Commitments and Contingencies | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Indemnifications In the normal course of business, we enter into agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide for general indemnification. Exposure under these agreements is unknown because claims may be made against us in the future and we may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations. As of July 3, 2021, we did not have any material indemnification claims that were probable or reasonably possible. Legal Proceedings We are subject to legal claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business, such as contract-related, product sales and servicing, real estate, product liability, regulatory matters, employment or intellectual property claims. Although we do not expect that such claims and litigation will ultimately have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, an adverse result in one or more matters could negatively affect our results in the period in which they occur, or in future periods. The United States and many foreign governments impose tariffs and duties on the import and export of certain products we sell and purchase. From time to time our customs compliance, product classifications, duty calculations and payments are reviewed or audited by government agencies. Any adverse result in such a review or audit could negatively affect our results in the period in which they occur, or in future periods. German authorities are currently investigating an export compliance matter involving one of our German subsidiaries involving four former employees (whose employment was terminated following our discovery of this matter). While under German law the subsidiary can be held liable for certain infringements by its employees of German export control laws, we believe that this matter involves less than approximately 1.5 million Euros in transactions in the period currently under investigation and do not believe that the final resolution of this matter will be material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the German government investigation is ongoing and it is possible that substantial payments, fines, penalties or damages could result. Even though we do not currently expect this matter to be material to our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, circumstances could change as the investigation progresses. As previously disclosed in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2021, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2021, on April 28, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Coherent and its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "S-4") filed in connection with the Merger (Stein v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-3775). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to management's financial projections and the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities, Inc. ("BofA Securities") and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC ("Credit Suisse"). Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, and that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses and DCF analyses. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction until such time as corrective disclosures are issued. The case was voluntarily dismissed on June 18, 2021. As previously disclosed in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2021, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2021, on May 4, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against the Company and its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4 (Shirey v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-10698 (District of New Jersey, May 4, 2021)). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to the Company's and II-VI's financial projections, the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse, and potential conflicts of interest involving Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided all line items used to calculate certain metrics and a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses, DCF analyses and price targets analyses and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the relationships between Credit Suisse and either the Company or II-VI. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction until such time as corrective disclosures are issued. The case was voluntarily dismissed on August 2, 2021. As previously disclosed in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2021, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2021, on May 4, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York against the Company, members of the Company's board of directors, II-VI and Watson Merger Sub Inc. alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4 (Diaz v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-03990). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to the Company's and II-VI's financial projections, the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse, and potential conflicts of interest involving Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided all line items used to calculate certain metrics and a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses, DCF analyses and price targets analyses and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the relationships between Credit Suisse and either the Company or II-VI. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on June 24, 2021. As previously disclosed in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 3, 2021, filed with the SEC on May 12, 2021, on May 4, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and members of its board of directors in the Southern District of New York alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (the “S-4/A”) filed in connection with the Merger (Costa v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-04108). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to Coherent's and II-VI's financial projections and the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses and DCF analyses and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the discretionary payment of $3.0 million to Credit Suisse at the closing of the merger. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on June 25, 2021. On June 1, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company and members of its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4/A (Wolf v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-04848). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to the Company's and II-VI's financial projections, the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse, and potential conflicts of interest involving Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided all line items used to calculate certain metrics and a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses, DCF analyses and price targets analyses and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the relationships between Credit Suisse and either the Company or II-VI. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on June 24, 2021. On June 2, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the Company and members of its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4/A (Lawrence v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00808). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to Coherent's and II-VI's financial projections and the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses and DCF analyses, that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the discretionary payment of $3.0 million to Credit Suisse at the closing of the merger, and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the calculation of BofA Securities' compensation. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on July 8, 2021. On June 2, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and members of its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4/A (Lawrence v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-04193). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to Coherent's and II-VI's financial projections and the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses and DCF analyses, that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the discretionary payment of $3.0 million to Credit Suisse at the closing of the merger, and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the calculation of BofA Securities' compensation. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on June 3, 2021. On June 3, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and members of its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4/A (Finger v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-04217). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to Coherent's and II-VI's financial projections and the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses and DCF analyses, that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the discretionary payment of $3.0 million to Credit Suisse at the closing of the merger, and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the calculation of BofA Securities' compensation. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on July 8, 2021. On June 10, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the Company and members of its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4/A (Waterman v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-02623). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses, price targets analyses, and DCF analyses. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the director defendants to disseminate a true and non-misleading Registration Statement. The case was voluntarily dismissed on July 8, 2021. On June 11, 2021, a purported stockholder of the Company filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against the Company and members of its board of directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws for misleading and incomplete disclosures in the S-4/A (Anderson v. Coherent, Inc., et al., Case No. 5:21-cv-04505). Specifically, the complaint challenges the disclosures relating to Coherent's and II-VI's financial projections and the analyses of the Company's financial advisors, BofA Securities and Credit Suisse. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the projections should have provided a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP, that the S-4 fails to disclose details about the bankers' precedent transactions analyses and DCF analyses and that there was insufficient disclosure regarding the discretionary payment of $3.0 million to Credit Suisse at the closing of the merger. The complaint seeks, among other relief, a preliminary injunction to prevent further advancement of the transaction and a direction to the |