Commitments and Contingencies | 3 Months Ended |
Jan. 02, 2015 |
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract] | |
Commitments and Contingencies | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Product Warranty |
The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s accrued product warranty: |
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| January 2, | | December 27, |
(In millions) | 2015 | | 2013 |
Accrued product warranty, at beginning of period | $ | 49.3 | | | $ | 53.2 | |
|
Charged to cost of revenues | 9.4 | | | 15.2 | |
|
Actual product warranty expenditures | (13.0 | ) | | (17.7 | ) |
Accrued product warranty, at end of period | $ | 45.7 | | | $ | 50.7 | |
|
|
Long-term accrued product warranty costs of $1.6 million and $2.0 million are included under other long-term liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2015 and September 26, 2014, respectively. |
Other Commitments |
As of January 2, 2015, the Company’s outstanding commitment under the CPTC Loans was $2.0 million. See Note 14, "CPTC Loans" for additional information. |
|
In April 2012, VMS entered into a strategic global partnership with Siemens AG (“Siemens”) through which, among other things, the Company and Siemens are working on developing interfaces to enable the Company’s ARIA® oncology information system software to connect with Siemens linear accelerators and imaging systems. Under the agreement establishing this collaboration, the Company committed to make certain payments, including up to $10.0 million in fixed fees and $20.0 million in license fees, in the event certain product development milestones are achieved. As of January 2, 2015, the outstanding fixed fees and license fees commitment for the Siemens agreement were $5.5 million and $12.0 million, respectively. |
In connection with the acquisition of businesses in prior years, the Company entered into agreements which included provisions to make additional consideration payments upon the achievement of certain milestones by the acquired businesses. As of January 2, 2015, the fair value of potential contingent considerations under these agreements was $6.7 million. See Note 3, "Fair Value" for additional information. |
As of January 2, 2015, the Company had an estimated fixed cost commitment of $13.3 million related to dpiX's amended agreement for the remaining nine months of fiscal year 2015. The fixed cost commitment for future years will be determined and approved by the dpiX board of directors at the beginning of each calendar year. See Note 5, "Related Party Transactions" for additional information. |
Environmental Remediation Liabilities |
The Company’s operations and facilities, past and present, are subject to environmental laws, including laws that regulate the handling, storage, transport and disposal of hazardous substances. Certain of those laws impose cleanup liabilities under certain circumstances. In connection with those laws and certain of the Company’s past and present operations and facilities, the Company oversees various environmental cleanup projects and also reimburses certain third parties for cleanup activities. Those include facilities sold as part of the Company’s electron devices business in 1995 and thin film systems business in 1997. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or third parties have named the Company as a potentially responsible party under the amended Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), at sites to which the Company or the facilities of the sold businesses were alleged to have shipped waste for recycling or disposal (the “CERCLA sites”). In connection with the CERCLA sites, the Company to date has been required to pay only modest amounts as its contributions to cleanup efforts. Under the agreement that governs the spin-offs of Varian, Inc., which was acquired by Agilent Technologies Inc. (the successor entity hereinafter referred to as “VI”), and Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc., which was acquired by Applied Materials, Inc. (the successor entity hereinafter referred to as “VSEA”), VI and VSEA are each obligated to indemnify the Company for one-third of the environmental cleanup costs associated with corporate, discontinued or sold operations prior to the spin-offs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds or tax benefits received by the Company), as well as fully indemnify the Company for other liabilities arising from the operations of the business transferred to it as part of the spin-offs. |
The Company spent $0.3 million and $0.2 million (net of amounts borne by VI and VSEA) in the three months ended January 2, 2015 and December 27, 2013, respectively, on environmental cleanup costs, third-party claim costs, project management costs and legal costs. |
Inherent uncertainties make it difficult to estimate the likelihood of the cost of future cleanup, third-party claims, project management and legal services for the CERCLA sites and one of the Company’s past facilities. Nonetheless, as of January 2, 2015, the Company estimated that, net of VI’s and VSEA’s indemnification obligations, future costs associated with the CERCLA sites and this facility would range in total from $1.6 million to $9.8 million. The time frames over which these cleanup project costs are estimated vary, ranging from one year to thirty years as of January 2, 2015. Management believes that no amount in that range is more probable of being incurred than any other amount and therefore accrued $1.6 million for these cleanup projects as of January 2, 2015. The accrued amount has not been discounted to present value due to the uncertainties that make it difficult to develop a single best estimate. |
The Company believes it has gained sufficient knowledge to better estimate the scope and cost of monitoring, cleanup and management activities for its other past and present facilities. This, in part, is based on agreements with other parties and also cleanup plans approved by or completed in accordance with the requirements of the governmental agencies having jurisdiction. As of January 2, 2015, the Company estimated that the Company’s future exposure, net of VI’s and VSEA’s indemnification obligations, for the costs at these facilities, and reimbursements of third-party’s claims for these facilities, ranged in total from $5.7 million to $36.1 million. The time frames over which these costs are estimated to be incurred vary, ranging from one year to thirty years as of January 2, 2015. As to each of these facilities, management determined that a particular amount within the range of estimated costs was a better estimate than any other amount within the range, and that the amount and timing of these future costs were reliably determinable. The best estimate within that range was $9.7 million at January 2, 2015. Accordingly, the Company has accrued $7.9 million for these costs, which represents the best estimate discounted at 4%, net of inflation. This accrual is in addition to the $1.6 million described in the preceding paragraph. |
