3
Property Casualty Insurance Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
2007 | 2006 | Change % | 2007 | 2006 | Change % |
Written premiums | $ | 810 | | $ | 814 | | (0.5) | $ | 1,656 | | $ | 1,643 | | 0.8 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earned premiums | $ | 787 | | $ | 793 | | (0.8) | $ | 1,571 | | $ | 1,571 | | 0.0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes | | 444 | | | 455 | | (2.3) | | 898 | | | 887 | | 1.3 |
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses | | 11 | | | 64 | | (82.2) | | 15 | | | 103 | | (85.9) |
Commission expenses | | 151 | | | 147 | | 2.2 | | 312 | | | 305 | | 2.3 |
Underwriting expenses | | 89 | | | 79 | | 11.5 | | 169 | | | 162 | | 4.1 |
Policyholder dividends | | 2 | | | 5 | | (50.3) | | 6 | | | 8 | | (31.4) |
Underwriting profit | $ | 90 | | $ | 43 | | 107.8 | $ | 171 | | $ | 106 | | 62.5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes | | 56.5 | % | | 57.3 | % | | | 57.2 | % | | 56.5 | % | |
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses | | 1.4 | | | 8.0 | | | | 0.9 | | | 6.5 | | |
Loss and loss expenses | | 57.9 | % | | 65.3 | % | | | 58.1 | % | | 63.0 | % | |
Commission expenses | | 19.2 | | | 18.6 | | | | 19.8 | | | 19.4 | | |
Underwriting expenses | | 11.2 | | | 9.9 | | | | 10.8 | | | 10.4 | | |
Policyholder dividends | | 0.3 | | | 0.7 | | | | 0.4 | | | 0.5 | | |
Combined ratio | | 88.6 | % | | 94.5 | % | | | 89.1 | % | | 93.3 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
·
0.8 percent rise in property casualty net written premiums for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
·
$161 million of six-month new business written directly by agencies, down 5.2 percent from the comparable 2006 period.
·
1,072 agency relationships with 1,297 reporting locations marketing our insurance products at June 30, 2007, compared with 1,066 agency relationships with 1,289 locations at year-end 2006. We made 29 new agency appointments during the six months, including 22 that were new relationships. These were offset by changes in agency structures and the cancellation of nine agency relationships.
·
89.1 percent six-month 2007 property casualty combined ratio. The ratio improved by 4.2 percentage points largely due to lower catastrophe losses and higher savings from favorable development on prior period reserves.
·
$11 million of net second-quarter 2007 catastrophe losses and $15 million of net six-month catastrophe losses.
·
$32 million of losses from nine weather events during the 2007 six months mitigated by $17 million of reduced estimates of losses from catastrophes in earlier years, in particular an October 2006 hail storm.
·
No material catastrophe loss activity in July 2007.
Catastrophe Loss and Loss Expenses Incurred
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions, net of reinsurance) | | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
| | Commercial | Personal | | | | Commercial | Personal | | | |
Dates | Cause of loss | Region | | lines | | lines | | Total | | | lines | | lines | | Total | |
2007 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jan. 12-15 | Wind, hail, ice, snow | Midwest | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | | $ | 3 | $ | 0 | $ | 3 | |
Feb. 14-15 | Wind, hail, ice, snow | Mid-Atlantic | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | 2 | | 1 | | 3 | |
Feb. 23-25 | Wind, hail, ice, snow | Midwest | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | | | 3 | | 0 | | 3 | |
Mar. 1-2 | Wind, hail, flood | South | | 0 | | (1) | | (1) | | | 6 | | 1 | | 7 | |
Apr. 13-16 | Wind, hail, flood | Northeast | | 2 | | 2 | | 4 | | | 2 | | 2 | | 4 | |
May 4-8 | Wind, hail, flood | Midwest | | 3 | | 0 | | 3 | | | 3 | | 0 | | 3 | |
May 21-24 | Wind, hail, flood | Midwest, South | | 1 | | 0 | | 1 | | | 1 | | 0 | | 1 | |
Jun. 7-9 | Wind, hail, flood | Midwest | | 2 | | 3 | | 5 | | | 2 | | 3 | | 5 | |
