COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Product Warranty The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s accrued product warranty: Nine Months Ended July 1, July 3, (In millions) 2016 2015 Accrued product warranty, at beginning of period $ 45.9 $ 49.3 Charged to cost of revenues 39.6 33.1 Actual product warranty expenditures (35.5 ) (38.8 ) Accrued product warranty, at end of period $ 50.0 $ 43.6 Accrued product warranty was included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 1, 2016 and October 2, 2015 . Other Commitments See Note 15, "VPT Loans" for additional information about the Company's commitments for funding development and construction of various proton therapy centers. Contingencies Environmental Remediation Liabilities The Company’s operations and facilities, past and present, are subject to environmental laws, including laws that regulate the handling, storage, transport and disposal of hazardous substances. Certain of those laws impose cleanup liabilities under certain circumstances. In connection with those laws and certain of the Company’s past and present operations and facilities, the Company oversees various environmental cleanup projects and also reimburses certain third parties for cleanup activities. Those include facilities sold as part of the Company’s electron devices business in 1995 and thin film systems business in 1997. In addition, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or third parties have named the Company as a potentially responsible party under the amended Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), at sites to which the Company or the facilities of the sold businesses were alleged to have shipped waste for recycling or disposal (the “CERCLA sites”). In connection with the CERCLA sites, the Company to date has been required to pay only a small portion of the total amount as its contributions to cleanup efforts. Under the agreement that governs the spin-offs of Varian, Inc., which was acquired by Agilent Technologies Inc. (the successor entity hereinafter referred to as “VI”), and Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc., which was acquired by Applied Materials, Inc. (the successor entity hereinafter referred to as “VSEA”), VI and VSEA are each obligated to indemnify the Company for one-third of the environmental cleanup costs associated with corporate, discontinued or sold operations prior to the spin-offs (after adjusting for any insurance proceeds or tax benefits received by the Company), as well as fully indemnify the Company for other liabilities arising from the operations of the business transferred to it as part of the spin-offs. The Company spent $0.3 million and $0.2 million (net of amounts borne by VI and VSEA) in the three months ended July 1, 2016 and July 3, 2015 , respectively, on environmental cleanup costs, third-party claim costs, project management costs and legal costs. The Company spent $0.7 million and $1.0 million (net of amounts borne by VI and VSEA) in the nine months ended July 1, 2016 and July 3, 2015 , respectively, on such costs. Inherent uncertainties make it difficult to estimate the likelihood of the cost of future cleanup, third-party claims, project management and legal services for the CERCLA sites and one of the Company’s past facilities. Nonetheless, as of July 1, 2016 , the Company estimated that, net of VI’s and VSEA’s indemnification obligations, future costs associated with the CERCLA sites and this facility would range in total from $1.3 million to $9.9 million . The time frames over which these cleanup project costs are estimated vary, ranging from one year to thirty years as of July 1, 2016 . Management believes that no amount in that range is more probable of being incurred than any other amount and therefore accrued $1.3 million for these cleanup projects as of July 1, 2016 . The accrued amount has not been discounted to present value due to the uncertainties that make it difficult to develop a single best estimate. The Company believes it has gained sufficient knowledge to better estimate the scope and cost of monitoring, cleanup and management activities for its other past and present facilities. This, in part, is based on agreements with other parties and also cleanup plans approved by or completed in accordance with the requirements of the governmental agencies having jurisdiction. As of July 1, 2016 , the Company estimated that the Company’s future exposure, net of VI’s and VSEA’s indemnification obligations, for the costs at these facilities, and reimbursements of third-party’s claims for these facilities, ranged in total from $5.6 million to $25.8 million . The time frames over which these costs are estimated to be incurred vary, ranging from one year to thirty years as of July 1, 2016 . As to each of these facilities, management determined that a particular amount within the range of estimated costs was a better estimate than any other amount within the range, and that the amount and timing of these future costs were reliably determinable. The best estimate within that range was $8.4 million at July 1, 2016 . Accordingly, the Company has accrued $7.1 million for these costs, which represents the best estimate discounted at 4% , net of inflation. This accrual is in addition to the $1.3 million described in the preceding paragraph. These amounts are only estimates of anticipated future costs. The amounts the Company will actually spend may be greater or less than these estimates, even as the Company believes the degree of uncertainty will narrow as cleanup activities progress. While the Company believes its reserve is adequate, as the scope of the Company’s obligations becomes more clearly defined, the Company may modify the reserve, and charge or credit future earnings accordingly. Nevertheless, based on information currently known to management, and assuming VI and VSEA satisfy their indemnification obligations, management believes the costs of these environmental-related matters are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company in any one fiscal year. The Company evaluates its liability for investigation and cleanup costs in light of the obligations and apparent financial strength of potentially