Later that evening, Ms. Blair Davis and Mr. Minogue had a video conference call to discuss, among other topics, certain retention arrangements and certain compensation arrangements.
On October 28, 2022, Mr. Duato and Mr. Minogue exchanged messages regarding certain issues in the draft CVR Agreement, including the efforts required by Johnson & Johnson following the closing of the Transactions to achieve the milestones contained therein and the expiration dates for the clinical recommendation milestone.
Later that morning, representatives of Cravath and Sullivan & Cromwell had a video conference call to discuss the draft Merger Agreement, including, among other topics, the amount of the termination fee that would be payable by ABIOMED in certain circumstances to Johnson & Johnson, antitrust timing filing, the outside date and ability of ABIOMED to extend such outside date for two months within its discretion and the definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect,” and the draft CVR Agreement, including, among other topics, certain details regarding the clinical recommendation milestone and the FDA approval milestone and certain details around enforcement of rights under the CVR Agreement.
In the early afternoon on October 28, 2022, Mr. Duato and Mr. Minogue had a video conference call and Mr. Antoun and Mr. Began separately had a telephone call, in each case to discuss, among other topics, issues in the draft Merger Agreement, including the proposed outside date, and the draft CVR Agreement, including, among other topics, the level of efforts that Johnson & Johnson would be required to expend to achieve the milestones in the CVR Agreement, certain details regarding the clinical recommendation milestone and certain details around enforcement of rights under the CVR Agreement.
Later that day, representatives of Cravath and Sullivan & Cromwell reconvened on a telephone call to continue discussing certain issues in the draft Merger Agreement. In connection with the foregoing, Cravath proposed a termination fee in an amount equal to $600 million (corresponding to 3.28% of ABIOMED’s fully diluted equity value based on the Offer Price (including the nominal value of CVR payments)) that would be payable by ABIOMED in certain circumstances to Johnson & Johnson, antitrust timing filing and the definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect,” and the draft CVR Agreement, including, among other topics, certain details regarding the clinical recommendation milestone and the FDA approval milestone and certain details around enforcement of rights under the CVR Agreement. Later that evening, representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell circulated to representatives of Cravath revised drafts of the Merger Agreement and CVR Agreement reflecting such discussions, and providing for, among other things, a termination fee in an amount equal to $500 million (corresponding to 2.72% of ABIOMED’s fully diluted equity value based on the Offer Price (assuming 50% of the CVR payments)) that would be payable by ABIOMED in certain circumstances to Johnson & Johnson, an outside date of eight months subject to an automatic extension for an additional two months if certain regulatory closing conditions remain the only conditions to not have been satisfied or waived as of the original outside date and a definition of “Company Material Adverse Effect” in the Merger Agreement without certain regulatory-related exceptions.
Between October 28, 2022 and October 31, 2022, representatives of Cravath and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, who were engaged by certain representatives of senior management of ABIOMED, including Mr. Minogue and Mr. Greenfield, Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of ABIOMED, to negotiate on their behalf with respect to certain letter agreements regarding, among other things, change in control payments, exchanged drafts of such letter agreements, at which time ABIOMED and representatives of senior management of ABIOMED entered into such letter agreements.
On October 29, 2022, representatives of Cravath and Sullivan & Cromwell had a telephone call to discuss certain issues in the draft Merger Agreement, including among other topics, the amount of the termination fee that would be payable by ABIOMED in certain circumstances to Johnson & Johnson and antitrust timing filing, and the draft CVR Agreement, including, among other topics, certain details around enforcement of rights under the CVR Agreement.
Later that day, representatives of Cravath circulated to representatives of Sullivan & Cromwell revised drafts of the Merger Agreement and CVR Agreement reflecting such discussions and providing for, among other things, a
35