Jun. 20-22 | Wind, hail | Midwest | | 0 | | 3 | | 3 | | | 0 | | 3 | | 3 | |
Development on 2006 and prior catastrophes | | (3) | | (1) | | (4) | | | (6) | | (11) | | (17) | |
Calendar year incurred total | | $ | 5 | $ | 6 | $ | 11 | | $ | 16 | $ | (1) | $ | 15 | |
2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mar. 11-13 | Wind, hail | Midwest, Mid-Atlantic | $ | (1) | $ | 0 | $ | (1) | | $ | 27 | $ | 10 | $ | 37 | |
Apr. 2-3 | Wind, hail | Midwest, South | | 13 | | 6 | | 19 | | | 13 | | 6 | | 19 | |
Apr. 6-8 | Wind, hail, tornados | Midwest, South | | 10 | | 17 | | 27 | | | 10 | | 17 | | 27 | |
Apr. 13-15 | Wind, hail, tornados | Midwest | | 5 | | 6 | | 11 | | | 5 | | 6 | | 11 | |
Apr. 23-25 | Wind, hail | Midwest, South | | 2 | | 1 | | 3 | | | 2 | | 1 | | 3 | |
Jun. 18-22 | Wind, hail, flood | Midwest | | 4 | | 2 | | 6 | | | 4 | | 2 | | 6 | |
Jun. 25-28 | Wind, flood | Northeast | | 2 | | 0 | | 2 | | | 2 | | 0 | | 2 | |
Development on 2005 and prior catastrophes | | (1) | | (2) | | (3) | | | 0 | | (2) | | (2) | |
Calendar year incurred total | | $ | 34 | $ | 30 | $ | 64 | | $ | 63 | $ | 40 | $ | 103 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures on Page 13 defines and reconciles measures presented in this release that are not based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) or Statutory Accounting Principles.
4
Commercial Lines Insurance Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
2007 | 2006 | Change % | 2007 | 2006 | Change % |
Written premiums | $ | 613 | | $ | 603 | | 1.7 | $ | 1,306 | | $ | 1,271 | | 2.8 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earned premiums | $ | 607 | | $ | 599 | | 1.3 | $ | 1,210 | | $ | 1,181 | | 2.5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes | | 330 | | | 334 | | (1.1) | | 673 | | | 658 | | 2.3 |
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses | | 5 | | | 34 | | (84.9) | | 16 | | | 63 | | (75.0) |
Commission expenses | | 112 | | | 105 | | 6.2 | | 235 | | | 222 | | 5.9 |
Underwriting expenses | | 68 | | | 63 | | 5.6 | | 123 | | | 116 | | 5.7 |
Policyholder dividends | | 2 | | | 5 | | (50.3) | | 6 | | | 8 | | (31.4) |
Underwriting profit | $ | 90 | | $ | 58 | | 54.8 | $ | 157 | | $ | 114 | | 38.5 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes | | 54.5 | % | | 55.7 | % | | | 55.7 | % | | 55.8 | % | |
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses | | 0.8 | | | 5.6 | | | | 1.3 | | | 5.3 | | |
Loss and loss expenses | | 55.3 | % | | 61.3 | % | | | 57.0 | % | | 61.1 | % | |
Commission expenses | | 18.5 | | | 17.6 | | | | 19.4 | | | 18.8 | | |
Underwriting expenses | | 11.0 | | | 10.5 | | | | 10.2 | | | 9.8 | | |
Policyholder dividends | | 0.4 | | | 0.9 | | | | 0.4 | | | 0.7 | | |
Combined ratio | | 85.2 | % | | 90.3 | % | | | 87.0 | % | | 90.4 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
·
2.8 percent growth in commercial lines net written premiums for the six months ended June 30, 2007, as competition continued to increase.
·
$143 million of new six-month commercial lines business written directly by agencies, down 8.1 percentfrom the comparable 2006 period.
·
$71 million of new second-quarter commercial lines business written directly by agencies, down 16.9 percent from the comparable 2006 period.
·
85.2 percent second-quarter 2007 commercial lines combined ratio. The ratio improved 5.1 percentage points largely because lower catastrophe losses and higher savings from favorable development on prior period reserves offset softer pricing and higher commissions and other underwriting expenses.
·
54.5 percent commercial lines second-quarter loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophe losses. The ratio improved 1.2 percentage points because higher savings from favorable development mitigated the softer pricing. New large losses for the second quarter were more in line with historical averages in all business lines except commercial auto.
