’s methodology for calculating AUM includes (i) the net asset value (NAV) of assets managed directly by Oaktree, (ii) the leverage on which management fees are charged, (iii) undrawn capital that Oaktree is entitled to call from investors in Oaktree funds pursuant to their capital commitments, (iv) for collateralized loan obligation vehicles (CLOs), the aggregate par value of collateral assets and principal cash, (v) for publicly-traded business development companies, gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage), net of cash, and (vi) Oaktree’s pro rata portion (20%) of the AUM reported by DoubleLine Capital. This calculation of AUM is not based on the definitions of AUM that may be set forth in agreements governing the investment funds, vehicles or accounts managed and is not calculated pursuant to regulatory definitions.

4

Oaktree Senior Executives

The current senior executives of Oaktree are Howard Marks, Bruce Karsh, Jay Wintrob, John Frank and Sheldon Stone. The original founders formed Oaktree in April 1995 after having managed funds in the high yield bond, distressed debt, private equity and convertible securities areas of Trust Company of the West (together with its affiliates, “TCW”) for approximately 10 years. The senior executives have led the investment of clients’ funds in the consistent, risk-controlled manner called for by Oaktree’s philosophy, generally resulting in what Oaktree believes to be an impressive track record, reduced risk and satisfied clients.

Oaktree’s Professionals

Oaktree is dedicated to highly professional management in a limited number of specialized investment niches. As of December 31, 2022, Oaktree had more than 1,050 professionals in 20 cities and 14 countries, including a deep and broad credit platform drawing from more than 400 highly experienced investment professionals with significant origination, structuring and underwriting experience. Specifically, the Private Credit group that will be responsible for implementing our investment strategy consists of 39 Investment Professionals led by Armen Panossian, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, who focus on the investment strategy employed by the Adviser and certain of its affiliates.

Oaktree’s Ownership

Oaktree’s asset management business is indirectly controlled by Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (“OCG”) and Atlas OCM Holdings LLC (“Atlas OCM”). As of December 31, 2022, approximately 64.2% of Oaktree’s business is owned by Brookfield Corporation (f/k/a Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.) (together with Brookfield Asset Management Ltd., “Brookfield”) and the remaining approximately 35.8% is owned by current and former Oaktree executives and employees. Brookfield’s ownership interest in Oaktree’s business is held through OCG, Atlas OCM and other holding entities. The current and former Oaktree executives and employees hold their interests through a separate entity, Oaktree Capital Group Holdings, L.P. The boards of directors of OCG and of Atlas OCM are currently composed of: (i) five Oaktree senior executives, Howard S. Marks, Bruce A. Karsh, Jay S. Wintrob, John B Frank and Sheldon M. Stone; (ii) four independent directors, Stephen J. Gilbert, D. Richard Masson, Marna C. Whittington and Depelsha T. McGruder; and (iii) two Brookfield senior executives, Justin B. Beber and J. Bruce Flatt.

Brookfield Transaction

The Adviser is under common control with OCG. On September 30, 2019, Brookfield completed the acquisition of up to 62% of the business of OCG, which, together with certain related transactions, resulted in Brookfield owning a majority economic interest in Oaktree’s business. Oaktree operates as an independent business within Brookfield, with its own product offerings and investment, marketing and support teams. Brookfield is a leading global alternative asset manager with over a 100-year history and over $725 billion of assets under management (inclusive of Oaktree) as of December 31, 2022 across a broad portfolio of real estate, infrastructure, renewable power, credit and private equity assets. OCG’s founders, senior management and current and former employee-unitholders of OCG are able to sell their remaining OCG units to Brookfield over time pursuant to an agreed upon liquidity schedule and approach to valuing such units at the time of liquidation. Pursuant to this liquidity schedule, the earliest year in which Brookfield could own 100% of the OCG business is 2029.

Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance

Oaktree takes account of environmental, social and corporate governance (“ESG”) considerations as part of its investment process. In September 2019, Oaktree became a signatory to the Principles for Responsible Investment (“PRI”). Oaktree believes that the tenets of the PRI are well-aligned with Oaktree’s mission of delivering superior investment results with risk under control, and complementary to – not in conflict with – its investment philosophy. Oaktree’s adoption of the PRI reflects broad-based support for incorporating environmental, social and corporate governance considerations when making investments. OCM’s ESG policy (“ESG Policy”) was first adopted and published in 2014, and since then Oaktree has continued to refine its approach. The firm recognizes that material ESG issues can directly impact investment performance. Accordingly, Oaktree’s Private Credit team follows Oaktree’s ESG Policy and regularly assesses ESG-related factors as part of the team’s investment process in a manner it believes is consistent with relevant regulatory requirements and its fiduciary obligations to maximize profits for its funds and accounts.

5

The ability of Oaktree’s Private Credit team to assess and influence material ESG issues varies by investment. Situations where Oaktree has access to full due diligence and where it obtains control allow Oaktree to better detect and address material ESG issues relative to situations where it may be limited to public information or have a non-controlling investment. In evaluating an existing or prospective investment, Oaktree’s Private Credit investment professionals generally seek to (a) identify material ESG issues that may affect the investment, (b) analyze the relative importance of, and risk posed by, any identified material ESG issue, (c) consider the costs and benefits of potential remedial measures, and (d) assess its ability to influence change to mitigate material ESG-related risks and/or meet relevant regulatory obligations. Based on the foregoing analysis, Oaktree may seek to foster change in some circumstances or even forgo investments in others. Oaktree’s Private Credit team seeks to, where possible, advance ESG practices through the interactions of its investment professionals with the management of existing and prospective portfolio companies and their advisers. Oaktree seeks to ensure that, where possible, portfolio company management appreciates the financial ramifications of such issues and has the benefit of Oaktree’s insight with respect to the approaches being taken across a wide variety of industries and companies.

In addition, the Adviser recognizes its obligations under Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of November 27, 2019 on sustainability related disclosures in the financial services sector (“SFDR”).

Our Administrator

We have entered into an administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”) with the Administrator, a wholly owned subsidiary of OCM. The principal executive offices of our Administrator are located at 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, our Administrator provides services to us, and we reimburse our Administrator for costs and expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement and providing personnel and facilities thereunder.

Investment Approach

Our investment objective is to generate current income and long-term capital appreciation. We intend to primarily focus on private lending opportunities to large private equity-owned companies. The Adviser believes that these large private equity-owned companies have two key characteristics that benefit lenders: (1) they tend to be more diversified with greater scale, which enables them to withstand economic cycles better than smaller companies and (2) they tend to be backed by larger, well-established, disciplined private equity firms with larger teams and access to significant amounts of capital.

We will seek to build a diverse portfolio across industries and expect most of our investments to be in the debt of eligible portfolio companies. Because non-U.S. entities are not eligible portfolio companies (as described below) and their securities are not qualifying assets, we do not expect investments in non-U.S. entities to be a large part of our portfolio. (See “—Certain BDC Regulatory Considerations — Qualifying Assets” below).

We intend to focus primarily on first lien secured loans but may occasionally invest in junior instruments. For example, when we make a debt investment, we may also be granted equity, such as warrants to purchase common stock in a portfolio company. To a lesser extent, we may also make preferred and/or common equity investments, which may be in conjunction with a concurrent debt investment or the result of an investment restructuring. For non-control equity investments, we generally seek to structure our non-control equity investments to provide us with minority rights provisions and event-driven put rights. We also seek to obtain limited registration rights in connection with these investments, which may include “piggyback” registration rights. These minority equity investments have the potential to generate excess returns.

6

The Investment Professionals will prioritize risk control and downside protection by evaluating credit fundamentals, monitoring appropriate credit metrics such as LTV and pursuing ample structural protections. Consistent with Oaktree’s firm-wide investment philosophy, we will seek to achieve our investment objective without subjecting principal to undue risk of loss. This emphasis on downside protection generally means (1) Oaktree focuses on the senior-most tranches within the capital structure, (2) Oaktree seeks ample collateral value well in excess of the principal value of its investment, (3) Oaktree links additional funding to the achievement of credit de-risking milestones, and (4) Oaktree negotiates robust covenant packages including, in many cases, maintenance-based financial covenants.

Investment Process

Source

The Adviser has several resources for originating new opportunities that grant the Investment Professionals a comprehensive view of the actionable investment universe. From this universe, the Adviser can then select the most attractive opportunities for us. In addition to its dedicated group of sourcing professionals, the Adviser will also leverage its strong global market presence and relationships with affiliates, advisers, sponsors, banks, management teams, capital-raising advisers, trading desks and other sources to gain access to opportunities. The Adviser is a trusted partner to financial sponsors and management teams based on its best-in-class market reputation, relationship-based approach, long-term investment orientation and focus on lending across economic cycles. The Adviser believes that this will give us access to proprietary deal flow and “first looks” at investment opportunities and that we are well-positioned for difficult and complex transactions.

Screen

The Adviser will be highly selective in making new investments. The initial screening process will typically include a review of the proposed capital structure of the target portfolio company (including level of assets or enterprise value coverage), the company’s management team and its equity ownership levels, the viability of its long-term business model, the target’s performance against our SFDR strategy (the “Article 8 SFDR Strategy”), forecasted financial statements and liquidity profile. In addition, the Adviser may assess industry and macroeconomic trends, potential catalysts that may create enhanced value in the investment, and the potential ability to enforce creditor rights, particularly where collateral is located outside of the United States.

Research

Once the Investment Professionals have identified a potential investment opportunity and prior to making any new investment, the Adviser will complete an extensive due diligence process led by investment analysts assigned to each transaction. The analysts will examine various elements of the prospective investment to assess its risks and ensure that it meets our investment criteria and guidelines. Throughout the underwriting process, the analysts typically consider the following to evaluate the opportunity: the company’s management team, suite of products/services, competitive position in its markets, barriers to entry, valuation, operating and financial performance, organic and inorganic growth prospects, as well as the expansion potential of its markets. In performing this evaluation, the analysts may use financial, qualitative and other due diligence materials provided by the target company, commissioned third-party reports and internal sources, including the Adviser’s relationships derived from the Investment Professionals, industry participants and experts. As part of their research, the Adviser’s analysts will typically perform a “what-if” analysis that explores a range of values for each proposed investment and a range of potential credit events to understand how the investment may perform under several different scenarios. The Adviser conducts diligence on underlying collateral value, including cash flows, hard assets or intellectual property, and will typically model exit scenarios as part of the diligence process, including assessing potential “work-out” scenarios.

Decide

The Investment Professionals will propose investments along with all due diligence findings to an investment committee of the Adviser (the “Investment Committee”). The Investment Committee is a collaborative and consensus-driven body that employs a rigorous process to weigh the merits and risks of each prospective investment, make investment decisions and appropriately size investments within the portfolio on our behalf. The Investment Committee generally strives for full consensus, but ultimately requires majority approval to move forward with an investment. No single committee member has veto rights for an investment. Investment Committee members are appointed and serve at the sole discretion of Armen Panossian and currently the committee includes three additional members alongside Mr. Panossian: Milwood Hobbs, Raghav Khanna and Rajkumar Makam.

7

Monitor

Risk management is the Adviser’s utmost priority. In managing our portfolio and mitigating its downside, the Adviser will seek to actively monitor each portfolio company and make hold and exit decisions when credit events occur, we become overleveraged or opportunities with more attractive risk-reward profiles are identified. Investment analysts will be assigned to each investment to monitor industry developments, review company financial statements, attend company presentations and regularly meet with company management, and, if applicable, the controlling shareholders. Based on their monitoring, the Investment Professionals will seek to determine the optimal exit timing and strategy while maximizing our return on investment, typically when prices or yields reach target valuations. In circumstances where a particular investment is underperforming, the Adviser will seek to employ a variety of strategies to maximize its recovery based on the specific facts and circumstances of the underperforming investment, including actively working with the management team to restructure all or a portion of the business, explore the possibility of a sale or merger of all or a portion of the assets, recapitalize or refinance the balance sheet, negotiate deferrals or other concessions from existing creditors and arrange new liquidity or new equity contributions. We believe that the Adviser’s experience with restructurings and our access to the Adviser’s deep knowledge, expertise and contacts in the distressed debt area will help us preserve the value of our investments.

There can be no assurance that our investment objective will be achieved.

Description of Investments

Set forth below are summary descriptions of the investments that are expected to comprise over time our principal investments. Certain of the risks associated with such investments are summarized below under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” We may not acquire any assets other than Qualifying Assets (as summarized below under “Certain BDC Regulatory Considerations—Qualifying Assets”) unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are Qualifying Assets.

Direct Lending

We may make loans directly to non-U.S. and U.S. borrowers, including negotiating and structuring covenant packages, and may receive commitment or other types of fees in connection therewith. These loans may be long-term or short-term, secured or unsecured, and may or may not have an equity component attached.

Debt Securities and Obligations

We may invest in all types of publicly traded or privately placed debt securities and other obligations such as bank loans and participations, equipment trust certificates, mortgages, mezzanine debt or deeds of trust on real property and trade credit. The debt obligations purchased may consist of various types of debt instruments, including those bearing fixed, contingent or varying rates of interest, those bearing no interest at all, those on which interest has ceased to accrue (e.g., debt obligations of a company that has entered into bankruptcy proceedings), convertible securities, municipal securities and “high yield” instruments (which are rated below investment grade by rating agencies or which are unrated). Debt instruments purchased may be senior or subordinated to other interests and may include secured and unsecured debt obligations, as well as hybrid debt instruments involving warrants or with other rights attached.

Preferred Stock

We may purchase preferred stock that ranks below debt and above common equity in a company’s capital structure. A typical preferred stock investment will have a fixed dividend payment rate, a redemption period, and an equity component in the form of warrants, convertibility, and/or purchased equity, but occasionally, it may also include such features as (a) contingent or varying dividend rates, (b) the issuance of additional preferred stock as PIK dividends, (c) original issuance at a deep discount with no dividend payments or (d) convertibility into common stock.

8

Equities

We may purchase publicly traded or privately placed equity securities, including common stock and preferred stock (including convertible preferred stock), as well as warrants with respect to such equity securities. Such securities may be purchased directly from the company or on the secondary market and may be obtained in connection with debt securities or obligations or on their own.

Bridge Financings

We may provide interim financing to a portfolio company to facilitate buy-outs or acquisitions. Bridge financing is a short-term method of financing in which repayment is customarily financed through receipt of proceeds of divestitures or asset sales by the borrower, the sale of new securities in either public or private transactions, the recapitalization of the company involving third-party debt or other methods. (See “Item 1A. Risk Factors — Investment-Related Risks — We will bear certain risks associated with any bridge financing we provide to portfolio companies.” below.)

“When-Issued” Securities

We may invest in the “when-issued” trading market. In this market, security holders who expect that other securities will be issued in exchange for or in connection with their securities may sell the right to purchase those other securities after their issue for a price fixed prior to issue. If the when-issued securities are not issued as expected, a seller is not obligated to deliver any securities. (See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Investment-Related Risks— Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued, “when, as and if issued,” delayed delivery or forward commitment basis could increase the volatility of our Net Asset Value.”)

Follow-on Investments/Build-ups

We may employ a strategy of making several mutually reinforcing investments intended to result in a more successful business entity. Such a strategy could begin with an investment in a platform company with subsequent complementary transactions or through the simultaneous closing of multiple transactions.

Securities or Other Obligations of non-U.S. Entities

We may invest in securities or obligations of companies that are non-U.S. entities. Some or all of these securities or obligations may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Investments in non-U.S. entities may be subject to risks different from those affecting U.S. investments. When a transaction is denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars and the transaction structure or timing exposes us to currency fluctuation risk, that risk may be hedged, although the Adviser is not required to hedge such risk. (See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Investment-Related Risks— We may invest in derivative instruments from time to time, which present various risks, including market, counterparty, operational and liquidity risks” below). Because non-U.S. entities are not eligible portfolio companies (as described below) and their securities are not Qualifying Assets, we do not expect such investments to be a large part of our portfolio. (See “Certain BDC Regulatory Considerations—Qualifying Assets” below).

Options and Warrants

We may purchase, write and sell covered and uncovered put and call options. Options will typically allow the holder to purchase common stock of an issuer on a future date for a price fixed at the time of the issuance of the options. Warrants are long-term options to purchase particular securities to be issued by, or owned by, the issuer of the warrants. We will use warrants in substantially the same manner as call options. We may write put and call options without (a) owning (i) the underlying security or (ii) the right to receive securities of the same class in similar amounts as the underlying security or (b) setting aside liquid assets equal to the anticipated potential liability with respect to the options. In evaluating opportunities in the areas of options and warrants, the Adviser will base its decisions on essentially the same research and evaluation procedures employed to judge securities generally. If the anticipated price movement does not occur within a given time frame, we could lose our entire investment in options or warrants. We may invest in both listed and unlisted options and warrants.

9

Money Market Investments

Pending the purchase of other permitted investments, or to provide the reserves described below, we may invest temporarily in one or more unaffiliated money market mutual funds or directly in certificates of deposit, commercial paper, interest bearing government securities, repurchase contracts pursuant to which the Company buys assets from a counterparty and simultaneously agrees to resell such assets or similar assets to such counterparty at a future date and other short-term instruments. We may also make such investments to reduce volatility at times when risk is considered high and market conditions become so volatile that effective hedging becomes difficult or cost-inefficient.

Reserves, Cash and Cash Equivalents

We may hold in reserve such cash and cash equivalents and other liquid investments as the Adviser considers appropriate to provide for our anticipated obligations, including the payment of expenses and other liquidity needs (including to take advantage of investment opportunities), the repayment of indebtedness and the exercise of options and warrants and obligations with respect to short sales. We may also hold cash in reserve in order to maintain liquidity to take advantage of investment opportunities. (See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to an Investment in the Company and Our Common Units—We face risks associated with the deployment of our capital” below).

Other Investment Techniques and Instruments

We may employ other investment techniques and invest in other instruments that the Adviser believes will help achieve our investment objective, whether or not such investment techniques or instruments are specifically described in this Registration Statement, though we do not expect these investments to make up a large portion of our portfolio. These other investments may include (a) investments in real estate properties or mortgages where the mortgagor is not a significant operating company, including pools of commercial and residential real estate loans, (b) shares of real estate investment trusts and mortgage-backed securities, (c) foreign currency in connection with the settlement of transactions in securities denominated in such foreign currency (but not as a standalone investment), (d) contracts with banks or other foreign currency brokers or dealers to purchase or sell or have the option to purchase or sell foreign currencies at a future date to hedge against the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on investments denominated in foreign currencies and (e) all types of derivative transactions and credit-linked securities, including total return swaps, rate of return swaps, credit default swaps (including index-related credit default swaps), interest rate swaps and credit-linked notes and deposits, subject to the limitations of the Investment Company Act.

In addition, if Oaktree believes that suitable opportunities present themselves to transact on attractive terms, we may also consider the acquisition of entire portfolios (or portions of portfolios) of securities of the types described herein or other types of securities which are consistent with our investment objectives. Consistent with our investment objective, we may invest in financial instruments of any and all types, which exist now or are hereafter created.

Investment Advisory Agreement

We have entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser, an entity in which certain of the Investment Professionals may have indirect ownership and pecuniary interests.

In addition, the Adviser, the Investment Professionals, our executive officers and directors, and other current and future principals of the Adviser serve or may serve as investment advisers, officers, directors or principals of entities or investment funds that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do and/or investment funds, accounts and other similar arrangements advised by Oaktree. An affiliated investment fund, account or other similar arrangement currently formed or formed in the future and managed by the Adviser or its affiliates may have investment objectives and strategies that overlap with ours and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. As a result, the Adviser and/or its affiliates may face conflicts of interest arising out of the investment advisory activities of the Adviser and other operations of Oaktree. See “—Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest” below.

10

The Adviser will not assume any responsibility to us other than to render the services described in, and on the terms of, the Investment Advisory Agreement and will not be responsible for any action of our board of directors in declining to follow the advice or recommendations of the Adviser. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Adviser (and its members (and their partners or members, including the owners of their partners or members), managers, officers, employees, agents, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with it) will not be liable to us for any action taken or omitted to be taken by the Adviser in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser (except to the extent specified in the Investment Company Act). Absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of the Adviser’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of the Adviser’s duties and obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we will provide indemnification from and against all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) incurred by those described above in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of us or our security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Adviser’s duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, we will pay our Adviser a fee for investment advisory and management services. All Investment Professionals of the Adviser who provide investment advisory services to us will be compensated by the Adviser, as described below.

Management Fee

The Adviser will receive quarterly in arrears a management fee (the “Management Fee”) equal to 1.00% per annum of our gross assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents). The Management Fee for each quarter shall be calculated based on our average gross assets (excluding cash and cash equivalents) at the end of such quarter and at the end of the preceding quarter.

The Adviser will not receive any fees on Capital Commitments not yet drawn.

Administration Agreement

Pursuant to an Administration Agreement, the Administrator will furnish us with office facilities (certain of which are located in buildings owned by a Brookfield affiliate), equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and recordkeeping services at such facilities. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator also performs, or oversees the performance of, required administrative services, which include, among other things, providing assistance in accounting, legal, compliance, operations, technology and investor relations, and being responsible for the financial records that we are required to maintain and preparing reports to unitholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, the Administrator assists us in determining and publishing our Net Asset Value, overseeing the preparation and filing of tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to unitholders, and generally overseeing the payment of expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others.

Payments under the Administration Agreement are equal to an amount that reimburses the Administrator for its costs and expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement and providing personnel and facilities, including the allocable portion of personnel. See “—Expenses” for additional information regarding our expenses. The Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party, by the vote of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, or by the vote of our directors or by the Administrator. Additionally, we bear all of the costs and expenses of any sub-administration agreements that the Administrator enters into.

The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of the Administrator’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of the Administrator’s duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator (and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or entity affiliated with the Administrator, including the Adviser and any person affiliated with its members or the Adviser, to the extent they are providing services for or otherwise acting on behalf of the Administrator, the Adviser or us) will not be liable to us for any action taken or

11

omitted to be taken by the Administrator in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as our administrator, and we will indemnify, defend and protect the Administrator (and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members, and any other person or entity affiliated with the Administrator, including the Adviser and any person affiliated with its members or the Adviser, to the extent they are providing services for or otherwise acting on behalf of the Administrator, the Adviser or us) and hold them harmless from and against all damages, liabilities, fees, penalties, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) incurred by them in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of us or our unitholders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Administrator’s duties or obligations under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as our administrator.

Expenses

All Investment Professionals of the Adviser who provide investment advisory services to us will be compensated by the Adviser or one of its affiliates, as described below. Under the Administration Agreement as in effect from time to time, the Administrator will provide us with certain administrative services. In full consideration of the provision of services of the Administrator, we will reimburse the Administrator for the costs and expenses incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations and providing personnel and facilities under the Administration Agreement.

All personnel of the Adviser, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by the Adviser or one of its affiliates and not by us. We will bear all other costs and expenses of our organization, operations, administration and transactions, including (without limitation) fees and expenses relating to: (a) all costs, fees, expenses and liabilities incurred in connection with our formation and organization and the offering and sale of our common units, including expenses of registering or qualifying securities held by us for sale and blue sky filing fees; (b) diligence and monitoring of our financial, regulatory and legal affairs, and, if necessary, enforcing rights in respect of investments (to the extent an investment opportunity is being considered for us and any other funds or accounts managed by the Adviser or its affiliates, the Adviser’s out-of-pocket expenses related to the due diligence for such investment will be shared with such other funds and accounts pro rata based on the anticipated allocation of such investment opportunity between us and the other funds and accounts); (c) the cost of calculating our Net Asset Value (including third-party valuation firms); (d) the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of our common units and other securities; (e) Management Fees payable pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement; (f) fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making investments and valuing investments (including third-party valuation firms); (g) retainer, finder’s, placement, adviser, consultant, custodian, sub-custodian, depository or pursuant to any national private placement regime in any jurisdiction, a Swiss representative and paying agent or ombudsman appointed pursuant to the Collective Investment Schemes Act dated June 23, 2006 as amended (the “CISA”), the Financial Services Act dated 15 June, 2018 as amended (the “FinSA”), as well as any similar law, rule or regulation relating to the implementation thereof), transfer agent, trustee, disbursal, brokerage, registration, legal and other similar fees, commissions and expenses attributable to making or holding investments; (h) the reporting, filing and other compliance requirements (including expenses associated with the initial registrations, filings and compliance) contemplated by any national private placement regime in any jurisdiction; (i) fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts (including travel and attendance at investment conferences and similar events); (j) allocable out-of-pocket costs incurred in providing managerial assistance to those portfolio companies that request it; (k) fees, interest and other costs payable on or in connection with any indebtedness; (l) federal and state registration fees and other governmental charges; (m) any exchange listing fees; (n) federal, state and local taxes; (o) independent directors’ fees and expenses; (p) brokerage commissions; (q) costs of proxy statements, unitholders’ reports and notices and any other regulatory reporting expenses; (r) costs of preparing government filings, including periodic and current reports with the SEC; (s) fidelity bond, liability insurance and other insurance premiums; (t) printing, mailing, independent accountants and outside legal costs; (u) costs of winding up and liquidation; (v) litigation, indemnification and other extraordinary or non-recurring expenses; (w) dues, fees and charges of any trade association of which we are a member; (x) research and software expenses, quotation equipment and services and other expenses incurred in connection with data services, including subscription costs, providing real-time price feeds, real-time news feeds, securities and company information, and company fundamental data attributable to such investments; (y) costs and expenses relating to investor reporting and communications; (z) all costs, expenses, fees and liabilities incurred in connection with a Liquidity Event, including

12

formation of a Liquidation Vehicle (as defined below); (aa) all other out-of-pocket expenses, fees and liabilities that are incurred by us or by the Adviser on our behalf or that arise out of our operation and activities, including expenses related to organizing and maintaining persons through or in which investments may be made and the allocable portion of any Adviser costs, including personnel, incurred in connection therewith; (bb) accounting expenses, including expenses associated with the preparation of our financial statements and tax information reporting our returns and the filing of various tax withholding forms and treaty forms by us; (cc) the allocable portion of the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer and their respective staffs; and (dd) all other expenses incurred by the Administrator, an affiliate of the Administrator or us in connection with administering our business, including payments under the Administration Agreement to the Administrator or such affiliate in an amount equal to our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by the Administrator or such affiliate in performing its obligations and services under the Administration Agreement, such as rent and our allocable portion of the cost of personnel attributable to performing such obligations and services, including, but not limited to, marketing, legal and other services performed by the Administrator or such affiliate for us. For the avoidance of doubt, we will bear our allocable portion of the costs of the compensation, benefits, and related administrative expenses (including travel expenses) of our officers who provide operational and administrative services under the Administration Agreement, their respective staffs and other professionals who provide services to us (including, in each case, employees of the Administrator or an affiliate) who assist with the preparation, coordination, and administration of the foregoing or provide other “back office” or “middle office” financial or operational services to us. We will reimburse the Administrator (or its affiliates) for an allocable portion of the compensation paid by the Administrator (or its affiliates) to such individuals (based on a percentage of time such individuals devote, on an estimated basis, to our business and affairs and in acting on our behalf).

Additionally, we will bear all of the costs and expenses of any sub-administration agreements that the Administrator enters into.

Competition

We will operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities. We will compete for investments with various other investors, such as other public and private funds, other BDCs, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds, some of which may be our affiliates. Other funds may have investment objectives that overlap with ours, which may create competition for investment opportunities. Many competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that will not be available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments than we do, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the Investment Company Act and the Code impose on us. The competitive pressures could impair our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Investment-Related Risks—We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.”

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As a result, we intend to take advantage of the exemption for emerging growth companies allowing us to temporarily forgo the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Market, Legal and Regulatory Risks—We are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our units less attractive to investors.” We do not intend to take advantage of other disclosure or reporting exemptions for emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of an initial public offering, (ii) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (iii) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common equity held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the prior second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

13

Staffing

We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees. Services necessary for our business will be provided through the Administration Agreement and the Investment Advisory Agreement. Each of our executive officers described under “Item 5. Directors and Executive Officers” is an employee of Oaktree.

Private Offering

We expect to enter into separate Subscription Agreements with investors providing for the private placement of our common units pursuant to the Private Offering. The Subscription Agreement sets forth, among other things, the terms and conditions upon which the investors will purchase our common units, the circumstances under which we may draw down capital from investors and certain covenants that all investors must agree to. In addition, the Subscription Agreement includes a questionnaire designed to ensure that all investors are “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act.

While we expect each Subscription Agreement to reflect the terms and conditions summarized in the following paragraphs, we reserve the right to enter into Subscription Agreements that contain terms and conditions not found in the Subscription Agreements entered into with other investors, subject to applicable law.

Closings

We will hold our initial closing (the “Initial Closing”) when we first accept subscriptions for our common units from any investor, other than our initial member, pursuant to the Private Offering. Investors may subscribe for our common units (which may be issued in fractional form to the extent required) at one or more closings after our Initial Closing (each, a “Subsequent Closing”) at the then-applicable price equal to the Net Asset Value (as defined below) per unit as of the end of the most recent calendar quarter prior to the date of the applicable purchase, as determined by the Adviser, as valuation designee of our board of directors under the Investment Company Act, and subject to the limitations of Section 23 under the Investment Company Act (the “Purchase Price”); provided, however, in the event that the Net Asset Value per unit is less than zero, as of the first capital drawdown date that occurs immediately following the Initial Closing, then solely for the purpose of such capital drawdown date, the Net Asset Value per unit will be deemed to be $20.00.

The Initial Closing and each Subsequent Closing are each referred to as a “Closing.”

Capital Drawdowns

Investors will be required to fund drawdowns up to 100% of the amount of their remaining respective Capital Commitments each time the Adviser delivers a drawdown notice. Subject to certain exceptions, the Adviser will deliver a drawdown notice at least ten calendar days prior to each funding. Drawdowns will generally be made pro rata, in accordance with the remaining Capital Commitments of all investors. Drawdowns will entitle unitholders to our common units (which may be issued in fractional form to the extent required) at the then-applicable Purchase Price.

Company Term

Our term is perpetual.

Transfer of Our Common Units

Unitholders generally may not sell, assign, transfer, grant a security interest over or otherwise dispose of their common units or their Capital Commitment (“Transfer”) unless (a) we (and, if required by our lending arrangements, our lenders) give consent, (b) the Transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and (c) the Transfer otherwise complies with the restrictions in the Subscription Agreement.

No Transfer shall be effectuated except by registration of the Transfer on our books and records. Each transferee must agree to be bound by these restrictions and all other obligations as our unitholder.

14

Valuation Procedures

Our investments will be valued at fair value. The Adviser, as valuation designee, will determine the fair value of our assets on at least a quarterly basis, in accordance with the terms of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. For purposes of periodic reporting, our assets will be valued in accordance with GAAP and based on the principles and methods of valuation summarized below. GAAP requires that a “fair value” be assigned to all assets and establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value that includes a framework for measuring fair value and enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements.

GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value into three levels based on their market price observability. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of instrument and the characteristics specific to the instrument. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices from an active market or for which fair value can be measured based on actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment inherent in measuring fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified as follows:

• Level 1 — Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which we have access at the date of measurement.

• Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are directly or indirectly observable.

• Level 3 — Valuations for which one or more significant inputs are unobservable. These inputs reflect our assessment of the assumptions that market participants use to value the investment based on the best available information. Level 3 inputs include prices obtained from brokers in markets for which there are few transactions, less public information exists or prices vary among broker market-makers.