These amounts are only estimates of anticipated future costs. The amounts the Company will actually spend may be greater or less than these estimates, even as the Company believes the degree of uncertainty will narrow as cleanup activities progress. While the Company believes its reserve is adequate, as the scope of the Company’s obligations becomes more clearly defined, the Company may modify the reserve, and charge or credit future earnings accordingly. Nevertheless, based on information currently known to management, and assuming VI and VSEA satisfy their indemnification obligations, management believes the costs of these environmental-related matters are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company in any one fiscal year. |
The Company evaluates its liability for investigation and cleanup costs in light of the obligations and apparent financial strength of potentially responsible parties and insurance companies with respect to which the Company believes it has rights to indemnity or reimbursement. The Company has asserted claims for recovery of environmental investigation and cleanup costs already incurred, and to be incurred in the future against various insurance companies and other third parties. The Company receives certain cash payments in the form of settlements and judgments from defendants, insurers and other third parties from time to time. The Company has also reached an agreement with an insurance company under which that insurer has agreed to pay a portion of the Company’s past and future environmental-related expenditures. Receivables, net of VI’s and VSEA’s portion, from that insurer amounted to $2.1 million at January 2, 2015 and $2.2 million at September 26, 2014, with the current and noncurrent receivables portion included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and the payable portion to that insurer is included other long-term liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company believes that this receivable is recoverable because it is based on a binding, written settlement agreement with what appears to be a financially viable insurance company, and the insurance company has paid the Company’s claims in the past. |
The availability of the indemnities of VI and VSEA will depend upon the future financial strength of VI and VSEA. Given the long-term nature of some of the liabilities, VI and VSEA may be unable to fund the indemnities in the future. It is also possible that a court would disregard this contractual allocation among the parties and require the Company to assume responsibility for obligations allocated to another party, particularly if the other party were to refuse or was unable to pay any of its allocated share. The agreement governing the spin-offs generally provides that if a court prohibits a company from satisfying its shared indemnification obligations, the indemnification obligations will be shared equally by the two other companies. |
Other Matters |
From time to time, the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and government inspections or investigations and other legal matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. These matters included a patent infringement lawsuit initiated on April 13, 2007 by the University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education (the “University of Pittsburgh”) regarding the Company’s Real-time Position Management™ (“RPM”) technology. In January 2014, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the University of Pittsburgh and in the third fiscal quarter of 2014 paid $35.6 million in full settlement of the lawsuit. Prior to the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company had accrued in aggregate approximately $5.0 million for the low end of the range of the probable settlement value for this matter. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2014, the Company accrued an additional $25.1 million of the $35.6 million for all damages and interest related to the case and in the third quarter of fiscal year 2014 recorded the remaining amount of approximately $5.5 million for future royalties as prepaid royalties. The amount of prepaid royalties is being amortized beginning with the third quarter of fiscal year 2014, over the remaining life of the patent of approximately two and a half years. |
The Company accrues amounts, to the extent they can be reasonably estimated, that it believes are adequate to address any liabilities related to legal proceedings and other loss contingencies that the Company believes will result in a probable loss (including, among other things, probable settlement value). However, such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. The Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses with respect to all other matters. There can be no assurances as to whether the Company will become subject to significant additional claims and liabilities with respect to ongoing or future proceedings. If actual liabilities significantly exceed the estimates made, the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. |
Restructuring Charges |
As part of the Company’s plan to enhance operational performance through productivity initiatives, the Company offered an enhanced retirement program to its qualifying employees across all reporting segments during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2014. The program required the participating employees to submit their applications by October 10, 2014, and as a result, the restructuring charges relating to this program were primarily incurred in the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. The Company incurred additional restructuring charges across all reporting segments for workforce reductions during the first quarter of fiscal year 2015. In connection with the above mentioned restructuring programs, during the three months ended January 2, 2015, the Company incurred restructuring charges of approximately $10.5 million, of which $1.0 million was paid in cash during the three months ended January 2, 2015. The restructuring charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The Company expects to recognize additional restructuring charges of $1.8 million in the remaining nine months of fiscal year 2015, in connection with the above mentioned programs, the majority of which are expected to be incurred in the second quarter of fiscal year 2015. |
No restructuring charges were incurred during the three months ended December 27, 2013 in relation to this or any restructuring programs. |