·
0.9 and 0.6 percentage point increases in second-quarter and six-month 2007 commercial lines commission expense ratios because of higher contingent commissions. There was virtually no change in the underwriting and policyholder dividend expense ratios.
·
Commercial casualty, commercial property and workers’ compensation – three of the company’s four largest commercial business lines – reported net written premium growth in the second quarter of 2007. In line with recent quarters, the fourth of the largest business lines – commercial auto – saw net written premiums decline slightly due to softer pricing. All of the commercial business lines reported healthy loss and loss expenses ratios.
·
Rollout of CinciBridge™ completed for selected commercial lines applications. CinciBridge integrates agency management systems with WinCPP®, the company’s online, real-time commercial lines rate quoting system, and with e-CLAS®, the company’s processing system for Businessowner (BOP) and Dentist’s Package (DBOP) Policies.
·
e-CLAS now is available in 11 states representing 57 percent of BOP and DBOP premiums. 2007 plans for e-CLAS include rollout to additional states for these policy types.
The Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures on Page 13 defines and reconciles measures presented in this release that are not based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) or Statutory Accounting Principles.
5
Personal Lines Insurance Operations
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in millions) | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
2007 | 2006 | Change % | 2007 | 2006 | Change % |
Written premiums | $ | 197 | | $ | 211 | | (6.8) | $ | 350 | | $ | 372 | | (6.1) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Earned premiums | $ | 180 | | $ | 194 | | (7.1) | $ | 361 | | $ | 390 | | (7.3) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes | | 114 | | | 121 | | (5.6) | | 225 | | | 229 | | (1.6) |
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses | | 6 | | | 30 | | (79.2) | | (1) | | | 40 | | (102.8) |
Commission expenses | | 39 | | | 42 | | (7.9) | | 77 | | �� | 83 | | (7.3) |
Underwriting expenses | | 21 | | | 16 | | 35.4 | | 46 | | | 46 | | 0.0 |
Underwriting profit (loss) | $ | 0 | | $ | (15) | | n/a | $ | 14 | | $ | (8) | | n/a |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ratios as a percent of earned premiums: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expenses excluding catastrophes | | 63.2 | % | | 62.3 | % | | | 62.3 | % | | 58.7 | % | |
Catastrophe loss and loss expenses | | 3.5 | | | 15.6 | | | | (0.3) | | | 10.3 | | |
Loss and loss expenses | | 66.7 | % | | 77.9 | % | | | 62.0 | % | | 69.0 | % | |
Commission expenses | | 21.5 | | | 21.7 | | | | 21.2 | | | 21.2 | | |
Underwriting expenses | | 11.7 | | | 8.0 | | | | 12.8 | | | 11.8 | | |
Combined ratio | | 99.9 | % | | 107.6 | % | | | 96.0 | % | | 102.0 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
·
6.1 percent decrease in six-month personal lines net written premiums on lower per-policy pricing due to changes made in mid-2006 that lowered rates while improving policyholder retention and new business. These changes lowered premiums for some current policyholders.
·
Six-month 2007 personal lines new business rose 26.0 percent to $18 million.
·
Second-quarter 2007 personal lines new business rose 26.5 percent to $10 million. This was the fourth consecutive quarter of new business growth following July 2006 introduction of a limited program of policy credits for homeowner and personal auto pricing in most of the states in which the company’s personal lines policy processing system is in use.
·
99.9 percent second-quarter 2007 personal lines combined ratio. The ratio improved 7.7 percentage points largely because the benefit of the improved catastrophe loss ratio was partially offset by an increase in the loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophe losses and a higher non-commission expense ratio.
·
63.2 percent personal lines second-quarter loss and loss expense ratio excluding catastrophe losses. The ratio rose 0.9 percentage points because of the lower pricing and normal loss cost trends.
·
3.7 and 1.0 percentage point increases in second-quarter and six-month 2007 personal lines underwriting expense ratios. The increase was primarily due to the lower earned premiums and the normal fluctuations in operating expenses and the timing of certain items.
·
Agencies in 16 states now use Diamond to write personal lines policies, the company’s personal lines policy processing system, with rollout planned to one additional state in 2007 and additional states next year. Approximately 97 percent of total 2006 personal lines earned premium volume was written in active Diamond states.