In some instances, an instrument may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such instances, the instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest of the three levels (with Level 3 being the lowest) that is significant to the value measurement. The assessment of the significance of an input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the instrument. The transfer of assets into or out of each fair value hierarchy level as a result of changes in the observability of the inputs used in measuring fair value are accounted for as of the beginning of the reporting period. Transfers resulting from a specific event, such as a reorganization or restructuring, are accounted for as of the date of the event that caused the transfer.

In the absence of observable market prices, the Adviser will value Level 3 investments using valuation methodologies applied on a consistent basis. The quarterly valuation process for Level 3 investments will begin with each portfolio company, property or security being initially valued by the Adviser’s valuation team. The preliminary valuations will then be reviewed and discussed with management of the Adviser. Separately, independent valuation firms prepare valuations of our investments, on a selected basis, for which market quotations are not readily available or are readily available but deemed not reflective of the fair value of the investment, and submit the reports to us and provide such reports to the Adviser. The Adviser compares and contrasts its preliminary valuations to the valuations of the independent valuation firms and prepares a valuation report for the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews the valuation report with Oaktree, and Oaktree responds and supplements the valuation report to reflect any discussions between the Adviser and the Audit Committee. Finally, the Adviser, as valuation designee, determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio. Results of the valuation process will be evaluated each quarter, including an assessment of whether the underlying calculations should be adjusted or recalibrated. In connection with this process, the Adviser will evaluate changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness, considering items such as industry trends, general economic and market conditions, and factors specific to the investment.

15

Certain Level 3 assets will be valued using prices obtained from pricing vendors or brokers. The Adviser will attempt to obtain pricing from two pricing vendors. When two vendors are not available, or if the prices obtained from pricing vendors are not within the Adviser’s set threshold, the Adviser will seek to obtain at least one price directly from a broker making a market for the asset. However, the Adviser does not expect that all of our Level 3 assets will be valued at least annually using prices obtained from pricing vendors or brokers. These investments may be classified as Level 3 because the quoted prices may be indicative in nature for securities that are in an inactive market, may be for similar securities, or may require adjustment for investment specific factors or restrictions. Generally, the Adviser will not adjust any of the prices received from these sources, and all prices will be reviewed by the Adviser. The Adviser will evaluate the prices obtained from brokers or pricing vendors based on available market information, including trading activity of the subject or similar securities, or by performing a comparable security analysis to ensure that fair values are reasonably estimated. The Adviser will also perform back-testing of valuation information obtained from brokers and pricing vendors against actual prices received in transactions. In addition to on-going monitoring and back-testing, the Adviser will perform due diligence procedures over pricing vendors to understand their methodology and controls to support their use in the valuation process.

Non-publicly traded debt and equity securities and other securities or instruments for which reliable market quotations are not available will be valued by the Adviser using valuation methodologies applied on a consistent basis. These securities may initially be valued at the acquisition price as the best indicator of fair value. The Adviser will review the significant unobservable inputs, valuations of comparable investments and other similar transactions for investments valued at acquisition price to determine whether another valuation methodology should be utilized. Subsequent valuations will depend on facts and circumstances known as of the valuation date and the application of valuation methodologies further described below under “Non-Exchange-Traded Investments.” The fair value may also be based on a pending transaction expected to close after the valuation date. These valuation methodologies involve a significant degree of management judgment. Accordingly, valuations do not necessarily represent the amounts which may eventually be realized from sales or other dispositions of investments in the future. Fair values may differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investment existed, and the differences could be material to our financial statements.

Exchange-Traded Investments

Securities listed on one or more national securities exchanges will be valued at their last reported sales price on the date of valuation. If no sale occurred on the valuation date or in the case of options, the security will be valued at the mean of the last “bid” and “ask” prices on the valuation date. Securities that are not marketable due to legal restrictions that may limit or restrict transferability will generally be valued at a discount from quoted market prices. The discount would reflect the amount market participants would require due to the risk relating to the inability to access a public market for the security for the specified period and would vary depending on the nature and duration of the restriction and the risk and volatility of the underlying securities. Securities with longer duration restrictions or higher volatility will generally be valued at a higher discount. Such discounts will generally be estimated based on put option models or analysis of market studies. The impact of such discounts is not expected to be material to our financial statements.

Non-Exchange-Traded Investments

Investments in corporate and government debt which are not listed or admitted to trading on any securities exchange will be valued at the mean of the last bid and ask prices on the valuation date based on quotations supplied by recognized quotation services or by reputable broker-dealers.

If the quotations obtained from pricing vendors or brokers are determined to not be reliable or are not readily available, we or the Adviser, as applicable, will value such investments using different valuation techniques. One valuation technique is the transaction precedent technique, which utilizes recent or expected future transactions of the investment to determine fair value, to the extent applicable. The market yield technique is considered in the valuation of non-publicly traded debt investments, utilizing expected future cash flows, discounted using estimated current market rates. Discounted cash flow calculations may be adjusted to reflect current market conditions and/or the perceived credit risk of the borrowers. Consideration may also be given to a borrower’s ability to meet principal and interest obligations; this may include an evaluation of collateral or the underlying value of the borrower, utilizing either the market or income techniques. A market technique utilizes valuations of comparable public companies or transactions and generally seeks to establish the enterprise value of the portfolio company using a market multiple technique. This technique takes into account a specific financial measure (such as EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA, free cash flow, net operating income, net income, book value or net asset value) believed to be

16

most relevant for the given company. Consideration may also be given to such factors as acquisition price of the security, historical and projected operational and financial results for the portfolio company, the strengths and weaknesses of the portfolio company relative to its comparable companies, industry trends, general economic and market conditions and other factors deemed relevant. The income technique is typically a discounted cash flow method that incorporates expected timing and level of cash flows. It incorporates assumptions in determining growth rates, income and expense projections, discount rates, capital structure, terminal values and other factors. The applicability and weight assigned to market and income techniques are determined based on the availability of reliable projections and comparable companies and transactions.

The valuation of securities may be impacted by expectations of investors’ receptiveness to a public offering of the securities, the size of the holding of the securities and any associated control, information with respect to transactions or offers for the securities (including the transaction pursuant to which the investment was made and the period of time elapsed from the date of the investment to the valuation date) and applicable restrictions on the transferability of the securities.

Investments made by us will, by nature, generally be considered to be long-term investments and will not be intended to be liquidated on a short-term basis. Additionally, these valuation methodologies involve a significant degree of management judgment. Accordingly, valuations by the Adviser will not necessarily represent the amounts which may eventually be realized from sales or other dispositions of investments in the future. Estimated fair values may differ from the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investment existed, and the differences could be material to our financial statements.

The Adviser may estimate the fair value of privately held warrants using a Black Scholes pricing model, which includes an analysis of various factors and subjective assumptions, including the current stock price (by using an enterprise value analysis as described above), the expected period until exercise, expected volatility of the underlying stock price, expected dividends and the risk-free rate. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates.

Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest

Our executive officers and directors, and certain members of the Adviser, serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as us, or of investment funds managed by the Adviser’s affiliates. For example, the Adviser presently serves as the investment adviser to OCSL, a publicly traded BDC, OSCF, a private BDC, and is expected to serve as investment adviser to Oaktree Lending Partners Corporation, which will be a private BDC with a similar investment strategy as us (“OLP”), and Oaktree Lending Partners (Unlevered) Corporation, which will be a private BDC with a similar investment strategy as us except with respect to the use of leverage (“OLPU”). OCSL and OSCF have historically invested in debt and debt-like instruments similar to those we target for investment. Therefore, there may be certain investment opportunities that satisfy our investment criteria and that of OCSL, OSCF, OLP and OLPU, as well as private investment funds and accounts advised or sub-advised by the Adviser or its affiliates. OCSL, OSCF, OLP and OLPU each operate as distinct and separate entities, and any investment in our common units will not be an investment in OCSL, OSCF, OLP, OLPU or any other fund or account managed by Oaktree. In addition, all of our executive officers serve in substantially similar capacities for OCSL, OSCF, OLP and OLPU, and all of our directors serve in substantially similar capacities for OSCF, OLP and OLPU. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us and our unitholders. For example, the personnel of the Adviser may face conflicts of interest in the allocation of investment opportunities. Oaktree has investment allocation guidelines that govern the allocation of investment opportunities among the investment funds and accounts managed or sub-advised by the Adviser and its affiliates. To the extent an investment opportunity is appropriate for us, OCSL, OSCF, OLP or OLPU or any other investment fund or account managed or sub-advised by the Adviser or its affiliates, the Adviser will adhere to its investment allocation guidelines in order to determine a fair and equitable allocation.

As a BDC, we are not generally permitted to invest in any portfolio company in which an Other Oaktree Fund or any of its downstream affiliates (other than us and our downstream affiliates) currently has an investment, or to make any co-investments with the Adviser or its affiliates, including any Other Oaktree Funds or any of its downstream affiliates (other than us and our downstream affiliates), without exemptive relief from the SEC, subject to certain exceptions.

17

On October 18, 2017, OCM received exemptive relief from the SEC to allow certain managed funds and accounts, each of whose investment adviser is OCM or an investment adviser controlling, controlled by or under common control with OCM, to participate in negotiated co-investment transactions where doing so is consistent with the applicable registered fund’s or BDC’s investment objective and strategies as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors, and pursuant to the conditions thereof (the “Exemptive Relief”). Each potential co-investment opportunity that falls under the terms of the Exemptive Relief and is appropriate for us and any affiliated fund or account, and that satisfies the then-current board-established criteria, will be offered to us and such other eligible funds and accounts. If there is a sufficient amount of securities to satisfy all participants, the securities will be allocated among the participants in accordance with their proposed order size, and if there is an insufficient amount of securities to satisfy all participants, the securities will be allocated pro rata based on the investment proposed by the applicable investment adviser to such participant, up to the amount proposed to be invested by each, which is reviewed and approved by an independent committee of legal, compliance and accounting professionals at the Adviser. In addition, on December 15, 2020, the Adviser and certain of its affiliates received a modified exemptive order that allows Oaktree proprietary accounts to participate in co-investment transactions subject to certain conditions.

Although the Adviser will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, we and our unitholders could be adversely affected to the extent investment opportunities are allocated to other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers, directors and members of the Adviser. We might not participate in each individual opportunity but will, on an overall basis, be entitled to participate equitably with other entities managed by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Adviser seeks to treat all clients fairly and equitably over time such that none receives preferential treatment vis-à-vis the others over time, in a manner consistent with its fiduciary duty to each of them; however, in some instances, especially in instances of limited liquidity, the factors may not result in pro rata allocations or may result in situations where certain funds or accounts receive allocations where others do not.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations

General

The following is a discussion of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to an investment in our common units. This discussion is based on laws, including the Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative, judicial and other authorities in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. We are under no obligation to provide information to an investor with respect to changes in law or facts affecting this discussion after the date hereof. In addition, the following does not purport to address all of the U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be applicable to any particular unitholder and does not address the U.S. state and local and non-U.S. tax consequences of an investment in our common units. Prospective investors are therefore strongly urged to consult their tax advisers prior to investing in our common units with respect to their own tax situations.

The actual tax and financial consequences of the purchase and ownership of our common units will vary depending upon the unitholder’s circumstances.

This discussion is limited to unitholders that hold our common units as a “capital asset” within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax consequences relevant to a unitholder’s particular circumstances. In addition, it does not address consequences relevant to unitholders subject to special rules, including, without limitation:

• unitholders that are U.S. Persons (as defined below), including U.S. Persons that are exempt from U.S. federal income tax;

• U.S. expatriates and former citizens or long-term residents of the United States;

• persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;

18

• persons holding our common units as part of a hedge, straddle or other risk reduction strategy or as part of a conversion transaction or other integrated investment;

• banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions;

• brokers, dealers or traders in securities;

• U.S. Unitholders (as defined below) whose “functional currency” is not the U.S. dollar;

• “controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment companies,” and corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax;

• partnerships or other entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes (and investors therein);

• tax-exempt organizations or governmental organizations;

• persons subject to the three-year holding period rule in Section 1061 of the Code;

• persons deemed to sell our common units under the constructive sale provisions of the Code;

• persons who hold or receive our common units pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation; and

• tax-qualified retirement plans.

For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Person” or “U.S. Unitholder” is any beneficial owner of our common units that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

• individual who is a citizen of the United States or is treated as a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

• a corporation or entity treated as a corporation for such purposes that in either case is created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

• an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or

• a trust that (a) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more U.S. persons as described in Section 7701(a)(30) of the Code, or (b) has a valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

19

A “Non-U.S. Person” or “Non-U.S. Unitholder” is any beneficial owner of our common units that is neither a U.S. Person nor an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

For tax purposes, our fiscal year ends September 30.

If a partnership (including an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common units, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner in the partnership, the activities in the partnership and certain determinations made at the partner level. If the prospective investor is a partner of a partnership investing in the common units, the prospective investor is urged to consult its tax advisers. This discussion does not constitute tax advice and is not intended to be a substitute for tax planning.

Tax matters are complicated, and prospective investors are urged to consult their own tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences in their particular situations of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common units, including the potential application of U.S. withholding taxes.

Regulated Investment Company Classification

We intend to elect to be treated, and intend to operate in a matter so as to continuously qualify annually, as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Subchapter M of the Code. As a RIC, we generally will not be required to pay corporate-level federal income taxes on our net investment income or capital gains that we timely distribute (or is deemed to distribute, except with respect to certain retained capital gains as discussed below) to our unitholders as dividends. Instead, dividends that we distribute (or are deemed to timely distribute) generally will be taxable to unitholders, and any net operating losses, foreign tax credits and most other tax attributes generally will not pass through to unitholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal corporate-level income tax on any undistributed income and/or gains. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to its unitholders, for each taxable year, generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” as defined by the Code, for that year, which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”). Our qualification and taxation as a RIC depends upon our ability to satisfy on a continuing basis, through actual, annual operating results, distribution, income and asset, and other requirements imposed under the Code. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to meet the complex and varied tests required to qualify as a RIC or to avoid corporate level tax. In addition, because the relevant laws may change, compliance with one or more of the RIC requirements may be impossible or impracticable.

Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company

If we:

• qualify as a RIC; and

• satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement;

then we will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain (generally, realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) we timely distribute (or are deemed to distribute, except with respect to certain retained capital gains as described below) to unitholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gain not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our unitholders.

We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in preceding years (to the extent that U.S. federal income tax was not imposed on such amounts) less certain over-distributions in the prior year (collectively, the “Excise Tax Requirement”). We may be subject to such excise tax on a portion of our income, depending on our decision to retain any income or gain.

20

Moreover, our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and (2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests (as defined below). If we dispose of assets to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement, the Diversification Tests, or the Excise Tax Requirement, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous.

In order to maintain our qualification as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, we generally must, among other things:

• at all times during each taxable year, have in effect an election to be treated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act;

• derive in each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from (a) dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities (including loans), gains from the sale of stock or other securities or currencies, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies or (b) net income derived from an interest in a “qualified publicly traded partnership” (collectively, the “90% Income Test”); and

• diversify our holdings so that at the end of each quarter of the taxable year:

• at least 50% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities, securities of other RICs, and other securities that, with respect to any issuer do not represent more than 5% of the value of our assets or more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of the issuer; and

• no more than 25% of the value of our assets is invested in (a) the securities, other than U.S. government securities or securities of other RICs, of one issuer, (b) the securities of two or more issuers that are controlled, as determined under applicable tax rules, by us and that are engaged in the same or similar or related trades or businesses or (c) the securities of one or more “qualified publicly traded partnerships” (collectively, the “Diversification Tests”).

We may be required to recognize taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes in circumstances in which we do not receive a corresponding payment in cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having OID (such as debt instruments with increasing interest rates or debt instruments issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the OID that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. Because any OID accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our unitholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount. To enable us to make distributions to unitholders that will be sufficient to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement and the Excise Tax Requirement, we may need to liquidate or sell some of our assets at times or at prices that are not advantageous, raise additional equity or debt capital, take out loans, forego new investment opportunities or otherwise take actions that are disadvantageous to our business (or be unable to take actions that are advantageous to our business). If we borrow money, we may be prevented by loan covenants from declaring and paying dividends in certain circumstances. Even if we are authorized to borrow funds and to sell assets in order to satisfy distribution requirements, under the Investment Company Act, we generally are not permitted to make distributions to unitholders while our debt obligations and senior securities are outstanding unless certain “asset coverage” tests or other financial covenants are met. Limits on our payment of dividends may prevent us from meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement, and may, therefore, jeopardize our qualification for taxation as a RIC, or subject us to the 4% excise tax on undistributed income.

We may have difficulty satisfying the diversification requirements if we liquidate our portfolio, given that we will not be making additional investments. Though we generally will not lose our status as a RIC as long as we do not acquire any non-qualifying securities or other property, under certain circumstances we may be deemed to have made an acquisition of non-qualifying securities or other property.

21

We may acquire debt instruments with “market discount.” In general, we will be treated as having acquired a debt instrument with market discount if it is acquired in the secondary market and its stated redemption price at maturity (or, in the case of a debt instrument issued with OID, its revised issue price) exceeds our initial tax basis in the debt instrument by more than a statutory de minimis amount. If we acquire a debt instrument with market discount, we will be required to treat any gain recognized on the disposition of such debt instrument as ordinary income (instead of capital gain) to the extent of the accrued market discount, unless we elect or have elected to include market discount in income as it accrues.

Because we may use debt financing, we will be subject to certain asset coverage requirements under the Investment Company Act described above and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement. If we unable to obtain cash from other sources or are otherwise limited in our ability to make distributions, it could fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and, thus, become subject to corporate-level income tax.

Certain of our investment practices may be subject to special and complex U.S. federal income tax provisions that may, among other things: (a) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or deductions; (b) convert long-term capital gain (currently taxed at lower rates for non-corporate U.S. taxpayers) into higher taxed short-term capital gain or ordinary income; (c) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction into a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited); (d) cause us to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash; (e) adversely affect the time as to when a purchase or sale of stock or securities is deemed to occur; (f) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial transactions; and (g) produce income that will not be qualifying income for purposes of the 90% Income Test. We will monitor our transactions and may make certain tax elections in order to mitigate the potential adverse effect of these provisions; however, no assurance can be given that we will be eligible for any such tax elections or that any elections we make will fully mitigate the effects of these provisions.

If, in any particular taxable year, we do not qualify as a RIC, all of our taxable income (including our net capital gains) will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates without any deduction for distributions to unitholders and distributions will be taxable to the unitholders as ordinary dividends to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits.

In the event we invest in non-U.S. securities, we may be subject to non-U.S. income, withholding and other taxes with respect to those securities. In such event, our yield on those securities would be decreased. We do not expect to satisfy the conditions necessary to pass through to our unitholders their share of the non-U.S. taxes paid by us, thus, unitholders will generally not be entitled to claim a U.S. foreign tax credit or deduction with respect to non-U.S. taxes paid by us.

A RIC is limited in its ability to deduct expenses in excess of its investment company taxable income. If our deductible expenses in a given year exceed our investment company taxable income, we will have a net operating loss for that year. However, a RIC is not permitted to carry forward net operating losses to subsequent years, and these net operating losses generally will not pass through to unitholders. In addition, expenses can be used only to offset investment company taxable income, and may not be used to offset net capital gain. A RIC may not use any net capital losses (that is, realized capital losses in excess of realized capital gains) to offset the RIC’s investment company taxable income, but may carry forward those losses, and use them to offset future capital gains, indefinitely. Further, a RIC’s deduction of net business interest expense is limited to 30% of its “adjusted taxable income” plus “floor plan financing interest expense.” It is not expected that any portion of any underwriting or similar fee will be deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes to us or our unitholders. Due to these limits on the deductibility of expenses, net capital losses and business interest expenses, we may, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, have aggregate taxable income for several years that we are required to distribute and that is taxable to unitholders even if this income is greater than the aggregate net income we actually earned during those years.

Failure to Qualify as a RIC

If we fail to satisfy the 90% Income Test for any taxable year or the Diversification Tests for any quarter of a taxable year, we may be eligible for relief provisions (which might, among other things, require us to pay certain corporate-level U.S. federal taxes or to dispose of certain assets) if the failures are due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect and if a penalty tax is paid with respect to each failure to satisfy the applicable requirements. Additionally, relief is provided for certain de minimis failures of the diversification requirements where we correct the failure within a specified period. If the applicable relief provisions are not available or cannot be met, all of our

22

income would be subject to corporate-level income tax as described below. We cannot provide assurance that we would qualify for any such relief should we fail the 90% Income Test or the Diversification Tests. Subject to a limited exception applicable to RICs that qualified for RIC status under Subchapter M of the Code for at least one year prior to disqualification and that requalify as a RIC no later than the second year following the non-qualifying year, we could be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any unrealized net built-in gains in the assets held by us during the period in which we failed to qualify as a RIC that are recognized during the 5-year period after our requalification as a RIC, unless we made a special election to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on these net built-in gains at the time of our requalification as a RIC.

If we fail to qualify for treatment as a RIC and such relief provisions do not apply to us, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate U.S. federal income tax rates (and we also would be subject to any applicable state and local taxes), regardless of whether we make any distributions to the unitholders. We would not be able to deduct distributions to unitholders, nor would distributions to the unitholders be required to be made for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Any distributions we make generally would be taxable to the unitholders as ordinary dividend income and, subject to certain limitations under the Code, would be eligible for the current maximum rate applicable to qualifying dividend income of individuals and other non-corporate U.S. Unitholders, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, unitholders that are corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the holder’s adjusted tax basis in its common units, and any remaining distributions would be treated as capital gain.

If, before the end of any quarter of our taxable year, we believe that we may fail the Diversification Tests, we may seek to take certain actions to avert a failure. However, the action frequently taken by RICs to avert a failure, the disposition of non-diversified assets, may be difficult for us to pursue because of the limited liquidity of our investments.

Although we expects to operate in a manner so as to qualify continuously as a RIC, we may not so qualify or may decide in the future to be taxed as a “C” corporation, even if it would otherwise qualify as a RIC, if we determine that treatment as a C corporation for a particular year would be in our best interests. The remainder of this discussion assumes that we will continuously qualify as a RIC for each taxable year.

Taxation of Non-U.S. Unitholders

The following discussion applies only to Non-U.S. Unitholders. Whether an investment in our common units is appropriate for a Non-U.S. Unitholder will depend upon that person’s particular circumstances. Non-U.S. Unitholders are urged to consult their tax advisers before investing in our common units.

Distributions on Units; Sales or Other Dispositions of Units

Distributions of our “investment company taxable income” to Non-U.S. Unitholders (including interest income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized long-term capital losses, which generally would be free of federal withholding tax if paid to Non-U.S. Unitholders directly) will be subject to withholding of federal tax at a 30% rate (unless lowered or eliminated by an applicable income tax treaty) to the extent such distributions do not exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits unless an applicable exception applies. If the distributions are income effectively connected (or treated as effectively connected) with a U.S. trade or business (“ECI”) of the Non-U.S. Unitholder (and, if a treaty applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the Non-U.S. Unitholder), we will not be required to withhold U.S. federal tax if the Non-U.S. Unitholder complies with applicable certification and disclosure requirements, although the distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. persons. Special certification requirements apply to a Non-U.S. Unitholder that is a non-U.S. partnership or a non-U.S. trust, and such entities are urged to consult their own tax advisers.

U.S.-source withholding taxes are generally not imposed on dividends paid by RICs to the extent the dividends are properly reported as “interest-related dividends” or “short-term capital gain dividends.” Interest-related dividends and short-term capital gain dividends generally represent distributions of interest or short-term capital gains that would not have been subject to U.S. withholding tax at the source if they had been received

23

directly by a non-U.S. person, and that satisfy certain other requirements. This exemption will not apply in respect of interest received from non-U.S. issuers. No assurance can be given as to whether any of our distributions will be reported as eligible for this exemption from withholding tax. In addition, Non-U.S. Unitholders should be aware that U.S. withholding rules require us (or our withholding agent) to withhold on distributions in the absence of certainty as to whether such distributions are eligible for the exemption from withholding tax. Since amounts designated as interest-related dividends may be reduced to the extent such amounts exceed our “qualified net interest income” (generally, our U.S. source interest income, other than certain contingent interest and interest from obligations of a corporation or partnership in which the Non-U.S. Unitholder or we are at least a 10% unitholder, reduced by expenses that are allocable to such income). No assurance can be given that we will distribute any interest-related or short-term capital gain dividends for the taxable year in which such dividend is distributed, we will generally not be certain that the entire amount of mid-year distributions of interest-related dividends is, in fact, properly treated as such. Accordingly, such distributions to Non-U.S. Unitholders may be subject to overwithholding by us (or our withholding agent).

Actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains to a Non-U.S. Unitholder, and gains realized by a Non-U.S. Unitholder upon the sale of our common units (including a redemption of such units or upon our liquidation), will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless the distributions or gains, as the case may be, are ECI of the Non-U.S. Unitholder (and, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Unitholder in the United States) or, in the case of an individual, the Non-U.S. Unitholder was present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions are met. If we distribute our net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions (which we may do in the future), a Non-U.S. Unitholder will be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the allocable share of the corporate-level tax we pay on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed; however, in order to obtain the refund, the Non-U.S. Unitholder must obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number (if one has not been previously obtained) and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the Non-U.S. Unitholder would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return.

If any actual or deemed distributions of our net capital gains, or any gains realized upon the sale or redemption of our common units, are ECI of the Non-U.S. Unitholder (and, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Unitholder), such amounts will be subject to U.S. income tax, on a net-income basis, in the same manner, and at the graduated rates applicable to, a U.S. Unitholder. For a corporate Non-U.S. Unitholder, the after-tax amount of distributions (both actual and deemed) and gains realized upon the sale or redemption of our common units that are ECI (and, if a treaty applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment), may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable treaty).

Pursuant to Section 1471-1474 of the Code and the U.S. Treasury regulations thereunder, the applicable withholding agent generally will be required to withhold 30% of any payments of dividends on our common units and (subject to proposed U.S. Treasury regulations as discussed below) 30% of the gross proceeds from a sale of our common units paid to (a) a non-U.S. financial institution (whether such financial institution is the beneficial owner or an intermediary) unless such non-U.S. financial institution agrees to verify, report and disclose its U.S. account holders and meets certain other specified requirements or (b) a non-financial non-U.S. entity (whether such entity is the beneficial owner or an intermediary) unless such entity certifies that it does not have any substantial U.S. owners or provides the name, address and taxpayer identification number of each substantial U.S. owner and such entity meets certain other specified requirements. If payment of this withholding tax is made, non-U.S. Unitholders that are otherwise eligible for an exemption from, or a reduction in, withholding of U.S. federal income taxes with respect to such interest or dividends will be required to seek a credit or refund from the IRS to obtain the benefit of such exemption or reduction. In certain cases, the relevant foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity may qualify for an exemption from, or be deemed to be in compliance with, these rules. Certain jurisdictions have entered into agreements with the United States that may supplement or modify these rules. We will not pay any additional amounts in respect of any amounts withheld. This withholding may be applied to reduce any future distributions to which you may be entitled.

24

Currently effective, proposed U.S. Treasury regulations have been issued that, when finalized, will provide for the repeal of the 30% withholding tax that would have potentially applied to all payments of gross proceeds from the sale, exchange or disposition occurring on or after January 1, 2019 of stock, bonds, or other property that could give rise to dividends or interest from sources within the United States (such as our common units). In the preamble to the proposed U.S. Treasury regulations, the government provided that taxpayers may rely upon this repeal until the issuance of final U.S. Treasury regulations.

Non-U.S. persons are urged to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the U.S. federal income tax and withholding tax, and state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences of an investment in our common units.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Backup withholding may apply to distributions on our common units with respect to certain non-exempt U.S. Unitholders. Such a U.S. Unitholder generally will be subject to backup withholding unless such U.S. Unitholder provides its correct taxpayer identification number and certain other information, certified under penalties of perjury, to the dividend paying agent, or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding. Any amount withheld under backup withholding is allowed as a credit against such U.S. Unitholder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the proper information is provided to the IRS.

Generally, we must report to the IRS and to Non-U.S. Unitholders the amount of interest and dividends paid to the Non-U.S. Unitholder and the amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect to those payments. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividend payments and any withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the holder resides under the provisions of an applicable tax treaty or agreement. In general, a Non-U.S. Unitholder will not be subject to backup withholding with respect to payments of dividends if the Non-U.S. Unitholder provides its name and address, and certifies, under penalties of perjury, to the applicable withholding agent that (a) it is not a U.S. person (which certification may be made on an IRS W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or successor form)) or (b) the Non-U.S. Unitholder holds our common units through certain foreign intermediaries or certain foreign partnerships, and satisfies the certification requirements of applicable Treasury regulations. A Non-U.S. Unitholder will be subject to information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding with respect to the proceeds of the sale or other disposition (including a redemption) of our common units within the United States or conducted through certain U.S.-related payors, unless the payor of the proceeds receives the statement described above or the Non-U.S. Unitholder otherwise establishes an exemption.

Non-U.S. Unitholders are urged to consult their tax advisers with respect to the U.S. federal income and withholding tax consequences, and state, local and non-U.S. tax consequences, of an investment in our common units.

Other Taxation

Unitholders may be subject to U.S. state, local and non-U.S. taxes on their distributions from our common units. Unitholders are urged to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the particular tax consequences to them of an investment in our common units.

Certain BDC Regulatory Considerations

As with other companies regulated by the Investment Company Act, a BDC must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. The Investment Company Act contains prohibitions and restrictions relating to transactions between BDCs and their affiliates (including any investment advisers), principal underwriters and affiliates of those affiliates or underwriters.

The Investment Company Act further requires that a majority of our directors be persons other than “interested persons,” as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act. In addition, we may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a BDC unless authorized by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, as required by the Investment Company Act. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the Investment Company Act as the lesser of: (a) 67% or more of such company’s voting securities present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company are present or represented by proxy, or (b) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. We do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of its business.

25

We are not generally able to issue and sell our common units at a price below net asset value per unit. We may, however, sell common units, warrants, options or rights to acquire such units, at a price below the current net asset value of the units if our board of directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and that of our unitholders, and our unitholders approve such sale. In any such case, the price at which our securities are to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our board of directors, closely approximates the market value of such securities (less any distributing commission or discount). We may also make rights offerings to the unitholders at prices per unit less than the net asset value per unit, subject to applicable requirements of the Investment Company Act.

Investment Restrictions

We do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the Investment Company Act. Under such limits, except for registered money market funds, we generally cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting stock of any registered investment company (which may be increased to 25% in certain circumstances under certain fund of funds arrangements), invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one registered investment company or invest more than 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of registered investment companies in the aggregate. The portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by investment companies ordinarily will subject our unitholders to additional indirect expenses. None of the policies described above is fundamental and each such policy may be changed without unitholder approval, subject to any limitations imposed by the Investment Company Act.

Qualifying Assets

Under the Investment Company Act, a BDC may not acquire any asset other than qualifying assets, unless, at the time the acquisition is made, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the company’s total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are any of the following:

(1) Securities purchased in transactions not involving any public offering from the issuer of such securities, which issuer (subject to certain limited exceptions) is an eligible portfolio company, or from any person who is, or has been during the preceding 13 months, an affiliated person of an eligible portfolio company, or from any other person, subject to such rules as may be prescribed by the SEC. An eligible portfolio company is defined in the Investment Company Act as any issuer which:

(a) is organized under the laws of, and has its principal place of business in, the United States;

(b) is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by the BDC) or a company that would be an investment company but for certain exclusions under the Investment Company Act; and

(c) satisfies any of the following:

i. does not have any class of securities that is traded on a national securities exchange;

ii. has a class of securities listed on a national securities exchange, but has an aggregate market value of outstanding voting and non-voting common equity of less than $250 million;

iii. is controlled by a BDC or a group of companies including a BDC and the BDC has an affiliated person who is a director of the eligible portfolio company; or

iv. is a small and solvent company having total assets of not more than $4 million and capital and surplus of not less than $2 million.