responsible parties and insurance companies with respect to which the Company believes it has rights to indemnity or reimbursement. The Company has asserted claims for recovery of environmental investigation and cleanup costs already incurred, and to be incurred in the future against various insurance companies and other third parties. The Company receives certain cash payments in the form of settlements and judgments from defendants, insurers and other third parties from time to time. The Company has also reached an agreement with an insurance company under which that insurer has agreed to pay a portion of the Company’s past and future environmental-related expenditures. Receivables, net of VI’s and VSEA’s portion, from that insurer amounted to $2.1 million at both July 1, 2016 and October 2, 2015 , with the noncurrent receivables portion included in other assets and the payable portion to that insurer is included in other long-term liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company believes that this receivable is recoverable because it is based on a binding, written settlement agreement with what appears to be a financially viable insurance company, and the insurance company has paid the Company’s claims in the past. The availability of the indemnities of VI and VSEA will depend upon the future financial strength of VI and VSEA. Given the long-term nature of some of the liabilities, VI and VSEA may be unable to fund the indemnities in the future. It is also possible that a court would disregard this contractual allocation among the parties and require the Company to assume responsibility for obligations allocated to another party, particularly if the other party were to refuse or was unable to pay any of its allocated shares. The agreement governing the spin-offs generally provides that if a court prohibits a company from satisfying its shared indemnification obligations, the indemnification obligations will be shared equally by the two other companies. Other Matters From time to time, the Company is a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings, claims and government inspections or investigations and other legal matters, both inside and outside the United States, arising in the ordinary course of its business or otherwise. The Company accrues amounts, to the extent they can be reasonably estimated, that it believes are adequate to address any liabilities related to legal proceedings and other loss contingencies that the Company believes will result in a probable loss (including, among other things, probable settlement value). A loss or a range of loss is disclosed when it is reasonably possible that a material loss will be incurred and can be estimated or when it is reasonably possible that the amount of a loss, when material, will exceed the recorded provision. In September 2015, Elekta Ltd. and William Beaumont Hospital served the Company with a complaint alleging infringement of patents related to certain aspects of cone beam imaging in conjunction with radiotherapy. During September 2015 and October 2015, the Company filed several complaints in the U.S. and foreign courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission against Elekta AB and its subsidiaries alleging infringement of various patents relating to certain aspects of cone beam imaging, cone-beam imaging gantries, volumetric modulated arc therapy (“VMAT”), and combined magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator systems. In February 2016, Elekta Ltd. filed several complaints in the U.S. and foreign courts alleging infringement of certain patents related to linear accelerator control systems and treatment planning. These lawsuits are ongoing and at this time, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters. Therefore, no amounts have been accrued as of July 1, 2016 . In June 2015, a foreign subsidiary of the Company was charged by the Department for Investigation and Penal Action of Lisbon with alleged improper activities relating to three tenders of medical equipment in Portugal during the period of 2003 to 2009. The Company has requested a judicial review available under Portuguese criminal procedure processes as to whether or not such charges are proper under Portuguese law. The Company previously undertook an internal investigation of this matter and voluntarily disclosed the results of this investigation to the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. At this time, the Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, and therefore no amounts have been accrued as of July 1, 2016 . In addition to the above, the Company is involved in other legal matters. However, such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes are not predictable with assurance. The Company is unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses with respect to such matters. There can be no assurances as to whether the Company will become subject to significant additional claims and liabilities with respect to ongoing or future proceedings. If actual liabilities significantly exceed the estimates made, the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially adversely affected. Legal expenses relating to legal matters are expensed as incurred. Restructuring Charges As part of the Company's plan to enhance operational performance through productivity initiatives, the Company implemented a workforce reduction, primarily in its Oncology Systems and Imaging Components segments, in the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. The Company incurred $0.8 million and $5.6 million in restructuring charges during the three and nine months ended July 1, 2016, in connection with the restructuring program, of which $3.5 million was paid in cash during the nine months ended July 1, 2016 . The restructuring charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings. The Company expects to substantially complete this restructuring program by the middle of fiscal year 2017, and any remaining restructuring charges relating to this program are not expected to be material. The Company incurred $13.4 million in restructuring charges related to an enhanced retirement program and workforce reduction during the nine months ended July 3, 2015 . |