·
New product offerings for 2007 and 2008 include the rollout of a new coverage endorsement – Replacement Cost Auto. This optional coverage now is available in most of our personal lines states. It provides for replacement of a totaled auto with a new auto, if the accident occurs in the first three years after the policyholder purchased the vehicle. An optional endorsement for personal auto policies that includes eight additional coverages will be rolled out in the third quarter of 2007. These coverages will increase towing and rental limits, pay for lock replacement if the policyholder’s keys are lost or stolen and pay for accidental deployment of an airbag, among others.
·
Personal lines appointments have been made in 32 of our commercial lines agencies over the past nine months, with a target of an additional 10 to 15 appointments during the remainder of the year. Expanding into these agencies should provide additional sources of premiums and help diversify the personal lines portfolio.
The Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures on Page 13 defines and reconciles measures presented in this release that are not based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) or Statutory Accounting Principles.
6
Life Insurance Operations
| | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
2007 | 2006 | Change % | 2007 | 2006 | Change % |
Written premiums | $ | 45 | $ | 41 | 9.6 | $ | 87 | $ | 81 | 7.6 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Earned premiums | $ | 35 | $ | 29 | 18.9 | $ | 66 | $ | 56 | 17.4 |
Investment income, net of expenses | | 28 | | 27 | 2.4 | | 56 | | 53 | 5.0 |
Other income | | 1 | | 1 | (9.8) | | 2 | | 2 | 28.6 |
Total revenues, excluding realized investment gains and losses | | 64 | | 57 | 10.7 | | 124 | | 111 | 11.7 |
Policyholder benefits | | 34 | | 28 | 22.1 | | 62 | | 59 | 5.6 |
Expenses | | 16 | | 13 | 14.3 | | 29 | | 24 | 20.5 |
Total benefits and expenses | | 50 | | 41 | 19.5 | | 91 | | 83 | 10.0 |
Net income before income tax and realized investment gains and losses | | 14 | | 16 | (13.0) | | 33 | | 28 | 16.5 |
Income tax | | 5 | | 6 | (21.5) | | 11 | | 10 | 4.0 |
Net income before realized investment gains and losses | $ | 9 | $ | 10 | (8.3) | $ | 22 | $ | 18 | 24.2 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
·
$87 million in total six-month 2007 life insurance segment net written premiums. Written premiums include life insurance, annuity and accident and health premiums.
·
13.3 percent increase to $70 million in six-month 2007 in statutory written premiums for term and other life insurance products. Since late 2005, the company has de-emphasized annuities because of an unfavorable interest rate environment. Statutory written annuity premiums decreased to $15 million in the first six months of 2007 from $17 million in the comparable 2006 period.
·
30.5 percent rise in six-month term life insurance written premiums, reflecting marketing advantages of competitive, up-to-date products, providing close personal attention and exhibiting financial strength and stability.
·
5.2 percent rise in face amount of life policies in force to $59.934 billion at June 30, 2007, from $56.971 billion at year-end 2006.
·
$4 million increase in six-month 2007 operating profit due to favorable mortality experience and persistency as well as healthy earned premium and investment income growth.
·
2007 plans include continued enhancement of term and other life insurance products. The priority continues to be expansion within the insurance agencies currently marketing our property casualty insurance products.
The Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures on Page 13 defines and reconciles measures presented in this release that are not based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) or Statutory Accounting Principles.
7
Investment Operations
| | | | | | | | | | |
(In millions) | | Three months ended June 30, | | Six months ended June 30, |
| 2007 | | 2006 | Change % | | 2007 | | 2006 | Change % |
Investment income: |
Interest | $ | 76 | $ | 77 | (0.7) | $ | 152 | $ | 151 | 0.7 |
Dividends | | 72 | | 65 | 9.7 | | 144 | | 127 | 13.1 |
Other | | 4 | | 3 | 37.9 | | 7 | | 7 | 5.7 |
Investment expenses | | (2) | | (2) | 14.4 | | (5) | | (4) | (30.3) |
Total net investment income | | 150 | | 143 | 5.0 | | 298 | | 281 | 6.1 |
Investment interest credited to contract holders | | (14) | | (13) | (6.2) | | (28) | | (27) | (4.5) |
Net realized investment gains and losses: |
Realized investment gains and losses | | 290 | | 10 | 2,737.8 | | 351 | | 669 | (47.6) |
Change in valuation of derivatives | | 3 | | 1 | 138.3 | | 4 | | 3 | 6.4 |
Other-than-temporary impairment charges | | 0 | | 0 | nm | | 0 | | (1) | 100.0 |
Net realized investment gains | | 293 | | 11 | 2,482.0 | | 355 | | 671 | (47.2) |
Investment operations income | $ | 429 | $ | 141 | 204.3 | $ | 625 | $ | 925 | (32.5) |
|
·
5.0 percent increase in second-quarter and 6.1 percent rise in six-month pretax net investment income. Fifth Third Bancorp, the company’s largest equity holding, contributed 42.5 percent of six-month 2007 dividend income.