(2) Securities of any eligible portfolio company which we control;

26

(3) Securities purchased in a private transaction from a U.S. issuer that is not an investment company or from an affiliated person of the issuer, or in transactions incident thereto, if the issuer is in bankruptcy and subject to reorganization or if the issuer, immediately prior to the purchase of its securities, was unable to meet its obligations as they came due without material assistance other than conventional lending or financing arrangements;

(4) Securities of an eligible portfolio company purchased from any person in a private transaction if there is no ready market for such securities and we already own 60% of the outstanding equity of the eligible portfolio company;

(5) Securities received in exchange for or distributed on or with respect to securities described in (1) through (4) above, or pursuant to the exercise of warrants or rights relating to such securities; or

(6) Cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment.

Managerial Assistance to Portfolio Companies

A BDC must be operated for the purpose of making investments in the types of securities described in (1), (2) or (3) above. However, in order to count portfolio securities as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, a BDC must either control the issuer of the securities or must offer to make available to the issuer of the securities (other than small and solvent companies described above) significant managerial assistance. However, when a BDC purchases securities in conjunction with one or more other persons acting together, one of the other persons in the group may make available such managerial assistance. Making available managerial assistance includes any arrangement whereby a BDC, through its directors, officers or employees, offers to provide, and, if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company.

Temporary Investments

Pending investment in other types of qualifying assets, as described above, our investments may consist of cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities or high-quality debt securities maturing in one year or less from the time of investment (collectively, “temporary investments”) so that 70% of our assets are qualifying assets. We may also invest in U.S. Treasury bills or in repurchase agreements, provided that such agreements are fully collateralized by cash or securities issued by the U.S. government or its agencies. A repurchase agreement involves the purchase by an investor, such as us, of a specified security and the simultaneous agreement by the seller to repurchase it at an agreed-upon future date and at a price which is greater than the purchase price by an amount that reflects an agreed-upon interest rate. There is no percentage restriction on the proportion of our assets that may be invested in such repurchase agreements. However, if more than 25% of our gross assets constitute repurchase agreements from a single counterparty, we would not meet the diversification tests in order to qualify as a RIC. Thus, we do not intend to enter into repurchase agreements with a single counterparty in excess of this limit. The Adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of the counterparties with which we enter into repurchase agreement transactions.

Senior Securities

Our sole unitholder has approved the application of the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act to us on May 1, 2023, with such requirements effective with respect to us on May 2, 2023. The reduced asset coverage requirements permit us to double the maximum amount of leverage that we are permitted to incur under the Investment Company Act by reducing the asset coverage requirements applicable to us from 200% to 150%. As a result of the reduced asset coverage requirement under the Investment Company Act, we can incur $2 of debt for each $1 of equity.

27

Consistent with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, we are permitted, subject to certain specified conditions, to issue multiple classes of indebtedness and one class of units senior to our common units if our asset coverage, as calculated as provided in the Investment Company Act, is at least 150% (or a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 2.0x) immediately after each such issuance. In addition, while any senior securities remain outstanding, we must make provisions to prohibit any distribution to the unitholders or the repurchase of such securities or units unless we meet the applicable asset coverage ratios at the time of the distribution or repurchase. We would also be permitted to borrow amounts up to 5% of the value of our total assets for generally up to 60 days for temporary purposes without regard to asset coverage.

Notwithstanding the ability to incur leverage under the Investment Company Act, we will not (a) incur additional leverage at any time when the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding permanent leverage in connection with our investment activities exceeds 60% of the value of our total assets or (b) enter into any repurchase agreement unless the terms of such agreement do not require the collateral to be marked to market. For purposes of determining compliance with these limitations, all references to us shall be deemed to include us together with all of our consolidated subsidiaries.

Other

We are subject to periodic examination by the SEC for compliance with the Investment Company Act.

We are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect it against larceny and embezzlement. Furthermore, as a BDC, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to us or the unitholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.

We and the Adviser will each be required to adopt and implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the U.S. federal securities laws, review these policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation, and designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a joint code of ethics with OLP, OLPU, OCSL and OSCF pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act and has also approved Oaktree’s code of ethics that was adopted by it under Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act and Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act. These codes establish procedures for personal investments and restrict certain personal securities transactions. Personnel subject to the codes may invest in securities for their personal investment accounts, including securities that may be purchased or held by us, so long as such investments are made in accordance with the applicable code’s requirements. The codes of ethics are available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and available upon request.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to the Adviser. The proxy voting policies and procedures of the Adviser are set forth below. These guidelines are reviewed periodically by the Adviser and our independent directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change.

An investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act has a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of its clients. As part of this duty, the Adviser recognizes that it must vote portfolio securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of its clients.

These policies and procedures for voting proxies are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.

The Adviser will vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities, if any, in what it perceives to be the best interest of the unitholders. The Adviser will review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a unitholder vote to determine its impact on our portfolio securities. Although the Adviser will generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our portfolio securities, it may vote for such a proposal if there are compelling long-term reasons to do so.

28

The Adviser’s proxy voting decisions will be made by officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our investments. To ensure that the vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, the Adviser will require that: (1) anyone involved in the decision-making process disclose to the Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a proxy vote; and (2) employees involved in the decision-making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how the Adviser intends to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

Unitholders may obtain information regarding how we voted proxies by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC, Chief Compliance Officer, 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

Privacy Principles

We endeavor to maintain the privacy of our unitholders and to safeguard their non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help unitholders understand what non-public personal information we collect, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share that information with select other parties.

We may collect non-public personal information about our unitholders from the Subscription Agreements or other forms, such as name, address, account number and the types and amounts of investments, and information about transactions with us or our affiliates, such as participation in other investment programs, ownership of certain types of accounts or other account data and activity. We may disclose the non-public personal information that we collect from our unitholders or former unitholders, as described above, to our affiliates and service providers and as allowed by applicable law or regulation. Any party that receives this information from us is permitted to use it only for the services required by us and as allowed by applicable law or regulation, and is not permitted to share or use this information for any other purpose. We permit access only by authorized personnel who need access to that non-public personal information to provide services to us and our unitholders. We also maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards for non-public personal information that are designed to comply with applicable law.

Pursuant to our privacy policy, we will provide a clear and conspicuous notice to each unitholder that details our privacy policies and procedures at the time of subscription.

Reporting Obligations

Following effectiveness of this Registration Statement, we will file annual reports containing audited financial statements, quarterly reports, proxy statements and such other periodic reports as we determine to be appropriate or as may be required by law. In addition, we will be required to comply with all periodic reporting, proxy solicitation and other applicable requirements under the Exchange Act. Reports, proxy and information statements and other information we file with the SEC are available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Securities Act; U.S. State Securities Laws

Our common units are not, and will not be, registered under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemption contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and in Rule 506 of Regulation D (“Rule 506”) promulgated thereunder or another applicable exemption promulgated under the Securities Act. The units have not been registered under the securities laws of any state in reliance on exemptions from registration or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction, nor is such registration contemplated.

Each investor will be required to make customary private placement representations, including that such investor is acquiring the units for its own account for investment and not with a view to resale or distribution. Further, each investor must be prepared to bear the risk of an investment in our common units for an indefinite period of time, since our common units are subject to restrictions on transferability and resale and may not be Transferred or resold except as permitted by us.

29

Our common units have not been recommended, approved or disapproved by any U.S. federal or state or non-U.S. securities commission or regulatory authority. Furthermore, the foregoing authorities have not confirmed the accuracy or determined the adequacy of this Registration Statement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Exchange Act

In connection with any acquisition or beneficial ownership by us of more than 5% of any class of the equity securities of a company registered under the Exchange Act, we may be required to make certain filings with the SEC. Generally, these filings require disclosure of the identity and background of the purchaser, the source and amount of funds used to acquire the securities, the purpose of the transaction, the purchaser’s interest in the securities and any contracts, arrangements or undertakings regarding the securities. In certain circumstances, we may be required to aggregate our investment position in a given portfolio company with the beneficial ownership of that company’s securities by or on behalf of the Adviser and its affiliates, which could require us, together with such other parties, to make certain disclosure filings or otherwise restrict our activities with respect to such portfolio company securities.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act Compliance

Following effectiveness of this Registration Statement, we will be subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the Exchange Act, including the filing of quarterly, annual and current reports, proxy statements and other required items. In addition, we will be subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which imposes a wide variety of regulatory requirements on public companies and their insiders. For example:

• pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required to certify the accuracy of the financial statements contained in our periodic reports;

• pursuant to Item 307 of Regulation S-K, our periodic reports are required to disclose our conclusions about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures; and

• pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our management will be required to prepare a report regarding its assessment of its internal control over financial reporting beginning with the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024. At such time as we are neither an emerging growth company nor a non-accelerated filer, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to audit its internal control over financial reporting. We intend to take advantage of the exemption for emerging growth companies allowing us to temporarily forgo the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which would require that our independent registered public accounting firm provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Foregoing the attestation requirement may increase the risk that material weaknesses or other deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting go undetected.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor compliance with all regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.

U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940

The Adviser’s registration as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act does not imply any specific level of skill or training nor does it imply any endorsement, approval or certification of the Adviser by the SEC.

30

U.S. Commodity Exchange Act

To the extent that we acquire instruments which are commodity interests, we, the Adviser or another entity involved with the Adviser could be required to register with the CFTC as a CPO in connection with our acquisition of such commodity interests. The Adviser intends to claim exclusion from the definition of a CPO under CFTC Rule 4.5 on the basis that, among other things, our trading in commodity interest positions will be limited. We anticipate entering into commodity interest transactions, if at all, to a very limited extent solely for hedging purposes or otherwise within the limitations of the applicable CFTC regulations. Therefore, the Adviser will not be required to deliver a CFTC compliant disclosure document to prospective investors, nor will it be required to provide our unitholders with periodic account statements or certified annual reports that satisfy the requirements of CFTC rules that are generally applicable to registered CPOs.

31

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common units is speculative and involves a high degree of risk, both to the types of investments contemplated by us as well as our ability to achieve our investment objective, and should only be undertaken by those investors capable of evaluating our risks and bearing such risks. An investment in our common units is intended for long-term investors who can accept the risks of investing primarily in illiquid loans and other debt or debt-like instruments. There can be no assurance that there will be any return of capital, and investment results may vary substantially between periods. Our common units are a potentially suitable investment only for sophisticated investors for whom an investment in us does not represent a complete investment program and who, in consultation with their own investment and tax advisers, fully understand and are capable of assuming the risks of an investment in our common units. In addition to the information set forth elsewhere in this Registration Statement, prospective investors should consider the following factors, among others.

Market, Legal and Regulatory Risks

Public health emergencies and other geopolitical risks could have a material adverse impact on general economic and market conditions, which could adversely affect our ability to fulfill our investment objective.

An unstable geopolitical climate and continued threats of terrorism could have a material adverse effect on general economic conditions, market conditions and market liquidity. Additionally, a serious pandemic or a natural disaster could severely disrupt global, national and/or regional economies. No assurance can be given as to the effect of these events on the value of our investments.

Without limiting the foregoing, the 2020 outbreak of the form of coronavirus known as “COVID-19” resulted in numerous deaths, adversely impacted global commercial activity and contributed to significant volatility in certain equity and debt markets. The general uncertainty surrounding the dangers and long-term impact of COVID-19 and government and public responses thereto continue to create significant disruption in supply chains and economic activity and continue to have a particularly adverse impact on transportation, oil-related, hospitality, tourism, entertainment and other industries. The potential long-term impacts of the pandemic, including a global, regional or other economic recession, remain uncertain and difficult to assess.

Any public health emergency, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of additional variants of COVID-19, or any outbreak of other existing or new epidemic or pandemic diseases, or the threat thereof, could have a significant adverse impact on us, our portfolio companies and other investments, and could adversely affect our ability to fulfill our investment objective.

The extent of the impact of any public health emergency on our and our portfolio companies’ operational and financial performance will depend on many factors, including the duration and scope of such public health emergency, the scale and efficacy of government stimulus measures, the extent of any related travel advisories and restrictions implemented, the impact of such public health emergency on overall supply and demand, goods and services, investor liquidity, consumer confidence and levels of economic activity and the extent of its disruption to important global, regional and local supply chains and economic markets, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. The effects of a public health emergency may materially and adversely impact (a) the value and performance of our portfolio companies and other investments, (b) the ability of our portfolio companies to continue to meet loan covenants, post margin or repay loans provided by us on a timely basis or at all, or (c) our ability to source, manage and divest investments and our ability to achieve our investment objective, all of which could result in significant losses to us. With respect to any revolving or delayed draw loans we make to a portfolio company, a portfolio company may be incentivized for liquidity or other reasons to draw on most, if not all, of the unfunded portion of such loan and we may not have the ability under the applicable credit agreement to refuse to fund such draw without our being in default and suffering financial penalties. The foregoing market conditions may cause us to write down assets materially as the fair market value of our investments may be reduced in light of a potential or actual economic decline or recession, decline in or lack of consumer confidence or uncertain and volatile market conditions that are difficult to assess or predict. In addition, our success depends in substantial part on the management, skill and acumen of the Adviser, whose operations may be adversely impacted by a public health emergency, including through quarantine measures, precautionary restrictions on travel or meetings imposed on the Investment Professionals or service providers, or any related health issues of such Investment Professionals or service providers.

32

The on-going conflict between Russia and Ukraine could materially affect the success of our activities and investments.

On February 24, 2022, Russia launched an invasion of Ukraine that has resulted in an ongoing military conflict between the two countries (the “Russia-Ukraine Conflict”). The Russia-Ukraine Conflict has caused, and is currently expected to continue to cause, significant disruptions to the global financial system, international trade, and the transportation and energy sectors, among other disruptions. In addition, the Russia-Ukraine Conflict has displaced millions of people, causing an acute refugee crisis in Europe, and has increased the threat of nuclear accidents or attacks, cyberattacks and further regional or global conflicts (including a potential expansion of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict to other countries as well as other potential conflicts, including, but not limited to, conflicts in other geographic locations and between other state and non-state actors), among other potentially dire consequences. In response to Russia’s actions, multiple countries and governing bodies, including the United States and the EU, have put in place global sanctions and other severe restrictions or prohibitions on the activities of certain individuals and businesses connected to Russia and/or Belarus. Private companies have also implemented restrictions that severely limit, and in some cases, reverse or cancel, business transactions in or involving certain individuals and/or businesses connected to or associated with Russia and/or Belarus. Further, some private companies have moved to divest Russia-based subsidiaries and assets. In addition, the impacts of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the supply chain and commodity prices are expected to be profound and may result in substantial inflation in one or more countries (or globally). However, the ultimate impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict and its effect on global economic and commercial activity and conditions, and on our operations, financial condition and performance or any particular industry, business, currency or country and the duration and severity of those effects, is impossible to predict.

The Russia-Ukraine Conflict may have a significant adverse impact on, and result in significant losses to, us and our portfolio companies. In particular, our portfolio companies may suffer significant increases in operating costs (including, among other reasons, as a result of the substantial increase in energy prices), reductions in customers or new subscriptions for services, losses from cyberattacks, significant reductions in revenue and growth, increased foreign exchange risk and/or unexpected operational losses and liabilities. It may also limit our ability to source, diligence and execute new investments and to manage, finance and exit investments in the future. Developing and further governmental actions (sanctions-related, military or otherwise) may cause additional disruption and constrain or alter existing financial, legal and regulatory frameworks and systems in ways that are adverse to the investment strategy that we intends to pursue, all of which could adversely affect our ability to fulfill our investment objectives.

General economic and market conditions could materially affect the success of our activities and investments.

Many factors affect the appeal and availability of investments in companies and the securities and obligations that are our focus. The success of our activities could be materially adversely affected by general economic and market conditions, such as interest rates, availability of credit, credit defaults, inflation rates, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation of our investments), trade barriers and currency exchange controls, and national and international political, environmental and socioeconomic circumstances (including wars, terrorist acts or security operations) in respect of the countries in which we may invest, as well as by numerous other factors outside the control of the Adviser or its affiliates. These factors may affect the level and volatility of securities prices and the liquidity of our investments, which could impair our profitability or result in losses. In addition, general fluctuations in the market prices of securities and interest rates may affect our investment opportunities and the value of our investments. These events could limit our investment originations, limit our ability to grow, negatively impact our operating results.

Oaktree’s financial condition may be adversely affected by a significant general economic downturn and it may be subject to legal, regulatory, reputational and other unforeseen risks that could have a material adverse effect on Oaktree’s business and operations, which includes the Adviser, and thereby could impact us. Moreover, a recession, slowdown and/or sustained downturn in the U.S. or global economy (or any particular segment thereof) or weakening of credit markets will adversely affect our profitability, impede the ability of our portfolio companies to perform under or refinance their existing obligations, and impair our ability to effectively exit investments on favorable terms. Any of the foregoing events could result in substantial or total losses to us in respect of certain investments, which losses could be exacerbated by the presence of leverage in a particular portfolio company’s capital structure.

33

In addition, economic problems in a single country are increasingly affecting other markets and economies. A continuation of this trend could adversely affect global economic conditions and world markets and, in turn, could adversely affect our performance. The economies of particular individual emerging markets countries may differ favorably or unfavorably from one another in such respects as growth of gross domestic product, rate of inflation, currency depreciation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments position. Governments of many emerging markets countries have exercised and continue to exercise substantial influence over many aspects of the private sector, including owning or controlling such countries’ large companies.

Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, world financial markets were experiencing extraordinary market conditions, including, among other things, bank failures, extreme losses and volatility in securities markets and the failure of credit markets to function. In reaction to these events, regulators and monetary authorities in the United States and several other countries undertook unprecedented regulatory and monetary actions, and regulators in the United States and many other jurisdictions continue to consider and implement measures to stabilize U.S. and global financial markets. However, despite these efforts, U.S. and global financial markets remain volatile. We may be adversely affected by the foregoing events, which may be exacerbated by COVID-19 or by similar or other events in the future. In the longer term, there may be significant new regulations that could limit our activities and investment opportunities or change the functioning of the capital markets, and there is the possibility of continued severe worldwide economic downturn. Consequently, we may not be capable of, or successful at, preserving the value of our assets, generating positive investment returns or effectively managing risks.

We are subject to regulatory oversight and requirements that restrict our activities and increase our cost of doing business.

The Investment Company Act and the Code impose numerous constraints on the operations of BDCs and RICs that do not apply to other types of investment vehicles. For example, under the Investment Company Act, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets in qualifying assets, primarily in private U.S. companies or thinly traded public U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. In addition, in order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we are required to meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. These constraints, among others, may hinder our ability to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and to achieve our investment objective.

Furthermore, any failure to comply with the requirements imposed on BDCs by the Investment Company Act could cause the SEC to bring an enforcement action against us and/or expose us to claims of private litigants. In addition, upon approval of a majority of our outstanding voting securities as required by the Investment Company Act, we may elect to withdraw our status as a BDC. If we decide to withdraw such election, or if we otherwise fail to qualify, or maintain our qualification, as a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company that is required to register under the Investment Company Act, which would subject us to additional regulatory restrictions, significantly decrease our operating flexibility and could significantly increase our cost of doing business. In addition, any such failure could cause an event of default under future outstanding indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Certain investments we make may result in reporting and compliance obligations under the applicable regulations of the various jurisdictions in which we make investments. In addition, the making of certain investments may subject us and certain of our portfolio companies to a varied and complex body of energy and environmental regulations that both public officials and private individuals may seek to enforce. The costs of compliance will be borne by us. In addition, our investments are or may become subject to regulation by various agencies within or outside the United States. New and existing regulations, changing regulatory schemes and the burdens of regulatory compliance all may have a material negative impact on our performance. Oaktree cannot predict whether new legislation or regulation will be enacted by legislative bodies or governmental agencies, nor can it predict what effect such legislation or regulation might have. There can be no assurance that new legislation or regulation, including changes to existing laws and regulations, will not have a material negative impact on our investment performance.

34

We are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our units less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. As a result, we have taken advantage of the exemption for emerging growth companies allowing us to temporarily forgo the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We cannot predict if prospective investors will find our common units less attractive because we rely on this exemption. If some prospective investors find our common units less attractive as a result, there may be less of an interest in investing. We do not intend to take advantage of other disclosure or reporting exemptions for emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (a) the last day of the fiscal year (i) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of an initial public offering, (ii) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.235 billion, or (iii) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common equity held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the end of the prior second fiscal quarter, and (b) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

We are subject to additional risks as a result of being regulated as a BDC and taxed as a RIC.

To qualify for the tax benefits available to RICs and to minimize corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes, we intend to distribute to our unitholders at least 90% of our taxable income each tax year, except that we may retain some or all of our net capital gains, and treat such amounts as a “deemed distribution” to our unitholders. If we elect to treat any amounts as deemed distributions, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the corporate rate on such deemed distributions on behalf of our unitholders. The amount of the deemed distribution net of such tax will be added to the unitholder’s cost basis for its common units.

As a BDC, we may issue “senior securities,” including borrowing money from banks or other financial institutions so long as we meet an asset coverage ratio, as calculated as provided in the Investment Company Act, of at least 150%, after such incurrence or issuance. These requirements limit the amount that we may borrow, may unfavorably limit our investment opportunities and may reduce our ability in comparison to other companies to profit from favorable spreads between the rates at which we can borrow and the rates at which we can lend. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy the asset coverage test, which could prohibit us from paying distributions and could prevent us from being subject to tax as a RIC. If we cannot satisfy the asset coverage test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our debt financing, if any, repay a portion of such indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous.

Because we will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio, these limitations may prevent us from incurring debt and require us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. We generally are not able to issue or sell our common units at a price below the then-current Net Asset Value per unit, which may be a disadvantage as compared with other public companies or private investment funds.

If we raise additional funds by issuing more common units or issuing senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, such units, the percentage ownership of then-existing unitholders may decline at that time and such unitholders may experience dilution with respect to their percentage ownership. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on terms favorable to us or at all.

In addition, we may in the future seek to securitize our portfolio securities to generate cash for funding new investments. To securitize loans, we would likely create a wholly owned subsidiary and contribute a pool of loans to the subsidiary. We would then sell interests in the subsidiary on a non-recourse basis to purchasers and would retain all or a portion of the equity in the subsidiary. An inability to successfully securitize our loan portfolio could limit our ability to grow our business or fully execute our business strategy and may decrease our earnings, if any. The securitization market is subject to changing market conditions and we may not be able to access this market when we would otherwise deem appropriate. Moreover, the successful securitization of our portfolio might expose us to losses as the residual investments in which we do not sell interests will tend to be those that are riskier and more apt to generate losses. The Investment Company Act also may impose restrictions on the structure of any securitization.

35

We will not be registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator but may be required to do so in the future.

To the extent we acquire instruments which are commodity interests, we, the Adviser or another entity involved with the Adviser could be required to register with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator in connection with our acquisition of such commodity interests. We anticipate entering into commodity interest transactions, if at all, to a very limited extent solely for hedging purposes or otherwise within the limitations of the applicable CFTC regulations. Accordingly, the Adviser intends to claim exclusion from the registration requirements applicable to commodity pool operators and will not be required to deliver a CFTC compliant disclosure document to prospective investors, nor will it be required to provide unitholders with periodic account statements or certified annual reports that satisfy the requirements of CFTC rules that are generally applicable to registered commodity pool operators.

It is possible that, in connection with any future strategic transaction or transactions we may enter into, the Adviser may not be able to operate us in a manner that will permit the Adviser to rely on an exemption or exclusion from the registration requirements applicable to commodity pool operators. Under these circumstances, the Adviser would be required to comply with disclosure, reporting, recordkeeping and other regulatory requirements applicable to registered commodity pool operators under the U.S. Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC rules.

If the Adviser or certain of its affiliates are deemed a “Bad Actor”, it could negatively impact our ability to raise capital.

Rule 501 and Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act bar issuers deemed to be “bad actors” from relying on Rule 506 in connection with private placements (the “disqualification rule”). Specifically, an issuer is precluded from conducting offerings that rely on the exemption from registration under the Securities Act provided by Rule 506 (“Rule 506 offerings”) if a “covered person” of the issuer has been the subject of a “disqualifying event” (each as defined below). “Covered persons” include, among others, the issuer, affiliated issuers, any investment manager of an issuer that is a pooled investment fund, any solicitor of the issuer, any director, executive officer or other officer participating in the offering of the issuer, any general partner or managing member of the foregoing entities, any promoter of the issuer and any beneficial owner of 20% or more of the issuer’s outstanding voting equity securities, calculated on the basis of voting power. A “disqualifying event” includes, among other things, certain (a) criminal convictions and court injunctions and restraining orders issued in connection with the purchase or sale of a security or false filings with the SEC; (b) final orders from the CFTC, federal banking agencies and certain other regulators that bar a person from associating with a regulated entity or engaging in the business of securities, insurance or banking or that are based on certain fraudulent conduct; (c) SEC disciplinary orders relating to investment advisers, brokers, dealers and their associated persons; (d) SEC cease-and-desist orders relating to violations of certain anti-fraud provisions and registration requirements of the federal securities laws; (e) suspensions or expulsions from membership in a self-regulatory organization (“SRO”) or from association with an SRO member; and (f) U.S. Postal Service false representation orders.

A disqualification will occur only in the case of a disqualifying event of a covered person that occurs on or after September 23, 2013, although issuers must disclose to potential investors in a Rule 506 offering disqualifying events of covered persons that occurred before September 23, 2013. The rule provides an exception from disqualification if the issuer can show that it did not know and, in the exercise of reasonable care, could not have known, that the issuer or any other covered person had a disqualifying event, although an issuer will not be able to establish that it has exercised reasonable care unless it has made, in light of the circumstances, factual inquiry into whether any disqualifications exist.

The Adviser has a large number of affiliates, many of whom may be deemed to be affiliated issuers of us and, therefore, covered persons of us for purposes of our Rule 506 offerings. Thus, while the Adviser has made, and on a periodic basis will continue to make, inquiries into whether any persons that the Adviser has determined to be affiliated issuers have been subject to any disqualifying events, in some circumstances the Adviser’s ability to determine whether we would be disqualified from relying on Rule 506 may depend on cooperation of third parties over whom the Adviser may have limited control and influence.

If any of Oaktree’s covered persons, including any affiliated issuer of us, is subject to a disqualifying event, we could lose the ability to raise capital in a future Rule 506 offering for a significant period of time and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

36

Existing and future financial reform legislation applicable to alternative asset managers and financial institutions more generally could have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

Legal, tax and regulatory changes could occur that may adversely affect us at any time. The legal, tax and regulatory environment for funds that invest in alternative investments is evolving, and changes in the regulation and market perception of such funds, including changes to existing laws and regulations and interpretations thereof and increased criticism of the private equity and alternative asset industry by some politicians, regulators and market commentators, may adversely affect our ability to pursue our investment strategy, our ability to obtain leverage and financing and the value of investments we hold. In recent years, market disruptions and the dramatic increase in the capital allocated to alternative investment strategies have led to increased governmental as well as self-regulatory scrutiny of the alternative investment fund industry in general, and certain legislation proposing greater regulation of the industry periodically is considered by the governing bodies of both U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions (including the European Union (“EU”)). It is impossible to predict what, if any, changes may be instituted with respect to the regulations applicable to us, the Adviser, Oaktree, our or their respective affiliates, the markets in which we and they trade and invest, our unitholders or the counterparties with which we and they do business, or what effect such legislation or regulations might have. There can be no assurance that we, the Adviser, Oaktree or our or their respective affiliates will be able, for financial reasons or otherwise, to comply with future laws and regulations, and any regulations that restrict our ability to implement our investment strategy could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio. To the extent that we or our investments are or may become subject to regulation by various agencies in the United States, Europe (including the United Kingdom (“UK”)) or other countries, the costs of compliance will be borne by us.

Furthermore, the securities, swaps and futures markets are subject to comprehensive statutes, regulations and margin requirements. The regulation of derivatives transactions and funds that engage in such transactions is an evolving area of law and is subject to modification by government and judicial action. The SEC recently adopted Rule 18f-4 under the Investment Company Act, which governs our use of derivatives. The SEC, the CFTC, other regulators and SROs and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies and retain the right to suspend or limit trading in securities, which could expose us to losses. The effect of any future regulatory change on us could be substantial and adverse.

Finally, the SEC and other various U.S. federal, state and local agencies may conduct examinations and inquiries into, and bring enforcement and other proceedings against, us, the Adviser, Oaktree or our respective affiliates. We, the Adviser, Oaktree or our respective affiliates may receive requests for information or subpoenas from the SEC and other state, federal and non-U.S. regulators (as well as from SROs and exchanges) from time to time in connection with such inquiries and proceedings and otherwise in the ordinary course of business. These requests may relate to a broad range of matters, including specific practices of the Adviser, Oaktree, the securities in which Oaktree invests on behalf of its clients or industry-wide practices. The costs of any such increased reporting, registration and compliance requirements may be borne by us and may furthermore place us at a competitive disadvantage to the extent that Oaktree or portfolio companies are required to disclose sensitive business information.

The United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union may create significant risks and uncertainty for global markets and our investments.

On January 31, 2020, the UK formally withdrew from the EU (“Brexit”). After this, the UK entered into a transition period during which the majority of the existing EU rules continued to apply in the UK. Following the end of the transition period on December 31, 2020, EU rules ceased to apply in the UK.

Although the terms of the UK’s future relationship with the EU were agreed in a trade and cooperation agreement signed on December 30, 2020, this did not include an agreement on financial services. In the absence of a formal agreement on this issue, UK firms in the financial sector have more limited access to the EU market than prior to Brexit and EU firms similarly have more limited access to the UK, owing to the loss of passporting rights under applicable EU and UK legislation. Alternative arrangements and structures may allow for the provision of cross-border marketing and services between the EU and UK, but these are subject to legal uncertainty and the risk that further legislative and regulatory restrictions could be imposed in the future.

37

As a result of the onshoring of EU legislation in the UK, UK firms are currently subject to substantially many of the same rules and regulations as prior to Brexit. However, the UK Government has stated its intention to recast onshored EU legislation as part of UK legislation and regulation, which could result in substantive changes to regulatory requirements in the UK. It remains to be seen to what extent the UK may elect to implement or mirror future changes in the EU regulatory regime, or to diverge from the current EU-influenced regime over time. It is possible that the EU may respond to UK initiatives by restricting third country access to EU markets. If the regulatory regimes for EU and UK financial services change or diverge further, this could have an adverse impact on us and our investments, including our ability to achieve our investment objectives in whole or in part (for example, owing to increased costs and complexity and/or new restrictions in relation to cross-border access between the EU and non-EU jurisdictions).

The legal, political and economic uncertainty and disruption generally resulting from Brexit may adversely affect both EU- and UK-based businesses (regardless of the sector in which they operate). Brexit has already led to disruptions in trade as businesses attempt to adapt cross-border procedures and rules applicable in the UK and in the EU to their activities, products, customers, and suppliers. Continuing uncertainty and the prospect of further disruption may result in an economic slowdown and/or a deteriorating business environment in the UK and in one or more EU member states.

General economic conditions in the Eurozone could adversely affect our ability to make investment in Europe and the performance of any existing investments in Europe.