·
Growth in pretax investment income reflected strong cash flow for new investments and increased dividend income from the common stock portfolio. Pretax interest income trends have been affected in recent years by the higher percentage of tax-advantaged bond purchases, such as municipal bonds, which have a lower gross yield than taxable bonds.
·
$17 million annually in additional investment income expected during 2007 just from dividend increases announced during the past 12 months by Fifth Third and another 33��of the company’s 41 publicly traded common stock holdings.
·
Sale of equity securities in the 2007 three- and six-month periods led to $290 million and $351 million in realized investment gains. The securities were sold because the investment either no longer met the company’s investment parameters or management determined yield prospects could be improved while maintaining potential for long-term appreciation. Realized gains in the 2006 six-month period primarily were due to the sale of our Alltel Corporation holdings.
·
$293 million in pretax net realized investment gains during the second quarter of 2007 compared with $11 million in the second quarter of 2006. 2007 gains included proceeds from the sale of securities because they no longer met the company’s investment parameters or because the company determined it could improve yield prospects.
·
$355 million in net realized investment gains during the 2007 six-month period compared with $671 million in the six months of 2006, which included $647 million from the sale of the company’s holdings of Alltel common stock.
The Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures on Page 13 defines and reconciles measures presented in this release that are not based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) or Statutory Accounting Principles.
8
Balance Sheet
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Dollars in millions except share data) | | | At June 30, | At December 31, |
| | | | | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Balance sheet data | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Invested assets | | | | | | | $ | 13,712 | | $ | 13,759 | |
Total assets | | | | | | | | 18,264 | | | 17,222 | |
Short-term debt | | | | | | | | 49 | | | 49 | |
Long-term debt | | | | | | | | 791 | | | 791 | |
Shareholders' equity | | | | | | | | 6,826 | | | 6,808 | |
Book value per share | | | | | | | | 39.74 | | | 39.38 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt-to-capital ratio | | | | | | | | 11.0 | % | | 11.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Performance measures | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income | $ | 171 | | $ | (86) | | $ | 184 | | $ | 153 | |
Return on equity, annualized | | 20.7 | % | | 8.6 | % | | 16.0 | % | | 22.5 | % |
Return on equity, annualized, based on comprehensive income | | 9.8 | | | (5.6) | | | 5.3 | | | 5.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
·
Book value of $39.74 at June 30, 2007, compared with $39.38 at year-end 2006. Book value rose 13.5 percent over the year-ago level.
·
$4.937 billion in statutory surplus for the property casualty insurance group at June 30, 2007, compared with $4.750 billion at year-end 2006. The ratio of common stock to statutory surplus for the property casualty insurance group portfolio was 90.9 percent at June 30, 2007, compared with 96.7 percent at year-end 2006.
·
31.3 percent ratio of investment securities held at the holding-company level to total holding-company-only assets at June 30, 2007, comfortably within management’s below-40 percent target.
·
No shares were repurchased in the three months ended June 30, 2007, following repurchase of 1.49 million shares at a total cost of $64 million in the three months ended March 31, 2007.
The Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures on Page 13 defines and reconciles measures presented in this release that are not based on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (non-GAAP) or Statutory Accounting Principles.
9
Cincinnati Financial Corporation offers property and casualty insurance, our main business, through The Cincinnati Insurance Company, The Cincinnati Indemnity Company and The Cincinnati Casualty Company. The Cincinnati Life Insurance Company markets life and disability income insurance and annuities. CFC Investment Company offers commercial leasing and financing services. CinFin Capital Management Company provides asset management services to institutions, corporations and individuals. For additional information about the company, please visitwww.cinfin.com.