There are significant and persistent concerns regarding the debt burden of certain Eurozone countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations, the overall stability of the Euro and the suitability of the Euro to function as a single currency given the diverse economic and political circumstances in individual Eurozone countries. The risks and prevalent concerns about a credit crisis in Europe could have a detrimental impact on global economic recovery, as well as on sovereign and non-sovereign debt in the Eurozone countries. There can be no assurance that the market disruptions in Europe will not spread to other countries, nor can there be any assurance that future assistance packages will be available or, even if provided, will be sufficient to stabilize affected countries and markets in Europe or elsewhere. These and other concerns could lead to the re-introduction of individual currencies in one or more Eurozone countries, or, in more extreme circumstances, the possible dissolution of the Euro entirely. Should the Euro dissolve entirely, the legal and contractual consequences with respect to us, our investments in Europe and our unitholders could be determined by laws in effect at such time. These potential developments could negatively impact our ability to make investments in Europe, the value of our investments in Europe and the general availability and cost of financing permitted investments.

We and our portfolio companies will be subject to regulations related to privacy, data protection and information securities, and any failure to comply with these requirements could result in fines, sanctions or other penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our reputation.

The adoption, interpretation and application of consumer protection, data protection and/or privacy laws and regulations in the United States, Europe or other jurisdictions (collectively, “Privacy Laws”) could significantly impact current and planned privacy and information security related practices, the collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of personal data and current and planned business activities of Oaktree and us and/or our portfolio companies, and increase compliance costs and require the dedication of additional time and resources to compliance for such entities. A failure to comply with such Privacy Laws by any such entity or their service providers could result in fines, sanctions or other penalties, which could materially and adversely affect the results of operations and overall business, as well as have a negative impact on reputation and our performance. As Privacy Laws are implemented, interpreted and applied, compliance costs are likely to increase, particularly in the context of ensuring that adequate data protection and data transfer mechanisms are in place.

For example, California has passed the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 and the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, each of which broadly impacts businesses that handle various types of personal data. Such laws impose stringent legal and operational obligations on regulated businesses, as well as the potential for significant penalties.

38

Other jurisdictions, including other U.S. states, already have, have proposed or are considering similar Privacy Laws, which impose, or could impose if enacted, similarly significant costs, potential liabilities and operational and legal obligations. Such Privacy Laws and regulations are expected to vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, thus increasing costs, operational and legal burdens, and the potential for significant liability for regulated entities, which could include Oaktree, the Adviser and us and/or our portfolio companies.

We may be held jointly and severally liable for any fine imposed on a portfolio company under EU competition laws.

Under EU competition law, the parent company of a group or holding companies that hold one or more portfolio companies may be held jointly and severally liable for the anticompetitive conduct of another entity where they formed part of a single economic unit during the period of the infringement. For that to be the case, such parent or holding company must have exercised decisive influence over the conduct of its subsidiary on the market at the time. Such parental liability may be imputed to Oaktree, the Adviser or us with respect to an investment in a portfolio company. In a recent decision, the European Commission imposed a fine jointly and severally on a private equity owner for an antitrust infringement by its former portfolio company. If a current or former portfolio company of ours were to be investigated and ultimately fined by the European Commission for breach of EU competition law, we, Oaktree or the Adviser could be held jointly and severally liable in whole or part for any fine that was imposed, which may have a material adverse effect on us. Similar competition law considerations and risks may also apply in respect of other jurisdictions (including, for example, the UK).

Our sustainability initiatives, specifically relating to environmental, social and governance matters, may impose additional costs and expose us to emerging areas of risk.

Sustainability risk means an environmental, social or governance event or condition that, if it occurs, could cause an actual or a potential material negative impact on the value of the investment (“Sustainability Risk”).

Oaktree has established a sustainability framework, which it intends to apply as applicable to our investment portfolio, consistent with, and subject to, its fiduciary duties and applicable legal, regulatory or contractual requirements. Generally, before an investment decision is made on behalf of us, the Adviser will seek to identify Sustainability Risks associated with the proposed investment. These risks form part of the overall investment analysis. The Adviser will attempt to assess the identified risks alongside other relevant factors. Following its assessment, the Adviser makes investment decisions having regard to our investment policy and objectives, taking into account Sustainability Risks and Oaktree’s wider policies and procedures on responsible investing as well as any applicable legal, regulatory, fiduciary or contractual duties.

While Sustainability Risks are only some of the many factors the Adviser will consider in making an investment, there is no guarantee that Oaktree will successfully identify and mitigate all Sustainability Risks. The act of selecting and evaluating Sustainability Risks is subjective by nature, and there is no guarantee that the criteria utilized or judgment exercised by Oaktree, the Adviser or a third-party ESG advisor will reflect the beliefs or values, internal policies or preferred practices of any particular unitholder or other asset managers or market trends. To the extent that Oaktree or a third-party advisor engages with underlying investments on sustainability-related and ESG-related practices, potential enhancements and risk mitigants, such steps may not achieve the desired financial results, or the market or society may not view any such changes as desirable. Successful engagement on the part of Oaktree will depend on Oaktree’s skill in properly identifying and analyzing Sustainability Risks and other factors (which may involve qualitative and subjective judgements) and their related value, together with the quality of the data provided in respect of the impact of Sustainability Risks in respect of the relevant investment and there can be no assurance that the strategy or techniques employed will be successful.

The materiality of sustainability and ESG risks on an individual asset and on a portfolio as a whole depends on many factors, including the relevant industry, location, investment strategy, asset class and investment style. Sustainability Risks and ESG factors, issues and considerations do not apply in every instance or with respect to each investment held, or proposed to be made by us, and will vary greatly based on numerous criteria, including, but not limited to, location, asset class, industry, investment strategy, and issuer-specific and investment-specific characteristics. Considering Sustainability Risks when evaluating an investment may result in the selection or exclusion of certain investments based on Oaktree’s view of certain sustainability-related and other factors and carries the risk that we may underperform compared to other funds that do not take sustainability-related factors into account. Although Oaktree considers the application of its sustainability framework to be an opportunity to enhance or protect the performance of its investments over the long-term, Oaktree cannot guarantee that its sustainability

39

program, which depends in part on qualitative judgments, will positively impact the financial performance of any individual investment or us as a whole. In assessing a particular investment, Oaktree may be dependent upon information and data obtained through third parties that may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable, which could cause Oaktree to incorrectly identify, prioritize, assess or analyze the investment’s sustainability and ESG practices and/or Sustainability Risks and opportunities. Oaktree does not intend to independently verify certain of the sustainability and ESG-related information reported by our investments, and may decide in its discretion not to utilize, report on, or consider certain information provided by such investments. To the extent that Oaktree provides reports of material sustainability and ESG issues to investors, such reports will be based on Oaktree’s or the applicable investment management team’s sole and subjective determination of whether and how to report on whether any material sustainability or ESG issue has occurred in respect of an investment and Oaktree makes no representations that all Sustainability Risks or ESG issues will or should be discussed in such reports.

Sustainability-related practices differ by region, industry and issue and are evolving accordingly, and an investment’s sustainability-related practices or Oaktree’s assessment of such practices may change over time. Oaktree in certain circumstances could determine in its discretion that it is not feasible or practical to implement or complete certain of its sustainability and ESG initiatives based on cost, timing or other considerations. It is also possible that market dynamics or other factors will make it impractical, inadvisable or impossible for the Adviser to adhere to all elements of our investment strategy, including with respect to sustainability and ESG risk management, whether with respect to one or more individual Investments or to our portfolio generally.

Further, ESG integration and responsible investing practices as a whole are evolving rapidly and there are different principles, frameworks, methodologies and tracking tools being implemented by asset managers, and Oaktree’s adoption of and adherence to such principles, frameworks, methodologies and tools may vary over time. For example, Oaktree’s sustainability framework does not represent a universally recognized standard for assessing ESG considerations. Oaktree is currently a signatory to the United Nations’ Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI). This initiative may not align with the approach used by other asset managers or preferred by prospective investors or with future market trends. There is no guarantee that Oaktree will remain a signatory, supporter or member of this initiative or other similar industry frameworks.

Finally, there is also growing regulatory interest, particularly in the U.S., UK and EU (which may be looked to as models in growth markets), in improving transparency around how asset managers define and measure ESG performance, in order to allow investors to validate and better understand sustainability claims. For example, on May 25, 2022, the SEC proposed amendments to rules and reporting forms concerning sustainability and ESG factors, which rules are not in final form and therefore cannot be determined as to how they may affect us. There may also be an increase in related enforcement through efforts such as those of the SEC’s Climate and ESG Enforcement Task Force, established in March 2021. The European Securities and Markets Authority also published its Sustainable Finance Roadmap for 2022 to 2024 in February 2022 which sets the priority areas for enforcement and specifies that tackling greenwashing and promoting transparency together constitute one of ESMA’s three priorities for its sustainable finance work over that period. Oaktree’s ESG program and the Adviser could become subject to additional regulation in the future, and the Adviser cannot guarantee that its current approach (including Oaktree’s ESG program) or our investments will meet future regulatory requirements, reporting frameworks or best practices, increasing the risk of related enforcement. Compliance with new requirements may lead to increased management burdens and costs. Similarly, new sustainability requirements imposed by jurisdictions in which Oaktree does business and/or in which we are marketed may result in additional compliance costs, disclosure obligations or other implications or restrictions on us or on Oaktree. Under such requirements, Oaktree may be required to classify itself or us against certain criteria, some of which can be open to subjective interpretation. Oaktree’s view on the appropriate classification may develop over time, including in response to statutory or regulatory guidance or changes in industry approach to classification. A change to the relevant classification may require further actions to be taken, for example it may require further disclosures by Oaktree or us or it may require new processes to be set up to capture data about us or our investments, which may lead to additional cost.

We and/or our portfolio companies may be materially and adversely impacted by global climate change.

Global climate change is widely considered to be a significant threat to the global economy. Real estate and similar assets in particular may face risks associated with climate change, including risks related to the impact of climate-related legislation and regulation (both domestically and internationally), risks related to climate-related business trends, and risks stemming from the physical impacts of climate change, such as the increasing frequency

40

or severity of extreme weather events and rising sea levels and temperatures. Additionally, the Paris Agreement and other regulatory and voluntary initiatives launched by international, federal, state, and regional policymakers and regulatory authorities as well as private actors seeking to reduce GHG emissions may expose real estate and similar assets to so-called “transition risks” in addition to physical risks, such as: (i) political and policy risks (e.g., changing regulatory incentives and legal requirements, including with respect to GHG emissions, that could result in increased costs or changes in business operations), (ii) regulatory and litigation risks (e.g., changing legal requirements that could result in increased permitting, tax and compliance costs, changes in business operations, or the discontinuance of certain operations, and litigation seeking monetary or injunctive relief related to impacts related to climate change), (iii) technology and market risks (e.g., declining market for assets, products and services seen as GHG intensive or less effective than alternatives in reducing GHG emissions) and (iv) reputational risks (e.g., risks tied to changing investor, customer or community perceptions of an asset’s relative contribution to GHG emissions). Oaktree cannot rule out the possibility that climate risks, including changes in weather and climate patterns, could result in unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of investment activities or the effective management of real estate and similar assets once undertaken, any of which could have a material adverse effect on an investment, or us.

The market’s focus on climate change may not have a positive impact on our investments.

Financial resources and public and private investment into business activities seeking to address climate change, reduce emissions and promote adaptation to climate change-related impacts are increasing. While financial and non-financial benefits may flow from these types of investments, Oaktree cannot guarantee that such activities will improve the financial or environmental, social and governance-related performance of the investment, reduce emissions or promote adaptation to climate change-related impacts and Oaktree may also not find itself in a position to maximize opportunities presented by such business activities whether in respect of financial or non-financial returns.

Regulation of derivatives transactions in the United States and other jurisdictions may have a negative impact on the performance of our investments.

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act establishes a general framework for systemic regulation that has imposed and will impose mandatory clearing, exchange trading and margin requirements on many over-the counter derivatives transactions. The Dodd-Frank Act also creates new categories of regulated market participants, such as “swap dealers” and “security-based swap dealers” that are subject to significant new capital, registration, recordkeeping, reporting, disclosure, business conduct and other regulatory requirements, a large number of which have been implemented. This regulatory framework has significantly increased the costs of entering into derivatives transactions for end-users of derivatives, such as us. In particular, new margin requirements and capital charges, even when not directly applicable to us, are expected to increase the pricing of derivatives we transact in. New exchange trading, trade reporting requirements and position limits may lead to changes in the liquidity of derivative transactions, or higher pricing.

In addition to U.S. laws and regulations relating to derivatives, certain non-U.S. regulatory authorities have passed or proposed, or may propose in the future, legislation similar to that imposed by the Dodd-Frank Act. For example, EU legislation imposes position limits on certain commodity transactions, and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 648/2012) (“EMIR”) requires reporting of derivatives and various risk mitigation techniques to be applied to derivatives entered into by parties that are subject to EMIR. Certain entities, including private funds, may be required to clear certain derivatives and may be subject to initial and variation margin requirements with respect to their non-cleared derivatives, under EMIR and its subordinate legislation. These EU regulatory changes have impacted or will impact, directly or indirectly, a broad range of counterparties, both outside and within the EU, and are understood to have increased, and are expected to potentially increase, our cost of transacting derivatives (particularly with banks and other dealers directly subject to such regulations).

In addition, the tax environment for derivative instruments and funds is evolving, and changes in the taxation of derivative instruments or funds may adversely affect the value of certain derivatives contracts we enter into and our ability to pursue our investment strategies. There can be no assurance that new legislation or regulation, including changes to existing laws and regulations, will not have a material negative impact on our investment performance.

Other similar regulations are developing around the world and may increase our cost of doing business even if not directly binding on us

41

Compliance with anti-money laundering requirements could require Oaktree and the Adviser to provide to governmental authorities information about our unitholders and could require that a unitholder’s funds be frozen or that the unitholder withdraw from the Company.

We, the Adviser and Oaktree will be authorized, without the consent of any person, including any unitholder, to take such action as they determine in their sole discretion to be reasonably necessary or advisable to comply, or to cause us to comply, with any applicable laws and regulations, including any anti-money laundering or counter-terrorist financing laws, rules, regulations, directives or special measures. In addition, we, the Adviser and Oaktree may disclose, without the consent of any person, including any unitholder, to governmental authorities, SROs and financial institutions information concerning us and one or more of the unitholders that we, the Adviser or Oaktree determines in our or its sole discretion is necessary or advisable to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including any anti-money laundering or counter-terrorist financing laws or regulations, and each unitholder will be required to provide us, the Adviser or Oaktree all information that we, the Adviser or Oaktree determines in our or its sole discretion to be advisable or necessary to comply with such laws and regulations. We or the Adviser may be required by applicable law to freeze a unitholder’s funds or cause such unitholder to withdraw or compulsorily withdraw such unitholder from the Company.

Economic and trade sanctions and anti-bribery laws could make it more difficult or costly for us to conduct our operations or achieve our business objectives.

Economic and trade sanctions laws in the United States and other jurisdictions may prohibit Oaktree, the Investment Professionals and us from transacting with or in certain countries and with certain individuals, companies and industry sectors. In the United States, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) administers and enforces laws, Executive Orders and regulations establishing U.S. economic and trade sanctions. Such sanctions prohibit, among other things, transactions with, and the provision of services to, certain foreign countries, territories, entities and individuals. These entities and individuals include specially designated nationals, specially designated narcotics traffickers and other parties subject to OFAC sanctions and embargo programs. The lists of OFAC prohibited countries, territories, persons and entities, including the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons, as such list may be amended from time to time, can be found on the OFAC website at http://www.treas.gov/ofac. In addition, certain programs administered by OFAC prohibit dealing with individuals or entities in certain countries or subject to certain sanctions programs regardless of whether such individuals or entities appear on the lists maintained by OFAC, which may make it more difficult for us to identify sanctioned parties and prevent dealings with them. These types of sanctions may significantly restrict or limit our investment activities in certain countries (in particular, certain emerging market countries). We, Oaktree and the Investment Professionals may from time to time be subject to trade sanctions laws and regulations of other jurisdictions, which may be inconsistent with or even preclude the effect of the sanctions administered by OFAC. The legal uncertainties arising from those conflicts may make it more difficult or costly for us to navigate investment activities that are subject to sanctions administered by OFAC or the laws and regulations of other jurisdictions.

At the same time, Oaktree may be obligated to comply with certain anti-boycott laws and regulations that prevent Oaktree and us from engaging in certain discriminatory practices that may be allowed or required in certain jurisdictions. Oaktree’s failure to discriminate in this manner could make it more difficult for us to pursue certain investments and engage in certain business activities, and any compliance with such practices could subject Oaktree, the Adviser or us to fines, penalties, and adverse legal and reputational consequences.

In some countries, there is a greater acceptance than in the United States and the UK of government involvement in commercial activities and of activities constituting corruption in the United States and the UK. Certain countries, including the United States and the UK, have laws prohibiting commercial bribery. We, Oaktree and the Adviser are committed to complying with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the UK Bribery Act 2010 (“UK Bribery Act”) and other anti-corruption laws, anti-bribery laws and regulations, as well as anti-boycott regulations, to which they are subject. As a result, we may be adversely affected because of our unwillingness to participate in transactions that violate such laws or regulations. Such laws and regulations may make it difficult in certain circumstances for us to act successfully on investment opportunities and for portfolio companies to obtain or retain business.

42

In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC have devoted greater resources to enforcement of the FCPA and have devoted greater scrutiny to investments by private equity sponsors. In addition, the UK, with enactment of the UK Bribery Act, has expanded the reach of its anti-bribery laws significantly. While Oaktree has developed and implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure strict compliance by Oaktree and its personnel with the FCPA and the UK Bribery Act and the sanctions regimes that apply to Oaktree, such policies and procedures may not be effective in all instances to prevent violations or offenses. In addition, in spite of Oaktree’s policies and procedures, affiliates of portfolio companies, particularly in cases in which we or an Other Oaktree Fund do not control such portfolio company, may engage in activities that could result in FCPA, UK Bribery Act or other violations of law. Any determination that Oaktree has violated or committed an offense under the FCPA, UK Bribery Act or other applicable anti-corruption laws or anti-bribery laws or sanctions requirements could subject Oaktree to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, reputational damage, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunctions on future conduct, securities litigation, disclosure obligations and a general loss of investor confidence, any one of which could adversely affect Oaktree’s business prospects and/or financial position, as well as our ability to achieve its investment objective and/or conduct its operations.

We may face a breach of our cyber security, which could result in adverse consequences to our operations and exposure of confidential information.

Cybersecurity incidents and cyber-attacks have been occurring globally at a more frequent and severe level and are expected to continue to increase in frequency and severity in the future. The information and technology systems of Oaktree, its affiliates, portfolio companies, issuers and service providers may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from cybersecurity breaches, computer viruses or other malicious code, network failures, computer and telecommunication failures, infiltration by unauthorized persons and other security breaches, usage errors or malfeasance by their respective professionals or service providers, power, communications or other service outages, and catastrophic events such as fires, tornadoes, floods, hurricanes, earthquakes or terrorist incidents. If unauthorized parties gain access to such information and technology systems, or if personnel abuse or misuse their access privileges, they may be able to steal, publish, delete or modify private and sensitive information, including non-public personal information related to unitholders (and their beneficial owners) and material non-public information. Although Oaktree has implemented, and portfolio companies, issuers and service providers may implement, various measures to manage risks relating to these types of events, such systems could prove to be inadequate and, if compromised, could become inoperable for extended periods of time, cease to function properly or fail to adequately secure private information. Oaktree does not control the cybersecurity plans and systems put in place by third-party service providers, and such third-party service providers may have limited indemnification obligations to Oaktree, its affiliates, us, our unitholders and/or a portfolio company or issuer, each of whom could be negatively impacted as a result. Breaches such as those involving covertly introduced malware, impersonation of authorized users and industrial or other espionage may not be identified in a timely manner or at all, even with sophisticated prevention and detection systems. This could potentially result in further harm and prevent such breaches from being addressed appropriately. The failure of these systems and/or of disaster recovery plans for any reason could cause significant interruptions in Oaktree’s, its affiliates’, our and/or a portfolio company’s or issuer’s operations and result in a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data, including personal information relating to unitholders (and their beneficial owners), material non-public information and the intellectual property and trade secrets and other sensitive information of Oaktree and/or portfolio companies or issuers. We, Oaktree and/or a portfolio company could be required to make a significant investment to remedy the effects of any such failures, harm to our reputations, legal claims that we or our respective affiliates may be subjected to regulatory action or enforcement arising out of applicable privacy and other laws, adverse publicity, and other events that may affect our business and financial performance.

Accounting and regulatory changes could make certain strategies obsolete.

In response to highly publicized losses resulting at least in part from improper accounting methods, a number of accounting pronouncements have been established by the accounting professional standards board. Certain of these pronouncements could render obsolete investment strategies which have been used routinely for many years. Changes affecting consolidation and valuations and other matters could adversely affect the viability of certain aspects of our strategies. In addition, there have recently been certain well-publicized incidents of regulators unexpectedly taking positions which prohibit strategies which had been implemented in a variety of formats for many years. In the current unsettled regulatory environment, it is impossible to predict if future regulatory developments might adversely affect us.

43

Inflation may adversely affect the business, results of operations and financial condition of our portfolio companies.

Certain countries have experienced substantial, and in some periods extremely high, rates of inflation for many years. In addition, the United States has also experienced a recent and significant increase in its inflation rate. Inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had and may continue to have very negative effects on the economies and securities markets (both public and private) of certain countries in which we may invest. There can be no assurance that high rates of inflation will not have a material adverse effect on our investments.

We may have no or limited insurance against certain catastrophic losses.

Certain losses of a catastrophic nature, such as wars, earthquakes, typhoons, terrorist attacks or other similar events, may be either uninsurable or insurable at such high rates that to maintain such coverage would cause an adverse impact on the related investments. In general, losses related to terrorism are becoming harder and more expensive to insure against. Some insurers are excluding terrorism coverage from their all-risk policies. In some cases, the insurers are offering significantly limited coverage against terrorist acts for additional premiums, which can greatly increase the total cost of casualty insurance for a property. As a result, all investments may not be insured against terrorism. If a major uninsured loss occurs, we could lose both invested capital in and anticipated profits from the affected investments.

We may not be able to obtain all required licenses.

Certain federal and local banking and other regulatory bodies or agencies inside or outside the United States may require us and/or the Adviser to obtain licenses or similar authorizations to engage in various types of lending activities, including investment in senior loans. Such licenses or authorizations may take a significant amount of time to obtain, and may require the disclosure of confidential information regarding us, a unitholder or our respective affiliates, including financial information and/or information regarding officers and directors of such investor, and we may or may not be willing or able to comply with these requirements. In addition, there can be no assurance that any such licenses or authorizations would be granted or, if so, would not impose restrictions on us. Alternatively, the Adviser may be able to structure our potential investments in a manner which would not require such licenses and authorizations, but which would be inefficient or otherwise disadvantageous for us and/or the borrower. Our or the Adviser’s inability to obtain such licenses or authorizations, or the structuring of an investment in an inefficient or otherwise disadvantageous manner, could adversely affect the Adviser’s ability to implement our strategy and our results.

Investment-Related Risks

Investments in privately owned companies pose a number of significant risks.

We will invest primarily in privately owned companies. Investments in these types of companies pose a number of significant risks. For example, such companies are not subject to the Exchange Act and other regulations that govern public companies, and, therefore, provide little information to the public. These companies often do not have third-party debt ratings or audited financial statements. Our unitholders, therefore, must rely on the ability of the Adviser to obtain adequate information through due diligence to evaluate the creditworthiness and potential returns from investing in these private companies. Additionally, these companies and their financial information will not generally be subject to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies. If the Adviser is unable to uncover all material information about these companies, it may not make a fully informed investment decision, and our unitholders may lose money on our investments.

In addition, we, the Adviser, its affiliates and their directors, executive management team and members, and the Investment Professionals may, in the ordinary course of business, be named as defendants in litigation arising from our investments in such portfolio companies.

Further, investments in such companies tend to be less liquid.

44

Interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial impact on our investments.

General interest rate fluctuations and changes in credit spreads on floating rate loans may have a substantial negative impact on our investments and investment opportunities and, accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our rate of return on invested capital, our net investment income and our Net Asset Value. The majority of our debt investments are expected to have variable interest rates that reset periodically based on benchmarks such as the SOFR, the Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”), the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), the federal funds rate, prime rate or any other offered rate, benchmark or index (collectively, “Benchmark Rates”). An increase in interest rates may make it more difficult for our portfolio companies to service their obligations under the debt investments that we will hold and increase defaults even where our investment income increases. Rising interest rates could also cause borrowers to shift cash from other productive uses to the payment of interest, which may have a material adverse effect on their business and operations and could, over time, lead to increased defaults. Additionally, as interest rates increase and the corresponding risk of a default by borrowers increases, the liquidity of higher interest rate loans may decrease as fewer investors may be willing to purchase such loans in the secondary market in light of the increased risk of a default by the borrower and the heightened risk of a loss of an investment in such loans. Decreases in credit spreads on debt that pays a floating rate of return would have an impact on the income generation of our floating rate assets. Trading prices for debt that pays a fixed rate of return tend to fall as interest rates rise. Trading prices tend to fluctuate more for fixed rate securities that have longer maturities.

Conversely, if interest rates decline, borrowers may refinance their loans at lower interest rates, which could shorten the average life of the loans and reduce the associated returns on the investment, as well as require Oaktree and the Investment Professionals to incur management time and expense to re-deploy such proceeds, including on terms that may not be as favorable as our existing loans.

In addition, because we intend to borrow money to make investments, our net investment income will depend, in part, upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest those funds. As a result, we can offer no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income.

Certain of our investments may have variable interest rates based on LIBOR or another Benchmark Rate.

To the extent that (i) our investments and/or (ii) our credit arrangements or facilities, hedging activities, derivative- or other structures, in each case, are subject to, utilize or otherwise reference, whether directly or indirectly, a variable interest rate that is based on (or calculated with reference to SOFR, SONIA, LIBOR or any other Benchmark Rate), we may be subject to certain material risks, some of which are described below.

LIBOR has historically been and presently is, and other Benchmark Rates may presently be, and/or may in the future become, the subject of manipulation, regulatory scrutiny and/or reform, phase-out, permanent discontinuation, replacement, tremendous volatility, and other change(s) which may have resulted and/or may result in, among others (i) such Benchmark Rate being artificially lower (or higher) than it otherwise would have been; (ii) changes to the applicable calculation and/or valuation methodology; and/or (iii) market uncertainty as to the current and/or future status of any such Benchmark Rate.

In July 2017, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) announced its intention to cease compelling panel banks to submit quotes for LIBOR and to phase-out the LIBOR Benchmark Rate by December 31, 2021. In March 2021, the ICE Benchmark Administration (“IBA”), the FCA-regulated LIBOR administrator, confirmed its intention to cease the publication of (i) the one-week and two-month United States Dollar (“USD”)-LIBOR tenors and (ii) British pound-, euro-, Swiss franc- and Japanese yen-LIBOR tenors immediately following the LIBOR publication on December 31, 2021 (while continuing the publication of certain British pound- and Japanese yen-LIBOR tenors on a “synthetic” basis through the end of 2022), and cease publication of the remaining USD-LIBOR tenors immediately following the LIBOR publication on June 30, 2023. It is possible that the IBA and the panel banks could continue to produce certain LIBOR tenors or that the FCA could deem LIBOR to be no longer representative of its underlying market prior to June 30, 2023, but no assurance can be given that any LIBOR tenors will survive through June 30, 2023. The transition away from LIBOR could cause a disruption in the credit markets generally, the full extent of which cannot be foreseen, and which could negatively impact our investments and/or our business, financial condition and results of operations.

45

Regulators and market participants are working to establish adequate replacement rates and LIBOR replacement mechanisms. In April 2018, the Bank of England began publishing SONIA, its alternative Benchmark Rate for GDP-LIBOR. In March 2020, the Federal Reserve began publishing 30-, 90- and 180-day tenor SOFR Averages and a SOFR Index for SOFR, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee’s (“ARRC”) nominated replacement for USD-LIBOR. LIBOR, which is a forward-looking, unsecured, credit-sensitive rate, differs significantly from SOFR, which is an overnight rate, secured by U.S. Treasury Notes, akin to risk-free and, at least historically, discounted to LIBOR. Various permutations of SOFR emerged, including “Term SOFR” and “Daily Simple SOFR”, as well as credit-spread adjustments (“CSAs”) to compensate lenders for the difference in economic value. On July 29, 2021, the ARRC formally recommended the forward-looking Term SOFR Rate published by CME Group, the world’s largest financial derivatives exchange, as the Benchmark Rate replacement for USD-LIBOR. The forward-looking Term SOFR is widely expected to be the replacement Benchmark Rate for USD-LIBOR and many credit facilities and financial instruments have already transitioned to (or are issued with) SOFR. Nevertheless, credit markets (especially private credit) are still developing, with continuing focus on minimizing lenders’ economic value transfer at the time of transition. On December 3, 2021, the ARRC released a statement selecting and recommending forms of SOFR, along with associated spread adjustments and conforming changes, to replace references to one-week and two-month USD-LIBOR.

The transition from LIBOR may involve, among other things, increased volatility or illiquidity in markets for loans, instruments or securities that, either directly or indirectly use, or are based on or calculated with reference to LIBOR. In March 2022, Congress passed the Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act (the “LIBOR Act”) to establish a uniform, federal solution to replace LIBOR as the applicable rate or reference for certain contracts, agreements, securities, instruments or other assets that use or reference USD-LIBOR and lack fallback provisions, or contain insufficient fallback provisions (i.e., identify neither a specific replacement Benchmark Rate nor a determining person with authority to determine such replacement) (the “Covered Contracts”). The LIBOR Act provides that, as of the first London banking day after June 30, 2023 (or such other date as the Federal Reserve Board determines that any LIBOR tenor will cease to be published or cease to be representative), the Benchmark Rate (including the applicable tenor spread adjustment) identified by the Federal Reserve Board will be the applicable replacement Benchmark Rate, and all conforming technical, administrative, operational, and other modifications necessary to implement such replacement will be effective automatically for such Covered Contracts. The LIBOR Act expressly supersedes any state-level LIBOR transition legislation and provides that the Federal Reserve Board will promulgate regulations to carry out the LIBOR Act within 180 days after its enactment.

Even if one or more replacement Benchmark Rates (e.g., Term SOFR) is adopted uniformly across all public and private credit markets (including direct lending markets), the transition away from LIBOR is complex and could have a material adverse effect on our investments, and/or our business, financial condition and results of operations, including, without limitation, as a result of: (i) adverse changes in (a) pricing and/or availability of existing or prospective investments, (b) the value of our investments, (c) the anticipated hold time of an investment prior to its repayment or refinancing, and/or (d) the ability to buy, sell, or otherwise transfer our investments in secondary markets, (ii) increased our cost of borrowing, or decrease to the interest rate (or anticipated interest rate) earned by us as a holder of our investments for any number of reasons, including due to a Benchmark Rate that is not reflective of the then-current (or anticipated) market interest rates during any one or more calculation periods, increased basis risk, or otherwise, (iii) reductions in the effectiveness of certain transactions, such as hedges, adverse changes in basis risk between investments and hedges, and/or basis risks within investments (e.g., securitizations), (iv) changes to valuation measurements that use or reference LIBOR, whether directly or indirectly, (v) increased operational complexities and related costs, including among others, costs of modifying Adviser processes and systems (including IT, controls, monitoring, compliance, risk, and valuation models, systems, and processes, among others) associated with the transition to, or tracking/monitoring of, one or more Benchmark Rates and any adjustment or component thereof, (vi) costs incurred by portfolio companies to manage the transition away from LIBOR. In addition, future reforms and other pressures could cause other Benchmark Rates to disappear entirely, to perform differently than in the past (as a result of a change in methodology or otherwise), create disincentives for market participants to continue to administer or participate in certain benchmarks, require amendments to debt documents, result in rates being determined for a period by applicable fallback provisions which may not operate as intended (including through rate changes and volatility), or have other consequences which cannot be predicted.