For additional information or to register for this morning’s conference call webcast, please visitwww.cinfin.com/investors.
This is our “Safe Harbor” statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our business is subject to certain risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements in this report. Some of those risks and uncertainties are discussed in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Item 1A, Risk Factors, Page 20. Although we often review or update our forward-looking statements when events warrant, we caution our readers that we undertake no obligation to do so.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to:
·
Unusually high levels of catastrophe losses due to risk concentrations, changes in weather patterns, environmental events, terrorism incidents or other causes
·
Increased frequency and/or severity of claims
·
Inaccurate estimates or assumptions used for critical accounting estimates
·
Events or actions, including unauthorized intentional circumvention of controls, that reduce the company’s future ability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
·
Changing consumer buying habits and consolidation of independent insurance agencies that could alter our competitive advantages
·
Events or conditions that could weaken or harm the company’s relationships with its independent agencies and hamper opportunities to add new agencies, resulting in limitations on the company’s opportunities for growth, such as:
○
Downgrade of the company’s financial strength ratings
○
Concerns that doing business with the company is too difficult or
○
Perceptions that the company’s level of service, particularly claims service, is no longer a distinguishing characteristic in the marketplace
·
Delays or inadequacies in the development, implementation, performance and benefits of technology projects and enhancements
·
Ability to obtain adequate reinsurance on acceptable terms, amount of reinsurance purchased, financial strength of reinsurers and the potential for non-payment or delay in payment by reinsurers
·
Increased competition that could result in a significant reduction in the company’s premium growth rate
·
Underwriting and pricing methods adopted by competitors that could allow them to identify and flexibly price risks, which could decrease our competitive advantages
·
Personal lines pricing and loss trends that lead management to conclude that this segment could not attain sustainable profitability, which could prevent the capitalization of policy acquisition costs
·
Actions of insurance departments, state attorneys general or other regulatory agencies that:
○
Restrict our ability to exit or reduce writings of unprofitable coverages or lines of business
○
Place the insurance industry under greater regulatory scrutiny or result in new statutes, rules and regulations
○
Increase our expenses
○
Add assessments for guaranty funds, other insurance related assessments or mandatory reinsurance arrangements; or that impair our ability to recover such assessments through future surcharges or other rate changes
○
Limit our ability to set fair, adequate and reasonable rates
○
Place us at a disadvantage in the marketplace or
○
Restrict our ability to execute our business model, including the way we compensate agents
·
Sustained decline in overall stock market values negatively affecting the company’s equity portfolio and book value; in particular a sustained decline in the market value of Fifth Third shares, a significant equity holding
·
Recession or other economic conditions or regulatory, accounting or tax changes resulting in lower demand for insurance products
·
Events, such as the sub-prime mortgage lending crisis, that lead to a significant decline in the value of a particular security or group of securities and impairment of the asset(s)
·
Prolonged low interest rate environment or other factors that limit the company’s ability to generate growth in investment income or interest-rate fluctuations that result in declining values of fixed-maturity investments
·
Adverse outcomes from litigation or administrative proceedings
·
Investment activities or market value fluctuations that trigger restrictions applicable to the parent company under the Investment Company Act of 1940
·
Events, such as an epidemic, natural catastrophe, terrorism or construction delays, that could hamper our ability to assemble our workforce at our headquarters location
Further, the company’s insurance businesses are subject to the effects of changing social, economic and regulatory environments. Public and regulatory initiatives have included efforts to adversely influence and restrict premium rates, restrict the ability to cancel policies, impose underwriting standards and expand overall regulation. The company also is subject to public and regulatory initiatives that can affect the market value for its common stock, such as recent measures affecting corporate financial reporting and governance. The ultimate changes and eventual effects, if any, of these initiatives are uncertain.