46

To the extent swaps, hedges, and/or similar derivatives or instruments that use or reference, whether directly or indirectly, LIBOR or other similar Benchmark Rates, including swaps or contracts used to manage long-term interest rate risk related to assets and/or liabilities, are entered into, in addition to the potential need to renegotiate some of those instruments to address a transition away from LIBOR, there also may be different conventions that arise in different but related market segments, which could result in mismatches between different assets and liabilities and, in turn, in possible unexpected gains and/or losses. In addition and as further described above, some of the standard conventions under consideration, including SOFR, are conceptually different than LIBOR and can behave differently from LIBOR in ways that cause greater payments or lesser payments under its derivatives or similar instruments, at least during certain market cycles. Some of these replacement rates may also be subject to compounding or similar adjustments that cause the amount of any payment referencing a replacement Benchmark Rate not to be determined until the end of the relevant calculation period, rather than at the beginning, which could lead to administrative challenges for us and our portfolio companies, and their respective affiliates and service providers and could also impact the timing, calculation of, and size of certain performance fees, payments and/or distributions made by us.

The Adviser does not have prior experience in investing during a period of Benchmark Rate transition and there can be no assurance that it will be able to manage our business or performance in a profitable manner during or after any such transition.

We face risk of loss in connection with transactions with counterparties, settlements and exposure to local intermediaries.

From time to time, certain securities markets have experienced operational clearance and settlement problems that have resulted in failed trades. These problems could cause us to miss attractive investment opportunities or result in our liability to third parties by virtue of an inability to perform our contractual obligation to deliver securities. In addition, delays and inefficiencies of the local postal, transport and banking systems could result in the loss of investment opportunities, the loss of funds (including dividends) and exposure to currency fluctuations.

Because substantially all purchases, sales, securities lending, derivatives and other transactions in which we will engage involve instruments that are not traded on an exchange, but are instead traded between counterparties based on contractual relationships, we are subject to the risk that a counterparty will not perform its obligations under the related contracts, as well as risks of transfer, clearance or settlement default. Such risks may be exacerbated with respect to non-U.S. securities or transactions with non-U.S. counterparties. There can be no assurance that a counterparty will not default and that we will not sustain a loss on a transaction as a result. Such risks may differ materially from those entailed in exchange-traded transactions that generally are backed by clearing organization guarantees, daily marking-to-market and settlement of positions and segregation and minimum capital requirements applicable to intermediaries. There can be no assurance that the Adviser’s monitoring activities will be sufficient to adequately control counterparty risk.

In situations where we place assets in the care of a custodian or are required to post margin or other collateral with a counterparty, the custodian or counterparty may fail to segregate such assets or collateral, as applicable, or may commingle the assets or collateral with the relevant custodian’s or counterparty’s own assets or collateral, as applicable. As a result, in the event of the bankruptcy or insolvency of any custodian or counterparty, our excess assets and collateral may be subject to the conflicting claims of the creditors of the relevant custodian or counterparty, and we may be exposed to the risk of a court treating us as a general unsecured creditor of such custodian or counterparty, rather than as the owner of such assets or collateral, as the case may be.

Certain of our transactions may be undertaken through local brokers, banks or other organizations in the countries in which we make investments, and we will be subject to the risk of default, insolvency or fraud of such organizations. The collection, transfer and deposit of bearer securities and cash expose us to a variety of risks, including theft, loss and destruction. Finally, we will be dependent upon the general soundness of the banking systems of countries in which investments will be made.

47

We may face significant environmental liability in connection with our investments.

We may face significant environmental liability in connection with our investments. When compared to the United States, the historical lack or inadequacy of environmental regulation in certain non-U.S. countries has led to the widespread pollution of air, ground and water resources. The legislative framework for environmental liability in these countries has not been fully established or implemented. The extent of the responsibility, if any, for the costs of abating environmental hazards may be unclear when we are considering an investment.

We may invest in derivative instruments from time to time, which present various risks, including market, counterparty, operational and liquidity risks.

Subject to applicable provisions of the Investment Company Act and applicable regulations promulgated by the CFTC, we may enter into hedging transactions, which may expose it to risks associated with such transactions. Such hedging may utilize instruments such as forward contracts, currency options and interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors to seek to hedge against fluctuations in the relative values of our portfolio positions and amounts due under any credit facility from changes in currency exchange rates and market interest rates. Use of these hedging instruments may include counterparty credit risk. Hedging against a decline in the values of our portfolio positions does not eliminate the possibility of fluctuations in the values of such positions and amounts due under our credit facilities or prevent losses if the values of such positions decline. However, such hedging can establish other positions designed to gain from those same developments, thereby offsetting the decline in the value of such portfolio positions. Such hedging transactions may also limit the opportunity for gain if the values of the underlying portfolio positions should increase. Moreover, it may not be possible to hedge against an exchange rate or interest rate fluctuation that is so generally anticipated that we are not able to enter into a hedging transaction at an acceptable price.

The success of any hedging transactions will depend on our ability to correctly predict movements in currencies and interest rates. Therefore, while we may enter into such transactions to seek to reduce currency exchange rate and interest rate risks, unanticipated changes in currency exchange rate or interest rates may result in poorer overall investment performance than if we had not engaged in any such hedging transactions. In addition, the degree of correlation between price movements of the instruments used in a hedging strategy and price movements in the portfolio positions being hedged may vary. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, we may not seek to (or be able to) establish a perfect correlation between such hedging instruments and the portfolio holdings or credit facilities being hedged. Any such imperfect correlation may prevent us from achieving the intended hedge and expose us to risk of loss. In addition, it may not be possible to hedge fully or perfectly against currency fluctuations affecting the value of securities denominated in non-U.S. currencies because the value of those securities is likely to fluctuate as a result of factors not related to currency fluctuations.

We will bear certain risks associated with any bridge financing we provide to portfolio companies.

We may provide bridge financing to a portfolio company in order to facilitate an investment we organize. Such bridge financings would typically be convertible into more permanent, long-term positions. We will bear the risk of any changes in capital markets, which may adversely affect the ability to refinance any bridge investments. For reasons not always in our or the Adviser’s control, such refinancings may not occur and such bridge financings may remain outstanding. In such event, the failure to refinance could lead to increased risk and cost to us.

Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued, “when, as and if issued,” delayed delivery or forward commitment basis could increase the volatility of our Net Asset Value.

Securities purchased or sold by us on a when issued, “when, as and if issued,” delayed delivery or forward commitment basis are subject to market fluctuation, and no interest or dividends accrue to the purchaser prior to the settlement date. At the time of delivery of the securities, the value may be more or less than the purchase or sale price. In the case of “when, as and if issued” securities, we could lose an investment opportunity if the securities are not issued. An increase in the percentage of our assets committed to the purchase of securities on a when issued, “when, as and if issued,” delayed delivery or forward commitment basis may increase the volatility of our Net Asset Value. Certain of such transactions are likely to be subject to new mandatory margin rules issued by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). FINRA’s changes to Rule 4210, which are not yet effective, may increase the cost to us of engaging in such transactions.

48

New laws and regulations may limit our ability to use derivatives.

In November 2020, the SEC adopted Rule 18f-4 under the Investment Company Act regarding the ability of a BDC to use derivatives and other transactions that create future payment or delivery obligations (except reverse repurchase agreements and similar financing transactions). Under the newly adopted rule, BDCs that use derivatives will be subject to a value-at-risk leverage limit, a derivatives risk management program and testing requirements and requirements related to board reporting. These new requirements will apply unless the BDC qualifies as a “limited derivatives user,” as defined under the adopted rules. We intend to conduct its operations so as to qualify as a limited derivatives user. Under the new rule, a BDC may enter into an unfunded commitment agreement that is not a derivatives transaction, such as an agreement to provide financing to a portfolio company, if the BDC has, among other things, a reasonable belief, at the time it enters into such an agreement, that it will have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet its obligations with respect to all of its unfunded commitment agreements, in each case as it becomes due. Collectively, these requirements may limit our ability to use derivatives and/or enter into certain other financial contracts.

We will invest in significant amounts of loans or other debt instruments, which pose unique risks.

Our investment program will be comprised of investments in loans or other debt instruments, focused on direct lending transactions. These obligations are subject to unique risks, including (a) the possible invalidation of an investment transaction as a fraudulent conveyance under relevant creditors’ rights laws, (b) so-called lender-liability claims by the issuer of the obligations and (c) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations. In analyzing each loan or other debt instrument, we will compare the relative significance of the risks against the expected benefits of the investment. Successful claims by third parties arising from these and other risks, absent certain conduct by the Adviser, Oaktree, their respective affiliates and certain other individuals, will be borne by us.

Loans or other debt instruments made or otherwise acquired by us may become non-performing following their origination or acquisition for a wide variety of reasons. Such non-performing loans or debt instruments may require a substantial amount of workout negotiations or restructuring, which may entail, among other things, a substantial reduction in the interest rate and a substantial write-down of principal. It is possible that we may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on collateral securing one or more loans purchased by us. The foreclosure process varies jurisdiction by jurisdiction and can be lengthy and expensive.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

The characterization of an investment as senior debt or senior secured debt does not mean that such debt will necessarily have repayment priority with respect to all other obligations of an issuer. Issuers may have, and/or may be permitted to incur, other debt and liabilities that rank equally with or senior to the senior loans in which we invest. If other indebtedness is incurred that ranks in parity in right of payment or proceeds of collateral with respect to senior loans in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors in the event of a liquidation, reorganization, insolvency, dissolution or bankruptcy of such an issuer. Where we hold a first lien to secure senior indebtedness, the issuers may be permitted to issue other senior loans with liens that rank junior to the first liens granted to us. The intercreditor rights of the holders of such other junior lien debt may, in any liquidation, reorganization, insolvency, dissolution or bankruptcy of such an issuer, affect the recovery that we would have been able to achieve in the absence of such other debt.

Even where the senior loans we hold are secured by a perfected lien over a substantial portion of the assets of an issuer and its subsidiaries, the issuer and its subsidiaries will often be able to incur a substantial amount of additional indebtedness, which may have an exclusive lien over particular assets. For example, debt and other liabilities incurred by non-guarantor subsidiaries of issuers will be structurally senior to the debt we hold. Accordingly, any such debt and other liabilities of such subsidiaries would, in the event of liquidation, dissolution, insolvency, reorganization or bankruptcy of such subsidiary, be repaid in full before any distributions to an obligor of the loans we hold. Furthermore, these other assets over which other lenders have a lien may be substantially more liquid or valuable than the assets over which we have a lien. We may also invest in second-lien secured debt, which compounds the risks described in this paragraph.

49

We may invest in secured or unsecured loans and are subject to risk of loss upon a borrower default.

In the event of a default by a borrower, we might not receive payments to which we are entitled and thereby could experience a decline in the value of our investments in the borrower. If we invest in debt that is not secured by collateral, in the event of such default, we will have only an unsecured claim against the borrower. In the case of loans that are secured by collateral, while the Adviser generally expects the value of the collateral to be greater than the value of such secured loans, the value of the collateral may actually be equal to or less than the value of such loans or may decline below the outstanding amount of such loans subsequent to our investment. Our ability to have access to the collateral may be limited by bankruptcy and other insolvency laws. Under certain circumstances, the collateral may be released with the consent of the lenders or pursuant to the terms of the underlying loan agreement with the borrower. There is no assurance that the liquidation of the collateral securing a loan would occur in a timely fashion or would satisfy the borrower’s obligation in the event of nonpayment of scheduled interest or principal, or that the collateral could be readily liquidated. As a result, we might not receive full payment on a secured loan investment to which we are entitled and thereby may experience a decline in the value of, or a loss on, the investment.

We may invest in second lien loans and participations, which pose unique risks.

Our investment program may include investments in second lien loans and participations. These obligations are subject to unique risks, including: (a) the possible invalidation of investment transactions as fraudulent conveyances or preferential payments under relevant creditors’ rights laws or the subordination of claims under so-called “equitable subordination” common law principles, (b) so-called lender-liability claims by the issuer of the obligations, (c) environmental liabilities that may arise with respect to collateral securing the obligations, and (d) limitations on our ability to directly enforce its rights with respect to participations. In analyzing each second lien loan or participation, the Investment Professionals compare the relative significance of the risks against the expected benefits of the investment. Successful claims by third parties arising from these and other risks, absent certain conduct by the Adviser, Oaktree, their respective affiliates, and certain other individuals, will be borne by us. In addition, the settlement process for the purchase of second lien loans can take significantly longer than the timeframes established by the Loan Syndications & Trading Association and comparable non U.S. bodies. The longer a trade is outstanding between the counterparties, the greater the risk of additional operational and settlement issues and the potential for our counterparty to fail to perform. In addition, the nature of second lien loans will entail risks related to priority with respect to collateral, including (a) the subordination of our claims to a senior lien in terms of the coverage and recovery of the collateral and (b) the prohibition of, or limitation on, the right to foreclose on a second lien or exercise other rights as a second lien holder. In certain cases, therefore, no recovery may be available from a defaulted second lien loan.

If we purchase a participation, we will not have established any direct contractual relationship with the borrower. We will be required to rely on the lender or the participant that sold the participation not only for the enforcement of our rights against the borrower but also for the receipt and processing of payments due to us under the participation. We will thus be subject to the credit risk of both the borrower and the selling lender or participant. Because it may be necessary to assert through the selling lender or participant such rights as may exist against the borrower, in the event the borrower fails to pay principal and interest when due, such assertion of rights against the borrower may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that would be involved if we could enforce its rights against the borrower directly.

We may invest in companies that are highly leveraged, and, in most cases, our investments in such companies will be in below investment grade securities, which are viewed as having predominately speculative characteristics.

We may invest in companies that are highly leveraged, and, in most cases, our investments in such companies will not be rated by any rating agency. If such investments were rated, the Adviser believes that they would likely receive a rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization of below investment grade (i.e., below BBB- or Baa), which is often referred to as “high yield” and “junk.” Exposure to below investment grade securities involves certain risks, and those securities are viewed as having predominately speculative characteristics with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Securities in the lower-rated categories and comparable non-rated securities are subject to greater risk of loss of principal and interest than higher-rated and comparable non-rated securities and are generally considered to be predominantly speculative with

50

respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Such issuers typically are highly leveraged, with significant burdens on cash flow and, therefore, involve a high degree of financial risk. During an economic downturn or recession, securities of financially troubled or operationally troubled issuers are more likely to go into default than securities of other issuers. Because investors generally perceive that there are greater risks associated with the lower-rated and comparable non-rated securities, the yields and prices of such securities may be more volatile than those for higher-rated and comparable non-rated securities. The market for lower-rated and comparable non-rated securities is thinner, often less liquid and less active than that for higher-rated or comparable non-rated securities, and the market prices of such securities are subject to erratic and abrupt movements. The spread between bid and asked prices for such securities may be greater than normally expected. Such factors can adversely affect the prices at which these securities can be sold and may even make it difficult to sell such securities.

Investment in the securities of financially troubled issuers and operationally troubled issuers involves a high degree of credit and market risk. These financial difficulties may never be overcome and may cause issuers to become subject to bankruptcy proceedings.

We may invest in event-driven special situations.

We may invest in companies that become involved in (or the target of) acquisition attempts or tender offers or in companies involved in or undergoing spin-offs or reorganizations, or that become the subject of work-outs, liquidations or bankruptcies or other catalytic changes or similar transactions. In any investment opportunity involving any such type of special situation, there exists the risk that the contemplated transaction either will be unsuccessful, will take considerable time or will result in a distribution of cash or a new security the value of which will be less than the purchase price to us of the security or other financial instrument in respect of which such distribution is received. Similarly, if an anticipated transaction does not in fact occur, we may be required to sell our investment at a loss. Because there is substantial uncertainty concerning the outcome of transactions involving financially troubled companies in which we may be invested, there is a potential risk of our entire investment in such companies.

We will invest in lower-rated loans and debt instruments, which are subject to greater risk of loss of principal and interest than higher-rated loans and debt instruments.

Since we will invest in loans and other debt instruments that are rated below investment grade by the various credit rating agencies, or trade at a yield similar to non-investment grade debt (and in comparable non-rated loans), the Adviser must take into account the special nature of such loans and debt instruments and certain special considerations in assessing the risks associated with such investments. Loans and debt instruments rated in the lower rating categories are subject to greater risk of loss of principal and interest than higher-rated loans and debt instruments and are generally considered to be predominantly speculative with respect to the borrower’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal. They are also considered to be subject to greater risk than investment grade rated debt instruments in the case of deterioration of general economic conditions. Because investors perceive that there are greater risks associated with such loans and debt instruments, the yields and prices of such loans and debt instruments may be more volatile than those for higher-rated loans and debt instruments. The market for lower-rated loans and debt instruments is thinner, often less liquid and less active than that for higher-rated loans and debt instruments, which can adversely affect the prices at which such loans and debt instruments can be sold and may even make it impractical to sell such loans or debt instruments. It should be recognized that economic downturns typically have a negative effect on the debt market and on the value of the loans and debt instruments held by us as well as on the ability of the borrowers of such debt, especially highly leveraged borrowers, to service principal and interest payment obligations to meet their projected business goals or to obtain additional financing. If a borrower of a loan owned by us defaults on such loan, we may incur additional expenses to seek recovery, and the possibility of any recovery may be subject to the expense and uncertainty of insolvency proceedings.

We may invest in bank loans, which have associated risks that are different from those of other debt instruments.

When compared to the purchase of high yield bonds, which typically settle within three business days after the initial trade date, the settlement process for the purchase of bank loans can take several days and, in certain instances, several weeks longer than a bond trade. The longer a trade is outstanding between the counterparties may increase the risk of additional operational and settlement issues and the potential for our counterparty to fail to perform.

51

Borrowers may elect to repay the principal on an obligation earlier than expected.

Our investments will typically permit the borrowers to voluntarily prepay directly originated senior secured loans and other debt investments at any time, either with no or a nominal prepayment premium. Borrowers may elect to repay the principal on an obligation earlier than expected. This may happen, including when there is a decline in interest rates, or when an issuer’s improved credit or operating or financial performance allows the refinancing of certain classes of debt with lower cost debt. Assuming an improvement in a borrower’s or the credit market conditions, early repayments of the debt held by us could increase. Generally, our investments are not expected to include a significant premium payable upon the repayment of such senior debt.

We may engage in short sale transactions.

We may engage in short sale transactions for hedging purposes. Short sales can, in certain circumstances, substantially increase the impact of adverse price movements on our portfolio. A short sale of a security involves the risk of a theoretically unlimited loss from a theoretically unlimited increase in the market price of the security that could result in an inability to cover the short position. In addition, there can be no assurance that securities necessary to cover a short position will be available for purchase.

We and our portfolio companies may be leveraged.

Our investments are expected to include companies whose capital structures may have significant leverage. Such investments are inherently more sensitive to declines in revenues and to increases in expenses and interest rates. The leveraged capital structure of such investments will increase the exposure of the portfolio companies to adverse economic factors, such as downturns in the economy or deterioration in the condition of the portfolio company or its industry. Additionally, the securities we acquire may be the most junior in what will typically be a complex capital structure, and, thus, subject to the greatest risk of loss.

Furthermore, it is expected that we will engage in certain investment activities that involve the use of leverage. The cumulative effect of the use of leverage by us in a market that moves adversely to our investments could result in a loss to the Company that would be greater than if leverage had not been used, including loss of the entire investment and also the possibility of loss exceeding the original amount of a particular investment. To the extent that we engage in any leveraging, we will be subject to the risks normally associated with debt financing, including those relating to the ability to refinance and the insufficiency of cash flow to meet principal and interest payments, which could significantly reduce or even eliminate the value of our investments. Leveraging the capital structure will mean that third parties, such as banks, may be entitled to the cash flow generated by such investments prior to the Company receiving a return. Also, if one of our assets is mortgaged or otherwise used as collateral to secure repayment of indebtedness and such payments are not made, the asset could be foreclosed upon by the lender or otherwise transferred to the lender.

There are also financing costs associated with leverage, and each leveraged investment will involve interest rate risk to the extent that financing charges for such leveraged investment are based on a predetermined interest rate. Furthermore, to the extent that we draw capital from a subscription line to fund investments (rather than drawing down capital from our unitholders’ undrawn Capital Commitments), the amount and timing of contributions and distributions to our unitholders may be affected in a manner that in some circumstances could be potentially adverse to the unitholders.

No assurance can be given that financing for our investments will be obtained on favorable or acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, once initial financing is obtained by us, no assurance can be given that such financing will subsequently be available throughout the life of the Company or any individual investment, or that replacement financing can be obtained as intended by the Adviser. If we are unable to obtain financing, this may have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective and the return on invested capital.

Leveraged portfolio companies may pose higher risk of default.

Leveraged companies, such as those in which we plan to invest, may be more prone to bankruptcy or similar financial distress. As a result, we may need to modify the payment terms of our investments, including changes in PIK interest provisions and/or cash interest rates. The performances of leveraged companies have been, and may continue to be, negatively impacted by these economic or other conditions, which may result in our receipt of a reduced level of interest income from such portfolio companies and/or losses or charge offs related to such investments, and, in turn, may adversely affect distributable income and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

52

Our success may depend, in part, on the ability of the Adviser to effectuate loan modifications or restructure and improve the operations of portfolio companies. The activity of identifying and implementing any such restructuring programs and operating improvements entails a high degree of uncertainty. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to successfully identify and implement such restructuring programs and improvements.

We are subject to the risk that our portfolio companies may default on their obligations to us or other lenders.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize a portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the securities that we will hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, which may include the waiver of certain financial covenants, with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, we may write down the value of a portfolio company investment upon the worsening of the financial condition of the portfolio company or in anticipation of a default, which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may invest in distressed or bankrupt companies, and investing in companies involved in bankruptcy proceedings presents significant risks.

We may acquire or hold securities and other obligations of distressed or bankrupt companies. At times, distressed debt obligations may not produce income and may require us to bear certain extraordinary expenses (including legal, accounting, valuation and transaction expenses) in order to protect and recover our investment. Therefore, to the extent we invest in distressed debt, our ability to achieve current income for our unitholders may be diminished, particularly where the portfolio company has negative EBITDA.

We also will be subject to significant uncertainty as to when and in what manner and for what value the distressed debt we hold will eventually be satisfied whether through a liquidation, an exchange offer or plan of reorganization involving the distressed debt securities or a payment of some amount in satisfaction of the obligation. In addition, even if an exchange offer is made or plan of reorganization is adopted with respect to distressed debt we hold, there can be no assurance that the securities or other assets we receive in connection with such exchange offer or plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was made.

Moreover, any securities we receive upon completion of an exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to resale. As a result of our participation in negotiations with respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with respect to an issuer of distressed debt, we may be restricted from disposing of such securities.

We may make investments that could require substantial workout negotiations or restructuring in the event of a default or bankruptcy. There are a number of significant risks when investing in companies involved in bankruptcy proceedings, including the following: First, many events in a bankruptcy are the product of contested matters and adversary proceedings that are beyond the control of the creditors. Second, a bankruptcy filing may have adverse and permanent effects on a company. For instance, the company may lose its market position and key employees and otherwise become incapable of restoring itself as a viable entity. Further, if the proceeding is converted to a liquidation, the liquidation value of the company may not equal the liquidation value that was believed to exist at the time of the investment. Third, the duration of a bankruptcy proceeding is difficult to predict. A creditor’s return on investment can be impacted adversely by delays while the plan of reorganization is being negotiated, approved by the creditors and confirmed by the bankruptcy court, and until it ultimately becomes effective. Fourth, certain claims, such as claims for taxes, wages, employee and worker pensions and certain trade claims, may have priority by law over the claims of certain creditors. Fifth, the administrative costs in connection with a bankruptcy proceeding are frequently high and will be paid out of the debtor’s estate prior to any return to creditors. Sixth, creditors can lose their ranking and priority in a variety of circumstances, including if they exercise

53

“domination and control” over a debtor, and other creditors can demonstrate that they have been harmed by such actions. Seventh, we may seek representation on creditors’ committees and as a member of a creditors’ committee, we may owe certain obligations generally to all creditors similarly situated that the committee represents, and we may be subject to various trading or confidentiality restrictions. If the Adviser concludes that our membership on a creditors’ committee entails obligations or restrictions that conflict with the duties we owe to our unitholders, or that otherwise outweigh the advantages of such membership, we will not seek membership in, or will resign from, that committee. Because we will indemnify the Adviser or any other person serving on a committee on our behalf for claims arising from breaches of those obligations to the extent permissible under the Investment Company Act, indemnification payments could adversely affect the return on our investment in an asset or company undergoing reorganization.

There is a possibility that we may incur substantial or total losses on our investments and, in certain circumstances, subject us to certain additional potential liabilities that may exceed the value of our original investment. For example, under certain circumstances, a lender who has inappropriately exercised control over the management and policies of a debtor may have its claims subordinated or disallowed or may be found liable for damages suffered by parties as a result of such actions. In addition, under certain circumstances, payments to us and distributions to our unitholders may be reclaimed if any such payment or distribution is later determined to have been a fraudulent conveyance, preferential payment or similar transaction under applicable bankruptcy and insolvency laws. Furthermore, bankruptcy laws may delay our ability to realize on collateral for loan positions we hold, or may adversely affect the priority of such loans through doctrines such as equitable subordination or may result in a restructuring of the debt through principles such as the “cramdown” provisions of the bankruptcy laws. In addition, the bankruptcy laws and regimes of certain jurisdictions outside the United States may be untested, subject to manipulation or change and not provide a proven venue to resolve a company’s bankruptcy estate.

Differing accounting standards for non-U.S. investments exposes us to additional risks.

Accounting standards in certain countries generally do not correspond to international accounting standards, and in some countries, national accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards may not yet be in place. The information appearing on the financial statements of the companies in those countries may not reflect financial positions or results of operations in the way they would be reflected if the financial statements had been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Investors in such companies generally have access to less reliable information than investors in more economically sophisticated countries. The timeliness of financial statement preparation in certain countries may also differ from that of the United States. In addition, the scope and nature of our due diligence activities in connection with portfolio investments in certain non-U.S. countries will be more limited than due diligence reviews conducted in more developed economies because reliable information is often unavailable or prohibitively costly to obtain. The lower standards of due diligence and financial controls in investments in certain non-U.S. countries increase the likelihood of material losses on such investments.

We may have difficulty successfully pursuing claims in the courts of non-U.S. countries.

Because the effectiveness of the judicial systems in the countries in which we may invest varies, we (or any portfolio company) may have difficulty in foreclosing or successfully pursuing claims in the courts of such countries, as compared to the United States or other countries. Further, to the extent we or a portfolio company may obtain a judgment but is required to seek its enforcement in the courts of one of the countries in which we invest, there can be no assurance that such courts will enforce such judgment. The laws of many nations often lack the sophistication and consistency found in the United States with respect to foreclosure, bankruptcy, corporate reorganization and creditors’ rights.

We are subject to risk of becoming involved in litigation by third parties as a result of our investment activities.

Our investment activities subject us to the risks of becoming involved in litigation by third parties. This risk is somewhat greater where we exercise control of, or significant influence in, a company’s direction. In addition, in the course of providing managerial assistance to certain portfolio companies, certain of our or the Adviser’s officers and directors may serve as directors on the boards of such companies. In connection therewith, we will be required to indemnify the Adviser and its affiliates, and each of their respective members, officers, directors, employees, shareholders, partners, managers, and certain other persons who serve at the request of the Adviser or its affiliates on our behalf for liabilities incurred in connection with our affairs. Such liabilities may be

54

material and have an adverse effect on the returns to our unitholders. The expense of defending against claims by third parties and paying any amounts pursuant to settlements or judgments would, absent certain conduct by the Adviser, be payable from our assets, including the unpaid Capital Commitments of our unitholders. It should also be noted that the Adviser may, but shall not be required to, purchase insurance for us, the Adviser and their affiliates, employees, agents and representatives. Additionally, the Investment Advisory Agreement, to the extent permitted by law, will limit the circumstances under which the Adviser can be held liable to us and our unitholders. As a result, our unitholders may have a more limited right of action in certain cases than they would in the absence of this provision.

We may be subject to potential allegations of lender liability.

In recent years, a number of judicial decisions in the United States have upheld the right of borrowers to sue lending institutions on the basis of various evolving legal theories (collectively termed “lender liability”). Generally, lender liability is founded upon the premise that an institutional lender has violated a duty (whether implied or contractual) of good faith and fair dealing owed to the borrower or has assumed a degree of control over the borrower resulting in the creation of a fiduciary duty owed to the borrower or its other creditors. We may be subject to potential allegations of lender liability. In addition, courts have in some cases applied the doctrine of equitable subordination to subordinate the claim of a lending institution against a borrower to claims of other creditors of the borrower when the lending institution is found to have engaged in unfair, inequitable or fraudulent conduct. Such claims may be brought even if we acquired the loan on a secondary basis.

The exercise of control of, or significant influence over, a portfolio company may impose additional risks of liability.

In certain circumstances, including if we invest in a different part of the capital structure as Other Oaktree Funds, our holdings may be aggregated with those of such Other Oaktree Funds, which collectively may be deemed to give these funds and accounts controlling interests in or the ability to significantly influence a portfolio company. The exercise of control of, or significant influence over, a portfolio company may impose additional risks of liability for environmental damage, product defects, failure to supervise management, violation of governmental regulations (including securities laws) or other types of liability in which the limited liability generally characteristic of business ownership may be ignored. In addition, a greater level of involvement by Oaktree in a portfolio company may subject us to a greater risk of litigation by third parties. If these liabilities were to arise, we might suffer a significant loss. We will be required to indemnify the Adviser and others in connection with such litigation, as well as other matters arising as a result of management of the Company, subject to certain conditions.

We are subject to contingent liabilities on disposition of our investments.

In connection with the disposition of an investment in a portfolio company, we may be required to make representations about the business and financial affairs of such company typical of those made in connection with the sale of any business. We also may be required to indemnify the purchasers of such investment with respect to certain matters, including the accuracy of such representations. These arrangements may result in contingent liabilities for which the Adviser may establish reserves or escrows.

Portfolio companies of Other Oaktree Funds may compete with our portfolio companies.

Portfolio companies of Other Oaktree Funds may engage in, or may in the future engage in, a broad range of business activities and may invest in, or transact with, companies whose operations may be substantially similar to and/or competitive with the portfolio companies in which we may invest. The performance and operation of such other businesses and investments could conflict with and adversely affect the performance and operation of our portfolio companies and may adversely affect the prices and availability of business opportunities or transactions available to us and such portfolio companies.

In addition, the activities of portfolio companies of Other Oaktree Funds may have an effect on the existing investments of and/or investment opportunities available to us. For example, any such investment could result in antitrust complexities for us, or any such investment in a particular industry could limit our ability to pursue other opportunities within the same or related industries. Furthermore, the activities of such portfolio companies of Other Oaktree Funds may subject us and/or our portfolio companies and/or issuers to laws, rules and/or regulations of

55

U.S., European and/or any other jurisdictions, in each case, that would not otherwise be applicable to us or our portfolio companies or issuers. Compliance with such laws, rules and regulations may place material burdens and/or limitations on, and may give rise to material costs borne by, us and/or our portfolio companies and/or issuers (including payment of back-taxes and penalties and compliance with additional reporting obligations), any or all of which may have a material adverse effect on our activities and operations.

We may invest in subordinated loans.

Our portfolio companies may have, or may be permitted to incur, other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may entitle the holders to receive payments of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments with respect to the debt instruments in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligation to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt instruments in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company.

We may invest in loans that have limited amortization requirements.

We may invest directly in senior secured loans, including at initial issuance, which would typically have limited mandatory amortization and interim repayment requirements. A low level of amortization of any directly originated senior secured loans over the life of such senior secured loans may increase the risk that an issuer will not be able to repay or refinance the senior secured loans we hold when it comes due at its final stated maturity.

We may have a limited ability to protect our investment in portfolio companies as a result of making non-controlling investments.

We are not expected to make investments that result in control of, or significant influence over, a company. As a result, we may have a more limited ability to protect our investment in portfolio companies than if we held a controlling interest or position of significant influence.

We may be exposed to risks associated with OID and PIK interest income.

Our investments may include OID and contractual PIK interest, which typically represents contractual interest added to a loan balance and due at the end of such loan’s term. To the extent OID or PIK interest constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to typical risks associated with such income being required to be included in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:

• OID and PIK instruments may have higher yields, which reflect the payment deferral and credit risk associated with these instruments;

• OID and PIK accruals may create uncertainty about the source of our distributions to unitholders;

• OID and PIK instruments may have unreliable valuations because their continuing accruals require continuing judgments about the collectability of the deferred payments and the value of the collateral; and

• OID and PIK instruments may represent a higher credit risk than coupon loans.

The illiquid nature of certain of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired.

We will invest in companies whose securities are not publicly traded, and whose securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or are otherwise less liquid than publicly traded securities. In fact, all of our assets may be invested in illiquid securities. The illiquidity of these investments may make it difficult for us to sell

56

these investments when desired. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had previously recorded these investments and suffer losses. Our investments may be subject to contractual or legal restrictions on resale or may otherwise be illiquid because there is usually no established trading market for such investments. In addition, we may also face restrictions on our ability to liquidate investments if the Adviser or any of its affiliates have material nonpublic information regarding the portfolio company.

We may utilize different investment techniques not described in this Registration Statement.

We may employ investment techniques and invest in other instruments that the Adviser believes will help achieve our investment objective, whether or not such investment techniques or instruments are specifically described herein. Consistent with our investment objective, we may invest in financial instruments of any and all types, which exist now or are hereafter created. Such investments may entail risks not described herein, any of which may adversely affect us.

We may be subject to risks associated with currency exchange transactions.

The Adviser anticipates that a portion of our investments could be made in countries other than the United States and, consequently, we are expected to make certain investments denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Changes in the rates of exchange between the U.S. dollar and other currencies will have an effect, which could be adverse, on our performance, amounts available for distribution by us and the value of investments distributed by us. Additionally, a particular non-U.S. country may impose exchange controls, devalue its currency or take other measures relating to its currency which could adversely affect us. Finally, we will incur costs in connection with conversions between various currencies.

We will not be obligated to hedge currency risks. Even if the Adviser does so, the Adviser may not be able to put a hedge in place on commercially reasonable terms given the credit terms offered by our counterparties or the volatility of the currency. There can be no guarantee that instruments suitable for hedging market shifts will be available at the time when we wish to use them, or that any hedge would reduce applicable risks. More specifically, if we hedge currency risk, we do not expect that the full risk of currency fluctuations can be eliminated due to the complexity of the investment characteristics of our investment portfolio and limitations in the non-U.S. currency market. We will conduct our non-U.S. currency exchange transactions in anticipation of funding investment commitments or receiving proceeds upon dispositions. In addition, to hedge against adverse stock market shifts, we may purchase put and call options on stocks and write covered call options on stocks.

We may make investments in “covenant-lite” loans.

Although the loans in which we expect to invest will generally have financial maintenance covenants, which are used to proactively address materially adverse changes in a portfolio company’s financial performance, we may invest to a lesser extent in “covenant-lite” loans. We use the term “covenant-lite” to refer generally to loans that do not have financial maintenance covenants. Generally, “covenant-lite” loans provide borrower companies more freedom to negatively impact lenders because their covenants are incurrence-based, which means they are only tested and can only be breached following an affirmative action of the borrower, rather than by a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition or operating results. Accordingly, to the extent we invest in “covenant-lite” loans, we may have fewer rights against a borrower and may have a greater risk of loss on such investments as compared to investments in or exposure to loans with financial maintenance covenants.

Risks Related to an Investment in the Company and Our Common Units

We are a new company and have no operating history.

Although the Adviser utilizes experienced professionals who have successfully pursued an investment strategy similar to ours, we are a newly formed entity with no operating history upon which to evaluate our likely performance. The past performance of any other businesses or companies that have or have had an investment objective which is similar to, or different from, our investment objective is not indicative of our future performance and provides no assurance of our future results.

57

We expect to have a different investment portfolio from other businesses or companies. Accordingly, our results may differ from and are independent of the results obtained by such businesses or companies. No assurance can be given that we will be successful in obtaining suitable investments or that, if the investments are made, our objective will be achieved. There can be no assurance that any unitholder will receive any proceeds from us. We are subject to different investment limitations than certain of the Other Oaktree Funds and, accordingly, may have a materially different portfolio than such Other Oaktree Funds. In addition, the fees and expenses we will pay may be different from, and may be higher than, those applicable to the Other Oaktree Funds. There can be no assurance that we will be able to (a) successfully identify, make and realize upon any particular investment or (b) achieve desired spreads and yields to maturity (or that such performance will be commensurate with the risks associated with an investment in us). Actual realized returns will depend on, among other factors, future operating results, pace of deployment, refinancings, whether such interests are held to maturity, value of the underlying assets, foreclosures, market conditions, legal and contractual restrictions, any related transaction costs, and the timing and manner of sale, all of which may differ from the circumstances on which the valuations used in the prior performance data contained herein are based. Accordingly, an investment should only be considered by persons that can afford a loss of their entire investment. Unitholders must rely on us and the Adviser to implement investment policies, to evaluate all investment opportunities and to structure the terms of investments rather than evaluating investments in advance.

We are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any new business, including the risk that we will not achieve our investment objective and that the value of our unitholders’ investments could decline substantially or that unitholders’ investments could become worthless. We anticipate, based on the amount of proceeds raised in the initial or subsequent closings that it could take some time to invest substantially all of the capital we expect to raise due to market conditions generally and the time necessary to identify, evaluate, structure, negotiate and close suitable investments. In order to comply with the RIC diversification requirements during the startup period, we may invest proceeds in temporary investments, such as cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less from the time of investment, which we expect will earn yields substantially lower than the interest, dividend or other income that we seek to receive in respect of suitable portfolio investments. We may not be able to pay any significant distributions during this period, and any such distributions may be substantially lower than the distributions we expect to pay when our portfolio is fully invested.

An investment in us is not suitable for all investors.

An investment in us is not suitable for all investors. An investment is suitable only for sophisticated investors, and an investor must have the financial ability to understand and willingness to accept the extent of its exposure to the risks and lack of liquidity inherent in an investment in us. Investors should consult their professional advisers to assist them in making their own legal, tax, accounting and financial evaluation of the merits and risks of investment in us in light of their own circumstances and financial condition. An investment in us requires a long-term commitment, and there can be no assurance that our investment objective will be achieved or that there will be any return of capital. Therefore, investors should only invest in us if they can withstand a total loss of their investment.

Our investment portfolio may not be diversified across companies, industries, types of securities or geographic regions.

Except to the extent required as a BDC or RIC , the Adviser is not under any other obligation to diversify our investments, whether by reference to the amount invested or the industries or geographical areas in which portfolio companies operate. The Adviser may allocate capital among investments as it determines in its sole discretion, subject to the goal of maximizing the returns for us, and our unitholders will have no assurances with respect to the diversification or geographic concentration of the investment program. This lack of diversification will expose us to losses disproportionate to market declines in general if there are disproportionately greater adverse price movements in the particular investments, and our investment portfolio may be subject to more rapid changes in value than would be the case if we were required to maintain a wide diversification among companies, industries and types of securities. To the extent we hold investments concentrated in a particular issuer, security, asset class, industry or geographic region, we will be more susceptible than a more widely diversified investment partnership to the negative consequences of a single corporate, economic, political or regulatory event. Unfavorable performance by any number of investments could substantially adversely affect the aggregate returns realized by our unitholders.

58

Our board of directors has broad discretionary power with respect to our investment objective, policies and strategies.

Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive our current investment objective, operating policies and strategies without prior notice and without unitholder approval. We cannot predict the effect any changes to our current investment objective, operating policies and strategies would have on our business, Net Asset Value and operating results. However, the effects might be adverse, which could negatively impact our ability to pay distributions and cause unitholders to lose part or all of their investment.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

We have not selected the investments that we will make. Our investors will not have an opportunity to evaluate for themselves the relevant economic, financial and other information regarding our investments (even if we enter into commitments to make permitted investments prior to the Closing at which a unitholder is admitted to the Company). Therefore, purchasers of our common units will be dependent upon the judgment and ability of the Adviser and its affiliates in sourcing transactions and investing and managing our capital. No assurance can be given that the Adviser will be able to identify and obtain a sufficient number of investment opportunities to invest the full amount of capital that may be committed to us, including any leverage, or that our investment objective will be achieved. Even if sufficient investment opportunities are identified, they may be allocated first to Other Oaktree Funds.

The activity of identifying and completing investments involves a high degree of uncertainty and risk. We will be competing for investments with various other investors, such as other public and private funds, commercial and investment banks, commercial finance companies and, to the extent they provide an alternative form of financing, private equity funds, some of which may be our affiliates. Other funds may have investment objectives that overlap with ours, which may create competition for investment opportunities. Many competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us, and may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships. Furthermore, many competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the Investment Company Act and the Code impose on us. The competitive pressures could impair our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities.

To the extent that we encounter competition for investments, returns to our unitholders may decrease, including as a result of higher pricing, foregoing opportunities or negotiating fewer transactional protections in order to remain competitive. Additionally, we may incur bid, due diligence, negotiating, consulting or other costs on investments that may not be successful. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, complete and exit investments which satisfy our investment objective, or realize upon their values, or that we will be able to invest fully our committed capital.

The Adviser relies on key personnel, the loss of any of whom could impair its ability to successfully manage us, and our unitholders will have no right to control our operations.

Our success depends in substantial part on the management, skill and acumen of the Adviser and the Investment Professionals. An investment in our common units is a passive investment, and our unitholders will have no opportunity to control our day-to-day operations, including any investment or disposition decisions. Subjective decisions made by the Adviser may cause us to incur losses or to miss profit opportunities on which we would otherwise have capitalized. In order to safeguard their limited liability for our liabilities and obligations, our unitholders must rely entirely on the Adviser to conduct and manage our affairs. Our unitholders will have no direct rights against third parties engaged by Oaktree in respect of us.

There can be no assurance that the Investment Professionals and such other professionals will continue to be available to the Adviser throughout the life of the Company. The loss of any of the Investment Professionals and such other professionals could have a material adverse effect on us. Moreover, certain of the Investment Professionals are also responsible for investing and managing the capital of certain Other Oaktree Funds, which require that such Investment Professionals devote considerable time to such Other Oaktree Funds instead of us.

59

We will rely on portfolio company management teams to operate their businesses successfully.

We intend to invest in healthy companies with proven operating management in place; however, there can be no assurance that such management will continue to operate successfully. Although the Adviser will monitor the performance of each investment and may make recommendations, we will rely upon management to operate the portfolio companies on a day-to-day basis and, if applicable, equity sponsors who control the boards of directors of the portfolio companies to select qualified management for such companies. In addition, certain of our investments may be in businesses with limited operating histories.

We will bear costs associated with due diligence of our potential investments, and such due diligence may not identify all risks associated with investments we make.

Before we make an investment, the Adviser will conduct such due diligence as it deems reasonable and appropriate based on the facts and circumstances applicable to the investment. Due diligence may entail marketing studies, business plan development, evaluation of important and complex business, financial, tax, accounting, regulatory and legal issues as well as background investigations of individuals. Outside professionals, consultants, legal advisors, accountants, investment banks and other third parties may be involved in the due diligence process to varying degrees depending on the type of investment. The involvement of such third parties may present a number of risks primarily relating to reduced control of the functions that are outsourced and may entail significant third-party expenses, which will generally be borne by us. In addition, if the Adviser is unable to timely engage third-party providers, its ability to evaluate and acquire more complex assets could be adversely affected. Due diligence investigations with respect to any investment opportunity may not reveal or highlight all relevant facts that may be necessary or helpful in evaluating the investment opportunity. Moreover, there can be no assurance that attempts to identify risks associated with an investment will achieve their desired effect. Potential investors should regard an investment in us as being speculative and having a high degree of risk.

In the event of fraud, any material misrepresentation or omission or any professional negligence by any seller or originator of assets or such seller’s or originator’s representatives, or by any other party, we may suffer a material loss of capital and the value of our investments may be adversely impacted. We will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of representations made by various persons in the due diligence process and cannot guarantee such accuracy or completeness.

We will bear costs and risks associated with the hiring of third-party service providers.

Certain of our and the Adviser’s operations may interface with and/or depend on third-party service providers, and we or the Adviser may not be in a position to verify the risks or reliability of such third parties. We may suffer adverse consequences from actions, errors or failure to act by such third parties, and will have obligations, including indemnity obligations, and limited recourse against them. The costs, fees and expenses associated with the provision of such services by third-party service providers will generally be borne by us instead of the Adviser, thereby increasing the expenses borne by our unitholders.

The Adviser may utilize financial projections to evaluate investments, and such projections are inherently uncertain and may be inaccurate.

We may rely upon projections developed by the Adviser or a third party concerning an investment’s future performance and cash flow, including when deciding that the possibility of actual adversity in connection with an investment in a different part of the capital structure of the portfolio company is remote. Projections are inherently subject to uncertainty and factors beyond the control of the Adviser and the portfolio company. In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the projections are developed. Different assumptions may produce different results. The inaccuracy of certain assumptions, the failure to satisfy certain financial requirements and the occurrence of other unforeseen events could impair the ability of a portfolio company to realize projected values and cash flow and could trigger the need for us to remain passive in the event of a restructuring. In addition, prospective investors should note that projected performance is not indicative of future results, and there can be no assurance that the projected results or expected returns will be achieved or that we will be able to effectively implement our investment objective.

60

In addition, the Adviser may determine the suitability of investments based in part on the basis of financial projections for portfolio issuers. Events or conditions, including changes in general market conditions, which may not have been anticipated or which are otherwise not foreseeable, may occur and have a significant impact on the actual rate of return received with respect to our investments.

Our success will depend in part on the Adviser’s ability to effect operating improvements at portfolio companies.

In some cases, the success of our investment strategy will depend, in part, on the ability of the Adviser to provide institutional management experience and financial insights to portfolio company management, and to restructure and effect improvements in the operations of a portfolio company. The activity of identifying and implementing restructuring programs (and operating improvements at portfolio companies) entails a high degree of uncertainty. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to successfully identify and implement such restructuring programs and improvements or that such insights and experience will be utilized and implemented by portfolio companies and, even if implemented, that they will result in operating improvements.

We face risks associated with the deployment of our capital.

In light of the need to be able to deploy capital quickly to capitalize on potential investment opportunities or to establish reserves for anticipated debts, liabilities or obligations, including liquidity needs, we may hold cash in money market investments pending deployment into other investments, the amount of which may at times be significant. While the duration of any such holding period is expected to be relatively short, in the event we are unable to find suitable investments, such money market investments may be held for longer periods, which would dilute overall investment returns. It is not anticipated that the temporary investment of such cash into money market investments will generate significant interest, and unitholders should understand that such low interest payments on the temporarily invested cash may adversely affect our overall returns.

Our ability to make follow-on investments may substantially impact the success of our investments.

We may be called upon to provide follow-on funding for our investments or have the opportunity to increase our investment in such investments. There can be no assurance that we will wish to make follow-on investments or that we will have sufficient funds to do so. Any decision by us not to make follow-on investments or our inability to make them may have a substantial negative impact on an investment in need of such an investment or may diminish our ability to influence such investment’s future development. There can be no assurance that the Adviser will be able to predict accurately how much capital may need to be reserved by us for participation in follow-on investments. If more capital is reserved than is necessary, then we may receive a lower allocation of other investment opportunities or may not fully draw our Capital Commitments. If less capital is reserved than is necessary, then we may not be able to fully protect or enhance our existing investment. If we do not have sufficient capital to participate in all (or a portion) of a follow-on investment opportunity, an Other Oaktree Fund may participate in such follow-on opportunity in lieu of or alongside the Company in accordance with the Investment Allocation Considerations.

An investment in our units, as well as a significant portion of our assets, will have limited liquidity.

Our common units will generally be an illiquid investment. Unitholders will not be permitted to Transfer their common units unless (a) we (and, if required by our lending arrangements, our lenders) give consent, (b) the Transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and (c) the Transfer otherwise complies with the restrictions in the Subscription Agreement. In addition, our unitholders will have no right to cause us to repurchase their common units.

A significant portion of our assets is expected to consist of investments that are illiquid loans or other thinly traded investments for which no market exists or investments that are restricted as to their transferability under applicable securities laws or documents governing particular transactions of ours. Some securities or instruments that were liquid at the time they were acquired may, for a variety of reasons which may not be in our control, later become illiquid. This factor may have the effect of limiting the availability of these securities or instruments for purchase by us and may also limit our ability to sell such investments at their fair market value prior to our dissolution or in response to changes in the economy or the financial markets. In addition, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we had

61

previously recorded our investments. Due to securities regulations governing certain publicly traded equity securities, our ability to sell securities could also be diminished with respect to equity holdings that represent a significant portion of the issuer’s securities (particularly if we have designated one or more directors of the issuer). Thus, there can be no assurance as to the timing and amount of distributions from us.

We may not pay distributions to our unitholders.

We intend to pay distributions to our unitholders out of assets legally available for distribution. We cannot assure our unitholders that we will achieve investment results that will allow us to sustain a specified level of cash distributions or periodic increases in cash distributions. In addition, the inability to satisfy the asset coverage test applicable to us as a BDC can limit our ability to pay distributions. All distributions will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, financial condition, maintenance of ability to be subject to tax as a RIC, compliance with applicable BDC regulations and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. There can be no assurance that we will pay distributions to unitholders.

We may make distributions in kind.

Although under normal circumstances, we intend to make distributions in cash, it is possible that under certain circumstances (including our liquidation) distributions may be made in kind and could consist of securities or other investments for which there is no readily available public market.

We may borrow money, which may magnify the potential for gain or loss and may increase the risk of investing in us.

We and/or one or more subsidiaries may enter into credit facilities or other borrowing arrangements pursuant to which some or all of our portfolio assets and/or the unfunded Capital Commitments of our unitholders may be charged, pledged or assigned as collateral security for (a) amounts borrowed by us or a subsidiary and/or (b) guarantees by us of any such financing vehicle’s obligations. Such credit facilities or guarantees may be secured by an assignment and/or pledge of our unitholders’ unfunded Capital Commitments and/or our portfolio investments and assets, and our right to call for additional capital contributions from our unitholders. In relation to the above, we may (a) authorize any lender or other creditors or holders of our other obligations or guarantees, including any agent or trustee acting on their behalf, as agent and on our behalf, or in such other capacity as we may specify to (i) exercise from time to time the rights assigned to it under the applicable borrowing arrangements (the “Assigned Rights”), (ii) issue drawdown notices and to require all or any portion of such unfunded Capital Commitment to be contributed to us for purposes of paying such funds to a lender or other creditor or holders of other obligations or guarantees, including by payment to an account or accounts pledged to a lender, a creditor or such holder, (iii) exercise any right or remedy of ours under the Subscription Agreements in respect of any Assigned Rights or in respect of any drawdown notice, capital contributions or unfunded Capital Commitment, and (iv) enforce our unitholders’ obligations under their respective Subscription Agreements and/or the LLC Agreement, and (b) take any other action we reasonably determine to be necessary for the purpose of providing such Assigned Rights. Our unitholders may be required to acknowledge their obligation to pay their share of such indebtedness up to the amount of their unfunded Capital Commitments or to acknowledge the right of such lender to call on such unitholders, and may be limited in their ability to use their common units as collateral for other indebtedness or in their ability to Transfer such units. In relation to the above, each unitholder, for the benefit of any third-party lenders (or their agent), may be required to acknowledge its obligations to (A) fund direct payments to an account of us in an amount not to exceed such unitholder’s uncalled Capital Commitment, (B) execute and deliver such documents as may be reasonably required to acknowledge and perfect the security interest in its uncalled Capital Commitment as provided in the Subscription Agreement, and (C) for so long as such financing or borrowing is in place, agree (I) to waive any present or future claims or rights, as well as any right of retention, defense, privilege, right of set-off, any counterclaim or any similar rights it may have in respect of its uncalled Capital Commitments and its payments obligations in connection therewith, and (II) to acknowledge and accept that any other claims that such unitholders may have against us, or against the Adviser solely in respect to claims on our assets, shall be subordinated to any payment due to the lenders (or their agent) under such financing or borrowing.

In addition, unitholders may be required to execute and deliver such documents and to take such actions as may be necessary or desirable, as determined by us in our sole discretion, to obtain, maintain and comply with the terms of any such credit facility. The Subscription Agreements may provide a lender with the right to receive detailed due diligence and credit related information regarding our unitholders.

62

Capital calls, including those used to pay interest and principal on subscription lines, asset-backed facilities and our other indebtedness, may be “batched” together into larger, less frequent capital calls, with our interim capital needs being satisfied by our borrowing money from such credit facilities. In particular, our capital needs during the fundraising period may be met through drawdowns from such credit facilities rather than capital calls. The interest expense and other costs of any such borrowings will be our expenses and, accordingly, decrease our net returns.

The use of a subscription-based credit facility may present conflicts of interest because the use of such a facility may result in a higher reported internal rate of return on the investment than if the facility had not been utilized and instead the applicable unitholders’ capital had been contributed at the inception of the investment. The costs and expenses of any such borrowings will be borne by us, which would be expected to diminish net cash on cash returns. Subject to any limitations in the LLC Agreement, the use of a subscription-based credit facility by us is within the Adviser’s discretion.

We may make co-investments with third parties.

We may co-invest with third parties through funds, joint ventures or other entities. Such investments may involve risks not present in investments where a third party is not involved, including the possibility that our co-venturer or partner may at any time have other business interests and investments other than the joint venture with us, or may have economic or business goals different from ours. In addition, we may be liable for actions of our co-venturers or partners. Our ability to exercise control or significant influence over management in these cooperative efforts will depend upon the nature of the joint venture arrangement. In addition, such arrangements are likely to involve restrictions on the resale of our interest in the company.

Investments in non-U.S. entities pose special risks and considerations.

We may invest in the securities or obligations of non-U.S. entities. Certain non-U.S. investments involve risks and special considerations not typically associated with U.S. investments. Such risks include (a) the risk of nationalization or expropriation of assets or confiscatory taxation, (b) social, economic and political uncertainty, including war, and revolution, (c) dependence on exports and the corresponding importance of international trade, (d) differences between U.S. and non-U.S. markets, including price fluctuations, market volatility, less liquidity and smaller capitalization of securities markets, (e) currency exchange rate fluctuations, (f) rates of inflation, (g) controls on, and changes in controls on, non-U.S. investment and limitations on repatriation of invested capital and on our ability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars, (h) governmental involvement in and control over the economies, (i) governmental decisions to discontinue support of economic reform programs generally and impose centrally planned economies, (j) differences in auditing and financial reporting standards that may result in the unavailability of material information about issuers, (k) less extensive regulation of the securities markets, (l) longer settlement periods for securities transactions, (m) less developed corporate laws regarding fiduciary duties and the protection of investors, (n) less reliable judicial systems to enforce contracts and applicable law, (o) certain considerations regarding the maintenance of our portfolio securities and cash with non-U.S. sub-custodians and securities depositories, (p) the possible imposition of non-U.S. taxes on income and gains recognized, or gross proceeds received, with respect to such non-U.S. investments, (q) restrictions and prohibitions on ownership of property by non-U.S. entities and changes in laws relating thereto, (r) additional transactional costs and administrative burdens as a result of local legal requirements and (s) crime, corruption, terrorism, political unrest and war. We may be adversely affected by the foregoing events, or by future adverse developments in global or regional economic conditions or in the financial or credit markets.

There may be restrictions which limit or preclude our investments in non-U.S. entities, and we may face difficulty repatriating investment proceeds from non-U.S. investments.

Non-U.S. investment in the securities of issuers in certain nations is restricted or controlled to varying degrees. These restrictions or controls may at times limit or preclude non-U.S. investment in issuers in such nations and increase our costs and expenses. Certain countries may restrict investment opportunities in issuers or industries deemed important to national interests. Some countries require governmental approval for the repatriation of

63

investment income, capital or the proceeds of sales of securities by non-U.S. investors. In addition, if there is a deterioration in a country’s balance of payments or for other reasons, a country may impose temporary restrictions on, or altogether change its restrictions on, non-U.S. capital remittances abroad. In response to sovereign debt or currency crises, for example, certain governments have enacted legislation that imposes restrictions on the inflow and outflow of non-U.S. currency into and from such country. These restrictions may adversely affect our ability to source investments or to repatriate investment proceeds. Repatriation of capital was particularly a problem during the sovereign debt and currency crises of the 1990s and continues to be a problem today in certain countries. Even where capital controls do not prohibit remittances abroad, the repatriation of proceeds from investment dispositions may require the procurement of a substantial number of regulatory consents, certificates and approvals, including licenses for us and clearance certificates from tax or monetary authorities. Obtaining such approvals or licenses may be difficult, expensive and time consuming and may depend on political or other factors outside our control. Finally, repatriation of income from and investments in entities that are organized or domiciled in non-U.S. countries may be affected adversely by local withholding and other non-U.S. tax requirements. The foregoing requirements and restrictions may adversely affect our ability to source investments or to repatriate investment proceeds, and there can be no assurance that we will be permitted to repatriate capital or profits, if any, from the non-U.S. jurisdictions in which we invest.

Projections are necessarily speculative in nature, and it can vary significantly from actual results.

Any projections, forecasts and estimates contained herein are forward-looking statements and are based upon certain assumptions that Oaktree considers reasonable. Projections are necessarily speculative in nature, and it can be expected that some or all of the assumptions underlying the projections will not materialize or will vary significantly from actual results. Projected operating results will often be based on management judgments. In all cases, projections are only estimates of future results that are based upon assumptions made at the time that the projections are developed. Actual results are expected to vary from the projections, and the variations may be material. The inclusion of projections herein should not be regarded as a representation by us, the Adviser, Oaktree or any of our respective affiliates or any other person or entity of the results that we will actually achieve. None of us the Adviser, Oaktree or any of their respective affiliates and any other person has any obligation to update or otherwise revise any projections, including any revisions to reflect changes in economic conditions or other circumstances arising after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, even if the underlying assumptions do not come to fruition.

Deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting could prevent us from accurately and timely reporting our financial results.

We may identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, including significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. A “significant deficiency” is a deficiency or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of a company’s financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis.

Failure to identify deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner or to remediate any deficiencies, or the identification of material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the future could prevent us from accurately and timely reporting our financial results.

The process of valuing our portfolio is subject to inherent uncertainties and judgments, which could impact how our Net Asset Value is calculated.

Valuations of our portfolio, which will affect the amount of the Management Fee and our performance results, may involve uncertainties and judgmental determinations. As a BDC, we are required to account for our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by the board of directors or its designee. Typically, there is not a public market for the securities of the privately held companies in which we will invest. As a result, we will value these securities quarterly at fair value as determined in good faith by the Adviser as our valuation designee. The fair value of such securities may change, potentially materially, between the date of the fair value determination by the board of directors or its designee and the release of the financial results for the corresponding period or the next date at which fair value is determined.

64

The process of valuing securities for which reliable market quotations are not available is based on inherent uncertainties, and the resulting values may differ from values that would have been determined had a ready market existed for such securities and may differ from the prices at which such securities may ultimately be sold. Further, third-party pricing information may at times not be available regarding certain of our securities, derivatives and other assets. Certain factors that may be considered in determining the fair value of our investments include the nature and realizable value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s earnings and its ability to make payments on its indebtedness, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to comparable publicly traded companies, discounted cash flow and other relevant factors. Because such valuations, and particularly valuations of private securities and private companies, are inherently uncertain, may fluctuate over short periods of time and may be based on estimates, the Adviser’s determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would have been used if a ready market for these securities existed. In addition, any investments that include OID or PIK interest may have unreliable valuations because their continuing accruals require ongoing judgments about the collectability of their deferred payments and the value of their underlying collateral. Due to these uncertainties, fair value determinations may cause the Net Asset Value on a given date to materially understate or overstate the value that we ultimately realize upon the sale of one or more investments.

A disruption in the secondary markets for our investments may limit the ability of the Adviser to obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing our investments and calculating our Net Asset Value. In addition, material events occurring after the close of a principal market upon which a portion of our securities or other assets are traded may require the Adviser to make a determination of the effect of a material event on the value of the securities or other assets traded on the market for purposes of determining the fair value of our investments on a valuation date. If the valuation of our securities in accordance with the Adviser’s valuation policy should prove to be incorrect, the fair value of our investments could be adversely affected. Absent bad faith or manifest error, valuation determinations in accordance with the Adviser’s valuation policy will be conclusive and binding. Furthermore, these values will be used to determine our Net Asset Value. To the extent these investments are undervalued or overvalued, common units held by existing or newly admitted unitholders could be adversely affected.

We may enter into reverse repurchase agreements, which involve many of the same risks posed by our use of leverage.

We may enter into reverse repurchase agreements as part of our management of our temporary investment portfolio. Entry into any such reverse repurchase agreements would be subject to the Investment Company Act limitations on leverage. In connection with entry into a reverse repurchase agreement, we would effectively pledge our assets as collateral to secure a short-term loan. Generally, the other party to the agreement would make a loan to us in an amount equal to a percentage of the fair value of the collateral pledged. At the maturity of the reverse repurchase agreement, we will be required to repay the loan and then receive back our collateral. While used as collateral, the assets continue to pay principal and interest, which are for our benefit.

Use of reverse repurchase agreements, if any, involves many of the same risks involved in our use of leverage. For example, the market value of the securities acquired in the reverse repurchase agreement may decline below the price of the securities that we have sold but we would remain obligated to purchase those securities. As such, we bear the risk of loss that the proceeds at settlement are less than the fair value of the securities pledged. In addition, the market value of the securities retained may decline. If a buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement were to file for bankruptcy or experience insolvency, we would be adversely affected. In addition, due to the interest costs associated with reverse repurchase agreements, the Net Asset Value would decline, and, in some cases, we may be worse off than if we had not used such agreements.

65

We may issue senior securities or incur indebtedness, and any amounts that we use to service our senior securities or indebtedness will reduce amounts distributable to holders of our common units.

Consistent with applicable legal and regulatory requirements, we may issue senior securities and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions up to the maximum amount permitted by the Investment Company Act. In addition, we may seek to securitize certain of our loans. Under the provisions of the Investment Company Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to issue senior securities if we meet an asset coverage ratio, as calculated as provided in the Investment Company Act, of at least 150% immediately after each such issuance. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test, which may prohibit us from paying dividends and could prevent us from maintaining our status as a RIC or may prohibit us from repurchasing our common units. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Accordingly, any failure to satisfy this test could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Also, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness or senior securities would not be available for distributions to our unitholders. Furthermore, as a result of issuing indebtedness or senior securities, our unitholders would also be exposed to typical risks associated with increased leverage, including an increased risk of loss resulting from increased indebtedness.