10
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| | | | | | |
(Dollars in millions except per share data) | | June 30, | | December 31, |
| 2007 | | 2006 |
| | | | (unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | | | | |
Investments |
Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2007—$5,910; 2006—$5,739) | | $ | 5,891 | $ | 5,805 |
Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2007—$2,944; 2006—$2,621) | | | | 7,650 | | 7,799 |
Short-term investments, at fair value (amortized cost: 2007—$101; 2006—$95) | | | 101 | | 95 |
Other invested assets | | | | 70 | | 60 |
Total investments | | | | 13,712 | | 13,759 |
| | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | | | 122 | | 202 |
Securities lending collateral | | | | 976 | | 0 |
Investment income receivable | | | | 124 | | 121 |
Finance receivable | | | | 100 | | 108 |
Premiums receivable | | | | 1,217 | | 1,128 |
Reinsurance receivable | | | | 751 | | 683 |
Prepaid reinsurance premiums | | | | 12 | | 13 |
Deferred policy acquisition costs | | | | 479 | | 453 |
Land, building and equipment, net, for company use (accumulated depreciation: 2007—$275; 2006—$261) | | 212 | | 193 |
Other assets | | | | 51 | | 58 |
Separate accounts | | | | 508 | | 504 |
Total assets | | | $ | 18,264 | $ | 17,222 |
|
LIABILITIES |
Insurance reserves | | | | | | |
Loss and loss expense reserves | | | $ | 3,953 | $ | 3,896 |
Life policy reserves | | | | 1,446 | | 1,409 |
Unearned premiums | | | | 1,662 | | 1,579 |
Securities lending payable | | | | 976 | | 0 |
Other liabilities | | | | 619 | | 533 |
Deferred income tax | | | | 1,434 | | 1,653 |
Note payable | | | | 49 | | 49 |
6.125% senior notes due 2034 | | | | 371 | | 371 |
6.9% senior debentures due 2028 | | | | 28 | | 28 |
6.92% senior debentures due 2028 | | | | 392 | | 392 |
Separate accounts | | | | 508 | | 504 |
Total liabilities | | | | 11,438 | | 10,414 |
| | | | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
Common stock, par value—$2 per share; (authorized: 2007—500 million shares, 2006—500 million shares; issued: 2007—196 million shares, 2006—196 million shares) | | 392 | | 391 |
Paid-in capital | | | | 1,035 | | 1,015 |
Retained earnings | | | | 3,213 | | 2,786 |
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 3,013 | | 3,379 |
Treasury stock at cost (2007—24 million shares, 2006—23 million shares) | | (827) | | (763) |
Total shareholders' equity | | | | 6,826 | | 6,808 |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | | $ | 18,264 | $ | 17,222 |
|
11
Cincinnati Financial Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income
| | | | | | | | | |
(In millions except per share data) | | Three months ended June 30, | | Six months ended June 30, |
| 2007 | | 2006 | | 2007 | | 2006 |
| | | | | |
REVENUES | | | | | | | | | |
Earned premiums |
Property casualty | | $ | 787 | $ | 793 | $ | 1,571 | $ | 1,571 |
Life | | | 35 | | 29 | | 66 | | 56 |
Investment income, net of expenses | | | 150 | | 143 | | 298 | | 281 |
Realized investment gains and losses | | | 293 | | 11 | | 355 | | 671 |
Other income | | | 5 | | 5 | | 11 | | 9 |
Total revenues | | | 1,270 | | 981 | | 2,301 | | 2,588 |
|
BENEFITS AND EXPENSES |
Insurance losses and policyholder benefits | | | 490 | | 546 | | 974 | | 1,047 |
Commissions | | | 160 | | 156 | | 330 | | 322 |
Other operating expenses | | | 87 | | 84 | | 176 | | 167 |
Taxes, licenses and fees | | | 19 | | 14 | | 39 | | 39 |
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs | | | (7) | | (7) | | (23) | | (22) |
Interest expense | | | 13 | | 13 | | 26 | | 26 |
Total benefits and expenses | | | 762 | | 806 | | 1,522 | | 1,579 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | | | 508 | | 175 | | 779 | | 1,009 |
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES |
Current | | | 156 | | 48 | | 233 | | 340 |
Deferred | | | 1 | | (5) | | 1 | | (15) |
Total provision for income taxes | | | 157 | | 43 | | 234 | | 325 |
|
NET INCOME | | $ | 351 | $ | 132�� | $ | 545 | $ | 684 |
|
PER COMMON SHARE |
Net income—basic | | $ | 2.04 | $ | 0.77 | $ | 3.16 | $ | 3.94 |
Net income—diluted | | $ | 2.02 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 3.13 | $ | 3.90 |
|
***
12
Definitions of Non-GAAP Information and
Reconciliation to Comparable GAAP Measures
(See attached tables for 2007 and 2006 data; prior-period reconciliations available at www.cinfin.com/investors.)
Cincinnati Financial Corporation prepares its public financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). Statutory data is prepared in accordance with statutory accounting rules as defined by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ (NAIC) Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual and therefore is not reconciled to GAAP data.
Management uses certain non-GAAP and non-statutory financial measures to evaluate its primary business areas – property casualty insurance, life insurance and investments – when analyzing both GAAP and certain non-GAAP measures may improve understanding of trends in the underlying business, helping avoid incorrect or misleading assumptions and conclusions about the success or failure of company strategies. Management adjustments to GAAP measures generally: apply to non-recurring events that are unrelated to business performance and distort short-term results; involve values that fluctuate based on events outside of management’s control; or relate to accounting refinements that affect comparability between periods, creating a need to analyze data on the same basis.
·
Operating income: Operating income is calculated by excluding net realized investment gains and losses (defined as realized investment gains and losses after applicable federal and state income taxes) from net income. Management evaluates operating income to measure the success of pricing, rate and underwriting strategies. While realized investment gains (or losses) are integral to the company’s insurance operations over the long term, the determination to realize investment gains or losses in any period may be subject to management’s discretion and is independent of the insurance underwriting process. Also, under applicable GAAP accounting requirements, gains and losses can be recognized from certain changes in market values of securities and embedded derivatives without actual realization. Management believes that the level of realized investment gain s or losses for any particular period, while it may be material, may not fully indicate the performance of ongoing underlying business operations in that period.
For these reasons, many investors and shareholders consider operating income to be one of the more meaningful measures for evaluating insurance company performance. Equity analysts who report on the insurance industry and the company generally focus on this metric in their analyses. The company presents operating income so that all investors have what management believes to be a useful supplement to GAAP information.
·
Statutory accounting rules: For public reporting, insurance companies prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP. However, insurers also must calculate certain data according to statutory accounting rules as defined in the NAIC’s Accounting Practices and Procedures Manual, which may be, and has been, modified by various state insurance departments. Statutory data is publicly available, and various organizations use it to calculate aggregate industry data, study industry trends and compare insurance companies.
·
Written premium: Under statutory accounting rules, property casualty written premium is the amount recorded for policies issued and recognized on an annualized basis at the effective date of the policy. Management analyzes trends in written premium to assess business efforts. Earned premium, used in both statutory and GAAP accounting, is calculated ratably over the policy term. The difference between written and earned premium is unearned premium.
·
Written premium adjustment – statutory basis only: In 2002, the company refined its estimation process for matching property casualty written premiums to policy effective dates, which added $117 million to 2002 written premiums. To better assess ongoing business trends, management may exclude this adjustment when analyzing trends in written premiums and statutory ratios that make use of written premiums.
·
Codification: Adoption of Codification of Statutory Accounting Principles was required for Ohio-based insurance companies effective January 1, 2001. The adoption of Codification changed the manner in which the company recognized statutory property casualty written premiums. As a result, 2001 statutory written premiums included $402 million to account for unbooked premiums related to policies with effective dates prior to January 1, 2001. To better assess ongoing business trends, management excludes this $402 million when analyzing written premiums and statutory ratios that make use of written premiums.
·
Life insurance gross written premiums: In analyzing the life insurance company’s gross written premiums, management excludes five larger, single-pay life insurance policies (bank-owned life insurance or BOLIs) written in 2004, 2002, 2000 and 1999 to focus on the trend in premiums written through the independent agency distribution channel.
·
One-time charges or adjustments: Management analyzes earnings and profitability excluding the impact of one-time items.
○
In 2003, as the result of a settlement negotiated with a vendor, pretax results included the recovery of $23 million of the $39 million one-time, pretax charge incurred in 2000.
○
In 2000, the company recorded a one-time charge of $39 million, pre-tax, to write down previously capitalized costs related to the development of software to process property casualty policies.
○
In 2000, the company earned $5 million in interest in the first quarter from a $303 million single-premium BOLI policy that was booked at the end of 1999 and segregated as a separate account effective April 1, 2000. Investment income and realized investment gains and losses from separate accounts generally accrue directly to the contract holder and, therefore, are not included in the company’s consolidated financials.
13