We are not generally able to issue and sell common units at a price below the then-current Net Asset Value per unit. We may, however, sell common units, or warrants, options or rights to acquire such units, at a price below the then-current Net Asset Value per unit if our board of directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of us and our unitholders, and our unitholders approve such sale. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common units, including in connection with senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, such units, then the percentage ownership of our common units at that time will decrease, and holders of our common units might experience dilution with respect to their percentage ownership.

Our unitholders will have limited voting rights.

Unitholders will have only the voting rights as required by the Investment Company Act or as otherwise provided for in the LLC Agreement. Under the LLC Agreement, we will not be required to hold annual meetings of unitholders. Only the board of directors, the Chair of the board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the holders of a majority-in-interest of the outstanding units may call a meeting of unitholders and only business specified in our notice of meeting (or supplement thereto) may be conducted at a meeting of unitholders.

Our unitholders will not have appraisal rights in the event of a merger, unless our board of directors determines such rights apply.

The board of directors may cause the sale of all or substantially all of its assets under a foreclosure or other realization without unitholder approval. Unitholders are not entitled to dissenters’ rights of appraisal under the LLC Agreement or applicable Delaware law in the event of a merger or consolidation, a sale of all or substantially all of our assets or any other similar transaction or event unless the board of directors, upon such terms and conditions as specified by the board of directors, determines that such rights apply, with respect to all or any common units.

Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest

There may be conflicts of interest related to obligations that the Adviser’s senior management and investment team have to Other Oaktree Funds.

Actual and potential conflicts between the Adviser and its affiliates, on one hand, and us and our portfolio companies, on the other hand, are expected to occur. Oaktree manages the Other Oaktree Funds, which present the possibility of overlapping investments, and thus the potential for conflicts of interest. Many of the investments targeted by us partially will be appropriate for certain Other Oaktree Funds, and in retrospect or at different points in the market cycle, investments that were made by us may seem more appropriate for an Other Oaktree Fund, and vice versa. In particular, we will be part of Oaktree’s Private Credit strategy, which is a combination of Oaktree’s Strategic Credit, U.S. Private Debt and European Private Debt strategies. Many of the investments targeted by us may be appropriate for Other Oaktree Funds within those strategies. Our unitholders will have no ability to challenge such allocation so long as it was made in good faith in accordance with the procedures discussed in “Item 1. Business—Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest”. Such procedures give Oaktree broad authority to allocate investment opportunities, notwithstanding the potential conflicts of interest that may exist. For example, management fees or incentive allocations and fees and liquidity provisions may differ significantly between us and the Other Oaktree Funds, creating an economic incentive for Oaktree to allocate investments that may be appropriate for a lower fee or more liquid strategy to a higher fee or less liquid strategy.

66

In addition, there are potential conflicts of interests between the interests of us and our unitholders, on the one hand, and the business interests of Oaktree, on the other hand. Potential conflicts of interests include, but are not limited to, the fact that Oaktree serves as our investment adviser. If any matter arises that Oaktree determines in its good faith judgment constitutes an actual conflict of interest, Oaktree may take such actions as may be necessary or appropriate to prevent or reduce the conflict. By acquiring our common units, each unitholder will be deemed to have acknowledged the existence of any such actual or potential conflict of interest and, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law (including the federal securities laws), to have waived any claim with respect to any liability arising from the existence of any such conflict of interest.

Our executive officers and directors, and certain members of the Adviser, serve or may serve as officers, directors or principals of entities that operate in the same or a related line of business as us, or of investment funds managed by the Adviser’s affiliates. For example, the Adviser presently serves as the investment adviser to OCSL, a publicly traded BDC, OSCF, a private BDC, OLP, a private BDC, and OLPU, a private BDC. OCSL and OSCF have historically invested in debt and debt-like instruments similar to those we target for investment. Therefore, there may be certain investment opportunities that satisfy our investment criteria and that of OCSL, OSCF, OLP and OLPU, as well as private investment funds and accounts advised or sub-advised by the Adviser or its affiliates. OCSL, OSCF, OLP and OLPU each operate as distinct and separate entities, and any investment in our common units will not be an investment in OCSL, OSCF, OLP, OLPU or any other fund or account managed by Oaktree. In addition, all of our executive officers serve in substantially similar capacities for OCSL, OSCF, OLP and OLPU, and all of our directors serve in substantially similar capacities for OSCF, OLP and OLPU. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us and our unitholders. For example, the personnel of the Adviser may face conflicts of interest in the allocation of investment opportunities. Oaktree has investment allocation guidelines that govern the allocation of investment opportunities among the investment funds and accounts managed or sub-advised by the Adviser and its affiliates. To the extent an investment opportunity is appropriate for us, OCSL, OSCF, OLP or OLPU or any other investment fund or account managed or sub-advised by the Adviser or its affiliates, the Adviser will adhere to its investment allocation guidelines in order to determine a fair and equitable allocation.

In addition, with respect to the feeder vehicle formed to facilitate indirect investments in us by certain investors, there are potential conflicts of interests between the interests of any such feeder vehicles and investors therein, on the one hand, and the business interests of Oaktree, on the other hand. Potential conflicts of interests may include, but are not limited to, the fact that one or more Oaktree affiliates will be the general partner, manager or managing member of any such feeder vehicle. If any matter arises that Oaktree determines in its good faith judgment constitutes an actual conflict of interest, Oaktree may take such actions as may be necessary or appropriate to prevent or reduce the conflict, subject to the limitations of the Investment Company Act.

In addition, we may make investments in different parts of the capital structure of companies in which Other Oaktree Funds already hold an investment. Generally speaking, the Adviser expects that we will make such investments only when, at the time of investment, the Adviser believes such investment is in our best interests and either the possibility of actual adversity is remote, our investment is small and non-controlling or the Adviser believes that such investment is appropriate for us in light of the particular circumstances, notwithstanding the potential for conflict. If any conflict were to arise, however, the Adviser will be permitted to take certain actions that, in the absence of such conflict, it would not take, such as causing us to remain passive, investing in the same class of securities to align interests, divesting investments or taking other actions to reduce adversity, which may have the effect of benefiting certain Other Oaktree Funds, and not us. Given that we generally intend to invest higher in the capital structure, it is likely we will remain passive in the event of a conflict, meaning that we must rely on other investors holding the same types of securities or obligations to advocate on behalf of our class. The Adviser will have no obligation to advise these other holders of any potential claims they may have of which the Adviser may be aware or to consider their interests when advocating on behalf of the Other Oaktree Funds that hold investments in lower parts of the capital structure.

67

Under certain circumstances, we potentially will be offered an opportunity to make an investment in a transaction in which one or more Other Oaktree Funds is expected to make an investment, or in a company in which one or more Other Oaktree Funds already has made, or concurrently will make, an investment. The Investment Company Act and the Exemptive Relief also impose restrictions on our ability to participate in certain transactions with other Oaktree Funds. As a result, we and the Other Oaktree Fund potentially will have conflicting interests in negotiating the terms of such investments. In negotiating the purchase of such investments, the nature of the covenants, and other terms and conditions of such securities, the Other Oaktree Funds potentially will have interests that conflict with ours. In that regard, subject to the requirements of the Investment Company Act and the Exemptive Relief, actions may be taken for the Other Oaktree Funds that are adverse to us. Such conflicts also have the potential to arise in the negotiations of amendments or waivers or in a workout or bankruptcy. It is possible that in a bankruptcy proceeding, our interests would be subordinated or otherwise adversely affected by virtue of such Other Oaktree Funds’ involvement and actions relating to its investment. Oaktree will seek to manage such conflicts in good faith and in a manner it believes is consistent with its duties to us and the Other Oaktree Funds and under the Investment Company Act and the Exemptive Relief, if applicable.

Oaktree’s existing relationships may influence any decision by the Adviser to undertake investments on our behalf.

Oaktree has long-term relationships with a significant number of companies and their respective senior management. Oaktree also has relationships with numerous investors, including institutional investors and their senior management. The existence and development of these relationships may influence whether or not the Adviser undertakes a particular investment on our behalf and, if so, the form and level of such investment. Similarly, the Adviser may take the existence and development of such relationships into consideration in its management of us and our investments. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, there may, for example, be certain strategies involving the management or realization of particular investments that the Adviser will not employ on our behalf in light of these relationships.

Other services provided by broker-dealers and financing sources to Oaktree may influence the Adviser’s selection of these service providers on our behalf.

Conflicts of interest may exist with respect to the Adviser’s selection of brokers, dealers and transaction agents and counterparties (collectively, “Broker-Dealers”) and financing sources for the execution of transactions by us. When engaging the services of Broker-Dealers and financing sources, the Adviser may, subject to best execution, take into consideration a variety of factors, including, to the extent applicable, the ability to achieve prompt and reliable execution, competitive pricing, transaction costs, operational efficiency with which transactions are effected, access to deal flow and precedent transactions, and the financial stability and reputation of the particular Broker-Dealer, as well as other factors that the Adviser deems appropriate to consider under the circumstances. Broker-Dealers and financing sources may provide other services that are beneficial to the Adviser, Oaktree and their affiliates but that are not necessarily beneficial to us, including capital introductions, other marketing assistance, client and personnel referrals, consulting services and research-related services. These other services and items may influence the Adviser’s selection of Broker-Dealers and financing sources.

Oaktree currently manages and will continue to raise additional investment vehicles that may have a substantially similar investment focus as us.

Within Oaktree’s Private Credit strategy, Oaktree currently manages and will continue to raise additional separately managed accounts, private commingled funds and public or private BDCs. Each of these BDCs, funds and accounts may have a substantially similar investment focus as us, although some may invest a larger percentage, as compared to us, of its total assets or total capital commitments, whichever is greater, in any one issuer or consolidated issuer group, some may not originate loans to U.S. borrowers, and some will not invest in any investment that is categorized as a Level 3 asset under GAAP at the time of acquisition. Oaktree is forming Oaktree Lending Partners (Unlevered), SCSp, which will co-invest with us, OLP and OLPU, and intends to form one or more additional parallel funds and/or separate accounts that will co-invest with us, OLP and OLPU. In addition, Oaktree may form parallel funds and/or separate accounts alongside any of such funds and accounts and may raise other funds and accounts within the Private Credit strategy in the future. All of such funds and accounts, whether now existing or subsequently created, are referred to herein collectively as the “Related Private Credit Funds.”

68

The Adviser intends to allocate investment opportunities among us and the Related Private Credit Funds in accordance with the procedures discussed in “Item 1. Business—Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest”; however, the fee structures and other terms among us and the Related Private Credit Funds are different, and the Adviser may, therefore, have an incentive to allocate certain opportunities to such funds and accounts for which Oaktree or the general partners of such funds or accounts will receive greater fees, which may result in more attractive but riskier or less liquid opportunities being weighted to a particular fund or account.

While Oaktree does not intend to accept more capital into its Private Credit strategy than it believes it can prudently invest at the time, the Private Credit strategy has expanded rapidly from its inception, and the investment process may be burdened by the number of new funds and accounts within the strategy. We will have to share the attention of the Investment Professionals with the Related Private Credit Funds, which could result in the Investment Professionals focusing more on funds and accounts that have larger capital commitments or that require greater administrative attention.

We may not receive investment opportunities that are allocated to other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by the Adviser.

We and certain of its controlled affiliates are prohibited under the Investment Company Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with upstream affiliates, or with the Adviser and its affiliates, without the prior approval of independent directors and, in some cases, the SEC. Any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our outstanding voting securities is an upstream affiliate for purposes of the Investment Company Act, and we are generally prohibited from buying or selling any security (other than our securities) from or to such affiliate, absent the prior approval of independent directors. The Investment Company Act also prohibits “joint” transactions with an upstream affiliate, or the Adviser or its affiliates, which could include investments in the same portfolio company (whether at the same or different times), without prior approval of independent directors. In addition, we and certain of our controlled affiliates are prohibited from buying or selling any security from or to, or entering into joint transactions with, the Adviser and its affiliates, or any person who owns more than 25% of our voting securities or is otherwise deemed to control, be controlled by, or be under common control with us, absent the prior approval of the SEC through an exemptive order (other than in certain limited situations pursuant to current regulatory guidance as described below). The analysis of whether a particular transaction constitutes a joint transaction requires a review of the relevant facts and circumstances then existing.

As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For example, we are not generally permitted to invest in any portfolio company in which an Other Oaktree Fund or any of our downstream affiliates (other than us and our downstream affiliates) currently has an investment, or to make any co-investments with the Adviser or its affiliates, including any Other Oaktree Funds or any of its downstream affiliates (other than us and our downstream affiliates), without exemptive relief from the SEC, subject to certain exceptions.

On October 18, 2017, OCM received the Exemptive Relief from the SEC to allow certain managed funds and accounts, each of whose investment adviser is OCM or an investment adviser controlling, controlled by or under common control with OCM, to participate in negotiated co-investment transactions where doing so is consistent with the applicable registered fund’s or business development company’s investment objective and strategies as well as regulatory requirements and other pertinent factors, and pursuant to the conditions thereof. Each potential co-investment opportunity that falls under the terms of the Exemptive Relief and is appropriate for us and any affiliated fund or account, and that satisfies the then-current board-established criteria, will be offered to us and such other eligible funds and accounts. If there is a sufficient amount of securities to satisfy all participants, the securities will be allocated among the participants in accordance with their proposed order size, and if there is an insufficient amount of securities to satisfy all participants, the securities will be allocated pro rata based on the investment proposed by the applicable investment adviser to such participant, up to the amount proposed to be invested by each, which is reviewed and approved by an independent committee of legal, compliance and accounting professionals at the Adviser. In addition, on December 15, 2020, the Adviser and certain of its affiliates received a modified exemptive order that allows Oaktree proprietary accounts to participate in co-investment transactions subject to certain conditions.

Although the Adviser will endeavor to allocate investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, we and our unitholders could be adversely affected to the extent investment opportunities are allocated to other investment vehicles managed or sponsored by, or affiliated with, our executive officers, directors and members of the Adviser. We might not participate in each individual opportunity but will, on an overall basis, be entitled to participate equitably with other entities managed by the Adviser and its affiliates. The Adviser seeks to treat all clients fairly and equitably over time such that none receives preferential treatment vis-à-vis the others over time, in a manner consistent with its fiduciary duty to each of them; however, in some instances, especially in instances of limited liquidity, the factors may not result in pro rata allocations or may result in situations where certain funds or accounts receive allocations where others do not.

69

The Adviser may offer other investors the opportunity to participate in investments side by side with us.

The Adviser may in its sole discretion offer strategic and other investors the opportunity to participate in one or more of our investments on a side-by-side basis, subject to compliance with the applicable provisions of the Investment Company Act and the allocation procedures described in “Item 1. Business—Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest”. The terms of any such investment opportunity shall be determined by the Adviser, including any management fee or incentive fee charged in connection therewith, and may vary with respect to any such investment opportunity.

Oaktree personnel will work on matters related to Other Oaktree Funds.

The Adviser and its affiliates will devote such time as they deem necessary to conduct our business affairs in an appropriate manner. However, Oaktree personnel will work on matters related to Other Oaktree Funds.

We may realize different investment returns than Other Oaktree Funds.

Other Oaktree Funds may make investments at different times and/or on different terms or exit any of such investments at different times and/or on different terms compared to such investment made on our behalf. Therefore, we may realize different investment returns than such Other Oaktree Funds, with respect to any investment made alongside some or all of such entities.

The Adviser shall have sole discretion in determining what investments we will be offered to pursue. As a result, there is no guarantee that we will be offered the opportunity to invest in any particular investments or type of investments alongside any Other Oaktree Funds. The terms, conditions and the time of investment and disposition of investments held by us may be materially different from those of any such Other Oaktree Funds.

Risk Relating to Tax Matters

The jurisdictions in which we may invest impose taxes on the types of income such as dividends, interest and in some instances, capital gains. In addition, changes in the tax laws or tax treaties (or their interpretation) of the countries in which we invest may severely and adversely affect our ability to efficiently realize income or capital gains and may subject us or our unitholders to tax and return filing obligations in such countries. The tax consequences applicable to a unitholder will depend upon the particular situation of such unitholder.

We may be subject to additional corporate-level income taxes if we fail to maintain our status as a RIC.

We have elected to be treated as a RIC under the Code and operate in a manner so as to qualify for the U.S. federal income tax treatment applicable to RICs. As a RIC, we generally will not pay U.S. federal corporate-level income taxes on our income and net capital gains that we distribute (or are deemed to distribute, except with respect to certain retained capital gains as discussed below) to the unitholders as dividends on a timely basis. We will be subject to U.S. federal corporate-level income tax on any undistributed income and/or gains. To maintain our status as a RIC, we must meet certain source of income, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. We may also be subject to certain U.S. federal excise taxes, as well as state, local and foreign taxes.

To maintain our RIC status, we must timely distribute an amount equal to at least 90% of our investment company taxable income (as defined by the Code, which generally includes net ordinary income and net short term capital gains) to the unitholders (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”). We have the ability to pay a large portion of our distributions in our common units, and as long as a portion of such distribution is paid in cash and other requirements are met, such distributions will be taxable as a dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes. This may result in our U.S. Unitholders having to pay tax on such dividends, even if no cash is received, and may result in its non-U.S. Unitholders being subject to withholding tax in respect of amounts distributed in common units. We are subject to certain asset coverage requirements under the Investment Company Act and financial covenants under our indebtedness that could, under certain circumstances, restrict it from making distributions necessary to qualify as a RIC. If we unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to maintain our status as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax on all of our income and/or gains.

70

To maintain our status as a RIC, in addition to the Annual Distribution Requirement, we must also meet certain annual source of income requirements at the end of each taxable year and asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these requirements may result in us having to (a) dispose of certain investments quickly or (b) raise additional capital to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments are in private companies and are generally illiquid, any such dispositions may be at disadvantageous prices and may result in losses. Also, the rules applicable to our qualification as a RIC are complex with many areas of uncertainty. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we have qualified or will continue to qualify as a RIC. If we fail to maintain our status as a RIC for any reason and become subject to regular “C” corporation income tax, the resulting corporate-level income taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and on any investment in us. Certain provisions of the Code provide some relief from RIC disqualification due to failures of the source of income and asset diversification requirements, although there may be additional taxes due in such cases. No assurances can be provided that we would qualify for any such relief should we fail the source of income or asset diversification requirements.

Because we intended to distribute at least 90% of our taxable income each taxable year to our unitholders in connection with our election to be treated as a RIC, we will need additional capital to grow.

In order to qualify for the tax benefits available to RICs and to minimize corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes, we intend to distribute to our unitholders at least 90% of our taxable income each taxable year, except that we may retain certain net capital gains for investment, and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our unitholders. If we elect to treat any amounts as deemed distributions, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the corporate rate applicable to net capital gains on such deemed distributions on behalf of our unitholders. As a result of these requirements, we will likely need to raise capital from other sources to grow our business. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our investment portfolio, these limitations together with the asset coverage requirements applicable to us may prevent us from incurring debt and require us to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we are required to recognize income for U.S. federal income tax purposes before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to include in income certain amounts that it has not yet received in cash, such as OID or certain income accruals on contingent payment debt instruments, which may occur if we receive warrants in connection with the origination of a loan or possibly in other circumstances. Such OID is generally required to be included in income before we receive any corresponding cash payments. In addition, our loans typically contain PIK interest provisions. Any PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is generally required to be added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that it does not receive, and may never receive, in cash. To avoid the imposition of corporate-level tax, this non-cash source of income may need to be distributed to our unitholders in cash or, in the event that we determine to do so, in common units, even though we may have not yet collected and may never collect the cash relating to such income.

Since, in certain cases, we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the Annual Distribution Requirement necessary to be relieved of corporate-level U.S. federal taxes on income and gains distributed to our unitholders. Accordingly, we may have to sell or otherwise dispose of some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement and thus become subject to corporate-level U.S. federal income tax.

71

Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. We cannot predict with certainty how any changes in the tax laws might affect us, our unitholders, or our investments. New legislation and any U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions interpreting such legislation could significantly and negatively affect our ability to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC or the U.S. federal income tax consequences to us and our unitholders of such qualification, or could have other adverse consequences. Unitholders are urged to consult with their tax adviser regarding tax legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our common units. Prospective investors are urged to consult their own tax advisers as to the tax consequences of an investment in our common units.

The foregoing risks do not purport to be a complete explanation of all the risks involved in acquiring our common units. Potential investors are urged to read this entire Memorandum, the LLC Agreement, the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Administration Agreement and the Subscription Agreement before making a determination whether to invest in our common units. In addition, as our investment program develops and changes over time, an investment in us may be subject to additional and different risk factors and potential conflicts of interest.

72

ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Discussion of our Expected Operating Plans

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Registration Statement. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this Registration Statement contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” appearing elsewhere in this Registration Statement.

Overview

We were organized on February 6, 2023 as a Delaware limited liability company. We are structured as an externally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company.

We are conducting the Private Offering of our common units to investors in reliance on exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Concurrent with the initial filing of this Registration Statement, we intend to elect to be regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act. See “Item 1. Business—Private Offering” for a description of the Private Offering. We also intend to elect to be treated, and to comply with the requirements to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. As a BDC and a RIC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. See “Item 1. Business—Certain BDC Regulatory Considerations” and “Item 1. Business—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

We intend to commence investment operations shortly after the Initial Drawdown. Since inception, there has been no investment activity. To date, our efforts have been limited to organizational activities. We, and indirectly our unitholders, will bear our organization and offering expenses.

Investments

Our investment objective is to generate current income and long-term capital appreciation by primarily focusing on private lending opportunities to large private equity-owned companies. We will seek to build a diverse portfolio across industries and expect most of our investments to be in the debt of eligible portfolio companies, generally in loans that are $500 million or more to companies with EBITDA of $100 million or greater. To a lesser extent, we may invest in small- and medium-sized companies, including bespoke, highly negotiated loans, including loans to life sciences companies, and attractive, publicly-traded credits, including opportunistic investments in discounted, high-quality investments that may result from broad market dislocations or specific situational challenges. The Investment Professionals will prioritize risk control and downside protection by evaluating credit fundamentals, monitoring appropriate credit metrics such as LTV and pursuing ample structural protections. We intend to focus primarily on first lien secured loans but may occasionally invest in junior instruments.

Revenues

We expect to generate revenue primarily in the form of interest income from the investments we hold. Our portfolio activity is also expected to reflect the proceeds of sales of securities. We may also generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, structuring or diligence fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and consulting fees.

Expenses

We do not currently have any employees and do not expect to have any employees. Services necessary for our business will be provided through the Administration Agreement and the Investment Advisory Agreement. See “Item 1. Business—Expenses” for a description of our costs, expenses and liabilities.

73

Hedging

We may enter into currency hedging contracts, interest rate hedging agreements such as futures, options, swaps and forward contracts, and credit hedging contracts, such as credit default swaps. However, no assurance can be given that such hedging transactions will be entered into or, if they are, that they will be effective. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Investment-Related Risks— We may invest in derivative instruments from time to time, which present various risks, including market, counterparty, operational and liquidity risks.”

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are currently in the development stage and have not commenced investment operations. We currently have no assets or liabilities, nor any contingent liabilities, other than as described in this Registration Statement. We expect to generate cash from the net proceeds of the Private Offering and any future offerings of securities and cash flows from operations, including earnings on future investments, as well as interest earned from the temporary investment of cash in cash-equivalents, U.S. government securities and other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. We may also fund a portion of our investments through borrowings from banks and issuances of senior securities, including before we have fully invested the proceeds of the Private Offering. See “—Credit Facilities.”

Our primary use of cash will be for (1) investments in portfolio companies and other investments to comply with certain portfolio diversification requirements, (2) the cost of operations (including our expenses, the Management Fee and any indemnification obligations), (3) debt service of any borrowings and (4) cash distributions to our unitholders.

Credit Facilities

Subscription Facility

We intend to enter into a revolving credit facility with one or more lenders (the “Subscription Facility”). The Subscription Facility is expected to provide for secured borrowings based on capacity under the borrowing base, subject to restrictions imposed on borrowings under the Investment Company Act. We expect the Subscription Facility to provide for a multiple year revolving period, with the maturity of the facility occurring on the last day of the revolving period (both of which are subject to extension). The Subscription Facility is expected to be secured by our unfunded capital commitments.

Revolving Facility

We intend to enter into a revolving credit facility with one or more lenders (the “Revolving Facility” and, together with the Subscription Facility, the “Credit Facilities”). The Revolving Facility is expected to initially provide for secured borrowings up to a maximum commitment amount, subject to restrictions imposed on borrowings under the Investment Company Act and adequate collateral to support such borrowings. Proceeds of the Revolving Facility are expected to be utilized to fund new investments and for general corporate purposes. We expect the Revolving Facility to provide for a multiple year reinvestment period and have a final maturity date occurring a few years from the end of the reinvestment period (which can be extended in connection with an extension of the revolving period). Subject to certain exceptions, the Revolving Facility is expected to be secured by certain of our assets. The Revolving Facility is expected to include customary covenants, including certain financial covenants related to asset coverage, unitholders’ equity and liquidity, certain limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liens, and other customary covenants, as well as usual and customary events of default for senior secured revolving credit facilities of this nature. The maximum principal amount available under the Revolving Facility is expected to be based on capacity available under the borrowing base.

There can be no assurance that we will enter into the Credit Facilities and, if the Credit Facilities are entered into, the terms and conditions may differ substantially from the terms and conditions described in this Registration Statement. See also “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to an Investment in the Company and Our Common Units— We may borrow money, which may magnify the potential for gain or loss and may increase the risk of investing in us.”

74

Other Contractual Obligations

We will have certain commitments pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement that we entered into with the Adviser. We have agreed to pay a fee for investment advisory services. See “Item 1. Business—Investment Advisory Agreement.” We have also entered into the Administration Agreement with the Administrator. Payments under the Administration Agreement will be equal to an amount that reimburses the Administrator for its costs and expenses and our allocable portion of overhead incurred by the Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including our allocable portion of the compensation paid to or compensatory distributions received by our officers (including our Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Financial Officer) and their respective staff who provide services to us, operations staff who provide services to us, and any internal audit staff, to the extent internal audit performs a role in our Sarbanes-Oxley internal control assessment. See “Item 1. Business—Administration Agreement.”

The Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement may be terminated by any party without penalty upon not less than 60 days’ written notice to the other. If either of these agreements is terminated, the costs we incur under a new agreement may increase. In addition, we will likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under these agreements. Any new investment advisory agreement would also be subject to approval by our unitholders.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We may become a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of our business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. These instruments may include commitments to extend credit and involve, to varying degrees, elements of liquidity and credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.

Related Parties

See “Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” for a description of certain transactions and relationships with related parties.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. We plan to invest primarily in illiquid debt securities of private companies. Most of our investments will not have a readily available market price, and we will value these investments at fair value as determined in good faith by the board of directors or its designee. There is no single standard for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. See “Item 1. Business—Valuation Procedures.”

ITEM 3. PROPERTIES

We do not own any real estate or other physical properties material to our operations. Our administrative and principal executive offices are located at 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted.

ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

As of May 1, 2023, we were wholly owned by Oaktree Fund GP I, L.P., an affiliate of the Adviser. The number of common units outstanding following the Initial Closing will depend on the number of common units purchased by the unitholders.

75

ITEM 5. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors (although the core portfolio management and risk management functions will be performed by the Adviser, as our external manager). To the fullest extent permitted by law, (i) each director is vested with the same powers and authority on behalf of the Company as are customarily vested in each director of a Delaware corporation and (ii) each independent director is vested with the same powers and authority on behalf of the Company as are customarily vested in each director of a Business Development Company that is organized as a Delaware corporation who is not an “interested person” of such company as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act. The board of directors currently consists of four members, three of whom are referred to as independent directors. One member of the board of directors is not an independent director. This individual is referred to as an “interested director.” The board of directors elects officers, who serve at the discretion of the board of directors. The responsibilities of each director include, among other things, the oversight of investment activity, the valuation of assets, and oversight of financing arrangements. The board of directors has established an Audit Committee and may establish additional committees in the future.

Under the LLC Agreement, each director will hold office until his or her death, resignation, removal or disqualification.

Information regarding our board of directors is as follows:

Name	Age		Position	Director Since
Interested Director
Armen Panossian		46	Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer		2023
Independent Directors
Jay Ferguson		56	Director		2023
Allison Keller		58	Director		2023
Steve Mosko		67	Director		2023

The address for each of our directors is c/o Oaktree Capital Management L.P., 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

Biographical Information of Directors

Our directors have been divided into two groups—an interested director and independent directors.

Interested Director

Armen Panossian. Mr. Panossian has served as a member of our board of directors since inception. Mr. Panossian is a managing director and Head of Performing Credit at OCM, where his responsibilities include oversight of the firm’s performing credit activities including the senior loan, high yield bond, private credit, convertibles, structured credit and emerging markets debt strategies. He also serves as a portfolio manager within the Global Private Debt and Global Credit strategies. Mr. Panossian has served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer for OCSL and OSCF since September 2019 and December 2021, respectively. Additionally, Mr. Panossian served as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation, a publicly traded BDC (“OCSI”), from September 2019 to March 2021, and of Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc., a private BDC (“OSI II”), from September 2019 until January 2023. Mr. Panossian joined OCM in 2007 as a senior member of its Global Opportunities group. In January 2014, he joined the U.S. Senior Loan team to assume co-portfolio management responsibilities and lead the development of OCM’s CLO business. Mr. Panossian joined OCM from Pequot Capital Management, where he worked on their distressed debt strategy. Mr. Panossian received a B.A. degree in economics with honors and distinction from Stanford University, where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. Mr. Panossian then went on to receive an M.S. degree in health services research from Stanford Medical School and J.D. and M.B.A. degrees from Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School. Mr. Panossian serves on the Advisory Board of the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. He is a member of the State Bar of California.

76

Independent Directors

Jay Ferguson. Mr. Ferguson has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2023. Mr. Ferguson has also been a Trustee of OSCF since December 2021 and a member of its Audit Committee. Mr. Ferguson is a Co-Founder and Managing Partner at Vicente Capital Partners, a Los Angeles-based investment firm providing capital to privately held growth companies across North America. Prior to co-founding Vicente in 2009, Mr. Ferguson was a partner at Kline Hawkes & Company, which he joined at the firm’s inception in 1995. Mr. Ferguson began his career as an investment banker for Merrill Lynch & Co where he was a member of the Energy and Natural Resources Group and the General Corporate Finance Group. From 1989 to 1994, he worked on over 30 public and private transactions for numerous emerging growth and middle market companies. Mr. Ferguson has been a member of the board of directors of Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (“MPAA”) since June 2016 and has served as MPAA’s lead independent director since March 2020. In addition to serving on the board of MPAA, Mr. Ferguson currently serves on the board of directors of Global LT, Inc., SportsMEDIA Technology and Intellectual Technology, Inc., and is a member of the board of trustees of The Wildwood School, the Treasurer of the Robert Toigo Foundation and a member of the Board of Advisors at the UCLA Anderson School of Management. Mr. Ferguson received a B.B.A in Finance from Southern Methodist University and an M.B.A from the UCLA Anderson School of Management.

Allison Keller. Ms. Keller has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2023. She was also a member of the board of directors of OSI II and served as the Chair of its Audit Committee from July 2018 until January 2023. Ms. Keller has also been a Trustee of OSCF since December 2021 and a member of its Audit Committee. Since 2007, Ms. Keller has been the Executive Director and Chief Financial Officer of the W.M. Keck Foundation, a foundation focused primarily on promoting pioneering scientific discoveries as well as undergraduate education and, in Southern California, community programs. Ms. Keller manages the program, investment, staff and administrative activities while working closely with the foundation’s board of directors to develop the foundation’s vision and strategies. From 2007 through 2016, Ms. Keller was also the President of Oakmont Corporation, a private investment firm and family office assisting multi-generational, high net worth extended families and related private foundations. Previously, Ms. Keller was a corporate partner with O’Melveny & Myers LLP. Ms. Keller’s practice focused on raising public and private capital, counseling private and public company boards of directors on strategic transactions and corporate governance policies, negotiating business combinations and reviewing complex regulatory filings. Ms. Keller’s philanthropic work includes board service in both public and private higher education and K-12 education and medical research and education. Ms. Keller has also performed pro bono legal work for multiple community organizations in Los Angeles. Ms. Keller earned her A.B. from Princeton University and J.D. from UCLA School of Law.

Steve Mosko. Mr. Mosko has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2023. Mr. Mosko was also a member of the board of directors of OSI II and served as a member of its Audit Committee from July 2018 until January 2023. Mr. Mosko has also been a Trustee of OSCF since December 2021 and a member of its Audit Committee. Since October 2018, Mr. Mosko has served as Chief Executive Officer of Village Roadshow Entertainment Group. Mr. Mosko formerly served as Chair of Sony Pictures Television for which he remains a consultant. Mr. Mosko also served as the President of Sony Pictures’ U.S. Television operation, Executive Vice President of Sales for Sony Pictures Television and Vice President of the Western Region for Columbia TriStar Television Distribution. Before joining Sony Pictures, Mr. Mosko held earlier career positions as Local Sales Manager of NBC affiliate WMAR-TV in Baltimore, and in Philadelphia as General Sales Manager of WTAF-TV and Vice President and Station Manager of WPHL-TV. Mr. Mosko has served as Chairman of the National Association of Television Program Executives; Chairman of the Academy of Television Arts & Sciences Foundation; Director of Game Show Network, LLC and Game Show Network; Director of The Advertising Council, Inc.; Member of the board of directors for the Celine Cousteau Film Fellowship; Member of the Executive Committee of the Los Angeles Board of Governors of The Paley Museum; Member of the National Board of Junior Achievement; Member of the Executive Board of the UCLA School of Theater, Film and Television; Director at Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles; Member of the Philadelphia Police Department’s Drug Advisory Council; and President of the Philadelphia Ad Club. Mr. Mosko received his Bachelor of Arts in Communications from the University of Delaware. Mr. Mosko also received honorary degrees from Loyola Marymount University, Chapman University and the University of Delaware.

77

Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

Information regarding executive officers who are not directors is as follows.

Name	Age		Position	Officer Since
Mathew Pendo		59	President		2023
Matthew Stewart		38	Chief Operating Officer		2023
Christopher McKown		41	Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer		2023
Ashley Pak		45	Chief Compliance Officer		2023

The address for each of our officers who are not directors is c/o Oaktree Capital Management L.P., 333 South Grand Avenue 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

Biographical Information of Officers Who Are Not Directors

Mathew Pendo. Mr. Pendo has served as our President since inception. Mr. Pendo has also served as President of OCSL and OSCF since August 2019 and December 2021, respectively. Mr. Pendo also currently serves as Managing Director, Head of Corporate Development and Capital Markets for OCM, which he joined in 2015, and as Chief Operating Officer of Oaktree Acquisition Corp. III since February 2021. Mr. Pendo previously served as Chief Operating Officer of OCSL from October 2017 to January 2022, as Chief Operating Officer and President of OCSI from October 2017 and August 2019, respectively, until March 2021, as Chief Operating Officer of OSI II from July 2018 until December 2021 as Chief Operating Officer of Oaktree Acquisition Corp. II. from August 2020 until June 2022 and as President of OSI II from August 2019 until January 2023.

Prior to joining OCM in 2015, Mr. Pendo was at the investment banking boutique of Sandler O’Neill Partners, where he was a managing director focused on the financial services industry. Prior thereto, Mr. Pendo was the Chief Investment Officer of the TARP of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, where he was honored with the Distinguished Service Award. There, he built and managed a team of 20 professionals overseeing the Treasury’s $200 billion TARP investment activities across multiple industries including AIG, GM and the banks, and all levels of the capital structure. Mr. Pendo began his career at Merrill Lynch, where he spent 18 years, starting in their investment banking division before becoming managing director of the technology industry group. Subsequently, Mr. Pendo was a managing director at Barclays Capital, first serving as co-head of U.S. Investment Banking and then co-head of Global Industrials group. Mr. Pendo previously served as a member of the board of directors of Keypath Education, Inc., New IPT Holdings, LLC and SuperValue Inc. He received a bachelor’s degree in economics from Princeton University, cum laude.

Matthew Stewart, CFA. Mr. Stewart has served as our Chief Operating Officer since inception. Mr. Stewart has also served as Chief Operating Officer of OCSL and OSCF since January 2022 and December 2021, respectively. Mr. Stewart also served as Chief Operating Officer of OSI II from December 2021 until January 2023. Mr. Stewart is a Managing Director and investment professional on Oaktree’s Strategic Credit team. Prior to joining OCM in 2017, Mr. Stewart was a vice president at Fifth Street Management. Prior thereto, he was a director at Stifel Nicolaus where he worked in the Leveraged Finance Group. Mr. Stewart began his career as a senior associate at BDO Consulting in the Business Restructuring group before moving on to serving as a vice president in the institutional fixed income business at Knight Capital Group. He received a B.B.A. in finance and a B.S. in accountancy from Villanova University. Mr. Stewart is a Certified Public Accountant and CFA charterholder.

Christopher McKown. Mr. McKown has served as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since inception. Mr. McKown has also served as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of OCSL and OSCF since November 2021 and December 2021, respectively. Mr. McKown also served as Chief Financial Officer of OSI II from January 2022 until January 2023. Mr. McKown joined OCM in 2011 and currently serves as a Managing Director responsible for fund accounting and reporting for Oaktree’s Strategic Credit strategy. Mr. McKown previously served as the Assistant Treasurer of OSI II and OCSL and also served as Assistant Treasurer of OCSI until March 2021. Prior to joining Oaktree, Mr. McKown worked in the audit practice at KPMG LLP. Mr. McKown received a B.A. degree in business economics with a minor in accounting cum laude from the University of California, Los Angeles and is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).

78

Ashley Pak. Ms. Pak has served as our Chief Compliance Officer since inception. Ms. Pak has also served as the Chief Compliance Officer of OCSL and OSCF since November 2021 and December 2021, respectively. Ms. Pak also served as the Chief Compliance Officer of OSI II from November 2021 until January 2023. Ms. Pak joined OCM in 2007 and currently serves as a Managing Director in the Compliance Department. Prior to joining Oaktree, she was a Compliance/Legal Specialist at Associated Securities Corp. Prior thereto, she was a Financial Operations Principal and Compliance Manager at Asia Pacific Investors Services. Ms. Pak received a B.A. in Business Administration from Seattle University, summa cum laude and an MBA from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst – Isenberg School of Management. Ms. Pak holds the Investment Adviser Certified Compliance Professional (IACCP^®) designation.

Board Leadership Structure

Our board of directors monitors and performs an oversight role with respect to our business and affairs, including with respect to investment practices and performance, compliance with regulatory requirements and the services, expenses and performance of service providers. Among other things, our board of directors approves the appointment of our investment adviser and our officers, reviews and monitors the services and activities performed by the Adviser and executive officers, and with the Audit Committee (as described below) approves the engagement and reviews the performance of our independent registered public accounting firm.

Our board of directors may designate a Chair to preside over the meetings of the board of directors and meetings of our unitholders and to perform such other duties as may be assigned to him or her by the board of directors. We do not have a fixed policy as to whether the Chair should be an independent director and believe that we should maintain the flexibility to select the Chair and reorganize the leadership structure, from time to time, based on criteria that are in our best interests and the best interests of our unitholders at such times.

Presently, Mr. Panossian serves as the Chair of the board of directors. Mr. Panossian’s familiarity with the Adviser and its affiliates and extensive knowledge of the financial services industry qualify him to serve as the Chair of the board of directors. We and the board of directors believe that we are best served through this leadership structure, as Mr. Panossian’s relationship with the Adviser and its affiliates provides an effective bridge and encourages an open dialogue between the Adviser and its affiliates and the board of directors.

The board of directors does not currently have a designated lead independent director. We are aware of the potential conflicts that may arise when a non-independent director is Chair, but believes these potential conflicts are offset by strong corporate governance policies. Our corporate governance policies include regular meetings of the independent directors in executive session without the presence of interested directors and management, the establishment of the Audit Committee comprised solely of independent directors and the appointment of a Chief Compliance Officer, with whom the independent directors meet regularly without the presence of interested directors and other members of management, for administering our compliance policies and procedures.

We recognize that different board leadership structures are appropriate for companies in different situations. We intend to reexamine our corporate governance policies on an ongoing basis to ensure that they continue to meet our needs.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our board of directors performs its risk oversight function primarily through (a) its standing Audit Committee, which reports to the entire board of directors and is comprised solely of independent directors, and (b) active monitoring by our Chief Compliance Officer and of our compliance policies and procedures.

As described below in more detail under “—Committees of the Board of Directors,” the Audit Committee assists our board of directors in fulfilling its risk oversight responsibilities. The Audit Committee’s risk oversight responsibilities include overseeing the internal audit staff (sourced through the Administrator), accounting and financial reporting processes, our valuation process, our systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting and audits of our financial statements.

79

Our board of directors also performs its risk oversight responsibilities with the assistance of the Chief Compliance Officer. Our board of directors will annually review a written report from the Chief Compliance Officer discussing the adequacy and effectiveness of our compliance policies and procedures and our service providers. The Chief Compliance Officer’s annual report will address, at a minimum, (a) the operation of compliance policies and procedures and service providers since the last report; (b) any material changes to such policies and procedures since the last report; (c) any recommendations for material changes to such policies and procedures as a result of the Chief Compliance Officer’s annual review; and (d) any compliance matter that has occurred since the date of the last report about which our board of directors would reasonably need to know to oversee compliance activities and risks. In addition, the Chief Compliance Officer will meet separately in executive session with the independent directors at least once each year.

We believe that our board of directors’ role in risk oversight is effective, and appropriate given the extensive regulation to which we will be already subject as a BDC. As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements that control the levels of risk in our business and operations. For example, our ability to incur indebtedness is limited such that we must meet an asset coverage ratio, as calculated as provided in the Investment Company Act, of at least 150% immediately after each time we incur indebtedness, and we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets”.

We recognize that different board roles in risk oversight are appropriate for companies in different situations. We intend to re-examine the manners in which our board of directors administers its oversight function on an ongoing basis to ensure that they continue to meet our needs.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has established an Audit Committee and may establish additional committees in the future. Our board of directors does not have a standing nominating committee or a standing compensation committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is currently composed of Ms. Keller and Messrs. Ferguson and Mosko, each of whom is an independent director. Ms. Keller serves as Chair of the Audit Committee. The board of directors has determined that Ms. Keller is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under Item 407 of Regulation S-K, as promulgated under the Exchange Act. Ms. Keller meets the current independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter approved by the board of directors, which sets forth the responsibilities of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include establishing guidelines and making recommendations to the board of directors regarding the valuation of loans and investments, selecting an independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with such independent registered public accounting firm the planning, scope and results of their audit of our financial statements, pre-approving the fees for services performed, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the adequacy of internal control systems, reviewing annual financial statements, overseeing internal audit staff and periodic filings and receiving audit reports and financial statements.

Nominating Committee

We do not have a standing nominating committee. Nomination for election as a director may be made by the board of directors or by our unitholders in compliance with the procedures set forth in our LLC Agreement.

Our board of directors seeks candidates who possess the background, skills and expertise to make a significant contribution to board of directors, to us and to our unitholders. In considering possible candidates for election as a director, the board of directors takes into account, in addition to such other factors as it deems relevant, the desirability of selecting directors who:

• are of high character and integrity;

80

• are accomplished in their respective fields, with superior credentials and recognition;

• have relevant expertise and experience upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management;

• have sufficient time available to devote to our affairs;

• are able to work with the other members of our board of directors and contribute to our success;

• can represent the long-term interests of our unitholders as a whole; and

• are selected such that our board of directors represents a range of backgrounds and experience.

Our board of directors has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. In determining whether to recommend a director nominee, the board of directors considers and discusses diversity, among other factors, with a view toward the needs of our board of directors as a whole. The board of directors generally conceptualizes diversity expansively to include, without limitation, concepts such as race, gender, national origin, differences of viewpoint, professional experience, education, skill and other qualities that contribute to our board of directors, when identifying and recommending director nominees. The board of directors believes that the inclusion of diversity as one of many factors considered in selecting director nominees is consistent with the goal of creating a board of directors that best serves our needs and the interests of our unitholders.

The directors will select and evaluate any director candidates in accordance with the criteria set forth above. Generally, candidates for a position as a member of the board of directors will be suggested by existing members of the board of directors; however, if the board of directors determines to consider a unitholder recommendation for a candidate for the board of directors, any such recommendation will be evaluated using the criteria set forth above.

Compensation Committee

We do not have a standing compensation committee because our executive officers do not receive any direct compensation from us. The compensation of the independent directors is determined solely by those independent directors.

Board and Committee Attendance

All directors are expected to attend at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the board of directors and of the respective committees on which they serve. We require each director to make a diligent effort to attend all board of directors and committee meetings. We do not currently have a policy with respect to director attendance at annual meetings of our unitholders.

Indemnification Agreements

We will enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers that will provide for the maximum indemnification permitted under Delaware law and the Investment Company Act. Each indemnification agreement provides that we will indemnify the director or executive officer who is a party to the agreement (an “Indemnitee”), including the advancement of reasonable expenses actually incurred by them, if, arising out of or in connection with such Indemnitee’s service to us, the Indemnitee is, or is threatened to be, made a party to or a witness in any threatened, pending, or completed proceeding, to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law and the Investment Company Act.

Investment Professionals

As of December 31, 2022, Oaktree employs over 400 investment, legal and compliance professionals supported by more than 700 administrative, marketing and other professionals. Oaktree specialists invest in less efficient markets and alternative investments, specifically concentrating their efforts in distressed debt, corporate debt (including mezzanine finance, high yield debt and senior loans), control investing, convertible securities, real estate, listed equities and multi-strategy solutions, all of which capabilities complement and leverage off each other.

81

Oaktree’s principal offices are located in the United States at 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90071. Its telephone number is (213) 830-6300.

ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation of Executive Officers

None of our officers receives direct compensation from us. We have agreed to reimburse the Administrator for our allocable portion of the compensation paid to or compensatory distributions received by our officers. In addition, to the extent that the Administrator outsources any of its functions, we will pay the fees associated with such functions at cost. As discussed under “Item 1. Business—Administration Agreement.”, we reimburse the Administrator for the allocable portion of the compensation of any personnel that they provide for our use.

Compensation of Directors

No compensation is expected to be paid to directors who are interested directors.

Compensation of directors who are independent directors will be comprised of an annual fee of an aggregate $150,000 from us, OLP and OLPU plus an additional annual fee of $25,000 for the Chair of the Audit Committee (with our portion of such fees to be determined by our relative total assets compared to OLP and OLPU at the time of payment) and reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending in-person board meetings

We will not have any retirement or pension plans or any compensation plans under which our equity securities would be authorized for issuance.

ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Investment Advisory Agreement

We entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser, an entity in which certain of the Investment Professionals may have indirect ownership and pecuniary interests. See “Item 1. Business—Investment Advisory Agreement.”

In addition, the Adviser, its Investment Professionals, our executive officers and directors, and other current and future principals of the Adviser serve or may serve as investment advisers, officers, directors or principals of entities or investment funds that operate in the same or a related line of business as we do and/or investment funds, accounts and other similar arrangements advised by Oaktree. An affiliated investment fund, account or other similar arrangement currently formed or formed in the future and managed by the Adviser or its affiliates may investment objectives and strategies that overlap with ours and, accordingly, may invest in asset classes similar to those targeted by us. As a result, the Adviser and/or its affiliates may face conflicts of interest arising out of the investment advisory activities of the Adviser and other operations of Oaktree. See “Item 1. Business—Allocation of Investment Opportunities and Potential Conflicts of Interest” and “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to Conflicts of Interest— There may be conflicts of interest related to obligations that the Adviser’s senior management and investment team have to Other Oaktree Funds.”

Administration Agreement

We entered into the Administration Agreement with the Administrator. See “Item 1. Business—Administration Agreement.”

82

Placement Agent Agreement

We entered into a Placement Agent Agreement with OCM Investments, LLC (the “Placement Agent”). Investors will not be charged an upfront placement fee or distribution fee. Although we will not pay any fees to the Placement Agent, we will indemnify the Placement Agent in connection with its activities.

Reimbursement

From time to time the Adviser, the Administrator or their respective affiliates may pay third-party providers of goods or services on our behalf. We will subsequently reimburse the Adviser, the Administrator or such affiliates thereof for any such amounts paid on our behalf.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Related Party Transactions

We have procedures in place for the review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving us and certain persons related to us. As a BDC, we are also subject to certain regulatory requirements that restrict our ability to engage in certain related-party transactions. In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with affiliates and portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies and procedures whereby certain of our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible affiliations between the proposed portfolio investment, us, and other affiliated persons, including the Adviser, our unitholders that own more than 5% of our outstanding units, our employees, officers and directors and the Adviser and certain persons directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with the foregoing persons. Our policies and procedures also assist us in complying with the relevant sections of the Investment Company Act and the restrictions associated with the Exemptive Relief. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that doing so will not raise concerns under the Investment Company Act or, if such concerns exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek review and approval by our board of directors or exemptive relief for such transactions. Our board of directors will review these procedures on an annual basis.

Certain Business Relationships

Certain of our current directors and officers are directors or officers of the Adviser.

Indebtedness of Management

None.

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

The Adviser may be deemed a promoter of the Company. We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Adviser. The Adviser, for its services to us, will be entitled to receive Management Fees. In addition, under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we expect, to the extent permitted by applicable law and in the discretion of our board of directors, to indemnify the Adviser and certain of its affiliates. See “Item 1. Description of Business—Investment Advisory Agreement.”

Director Independence

For information regarding the independence of our directors, see “Item 5. Directors and Executive Officers.”

ITEM 8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under loans to or other contracts with our portfolio companies. We and our Adviser are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, and, to our knowledge, no material legal proceeding is threatened against us.

83

ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED UNITHOLDER MATTERS

Market Information

Our common units will be offered and sold in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemption contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and in Rule 506 promulgated thereunder or another applicable exemption promulgated under the Securities Act. There is no public market for our common units currently, nor are there any plans for one to develop.

Because our common units are being acquired by investors in one or more transactions “not involving a public offering,” they are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Our common units are subject to Transfer restrictions described in “Item 1. Business—Transfer of Our Common Units.” Accordingly, an investor must be willing to bear the economic risk of investment in our common units until we are liquidated. Each transferee will be required to execute an instrument agreeing to be bound by these restrictions and the other restrictions imposed on the common units and to execute such other instruments or certifications as are reasonably required by us.

Holders

Please see “Item 4. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” for disclosure regarding the holders of our common units.

Distributions

Beginning after the first full quarter following the completion of the Initial Closing, we anticipate that we will make quarterly distributions of at least 90% of our realized net ordinary income and net short-term capital gains in excess of our net long-term capital losses, if any, then available for distribution, each as determined by our board of directors in accordance with applicable law and the terms of the LLC Agreement. Any distributions will be declared out of assets legally available for distribution. We expect quarterly distributions to be paid from income primarily generated by interest and dividends earned on our investments, although distributions to unitholders may also include a return of capital.

We intend to elect to be treated, and to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. To maintain RIC qualification, we must distribute to our unitholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income” for that year. In order to avoid certain excise taxes imposed on RICs, we intend to distribute during each calendar year an amount at least equal to the sum of: (1) 98% of our ordinary income for the calendar year; (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income (both long-term and short-term) for the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar year; and, (3) any undistributed ordinary income and capital gain net income for preceding years on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax less certain over-distributions in prior years. In addition, although we currently intend to distribute realized net capital gains (i.e., net long term capital gains in excess of short term capital losses), if any, at least annually, we may in the future decide to retain such capital gains for investment, pay U.S. federal income tax on such amounts at regular corporate tax rates, and elect to treat such gains as deemed distributions to our unitholders. If this happens, our unitholders will be treated as if they had received an actual distribution of the capital gains we retain and reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in us. In this situation, unitholders would be eligible to claim a tax credit (or, in certain circumstances, a tax refund) equal to their allocable share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed. See “Item 1. Business—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.” We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, to the extent that we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the Investment Company Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.

84

Depending on the level of taxable income and net capital gain earned in a year, we may choose to carry forward taxable income or net capital gain for distribution in the following year and pay the applicable U.S. federal excise tax. Distributions will be appropriately adjusted for any taxes payable by us or any direct or indirect subsidiary through which it invests (including any corporate, state, local, non-U.S. and withholding taxes).

We intend to pay dividends and distributions, if any, in cash to our unitholders. However, we can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the Investment Company Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings.

ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

In connection with our formation, on May 1, 2023, Oaktree Fund GP I, L.P. purchased 2,500 common units at a purchase price of $20.00 per unit. These units were issued and sold in reliance upon the available exemptions from registration requirements of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED

The following description is based on relevant portions of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, the Investment Company Act, the LLC Agreement and the Subscription Agreement. This summary is not necessarily complete, and investors should refer to the Investment Company Act, Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, the LLC Agreement and the Subscription Agreement for more detailed descriptions of the provisions summarized below.

Limited Liability Company Units

Under the terms of the LLC Agreement, we retain the right to accept subscriptions for commitments to purchase our units. Unitholders will be entitled to one vote for each common unit held on all matters submitted to a vote of unitholders, and do not have cumulative voting rights. Unitholders will be entitled to receive proportionately any dividends or distributions declared by our board of directors. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the unitholders will be entitled to receive ratably our net assets available after the payment of (or establishment of reserves for) all debts and other liabilities. Unitholders will have no redemption or preemptive rights.

Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses

The LLC Agreement provides that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by law, and this right to indemnification will continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director or officer and will inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and personal and legal representatives; however, for proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, we will not be obligated to indemnify any director or officer (or his or her heirs, executors or personal or legal representatives) in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person unless that proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized or consented to by our board of directors. The right to indemnification includes the right to be paid by us the expenses incurred in defending or otherwise participating in any proceeding in advance of its final disposition.

Our obligation to provide indemnification and advancement of expenses is subject to the requirements of the Investment Company Act and Investment Company Act Release No. 11330, which, among other things, preclude indemnification for any liability (whether or not there is an adjudication of liability or the matter has been settled) arising by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of duties, and require reasonable and fair means for determining whether indemnification will be made.

In addition, we will enter into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers that provide for a contractual right to indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

We may, to the extent authorized from time to time by our board of directors, provide rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses to our employees and agents similar to those conferred to our directors and officers. The rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses are subject to the

85

requirements of the Investment Company Act to the extent applicable. Any repeal or modification of the LLC Agreement will not adversely affect any rights to indemnification and to the advancement of expenses of a director or officer existing at the time of the repeal or modification with respect to any acts or omissions occurring prior to the repeal or modification.

Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, indemnify the Adviser and certain of its affiliates.

Limited Liability of Unitholders

No unitholder or former unitholder, in its capacity as such, will be liable for any of our debts, liabilities or obligations except as provided under the LLC Agreement and to the extent otherwise required by applicable law. Each unitholder will be required to pay to us (a) any unpaid capital commitments of such unitholder and (b) the amount of any distribution that such unitholder is required to return to us pursuant to the LLC Agreement or the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.

Delaware Law and Certain LLC Agreement Provisions

Organization and Duration

We were organized as a Delaware limited liability company on February 6, 2023. We will remain in existence until dissolved in accordance with the LLC Agreement or pursuant to Delaware law. Following dissolution, our assets will be liquidated.

Purpose

Under the LLC Agreement, we are permitted to engage in any business activity that lawfully may be conducted by a limited liability company organized under Delaware law and, in connection therewith, to exercise all of the rights and powers conferred upon us pursuant to the agreements relating to such business activity.

Agreement to be Bound by the LLC Agreement; Power of Attorney

By executing the Subscription Agreement (which signature page constitutes a counterpart signature page to the LLC Agreement), each investor accepted by the Company has agreed be admitted as a member of the Company and to be bound by the terms of the LLC Agreement. Pursuant to the LLC Agreement, each unitholder and each person who acquires our common units from a unitholder grants to certain of our officers (and, if appointed, a liquidator) a power of attorney to, among other things, execute and file documents required for our qualification, continuance or dissolution. The power of attorney also grants our board of directors the authority to make certain amendments to, and to make consents and waivers under and in accordance with, the LLC Agreement.

Drawdowns

Investors will be required to fund drawdowns up to 100% of the amount of their remaining respective Capital Commitments each time the Adviser delivers a drawdown notice, which will be issued at least ten calendar days prior to each funding (other than for the Initial Drawdown, notice of which may be delivered to investors any time prior to the Initial Closing). Drawdowns will generally be made pro rata, in accordance with the remaining Capital Commitments of all investors. Drawdowns will entitle unitholders to our common units (which, for the avoidance of doubt, may be issued in fractional form to the extent required) at the then-applicable Purchase Price. The Company may draw Capital Commitments from the Unitholders at any time after the Initial Closing.

The period during which the Company may draw such Capital Commitments is referred to as the “Investment Period”. If the Investment Period is terminated, the Company will cease drawing Capital Commitments from Unitholders except for certain runoff activities.

86

Resignation and Removal of Directors; Procedures for Vacancies

A director may resign from our board of directors at any time upon notice given in writing or by electronic transmission to the board of directors, the Chair of the board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the Secretary. The resignation will take effect at the time specified therein, and if no time is specified, at the time of its receipt. The acceptance of a resignation will not be necessary to make it effective unless otherwise expressly provided in the resignation.

Any director, or the entire board of directors, may be removed from office at any time, but only for cause and then only by the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding units. For the purpose of this paragraph, “cause” shall mean, with respect to any particular director, conviction of a felony or a final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction holding that such director caused demonstrable, material harm to us through bad faith or active and deliberate dishonesty.

Except as otherwise provided by applicable law, including the Investment Company Act, any newly created directorship on the board of directors that results from an increase in the number of directors, and any vacancy occurring in the board of directors that results from the death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal of a director or other cause, will be filled exclusively by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors in office, although less than a quorum (with a quorum being a majority of the total number of directors), or by a sole remaining director. Any director elected to fill a vacancy or newly created directorship will hold office until his or her death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.

Action by Unitholders

Unitholders have only the voting rights as required by the Investment Company Act or as otherwise provided for in the LLC Agreement. Under the LLC Agreement, we are not required to hold annual meetings of unitholders. Unitholder action can be taken only at a meeting of unitholders or by written consent in lieu of a meeting by unitholders representing at least the specified percentage of the aggregate outstanding units required to approve the matter in question. Only the board of directors, the Chair of the board of directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the holders of a majority-in-interest of the outstanding units may call a meeting of unitholders and only business specified in our notice of meeting (or supplement thereto) may be conducted at a meeting of unitholders.

Submission to Jurisdiction; Venue

The LLC Agreement provides that, unless we otherwise agree in writing, any legal action or proceeding with respect to the LLC Agreement may be brought in the courts of the State of Delaware, and, by execution and delivery of the LLC Agreement, each of our members irrevocably accepts for him or herself and in respect of his or her property, generally and unconditionally, the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts. Each member further irrevocably waives any claim that any such courts lack personal jurisdiction over such Member, and agrees not to plead or claim, in any legal action proceeding with respect to the LLC Agreement in any of the aforementioned courts, that such courts lack personal jurisdiction over such member. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any legal action or proceeding with respect to the LLC Agreement by a member seeking any relief whatsoever against us may be brought only in the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware (or other appropriate state court in the State of Delaware), and not in any other court in the United States, or any court in any other country. In addition, each member irrevocably waives any objection that such member may have to the laying of venue of any of the aforesaid actions or proceedings arising out of or in connection with the LLC Agreement brought in the aforesaid courts and further irrevocably, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waives his or her rights to plead or claim and agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any such action or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum.

Amendment of the LLC Agreement; No Approval by Unitholders

Except as otherwise provided in the LLC Agreement, the terms and provisions of the LLC Agreement may be amended (which term includes any waiver, modification, or deletion of the LLC Agreement) during or after our term, with the prior written consent of a majority-in-interest of the unitholders.

87

Notwithstanding clauses the foregoing, certain limited amendments, as set forth in the LLC Agreement, may be made with the consent of the board of directors and without the need to seek the consent of any unitholder.

For these purposes, a “majority-in-interest” shall mean a percentage in interest in excess of 50%.

Transfer Restrictions

Our common units have not been registered under the Securities Act or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction. Accordingly, we and the Placement Agent are offering our common units only to purchasers of common units who represent that they are (i) an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act and (ii) are acquiring the common units purchased by them for investment and not with a view to resale or distribution.

Each purchaser of our common units will be required to complete and deliver to the Placement Agent and the Adviser or the Company, prior to the acceptance of any order, a Subscription Agreement substantiating the purchaser’s investor status and including other limitations on resales and Transfers of our common units.

The Subscription Agreement and the LLC Agreement will provide that unitholders will not be permitted to Transfer their common units, unless (a) we (and, if required by our lending arrangements, our lenders) give consent, (b) the Transfer is made in accordance with applicable securities laws and (c) the Transfer otherwise complies with the restrictions in the Subscription Agreement and the LLC Agreement. Although we expect not to unreasonably withhold our prior written consent to Transfers by unitholders, we expect to withhold our consent if any such Transfer would (i) result in a change of U.S. federal income tax treatment of us and the units, (ii) be prohibited by or trigger a prepayment under our debt or other credit facilities, (iii) result in us no longer being eligible to be treated as a RIC pursuant to the Investment Company Act or (iv) result in us being subject to additional regulatory or compliance requirements imposed by laws other than the Exchange Act or the Investment Company Act.

Any Transfer of our common units in violation of these provisions will be void, and any intended recipient of the common units will acquire no rights in such common units and will not be treated as a unitholder for any purpose.

ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

See “Item 11. Description of Registrant’s Securities to Be Registered—Limitation on Liability of Directors and Officers; Indemnification and Advancement of Expenses.”

ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Set forth below is an index to our audited financial statements attached to this Registration Statement.

Index to Financial Statements

Oaktree Gardens OLP, LLC

	Page
Index to Financial Statements*		F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*		F-	[•]
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of May 1, 2023*		F-	[•]
Notes to Statement of Assets and Liabilities*		F-	[•]

* To be filed by amendment

88

ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There are not and have not been any disagreements between us and our accountant on any matter of accounting principles, practices, or financial statement disclosure.

ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

(a) List separately all financial statements filed

The financial statements attached to this Registration Statement are listed in Item 13 and commence on page F-1.

(b) Exhibits

Exhibit Index

3.1	Certificate of Formation*
3.2	Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement*
10.1	Investment Advisory Agreement*
10.2	Administration Agreement*
10.3	Custody Agreement*
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
	Gardens Coinvest, LLC – Delaware

* Filed herewith

89

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

OAKTREE GARDENS OLP, LLC
By:	/s/ Armen Panossian
	Name: Armen Panossian
	Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer

Date: May 1, 2023

90